Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2)

What matters to mothers: A qualitative exploration of pain and recovery after cesarean section

BACKGROUND

Fast recovery after cesarean section is vital since the mother not only has to take care of herself but also the newborn. Recovery scores are useful tools to measure and compare recovery; however, standardized questionnaires may miss in-depth patient experiences. What is important to women in the postoperative period after cesarean section can vary in different populations, making it crucial to understand the specific needs of one's own population. This study aims to explore what matters most to Danish mothers during the early phase of recovery following elective cesarean section.

METHODS

Qualitative design: Adult, Danish-speaking women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in three Danish hospitals. Semi-structured interviews focusing on women's experiences of recovery, pain, and mobilization both in hospital and after discharge were conducted for 4-7 days following their cesarean section. Baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes were collected from patient files. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using manifest content analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 25 women were interviewed a median of 6 days post cesarean section (IQR 5-8). Three themes emerged: "Experience of being a cesarean section patient," "I'm doing good - and better than expected," and "Challenges when going home." The cesarean section itself was described as a disturbing experience. The initial days post-cesarean section were described as very painful, but hereafter, many patients expressed surprise at their rapid recovery. None used opioids after discharge. Post-discharge, having a partner's support, especially with other children to care for, was helpful, and moving from lying to sitting position and getting out of bed were noted as particularly painful. Many women requested more information and specific rehabilitation programs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this qualitative study of Danish women 4-7 days after elective cesarean sections, the women described the initial days as very painful but felt that they recovered rather quickly thereafter. The study indicated a need for enhanced communication, especially regarding the experience of surgery, pain after cesarean section, and physical rehabilitation plans.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

In this qualitative, explorative study, participants were interviewed by telephone 4-7 days following their elective cesarean section. The focus was the women's experience of recovery, pain, and mobilization, both in hospital and when going home. The findings identified a need for more information about the perioperative course, as most participants were surprised and unprepared both for the pain from other areas than the scar and for the surgery experience being unpleasant, and many requested physical rehabilitation plans.

Evaluating the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) after elective Caesarean section in a South African public hospital: a prospective before-after study

Background

Caesarean section is a common surgical procedure, accounting for almost a third of all surgical procedures in low- middle-income countries. Enhanced recovery after Caesarean section (ERAC) programmes are rarely implemented in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a tailored enhanced recovery programme's impact on quality of recovery after elective Caesarean section in a Johannesburg public hospital.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, before-after cohort study. Fifty-two patients (aged ≥18 yr) undergoing elective Caesarean section were analysed, comprising a pre-ERAC cohort (n=25), analysed from 8 to 22 April 2024 and a post-ERAC cohort (n=27), analysed from 3 to13 June 2024. The primary outcome was postpartum recovery measured by the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 score.

Results

There was a significant improvement in Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scores post-ERAC, with a difference in medians of 9 between cohorts (95% confidence interval: 6-14; P<0.001). There was also a significant reduction in opioid consumption with a median decrease of 10 mg oral morphine equivalent in the post-ERAC cohort in the first 24 h after operation (95% confidence interval: -26 to 6; P<0.001). Time to urinary catheter removal, time to first oral intake, time to first mobilisation, and preoperative fasting for liquids all showed significant improvement in the post-ERAC cohort. There was no difference in length of stay and other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that ERAC implementation in a resource-limited setting is feasible and can enhance maternal recovery after elective Caesarean section. These findings highlight the potential for ERAC programs to significantly improve patient-centred outcomes in low-middle income countries.

Pregnancy and trauma: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Nearly 4% of pregnant patients have an injury-related visit to the emergency department during their pregnancy. There are important physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy that make managing pregnant trauma patients different from the standard management of a nonpregnant patient. This review discusses these changes and the initial assessment, laboratory, and imaging workups for the pregnant trauma patient. In addition, management of specific injuries in pregnancy including pelvic fractures, hemorrhagic shock, and postpartum hemorrhage are reviewed as well as key points regarding resuscitative hysterotomy and fetal support that trauma surgeons should be aware of.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Transfer of Gabapentin When Used as a Pain Adjunct for Cesarean Deliveries

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for cesarean deliveries (CDs) utilize multimodal pain management strategies that often include gabapentin. While gabapentin is excreted in breast milk, its pharmacokinetics in immediately postpartum lactating women are not known. This observational pharmacokinetic study (NCT05099484) enrolled 21 healthy singleton pregnant individuals, ≥ 18 years old, undergoing CD and planning to breastfeed. Participants received 300 mg oral gabapentin before CD and every 6 h for 48 h per hospital protocol. Serial maternal plasma and breast milk samples were collected over a single dosing interval. Gabapentin pharmacokinetics were assessed using two structurally distinct population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) models to describe transfer of drug into breast milk utilizing (A) milk-to-plasma ratio and (B) inter-compartmental rate constants. These models were then used to estimate exposure to breastfed infants. Postpartum gabapentin plasma concentrations fit a 1-compartment model that was adapted to include breast milk concentrations. The two POPPK models both estimated relative infant doses (RID0-48h) of gabapentin < 0.15% of maternal dose within the first 48 h postpartum. Infant daily dose (IDD) from 24 to 48 h was estimated to be 0.0137 (0.0058-0.0316) mg/kg/day and 0.0139 (0.00041-0.0469) mg/kg/day by models A and B, respectively. These findings indicate limited neonatal exposure to gabapentin administered as part of a postpartum enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

Enhanced Recovery Canada Clinical Pathway for Cesarean Delivery

Enhanced recovery after surgery is a process to promote optimal recovery after a variety of operations utilized by many surgical specialties. This evidence-based series of interventions was developed to decrease the physiological stress and risks associated with surgery. In April of 2023, Enhanced Recovery Canada released its new Clinical Pathway for Cesarean Delivery. This has been endorsed by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. This manuscript will introduce the Clinical Pathway, emphasize its unique features specific to cesarean delivery, and detail how to incorporate guidance into routine practice.

Different doses of epidural morphine combined with multimodal analgesia strategies for postpartum pain management: study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind randomised, pragmatic clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The neuraxial morphine has been regarded as the gold standard for postpartum analgesia. However, the recent advancements in patient-controlled analgesia and various regional nerve blocks have led to the implementation of multimodal analgesia strategies, which aim to reduce opioid usage and associated complications while ensuring satisfactory pain relief. The objective of this research is to investigate the optimal dosage of epidural morphine for alleviating moderate and severe pain after caesarean sections in healthy parturients, as well as reducing unnecessary burden of respiratory monitoring resources.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The present single-centre randomised controlled pragmatic clinical trial aims to enrol a total of 310 healthy parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II, who are scheduled for caesarean section under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia at West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University. The recruitment process has not yet commenced and is anticipated to commence in March 2024, concluding in September 2024. Enrolled patients will be evenly distributed into five groups, namely morphine groups (M1-M4) and the control group (M0). The primary outcome measure is the incidence rate of postoperative use Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score ≥4 points within 24 hours, which will be primarily assessed through bedside follow-up conducted by investigators and patient self-assessment at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes encompass the following: incidence of postoperative NRS score ≥4 within 48 hours, occurrence of SpO2 <90% (during air inhalation)/ SpO2 <95% (during nasal cannula oxygen inhalation) and respiratory rate (RR)＜10 breaths/min recorded on the bedside monitoring, Ramsay sedation score, administration of rescue analgesics and total usage of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump, time to first flatus and food intake, maternal and neonatal urinary morphine concentrations, and any other maternal adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and neonatal depression. The administration of local anaesthetics, surgical procedures and the timing for administering rescue analgesics will not be subject to any restrictions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (2022(269)).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400080350.

Integrative Review of Opioid Use and Protocol Adherence in Hospitals After Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols for Cesarean Birth

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols used and amount of opioids administered during hospitalization for cesarean birth after the ERAS protocols were implemented.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted in CINAHL Complete, Scopus, and PubMed for sources published in English between January 2018 and December 2023. Search terms were cesarean AND opioid∗ AND eras OR erac OR enhanced recovery.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies were conducted in the United States, used key pain management components from the ERAS guidelines, and reported results for in-patient postsurgical opioid use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data obtained were for post-ERAS implementation only and included authors, date, sample size, study location, participant inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods, interventions used (ERAS guideline components), and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during the hospital stay.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Weighted averages were calculated for results reported as means and percentages. Descriptive summaries were used for the remainder of the results.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were found, accounting for 19,961 individuals' post-ERAS experiences. Although 30% of participants experienced a scheduled cesarean birth, 70% experienced all types of cesarean births, including scheduled, urgent, or emergent. There was substantial heterogeneity of the data reported, especially for how opioid use was measured and analyzed and time frames for opioid use. In 11 studies that reported MME as means, the weighted average for in-patient opioid use was 54 MME per stay. In only 17 studies, researchers reported the number of women who experienced an opioid-free recovery, which averaged 40% of the women.

CONCLUSION

While implementation of key components of the ERAS protocol is associated with reduced opioid exposure for women experiencing scheduled and nonscheduled cesarean births, a benchmark for the amount of in-patient opioid use was not established. Still, this review offers evidence regarding best practices, lessons learned, and outcome analysis strategies. These findings can support perinatal teams who are considering implementing ERAS for cesarean birth, or those looking for further improvements.

Association between duration of urinary catheterization and post-operative mobilization following elective cesarean section: A retrospective case-control study in Espoo, Finland

INTRODUCTION

Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed on women. The enhanced recovery recommendations are early urinary catheter removal and early mobilization, as essential elements of post-operative care. This study aimed to analyze the association between these elements and whether limiting the catheter treatment duration affects the timing of post-operative mobilization.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study compared the mobilization of healthy elective cesarean patients under different instructions on urinary catheter removal: cases with a preset catheter removal time (8-12 hours) and controls with catheter removal based on midwife considerations. Apart from the preset time of catheter removal, the routine post-operative care was given by the same personnel without any advice on patient mobilization. Data on patient demographics, surgery details, post-operative medication, first upright mobilization, the length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study comprised 52 cases and one control for each case (N=104). The mean duration of urinary catheterization was 20.15 ± 6.59 and 11.30 ± 4.20 hours in the control and intervention groups, respectively (p<0.001). A linear regression analysis showed a significant association between the catheter removal time and patient mobilization, when adjusted for maternal background parameters (age, BMI, fear of childbirth diagnosis, prior uterine scar), duration and timing of the surgery, bleeding and post-operative analgesic use (R2=0.444, p<0.001). No difference was detected in the length of hospital stay, or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Limiting the duration of urinary catheter therapy is associated with shorter time to post-operative mobilization. A prospective randomized trial would provide more detailed information.

Enhanced recovery after fetal spina bifida surgery: global practice

OBJECTIVES

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal evidence-based care plans that have been adopted for multiple surgical procedures to promote faster and better patient recovery and shorter hospitalization. This study aimed to explore whether worldwide fetal therapy centers offering prenatal myelomeningocele repair implement the ERAS principles and to provide recommendations for improved perioperative management of patients.

METHODS

In this survey study, a total of 53 fetal therapy centers offering prenatal surgery for open spina bifida were identified and invited to complete a digital questionnaire covering their pre-, intra- and postoperative management. An overall score was calculated per center based on compliance with 20 key ERAS principles, extrapolated from ERAS guidelines for Cesarean section, gynecological oncology and colorectal surgery. Each item was awarded a score of 1 or 0, depending, respectively, on whether the center did or did not comply with that principle, with a maximum score of 20.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 46 centers in 17 countries (response rate, 87%). In total, 22 (48%) centers performed exclusively open fetal surgery (laparotomy and hysterotomy), whereas 14 (30%) offered both open and fetoscopic procedures and 10 (22%) used only fetoscopy. The perioperative management of patients undergoing fetoscopic and open surgery was very similar. The median ERAS score was 12 (range, 8-17), with a mean ± SD of 12.5 ± 2.4. Center compliance was the highest for the use of regional anesthesia (98%), avoidance of bowel preparation (96%) and thromboprophylaxis (96%), while the lowest compliance was observed for preoperative carbohydrate loading (15%), a 2-h fasting period for clear fluids (20%), postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention (33%) and early feeding (35%). ERAS scores were similar in centers with a short (2-5 days), medium (6-10 days) and long (≥ 11 days) hospital stay (mean ± SD, 12.9 ± 2.4, 12.1 ± 2.0 and 10.3 ± 3.2, respectively, P = 0.15). Furthermore, there was no significant association between ERAS score and surgical technique or case volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative management of fetal spina bifida surgery is highly variable across fetal therapy centers worldwide. Standardized protocols integrating ERAS principles may improve patient recovery, reduce maternal morbidity and shorten the hospital stay after fetal spina bifida surgery. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

A Survey of Obstetric Anaesthesia Services and Practices in the United Kingdom

Background Variability in obstetric anaesthetia practice and care delivered within the UK is under-explored. The ObsQoR study explored structures, processes, and outcomes of obstetric anaesthesia in 107 hospitals within the UK's National Health Service, and the results of the hospital-level survey are reported here. Methods Hospitals were surveyed to assess obstetric anaesthesia provision, practice, and care delivery. Questions explored staffing, service provision and training, facilities present, clinical practices, outcome measurement, and key indicators of quality in obstetric anaesthesia. Results We received responses from 106 participating hospitals, representing 69% of all UK obstetric units. One hundred (94%) hospitals had a dedicated consultant obstetric anaesthetist within working hours, with 27 (25%) of hospitals' duty anaesthetists having additional clinical responsibilities outside the care of obstetric patients outside of working hours. Around 102 hospitals (98%) offer multidisciplinary team training, of which 95 (93%) use a simulation-based method. Dedicated high-risk antenatal clinics were present in 50 (47%) hospitals. The majority of hospitals provide written patient information in multiple languages for discussing obstetric anaesthesia options (77, 82%). Seventy-three hospitals (69%) use point-of-care testing to estimate haemoglobin concentration. Labour epidural analgesia is most commonly delivered via patient-controlled epidural analgesia in 80 (76%) hospitals, and the incidence of post-dural puncture headaches was recorded by 80 (76%) hospitals. Conclusions These results demonstrate variation in the provision of staffing, facilities, clinical practices, and outcome measurements across the UK. To deliver safe and equitable care across the UK, there needs to be standardisation of anaesthetic peripartum care based on national recommendations and the benchmarking and measurement of appropriate markers of quality.

Early oral feeding within two hours for parturients compared with delayed oral feeding after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is recommended that postpartum women undergo early oral feeding (EOF) after cesarean section (CS). However, the optimal early time for oral feeding after CS is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether EOF within two hours is superior to delayed oral feeding (DOF) after CS.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to February 2024 for randomized controlled trials comparing EOF versus DOF after CS. Primary outcomes included the time to normal bowel function. The secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, the time to ambulation after surgery, the time to removal of the catheter, the time to start of a regular diet, the length of hospital stay and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Data from 8 studies involving a total of 2572 women were obtained. EOF within two hours was significantly associated with shorter durations of return bowel movement (WMD, - 2.41, 95% CI, - 3.80-- 1.02; p < 0.001; I2 = 96%), passage flatus after surgery (WMD, - 3.55, 95% CI, - 6.36-- 0.75; p = 0.01; I2 = 98%), ambulation after surgery (WMD, - 0.96, 95% CI, - 1.80-- 0.13; p = 0.02; I2 = 53%), removal of catheters (WMD, - 15.18, 95% CI, - 25.61-- 4.74; p = 0.004; I2 = 100%) and starting a regular diet (WMD, - 7.03, 95% CI, - 13.13-- 0.92; p = 0.02; I2 = 99%) compared with DOF. EOF was not related to increased vomiting (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.74-1.57; p = 0.69; I2 = 0%), nausea (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.77; p = 0.33; I2 = 37%), abdominal distension (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.31-1.89; p = 0.55; I2 = 54%) or ileus (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.40-2.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence that EOF within two hours after CS has comparable safety with DOF, and can accelerate the recovery time for normal bowel function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

INPLASY202320055.

Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery: 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study)

BACKGROUND

The rising rate of cesarean deliveries has led to an increased incidence of long long-term complications, including niche formation in the uterine scar. Niche development is associated with various gynecologic complaints and complications in subsequent pregnancies, such as uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Although uterine closure technique is considered a potential risk factor for niche development, consensus on the optimal technique remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of single-layer vs double-layer closure of the uterine incision on live birth rate at a 3-year follow-up with secondary objectives focusing on gynecologic, fertility, and obstetrical outcomes at the same follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed at 32 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women ≥18 years old undergoing a first cesarean delivery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either single-layer or double-layer closure of the uterine incision. The primary outcome of the long-term follow-up was the live birth rate; with secondary outcomes, including pregnancy rate, the need for fertility treatment, mode of delivery, and obstetrical and gynecologic complications. This trial is registered on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform www.who.int (NTR5480; trial finished).

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2018, the 2Close study randomly assigned 2292 women, with 830 of 1144 and 818 of 1148 responding to the 3-year questionnaire in the single-layer and double-layer closure. No differences were observed in live birth rates; also there were no differences in pregnancy rate, need for fertility treatments, mode of delivery, or uterine ruptures in subsequent pregnancies. High rates of gynecologic symptoms, including spotting (30%-32%), dysmenorrhea (47%-49%), and sexual dysfunction (Female Sexual Function Index score, 23) are reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The study did not demonstrate the superiority of double-layer closure over single-layer closure in terms of reproductive outcomes after a first cesarean delivery. This challenges the current recommendation favoring double-layer closure, and we propose that surgeons can choose their preferred technique. Furthermore, the high risk of gynecologic symptoms after a cesarean delivery should be discussed with patients.

The awareness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines among anesthesiology and reanimation assistants in Turkey; a questionnaire study

BACKGROUND

To reduce maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, it is becoming increasingly important for anesthetists to understand and implement enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines. Our aim was to reveal the knowledge of anesthesia assistants in Turkey about ERAS during cesarean delivery and to increase their awareness of ERAS.

METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted in the city of Isparta, Turkey in 2023. The survey, which was approved by the ethics committee, was distributed to participants across Turkey via e-mail and online messages. The survey comprises of a total of 42 questions evaluating perioperative ERAS recommendations.

RESULTS

Of the 404 participants in our survey, 59.9% were associated with university hospitals and 65.8% had completed three or more years of education. A total of 87.9% of the participants were familiar with ERAS; however, only 42.8% had received ERAS training. Although 93.8% of the participants' institutions performed a cesarean delivery, ERAS recommendations were only implemented at a rate of 48%. This may be due to the absence of an ERAS team, which was identified in our survey at a high rate of 66.6%.

CONCLUSION

Awareness about ERAS was high among the participants, but the implementation rates of some recommendations were low. The reason for this may be the inability to form a multidisciplinary team and inadequate training of participants. For this purpose, we recommend the formation of a multidisciplinary team for ERAS protocol implementation and increased participant training opportunities.

Conversion to general anesthesia and intravenous supplementation during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with or without conversion to general anesthesia has been shown to negatively impact maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce these adverse events are a recent focus of obstetric anesthesia care. We aimed to assess rates of and risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia and intraoperative pain during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter in our academic center.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all women undergoing cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Labor epidural analgesia was provided according to a standardized protocol, and conversion to epidural anesthesia was achieved in the operating room before surgery. We determined the conversion rate to general anesthesia and associated risk factors. Second, we examined the rate of administration of analgesics/sedatives and related risk factors in cesarean cases that were not converted to general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Among the 1192 women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, there were 97 cases with conversion to general anesthesia (8.1%), of which 87 (89.7%) were due to a failed epidural. Higher age, higher weight, and higher gestational age were associated with decreased odds of conversion to general anesthesia. Higher gravidity and longer surgical time were associated with increased odds. An emergent indication was not associated with conversion to general anesthesia. Intravenous analgesic/sedative supplementation occurred in 141 cases (12.9%). Higher age was associated with decreased odds of supplementation, and longer surgical time was associated with increased odds.

CONCLUSION

In our tertiary academic center, the rate of intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia and administration of analgesic/sedative medication among women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia was relatively high. Emergency cesarean delivery was not associated with either of the above endpoints.

Enhanced recovery after caesarean section: Implementation of an ERAC protocol in a tertiary obstetric hospital

OBJECTIVE

Assess safety and efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean protocol.

BACKGROUND

Caesarean sections are among the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide, but have been associated with postoperative chronic pain and opioid abuse.

METHODS

ASA 2 females, over 18 years, non-primiparous, repeat elective LSCS. Primary outcomes were length of stay and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, functional assessment scores, pruritus, nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

A total of 579 women divided into standard care (389 patients) and enhanced recovery after caesarean groups (190 patients). Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with reduced length of stay, 50.8 hours (interquartile range 48.6, 53.6) versus 72.2 hours (interquartile range 53.2, 75.7) in standard care. Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with reduced opioid consumption, median 10 (interquartile range 0, 27.5mg) versus 120mg (interquartile range 90, 145mg) in standard care at 24 hours and 30 (interquartile range 7.7, 67.5mg) versus 177.5mg (interquartile range 132.5, 222.5 mg) at 48 hours. Pain scores reduced from moderate to mild in the enhanced recovery after caesarean. functional assessment scores trend towards improved function in the enhanced recovery after caesarean group (Functional assessment scores B 8.9% in enhanced recovery after caesarean versus 147% in standard care). Increased pruritus in the enhanced recovery after caesarean with 41.6% compared with 9.3% in standard care. Nausea and vomiting increased in enhanced recovery after caesarean group 48.9% versus 11.6% in standard care.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced recovery after caesarean associated with a reduction in length of stay, opioid consumption and improved pain scores with an increase in side effects.

Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study

Objective

Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data.

Results

In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol on maternal outcomes following emergency caesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial

Background

With ever increasing rates of emergency caesarean deliveries (CD),incorporating the ERAS protocol might provide a perfect window of opportunity to increase maternal comfort during the postsurgical period, but also improve outcomes and facilitate optimal return of physiological function.

Objective

To determine whether an ERAS pathway at emergency caesarean birth would permit a reduction in postoperative length of stay and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.

Material & methods

Patients undergoing emergent caesarean delivery at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were randomized to ERAS or conventional care. The primary outcome was to compare postoperative length of hospital stay. Secondary outcome variables included first oral intake, passage of flatus/defecation, first ambulation, first urination after catheter removal and postoperative pain scores in both groups.

Results

We randomized 142 women (71 each in ERAS versus Conventional arm) undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. Incorporation of ERAS protocol resulted in shorter length of hospital stay (73.92 ± 8.96 in conventional arm vs 53.87 ± 15.02 in ERAS arm; p value <.0001). Significant difference was seen in visual analogue scoring during initial ambulation and rest on day 0 and day 1 between ERAS and conventional arms with mean scores being lower in ERAS arm compared to Conventional arm (p value <.05). In terms of quality of life, ERAS arm had better quality of life compared to conventional arm.

Conclusion

Incorporation of ERAS protocol in emergency caesarean definitely improves patient outcome in terms of early resumption of activities with better quality of life.

Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews

Background

Caesarean section (CS) is the most performed major surgery worldwide. Surgical techniques used for CS vary widely and there is no internationally accepted standardization. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to summarize the evidence on surgical techniques or procedures related to CS.

Methods

Searches were conducted from database inception to 31 January 2024 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, EMBASE, Lilacs and CINAHL without date or language restrictions. AMSTAR 2 and GRADE were used to assess the methodological quality of the SRs and the certainty of evidence at outcome level, respectively. We classified each procedure-outcome pair into one of eight categories according to effect estimates and certainty of evidence. The overview was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42023208306).

Findings

The analysis included 38 SRs (16 Cochrane and 22 non-Cochrane) published between 2004-2024 involving 628 RCT with a total of 190,349 participants. Most reviews were of low or critically low quality (AMSTAR 2). The SRs presented 345 procedure-outcome comparisons (237 procedure versus procedure, 108 procedure versus no treatment/placebo). There was insufficient or inconclusive evidence for 256 comparisons, clear evidence of benefit for 40, possible benefit for 17, no difference of effect for 13, clear evidence of harm for 14, and possible harm for 5. We found no SRs for 7 pre-defined procedures. Skin cleansing with chlorhexidine, Joel-Cohen-based abdominal incision, uterine incision with blunt dissection and cephalad-caudal expansion, cord traction for placental extraction, manual cervical dilatation in pre-labour CS, changing gloves, chromic catgut suture for uterine closure, non-closure of the peritoneum, closure of subcutaneous tissue, and negative pressure wound therapy are procedures associated with benefits for relevant outcomes.

Interpretation

Current evidence suggests that several CS surgical procedures improve outcomes but also reveals a lack of or inconclusive evidence for many commonly used procedures. There is an urgent need for evidence-based guidelines standardizing techniques for CS, and trials to fill existing knowledge gaps.

Funding

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements on obstetric anaesthesia: a systematic review using the AGREE II instrument

OBJECTIVES

Despite the publication of hundreds of trials on obstetric anaesthesia, the management of these conditions remains suboptimal. We aimed to assess the quality and consistency of guidance documents for obstetric anaesthesia.

DESIGN

This is a systematic review and quality assessment using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II methodology.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources include PubMed and Embase (8 June 2023), three Chinese academic databases, six guideline databases (7 June 2023) and Google and Google scholar (1 August 2023).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included the latest version of international and national/regional clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements for the anaesthetic management of pregnant patients during labour, non-operative delivery, operative delivery and selected aspects of perioperative monitoring, postpartum care and analgesia, published in English or Chinese.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened the searched items and extracted data. Four reviewers independently scored documents using AGREE II. Recommendations from all documents were tabulated and visualised in a coloured grid.

RESULTS

Twenty-two guidance documents (14 clinical practice guidelines and 8 consensus statements) were included. Included documents performed well in the domains of scope and purpose (median 76.4%, IQR 69.4%-79.2%) and clarity of presentation (median 72.2%, IQR 61.1%-80.6%), but were unsatisfactory in applicability (median 21.9%, IQR 13.5%-27.1%) and editorial independence (median 47.9%, IQR 6.3%-73.2%). The majority of obstetric anaesthesia guidelines or consensus centred on different topics. Less than 30% of them specifically addressed the management of obstetric anaesthesia perioperatively. Recommendations were concordant on the perioperative preparation, and on some indications for the choice of anaesthesia method. Substantially different recommendations were provided for some items, especially for preoperative blood type and screen, and for the types and doses of neuraxial administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality in guidance documents for obstetric anaesthesia necessitates enhancement. Despite numerous trials in this area, evidence gaps persist for specific clinical queries in this field. One potential approach to mitigate these challenges involves the endorsement of standardised guidance development methods and the synthesis of robust clinical evidence, aimed at diminishing difference in recommendations.

The Novel Parallel Closure Technique Compared to Single-Layer Closure of the Uterus After Primary Cesarean Section Decreases the Incidence of Isthmocele Formation and Increases Residual Myometrial Thickness

Background Isthmocele or a scar defect is a relatively common consequence of cesarean section resulting in menstrual disturbances and infertility and may compromise the myometrial integrity of the uterus in women contemplating subsequent vaginal birth. Several preventive measures have been suggested, including the modification of surgical techniques used for the closure of the uterine incision. The current study aimed to compare the incidence of isthmocele and assess residual myometrial thickness in women who underwent single versus parallel layered closure to approximate the endo-myometrial layer during cesarean section. Methodology This retrospective study evaluated data of women undergoing their first cesarean section under elective conditions (n = 497) where the uterine incision was closed using a single (n = 295) or a parallel layer (n = 202) technique. Patients were evaluated twice, at 3-6 months and 18 months postpartum, with a transvaginal ultrasound noting the presence or absence of an isthmocele and measurement of the residual myometrial thickness. Results Regardless of the closure technique, 64 (12.9%) women had an ultrasound-diagnosed isthmocele. Significantly fewer patients in the parallel-layer closure group presented with an isthmocele both at 3-6 (13.6 vs. 6.9%; p = 0.019) and 18 months (16.3 vs. 7.8%; p = 0.009) postpartum. Residual myometrium was significantly thicker in the parallel-layer closure group (8.0 vs. 13.2 mm at 3-6 months postpartum; p = 0.000 and 7.2 vs. 12.3 mm at 18 months postpartum; p = 0.004). For all patients, a retroverted position of the uterus at 3-6 months follow-up examination significantly increased the frequency of isthmocele (36/395 (9.1%) with an anteverted uterus and 18/102 (17.6%) with a retroverted uterus; p = 0.002). In patients with a single-layer closure, a retroverted uterus at the 3-6-month follow-up was associated with an isthmocele in 29.5% (18/61) of patients, while no isthmocele was recorded when the uterus was retroverted in the parallel-layer closure group (0/41) (p = 0.001). At 18 months postpartum, of the 64 patients with an isthmocele, 26 (40.6%) presented with abnormal uterine bleeding mainly in the form of postmenstrual spotting. Of the 26 patients with abnormal bleeding, 23 were in the single-layer and three were in the parallel-layer closure group. Conclusions The parallel-layer closure when compared to a single-layer closure of the uterine incision in patients undergoing primary cesarean section decreased the incidence of isthmocele formation and increased residual myometrial thickness. More patients in the single-layer closure group had menstrual cycle disturbances at 18 months postpartum.

Obesity at term: What to consider? How to deliver?

Obesity presents significant challenges during pregnancy, increasing the risk of complications and adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. With the rising prevalence of obesity among pregnant women, questions arise regarding optimal management, including timing of delivery and choice of delivery mode. Labour induction in obese women may require a combination of mechanical and pharmacological methods due to increased risk of failed induction. Caesarean section in obese women presents unique challenges, requiring comprehensive perioperative planning and specialized care to optimize outcomes. However, specific guidelines tailored to obese patients undergoing caesarean sections are lacking. Postpartum care should include vigilant monitoring for complications. Addressing obesity in pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and specialized care to ensure the best outcomes.

Implementing a bundle for evidence-based cesarean delivery may not be as beneficial as expected: a multicenter, pre- and post-study

BACKGROUND

Standardization of procedures improves outcomes. Though systematic reviews have summarized the evidence-based steps of cesarean delivery, their bundled implementation has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

In this preimplementation and postimplementation trial, we sought to ascertain if bundled evidence-based steps of cesarean delivery, compared with the surgeon's preference, improve outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies compliant, multicenter preimplementation and postimplementation trial at 4 teaching hospitals was conducted. The preimplementation period consisted of cesarean delivery done on the basis of the physicians' preferences for 3 months; educational intervention (eg, didactics, badge cards, posters, video) occurred in the fourth month. Cesarean deliveries in the postimplementation period employed the bundled evidence-based steps. A preplanned 10% randomized audit of both groups assessed adherence and uptake of evidence-based steps. The primary outcome was composite maternal morbidity, which included estimated blood loss ≥1000 mL, blood transfusion, endometritis, postpartum fever, wound complications, sepsis, thrombosis, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, or death. The secondary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity, and some of its components were a 5-min Apgar score <7, positive pressure oxygen use, hypoglycemia, or sepsis. A priori Bayesian sample size calculation indicated 700 cesarean deliveries in each group were needed to demonstrate a 20% relative reduction (from 15% to 12%) of composite maternal morbidity with 75% certainty. Bayesian logistic regression with neutral priors was used to calculate the likelihood of net improvement in adjusted relative risk with 95% credible intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 1425 consecutive cesarean deliveries (721 in preimplementation and 704 in postimplementation group) were examined. Audited data indicated that the baseline evidence-based steps utilization rate during the preimplementation period was 79%; after the implementation of bundled evidence-based steps of cesarean delivery, the audited adherence was 89%-an uptake of 10.0% of the evidence-based steps. In 4 aspects, the maternal characteristics differed significantly in the preimplementation and postimplementation periods: race/ethnicity, hypertensive disorder, and the relative contribution of the 4 centers to the cohorts and the gestational age at delivery, but the indications for cesarean delivery and whether its duration was less or greater than 60 minutes did not. The rates of composite maternal morbidity in the preimplementation and postimplementation groups were 26% and 22%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 0.88 [95% credible intervals, 0.73-1.04]), with a 94 % Bayesian probability of a reduction in composite maternal morbidity. The composite maternal morbidity occurred in 37% of the preimplementation and 41% of the postimplementation group (adjusted relative risk, 1.12 [95% credible intervals, 0.98-1.39]), with a 95% Bayesian probability of worsening in composite maternal morbidity. When composite maternal morbidity was segregated by preterm (<37 weeks) and term (≥37 weeks) cesarean delivery, the improvement in maternal outcomes persisted; when composite maternal morbidity was segregated by gestational age subgroups, the potential for worsening neonatal outcomes persisted as well.

CONCLUSION

Standardization of the evidence-based bundled steps of cesarean delivery resulted in a modest reduction of the composite maternal outcome; however, a paradoxical increase in neonatal composite morbidity was noted. Although individual evidence-based steps may be of value while awaiting additional intervention trials, a formal bundling of such steps is currently not recommended.

Skin-to-Skin Contact and Breastfeeding After Planned Cesarean Birth Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Benefits of early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) between mother and newborn are widely documented, including improved breastfeeding outcomes. While promoting immediate SSC is standard practice for vaginal birth, it happens less often after cesarean birth. It is not known how changes in hospital practices and staffing shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic have influenced the practice of SSC in the operating room (OR). This study aims to identify the relationship between SSC after cesarean birth and breastfeeding and compare SSC before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single institution. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 244 subjects who had scheduled cesarean births during 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was newborn feeding at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were time to initiate breastfeeding, newborn feeding at 4-8-weeks postpartum, and location of SSC initiation in 2019 versus 2020. Results: SSC within 3 days of birth was significantly associated with feeding type on discharge and/or 4-8 weeks postpartum. More subjects intending to exclusively breastfeed met this intention at discharge with SSC in the OR. Newborns who had SSC in the OR had significantly earlier initiation of breastfeeding. There was an increase in SSC in the OR between 2019 (27%) and 2020 (39%). Conclusion: SSC in the OR was associated with improved short-term breastfeeding outcomes in our study. If immediate SSC is not possible, SSC within 3 days of birth may have breastfeeding benefits. The increase in SSC in the OR during the COVID-19 pandemic indicates that SSC practices can be implemented, despite challenging circumstances.

A randomized controlled trial of spinal morphine with an enhanced recovery pathway and its effect on duration of analgesia after cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal morphine is frequently administered after cesarean delivery to provide pain relief lasting up to 24 h. An enhanced recovery after cesarean pathways reduces the amount of postoperative opioids needed. The ideal dose of intrathecal morphine when combined with a pathway has not been determined.

METHODS

This was a non-inferiority trial in 72 healthy women undergoing a scheduled cesarean delivery. Women were randomized to receive either 50 mcg, 150 mcg, or 250 mcg of intrathecal morphine during spinal anesthesia, with a standardized postoperative enhanced recovery pathway. The time to request supplemental opioids was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, side effects, and quality of recovery at 24 h.

RESULTS

The duration of analgesia with 50 mcg of morphine (median 24.5 h [IQR: 3.5-34.4]) was inferior to 150 mcg (29.4 h [24.5-72]), and both doses were inferior to 250 mcg (32 h [30.5-72]). Women who received 50 mcg morphine had higher pain scores than the other doses, received more supplemental opioids, and had lower quality recovery scores. The secondary outcomes between 150 mcg and 250 mcg were similar. Side effects were similar among all groups. 63% of women who received 250 mcg remained opioid-free at 72 h, compared to 150 mcg (52%) and 50 mcg (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of analgesia using intrathecal morphine with an enhanced recovery pathway was longer with 250 mcg than with lower doses, and side effects were similar. 50 mcg provided inferior pain relief over 24 h. More than half of our patients avoided additional opioids for up to 72 h with either 150 mcg or 250 mcg doses.

REGISTRATION

Clinical trial number NCT05069012.

Surgical transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine at cesarean: a pilot randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Postcesarean pain control is challenging. In addition to intrathecal morphine, recent studies have shown that liposomal bupivacaine administered via conventional transversus abdominis plane block reduces postcesarean opioid use. However, whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via a surgical approach also reduces opioid use is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) reduces the cumulative dose of opioids administered in the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery among participants who also receive intrathecal morphine.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial of 60 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at a community tertiary referral hospital staffed by academic physicians. Immediately before fascial closure during cesarean delivery, a total of 80 mL of dilute bupivacaine plus liposomal bupivacaine or dilute bupivacaine alone was administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (40 mL on each side). The primary outcome was a median cumulative opioid dose received within the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery measured in morphine milligram equivalents. In addition, opioid use at other time points, pain scores, and participant satisfaction were assessed. A sample size of 60 was determined to be adequate to inform a potential future adequately powered randomized trial. The primary outcome of morphine milligram equivalents and pain scores were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Between October 11, 2021, and August 29, 2022, 60 participants were randomized and analyzed: 31 were allocated to liposomal bupivacaine plus regular bupivacaine (intervention group), and 29 were allocated to regular bupivacaine alone (control group). Participants allocated to the intervention group used a median cumulative dose of 2 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids (interquartile range, 0-24) in the first 48 hours compared with 8 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range, 0-40) among participants allocated to the control group (P=.236). The percentage of participants who used ≤15 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids was 61% in the intervention arm and 41% in the control arm (P=.123), and the percentage who used zero opioids was 45% in the intervention arm and 34% in the control arm (P=.399). The total number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge was fewer in the intervention arm than in the control arm (P=.029). Patient satisfaction with the intervention group and control group was similar.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study suggests that liposomal bupivacaine administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block is worth critical evaluation as an adjunctive analgesic modality in an adequately powered randomized trial.

A Prospective Longitudinal Quality Initiative toward Improved Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathways

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) pathways reduces inpatient and outpatient opioid use, pain scores and improves the indicators of postoperative recovery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, longitudinal, quality improvement study of all patients older than 18 undergoing an uncomplicated cesarean delivery (CD) at an academic medical center. We excluded complicated CD, patients with chronic pain disorders, chronic opioid use, acute postpartum depression, or mothers whose neonate demised before their discharge. Lastly, we excluded non-English- and non-Spanish-speaking patients. Our study compared patient outcomes before (pre-ERAC) and after (post-ERAC) implementation of ERAC pathways. Primary outcomes were inpatient morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use and the patient's delta pain scores. Secondary outcomes were outpatient MME prescriptions and indicators of postoperative recovery (time to feeding, ambulation, and hospital discharge).

RESULTS

Of 308 patients undergoing CD from October 2019 to September 2020, 196 were enrolled in the pre-ERAC cohort and 112 in the post-ERAC cohort. Patients in the pre-ERAC cohort were more likely to require opioids in the postoperative period compared with the post-ERAC cohort (81.6 vs. 64.3%, p < 0.001). Likewise, there was a higher use of MME per stay in the pre-ERAC cohort (30 [20-49] vs. 16.8 MME [11.2-33.9], p < 0.001). There was also a higher number of patients who required prescribed opioids at the time of discharge (98 vs. 86.6%, p < 0.001) as well as in the amount of MMEs prescribed (150 [150-225] vs. 150 MME [112-150], p < 0.001; different shape of distribution). Furthermore, the patients in the pre-ERAC cohort had higher delta pain scores (3.3 [2.3-4.7] vs. 2.2 [1.3-3.7], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study has illustrated that our ERAC pathways were associated with reduced inpatient opioid use, outpatient opioid use, patient-reported pain scores, and improved indicators of postoperative recovery.

KEY POINTS

· Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with a higher percentage of no postpartum opioid use.. · Implementation of ERAC pathways is associated with lower delta (reported - expected) pain scores.. · The results of ERAC pathways implementation are increased by adopting a patient-centered approach..

Enhanced recovery after cesarean from the patient perspective: a prospective study of the ERAC Questionnaire (ERAC-Q)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean (ERAC) protocol on the post-cesarean recovery experience using a validated ten-item questionnaire (ERAC-Q).

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of patients completing ERAC quality-of-life questionnaires (ERAC-Q) during inpatient recovery after cesarean delivery (CD) between October 2019 and September 2020, before and after the implementation of our ERAC protocol. Patients with non-Pfannenstiel incision, ICU admission, massive transfusion, bowel injury, existing chronic pain disorders, acute postpartum depression, or neonatal demise were excluded. The ERAC-Q was administered on postoperative day one and day of discharge to the pre- and post-ERAC implementation cohorts, rating aspects of their recovery experience on a scale of 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The primary outcome was ERAC-Q scores. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS software.

RESULTS

There were 196 and 112 patients in the pre- and post-ERAC cohorts, respectively. The post-ERAC group reported significantly lower total ERAC-Q scores compared to the pre-ERAC group, reflecting fewer adverse symptoms and greater perceived recovery on postoperative day one (1.6 [0.7, 2.8] vs. 2.7 [1.6, 4.3]) and day of discharge (0.8 [0.3, 1.5] vs. 1.4 [0.7, 2.2]) (p<0.001). ERAC-Q responses did not predict the time to achieve objective postoperative milestones. However, worse ERAC-Q pain and total scores were associated with higher inpatient opiate use.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAC implementation positively impacts patient recovery experience. The administration of ERAC-Q can provide real-time feedback on patient-perceived recovery quality and how healthcare protocol changes may impact their experience.

Oral hydrolyzed whey protein in the perioperative period of cesarean section increases postoperative prolactin in mothers: a randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral administration of hydrolyzed whey protein during the perioperative period of cesarean section on postoperative prolactin levels and breast milk production in mothers. Methods triple-blind randomized trial was conducted on women who gave birth in a Chinese tertiary care hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hydrolyzed whey protein or placebo group and were administered the respective substances at specific times during the perioperative period. The primary outcomes were prolactin levels and additional fluid milk intake during specific postoperative periods. Secondary observations included mothers’ subjective preoperative feelings and postoperative exhaust time. Results The study found that mothers in the hydrolyzed whey protein group had reduced visual hunger (p=0.002) and anxiety (p<0.001) while having higher neonatal blood glucose levels (p=0.041) compared to the placebo group. This group also had higher prolactin levels (p=0.009) and a reduced the number of milk additions in the first 48 hours of a newborn’s life (No-BreakpNo-Break=0.035). Conclusion Hydrolyzed whey protein intake during the cesarean section perioperative period reduces maternal hunger and anxiety, increases serum prolactin levels 3-4 hours after surgery, increases the infant’s blood glucose level 30 minutes after birth, and reduces milk supplementation in the first 48 hours.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery rate is increasing, with no prediction of this rate to drop. Implementation of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program adapted to this high prevalent obstetrical surgical procedure proposes better peri-operative care achievement with improved maternal medical care, namely reduced morbidity, faster return to normal daily activities and improved impact on quality of life. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of ERAS guidelines implementation in cesarean sections (CS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed across 3 databases (MEDLINE (Pubmed), Scopus and Web of Science), with no time or language filters, for articles comparing outcomes on pregnant women who delivered via CS with ERAS guidelines implementation versus the traditional approach without ERAS implementation. Outcomes established: primary - hospital length of stay; secondary - opioid consumption, readmission rates and maternal complications (overall, surgical site infection and emetic morbidity). Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and its results were expressed as mean difference, standardized mean difference and odds ratio, with 95% of confidence intervals. This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 16 studies (3 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 4 prospective cohorts and 9 retrospective cohorts), with a pool analysis of 19,001 women (9752 with the traditional approach and 9249 following ERAS guidelines). Our results showed a significative decrease in length of hospital stay (MD: -13.78 h; CI 95 % -19.28 to -8.28; p < 0.00001) and opioid consumption (SMD: -0.91; CI 95 % -1.51 to -0.32; p = 0.003), with similar readmission rates (OR: 0.85; CI 95 % 0.50 to 1.44; p = 0.53) and maternal complications, namely: overall (OR: 0.87; CI 95 % 0.56 to 1.35; p = 0.53); surgical site infection (OR: 1.13; CI 95 % 0.72 to 1.77; p = 0.60) and emetic morbidity (OR: 0.78; CI 95 % 0.31 to 1.96; p = 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS guidelines applied at CS management are associated with decreased length of stay and opioid consumption, without negatively impact on readmission rates and overall maternal complications, including surgical site infection and emetic morbidity. The reduced number of RCT studies and the heterogeneity of the studies (heterogeneous inter-study protocols) constitutes the major limitation of the evidence found. Still, these findings may be a foremost help to confirm the beneficial impact of an ERAS approach during peri-cesarean management.

The efficacy of preoperative low-residue diet on postoperative ileus following cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative low-residue diet on postoperative ileus in women undergoing elective cesarean section (CS).

METHODS

This is a surgeon-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolling pregnant women at ≥39 weeks of gestation undergoing elective CS. Patients were preoperatively randomized to receive either low-residue diet (arm A) or free diet (arm B) starting from three days before surgery. The primary outcome was the postoperative ileus. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative pain (assessed through VAS scale), the quality of the surgical field (scored using a 5-point scale, from poor to excellent), postoperative complications, and the length of hospital stay. Perioperative data were collected and compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were enrolled and randomized in arm A (n = 83) and arm B (n = 83). Postoperative ileus over 24 h was significantly shorter in arm A, compared to arm B (19.3% vs 36.2%). The surgical evaluation of small intestine was scored ≥3 in 96.4% of arm A patients versus 80.7% in arm B, while evaluation of large intestine, respectively, in 97.7% and 81.9%. Postoperative pain after 12 h from CS was significantly lower in arm A (VAS, 3.4 ± 1.7) compared to arm B (VAS, 4.1 ± 1.8). There were no significant differences as regards postoperative pain at 24 and 48 h, nausea/vomit, surgical complications, and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a preoperative low-residue diet for women scheduled for elective CS would reduce postoperative ileus and pain. Further large-scale studies are required before translating these research findings into routine obstetrical practice.

The Use of Sequential Surveys to Shorten Implementation Time for Healthcare System-Level Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways improve healthcare quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness. We hypothesized that the RAND Method (a hybrid Delphi approach), involving anonymous sequential surveys and face-to-face meetings, would allow for more rapid agreement and initiation of new ERAS pathways.

METHODS

Using the ERAS Society guidelines for cesarean section as a baseline, our institution's ERAS Leadership Team (ELT) compiled published literature and institutional practices to design a 32-component survey that was sent to obstetricians, nurse midwives, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, and nurses. Components that did not reach 90% consensus were included in a second survey the following week, and meetings were held to review results. At the conclusion of this process, time to agreement was retrospectively compared to the colorectal ERAS pathway process at this institution.

RESULTS

ERAS pathway components were compiled and reviewed by 121 stakeholders at 7 hospitals using iterative surveys with review meetings over a 13-week period. Survey response rates were 61% and 50% in the initial and follow-up surveys, respectively. There was agreement on 28/32 and 32/32 items on the initial and follow-up surveys. Using the RAND Method, time to agreement decreased by 54.1% (24 vs 13 weeks) compared to prior system-wide efforts to standardize the colorectal surgery ERAS pathway.

DISCUSSION

With rapidly expanding healthcare systems, effective methods to gain consensus and adopt ERAS pathways are critical to implementation of ERAS guidelines. We demonstrate that the RAND Method allows for a transparent and efficient means of agreement across a diverse group of clinicians practicing in several settings.

Horizontal mattress uterine closure compared to single layered lock suture in cesarean section - A retrospective cohort study

Objective

The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of standard cesarean section uterine closure, single-layered running lock sutures, versus using primary horizontal mattress sutures (the K uterine closure technique).

Method

This study used a retrospective cohort chart review of patients undergoing elective primary and repeat cesarean section between January 2016 and August 2020 at a South Florida hospital. From 613 included patients, 176 received the K uterine closure technique completed by a triple board-certified physician. Remaining 437 patients received single-layered lock uterine closure completed by other physicians in the same hospital. Clinical, demographic, and post-operative outcomes were collected using patients' operative, post-operative, and progress notes.

Results

Using the data gathered, the experimental group demonstrated a greater difference between pre- and post-cesarean section hemoglobin (p < 0.027) and hematocrit (p < 0.014) compared to single-layered lock closure methods. There was a significantly lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), however, there was no significant difference in the average quantitative blood loss (p < 0.374). There was also a significant reduction in the length of total and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001), but the total operation time was significantly increased (p < 0.016). No significant difference was found in the percentage of patients using opioids as pain management during hospital stay (p < 0.431). There was no need for blood transfusion nor an increase in infectious morbidity using this method.

Conclusions

Using the K uterine closure technique for post-cesarean section uterine closure was a reasonable alternative for closure of hysterotomy. It led to decreased duration of hospital stay and no significant difference in quantitative blood loss. The greater difference in hemoglobin and hematocrit for the K uterine closure technique group could be explained due to the significantly greater total operation time. Although the single-layered running lock suture closure is what has been more historically performed by obstetricians for cesarean sections, this data supports the viability and efficacy of the K uterine closure technique as an equally safe, non-inferior alternative. The value of this technique for uterine closure can be confirmed with future prospective studies and potential research in reduction of uterine scar defects.

Synopsis

Primary horizontal mattress closure at cesarean section provides a safe alternative to single-layered lock closure and may reduce blood loss, hospital stay, and opioid use.

Fostering Excellence in Obstetrical Surgery

Introduction

This obstetric surgery review is directed toward the common obstetrical surgeries (caesarean delivery, VBAC/TOLAC, operative vaginal delivery, placenta accreta spectrum) with evidence for quality and safety to allow for obstetrical outcome excellence.

Materials and Methods

This focused scoping review has used a structured process for article identification and inclusion for each of the focused surgeries.

Results

The review results provide an obstetrical surgery (OS) overview for caesarean delivery, vaginal birth after caesarean delivery and/or trial of labor after caesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, placenta accreta spectrum; considerations for quality and safety variance due to non-clinical human factors; quality improvement (QI) tools; OS QI implementation cohorts; implementation considering certain barriers and solutions.

Conclusion

Administrative health care systems and obstetrical surgery care providers cannot afford, not to consider and implement, certain evidenced-based "bottom-up/top-down" processes for quality and safety, as the patients will demand the quality and the safety, but the lawyers should not have to enforce it.

Effect of early oral carbohydrate intake after elective Cesarean delivery on maternal body temperature and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Although the Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Delivery (ERAC) consensus statement provides recommendations for early postoperative drinking and eating, evidence from high-quality clinical research directly addressing parturients is sparse. Our objective was to assess if early oral carbohydrate intake after elective Cesarean delivery improves maternal recovery.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, we enrolled parturients undergoing elective Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia with tympanic membrane temperatures ≤ 36.5 °C immediately upon arrival at the postanesthesia care unit. Parturients were randomized to either 100 mL of oral complex carbohydrate intake (group CC) or 10 mL of water (group C). The primary outcome was maternal tympanic membrane temperature. Other outcomes included maternal thermal comfort score, degree of shivering, satisfaction, degree of thirst and hunger, and gastric emptying assessed by ultrasonography.

RESULTS

We included 90 participants in the final analysis. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) maternal body temperature at 120 min after ingestion was 36.7 (0.3) °C in group CC and 36.6 (0.3) °C in group C (difference in means, 0.14 °C; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.26; P = 0.02). Furthermore, using repeated measure models, the linear trends of temperature changes over time between groups CC and C were significantly different (P = 0.04). The thermal comfort scores at 120 min after ingestion were higher in group CC than in group C (P = 0.02), and the linear trends of shivering score changes over time between groups CC and C also were different (P = 0.003). The mean (SD) visual analogue scale scores for maternal satisfaction were 84 (13) mm in group CC and 47 (20) mm in group C (P < 0.001). Nevertheless, at 90 and 120 min after ingestion, there were no differences between the two groups in the number of participants with a gastric antrum cross-sectional area > 10.3 cm2.

CONCLUSIONS

Early oral carbohydrate intake after Cesarean delivery helped to restore maternal body temperature postoperatively and improve maternal satisfaction. Nevertheless, the clinical importance of these finding is unclear, given that most of the differences were small. In addition, there was no delay in maternal gastric emptying after consumption of a complex carbohydrate beverage in the early post-Cesarean period.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000031085); first submitted 13 November 2022.

Factors affecting gastrointestinal function recovery after cesarean section among Chinese mothers: A cross-sectional study

This study was conducted to explore the influencing factors of gastrointestinal function recovery after cesarean section (CS), which could provide a reference for the enhanced recovery after surgery in obstetrics. This is a cross-sectional survey on Chinese mothers receiving CS. The participants's socio-demographic characteristics, perioperative diet, medical condition and gastrointestinal function after surgery were collected by a self-designed questionnaire. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the influencing factors of gastrointestinal function recovery after CS. A total of 1501 (94.76%) valid questionnaires were collected. The first borborygmus was 2.21 ± 0.63 hours, and the first anal exhaust was 35.73 ± 14.85 hours after the CS. The incidence of abdominal distension and intestinal obstruction were 15.1% and 0.7%, respectively. The parity, type of CS, 2-hours bleeding after surgery, time of first meal after surgery, whether taking peppermint water after surgery were the independent influencing factors for gastrointestinal function recovery after CS. We should pay more attention to the mothers with scarred uterus, manage the labor process strictly, and reduce 2-hours bleeding after surgery. The mothers with CS should also be encouraged to eat early and take peppermint water to promote intestinal peristalsis actively.

Effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy on postoperative complications after thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An understanding of the impact of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on the outcomes of patients undergoing one-lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery remains incomplete and controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of GDFT compared to other fluid therapy strategies on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with OLV.

METHODS

The Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE via PubMed databases were searched from their inception to November 30, 2022. Forest plots were constructed to present the results of the meta-analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Study of Interventions (ROBINS-I). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, total fluid infusion, inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6), and postoperative bowel function recovery time.

RESULTS

A total of 1318 patients from 11 studies were included in this review. The GDFT group had a lower incidence of postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.47; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.29-0.75; P = 0.002; I 2, 67%], postoperative pulmonary complications (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.83; P = 0.009), and postoperative anastomotic leakage (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.97; P = 0.04). The GDFT strategy reduces total fluid infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

GDFT is associated with lower postoperative complications and better survival outcomes after thoracic surgery for OLV.

Inter-rater agreement of CDC criteria and ASEPSIS score in assessing surgical site infections after cesarean section: a prospective observational study

Objective

To assess and compare the inter-rater agreement of the CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score in identifying surgical site infections after cesarean section.

Methods

Prospective observational study including 110 patients subjected to a cesarean section at our institution. Surgical wounds were managed according to standard care and were photographed on the third, seventh, and thirtieth postoperative day or during any evaluation in case of complications. Three expert surgeons reviewed the prospectively gathered data and photographs and classified each wound using CDC criteria and the ASEPSIS score. The inter-rater agreements of CDC criteria and ASEPSIS score were determined with Krippendorff's Alpha with linear weights and compared with a confidence interval approach.

Results

The weighted α coefficient for CDC criteria was 0.587 (95%CI, 0.411-0.763, p < 0.001, "moderate" agreement according to Altman's interpretation of weighted agreement coefficient), while the weighted α coefficient for the ASEPSIS score was 0.856 (95%CI, 0.733-0.980, p < 0.001, "very good" agreement).

Conclusion

ASEPSIS score presents a "very good" inter-rater agreement for surgical site infections identification after cesarean, resulting in a more objective method than CDC criteria ("moderate" inter-rater agreement). ASEPSIS score could represent an objective tool for managing and monitoring surgical site infections after cesarean section, also by photographic evaluation.

Enhanced recovery protocol after cesarean delivery: impact on opioid use and pain perception

BACKGROUND

Opioids are routinely prescribed to patients postoperatively after cesarean delivery. With rates of cesarean deliveries increasing globally and the opioid epidemic continuing to have deleterious effects, finding methods to achieve effective pain control without opioids is of increasing importance. The ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol applied following cesarean delivery engages multimodal perioperative management techniques to encourage early recovery. In the obstetrical surgery setting, these interventions include increasing scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration and laxative use to improve postoperative gastrointestinal motility and pain scores. Postcesarean patients are also encouraged to use abdominal binders, incentive spirometry, and early movement as pain modulators.

OBJECTIVE

This quality improvement study aimed to measure whether the introduction of an ERAS protocol following cesarean delivery at a United States-based health network would improve outcomes such as the use of opioid medications for pain and pain control.

STUDY DESIGN

This single-center retrospective cohort study compared patients who gave birth via cesarean delivery before (n=1425) and after (n=3478) the implementation of the postsurgical recovery protocol. Outcomes of interest included total postoperative opioid medications used, discharge opioid prescription, average pain score, pain scores by postoperative day, and highest pain score. Patients with a history of opioid use disorder, those who underwent a cesarean hysterectomy, and those who experienced a major surgical complication at delivery were excluded. Data were collected from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Patients in the postimplementation period used significantly fewer opioid medications than those who gave birth before the protocol was introduced at the institution. The total median opioid use before implementation was 75 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range, 45-112.5) vs 30 (interquartile range, 15-52.5) after implementation (P<.001). The median discharge prescription was 225 (interquartile range, 150-225) before implementation vs 112.5 (interquartile range, 75-150) after implementation (P<.001). Pain scores were also significantly lower after implementation. The median highest pain score was 8 (interquartile range, 6-8) on a 10-point pain scale before implementation vs 7 (interquartile range, 6-8) after implementation (P<.001). The average pain score before implementation was 3.4 (interquartile range, 2.4-4.5) vs 2.9 (interquartile range, 1.9-3.9) after implementation (P<.001). Results of paired-sample analyses of 177 patients who gave birth by cesarean delivery in both time periods showed statistically significant outcomes similar to those of the larger cohort groups.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of multimodal pain regimens following cesarean delivery, such as the ERAS protocol, which incorporate both pharmacologic (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, laxatives) and nonpharmacologic methods (abdominal binders, deep breathing, movement) can be effective for pain control and may decrease postoperative opioid prescribing needs, thus mitigating the potential for opioid misuse and dependence.

Comparison between the modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section and standard cesarean technique-a randomized double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section is a cesarean delivery technique, which includes a vertical fascial incision to the left of the linea alba and an extraperitoneal approach to the uterus. The presumed benefits of this technique are decreased postoperative pain and accelerated recovery. However, evidence supporting these impressions is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare maternal recovery after French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section vs standard cesarean delivery technique.

STUDY DESIGN

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, women undergoing elective cesarean delivery at term were allocated into French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section vs standard cesarean delivery technique. A modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section technique was used, adhering to all French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section operative steps except for the extraperitoneal approach. In both groups, the use of intravenous hydration, intrathecal morphine, and bladder catheter was avoided, and all women were encouraged to stand and walk 3 to 4 hours after the operation. The primary adverse composite outcome included either of the following: a visual analog scale score of >6 at 3 to 4 hours after the operation, an inability to stand up and walk to the restroom 3 to 4 hours after the operation, and a 15-Item Quality of Recovery (QoR) questionnaire score of <90 at 24 hours after the operation. The women were followed up for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 116 women were included in the trial (58 in each group). The adverse composite outcome did not differ between the 2 groups (38.9% for the French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section group vs 53.8% for the regular cesarean delivery group; P=.172). In both groups, more than 90% of the women were able to get up and walk 3 to 4 hours after the operation. Compared with the standard cesarean delivery group, the French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section group had a longer duration of the operation (43.7±11.2 vs 54.4±11.3 minutes; P<.001), a higher rate of intraoperative complications (0.0% vs 13.8%; P=.006), and a higher rate of umbilical cord pH level of <7.2 (3.4% vs 17.2%; P=.029) were noted. Evaluation via phone call 1 week after the operation showed better quality of recovery scores in the French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section group than in the standard cesarean delivery group (27.1±8.4 vs 24.6±8.0; P=.043). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

As excellent maternal recovery was noted in both groups, we believe that the main factor affecting this recovery is the perioperative management (including avoidance of the use of intraoperative intravenous hydration, intrathecal morphine, and bladder catheter, with early postoperative mobilization). The maternal and neonatal safety outcomes of the French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section technique remain to be proven by larger-scale high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Outcome in Patient Undergoing LSCS via ERAS Pathway versus Traditional Pathway: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

ERAS is an evidence-based management protocol for perioperative care, to accelerate patient recovery. The field of obstetrics has been a late adapter of ERAS pathway for CS, and the literature is limited from Indian population.

Material and Methods

This prospective non-randomized comparative clinical study was conducted on 190 pregnant patients, out of which 95 were subjected to ERAS protocol (Group 1) and remaining 95 cases were enrolled in existing traditional protocol (Group 2). The primary objective was to compare quality of recovery based on obstetric-specific QoR 11 questionnaire between patients undergoing ERAC and traditional protocol for elective LSCS. Secondary objective was to compare perioperative bleeding, breast feeding initiation and difficulties, first oral intake, ambulation attempts, decatheterization, surgical site infection and length of hospital stay.

Results

At 24 h postoperatively, mean QoR score was significantly higher for patients in the ERAC group (85.5 ± 7.46 vs 57.1 ± 11.33, p value < 0.01). In the ERAC group, 50.5% of the mothers started breastfeeding within first hour. The mean duration to start oral intake postoperatively was significantly lower in ERAC group. In the ERAC group, ambulation and decatheterization were attempted within 6 h postoperatively in 86.3%. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower for patients in the ERAC group (68.8 ± 1.9 vs 105.4 ± 25.7 h, p value < 0.001).

Conclusion

The use of ERAC protocol at cesarean delivery significantly improves quality of recovery and length of hospital stay.

A pharmacological overview of aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affects 30% of all patients undergoing surgery and up to 80% of high-risk patients. Antiemetics for PONV prophylaxis target a variety of receptor systems, with varying degrees of efficacy and side effect profile. Neurokinin -1 receptor antagonists are the most recent class of compounds investigated for PONV prophylaxis, with aprepitant being the only one currently approved for this indication.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the pathophysiology of PONV, current recommendations for PONV prophylaxis, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aprepitant, and the evidence for its efficacy in the management of PONV as a single agent and in combination therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Aprepitant is effective for PONV prophylaxis. It has superior antivomiting efficacy, long half-life, and favorable side effect profile. Data on antiemetic combinations involving aprepitant are limited, and it not clear if the addition of other antiemetics to aprepitant result in improved PONV prophylaxis. The oral route of administration of aprepitant is a potential limitation in a busy clinical practice. However, the recent approval of an intravenous formulation could provide a more convenient route of administration. Aprepitant remains more expensive than other antiemetics, and there are no studies assessing the cost effectiveness of its use.

Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Section (ERAC): Where are We in Austria?

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations for cesarean section (ERAC), likely the most common reason for laparotomy in women, were issued in 2018-19. We examined how current perioperative management at cesarean section in Austrian hospitals aligns with ERAS recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed the 21 largest public obstetric units in Austria for alignment with 20 of the 31 strong ERAS recommendations regarding perioperative maternal care at cesarean section. We also looked at how the German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section (AWMF Guideline Sectio caesarea) aligns with ERAS recommendations.

RESULTS

The 21 obstetric units cared for about 51% of all births in Austria in 2019. Cesarean section rates ranged from 17.7% to 50.4%. All 21 units implemented the five strong recommendations regarding patient information and counselling, regional anesthesia, euvolemia and multimodal analgesia. The least implemented strong recommendation was the one for the use of pneumatic compression stockings to prevent thromboembolic disease (0/21 units). Overall, all 21 units implemented ≥11 and 13 (62%) implemented ≥15 (≥75%) of the 20 strong recommendations; no unit implemented all 20 strong recommendations. There were no differences in the implementation of strong recommendations according to hospital volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in the absence of formal adoption of ERAS program for cesarean section many perioperative ERAS recommendations are already implemented in Austria. The least implemented recommendations were the use of pneumatic compression stockings (0 of 21 units) and immediate catheter removal (4 of 21 units). Only 10 of the 20 ERAS recommendations we looked at are included in the current German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section.

Variation in Opioid Prescribing After Vaginal and Cesarean Birth: A Statewide Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to evaluate variation in opioid prescribing rates and prescription size following childbirth across providers and hospitals.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed claims data from a single-payer Preferred Provider Organization from June 2014 to May 2019 in 84 hospitals in a statewide quality collaborative. All patients aged 12-55 years, undergoing childbirth, with continuous enrollment in pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the predicted rate of postpartum opioid fills from 7 days before birth to 3 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes included postpartum opioid prescription size in oral morphine equivalents, a standardized measure that includes the number of pills prescribed times the strength of the medication. Multilevel regression models accounted for clustering. We calculated attributable variation in opioid fills using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Of 41,427 births, 15,459 patients (37.2%) filled a postpartum opioid prescription (vaginal, 4,624/27,536 [16.8%]; cesarean, 10,835/13,891 [78.0%]). The median postpartum prescription size was 150 oral morphine equivalents (interquartile range [IQR], 30) (vaginal, 135; [IQR, 45]; cesarean, 150 [IQR, 75]). In adjusted models, the rates of opioid prescribing after vaginal birth differed from cesarean birth (vaginal median, 12.1% [range, 1.1%-60.0%]; cesarean median, 80.4% [range, 43.6%-90.2%]). More variation in postpartum opioid fills was attributable to providers and hospitals for vaginal (provider, 29%; hospital, 24%) than cesarean birth (provider, 8%; hospital, 6%). Variation in prescription size was driven by providers for vaginal birth (provider, 27%; hospital, 6%) and providers and hospitals for cesarean birth (provider, 29%; hospital, 21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Across a statewide quality collaborative, variation in postpartum opioid prescribing is attributable to providers and hospitals. Future efforts at the provider and hospital levels are needed to implement best practices for postpartum opioid prescribing.

Improving the Quality of Maternity Care: Learning From Malpractice

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to depict the characteristics, injury outcomes, and payment of obstetric malpractice lawsuits to better understand the medicolegal burden in obstetrics and categorize the causes of obstetric malpractice lawsuits using The National Health Service Litigation Authority coding taxonomy for further quality improvement in maternity care.

METHODS

We reviewed and retrieved key information on court records of legal trials from China Judgment Online between 2013 and 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 3441 obstetric malpractice lawsuits successfully claimed were reviewed in this study, with a total indemnity payment of $139,875,375. After peaking in 2017, the number of obstetric malpractice claims begins to decline. Of the 2424 hospitals that were sued, 8.3% (201/2424) were referred to as "repeat defendant" because they were involved in multiple lawsuits. Death and injury were the outcomes in 53.4% and 46.6% of the cases, respectively. The most common outcome type was neonatal death, which made up 29.8% of all cases. The median indemnity payment for death was higher compared with injury (P < 0.05). In terms of detailed injury outcomes, the major neonatal injury had higher median indemnity payments than neonatal death and fetal death (P < 0.05). The median indemnity payment of the major maternal injury was higher than that of maternal death (P < 0.05). The leading causes of obstetric malpractice were the management of birth complications and adverse events (23.3%), management of labor (14.4%), career decision making (13.7%), fetal surveillance (11.0%), and cesarean section management (9.5%). The cause for 8.7% of cases was high payment (≥$100, 000). As indicated by the results of the multivariate analysis, the hospitals in the midland of China (odds ratio [OR], 0.476; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.348-0.651), the hospitals in the west of China (OR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.357-0.767), and the secondary hospitals (OR, 0.587; 95% CI, 0.356-0.967) had lower risks of high payment. Hospitals with ultimate liability (OR, 9.695; 95% CI, 4.072-23.803), full liability (OR, 16.442; 95% CI, 6.231-43.391), major neonatal injury (OR, 12.326; 95% CI, 5.836-26.033), major maternal injury (OR, 20.885; 95% CI, 7.929-55.011), maternal death (OR, 18.783; 95% CI, 8.887-39.697), maternal death with child injury (OR, 54.682; 95% CI, 10.900-274.319), maternal injury with child death (OR, 6.935; 95% CI, 2.773-17.344), and deaths of both mother and child (OR, 12.770; 95% CI, 5.136-31.754) had higher risks of high payment. In the causative domain, only anesthetics had a higher risk of high payment (OR, 5.605; 95% CI, 1.347-23.320), but anesthetic-related lawsuits made up just 1.4% of all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The healthcare systems had to pay a significant amount as a result of obstetric malpractice lawsuits. Greater efforts are required to minimize serious injury outcomes and improve obstetric quality in the risky domains.

Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery is a protocolized approach to perioperative care, with the aim to optimize maternal recovery after surgery. It is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, including decreased length of hospital stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, complications, increased maternal satisfaction, and increased breastfeeding success. However, the pace and enthusiasm of adoption of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery internationally has not yet been matched with high-quality evidence demonstrating its benefit, and current studies provide low- to very low-quality evidence in support of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. This article provides a summary of current measures of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, and optimal measures of inpatient and outpatient postpartum recovery. We summarize outcomes from 22 published enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies and 2 meta-analyses. A variety of disparate metrics have been used to measure enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, including process measures (length of hospital stay, bundle compliance, preoperative fasting time, time to first mobilization, time to urinary catheter removal), maternal outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, complications, opioid consumption, satisfaction), neonatal outcomes (breastfeeding success, Apgar scores, maternal-neonatal bonding), cost savings, and complication rates (maternal readmission rate, urinary recatheterization rate, neonatal readmission rate). A core outcome set for use in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies has been developed through Delphi consensus, involving stakeholders including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, patients, and a midwife. Fifteen measures covering key aspects of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery adoption are recommended for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies. The use of these outcome measures could improve the quality of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Using evidence-based evaluation guidelines developed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group, the Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR) was identified as the best patient-reported outcome measure for inpatient postpartum recovery. Advances in our understanding of postpartum recovery as a multidimensional and dynamic construct have opened new avenues for the identification of optimum patient-reported outcome measures in this context. The use of standardized measures such as these will facilitate pooling of data in future studies and improve overall levels of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Larger studies with optimal study designs, using recommended outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures, will reduce variation and improve data quality to help guide future recommendations.

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery on postoperative pain

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize perioperative care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to holistically investigate the effect of implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries on postoperative pain experience.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prepost study comparing subjective and objective measures of postoperative pain before and after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for cesarean delivery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary team and included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative components, with emphasis on preoperative preparation, hemodynamic optimization, early mobilization, and multimodal analgesia. All individuals undergoing cesarean delivery, whether scheduled, urgent, or emergent, were included. Demographic, delivery, and inpatient pain management data were obtained through medical record review. Of note, 2 weeks after discharge, patients were surveyed about their delivery experience, analgesic usage, and complications. The primary outcome was inpatient opioid use.

RESULTS

The study included 128 individuals, 56 in the preimplementation cohort and 72 in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery cohort. Baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were similar. The survey response rate was 73% (94/128). Opioid use in the first 48 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group than the preimplementation group (9.4 vs 21.4 morphine milligram equivalents 0-24 hours after delivery [P<.001]; 14.1 vs 25.4 morphine milligram equivalents 24-48 hours after delivery [P<.001]) with no increase in either average or maximum postoperative pain scores. Individuals in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery group used fewer opioid pills after discharge (10 vs 20; P<.001). Patient satisfaction and complication rates did not change after the implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for all cesarean deliveries decreased both inpatient and outpatient postpartum opioid use without increasing pain scores or decreasing patient satisfaction.