Naloxone's effects on operant responding depend upon level of deprivation

Behavioral plasticity: Role of neuropeptides in shaping feeding responses

Behavioral plasticity refers to changes occurring due to external influences on an organism, including adaptation, learning, memory and enduring influences from early life experience. There are 2 types of behavioral plasticity: "developmental", which refers to gene/environment interactions affecting a phenotype, and "activational" which refers to innate physiology and can involve structural physiological changes of the body. In this review, we focus on feeding behavior, and studies involving neuropeptides that influence behavioral plasticity - primarily opioids, orexin, neuropeptide Y, and oxytocin. In each section of the review, we include examples of behavioral plasticity as it relates to actions of these neuropeptides. It can be concluded from this review that eating behavior is influenced by a number of external factors, including time of day, type of food available, energy balance state, and stressors. The reviewed work underscores that environmental factors play a critical role in feeding behavior and energy balance, but changes in eating behavior also result from a multitude of non-environmental factors, such that there can be no single mechanism or variable that can explain ingestive behavior.

Involvement of Peripheral Opioid Receptors in the Realization of Food Motivation Into Eating Behavior

The involvement of peripheral opioid receptors in the mechanisms of eating behavior is still unclear. The aim of this work was to study the role of peripheral, predominantly gastric mu and delta opioid receptors in the realization of food motivation in conditions of different energy costs for eating behavior. Experiments were performed under a between-sessions progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in food-deprived rats. The level of food motivation was calculated using a self-developed method. Food intake, motor activity, and metabolic rate were recorded in fed and hungry animals. Results showed that intragastric administration of the mu opioid receptor agonist DAMGO led to an increase in the level of food motivation in the light variant of operant feeding behaviors. Food consumption did not change. At high costs for feeding behavior, the administration of DAMGO did not alter food motivation; however, food consumption and motor activity were reduced. Intragastric administration of the delta opioid receptor agonist DADLE did not lead to changes in the level of food motivation and physical activity, but inhibition of feeding behavior was observed in all reinforcement schedules. Three regulatory pathways of eating behavior in difficult food conditions by peripheral, predominantly gastric opioid receptors are hypothesized: environmental-inhibitory afferentations and suppression of the realization of food motivation into behavior; homeostatic-inhibitory action on food motivation; and rewarding-suppression of the anticipatory reinforcement.

Endogenous opioid modulation of food intake and body weight: Implications for opioid influences upon motivation and addiction

This review is part of a special issue dedicated to Opioid addiction, and examines the influential role of opioid peptides, opioid receptors and opiate drugs in mediating food intake and body weight control in rodents. This review postulates that opioid mediation of food intake was an example of "positive addictive" properties that provide motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior and that are not subject to the "negative addictive" properties associated with tolerance, dependence and withdrawal. Data demonstrate that opiate and opioid peptide agonists stimulate food intake through homeostatic activation of sensory, metabolic and energy-related In contrast, general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists typically block these homeostatically-driven ingestive behaviors. Intake of palatable and hedonic food stimuli is inhibited by general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists. The selectivity of specific opioid agonists to elicit food intake was confirmed through the use of opioid receptor antagonists and molecular knockdown (antisense) techniques incapacitating specific exons of opioid receptor genes. Further extensive evidence demonstrated that homeostatic and hedonic ingestive situations correspondingly altered the levels and expression of opioid peptides and opioid receptors. Opioid mediation of food intake was controlled by a distributed brain network intimately related to both the appetitive-consummatory sites implicated in food intake as well as sites intimately involved in reward and reinforcement. This emergent system appears to sustain the "positive addictive" properties providing motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior.

Sex differences in hedonic and homeostatic aspects of palatable food motivation

Feeding behaviors can be modified via homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms. Homeostasis, while primarily concerned with maintaining energy balance via food consumption and energy expenditure, can alter food reward and motivation in response to food deprivation. Alternatively, reward and motivation of food is also driven by its palatability or hedonic nature, and this process can be augmented by opioid receptor activation. The present study examined sex differences in the motivational properties of sucrose pellets through manipulation of homeostatic and hedonic processes via acute food deprivation and acute systemic administration of morphine, respectively. The results showed that regardless of sex, systemic injections of morphine did not alter the motivation to obtain a sucrose pellet on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement but does significantly increase consumption of sucrose pellets when freely available. Male and female rats demonstrated similar increased consumption of sucrose pellets under free feeding conditions following acute (24-hours) food deprivation, compared to the non-deprived conditions. Overall, the findings from these experiments indicate that female rats work harder in order to obtain a sucrose pellet (under a Progressive Ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement) and consume more sucrose pellets than males. However, while acute morphine administration causes similar increases on feeding in males and females, it does not alter motivation as measured by breakpoint on a PR schedule of reinforcement.

Effects of isolated tobacco alkaloids and tobacco products on deprivation-induced food intake and meal patterns in rats

The ability of smoking to reduce body weight serves as motivation for continued smoking. It is unclear to what extent non-nicotine constituents in cigarettes are contributing to the weight-reducing effect of smoking. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of nicotine and four minor tobacco alkaloids (nornicotine, cotinine, anatabine, and anabasine) on food intake, one of the key regulators of body weight. In addition, a smokeless tobacco extract (STE) and e-cigarette (EC) refill liquid were used to model the effects of actual tobacco product exposure on food intake. Male Holztman rats were trained to lever press for food pellets during daily 2h sessions in operant chambers. In Experiment 1, the effects of subcutaneous injections of saline, nicotine (0.25-1.00mg/kg), nornicotine (0.50-6.00mg/kg), cotinine (1.00-100.00mg/kg), anatabine (0.25-3.00mg/kg), and anabasine (0.50-4.00mg/kg) were assessed. In Experiment 2, rats from Experiment 1 were used to examine the effects of nicotine, STE, and EC liquid. All alkaloids, except cotinine, produced a dose-dependent reduction in overall food intake. The highest doses of all drugs significantly reduced latency and response rate to obtain the first pellet. At some doses, nicotine, anatabine, and nornicotine reduced food intake within the first 45min without compensatory increases in intake later in the session. STE and EC liquid produced dose dependent decreases in food intake similar to nicotine alone. These data suggest that minor tobacco alkaloids have appetite suppressant effects and warrant further investigation into their effects on body weight, energy intake, and energy expenditure under free-feeding conditions. However, findings with STE and EC liquid suggest that nicotine is the primary constituent in these products to affect food intake, whereas levels of minor alkaloids in these products may be too low to influence food intake.

Feeding-modulatory effects of mu-opioids in the medial prefrontal cortex: a review of recent findings and comparison to opioid actions in the nucleus accumbens

RATIONALE

Whereas reward-modulatory opioid actions have been intensively studied in subcortical sites such as the nucleus accumbens (Acb), the role of cortical opioid transmission has received comparatively little attention.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to describe recent findings on the motivational actions of opioids in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), emphasizing studies of food motivation and ingestion. PFC-based opioid effects will be compared/contrasted to those elicited from the Acb, to glean possible common functional principles. Finally, the motivational effects of opioids will be placed within a network context involving the PFC, Acb, and hypothalamus.

RESULTS

Mu-opioid receptor (μ-OR) stimulation in both the Acb and PFC induces eating and enhances food-seeking instrumental behaviors; μ-OR signaling also enhances taste reactivity within a highly circumscribed zone of medial Acb shell. In both the Acb and PFC, opioid-sensitive zones are aligned topographically with the sectors that project to feeding-modulatory zones of the hypothalamus and intact glutamate transmission in the lateral/perifornical (LH-PeF) hypothalamic areas is required for both Acb- and PFC-driven feeding. Conversely, opioid-mediated feeding responses elicited from the PFC are negatively modulated by AMPA signaling in the Acb shell.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid signaling in the PFC engages functionally opposed PFC➔hypothalamus and PFC➔Acb circuits, which, respectively, drive and limit non-homeostatic feeding, producing a disorganized and "fragmented" pattern of impulsive food-seeking behaviors and hyperactivity. In addition, opioids act directly in the Acb to facilitate food motivation and taste hedonics. Further study of this cortico-striato-hypothalamic circuit, and incorporation of additional opioid-responsive telencephalic structures, could yield insights with translational relevance for eating disorders and obesity.

Naloxone Decreases Responding for Conditioned Reinforcement in Rats

That opioids can mediate unconditioned reinforcement is well established, but there is little evidence indicating whether they modify conditioned reinforcement. Here, a tone which initially served as a discriminative stimulus for the availability of water reinforcement was established as a conditioned stimulus. When later given a choice between pressing a lever producing the tone (but not water) or one which produced no effect, rats chose the tone-producing lever 66% of the time. Naloxone (3.0 mg/kg) reduced overall responding and completely eliminated the preference for the tone-producing lever. Results are briefly discussed in terms of the importance of understanding mechanisms serving conditioned reinforcement.

Comparison of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and pregnanolone with existing pharmacotherapies for alcohol abuse on ethanol- and food-maintained responding in male rats

The present study compared two putative pharmacotherapies for alcohol abuse and dependence, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and pregnanolone, with two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pharmacotherapies, naltrexone and acamprosate. Experiment 1 assessed the effects of different doses of DHEA, pregnanolone, naltrexone, and acamprosate on both ethanol- and food-maintained responding under a multiple fixed-ratio (FR)-10 FR-20 schedule, respectively. Experiment 2 assessed the effects of different mean intervals of food presentation on responding for ethanol under a FR-10 variable-interval (VI) schedule, whereas Experiment 3 assessed the effects of a single dose of each drug under a FR-10 VI-80 schedule. In Experiment 1, all four drugs dose-dependently decreased response rate for both food and ethanol, although differences in the rate-decreasing effects were apparent among the drugs. DHEA and pregnanolone decreased ethanol-maintained responding more potently than food-maintained responding, whereas the reverse was true for naltrexone. Acamprosate decreased responding for both reinforcers with equal potency. In Experiment 2, different mean intervals of food presentation significantly affected the number of food reinforcers obtained per session; however, changes in the number of food reinforcements did not significantly affect responding for ethanol. Under the FR-10 VI-80 schedule in Experiment 3, only naltrexone significantly decreased both the dose of alcohol presented and blood ethanol concentration (BEC). Acamprosate and pregnanolone had no significant effects on any of the dependent measures, whereas DHEA significantly decreased BEC, but did not significantly decrease response rate or the dose presented. In summary, DHEA and pregnanolone decreased ethanol-maintained responding more potently than food-maintained responding under a multiple FR-10 FR-20 schedule, and were more selective for decreasing ethanol self-administration than either naltrexone or acamprosate under that schedule. Experiment 2 showed that ethanol intake was relatively independent of the interval of reinforcement in the food-maintained component, and Experiment 3 showed that naltrexone was the most effective drug at the doses tested when the interval for food reinforcement was low and maintained under a variable-interval schedule.

Immediate postsession feeding reduces operant responding in rats

Three experiments investigated the effects of immediate and delayed postsession feeding on progressive-ratio and variable-interval schedule performance in rats. During Experiments 1 and 2, immediate postsession feeding decreased the breakpoint, or largest completed ratio, under progressive-ratio schedules. Experiment 3 was conducted to extend the results of the first two experiments to responding maintained by variable-interval schedules with different session lengths (15 and 60 min). Response rates decreased in all 4 subjects when postsession feeding immediately followed a 15-min session and in 3 of 4 subjects when postsession feeding immediately followed a 60-min session. The implications of this research are twofold: (1) The functional context in which within-session reinforcers are embedded extends outside the experimental chamber, and (2) supplemental postsession feedings should be sufficiently delayed from the end of a session to avoid weakening operant behavior in the experimental sessions.

Substrate oxidation influences liking, wanting, macronutrient selection, and consumption of food in humans

BACKGROUND

Several carbohydrate-based models of feeding have been described. The influence of the substrate oxidation rate on liking, wanting, and macronutrient selection, however, is not known in humans.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the substrate oxidation rate on the above variables.

DESIGN

A randomized 4-condition study was conducted in 16 normal-weight men (mean ± SD age: 23 ± 3 y). The sessions differed in the composition of breakfast, which was either high in carbohydrates (HC) or low in carbohydrates (LC) or high in fat (HF) or low in fat (LF). Two hours and 20 minutes after breakfast, energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory exchange ratios (RERs) were measured. Next, olfactory liking for 4 foods (sweet and fatty) and ad libitum energy intake (carbohydrate- and fat-rich bread) were evaluated.

RESULTS

EE was higher (P < 0.001) and subsequent intake was lower (P < 0.01) after the HC and HF breakfasts than after the LC and LF breakfasts. The HC and LC breakfasts induced a higher RER (P < 0.001), lower olfactory liking for sweet foods (P < 0.05), and the consumption of a lower proportion of carbohydrate-rich bread (P< 0.05) than did the HF and LF breakfasts. The HF breakfast induced the lowest RER (P < 0.001), the lowest olfactory liking for fatty foods (P < 0.05), and the lowest proportion of fat-rich bread consumed (P < 0.01). Above all, a negative correlation was found between the RER and olfactory liking for sweet foods (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A high fat oxidation rate induces a strong liking for carbohydrates and a low liking for fats, which lends new support to the carbohydrate-based model of feeding. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01122082.

Opioids as facilitators of feeding: can any food be rewarding?

Palatability is one of the most rewarding aspects of consummatory behavior. Opioids, potent facilitators of intake of sweet and fat tastants, are thought to mediate hedonics of feeding. However, the rewarding context of consumption is not limited to palatability, and gratification can be achieved through other means, e.g., eating to satisfy hunger. The current review discusses the role of opioid peptides in food intake regulation by incorporating this expanded concept of feeding reward. We present evidence that, aside from increasing sugar/fat consumption, opioids propel the intake of diets whose gustatory value is low but are nonetheless consumed under circumstances allowing feeding gratification to occur. Opioids enhance reward-driven consumption by acting within the classical reward circuitry and also by signaling reward at sites that regulate other aspects of food intake, such as satiety and aversion. We conclude that, due to the complexity of neural and functional interactions, opioids are capable of enhancing pleasure of eating any food--palatable, bland or even aversive--making any meal into a more rewarding experience, despite possible consequences.

Sucrose self-administration and CNS activation in the rat

We have previously reported that administration of insulin into the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus decreases motivation for sucrose, assessed by a self-administration task, in rats. Because the pattern of central nervous system (CNS) activation in association with sucrose self-administration has not been evaluated, in the present study, we measured expression of c-Fos as an index of neuronal activation. We trained rats to bar-press for sucrose, according to a fixed-ratio (FR) or progressive-ratio (PR) schedule and mapped expression of c-Fos immunoreactivity in the CNS, compared with c-Fos expression in handled controls. We observed a unique expression of c-Fos in the medial hypothalamus (the arcuate, paraventricular, retrochiasmatic, dorsomedial, and ventromedial nuclei) in association with the onset of PR performance, and expression of c-Fos in the lateral hypothalamus and the bed nucleus of stria terminalis in association with the onset of FR performance. c-Fos expression was increased in the nucleus accumbens of both FR and PR rats. Our study emphasizes the importance of both hypothalamic energy homeostasis circuitry and limbic circuitry in the performance of a food reward task. Given the role of the medial hypothalamus in regulation of energy balance, our study suggests that this circuitry may contribute to reward regulation within the larger context of energy homeostasis.

Energy regulatory signals and food reward

The hormones insulin, leptin, and ghrelin have been demonstrated to act in the central nervous system (CNS) as regulators of energy homeostasis, acting at medial hypothalamic sites. Here, we summarize research demonstrating that, in addition to direct homeostatic actions at the hypothalamus, CNS circuitry that subserves reward and is also a direct and indirect target for the action of these endocrine regulators of energy homeostasis. Specifically, insulin and leptin can decrease food reward behaviors and modulate the function of neurotransmitter systems and neural circuitry that mediate food reward, the midbrain dopamine (DA) and opioidergic pathways. Ghrelin can increase food reward behaviors, and support midbrain DA neuronal function. We summarize discussion of behavioral, systems, and cellular evidence in support of the contributions of reward circuitry to the homeostatic roles of these hormones in the CNS. The understanding of neuroendocrine modulation of food reward, as well as food reward modulation by diet and obesity, may point to new directions for therapeutic approaches to overeating or eating disorders.

Energy regulatory signals and food reward

The hormones insulin, leptin, and ghrelin have been demonstrated to act in the central nervous system (CNS) as regulators of energy homeostasis, acting at medial hypothalamic sites. Here, we summarize research demonstrating that, in addition to direct homeostatic actions at the hypothalamus, CNS circuitry that subserves reward and is also a direct and indirect target for the action of these endocrine regulators of energy homeostasis. Specifically, insulin and leptin can decrease food reward behaviors and modulate the function of neurotransmitter systems and neural circuitry that mediate food reward, the midbrain dopamine (DA) and opioidergic pathways. Ghrelin can increase food reward behaviors, and support midbrain DA neuronal function. We summarize discussion of behavioral, systems, and cellular evidence in support of the contributions of reward circuitry to the homeostatic roles of these hormones in the CNS. The understanding of neuroendocrine modulation of food reward, as well as food reward modulation by diet and obesity, may point to new directions for therapeutic approaches to overeating or eating disorders.

Appetite and reward

The tendency to engage in or maintain feeding behaviour is potently influenced by the rewarding properties of food. Affective and goal-directed behavioural responses for food have been assessed in response to various physiological, pharmacological and genetic manipulations to provide much insight into the neural mechanisms regulating motivation for food. In addition, several lines of evidence tie the actions of metabolic signals, neuropeptides and neurotransmitters to the modulation of the reward-relevant circuitry including midbrain dopamine neurons and corticolimbic nuclei that encode emotional and cognitive aspects of feeding. Along these lines, this review pulls together research describing the peripheral and central signalling molecules that modulate the rewarding effects of food and the underlying neural pathways.

Evaluation of study design variables and their impact on food-maintained operant responding in mice

Operant conditioning paradigms are useful for studying factors involved in reward, particularly when combined with the tools of genetic manipulation in mice. Published operant studies involving mice vary widely with respect to design, and insight into the consequences of design choices on performance in mice is limited. Here, we evaluated the impact of five design variables on the performance of inbred male mice in operant tasks involving solid food pellets as reinforcing agents. We found that the use of lever-press or nose-poke during FR1 sessions did not impact the performance of C57BL/6 mice, but that the lever-press approach correlated with enhanced performance during PR testing. While FR1 session duration had a notable impact on the rate of acquisition of food-maintained responding, performance during FR1 and PR sessions was largely unaffected. Higher order schedules of reinforcement (FR3 and FR5) led to elevated responding during both FR and PR sessions, and improved the correspondence between rewards earned and consumed. Single and group-housed mice performed indistinguishably during FR1 and PR sessions, while environmental enrichment combined with group housing accelerated the rate of acquisition of food-maintained responding while decreasing responding during PR testing. Finally, while C57BL/6 and 129/Sv mice exhibited comparable behavior during FR1 sessions, C57BL/6 mice tended to acquire food-maintained responding faster than 129/Sv counterparts, and exhibited elevated responding during PR testing. Altogether, our findings indicate that while operant performance for food in mice is relatively insensitive to many study parameters, experimental outcomes can be shaped predictably with proper design decisions.

From taste hedonics to motivational drive: central μ-opioid receptors and binge-eating behaviour

Endogenous opioids and μ-opioid receptors (MORs) have long been implicated in the mechanism of appetite control and, in particular, hedonic processes associated with food evaluation, consumption and orosensory reward processes. In animal models of binge eating, selective MOR antagonists suppress food consumption. In humans, non-selective opioid receptor antagonists reduce hedonic taste preferences and food intake, particularly for palatable foods, and cause short-term weight loss. These effects have been linked to direct stimulation of MORs and modulation of dopamine release within the reward circuitry including the nucleus accumbens. These findings suggest that reduction of MOR-mediated hedonic and motivation processes driving consumption of highly palatable foods may be a promising therapeutic approach and provide a strong rationale for developing safer and more selective MOR antagonists or inverse agonists for disorders of 'appetitive motivation' including obesity and binge-eating disorder.

Involvement of dopamine and opioids in the motivation to eat: influence of palatability, homeostatic state, and behavioral paradigms

RATIONALE

Motivation for food depends on several variables including food palatability, the homeostatic state of the organism, and the nature of the behavior required to obtain the reward. However, few studies to date have tried to evaluate motivation for food considering all these variables at the same time. Since dopamine and opioids have been deeply involved in the regulation of feeding, it is of interest to investigate their role considering all the mentioned variables.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the involvement of dopamine and endogenous opioids on food consumption and food motivation using behavioral paradigms that differ in the motor requirement to gain access to the reward, when food palatability and homeostatic state were taken into account.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pellets differentiated on palatability were offered to sated and restricted rats in consummatory tests and in different behavioral paradigms measuring motivational state, but requiring different motor outputs (runway and an operant progressive ratio 3 task). Peripheral injections of naloxone or flupenthixol were administered when these tasks were learned and stable.

RESULTS

Naloxone decreased food intake when pellets were palatable, while flupenthixol was without any effect. When considering motivation, naloxone decreased performances in both the runway and progressive ratio tests while flupenthixol was only effective in the progressive ratio test.

CONCLUSIONS

Impairing the opioid neurotransmission diminishes motivation to obtain food, possibly through a decrease in the perceived palatability of the food reward. The dopaminergic system appears to be more involved in the modulation of motivation to obtain food in a cost/benefit-related manner.

Potency of naltrexone to reduce ethanol self-administration in rats is greater for subcutaneous versus intraperitoneal injection

The opioid antagonist naltrexone (NTX) is used to treat alcohol dependence and may reduce alcohol consumption by selectively blocking opioid receptors. In rat experiments, discrepancy exists across studies regarding the potency of NTX to reduce ethanol consumption. One cause of this discrepancy may be the use of different routes of NTX administration (e.g., intraperitoneal vs. subcutaneous). The purpose of this study was to directly compare the effects of intraperitoneal and subcutaneous injections of NTX on ethanol self-administration. Rats pressed a lever for a sweetened ethanol solution (10% wt/vol in 0.1% saccharin) during 20 min daily sessions. One group received intraperitoneal injections of 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg NTX before the sessions. Another group received subcutaneous injections of 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg/kg NTX before the sessions. The group that received subcutaneous NTX was also tested with a single intraperitoneal injection of 0.3 mg/kg NTX. Naltrexone significantly reduced ethanol self-administration, and NTX was more potent when administered via subcutaneous injection versus intraperitoneal injection. Ethanol intake (g/kg) was significantly reduced after subcutaneous injection of NTX 0.1 mg/kg and higher. In contrast, ethanol intake was significantly reduced after intraperitoneal injection of NTX 3 mg/kg and higher. A comparison of the NTX ED(50) values showed that subcutaneous NTX was approximately 30-fold more potent than intraperitoneal NTX. For the subcutaneous 0.3 mg/kg NTX dose, a detailed bin analysis showed that responding during the first 2 min after injection was similar to that during the first 2 min after a saline injection while responding after NTX decreased in subsequent bins. These findings suggest that researchers should carefully consider the route of NTX administration when discussing potency and selectivity of NTX's effects on ethanol-related behaviors in rats. These findings further support the notion that NTX acts by terminating responding early rather than reducing the initial responding.

Insulin acts at different CNS sites to decrease acute sucrose intake and sucrose self-administration in rats

Findings from our laboratory and others have demonstrated that the hormone insulin has chronic effects within the CNS to regulate energy homeostasis and to decrease brain reward function. In this study, we compared the acute action of insulin to decrease intake of a palatable food in two different behavioral tasks-progressive ratios sucrose self-administration and micro opioid-stimulated sucrose feeding-when administered into several insulin-receptive sites of the CNS. We tested insulin efficacy within the medial hypothalamic arcuate (ARC) and paraventricular (PVN) nuclei, the nucleus accumbens, and the ventral tegmental area. Administration of insulin at a dose that has no chronic effect on body weight (5 mU) into the ARC significantly suppressed sucrose self-administration (75+/-5% of paired control). However, although the mu opioid DAMGO, [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin acetate salt, stimulated sucrose intake at all four CNS sites, the ventral tegmental area was the only sensitive site for a direct effect of insulin to antagonize acute (60 min) micro opioid-stimulated sucrose feeding: sucrose intake was 53+/-8% of DAMGO-induced feeding, when insulin was coadministered with DAMGO. These findings demonstrate that free feeding of sucrose, and motivated work for sucrose, can be modulated within unique sites of the CNS reward circuitry. Further, they support the interpretation that adiposity signals, such as insulin, can decrease different aspects of ingestion of a palatable food, such as sucrose, in an anatomically specific manner.

Decreased motivation to eat in µ-opioid receptor-deficient mice

Altered motivational processes might participate to the physiopathology of eating-related disorders. The endogenous opioid system is thought to mediate the hedonic properties of food intake. To assess the role for the micro-opioid receptor (MOR) pathway in the motivational properties of food intake, in the present study we tested wild-type and MOR-deficient mice (MOR-/-) in a nose-poke operant paradigm for chow or sucrose pellets. To avoid confounding factors linked to food restriction/deprivation experience, mice were always provided with food ad libitum. Although less MOR-/- than wild-type mice initiated operant behaviour, under a fixed ratio-1 (FR-1) reinforcement schedule the two genotypes showed similar patterns of food-driven nose-poking, indicating preserved cognitive abilities in MOR-deficient mice. However, during FR-3 and progressive ratio (PR) reinforcement experiments, MOR-/- mice showed lower levels of nose-poking for either chow or sucrose pellets than wild-type mice, indicating a crucial role for the MOR pathway in the motivational properties of food intake. Moreover, under the PR reinforcement schedule mice nose-poking for sucrose pellets showed higher genotype-independent breakpoint levels than mice working for chow pellets, indicating that the MOR pathway is not essential for hedonic processing of palatable food intake. Finally, MOR-/- mice did not differ from wild-type mice in the rate of operant responding extinction, further supporting the notion of unaltered cognitive abilities in the MOR-deficient mice. The present findings strongly indicate that the MOR pathway mediates the motivational properties of food intake, but it is not essential for hedonic processing of ingestive behaviour.

Development of naltrexone supersensitivity during food-maintained responding enhances naltrexone's ability to reduce ethanol-maintained responding

BACKGROUND

Similar doses of the opiate antagonist naltrexone (NTX) reduce responding maintained by food and ethanol. In animals responding for food, repeated administration of NTX produces supersensitivity to NTX. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the factors that produce enhanced sensitivity to NTX during food-maintained responding also contribute to NTX's ability to reduce ethanol-maintained responding.

METHODS

Rats (n=12) were trained to lever press using food reinforcement. After responding stabilized, the rats were trained to respond for 10% ethanol. Before ethanol sessions, injections of 30 mg/kg NTX were given. Subsequently, weekly cumulative NTX dose-effect curves (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg), known to produce NTX supersensitivity, were determined during food-maintained responding in half the rats for 8 weeks while the other half of the rats received saline vehicle injections instead. To determine whether NTX supersensitivity would transfer to ethanol self-administration, ethanol-maintained responding was re-established and 30 mg/kg NTX was administered again.

RESULTS

Initially, 30 mg/kg NTX had little effect on ethanol-maintained responding. During food-maintained responding, supersensitivity developed in rats receiving weekly cumulative NTX injections. After development of supersensitivity, 30 mg/kg decreased ethanol-maintained responding. Naltrexone's potency to reduce ethanol-maintained responding was unchanged in rats that received only vehicle injections for 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The mechanisms that produce NTX supersensitivity during food-maintained responding may play a role in NTX's effect on ethanol consumption. Naltrexone's effect on responding for ethanol was much smaller than that reported in other studies. Further exploration may lead to techniques that maximize NTX's effect on ethanol while minimizing its effect on other behaviors.

Nucleus accumbens opioid signaling conditions short-term flavor preferences

Opioid signaling in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) strongly modulates flavor-based food choice. To further investigate the role of opioid signaling in taste reward, we used a sensory specific satiety (SSS) paradigm to devalue specific flavors of nutritionally identical food pellets in rats. In the NAcc, infusion of a mu opioid (MOP) receptor selective agonist selectively increased consumption of a pre-fed flavor, thus reversing the SSS effect. Conversely, blockade of endogenous opioid signaling with the opioid antagonist naltrexone selectively decreased consumption of a recently consumed flavor, potentiating the SSS effect. No enhancement of consumption was observed if a delay of 3 h was imposed following the intra-NAcc MOP agonist indicating that there were no long-term changes in flavor preference. If a delay was introduced between the initial flavor exposure and the intra-NAcc MOP agonist infusion, pellet consumption was increased non-selectively (irrespective of flavor) suggesting that close temporal contiguity between flavor experience and NAcc opioid action is critical for the opioid effect on flavor preference. In contrast to opioid effects, inactivating NAcc neurons by local microinjection of muscimol (a GABAA agonist) increased consumption of both the pre-fed and non-pre-fed flavors equally. These results demonstrate that opioids released in the NAcc during consumption of palatable foods produce a selective and transient increase in preference for a recently sampled flavor.

The contribution of endogenous opioids to food reward is dependent on sex and background strain

Complex behaviors such as those associated with reward to unconditioned positive reinforcers are polygenic processes. In studies using genetically modified mice specific for the endogenous opioid systems an observed phenotype in a complex behavior is likely to be dependent on interacting genes which, in inbred mouse lines, influence that phenotype. To address this issue we examined operant responding for palatable food reinforcers in mice lacking the expression of beta-endorphin, enkephalin or both peptides congenic to two different genetic backgrounds; C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. These two inbred strains were chosen because their endogenous opioid states differ and they respond differently to exogenous opioids in many behavioral assays. We found that wildtype and mutant C57BL/6J mice acquired operant responding for food reinforcers faster than DBA/2J mice, regardless of their opioid genotype. Although wildtype DBA/2J mice had a significant deficit in acquisition of bar-pressing behavior to reach a pre-established performance criterion, no subsequent deficit was observed under two different schedules of reinforcement. Additionally, we found that mice lacking enkephalin had decreased motivation to bar press for palatable food reinforcers under a progressive ratio regardless of sex or background strain. In contrast, the only subset of beta-endorphin-deficient mice that had decreased motivation to bar press under a progressive ratio was males on the C57BL/6J background. Of the two classical endogenous opioid peptides with preferential activation of the mu opioid receptor, the knockout models would suggest that enkephalins play a more consistent role than beta-endorphin in mediating the motivation for food reward when tested under a progressive ratio.

Intraventricular insulin and leptin decrease sucrose self-administration in rats

Data from our laboratory and others have demonstrated an effect of the candidate adiposity signals insulin and leptin to decrease brain reward function, as assessed by lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and food-conditioned place preference. In this study, we evaluated the effect of centrally administrated insulin or leptin to acutely decrease motivated performance for 5% sucrose, i.e., progressive ratio (PR) sucrose self-administration. Consistent with findings using other behavioral assays, both insulin and leptin significantly decreased the number of bar presses (62+/-7 and 76+/-8% of paired controls respectively), and the number of sucrose rewards obtained (87+/-4 and 91+/-4% of paired controls respectively), relative to within-subjects' control day performance on PR sucrose self-administration, whereas acute intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid had no effect. Rats fed a higher fat diet for 5 weeks were resistant to the effects of the intraventricular insulin or leptin, suggesting a central resistance to their action. Thus the findings of this study extend and support previous observations which suggest that neuroendocrine signals which regulate energy homeostasis in the CNS may also play a role in modulating reward circuitry, and specifically, food reward.

Differential regulation of the consummatory, motivational and anticipatory aspects of feeding behavior by dopaminergic and opioidergic drugs

Various aspects of feeding behavior (eg consumption, motivation and anticipation) are regulated by homeostatic and hedonic systems, and are modulated by dopaminergic and opioid brain systems. Here, we have studied the modulation of these aspects of feeding behavior by opioid and dopaminergic neurotransmission while taking into account food palatability and homeostatic state. Foods that varied in palatability were presented to either food sated or food restricted rats following injections of different doses of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, or flupenthixol, a dopaminergic receptor antagonist, in behavioral paradigms that measured different aspects of feeding. Naloxone decreased food intake in a dose-dependent manner in sated rats given access to palatable food, without modifying food intake in food restricted rats. Flupenthixol did not have any effect on food intake. With regard to motivation, which was tested in a straight alley, naloxone increased the latency to reach the food only in sated rats presented with palatable food. Flupenthixol did not modify the latency of any group. Conditioned locomotor activity to repeated food presentation, a measure of anticipation, is expressed only in food restricted rats. Naloxone did not modify anticipatory activity, whereas flupenthixol decreased it only in food restricted rats presented with palatable food. These results reinforce the idea that the opioid system regulates feeding through the modulation of the perceived palatability of food. The dopaminergic system seems to be more important for the regulation of anticipatory activity related to motivationally relevant stimuli.

Opposite effects of MK-801 on the expression of food and morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

Behavioural studies have provided strong evidence for common substrates in the rewards of natural and addictive substances, but it is still unclear whether there is a common glutamatergic NMDA receptor mechanism involved in the processing of reward for both. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of MK-801 (0.1mg/kg) on the expression of place preference conditioned with food and morphine (5.0mg/kg) in rats. The data indicates that MK-801 potentiates the expression of food-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) but retards that of morphine CPP. It also demonstrates that the opposite effects of MK-801 on food and morphine CPP expression were caused neither by hyperactivity nor by the impairment of memory retrieval. These results suggest that MK-801 enhances food craving and inhibits morphine craving in rats, and that the roles of glutamatergic NMDA receptor mechanisms in the reward processing of natural reinforcers and addictive drugs may be dissociable.

Opioids as agents of reward-related feeding: a consideration of the evidence

Gerard Smith was one of the pioneers in the field of neuropeptidergic control of food intake. He established methodology and criteria used to determine whether a neuropeptide acts as an endogenous satiety factor. More recently, he theorized that there are direct and indirect controls of meal size. Direct controls include those that depend upon contact of food with preabsorptive receptors from the tip of the tongue to the end of the small intestine, and indirect controls include those that do not depend upon direct contact of mucosal receptors, such as learning and metabolism. In this review, we consider the evidence that opioids are mediators of reward-related feeding. We address these issues adopting Smith's approach to problem solving, including an evaluation of the opioids as controllers of the meal. We also present a novel concept of "hedonic restriction," resulting in a change in opioid gene expression. Overall, we believe the evidence supporting opioid participation in reward-driven and other types of ingestion is very strong, but much work remains before we understand how opioids contribute to the widely distributed neural network that controls ingestive behavior.

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective

This invited review, based on the receipt of the Third Gayle A. Olson and Richard D. Olson Prize for the publication of the outstanding behavioral article published in the journal Peptides in 2002, examines the 30-year historical perspective of the role of the endogenous opioid system in feeding behavior. The review focuses on the advances that this field has made over the past 30 years as a result of the timely discoveries that were made concerning this important neuropeptide system, and how these discoveries were quickly applied to the analysis of feeding behavior and attendant homeostatic processes. The discoveries of the opioid receptors and opioid peptides, and the establishment of their relevance to feeding behavior were pivotal in studies performed in the 1970s. The 1980s were characterized by the establishment of opioid receptor subtype agonists and antagonists and their relevance to the modulation of feeding behavior as well as by the use of general opioid antagonists in demonstrating the wide array of ingestive situations and paradigms involving the endogenous opioid system. The more recent work from the 1990s to the present, utilizes the advantages created by the cloning of the opioid receptor genes, the development of knockout and knockdown techniques, the systematic utilization of a systems neuroscience approach, and establishment of the reciprocity of how manipulations of opioid peptides and receptors affect feeding behavior with how feeding states affect levels of opioid peptides and receptors. The role of G-protein effector systems in opioid-mediated feeding responses, which was the subject of the prize-winning article, is then reviewed.

State-dependent modulation of feeding behavior by proopiomelanocortin-derived beta-endorphin

Feeding behavior can be divided into appetitive and consummatory phases, differing in neural substrates and effects of deprivation. Opioids play an important role in the appetitive aspects of feeding, but they also have acute stimulatory effects on food consumption. Because the opioid peptide beta-endorphin is co-synthesized and released with melanocortins from proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neuronal terminals, we examined the physiological role of beta-endorphin in feeding and energy homeostasis using a strain of mutant mice with a selective deficiency of beta-endorphin. Male beta-endorphin-deficient mice unexpectedly became obese with ad libitum access to rodent chow. Total body weight increased by 15% with a 50-100% increase in the mass of white fat. The mice were hyperphagic with a normal metabolic rate. Despite the absence of endogenous beta-endorphin, the mutant mice did not differ from wild-type mice in their acute feeding responses to beta-endorphin or neuropeptide Y administered intracerebroventricularly or naloxone administered intraperitoneally. Additional mice were studied using an operant behavioral paradigm to examine their acquisition of food reinforcers under increasing work demands. Food-deprived, beta-endorphin-deficient male mice emitted the same number of lever presses under a progressive ratio schedule compared to wild-type mice. However, the mutant mice worked significantly less than did the wild-type mice for food reinforcers under nondeprived conditions. Controls for nonspecific effects on acquisition of conditioned learning, activity, satiety, and resistance to extinction revealed no genotype differences, supporting our interpretation that beta-endorphin selectively affects a motivational component of reward behavior under nondeprived conditions. Therefore, we propose that beta-endorphin may function in at least two primary modes to modulate feeding. In the appetitive phase, beta-endorphin release increases the incentive value of food as a primary reinforcer. In contrast, it appears that endogenous beta-endorphin may inhibit food consumption in parallel with melanocortins and that the orexigenic properties previously ascribed to it may actually be due to other classes of endogenous opioid peptides.

Selective reward deficit in mice lacking beta-endorphin and enkephalin

It has been impossible to unequivocally identify which endogenous opioids modulate the incentive value of rewarding stimuli because these peptides are not highly selective for any single opioid receptor subtype. Here, we present evidence based on the measurement of instrumental behavior of beta-endorphin and enkephalin knock-out mice that both opioid peptides play a positive role. A progressive ratio schedule was used to measure how hard an animal would work for food reinforcers. The loss of either opioid reduced responding under this schedule, regardless of the palatability of the three different formulas of reinforcers used. The phenotype of mice lacking both endogenous opioids was nearly identical to the phenotype of mice mutant for either individual opioid. Responses were tested in nondeprived and deprived feeding states but were reduced in beta-endorphin- and enkephalin-deficient mice only when they were maintained under nondeprived conditions. Other operant manipulations ruled out variables that might contribute nonspecifically to this result such as differences in acquisition, early satiation, motor performance deficit, and reduced resistance to extinction. In contrast to the effects on instrumental performance, the loss of either or both endogenous opioids did not influence preference for water flavored with sucrose or saccharin in a two-bottle free-choice drinking paradigm. We conclude that both beta-endorphin and enkephalin positively contribute to the incentive-motivation to acquire food reinforcers. Because the attenuation of operant responding was observed only during a nondeprived motivational state, the hedonics of feeding are likely altered rather than energy homeostasis.

Excitatory amino acid receptor subtype agonists induce feeding in the nucleus accumbens shell in rats: opioid antagonist actions and interactions with mu-opioid agonists

Administration of mu-opioid receptor subtype agonists into the nucleus accumbens shell elicits feeding which is dependent upon the normal function of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors, D(1) dopamine receptors and GABA(B) receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell for its full expression. Whereas the AMPA antagonist, DNQX administered into the nucleus accumbens shell elicits a transient, though intense feeding response, feeding is elicited by excitatory amino acid agonists administered into the lateral hypothalamus. The present study examined whether excitatory amino acid agonists elicited feeding following administration into the nucleus accumbens shell of rats, whether such feeding responses were altered by opioid antagonist pretreatment, and whether such feeding responses interacted with feeding elicited by mu-opioid agonists. Both AMPA (0.25-0.5 microg) and NMDA (1 microg) in the nucleus accumbens shell significantly and dose-dependently increased food intake over 4 h. Both feeding responses were blocked by naltrexone pretreatment in the nucleus accumbens shell. The mu-opioid agonist, [D-Ala(2),NMe-Phe(4),Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin in the nucleus accumbens shell significantly increased food intake which was significantly enhanced by AMPA cotreatment. This enhanced feeding response was in turn blocked by pretreatment with either general or mu-selective opioid antagonists. In contrast, cotreatment of NMDA and the mu-opioid agonist in the nucleus accumbens shell elicited feeding which was significantly less than that elicited by either treatment alone. These data indicate the presence of important interactions between excitatory amino acid receptors and mu-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell in mediating feeding responses in nondeprived, ad libitum-fed rats.

The effect of naloxone on operant behavior for food reinforcers in DBA/2 mice

Mice are powerful models to investigate the genetic basis of food reward because many spontaneous obesity mutants exist and the murine genome is accessible to selectively targeted manipulations. Experiments in rats have shown that opioid receptor blockade reduces operant responding to food reinforcers. The present study investigated whether DBA/2J mice would display similar behavior in response to an opioid antagonist. Twelve male DBA/2J mice were trained to lever press for food reinforcers and subsequently randomized in a within subjects design for no injection, saline injection, or 10 mg/kg naloxone injection intraperitoneal (i.p.) 20 min before each daily trial under ad lib or food-deprived conditions. A significant main effect of injection occurred to reduce lever pressing by the mice. However, a greater pharmacological effect of naloxone occurred compared with saline on the operant responding only under the food-deprived conditions. Interestingly, the percentage of dispensed food pellets actually consumed was significantly reduced after naloxone injection compared with saline injection for either chow-based or sucrose pellets under ad lib or deprived feeding conditions. These data suggest that opioids specifically influence consumatory behavior in mice, but our findings on instrumental behavior were confounded by an independent inhibitory effect of an i.p. saline injection.

Naloxone's effect on meal microstructure of sucrose and cornstarch diets

The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone decreases consumption of high-sucrose diets but does not reduce cornstarch diet intake in energy-restricted rats. Sucrose-fed rats eat at a much higher rate, consuming more food than cornstarch-fed rats. We examined meal microstructure using an automated weighing system in food-restricted rats eating either a high-sucrose or high-cornstarch diet. Sucrose-fed rats exhibited a higher rate of eating during their first meal compared with cornstarch-fed rats (0.34 vs. 0.20 g/min, respectively). However, naloxone did not reduce eating rate in either group. Naloxone decreased the size of the first meal in both diet groups by shortening the length of the meal. Naloxone's anorectic effect was more potent in the sucrose-fed rats. These results indicate that naloxone's heightened anorectic effect on sucrose diet consumption is not "rate dependent." Naloxone's anorectic actions may be modulated by two conditions, the sensory properties of food and the energy state of the animal. Thus the elevated anorectic potency of naloxone in energy-restricted sucrose-fed rats may reflect actions on neural systems that mediate orosensory and/or postingestive signals.

Opioids and food intake: distributed functional neural pathways?

Agonists of the mu, delta, kappa and ORL(1)opioid receptors increase food intake while opioid receptor blockade decreases food intake. The majority of the collected data related to opioids and feeding has led to the speculation that opioids are involved in meal maintenance and orosensory reward; however, some data suggest that opioids may impact feeding associated with energy needs. Based on the wide distribution of CNS opioid receptors and the presence of other neuropeptides in the vicinity of opioidergic pathways, it seems likely that opioids affect multiple feeding systems. For example, opioids in the hindbrain might be involved in both sensory and metabolic aspects of food intake, those in the amygdala in processing of 'emotional' properties of foods, and those in the hypothalamus in energy needs. In this review we present data which support functional diversity of opioids in feeding behavior.

Behavioral effects of naloxone on neuropeptide Y-induced feeding

We evaluated the effect of naloxone on neuropeptide Y (NPY)-induced feeding behavior using two methods; operant chambers and observational analysis. In the first study rats were trained on a FR 80 (first pellet) FR 3 (subsequent pellets) reinforcement schedule. Following training, rats were injected with NPY (intraventricular, 5 micrograms) and various doses of naloxone (subcutaneous, 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg). NPY significantly increased the number of pellets consumed during the one hour session and naloxone (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) blocked this effect. NPY failed to alter the time to the first response, but did decrease the time needed to complete the first ratio (FR 80). Naloxone (3 and 10 mg/kg) increased the latency to the first response and blocked NPY's effect on completion of the first ratio. In the second study, we observed rats continually following injection of saline. NPY (5 micrograms i.c.v.) and/or naloxone (1 mg/kg s.c.). NPY increased food intake during the 1-h session and naloxone blocked this effect. NPY decreased the latency to eat, but naloxone failed to significantly antagonize this effect. The amount of time spent eating was greater in the NPY group compared to the saline group and naloxone antagonized this effect. Lag sequential analysis indicated that NPY induced a move-eat-move behavioral sequence that disappeared following naloxone administration. These data lend support to the notion that opioids are involved in maintenance of NPY-induced feeding but affect meal initiation in a minor way. Only relatively high doses of naloxone (3 and 10 mg/kg) altered NPY-induced changes in meal initiation.

Naloxone effects on sucrose-motivated behavior

The opioid system plays an important role in feeding. In general, opioid agonists typically increase feeding and opioid antagonists decrease feeding in non-food restricted animals. In food restricted animals the effects of these drugs are substantially reduced. Opioid antagonists have shown a marked effectiveness at reducing consumption of sweet foods. Explanations for this robust effect have typically focused on drug induced changes in taste, taste perception, or palatability. The current study relates the effects of the opioid antagonist naloxone on motivation to obtain different sucrose concentrations to the drug's effects on unrestricted sucrose solution consumption. Changes in motivation to respond were assessed under a progressive ratio reinforcement schedule (PR) which required increased response cost for each successive unit of sucrose solution. Motivation, as measured by the PR, increased as sucrose concentration increased and naloxone produced a dose-dependent decrease in motivation to respond for a given sucrose concentration. Thus, the effectiveness of naloxone was indirectly related to strength of the sucrose concentration. Under unrestricted access to sucrose solutions, naloxone reduced consumption greatest under the higher concentrations. The data suggest at least part of naloxone's effects on sweet tasting food may be mediated through endogenous opioid reward systems that are reflected in measures of motivation.

Endogenous opiates: 1994

This article is the 17th installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes papers published during 1994 involving the behavioral, nonanalgesic, effects of the endogenous opiate peptides. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.