Effects of bezafibrate on receptor-mediated and receptor-independent low density lipoprotein catabolism in type II hyperlipoproteinaemic subjects

The effect of PPAR-alpha agonism on apolipoprotein metabolism in humans

Metabolic syndrome, diabetes and obesity are frequently associated with hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia and low HDL levels, a phenotype known as atherogenic dyslipidemia. Atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia are frequently treated with fibric acid derivatives which activate the nuclear receptor PPAR-alpha leading to reduce plasma triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol levels. The mechanism by which activation of PPAR-alpha with fibrates improves the plasma lipid profile in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia has been examined in several small studies measuring lipoprotein kinetics. The results of these studies indicate that the changes in lipoprotein metabolism observed in response to fibrate treatment vary according to lipoprotein phenotype. In general, fibrates act to reduce VLDL apoB-100 through enhanced fractional catabolism (clearance) of VLDL apoB-100 with additional effects on reducing VLDL apoB-100 production. LDL apoB-100 levels generally decrease in response to fibrates due to increased LDL fractional catabolism except in those patients with high to very high plasma triglyceride levels (>400mg/dL). Fibrates also increase HDL apoA-I and apoA-II levels by enhancing apoA-I and apoA-II production, although this is partially counteracted by increasing fractional catabolism of these apolipoproteins. The potent and specific PPAR-alpha agonist LY518674, reduced VLDL apoB-100 levels through enhanced fractional catabolism similar to what is seen with fibrates. In contrast to fibrates, LY518674 did not change HDL apoA-I levels in response to due to an increased turnover of apoA-I where an increased fractional catabolic rate entirely counteracted the increase in apoA-I production. The changes in apoB metabolism in response to PPAR-alpha activation with fibrates and specific PPAR-alpha agonists would be expected to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the benefit of the enhanced turnover of HDL apoA-I in response to PPAR-alpha activation remains to be determined.

Chemistory of Fibrates

Since the description of the synthetic chemical clofibrate in 1962, various derivatives of fibrates with a diversity of chemical structures have been developed. Several of these are used clinically to treat dyslipidemia because they are generally effective in lowering elevated plasma triglycerides and cholesterol. Studies suggest that several biochemical mechanisms underlie fibrate-mediated modulation of lipoprotein and related metabolites. These mechanisms are: 1) induced lipoprotein lipolysis; 2) induced hepatic fatty acid uptake and reduced hepatic triglyceride formation; 3) amplified removal of low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles; 4) reduced neutral lipid (cholesteryl ester and triglyceride) exchange between very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) resulting from decreased plasma levels of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL); and 5) increased HDL production and stimulation of reverse cholesterol transport. Recent studies of structure-based inhibitor design strategy revealed that an independent enzyme, aldose reductase (AR), is a target of fibrate activity, an additional biochemical mechanism. AR has been implicated as a major player in the development of diabetes and diabetic complications because of its ability to catalyze the conversion of glucose to sorbitol. This article discusses various targets of fibrate action, biochemical pathways and commonalities in potential molecular interactions.

Effects of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate on apoB-100 and apoA-I kinetics in mixed hyperlipidemia

Kinetics of apo B and apo AI were assessed in 8 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia at baseline and after 8 weeks of atorvastatin 80 mg q.d. and micronised fenofibrate 200 mg q.d. in a cross-over study. Both increased hepatic production and decreased catabolism of VLDL accounted for elevated cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations at baseline. Atorvastatin significantly decreased triglyceride, total, VLDL and LDL cholesterol and apo B concentrations (-65%, -36%, -57%, -40% and -33%, respectively, P<0.05). Kinetic analysis revealed that atorvastatin stimulated the catabolism of apo B containing lipoproteins, enhanced the delipidation of VLDL1 and decreased VLDL1 production. Fenofibrate lowered triglycerides and VLDL cholesterol (-57% and -64%, respectively, P<0.05) due to enhanced delipidation of VLDL1 and VLDL2 and increased VLDL1 catabolism. Changes of HDL particle composition accounted for the increase of HDL cholesterol during atorvastatin and fenofibrate (18% and 23%, P<0.01). Only fenofibrate increased apo AI concentrations through enhanced apo AI synthesis (45%, P<0.05). We conclude that atorvastatin exerts additional beneficial effects on the metabolism of apo B containing lipoproteins unrelated to an increase in LDL receptor activity. Fenofibrate but not atorvastatin increases apo AI production and plasma turnover.

Disappearance of intraglomerular lipoprotein thrombi and marked improvement of nephrotic syndrome by bezafibrate treatment in a patient with lipoprotein glomerulopathy

Lipoprotein glomerulopathy (LPG) is a hereditary disorder characterized by intraglomerular lipoprotein thrombi and increased serum apolipoprotein (apo) E. Patients with LPG usually manifest with nephrotic syndrome, and some progress to renal failure; however, no effective therapeutic regimen has been established for this disease. We experienced a patient with LPG for whom bezafibrate treatment was very effective. This 30-year-old Japanese woman had nephrotic syndrome and type III hyperlipoproteinemia. Renal biopsy showed markedly dilated capillary lumina containing massive lipoprotein thrombi. Plasma apo E concentration was elevated to twice that of normal controls. She was proved to be a heterozygote of apo E2 Kyoto (Arg25Cys). After 2 years treatment with bezafibrate (400 mg/day), her plasma albumin gradually increased from 2.1 to 4.0 mg/dl, and intraglomerular lipoprotein thrombi disappeared almost completely. Bezafibrate decreased plasma apo E and dramatically increased high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. The decrease in apo E was observed mainly in the pre-beta-fraction, not in the alpha fraction. Lipidological analyses of our patient suggest that the origin her lipoprotein thrombi may be mainly from pre-beta-lipoproteins and that HDL might be involved in resolving lipoprotein thrombi. Our case suggests that administration of fibrates such as bezafibrate may be a novel therapeutic strategy for resolving intraglomerular thrombi and improving nephrotic syndrome in patients with LPG.

Differential regulation of lipoprotein kinetics by atorvastatin and fenofibrate in subjects with the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is characterized by insulin resistance and abnormal apolipoprotein AI (apoAI) and apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) metabolism that may collectively accelerate atherosclerosis. The effects of atorvastatin (40 mg/day) and micronised fenofibrate (200 mg/day) on the kinetics of apoAI and apoB were investigated in a controlled cross-over trial of 11 dyslipidemic men with the metabolic syndrome. ApoAI and apoB kinetics were studied following intravenous d(3)-leucine administration using gas-chromatography mass spectrometry with data analyzed by compartmental modeling. Compared with placebo, atorvastatin significantly decreased (P < 0.001) plasma concentrations of cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, VLDL apoB, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) apoB, and LDL apoB. Fenofibrate significantly decreased (P < 0.001) plasma triglyceride and VLDL apoB and elevated HDL(2) cholesterol (P < 0.001), HDL(3) cholesterol (P < 0.01), apoAI (P = 0.01), and apoAII (P < 0.001) concentrations, but it did not significantly alter LDL cholesterol. Atorvastatin significantly increased (P < 0.002) the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL apoB, IDL apoB, and LDL apoB but did not affect the production of apoB in any lipoprotein fraction or in the turnover of apoAI. Fenofibrate significantly increased (P < 0.01) the FCR of VLDL, IDL, and LDL apoB but did not affect the production of VLDL apoB. Relative to placebo and atorvastatin, fenofibrate significantly increased the production (P < 0.001) and FCR (P = 0.016) of apoAI. Both agents significantly lowered plasma triglycerides and apoCIII concentrations, but only atorvastatin significantly lowered (P < 0.001) plasma cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Neither treatment altered insulin resistance. In conclusion, these differential effects of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on apoAI and apoB kinetics support the use of combination therapy for optimally regulating dyslipoproteinemia in the metabolic syndrome.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-hyperlipidemic agent fenofibrate

We evaluated the economic efficiency as well as the clinical effectiveness on serum lipid levels of a change in drug therapy from bezafibrate or a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor to fenofibrate. Subjects were 26 outpatients suffering from type IIb or type IV hyperlipidemia who visited our hospital between October 2000 and January 2001. Medication doses, and serum lipid levels were recorded prior to the change to fenofibrate and at 6 months after the change. Medical costs were also calculated at the same time points. A significant reduction in medical costs of 14.9% was observed following the change to fenofibrate. Serum lipid levels were not significantly different, although an increase in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) was observed in patients changing from the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. The actual drug costs were reduced by 21.8% in the bezafibrate to fenofibrate group and by 23.7% in the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor to fenofibrate group. Although the drug costs of changing to fenofibrate decreased significantly, other costs remained almost unchanged.

Effects of bezafibrate and simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia resistant to hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES

Estrogen replacement therapy has favorable effects on serum lipoprotein levels in postmenopausal women with hypercholesterolemia. However, there are some patients who fail to respond to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to lower the serum cholesterol level. In these cases, a conventional lipid-lowering therapy will be applied in addition to HRT, while the effects of these drugs are not well understood. In this study, we studied the effects of simvastatin and bezafibrate administered in addition to HRT.

METHODS

Patients who were hypercholesterolemic even after HRT were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: HRT only (control group, n=10), HRT+simvastatin (10 mg/day, n=10), or HRT+bezafibrate (400 mg/day, n=10). Serum lipids and lipoprotein levels were measured throughout 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The serum triglyceride levels were decreased by 24+/-28 and 38+/-13% in the HRT+simvastatin and HRT+bezafibrate groups, respectively. HRT+simvastatin decreased the total cholesterol (21+/-10%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (28+/-12%) levels without affecting the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level, while HRT+bezafibrate increased the HDL-C level (12+/-11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with simvastatin or bezafibrate in addition to HRT should be considered in cases of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemia in which HRT alone fails to lower the serum lipoprotein levels.

Combined effects of probucol and benzafibrate on lipoprotein metabolism and liver cholesteryl ester transfer protein mRNA in cholesterol-fed rabbits

Probucol decreases and bezafibrate increases plasma high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in humans. This study was performed to determine whether the HDL-C-lowering effects of probucol could be reversed by treatment with bezafibrate in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Forty-nine normolipidemic Japanese White rabbits were divided into 5 groups [group 1: normal chow; group 2: 0.2% cholesterol (Ch) diet; group 3: 0.2% Ch and 1% probucol diet; group 4: 0.2% Ch and 1% bezafibrate diet; group 5: 0.2% Ch and 1% probucol plus 1% bezafibrate diet] and treated for 8 weeks. Plasma lipids, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity in the lipoprotein-deficient plasma fraction, CETP mRNA in liver tissue and plasma drug concentrations were investigated. Serum total cholesterol (TC) increased after the rabbits in groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 were fed Ch, but overall, no significant differences were observed in serum TC and triglyceride (TG) among these groups. Serum HDL-C levels increased (p<0.01) in the bezafibrate-treated group, but a significant (p<0.05) reduction in HDL-C was observed in both the Ch + probucol (group 3) and Ch + probucol plus bezafibrate (group 5) groups; no significant difference was observed between groups 3 and 5. Significant correlation (p<0.01) was found between serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and plasma probucol concentrations in groups 3 and 5, but no correlation was found between plasma concentrations of probucol/bezafibrate and serum HDL-C levels. CETP activity in the lipoprotein-deficient plasma fraction increased in the Ch-, Ch + probucol-, and Ch + probucol and bezafibrate-fed groups (groups 2, 3 and 5, respectively), whereas a significant reduction in this activity was observed in the Ch + bezafibrate-fed group (group 4). An analysis of covariance showed that the CETP activity responded more sensitively to drug treatment than did the serum HDL-C level. CETP mRNA in liver tissue was assessed by Northern blotting at 8 weeks, but no changes were observed among the 5 groups. Probucol decreased and bezafibrate increased serum HDL-C levels, through CETP activity without affecting liver CETP mRNA levels, and the decrease in HDL-C levels produced by probucol could not be reversed by bezafibrate.

Influence of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on bezafibrate treatment response in dyslipidemic patients

To examine the significance of apolipoprotein E (apo E) polymorphism in the hypolipidemic effect of bezafibrate, we evaluated the influence of different apo E phenotypes on serum lipid response to bezafibrate treatment in 58 dyslipidemic patients with WHO phenotypes of IIb, IV, or isolated hypo HDL cholesterolemia. Patients were categorized into one of three groups according to apo E phenotypes of E2 (E2/3, n=5), E3 (E3/3, n=35), and E4 (E3/4 and E4/4, n=18). After 3 months daily administration of 400 mg bezafibrate, serum total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) levels changed on average in the E3 group [-8.0%; p<0.05 and +1.1%; not significant (ns), respectively], the E2 group (-18.3%; p<0.005 and -26.9%; p<0.05, respectively) and the E4 group (+3.8%; ns and +10.1%; ns, respectively). The changes in TC and LDLC levels in the E4 group was significantly less effective compared with those in the E3 (p<0.05) and E2 groups (p<0.01). Bezafibrate induced a reduction in serum triglyceride (TG) levels in the E3 group (-50.1%; p<0.0001), the E2 group (-46.9%; p<0.05) and the E4 group (-44.8%; p<0.005). An increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) levels was also observed in the E3 group (+27.5%; p<0.0001), the E2 group (+35.0%; ns) and the E4 group (+38.8%; p<0.005). However, there was no significant difference in the changes of TG and HDLC levels between the groups. These results suggest an important role of apo E polymorphism in modulating serum lipid response to bezafibrate, and phenotyping of apo E helps predict the therapeutic effect of bezafibrate treatment.

Evidence based approach for the management of mixed hyperlipidaemia

There is now a large body of evidence from multiple clinical trials confirming that lowering plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol results in a clinically significant reduction in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. These include the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study and the West of Scotland Study. However, further analyses of the Helsinki Heart Study (HHS) have provided additional detail on the relationship between other lipid changes and incidence of CHD. In the HHS, the reduction of CHD events was related not only to the LDL-cholesterol lowering ability of the drug used, but also to its HDL-cholesterol raising and triglyceride lowering effects. Furthermore, a recent comparison of the levels of atheroma regression associated with different drug classes reveals that, while statins produce much greater changes in total and LDL-cholesterol, fibrates have the most marked effect on coronary artery minimum lumen diameter changes. In practice, the overall CHD risk of patients should be reduced by a co-ordinated approach to management of all the correctable risk factors. As part of this approach, the lipid profile should be assessed and normalised initially through the instigation of lifestyle changes, and if necessary, the adjunctive use of lipid regulating drugs. While the lowering of LDL-cholesterol is clearly important, the significance of lowering plasma triglyceride should not be overlooked.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fibric acid derivatives (fibrates)

Beginning with the description of clofibrate in 1962, derivatives of fibric acid (fibrates) have been used clinically to treat dyslipidaemias. Subsequently, gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate and long-acting forms of gemfibrozil, fenofibrate and bezafibrate have been developed. Clinically, this class of drugs appears to be most useful in lipoprotein disorders characterised by elevations of very low density lipoprotein and plasma triglycerides, which are often accompanied by reductions in high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels. The principal effects are a reduction in triglyceride and increase in HDL levels, with increases in the activity of hepatic lipase and lipoprotein lipase. There is some reduction of low density lipoprotein (LDL), lipoprotein (a), fibrinogen and uric acid. As a class, these drugs are generally well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract (immediate-acting fenofibrate being the exception) and display a high degree of binding to albumin. Fibrates are metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. All members of this class are primarily excreted via the kidneys and display some increase in plasma half-life in individuals with severe renal impairment. The long-acting forms of gemfibrozil and bezafibrate have pharmacokinetic properties similar to those of their immediate-acting parent compounds. The long-acting form of fenofibrate, produced by the process of micronisation, has increased oral bioavailability with less variability in absorption compared with the immediate-acting form of fenofibrate. Drug interactions are seen with other drugs that share a high degree of binding to albumin or are metabolised by CYP3A4. Clinically the most important and most commonly reported drug interactions are with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin), warfarin, cyclosporin and oral hypoglycaemic agents [including metformin, tolbutamide and glibenclamide (glyburide)]. The main potential for drug interactions is with drugs or compounds that are metabolised by or affect CYP3A4, including imidazoles, grapefruit juice, erythromycin, mibefradil and others.

Upregulation of low density lipoprotein receptor by gemfibrozil, a hypolipidemic agent, in human hepatoma cells through stabilization of mRNA transcripts

Gemfibrozil reduces the plasmal levels of cholesterol and triglyceride in patients with hyperlipidemia by a mechanism that is not well understood. The present study evaluated the effect of gemfibrozil on the LDL receptor in human hepatoma cells compared with that of pravastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Exposure to gemfibrozil, 40 mumol/L, for 3 days increased the binding of 125I-LDL to the surface of three lines of human hepatoma cell, HepG2, HuH7, and HLE by 1.5- to 2.0-fold. Similar findings were observed with pravastatin. Scatchard analysis with 125I-LDL indicated an increased number of LDL receptors on the cell surface of HepG2 cells when treated with gemfibrozil and pravastatin. However, the gemfibrozil-treated cells exhibited no increase in the binding of 125I-epidermal growth factor (EGF). Gemfibrozil increased the levels of LDL receptor mRNA and protein in HepG2 cells. The increase in LDL receptor activity induced by pravastatin was abolished by concomitant administration of mevalonic acid, 770 mumol/L. This effect was not seen with gemfibrozil, suggesting the mechanism differs for the two lipid-lowering drugs. To determine whether this increase in mRNA was due to transcriptional activation, we prepared HepG2 cells transfected with an LDL receptor promoter-reporter construct that contained a sterol regulatory element. The expression of LDL receptor regulated by the sterol regulatory element was increased by pravastatin, but not by gemfibrozil. We evaluated the stability of the mRNA in the presence of actinomycin D to explain the increase in the LDL receptor mRNA. Gemfibrozil prolonged the half-life of the mRNA for LDL receptor but not that for the EGF receptor. Stabilization of the LDL receptor mRNA is suggested to be the novel mode of action of gemfibrozil.

The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARS) and their effects on lipid metabolism and adipocyte differentiation

The three types of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR), alpha, beta (or delta), and gamma, each with a specific tissue distribution, compose a subfamily of the nuclear hormone receptor gene family. Although peroxisome proliferators, including fibrates and fatty acids, activate the transcriptional activity of these receptors, only prostaglandin J2 derivatives have been identified as natural ligands of the PPAR gamma subtype, which also binds thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agents with high affinity. Activated PPARs heterodimerize with RXR and alter the transcription of target genes after binding to specific response elements or PPREs, consisting of a direct repeat of the nuclear receptor hexameric DNA core recognition motif spaced by one nucleotide. The different PPARs can be considered key messengers responsible for the translation of nutritional, pharmacological and metabolic stimuli into changes in the expression of genes, more specifically those genes involved in lipid metabolism. PPAR alpha is involved in stimulating beta-oxidation of fatty acids. In rodents, a PPAR alpha-mediated change in the expression of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism lies at the basis of the phenomenon of peroxisome proliferation, a pleiotropic cellular response, mainly limited to liver and kidney and which can lead to hepatocarcinogenesis. In addition to their role in peroxisome proliferation in rodents, PPAR is also involved in the control of HDL cholesterol levels by fibrates and fatty acids in rodents and humans. This effect is, at least partially, based on a PPAR-mediated transcriptional regulation of the major HDL apolipoproteins, apo A-I and apo A-II. The hypotriglyceridemic action of fibrates and fatty acids also involves PPARs and can be summarized as follows: (1) an increased lipolysis and clearance of remnant particles, due to changes in LPL and apo C-III levels, (2) a stimulation of cellular fatty acid uptake and their conversion to acyl-CoA derivatives by the induction of FAT, FATP and ACS activity, (3) an induction of fatty acid beta-oxidation pathways, (4) a reduction in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis, and finally (5) a decrease in VLDL production. Hence, both enhanced catabolism of triglyceride-rich particles as well as reduced secretion of VLDL particles are mechanisms that contribute to the hypolipidemic effect of fibrates and FFAs. Whereas for PPAR beta no function so far has been identified, PPAR gamma triggers adipocyte differentiation by inducing the expression of several genes critical for adipogenesis.

Stimulation of decreased lipoprotein lipase activity in the tumor-bearing state by the antihyperlipidemic drug bezafibrate

The activity of lipoprotein lipase (LPL), a key regulatory enzyme for triglyceride (TG) clearance from plasma, is reported to decrease as the tumor burden increases in tumor-bearing animals and patients with lung cancer; therefore, it is believed to play a key role in inducing cancer cachexia. We attempted to reverse cancer cachexia by stimulating LPL activity with an antihypertriglyceridemic drug, bezafibrate. Bezafibrate, which reduces circulating TG levels by stimulating tissue LPL activity, has been used clinically in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Bezafibrate was administered subcutaneously to 24 rats at a dose of 30 mg/kg per day from the 8th day after tumor inoculation with methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma until they were killed on either the 25th or 33rd day, at the precachectic and cachectic stages, respectively. The animals were divided into the following three groups: treated tumor-bearing rats (treated TBR group), untreated TBRs (untreated TBR group), and a control (CTR) group. LPL activities in both the adipose tissue and cardiac muscle were measured by the method of Nilsson-Ehle and Schotz. Both TG and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) became elevated as the size of the tumor increased in the TBRs; however, this increment was quantitatively less in the treated TBR group than in the untreated TBR group. The administration of bezafibrate resulted in preservation of the epididymal fat pad mass at the cachectic stage. A significant decrease in LPL activity in the epididymal fat was observed in the untreated TBR group at the cachectic stage, but this was prevented in the treated TBR group, the values being 2.97 +/- 1.37 U/whole tissue in the untreated TBR group, 4.03 +/- 1.11 in the treated TBR group, and 10.15 +/- 6.61 in the CTR group. Thus, tumor growth in the treated TBR group at the cachectic stage was significantly suppressed compared with that of the untreated TBR group. These results suggest that the decreased LPL activity that occurs in the tumor-bearing state can be stimulated by the antihyperlipidemic drug bezafibrate, which may modulate some of the tumor-bearing state can be stimulated by the antihyperlipidemic drug bezafibrate, which may modulate some of the tumor-induced metabolic alterations leading to cancer cachexia.

Effect of gemfibrozil treatment in hypercholesterolemia on low density lipoprotein (LDL) subclass distribution and LDL-cell interaction

Gemfibrozil, a widely used fibric acid derivative, corrects hypercholesterolemia in a non-negligible fraction of patients. To investigate the mechanism of the cholesterol-lowering activity of fibric acids, a study was performed in 12 type IIa hyperlipidemic patients treated with gemfibrozil for 12 weeks. Changes in low density lipoprotein (LDL) structure and composition, agonist capacity of LDL against the LDL-receptor in human skin fibroblasts, LDL-receptor activity in mononuclear cells, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, were evaluated. Plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels decreased by 17% and 20% after 12 weeks of treatment, the reduction being directly correlated with the baseline levels (r = 0.75 and 0.78, respectively). The mean LDL diameter increased significantly, from 25.5 to 26.1 nm, while the relative content of small LDL particles (< 25.1 nm) increased from 23.4% to 32.8% of total LDL. Neither the apolipoprotein (apo) B secondary structure nor the affinity of LDL for the LDL-receptor of fibroblasts were affected. The LDL-receptor activity in patients' mononuclear cells increased 3-fold, the rise being unrelated to the plasma cholesterol reduction. LCAT activity did not change, while CETP activity was reduced by 25% (P = 0.13) after treatment. These findings indicate that gemfibrozil causes significant changes in LDL structure that do not, however, affect the LDL interaction with peripheral cells.

Influence of bezafibrate on hepatic cholesterol metabolism in gallstone patients: reduced activity of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase

Bezafibrate is a hypolipidemic fibric acid derivative known to induce cholesterol supersaturation of bile. To characterize its effects on hepatic cholesterol metabolism, 31 normolipidemic, normal-weight patients with gallstones undergoing cholecystectomy were studied. Eleven patients (5 men) were randomized to treatment with bezafibrate, 200 mg three times daily for 4 weeks before operation; the remaining 20 patients (5 men) served as nontreatment controls. At operation, a liver biopsy specimen was obtained under standardized conditions and several important parameters of cholesterol metabolism were assayed. Bezafibrate treatment lowered total plasma cholesterol and triglycerides 30% and 37%, respectively. The hepatic cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase activity was reduced by approximately 60% in the bezafibrate treated patients compared with the controls, whereas the acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) activity was similar in the two groups. The total 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase activity was increased twofold in the treated patients, whereas the active enzyme remained about the same as in the controls. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor binding activity was unaffected by the treatment. Bezafibrate treatment significantly reduces cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase activity, and it is suggested that this may play an important role for the development of supersaturated bile during such therapy.

The effects of lipid lowering drugs on metabolic control and lipoprotein composition in type 2 diabetic patients with mild hyperlipidaemia

Patients with Type 2 diabetes are at increased risk from macrovascular disease whether or not they are hyperlipidaemic. Several factors may contribute to this increased risk including abnormalities of lipoprotein composition. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of lipid lowering drugs on lipoprotein composition (lipoprotein fractions were separated by sequential flotation ultracentrifugation) and insulin sensitivity (measured by a modified Harano technique) in 44 patients with mild hyperlipidaemia. All patients had total cholesterol concentrations between 5.2 and 6.5 mmol l-1 and total triglyceride concentrations < 3.0 mmol l-1, and were randomized by minimization to receive treatment for 12 weeks with bezafibrate, acipimox, simvastatin or placebo. Total cholesterol concentrations were decreased by simvastatin, 5.7 +/- 0.4 to 3.7 +/- 0.6 mmol l-1 (p < 0.05), due mainly to reduced LDL-cholesterol levels (-1.25 mmol l-1; p < 0.05), and bezafibrate 5.7 +/- 0.6 to 4.6 +/- 0.4 mmol l-1 (p < 0.05). The LDL:HDL-cholesterol ratio was reduced in the simvastatin group 2.0 +/- 0.5 to 1.2 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.005). There was no effect of the drugs on glycated haemoglobin or insulin sensitivity. In conclusion bezafibrate and simvastatin improve the lipid profile in Type 2 diabetic patients without adversely affecting diabetic control.

Effects of ciprofibrate on LDL metabolism in man

This study examined the effects of ciprofibrate therapy (100 mg/day) on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and low density lipoprotein (LDL) kinetic heterogeneity in moderately hypercholesterolaemic subjects. The drug lowered plasma triglyceride and cholesterol by 41% and 17%, respectively. Very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol fell by 38%, LDL cholesterol fell by 22%, while the content of the lipid in high density lipoprotein (HDL) increased by 11%. LDL structural and metabolic heterogeneity were assessed before and during therapy in eight subjects. Density gradient centrifugation was used to fractionate LDL into three species. LDL-I, the least dense, was not affected by therapy whereas LDL-II and LDL-III were decreased by 28% (P < 0.01) and 31% (N.S.). Baseline turnover studies revealed that LDL catabolism was subnormal and this was the cause of the raised cholesterol in these subjects. Ciprofibrate therapy increased the apoLDL fractional catabolic rate (FCR) by 19%, principally by inducing a 38% enhancement (P < 0.03) in apoLDL removal by the receptor pathway. ApoLDL kinetics exhibited metabolic heterogeneity both before and during drug therapy. Analysis of plasma decay curves for the LDL tracer and urinary excretion data indicated that the lipoprotein comprised two metabolically distinct species, one with an FCR of about 0.50 pools/day (Pool A), the other with an FCR of about 0.18 pools/day (Pool B). Drug therapy decreased synthesis of and hence reduced the plasma mass of apoLDL in the slow metabolised pool B. This perturbation in synthesis was linked to the change in plasma triglyceride concentration. The resultant reduced proportion of pool B vs. pool A material accounted for the observed promotion of LDL receptor-mediated clearance. Ciprofibrate, therefore, produced beneficial changes in the plasma levels of VLDL, LDL and HDL and in the metabolism of LDL.

Treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: fluvastatin versus bezafibrate

The effects of fluvastatin and bezafibrate on lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins (apo) were investigated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. After 8 weeks of strictly controlled (computer-based assessment) dietary stabilization, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > or = 160 mg/dL; triglycerides < or = 300 mg/dL) were enrolled into a 6-week placebo phase. Altogether, 131 patients were randomized to receive either fluvastatin at 40 mg once daily (n = 64; mean age 53 years) or bezafibrate at 400 mg once daily (n = 67; mean age 52 years) for 12 weeks. Compliance with the diet was monitored (3-day food records) after 6 and 12 weeks. Fluvastatin led to significant reductions in LDL-C (-23%), total cholesterol (-17%), LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (-24%) and apo B (-19%). Fluvastatin significantly increased LpA-I (+8%) and apo E (+20%). Bezafibrate produced significant reductions in LDL-C (-17%), total cholesterol (-13%), LDL-C/HDL-C (-24%), triglycerides (-28%), apo B (-15%), and LpA-I (-10%) and significantly increased HDL-C (+12%), apo A-I (+9%), apo A-II (+30%), apo E (+14%), and Lp(a) (+3%). No clinically notable increases in levels of liver enzymes or creatine phosphokinase were observed with either treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. There was a low incidence of adverse events that tended to be mild and included headache, muscular pain, angina, and dyspepsia. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups, and no significant differences in dietary behavior were observed. In conclusion, fluvastatin is a well tolerated 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. Effects of fluvastatin on LpA-I occur irrespective of changes in HDL-C.

Drug treatment of dyslipoproteinemia

This article has focused on the appropriate indications for lipid-lowering drugs in adult patients with different lipoprotein disorders, which we have divided into primary hypercholesterolemia, combined hyperlipidemia,and hypertriglyceridemia. The mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile of the major drugs have been reviewed, and based on this information, we have presented our views on the appropriate drugs of first choice and appropriate second-choice agents for treatment of adult patients with different dyslipidemias. The rationale for the use of hypolipidemic drugs is strongest in patients with hyperlipidemia who concurrently have evidence for coronary or peripheral vascular disease, in whom the goal of secondary prevention is to retard further progression of atherosclerosis and potentially induce some regression, whereas in selected high-risk patients without evidence of atherosclerosis, the goals of therapy are to prevent the premature development of CAD or, in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, prevent the adverse sequelae of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and potentially pancreatitis. We have focused on the use of hypolipidemic drugs in adult patients, and the guidelines discussed are not appropriate for use in children with hyperlipidemia, in whom drug therapy should be undertaken selectively and in consultation with a lipid specialist. Many areas of controversy in the use of lipid-lowering drugs remain to be addressed by future studies; these include the use of lipid-lowering drugs in patients with secondary causes of hyperlipidemia (e.g., the nephrotic syndrome), the use of lipid-lowering drugs in women, and recommendations for drug therapy in older patients.

Fenofibrate and LDL metabolic heterogeneity in hypercholesterolemia

Metabolic heterogeneity in low density lipoprotein (LDL) may be detected by examination of the daily urinary excretion rate of radioactivity after injection of trace-labeled lipoprotein. Two distinct pools are observed within LDL. The first (pool A) is cleared rapidly from the plasma, whereas the second (pool B) is catabolized more slowly. In the present study we examined LDL metabolism in seven hypercholesterolemic subjects (six women and one man) before and during fenofibrate therapy. Comparison with normocholesterolemic individuals showed that the pretreatment high LDL levels in the hypercholesterolemic subjects resulted from an accumulation of apoprotein-LDL (apo-LDL) mass in pool B (2,077 +/- 174 mg versus 787 +/- 70 mg in normal subjects, p < 0.002). Pool A apo-LDL was present at normal levels (approximately 1,000 mg), although its fractional catabolic rate was reduced (0.39 +/- 0.06 versus 0.61 +/- 0.03 pool/day in normal subjects, p < 0.01). Fenofibrate therapy (100 mg t.i.d. for 8 weeks) produced substantial reductions in plasma cholesterol (29%; p < 0.001), triglycerides (36%; p < 0.001), and LDL cholesterol (30%; p < 0.001). The latter was associated with a 30% decrease in circulating apo-LDL mass (2,312 +/- 200 mg versus 3,279 +/- 264 mg before treatment, p < 0.005). This resulted from a combination of two effects. First, although overall LDL apoprotein B production did not change, there was a shift from pool B to pool A. Pool A input was 400 +/- 74 mg/day pretreatment versus 706 +/- 62 mg/day on fenofibrate; pool B input was 422 +/- 35 mg/day pretreatment versus 258 +/- 41 mg/day on the drug. At the same time, catabolism of pool A rose from 0.39 +/- 0.06 to 0.66 +/- 0.08 pool/day (p < 0.05). We hypothesize that the shift from pool B to pool A resulted from a drug-induced decrease in the particle size of very low density lipoprotein made by the liver, which in turn favored the formation of more rapidly catabolized LDL. Overall, the rate of apo-LDL degradation by the receptor route (as detected using a combination of native and 1,2-cyclohexanedione-modified LDL tracers) rose 43% on the drug, whereas the amount cleared by the receptor-independent pathway did not change. Fenofibrate, therefore, appears not only to promote LDL catabolism via the receptor-mediated pathway but also, by lowering plasma triglyceride levels, inhibits the formation of slowly metabolized, potentially atherogenic LDL particles.

Ciprofibrate therapy normalises the atherogenic low-density lipoprotein subspecies profile in combined hyperlipidemia

The effect of ciprofibrate treatment on the atherogenic profile of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subspecies in combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) has been investigated in six patients displaying elevated plasma triglyceride and cholesterol levels (> 200 and > 250 mg/dl, respectively). The E2E2 phenotype was excluded; four patients possessed familial antecedents of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Analysis of five LDL subclasses separated by isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation showed a predominance of dense LDL subspecies (LDL-4 and LDL-5, d 1.039-1.063 g/ml; 51% of total LDL mass) in the asymmetric LDL density profile characteristic of CHL patients at baseline. Ciprofibrate treatment (100 mg/day for 1 month) effected marked reductions in both total plasma LDL and apo B-100 levels (approximately 19% and approximately 23%, respectively). Equally, the plasma profile of LDL subspecies was normalised to a significant degree as a result of preferential reduction in the elevated levels of both dense subspecies (LDL-4 and LDL-5; -43% and -54%, respectively; P < 0.03 and P < 0.006 [corrected], respectively). The circulating concentrations of light LDL (LDL-1, d 1.019-1.023 g/ml) were also diminished significantly by ciprofibrate (-30%; P < 0.006 [corrected]). Furthermore, ciprofibrate not only effected reductions in the elevated triglyceride content of the hydrophobic core of all LDL subspecies but also normalised their common deficiency in free cholesterol. In addition, the abnormally small particle diameters of LDL-4 and -5 were increased to normal. Plasma levels of both apo B-100 and triglycerides were significantly and positively correlated with those of LDL-4 and LDL-5, suggesting not only that the degree of triglyceride elevation is intimately linked to the extent of shift in LDL subclass profile towards denser subspecies, but also that triglyceride reduction upon treatment strongly influences LDL-4 and LDL-5. In conclusion, our findings indicate that ciprofibrate treatment in combined hyperlipidemia results in marked reduction in plasma triglyceride levels (-33%), and that such reduction is intimately linked to normalisation of both the qualitative and quantitative features of the atherogenic LDL subspecies profile typical of this disorder.

Lipid abnormalities in chronic uremic patients. Response to treatment with gemfibrozil

Seventy-four patients with end stage renal failure were studied. Forty-six of them were on hemodialysis (HD) while 28 were on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). In addition 56 nondialysis chronic renal failure (NDCRF) patients with various degree of renal failure were also studied. In all groups serum triglyceride concentrations were significantly higher and HDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly lower compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Total and LDL cholesterol were significantly higher in the NDCRF and CAPD patients compared to controls. In 55 patients (20 on HD, 13 on CAPD and 22 NDCRF) with severe hypertriglyceridemia or diminished HDL cholesterol gemfibrozil 300 mg b.i.d. per os was given for 6 months. Drug treatment reduced significantly serum triglycerides in all groups of patients and increased the levels of HDL cholesterol in CAPD patients. Moreover, a statistically significant decrease of the levels of total and LDL cholesterol was noticed in HD and NDCRF patients. During treatment no significant side effects were observed and liver and muscle enzymes remained within normal values.

Mode of action of fibrates

Fibrates are a class of hypolipidaemic drugs that effectively reduce plasma triglyceride and cholesterol levels, but also raise HDL cholesterol. In recent years the attention of pharmacologists and clinicians to fibrates has been renewed also in the light of a multifaceted action on plasma lipids as well as on factors modulating the thrombotic homeostasis in blood. The mechanisms of actions underlying these effects are discussed in this short review.

Differences in the response of Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats to bezafibrate: the hypolipidemic effect and the induction of peroxisomal enzymes

The effects of bezafibrate administered at 10 and 50 mg/kg/day for 7 days to male Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Lewis rats were investigated in order to determine the interrelation between the changes in serum and hepatic lipid contents and activities of selected peroxisomal, microsomal and mitochondrial enzymes in the two rat strains. In both strains, bezafibrate effectively reduced serum and hepatic lipids, increased the liver weight, induced a proliferation of peroxisomes, and selectively elevated the activities of carnitine acetyltransferase and of the enzymes of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation system. Moreover, immunoblotting revealed that the drug specifically enhanced the concentration of only those peroxisomal enzymes involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation. The data obtained demonstrate that although the responses initiated by bezafibrate are qualitatively similar in both strains, they differ in their magnitude in a dose-dependent manner, with the Lewis strain exhibiting a more pronounced response than the SD rats. These results show that dose-dependent strain differences as well as the generally known species differences should be taken into account in pharmacological and toxicological evaluations of fibrates in rodents. Furthermore, generalization and extrapolation from rodent studies should be treated with great caution.

The effect of bezafibrate on very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), and low density lipoprotein (LDL) composition in type 1 diabetes associated with hypercholesterolaemia or combined hyperlipidaemia

Lipoprotein composition was examined in type 1 diabetic subjects with hypercholesterolaemia +/- hypertriglyceridaemia during a 3-month double-blind placebo controlled assessment of bezafibrate therapy. The predominant effect was on lipoprotein lipid content. In those with hypercholesterolaemia alone, bezafibrate significantly reduced the cholesterol (particularly esterified cholesterol) and triglyceride content of large very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) (Svedberg flotation units (Sf) 60-400) in comparison to the placebo group (P less than 0.05), and a trend towards a reduction in free and esterified cholesterol within the intermediate density lipoprotein fraction (IDL) (Sf 12-20) was noted. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) composition was unaltered and in general phospholipid and protein concentrations and cholesteryl ester/protein ratios within the lipoprotein fractions were unaffected. Large VLDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations in those with combined hyperlipidaemia were significantly decreased following bezafibrate therapy, both in comparison to placebo-treated subjects and to baseline concentrations (P less than 0.05). An additional significant reduction in small VLDL (Sf 20-60) free cholesterol was recorded (P less than 0.05). Average reductions of large and small VLDL protein of 50-56% were not significant because of wide variation in responses. Bezafibrate had no effect on the abnormal composition of IDL and LDL, characteristic of Type 1 diabetes, regardless of whether or not hypertriglyceridaemia was associated with hypercholesterolaemia. Its major action was to lower VLDL lipid concentrations, but it may also reduce the lipid content of intermediate density lipoprotein in Type 1 diabetes.

Double-blind comparison of bezafibrate versus placebo in male volunteers with hyperlipoproteinemia

The efficacy and safety of bezafibrate were evaluated in 83 patients with type IIa, IIb, or IV hyperlipoproteinemia. Following a 12- to 14-week placebo period on a coronary-prudent diet (Period 1), patients were assigned randomly to receive either bezafibrate 600 mg/day or placebo, plus diet in a double-blind, 12-week treatment period (Period 2). The return of lipid and lipoprotein levels toward baseline was evaluated in a subsequent 8-week period on placebo plus diet (Period 3). In patients with type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia, bezafibrate significantly lowered total (14.6%, P less than 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (16.4%, P less than 0.001) and total (29.9%, P less than 0.001) and VLDL-triglyceride (44.0%, P less than 0.001) and significantly increased HDL cholesterol (9.5%, P less than 0.001). In patients with type IIb, bezafibrate had a qualitatively similar effect to that seen in type IIa on each of these lipoproteins, but the sample size was too small for statistical evaluation. In patients with type IV, bezafibrate lowered total (48.3%, P less than 0.01) and VLDL-triglyceride (57.7%, P less than 0.001) and VLDL-cholesterol (56.8%, P less than 0.001) and increased HDL-cholesterol (16.6%, P less than 0.05). All values returned toward baseline during Period 3. Only two bezafibrate patients experienced adverse events that were considered definitely treatment related; one was dropped from the study because of elevations in SGOT and SGPT, 1.5- and 4-times the upper limit of normal, respectively. For other laboratory parameters, trends upward or downward were small and of doubtful clinical significance. Bezafibrate appears to be effective and safe for modifying lipid and lipoprotein levels in patients with types IIa, IIb and IV hyperlipoproteinemia.

Low density lipoprotein density and composition in hypercholesterolaemic men treated with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and gemfibrozil

The effects of HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (lovastatin or simvastatin) and gemfibrozil treatment on low density lipoprotein (LDL) density distribution and composition were studied in male patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) (n = 17) or non-familial hypercholesterolaemia (non-FH) (n = 14). In FH patients the HMG CoA reductase inhibitors reduced 'light' LDL particles (density 1.022-1.033 g ml-1) significantly more than 'heavy' LDL (density 1.033-1.059 g ml-1), while a more uniform reduction of 'light' and 'heavy' LDL occurred in non-FH patients. HMG CoA reductase inhibitor treatment increased the apolipoprotein B (apoB) content and decreased the cholesterol/apoB ratio of LDL in FH patients. Gemfibrozil significantly reduced 'heavy' LDL but not the 'light' LDL fraction in both FH and non-FH patients, and the mean cholesteryl ester content of LDL increased, while the Tg content decreased, in both FH and non-FH patients. The results indicate that HMG CoA reductase inhibitor and gemfibrozil treatment have distinctly different effects on the physico-chemical properties of LDL, reflecting their different modes of action on lipoprotein metabolism.

Simvastatin in severe hypercholesterolaemia: a placebo controlled trial

The effect of simvastatin in 27 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolaemia was assessed by a double-blind placebo controlled parallel group trial. Total serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apoprotein B (ApoB) were significantly reduced by simvastatin 40 mg daily. Reductions in triglyceride and VLDL-cholesterol and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels were only significant when calculated as a percentage of baseline, because of wide inter-individual variability. No changes in apoprotein A1, lipoprotein (a), fibrinogen, viscosity or blood pressure were observed. Leucocyte HMG-CoA reductase activity was unchanged after 4 weeks of active treatment but increased by 87% after 3 months (n = 21, P less than 0.05). No severe adverse effects or changes in CK or AST levels were noted. We conclude that simvastatin is effective in the treatment of severe and resistant hypercholesterolaemia, and well tolerated in the short term.

Effects of bezafibrate on hepatic cholesterol metabolism

The influence of bezafibrate treatment on hepatic cholesterol metabolism was studied in rats and in humans. The activities of the three key enzymes involved in cholesterol metabolism [3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase, and acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT)] were suppressed by bezafibrate treatment in rats, but only the ACAT activity was significantly decreased when the activity was related to total liver weight. In humans, HMG-CoA reductase activity was increased about twice in the treated normolipidemic gallstone patients. In contrast, the concentration of lathosterol in serum decreased, indicating depression of the cholesterol synthesis. The increase in HMG-CoA reductase activity may be a compensatory effect of an inhibition of some other enzymes in the synthesis of cholesterol, as in vitro study on liver microsomes excluded a direct inhibitory effect of bezafibrate on HMG-CoA reductase. The ACAT activity was not significantly changed, and the cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase activity was decreased by 55-60% compared with controls. The LDL-receptor-binding activity was unaffected by bezafibrate treatment.

Comparative studies on the influence of different fibrates on serum lipoproteins in endogenous hyperlipoproteinaemia

Two trials have been performed in the same patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types IIb (12 cases), III (6 cases) and IV (11 cases). In the first study the lipid-lowering properties of bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate were compared and in a separate trial the influence of combined treatment with gemfibrozil plus colestipol and bezafibrate plus probucol on lipoproteins were investigated. The mean percentage lipid-lowering effect of each fibrate on serum and VLDL fraction was significant in the Types IIb, III and IV patients, but there were significant differences between the fibrates. In general, gemfibrozil and bezafibrate decreased plasma lipid levels more than etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate in Type IIb patients. In Type IV cases gemfibrozil and bezafibrate were significantly potent in reducing the triglyceride level than fenofibrate, etofibrate or etofylline clofibrate. All the fibrates produced an increase in HDL cholesterol, but there were significant differences between them were in the Type IV patients. The influence of fibrates on the LDL fraction was much more variable. In hyperlipoproteinaemia Type IIb, a decrease in both LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B was observed. In Type III and IV patients, however, an increase in LDL concentration occurred. The addition of colestipol to gemfibrozil therapy led to a further decrease in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B in Type IIb patients. In patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types III and IV colestipol prevented the increase in LDL concentration after treatment with gemfibrozil alone. The effect of probucol on LDL cholesterol was comparable to that of colestipol. Combined treatment with gemfibrozil and colestipol caused an increase in HDL cholesterol concentration in contrast to combined treatment with bezafibrate and probucol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effects of bezafibrate on blood lipids, lipoproteins, and fibrinogen in hyperlipidaemic type 1 diabetes mellitus

The effects of bezafibrate 400 mg day-1 or placebo administered for 3 months, were compared in 36 patients with stable Type 1 diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia and/or hypertriglyceridaemia. Baseline characteristics of the 17 bezafibrate- and 19 placebo-treated patients were comparable in most respects with the exception of concentrations of fasting serum triglycerides and blood glucose which were lower (NS) and plasma fibrinogen which were higher (p less than 0.05), in those later treated with bezafibrate. Serum cholesterol concentrations decreased after 3 months bezafibrate treatment (from 7.1(0.2) (SE) to 6.3 (0.3) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05), predominantly due to a reduction in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (from 4.8(0.3) to 4.2(0.3) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05). Over the same period bezafibrate reduced serum triglycerides from 1.78 (95% Cl 1.23-2.57) to 1.26(1.02-2.09) mmol l-1 (p less than 0.05), and plasma fibrinogen from 4.1(0.2) to 2.9(0.2) g l-1, p less than 0.001. Serum apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein (a) showed no statistically significant changes. Overall there was no change in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. However, in patients who were initially hypertriglyceridaemic there was significant increase in the cholesterol content of HDL and the HDL2-cholesterol subfraction (both p less than 0.05). After 3 months treatment with bezafibrate, fasting blood glucose levels were reduced from 8.5(1.1) to 6.4(0.7) mmol l-1, p less than 0.05, without any change in glycosylated haemoglobin (9.2(0.4) to 9.1(0.5)%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis by bezafibrate in different rat cells

Bezafibrate is one of the main drugs used in the treatment of human hyperlipemic diseases. Its action on the biosynthesis of fatty acids has been studied and the following conclusions have been drawn: (1) Lipogenesis from glucose is inhibited in hepatocytes and adipocytes isolated from "refed" rats previously treated with bezafibrate. (2) Lipogenesis from glucose is inhibited by bezafibrate in hepatocytes and adipocytes isolated from "refed" rats. (3) Lipogenesis from glucose is also inhibited by bezafibrate in acini isolated from lactating rats. These results show that bezafibrate is an inhibitor of fatty acid synthesis.

Bezafibrate inhibits HMG-CoA reductase activity in incubated blood mononuclear cells from normal subjects and patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

In incubated blood mononuclear cells from normal subjects bezafibrate inhibited the incorporation of 14C-acetate into squalene, methylsterols and cholesterol. Similarly, the drug produced a sharp decrease of the incorporation of labelled 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) into non-saponifiable lipids, while the incorporation of 14C-mevalonate was unaffected by the presence of bezafibrate in the incubation mixture. This strongly suggests that bezafibrate inhibits HMG-CoA reductase activity. In cultured cells from patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia the presence of bezafibrate in the incubation medium resulted in an inhibition of the incorporation of labelled acetate into non-saponifiable lipids. Bezafibrate then inhibits cholesterol biosynthesis in cells from normal and hypercholesterolaemic patients and this effect is likely, to contribute to the hypocholesterolaemic activity of the drug.

Effect of combined therapy with bezafibrate and cholestyramine on low-density lipoprotein metabolism in type IIa hypercholesterolemia

This study was designed to examine the influence of combined therapy with bezafibrate and cholestyramine on plasma lipids and on the metabolism of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Twenty-one type II hyperlipidemic subjects were treated with bezafibrate alone or in combination with cholestyramine. A 17% fall in plasma cholesterol was seen with bezafibrate, and addition of cholestyramine produced an additional 9% reduction in this lipid. The effectiveness of the combination therapy was mediated through a 47% decrement in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, a 37% reduction in LDL cholesterol, and a 15% increase in the level of that lipid in high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Plasma triglyceride fell 43% when bezafibrate was given alone, and did not change further when cholestyramine was added. The metabolism of LDL was examined in nine individuals to determine the mechanism underlying these changes. No significant modification in LDL synthetic rate was incurred with either drug regimen, whereas the fractional catabolic rate of LDL via the receptor pathway rose by 66% with bezafibrate alone and by 79% (compared to baseline) following the addition of cholestyramine. Plasma HDL rose during bezafibrate therapy due to an increase in the HDL3 subfraction. Compositional analysis of LDL showed a reduction in cholesterol ester and an increase in triglyceride and phospholipid during combined drug therapy. These results demonstrate that combined therapy with bezafibrate and cholestyramine markedly improves the lipoprotein profile in type II hyperlipidemia. The drugs appear to be complementary in their actions upon the LDL receptor pathway.