SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

COVID-19 is associated with early emergence of preeclampsia: results from a large regional collaborative

Objective: To investigate the relationship between preeclampsia and SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women between March and October 2020. Pregnant patients admitted to 14 obstetrical centers in Michigan, USA formed the study population. Of the N = 1458 participants, 369 had SARS-CoV-2 infection (cases). Controls were uninfected pregnancies that were delivered in the same obstetric unit within 30 days of the index case. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk (RR) of preterm and term preeclampsia and preeclampsia involving placental lesions. The analysis included adjustment for relevant clinical and demographic risk factors.Results: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy increased the risk of preeclampsia [adjusted aRR = 1.69 (1.26-2.26)], preeclampsia involving placental lesions [aRR = 1.97(1.14-3.4)] and preterm preeclampsia 2.48(1.48-4.17). Although the highest rate of preeclampsia was observed in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 who were symptomatic (18.4%), there was increased risk even in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (14.2%) relative to non-infected controls (8.7%) (p < 0.05). This association with symptomatology was also noted with preterm preeclampsia for which the rate doubled from 2.7% in controls to 5.2% in asymptomatic cases and reached 11.8% among symptomatic cases (p < 0.05). The rate of preterm preeclampsia among cases of pregnant people self-identified as Black reached 10.1% and was almost double the rate of the reminder of the group of infected pregnancies (5.3%), although the rate among uninfected was almost the same (2.7%) for both Black and non-Black groups (interaction p = 0.05).Conclusions: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of preeclampsia even in the absence of symptoms, although symptomatic persons are at even higher risk. Racial disparities in the development of preterm preeclampsia after SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain discrepancies in prematurity between different populations.

COVID-19 in Pregnancy: An Update for Clinicians

In this review, we will discuss the risks of COVID-19 on maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes. We will also review the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, as well as review the management of COVID-19 in pregnancy.

Perinatal outcomes among pregnant patients with peripartum coronavirus disease 2019 infection

PURPOSE

Evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes in peripartum coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive women.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, comparing outcomes between women with and without peripartum COVID-19. All singleton deliveries from June 2020 to January 2022 were included. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 26,827 singleton deliveries, 563 women had peripartum COVID-19, associated with preterm deliveries both near-term and remote from term [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.6 and 2.0, respectively, p = 0.007 and 0.003]. Women with peripartum COVID-19 had a significantly higher rate of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (aOR 23.0, p < 0.001). Conversely, peripartum COVID-19 peripartum COVID-19 was negatively associated with premature rupture of membranes and prolonged maternal length of stay (aOR 0.7 and 0.5, respectively, p = 0.006 and <0.001). In cesarean delivery (CDs), patients with COVID-19 had higher rate of urgent CDs (75.5 vs. 56.1%, p < 0.001), higher rate of regional anesthesia (74.5 vs. 64.9%, p = 0.049), and longer anesthesia duration (86.1 vs. 53.4 min, p < 0.001). CD rate due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) was significantly higher in women with COVID-19 (29.6 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.002). Conversely, CDs rate due to history of previous single CD was significantly higher in patients without COVID-19 diagnosis (13.6 vs. 4.1%, p = 0.006). Concerning neonatal outcomes, an association has been observed between COVID-19 and low one-minute APGAR score <5, as well as neonatal COVID-19 infection (aOR 61.8 and 1.7 respectively, p < 0.001 and p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripartum COVID-19 is associated with preterm deliveries, urgent CDs and DIC, potentially aligning with the infection's pathophysiology and coagulation alterations.

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with and without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy.

METHODS

Women who delivered in an obstetric unit from March 2022 to October 2022 were recruited. The history of vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was recorded. The pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1015 women were recruited - 41.5% had SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and 25.2% were unvaccinated. The incidences of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus and caesarean section were similar between the two groups. There were more preterm deliveries (9.0% vs 5.1%, P = 0.01) and more late preterm deliveries of between 33 and 36 + 6 weeks (6.2% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.03) in the SARS-CoV-2 infection group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in perinatal outcomes, including birthweight, incidence of small for gestational age, low Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care or special care baby unit admissions. There were no differences in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between women infected in the first/second trimester and those infected in the third trimester, except for lower mean birthweight (3180 g vs. 3292 g, P = 0.04). There were no major differences in pregnancy outcome between vaccinated and unvaccinated women.

CONCLUSION

The pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during gestation appear favourable.

The Impact of Emotional Responses on Female Reproduction: Fibrinolysis in the Spotlight

Fibrinolytic enzymes modify various substrates required for tissue remodeling, playing a crucial role in mechanisms underlying resilience, reward processing, ovulation, embryo implantation, and placentation. Individuals with low resilience and reduced reward responsiveness, when exposed to chronic stress, are at increased risk of experiencing a range of negative emotions. Chronic anxiety and melancholia are examples of negative emotions associated with hypercortisolism, while fear and atypical depression are characterized by systemic inflammation. Both cortisol and inflammatory cytokines stimulate the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), a potent fibrinolysis inhibitor. Chronic anxiety, fear, and depression are among the many hypofibrinolytic conditions increasing the risk of oligo-anovulation, miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, and preeclampsia. Although significant, the impact of negative emotions on implantation is not as obvious as on ovulation or placentation. Other hypofibrinolytic conditions that may affect female reproduction through mechanisms dependent or independent of PAI-1 include metabolic disturbances (e.g., due to consumption of highly palatable foods, often used to alleviate negative affect), inflammation, hyperhomocysteinemia, hypothyroidism, hypercortisolism, antiphospholipid antibodies, and the 4G allele of the PAI-1 gene. Benzodiazepines and antidepressants should be used with caution in the first trimester as this combination may cause malformations. Also, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have fibrinolytic properties that increase the risk of bleeding after surgical procedures. Psychological interventions, especially group therapy, are effective in the prevention of reproductive disorders. Controlled trials are needed to test the hypothesis that female reproductive health depends on psychological well-being, a balanced diet and physical activity, suppression of inflammation and autoantibodies, and homocysteine and hormonal homeostasis.

Post-COVID-19 Fetal Cardiac Morphology and Systolic Evaluation in Infected Pregnant Women by Fetal Heart Quantification Technology

OBJECTIVES

Due to the government's liberalization of epidemic control, the current 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has started to spread widely within China. This study aimed to use the fetal heart quantification (fetal HQ) technique to assess the cardiac function and morphology of the fetuses of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 in the early stages of pregnancy.

METHODS

Exactly 86 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 infection in early pregnancy (COVID-19 group) and 90 healthy pregnant women (control group) who underwent fetal echocardiography were prospectively included in this study. The fetal HQ technique was applied to compare the differences in the global sphericity index (GSI), global strain values (GS), fractional area change (FAC), and 24-segment fractional shortening (FS) of the left and right ventricles, between the COVID-19 group and the control group.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the differences in GS and 24-segment FS of the left ventricle in the COVID-19 group were not statistically significant. However, the COVID-19 group showed lower GSI values compared with the control group (1.24 vs 1.28). FAC (48.12%) of the left ventricle and GS (-23.55%), FAC (41.74%) of the right ventricle in the COVID-19 group were reduced compared with FAC (50.50%) of the left ventricle and GS (-27.63%), FAC (46.01%) of the right ventricle in the control group. Segmental analysis revealed reduced FS in segments 20-24 in the COVID-19 group compared with the control group. Right ventricular GS was an independent predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome with an optimal cutoff value of -18.66%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that COVID-19 infection in early pregnancy may have a negative impact on fetal cardiac morphology and function. Fetal HQ may offer a new assessment method for the early identification of fetal cardiac alterations in pregnant women infected with COVID-19.

Association of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy with postnatal outcomes in premature infants

AIM

The effect of COVID-19 vaccine given during pregnancy on premature infants is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between maternal COVID-19 vaccine with postnatal outcome in premature infants.

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study of infants born before 35 weeks gestation to mothers who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during pregnancy compared with infant born to non-vaccinated mothers.

RESULTS

A total of 78 infants in each group were included. Infants in the vaccinated group had less respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (p = 0.02) and less need for respiratory support (p = 0.002), and maternal vaccine had a protective effect on RDS [adjustable OR 0.38 (0.17-0.85)]. Vaccination during the first compared to the second trimester was associated with earlier gestational age (32.3 ± 2.1 vs. 33.3 ± 1.1 weeks, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that maternal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is not associated with postnatal adverse effect in premature infants and potentially has a protective effect on RDS. Earlier gestational age among the infants born to mothers who received COVID-19 vaccine during the first trimester did not translate to higher rate of postnatal complications. These findings might suggest that COVID-19 vaccine is safe in high-risk pregnancies, but timing of administration should be considered. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and the biological mechanism.

The Impact of COVID-19 during Pregnancy on Maternal Hemodynamic Function, Angiogenic Markers and Neonatal Outcome

Infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in pregnancy are associated with the development of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction (FGR). Recently, preeclampsia was linked to impaired maternal hemodynamic function. This retrospective study evaluated singleton pregnancies with COVID-19 during pregnancy and healthy pregnant controls matched for gestational age from November 2020 to March 2022. Non-invasive assessment of maternal hemodynamics by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound measurements (USCOM-1A® Monitor) and oscillometric arterial stiffness (Arteriograph) was performed. Overall, 69 pregnant women were included-23 women after COVID-19 during pregnancy and 46 healthy controls. While two women (8.7%) were admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19-related symptoms, none required intensive care unit admission or non-invasive/invasive ventilation. There were no statistically significant differences in the majority of hemodynamic parameters between the two cohorts. The prevalence of FGR was significantly higher in the COVID-19 during pregnancy group (9.5% vs. healthy controls: 0.0%; p = 0.036), especially in nulliparous women. No difference in angiogenic markers and neonatal outcomes were observed between pregnant women after COVID-19 and healthy controls. In conclusion, no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters or neonatal outcome were observed in women with COVID-19 during pregnancy. However, an increased prevalence of FGR could be described.

Extracellular vesicles alter trophoblast function in pregnancies complicated by COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and resulting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) causes placental dysfunction, which increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. While abnormal placental pathology resulting from COVID-19 is common, direct infection of the placenta is rare. This suggests that pathophysiology associated with maternal COVID-19, rather than direct placental infection, is responsible for placental dysfunction and alteration of the placental transcriptome. We hypothesized that maternal circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs), altered by COVID-19 during pregnancy, contribute to placental dysfunction. To examine this hypothesis, we characterized maternal circulating EVs from pregnancies complicated by COVID-19 and tested their effects on trophoblast cell physiology in vitro . We found that the gestational timing of COVID-19 is a major determinant of circulating EV function and cargo. In vitro trophoblast exposure to EVs isolated from patients with an active infection at the time of delivery, but not EVs isolated from Controls, altered key trophoblast functions including hormone production and invasion. Thus, circulating EVs from participants with an active infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases, can disrupt vital trophoblast functions. EV cargo differed between participants with COVID-19 and Controls, which may contribute to the disruption of the placental transcriptome and morphology. Our findings show that COVID-19 can have effects throughout pregnancy on circulating EVs and circulating EVs are likely to participate in placental dysfunction induced by COVID-19.

The causal relationship between COVID-19 and ten esophageal diseases: a study utilizing Mendelian randomization

Background

Clinical signs of dysphagia, pancreatic achalasia, and esophagitis have been reported in patients with COVID-19. However, the causal relationship between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases is not clear. Therefore, we utilized Mendelian randomization to explore the potential association between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases.

Methods

The summary statistics for a Genome-wide association study (GWAS) were obtained from The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, encompassing four types of COVID-19 as exposure: severe COVID-19, hospitalized COVID-19 versus ambulatory COVID-19, hospitalized COVID-19 versus uninfected, and confirmed COVID-19. Additionally, summary statistics for ten esophageal diseases as outcomes were sourced from the GWAS Catalog and FinnGen databases. Univariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was utilized to thoroughly investigate and validate the potential causal association between COVID-19 and various esophageal conditions, including esophageal varices, Barrett's esophagus, esophagitis, esophageal obstruction, esophageal ulcer, esophageal perforation, gastroesophageal reflux, congenital esophageal malformations, benign esophageal tumors, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Results

An inverse variance-weighted (IVW) model was utilized for univariate Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, which revealed that genetic liability in patients with confirmed COVID-19 was associated with esophageal obstruction (OR [95% CI]: 0.5275458 [0.2822400-0.9860563]; p-value = 0.0450699). Furthermore, a suggestive causal association was found between genetic liability and a reduced risk of benign esophageal tumors (OR [95% CI]: 0.2715453 [0.09368493-0.7870724]; p-value = 0.0163510), but with a suggestively increased risk of congenital esophageal malformations (OR [95% CI]: 6.959561 [1.1955828-40.51204]; p-value = 0.03086835). Additionally, genetic liability in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, compared to non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, was suggestively associated with an increased risk of esophagitis (OR [95% CI]: 1.443859 [1.0890568-1.914252]; p-value = 0.01068201). The reliability of these causal findings is supported by Cochran's Q statistic and the MR-Egger intercept test.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest the existence of a causal relationship between COVID-19 and esophageal diseases, highlighting differing risk effects of COVID-19 on distinct esophageal conditions.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 Antibody Status at the Time of Delivery and the Risk of Preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

 Our objective was to evaluate the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic status in immunologically naive patients and the risk of preeclampsia at the time of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

 We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients admitted to our institution from August 1 to September 30, 2020. We recorded maternal medical and obstetric characteristics and SARS-CoV-2 serologic status. Our primary outcome was the incidence of preeclampsia. Antibody testing was performed, and patients were classified into seropositive groups: immunoglobulin (Ig)G + , IgM + , or both IgG+ and IgM + . Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

 We included 275 patients that were negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and 165 that were positive. Seropositivity was not associated with higher rates of preeclampsia (p = 0.183) or with preeclampsia with severe features (p = 0.916) even after adjusting for maternal age >35, BMI ≥ 30, nulliparity, and previous history of preeclampsia, and type of serologic status. Previous preeclampsia had the greatest association with the development of preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR] = 13.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.98-36.09; p <  0.05) and with preeclampsia with severe features (OR = 5.46; 95% CI: 1.65-18.02; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 We found that in an obstetric population, there was no association between SARS-CoV-2 antibody status and the risk of preeclampsia.

KEY POINTS

· Pregnant people with acute COVID-19 are at an increased risk of developing preeclampsia.. · Seroconversion during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia.. · Further study regarding the timing of infection and its association with preeclampsia is necessary..

Chronic villitis as a distinctive feature of placental injury in maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for stillbirth, preeclampsia, and preterm birth. However, this does not seem to be caused by intrauterine fetal infection because vertical transmission is rarely reported. There is a paucity of data regarding the associated placental SARS-CoV-2 histopathology and their relationship with the timing and severity of infection.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with specific patterns of placental injury and if these findings differed by gestational age at time of infection or disease severity.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of California San Diego between March 2020 and February 2021. Placentas from pregnancies with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were matched with 2 sets of controls; 1 set was time-matched by delivery date and sent to pathology for routine clinical indications, and the other was chosen from a cohort of placentas previously collected for research purposes without clinical indications for pathologic examination before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Placental pathologic lesions were defined based on standard criteria and included maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion and acute and chronic inflammatory lesions. A bivariate analysis was performed using the independent Student t test and Pearson chi-square test. A logistic regression was used to control for relevant covariates. Regions of SARS-CoV-2-associated villitis were further investigated using protein-based digital spatial profiling assays on the GeoMx platform, validated by immunohistochemistry, and compared with cases of infectious villitis and villitis of unknown etiology. Differential expression analysis was performed to identify protein expression differences between these groups of villitis.

RESULTS

We included 272 SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, 272 time-matched controls, and 272 historic controls. The mean age of SARS-CoV-2 affected subjects was 30.1±5.5 years and the majority were Hispanic (53.7%) and parous (65.7%). SARS-CoV-2 placentas demonstrated a higher frequency of the 4 major patterns of placental injury (all P<.001) than the historic controls. SARS-CoV-2 placentas also showed a higher frequency of chronic villitis and severe chronic villitis (P=.03 for both) than the time-matched controls, which remained significant after controlling for gestational age at delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.28; adjusted odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.88, respectively). Digital spatial profiling revealed that programmed death-ligand 1 was increased in villitis-positive regions of the SARS-CoV-2 (logFC, 0.47; adjusted P value =.002) and villitis of unknown etiology (logFC, 0.58; adjusted P value =.003) cases, but it was conversely decreased in villitis-positive regions of the infectious villitis group (log FC, -1.40; adjusted P value <.001).

CONCLUSION

Chronic villitis seems to be the most specific histopathologic finding associated with SARS-CoV-2 maternal infection. Chronic villitis involves damage to the vasculosyncytial membrane of the chorionic villi, which are involved in gas and nutrient exchange, suggesting potential mechanisms of placental (and perhaps neonatal) injury, even in the absence of vertical transmission. Surprisingly, changes in protein expression in SARS-CoV-2-associated villitis seem to be more similar to villitis of unknown etiology than to infectious villitis.

Impact of COVID-19 and Vaccination During Pregnancy on Placenta-Mediated Complications (COVIGRO Study)

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 has been associated with preterm birth (PTB) and placental-mediated complications, including fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia (PE). This study aimed to estimate the impact of COVID-19 and vaccination on adverse pregnancy outcomes and markers of placental function.

METHODS

We performed a study on a prospective cohort of women recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (December 2020 to December 2021). At each trimester of pregnancy, the assessment included a questionnaire on COVID-19 and vaccination status; serological tests for COVID-19 (for asymptomatic infection); measurement of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) in maternal blood; measurement of mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI); and pregnancy outcomes (PTB, PE, birth weight below the fifth and the tenth percentile).

RESULTS

Among 788 patients with complete data, we observed 101 (13%) cases of symptomatic infection and 74 (9%) cases of asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2. Most cases (73%) of infection were among women with previous vaccination or COVID-19 infection before pregnancy. COVID-19 infection was not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, abnormal fetal growth, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, or mean UtA-PI. Vaccination during pregnancy did not influence these outcomes either. We observed no case of severe COVID-19 infection requiring respiratory support.

CONCLUSION

Mild symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 during pregnancy did not influence the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and the markers of placental function in predominantly vaccinated women. Fetal growth monitoring is unlikely to be mandatory in women with mild symptoms of COVID-19.

Prevalence of COVID-19 among pregnant women and its impact on childbirth in March 2021: Data from the French National Perinatal Survey

BACKGROUND

Several series reported obstetric complications among pregnant women hospitalized for COVID. These data, because they focused on women with the most severe presentations or with specific immunosuppression, were likely to overestimate the risks associated with the infection at a global level. To date, population-based studies, most of which collected data from registers of women hospitalized during pregnancy for COVID-19, remain sparse. Neither the prevalence of COVID-19 in pregnant women nor the overall extent of obstetric complications worldwide, compared with uninfected pregnant women is clear. The impact of COVID-19 on perinatal care and obstetric management is thus difficult to evaluate.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 diagnosis during pregnancy and assess related obstetric practices and perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Used data collected at childbirth in France from women included in the 2021 national perinatal survey, we compared women with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis (for sociodemographic characteristics) and then women with no COVID-19 diagnosis during pregnancy, women diagnosed more than 15 days preceding childbirth, and those diagnosed within those 15 days for outcomes.

RESULTS

The COVID-19 prevalence during pregnancy was 5.7 % (95 %CI 5.3-6.1) (678/11 930). The aOR for COVID-19 diagnosis associated with non-French nationality was 1.27 (95 %CI 1.03-1.58), with non-smoking 0.63 (95 %CI 0.55-0.81) and with multiparity 1.21 (95 %CI 1.02-1.45). Diagnosis occurred in the third trimester for 49 % -28.5 % in the 15 days before childbirth. Women with COVID-19 diagnosed during pregnancy had preterm births more often (9.6 %) than women without this diagnosis (6.9 %) (P = 0.007). Women with COVID-19 diagnosed within the 15 days preceding childbirth had more cesarean deliveries (28.3 %) than those diagnosed earlier (17.4 %) (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 diagnosis during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. Obstetric outcomes were poorer in women with a COVID-19 diagnosis in the 15 days preceding childbirth.

Implication of viruses in the etiology of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is one of the most common disorders that poses threat to both mothers and neonates and a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Viral infection during pregnancy is not typically considered to cause preeclampsia; however, syndromic nature of preeclampsia etiology and the immunomodulatory effects of viral infections suggest that microbes could trigger a subset of preeclampsia. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Herein, we review the potential role of viral infections in this great obstetrical syndrome. According to in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, viral infections can cause preeclampsia by introducing poor placentation, syncytiotrophoblast stress, and/or maternal systemic inflammation, which are all known to play a critical role in the development of preeclampsia. Moreover, clinical and experimental investigations have suggested a link between several viruses and the onset of preeclampsia via multiple pathways. However, the results of experimental and clinical research are not always consistent. Therefore, future studies should investigate the causal link between viral infections and preeclampsia to elucidate the mechanism behind this relationship and the etiology of preeclampsia itself.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease- 2019 Among Pregnant Women in Saudi Arabia; a Retrospective Study

Background

Pregnancy-related coronavirus disease 2019 infection ranges from asymptomatic to very serious illness. This study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 infection on pregnant women in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of women who had COVID-19 positive test in pregnancy admitted in King Fahd Hospital, Abu Arish General Hospital, and Sabya General Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia during the period between March 2020 and March 2022. Data were extracted from the patient's records. Frequency and percentage distributions were calculated for categorical variables. Descriptive studies and regression analysis were conducted to evaluate the association between selected variables and pregnancy outcomes.

Results

Of the 33 pregnant women with confirmed infection, the majority were in their second and third trimester, with approximately 42.4% requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and oxygen therapy. The most prevalent symptoms were high respiratory rate and low blood pressure, often accompanied by fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Live births resulted in 54.5% of the cases, while two maternal deaths were reported. Significant associations were found between the need for non-invasive ventilation and timing of infection (p = 0.026), the mode of delivery and timing of infection (p = 0.036), and the mode of delivery and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

COVID-19 poses significant risks to pregnant women, particularly in the third trimester, and emphasized the importance of early identification of high-risk pregnancies, strategic planning, and enhanced monitoring during antenatal care.

Mendelian randomization supports genetic liability to hospitalization for COVID-19 as a risk factor of pre-eclampsia

Background

Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are among the major threats to pregnant women and fetuses, but they can be mitigated by prevention and early screening. Existing observational research presents conflicting evidence regarding the causal effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on pre-eclampsia risk. Through Mendelian randomization (MR), this study aims to investigate the causal effect of three COVID-19 severity phenotypes on the risk of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia to provide more rigorous evidence.

Methods

Two-sample MR was utilized to examine causal effects. Summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals of European ancestry were acquired from the GWAS catalog and FinnGen databases. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with COVID-19 traits at p < 5 × -8 were obtained and pruned for linkage disequilibrium to generate instrumental variables for COVID-19. Inverse variance weighted estimates were used as the primary MR results, with weighted median and MR-Egger as auxiliary analyses. The robustness of the MR findings was also evaluated through sensitivity analyses. Bonferroni correction was applied to primary results, with a p < 0.0083 considered significant evidence and a p within 0.083-0.05 considered suggestive evidence.

Results

Critical ill COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19 with either a death outcome or respiratory support, OR (95% CI): 1.17 (1.03-1.33), p = 0.020] and hospitalized COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19, OR (95% CI): 1.10 (1.01-1.19), p = 0.026] demonstrated suggestive causal effects on pre-eclampsia, while general severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection did not exhibit a significant causal effect on pre-eclampsia. None of the three COVID-19 severity phenotypes exhibited a significant causal effect on eclampsia.

Conclusions

Our investigation demonstrates a suggestive causal effect of genetic susceptibility to critical ill COVID-19 and hospitalized COVID-19 on pre-eclampsia. The COVID-19 severity exhibited a suggestive positive dose-response relationship with the risk of pre-eclampsia. Augmented attention should be paid to pregnant women hospitalized for COVID-19, especially those needing respiratory support.

Causes and Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pregnant Women and its Association with Adverse Maternal, Placental, and Perinatal Outcomes

Populations identified to be severely affected by COVID-19, such as pregnant patients, require special consideration in vaccine counseling, access, and provider education. Maternal infection with COVID-19 poses a significant risk to the maternal-fetal dyad with known adverse placenta destruction [1-5]. Despite the widespread access and availability of vaccinations, vaccine hesitancy continues to persist and is highly prevalent in pregnant populations [6-9]. Addressing the multitude of social ecological factors surrounding vaccine hesitancy can aid in providing holistic counseling [10]. However, such factors are foremost shaped by maternal concern over possible fetal effects from vaccination. While changes in policy can help foster vaccine access and acceptance, increasing global provider education and incorporation of motivational interviewing skills are the first steps towards increasing maternal acceptance.

Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology

Machine learning (ML) models are poised to transform surgical pathology practice. The most successful use attention mechanisms to examine whole slides, identify which areas of tissue are diagnostic, and use them to guide diagnosis. Tissue contaminants, such as floaters, represent unexpected tissue. Although human pathologists are extensively trained to consider and detect tissue contaminants, we examined their impact on ML models. We trained 4 whole-slide models. Three operate in placenta for the following functions: (1) detection of decidual arteriopathy, (2) estimation of gestational age, and (3) classification of macroscopic placental lesions. We also developed a model to detect prostate cancer in needle biopsies. We designed experiments wherein patches of contaminant tissue are randomly sampled from known slides and digitally added to patient slides and measured model performance. We measured the proportion of attention given to contaminants and examined the impact of contaminants in the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding feature space. Every model showed performance degradation in response to one or more tissue contaminants. Decidual arteriopathy detection--balanced accuracy decreased from 0.74 to 0.69 ± 0.01 with addition of 1 patch of prostate tissue for every 100 patches of placenta (1% contaminant). Bladder, added at 10% contaminant, raised the mean absolute error in estimating gestational age from 1.626 weeks to 2.371 ± 0.003 weeks. Blood, incorporated into placental sections, induced false-negative diagnoses of intervillous thrombi. Addition of bladder to prostate cancer needle biopsies induced false positives, a selection of high-attention patches, representing 0.033 mm2, and resulted in a 97% false-positive rate when added to needle biopsies. Contaminant patches received attention at or above the rate of the average patch of patient tissue. Tissue contaminants induce errors in modern ML models. The high level of attention given to contaminants indicates a failure to encode biological phenomena. Practitioners should move to quantify and ameliorate this problem.

sFlT-1/PlGF ratio as a predictor of preeclampsia in COVID-19 pregnant patients

The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and preeclampsia is widely debated in numerous studies. The aim of our study was to investigate whether an increased sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is a good marker of preeclampsia in pregnant patients with COVID-19 infection. This single centre prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at the Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw. The study group consisted of 68 COVID-19 pregnant patients and 57 SARS-CoV-2 negative pregnant controls. Serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was assessed. The two groups did not differ in terms of the frequency of IVF, nulliparity, history of hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia was diagnosed in 10 patients in both groups. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio higher than 38, considered highly suggestive of developing preeclampsia, was found in 20 patients in the COVID-19 group and 15 patients in the control group. The odds of developing preeclampsia in patients with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 was approximately 4-fold higher in COVID-19 group and 11-fold higher in controls. Sflt-1/PlGF ratio does not differ significantly between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-COV-2-negative pregnant patients. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 is associated with higher odds of the diagnosis of preeclampsia in both of these groups, and therefore may serve as its marker regardless of COVID-19 infection status.

Diffusion-sensitized magnetic resonance imaging highlights placental microstructural damage in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 pregnancy infection

INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been a major global health problem since December 2019. This work aimed to investigate whether pregnant women's mild and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with microstructural and vascular changes in the placenta observable in vivo by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) at different gestational ages (GA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, nested case-control of pregnant women during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (COVID-19 group, n = 14) compared to pre-pandemic healthy controls (n = 19). MRI IVIM protocol at 1.5T was constituted of diffusion-weighted (DW) images with TR/TE = 3100/76 ms and 10 b-values (0,10,30,50,75,100,200,400,700,1000s/mm2). Differences between IVIM parameters D (diffusion), and f (fractional perfusion) quantified in the two groups were evaluated using the ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction and linear correlation between IVIM metrics and GA, COVID-19 duration, the delay time between a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and MRI examination (delay-time exam+) was studied by Pearson-test.

RESULTS

D was significantly higher in the COVID-19 placentas compared to that of the age-matched healthy group (p < 0.04 in fetal and p < 0.007 in maternal site). No significant difference between f values was found in the two groups suggesting no-specific microstructural damage with no perfusion alteration (potentially quantified by f) in mild/moderate SARS-Cov-2 placentas. A significant negative correlation was found between D and GA in the COVID-19 placentas whereas no significant correlation was found in the control placentas reflecting a possible accelerated senescence process due to COVID-19.

DISCUSSION

We report impaired microstructural placental development during pregnancy and the absence of perfusion-IVIM parameter changes that may indicate no perfusion changing through microvessels and microvilli in the placentas of pregnancies with mild/moderate SARS-Cov-2 after reaching negativity.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection: a target trial emulation

To date, there is a lack of randomized trial data examining the use of the antiviral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pregnant persons. This target trial emulation study aimed to address this gap by evaluating the use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in nonhospitalized pregnant women with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection. Among patients diagnosed between 16 March 2022 and 5 February 2023, exposure was defined as outpatient nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment within 5 days of symptom onset or coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis. Primary outcomes were maternal morbidity and mortality index (MMMI), all-cause maternal death and COVID-19-related hospitalization, while secondary outcomes were individual components of MMMI, preterm birth, stillbirth, neonatal death and cesarean section. One-to-ten propensity-score matching was conducted between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users and nonusers, followed by cloning, censoring and weighting. Overall, 211 pregnant women on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and 1,998 nonusers were included. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with reduced 28-day MMMI risk (absolute risk reduction (ARR) = 1.47%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21-2.34%) but not 28-days COVID-19-related hospitalization (ARR = -0.09%, 95% CI = -1.08% to 0.71%). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was also associated with reduced risks of cesarean section (ARR = 1.58%, 95% CI = 0.85-2.39%) and preterm birth (ARR = 2.70%, 95% CI = 0.98-5.31%). No events of maternal or neonatal death or stillbirth were recorded. The findings suggest that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is an effective treatment in symptomatic pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection.

Management of neonates with maternal prenatal coronavirus infection and influencing factors

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy causes adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Neonates are at risk of vertical transmission and in-utero infection. Additionally, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and impairment in the organ systems of the mother are associated with neonatal outcomes, including impaired intrauterine growth, prematurity, and neonatal ICU admission. The management of neonates born from infected mothers has changed over the progress of the pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, cesarean section, immediate separation of mother-infant dyads, isolation of neonates, and avoiding of skin-to-skin contact, breast milk, and breastfeeding were the main practices to reduce vertical and horizontal transmission risk in the era of insufficient knowledge. The effects of antenatal steroids and delayed cord clamping on COVID-19 were also not known. As the pandemic progressed, data showed that prenatal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates can be performed as pre-pandemic practices. Variants and vaccines that affect clinical course and outcomes have emerged during the pandemic. The severity of the disease and the timing of infection in pregnancy also influence maternal and neonatal outcomes. The knowledge and lessons from COVID-19 will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens. IMPACT: Prenatal infection with COVID-19 is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review includes the management of neonates with prenatal COVID-19 infection exposure, maternal-fetal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates, clinical features, treatment of neonates, and influencing factors such as variants, vaccination, severity of maternal disease, and timing of infection during pregnancy. There is a growing body of data and evidence about the COVID-19 pandemic. The knowledge and lessons from the pandemic will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens.

Effects of novel coronavirus Omicron variant infection on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from Guangzhou

Objective

Since 2022, Omicron has been circulating in China as a major variant of the novel coronavirus, but the effects of infection with Omicron variants on pregnant women and newborns are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics of Omicron infection during pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 93 confirmed cases of novel coronavirus infection and 109 non-infected patients admitted to the isolation ward of Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from December 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023, and statistically analyzed the clinical features of Omicron variant infection during pregnancy and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. Further effects of underlying diseases on Omicron infection in pregnant women were analyzed.

Results

The incubation period of COVID-19 infection was 0.99±0.86 days, 94.38% of patients had fever or other respiratory symptoms, the lymphocyte count in the infected group was lower than that in the uninfected group, and the lymphocyte count was further reduced in the patients with pregnancy complications or complications. Compared with the uninfected group, APTT and PT were prolonged, platelet count and fibrinogen were decreased in the infected group, all of which had statistical significance. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy increased the rate of cesarean section compared to uninfected pregnant patients, and COVID-19 infection in gestational diabetes resulted in a 4.19-fold increase in cesarean section rate. There was no statistically significant difference in gestational age between the two groups. The incidence of intrauterine distress, turbidity of amniotic fluid and neonatal respiratory distress were higher in the infection group. No positive cases of neonatal COVID-19 infection have been found.

Conclusion

The patients infected with omicron during pregnancy often have febrile respiratory symptoms with lymphocyopenia, but the incidence of severe disease is low. Both Omicron infection and gestational diabetes further increase the incidence of cesarean section, and this study found no evidence of vertical transmission of Omicron.

Effects of COVID-19 vaccination on human fertility: a post-pandemic literature review

Although vaccination with the Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine is important and effective in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the public expressed concerns regarding the adverse effects of vaccine on fertility. Some reviews have focused on it, they have been unable to collect sufficient research data because of the earlier publication period. As relevant evidence has gradually increased, we reviewed these studies from the perspectives of males, females with or without pregnancy, and different vaccine types. The results suggest that although males may experience fluctuations in semen parameters within their physiological ranges after receiving the vaccine, it has not yet reached a level of influence on the partner's pregnancy probability. As to female without pregnancy, it is believed that vaccination will not affect fertility; however, more research is needed to explore the short-term impact. Vaccination during any trimester is considered safe in pregnant women.

Nutricional intake, maternal outcomes and knowledge on preeclampsia prevention: Was there impact during the COVID-19 pandemic among women with hypertension?

AIM

Compare nutritional intake, weight gain, frequency of superimposed pre-eclampsia (SPE) and adequate use/knowledge on preventive interventions for PE, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among pregnant women with chronic hypertension (CH) METHODS: Prospective cohort of pregnant women with CH. Inclusion between 13 and 25 weeks, with sociodemographic characterization, food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour recall (R24h). Indirect adherence test MEDTAKE was employed to investigate adequate use/understanding of calcium and aspirin. Frequency of SPE, weight gain, food intake, maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between periods.

RESULTS

58 women were included and 116 R24h considered. Over 80 % used aspirin and calcium for PE prophylaxis. However, less than half understood the meaning of such interventions. There were no differences in sociodemographic characteristics, majority white, 20 to 34 years-old, and multiparous. There were 31 women included before and 27 during the pandemic. Frequency of SPE was respectively 40 % and 44.4 % before and during the pandemic (p = 0.746) and weight gain 8.7Kg before and 7.4Kg during the pandemic. There was no difference in macronutrient intake, average calcium consumption was 444.8 mg before and 402.6 mg during the pandemic; with inadequate use/understanding of preventive interventions for PE.

CONCLUSION

The pandemic period did not significantly increase the risk of SPE, without significant increase in weight gain or worsening food quality intake and knowledge on preventive interventions.

Genetic liability between COVID-19 and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia: a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible causal relationship between COVID-19 and the risk of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia using a Mendelian randomized (MR) design.

METHODS

We estimated their genetic correlations and then performed two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using pooled statistics from the COVID-19 susceptibility/hospitalization genome-wide association study and the pre-eclampsia/eclampsia datasets. The main analyses were performed using the inverse variance weighting method, supplemented by the weighted median method and the MR-Egger method.

RESULTS

We identified a significant and positive genetic correlation between COVID-19 susceptibility and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [OR = 1.23 (1.01-1.51), p = 0.043]. Meanwhile, hospitalization of COVID-19 was significantly associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia [OR = 1.15 (1.02-1.30), p = 0.024]. Consistently, hospitalization of COVID-19 were nominally associated with higher risk of pre-eclampsia [OR = 1.14, (1.01-1.30), p = 0.040]. The results were robust under all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that COVID-19 may increase the risk of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Future development of preventive or therapeutic interventions should emphasize this to mitigate the complications of COVID-19. [Figure: see text].

COVID-19 and obstetric outcomes: a single-center retrospective experience in a predominantly Black population

Objective: This retrospective, single-center case series was designed to characterize the effects of perinatal COVID-19 diagnosis on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in a predominantly high-risk, urban Black population.Study Design: Data were collected via retrospective chart review on all COVID-19-positive obstetric patients and their neonates who presented to the University of Chicago Medical Center between March 2020 and November 2020, before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine. Patient demographics, delivery outcomes, COVID-19 symptoms, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed.Results: A total of 56 COVID-19-positive obstetric patients were included in the study, of which four were lost to follow-up before delivery. The median age of patients was 27 years (IQR 23, 32), with 73.2% publicly insured and 66.1% Black. Patients had a median body mass index (BMI) of 31.6 kg/m² (IQR 25.9, 35.5). 3.6% of patients had chronic hypertension, 12.5% had diabetes, and 16.1% had asthma. Perinatal complications were common. Twenty-six patients (50.0%) had a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP). 28.8% had gestational hypertension, and 21.2% had preeclampsia (with and without severe features). The rate of maternal ICU admission was 3.6%. Furthermore, 23.5% of patients delivered preterm (<37 weeks gestation), and 50.9% of infants were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).Conclusion: In our study of a predominantly Black, publicly-insured, unvaccinated group of COVID-19-positive pregnant patients, we found high rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, and NICU admission compared to rates reported in existing literature before widespread vaccine availability. Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, irrespective of maternal disease severity, may exacerbate existing obstetric health disparities by disproportionately impacting Black, publicly insured patients. Larger comparative studies are needed to better characterize possible racial and socioeconomic disparities in obstetric outcomes in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. These studies should examine the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, as well as potential associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and disparities in access to care, COVID-19 vaccination, and other social determinants of health amongst more vulnerable populations infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.

COVID-19 during pregnancy could potentially affect placental function

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic and has been extensively studied. However, the effects of COVID-19 during pregnancy, particularly on placental function, have not been verified. In this study, we used blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) to evaluate whether COVID-19 incidence during pregnancy has any lasting effects with respect to placental oxygenation.

METHODS

This is a case-control study, in which eight cases of singleton pregnancies before 30 weeks gestation with COVID-19 mothers were included. Placental oxygenation was evaluated using BOLD-MRI after 32 weeks of gestation. BOLD-MRI was consecutively performed under normoxia (21% O2), hyperoxia (100% O2), and normoxia for 4 min each. Individual placental time-activity curves were evaluated to calculate the peak score (peakΔR2*) and the time from the start of maternal oxygen administration to the time of peakΔR2* (time to peakΔR2*). Eighteen COVID-19-free normal pregnancies from a previous study were used as the control group.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding maternal background, number of days of delivery, birth weight, and placental weight. The parameter peakΔR2* was significantly decreased in the COVID-19 group (8 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 1, p < .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to peakΔR2* (458 ± 74 s vs. 471 ± 33 s, p = .644).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, BOLD-MRI was used to evaluate placental oxygenation during pregnancy in COVID-19-affected patients. COVID-19 during pregnancy decreased placental oxygenation even post-illness, but had no effect on fetal growth; further investigation of the possible effects of COVID-19 on the fetus and mother is warranted.

Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant attenuates preeclampsia-like phenotypes induced by syncytiotrophoblast-specific Gαq signaling

Syncytiotrophoblast stress is theorized to drive development of preeclampsia, but its molecular causes and consequences remain largely undefined. Multiple hormones implicated in preeclampsia signal via the Gαq cascade, leading to the hypothesis that excess Gαq signaling within the syncytiotrophoblast may contribute. First, we present data supporting increased Gαq signaling and antioxidant responses within villous and syncytiotrophoblast samples of human preeclamptic placenta. Second, Gαq was activated in mouse placenta using Cre-lox and DREADD methodologies. Syncytiotrophoblast-restricted Gαq activation caused hypertension, kidney damage, proteinuria, elevated circulating proinflammatory factors, decreased placental vascularization, diminished spiral artery diameter, and augmented responses to mitochondrial-derived superoxide. Administration of the mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant Mitoquinone attenuated maternal proteinuria, lowered circulating inflammatory and anti-angiogenic mediators, and maintained placental vascularization. These data demonstrate a causal relationship between syncytiotrophoblast stress and the development of preeclampsia and identify elevated Gαq signaling and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species as a cause of this stress.

Navigation of Knowledge: the Impact of COVID-19 on Pregnancy-a Bibliometric Analysis

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, countries around the world have faced huge economic and social burdens. SARS-COV-2 may exist in nature for a long time due to the diversity of its different variants. Pregnant women and newborns as vulnerable groups will suffer serious health threats. Bibliometrics as a method of summarizing publications can be used to extract important achievements and hot topics in this field. We search the target publications from the Web of Science Core collection database, and then use Microsoft Office Excel, CiteSpace, R, Scimago, and VOSviewer for visual analysis. Finally, we included 1709 publications from 2998 institutions in 104 countries. The number of publications has exploded since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019. Among them, the USA, China, Britain, and Italy have higher quantity and quality. We identified important journals, authors, keywords, and references in this field. Anxiety, stress, risk of pregnancy complications, and vaccine safety and acceptance have received extensive attention from scholars during the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to be urgent issues to be addressed in the future. Most of the current studies fall into the category of case reports and clinical data analysis. COVID-19 has been linked to serious pregnancy complications and mental illness, and vaccination during pregnancy is recommended to protect both mother and fetus. Further large-scale cohort studies and discovery of molecular mechanisms are needed in this field.

Trends of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among the Medicaid population before and during COVID-19

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a group of high blood pressure disorders during pregnancy that are a leading cause of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. The trend of HDP among the Medicaid population during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is severely lacking. To determine the trends in the annual prevalence of HDP among Louisiana Medicaid pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2016-2021), a total of 113,776 pregnant women aged 15-50 years was included in this study. For multiparous individuals, only the first pregnancy was used in the analyses. Women with a diagnosis of each type-specific HDP were identified by using the ICD-10 codes. The prevalence of HDP increased from 10.5% in 2016 to 17.7% in 2021. The highest race/ethnicity-specific incidence of HDP was seen in African American women (13.1%), then white women (9.4%), followed by other women (7.9%). HDP remains as a very prevalent and significant global health issue, especially in African American women. Obesity and physical inactivity are major risk factors of HDP, which became amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic and led to a higher prevalence of HDP. Severe HDP substantially increases the risk of mortality in offspring and long-term issues in both the mother and infant. This is very pertinent to the Medicaid population due to the disparities and barriers that diminish the quality of healthcare they receive.

Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Obstetric Care: Clinical Characteristics and Maternofetal Outcomes in a Latin American High-Complexity Unit

The asymptomatic population's role in COVID-19 transmission poses challenges for control efforts. Pregnant women are susceptible to severe manifestations, increasing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. This study describes the clinical characteristics, maternal and fetal outcomes, and our experience in universal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening of pregnant women admitted to a high-complexity obstetric unit in Latin America. Of 568 pregnant women tested for SARS-CoV-2, 23 obtained a positive result. Among these patients, 17% had symptoms at admission, and 0.2% reported an epidemiological link. Pregnant women with positive were associated with an increased risk of eclampsia (16.7% vs 4.9%, P = .014) and acute respiratory distress (16.7% vs 4.9%, P = .014). In this group, 4 patients developed maternal near misses, and no maternal deaths were noted. Two early perinatal deaths occurred in the positive SARS-CoV-2 test group (2, 9.5% vs 17, 4.1%, P = .235). The high prevalence of asymptomatic pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 and the adverse outcomes for those infected during pregnancy highlights the importance of universal screening upon hospital admission. This approach streamlines risk management, and enhances service structure, resource allocation, care pathways, patient management, follow-up, and overall outcomes.

Remdesivir in pregnant women with moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a retrospective cohort study

Data on the efficacy of remdesivir in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited in pregnant patients since they have been excluded from clinical trials. We aimed to investigate some clinical outcomes following remdesivir administration in pregnancy. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on pregnant women with moderate to severe COVID-19. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups with and without remdesivir treatment. The primary outcomes of this study were the length of hospital and intensive care unit stay; respiratory parameters of hospital day 7 including respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mode of oxygen support; discharge until days 7 and 14, and need for home oxygen therapy. Secondary outcomes included some maternal and neonatal consequences. Eighty-one pregnant women (57 in the remdesivir group and 24 in the non-remdesivir group) were included. The two study groups were comparable according to the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the respiratory outcomes, remdesivir was significantly associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (p = 0.021) and also with a lower level of oxygen requirement in patients on low-flow oxygen [odds ratio (OR) 3.669]. Among the maternal consequences, no patients in the remdesivir group developed preeclampsia but three patients (12.5%) experienced this complication in the non-remdesivir group (p = 0.024). Furthermore, in patients with moderate COVID-19, the percentage of emergency termination was significantly lower in remdesivir group (OR 2.46). Our results demonstrated some probable benefits of remdesivir in respiratory and also maternal outcomes. Further investigations with a larger sample size should confirm these results.

From Emergence to Endemicity: A Comprehensive Review of COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), later renamed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first identified in Wuhan, China, in early December 2019. Initially, the China office of the World Health Organization was informed of numerous cases of pneumonia of unidentified etiology in Wuhan, Hubei Province at the end of 2019. This would subsequently result in a global pandemic with millions of confirmed cases of COVID-19 and millions of deaths reported to the WHO. We have analyzed most of the data published since the beginning of the pandemic to compile this comprehensive review of SARS-CoV-2. We looked at the core ideas, such as the etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnostics, histopathologic findings, consequences, therapies, and vaccines. We have also included the long-term effects and myths associated with some therapeutics of COVID-19. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 virology, vaccines, medicines, and significant variants identified during the course of the pandemic. Our review article is intended to provide medical practitioners with a better understanding of the fundamental sciences, clinical treatment, and prevention of COVID-19. As of May 2023, this paper contains the most recent data made accessible.

Mild/asymptomatic COVID-19 in unvaccinated pregnant mothers impairs neonatal immune responses

Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers placental inflammation and alters cord blood immune cell composition. However, most studies focus on outcomes of severe maternal infection. Therefore, we analyzed cord blood and chorionic villi from newborns of unvaccinated mothers who experienced mild/asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. We investigated immune cell rewiring using flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and functional readouts using ex vivo stimulation with TLR agonists and pathogens. Maternal infection was associated with increased frequency of memory T and B cells and nonclassical monocytes in cord blood. Ex vivo T and B cell responses to stimulation were attenuated, suggesting a tolerogenic state. Maladaptive responses were also observed in cord blood monocytes, where antiviral responses were dampened but responses to bacterial TLRs were increased. Maternal infection was also associated with expansion and activation of placental Hofbauer cells, secreting elevated levels of myeloid cell-recruiting chemokines. Moreover, we reported increased activation of maternally derived monocytes/macrophages in the fetal placenta that were transcriptionally primed for antiviral responses. Our data indicate that even in the absence of vertical transmission or symptoms in the neonate, mild/asymptomatic maternal COVID-19 altered the transcriptional and functional state in fetal immune cells in circulation and in the placenta.

A Narrative Review of Parameters Influencing Preeclampsia in the COVID-19 Era

The COVID-19 outbreak has emerged as one of the most profound medical events of the 21st century, leaving an indelible impact on a global scale. The widespread prevalence causing significant illness and death needs collaborative and inventive efforts to deal with this challenge. One of the particular subset of the general population that had endured a significant impact was the pregnant population. A key complication of pregnancy seen in patients with a COVID-19 infection was the increased risk of developing preeclampsia. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor is an important part of the renin-angiotensin system, which has been implicated in the control of blood flow and also is a key receptor in the pathogenesis of the multitude of symptoms of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the psychiatric, hematological, neurological, and social factors influenced by the COVID-19 virus and its subsequent effect on the development of preeclampsia. Increased rates of anxiety and depression were seen globally during the COVID-19 pandemic and due to the following physiological response of anxiety and depression, elevated blood pressure levels and development of preeclampsia were noted. Neurological factors such as the development of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and its relationship between COVID-19 and preeclampsia were also strongly observed. The observation suggested biomarkers such as serum neurofilament light may be used as a screening tool to stratify the severity of preeclampsia. Hematological parameters observed were most notable for the presence of thrombocytopenia, which itself is a marker of the severity of preeclampsia. The numerous effects of COVID-19 on preeclampsia have proven to have a tremendous impact on the healthcare burden. Careful analysis and prevention strategies, if implemented, will contribute to reducing the morbidity and mortality of patients with preeclampsia and COVID-19 infections.

Obstetrical and gynecologic implications of COVID-19: what have we learned over the first two years of the pandemic

The rapidly evolving nature of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in the publication of a breadth of information in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology. This article is an examination of the impacts of COVID-19 on women's health, specifically on pregnancy, fertility, and delays to care. We review, in brief, the clinical presentation, transmission, and definitions of post-COVID conditions. Additionally, this article explores the reassuring evidence published regarding the use of mRNA vaccines in preconception and fertility treatments.

Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study

The occurrence of neurological manifestations and complications in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women with COVID-19 is unclear. This cross-sectional study included women aged over 18 years hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by RT-PCR from March to June 2020 in Recife, Brazil. We evaluated 360 women, including 82 pregnant patients who were significantly younger (27.5 vs. 53.6 years; p < 0.01) and less frequently obese (2.4% vs. 15.1%; p < 0.01) than the non-pregnant group. All pregnancies were confirmed using ultrasound imaging. Abdominal pain was the only more frequent COVID-19 manifestation during pregnancy (23.2% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.01), but was not associated with the outcomes. Almost half the pregnant women presented neurological manifestations, including anosmia (31.7%), headache (25.6%), ageusia (17.1%), and fatigue (12.2%). However, neurological manifestations occurred similarly in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Four (4.9%) pregnant women and 64 non-pregnant women (23%) presented delirium, but the frequency with age-adjustment was similar in the non-pregnant group. Pregnant women with COVID and preeclampsia (19.5%) or eclampsia (3.7%) were older (31.8 vs. 26.5 years; p < 0.01), and epileptic seizures occurred more often in association with eclampsia (18.8% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.01) regardless of previous epilepsy. There were three maternal deaths (3.7%), one dead fetus, and one miscarriage. The overall prognosis was good. There was no difference in prolonged hospital stay, the need for ICU and mechanical ventilation, or death when comparing pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women's health: Consequences in obstetrics two years after the pandemic

The pandemic linked to SARS-CoV-2 has profoundly disrupted the health systems and many studies have led to a better understanding of this virus, which is responsible for severe disease, particularly during pregnancy. Pregnancy is a risk factor for severe COVID-19. Term of pregnancy and vaccination status is the main risk factor in addition to classic comorbidities like general population. COVID-19 during pregnancy is responsible for more maternal death, stillbirth, pre-eclampsia spontaneous and induced prematurity. Vaccination is therefore strongly recommended for pregnant patients. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted a psychological and social dimension that should not be neglected in the management of a pregnant patient. Correlation between immunological changes and clinical impact are described in this review. Many conclusions can now be made and are summarized in this article in order to discuss possible future research.

Characterization of extracellular vesicles in COVID-19 infection during pregnancy

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause a severe inflammatory response, inflicting severe morbidity and mortality. This risk is modestly increased in pregnant patients. Despite the hypercoagulability and immunosuppression associated with pregnancy, most pregnant women experience a mild COVID-19 infection. Maternal extracellular vesicles (EVs) may interact with endothelial and immune components to facilitate a favorable disease course. This pilot study aimed to explore the characteristics of EVs released during COVID-19 infection occurring during the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: In this prospective study, blood samples were obtained from 16 healthy non-pregnant (NP), 18 healthy-pregnant (HP), and 22 COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects (CoV-P). Disease course and pregnancy outcomes were assessed and EVs were characterized. Of note, limited volumes of sample acquired from the subjects made it necessary to use smaller and different subsets of samples for each analysis. Results: The majority (91%) of the COVID-19-pregnant subjects (18 mild and 2 moderate disease) experienced good pregnancy-related outcomes. EV concentrations were higher in healthy-pregnant subjects compared to non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0041) and lower in COVID-19-pregnant subjects compared to healthy-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0150). CD63 exosome marker expression was higher in EVs of healthy-pregnant subjects and COVID-19-pregnant subjects compared to EVs of non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0149, p = 0.0028, respectively). Similar levels of SARS-CoV-2 entry proteins (ACE-2 and TMPRSS2) were found in all three groups. Cytokine content increased in healthy-pregnant subject-EVs compared to non-pregnant EVs, while IL-2 and IL-6 levels were decreased in COVID-19-pregnant subject-EVs compared to healthy-pregnant subject-EVs (p = 0.043, p = 0.0390, respectively). CD8+, cytotoxic T-cell marker, was lower in non-pregnant EVs compared to healthy-pregnant subject-EVs and to COVID-19-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0108, p < 0.0001, respectively). COVID-19- pregnant subject-EVs demonstrated higher levels of platelet activation marker (CD62P) than non-pregnant (p = 0.0327) and healthy-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0365). Endothelial marker EV-CD144+ was lower in healthy-pregnant subjects versus non-pregnant subjects (p = 0.0093), but similar in COVID-19-pregnant and non-pregnant subjects. Other EVs' coagulation markers/activity, D-Dimer and fibrinogen levels were similar in healthy-pregnant subjects and COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects. Conclusion: COVID-19 positive pregnant subjects' EVs demonstrated an attenuated inflammatory response, with no additional activation of the coagulation system.

Association of D-Dimer, C-Reactive Protein, and Ferritin with COVID-19 Severity in Pregnant Women: Important Findings of a Cross-Sectional Study in Northern Brazil

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact on pregnant women due to the broad clinical spectrum of the disease. The present study investigated the profile of three biomarkers during hospital admission of pregnant women-D-dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), and ferritin-and their correlation with the severity and outcome of COVID-19.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study included 226 pregnant women hospitalized in the city of Belém, Pará, Northern Brazil, from April 2020 to July 2021. Epidemiological and laboratory data were obtained from medical records, and all pregnant women underwent RT-PCR molecular testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

In total, 121 (53.5%) were positive and 105 (46.5%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR. Most pregnant women (49.5%) with COVID-19 were between 26 and 34 years old, were residing in the interior of the state of Pará (51.2%), and were in the third gestational trimester (71.9%). In addition, 71.1% of them were admitted to the ward and 28.9% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), with 90.9% surviving COVID-19. The concentrations of D-dimer (p = 0.0122) and ferritin (p ≤ 0.0001) were significantly higher among pregnant women with COVID-19, especially among those hospitalized in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

Ferritin and D-dimer seem to serve as important biomarkers for the prognosis of COVID-19 in pregnant women, which was not observed for CRP.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Preeclampsia-How an Infection Can Help Us to Know More about an Obstetric Condition

Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection have a significantly higher risk of maternal death, ICU admission, preterm delivery, and stillbirth compared to those without infection. Additionally, the risk of preeclampsia (PE) increases in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2, particularly in severe cases. The association between COVID-19 and PE is likely attributed to various mechanisms, including direct effects of the virus on trophoblast function and the arterial wall, exaggerated inflammatory response in pregnant women, local inflammation leading to placental ischemia, SARS-CoV-2-related myocardial injury, cytokine storm, and thrombotic microangiopathy. This paper aims to explore the similarities between PE and SARS-CoV-2 infection, considering COVID-19 as a valuable study model. By examining these parallels, we can enhance our knowledge and comprehension of PE. We wish to emphasize the potential for COVID-19-induced myocardial injury in pregnant women and its connection to the increased maternal mortality rate.

Higher NICU admissions in infants born at ≥35 weeks gestational age during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Increasing evidence has shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound negative impact on vulnerable populations and a significant effect on maternal and neonatal health. We observed an increase in the percentage of infants admitted to NICU from 8% to 10% in the first year of the pandemic. This study aimed to compare the delivery room outcomes, NICU admissions and interventions, and neonatal outcomes two years before and during the pandemic.

Methods

This was a retrospective study in a public hospital between pre-COVID-19 (April 2018-December 2019) and COVID-19 (April 2020-December 2021). Data were obtained from all live births at ≥35 weeks gestation (GA). Maternal and neonatal demographics, delivery room (DR), and NICU neonatal outcomes were compared between the study periods using simple bivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression. Multivariable GEE logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for the effects of baseline differences in demographics on the outcomes.

Results

A total of 9,632 infants were born ≥35 weeks gestation during the study period (pre-COVID-19 n = 4,967, COVID-19 n = 4,665). During the COVID-19 period, there was a small but significant decrease in birth weight (33 g); increases in maternal diabetes (3.3%), hypertension (4.1%), and Hispanic ethnicity (4.7%). There was a decrease in infants who received three minutes (78.1% vs. 70.3%, p < 0.001) of delayed cord clamping and increases in the exclusive breastfeeding rate (65.9% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), metabolic acidosis (0.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.02), NICU admission (5.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.009), antibiotic (0.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), and nasal CPAP (1.2% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.02) use. NICU admissions and nasal CPAP were not significantly increased after adjusting for GA, maternal diabetes, and hypertension; however, other differences remained significant. Maternal hypertension was an independent risk factor for all these outcomes.

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic period, we observed a significant increase in maternal morbidities, exclusive breastfeeding, and NICU admissions in infants born at ≥35 weeks gestation. The increase in NICU admission during the COVID-19 pandemic was explained by maternal hypertension, but other adverse neonatal outcomes were only partly explained by maternal hypertension. Socio-economic factors and other social determinants of health need to be further explored to understand the full impact on neonatal outcomes.

The coronavirus disease 2019 infection in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak which started in December 2019 rapidly developed into a global health concern. Pregnant women are susceptible to respiratory infections and can experience adverse outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared pregnancy outcomes according to COVID-19 disease status. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published between December 1, 2019, and October 19, 2022. Main inclusion criterion was any population-based, cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control study that assessed pregnancy outcomes in women with or without laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Sixty-nine studies including 1,606,543 pregnant women (39,716 [2.4%] diagnosed with COVID-19) were retrieved. COVID-19-infected pregnant women had a higher risk of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.78), preeclampsia (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.53), low birth weight (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.30-1.79), cesarean delivery (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30), stillbirth (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.39-2.10), fetal distress (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.54-4.03), neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.72-3.16), perinatal mortality (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.15-3.34), and maternal mortality (OR, 6.15; 95% CI, 3.74-10.10). There were no significant differences in total miscarriage, preterm premature rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage, cholestasis, or chorioamnionitis according to infection. This review demonstrates that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. This information could aid researchers and clinicians in preparing for another pandemic caused by newly discovered respiratory viruses. The findings of this study may assist with evidence-based counseling and help clinicians manage pregnant women with COVID-19.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Women With Mild and Moderate Forms of COVID-19 Giving Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

We aim to investigate the clinical course and impact of mild and moderate forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on pregnant women.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women who delivered in a hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Demographic features, clinical characteristics, and perinatal outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 157 pregnant women with COVID-19 were hospitalized. In a total of 46 deliveries, three (6.5%) had comorbidities and six (13%) were symptomatic. Myalgia and cough were the leading symptoms. In total, 11 (23.8%) patients received COVID-19 therapy, 41 (90%) had mild disease, and five (10.9%) were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Maternal mortality was observed in two (4.3%) cases. Of the patients, 15 (32.6) had pregnancy complications (preterm delivery) (n = 13, 28.2%), and the cesarean section rate was 91.3%.

CONCLUSION

The course of COVID-19 was mild in the majority of cases. However, accompanying comorbid conditions may accelerate the return to severe form and cause death.

Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Data from a University Hospital Setting in Tirana, Albania, May 2020 to November 2021

Scientific evidence suggests an increased risk of maternal and obstetric complications in pregnant patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study is aimed at evaluating perinatal and maternal outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a university hospital setting. This was a prospective cohort study of 177 pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at a tertiary hospital between May 2020 and November 2021. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic women with a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test result at any time during pregnancy were included in this study. For the purpose of this study, we classified COVID-19 cases into two groups: mild and severe cases. The two groups were then compared to predict how the clinical presentation of COVID-19 affected adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Gestational age ≥ 20 weeks at the time of infection was significantly associated with the occurrence of severe forms of the disease (relative risk (RR) 3.98, p = 0.01). Cesarean section was the preferred mode of delivery, with 95 women (62.1%) undergoing surgery. A total of 149 neonates were delivered to women who had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time during the course of pregnancy of which thirty-five (23.5%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Severe forms of COVID-19 increased the risk of premature delivery (RR 6.69, p < 0.001), emergency cesarean delivery (RR 9.4, p < 0.001), intensive care hospitalization (RR 51, p < 0.001), and maternal death (RR 12.3, p = 0.02). However, severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection are not directly responsible for low birth weight or the need for neonatal resuscitation. Our findings suggest that pregnant women presenting with severe COVID-19 disease are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, such as premature delivery, cesarean section, admission to the ICU, and maternal death. Infection after the 20^th week of gestation increases the risk of developing severe forms of the disease.

Vaccine hesitancy in pregnant Women: A narrative review

Pregnant women are often at higher risk for morbidity and mortality due to contracting vaccine-preventable diseases that result in adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, preterm births, and congenital fetal defects. For example, health care provider recommendation is correlated with maternal acceptance of influenza vaccination, however, up to 33 % of pregnant women remain unvaccinated irrespective of provider recommendation. Vaccine hesitancy is a multifactorial problem that both the medical and public health systems need to address synergistically. Vaccine education should incorporate balanced perspectives to deliver vaccine education. This narrative review addresses four questions: 1) what are the primary concerns of pregnant women that lead them to be hesitant about receiving vaccinations; 2) to what extent does the source (e.g. provider, friend, family) of vaccine advice and information influence a pregnant person's decision to accept a vaccine; 3) how does the delivery method of vaccine education influence their decision; 4) how can categorizing patients into four distinct groups based on their opinions and behavior regarding vaccines be used to improve provider-patient communication and increase vaccine acceptance. Results from the literature show that the three most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy include: i.) fear of side effects or adverse events; ii.) lack of confidence in vaccine safety; iii.) low perception of being at high risk of infection during pregnancy and/or not having previously received the vaccination when not pregnant. We conclude that vaccine hesitancy is dynamic therefore people do not always hold a static level of vaccine hesitancy. People may move between a continuum of vaccine hesitancy for a multifactorial reasons. A framework, characterized by levels of vaccine hesitancy before and during pregnancy, was constructed to help providers find balance between promoting individual health and public health while providing vaccine education.

A critical review of COVID-19 course and vaccination in dermatology patients on immunomodulatory/biologic therapy: recommendations should not differ between non-pregnant and pregnant individuals

COVID-19 can have detrimental effects on immunosuppressed patients. Here, we evaluate the evidence regarding continuing immunomodulatory/biologic (IMBI) therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we discuss the risks of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI therapy. As indicated in this review, regarding continuing IMBI therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the pandemic, there is no compelling reason for treating them differently than non-pregnant. The body of evidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy. Studies on rheumatology patients, a group that overlaps significantly with the dermatology group, provided essential findings. IMBI in a non-pregnant rheumatology patient was not associated with COVID-19 mortality (except for rituximab), and vaccination of the rheumatology patient during pregnancy improved the obstetric outcomes compared to the unvaccinated patient. Based on this data, it can be stated that after weighing the benefit-risk profile of the available COVID-19 vaccines, the recommendation for the pregnant dermatology patient speaks in favor of the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine recommendations in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI should not differ from those for their non-pregnant counterparts.

Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy: prospective, population based cohort study

Objective

To study the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy.

Design

Prospective, population based cohort study.

Setting

All singleton pregnancies after 22 completed gestational weeks registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 March 2020 to 24 May 2022.

Participants

312 456 individuals available for analysis (201 770 in Sweden and 110 686 in Norway), with pregnancies that reached 42 completed gestational weeks by the end of follow-up in the pregnancy registries, excluding individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection before pregnancy and those with a diagnosis of pre-existing hypertension or onset of hypertension before 20 gestational weeks.

Main outcome measures

Newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy was defined as a composite outcome of a diagnosis of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, or eclampsia, from gestational week 20 to one week after delivery. The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypertension during pregnancy was investigated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, region of birth, education, income, coexisting medical conditions, previous hypertension during pregnancy, number of healthcare visits during the past year, and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Pre-eclampsia was also analysed as a separate outcome.

Results

Of 312 456 individuals available for analysis, 8% (n=24 566) had SARS-CoV-2 infection any time during pregnancy, 6% (n=18 051) had a diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy, and 3% (9899) had pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.04) or pre-eclampsia (0.98, 0.87 to 1.10). The results were similar for SARS-CoV-2 infection in all gestational trimesters and in different time periods that corresponded to dominance of different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Conclusions

This population based study did not find any evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy or pre-eclampsia.