Differences in sensitivity to neuroleptic blockade: medial forebrain bundle versus frontal cortex self-stimulation

Medial prefrontal cortex and anteromedial thalamus interaction regulates goal-directed behavior and dopaminergic neuron activity

The prefrontal cortex is involved in goal-directed behavior. Here, we investigate circuits of the PFC regulating motivation, reinforcement, and its relationship to dopamine neuron activity. Stimulation of medial PFC (mPFC) neurons in mice activated many downstream regions, as shown by fMRI. Axonal terminal stimulation of mPFC neurons in downstream regions, including the anteromedial thalamic nucleus (AM), reinforced behavior and activated midbrain dopaminergic neurons. The stimulation of AM neurons projecting to the mPFC also reinforced behavior and activated dopamine neurons, and mPFC and AM showed a positive-feedback loop organization. We also found using fMRI in human participants watching reinforcing video clips that there is reciprocal excitatory functional connectivity, as well as co-activation of the two regions. Our results suggest that this cortico-thalamic loop regulates motivation, reinforcement, and dopaminergic neuron activity.

Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs

Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is a behavioral procedure in which operant responding is maintained by pulses of electrical brain stimulation. In research to study abuse-related drug effects, ICSS relies on electrode placements that target the medial forebrain bundle at the level of the lateral hypothalamus, and experimental sessions manipulate frequency or amplitude of stimulation to engender a wide range of baseline response rates or response probabilities. Under these conditions, drug-induced increases in low rates/probabilities of responding maintained by low frequencies/amplitudes of stimulation are interpreted as an abuse-related effect. Conversely, drug-induced decreases in high rates/probabilities of responding maintained by high frequencies/amplitudes of stimulation can be interpreted as an abuse-limiting effect. Overall abuse potential can be inferred from the relative expression of abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects. The sensitivity and selectivity of ICSS to detect abuse potential of many classes of abused drugs is similar to the sensitivity and selectivity of drug self-administration procedures. Moreover, similar to progressive-ratio drug self-administration procedures, ICSS data can be used to rank the relative abuse potential of different drugs. Strengths of ICSS in comparison with drug self-administration include 1) potential for simultaneous evaluation of both abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects, 2) flexibility for use with various routes of drug administration or drug vehicles, 3) utility for studies in drug-naive subjects as well as in subjects with controlled levels of prior drug exposure, and 4) utility for studies of drug time course. Taken together, these considerations suggest that ICSS can make significant contributions to the practice of abuse potential testing.

Effects of peripherally restricted κ opioid receptor agonists on pain-related stimulation and depression of behavior in rats

κ opioid receptor agonists that do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier are peripherally restricted and distribute poorly to the central nervous system after systemic administration. Peripherally restricted κ agonists have promise as candidate analgesics, because they may produce antinociception mediated by peripheral κ receptors more potently than they produce undesirable sedative and psychotomimetic effects mediated by central κ receptors. The present study used assays of pain-related stimulation and depression of behavior in rats to compare effects of 1) two peripherally restricted κ agonists [the tetrapeptide D-Phe-D-Phe-D-Ile-D-Arg-NH(2) (ffir) and the nonpeptidic compound ((R,S)-N-[2-(N-methyl-3,4-dichlorophenylacetamido)-2-(3-carboxyphenyl)-ethyl]pyrrolidine hydrochloride (ICI204448)], 2) a centrally penetrating κ agonist (salvinorin A), and 3) several reference drugs, including a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID; ketoprofen). Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid served as a noxious stimulus to stimulate a stretching response and depress intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) maintained by the delivery of electrical brain stimulation to the medial forebrain bundle. Acid-stimulated stretching was blocked by ketoprofen, the peripherally restricted κ agonists, and salvinorin A. However, acid-induced depression of ICSS was blocked only by ketoprofen. The peripherally restricted κ agonists had little effect, and salvinorin A exacerbated acid-induced depression of ICSS. These results suggest that peripherally restricted κ agonists may be safer than centrally penetrating κ agonists but less efficacious than NSAIDS or μ opioid receptor agonists to block pain-related depression of behavior; however, the peripheral selectivity of ffir and ICI204448 is limited, and future studies with κ agonists capable of greater peripheral selectivity are warranted.

Dopamine and glutamate release in the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of rat following lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation

Rewarding hypothalamic brain stimulation is thought to depend on trans-synaptic activation of high-threshold (and thus rarely directly depolarized by rewarding stimulation) dopaminergic fibers of the medial forebrain bundle. We used in vivo microdialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrochemical or fluorometric detection to investigate the concurrent release of dopamine and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens septi and in the ventral tegmental area, as a function of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation.Self-stimulation at a variety of stimulation frequencies and pulse widths increased levels of dopamine and its primary metabolites, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid in the nucleus accumbens. Lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation also induced significant increases in ventral tegmental area dopamine and metabolite levels, and the percentage increase of dopamine was higher in this region than in the nucleus accumbens. Local perfusion with the dopamine uptake inhibitor nomifensine (10 microM) increased dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens about three-fold and potentiated the increase of dopamine levels induced by self-stimulation. Nomifensine perfusion also induced a delayed decrease in nucleus accumbens glutamate levels, and self-stimulation did not modify this effect of the drug. Local perfusion with the D2-type dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride significantly increased both basal and self-stimulation induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Neither nomifensine nor raclopride perfusion significantly affected the maximal rates of self-stimulation. Perfusion with tetrodotoxin (2 microM) into nucleus accumbens significantly decreased basal and prevented stimulation-induced increases in accumbens dopamine levels but only slightly decreased the rate of self-stimulation. In contrast, perfusion of tetrodotoxin (0.5 microM) into the ventral tegmental area decreased basal and blocked stimulation-induced increases in both nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area dopamine levels; this treatment also blocked or strongly inhibited self-stimulation. While it had no effect on glutamate levels in the nucleus accumbens, lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation induced a significant and tetrodotoxin-sensitive increase in glutamate levels in the ventral tegmental area. Taken together, the present results indicate that, across a broad range of stimulation parameters, rewarding lateral hypothalamus stimulation causes major and persistent activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system, and suggest descending glutamatergic fibers in the medial forebrain bundle as a candidate for the directly activated descending pathway in lateral hypothalamus brain stimulation reward.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

Fos expression following self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex

Self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex and medial forebrain bundle appears to be mediated by different directly activated fibers. However, reward signals from the medial prefrontal cortex do summate with signals from the medial forebrain bundle, suggesting some overlap in the underlying neural circuitry. We have previously used Fos immunohistochemistry to visualize neurons activated by rewarding stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. In this study, we assessed Fos immunolabeling after self-stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. Among the structures showing a greater density of labeled neurons in the stimulated hemisphere were the prelimbic and cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, lateral preoptic area, substantia innominata, lateral hypothalamus, anterior ventral tegmental area, and pontine nuclei. Surprisingly, little or no labeling was seen in the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus or the locus coeruleus. Double immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase and Fos showed that within the ventral tegmental area, a substantial proportion of dopaminergic neurons did not express Fos. Despite previous suggestions to the contrary, comparison of the present findings with those of our previous Fos studies reveals a number of structures activated by rewarding stimulation of both the medial prefrontal cortex and the medial forebrain bundle. Some subset of activated cells in the common regions showing Fos-like immunoreactivity may contribute to the rewarding effect produced by stimulating either site.

The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking

Studies addressing behavioral functions of dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens septi (NAS) are reviewed. A role of NAS DA in reward has long been suggested. However, some investigators have questioned the role of NAS DA in rewarding effects because of its role in aversive contexts. As findings supporting the role of NAS DA in mediating aversively motivated behaviors accumulate, it is necessary to accommodate such data for understanding the role of NAS DA in behavior. The aim of the present paper is to provide a unifying interpretation that can account for the functions of NAS DA in a variety of behavioral contexts: (1) its role in appetitive behavioral arousal, (2) its role as a facilitator as well as an inducer of reward processes, and (3) its presently undefined role in aversive contexts. The present analysis suggests that NAS DA plays an important role in sensorimotor integrations that facilitate flexible approach responses. Flexible approach responses are contrasted with fixed instrumental approach responses (habits), which may involve the nigro-striatal DA system more than the meso-accumbens DA system. Functional properties of NAS DA transmission are considered in two stages: unconditioned behavioral invigoration effects and incentive learning effects. (1) When organisms are presented with salient stimuli (e.g., novel stimuli and incentive stimuli), NAS DA is released and invigorates flexible approach responses (invigoration effects). (2) When proximal exteroceptive receptors are stimulated by unconditioned stimuli, NAS DA is released and enables stimulus representations to acquire incentive properties within specific environmental context. It is important to make a distinction that NAS DA is a critical component for the conditional formation of incentive representations but not the retrieval of incentive stimuli or behavioral expressions based on over-learned incentive responses (i.e., habits). Nor is NAS DA essential for the cognitive perception of environmental stimuli. Therefore, even without normal NAS DA transmission, the habit response system still allows animals to perform instrumental responses given that the tasks take place in fixed environment. Such a role of NAS DA as an incentive-property constructor is not limited to appetitive contexts but also aversive contexts. This dual action of NAS DA in invigoration and incentive learning may explain the rewarding effects of NAS DA as well as other effects of NAS DA in a variety of contexts including avoidance and unconditioned/conditioned increases in open-field locomotor activity. Particularly, the present hypothesis offers the following interpretation for the finding that both conditioned and unconditioned aversive stimuli stimulate DA release in the NAS: NAS DA invigorates approach responses toward 'safety'. Moreover, NAS DA modulates incentive properties of the environment so that organisms emit approach responses toward 'safety' (i.e., avoidance responses) when animals later encounter similar environmental contexts. There may be no obligatory relationship between NAS DA release and positive subjective effects, even though these systems probably interact with other brain systems which can mediate such effects. The present conceptual framework may be valuable in understanding the dynamic interplay of NAS DA neurochemistry and behavior, both normal and pathophysiological.

Electrical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex increases cholecystokinin, glutamate, and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: an in vivo microdialysis study in freely moving rats

In vivo microdialysis, radioimmunoassay, and HPLC with electrochemical or fluorometric detection were used to investigate the release of cholecystokinin (CCK), glutamate (Glu), and dopamine (DA) in nucleus accumbens septi (NAS) as a function of ipsilateral electrical stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). CCK was progressively elevated by mPFC stimulation at 50-200 Hz. Stimulation-induced CCK release was intensity-dependent at 250-700 microA. NAS Glu and DA levels were each elevated by stimulation at 25-400 Hz; the dopamine metabolites DOPAC and homovanillic acid were increased by stimulation at 100-400 Hz. When rats were trained to lever press for mPFC stimulation, the stimulation induced similar elevations of each of the three transmitters to those seen with experimenter-administered stimulation. Perfusion of 1 mM kynurenic acid (Kyn) into either the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or NAS blocked lever pressing for mPFC stimulation. VTA, but not NAS, perfusion of Kyn significantly attenuated the increases in NAS DA levels induced by mPFC stimulation. Kyn did not affect NAS CCK or Glu levels when perfused into either the VTA or NAS. The present results are consistent with histochemical evidence and provide the first in vivo evidence for the existence of a releasable pool of CCK in the NAS originating from the mPFC. Although dopamine is the transmitter most closely linked to reward function, it was CCK that showed frequency-dependent differences in release corresponding most closely to rewarding efficacy of the stimulation. Although not essential for the reward signal itself, coreleased CCK may modulate the impact of the glutamatergic action in this behavior.

Effect of adrenalectomy on cocaine facilitation of medial prefrontal cortex self-stimulation

Adrenalectomy (ADX) is known to block the acquisition of intravenous cocaine self-administration. A previous study therefore examined whether ADX decreases sensitivity of the 'brain reward system' in general, or its response to cocaine in particular, by measuring thresholds for intracranial self-stimulation with and without concurrent cocaine administration. ADX had no effect on thresholds for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) and did not alter the cocaine dose-response curve for lowering the LHSS threshold. This result suggested that ADX does not affect sensitivity of the brain reward system. However, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) appears to be an important site in the mediation of cocaine reinforcing effects, and MPFC self-stimulation (MPFCSS) is mediated by a neural substrate that is largely independent of that which mediates LHSS. The present study therefore assessed whether ADX diminishes cocaine facilitation of MPFCSS. It was found that the threshold-lowering effect of cocaine (5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 mg/kg, i.p. ) did not differ between ADX rats maintained on 0.7% saline, ADX rats maintained on corticosterone (50 microg/ml) in 0.7% saline, and sham-operated controls. However, there was a trend toward desensitization of MPFCSS, itself, following ADX in the group that did not receive corticosterone supplementation. Based on this observation, and the similar responses of MPFCSS and cocaine self-administration to noncontingent priming stimulation, stress, and NMDA receptor antagonism, it is speculated that acquisition of MPFCSS and cocaine self-administration may be dependent upon a common sensitization process that is regulated by corticosterone.

Synergistic effects of cocaine and dizocilpine (MK-801) on brain stimulation reward

The rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation were assessed in animals treated with the combination of cocaine and dizocilpine (MK-801), a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist. Eight male Long-Evans rats were trained to perform a lever-press operant to deliver trains of cathodal rectangular pulses directly into the lateral hypothalamus. Response rate was determined across the range of effective stimulation frequencies. For each rat the frequency threshold was defined as the lowest frequency that sustained minimal responding. After thresholds had stabilized each rat was tested under 4 treatment conditions; saline + saline, dizocilpine (0.05 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min before test) + saline, saline + cocaine (4 mg/kg, i.p., 5 min before test) and dizocilpine + cocaine. The saline + saline, dizocilpine + saline and saline + cocaine treatments each failed to cause significant changes in threshold or maximum response rates. The dizocilpine + cocaine treatment produced a large reduction in thresholds indicating a synergism between the two drugs and the rewarding stimulation. These synergistic effects of dizocilpine and cocaine stand in contrast to the putative antagonism by dizocilpine of cocaine's psychomotor-sensitizing action.

Single neuronal responses in medial prefrontal cortex during cocaine self-administration in freely moving rats

Chronic single neuronal recording techniques were applied to investigate the involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) during cocaine self-administration in the rat. Rats were trained to press a lever for cocaine under continuous reinforcement and fixed ratio schedules. Different patterns of phasic neuronal activity changes were found to be associated with lever-pressing for cocaine. The neuronal responses could be classified into five categories: 1) increases in neuronal firing before the lever press (15 out of 121 neurons, 12.4%); 2) decreases in neuronal firing before the lever press (13 neurons, 10.7%); 3) increases in neuronal firing after cocaine infusion (4 neurons, 3.3%); 4) decreases in neuronal firing after cocaine infusion (32 neurons, 26.4%); and 5) no alteration of neuronal activity throughout the self-administration session (67 neurons, 55.4%). The anticipatory responses, i.e., neuronal activity appearing before the lever press, were observed for both the continuous reinforcement and fixed ratio schedules. In a few cases, alteration of firing rate was not observed for the first lever press but appeared before subsequent lever presses in fixed ratio schedules. Eliminating cocaine abolished the inhibitory neuronal responses observed after lever press, suggesting that these inhibitory responses after cocaine self-administration were attributable to the pharmacologic effect of cocaine. The data provide initial electrophysiological evidence that the mPFC may play a role in mediating the task sequencing which leads to cocaine self-administration.

The preferential dopamine autoreceptor antagonist (+)-UH232 antagonizes the positive reinforcing effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine in the ICSS paradigm

The dopamine autoreceptor and D3 preferring antagonist [cis-(+)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin] (+)-UH232, exerts weak stimulatory effects when tested in locomotor activity experiments using habituated animals. (+)-UH232 also blocks d-amphetamine-, cocaine-, and apomorphine-induced hyperactivity, but fails to induce catalepsy. Thus, the behavioral effects of (+)-UH232 appear to be dependent upon the baseline activity of the animal. The antagonistic properties of (+)-UH232 were studied in the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) technique in the rat. (+)-UH232 and haloperidol produced inhibitory effects over a wide dose range. Cocaine, GBR12909 and d-amphetamine clearly lowered ICSS thresholds, indicating stimulatory effects. (+)-UH232 antagonized the stimulatory effects of cocaine, GBR12909, and d-amphetamine, whereas haloperidol, at a dose producing an inhibition similar to (+)-UH232, was significantly weaker in antagonizing cocaine- or d-amphetamine-induced stimulation. This difference between (+)-UH232 and haloperidol with respect to stimulant-blocking ability, support the concept that the effects of (+)-UH232 are not representative of either classical DA agonists or DA antagonists.

Chronic morphine fails to enhance the reward value of prefrontal cortex self-stimulation

Dopamine (DA) plays an important role in the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse and intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). We previously reported that ICSS derived from the prefrontal cortex appears insensitive to the reward-enhancing effects of amphetamine, a drug that increases DA release and reward at other ICSS sites. In the present study, rats with prefrontal electrodes were tested to see if morphine (7.5 or 10.0 mg/kg, IP) given once per day for 10 days enhanced prefrontal reward as assessed with the curve-shift method. Morphine initially produced sedation; however, after 3-4 days response rates increased sharply while frequency thresholds were unaffected. These results demonstrate that morphine does not enhance prefrontal ICSS reward and provide further evidence that prefrontal brain stimulation reward does not display the same characteristics as other ICSS sites.

The acquisition of self-stimulation of the medical prefrontal cortex following exposure to escapable or inescapable footshock

The effect of acute stress on the acquisition of an instrumental action reinforced by electrical stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) was investigated by exposing rats to either escapable, inescapable or no footshock prior to daily self-stimulation training sessions. Treatment with inescapable footshock did not affect the number of sessions required for acquisition of MPC self-stimulation but did increase the rate of responding over acquisition sessions compared with the no-shock group. When the treatment footshock was escapable, however, both a facilitation in acquisition, as indexed by a reduction in the number of sessions to criterion, and an increase in the rate of MPC self-stimulation was found. These data were interpreted as offering evidence for the operation of a dopaminergic mechanism in the acquisition of MPC self-stimulation. Further, they indicate, contrary to the reported effects of footshock on self-stimulation of other brain areas, that exposure to acute stress has a facilitatory effect on the rate of self stimulation of the MPC.

Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine system responsivity: a hypothesis for the etiology of schizophrenia

A novel mechanism for regulating dopamine activity in subcortical sites and its possible relevance to schizophrenia is proposed. This hypothesis is based on the regulation of dopamine release into subcortical regions occurring via two independent mechanisms: (1) transient or phasic dopamine release caused by dopamine neuron firing, and (2) sustained, "background" tonic dopamine release regulated by prefrontal cortical afferents. Behaviorally relevant stimuli are proposed to cause short-term activation of dopamine cell firing to trigger the phasic component of dopamine release. In contrast, tonic dopamine release is proposed to regulate the intensity of the phasic dopamine response through its effect on extracellular dopamine levels. In this way, tonic dopamine release would set the background level of dopamine receptor stimulation (both autoreceptor and postsynaptic) and, through homeostatic mechanisms, the responsivity of the system to dopamine in these sites. In schizophrenics, a prolonged decrease in prefrontal cortical activity is proposed to reduce tonic dopamine release. Over time, this would elicit homeostatic compensations that would increase overall dopamine responsivity and thereby cause subsequent phasic dopamine release to elicit abnormally large responses.