Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Focus on Combination Therapy in the SERAPHIN Trial

Real-world effectiveness and safety of macitentan in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Macitentan, either as monotherapy or part of combination therapy, improved clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) in clinical trials. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of macitentan administered in real-world clinical practice in China is limited.

METHODS

This real-world, retrospective, multicenter chart review study was conducted at seven hospitals in China. Adult patients with a diagnosis of PAH who initiated macitentan and had medical assessments at 3-7 months after macitentan initiation were included. The primary outcomes were changes in the World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/B-type natriuretic peptide from baseline to first follow-up visit (months 3-7). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of macitentan were collected.

RESULTS

From 30 August 2021 to 31 March 2022, 214 eligible patients were included in the safety analysis set and 105 patients were included in the analysis of effectiveness. At the first follow-up visit compared with baseline, significant changes in WHO-FC were observed (p = .04), 93.5% patients had their WHO-FC improved (25.8%) or maintained (67.7%). 6MWD changed by a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 45.0 (81.4) meters (p < .001), with 94.7% having their 6MWD improved (34.7%) or maintained (60.0%). The mean (SD) of NT-proBNP decreased from 1667.4 (3233.0) ng/L to 1090.0 (2230.1) ng/L (p < .001). In the safety analysis set, 24 (11.2%) patients experienced at least one ADR and/or SAE. ADRs and SAEs were reported in 11 (5.1%) and 18 (8.4%), respectively. No deaths or unexpected safety events were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world evidence on the clinical benefits and good tolerance of macitentan in Chinese patients with PAH treated in routine clinical practice.

Clinical use of macitentan in the treatment of connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background

Connective tissue disease (CTD) is the second most common cause of the pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Currently, clinical data concerning CTD-PAH is scarce. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of macitentan in the treatment of CTD-PAH.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with CTD-PAH at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2020 to November 2021 were included. Of the patients, 9 were switched to macitentan monotherapy whereas 23 received initial combination therapy. The mean follow-up time was 24 weeks. Six-minute walking distance (6MWD), World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and echocardiography parameters before and after medication were assessed. Adverse reactions were also recorded and compared.

Results

After 24 weeks of treatment, 6MWD, NT-proBNP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) estimated by ultrasound, tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in the macitentan monotherapy group revealed significant differences (Z=-2.67, Z=-2.67, t=6.20, t=5.60, t=-3.04, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in right ventricular diameter (RVD), right atrial diameter (RAD), ascending aortic root inner diameter (AAO) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) (P>0.05). After 24 weeks of medication, the number of patients with WHO-FC grade III/IV symptoms decreased from 6 to 3, 1 to 0 respectively (P<0.05), and that of patients with WHO-FC grade I/II symptoms increased from 0 to 2, 2 to 4 respectively(P<0.05). After 24 weeks of treatment, 6MWD, NT-proBNP, LVEDd, sPAP and TRPG in the macitentan combined with sildenafil treatment group revealed statistically significant differences (Z=-4.11, Z=-3.74, Z=-3.83, t=6.88, t=6.54, P<0.001). Significant differences in RVD, RAD, and TAPSE were found (t=3.46, t=3.69, t=-3.12, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant variances in AAO between the groups (P>0.05). The number of patients with WHO-FC grade III/IV symptoms decreased from 16 to 8, 5 to 0 respectively (P<0.05), and that of patients with WHO-FC grade I/II symptoms increased from 0 to 1, 2 to 14 respectively (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences before and after treatment in 6MWD, NT-proBNP, RVD, RAD, AAO, LVEDd, sPAP, TRPG and TAPSE between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine (Scr) and hemoglobin (Hb) between 0 and 24 weeks (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Exercise tolerance and cardiac function in patients with CTD-PAH were significantly improved after treatment with macitentan, which was well tolerated. Therefore, macitentan may be an effective and safe targeted drug for CTD-PAH.

Vitamin C deficiency can lead to pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review of case reports

BACKGROUND

In the early literature, unintentional vitamin C deficiency in humans was associated with heart failure. Experimental vitamin C deficiency in guinea pigs caused enlargement of the heart. The purpose of this study was to collect and analyze case reports on vitamin C and pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed and Scopus for case studies in which vitamin C deficiency was considered to be the cause of pulmonary hypertension. We selected reports in which pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed by echocardiography or catheterization, for any age, sex, or dosage of vitamin C. We extracted quantitative data for our analysis. We used the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) as the outcome of primary interest.

RESULTS

We identified 32 case reports, 21 of which were published in the last 5 years. Dyspnea was reported in 69%, edema in 53% and fatigue in 28% of the patients. Vitamin C plasma levels, measured in 27 cases, were undetectable in 24 and very low in 3 cases. Diet was poor in 30 cases and 17 cases had neuropsychiatric disorders. Right ventricular enlargement was reported in 24 cases. During periods of vitamin C deficiency, the median mPAP was 48 mmHg (range 29-77 mmHg; N = 28). After the start of vitamin C administration, the median mPAP was 20 mmHg (range 12-33 mmHg; N = 18). For the latter 18 cases, mPAP was 2.4-fold (median) higher during vitamin C deficiency. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during vitamin C deficiency was reported for 9 cases, ranging from 4.1 to 41 Wood units. PVR was 9-fold (median; N = 5) higher during vitamin C deficiency than during vitamin C administration. In 8 cases, there was direct evidence that the cases were pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH). Probably the majority of the remaining cases were also PAH.

CONCLUSIONS

The cases analyzed in our study indicate that pulmonary hypertension can be one explanation for the reported heart failure of scurvy patients in the early literature. It would seem sensible to measure plasma vitamin C levels of patients with PH and examine the effects of vitamin C administration.

Future Perspectives of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review of Novel Pipeline Treatments and Indications

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterized by elevated blood pressure and pathological changes in the pulmonary arterioles, leading to the development of right-heart failure and potentially fatal outcomes if left untreated. This review aims to provide an overview of novel drugs or formulations and new drug indications for pulmonary arterial hypertension that are currently in phases II-III of randomized controlled trials, and describe the rationale for the use of these targeted therapies, as well as their efficacy, safety profile, and impact on quality of life and survival. The literature research was conducted using data from ClinicalTrials.gov for the period between 1 January 2016 up to 31 December 2022. The population of interest includes individuals aged ≥ 18 years who have been diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The review selection criteria included trials with recruiting, enrolling by invitation, active, terminated or completed status in 2022 and 2023. A total of 24 studies were selected for evaluation based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This review summarizes the updated information from randomized clinical trials involving novel therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, larger clinical trials are required to validate their clinical safety and effects. In the future, clinicians should choose therapies based on the patient's individual situation and requirements when developing treatment strategies.

Randomized Trial of Macitentan/Tadalafil Single-Tablet Combination Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) combination therapy is recommended for low-/intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. A fixed-dose combination of the ERA macitentan and PDE5i tadalafil (M/T FDC) in a once-daily, single tablet would simplify treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The multicenter, double-blind, adaptive phase 3 A DUE study investigated the efficacy and safety of M/T FDC vs macitentan 10 mg and vs tadalafil 40 mg monotherapies in PAH patients, including treatment-naïve and prior ERA or PDE5i monotherapy-treated patients.

METHODS

World Health Organization functional class II-III patients were randomized to M/T FDC, macitentan, or tadalafil depending on their PAH treatment (treatment-naïve, ERA, or PDE5i monotherapy) at baseline. The primary endpoint was change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at week 16.

RESULTS

In total, 187 patients were randomized to single-tablet M/T FDC (n = 108), macitentan (n = 35), or tadalafil (n = 44). PVR reduction with M/T FDC was significantly greater vs macitentan (29%; geometric mean ratio 0.71; 95% CL: 0.61-0.82; P < 0.0001) and vs tadalafil (28%; geometric mean ratio 0.72; 95% CL: 0.64-0.80; P < 0.0001). Three patients died in the M/T FDC arm (judged unrelated to treatment). Adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation, serious AEs, and those of special interest (anemia, hypotension, and edema) were more frequent with M/T FDC.

CONCLUSIONS

Macitentan and tadalafil FDC significantly improved PVR vs monotherapies in PAH patients, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the individual components. The A DUE study supports M/T FDC as a once-daily, single-tablet combination for initial therapy and escalation to double combination therapy in patients with PAH. (Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Macitentan and Tadalafil Monotherapies With the Corresponding Fixed-dose Combination Therapy in Subjects With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [PAH]) [A DUE]; NCT03904693).

Liver injury due to endothelin receptor antagonists: a real-world study based on post-marketing drug monitoring data

BACKGROUND

Liver injury is the hallmark adverse reaction of endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Since the first drug, bosentan has been widely used in clinical practice, hepatotoxicity has been accompanied by the history of ERA. The new ERA has been proven to have a lower liver risk but the current research findings are inconsistent. ERA-based targeted drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where the risk of liver injury is difficult to estimate.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the correlation between ERA and different ERA combination regimens with liver injury in the real world.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System (Food and Drug Administration AERS, FAERS).

METHODS

The study used proportional imbalance and Bayesian analysis to mine FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 to determine the association of three ERAs with liver injury and to further mine the risk of liver injury due to the combination of ERAs with other targeted drugs. In addition, we analyzed the onset time, mortality, and hospitalization rate of liver injury caused by different ERA combination regimens.

RESULTS

We screened out 3581 ERA-related liver injury events, of which bosentan (59.82%) had the largest number of cases. The patients with liver injury were mainly female (60.63%), and the age was concentrated between 61 and 75 years (26.75%). According to different signal mining methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR; 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.23-3.53), proportional reporting ratio (PRR; 3.22, χ2 = 37.84), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; 1.68, 95% confidence interval = 1.61), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; 3.21, 95% confidence interval = 3.09), bosentan had the strongest association with liver injury compared to ambrisentan and macitentan. Furthermore, bosentan + sildenafil [ROR (2.52, 95% confidence interval = 2.23-2.84), PRR (2.44, χ2 = 15.92), BCPNN (1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.14), MGPS (2.44, 95% confidence interval = 2.21)], bosentan + epoprostenol [ROR (5.39, 95% confidence interval = 4.29-6.77), PRR (4.94, χ2 = 65.18), BCPNN (2.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.83), MGPS (4.94, 95% confidence interval = 4.08)], bosentan + iloprost [ROR (2.70, 95% confidence interval = 2.11-3.45), PRR (2.61, χ2 = 31.03), BCPNN (1.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.08), MGPS (2.61, 95% confidence interval = 2.12)] had a higher risk of liver injury caused by the three ERA combination regimens. The median time to onset of hepatotoxicity associated with all ERA combination regimens was 259 days (interquartile range: 58-716.5 days). Finally, the hospitalization rate for patients experiencing hepatotoxicity with ERA combination regimens was 47.86% and the mortality rate was 12.67%.

CONCLUSION

By mining the FAERS, we analyzed and compared the risk of liver injury related to different ERA and ERA combination regimens, and the onset time and adverse reaction outcomes of all ERA combination regimens. According to the results of the study, bosentan had the highest risk of liver injury and the combination regimens bosentan + sildenafil, bosentan + epoprostenol, and bosentan + iloprost had a stronger risk of liver injury. From the early stages of treatment, we need to regularly monitor the liver function of patients, especially for females and the elderly, and discontinue the suspected drug as soon as the liver injury occurs.

Efficacy and safety of macitentan for pulmonary hypertension: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of macitentan in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH).

METHODS

We retrieved the safety and efficacy of macitentan treatment for PH using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for literature screening and quality assessment. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata/SE 15.1 software. Results are presented as standardization mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies and four non-RCT studies with 2769 patients was included, involving 723 in the macitentan group and 599 in the placebo group. The results of the study showed that macitentan had effectively decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.77--0.29, p < 0.05), cardiac index (CI) (SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37-0.83, p < 0.05) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI: -0.40--0.03, p < 0.05). Furthermore, macitentan also significantly reduced PVR (SMD = -0.58, 95% CI: -0.80--0.35, p < 0.05), 6-min walk distance (6WMD) (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.50, p < 0.05), CI (SMD = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.28-0.69, p < 0.05), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.64--0.23, p < 0.05) and NT-proBNP (SMD = -0.55, 95% CI: -1.07--0.03, p < 0.05) between baseline and follow-up. The adverse reactions to macitentan were mild, with headache, anaemia and bronchitis. Other efficacy and safety outcomes did not reach statistical differences.

CONCLUSION

Macitentan therapy for PH is effective and safe. The effectiveness on PVR, mPAP, mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), mortality and other indicators still needs to be further confirmed.

Pulmonary vasodilator therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with CHD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The optimal treatment strategy using pulmonary vasodilators in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with CHD (PAH-CHD) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasodilators in PAH-CHD. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through May 2022 and a network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcomes were mean difference of changes in 6-minute walk distance, NYHA functional class, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The secondary outcomes included pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and resting oxygen saturation. We identified 14 studies, yielding 807 patients with PAH-CHD. Bosentan and sildenafil were associated with a significant increase in 6-minute walk distance from baseline compared with placebo (MD 48.92 m, 95% CI 0.32 to 97.55 and MD 59.70 m, 95% CI 0.88 to 118.53, respectively). Bosentan, sildenafil, and combination of bosentan and sildenafil were associated with significant improvement in NYHA functional class compared with placebo (MD -0.33, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.22 and MD -0.62, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.31, respectively). Bosentan and sildenafil were also associated with significant improvements in secondary outcomes. These findings were largely confirmed in the subgroup analysis. Various adverse events were reported; however, serious adverse event rates were relatively low (4.8-8.7%), including right heart failure, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, hypotension, and discontinuation of pulmonary vasodilators. In conclusion, bosentan and sildenafil were the most effective in improving prognostic risk factor such as 6-minute walk distance and NYHA class. Overall, pulmonary vasodilators were well tolerated in PAH-CHD.

Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of class I pulmonary arterial hypertension

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical data and prognosis of patients with World Health Organization (WHO) functional class I pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS

This research retrospectively analyzed the clinical data (baseline, laboratory as well as echocardiography and right heart catheterization data) of 63 class I PAH patients diagnosed and treated in the Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, between January 2021 and June 2022. The mean follow-up time was 10.7±6.5 months. The treatment and prognosis of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the class I PAH patients, the average age at diagnosis was 39.7±12.7 years, with females accounting for 92.1%; 44.4% of patients were at grade III or IV; 55.6% were at medium-high risk. In the subgroup analysis, there were more cases with grade III/IV cardiac function (P=0.03) and high risk in idiopathic PAH (IPAH) group than those in congenital heart disease-associated (CHD-PAH) and connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-PAH) groups (P=0.04). CHD-PAH patients tended to present with higher pulmonary systolic blood pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance than CTD-PAH patients (P<0.01), while IPAH patients had worse right ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (P<0.05). The three subgroups showed no obvious differences in echocardiographic indexes (right atrial size, right ventricular size and pulmonary artery systolic pressure) and related laboratory indexes (blood routines and hepatorenal function). In terms of the targeted drug therapy for PAH, the proportion of dual-drug combination therapy was the highest (48.1%), followed by monotherapy (35%) and triple combination therapy (15.9%). Nearly half (48.7%) of CTD-PAH cases were first diagnosed in the Rheumatology and Immunology Department, and all of them were given targeted drug therapy for PAH. After a mean follow-up of 10.7±6.5 months, a total of 8 endpoint events occurred, including 3 deaths due to CTD-PAH complicated with serious complications of other organs. The 1-year survival rate for all the included PAH patients was 95.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of targeted therapy, class I PAH patients in China have a high early survival rate, a high proportion of combined therapy and strong multidisciplinary attention.

New progress in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease. Although great progress has been made in its diagnosis and treatment in recent years, its mortality rate is still very significant. The pathophysiology and pathogenesis of PAH are complex and involve endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, smooth muscle cell proliferation, pulmonary arteriole occlusion, antiapoptosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling. These factors will accelerate the progression of the disease, leading to poor prognosis. Therefore, accurate etiological diagnosis, treatment and prognosis judgment are particularly important. Here, we systematically review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, genetics, prognosis and treatment of PAH.

Efficacy and safety of sequential combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) combination therapy pooled sequential and initial combination together, which might threaten their authenticity and clinical significance for the difference between two strategies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sequential combination therapy (SCT) with background therapy (BT) in PAH patients. Raw data were extracted to calculate risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) for predefined efficacy and safety outcomes. Mantel-Haenszel fixed or random effects model was used based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

17 RCTs involving 4343 patients (97.2% of patients with WHO-FC II-III) were included. SCT decreased clinical worsening (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.76), nonfatal clinical worsening (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.71), functional class (decrease of 28% in the portion of patients with WHO-FC worsening and increase of 33% in the portion of patients with WHO-FC improvement), and increased 6-min walk distance (WMD 17.68 m, 95% CI 10.16 to 25.20), but didn't reduce mortality, lung transplantation, admission to hospital, and treatment escalation compared with BT. Although any adverse event and serious adverse event were similar between SCT and BT, SCT increased all-cause treatment discontinuation (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.71) and drug-related treatment discontinuation (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.84) with higher incidence of headache, flushing, nausea, diarrhoea and jaw pain.

CONCLUSIONS

For WHO-FC II-III PAH patients who have established BT, our study reinforced the recommendation of SCT to improve clinical worsening, functional status, and exercise capacity, although with higher incidence of side-effects and withdrawal.

Prognostic impact of follow-up pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Objective

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), caused by pulmonary artery remodelling and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) due to an unknown mechanism, is an intractable disease with a poor prognosis. The recent development of PAH-specific treatment medications may allow for higher PVR reduction than previously achieved. This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of follow-up PVR levels achieved shortly after the initiation of targeted treatment in patients with idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (I/H-PAH).

Methods

We analysed the data of all patients with I/H-PAH admitted to our hospital between 1998 and 2019. We collected data at baseline and during the first invasive haemodynamic evaluation. The primary outcome was death or lung transplantation.

Results

Of the 133 treatment-naïve patients enrolled in this study, 47 experienced adverse events during a median follow-up period of 6.4 (IQR 3.5–11.5) years. The median time interval to first follow-up from diagnosis was 162 (IQR 117–253) days. Incidence of the primary outcome was significantly lower in patients who achieved low PVR at follow-up. Of risk factors evaluated at follow-up, the multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed PVR as an independent predictor of the primary outcome (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.029 to 1.183; p=0.006). The results were consistent across risk profiles according to the simplified risk stratification recommended by the European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines.

Conclusion

Follow-up PVR was an independent predictor of transplant-free survival in patients with I/H-PAH. Evaluation of haemodynamic status shortly after initiating treatment may help predict long-term prognosis.

Real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and cost among adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States

Treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has evolved over the past decade, including approval of new medications and growing evidence to support earlier use of combination therapy. Despite these changes, few studies have assessed real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among people with PAH using recent data. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database®. Adult members with claims for a PAH diagnosis, right heart catheterization, and who initiated PAH treatment (index date) between October 1, 2015 and November 30, 2020 were identified. Members had to be continuously enrolled in the health plan for 6 months before the index date (baseline) and ≥30 days after. Treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs were described. A total of 843 members with PAH (mean age 62.3 years, 64.2% female) were included. Only 21.0% of members received combination therapy as their first-line treatment, while most members (54.6%) received combination therapy as second-line treatment. All-cause HCRU remained high after treatment initiation with 58.0% of members having ≥1 hospitalization and 41.3% with ≥1 emergency room visit. Total all-cause costs declined from $15,117 per patient per month at baseline to $14,201 after treatment initiation, with decreased medical costs ($14,208 vs. $6,349) more than offsetting increased pharmacy costs ($909 vs. $7,852). In summary, despite growing evidence supporting combination therapy, most members with PAH initiated treatment with monotherapy. Total costs decreased following treatment, driven by a reduction in medical costs even with increases in pharmacy costs.

Causes and outcomes of ICU hospitalisations in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Rationale

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease characterised by limited survival despite remarkable improvements in therapy. The causes, clinical burden and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remain poorly characterised. The aim of this study was to describe patient characteristics, causes of ICU hospitalisation, and risk factors for ICU and 1-year mortality.

Methods

Data from patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Pulmonary Hypertension Registry were analysed for the period between January 2010 and December 2020. Clinical, functional, haemodynamic and laboratory data were collected.

Measurements and main results

102 adult patients with 155 consecutive ICU hospitalisations were included. The leading causes for admission were right heart failure (RHF, 53.3%), infection (17.4%) and arrhythmia (11.0%). ICU mortality was 27.1%. Mortality risk factors included Na <136 mEq·mL-1 (OR: 3.10, 95% CI: 1.41-6.82), elevated pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.03-2.98), hyperbilirubinaemia (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.09-1.80), hyperlactaemia (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.05-1.93), and need for vasopressors/inotropes (OR: 5.29, 95% CI: 2.28-12.28), mechanical ventilation (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.63-8.76) and renal replacement therapy (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.25-24.76). Mortality rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were 17.5%, 27.6% and 39.0%, respectively. Connective tissue disease-associated PAH has lower 1-year survival compared to idiopathic PAH (51.4% versus 79.8%, log-rank test p=0.019).

Conclusions

RHF is the most common cause for ICU admission. In-hospital and 1-year mortality remain exceedingly high despite improved ICU care. Recognising specific risk factors on admission can help identifying patients at risk for poor outcomes.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia associated with ACVRL1 mutation: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is an autosomal dominant condition with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 5000. It is characterized by the presence of abnormalities of vascular structures, and may affect many organ systems, including the lungs, brain, spinal cord, gastrointestinal tract, and liver. A causative mutation is identified in approximately 97% of patients with definite hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia in one of three genes including a mutation in endoglin, a mutation in a locus mapped to chromosome 5, and an activin receptor-like kinase-1 (ACVRL1) mutation that is associated with an increased incidence of primary pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare (15-25 cases per million people) but severe vascular disorder. Heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension is associated with several gene mutations, with 75% having a mutation in the bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2 (BMPR2). However, the remaining 25% of patients have other associated genetic mutations including ACVLR1, which is also associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare complication in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (< 1% of the hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia population). We describe a case report with this rare occurrence.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old white/caucasian Irish male presented for screening for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia due to a history of recurrent epistaxis (once/week) and a family history suggestive of pulmonary hypertension. Genetic testing confirmed an ACVRL1 mutation, while an echocardiogram and right heart catheterization confirmed pulmonary arterial hypertension. On examination, he had several mucocutaneous telangiectasia across his face. He was commenced on tadalafil and macitentan. However, this led to increased iron deficiency anemia and pedal edema. Selexipag was also added to his drug regime. He continues to require intermittent admissions for diuresis and blood transfusions.

CONCLUSION

The association of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and pulmonary arterial hypertension is rare (< 1%). Here we describe a case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia complicated with pulmonary arterial hypertension as a result of an ACVRL1 mutation. We also describe the clinical challenges of treating these two conditions together, as treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension tend to worsen hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of novel-targeted drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe and fatal clinical syndrome characterized by high blood pressure and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary arterioles, which is also a rapidly progressing disease of the lung vasculature with a poor prognosis. Although PAH medication made great advances in recent years, the efficacy and safety of the medication are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we aimed to update and expand previous studies to explore the efficacy and safety of PAH-targeted medications. Methods: Relevant articles were searched and selected from published or publicly available data in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE (from inception until October 1st, 2020). To assess the efficacy and safety of PAH therapies, five efficacy outcomes [6-minute walking distance (6MWD), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), WHO functional class (WHO FC) improvement, clinical worsening, death] and two safety outcomes [adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs)] were selected. And 6MWD was regarded as the primary efficacy outcome.Results: 50 trials included with 10 996participants were selected. In terms of efficacy, all targeted drugs were more effective than placebo. For 6MWD, Bosentan + Sildenafil, Sildenafil, Bosentan + Iloprost were better than others. Bosentan + Iloprost and Bosentan + Sildenafil were better for mPAP. Bosentan + Iloprost and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil were more effective in improving WHO FC. Bosentan + Tadalafil and Bosentan + Iloprost had the Ambrisentan probability to reduce the incidence of clinical worsening. It is demonstrated that Ambrisentan had clear benefits in reducing all-cause mortality. In terms of safety, no therapies had been shown to reduce the incidence of SAEs significantly, and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil significantly increased the incidence of AEs.Conclusions: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) + Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERA) seems to be better therapy for PAH. Prostacyclin analogs (ProsA) + ERA appear promising, though additional data is warranted.Registration PROSPERO CRD42020218818.

The REPAIR Study: Effects of Macitentan on RV Structure and Function in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The REPAIR (Right vEntricular remodeling in Pulmonary ArterIal hypeRtension) study evaluated the effect of macitentan on right ventricular (RV) and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and right heart catheterization (RHC).

BACKGROUND

RV failure is the primary cause of death in PAH. CMR is regarded as the most accurate noninvasive method for assessing RV function and remodeling and CMR measures of RV function and structure are strongly prognostic for survival in patients with PAH. Despite this, CMR is not routinely used in PAH clinical trials.

METHODS

REPAIR was a 52-week, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 4 study evaluating the effect of macitentan 10 mg, with or without phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibition, on RV remodeling and function and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. Primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 26 in RV stroke volume, determined by CMR; and pulmonary vascular resistance, determined by RHC. Efficacy measures were assessed for all patients with baseline and week 26 data for both primary endpoints.

RESULTS

At a prespecified interim analysis in 42 patients, both primary endpoints were met, enrollment was stopped, and the study was declared positive. At final analysis (n = 71), RV stroke volume increased by 12 mL (96% confidence level: 8.4-15.6 mL; P < 0.0001) and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased by 38% (99% confidence level: 31%-44%; P < 0.0001) at week 26. Significant positive changes were also observed in secondary and exploratory CMR (RV and left ventricular), hemodynamic, and functional endpoints at week 26. Improvements in CMR RV and left ventricular variables and functional parameters were maintained at week 52. Safety (n = 87) was consistent with previous clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of this study, macitentan treatment in patients with PAH resulted in significant and clinically-relevant improvements in RV function and structure and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics. At 52 weeks, improvements in RV function and structure were sustained. (REPAIR: Right vEntricular remodeling in Pulmonary ArterIal hypeRtension [REPAIR]; NCT02310672).

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults with congenital heart disease: markers of disease severity, management of advanced heart failure and transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) is a progressive, life-limiting disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we review the classification and pathophysiology of PAH-CHD, including the mechanisms of disease progression and multisystem effects of disease. We evaluate current strategies of risk stratification and the use of biological markers of disease severity, and review principles of management of PAH-CHD. The indications, timing, and the content of advanced heart failure assessment and transplant listing are discussed, along with a review of the types of transplant and other forms of available circulatory support in this group of patients. Finally, the integral role of advance care planning and palliative care is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

All patients with PAH-CHD should be followed up in expert centers, where they can receive appropriate risk assessment, PAH therapy, and supportive care. Referral for transplant assessment should be considered if there continue to be clinical high-risk features, persistent symptoms, or acute heart failure decompensation despite appropriate PAH specific therapy. Expert management of PAH-CHD patients, therefore, requires vigilance for these features, along with a close relationship with local advanced heart failure services and a working knowledge of listing criteria, which may disadvantage congenital heart disease patients.

Results of Macitentan in Japanese Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension - A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 3 Study

Background: Macitentan, an endothelin-receptor antagonist, is approved in Japan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study evaluated the use of macitentan for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in Japanese patients. Methods and Results: This open-label single-arm Phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral macitentan 10 mg (once daily) in Japanese CTEPH patients. The study was prematurely discontinued due to the sponsor's decision to not develop macitentan 10 mg further for the indication of CTEPH (unrelated to safety concerns). Of the 9 patients enrolled in the study, 4 completed 24 weeks of treatment. The mean (±SD) ratio of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) at Week 16 to baseline was 71.9±34.3%. The mean (±SD) decreases in PVR and the PVR index (PVRI) from baseline to Week 16 were 181.4±243.9 dyn·s/cm5 and 280.6±366.0 dyn·s·m2/cm5, respectively. The mean (±SD) increase in the 6-min walk distance from baseline to Week 24 was 44.3±46.8 m. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild or moderate in severity, except for 1 serious TEAE of angioplasty reported in 1/9 patients that was severe in intensity. Conclusions: Definite conclusions regarding the efficacy of macitentan 10 mg in Japanese patients with CTEPH cannot be drawn because of premature study discontinuation. No safety concerns were observed, and the safety profile was consistent with previously reported studies in CTEPH and PAH patients.

Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension: Spectrum and Impact

Systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is a catastrophic complication of one of the most common and devastating autoimmune diseases. Once diagnosed, it becomes the leading cause of mortality among this patient population. Screening modalities and risk assessments have been designed and validated by various organizations and societies in order to identify patients early in their disease course and promptly refer them to expert centers for a hemodynamic assessment and formal diagnosis. Moreover, several large multicenter clinical trials have now included patients with SSc-PAH to assess their response to therapy. Despite an improved understanding of the condition and significant advances in supportive and targeted therapy, outcomes have remained far from optimal. Therefore, rigorous phenotyping and search for novel therapies are desperately needed for this devastating condition.

[Organ Bath Experiments on Human Pulmonary Vessels: Assessment of Drug Efficacy for Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension]

Various vasodilator medications are used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) or phosphodiesterase-5-(PDE-5-)inhibitors. In a human ex vivo model, we investigated whether the combination of two substance classes could achieve a higher effect or - without loss of vasodilatation - a lower dosage of the individual substances might be sufficient. We established an ex vivo organ bath model to evaluate the dose-dependent effects of ERA and PDE-5-inhibitors on pulmonary vessels harvested from patients who underwent surgery (lung resection/transplantation). We compared the combined use of both substance classes with administration of one class of drugs alone. Due to the limitations of the experimental design, it is not possible to extrapolate our results to the conditions in vivo. Nevertheless, organ bath proved to be helpful in evaluating the dose-dependent effects of ERA and PDE-5 inhibitors, which is not practical in everyday clinical practice. In this setting, the effectiveness of the combination therapy and the potential for dose reduction depended on the concentrations used and on the influence of previous illnesses on blood vessel function. This article describes the most important results of our experimental investigations and suggestions for future projects.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease after defect repair: the effect of pregnancy

Background

An increasing number of patients with previously repaired congenital heart disease (CHD) present with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This can occur immediately after repair (residual PAH) or years later.

Case presentation

We present the case of a young woman who underwent repair of a ventricular septal defect in later childhood. Three years after repair, she was found to have significant residual PAH. She remained stable on PAH therapies, but a decade later decided to become pregnant against medical advice. She deteriorated during pregnancy and required escalation of PAH therapies and eventual admission to the intensive care unit, with an uneventful delivery at 32 weeks. Despite successful delivery, she remained symptomatic post-partum, with evidence of disease progression at right heart catheterisation.

Conclusions

All patients with repaired CHD should undergo routine screening for PAH. Early diagnosis and expert management, including the use of PAH therapies, is recommended to optimise outcome. Pregnancy is contraindicated in PAH patients, including patients with CHD, and requires an expert multidisciplinary approach to reduce morbidity and mortality when patients opt to proceed.

Strategies for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with congenital heart disease

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is commonly seen in adults who have congenital heart disease (CHD). Therapy is available for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and has greatly benefitted many patients with PAH related to CHD (PAH-CHD) over the last 15 years, with evidence of improved quality of life and prognosis in those with Eisenmenger syndrome and repaired PAH-CHD.

In this review, we describe the standard management and advanced therapies for PAH, which are available in specialist PH centres around the UK and Ireland, and how these are used in PAH-CHD. Decisions around the choice of therapy are governed by commissioning and available evidence.

Conclusion

We explain the different pathways for action and the variety of medications now at our disposal to help this important group of patients.

Initial combination therapy of macitentan and tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Initial combination therapy plays a central role in managing pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) [1–4]. Patients with low- or intermediate-risk of 1-year mortality at diagnosis should be treated with initial combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) [2–4]. Benefits of initial therapy with the ERA ambrisentan and PDE5i tadalafil were demonstrated in AMBITION [1]; prospective evidence for other treatment combinations within these drug classes is needed.

Initial combination therapy with macitentan and tadalafil is well tolerated and improves cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity in newly diagnosed PAH patientshttps://bit.ly/3aWZagH

Initial combination therapy of macitentan and tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Initial combination therapy with macitentan and tadalafil is well tolerated and improves cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and functional capacity in newly diagnosed PAH patients https://bit.ly/3aWZagH

Pulmonary Hypertension Phenotypes in Systemic Sclerosis: The Right Diagnosis for the Right Treatment

Systemic sclerosis is an auto-immune disease characterized by skin involvement that often affects multiple organ systems. Pulmonary hypertension is a common finding that can significantly impact prognosis. Molecular pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis can be extremely heterogeneous, leading to distinct clinical phenotypes. In addition, different causes of pulmonary hypertension may overlap within the same patient. Since pulmonary hypertension treatment is very different for each phenotype, it is fundamental to perform an adequate diagnostic work-up to properly and promptly identify the prevalent mechanism underlying pulmonary hypertension in order to start the right therapies. When pulmonary hypertension is caused by a primary vasculopathy of the small pulmonary arteries, treatment with pulmonary vasodilators, often in an initial double-combination regimen, is indicated, aimed at reducing the mortality risk profile. In this review, we describe the different clinical phenotypes of pulmonary hypertension in the scleroderma population and discuss the utility of clinical tools to identify the presence of pulmonary vascular disease. Furthermore, we focus on systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, highlighting the advances in the knowledge of right ventricular dysfunction in this setting and the latest updates in terms of treatment with pulmonary vasodilator drugs.

Management of systemic sclerosis: the first five years

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a risk-stratified and evidence-based management for subsets of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients in the first five years from disease onset.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiopulmonary disease remains the primary cause of mortality in SSc patients. Morbidity and mortality in SSc-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension have improved with combination treatment, in either an upfront or sequential treatment pattern. Traditional therapies for interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) have targeted those with clinically significant and progressive ILD with immunosuppression. New data suggest a possible paradigm shift, introducing immunosuppressive therapy to patients before they develop clinically significant or progressive ILD. The year 2019 saw the approval of the first FDA-approved therapy for SSc-associated interstitial lung disease, using an antifibrotic agent previously approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. To date, only autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant has demonstrated a mortality benefit for SSc-ILD, albeit in a narrow spectrum of SSc-ILD patients.

SUMMARY

SSc is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease typified by varying clinical trajectories. Its management may be stratified within the first five years by subclassifying patients based on factors that have important prognostic significance: skin distribution and autoantibody status.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and complex immune-mediated connective tissue disease characterized by multi-organ fibrosis and dysfunction. Systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is a leading cause of death in this population. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) can coexist with other forms of pulmonary hypertension in SSc, including pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease, interstitial lung disease, chronic thromboembolism and pulmonary venous occlusive disease, which further complicates diagnosis and management. Available pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies target the nitric oxide, endothelin and prostacyclin pathways. These therapies have been studied in SSc-PAH in addition to idiopathic PAH, often with different treatment responses. In this article, we discuss the management as well as the treatment options for patients with SSc-PAH.

Newer approaches and novel drugs for inhalational therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by remodeling of small pulmonary arteries leading to increased pulmonary arterial pressure. Existing treatments acts to normalize vascular tone via three signaling pathways: the prostacyclin, the endothelin-1, and the nitric oxide. Although over the past 20 years, there has been considerable progress in terms of treatments for PAH, the disease still remains incurable with a disappointing prognosis.Areas covered: This review summarizes the pathophysiology of PAH, the advantages and disadvantages of the inhalation route, and assess the relative advantages various inhaled therapies for PAH. The recent studies concerning the development of controlled-release drug delivery systems loaded with available anti-PAH drugs have also been summarized.Expert opinion: The main obstacles of current pharmacotherapies of PAH are their short half-life, stability, and formulations, resulting in reducing the efficacy and increasing systemic side effects and unknown pathogenesis of PAH. The pulmonary route has been proposed for delivering anti-PAH drugs to overcome the shortcomings. However, the application of approved inhaled anti-PAH drugs is limited. Inhalational delivery of controlled-release nanoformulations can overcome these restrictions. Extensive studies are required to develop safe and effective drug delivery systems for PAH patients.

Retrospective Database Analysis of Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Release of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines put increased emphasis on using combination therapy, either as upfront or sequential therapy among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, with these recommendations and the therapy advances made in the last several years, little is known on the real-world treatment patterns among patients with PAH, particularly before and after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) enrollees with at least one claim for a PAH-related medication from January 01, 2012 to March 31, 2017, at least one medical claim with a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis, and continuous health plan enrollment at least 6 months prior to and at least 12 months following the date of the first pharmacy claim for PAH-related therapy (index date). Patients were divided into cohorts based on prescription of monotherapy or combination therapy and index date category (2012-2013, January 2014-July 2015, and August 2015-March 2017).

RESULTS

Out of 1878 patients, 90.8% initiated with monotherapy and 9.2% initiated with combination therapy. The percentage of patients with index combination therapy increased from 5.7% in 2012-2013 to 13.0% in August 2015-March 2017. Patients with index combination therapy had better persistence (11.6 months versus 10.3 months) and adherence (0.95 versus 0.85). Overall, the discontinuation rate was 40% and was higher in monotherapy versus combination therapy patients (42.8% versus 12.2%). Approximately 30.2% of patients had a second regimen, of which 50% were combination regimens. The time to combination therapy initiation decreased from 10.5 months in 2012-2013 to 3.4 months in August 2015-March 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients initiated monotherapy treatment for PAH, most often a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). Patients with upfront combination therapy increased following publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines, indicating that physicians responded to the guideline's option of prescribing upfront combination therapy.

A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Add-on Drug Therapies Specific for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background: Recently published meta-analyses did not discriminate between drug agents used for initial and sequential combination therapy. Objective: To assess the comparative efficacy of drugs specific for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as add-on therapies based on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), all-cause mortality, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). Methods: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until December 9, 2018, for the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) conducted on primarily adult patients diagnosed with PAH. Data extracted from applicable RCTs were as follows: for 6MWD mean change from baseline, the total number of patients, and the number of patients with events, per treatment. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in a Bayesian framework. Results: A total of 16 RCTs were eligible for analysis, with 4112 patients. Add-on therapy with tadalafil or inhaled treprostinil performed better than endothelin receptor antagonists alone [27 m; 95% credible interval (CrI): (11, 43); and 19 m; 95% CrI: (10, 27); respectively]. Add-on therapy with macitentan or bosentan performed better than phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors alone [26 m; 95% CrI: (6.4, 45); and 22 m; 95% CrI: (5.1, 38); respectively]. Differences in all-cause mortality and discontinuation due to AEs were nonsignificant. Conclusion and Relevance: Our NMA evaluated efficacy and safety of add-on therapies in patients with PAH. None of the previous meta-analyses evaluated RCTs focusing solely on patients pretreated with another PAH-specific drug therapy. Our results support guideline recommendations on combination therapy in PAH patients and add the quantitative perspective on which sequential therapy demonstrated the greatest effect size.

Safety and tolerability of macitentan in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: an update

Macitentan is a medication in the endothelin receptor antagonist class, approved for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in 2013 based on the results of the pivotal SERAPHIN Trial (Study with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist in Pulmonary arterial Hypertension to Improve cliNical outcome). Macitentan was shown in initial trials to reduce the likelihood of a morbidity/mortality event. Real-world use of this medication additionally reveals a reduced risk of hospitalizations related to pulmonary arterial hypertension, improved health-related quality of life scores, potential clinical utility in other conditions (such as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary hypertension related to congenital heart disease), and has a similar safety profile as demonstrated in initial trials.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with the dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan: clinical evidence and experience

Macitentan (10 mg once daily orally), a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) developed by modifying the structure of bosentan to increase the efficacity and safety, is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The pivotal SERAPHIN trial, (a landmark trial in the history of PAH trials because of the large number of included patients, the long-term follow up and the first trial with morbidity/mortality as the primary endpoint) showed a reduction of the risk of a morbidity or mortality event by 45% over the treatment time compared with placebo. The positive effect on the primary endpoint was observed whether or not the patient was already on PAH therapy. There has been no direct comparison between macitentan and other ERAs, which were approved based on improved exercise capacity, but preclinical and clinical data suggest better pharmacological and safety profiles. Further analyses of the SERAPHIN trial investigated the predictive value of different indices and events on long-term outcome and mortality. The efficacy in children, the long-term effects and safety of macitentan and its place in combination therapy compared with other ERAs are still under investigation. This review presents the preclinical evidence of superiority of macitentan compared with other ERAs, and the available clinical trial data. The place of macitentan in the therapeutic algorithm for PAH treatment, post-marketing experience and future perspectives are discussed.

Systemic Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies, beyond the Fibroblast

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex rheumatologic autoimmune disease in which inflammation, fibrosis, and vasculopathy share several pathogenic pathways that lead to skin and internal organ damage. Recent findings regarding the participation and interaction of the innate and acquired immune system have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and to the identification of new therapeutic targets, many of which have been tested in preclinical and clinical trials with varying results. In this manuscript, we review the state of the art of the pathogenesis of this disease and discuss the main therapeutic targets related to each pathogenic mechanism that have been discovered so far.

Endothelin and the heart in health and diseases

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a 21-amino acid peptide, was initially identified in 1988 as a potent vasoconstrictor and pressor substance isolated from the culture supernatant of porcine aortic endothelial cells. From human genomic DNA analysis, two other family peptides, ET-2 and ET-3, were found. They showed different effects and distribution, suggesting that each peptide may play separate roles in different organs. In the heart, ET-1 also causes positive inotropic and chronotropic responses and hypertrophic activity of the cardiomyocytes. ETs act via activation of two receptor subtypes, ET_A and ET_B receptors, both of which are coupled to various GTP-binding proteins depending on cell types. Endogenous ET-1 may be involved in progression of various cardiovascular diseases. ET antagonists are currently used clinically in the treatment for patients with pulmonary hypertension, and are considered to have further target diseases as heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy and other cardiac diseases, renal diseases, systemic hypertension, and cerebral vasospasm.

Risk Factors for Mortality and Cardiopulmonary Hospitalization in Systemic Sclerosis Patients At Risk for Pulmonary Hypertension, in the PHAROS Registry

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify predictors of mortality and cardiopulmonary hospitalizations in patients at risk for pulmonary hypertension (PH) and enrolled in PHAROS, a prospective cohort study to investigate the natural history of PH in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

The at-risk population for PH was defined by the following entry criteria: echocardiogram systolic pulmonary arterial pressure > 40 mmHg, or DLCO < 55% predicted or ratio of % forced vital capacity/%DLCO > 1.6, measured by pulmonary function testing. Baseline clinical measures were evaluated as predictors of hospitalization and death between 2005 and 2014. Cox proportional hazards models were censored at date of PH onset or latest study visit and adjusted for age, sex, race, and disease duration.

RESULTS

Of the 236 at-risk subjects who were followed for a median of 4 years (range 0.4-8.5 yrs), 35 developed PH after entering PHAROS (reclassified as PH group). In the at-risk group, higher mortality was strongly associated with male sex, low %DLCO, exercise oxygen desaturation, anemia, abnormal dyspnea scores, and baseline pericardial effusion. Risks for cardiopulmonary hospitalization were associated with increased dyspnea and pericardial effusions, although PH patients with DLCO < 50% had the highest risk of cardiopulmonary hospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for poor outcome in patients with SSc who are at risk for PH were similar to others with SSc-PH and SSc-pulmonary arterial hypertension, including male sex, DLCO < 50%, exercise oxygen desaturation, and pericardial effusions. This group should undergo right heart catheterization and receive appropriate intervention if PH is confirmed.

A Focus on Macitentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The approval of macitentan has increased the number of pharmacological treatments of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Here, we review the effect on PAH of macitentan compared to other endothelin receptor antagonists. Drugs targeting the endothelin (ET) pathway include the selective ET_A receptor antagonist ambrisentan, the ET_A /ET_B receptor antagonists, bosentan and macitentan, which were recently approved for PAH treatment. Macitentan exhibits higher antagonistic potency than bosentan and ambrisentan in pulmonary smooth muscle cells. Compared to ambrisentan and bosentan, macitentan has a longer duration of action, reflected by the longer half-life, as well as pharmacodynamics attributed to its active metabolite, ACT-132577. The efficacy of macitentan on PAH was investigated in the phase III SERAPHIN trial (NCT00660179). Macitentan significantly reduced morbidity and mortality. It improved the 6-min. walk distance (6MWD) among PAH patients. In the AMB-320/321-E (NCT00578786) study, ambrisentan improved exercise capacity. In the EARLY study (NCT00091715), bosentan showed improvements in 6MWD which were not statistically significant. Bosentan had an effect on PAH in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) in the BREATHE-5 study (NCT00367770), while macitentan did not improve 6MWD in these patients, but there are differences regarding study size and functional class, and that 30% of the patients treated with macitentan were already in treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Macitentan revealed a lower risk of developing peripheral oedema and hepatotoxicity in the SERAPHIN study. In summary, macitentan has an efficiency comparable to bosentan and ambrisentan in the treatment of PAH. Patients treated with macitentan exhibited less adverse effects compared to bosentan and ambrisentan. In patients with PAH associated with ES, the trials with bosentan and macitentan do not seem comparable, and it needs to be clarified whether these drugs are effective when administered as part of a combination treatment in this condition.