Carbamazepine addition in tricyclic antidepressant-resistant unipolar depression

Pharmacological evaluation of NO/cGMP/KATP channels pathway in the antidepressant-like effect of carbamazepine in mice

Carbamazepine, an anticonvulsant drug, has shown antidepressant effects in clinical and experimental models. Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and has been involved in a variety of diseases including depression. In the present study, the involvement of NO/cyclic GMP/KATP channels pathway in the antidepressant action of carbamazepine was investigated in mice. The antidepressant-like activity was assessed in the forced swim test (FST) behavioral paradigm. Carbamazepine reduced (40 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) immobility period. The antidepressant-like effect of carbamazepine (40 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) was prevented by pretreatment with L-arginine [substrate for NO synthase (NOS), 750 mg/kg, intraperitoneal], sildenafil (a PDE-5 inhibitor, 5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and diazoxide (K+ channels opener, 10 mg/kg). Pretreatment of mice with L-NAME (a non-selective NOS inhibitor, 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), methylene blue (direct inhibitor of both NOS and soluble guanylate cyclase, 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) and glibenclamide (an ATP-sensitive K+ channel blocker, 1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) produced potentiation of the action of a sub-effective dose of carbamazepine (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). Also, carbamazepine (30 mg/kg) potentiated the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine through NO modulation. The various modulators used in the study did not produce any changes in locomotor activity per se. The results demonstrated that the antidepressant-like effect of carbamazepine in the FST involved an interaction with the NO/cGMP/KATP channels pathway.

Bipolarity and inadequate response to antidepressant drugs: clinical and psychopharmacological perspective

OBJECTIVES

The reason why depression may respond poorly to treatment with antidepressant drugs may be connected with the features of bipolarity. Evidence to this effect has accumulated in recent studies of various kinds of depression in mood disorders. Additional evidence for such a connection may be the efficacy of mood-stabilizing drugs in the augmentation of antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression.

METHODS

This review is based on clinical and psychopharmacological research performed over the past five years. The clinical investigation was based on the response to antidepressants of bipolar depression or to symptoms of hypomania, assessed mainly by the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32). The psychopharmacological research tested the efficacy of augmentation of antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression by mood-stabilizing drugs of the 1st and 2nd generations.

RESULTS

A number of studies have pointed to an association between bipolar depression, or symptoms of hypomania and an inadequate response to antidepressants. Such a connection was also found in the Polish TRES-DEP study which included 1051 depressed patients. Pharmacological studies have demonstrated the efficacy of first generation mood-stabilizing drugs (lithium, carbamazepine) and second generation drugs (quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, lamotrigine) for augmentation of antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression. Some evidence has been presented that mixed depressive episodes may also belong to this category.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these clinical and psychopharmacological studies appear to confirm an association between bipolarity and a poor response of depression to treatment with antidepressant drugs.

Lithium but not carbamazepine augments antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine in unipolar depression: an open-label study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present open-label study was to investigate the antidepressant efficacy of lithium and carbamazepine as augmentation strategies in unipolar depressed inpatients.

METHOD

Forty-six patients suffering from unipolar depression (major depressive episode according to DSM-IV criteria) were pre-treated with mirtazapine for 2 weeks initially (week -2 to week 0). Thereafter, the patients received either continuation of mirtazapine monotherapy (n = 23), combination treatment with mirtazapine and lithium (n = 13), or combination therapy with mirtazapine and carbamazepine (n = 10) for further 3 weeks (week 0 to week 3). Severity of depression was estimated weekly using the 21-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (21-HAMD). Response was defined by a reduction of at least 50% in the 21-HAMD sum score after 3 weeks of pharmacotherapy (week 0-3).

RESULTS

Additional administration of lithium, but not adjunctive carbamazepine significantly augmented the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine in the unipolar depressed patients. Moreover, carbamazepine but not lithium significantly lowered the serum concentrations of mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

Whereas the clinical importance of anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar disorder is not in doubt, the therapeutic efficacy of antiepileptic drugs such as carbamazepine is obviously limited in the pharmacotherapy of unipolar depression.

Anticonvulsants in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an overview

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent, potentially disabling, and sometimes fatal. Antidepressants (ADs) have improved its treatment, but incomplete response, sustained morbidity, recurrences, agitation, substance abuse, excess medical mortality, and suicide remain unsolved problems among mood disorder patients. AD treatment itself sometimes induces adverse behavioral responses. Several anticonvulsants (ACs) used to treat bipolar disorder (BPD) might also be of value for MDD. Accordingly, we reviewed published reports on ACs for MDD, identifying studies by computerized searches. We excluded reports dealing only with BPD patients or with sedatives, classified trials by design quality, and evaluated treatment of acute episodes and recurrences of adult MDD. We found 36 reports involving 41 relevant trials of carbamazepine (12 trials), valproate (11), lamotrigine (9), gabapentin (3), topiramate (3), phenytoin (2), and tiagabine (1). They include 9 blinded, controlled trials (of 28-70 days), involving carbamazepine (3 trials), lamotrigine (3), phenytoin (2), or topiramate (1) as primary treatments (5) or AD adjuncts (4). Some of these trials, as well as 7 of lesser quality, suggest benefits of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and valproate, mainly as adjuncts to ADs. Another 20 anecdotes or small trials further suggest that these ACs might be useful as AD adjuncts-specifically to treat irritability or agitation in MDD. Overall, these reports provide suggestive evidence of beneficial effects of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and valproate that require further study, especially for long-term adjunctive use, particularly in patients with recurring MDD with prominent irritability or agitation.

The effectiveness of anticonvulsants in psychiatric disorders

Anticonvulsant drugs are widely used in psychiatric indications. These include mainly alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal syndromes, panic and anxiety disorders, dementia, schizophrenia, affective disorders, bipolar affective disorders in particular, and, to some extent, personality disorders, A further area in which neurology and psychiatry overlap is pain conditions, in which some anticonvulsants, and also typical psychiatric medications such as antidepressants, are helpful. From the beginning of their psychiatric use, anticonvulsants have also been used to ameliorate specific symptoms of psychiatric disorders independently of their causality and underlying illness, eg, aggression, and, more recently, cognitive impairment, as seen in affective disorders and schizophrenia. With new anticonvulsants currently under development, it is likely that their use in psychiatry will further increase, and that psychiatrists need to learn about their differential efficacy and safety profiles to the same extent as do neurologists.

Augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression: a literature review

BACKGROUND

The large majority of depressed patients fail to remit on the first antidepressant prescribed. These patients with residual symptoms have higher relapse rates and poorer outcomes than those who remit. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a therapeutic challenge for the clinician. Augmentation pharmacotherapy refers to the addition of drugs that are not standard antidepressants in order to enhance the effect of a classical antidepressant drug. The aim of this paper was to review the available evidence on the various augmenting agents that have been tested for efficacy in TRD.

METHODS

Electronic databases and relevant textbooks were searched and the information retrieved was integrated in this review.

RESULTS

Although augmentation strategies have been tested with various pharmacological agents, there are few controlled studies published. Lithium, triiodothyronine (T3), buspirone and pindolol have been most widely studied. Other agents include dopaminergic agents, atypical antipsychotics, psychostimulants, benzodiazepines/hypnotics, hormones and anticonvulsants.

CONCLUSION

The augmentation therapy with the best evidence was the lithium-antidepressant combination, especially in patients not responding to tricyclic agents. However, good results have also been reported with augmentation strategies involving T3 and buspirone.

Effects of combination treatment with mood stabilizers and mirtazapine on plasma concentrations of neuroactive steroids in depressed patients

Antidepressants such as SSRIs or mirtazapine have been demonstrated to increase the concentrations of 3alpha-reduced neuroactive steroids throughout several weeks of treatment. However, no data are available on the impact of mood stabilizers such as lithium or carbamazepine on neuroactive steroid levels in depressed patients. Study 1 was performed in 26 drug-free depressed inpatients who were treated with either mirtazapine monotherapy (n=13) or combination therapy with mirtazapine and addition of lithium (n=13). Twenty drug-free depressed inpatients were included in study 2, receiving either mirtazapine monotherapy (n=10) or combination treatment with mirtazapine and carbamazepine (n=10). Plasma samples were taken weekly at 0800 h in the morning and quantified for neuroactive steroids by means of combined gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. In study 1, the mirtazapine-induced rises in 3alpha,5alpha-tetrahydroprogesterone and 3alpha,5beta-tetrahydroprogesterone were abolished by additional lithium administration, as compared to mirtazapine monotherapy. In study 2, the mirtazapine-evoked increase in 3alpha,5alpha-tetrahydroprogesterone was reversed after additional administration of carbamazepine, presumably due to lowered mirtazapine levels after induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Apparently, the mood stabilizers lithium and carbamazepine do not enhance but rather reverse the increase in plasma concentrations of 3alpha-reduced neuroactive steroids in depressed patients pretreated with antidepressants such as mirtazapine.

Current status of augmentation and combination treatments for major depressive disorder: a literature review and a proposal for a novel approach to improve practice

Most patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not reach symptom remission. These patients with residual symptoms have worse function and worse prognosis than those who remit. Several augmentation and combination treatments are used to either increase the chances of achieving remission or to eliminate/minimize residual depressive symptoms. Evidence for these pharmacological approaches rests primarily on open, uncontrolled studies, and there are clearly not enough controlled studies. Clinicians should carefully weigh these different treatment options to increase their patients' chances of achieving and sustaining remission from depression. This paper will review the pertinent studies and will propose a novel approach to improve practice involving the use of augmentation or combination strategies at the outset of initial treatment to primarily enhance the chances of remission through synergy and/or a broader spectrum of action. This novel approach could potentially enhance retention and/or increase remission rates since the lack of response with antidepressant monotherapy may lead many depressed patients with little or no benefit to drop out of treatment, precluding the subsequent use of augmentation or combination strategies altogether. In addition, the emergence of certain side-effects (e.g., agitation, insomnia) or the persistence of some initial baseline symptoms (e.g., anxiety, insomnia) may lead to premature discontinuation from monotherapy in the absence of concomitant use of augmenting pharmacological options targeting these symptoms.

Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: Conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application

Major depression is a debilitating and recurrent disorder with a substantial lifetime risk and a high social cost. Depressed patients generally display co-morbid symptoms, and depression frequently accompanies other serious disorders. Currently available drugs display limited efficacy and a pronounced delay to onset of action, and all provoke distressing side effects. Cloning of the human genome has fuelled expectations that symptomatic treatment may soon become more rapid and effective, and that depressive states may ultimately be "prevented" or "cured". In pursuing these objectives, in particular for genome-derived, non-monoaminergic targets, "specificity" of drug actions is often emphasized. That is, priority is afforded to agents that interact exclusively with a single site hypothesized as critically involved in the pathogenesis and/or control of depression. Certain highly selective drugs may prove effective, and they remain indispensable in the experimental (and clinical) evaluation of the significance of novel mechanisms. However, by analogy to other multifactorial disorders, "multi-target" agents may be better adapted to the improved treatment of depressive states. Support for this contention is garnered from a broad palette of observations, ranging from mechanisms of action of adjunctive drug combinations and electroconvulsive therapy to "network theory" analysis of the etiology and management of depressive states. The review also outlines opportunities to be exploited, and challenges to be addressed, in the discovery and characterization of drugs recognizing multiple targets. Finally, a diversity of multi-target strategies is proposed for the more efficacious and rapid control of core and co-morbid symptoms of depression, together with improved tolerance relative to currently available agents.

Clinical use of carbamazepine for bipolar disorders

Two recently completed large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials supporting the efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ) extended-release capsules (ERC) for the treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes have resulted in US FDA approval of CBZ-ERC, and have reinvigorated the importance of understanding the role of CBZ in bipolar disorder (BD) pharmacotherapy. Additional data suggest that CBZ may have a use in BD maintenance treatment and possibly in acute BD depression. Optimal use of CBZ requires sound knowledge of adverse effects and pharmacokinetic interactions with this agent. Adverse effects commonly involve benign side effects but can rarely include serious haematological, dermatological and hepatic manifestations. On the other hand, metabolic adverse effects (thyroid, glucose, lipid disturbances and significant weight gain) can be less problematic with CBZ, compared with lithium, valproate and atypical antipsychotics. Pharmacokinetic considerations (cytochrome P450 3A3/4 metabolism, active epoxide metabolite and catabolic enzyme induction) can influence the clinical use of CBZ. Managing adverse effects and pharmacokinetic complexities is important for optimising pharmacotherapy with CBZ in patients with BD. This paper reviews the chemistry, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of CBZ, as well as reviews of the controlled trials of CBZ in acute bipolar mania, acute bipolar depression and bipolar maintenance treatment.

Combination therapy with venlafaxine and carbamazepine in depressive patients not responding to venlafaxine: pharmacokinetic and clinical aspects

The chiral antidepressant venlafaxine (VEN) is both a serotonin and a norepinephrine uptake inhibitor. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 contribute to its metabolism, which has been shown to be stereoselective. Ten CYP2D6 genotyped and depressive (F32x and F33x, ICD-10) patients participated in an open study on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of a carbamazepine augmentation in VEN non-responders. After an initial 4-week treatment with VEN (195 +/- 52 mg/day), the only poor metabolizer out of 10 depressive patients had the highest plasma concentrations of S-VEN and R-VEN, respectively, whereas those of R-O-demethyl-VEN were lowest. Five non-responders completed the second 4-week study period, during which they were submitted to a combined VEN-carbamazepine treatment. In the only non-responder to this combined treatment, there was a dramatic decrease of both enantiomers of VEN, O-demethylvenlafaxine, N-desmethylvenlafaxine and N, O-didesmethylvenlafaxine in plasma, which suggests non-compliance, although metabolic induction by carbamazepine cannot entirely be excluded. The administration of carbamazepine [mean +/- SD, range: 360 +/- 89 (200-400) mg/day] over 4 weeks did not result in a significant modification of the plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of VEN and its O- and N-demethylated metabolites in the other patients. In conclusion, these preliminary observations suggest that the combination of VEN and carbamazepine represents an interesting augmentation strategy by its efficacy, tolerance and absence of pharmacokinetic modifications. However, these findings should be verified in a more comprehensive study.

Carbamazepine augmentation in depressive patients non-responding to citalopram: a pharmacokinetic and clinical pilot study

Citalopram is a chiral antidepressant drug. Its eutomer, S-citalopram (escitalopram), has recently been introduced as an antidepressant. In an open pilot study, four outpatients and two inpatients with a major depressive episode (ICD-10), and who were nonresponders to a 4-week pretreatment with 40-60 mg/day citalopram, were comedicated for another 4-week period with carbamazepine (200-400 mg/day). Some of the patients suffered also from comorbidities: Phobic anxiety disorder with panic attacks (n=2), generalised anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, dependent personality disorder, hypertension (n=1). After a 4-week augmentation therapy with carbamazepine, a significant (P<0.03) decrease of the plasma concentrations of S-citalopram and R-citalopram, by 27 and 31%, respectively, was observed. Apparently, the probable induction of CYP3A4 by carbamazepine results in a nonstereoselective increase in N-demethylation of citalopram. Moreover, there was a significant (P<0.03) decrease of the ratio S/R-citalopram propionic acid derivative, the formation of it being partly regulated by MAO-A and MAO-B. Already, within 1 week after addition of carbamazepine, there was a slight but significant (P<0.03) decrease of the MADRS depression scores, from 27.0+/-7.7 (mean+/-S.D.) to 23.3+/-6.6, and the final score on day 56 was 18.8+/-10.9. The treatment was generally well tolerated. There was no evidence of occurrence of a serotonin syndrome. After augmentation with carbamazepine, treatment related adverse events were: Nausea in one case, diarrhea in one case, and rash in two cases. In conclusion, the results of this pilot study suggest that carbamazepine augmentation of a citalopram treatment in previous nonresponders to citalopram may be clinically useful, but that in addition carbamazepine can lead to a decrease of the plasma concentrations of the active enantiomer escitalopram.

The psychopharmacologic treatment of depression and anxiety in the context of chronic pain

Chronic pain afflicts millions of people, commonly causing depression and anxiety. These conditions must be treated to achieve a good functional outcome from pain treatment. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclics, and newer antidepressants effectively treat both depression and selected anxiety disorders. Antidepressants with noradrenergic and serotinergic activity, and anticonvulsants, which may also stabilize mood, are effective in neuropathic pain. Other medications have limited but important pharmacotherapeutic roles.

Antidepressant augmentation and combinations

A significant proportion of patients with MDD are treatment resistant or only partial responders to adequate therapy with a single agent. In this situation, one must consider augmentation with another agent. Lithium and thyroid augmentation have been investigated for many years. In a meta-analysis of double-blind studies involving augmentation with lithium or placebo after nonresponse to conventional antidepressants, lithium augmentation was concluded to be the first-line therapy for depressed patients who failed to respond to monotherapy. One important study reported no significant difference in response rates between T3 and lithium as augmentation agents in patients who had failed to respond to TCAs. Very few controlled, double-blind trials show consistently positive results for the other augmentation strategies, although some open-labeled trials and case reports are promising. Additional placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are needed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of all of these agents, especially in combination with the newer classes of antidepressants.

Carbamazepine-nefazodone interaction in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone and carbamazepine was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received nefazodone 200 mg twice daily for 5 days, and blood sample collection was performed on day 5 for 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis. A 4-day wash-out phase then followed from days 6 to 9. Carbamazepine 200 mg was administered once daily from days 10 to 12, and then 200 mg was given twice daily from days 13 to 44. A 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 38. Nefazodone 200 mg twice daily was added to the dosing regimen from days 40 to 44, and a subsequent 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 44. Coadministration of nefazodone increased steady-state plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of carbamazepine from 60.77 (+/-8.44) to 74.98 (+/-12.88) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.001) and decreased the active carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide metabolite AUC concentration from 7.10 (+/-1.16) to 5.71 (+/-0.52) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.005). During the combination, the steady-state AUC of nefazodone decreased from 7,326 (+/-3,768) to 542 (+/-191) ng x hr/mL, and the AUCs of its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine, and triazoledione) decreased significantly as well (p < 0.001). Coadministration of nefazodone 200 mg twice daily and carbamazepine 200 mg twice daily was found to be safe and well tolerated; however, the increased plasma exposure to carbamazepine may warrant monitoring of plasma carbamazepine concentrations with the combination. However, higher doses (>400 mg/day) of carbamazepine could yield more extensive induction, affecting tolerability of the combination. No change in the initial nefazodone dose is necessary, and subsequent dose adjustments should be made on the basis of clinical effects; however, the repercussion of carbamazepine induction of nefazodone metabolism on the antidepressant efficacy has yet to be studied.

Potentiation of antidepressants with lithium or carbamazepine in treatment-resistant depression

Fifty-nine patients with treatment-resistant depression were randomly allocated an addition of either lithium (Li; 31 patients) or carbamazepine (CBZ; 28 patients) to ongoing antidepressant treatment. The therapeutic efficacy of both strategies, assessed after 28 days, was not significantly different. In the Li group, clinical improvement significantly correlated with decrease in thyroxine concentration. Also, a decrease in cortisol level in Li responders and an increase in nonresponders was observed, suggesting a regulatory effect of Li on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. CBZ responders had lower baseline severity of depression than CBZ nonresponders and clinical improvement significantly correlated with increase in erythrocyte ATPase activity in the CBZ group.

Risk of adverse events with the use of augmentation therapy for the treatment of resistant depression

Augmentation therapy is used for those situations where a patient's depression is either treatment-resistant, or partially and/or insufficiently responsive to treatment. It also may be used to attempt to induce a more rapid treatment response. Using drugs together may increase the risk of adverse effects, through potentiation of existing adverse effects or alterations in plasma concentrations of the drug. It is important that clinicians are aware of potential risks of augmentation therapy. Lithium augmentation of a tricyclic antidepressant is relatively well tolerated and the dangers are no greater than using these medications on their own. There are also no reports of serious adverse events when lithium is added to a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. With lithium augmentation of selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy there have been case reports of the development of a central serotonin syndrome, and thus caution must exercised. A serious concern when using a tricyclic antidepressant to augment an SSRI is the effect of the SSRI on the cytochrome P450 system and the resulting significant increase in tricyclic antidepressant blood concentrations. Augmentation with thyroid hormones appears to be well tolerated and effective. Case reports and open studies indicate that augmentation with buspirone and the psychostimulants, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium) is effective and results in minimal adverse effects. However, there is no empirical evidence supporting these results. Recent work supports the tolerability and efficacy of pindolol augmentation. Considerable caution should be exercised when combining psychotropic drugs. The practitioner should only do so with a full knowledge of the compounds involved and their pharmacological properties.

Effects of carbamazepine on hippocampal serotonergic system

To establish the mechanism of action of the antiepileptic and psychotropic effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), its effects on serotonin (5-HT) transmission, metabolism and re-uptake activity in the rat hippocampus were studied. After acute and chronic administrations of 25 mg/kg CBZ, the plasma concentration of CBZ was found to be within the therapeutic range, whereas both acute and chronic administrations of 50 and 100 mg/kg CBZ resulted in a supratherapeutic plasma concentration. Acute administration of the therapeutic dose of CBZ resulted in an increase in the hippocampal extracellular and total level of 5-HT, its metabolite, 5-hydroxydoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and its precursor, 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP). The acute administration of 50 mg/kg CBZ resulted in an increase in the hippocampal levels of extracellular 5-HT and 5-HIAA as well as in the total levels of 5-HTP, whereas hippocampal levels of extracellular 5-HTP, total 5-HT and 5-HIAA remained unaffected. CBZ at a dose of 100 mg/kg decreased the levels of all of these substances. After chronic administration, 25 mg/kg/day CBZ increased hippocampal total levels of 5-HT, 5-HTP and 5-HIAA, whereas 100 mg/kg/day CBZ decreased all of these total levels. CBZ at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day decreased total levels of 5-HT, however neither total levels of 5-HIAA nor 5-HTP were affected. Both therapeutic and supratherapeutic plasma concentrations of CBZ inhibited 5-HTP accumulation, and did not affect 5-HT re-uptake activity in vitro. These results suggest that a therapeutic concentration of CBZ enhances 5-HT turnover and transmission, whereas a supratherapeutic concentration of CBZ inhibits 5-HT turnover and transmission without affecting 5-HT re-uptake activity. These effects of CBZ on serotonergic systems may be, at least partially, involved in the mechanisms of action of CBZ.

A review of the use of augmentation therapy for the treatment of resistant depression: implications for the clinician

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the literature on augmentation therapy in resistant depression in order to assist the clinician to make a reasoned choice. Augmentation therapy is defined as the addition of a second agent to an existing antidepressant regimen with the aim of achieving improved clinical response.

METHOD

The available literature which related specifically to currently popular augmentation strategies in treatment resistant depression for the past 20 years was examined. The scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of these regimens and their safety was reviewed.

RESULTS

Considerable research on lithium augmentation has been undertaken, and on triiodothyronine augmentation to a lesser degree. A number of other drugs have been trialed as augmentation agents with claims of success; however, most of the evidence supporting these agents is anecdotal and in the form of case reports. There are very few well-performed double-blind placebo-controlled studies of augmentation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of possible complex pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions, augmentation therapy is not without its potential complications. Lithium augmentation of tricyclic antidepressants can be recommended as a safe and effective strategy and there is a body of scientific evidence supporting the addition of T3 as an effective augmentation agent. Recent research with pindolol augmentation of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is encouraging, but these findings require replication. There is no empirical evidence supporting buspirone, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, methylphenidate or amphetamine as effective augmentation agents, or that adding a tricyclic to a SSRI has usefulness in relieving depressive symptoms. There is a need for considerable research in this area, with more prospective well-controlled placebo studies.

Management of treatment-resistant unipolar and chronically depressed patients

The majority of depressed patients presenting as treatment refractory will respond to a properly chosen new medication or to a previous agent administered correctly. Drug combinations are less frequently required than current practice would indicate, and their usage depends at present more on clinical experience than scientific fact. Educating the patient about the series of options available, and the sequence in which they will be undertaken, and imbuing the enterprise with hopeful optimism are essential ingredients to ultimate success.