Biomarkers for eosinophilic esophagitis: a review

Orally administered anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody is biologically active in the gut and alleviates immune-mediated hepatitis: A novel anti-inflammatory personalized therapeutic approach

Personalized therapies are designed to optimize the safety-to-efficacy ratio by selecting patients with higher response rates based on specific biomarkers. Inflammation plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a common liver disorder. Eotaxin-1 plays a role in innate and adaptive immune responses. High eotaxin-1 levels are associated with diabetes and fatty liver disease and, therefore, serves as a biomarker for patient selection. The anti-eotaxin-1 monoclonal antibody is tailored for the personalized therapy of patients with inflammatory conditions due to high levels of eotaxin-1. To evaluate the biological activity and immunomodulatory effect of orally administered anti-eotaxin-1. C57B1/6 mice were treated with either oral or intra-peritoneal anti-eotaxin-1 antibody before induction of immune-mediated hepatitis using an injection of concanavalin A (ConA) and checked for liver injury and eotaxin-1 serum levels. Oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 alleviated the immune-mediated liver injury. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels decreased to 1807 U/L, compared with 19025 U/L in untreated controls and 3657 U/L in mice treated with parenteral anti-eotaxin-1 (P < 0.005). A trend toward reduced serum eotaxin-1 levels was observed in treated mice, ranging from 594 pg/mL in the controls to 554 and 561 pg/mL in mice treated orally and intraperitoneally (P = 0.08, P = 0.06, respectively). Oral administration of anti-eotaxin-1 antibody shows biological activity in the gut and exerts a systemic immunomodulatory effect to alleviate immune-mediated hepatitis. The data suggest that testing for eotaxin-1 serum levels may enable screening patients with high-eotaxin-1 levels-associated NASH.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Blood-Based Parameters Identify Response to Treatment in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive methods to assess treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis are needed.

AIMS

Our aim was to determine whether a blood-based biomarker panel centered on immune parameters could identify histologic response to treatment in eosinophilic esophagitis patients.

METHODS

A pilot study involving adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis recruited at two Ear, Nose, Throat clinics in Sweden was designed. The patients (n = 20) donated blood and esophageal biopsies and filled in three questionnaires before and after a 2-month course of topical corticosteroids. Blood samples were analyzed for absolute levels of granulocytes and T cells and the fractions of eosinophils expressing 10 different surface markers by flow cytometry. All data were analyzed by multivariate methods of pattern recognition.

RESULTS

Multivariate modeling revealed that a combination of 13 immune parameters and 10 patient-reported outcome scores were required to create a model capable of separating responders (n = 15) from non-responders (n = 5). Questions regarding symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and capacity to eat certain foods from two of the questionnaires were discriminatory in the multivariate model, as were absolute counts of T cells, eosinophils, and eosinophil expression of activation markers and cell adhesion molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of blood-based immune parameters and directed questions may prove helpful to monitor response to treatment, perhaps reducing the need for repeat endoscopies in eosinophilic esophagitis patients in the future.

Proton-pump Inhibitor Response Prediction Using Esophageal microRNAs in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic esophageal disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) induce disease remission but no predictive factors of PPI-responsiveness have been identified yet. So, a biomarker must be found to differentiate between responders (PPI-R) and nonresponder patients (PPI-NR) to PPI. Aims were to identify any molecular biomarker that could predict PPI responsiveness and to study molecular remission after PPI therapy.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 39 controls and 43 pediatric children with EoE from 2 hospitals, and they were treated with esomeprazole for 8 to 12 weeks. After therapy, patients were classified as either PPI-R or PPI-NR. Biopsies were collected and RNA, microRNAs, and proteins were isolated from them, measuring levels by qPCR and Western blot (WB). Also, miRNAs were evaluated in serum.

RESULTS

We found several esophageal miRNAs with different expression values between PPI-R and PPI-NR children, which can be used to discriminate them (area under curve = 0.90). No useful serum miRNAs were, however, identified. Also, these miRNAs were dysregulated in responder patients before and after PPI therapy. Moreover, we corroborated in this child population, that PPI-R displayed a significant decrease in eotaxin-3, IL-5, IL-13, periostin, and major basic protein (P < 0.05) and a significant increase in filaggrin levels after PPI treatment (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal miRNA levels found are able to discriminate between both PPI-R and PPI-NR at baseline, and before and after treatment in PPI-R, so they could be used as biomarkers. Furthermore, we observed clinical and esophageal molecular restoration in PPI-R patients after PPI therapy.

MiR-4668 as a Novel Potential Biomarker for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Introduction

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinico-pathological diagnosis characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. Demonstration of esophageal eosinophilia (more than 15 eosinophils/hpf) in biopsy specimen obtained by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) continues to be the gold standard for diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy. There is a growing necessity for non-invasive biomarkers that can accurately diagnose this condition and assess response to therapy. While microRNAs (miRNA) are being investigated in allergic diseases, including EoE, not many studies have explored the role of salivary miRNAs in EoE. MiR-4668-5p is a particularly interesting candidate, as it is predicted to regulate TGF-beta signaling and has not previously been identified as a target in any allergy disease. We sought to further investigate the role of miR-4668 as a biomarker to characterize and monitor response to treatment with swallowed topical glucocorticoids.

Methods

After IRB approval, twenty-two adult patients with EoE were randomly enrolled to provide a saliva sample before and after 2 months of swallowed fluticasone therapy. Differences of miRNA expression before and after treatment were analyzed by paired T-test. A significance cutoff of <0.05 was used for all analyses.

Results

Expression of miR-4668 was higher in EoE vs. non-EoE subjects. The level of miR-4668 decreased in all subjects except one, with a mean fold change 0.49 ± 0.25. There was an association between miRNA expression and number of positive aeroallergens. The miR-4668 high group had a higher number of positive aeroallergen tests, while the miR-4668 low group had a greater number of subjects with drug allergies.

Conclusions

In this study, we identified that salivary miRNAs may serve as biomarkers to characterize EoE and response to topical corticosteroids. We specifically identified miR-4668 as a novel potential biomarker, which was not previously discovered as a target in EoE or any other allergic disease.

Minimally invasive biomarker studies in eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the esophagus that currently requires repeated endoscopic biopsies for diagnosis and monitoring because no reliable noninvasive markers have been identified.

OBJECTIVE

To identify promising minimally invasive EoE biomarkers and remaining gaps in biomarker validation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to June 6, 2017. Studies were included if patients met the 2007 consensus criteria for EoE diagnosis, a minimally invasive biomarker was assessed, and the study included at least 1 control for comparison.

RESULTS

The search identified 2094 studies, with 234 reviewed at full-text level, and 49 included in the analysis (20 adult, 19 pediatric, 7 pediatric and adult, and 3 not stated). Most (26 of 49) were published after 2014. Thirty-five studies included healthy controls, 9 analyzed atopic controls, and 29 compared samples from patients with active and inactive EoE. Minimally invasive biomarkers were obtained from peripheral blood (n = 41 studies), sponge or string samples (n = 3), oral or throat swab secretions (n = 2), breath condensate (n = 2), stool (n = 2), and urine (n = 2). The most commonly reported biomarkers were peripheral blood eosinophils (n = 16), blood and string eosinophil granule proteins (n = 14), and eosinophil surface or intracellular markers (n = 12). EoE biomarkers distinguished active EoE from healthy controls in 23 studies, atopic controls in 2 studies, and inactive EoE controls in 20 studies.

CONCLUSION

Several promising minimally invasive biomarkers for EoE have emerged; however, few are able to differentiate EoE from other atopic diseases.

Possible Noninvasive Biomarker of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) diagnosis and follow-up response to therapy is based on repeated endoscopies and histological examination for eosinophils/HPF. The procedure is invasive and risky in particular for the pediatric population. Presently, there is no highly sensitive and specific noninvasive blood test available to monitor the disease pathogenesis. Reports indicate the expression of PDL1 (CD274) on the eosinophils in allergic patients. Herein, we report that CD274-expressing and -nonexpressing eosinophils were detected in both examined pediatric and adult EoE patients. We show that CD274 expression on blood eosinophils and blood mRNA expression levels increase in the blood of EoE patients and decrease following treatment. These observations are consistent with the esophageal eosinophilia of before and after treatment in both examined patients. These two clinical and experimental analysis reports provide the possibility that the CD274 mRNA and CD274-expressing esinophil levels may be novel possible noninvasive biomarkers for EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: From pathophysiology to treatment

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune disease, characterized by a dense eosinophilic infiltrate in the esophagus, leading to bolus impaction and reflux-like symptoms. Traditionally considered a pediatric disease, the number of adult patients with EoE is continuously increasing, with a relatively higher incidence in western countries. Dysphagia and food impaction represent the main symptoms complained by patients, but gastroesophageal reflux-like symptoms may also be present. Esophageal biopsies are mandatory for the diagnosis of EoE, though clinical manifestations and proton pump inhibitors responsiveness must be taken into consideration. The higher prevalence of EoE in patients suffering from atopic diseases suggests a common background with allergy, however both the etiology and pathophysiology are not completely understood. Elimination diets are considered the first-line therapy in children, but this approach appears less effective in adults patients, who often require steroids; despite medical treatments, EoE is complicated in some cases by esophageal stricture and stenosis, that require additional endoscopic treatments. This review summarizes the evidence on EoE pathophysiology and illustrates the safety and efficacy of the most recent medical and endoscopic treatments.

Peripheral blood eosinophils and other non-invasive biomarkers can monitor treatment response in eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Monitoring of the treatment response in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) requires structured endoscopical and histological examination of the oesophagus. Less invasive methods would be highly desirable.

AIM

To evaluate the utility of several EoE-associated blood and serum markers in order to non-invasively monitor the response to treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids in adult EoE patients.

METHODS

In a randomised, controlled double-blind trial blood samples of EoE patients (n = 69) were collected at baseline and after 14 days of treatment with budesonide (n = 51) or placebo (n = 18) respectively. Absolute blood eosinophil count (AEC) as well as serum levels of CCL-17, CCL-18, CCL-26, eosinophil-cationic-protein (ECP) and mast cell tryptase (MCT) were determined and correlated with oesophageal eosinophil density and with symptom and endoscopy scores.

RESULTS

Histological remission, defined as mean number of <16 eos/mm(2) hpf at end-of-treatment, was achieved in 98% of the budesonide and 0% of the placebo recipients. AEC [380.2 vs. 214.7/mm(3) (P = 0.0001)], serum-CCL-17 [294.3 vs. 257.9 pg/mL (P = 0.0019)], -CCL-26 [26.7 vs. 16.2 pg/mL (P = 0.0058)], -ECP [45.5 ± 44.7 vs. 27.5 ± 25.0 μg/L (P = 0.0016)] and -MCT [5.3 ± 2.9 vs. 4.5 ± 2.6 μg/L (P = 0.0019)] significantly decreased under budesonide but not under placebo. AEC significantly correlated with oesophageal eosinophil density before (r = 0.28, P = 0.0236) and after (r = 0.42, P = 0.0004) budesonide treatment. In ROC-AUC analyses post-treatment values of AEC were significantly associated with histological remission (ROC-AUC 0.754; 95% CI: 0.617-0.891; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The budesonide-induced treatment response in EoE is mirrored by several blood and serum markers, and the absolute blood eosinophil count is the most valuable as it shows correlation with the oesophageal eosinophil density.

Deciphering Asthma Biomarkers with Protein Profiling Technology

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways, resulting in bronchial hyperresponsiveness with every allergen exposure. It is now clear that asthma is not a single disease, but rather a multifaceted syndrome that results from a variety of biologic mechanisms. Asthma is further problematic given that the disease consists of many variants, each with its own etiologic and pathophysiologic factors, including different cellular responses and inflammatory phenotypes. These facets make the rapid and accurate diagnosis (not to mention treatments) of asthma extremely difficult. Protein biomarkers can serve as powerful detection tools in both clinical and basic research applications. Recent endeavors from biomedical researchers have developed technical platforms, such as cytokine antibody arrays, that have been employed and used to further the global analysis of asthma biomarker studies. In this review, we discuss potential asthma biomarkers involved in the pathophysiologic process and eventual pathogenesis of asthma, how these biomarkers are being utilized, and how further testing methods might help improve the diagnosis and treatment strain that current asthma patients suffer.

Utility of a Noninvasive Serum Biomarker Panel for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Noninvasive biomarkers would be valuable for diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of this study was to determine the utility of a panel of serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of EoE.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive adults undergoing outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines; controls had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or dysphagia and did not meet the EoE criteria. EoE cases were treated with topical steroids and had repeat endoscopy. Pre- and post-treatment serum samples were analyzed in a blinded manner for interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-13, transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, TGF-β, tumor necrosis factor-α, eotaxin-1, -2, and -3, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), major basic protein, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin. Cases and controls were compared at baseline, and pre- and post-treatment assays were compared in cases.

RESULTS

A total of 61 incident EoE cases and 87 controls were enrolled; 51 EoE cases had post-treatment serum analyzed. There were no significant differences in any of the biomarkers between EoE cases and controls at baseline. IL-13 and eotaxin-3 for cases and controls were 85 ± 160 vs. 43 ± 161 pg/ml (P=0.12) and 41 ± 159 vs. 21 ± 73 (P=0.30). There were no significant differences in assay values among cases before and after treatment. There were also no differences after stratification by atopic status or treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

A panel of inflammatory factors known to be associated with EoE pathogenesis were not increased in the serum, nor were they responsive to therapy. None of these biomarkers are likely candidates for a serum test for EoE. Histologic analysis for diagnosis and management of EoE continues to be necessary, and novel, less invasive, biomarkers are needed.

Correlation between CCL26 production by human bronchial epithelial cells and airway eosinophils: Involvement in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

BACKGROUND

High pulmonary eosinophil counts are associated with asthma symptoms and severity. Bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) produce CC chemokines, notably CCL26 (eotaxin-3), which recruits and activates eosinophils from asthmatic patients. This suggests that CCL26 production by BECs might be involved in persistent eosinophilia in patients with severe asthma despite treatment with high corticosteroid doses.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether CCL26 levels correlate with eosinophilia and asthma severity.

METHODS

Human CC chemokine expression was assessed by means of quantitative PCR or a quantitative PCR array in vehicle- or IL-13-treated BECs. CCL26 was quantitated by means of ELISA. Immunohistochemistry analyses of CCL26 and major basic protein were done on bronchial biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

IL-13 selectively induced CCL26 expression by BECs. This increase was time-dependent and more prominent in BECs from patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. CCL26 levels measured in supernatants of IL-13-stimulated BECs also increased with asthma severity as follows: patients with severe eosinophilic asthma > patients with mild asthma ≈ healthy subjects. Immunohistochemistry analyses of bronchial biopsy specimens confirmed increased levels of CCL26 in the epithelium of patients with mild and those with severe eosinophilic asthma. Tissue eosinophil counts did not correlate with CCL26 staining. However, sputum CCL26 levels significantly correlated with sputum eosinophil counts (P < .0001), suggesting that CCL26 participates in the movement of eosinophils from the tissues to the airway lumen.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show a relation between CCL26 production by IL-13-stimulated BECs, sputum eosinophil counts, and asthma severity. They also suggest a role for CCL26 in the sustained inflammation observed in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and reveal CCL26 as a potential target for treating patients with eosinophilic asthma that are refractory to classic therapies.

Comparison of atopic features between children and adults with eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological diagnosis seen in children as well as adults. Growing evidence suggests that EoE is strongly associated with atopic disorders. Presenting symptoms differ in children and adults and it is not known whether atopic features vary by age. This study was designed to compare atopic features and allergic sensitization between children and adults with EoE. We conducted a retrospective analysis of demographic and clinical data from 50 children (aged 2-18 years) and 50 adults (aged 21-75 years) with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of EoE referred to our allergy clinic. Data regarding patient characteristics, history of atopic diseases, and allergy test results were collected for analysis. The majority of children and adults were white and male patients. When compared with adults, a higher percentage of children had a history of asthma (52% versus 24%; p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between adults and children regarding history of allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy, and family history of atopy. There was no statistically significant difference between children and adults regarding immediate-type sensitization to foods and aeroallergens. Compared with adults, a higher percentage of children showed a positive reaction to one or more foods on patch testing (62% versus 31%; p = 0.01). A high prevalence of comorbid atopic diseases and sensitizations to food and environmental allergens was seen in both children and adults. Children had a significantly higher rate of asthma and positive patch test to foods compared with adults.

Serum eosinophil cationic protein is superior to mast cell tryptase as marker for response to topical corticosteroid therapy in eosinophilic esophagitis

GOALS

We evaluated the serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and mast cell tryptase (MCT) as surrogate markers for response to treatment in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) under topical steroid therapy with fluticasone.

BACKGROUND

EoE is a chronic disease characterized histologically by eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus. Esophageal mastocytosis and mast cell activation have been implicated in EoE pathogenesis.

STUDY

Fifteen patients with EoE completed this prospective observational study. Before and after 3 months of therapy with fluticasone, eosinophilic and mast cell counts were analyzed from histologic samples of the esophagus and were correlated with serum markers ECP and MCT.

RESULTS

Fluticasone-therapy significantly decreased mean eosinophils [from 42.2 to 16.2 eosinophils/high-power field (hpf); P=0.004] and mast cells (from 13.9 to 5.1 mast cells/hpf; P=0.001) in the esophageal epithelium. There was a significant decrease of mean ECP (from 15.6 to 5.5 μg/L; P=0.024) and MCT-serum-values (from 4.7 to 3.8 μg/L; P=0.029) under therapy. Serum-ECP correlated significantly with histologic eosinophilic counts after fluticasone-therapy (r=0.54; P=0.038) in contrast to serum-MCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum-ECP but not serum-MCT could be a promising noninvasive biomarker to assess response to topical corticosteroid therapy in EoE. These findings should be confirmed by larger studies; ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT01624129.

Serum immunoglobulin free light chain levels are higher in girls than boys during eosinophilic oesophagitis

AIM

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is an emerging worldwide disease, closely associated with male gender and allergic disorders. This study investigated the distribution of allergy markers in a cohort of children with EO.

METHODS

We analysed allergy markers in 91 children (62 males and 29 females) with EO and a control group of 45 age-matched children who had non-EO gastrointestinal allergic symptoms. The markers analysed were serum cow's milk-specific and hen's egg-specific IgE, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), thymus-regulated and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) and immunoglobulin free light chain (Ig-fLC).

RESULTS

In the EO group, cow's milk-specific IgE levels were detectable in 41.9% of males and 62.1% of females and hen's egg-specific levels in 25% of males and 26.9% of females. There was no gender difference in increased TSLP or TARC levels. Kappa Ig-fLC were increased in 5.6% of males and 20.8% of females (p = 0.058) and lambda Ig-fLC in 1.9% of males and 33.3% of females (p = 0.000). No gender differences were found in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that serum TSLP might be a potential marker of EO and TARC of non-EO gastrointestinal food allergies. In EO, serum Ig-fLC appeared higher in females, adding another gender difference to the biology of EO.

Differences in microglia activation between rats-derived cell and mice-derived cell after stimulating by soluble antigen of IV larva from Angiostrongylus cantonensis in vitro

Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a rodent nematode. Adult worms of A. cantonensis live in the pulmonary arteries of rats. Humans and mice are accidental hosts or named nonpermissive hosts. The larva cannot develop into an adult worm and only causes serious eosinophilic meningitis or meningoencephalitis if humans or mice eat food containing larva of A. cantonensis in the third stage. The differing consequences largely depend on differing immune responses of the host to parasite during A. cantonensis invasion and development. Microglia is considered to be the key immune cell in the central nervous system like macrophage. To further understand the reasons for why mice and rats attain different outcomes in A. cantonensis infection, we set up the method to isolate and culture newborn rats' primary microglia and observe the activation of the microglia cells, comparing with mice microglia cell line N9. We treated cells with soluble antigen of the fourth larva of A. cantonensis (L4 larva) and measured mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, IL-13, eotaxin, iNOS, and TNF-α by real-time PCR. The results showed that N9 expressed high mRNA level of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS, IL-5, IL-13, and eotaxin, but primary microglia only had IL-5, IL-13, and eotaxin mRNA level. It implies that microglia from rats and mice had different reaction to soluble antigen of A. cantonensis. Therefore, we supposed that microglia may play an immune modulation role during the brain inflammation induced by A. cantonensis.