Interaction between opioid agonists or naloxone and 5-HTP on feeding behavior in food-deprived rats

Central effects of opioidergic system on food intake in birds and mammals: a review

Undoubtedly, the food intake process is one of the most necessary physiological functions for the survival of animals and humans. Although; this operation seems simple on the surface, the regulation of the mechanisms involved in it requires the cooperation of many neurotransmitters, peptides, and hormonal factors in the nervous and endocrine systems. Understanding the signals that regulate energy levels and appetite, may open new approaches to therapeutics and drugs used in obesity-related complications. Improving the quality of animal products and health is also possible due to this research. The present review is aimed to sum up the current findings on central effects of opioids on the food consumption of birds and mammals. Based on the reviewed articles, the opioidergic system appears to be one of the key elements in the birds' and mammals' food intake and is closely related to other systems involved in appetite regulation. According to the findings, it seems that the effects of this system on nutritional mechanisms are often applied via kappa- and mu-opioid receptors. Controversial observations have been made regarding opioid receptors, highlighting the need for further studies, especially at the molecular level. The role of opiates in taste or diet craving also showed the efficacy of this system, especially the mu-opioid receptor, on preferences such as diets containing high sugar and fat. Finally, putting the results of this study together with the findings of human experiments and other primates can lead to a correct comprehension of the appetite regulation processes, especially the role of the opioidergic system.

Anorectic interaction and safety of 5-hydroxytryptophan/carbidopa plus phentermine or diethylpropion in rat

Drug combinations are being studied as potential therapies to increase the efficacy or improve the safety profile of weight loss medications. This study was designed to determine the anorectic interaction and safety profile of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)/carbidopa + diethylpropion and 5-HTP/carbidopa + phentermine combinations in rats. The anorectic effect of individual drugs or in combination was evaluated by the sweetened milk test. Isobologram and interaction index were employed to determine the anorectic interaction between 5-HTP/carbidopa and diethylpropion or phentermine. Plasma serotonin (5-HT) was measured by ELISA. Safety of repeated doses of both combinations in rats was evaluated using the tail sphygmomanometer, cardiac ultrasound, hematic biometry and blood chemistry. A single oral 5-HTP, diethylpropion or phentermine dose increased the anorectic effect, in a dose-dependent fashion, in 12 h-fasted rats. A dose of carbidopa at 30 mg/kg reduced the 5-HTP-induced plasmatic serotonin concentration and augmented the 5-HTP-induced anorectic effect. Isobologram and interaction index indicated a potentiation interaction between 5-HTP/30 mg/kg carbidopa + diethylpropion and 5-HTP/30 mg/kg carbidopa + phentermine. Chronic administration of experimental ED40 of 5-HTP/30 mg/kg carbidopa + phentermine, but not 5-HTP/30 mg/kg carbidopa + diethylpropion, increased the mitral valve leaflets area. Moreover, there were no other significant changes in cardiovascular, hematic or blood parameters. Both combinations induced around 20% body weight loss after 3 months of oral administration. Results suggest that 5-HTP/30 mg/kg carbidopa potentiates the anorectic effect of diethylpropion and phentermine with an acceptable safety profile, but further clinical studies are necessary to establish their therapeutic potential in the obesity treatment.

On the behavioural specificity of hypophagia induced in male rats by mCPP, naltrexone, and their combination

RATIONALE

Serotonergic (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and opioidergic mechanisms are intimately involved in appetite regulation.

OBJECTIVES

In view of recent evidence of positive anorectic interactions between opioid and various non-opioid substrates, our aim was to assess the behavioural specificity of anorectic responses to the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone, the 5-HT2C/1B receptor agonist mCPP and their combination.

METHODS

Behavioural profiling techniques, including the behavioural satiety sequence (BSS), were used to examine acute drug effects in non-deprived male rats tested with palatable mash. Experiment 1 characterised the dose-response profile of mCPP (0.1-3.0 mg/kg), while experiment 2 assessed the effects of combined treatment with a sub-anorectic dose of mCPP (0.1 mg/kg) and one of two low doses of naltrexone (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Experiment 1 confirmed the dose-dependent anorectic efficacy of mCPP, with robust effects on intake and feeding-related measures observed at 3.0 mg/kg. However, that dose was also associated with other behavioural alterations including increased grooming, reductions in locomotion and sniffing, and disruption of the BSS. In experiment 2, naltrexone dose-dependently reduced food intake and time spent feeding, effects accompanied by a behaviourally selective acceleration in the BSS. However, the addition of 0.1 mg/kg mCPP did not significantly alter the behavioural changes observed in response to either dose of naltrexone given alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to recently reported positive anorectic interactions involving low-dose combinations of opioid receptor antagonists or mCPP with cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists, present results would not appear to provide any support for potentially clinically relevant anorectic interactions between opioid and 5-HT2C/1B receptor mechanisms.

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective

This invited review, based on the receipt of the Third Gayle A. Olson and Richard D. Olson Prize for the publication of the outstanding behavioral article published in the journal Peptides in 2002, examines the 30-year historical perspective of the role of the endogenous opioid system in feeding behavior. The review focuses on the advances that this field has made over the past 30 years as a result of the timely discoveries that were made concerning this important neuropeptide system, and how these discoveries were quickly applied to the analysis of feeding behavior and attendant homeostatic processes. The discoveries of the opioid receptors and opioid peptides, and the establishment of their relevance to feeding behavior were pivotal in studies performed in the 1970s. The 1980s were characterized by the establishment of opioid receptor subtype agonists and antagonists and their relevance to the modulation of feeding behavior as well as by the use of general opioid antagonists in demonstrating the wide array of ingestive situations and paradigms involving the endogenous opioid system. The more recent work from the 1990s to the present, utilizes the advantages created by the cloning of the opioid receptor genes, the development of knockout and knockdown techniques, the systematic utilization of a systems neuroscience approach, and establishment of the reciprocity of how manipulations of opioid peptides and receptors affect feeding behavior with how feeding states affect levels of opioid peptides and receptors. The role of G-protein effector systems in opioid-mediated feeding responses, which was the subject of the prize-winning article, is then reviewed.

Combined naloxone and fluoxetine on deprivation-induced binge eating of palatable foods in rats

Opioid antagonism and serotonergic stimulation is associated with macronutrient-specific hypophagia in animals. In the present study we evaluated their systemic effect alone, and in combination, at various doses, on the intake of sweet carbohydrate-rich and sweet fat-rich foods, tastes, and nutrients that are typical of binge-food items. Low-dose (1 mg/kg) naloxone, alone, preferentially suppressed fat-rich intake while low-dose (2.5 mg/kg) fluoxetine, alone, preferentially suppressed carbohydrate-rich intake. Each drug at these doses, combined with various doses of the other (2.5-10 mg/kg fluoxetine; 0.01-1 mg/kg naloxone) additively suppressed both kinds of the sweet foods. Naloxone and fluoxetine have therapeutic potential in treating binge-eating disorders. This animal study suggests what shortcomings and benefits might be expected when combining these two agents.

Naltrexone, dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists, and food intake in rats: 1. Food deprivation

Different forms of food intake are reduced by both agonists and antagonists of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors as well as general opioid antagonists. The present study evaluated whether deprivation (24 h)-induced food intake was altered following systemic administration of either the D1 agonist, SKF-38393, the D1 antagonist, SCH-23390, the D2 agonist, quinpirole, or the D2 antagonist, haloperidol, alone or in combination with the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone. Both SKF-38393 (5-10 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (100-200 micrograms/kg) significantly and dose dependently reduced deprivation-induced intake. Whereas quinpirole (0.5-1 mg/kg) failed to alter deprivation-induced intake, haloperidol increased deprivation-induced intake at low (50 micrograms) doses and decreased intake at higher (100-500 micrograms/kg) doses. Naltrexone (2.5-10 mg/kg) significantly inhibited deprivation-induced intake. When naltrexone was paired with behaviorally ineffective doses of either SCH-23390 (2.5-100 micrograms/kg), quinpirole (0.01-1 mg/kg), or haloperidol (50 micrograms/kg), the degree of reduction of deprivation-induced intake was significantly greater than that produced by naltrexone alone. Pairing naltrexone with SKF-38393 produced reductions of deprivation-induced intake comparable to that of naltrexone alone.

Naltrexone, serotonin receptor subtype antagonists, and carbohydrate intake in rats

Functional interactions between serotonergic (5-HT) and opioid drugs have been observed with 5-HT3 receptor antagonism enhancing the inhibitory actions of naloxone and naltrexone in both food-deprived and glucoprivic rats; 5-HT2A/C receptor antagonism enhanced naltrexone's inhibition of insulin hyperphagia. The present study examined whether pretreatment with either general 5-HT (methysergide: 0.5-5 mg/kg), 5-HT2A/C (ritanserin: 0.25-2.5 mg/kg), or 5-HT3 (ICS 205930: 0.5-5 mg/kg) antagonists altered the pattern and magnitude of ad lib intake of simple (sucrose: 10%) or more complex (maltose dextrin: MD, 10%) carbohydrate solutions, or naltrexone's (0.25-2.5 mg/kg) inhibition of these forms of intake. Methysergide significantly increased the pattern and magnitude of sucrose intake at low (0.5-2.5 mg/kg) doses, and transiently delayed the pattern of MD intake at high (5 mg/kg) doses. Ritanserin significantly accelerated the pattern, but not the magnitude of sucrose intake at low (0.25-1.25 mg/kg) doses without affecting MD intake. ICS 205930 reduced the magnitude of sucrose intake at the highest (5 mg/kg) dose, and transiently reduced MD intake. Naltrexone dose dependently altered the pattern and magnitude of both sucrose and MD intake. Coadministration of ritanserin and naltrexone either eliminated or delayed the pattern of opioid antagonist inhibition of both sucrose and MD intake. Methysergide and ICS 205930 pretreatment produced minor changes in the pattern of naltrexone-induced inhibition. These data indicate that 5-HT receptor differentially modulate the pattern of carbohydrate intake, and indicate differential ingestive interactions between 5-HT and opioid antagonists under challenge and palatable conditions.

Comparison of neurokinin substance P with morphine in effects on food-reinforced operant behavior and feeding

In the present study, substance P (SP) was injected intraperitoneally (IP), and its effects on operant behavior were assessed in rats, which had been trained to bar press for food reward on a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule. These effects were compared with IP injection of morphine sulfate, which had previously been shown to strongly suppress operant responding on FR schedules. The IP injection of SP resulted in a dose-related decrement in response rates. SP in a dose range of 250-500 micrograms/kg decreased operant responding, whereas SP in a dose range of 5-50 micrograms/kg did not influence response rates. The IP injection of morphine (10 mg/kg) markedly suppressed operant responding. However, in contrast to the rate-decreasing effects of SP, this suppression was not selective for the reinforced lever as responding on the nonreinforced lever, used as a control, was also decreased. Furthermore, both injection of 10 mg/kg morphine and SP in a dose range of 250-500 micrograms/kg was found to reduce food intake when the animals had free access to food subsequent to the operant conditioning session. The present results provide the first evidence that systemically administered neurokinin SP can affect operant responding for food reward. The suppressive effects on operant behavior and feeding obtained with systemic SP or morphine are discussed with respect to recent findings showing that both drugs can modulate mesolimbic dopamine activity after systemic drug injection.

Naltrexone, serotonin receptor subtype antagonists, and glucoprivic intake: 1. 2-Deoxy-D-glucose

Inhibition of deprivation-induced intake by naloxone was significantly enhanced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) antagonist ICS-205,930. Interactions between naloxone and either the general 5-HT antagonist methysergide or the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin or ketanserin produced smaller effects. The present study evaluated whether 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG, 400 mg/kg) hyperphagia was affected by methysergide (0.5-5 mg/kg), ritanserin (0.25-2.5 mg/kg), or ICS-205,930 (0.5-5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with naltrexone (0.25 and 2.5 mg/kg). Only ICS-205,930 stimulated spontaneous intake for up to 4 h in the light cycle. Only ritanserin (1.25 mg/kg) transiently reduced 2DG hyperphagia. The dose-dependent decreases in 2DG hyperphagia by naltrexone were significantly enhanced by the dose range of ICS-205,930. The inhibition of 2DG hyperphagia by the low naltrexone dose was enhanced by methysergide (5 mg/kg) and ritanserin (1.25 mg/kg). These data suggest that the 5-HT3 receptor primarily interacts with opioid systems to modulate 2DG hyperphagia and that one possible locus of interaction is in the caudal brainstem.

Naltrexone, serotonin receptor subtype antagonists, and glucoprivic intake: 2. Insulin

Opiate antagonist inhibition of deprivation-induced intake and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) hyperphagia is significantly enhanced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) antagonist, ICS-205,930. Interactions between opiate antagonists and either 5-HT or 5-HT2 antagonists produced smaller effects. The present study evaluated whether insulin (5 U/kg) hyperphagia was affected by methysergide (0.5-5 mg/kg), ritanserin (0.25-2.5 mg/kg), and ICS-205,930 (0.5-5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with naltrexone (2.5-10 mg/kg). Whereas ICS-205,930 stimulated insulin hyperphagia across the 6-h time course, ritanserin and, to a lesser degree, methysergide reduced insulin hyperphagia. Naltrexone marginally (19-33%) reduced insulin hyperphagia. Pairing naltrexone with either ICS-205,930 or ritanserin significantly suppressed insulin hyperphagia after 2 h. Pairing naltrexone with each of the serotonin antagonists significantly enhanced insulin hyperphagia after 4 and 6 h. These data suggest that 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor subtypes interact with opioid systems to modulate insulin hyperphagia. Given that central insulin reduces food intake and body weight, the interaction between serotonergic and opioid systems may occur peripherally.

Naloxone and serotonin receptor subtype antagonists: interactive effects upon deprivation-induced intake

Whereas opiate receptor antagonists generally act to inhibit food intake under a variety of physiological conditions in rats, agonists of some serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes appear to stimulate intake, and others appear to inhibit intake. The present study evaluated the effects of the general 5-HT receptor antagonist, methysergide (1-5 mg/kg), the 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, ketanserin (1-2.5 mg/kg) and ritanserin (1-2.5 mg/kg), and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ICS 205930 (1-5 mg/kg) upon deprivation (24 h)-induced intake themselves, and upon the hypophagic properties of the general opiate receptor antagonist, naloxone (1-5 mg/kg). Whereas the high doses of methysergide (0.5-4 h, 34%) and ketanserin (0.5 h, 28%) significantly decreased deprivation-induced intake themselves, ritanserin and ICS 205930 were without effect. Naloxone produced dose-dependent reductions in deprivation-induced intake (24-45%). Methysergide (1 mg/kg) significantly potentiated naloxone (5 mg/kg) hypophagia after 0.5 h. Significant potentiations of hypophagia occurred following pairing the 1 mg/kg ketanserin dose with the 1 and 5 mg/kg naloxone doses at 2 and 4 h respectively, and pairing the 2.5 mg/kg ketanserin and 1 mg/kg naloxone doses at 0.5 and 2 h. Whereas the 1 mg/kg dose of ritanserin eliminated naloxone (1 mg/kg) hypophagia over a 2-h time course, ritanserin failed to exert further effects in other dose conditions. The differences between ketanserin and ritanserin in their effects upon deprivation-induced feeding and naloxone hypophagia suggest that the former's antagonistic actions upon alpha-adrenergic receptors may be responsible for its effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cyclo(His-Pro) potentiates the reduction of food intake induced by amphetamine, fenfluramine, or serotonin

Electrophysiological and pharmacological evidence suggests that cyclo(His-Pro) (cHP) could reduce food intake by modulating the actions of relevant neurotransmitters. We tested this hypothesis by giving rats a combination of cHP or its analogs centrally and an anorectic, amphetamine or fenfluramine, systemically. Compared to saline control, cHP at doses too low to affect food intake by itself significantly potentiated the reduction of food intake by amphetamine. This potentiation is thought to be due to cHP modulation of norepinephrine (NE) action, because at the low dose used amphetamine acts mainly through NE to inhibit food intake. The modulation has specific requirements for cHP structure, since it was mimicked by one but not two other analogs tested. The anorectic effect of fenfluramine was also potentiated and prolonged by cHP at a dose not effective by itself. Since fenfluramine is known to act by increasing brain serotonin (5-HT), the potentiation was apparently a result of an interaction between cHP and 5-HT effects. To examine this interaction more directly, we administered both cHP and 5-HT centrally. Again, cHP potentiated the reduction of food intake caused by 5-HT. Thus the neuromodulation of feeding-relevant neurotransmitter effects, following NE and 5-HT, is probably a mechanism by which cHP reduces food intake.

Endogenous opiates: 1988

This paper is the eleventh installment in our annual review of the research during the past year involving the endogenous opiate system. It is concerned with nonanalgesic and behavioral studies of the opiate peptides that were published during 1988. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic functions; mental illness; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical activity; locomotor activity; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunology and cancer; and other behavior.