1
|
Sharma K, Cox S, Romero L, Ekwueme D, Whiteman M, Kroelinger C, Ouyang L. State variations in insertion of long-acting reversible contraception during delivery hospitalization. Contraception 2024; 138:110509. [PMID: 38830389 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to describe immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (IPP LARC) insertion rates during delivery hospitalizations at the state level and by payor type. STUDY DESIGN This is a cross-sectional study of 26 states and District of Columbia using 2020 State Inpatient Database. RESULTS In 2020, IPP LARC insertion rates varied widely by states, ranging from 2.55 to 637.25 per 10,000 deliveries. Rates were higher for deliveries with Medicaid as primary expected payor than with private insurance in all states but District of Columbia. CONCLUSIONS Rates of IPP LARC insertion varied in 2020 by state and were higher for deliveries with Medicaid as primary expected payor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keshob Sharma
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Shanna Cox
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lisa Romero
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Donatus Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maura Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charlan Kroelinger
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lijing Ouyang
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thornton M, Mann ES, Bullington BW, Hartheimer J, Arora KS, Allison BA. Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2024. [PMID: 39175306 DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care. METHODS We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose. RESULTS We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework. CONCLUSION Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeline Thornton
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily S Mann
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brooke W Bullington
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joline Hartheimer
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kavita Shah Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bianca A Allison
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Curtis KM, Nguyen AT, Tepper NK, Zapata LB, Snyder EM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, Kortsmit K, Cohen MA, Whiteman MK. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73:1-77. [PMID: 39106301 PMCID: PMC11340200 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2024 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a selected group of common, yet sometimes complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016;65[No. RR-4]:1-66). Notable updates include 1) updated recommendations for provision of medications for intrauterine device placement, 2) updated recommendations for bleeding irregularities during implant use, 3) new recommendations for testosterone use and risk for pregnancy, and 4) new recommendations for self-administration of injectable contraception. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Antoinette T. Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Naomi K. Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Lauren B. Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Emily M. Snyder
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Megan A. Cohen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Maura K. Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen AT, Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Kortsmit K, Brittain AW, Snyder EM, Cohen MA, Zapata LB, Whiteman MK. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73:1-126. [PMID: 39106314 PMCID: PMC11315372 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette T. Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kathryn M. Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Naomi K. Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anna W. Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emily M. Snyder
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Megan A. Cohen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren B. Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maura K. Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zell B, Effland K, Snyder M, Hays K, Gordon W. Prescriptive Authority for Direct Entry Midwives in Washington State: Increasing Client Access to Contraception. J Midwifery Womens Health 2024; 69:600-605. [PMID: 38229277 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Improving health and achieving health equity includes access to sexual and reproductive health care for all populations, especially those most in need. However, access to life-saving and life-affirming contraception with an individual's chosen perinatal provider can be impeded by restrictive regulations that limit scope and practice authority. This is especially true for the majority of community and direct entry midwives in the United States who have historically been unable to legally provide effective contraceptive methods. Recently, licensed midwives in Washington state were the first in the nation to achieve prescriptive authority, enabling their clients to directly obtain contraception and access to medications for common prenatal and postpartum conditions. Sustained advocacy efforts in the state's capitol enabled the Midwives' Association of Washington State to build relationships over time with legislators and government agencies to achieve this long-term goal. We present a successful midwifery-led innovation that achieved scope expansion for licensed midwives whose practice authority was limited by restrictive laws. Lessons learned are described and strategies offered to aid midwives and their advocates in other locales who want to improve health equity and access to contraception. Midwives are well positioned to provide this essential care to individuals living in underserved rural and urban areas and those from historically marginalized communities, but their ability to do so is limited by restrictive legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristin Effland
- Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington, USA
| | | | - Karen Hays
- Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington, USA
| | - Wendy Gordon
- Department of Midwifery, Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carvajal DN, McSorley AMM, Zambrana RE. Latine Reproductive Health and Data Inequities Across the Life Course: A Call to Action. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:S457-S462. [PMID: 39083730 PMCID: PMC11292275 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2024.307756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Diana N Carvajal
- Diana N. Carvajal is with the School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Anna-Michelle Marie McSorley is with the Department of Public Health Policy and Management and Center for Anti-Racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY. Ruth Enid Zambrana is with the Harriet Tubman Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Anna-Michelle Marie McSorley
- Diana N. Carvajal is with the School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Anna-Michelle Marie McSorley is with the Department of Public Health Policy and Management and Center for Anti-Racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY. Ruth Enid Zambrana is with the Harriet Tubman Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Ruth Enid Zambrana
- Diana N. Carvajal is with the School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore. Anna-Michelle Marie McSorley is with the Department of Public Health Policy and Management and Center for Anti-Racism, Social Justice, and Public Health, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY. Ruth Enid Zambrana is with the Harriet Tubman Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland, College Park
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Newton-Levinson A, Griffin K, Blake SC, Swartzendruber A, Kramer M, Sales JM. "I probably have access, but I can't afford it": expanding definitions of affordability in access to contraceptive services among people with low income in Georgia, USA. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:709. [PMID: 38849826 PMCID: PMC11157915 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11133-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in rates of contraceptive use are frequently attributed to unequal access to and affordability of care. There is a need to better understand whether common definitions of affordability that solely relate to cost or to insurance status capture the reality of individuals' lived experiences. We sought to better understand how individuals with low incomes and the capacity for pregnancy conceptualized one domain of contraceptive access-affordability --in terms of health system and individual access and how both shaped contraceptive care-seeking in the US South. METHOD Between January 2019 to February 2020, we conducted twenty-five life-history interviews with low-income individuals who may become pregnant living in suburban counties in Georgia, USA. Interviews covered the ways individual and health system access factors influenced care-seeking for family planning over the life course. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to identify experiences associated with individual and health system access. RESULTS Affordability was identified as a major determinant of access, one tied to unique combinations of individual factors (e.g., financial status) and health system characteristics (e.g., cost of methods) that fluctuated over time. Navigating the process to attain affordable care was unpredictable and had important implications for care-seeking. A "poor fit" between individual and health system factors could lead to inequities in access and gaps in, or non-use of contraception. Participants also reported high levels of shame and stigma associated with being uninsured or on publicly funded insurance. CONCLUSIONS Affordability is one domain of contraceptive access that is shaped by the interplay between individual factors and health system characteristics as well as by larger structural factors such as health and economic policies that influence both. Assessments of the affordability of contraceptive care must account for the dynamic interplay among multilevel influences. Despite the expansion of contraceptive coverage through the Affordable Care Act, low-income individuals still struggle with affordability and disparities persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Newton-Levinson
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.
| | - Kelsey Griffin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Sarah C- Blake
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Andrea Swartzendruber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The University of Georgia, 101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA, 30606, USA
| | - Michael Kramer
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Jessica M- Sales
- Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wright RL, Kara D, Buchanan KC, Adler C, Pulley A. The Impact of Rural Environments on Reproductive Autonomy Among Women in Appalachia: A Qualitative Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR SEXUAL HEALTH 2024; 36:273-286. [PMID: 39148922 PMCID: PMC11323869 DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2360730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Reproductive autonomy encompasses one's ability to make decisions around contraceptive use, pregnancy, and childbirth. An individual's geographic location affects access to a wide range of information and care related to reproductive choice. Individuals in rural areas face additional barriers to reproductive health and decision-making than those in urban areas. This phenomenological qualitative study examined the experiences with and perceptions of reproductive decision-making among women in rural Appalachian communities in the United States. Four themes emerged from the data: autonomy tied to choice, role of religion and church on autonomy and decision-making, navigating limited access to care, and shame. Women should be supported in making reproductive health decisions, and efforts are needed to increase autonomy within reproductive health care and decisions. Sexual health programming within school and other community settings should address shame that often occurs around reproductive health topics, particularly among religious communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel L. Wright
- Department of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| | - Danyelle Kara
- Department of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| | - K. C. Buchanan
- Department of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| | - Cassie Adler
- Department of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| | - Amanda Pulley
- Department of Social Work, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zia Y, Upadhyay U, Rhew I, Kimanthi S, Congo O, Onono M, Barnabas R, Mugo N, Bukusi EA, Harrington EK. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validation of the Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults in Kenya. Stud Fam Plann 2024; 55:85-103. [PMID: 38604945 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Understanding the levels of power that adolescent girls and young women exercise in their sexual and reproductive lives is imperative to inform interventions to help them meet their goals. We implemented an adapted version of the Sexual and Reproductive Health Empowerment (SRE) Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults among 500 adolescent girls and young women aged 15-20 in Kisumu, Kenya. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess factor structure, and logistic regression to examine construct validity through the relationship between empowerment scores and ability to mitigate risk of undesired pregnancy through consistent contraceptive use. Participants had a mean age of 17.5, and most were students (61 percent), were currently partnered (94 percent), and reported having sex in the past 3 months (70 percent). The final, 26-item CFA model had acceptable fit. All subscales had Cronbach's alpha scores >0.7, and all items had rotated factor loadings >0.5, indicating good internal consistency and robust factor-variable associations. The total SRE-Kenya (SRE-K) score was associated with increased odds of the consistent method used in the past three months (adjusted odds ratio: 1.98, 95 percent CI: 1.29-3.10). The SRE-K scale is a newly adapted and valid measure of sexual and reproductive empowerment specific to adolescent girls and young women in an East African setting.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zapata LB, Kortsmit K, Curtis KM, Romero L, Hurst S, Lathrop E, Acosta Perez E, Sánchez Cesáreo M, Whiteman MK. Continuation of Reversible Contraception Following Enrollment in the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) in Puerto Rico, 2016-2020. Stud Fam Plann 2024; 55:105-125. [PMID: 38659169 PMCID: PMC11299421 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
The Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) provided access to high-quality client-centered contraceptive services across Puerto Rico during the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak. We sent online surveys during May 2017-August 2020 to a subset of Z-CAN patients at 6, 24, and 36 months after program enrollment (response rates: 55-60 percent). We described contraceptive method continuation, method satisfaction, and method switching, and we identified characteristics associated with discontinuation using multivariable logistic regression. Across all contraceptive methods, continuation was 82.5 percent, 64.2 percent, and 49.9 percent at 6, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Among continuing users, method satisfaction was approximately ≥90 percent. Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of discontinuation included: using an intrauterine device or implant compared with a nonlong-acting reversible contraceptive method (shot, pills, ring, patch, or condoms alone); wanting to prevent pregnancy at follow-up; and receiving as their baseline method the same method primarily used before Z-CAN. Other associated characteristics included: receiving the method they were most interested in postcounseling (6 and 24 months) and being very satisfied with Z-CAN services at the initial visit (6 months). Among those wanting to prevent pregnancy at follow-up, about half reported switching to another method. Ongoing access to contraceptive services is essential for promoting reproductive autonomy, including supporting patients with continued use, method switching, or discontinuation.
Collapse
Grants
- CC999999 Intramural CDC HHS
- The CDC Foundation secured large-scale donations, offers of contraceptive products, support tools, and services from Bayer, Allergan, Medicines360, Americares and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Mylan, the Pfizer Foundation, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., RB, Power to Decide (formerly The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy), Upstream USA, and Market Vision, Culture Inspired Marketing.
- Funding for the Z-CAN program via the CDC Foundation was made possible by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Pfizer Foundation, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
- This data collection was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren B Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| | - Kathryn M Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| | - Lisa Romero
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| | - Stacey Hurst
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| | - Eva Lathrop
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Edna Acosta Perez
- Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Science Campus, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 365067 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067, USA
| | - Marizaida Sánchez Cesáreo
- Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Science Campus, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 365067 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067, USA
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rothschild CW, Bulama A, Odeh R, Chika-Igbokwe S, Njogu J, Tumlinson K, Musau A. Preference-aligned fertility management among married adolescent girls in Northern Nigeria: assessing a new measure of contraceptive autonomy. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e013902. [PMID: 38760023 PMCID: PMC11103226 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare-including family planning (FP)-is a global priority, yet there is no standard outcome measure to evaluate rights-based FP programme performance at the regional, national or global levels. METHODS We collected a modified version of preference-aligned fertility management (PFM), a newly proposed rights-based FP outcome measure which we operationalised as concordance between an individual's desired and actual current contraceptive use. We also constructed a modified version (satisfaction-adjusted PFM) that reclassified current contraceptive users who wanted to use contraception but who were dissatisfied with their method as not having PFM. Our analysis used data collected 3.5 months after contraceptive method initiation within an ongoing prospective cohort of married adolescent girls aged 15-19 years in Northern Nigeria. We described and compared prevalence of contraceptive use and PFM in this population. RESULTS Ninety-seven per cent (n=1020/1056) of respondents were practising PFM 3.5 months after initiating modern contraception, while 93% (n=986/1056) were practising satisfaction-adjusted PFM. Among participants not practising satisfaction-adjusted PFM (n=70), most were using contraception but did not want to be (n=30/70, 43%) or wanted to use contraception but were dissatisfied with their method (n=34/70, 49%), while the remaining 9% (n=6/70) wanted but were not currently using contraception. CONCLUSION PFM captured meaningful discordance between contraceptive use desires and behaviours in this cohort of married Nigerian adolescent girls. Observed discordance in both directions provides actionable insights for intervention. PFM is a promising rights-focused FP outcome measure that warrants future field-testing in programmatic and population-based research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire W Rothschild
- Sexual and Reproductive Health, Population Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Roselyn Odeh
- Society for Family Health Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | - Julius Njogu
- Sexual and Reproductive Health, Population Services International, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Katherine Tumlinson
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Abednego Musau
- Sexual and Reproductive Health, Population Services International, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harrington EK, Hauber B, Ouma DC, Kimanthi S, Dollah A, Onono M, Bukusi EA. Priorities for contraceptive method and service delivery attributes among adolescent girls and young women in Kenya: a qualitative study. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2024; 6:1360390. [PMID: 38774834 PMCID: PMC11107089 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1360390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite increasing global commitment to meeting the family planning needs of adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), there is limited research on how they prioritize contraceptive method and service delivery characteristics. In this qualitative study, we examine the specific elements that drive the contraceptive choices of Kenyan AGYW, and apply our findings to the development of attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Methods Our four-stage approach included data collection, data reduction, removing inappropriate attributes, and optimizing wording. Between June-October 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 30 sexually-active 15-24 year-old AGYW in Kisumu county, Kenya who were non-pregnant and desired to delay pregnancy. Interviews focused on priorities for contraceptive attributes, how AGYW make trade-offs between among these attributes, and the influences of preferences on contraceptive choice. Translated transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed with a constant comparative approach to identify key concepts. We developed and iteratively revised a list of attributes and levels, and pre-tested draft DCE choice tasks using cognitive interviews with an additional 15 AGYW to optimize comprehension and relevance. Results In-depth interview participants' median age was 18, 70% were current students, and 93% had a primary sexual partner. AGYW named a variety of priorities and preferences related to choosing and accessing contraceptive methods, which we distilled into six key themes: side effects; effectiveness; user control; privacy; source of services; and cost. Bleeding pattern was top of mind for participants; amenorrhea was generally considered an intolerable side effect. Many participants felt more strongly about privacy than effectiveness, though some prioritized duration of use and minimizing chance of pregnancy above other contraceptive characteristics. Most AGYW preferred a clinic setting for access, as they desired contraceptive counseling from a provider, but pharmacies were considered preferable for reasons of privacy. We selected, refined, and pre-tested 7 DCE attributes, each with 2-4 levels. Conclusions Identifying AGYW preferences for contraceptive method and service delivery characteristics is essential to developing innovative strategies to meet their unique SRH needs. DCE methods may provide valuable quantitative perspectives to guide and tailor contraceptive counseling and service delivery interventions for AGYW who want to use contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K. Harrington
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Brett Hauber
- School of Pharmacy, Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Dismas Congo Ouma
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Syovata Kimanthi
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Maricianah Onono
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elizabeth A. Bukusi
- Department of OB/GYN, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hale N, Dehlendorf C, Smith MG, Stapleton J, McCartt P, Khoury AJ. Contraceptive counseling, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation among women in the U.S. southeast. Contraception 2024; 132:110365. [PMID: 38215919 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We used the validated Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale to examine experiences with counseling and associations between counseling quality, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation at the population level in two southeastern states. STUDY DESIGN We used data from the Statewide Survey of Women, a probability-based sample of reproductive-aged women in Alabama and South Carolina in 2017/18. We included women using a contraceptive method and reporting a contraceptive visit in the past year (n = 1265). Respondents rated their most recent provider experience across four PCCC items. Regression analyses examined relationships between counseling quality and outcomes of interest, and path analysis examined the extent to which method satisfaction mediated the effects of counseling quality on planned continuation. RESULTS Over half of participants (54%) reported optimal contraceptive counseling. Optimal counseling was associated with method satisfaction (aPR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.29) in adjusted models. Optimal counseling was marginally associated with planned discontinuation in the bivariate analysis but was attenuated in the adjusted model (aPR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.98-1.18). In the path analysis, counseling quality influenced method satisfaction (0.143 (0.045), p = 0.001) which influenced planned continuation, controlling for PCCC (0.74 (0.07), p < 0.001). The total indirect effect of counseling quality on planned continuation was significant (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001), and a residual direct effect from counseling quality to planned continuation was noted (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Counseling quality is independently associated with method satisfaction at the population level. The effect of counseling on planned continuation is partially mediated by method satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS Interventions to support person-centered contraceptive counseling promise to improve quality of care, patient experience with care, and reproductive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hale
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
| | - Christine Dehlendorf
- Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Michael G Smith
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Jerod Stapleton
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Paezha McCartt
- Ballad Health, Office of Population Health, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Amal J Khoury
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gomez AM, Bennett AH, Arcara J, Stern L, Bardwell J, Cadena D, Chaudhri A, Davis L, Dehlendorf C, Frederiksen B, Labiran C, McDonald-Mosley R, Rice WS, Stein TB, Valladares ES, Kavanaugh ML, Marshall C. Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2024; 30:100662. [PMID: 38304390 PMCID: PMC10831268 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Background In the U.S. and globally, dominant metrics of contraceptive access focus on the use of certain contraceptive methods and do not address self-defined need for contraception; therefore, these metrics fail to attend to person-centeredness, a key component of healthcare quality. This study addresses this gap by presenting new data from the U.S. on preferred contraceptive method use, a person-centered contraceptive access indicator. Additionally, we examine the association between key aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Methods We fielded a nationally representative survey in the U.S. in English and Spanish in 2022, surveying non-sterile 15-44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth. Among current and prospective contraceptive users (unweighted n = 2119), we describe preferred method use, reasons for non-use, and differences in preferred method use by sociodemographic characteristics. We conduct logistic regression analyses examining the association between four aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Findings A quarter (25.2%) of current and prospective users reported there was another method they would like to use, with oral contraception and vasectomy most selected. Reasons for non-use of preferred contraception included side effects (28.8%), sex-related reasons (25.1%), logistics/knowledge barriers (18.6%), safety concerns (18.3%), and cost (17.6%). In adjusted logistic regression analyses, respondents who felt they had enough information to choose appropriate contraception (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 3.31; 95% CI 2.10, 5.21), were very (AOR 9.24; 95% CI 4.29, 19.91) or somewhat confident (AOR 3.78; 95% CI 1.76, 8.12) they could obtain desired contraception, had received person-centered contraceptive counseling (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.33, 2.23), and had not experienced discrimination in family planning settings (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13, 2.20) had increased odds of preferred contraceptive method use. Interpretation An estimated 8.1 million individuals in the U.S. are not using a preferred contraceptive method. Interventions should focus on holistic, person-centered contraceptive access, given the implications of information, self-efficacy, and discriminatory care for preferred method use. Funding Arnold Ventures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Manchikanti Gomez
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Ariana H. Bennett
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jennet Arcara
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Stern
- Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Christine Dehlendorf
- Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Departments of Family & Community Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Whitney S. Rice
- Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tara B. Stein
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Cassondra Marshall
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Allison BA, Yates L, Tadikonda A, Arora KS, Stuart GS. Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19. J Adolesc Health 2024; 74:367-374. [PMID: 37815761 PMCID: PMC10810361 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19. RESULTS One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01). DISCUSSION Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A Allison
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Lindsey Yates
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Center of Excellence, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ananya Tadikonda
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kavita Shah Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Gretchen S Stuart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kroelinger CD, Pagano HP, DeSisto CL, Estrich C, Romero L, Pliska E, Akbarali S, Velonis A, Cox S. Increasing Access to Contraception: Examining Barriers and Facilitators of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:52-61. [PMID: 37971864 PMCID: PMC10841967 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective(s): To identify barriers and facilitators related to reimbursement processes, device acquisition costs, stocking, and supply of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) from 27 jurisdictions (26 states/1 territory) participating in the Increasing Access to Contraception Learning Community from 2016 to 2018. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study using qualitative data collected through 27 semistructured key informant interviews was conducted during the final year of the learning community among all jurisdictional teams. Excerpts were extracted and coded by theme, then summarized as barriers or facilitators using implementation science methods. Results: Most jurisdictions (89%) identified barriers to reimbursement processes, device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC devices, and 85% of jurisdictions identified facilitators for these domains. Payment methodology challenges and lack of billing and coding processes were identified as the most common barriers to reimbursement processes. Device acquisition cost challenges and lack of delivery facility protocols for billing were the most common barriers to device acquisition, stocking, and supply of LARC. The most common facilitator of reimbursement processes was expanded payment methodology options, whereas supplemental funding for acquisition costs and protocol development were identified as the most common facilitators of device acquisition, stocking, and supply. Conclusion: Revised payment methodologies and broader health systems changes including additional funding sources and protocols for billing, stocking, and supply were used by learning community jurisdictions to address identified barriers. The learning community framework offers a forum for information exchange, peer-to-peer learning, and sharing of best practices to support jurisdictions in addressing identified barriers and facilitators affecting contraception access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlan D. Kroelinger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - H. Pamela Pagano
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Carla L. DeSisto
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Cameron Estrich
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lisa Romero
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ellen Pliska
- Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, Virginia, USA
| | - Sanaa Akbarali
- Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, Virginia, USA
| | - Alisa Velonis
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shanna Cox
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sokol NA, Sawadogo N, Bullington BW, Tumlinson K, Langer A, Soura A, Zabre P, Sie A, Johnson JA, Senderowicz L. Perceptions of access to long-acting reversible contraception removal among women in Burkina Faso. Contraception 2024; 129:110302. [PMID: 37802461 PMCID: PMC11285006 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiation has been well-studied and intervened upon. Because LARC requires provider intervention for initiation and removal, it is critical to measure informed choice at the time of desired discontinuation as well. We examined perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation among women at two sites in Burkina Faso, where LARC is the dominant method in the contraceptive mix. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed data from a 2017-2018 population-based, cross-sectional survey of 281 implant users and 55 intrauterine device users at two sites in Burkina Faso. We measured perceptions of access to LARC discontinuation through survey items assessing whether participants (1) were informed on how to discontinue the method, (2) believed they could have LARC removed without a lot of difficulty, (3) believed cost would be a barrier to discontinuation, (4) had ever attempted to have a provider remove LARC, and (5) successfully had LARC removed. The distribution of these measures was examined in the population and for differences by gravida, parity, domestic partnership, fertility desires, and recency of last childbirth. RESULTS Thirty-eight (11%) of current LARC users reported that they were not informed on how to discontinue, 56 (17%) believed having their device removed would be difficult, and 54 (16%) believed cost would be a barrier to removal. Of women who attempted removal, providers did not immediately remove LARC on request for 10 (28%). CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that LARC uptake is an insufficient measure of reproductive access or choice. Future studies should include patient-centered measures that span the full duration of contraceptive use. IMPLICATIONS This paper finds that a sizable proportion of LARC users lack information about method discontinuation and perceive or experience barriers to method removal. These findings call for a reconsideration of free and informed contraceptive choice to include the entire duration of contraceptive use, not only the time of method provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A Sokol
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States; Center for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.
| | - Nathalie Sawadogo
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Brooke W Bullington
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Katherine Tumlinson
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Ana Langer
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Abdramane Soura
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Pascal Zabre
- Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso
| | - Ali Sie
- Centre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso
| | - Janet A Johnson
- Center for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Leigh Senderowicz
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Costanzo MA, Magnuson KA, Gennetian LA, Halpern-Meekin S, Noble KG, Yoshikawa H. Contraception use and satisfaction among mothers with low income: Evidence from the Baby's First Years study. Contraception 2024; 129:110297. [PMID: 37806470 PMCID: PMC10843149 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low income can lead to limited choice of and access to contraception. We examine whether an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) impacts contraceptive use, including increased satisfaction with and reduced barriers to preferred methods, for individuals with low income. STUDY DESIGN Baby's First Years is a randomized control study of a monthly UCT to families with low incomes. The study enrolled 1000 mothers at the time of childbirth across four US sites in 2018-2019; 400 were randomized to receive a UCT of $333/mo and 600 were randomized to receive $20/mo for the first years of their child's life. We use intent-to-treat analyses to estimate the impact of the cash transfer on contraception use, satisfaction with contraception method, and barriers to using methods of choice. RESULTS Over 65% of mothers reported using some type of contraception, and three-quarters reported using the method of their choice. We find no impact of the UCT on mothers' choice of, satisfaction with, or barriers to contraception. However, the cash transfer was associated with trends toward using multiple methods and greater use of short-term hormonal methods. CONCLUSIONS We find high levels of satisfaction with current contraceptive use among mothers of young children with low income. Receipt of monthly UCTs did not impact contraception methods, perceived barriers to use, or satisfaction. Yet, 25% were not using the method of their choice, despite the provision of cash, indicating that this cash amount alone may not be sufficient to impact contraceptive use or increase satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS Satisfaction with contraception use among low-income populations may be higher than previously documented. Nevertheless, provision of modest financial resources alone may not sufficiently address access, availability, and satisfaction for individuals with low-incomes of childbearing age. This suggests the importance of exploring how other nonfinancial factors influence reproductive autonomy, including contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A Costanzo
- Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
| | - Katherine A Magnuson
- Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Sandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Lisa A Gennetian
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Sarah Halpern-Meekin
- School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; LaFollette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Kimberly G Noble
- Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Hirokazu Yoshikawa
- Department of Applied Psychology at the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bevilacqua KG, Tuchler AM, Carvajal DN. Provider perspectives on a point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care among Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 3:100190. [PMID: 37502428 PMCID: PMC10368902 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To explore clinician perspectives on the development, utility, and feasibility of a provider-facing point-of-care tool to assist in provision of patient-centered contraceptive care for Latina/x patients in Baltimore, MD. Methods We conducted 25 semi-structured qualitative interviews with a sample of clinicians who provide contraceptive care to Latina/x patients. An interview guide was developed based on prior research related to patient-centered care and extant point-of-care tools. Transcripts were independently coded by two study team members and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. Results Four themes emerged from the data: (1) clinician perception of a need for a tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive care, (2) concern for tool burden and burnout, (3) desire for tool ease of use, and (4) a need for cultural awareness during tool development to avoid bias and typecasting. Conclusions A provider-facing, point-of-care tool to facilitate patient-centered contraceptive counseling was acceptable among providers, provided the tool is easy to use and promotes cultural awareness. Innovation In the current era of more limited reproductive choice across the U.S., the need and support for non-coercive, patient-centered contraceptive care is timely. A provider-facing, point-of-care tool can facilitate the provision of patient-centered care among clinicians proving contraceptive counseling to Latina/s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin G. Bevilacqua
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - Diana N. Carvajal
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wingo EE, Newmann SJ, Borne DE, Shapiro BJ, Seidman DL. Improving Reproductive Health Communication Between Providers and Women Affected by Homelessness and Substance Use in San Francisco: Results from a Community-Informed Workshop. Matern Child Health J 2023; 27:143-152. [PMID: 37204587 PMCID: PMC10691983 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03671-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many cisgender women affected by homelessness and substance use desire pregnancy and parenthood. Provider discomfort with patient-centered counseling about reproductive choices and supporting reproductive decisions of these women poses barriers to reproductive healthcare access. METHODS We used participatory research methods to develop a half-day workshop for San Francisco-based medical and social service providers to improve reproductive counseling of women experiencing homelessness and/or who use substances. Guided by a stakeholder group comprising cisgender women with lived experience and providers, goals of the workshop included increasing provider empathy, advancing patient-centered reproductive health communication, and eliminating extraneous questions in care settings that perpetuate stigma. We used pre/post surveys to evaluate acceptability and effects of the workshop on participants' attitudes and confidence in providing reproductive health counseling. We repeated surveys one month post-event to investigate lasting effects. RESULTS Forty-two San Francisco-based medical and social service providers participated in the workshop. Compared to pre-test, post-test scores indicated reduced biases about: childbearing among unhoused women (p < 0.01), parenting intentions of pregnant women using substances (p = 0.03), and women not using contraception while using substances (p < 0.01). Participants also expressed increased confidence in how and when to discuss reproductive aspirations (p < 0.01) with clients. At one month, 90% of respondents reported the workshop was somewhat or very beneficial to their work, and 65% reported increased awareness of personal biases when working with this patient population. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE A half-day workshop increased provider empathy and improved provider confidence in reproductive health counseling of women affected by homelessness and substance use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Wingo
- Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program (PCRHP), Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Sara J Newmann
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Services, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Deborah E Borne
- Transitions Division, San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Brad J Shapiro
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dominika L Seidman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Services, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, Hollier LM, Ramer S, Rodenhizer J, Whiteman MK. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2023; 72:1-29. [PMID: 37992038 PMCID: PMC10684357 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Problem/Condition CDC conducts abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions and number of abortion-related deaths in the United States. Period Covered 2021. Description of System Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. For 2021, a total of 48 reporting areas voluntarily provided aggregate abortion data to CDC. Of these, 47 reporting areas provided data each year during 2012-2021. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. Abortion-related deaths from 2020 were assessed as part of CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS). Results A total of 625,978 abortions for 2021 were reported to CDC from 48 reporting areas. Among 47 reporting areas with data each year during 2012-2021, in 2021, a total of 622,108 abortions were reported, the abortion rate was 11.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 204 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2020 to 2021, the total number of abortions increased 5% (from 592,939 total abortions), the abortion rate increased 5% (from 11.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio increased 4% (from 197 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2012 to 2021, the total number of reported abortions decreased 8% (from 673,634), the abortion rate decreased 11% (from 13.1 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 1% (from 207 abortions per 1,000 live births).In 2021, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (57.0%). Women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions (28.3% and 28.7%, respectively) and had the highest abortion rates (19.7 and 19.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively). By contrast, adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥40 years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions (0.2% and 3.6%, respectively) and had the lowest abortion rates (0.4 and 2.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged <15 and ≥40 years, respectively). However, abortion ratios were highest among adolescents (aged ≤19 years) and lowest among women aged 30-39 years.From 2020 to 2021, abortion rates increased among women aged 20-39 years, decreased among adolescents aged 15-19 years, and did not change among adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥40 years. Abortion rates decreased from 2012 to 2021 among all age groups, except women aged 30-34 years for whom it increased. The decrease in the abortion rate from 2012 to 2021 was highest among adolescents compared with any other age group. From 2020 to 2021, abortion ratios increased for women aged 15-24 years, decreased among adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥35 years and did not change for women aged 25-34 years. From 2012 to 2021, abortion ratios increased among women aged 15-29 years and decreased among adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥30 years. The decrease in abortion ratio from 2012 to 2021 was highest among women aged ≥40 years compared with any other age group.In 2021, the majority (80.8%) of abortions were performed at ≤9 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (93.5%) were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. During 2012-2021, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained ≤8.7%. In 2021, the highest percentage of abortions were performed by early medication abortion at ≤9 weeks' gestation (53.0%), followed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks' gestation (37.6%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks' gestation (6.4%), and medication abortion at >9 weeks' gestation (3.0%); all other methods were uncommon (<0.1%). Among those that were eligible (≤9 weeks' gestation), 66.6% of abortions were early medication abortions. In 2020, the most recent year for which PMSS data were reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths; six women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion. Interpretation Among the 47 areas that reported data continuously during 2012-2021, overall decreases were observed during 2012-2021 in the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions; however, from 2020 to 2021, increases were observed across all measures. Public Health Action Abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered quality contraceptive services in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Brennan K, Hotelling B, McInerney R. Providing Inpatient Contraception Care Within a Reproductive Justice Framework. J Midwifery Womens Health 2023; 68:702-704. [PMID: 37766393 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kandyce Brennan
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Rachel McInerney
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gutman S, Connor H, Mumford SL, Gilmore E, Roe AH, Schreiber CA. Feasibility and acceptability of virtual group contraceptive counseling prior to abortion care. Contraception 2023; 126:110114. [PMID: 37467921 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group contraceptive counseling in the abortion care setting. STUDY DESIGN Patients seeking abortion care at an urban university hospital were invited to participate in this cohort study. Prior to their clinical appointments, groups of two to six patients participated in 45-minute virtual contraceptive counseling visits facilitated by study staff. Contraceptive method use, effectiveness, and side effects were reviewed according to group interest. Participant satisfaction scores were collected immediately following the sessions. After their appointments, providers estimated the time spent on contraceptive counseling during the clinical visit. RESULTS Of 195 patients approached, 86 (44%) were enrolled. Fifty-seven (66%) enrolled patients completed a session. The most common reason for declining enrollment was concern about the time commitment. Most (93%) participants reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" overall, and 96% would recommend group contraceptive counseling to a friend. Providers reported that compared to typical counseling, participants required a shorter amount of time during the clinical visit than nonparticipants (time spent <5 minutes: 74% vs 54%). CONCLUSIONS Virtual group contraceptive counseling for patients seeking abortion was feasible and acceptable in this study. Group virtual visits may reduce provider time burden, add value when virtual care delivery is desired or required, and deserve further study. IMPLICATIONS Family planning clinics can consider incorporating virtual group counseling as a person-centered and efficient approach to contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gutman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Hannah Connor
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sunni L Mumford
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Emma Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andrea H Roe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Courtney A Schreiber
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wemrell M, Gunnarsson L. Claims in the clinic: A qualitative group interview study on healthcare communication about unestablished side effects of the copper IUD. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0291966. [PMID: 37768919 PMCID: PMC10538671 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lay online communication about health-related issues has in recent years largely been associated with the spread of misinformation and decreased trust in healthcare. Such communication has included claims about systemic side effects of the copper IUD. In Sweden, a social media group centered on this issue now gathers around 8,700 members. This study aimed to use the case of reported yet unestablished side effects of the copper IUD to investigate experiences of and reasoning about healthcare encounters between caregivers and patients contesting established medical knowledge. METHODS We conducted qualitative, semi-structured, digital group interviews with members of the social media group (seven groups, n = 23) and with midwives and gynecologists (six groups, n = 15). We also gathered essays written by social media group members (n = 23). The material was analyzed thematically. RESULTS The participant accounts pointed towards tensions related to principles of evidence-based medicine, i.e., perceived insufficiency of research on the safety of the copper IUD and lack of clarity in routines for reporting and following up suspected side effects, and of patient-centered care, i.e., listening respectfully to patients. Tension between caregivers' obligation to adhere to evidence-based medicine while also providing patient-centered care was noted. CONCLUSION Healthcare providers' efforts to assess and address patient claims contesting established medical knowledge should include ensuring and communicating sufficient research, clarifying procedures for reporting suspected side effects, and improving person-centered care. This can increase the quality of care while contributing to the mitigation of distrust in healthcare and the spreading of health-related misinformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Wemrell
- Department of Social Work, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden
- Unit for Social Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Lena Gunnarsson
- School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crawford AD, Ricks TN, Polinard E, Abbyad CW. What is Known About Reproductive Autonomy Among Justice-Involved Black Women?: A Scoping Review. J Transcult Nurs 2023; 34:375-388. [PMID: 37431805 DOI: 10.1177/10436596231183180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are approximately 231,000 women detained daily within the nation's jail and prison systems with women of color making up nearly half of those experiencing incarceration. The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the literature on the reproductive autonomy of Black women influenced by incarceration, using the three tenets of reproductive justice. METHODS We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and PsycINFO for research related to reproductive justice written in English and published in the United States from 1980 to 2022. A review of 440 article titles and abstracts yielded 32 articles for full-text review; nine articles met inclusion. RESULTS Eight addressed Tenet 1; five mentioned Tenet 2; none addressed Tenet 3. Recognition of the influence of incarceration on the reproductive autonomy of Black women is limited. CONCLUSION The findings from this review suggest a need to address (a) reproductive choice, (b) support goals, and (c) support of justice-involved Black women.
Collapse
|
26
|
Johansson L, Vesström J, Alehagen S, Kilander H. Women's experiences of dealing with fertility and side effects in contraceptive decision making: a qualitative study based on women's blog posts. Reprod Health 2023; 20:98. [PMID: 37381022 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01642-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, there is limited knowledge regarding women's views of future fertility in relation to contraceptive use. Few studies include material where women share their experiences at peer-written public domain websites, in spite of a larger portion of women discontinuing use of contraceptives. The objective of this study was to explore women's experiences of contraceptive methods based on data gathered from individual blog posts. METHODS Explorative qualitative study including 123 individual blog posts as the data source analysed with inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Two themes were identified. Theme 1, 'Seeking control over reproduction and optimise fertility' including the sub-themes; Having the possibility to decide if, and when, to become pregnant, The value of effective contraceptive methods and the impact of women's sexuality, A wish to understand the body's normal fertility function and Limited knowledge-sharing information about the menstrual cycle during counselling and Theme 2, 'Making the complex decision on their own' including the sub- themes; Limited or subpar guidance in counselling and need for information from social media, Relational and environmental factors influencing contraceptive decision making and Considering beneficial effects and fears of adverse health effects when using hormonal contraceptive methods. CONCLUSIONS During counselling, women desired an extended dialogue regarding effectiveness, health effects of different methods and an increased understanding of their menstrual cycle. Insufficient understanding of contraceptive methods can lead to use of methods not providing the expected level of protection. Hormonal contraceptives, especially Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) were believed to inhibit fertility long after ending treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Johansson
- Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Julia Vesström
- Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Siw Alehagen
- Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Helena Kilander
- Division of Nursing Sciences and Reproductive Health, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hart L, Parsons G, Beaudoin J, Alonge O, Karp C. A Mixed Methods Study of Contraceptive Counseling and Care at a Federally Qualified Health Center in Maryland. J Patient Exp 2023; 10:23743735231183572. [PMID: 37362247 PMCID: PMC10286192 DOI: 10.1177/23743735231183572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examined the experience of contraceptive counseling and care in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Maryland. Patients attending medical visits in 2021 were surveyed using the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning scale to assess the quality of contraceptive counseling. Medical chart reviews were performed to identify alignment between contraceptive care received, and preferences patients had expressed. Primary care providers, reproductive health providers, and a subgroup of patients were interviewed to further contextualize survey and chart review findings. The average item score for the 94 survey participants was 4.39 (SD: 0.9) out of 5. Factor analysis showed high internal consistency reliability (alpha = 0.96). Eighty percent of patients received contraceptive care that aligned with their preferences, 4% did not, and 16% lacked clear contraceptive preferences. Qualitative analysis revealed that patients desired more guidance from providers in selecting a contraceptive method, while providers noted logistical and insurance-related barriers to care. While the quality of contraceptive counseling was high, patient experience of care may be improved by implementing team-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Hart
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Chase Brexton Health Care, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jarett Beaudoin
- Preventive Medicine Residency, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Olakunle Alonge
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Celia Karp
- Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Morison T. Patient-provider power relations in counselling on long-acting reversible contraception: a discursive study of provider perspectives. CULTURE, HEALTH & SEXUALITY 2023; 25:537-553. [PMID: 35510833 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2067593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Contraceptive providers play an essential role in shaping contraceptive decision-making and care, with the potential to constrain patients' agency. This is a particular concern given the rising hegemony of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) and growing evidence of negative patient experiences of LARC promotion and provision. Despite this evidence, little research has considered health providers' perspectives. Drawing on interviews with 22 contraceptive health providers in Aotearoa New Zealand, this paper explored their professional identity construction, focusing on meaning-making in instances of conflict between providers' and patients' priorities and agendas. Guided by feminist poststructuralist theory, the discursive analysis highlights common rhetorical strategies used by participants to (1) justify the use of coercive practices to encourage LARC uptake, and (2) in turn, negotiate positive identities. Findings show how participants grapple with the reproductive politics structuring contraceptive care, including established understandings of the purpose of (long-acting) contraception and contraceptive providers' roles vis-à-vis provision and promotion. The findings point to limitations on contraceptive agency, despite the unanimous endorsement of rights-based voluntary care. Extending the critical literature on LARC and contributing to the under-researched area of contraceptive coercion and agency, the findings of this study have important implications for the delivery of contraceptive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Morison
- School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
- Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kavanaugh ML, Zolna MR. Where Do Reproductive-Aged Women Want to Get Contraception? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023. [PMID: 37099807 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: People's preferences regarding how they want to obtain contraception should be considered when building and refining high-quality contraceptive care programs, especially in light of recent shifts to incorporate more telehealth options into contraceptive care due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Our study is a cross-sectional analysis of population-representative surveys conducted between November 2019 and August 2020 among women aged 18-44 years in Arizona (N = 885), New Jersey (N = 952), and Wisconsin (N = 967). We use multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with each of five contraception source preference groups (in-person via health care provider, offsite with a provider via telemedicine, offsite without a provider via telehealth, at a pharmacy, or via innovative strategies), and we examine associations between contraceptive care experiences and perceptions and each preference group. Results: Across states, most respondents (73%) expressed preferences for obtaining contraception via more than one source. One quarter indicated a narrow preference for obtaining contraception in-person from a provider, 19% expressed interest in doing so offsite with a provider via telemedicine, 64% for doing so offsite without a provider via telehealth, 71% reported interest in pharmacy-based contraception, and 25% indicated interest in getting contraception through innovative strategies. Those who had experienced nonperson-centered contraceptive counseling reported higher levels of interest in telehealth and innovative sources, and those who expressed mistrust in the contraceptive care system had higher levels of preferring to obtain contraception offsite, via telemedicine, telehealth, and other innovative avenues. Conclusions: Policies that ensure access to a diversity of contraceptive sources, which acknowledge and address people's past experiences of contraceptive care, have the greatest likelihood of closing the gap between people's contraceptive access preferences and realities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mia R Zolna
- Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Karp C, OlaOlorun FM, Guiella G, Gichangi P, Choi Y, Anglewicz P, Holt K. Validation and Predictive Utility of a Person-Centered Quality of Contraceptive Counseling (QCC-10) Scale in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Study of Family Planning Clients and a New Indicator for Measuring High-Quality, Rights-Based Care. Stud Fam Plann 2023; 54:119-143. [PMID: 36787283 PMCID: PMC11152181 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
The lack of validated, cross-cultural measures for examining quality of contraceptive counseling compromises progress toward improved services. We tested the validity and reliability of the 10-item Quality of Contraceptive Counseling scale (QCC-10) and its association with continued protection from unintended pregnancy and person-centered outcomes using longitudinal data from women aged 15-49 in Burkina Faso, Kenya, and Nigeria. Psychometric analysis showed moderate-to-strong reliability (alphas: 0.73-0.91) and high convergent validity with greatest service satisfaction. At follow-up, QCC-10 scores were not associated with continued pregnancy protection but were linked to contraceptive informational needs being met among Burkinabe and Kenyan women; the reverse was true in Kano. Higher QCC-10 scores were also associated with care-seeking among Kenyan women experiencing side effects. The QCC-10 is a validated scale for assessing quality of contraceptive counseling across diverse contexts. Future work is needed to improve understanding of how the QCC-10 relates to person-centered measures of reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Karp
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Funmilola M OlaOlorun
- Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Georges Guiella
- Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population (ISSP/University Joseph Ki-Zerbo), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Peter Gichangi
- International Centre for Reproductive Health-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Philip Anglewicz
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Kelsey Holt
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Equitable access to contraception and contraceptive education has the potential to mitigate health disparities related to unintended pregnancy. Pregnancy and the postpartum window frequently offer reduced insurance barriers to healthcare, increased interaction with healthcare systems and family planning providers, and an opportune time for many individuals to receive contraception; however, there are additional considerations in method type for postpartum individuals, and contraceptive counseling must be thoughtfully conducted to avoid coercion and promote shared decision-making. This commentary reviews method-specific considerations and suggests priorities for achieving equity in postpartum contraceptive access.
Collapse
|
32
|
Carvajal DN, Bevilacqua KG, Caldwell MT, Zambrana RE. Provider perspectives on patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latinas in Baltimore, MD. Contraception 2023; 119:109921. [PMID: 36535412 PMCID: PMC9957913 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.109921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore: 1) provider narratives of their contraceptive counseling practices with Latina patients within the context of patient-centered care (PCC); and 2) provider perceptions about the barriers to the provision of patient-centered contraceptive counseling in general and more specifically, with Latina patients in Baltimore, MD. STUDY DESIGN We conducted 25 semistructured qualitative interviews with physicians and nurse practitioners from four specialties who provide contraceptive care to Latinas in Baltimore, MD. We analyzed data using directed content analysis. We discuss findings with attention to major constructs of PCC, applying a reproductive justice framework. RESULTS Providers described a contraceptive counseling approach focused on pregnancy prevention as the primary goal. Most respondents used a tiered-effectiveness approach, even while noting the importance of PCC. Providers noted health system barriers to PCC, including time constraints and insurance status. Provider-reported patient-attributed barriers included low patient education/health literacy, culturally-attributed misconceptions about contraception, and language discordance. CONCLUSION Providers described knowledge of and intention to practice PCC but had limited integration of it in their own counseling with Latinas. Responses suggest tension between an expressed desire to provide PCC and paternalistic counseling paradigms that prioritize pregnancy prevention over patient preferences. Inequitable health system barriers also interfere with true implementation of contraceptive PCC. IMPLICATIONS Translating contraceptive PCC into practice, especially for marginalized communities, is paramount. Training should teach clinicians to recognize systems of structural inequity and discrimination that have informed approaches to counseling but are not reflective of PCC. Institutional policies must address health system barriers that also hamper PCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana N Carvajal
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Kristin G Bevilacqua
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Martina T Caldwell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Ruth E Zambrana
- Harriet Tubman Department of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Korn E, Yan X, Schmidt-Swartz J, Rahimi S, Moon F, Dinglas C. Is enhanced, structured prenatal counseling in third trimester associated with postpartum contraceptive uptake? SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2023; 35:100818. [PMID: 36739823 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2023.100818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contraception is key for maternal well-being in the postpartum period. This study aims to evaluate the impact of prenatal counseling on postpartum contraception uptake. METHODS This cohort study assessed pregnant patients who received their prenatal care at our outpatient obstetrics clinic in 2021-2022. The intervention group received counseling at their 28- and 36-week prenatal visits with a language-congruent paper handout and a review of methods by the provider. The non-intervention group was seen in the outpatient clinic prior to implementation. Intervention patients were surveyed on postpartum days 1-3 to evaluate recollection of counseling and intent to start contraception. Data on uptake and type of contraception chosen was collected for both groups at 6- and 12-weeks postpartum. Our primary outcome was uptake of any type of contraception at the 6-week postpartum visit. RESULTS A total of 126 patients over two five-month intervals (64 intervention and 62 non-intervention) were included in analysis. Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the groups, including predominance of public insurance. Groups differed by race/ethnicity, with higher rates of Hispanic patients in the intervention group. Patients in the intervention group had higher contraception uptake within six weeks of delivery (OR 2.61, p = 0.0287). Forty-three patients in the intervention group desired postpartum contraception (including permanent methods, such as tubal ligation), although only 21 (48.8 %) received their desired method. There were no differences in method chosen between the non-intervention and intervention groups (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Structured prenatal counseling regarding contraceptive options can improve the timely initiation of contraception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Electra Korn
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA.
| | - Xiteng Yan
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA
| | - Jordana Schmidt-Swartz
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA
| | - Salma Rahimi
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA
| | - Fredric Moon
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA
| | - Cheryl Dinglas
- Mount Sinai South Nassau Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
VandeVusse A, Mueller J, Kirstein M, Castillo PW, Kavanaugh ML. The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2022; 30:2089322. [PMID: 35791904 PMCID: PMC9262356 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there have been several state and federal policies that have disrupted access to publicly supported family planning care in the United States, including the 2019 rule that altered the federal Title X family planning program. In late 2020, we conducted in-depth interviews with health care providers from 55 facilities providing family planning care in Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin with the aim of learning how sites were affected by policy changes. We identified perceived effects on clinic finances, patient confidentiality, contraceptive counselling and service provision, and options counselling resulting from state and federal policy changes. Some clinics lost funding and had to pass some of the cost of services on to patients, raising new confidentiality concerns and creating new burdens on staff to carry out financial counselling with patients. Other sites had to grapple with restrictions on the pregnancy options counselling that they could provide, concentrate counselling on fertility awareness-based methods, and increase efforts to include parents/guardians in the care of adolescent patients. State and federal policies impact how publicly supported family planning care is provided, and compromise efforts to provide patient-centred care.
Collapse
|
35
|
Galavotti C, Gullo S. Reproductive power matters: aligning actions with values in global family planning. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2022; 30:2082353. [PMID: 35904528 PMCID: PMC9341371 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2082353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Gullo
- Independent Consultant, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Perception of coercion during contraceptive counseling among individuals with HIV. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2022; 34:100791. [DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
37
|
Rice WS, Narasimhan S, Newton-Levinson A, Pringle J, Redd SK, Evans DP. "Post- Roe" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2022; 49:913-918. [PMID: 36172995 PMCID: PMC9574421 DOI: 10.1177/10901981221125399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The exceptionalism of abortion in public health education, due to social stigma, politicization, and lack of training, contributes to misinformation, policies unjustified by rigorous science, lack of access to person-centered health care, and systemic pregnancy-related inequities. Now that abortion access has vanished for large portions of the United States, following the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (JWHO), health educators must work to eliminate abortion-related silos, destigmatize abortion education, and bring comprehensive sexual and reproductive health information and evidence to the many audiences that will require it. We discuss consequences of abortion exceptionalism in health education for the public, health care providers, pregnant people, and health professionals in training-and opportunities to better and more accessibly provide sexual and reproductive health education to these audiences.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lowe P, Rowlands S. Long-acting reversible contraception: Targeting those judged to be unfit for parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Glob Public Health 2022; 17:3773-3784. [PMID: 35239450 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2048408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
There is a long history of regarding marginalised groups as unfit to parent and of eugenic policies targeting those with 'undesirable' bodily conditions or behaviours. This is part of a broader pattern of stratified reproduction - structural conditions that enable or discourage certain groups from reproducing - that often brings about and exacerbates injustices. This paper critically assesses the US and UK social and medical literature on applying pressure to marginalised groups, or those who have behaved 'irresponsibly', to use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Targeting young people for LARC fails to recognise that social inequality is the context for teenage pregnancy, not the result of it. Provider pressure on women of colour to use LARC is linked to institutional racism, whilst policy for those with physical and intellectual disabilities is shaped by disability discrimination. Other groups to be targeted include so-called 'welfare mothers', substance users, those who have had children put into care and offenders. Particularly controversial are cases in which LARC has been ordered by courts. LARC policy incorporating these kind of discriminatory practices needs to stop; future policy should focus on person-centred care that bolsters reproductive justice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pam Lowe
- Department of Sociology and Policy, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sam Rowlands
- Department of Medical Science & Public Health, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kortsmit K, Nguyen AT, Mandel MG, Clark E, Hollier LM, Rodenhizer J, Whiteman MK. Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2022; 71:1-27. [PMID: 36417304 PMCID: PMC9707346 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Problem/Condition CDC conducts abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions and number of abortion-related deaths in the United States. Period Covered 2020. Description of System Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. For 2020, a total of 49 reporting areas voluntarily provided aggregate abortion data to CDC. Of these, 48 reporting areas provided data each year during 2011-2020. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. Abortion-related deaths from 2019 were assessed as part of CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS). Results A total of 620,327 abortions for 2020 were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. Among 48 reporting areas with data each year during 2011-2020, in 2020, a total of 615,911 abortions were reported, the abortion rate was 11.2 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 198 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2019 to 2020, the total number of abortions decreased 2% (from 625,346 total abortions), the abortion rate decreased 2% (from 11.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio increased 2% (from 195 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2011 to 2020, the total number of reported abortions decreased 15% (from 727,554), the abortion rate decreased 18% (from 13.7 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 9% (from 217 abortions per 1,000 live births).In 2020, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (57.2%). Women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions (27.9% and 29.3%, respectively) and had the highest abortion rates (19.2 and 19.0 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively). By contrast, adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥40 years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions (0.2% and 3.7%, respectively) and had the lowest abortion rates (0.4 and 2.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged <15 and ≥40 years, respectively). However, abortion ratios were highest among adolescents (aged ≤19 years) and lowest among women aged 25-39 years.Abortion rates decreased from 2011 to 2020 among all age groups. The decrease in abortion rate was highest among adolescents compared with any other age group. From 2019 to 2020, abortion rates decreased or did not change for all age groups. Abortion ratios decreased from 2011 to 2020 for all age groups, except adolescents aged 15-19 years and women aged 25-29 years for whom abortion ratios increased. The decrease in abortion ratio was highest among women aged ≥40 years compared with any other age group. From 2019 to 2020, abortion ratios decreased for adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥35 and increased for women 15-34 years.In 2020, 80.9% of abortions were performed at ≤9 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (93.1%) were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. During 2011-2020, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained consistently low (≤9.2%). In 2020, the highest percentage of abortions were performed by early medical abortion at ≤9 weeks' gestation (51.0%), followed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks' gestation (40.0%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks' gestation (6.7%), and medical abortion at >9 weeks' gestation (2.4%); all other methods were uncommon (<0.1%). Among those that were eligible (≤9 weeks' gestation), 63.9% of abortions were early medical abortions. In 2019, the most recent year for which PMSS data were reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths, four women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion. Interpretation Among the 48 areas that reported data continuously during 2011-2020, overall decreases were observed during 2011-2020 in the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions. From 2019 to 2020, decreases also were observed in the total number and rate of reported abortions; however, a 2% increase was observed in the total abortion ratio. Public Health Action Abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered quality contraceptive services in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Antoinette T Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Michele G Mandel
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Elizabeth Clark
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Lisa M Hollier
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Jessica Rodenhizer
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Swan LET, McDonald SE, Price SK. Pathways to reproductive autonomy: Using path analysis to predict family planning outcomes in the United States. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e6487-e6499. [PMID: 36317755 PMCID: PMC10092462 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In the United States, about half of pregnancies are unintended, and most women of reproductive age are at risk of unintended pregnancy. Research has explored predictors of contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy, but there is a lack of research regarding access to preferred contraceptive method(s) and the complex pathways from sociodemographic factors to these family planning outcomes. This study applied Levesque et al.'s (2013) healthcare access framework to investigate pathways from sociodemographic factors and indicators of access to family planning outcomes using secondary data. Data were collected at four time points via an online survey between November 2012 and June 2014. Participants were US women of reproductive age who were seeking to avoid pregnancy (N = 1036; Mage = 27.91, SD = 5.39; 6.9% Black, 13.6% Hispanic, 70.2% white, 9.4% other race/ethnicity). We conducted mediational path analysis, and results indicated that contraceptive knowledge (β = 0.116, p = 0.004), insurance coverage (β = 0.423, p < 0.001), and relational provider engagement (β = 0.265, p = 0.011) were significant predictors of access to preferred contraceptive method. Access to preferred contraceptive method directly predicted use of more effective contraception (β = 0.260, p < 0.001) and indirectly predicted decreased likelihood of experiencing unintended pregnancy via contraceptive method(s) effectiveness (β = -0.014, 95% confidence interval: -0.041, -0.005). This study identifies pathways to and through access to preferred contraceptive methods that may be important in determining family planning outcomes such as contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy. This information can be used to improve access to contraception, ultimately increasing reproductive autonomy by helping family planning outcomes align with patients' needs and priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E. T. Swan
- Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin‐MadisonMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Shelby E. McDonald
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityClark‐Hill Institute for Positive Youth DevelopmentRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Sarah K. Price
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversitySchool of Social WorkRichmondVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Swan LET, McDonald SE, Price SK. Pathways to reproductive autonomy: Using path analysis to predict family planning outcomes in the United States. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30. [DOI: http:/doi.org/10.1111/hsc.14094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E. T. Swan
- Department of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
| | - Shelby E. McDonald
- Virginia Commonwealth University Clark‐Hill Institute for Positive Youth Development Richmond Virginia USA
| | - Sarah K. Price
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Social Work Richmond Virginia USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zapata LB, Nguyen A, Snyder E, Whiteman MK, Kapp N, Ti A, Curtis KM. Analgesics for intrauterine device placement. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2022. [PMCID: PMC9560477 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness of analgesics for routine intrauterine device (IUD) placement on patient (e.g. pain, side effects, satisfaction) and provider outcomes (e.g. ease of placement, need for adjunctive placement measures, placement success) compared with placebo or no treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren B Zapata
- Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Antoinette Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Emily Snyder
- Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Angeline Ti
- Wellstar Atlanta Medical CenterFamily Medicine Residency ProgramAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Kathryn M Curtis
- Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Goldberg AB. Extending use of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine systems to 8 years: bridging phases of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
44
|
Agency in Contraceptive Decision-Making in Patient Care: a Psychometric Measure. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 38:1366-1374. [PMID: 36070169 PMCID: PMC10160288 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07774-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient agency in contraceptive decision-making is an essential component of reproductive autonomy. OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a psychometrically robust measure of patient contraceptive agency in the clinic visit, as a measure does not yet exist. DESIGN For scale development, we generated and field tested 54 questionnaire items, grounded in qualitative research. We used item response theory-based methods to select and evaluate scale items for psychometric performance. We iteratively examined model fit, dimensionality, internal consistency, internal structure validity, and differential item functioning to arrive at a final scale. PARTICIPANTS A racially/ethnically diverse sample of 338 individuals, aged 15-34 years, receiving contraceptive care across nine California clinics in 2019-2020. MAIN MEASURES Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS) of patient agency in preventive care. KEY RESULTS Participants were 20.5 mean years, with 36% identifying as Latinx, 26% White, 20% Black, 10% Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Scale items covered the domains of freedom from coercion, non-judgmental care, and active decision-making, and loaded on to a single factor, with a Cronbach's α of 0.80. Item responses fit a unidimensional partial credit item response model (weighted mean square statistic within 0.75-1.33 for each item), met criteria for internal structure validity, and showed no meaningful differential item functioning. Most participants expressed high agency in their contraceptive visit (mean score 9.6 out of 14). One-fifth, however, experienced low agency or coercion, with the provider wanting them to use a specific method or to make decisions for them. Agency scores were lowest among Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander participants (adjusted coefficient: -1.5 [-2.9, -0.1] vs. White) and among those whose mothers had less than a high school education (adjusted coefficient; -2.1 [-3.3, -0.8] vs. college degree or more). CONCLUSIONS The Contraceptive Agency Scale can be used in research and clinical care to reinforce non-coercive service provision as a standard of care.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kavanaugh ML, Zolna M, Pliskin E, MacFarlane K. A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect. POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW 2022; 41:2555-2583. [PMID: 36092460 PMCID: PMC9440451 DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09740-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Inequities in access to contraception based on ability to pay can interfere with individuals’ reproductive autonomy. This study examines the impact of a 2017 state-level policy in Iowa restricting Medicaid coverage at abortion-providing health care centers on patients’ access to contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive use. We draw on a unique panel dataset of individuals who originally sought care at a publicly supported family planning site in Iowa in 2018–2019 and then participated in subsequent follow-up surveys every 6 months for 2 years to examine an effect of access to care on contraceptive use. Among our final analytic sample of 368 individuals, our findings indicate that receipt of recent contraceptive care decreased over the study period; this coincided with patients shifting away from getting contraceptive care at sites potentially impacted by the 2017 Iowa Medicaid policy restriction while those getting this care at non-impacted sites remained relatively steady over the study period. At the same time, nonuse of contraception increased while use of a contraceptive method that carries cost, use of a provider-involved method, and satisfaction with one’s method decreased. We find that, after controlling for patient characteristics, those who shifted toward receiving contraceptive care experienced increases in these three contraceptive outcomes. We interpret this as preliminary descriptive evidence demonstrating an impact of disruptions in access to contraceptive care on contraceptive outcomes. Supportive payment and funding strategies for contraception, rather than policies that impede or restrict access, are needed to enable people to realize full reproductive autonomy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Song B, Boulware A, Wong ZJ, Huang I, Whitaker AK, Hasselbacher L, Stulberg D. "This has definitely opened the doors": Provider perceptions of patient experiences with telemedicine for contraception in Illinois. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2022; 54:80-89. [PMID: 36071608 PMCID: PMC9826464 DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The COVID-19 pandemic increased the provision of contraception through telemedicine. This qualitative study describes provider perceptions of how telemedicine provision of contraception has impacted patient care. METHODS We interviewed 40 obstetrics-gynecology and family medicine physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and support staff providing contraception via telemedicine in practices across Illinois, including Planned Parenthood of Illinois (PPIL) health centers. We analyzed interview content to identify themes around the perceived impact of telemedicine implementation on contraception access, contraceptive counseling, patient privacy, and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). RESULTS Participants perceived that telemedicine implementation improved care by increasing contraception access, increasing focus on counseling while reducing bias, and allowing easier method switching. Participants thought disparities in telemedicine usage and limitations to the technological interface presented barriers to patient care. Participants' perceptions of how telemedicine implementation impacts patient privacy and LARC provision were mixed. Some participants found telemedicine implementation enhanced privacy, while others felt unable to ensure privacy in a virtual space. Participants found telemedicine modalities useful for counseling patients considering methods of LARC, but they sometimes presented an unnecessary extra step for those sure about receiving one at a practice offering same day insertion. CONCLUSION Providers felt telemedicine provision of contraception positively impacted patient care. Improvements to counseling and easier access to method switching suggest that telemedicine implementation may help reduce contraceptive coercion. Our findings highlight the need to integrate LARC care with telemedicine workflows, improve patient privacy protections, and promote equitable access to all telemedicine modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Song
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Southern California/LAC+USC Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Angel Boulware
- Department of Comparative Human DevelopmentUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Iris Huang
- Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Lee Hasselbacher
- Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ci3)University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Debra Stulberg
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Thompson I, Bryant A, Stuebe AM. Centering the Patient in Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:588-593. [PMID: 35708969 PMCID: PMC9339468 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Birth control has long been considered an essential part of postpartum rounds. Many health care providers believe prevention of pregnancy is a priority in the postpartum period and that the inpatient postpartum stay is an ideal time to discuss contraception. This belief is not necessarily shared by birthing people. Many patients are unready to talk about contraception hours after birth, and contraceptive counseling may feel punitive for people whose reproduction has been marginalized. Health care providers must acknowledge this harmful and racist history to change counseling practices actively and thoughtfully to best meet patient needs while simultaneously respecting patient autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Thompson
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
| | - Amy Bryant
- Complex Family Planning Division, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 4009 Old Clinic Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27514
| | - Alison M. Stuebe
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3010 Old Clinic Bldg./CB #7516, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7516
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Frohwirth L, Mueller J, Anderson R, Williams P, Kochhar S, Castle SK, Kavanaugh ML. Understanding contraceptive failure: an analysis of qualitative narratives. WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2022; 10:280-302. [PMID: 37313349 PMCID: PMC10260167 DOI: 10.1080/23293691.2022.2090304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Most American women wanting to avoid pregnancy use contraception, yet contraceptive failures are common. Guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM), we conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews with women who described experiencing a contraceptive failure (n=69) to examine why and how this outcome occurs. We found three primary drivers of contraceptive failures (health literacy and beliefs, partners and relationships, and structural barriers), and we identified pathways through which these drivers led to contraceptive failures that resulted in pregnancy. These findings have implications for how individuals can be better supported to select their preferred contraception during clinical contraceptive discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Frohwirth
- Formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States
| | | | - Ragnar Anderson
- Formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States
| | - Patrice Williams
- Formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States
| | - Shivani Kochhar
- Formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States
| | - S. Kate Castle
- Formerly of Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cadena DS, Chaudhri A, Scott C. Contraceptive Care Using Reproductive Justice Principles: Beyond Access. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:S494-S499. [PMID: 35767782 PMCID: PMC10461485 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Denicia Sam Cadena
- Denicia Sam Cadena is policy director at Bold Futures in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and a board member of SisterReach. Aisha Chaudhri is the reproductive autonomy manager at EverThrive Illinois in Chicago, the co-chair of the board of directors of the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health in Chicago, and a steering committee member of the American Society for Emergency Contraception, Cambridge, MA. Cherisse Scott is founder and CEO at SisterReach, Memphis, TN
| | - Aisha Chaudhri
- Denicia Sam Cadena is policy director at Bold Futures in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and a board member of SisterReach. Aisha Chaudhri is the reproductive autonomy manager at EverThrive Illinois in Chicago, the co-chair of the board of directors of the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health in Chicago, and a steering committee member of the American Society for Emergency Contraception, Cambridge, MA. Cherisse Scott is founder and CEO at SisterReach, Memphis, TN
| | - Cherisse Scott
- Denicia Sam Cadena is policy director at Bold Futures in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and a board member of SisterReach. Aisha Chaudhri is the reproductive autonomy manager at EverThrive Illinois in Chicago, the co-chair of the board of directors of the Illinois Caucus for Adolescent Health in Chicago, and a steering committee member of the American Society for Emergency Contraception, Cambridge, MA. Cherisse Scott is founder and CEO at SisterReach, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dehlendorf C, Perritt J. Statewide Contraceptive Access Initiatives: A Critical Perspective. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:S490-S493. [PMID: 35767799 PMCID: PMC10490307 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Dehlendorf
- Christine Dehlendorf is with the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Jamila Perritt is president and CEO of Physicians for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC
| | - Jamila Perritt
- Christine Dehlendorf is with the Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Jamila Perritt is president and CEO of Physicians for Reproductive Health, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|