D-fenfluramine-induced prolactin and cortisol release in major depression: response to treatment

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis: neuropsychiatric aspects

Evidence of aberrant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity in many psychiatric disorders, although not universal, has sparked long-standing interest in HPA hormones as biomarkers of disease or treatment response. HPA activity may be chronically elevated in melancholic depression, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and schizophrenia. The HPA axis may be more reactive to stress in social anxiety disorder and autism spectrum disorders. In contrast, HPA activity is more likely to be low in PTSD and atypical depression. Antidepressants are widely considered to inhibit HPA activity, although inhibition is not unanimously reported in the literature. There is evidence, also uneven, that the mood stabilizers lithium and carbamazepine have the potential to augment HPA measures, while benzodiazepines, atypical antipsychotics, and to some extent, typical antipsychotics have the potential to inhibit HPA activity. Currently, the most reliable use of HPA measures in most disorders is to predict the likelihood of relapse, although changes in HPA activity have also been proposed to play a role in the clinical benefits of psychiatric treatments. Greater attention to patient heterogeneity and more consistent approaches to assessing treatment effects on HPA function may solidify the value of HPA measures in predicting treatment response or developing novel strategies to manage psychiatric disease.

Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression

BACKGROUND

Depression is common in primary care and is associated with marked personal, social and economic morbidity, thus creating significant demands on service providers. The antidepressant fluoxetine has been studied in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in comparison with other conventional and unconventional antidepressants. However, these studies have produced conflicting findings.Other systematic reviews have considered selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) as a group which limits the applicability of the indings for fluoxetine alone. Therefore, this review intends to provide specific and clinically useful information regarding the effects of fluoxetine for depression compared with tricyclics (TCAs), SSRIs, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), monoamineoxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and newer agents, and other conventional and unconventional agents.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of fluoxetine in comparison with all other antidepressive agents for depression in adult individuals with unipolar major depressive disorder.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR)to 11May 2012. This register includes relevant RCTs from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (all years),MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). No language restriction was applied. Reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews were handsearched. The pharmaceutical company marketing fluoxetine and experts in this field were contacted for supplemental data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All RCTs comparing fluoxetine with any other AD (including non-conventional agents such as hypericum) for patients with unipolar major depressive disorder (regardless of the diagnostic criteria used) were included. For trials that had a cross-over design only results from the first randomisation period were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted by two review authors using a standard form. Responders to treatment were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis: dropouts were always included in this analysis. When data on dropouts were carried forward and included in the efficacy evaluation, they were analysed according to the primary studies; when dropouts were excluded from any assessment in the primary studies, they were considered as treatment failures. Scores from continuous outcomes were analysed by including patients with a final assessment or with the last observation carried forward. Tolerability data were analysed by calculating the proportion of patients who failed to complete the study due to any causes and due to side effects or inefficacy. For dichotomous data, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model. Continuous data were analysed using standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 171 studies were included in the analysis (24,868 participants). The included studies were undertaken between 1984 and 2012. Studies had homogenous characteristics in terms of design, intervention and outcome measures. The assessment of quality with the risk of bias tool revealed that the great majority of them failed to report methodological details, like the method of random sequence generation, the allocation concealment and blinding. Moreover, most of the included studies were sponsored by drug companies, so the potential for overestimation of treatment effect due to sponsorship bias should be considered in interpreting the results. Fluoxetine was as effective as the TCAs when considered as a group both on a dichotomous outcome (reduction of at least 50% on the Hamilton Depression Scale) (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.22, 24 RCTs, 2124 participants) and a continuous outcome (mean scores at the end of the trial or change score on depression measures) (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.14, 50 RCTs, 3393 participants). On a dichotomousoutcome, fluoxetine was less effective than dothiepin or dosulepin (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.20; number needed to treat (NNT) =6, 95% CI 3 to 50, 2 RCTs, 144 participants), sertraline (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.74; NNT = 13, 95% CI 7 to 58, 6 RCTs, 1188 participants), mirtazapine (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.04; NNT = 12, 95% CI 6 to 134, 4 RCTs, 600 participants) and venlafaxine(OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.51; NNT = 11, 95% CI 8 to 16, 12 RCTs, 3387 participants). On a continuous outcome, fluoxetine was more effective than ABT-200 (SMD -1.85, 95% CI -2.25 to -1.45, 1 RCT, 141 participants) and milnacipran (SMD -0.36, 95% CI-0.63 to -0.08, 2 RCTs, 213 participants); conversely, it was less effective than venlafaxine (SMD 0.10, 95% CI 0 to 0.19, 13 RCTs,3097 participants). Fluoxetine was better tolerated than TCAs considered as a group (total dropout OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.96;NNT = 20, 95% CI 13 to 48, 49 RCTs, 4194 participants) and was better tolerated in comparison with individual ADs, in particular amitriptyline (total dropout OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.85; NNT = 13, 95% CI 8 to 39, 18 RCTs, 1089 participants), and among the newer ADs ABT-200 (total dropout OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.39; NNT = 3, 95% CI 2 to 5, 1 RCT, 144 participants), pramipexole(total dropout OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.42, NNT = 3, 95% CI 2 to 5, 1 RCT, 105 participants), and reboxetine (total dropout OR0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82, NNT = 9, 95% CI 6 to 24, 4 RCTs, 764 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The present study detected differences in terms of efficacy and tolerability between fluoxetine and certain ADs, but the clinical meaning of these differences is uncertain.Moreover, the assessment of quality with the risk of bias tool showed that the great majority of included studies failed to report details on methodological procedures. Of consequence, no definitive implications can be drawn from the studies' results. The better efficacy profile of sertraline and venlafaxine (and possibly other ADs) over fluoxetine may be clinically meaningful,as already suggested by other systematic reviews. In addition to efficacy data, treatment decisions should also be based on considerations of drug toxicity, patient acceptability and cost.

The impact of treatment on HPA axis activity in unipolar major depression

Dysregulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in major depressive disorder has been found to normalize with successful treatment, though inconsistencies exist. To determine the magnitude of change in cortisol levels from pre to post-treatment in individuals with unipolar depression quantitative methods of meta-analysis were applied. Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria and consisted of a total of 1049 depressed patients across study samples. The overall mean effect size of pre-post-treatment cortisol measures indicated that approximately 56% of depressed participants had similar cortisol levels before and after treatment regardless of symptom improvement. The mean effect size of pre-post cortisol measures for those who responded to treatment was larger than the mean effect size of non-responders; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. As well, no significant differences in mean effect size of pre-post cortisol measures based on type of treatment (e.g. antidepressant vs. ECT) were found. Subtype of depressive illness and length of treatment may contribute to the magnitude of change in cortisol measure before and after treatment. Inconsistent findings within the reviewed literature may confound the overall results. The type of treatment and response to treatment do not appear to impact the magnitude of change in cortisol level pre to post-treatment. Our findings suggest that the utility of cortisol as an outcome measure may be limited to specific subsets of the depressed population, and that given the variability in HPA results between studies, it is premature to state that cortisol is not a good outcome measure.

Abnormal neuroendocrine response to clomipramine in hereditary affective psychosis

BACKGROUND

Blunting of prolactin response after serotonergic stimulation during a major depressive episode has been described by several investigators. In this study, the neuroendocrine responses to clomipramine were assessed in remitted patients suffering from hereditary depression.

METHODS

Twenty remitted patients from 11 large families with multigenerational, multiple cases of major affective disorder (bipolar disorder n=15, recurrent depression n=5, according DSM-IV) and 12 healthy relatives were investigated. After intravenous application of 12.5 mg of the serotonin re-uptake inhibitor clomipramine, serum prolactin and cortisol levels were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients and comparison group did not differ significantly with respect to age, baseline prolactin and cortisol concentrations. A gender effect was found in an exploratory analysis for prolactin but not for cortisol and therefore the data for prolactin were analysed separately. After clomipramine infusion, the increase of cortisol was significantly lower in patients than in the comparison group (P=.046). For prolactin, this effect could be found in the male (P=.012) as well as in the female (P=.007) subsample.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that blunted prolactin and cortisol responses to serotonergic stimulation are characteristic for remitted depressive patients with previous episodes of major affective disorders.

Serotonergic vulnerability and depression: assumptions, experimental evidence and implications

In recent years, the term serotonergic vulnerability (SV) has been used in scientific literature, but so far it has not been explicitly defined. This review article attempts to elucidate the SV concept. SV can be defined as increased sensitivity to natural or experimental alterations of the serotonergic (5-HTergic) system. Several factors that may disrupt the 5-HTergic system and hence contribute to SV are discussed, including genetic factors, female gender, personality characteristics, several types of stress and drug use. It is explained that SV can be demonstrated by means of manipulations of the 5-HTergic system, such as 5-HT challenges or acute tryptophan depletion (ATD). Results of 5-HT challenge studies and ATD studies are discussed in terms of their implications for the concept of SV. A model is proposed in which a combination of various factors that may compromise 5-HT functioning in one person can result in depression or other 5-HT-related pathology. By manipulating 5-HT levels, in particular with ATD, vulnerable subjects may be identified before pathology initiates, providing the opportunity to take preventive action. Although it is not likely that this model applies to all cases of depression, or is able to identify all vulnerable subjects, the strength of the model is that it may enable identification of vulnerable subjects before the 5-HT related pathology occurs.

L-5-Hydroxytryptophan augments the neuroendocrine response to a SSRI

The objective of the study was to assess l-5-hydroxytryptophan's (l-5HTP) augmentation effect on the neuroendocrine response to a SSRI (citalopram). A neuroendocrine challenge study was conducted in healthy Asian male subjects. The neuroendocrine response to oral citalopram and l-5HTP was measured primarily as the prolactin and cortisol area under the response curve (or AUC). The study comprised 2 studies: Study 1. A double blind, randomised dose ranging study was conducted with l-5HTP (50-200 mg) to explore the prolactin and/or cortisol dose response and select a dose that provided a threshold neuroendocrine response. Study 2. A randomized comparison of citalopram 20 vs 40 mg was used to assess the effect of these doses on prolactin and cortisol. Based on the results of the dose response assessments with l-5HTP and cortisol, 200 mg l-5HTP was subsequently used in Study 2 to explore the augmentation of the neuroendocrine response to 20 mg citalopram. Citalopram, but not l-5HTP, increased prolactin AUC(0-3h) while 5HTP and citalopram increased cortisol AUC(0-3h). A 200 mg dose of l-5HTP significantly augmented the prolactin and cortisol response AUC(0-3h) to 20mg oral citalopram. The results of the study suggest that an augmented neuroendocrine challenge may be a suitable marker to demonstrate increased 5-HT-mediated responses when exploring novel agents as improved SSRIs.

Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression

BACKGROUND

Depression is common in primary care and it is associated with marked personal, social and economic morbidity, and creates significant demands on service providers in terms of workload. Treatment is predominantly pharmaceutical or psychological. Fluoxetine, the first of a group of antidepressant (AD) agents known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), has been studied in many randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in comparison with tricyclic (TCA), heterocyclic and related ADs, and other SSRIs. These comparative studies provided contrasting findings. In addition, systematic reviews of RCTs have always considered the SSRIs as a group, and evidence applicable to this group of drugs might not be applicable to fluoxetine alone. The present systematic review assessed the efficacy and tolerability profile of fluoxetine in comparison with TCAs, SSRIs and newer agents.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of fluoxetine, compared with other ADs, in alleviating the acute symptoms of depression, and to review its acceptability.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant studies were located by searching the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline (1966-2004) and Embase (1974-2004). Non-English language articles were included.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only RCTs were included. For trials which have a crossover design only results from the first randomisation period were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted by two reviewers using a standard form. Responders to treatment were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis: drop-outs were always included in this analysis. When data on drop-outs were carried forward and included in the efficacy evaluation, they were analysed according to the primary studies; when dropouts were excluded from any assessment in the primary studies, they were considered as treatment failures. Scores from continuous outcomes were analysed including patients with a final assessment or with the last observation carried forward. Tolerability data were analysed by calculating the proportion of patients who failed to complete the study and who experienced adverse reactions out of the total number of randomised patients. The primary analyses used a fixed effects approach, and presented Peto Odds Ratio (PetoOR) and Standardised Mean Difference (SMD).

MAIN RESULTS

On a dichotomous outcome fluoxetine was less effective than dothiepin (PetoOR: 2.09, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.05), sertraline (PetoOR: 1.40, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.76), mirtazapine (PetoOR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.65) and venlafaxine (Peto OR: 1.40, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.70). On a continuous outcome, fluoxetine was more effective than ABT-200 (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) random effects: - 1.85, 95% CI - 2.25 to - 1.45) and milnacipran (SMD random effects: - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.06); conversely, it was less effective than venlafaxine (SMD random effect: 0.11, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.23), however these figures were of borderline statistical significance. Fluoxetine was better tolerated than TCAs considered as a group (PetoOR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89), and was better tolerated in comparison with individual ADs, in particular than amitriptyline (PetoOR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.85) and imipramine (PetoOR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.99), and among newer ADs than ABT-200 (PetoOR: 0.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.41), pramipexole (PetoOR: 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47) and reboxetine (PetoOR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.94).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are statistically significant differences in terms of efficacy and tolerability between fluoxetine and certain ADs, but the clinical meaning of these differences is uncertain, and no definitive implications for clinical practice can be drawn. From a clinical point of view the analysis of antidepressants' safety profile (adverse effect and suicide risk) remains of crucial importance and more reliable data about these outcomes are needed. Waiting for more robust evidence, treatment decisions should be based on considerations of clinical history, drug toxicity, patient acceptability, and cost. We need for large, pragmatic trials, enrolling heterogeneous populations of patients with depression to generate clinically relevant information on the benefits and harms of competitive pharmacological options. A meta-analysis of individual patient data from the randomised trials is clearly necessary.

The effect of citalopram pretreatment on neuronal responses to neuropsychological tasks in normal volunteers: an FMRI study

Changes in serotonin neurotransmission have also been implicated in the etiology and treatment of impulse control disorders, depression, and anxiety. We have investigated the effect of enhancing serotonin function on fundamental brain processes that we have proposed are abnormal in these disorders. In all, 12 male volunteers received citalopram (7.5 mg intravenously) and placebo pretreatment in a single-blind crossover design before undertaking Go/No-go, Loss/No-loss, and covert (aversive) face emotion recognition tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Blood oxygenation level dependent responses were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM2). The tasks activated prefrontal and subcortical regions generally consistent with literature with lateral orbitofrontal cortex (BA47) common to the three tasks. Citalopram pretreatment enhanced the right BA47 responses to the No-go condition, but attenuated this response to aversive faces. Attenuations were seen following citalopram in the medial orbitofrontal (BA11) responses to the No-go and No-loss (ie relative reward compared with Loss) conditions. The right amygdala response to aversive faces was attenuated by citalopram. These results support the involvement of serotonin in modulating basic processes involved in psychiatric disorders but argue for a process-specific, rather than general effect. The technique of combining drug challenge with fMRI (pharmacoMRI) has promise for investigating human psychiatric disorders.

Growth hormone, cortisol and prolactin responses to physical exercise: higher prolactin response in depressed patients

This study was designed to compare growth hormone, cortisol and prolactin responses to physical exercise in depressed patients and healthy comparison subjects. Patients fulfilled the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for current major depressive disorder; subjective depressive symptoms were rated with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) immediately before the experiment. Growth hormone, cortisol and prolactin were measured before and immediately after physiologically stressful bicycle cardiopulmonary exercise test. After exercise, there were three additional hormone measurements, with 30-min intervals. No significant difference was found in baseline growth hormone, cortisol or prolactin levels between patients and the control group. Plasma growth hormone and cortisol levels increased significantly during physical exercise in both patients and controls and returned to baseline in 90 min. There was no significant difference in growth hormone or cortisol responses to physical exercise between the two groups. However, prolactin levels increased only in the depressed patients group during the exercise. We hypothesize that acute exercise may have a stronger effect on serotonin (5-HT) release in depressed patients, which is reflected in increased plasma prolactin concentration.

From galactorrhea to osteopenia: rethinking serotonin-prolactin interactions

The widespread use of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has been accompanied by numerous reports describing a potential association with hyperprolactinemia. Antipsychotics are commonly known to elevate serum prolactin (PRL) through blockade of dopamine receptors in the pituitary. However, there is little awareness of the mechanisms by which SSRIs stimulate PRL release. Hyperprolactinemia may result in overt symptoms such as galactorrhea, which may be accompanied by impaired fertility. Long-term clinical sequelae include decreased bone density and the possibility of an increased risk of breast cancer. Through literature review, we explore the possible pathways involved in serotonin-induced PRL release. While the classic mechanism of antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia directly involves dopamine cells in the tuberoinfundibular pathway, SSRIs may act on this system indirectly through GABAergic neurons. Alternate pathways involve serotonin stimulation of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and oxytocin (OT) release. We conclude with a comprehensive review of clinical sequelae associated with hyperprolactinemia, and the potential role of SSRIs in this phenomenon.

Serotonin and the neuroendocrine regulation of the hypothalamic--pituitary-adrenal axis in health and disease

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT)-containing neurons in the midbrain directly innervate corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-containing cells located in paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. Serotonergic inputs into the paraventricular nucleus mediate the release of CRH, leading to the release of adrenocorticotropin, which triggers glucocorticoid secretion from the adrenal cortex. 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors are the main receptors mediating the serotonergic stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In turn, both CRH and glucocorticoids have multiple and complex effects on the serotonergic neurons. Therefore, these two systems are interwoven and communicate closely. The intimate relationship between serotonin and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is of great importance in normal physiology such as circadian rhythm and stress, as well as pathophysiological disorders such as depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and chronic fatigue.

Contrasting effects of citalopram and reboxetine on waking salivary cortisol

RATIONALE

Acute administration of antidepressants which potentiate serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) function stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and increases salivary free cortisol in healthy subjects. The effects of repeated antidepressant administration have been less studied, but the ability of such treatment to modulate HPA axis activity may be relevant to therapeutic effects.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the effect of short-term treatment with two different antidepressant medications on HPA axis activity.

METHODS

We studied the effect of 6-day treatment with the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (20 mg daily) and the selective noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor, reboxetine (8 mg daily), on diurnal salivary cortisol in a parallel group, placebo-controlled, double-blind design.

RESULTS

Citalopram significantly enhanced the increase in salivary cortisol produced by waking, while the effect of reboxetine treatment was indistinguishable from placebo. There was no change in basal salivary cortisol levels sampled in a standard pattern throughout the day.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment with citalopram and reboxetine produced strikingly different effects on waking salivary cortisol, arguing against a common effect of antidepressant drugs on HPA axis function. Waking salivary cortisol may be a more reliable means of assessing the effects of antidepressant treatment on the HPA axis than a standard regime of basal salivary sampling.

Effects of sertraline treatment on plasma cortisol, prolactin and thyroid hormones in female depressed patients

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 4 and 24 weeks of sertraline treatment (average dose 42.5 mg/day) on plasma hormone levels in 15 female patients with major depression. Baseline levels of triiodothyronine (T(3)) were lower, while cortisol, prolactin (PRL), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroxin (T(4)) levels did not differ from the values in 16 female controls. There was a positive correlation between the scores on the Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale and baseline cortisol levels. Treatment with sertraline for 4 weeks increased plasma cortisol levels, while 24 weeks of sertraline treatment increased plasma T(3) levels in depressed patients. Neither 4, nor 24 weeks of sertraline treatment affected PRL, T(4) and TSH levels in depressed patients. The data show different and time-dependent effects of sertraline treatment on plasma cortisol, PRL and thyroid hormones in female depressed patients.

Thyroid hormones, serotonin and mood: of synergy and significance in the adult brain

The use of thyroid hormones as an effective adjunct treatment for affective disorders has been studied over the past three decades and has been confirmed repeatedly. Interaction of the thyroid and monoamine neurotransmitter systems has been suggested as a potential underlying mechanism of action. While catecholamine and thyroid interrelationships have been reviewed in detail, the serotonin system has been relatively neglected. Thus, the goal of this article is to review the literature on the relationships between thyroid hormones and the brain serotonin (5-HT) system, limited to studies in adult humans and adult animals. In humans, neuroendocrine challenge studies in hypothyroid patients have shown a reduced 5-HT responsiveness that is reversible with thyroid replacement therapy. In adult animals with experimentally-induced hypothyroid states, increased 5-HT turnover in the brainstem is consistently reported while decreased cortical 5-HT concentrations and 5-HT2A receptor density are less frequently observed. In the majority of studies, the effects of thyroid hormone administration in animals with experimentally-induced hypothyroid states include an increase in cortical 5-HT concentrations and a desensitization of autoinhibitory 5-HT1A receptors in the raphe area, resulting in disinhibition of cortical and hippocampal 5-HT release. Furthermore, there is some indication that thyroid hormones may increase cortical 5-HT2 receptor sensitivity. In conclusion, there is robust evidence, particularly from animal studies, that the thyroid economy has a modulating impact on the brain serotonin system. Thus it is postulated that one mechanism, among others, through which exogenous thyroid hormones may exert their modulatory effects in affective illness is via an increase in serotonergic neurotransmission, specifically by reducing the sensitivity of 5-HT1A autoreceptors in the raphe area, and by increasing 5-HT2 receptor sensitivity.

Role of serotonergic and noradrenergic systems in the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety disorders

There is abundant evidence for abnormalities of the norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5HT) neurotransmitter systems in depression and anxiety disorders. The majority of evidence supports underactivation of serotonergic function and complex dysregulation of noradrenergic function, most consistent with overactivation of this system. Treatment for these disorders requires perturbation of these systems. Reproducible increases in serotonergic function and decreases in noradrenergic function accompany treatment with antidepressants, and these alterations may be necessary for antidepressant efficacy. Dysregulation of these systems clearly mediates many symptoms of depression and anxiety. The underlying causes of these disorders, however, are less likely to be found within the NE and 5HT systems, per se. Rather their dysfunction is likely due to their role in modulating, and being modulated by, other neurobiologic systems that together mediate the symptoms of affective illness. Clarification of noradrenergic and serotonergic modulation of various brain regions may yield a greater understanding of specific symptomatology, as well as the underlying circuitry involved in euthymic and abnormal mood and anxiety states. Disrupted cortical regulation may mediate impaired concentration and memory, together with uncontrollable worry. Hypothalamic abnormalities likely contribute to altered appetite, libido, and autonomic symptoms. Thalamic and brainstem dysregulation contributes to altered sleep and arousal states. Finally, abnormal modulation of cortical-hippocampal-amygdala pathways may contribute to chronically hypersensitive stress and fear responses, possibly mediating features of anxiety, anhedonia, aggression, and affective dyscontrol. The continued appreciation of the neural circuitry mediating affective states and their modulation by neurotransmitter systems should further the understanding of the pathophysiology of affective and anxiety disorders.

Blunted temperature and cortisol responses to ipsapirone in major depression: lack of enhancement by electroconvulsive therapy

Depression has been shown in some studies to be associated with a reduction in hypothalamic 5-HT(1A) receptor function, as indicated by reduced hormone and/or hypothermic responses to 5-HT(1A) agonists such as ipsapirone. The hypothermic response to ipsapirone was reduced in depressed patients treated with amitriptyline. Hormone and hypothermic responses to 5-HT(1A) agonists were reduced in normal subjects administered specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on 5-HT(1A) receptor-mediated responses in humans have not been reported. In the present work, ten depressed patients and 15 control subjects were challenged with placebo and with 0.3 mg/kg ipsapirone, administered 48 h apart in a randomised double blind design. Hypothermic, growth hormone (GH) and cortisol responses were measured. Seven of the depressed patients were treated with a course of ECT, and placebo and ipsapirone challenges were repeated 24 and 72 h after the last treatment. The cortisol response to ipsapirone was significantly reduced in the depressed patients compared with controls. The hypothermic response to ipsapirone was totally abolished in the depressed patients. When tested after a course of ECT, the seven depressed patients again showed reduced or blunted responses. We conclude that hypothalamic 5-HT(1A) receptor function is reduced in depression. In contrast to the effects of electroconvulsive shock (ECS) on post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor function in animals, which have chiefly been measured in the hippocampus using electrophysiological techniques, ECT in humans does not induce an increase in sensitivity of post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the hypothalamus.

Effects of subchronic paroxetine administration on night-time endocrinological profiles in healthy male volunteers

To evaluate the subchronic effects of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on nocturnal endocrinological profiles, eight healthy male volunteers with no personal or family history of a psychiatric or neurological disease were administered paroxetine (30 mg/day) or placebo in a double-blind cross-over design. Drugs were given as a single dose at 10:00 h for a period of 4 weeks each. Between days 21 and 28 of each treatment period, sleep EEG was registered for four consecutive nights from 23:00 to 07:00 h. During the last night, hormonal profiles for prolactin, growth hormone (GH), cortisol, corticotropin (ACTH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone and melatonin were determined, and area-under-the-curve values were calculated. None of the endocrinological parameters revealed any statistically significant changes. A trend could be found for an increased cortisol production under paroxetine (P = 0.069). ACTH, LH, and melatonin showed slight and non-significant decreases. Prolactin release was only marginally elevated (+7%). The mean sleep onset GH release (as measured for a time period of 180 min after sleep onset) was decreased by about 30% under paroxetine. However, statistical significance could not be reached. For hGH, there was a delayed mean GH-peak under paroxetine. Nocturnal testosterone secretion remained almost unaltered. The lack of significant endocrinological alterations might be partially explained by both adaptational phenomena under subchronic treatment conditions and the extended time span between the single morning dose and the registration period, respectively.

Serotonergic blunting to meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) highly correlates with sustained childhood abuse in impulsive and autoaggressive female borderline patients

BACKGROUND

Disturbances of affect, impulse regulation, and autoaggressive behavior, which are all said to be related to an altered function of the central serotonergic (5-HT) system, are prominent features of borderline personality disorder (BPD). A high coincidence of childhood physical and sexual abuse is reported in these patients. Animal studies indicate that early, sustained stress correlates with a dysfunctional central 5-HT system. Therefore, we hypothesize that sustained traumatic stress in childhood affects the responsivity of the postsynaptic serotonergic system of traumatized BPD patients.

METHODS

Following Axis I, Axis II, and trauma assessment, a neuroendocrine challenge test was performed with the postsynaptic serotonergic agonist meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) in 12 impulsive and autoaggressive female patients with BPD and 9 matched healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The cortisol and prolactin responses to the m-CPP challenge in BPD patients were significantly lower compared to those in controls. Within the group of patients with BPD, the net prolactin response showed a high inverse correlation with the frequency of the physical (r = -.77) and sexual abuse (r = -.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that severe and sustained traumatic stress in childhood affects the 5-HT system and especially 5-HT(1A) receptors. This finding confirms the data from animal research. The blunted prolactin response to m-CPP appears to be the result of severe traumatization and independent of the BPD diagnosis.

Characterization of D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia: evidence for multiple sites of action

The effects of D-fenfluramine on core body temperature has been largely investigated under conditions of either high or low ambient temperature, whereas little research has focused on this response under normal environmental conditions. Moreover, there has been neglect in research on the mechanisms underlying changes in body temperature. In this study, we demonstrate that D-fenfluramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) induces a sustained decrease in body temperature in the rat under normal ambient temperatures. Pre-treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline (5 mg/kg), the full 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist 4-fluoro-N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-2-pyridinyl benzamide], WAY 100635 (0.15 mg/kg) and the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist benzofuran-2-carboxamidine, RO 43-0440 (2.5 mg/kg) blocked D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia. Depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) stores following treatment with the serotonergic neurotoxin parachlorophenylalanine reversed the initial hypothermic effects of D-fenfluramine but not the later effects, as D120 min post-challenge) in animals pre-treated with parachlorophenylalanine. Such findings are consistent with a requirement for D-fenfluramine uptake into 5-HT neurons followed by release of 5-HT from intracellular stores and stimulation of post-synaptic 5-HT receptors to reduce body temperature. The hypothermic response to D-fenfluramine was potentiated by ketanserin pre-treatment 30 min post-challenge but then antagonized at later time intervals. Pre-treatment with the dopamine, D(2) antagonist, haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and sulpiride (30 mg/kg) had a similar effect in blocking the hypothermia as WAY 100635, suggesting a role for dopamine D(2) receptors in the response. Pre-treatment with the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine failed to block the hypothermic response. These results suggest multiple sites of action mediating D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia and may be the result of a combined effect of D-fenfluramine and its active metabolite norfenfluramine affecting not only the release of 5-HT but also stimulation of post-synaptic receptors.

Serotonin and the prediction of response time to fluoxetine in patients with mild depression

Serotonin (5-HT) dysregulation has been associated with major depressive disorder (MDD); a blunted prolactin (PRL) response to D,L-fenfluramine (FEN) has been associated with MDD. Pharmacologic manipulation of the serotonin system with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) is effective in the treatment of depression. However, the relationship between pre-treatment 5-HT activity and response to SSRIs is not well understood. This study investigated the relationship between 5-HT dysregulation and response to fluoxetine (FLU). Twenty patients with MDD entered a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine preceded by D,L-fenfluramine stimulation. Patients were assigned randomly to either FLU, 20 mg QD, or placebo (PLA) for an 11-week trial. No relationship was found between the PRL response to FEN and response to FLU. Among the seven responding to FLU, there was a significant negative correlation between PRL response and the time until sustained response to FLU (r = -0.93, P < 0.001, n = 7). Although preliminary, this study suggests that low baseline serotonin activity may be associated with a slower response to FLU in depression.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and neuroendocrine function

Selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective drugs for the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders associated with reduced serotonergic function. Serotonergic neurons play an important role in the regulation of neuroendocrine function. This review will discuss the acute and chronic effects of SSRIs on neuroendocrine function. Acute administration of SSRIs increases the secretion of several hormones, but chronic treatment with SSRIs does not alter basal blood levels of hormones. However, adaptive changes are induced by long-term treatment with SSRIs in serotonergic, noradrenergic and peptidergic neural function. These adaptive changes, particularly in the function of specific post-synaptic receptor systems, can be examined from altered adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, oxytocin, vasopressin, prolactin, growth hormone (GH) and renin responses to challenges with specific agonists. Neuroendocrine challenge tests both in experimental animals and in humans indicate that chronic SSRIs produce an increase in serotonergic terminal function, accompanied by desensitization of post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptor-mediated ACTH, cortisol, GH and oxytocin responses, and by supersensitivity of post-synaptic 5-HT2A (and/or 5-HT2C) receptor-mediated secretion of hormones. Chronic exposure to SSRIs does not alter the neuroendocrine stress-response and produces inconsistent changes in alpha2 adrenoceptor-mediated GH secretion. Overall, the effects of SSRIs on neuroendocrine function are dependent on adaptive changes in specific neurotransmitter systems that regulate the secretion of specific hormones.

Prolactin response to d-fenfluramine in major depression before and after treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Central serotonin dysfunction is thought to be involved in the etiology of major depression. Serotonergic challenge studies before and after treatment of depressed patients have yielded conflicting results; however, these studies have not focused on the effect of antidepressant treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on serotonergic challenge studies.

METHODS

The authors studied 19 outpatients with major depressive disorder using prolactin response to d-fenfluramine as a measure of central serotonergic functioning. Testing of patients was conducted just before and right after 8 weeks of treatment with either fluoxetine (n = 10) or fluvoxamine (n = 9) as part of a randomized, double-blind treatment trial. Blood samples for prolactin were collected prior to administration of d-fenfluramine (0.5 mg/kg) and then over the next 5 hours.

RESULTS

Unlike previous studies in which antidepressant treatment produced an enhanced prolactin response to fenfluramine, in this study there was no increase in prolactin response to d-fenfluramine following SSRI treatment. In fact, prolactin response to d-fenfluramine was significantly diminished after treatment with fluvoxamine but not fluoxetine.

CONCLUSIONS

The implications of these findings are discussed with regard to possible mechanisms of action of SSRI treatment.

Psychoneuroendocrinology of depression. Prolactin

Prolactin provides us with a window to the brain in our quest for understanding the psychobiology of depression, since the regulation of its release involves some of the monamine neurotransmitter systems that have been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. Investigation examining basal prolactin plasma concentrations in depressed patients, including assessments of the rhythm of prolactin release, have not provided clear, consistent findings. Further exploration of the precise mechanisms involved in serotonin-stimulated prolactin release should shed light on the pathophysiology of abnormal prolactin responsivity in depression, and by extension, the psychobiologic basis of depression.

Recovery from major depression is not associated with normalization of serotonergic function

BACKGROUND

Plasma prolactin response to fenfluramine, a serotonergic agent, is typically blunted in moderately to severely depressed adults when compared to healthy controls. It is not clear, however, whether this dysregulation represents an acute change during symptomatic depression or a chronic disturbance.

METHODS

In the current study, the prolactin responses to D,L-fenfluramine (weight-adjusted oral dose) of 29 adults who had a history of at least one major depressive episode (DSM-III-R criteria), but not during the past year, were compared to the prolactin responses of 58 age-, sex-, and socioeconomic status-matched adults without a lifetime history of major depression.

RESULTS

Individuals with a positive history of major depression had significantly lower peak prolactin responses than controls. This finding was not attributable to weight, fenfluramine bioavailability, or baseline prolactin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first investigation to compare men and women with a history of depression but not depressed at the time of the fenfluramine challenge to a similar group of healthy controls. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that central serotonergic activity is persistently disturbed in adults who experience depressive episodes.

5-HT brain function in affective disorder: d,l-fenfluramine-induced hormone release and clinical outcome in long-term lithium/carbamazepine prophylaxis

Prolactin (PRL) and Cortisol (CORT) responses to d,l-fenfluramine (FEN) challenge (60 mg) were examined in patients with affective disorders on two occasions under euthymic conditions: drug-free before admission to prophylactic treatment and after about 9 months of medication with lithium or carbamazepine. Response to treatment was assessed by a complex algorithm using continuous ratings in outpatient clinic over a period of 2 years. In general, treatment resulted in a delayed and diminished CORT release (n.s.); subgroup analysis revealed an attenuated CORT response (P < 0.05) in responders, whereas nonresponders showed no change in CORT secretion pattern except an enhanced CORT baseline value (P < 0.05). Cross-sectional comparison of responders with nonresponders under medication yielded a trend for greater CORT stimulation in nonresponders. This result was not affected by FEN/NorFEN or lithium/carbamazepine serum levels, baseline CORT values, age, sex, diagnostic distribution, number of appointments to the outpatient clinic or duration of medication at the time of FEN test session. Before onset of prophylactic medication responders and nonresponders could not be discriminated significantly regarding stimulated hormone release, probably due to the small sample size (n = 17). CORT response to FEN was increased in drugfree unipolar patients compared to bipolar (P < 0.05) and to schizoaffective patients (P < 0.1). In accordance with its well-documented presynaptic 5-HT-agonistic action lithium medication resulted in a significantly greater increase in CORT release than carbamazepine (P < 0.05). Evaluation of PRL stimulation showed patterns of secretion quite similar to those of CORT, without reaching statistical significance in most cases. Perhaps due to methodological differences in assessing treatment response, these data do not confirm former results, which supposed an enhanced 5-HT net activity in long-term prophylactic lithium treatment. Because of high interindividual variances of hormone parameters, the FEN-test procedure is not a useful tool for the prediction of therapeutical outcome in terms of clinical routine use. Relations of stimulated hormone response as a marker of central serotoninergic activity and clinical outcome are discussed.

Serotonergic function and negative and depressive symptomatology in schizophrenia and major depression

BACKGROUND

Serotonergic abnormalities are found in both major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia. Depressive symptoms commonly occur alongside the negative or defect symptoms in schizophrenia and antiserotonergic drugs may be particularly effective in their treatment. We wished to explore whether these symptoms could be distinguished biologically by directly comparing serotonergic function in these two illnesses.

METHOD

Fifteen patients with MDD and 13 patients with schizophrenia underwent testing with the specific serotonin releasing agent D-fenfluramine (D-FEN). Prolactin and cortisol responses were measured to ascertain central serotonergic function. Individual patient results were compared with their own carefully matched control to correct for the effect of age, sex, weight and menstrual cycle, before the two patient groups were then compared.

RESULTS

Prolactin responses differed significantly between the two patient groups, being lower in MDD patients and higher in schizophrenia patients than their individually matched controls. Cortisol responses did not differ. Within the schizophrenia group, increased serotonergic function correlated positively with depressive symptoms, but there was no such correlation with defect symptoms. Depressive scores were negatively correlated with the presence of negative symptoms in the schizophrenic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Schizophrenia and MDD have distinct and opposite neuroendocrine responses to D-FEN. There is no evidence that depressive symptoms in these two conditions have a common serotonergic basis. Moreover, these responses distinguished between negative and depressive symptoms in our schizophrenic group.

Does central serotonergic function correlate inversely with aggression? A study using D-fenfluramine in healthy subjects

Much research has investigated possible links between serotonergic function and aggression in violent or personality disordered populations, but few studies have looked at healthy subjects. In this study we administered 30 mg of the specific 5-HT releasing agent D-fenfluramine to 35 healthy subjects, along with questionnaire measures of hostility and aggression. Prolactin and cortisol responses were used as indices of central 5-HT function. In males, there were significant inverse correlations between 5-HT mediated cortisol responses and both the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory total score and the aggression factor. There were no such relations in female subjects or using prolactin responses. There was also an inverse relation between basal cortisol levels and both prolactin and cortisol responses, but no relation between basal cortisol levels and aggressive measures. These results provide some support for the existence of an inverse relationship between central serotonin function and aggression/hostility in healthy males, similar to that seen in previous studies using violent or highly aggressive populations.

Differences between morning and afternoon hormonal responses to D-fenfluramine in healthy humans

The prolactin (PRL) and cortisol responses to oral D-fenfluramine (30 mg) and placebo were measured in seven healthy subjects (two women and five men) in the morning and in the afternoon. As compared to placebo, D-fenfluramine significantly increased plasma PRL levels in both the morning and the afternoon, with no significant circadian difference. On the contrary, D-fenfluramine significantly enhanced plasma cortisol levels in the afternoon, but not in the morning. These data suggest that the time of the day at which the D-fenfluramine challenge test is carried out may be an important variable in determining the glucocorticoid response to the 5-HT releasing agent in humans.

D-fenfluramine-induced prolactin responses in postwithdrawal alcoholics and controls

Serum prolactin response to the serotonin agonist D-fenfluramine were measured in 19 DSM-111-R male alcoholics, 2.5 or more weeks postalcohol withdrawal. Prolactin responses were compared with nine healthy nonalcoholic male controls. After an overnight fast, each subject received 30 mg of D-fenfluramine orally, and serial samples of serum prolactin were taken over a 4-hr period. D-fenfluramine caused a significantly attenuated peak delta-prolactin response in the alcoholics relative to the controls (p = 0.05). A repeated-measures ANOVA of delta-prolactin yielded a significant within-subjects effect of time (p < 0.05), a within-subjects effect of group that reached significance (p = 0.05), and a nonsignificant group by time interaction. The delta-prolactin value at time points 60 and 240 min postadministration of the probe was significantly attenuated in the alcoholic group, with p < 0.05. There was also some evidence for a diminished serotonergic response in those alcoholics with a negative family history. The delta-prolactin response did not correlate with subjects' age, duration of alcohol use, duration of abstinence from alcohol, severity of alcohol dependence, or age of onset. Results imply a relative subsensitivity of the serotonin system in postwithdrawal alcoholics, and this may be primarily of the 5-HT2 receptor.

Contrasting neuroendocrine responses in depression and chronic fatigue syndrome

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and central 5-HT function were compared in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), depression and healthy states. 10 patients with CFS and 15 patients with major depression were matched for age, weight, sex and menstrual cycle with 25 healthy controls. Baseline-circulating cortisol levels were highest in the depressed, lowest in the CFS and intermediate between the two in the control group (P = 0.01). Prolactin responses to the selective 5-HT-releasing agent d-fenfluramine were lowest in the depressed, highest in the CFS and intermediate between both in the healthy group (P = 0.01). Matched pair analysis confirmed higher prolactin responses in CFS patients than controls (P = 0.05) and lower responses in depressed patients than controls (P = 0.003). There were strong inverse correlations between prolactin and cortisol responses and baseline cortisol values. These data confirm that depression is associated with hypercotisolaemia and reduced central 5-HT neurotransmission and suggest that CFS may be associated with hypocortisolaemia and increased 5-HT function. The opposing responses in CFS and depression may be related to reversed patterns of behavioural dysfunction seen in these conditions. These findings attest to biological distinctions between these disorders.

Cortisol synthesis inhibition: a new treatment strategy for the clinical and endocrine manifestations of depression

Evidence exists that oversecretion of cortisol may be responsible for the clinical manifestations and serotonergic abnormality in depressive illness. Using the cortisol synthesis inhibitor ketoconazole, we investigated the effects of directly lowering cortisol on the symptoms and the response of prolactin (PRL) to d-fenfluramine in eight patients suffering from major depression. Prolactin responses to d-fenfluramine were measured, and patients were treated with 400-600 mg of ketoconazole for 4 weeks, after which they were retested. Five patients treated with ketoconazole recovered from their depression, while the other three had decreases in their Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores of < or = 50% and were deemed partial responders. Posttreatment prolactin responses to d-fenfluramine were higher than pretreatment values. Ketoconazole normalizes the blunted prolactin responses to d-fenfluramine and may be an effective method by which to treat depression. This implies that hypercortisolemia may be responsible for the clinical features and serotonergic subsensitivity observed in depression.

Glucocorticoids and the genesis of depressive illness. A psychobiological model

Abnormalities in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) have been the most consistently demonstrated biological markers in depressive illness. Numerous other neuroendocrine disturbances have also been described, including blunted clonidine-induced growth hormone release and blunted fenfluramine-induced prolactin release. These disturbances are generally interpreted in terms of monoaminergic receptor dysfunction. The theory presented here suggests that chronic stress which activates the HPA will in certain susceptible people produce changes in central monoamines. The high level of glucocorticoid receptors on such central neurons is postulated as mediating the alterations. Thus monoamine abnormalities, rather than being a core aetiological feature of depression, are seen as secondary to HPA overdrive.