Relation between atherosclerosis risk factors and aspirin resistance in a primary prevention population

Association of Thromboxane Generation With Survival in Aspirin Users and Nonusers

BACKGROUND

Persistent systemic thromboxane generation, predominantly from nonplatelet sources, in aspirin (ASA) users with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a mortality risk factor.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the mortality risk associated with systemic thromboxane generation in an unselected population irrespective of ASA use.

METHODS

Stable thromboxane B₂ metabolites (TXB₂-M) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in banked urine from 3,044 participants (mean age 66 ± 9 years, 53.8% women) in the Framingham Heart Study. The association of TXB₂-M to survival over a median observation period of 11.9 years (IQR: 10.6-12.7 years) was determined by multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

In 1,363 (44.8%) participants taking ASA at the index examination, median TXB₂-M were lower than in ASA nonusers (1,147 pg/mg creatinine vs 4,179 pg/mg creatinine; P < 0.0001). TXB₂-M were significantly associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality irrespective of ASA use (HR: 1.96 and 2.41, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both) for TXB₂-M in the highest quartile based on ASA use compared with lower quartiles, and remained significant after adjustment for mortality risk factors for similarly aged individuals (HR: 1.49 and 1.82, respectively; P ≤ 0.005 for both). In 2,353 participants without CVD, TXB₂-M were associated with cardiovascular mortality in ASA nonusers (adjusted HR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.29-7.16) but not in ASA users, while ASA use was associated with all-cause mortality in those with low (adjusted HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.14-1.87) but not elevated TXB₂-M.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic thromboxane generation is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality irrespective of ASA use, and its measurement may be useful for therapy modification, particularly in those without CVD.

PEAR1 polymorphisms as a prognostic factor in hemostasis and cardiovascular diseases

Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor (PEAR1), as a platelet receptor, plays a vital role in hemostasis. This receptor, by its extracellular part, causes platelet adhesion and consequently initiates platelet aggregation. Dysfunction of PEAR1 can disrupt platelet aggregation in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The content used in this paper has been taken from English language articles (2005-2020) retrieved from Pubmed database and Google scholar search engine using "Cardiovascular Disease", "PEAR1", "Polymorphism", and "Platelet Aggregation" keywords. Some PEAR1 polymorphisms can disrupt homeostasis and interfere with the function mechanism of cardiac drugs. Since polymorphisms in this gene affect platelet function and the platelet aggregation process, PEAR1 could be further studied in the future as an essential factor in controlling the treatment process of patients with cardiovascular diseases. PEAR1 polymorphisms through disruption of the platelet aggregation process can be a risk factor in patients with CVDs. Therefore, controlling patients through genetic testing and the evaluation of PEAR1 polymorphisms can help improve the treatment process of patients. According to the studies on the PEAR1 gene and the effect of different polymorphisms on some crucial issues in CVDs patients (changes in platelet activity), it is clear that if there is a significant relationship between polymorphisms and CVDs, they can be used as prognostic and diagnostic markers. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis and drug treatment of the PEAR1 gene in CVDs patients.

Significance of urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 in age-related diseases: Focus on atherothrombosis

Platelet activation plays a key role in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis. Biochemical evidence of increased platelet activation in vivo can be reliably obtained through non-invasive measurement of thromboxane metabolite (TXM) excretion. Persistent biosynthesis of TXA₂ has been associated with several ageing-related diseases, including acute and chronic cardio-cerebrovascular diseases and cardiovascular risk factors, such as cigarette smoking, type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic inflammatory diseases. Given the systemic nature of TX excretion, involving predominantly platelet but also extraplatelet sources, urinary TXM may reflect either platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1)-dependent TX generation or COX-2-dependent biosynthesis by inflammatory cells and/or platelets, or a combination of the two, especially in clinical settings characterized by low-grade inflammation or enhanced platelet turnover. Although urinary 11-dehydro-TXB₂ levels are largely suppressed with low-dose aspirin, incomplete TXM suppression by aspirin predicts the future risk of vascular events and death in high-risk patients and may identify individuals who might benefit from treatments that more effectively block in vivo TX production or activity. Several disease-modifying agents, including lifestyle intervention, antidiabetic drugs and antiplatelet agents besides aspirin have been shown to reduce TX biosynthesis. Taken together, these aspects may contribute to the development of promising mechanism-based therapeutic strategies to reduce the progression of atherothrombosis. We intended to critically review current knowledge on both the pathophysiological significance of urinary TXM excretion in clinical settings related to ageing and atherothrombosis, as well as its prognostic value as a biomarker of vascular events.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity – definition and measurement

In the last decade, several studies revealed inter-patient response variability to antiplatelet agents: patients who display negligible or no responses to these drugs are considered poor responders, or “resistant” to treatment. In order to identify poor responders to an antiplatelet drug, laboratory tests of platelet function that specifically explore the platelet activation pathway that is targeted by the drug should be utilised. In addition, they should be performed both at baseline and during treatment: however, most studies explored platelet function during antiplatelet treatment, in order to identify those patients with “high on-treatment platelet reactivity” (HPR), which exposes them to increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Many tests of platelet function have been used, most of which are able to identify patients at risk of MACE. Unfortunately, universal cut-off values for HPR have not been clearly established yet. In addition, the concordance among different tests in the identification of patients at risk is very poor and the most effective and safe treatment for patients at risk is still unknown.

Differential Impact of Serial Measurement of Nonplatelet Thromboxane Generation on Long-Term Outcome After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Systemic thromboxane generation, not suppressible by standard aspirin therapy and likely arising from nonplatelet sources, increases the risk of atherothrombosis and death in patients with cardiovascular disease. In the RIGOR (Reduction in Graft Occlusion Rates) study, greater nonplatelet thromboxane generation occurred early compared with late after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, although only the latter correlated with graft failure. We hypothesize that a similar differential association exists between nonplatelet thromboxane generation and long-term clinical outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five-year outcome data were analyzed for 290 RIGOR subjects taking aspirin with suppressed platelet thromboxane generation. Multivariable modeling was performed to define the relative predictive value of the urine thromboxane metabolite, 11-dehydrothromboxane B₂ (11-dhTXB₂), measured 3 days versus 6 months after surgery on the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, revascularization or stroke, and death alone. 11-dhTXB₂ measured 3 days after surgery did not independently predict outcome, whereas 11-dhTXB₂ >450 pg/mg creatinine measured 6 months after surgery predicted the composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.79; P=0.02) and death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.90; P=0.01) at 5 years compared with lower values. Additional modeling revealed 11-dhTXB₂ measured early after surgery associated with several markers of inflammation, in contrast to 11-dhTXB₂ measured 6 months later, which highly associated with oxidative stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term nonplatelet thromboxane generation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is a novel risk factor for 5-year adverse outcome, including death. In contrast, nonplatelet thromboxane generation in the early postoperative period appears to be driven predominantly by inflammation and did not independently predict long-term clinical outcome.

A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Aspirin Effects on Immune Activation in Chronically Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Adults on Virologically Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune activation persists despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and predicts non-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) comorbidities including cardiovascular disease. Activated platelets play a key role in atherothrombosis and inflammation, and platelets are hyperactivated in chronic HIV infection. Aspirin is a potent inhibitor of platelet activation through the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) pathway. We hypothesized that platelet activation contributes to immune activation and that aspirin would reduce immune activation and improve endothelial function in ART-suppressed HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 3-arm trial of 121 HIV-infected participants on suppressive ART for >48 weeks, we evaluated the effects of 12 weeks of daily aspirin 100 mg, aspirin 300 mg, or placebo on soluble and cellular immune activation markers, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, and serum thromboxane B₂, a direct readout of platelet COX-1 inhibition.

RESULTS

The 300-mg and 100-mg aspirin arms did not differ from placebo in effects on soluble CD14, interleukin (IL)-6, soluble CD163, D-dimer, T-cell or monocyte activation, or the other immunologic endpoints measured. Endothelial function, as measured by FMD, also was not significantly changed when comparing the 300-mg and 100-mg aspirin arms to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin treatment for 12 weeks does not have a major impact on soluble CD14, IL-6, soluble CD163, D-dimer, T-cell or monocyte activation, or FMD, suggesting that inhibition of COX-1-mediated platelet activation does not significantly improve HIV-related immune activation and endothelial dysfunction. Although future studies are needed to further identify the causes and consequences of platelet activation in ART-treated HIV infection, interventions other than COX-1 inhibition will need to be explored to directly reduce immune activation in treated HIV infection.

Current controversies in the use of aspirin and ticagrelor for the treatment of thrombotic events

INTRODUCTION

A P2Y₁₂ inhibitor plus aspirin is the most widely used antiplatelet strategy to prevent adverse outcomes in the setting of atherothrombotic vascular disease. Areas covered: A paucity of robust evidence for an optimal dose, gastrointestinal toxicity, ineffectiveness in high-risk patients and interactions with other antiplatelet agents, are major controversies associated with aspirin therapy. Ticagrelor is a reversibly binding oral P2Y₁₂ receptor blocker that mediates potent inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet function. It is more effective than clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome patients. The absence of a beneficial effect for ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in ACS observed in the North American subgroup of the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial has been attributed to a higher concomitant aspirin dose. Expert commentary: Ongoing studies are now investigating the plausibility of removing aspirin therapy in the setting of potent P2Y₁₂ receptor blockade via ticagrelor monotherapy or replacing aspirin with an oral anticoagulant.

Establishing a predictive model for aspirin resistance in elderly Chinese patients with chronic cardiovascular disease

Background

Resistance to anti-platelet therapy is detrimental to patients. Our aim was to establish a predictive model for aspirin resistance to identify high-risk patients and to propose appropriate intervention.

Methods

Elderly patients (n = 1130) with stable chronic coronary heart disease who were taking aspirin (75 mg) for > 2 months were included. Details of their basic characteristics, laboratory test results, and medications were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a predictive model for aspirin resistance. Risk score was finally established according to coefficient B and type of variables in logistic regression. The Hosmer–Lemeshow (HL) test and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to respectively test the calibration and discrimination of the model.

Results

Seven risk factors were included in our risk score. They were serum creatinine (> 110 μmol/L, score of 1); fasting blood glucose (> 7.0 mmol/L, score of 1); hyperlipidemia (score of 1); number of coronary arteries (2 branches, score of 2; ≥ 3 branches, score of 4); body mass index (20–25 kg/m², score of 2; > 25 kg/m², score of 4); percutaneous coronary intervention (score of 2); and smoking (score of 3). The HL test showed P ≥ 0.05 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥ 0.70.

Conclusions

We explored and quantified the risk factors for aspirin resistance. Our predictive model showed good calibration and discriminative power and therefore a good foundation for the further study of patients undergoing anti-platelet therapy.

Comparison between urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 detection and platelet Light Transmission Aggregometry (LTA) assays for evaluating aspirin response in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

Aspirin is widely used in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of our study was to compare between two established methods of aspirin response, urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (11dhTXB2) and platelet Light Transmission Aggregometry (LTA) assays in elderly Chinese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to investigate the clinical significance of both methods in predicting cardiovascular events. Urinary 11dhTxB2 assay and arachidonic acid-induced (AA, 0.5mg/ml) platelet aggregation by Light Transmission Aggregometry (LTAAA) assay were measured to evaluate aspirin responses. High-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) was defined as urinary 11dhTxB2>1500pg/mg or AA-induced platelet aggregation≥15.22%-the upper quartile of our enrolled population. The two tests showed a poor correlation for aspirin inhibition (r=0.063) and a poor agreement in classifying HAPR (kappa=0.053). With a mean follow-up time of 12months, cardiovascular events occurred more frequently in HAPR patients who were diagnosed by LTA assay as compared with no-HAPR patients (22.5% versus 10.6%, P=0.039, OR=2.45, 95% CI=1.06-5.63). However, the HAPR status, as determined by urinary 11dTXB2 measurement, did not show a significant correlation with outcomes.

Decreased Threshold of Aggregation to Low-Dose Epinephrine is Evidence of Platelet Hyperaggregability in Patients with Thrombosis

Sticky platelet syndrome has been described as a hereditary thrombophilic condition. The aim of this study is to identify the presence of platelet hyperaggregability in patients who have experienced thrombosis. Light-transmittance platelet aggregometry was used to assess for spontaneous platelet aggregation, aggregation in response to full and low-dose (LD) epinephrine (Epi) and adenosine diphosphate, as well as arachidonic acid, and identify a distinct pattern of platelet hyperaggregability. Light-transmittance platelet aggregometry results were correlated with PFA-100® (Dade-Behring, Marburg, Germany) results, when available. An exaggerated response to LD Epi was found in 68% of patients with thrombosis compared to only 36% of healthy controls (P=0.034). Patients with thrombosis, either arterial or venous, demonstrated an exaggerated response to LD Epi nearly twice as frequently as healthy controls, even without significant family history of thrombophilia or other known risk factors for thrombosis. This suggests that platelet hyperaggregability may be multifactorial in nature and not necessarily hereditary.

Variation in thromboxane B2 concentrations in serum and plasma in patients taking regular aspirin before and after clopidogrel therapy

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 antagonist is widely prescribed for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with an acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is recognised that there is inter-individual variation in the antiplatelet effects of both drugs. Recent data also suggest that P2Y12 antagonists can affect the response to aspirin. A direct indicator of the effect of aspirin on platelets is their ability to generate thromboxane, which if measured as the difference between the level of thromboxane B2 in serum and plasma ([TxB2]S-P) avoids the confounding effect of endogenous TxB2 production from other cells. We therefore analysed [TxB2]S-P as a measure of aspirin response in a group of 123 patients undergoing elective PCI before and after the introduction of clopidogrel. In a subgroup of 40 patients taking aspirin alone, we compared [TxB2]S-P and VerifyNow Aspirin for the assessment of aspirin response. There was a wide variation in plasma and serum TxB2 concentrations both before and after clopidogrel therapy but only 3.5% of patients had residual serum concentration of TxB2 > 10 ng/ml. There was a strong correlation between the pre and post clopidogrel levels of TxB2 (r ≥ 0.78; p = 0.001) and no significant difference in [TxB2]S-P. There was no correlation between the magnitude of response to clopidogrel response and the generation of thromboxane B2. Correlation between [TxB2]S-P and VerifyNow Aspirin was poor. We conclude that the use of a P2Y12 antagonist does not influence the effect of aspirin on the ability of platelets to generate thromboxane. Therefore, measurement of TxB2 levels in serum, after subtracting the contribution from plasma, provides a measure of the response to aspirin in patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy.

Clinical implications of aspirin resistance

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is one of the main therapeutic medications used in the prevention of thromboembolic vascular events. Aspirin exhibits its antiplatelet action by irreversibly inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme, thus preventing the production of thromboxane A2 (TXA2). Aspirin resistance, as measured in vitro, is the inability of aspirin to reduce platelet activation and aggregation by failure to suppress the platelet production of TXA2. Laboratory tests of platelet TXA2 production or platelet function dependent on TXA2 can detect aspirin resistance in vitro. The clinical implication of this laboratory definition has not yet been elucidated via prospective trials that have controlled for confounders, such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. Large meta-analyses have found low-dose aspirin to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in preventing vascular events, making a dose-dependent improvement in laboratory response clinically irrelevant. Possible causes of aspirin resistance include poor compliance, inadequate dose, drug interactions, genetic polymorphisms of cyclooxygenase-1, increased platelet turnover and upregulation of non-platelet pathways of thromboxane production. However, there is currently no standardized approach to the diagnosis and no proven effective treatment for aspirin resistance. Further research exploring the mechanisms of aspirin resistance is needed in order to better define aspirin resistance, as well as to develop a standardized laboratory test that is specific and reliable, and can correlate with the clinical risk of vascular events. The intent of this paper is to review the literature discussing possible mechanisms, diagnostic testing and clinical trials of aspirin resistance and to discuss its clinical relevance as it pertains to cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease.

Aspirin resistance: current status and role of tailored therapy

Aspirin is integral in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome. Given the high clinical importance of aspirin in the management of coronary artery disease, much attention has been directed towards the concept of "aspirin resistance." Unfortunately, the term aspirin resistance is ill-defined in the literature, leading to a large variance in the reported prevalence of this phenomenon. In this review, the current understanding of aspirin resistance is discussed. Commonly used functional and diagnostic tests of platelet function, including their strengths and weakness, are reviewed. We next discuss several proposed mechanisms of aspirin resistance and special high-risk groups at risk for aspirin treatment failure. We then discuss optimal dosing and diagnostic strategies for those populations at risk for aspirin resistance with a focus on tailored aspirin therapy for high-risk groups. Finally, future topics of interest in the field of aspirin resistance are considered.

Antiplatelet drug response status does not predict recurrent ischemic events in stable cardiovascular patients: results of the Antiplatelet Drug Resistances and Ischemic Events study

BACKGROUND

The biological response to antiplatelet drugs has repeatedly been shown to predict the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, most studies involved coronary artery disease patients with recent vessel injury shortly after the initiation of antiplatelet therapy. Data on stable cardiovascular patients are scarce, and the added predictive value of specific assays (the vasodilator phosphoprotein assay for the clopidogrel response and serum thromboxane B2 for the aspirin response) and aggregation-based assays relative to common predictors has rarely been addressed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Stable cardiovascular outpatients participating in the Antiplatelet Drug Resistances and Ischemic Events (ADRIE) study (n=771) were tested twice, at 2 separate visits, with specific and aggregation-based assays. Follow-up lasted 3 years, and <1% of patients were lost to follow-up. MACEs were adjudicated by an independent committee. Multivariate survival analyses included relevant variables identified in univariate analysis and platelet function test results. The C-index was used to express the prognostic value of various multivariate models. MACEs, the primary end point, occurred in 16% of patients. Hypertension, smoking, older age, and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were predictive of MACE recurrence, with a C-index of 0.63 (P<0.001). Neither the specific nor the aggregation-based assays added significant predictive value for the primary end point.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological antiplatelet drug responsiveness, measured with specific or aggregation-based assays, has no incremental predictive value over common cardiovascular risk factors for MACE recurrence in stable cardiovascular outpatients. These results do not support platelet function testing for MACE risk evaluation in stable cardiovascular patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00501423.

Variability and persistence of aspirin response in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of poor response to aspirin (ASA) therapy over 12-month follow-up in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and to compare the classification agreement among different ASA response assays.

METHODS

Patients with PAD on ASA therapy at baseline were included from the ongoing Effect of Lipid Modification on Peripheral Arterial Disease after Endovascular Intervention Trial (ELIMIT), which is a randomized trial testing whether combination treatment with ezetimibe, niacin, and a statin will halt/regress atherosclerosis compared with statin monotherapy. Patients who had baseline platelet testing and repeat testing at 6-month or 12-month follow-up were included. ASA responsiveness was tested using three different assays: Optical aggregation with 0.5 mg/mL of arachidonic acid (AA), optical aggregation with 10 μM of adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and platelet function analyzer-100 (PFA-100) testing with collagen/epinephrine (Epi) loaded cartridges. ASA response was defined as AA aggregation <30%, ADP aggregation <70%, or PFA-100 Epi >164 seconds. Patients who showed response to ASA at baseline were classified as Responders. Poor response to ASA was defined as AA aggregation ≥ 30%, ADP aggregation ≥ 70%, or PFA-100 Epi ≤ 164 seconds. Patients who showed poor response (PR) to an assay at baseline, but then were responsive at follow-up visits were classified as Initial PRs. Patients who showed poor response at baseline and all follow-up visits were classified as Persistent PRs. The classification agreement between assays was tested using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients randomized in ELIMIT, 80 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. There were no significant baseline demographic differences between Responders, Initial PRs, and Persistent PRs. The prevalence of persistent poor response varied by the assay used; 5% of subjects (4/80) were Persistent PRs by AA aggregation, compared with 27.5% (22/80) of subjects by ADP aggregation and 9.9% (7/71) of patients by PFA-100 Epi. Regarding the agreement of the assays, only AA aggregation and PFA-100 Epi agreed significantly (K = 0.3223; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.493; P = .0001), and though statistically significant, the magnitude of this agreement is small. AA aggregation and ADP aggregation did not agree (K = 0.1161; 95% CI -0.004-0.236; P = .029), nor did ADP aggregation and PFA-100 Epi (K = 0.0044; 95% CI -0.151-0.160; P = .48).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 5% and 27.5% of PAD patients were Persistent PRs to ASA over 6- to 12-month follow-up using different platelet assays. Further, these commonly used platelet assays show weak agreement in determining poor response to aspirin.

Long-Term Aspirin and Clopidogrel Response Evaluated by Light Transmission Aggregometry, VerifyNow, and Thrombelastography in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: A reduced response to aspirin and clopidogrel predicts ischemic events, but reliable tests are needed to identify low responders. We compared 3 platelet-function tests during long-term dual treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel.

Methods: Patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention and were receiving a combination of 325 mg/day aspirin and 75 mg/day clopidogrel were followed for 1 year. Blood was sampled 5 times during this period for 3 tests: light transmission aggregometry (LTA) assay, with 5.0 μmol/L ADP or 1.0 mmol/L arachidonic acid (AA) used as an agonist; VerifyNow™ assay, with the P2Y12 or aspirin cartridge (Accumetrics); and thrombelastography (TEG), stimulated by 2.0 μmol/L ADP or 1.0 mmol/L AA.

Results: Twenty-six of 33 patients completed all scheduled visits. A low response to clopidogrel was found in a few patients at variable frequencies and at different visits, depending on the method and criteria used. We found a moderate correlation between the LTA (ADP) and VerifyNow (P2Y12 cartridge) results, but the TEG (ADP) results correlated poorly with the LTA and VerifyNow results. A low response to aspirin was found with the VerifyNow (aspirin cartridge) and TEG (AA) methods on 6 and 2 occasions, respectively, but not with the LTA (AA) method, except for 1 occasion caused by probable noncompliance.

Conclusions: Detecting a low response to clopidogrel depends largely on the method used. Which method best predicts ischemic events remains uncertain. A low response to aspirin is rare with AA-dependent methods used at the chosen cutoffs. In some patients, the response to clopidogrel or aspirin may be classified differently at different times, even with the same method.

Targeting the urine and plasma determinants of thromboxane A2 metabolism in detection of aspirin effectiveness

Detection of reduced aspirin effectiveness has gained significant importance since clinical consequences of aspirin resistance were reported. Nevertheless, due to differentiated molecular basis of aspirin resistance, the conflicting choice of referential method for detection of acetylsalicylic acid ineffectiveness has become troublesome. This study, using a rat model of antiplatelet therapy, examines the aptitude of selected TXB2 metabolism-based methods in the detection of acetylsalicylic acid effectiveness. We hypothesized that ex-vivo whole blood spontaneous TXB2 generation assay could be, contrary to basal TXB2 and urine 11-dTXB2, a novel surrogate measure for impaired acetylsalicylic acid-dependent inhibition of thromboxane synthesis. To address this hypothesis, we evaluated the sensitivity of TXB2 generation assay in hirudinized whole blood to detect acetylsalicylic acid-mediated inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity in healthy rats and diabetic rats treated with acetylsalicylic acid. In diabetic and control animals, both acetylsalicylic acid drenches in the dose-independent manner contributed to significant attenuation of basal plasma TXB2 and urinary 11-dTXB2 formation. Urinary concentrations of 11-dTXB2 were, contrary to basal TXB2, significantly higher, regardless of acetylsalicylic acid dose, among all diabetic groups, compared with corresponding control groups. Determination of TXB2 generation in whole blood enabled sensitive detection of dose-related acetylsalicylic acid effect in both groups, as well as increased TXB2 formation in diabetes. We showed for the first time that evaluation of spontaneous generation of TXB2 in hirudinized whole blood enables, contrary to basal plasma TXB2 and urine 11-dTXB2 concentrations, to sensitively determine the acetylsalicylic acid effect in healthy and diabetic subjects.

[Variable platelet response to aspirin and new therapeutic targets]

Aspirin is the first-line oral antiplatelet drug to prevent thromboembolic arterial occlusions. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 involved in the platelet production of thromboxane (TX) A(2), an inducer of vasoconstriction and a platelet activating agent. Recurrent vascular events despite aspirin intake, combined with laboratory evidence of poor antiplatelet effect, suggested what has been called "aspirin resistance". For clarity's sake a real aspirin resistance would be the absence of COX1 inhibition due to intrinsic platelet factors (which has never been reported). What has been described is (expected) variability. COX1 inhibition can be insufficient to modify TX-dependent platelet behaviour. Other agonists, the production of which does not involve COX1, can stimulate TX-receptors. The antiplatelet effect of aspirin can be insufficient for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic reasons, the latter being further classified as TX-dependent or not. If platelets are so reactive that responses are more TX-independent than normally, then neither aspirin nor any drugs acting on this pathway can do the job. These mechanisms should be better understood and diagnosed, and this is the prerequisite for the development of newer antiplatelet agents.

Aspirin 'resistance': role of pre-existent platelet reactivity and correlation between tests

BACKGROUND

Aspirin 'resistance' is a widely used term for hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a platelet function test. Serum thromboxane (TX) B(2) is the most specific test of aspirin's effect on platelets.

OBJECTIVES

(i) To examine the role of pre-existent platelet hyperreactivity in aspirin 'resistance'. (ii) To determine the correlation between aspirin resistance defined by serum TXB(2) and other assays of platelet function.

METHODS

To enable pre-aspirin samples to be drawn, platelet function was measured in normal subjects (n = 165) before and after aspirin 81 mg daily for seven days.

RESULTS

The proportion of the post-aspirin platelet function predicted by the pre-aspirin platelet function was 28.3 +/- 7.5% (mean +/- asymptotic standard error) for serum TXB(2), 39.3 +/- 6.8% for urinary 11-dehydro TXB(2), 4.4 +/- 7.7% for arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, 40.4 +/- 7.1% for adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, 26.3 +/- 9.2% for the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay, and 45.0 +/- 10.9% for the TEG PlateletMapping System with arachidonic acid. There was poor agreement between aspirin-resistant subjects identified by serum TXB(2) vs. aspirin-resistant subjects identified by the other five assays, irrespective of whether the analysis was based on categorical or continuous variables. Platelet count correlated with pre-aspirin serum TXB(2) and VerifyNow Aspirin Assay, but not with any post-aspirin platelet function test.

CONCLUSIONS

(i) Aspirin 'resistance' (i.e. hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a laboratory test) is in part unrelated to aspirin but is the result of underlying platelet hyperreactivity prior to the institution of aspirin therapy. (ii) Aspirin resistance defined by serum TXB(2) shows a poor correlation with aspirin resistance defined by other commonly used assays.

Effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy men measured by platelet aggregation and PFA-100

There are no generally accepted definitions for low-response (frequently called resistance) to the platelet inhibitors, aspirin and clopidogrel. Low-response may increase the risk of cardiovascular events in atherosclerotic patients. We aimed to define the normal drug responses in healthy men. Platelet function was measured in 20 healthy men during 11 days of aspirin or clopidogrel intake, using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the Platelet Function Analyzer 100 (PFA-100). The lower limits for LTA at baseline were 64% and 61%, using arachidonic acid and ADP as agonists, respectively. During aspirin intake the LTA results were stable from day to day, and an upper limit of 9% arachidonic acid stimulated aggregation was found. Clopidogrel intake was best shown by ADP induced aggregation. However, two out of 20 individuals exhibited low-response to clopidogrel. In the remaining 18 volunteers an upper limit of 48% aggregation was found. We found an upper limit for collagen-epinephrine stimulated PFA-100 results of 166 s at baseline. During aspirin intake, these results varied considerably from day to day in nine out of 20 men, resulting in an overlap between the reference ranges at baseline and during therapy. In conclusion, platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel assessed by aggregometry was stable during 11 days of treatment and reference ranges were established. The PFA-100 results varied greatly and low-response was not precisely defined by this method.

Assessment of aspirin resistance varies on a temporal basis in patients with ischaemic heart disease

Objective:

Laboratory tests including optical platelet aggregometry (OPA), platelet function analyser (PFA-100), and thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) metabolite levels have been used to define aspirin resistance. This study characterised the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and investigated the concordance and repeatability of these tests.

Design, setting and patients:

Consecutive outpatients with stable IHD were enrolled. They were commenced on 150 mg aspirin daily (day 0) and had platelet function assessment (OPA and PFA-100) and quantitative analysis of serum/urine TXB₂ at day ⩾7 and then at a second visit approximately 2 weeks later.

Main outcome measures:

We assessed the prevalence of aspirin resistance by each method, concordance between methods of measuring response to aspirin and association between time points to assess the predictability of response over time.

Results:

172 patients (62.7 (SD 8.7) years, 83.1% male) were recruited. At visits 1 and 2, respectively, 1.7% and 4.7% were aspirin resistant by OPA, whereas 22.1% and 20.3% were aspirin resistant by PFA-100. There were poor associations between PFA-100 and OPA, and between TXB₂ metabolites and platelet function tests. OPA and PFA-100 results were poorly associated between visits (κ = 0.16 and κ = 0.42, respectively) as were TXB₂ metabolites, suggesting that aspirin resistance is not predictable over time.

Conclusions:

The prevalence of aspirin resistance is dependent on the method of testing. Response varies on a temporal basis, indicating that testing on a single occasion is inadequate to diagnose resistance or guide therapy in a clinical setting.

Low prevalence and assay discordance of "aspirin resistance" in children

BACKGROUND

Although "aspirin resistance" (AR-inadequate platelet inhibition as suggested by in vitro testing of aspirin-treated patients) has been widely studied in adults and linked to increased risk of adverse outcomes, its prevalence and clinical significance are largely unknown in children.

PROCEDURE

To determine AR prevalence in children and its relationship to assay methodology, we undertook a cross-sectional study of 44 children (1-17 years, 24 male) on aspirin for various indications and considered three published definitions of AR in adults: platelet aggregation >/=70% to 10 microM adenosine diphosphate and >/=20% to 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid (AA), normal PFA-100(R) closure time and elevated urinary 11-dehydro thromboxane B(2) (11dhTxB(2)) concentration.

RESULTS

Six subjects exhibited AR according to at least one of the criteria (5 by PFA-100(R), 1 by aggregometry and 11dhTxB(2) criteria); nearly all subjects had low levels of 11dhTxB(2) compared with controls. Subjects studied prior to therapy showed pronounced changes in AR parameters after aspirin dosing (e.g., mean aggregation to AA decreased from 82% to 6%, P < 0.001), confirming an aspirin effect. Subjects with AR did not differ from aspirin responsive subjects in terms of age, race, platelet count, or aspirin dose, indication or therapy duration. There was minimal correlation between assays.

CONCLUSIONS

In this initial prevalence study of a clinically diverse group of pediatric patients, frequencies of AR were assay-dependent; however, the prevalence of true AR is likely low in children (2.3%; 95% CI 0.1-10.7%), in agreement with adult studies. To better define the clinical relevance of AR in children, multicenter, prospective cohort studies are imperative.

A novel variant in the platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 gene is associated with increased platelet aggregability

OBJECTIVE

Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) is a recently identified platelet transmembrane protein that becomes activated by platelet contact. We looked for novel genetic variants in PEAR1 and studied their association with agonist-induced native platelet aggregation and with the inhibitory effect of aspirin on platelets.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We genotyped PEAR1 for 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), selected for optimal gene coverage at a density of 4 kb, in 1486 apparently healthy individuals from two generations of families with premature CAD. Subjects had a mean age of 45 years; 62% were white and 38% black. Platelet aggregation to collagen, epinephrine, and ADP was measured in platelet rich plasma, at baseline and after 2 weeks of aspirin (ASA, 81 mg/d), and genotype-phenotype associations were examined separately by ethnicity using multivariable generalized linear models adjusted for covariates. The C allele of SNP rs2768759 [A/C], located in the promoter region of the gene, was common in whites and uncommon in blacks (allele frequency 70.2% versus 17.7%). The C allele was generally associated in both ethnic groups with increased aggregation of native platelets to each agonist. After ASA, the associations were stronger and more consistent and remained significant when post-ASA aggregation was adjusted for baseline aggregation, consistent with a relationship between the C allele and reduced platelet responsiveness to ASA. The PEAR1 SNP explained up to 6.9% of the locus specific genetic variance in blacks and up to 2.5% of the genetic variance in whites after ASA.

CONCLUSIONS

PEAR1 appears to play an important role in agonist-induced platelet aggregation and in the response to ASA in both whites and blacks.

Flow cytometric assessment of platelet aspirin resistance using light scattering

BACKGROUND

A simple and reliable assay is needed for the prediction of the clinical efficacy of antiplatelet aspirin therapy. We have devised another method for the evaluation of platelet function and aspirin resistance (AR), via conventional flow cytometry (FCM).

METHODS

To devise an optimized protocol for the assessment of platelet AR, various analytic variables of FCM were investigated. Using this devised protocol, AR was assessed in healthy subjects as an example.

RESULTS

The protocol utilized herein is as follows: citrate-anticoagulated platelet-rich plasma was mixed 1:1 with HEPES-buffered saline in two tubes, one of which is treated with aspirin. During the acquisition of FCM, arachidonate is added to the tube. The response of the aspirin-treated platelets is then compared with those of nontreated ones on a time/forward scatter plot. In the 61 total subjects, none was identified as aspirin resistant by this assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Using light scattering, platelet aggregation and aspirin's antiplatelet effects can be readily and cost-effectively detected. According to this assay, biochemical AR appears to be rare. This new protocol may prove useful in a clinical setting or as a research tool.

Pharmacogenomics of platelet responsiveness to aspirin

Aspirin is the most widely used drug in the world for cardiovascular protection. Aspirin's ability to suppress platelet function varies widely among individuals and lesser suppression of platelet function is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Platelet response to aspirin is a complex phenotype involving multiple genes and molecular pathways. Aspirin response phenotypes can be categorized as directly or indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) activity, with phenotypic variation indirectly related to COX-1 being much more prominent. Recent data indicate that variability in platelet response to aspirin is genetically determined, but the specific gene variants that contribute to phenotypic variation are not known. An understanding of the relationship between genotype, aspirin response phenotype and clinical outcome will help to bring about a personalized approach to antiplatelet therapy that maximizes antithrombotic benefit whilst minimizing bleeding risk for individual patients.

Aspirin responsiveness in healthy volunteers measured with multiple assay platforms

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the sensitivity, precision, and concordance of 4 assays designed to detect aspirin responsiveness or resistance.

METHODS

Twenty-nine healthy laboratory volunteers took 80 mg aspirin for 7 days, and a subset of volunteers took 325 mg aspirin for an additional 7 days. We measured platelet function by light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid, PFA-100, and VerifyNow. PFA-100 and VerifyNow assays were performed in duplicate to assess method imprecision. Some volunteers had samples taken within 2-4 h of the final dose of aspirin and again within 20-24 h of the final dose. We measured urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) at baseline and after 80 or 325 mg aspirin.

RESULTS

No volunteers were nonresponsive to aspirin therapy as measured by the PFA-100. One of 29 participants demonstrated lack of response to aspirin as measured by VerifyNow and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2); 2 of 29 demonstrated lack of response as measured by light transmission aggregometry. Imprecision was <10% for the PFA-100 and VerifyNow. Concordance was high (>90%) between all assays. Neither aspirin dose (80 vs 325 mg) nor timing between final dose of aspirin and blood draw (2-4 vs 20-24 h) affected any of the assays.

CONCLUSIONS

Light transmission aggregometry, PFA-100, VerifyNow, and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) are all sensitive to the effects of aspirin in healthy individuals. Variables such as aspirin dose, timing between final dose of aspirin and blood collection, and imprecision do not affect the ability of the assays to detect aspirin effect on platelet function.

Targeting platelets for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease

Platelets play an important role in the development of thrombosis, atherosclerosis, hypertension, heart attack and stroke. As a result, pharmacologic interventions that influence platelet functions, such as adhesion, aggregation and the release of different factors, are considered useful for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Although classical anti-platelet agents have proven beneficial effects for the treatment of some specific cardiovascular diseases, there are limitations for their use as these drugs target platelet function directly. In contrast, newly developed anti-platelet agents have broad applications for the treatment of cardiovascular disease as they not only influence platelet function but are also considered to affect cardiac and vascular smooth muscle cell functions. Natural food products and nutraceutical agents also appear to modify cardiovascular abnormalities by affecting various platelet functions; however, the mechanisms of their actions remain to be investigated. Accordingly, this article is focused to discuss emerging pharmacologic, nutritional and nutraceutical interventions that may influence the prevention or progression of a broad range of cardiovascular diseases.

Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: molecular mechanisms and laboratory detection

The definition 'resistance to antiplatelet drugs' should be limited to situations in which failure of the drug to hit its pharmacological target has been documented by specific laboratory tests. Aspirin resistance, as determined by specific tests (e.g. serum thromboxane B(2)), appears to be rare (1-2%) and, in most instances, is caused by poor compliance. In contrast to aspirin, studies that used specific tests to measure the pharmacological effect of thienopyridines [e.g. vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)] showed a wide variability of responses to these drugs, with significant proportions of subjects (15-30%) who are very poor responders. Inter-individual differences in the extent of metabolism of thienopyridines to their active metabolites is the most plausible mechanism for the observed inter-individual variability in platelet inhibition. The demonstration that some patients may be 'resistant' or 'poor responders' to the pharmacological effect of antiplatelet drugs, has prompted the need of laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy. However, many published studies have been performed using unspecific tests of platelet function, which identify patients on antiplatelet treatment with high residual platelet reactivity, which is not necessarily because of resistance to antiplatelet drugs. Despite this drawback, identification of patients with high residual platelet reactivity may be useful to predict their risk of atherothrombotic events. However, many studies still need to be carried out to identify the ideal laboratory test and to answer basic questions on its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, before monitoring antiplatelet therapy can be recommended in the clinical practise. Until then, monitoring of antiplatelet therapy should be considered for investigational purposes only.

Heritability of Platelet Responsiveness to Aspirin in Activation Pathways Directly and Indirectly Related to Cyclooxygenase-1

Background— The inability of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) to adequately suppress platelet function is associated with future risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Genetic variation is a proposed but unproved mechanism for insufficient ASA responsiveness.

Methods and Results— We examined platelet ASA responsiveness in 1880 asymptomatic subjects (mean age, 44±13 years; 58% women) recruited from 309 white and 208 black families with premature coronary heart disease. Ex vivo platelet function was determined before and after ingestion of ASA (81 mg/d for 2 weeks) with the use of a panel of measures that assessed platelet activation in pathways directly and indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1, the enzyme inhibited by ASA. The proportion of phenotypic variance related to CHD risk factor covariates was determined by multivariable regression. Heritability of phenotypes was determined with the use of variance components models unadjusted and adjusted for covariates. ASA inhibited arachidonic acid–induced aggregation and thromboxane B 2 production by ≥99% ( P <0.0001). Inhibition of urinary thromboxane excretion and platelet activation in pathways indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 was less pronounced and more variable (inhibition of 0% to 100%). Measured covariates contributed modestly to variability in ASA response phenotypes ( r 2 =0.001 to 0.133). Phenotypes indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 were strongly and consistently heritable across races (h 2 =0.266 to 0.762; P <0.01), but direct cyclooxygenase-1 phenotypes were not.

Conclusions— Heritable factors contribute prominently to variability in residual platelet function after ASA exposure. These data suggest a genetic basis for the adequacy of platelet suppression by ASA and potentially for differences in the clinical efficacy of ASA.