Universal screening at age 1-2 years as an adjunct to cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the UK: A cost-utility analysis

Potentials of artificial intelligence in familial hypercholesterolemia: Advances in screening, diagnosis, and risk stratification for early intervention and treatment

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) poses a global health challenge due to high incidence rates and underdiagnosis, leading to increased risks of early-onset atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Early detection and treatment of FH is critical in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events and improving the long-term outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals and their families. Traditional therapeutic approaches revolve around lipid-lowering interventions, yet challenges persist, particularly in accurate and timely diagnosis. The current diagnostic landscape heavily relies on genetic testing of specific LDL-C metabolism genes, often limited to specialized centers. This constraint has led to the adoption of alternative clinical scores for FH diagnosis. However, the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) present promising solutions to these diagnostic challenges. This review explores the intricacies of FH, highlighting the challenges that are encountered in the diagnosis and management of the disorder. The revolutionary potential of ML, particularly in large-scale population screening, is highlighted. Applications of ML in FH screening, diagnosis, and risk stratification are discussed, showcasing its ability to outperform traditional criteria. However, challenges and ethical considerations, including algorithmic stability, data quality, privacy, and consent issues, are crucial areas that require attention. The review concludes by emphasizing the significant promise of AI and ML in FH management while underscoring the need for ethical and practical vigilance to ensure responsible and effective integration into healthcare practices.

Coronary risk factor profiles according to different age categories in premature coronary artery disease patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention

Many studies have investigated the coronary risk factors (CRFs) among premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) patients. However, reports on the proportion and CRFs of PCAD according to different age cut-offs for PCAD is globally under-reported. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PCAD patients and analyse the significant CRFs according to different age cut-offs among percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients. Patients who underwent PCI between 2007 and 2018 in two cardiology centres were included (n = 29,241) and were grouped into four age cut-off groups that defines PCAD: (A) Males/females: < 45, (B) Males: < 50; Females: < 55, (C) Males: < 55; Females: < 60 and (D) Males: < 55; Females: < 65 years old. The average proportion of PCAD was 28%; 9.2% for group (A), 21.5% for group (B), 38.6% and 41.9% for group (C) and (D), respectively. The top three CRFs of PCAD were LDL-c level, TC level and hypertension (HTN). Malay ethnicity, smoking, obesity, family history of PCAD, TC level and history of MI were the independent predictors of PCAD across all age groups. The proportion of PCAD in Malaysia is higher compared to other studies. The most significant risk factors of PCAD are LDL-c, TC levels and HTN. Early prevention, detection and management of the modifiable risk factors are highly warranted to prevent PCAD.

Overcoming the real and imagined barriers to cholesterol screening in pediatrics

Recent guidance by the United States Preventive Services Task Force has renewed the debate surrounding the benefits of pediatric lipid screening. This commentary reviews the evolution of the pediatric lipid screening recommendations in the United States, followed by an exploration of real and imagined challenges that prevent optimal cholesterol screening rates in children. Real challenges substantively prevent the uptake of these guidelines into practice; imagined challenges, such as identifying the best age to screen, are often context-dependent and can also be surmounted. Experiences from other countries identify potential facilitators to improving screening and additional barriers. Implementation science provides guidance on overcoming the real barriers, translating evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice, and informing the next wave of solutions to overcome these challenges.

Health economics of detection and treatment of children with familial hypercholesterolemia: to screen or not to screen is no longer the question

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is one of the most common monogenic disorders and is safely treatable with lipid-lowering medication. However, most individuals with HeFH remain untreated and undetected, especially in paediatric populations where the potential for long-term therapeutic benefit is higher. Here, we review the recent literature on health economic outcomes for the detection and management of FH in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

A targeted literature review identified eight studies evaluating detection and management strategies for paediatric FH populations in the last 25 years. Most studies conducted modelled cost-effectiveness analyses to understand the long-term impact of these strategies on health outcomes and the financial impact on the healthcare system. All studies reported that detection and management of HeFH in paediatric populations was cost-effective, regardless of the age of the children. However, cost-effectiveness varied depending on the method of case ascertainment - targeted screening was generally cheaper overall, but less effective, than whole-of-population screening, although both methods were generally cost-effective.

SUMMARY

Detection and management of HeFH in paediatric populations is a cost-effective way to significantly lower the burden of disease later in life for these individuals. These strategies should be implemented across healthcare systems.

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: An Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically synthesise the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

METHODS

We searched seven databases from inception to 2 February , 2023, for eligible cost-effective analysis (CEA) that evaluated screening strategies for FH versus the standard care for FH detection. Independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction and quality evaluation. Cost results were adapted to 2022 US dollars (US$) to facilitate comparisons between studies using the same screening strategies. Cost-effectiveness thresholds were based on the original study criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies evaluating 62 strategies were included in this review, most of the studies (95%) adopted a healthcare perspective in the base case, and majority were set in high-income countries. Strategies analysed included cascade screening (23 strategies), opportunistic screening (13 strategies), systematic screening (11 strategies) and population-wide screening (15 strategies). Most of the strategies relied on genetic diagnosis for case ascertainment. The most common comparator was no screening, but some studies compared the proposed strategy versus current screening strategies or versus the best next alternative. Six studies evaluated screening in children while the remaining were targeted at adults. From a healthcare perspective, cascade screening was cost-effective in 78% of the studies [cost-adapted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from dominant to 2022 US$ 104,877], opportunistic screening in 85% (ICERs from US$4959 to US$41,705), systematic screening in 80% (ICERs from US$2763 to US$69,969) and population-wide screening in 60% (ICERs from US$1484 to US$223,240). The most common driver of ICER identified in the sensitivity analysis was the long-term cost of lipid-lowering treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on reported willingness to pay thresholds for each setting, most CEA studies concluded that screening for FH compared with no screening was cost-effective, regardless of the screening strategy. Cascade screening resulted in the largest health benefits per person tested.

Advances in familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a semi-dominant genetic disease affecting more than 25 million people worldwide, is associated with severe hypercholesterolemia and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Over the last decade, advances in data analysis, screening, diagnosis and cardiovascular risk stratification has significantly improved our ability to deliver precision medicine for these patients. Furthermore, recent updates on guideline recommendations and new therapeutic approaches have also proven to be highly beneficial. It is anticipated that both ongoing and upcoming clinical trials will offer further insights for the care and treatment of FH patients.

Modern approaches to the management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in the Middle East and North Africa

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a severe form of FH in which inheritance of two defective or null mutations in genes associated with metabolism of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) results in extremely high LDL-C, premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Treatment of HoFH comprises a multi-modal approach of statins, ezetimibe, lipoprotein apheresis; and inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type, angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein. These treatments are generally costly, and patients also often require treatment for ASCVD consequent to HoFH. Therefore, in the interests of both economics and preservation of life, disease prevention via genetic screening and counselling is rapidly becoming a key element in the overall management of HoFH. Guidelines are available to assist diagnosis and treatment of HoFH; however, while advancements have been made in the management of the disease, there has been little systematic attention paid to prevention. Additionally, the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region has a higher prevalence of HoFH than most other regions - chiefly due to consanguinity. This has led to the establishment of regional lipid clinics and awareness programs that have thrown education and awareness of HoFH into sharp focus. Incorporation of principles of prevention, education, awareness, and data from real-world use of existing therapeutics will significantly enhance the effectiveness of future guidelines for the management of HoFH, particularly in the MENA region.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents from 48 countries: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 450 000 children are born with familial hypercholesterolaemia worldwide every year, yet only 2·1% of adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia were diagnosed before age 18 years via current diagnostic approaches, which are derived from observations in adults. We aimed to characterise children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) and understand current approaches to the identification and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia to inform future public health strategies.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study, we assessed children and adolescents younger than 18 years with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of HeFH at the time of entry into the Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC) registry between Oct 1, 2015, and Jan 31, 2021. Data in the registry were collected from 55 regional or national registries in 48 countries. Diagnoses relying on self-reported history of familial hypercholesterolaemia and suspected secondary hypercholesterolaemia were excluded from the registry; people with untreated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) of at least 13·0 mmol/L were excluded from this study. Data were assessed overall and by WHO region, World Bank country income status, age, diagnostic criteria, and index-case status. The main outcome of this study was to assess current identification and management of children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

FINDINGS

Of 63 093 individuals in the FHSC registry, 11 848 (18·8%) were children or adolescents younger than 18 years with HeFH and were included in this study; 5756 (50·2%) of 11 476 included individuals were female and 5720 (49·8%) were male. Sex data were missing for 372 (3·1%) of 11 848 individuals. Median age at registry entry was 9·6 years (IQR 5·8-13·2). 10 099 (89·9%) of 11 235 included individuals had a final genetically confirmed diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia and 1136 (10·1%) had a clinical diagnosis. Genetically confirmed diagnosis data or clinical diagnosis data were missing for 613 (5·2%) of 11 848 individuals. Genetic diagnosis was more common in children and adolescents from high-income countries (9427 [92·4%] of 10 202) than in children and adolescents from non-high-income countries (199 [48·0%] of 415). 3414 (31·6%) of 10 804 children or adolescents were index cases. Familial-hypercholesterolaemia-related physical signs, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiovascular disease were uncommon, but were more common in non-high-income countries. 7557 (72·4%) of 10 428 included children or adolescents were not taking lipid-lowering medication (LLM) and had a median LDL-C of 5·00 mmol/L (IQR 4·05-6·08). Compared with genetic diagnosis, the use of unadapted clinical criteria intended for use in adults and reliant on more extreme phenotypes could result in 50-75% of children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia not being identified.

INTERPRETATION

Clinical characteristics observed in adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia are uncommon in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia, hence detection in this age group relies on measurement of LDL-C and genetic confirmation. Where genetic testing is unavailable, increased availability and use of LDL-C measurements in the first few years of life could help reduce the current gap between prevalence and detection, enabling increased use of combination LLM to reach recommended LDL-C targets early in life.

FUNDING

Pfizer, Amgen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi Sankyo, and Regeneron.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia

AIMS

Diagnosis rate of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remained less than 10 % globally and the economic evaluation results of different FH screening strategies varied. This study aimed to systematically review the methodology and results of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of FH screening, which will provide evidence support for health-related decision-making.

METHODS

The Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) and CEA Registry databases were electronically searched to collect full economic evaluation from the establishment of the databases to June 30, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement 2022 (CHEERS 2022) checklist.

RESULTS

Among 232 retrieved studies, 18 economic evaluations were included and all of them are from developed countries, with an average quality score of 0.73. The decision tree model and/or Markov model were constructed by thirteen articles (72 %). Twelve studies (67 %) adopted the healthcare perspective and the lifetime horizon to compare the costs and health outcome of different screening strategies. The results of eight studies indicated that cascade screening was a cost-effective strategy compared with no screening, which was more pronounced in younger adults. Universal screening in young adults aged 16 years or 18-40 years (n=3) and in children aged 1-2 years combined with reverse cascade screening (n=3) are both cost-effective. The probability of being cost-effective for cascade screening (n=6) and universal screening (n=1) of young aged 18-40 years were greater than 95 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated the economic advantages of cascade screening, universal screening of young adults, and universal screening of newborns combined with reverse cascade screening. Further health economic evaluation is needed in children and in low- and middle-income countries.

Prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in early childhood

Atherosclerotic lesions are present even in very young individuals and therefore, risk stratification for cardiovascular (CV) disease should be implemented in childhood to promote early prevention strategies. In this review we critically appraise clinical, biochemical and genetic biomarkers available for pediatric clinical practice, which might be integrated to build effective algorithms to identify children at risk of future CV events. The first critical issue is to characterize in children aged 2-5 years, those CV risk factors/clinical conditions associated with dramatically accelerated atherosclerosis. Presence of clinical conditions such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, Kawasaki disease, etc., or positive family history for premature CV disease should be evaluated. Subsequently, a complete lipid profile and Lipoprotein(a) determination are recommended for children with increased baseline CV risk. Individuals with altered lipid profile could then undergo genetic testing for monogenic dyslipidemias to identify children with high CV genetic risk, who will be directed to appropriate therapeutic options. In perspective, calculation of a polygenic risk score, based on the analysis of several common single-nucleotide polymorphisms, could be integrated for better risk assessment. We here emphasize the importance of a "holistic" strategy integrating biochemical, anamnestic and genetic data to stratify CV risk in early childhood.

Should Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Be Included in the UK Newborn Whole Genome Sequencing Programme?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The UK National Health Service (NHS) has recently announced a Newborn Genomes Programme (NGP) to identify infants with treatable inherited disorders using whole genome sequencing (WGS). Here, we address, for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the four principles that must be met for the inclusion of a disorder in the NGP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Principle A: There is strong evidence that the genetic variants causing FH can be reliably detected. Principle B: A high proportion of individuals who carry an FH-causing variant are likely to develop early heart disease if left undiagnosed and not offered appropriate treatment. Principle C: Early intervention has been shown to lead to substantially improved outcomes in children with FH. Principle D: The recommended interventions are equitably accessible for all. FH meets all the Wilson and Jungner criteria for inclusion in a screening programme, and it also meets all four principles and therefore should be included in the Newborn Genomes Programme.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

Cascade testing the relatives of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia is an efficient approach to identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia. The cascade-testing protocol starts with identifying an index patient with familial hypercholesterolaemia, followed by one of three approaches to contact other relatives: indirect approach, whereby index patients contact their relatives; direct approach, whereby the specialist contacts the relatives; or a combination of both direct and indirect approaches. However, it is unclear which protocol may be most effective.

Objectives

The objectives were to determine the yield of cases from different cascade-testing protocols, treatment patterns, and short- and long-term outcomes for people with familial hypercholesterolaemia; to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative protocols for familial hypercholesterolaemia cascade testing; and to qualitatively assess the acceptability of different cascade-testing protocols to individuals and families with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and to health-care providers.

Design and methods

This study comprised systematic reviews and analysis of three data sets: PASS (PASS Software, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) hospital familial hypercholesterolaemia databases, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)-Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) linked primary-secondary care data set, and a specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register. Cost-effectiveness modelling, incorporating preceding analyses, was undertaken. Acceptability was examined in interviews with patients, relatives and health-care professionals.

Result

Systematic review of protocols: based on data from 4 of the 24 studies, the combined approach led to a slightly higher yield of relatives tested [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 42%] than the direct (33%, 95% CI 28% to 39%) or indirect approaches alone (34%, 95% CI 30% to 37%). The PASS databases identified that those contacted directly were more likely to complete cascade testing (p < 0.01); the CPRD-HES data set indicated that 70% did not achieve target treatment levels, and demonstrated increased cardiovascular disease risk among these individuals, compared with controls (hazard ratio 9.14, 95% CI 8.55 to 9.76). The specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register confirmed excessive cardiovascular morbidity (standardised morbidity ratio 7.17, 95% CI 6.79 to 7.56). Cost-effectiveness modelling found a net health gain from diagnosis of -0.27 to 2.51 quality-adjusted life-years at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The cost-effective protocols cascaded from genetically confirmed index cases by contacting first- and second-degree relatives simultaneously and directly. Interviews found a service-led direct-contact approach was more reliable, but combining direct and indirect approaches, guided by index patients and family relationships, may be more acceptable.

Limitations

Systematic reviews were not used in the economic analysis, as relevant studies were lacking or of poor quality. As only a proportion of those with primary care-coded familial hypercholesterolaemia are likely to actually have familial hypercholesterolaemia, CPRD analyses are likely to underestimate the true effect. The cost-effectiveness analysis required assumptions related to the long-term cardiovascular disease risk, the effect of treatment on cholesterol and the generalisability of estimates from the data sets. Interview recruitment was limited to white English-speaking participants.

Conclusions

Based on limited evidence, most cost-effective cascade-testing protocols, diagnosing most relatives, select index cases by genetic testing, with services directly contacting relatives, and contacting second-degree relatives even if first-degree relatives have not been tested. Combined approaches to contact relatives may be more suitable for some families.

Future work

Establish a long-term familial hypercholesterolaemia cohort, measuring cholesterol levels, treatment and cardiovascular outcomes. Conduct a randomised study comparing different approaches to contact relatives.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018117445 and CRD42019125775.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Evaluating the prevalence of lipid assessments in children in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common, inherited, life-threatening and treatable condition that is characterized by marked elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), resulting in a high risk of cardiovascular disease, but treatment starting in childhood dramatically reduces this risk. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of pediatric lipid assessments among children in Alberta.

METHODS

We reviewed laboratory and administrative data from Alberta Health between Apr. 1, 2012, and Dec. 31, 2021. We evaluated 2 pediatric cohorts (children aged 2-10 yr and children aged 9-17 yr) to allow for longitudinal assessments throughout the pediatric period. We also reviewed annual frequencies of lipid assessment for all children between 2013 and 2021.

RESULTS

Pediatric lipid assessments were performed for 1972 (4.3%) of 46 170 children aged 2-10 years and for 8158 (19.9%) of 40 926 children aged 9-17 years. Female children (aged 2-10 yr) and those living in rural communities were significantly less likely to have a lipid assessment, compared with male children and those in nonrural communities. Among those with lipid assessments, 23 (1.2%) and 86 (1.1%) children aged 2-10 years and 9-17 years, respectively, had an LDL-C level suggestive of probable familial hypercholesterolemia (≥ 4.0 mmol/L). Statin therapy was prescribed in 16 children during the study period. The frequency of lipid assessments was relatively stable, with the exception of a decrease in 2020.

INTERPRETATION

Rates of pediatric lipid assessment in Alberta are suboptimal. These findings highlight the need to increase awareness of the benefits of early diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia with regard to long-term health and identify and overcome barriers to diagnosis and treatment.

Economic evaluations of predictive genetic testing: A scoping review

Predictive genetic testing can provide information about whether or not someone will develop or is likely to develop a specific condition at a later stage in life. Economic evaluation can assess the value of money for such testing. Studies on the economic evaluation of predictive genetic testing have been carried out in a variety of settings, and this research aims to conduct a scoping review of findings from these studies. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases with combined search terms, from 2019 to 2022. Relevant studies from 2013 to 2019 in a previous systematic review were also included. The study followed the recommended stages for undertaking a scoping review. A total of 53 studies were included, including 33 studies from the previous review and 20 studies from the search of databases. A significant number of studies focused on the US, UK, and Australia (34%, 23%, and 11%). The most frequently included health conditions were cancer and cardiovascular diseases (68% and 19%). Over half of the studies compared predictive genetic testing with no genetic testing, and the majority of them concluded that at least some type of genetic testing was cost-effective compared to no testing (94%). Some studies stated that predictive genetic testing is becoming more cost-effective with the trend of lowering genetic testing costs. Studies on predictive genetic testing covered various health conditions, particularly cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Most studies indicated that predictive genetic testing is cost-effective compared to no testing.

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in a Pediatric Group: A Romanian Showcase

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease marked by high levels of LDL-cholesterol. This condition has long-term clinical implications, such as cardiovascular events, that are evident during adult life. Here, we report on a single-center cross-sectional showcase study of genetic testing for FH in a Romanian pediatric group. Genetic testing for FH was performed on 20 Romanian pediatric patients, 10 boys and 10 girls, admitted with LDL-cholesterol levels over 130 mg/mL to the National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alesssandrescu-Rusescu" in 2020. Genetic testing was performed using the Illumina TruSight Cardio panel. We identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants that could explain the phenotype in 5/20 cases. The involved genes were LDLR and APOB. Clinical signs that suggest the diagnosis of FH are scarce for the pediatric patient, although it can be diagnosed early during childhood by lipid panel screening. Prevention could prove lifesaving for some of these patients.

Cost-effectiveness and Return on Investment of a Nationwide Case-Finding Program for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children in the Netherlands

Importance

The Netherlands is one of the few countries that has a long-term history of active screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), enabling health-economic analyses.

Objective

To investigate cost-effectiveness and the return on investment (ROI) of a nationwide cascade case-finding and preventive treatment program starting with identification of FH in children and treatment, from both a societal and health care perspective.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cascade case-finding and early preventive treatment were modeled to simulate the progression of disease and costs of 10-year-olds suspected of having heterozygous FH over a lifetime. The model consisted of 3 health states: alive without coronary heart disease (CHD), alive with CHD, and deceased. Mendelian randomization analysis was used to quantify the risk of a first CHD event as a function of age and total lifetime exposure to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Cost-effectiveness was defined as €20 000 ($21 800) per QALYs (quality-adjusted life-years) gained, using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). All future benefits and costs were discounted annually by 1.5% and 4%, respectively.

Interventions

The study compared 2 strategies: (1) cascade screening and initiation of treatment with statins in children (mean age, 10 years) and (2) no screening, later detection, and treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcome of interest included cost, detection, and successful treatment of FH in terms of life-years gained and QALYs. The clinical and cost outputs for each model in the 2 scenarios (early detection and treatment and later detection and treatment) were totaled to determine the overall cost-effectiveness and ROI attributed to implementation of the Dutch FH program.

Results

In this model constructed to simulate the progression of FH in 1000 hypothetical 10-year-olds, from a health care perspective, the program would gain 2.53 QALYs per person, at an additional cost of €23 365 ($25 468) (both discounted). These equated to an ICER of €9220 ($10 050) per QALY gained. From the societal perspective, the detection and treatment program were cost saving over a lifetime compared with no cascade screening for FH. The ROI for the detection and treatment program for FH in children was €8.37 ($9.12).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that the early detection and treatment program for FH in children may offer a good value for investment, being both health and cost saving. The findings and interpretations are conditional on assumptions inherent in the health economic model.

Genetic Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Is It for Everyone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipid measurements and genetic testing are the main diagnostic tools for FH screening that are available in many countries. A lipid profile is widely accessible, and genetic testing, although available worldwide, in some countries is only performed in a research context. Still FH is diagnosed late, showing lack of early screening programs worldwide.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric screening of FH was recently recognized by the European Commission Public Health Best Practice Portal as one on the best practices in non-communicable disease prevention. The early diagnosis of FH and the lowering of LDL-C values over lifespan can reduce the risk of coronary artery disease and offer health and socioeconomic gains. Current knowledge about FH shows that early detection through appropriate screening needs to become a priority in healthcare systems worldwide. Governmental programs for FH identification should be implemented to unify the diagnosis and increase patient identification.

A comparison of the Netherlands, Norway and UK familial hypercholesterolemia screening programmes with implications for target setting and the UK's NHS long term plan

We sought to determine the most efficacious and cost-effective strategy to follow when developing a national screening programme by comparing and contrasting the national screening programmes of Norway, the Netherlands and the UK. Comparing the detection rates and screening profiles between the Netherlands, Norway, the UK and constituent nations (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) it is clear that maximising the number of relatives screened per index case leads to identification of the greatest proportion of an FH population. The UK has stated targets to detect 25% of the population of England with FH across the 5 years to 2024 with the NHS Long Term Plan. However, this is grossly unrealistic and, based on pre-pandemic rates, will only be reached in the year 2096. We also modelled the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies: 1) Universal screening of 1-2-year-olds, 2) electronic healthcare record screening, in both cases coupled to reverse cascade screening. We found that index case detection from electronic healthcare records was 56% more efficacious than universal screening and, depending on the cascade screening rate of success, 36%-43% more cost-effective per FH case detected. The UK is currently trialling universal screening of 1-2-year-olds to contribute to national FH detection targets. Our modelling suggests that this is not the most efficacious or cost-effective strategy to follow. For countries looking to develop national FH programmes, screening of electronic healthcare records, coupled to successful cascade screening to blood relatives is likely to be a preferable strategy to follow.

[Advantages of Universal Early Childhood Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Germany]

Hintergrund Kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse sind die wichtigste Mortalitätsursache in der westlichen Welt. Die familiäre Hypercholesterinämie (FH) zeichnet sich durch erhöhte low-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterin- und Gesamtcholesterin-Spiegel im peripheren Blut aus. Die FH beruht zumeist auf einer genetischen Veränderung im LDL-Rezeptorgen und gehört zu den häufigsten monogenen Erkrankungen. Bei der homozygoten Form ist die Mortalität aufgrund kardiovaskulärer Ereignisse im Kindes- und Jugendalter extrem hoch. Auch die heterozygote Form der FH führt unbehandelt früh zu kardiovaskulären Ereignissen und sollte frühzeitig diagnostiziert und behandelt werden, um eine Atherosklerose zu vermeiden. Die präventive und sichere Anwendung einer medikamentösen Lipidsenkung konnte für Kinder gezeigt werden.

Methode Literatursuche in Cochrane library, Medline, NCBI databases.

Ergebnisse Anders als in europäischen Nachbarländern wurde in Deutschland im Kindesalter kein universelles Screening auf diese häufige Erkrankung etabliert, obwohl dies in den Leitlinien gefordert wird. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird die Literatur untersucht hinsichtlich der Kausalität der Erkrankung, der Therapie im Kindesalter sowie hinsichtlich des Zutreffens klassischer und modifizierter Kriterien für das Durchführen eines vorgeschlagenen universellen FH-Screenings zum 5. Geburtstag mit anschließendem reversen Kaskadenscreening bei Verwandten.

Schlussfolgerung Die Autoren plädieren für die Einführung eines universellen FH-Screenings in Deutschland zur Vorsorgeuntersuchung U9 mit 5 Jahren. Eine Analyse anhand des Goldstandards klassischer Kriterien nach Wilson und Jungner sowie anhand im zeitlichen Kontext angepasster Kriterien zeigt die Vorteile eines universellen frühkindlichen FH-Screening. Dieses kann präventiv das kardiovaskuläre Risiko absenken, das Fortschreiten der Atherosklerose verlangsamen und zu niedrigeren Inzidenzen von Schlaganfall und Herzinfarkt im Erwachsenenalter beitragen. Neben den diagnostizierten FH-Kindern können auch deren betroffene Verwandte erkannt werden.

Paediatric familial hypercholesterolaemia screening in Europe: public policy background and recommendations

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is under-recognized and under-treated in Europe leading to significantly higher risk for premature heart disease in those affected. As treatment beginning early in life is highly effective in preventing heart disease and cost-effective in these patients, screening for FH is crucial. It has therefore now been recognized by the European Commission Public Health Best Practice Portal as an effective strategy. Model programmes exist in Europe to identify young individuals with FH, which are based on cascade screening of first-degree relatives of affected individuals, universal screening for high cholesterol, opportunistic screening of high-risk individuals, or a combination of the above approaches. Recommendations presented herein to improve identification of FH emphasize that every country should have an FH screening programme. These programmes should be adapted from existing strategies to best fit the individual country's healthcare system, governments should provide financial support for these programmes and related care, and further research to optimize care and implementations should be conducted.

World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap 2022

Background:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) including myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral arterial disease continue to be major causes of premature death, disability and healthcare expenditure globally. Preventing the accumulation of cholesterol-containing atherogenic lipoproteins in the vessel wall is central to any healthcare strategy to prevent ASCVD. Advances in current concepts about reducing cumulative exposure to apolipoprotein B (apo B) cholesterol-containing lipoproteins and the emergence of novel therapies provide new opportunities to better prevent ASCVD. The present update of the World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap provides a conceptual framework for the development of national policies and health systems approaches, so that potential roadblocks to cholesterol management and thus ASCVD prevention can be overcome.

Methods:

Through a review of published guidelines and research papers since 2017, and consultation with a committee composed of experts in clinical management of dyslipidaemias and health systems research in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs), this Roadmap identifies (1) key principles to effective ASCVD prevention (2) gaps in implementation of these interventions (knowledge-practice gaps); (3) health system roadblocks to treatment of elevated cholesterol in LMICs; and (4) potential strategies for overcoming these.

Results:

Reducing the future burden of ASCVD will require diverse approaches throughout the life-course. These include: a greater focus on primordial prevention; availability of affordable cholesterol testing; availability of universal cholesterol screening for inherited dyslipidaemias; risk stratification moving beyond 10-year risk to look at lifetime risk with adequate risk estimators; wider availability of affordable cholesterol-lowering therapies which should include statins as essential medications globally; use of adequate doses of potent statin regimens; and combination therapies with ezetimibe or other therapies in order to attain and maintain robust reductions in LDL-C in those at highest risk. Continuing efforts are needed on health literacy for both the public and healthcare providers, utilising multi-disciplinary teams in healthcare and applications that quantify both ASCVD risk and benefits of treatment as well as increased adherence to therapies.

Conclusions:

The adverse effects of LDL-cholesterol and apo B containing lipoprotein exposure are cumulative and result in ASCVD. These are preventable by implementation of different strategies, aimed at efficiently tackling atherosclerosis at different stages throughout the human life-course. Preventive strategies should therefore be updated to implement health policy, lifestyle changes and when needed pharmacotherapies earlier with investment in, and a shift in focus towards, early preventive strategies that preserve cardiovascular health rather than treat the consequences of ASCVD.

The time is now: Achieving FH paediatric screening across Europe - The Prague Declaration

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common inherited metabolic disorder characterized by high cholesterol and if left untreated leads to premature cardiovascular disease, such as heart attacks. Treatment that begins early in life, particularly in childhood, is highly efficacious in preventing cardiovascular disease and cost-effective, thus early detection of FH is crucial. However, in Europe, less than 10% of people living with FH are diagnosed and even less receive life-saving treatment. The Prague Declaration is a call to action for national and European Union policymakers and decision-makers and a result of the Czech EU Presidency meeting on FH Paediatric Screening (early detection of inherited high cholesterol) at the Czech Senate in Prague on 6th September 2022. It builds on a considerable body of evidence which was discussed at the Technical Meeting under the auspices of the Slovenian EU Presidency in October 2021. The Prague meeting addressed the outstanding barriers to the systematic implementation of FH paediatric screening across Europe. In this article, we present the key points from the Prague meeting and concrete actions needed to move forward.

The Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Dyslipidemia in Children and Adolescents: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association Clinical Practice Update

Atherosclerosis begins in youth and is directly linked with the presence and severity of cardiovascular risk factors, including dyslipidemia. Thus, the timely identification and management of dyslipidemia in childhood might slow atherosclerotic progression and decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. This is particularly true for children with genetic disorders resulting in marked dyslipidemia, including familial hypercholesterolemia, which remains frequently undiagnosed. Universal and cascade screening strategies can effectively identify cases of pediatric dyslipidemia. In the clinical evaluation of children with dyslipidemia, evaluating for secondary causes of dyslipidemia, including medications and systemic disorders is essential. The first line therapy generally centres around lifestyle modifications, with dietary changes specific to the dyslipidemia phenotype. Indications for medication depend on the severity of dyslipidemia and an individualized assessment of cardiovascular risk. Despite an expanding evidence base supporting the detection and timely management of pediatric dyslipidemia, numerous knowledge gaps remain, including a sufficient evidence base to support more widespread screening, thresholds for initiation of pharmacotherapy, and treatment targets. Further studies on the most appropriate age for statin initiation and long-term safety studies of statin use in youth are also required. The most pressing matter, however, is the development of knowledge translation strategies to improve the screening and detection of lipid disorders in Canadian youth.

Integrated guidance to enhance the care of children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolaemia: Practical advice for the community clinician

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly penetrant monogenic disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration and, if untreated, leads to premature atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). At a prevalence of 1:250 individuals, with over 90% undiagnosed, recent estimates suggest that there are approximately 22 000 children and adolescents with FH in Australia and New Zealand. However, the overwhelming majority remain undetected and inadequately treated until adulthood or after their first cardiac event. The guidance in this paper aims to increase awareness about paediatric FH and provide practical advice for the diagnosis and management of FH in children and adolescents. Recommendations are given on the detection, diagnosis, assessment and management of FH in children and adolescents. Recommendations are also made on genetic testing, including counselling and the potential for universal screening programmes. Practical guidance on management includes treatment of non-cholesterol risk factors, and safe and appropriate use of LDL-C lowering therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors and lipoprotein apheresis. Models of care for FH need to be adapted to local and regional health care needs and available resources. Targeting the detection of FH as a priority in children and young adults has the potential to alter the natural history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and recognise the promise of early detection for improving long-term health outcomes. A comprehensive implementation strategy, informed by further research, including assessments of cost-benefit, will be required to ensure that this new guidance benefits all families with or at risk of FH.

A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders

PURPOSE

Understanding the value of genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders requires high-quality, methodologically robust economic evaluations. This systematic review sought to assess the methodological quality among such studies and examined opportunities for improvement.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science for economic evaluations of genetic screening/testing (2013-2019). Methodological rigor and adherence to best practices were systematically assessed using the British Medical Journal checklist.

RESULTS

Across the 47 identified studies, there were substantial variations in modeling approaches, reporting detail, and sophistication. Models ranged from simple decision trees to individual-level microsimulations that compared between 2 and >20 alternative interventions. Many studies failed to report sufficient detail to enable replication or did not justify modeling assumptions, especially for costing methods and utility values. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or calibration were rarely used to derive parameter estimates. Nearly all studies conducted some sensitivity analysis, and more sophisticated studies implemented probabilistic sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, threshold analysis, and value of information analysis.

CONCLUSION

We describe a heterogeneous body of work and present recommendations and exemplar studies across the methodological domains of (1) perspective, scope, and parameter selection; (2) use of uncertainty/sensitivity analyses; and (3) reporting transparency for improvement in the economic evaluation of genetic screening/testing.

Decision-making given surrogate outcomes

BACKGROUND

Opinions differ about the extent to which intervention research should and can directly assess the main patient-important health outcomes, what role surrogate endpoints can play, and which requirements should then apply to the scientific underpinning of clinical and policy decisions.

METHOD

In a commentary we elaborate on this and provide guidance for dealing with related dilemmas.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethical, methodological and practical reasons for decision making based on surrogate endpoints can be that (1) reaching the intended patient-important health outcome would take too long to await direct RCT-based evidence, (2) experimental conditions have limited sustainability over time; and (3) the plausibility of an intervention's clinical efficacy, given the already available evidence regarding surrogate endpoints, goes beyond equipoise. Given an expected increase of interventions with a long term patient-important health outcome perspective, dealing with surrogate endpoints will remain an important challenge. Appropriately dealing with a surrogate endpoint includes (1) the assessment of its predictive value for the intended patient-important outcome, where GRADE guidelines for assessing 'indirectness' and 'causal chain analysis' can be helpful; (2) transparency of (absence of) evidence; (3) adequately updating the 'knowledge mosaic'; (4) weighing different perspectives and values, and (5) monitoring whether adjustments need to be made. The remaining level of uncertainty must be balanced against the urgency of clinical or societal decision making and the disadvantages of postponing this. Criteria for using surrogate endpoints are suggested. Patients, citizens and policy makers can be involved in agreeing upon these criteria.

Effectiveness of cascade testing strategies in relatives for familial hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cascade testing in relatives of index cases is the most cost-effective approach to identifying people with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH); however, it is currently unclear which strategy to contact relatives would be the most effective. A systematic review was performed to quantify the effectiveness of different strategies in cascade testing of FH.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches of three electronic databases and grey literature sources were done (from inception to May 2020). Screening, data extraction and assessments of methodological quality were made independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed using random effects models. Effect measures are reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

24 non-comparative studies were included, of which 11 used a direct, 8 used an indirect, and 5 used a combination of both direct and indirect cascade strategies. The median number of new relatives with FH per known index case was approximately 1. The combination strategy resulted in the largest yields of relatives tested for FH out of those contacted (40%, 95% CI 37%-42%, 1 study) and relatives responding to testing out of those contacted (54%, 1 study); however, the direct strategy had the largest yield of index cases participating in cascade testing out of those with FH confirmed (94%, 8 studies) compared to other strategies (p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is limited; however, a combination strategy, which allows the index case to decide on method of contacting relatives, appears to lead to better yields compared to using the direct or indirect strategy.

Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia-past, present, and future

In the early 1980s, the Nobel Prize winning cellular and molecular work of Mike Brown and Joe Goldstein led to the identification of the LDL receptor gene as the first gene where mutations cause the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) phenotype. We now know that autosomal dominant monogenic FH can be caused by pathogenic variants of three additional genes (APOB/PCSK9/APOE) and that the plasma LDL-C concentration and risk of premature coronary heart disease differs according to the specific locus and associated molecular cause. It is now possible to use next-generation sequencing to sequence all exons of all four genes, processing 96 patient samples in one sequencing run, increasing the speed of test results, and reducing costs. This has resulted in the identification of not only many novel FH-causing variants but also some variants of unknown significance, which require further evidence to classify as pathogenic or benign. The identification of the FH-causing variant in an index case can be used as an unambiguous and rapid test for other family members. An FH-causing variant can be found in 20-40% of patients with the FH phenotype, and we now appreciate that in the majority of patients without a monogenic cause, a polygenic etiology for their phenotype is highly likely. Compared with those with a monogenic cause, these patients have significantly lower risk of future coronary heart disease. The use of these molecular genetic diagnostic methods in the characterization of FH is a prime example of the utility of precision or personalized medicine.

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Expanding on Mutations and Detection for Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a highly prevalent condition, predisposing individuals to premature cardiovascular disease and with a genetic basis more complex than initially thought. Advances in molecular technologies have provided novel insights into the role of next-generation-sequencing, the assessment and classification of newly found variants, the complex genotype-phenotype correlation, and the position of FH in the context of other dyslipidaemias.Areas covered: Understanding the scope of genetic determinants of FH has expanded substantially. This article reviews the current literature on the complexity that comes with this incremental knowledge and highlights the added value of genetic testing as an addition to phenotypic diagnosis of FH. Moreover, we discuss the broad genetic basis of FH, with a focus on the three main FH genes, but we also pay attention to polygenic hypercholesterolemia as well as minor and modulator genes involved in FH.Expert opinion: Both the availability and the need for genetic analysis of FH are on the rise as costs of sequencing continue to drop and new therapies require a genetic diagnosis for reimbursement. However, greater use of genetic testing requires more education of healthcare professionals, since molecular technologies will allow for rapid and accurate evaluation of large numbers of detected variants.

Challenges of Precision Medicine for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Based on Human Genome Information

Precision or personalized medicine is currently gaining a lot of attention. Clinical evidence for its effectiveness has been established based on randomized clinical trials accounting for classical risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and serum lipids. However, besides such classical risk factors, the genetic background should be considered, at least for heritable traits, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Such classical risk factors are almost always incidents that have already occurred in which it may be too late to start treatment, instead of indicators of presymptomatic state. Human genome information is associated with most traits, including ASCVD. Two methods of implementing precision medicine for ASCVD using human genome information are currently being investigated: the use of rare genetic variations that have large effect sizes and polygenic risk scores that are composed of multiple common genetic variations. This review article emphasizes the importance of clinical as well as genetic diagnoses when implementing precision medicine. Precision medicine should be considered based on comprehensive genetic analyses, encompassing rare to common genetic variations.

Advances, gaps and opportunities in the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia: overview of current and future screening and detection methods

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies reaffirm that familial hypercholesterolemia is more prevalent than initially considered, with a population frequency of approximately one in 300. The majority of patients remains unidentified. This warrants critical evaluation of existing screening methods and exploration of novel methods of detection.

RECENT FINDINGS

New public policy recommendations on the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia have been made by a global community of experts and advocates. Phenotypic tools for diagnosing index cases remain inaccurate. Genetic testing is the gold standard for familial hypercholesterolemia and a new international position statement has been published. Correction of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) for the cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may increase the precision of the phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Cascade cotesting for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a) levels provides a new opportunity to stratify risk in families. Digital technology and machine learning methods, coupled with clinical alert and decision support systems, lead the way in more efficient approaches for detecting and managing index cases. Universal screening of children, combined with child-parent cascade testing, appears to be the most effective method for underpinning a population strategy for maximizing the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia.

SUMMARY

Detection of familial hypercholesterolemia can be enhanced by optimizing current diagnostic algorithms, probing electronic health records with novel information technologies and integrating universal screening of children with cascade testing of parents and other relatives.

Management of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common monogenic disorder associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Early diagnosis and effective treatment can significantly improve prognosis. Recent advances in the field of lipid metabolism have shed light on the molecular defects in FH and new therapeutic options have emerged. A search of PubMed database up to March 2020 was performed for this review using the following keywords: “familial hypercholesterolemia,” “diagnosis,” “management,” “guideline,” “consensus,” “genetics,” “screening,” “lipid lowering agents.” The prevalence rate of heterozygous FH is approximately 1 in 200 to 250 and FH is underdiagnosed and undertreated in many parts of the world. Diagnostic criteria have been developed to aid the clinical diagnosis of FH. Genetic testing is now available but not widely used. Cascade screening is recommended to identify affected family members, and the benefits of early interventions are clear. Treatment strategy and target is currently based on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels as the prognosis of FH largely depends on the magnitude of LDL cholesterol-lowering that can be achieved by lipid-lowering therapies. Statins with or without ezetimibe are the mainstay of treatment and are cost-effective. Addition of newer medications like PCSK9 inhibitors is able to further lower LDL cholesterol levels substantially, but the cost is high. Lipoprotein apheresis is indicated in homozygous FH or severe heterozygous FH patients with inadequate response to cholesterol-lowering therapies. In conclusion, FH is a common, treatable genetic disorder, and although our understanding of this disease has improved, many challenges still remain for its optimal management.

Barriers to Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Current Perspectives on Improving Patient Care

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a frequent disorder associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Different clinical diagnosis criteria are available, and cost of genetic testing has been reduced in the last years; however, most cases are not diagnosed worldwide. Patients with FH are at high cardiovascular risk and the risk can be reduced with lifelong lifestyle and pharmacological treatment. Statins and ezetimibe are available as generic drugs in most countries reducing the cost of treatment. However, the use of high-intensity statins combined with ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, if necessary, is low for different reasons that contribute to a high number of patients not reaching LDL-C targets according to guidelines. On the other hand, cardiovascular risk varies greatly in families with FH; therefore, risk stratification strategies including cardiovascular imaging is another element to consider for improving care and management of FH. There are numerous barriers depending on the awareness, knowledge, perception of risk, management and care of patients living with FH that impact in the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder. In this contemporary review, we analyze different barriers in the diagnosis and care of patients to improve patients’ care and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and describe recent advances and strategies to improve the gaps in the care of FH, including global collaboration and advocacy.

A pediatric perspective on genomics and prevention in the twenty-first century

We present evidence from diverse disciplines and populations to identify the current and emerging role of genomics in prevention from both medical and public health perspectives as well as key challenges and potential untoward consequences of increasing the role of genomics in these endeavors. We begin by comparing screening in healthy populations (newborn screening), with testing in symptomatic populations, which may incidentally identify secondary findings and at-risk relatives. Emerging evidence suggests that variants in genes subject to the reporting of secondary findings are more common than expected in patients who otherwise would not meet the criteria for testing and population testing for variants in these genes may more precisely identify discrete populations to target for various prevention strategies starting in childhood. Conversely, despite its theoretical promise, recent studies attempting to demonstrate benefits of next-generation sequencing for newborn screening have instead demonstrated numerous barriers and pitfalls to this approach. We also examine the special cases of pharmacogenomics and polygenic risk scores as examples of ways genomics can contribute to prevention amongst a broader population than that affected by rare Mendelian disease. We conclude with unresolved questions which will benefit from future investigations of the role of genomics in disease prevention.

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in 2020: A Leading Tier 1 Genomic Application

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is caused by a major genetic defect in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) clearance pathway. Characterised by LDL-cholesterol elevation from birth, FH confers a significant risk for premature coronary artery disease (CAD) if overlooked and untreated. With risk exposure beginning at birth, early detection and intervention is crucial for the prevention of CAD. Lowering LDL-cholesterol with lifestyle and statin therapy can reduce the risk of CAD. However, most individuals with FH will not reach guideline recommended LDL-cholesterol targets. FH has an estimated prevalence of approximately 1:250 in the community. Multiple strategies are required for screening, diagnosing and treating FH. Recent publications on FH provide new data for developing models of care, including new therapies. This review provides an overview of FH and outlines some recent advances in the care of FH for the prevention of CAD in affected families. The future care of FH in Australia should be developed within the context of the National Health Genomics Policy Framework.

Comparative aspects of the care of familial hypercholesterolemia in the "Ten Countries Study"

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of information on the health care of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the health care of FH in countries of the Asia-Pacific region and Southern Hemisphere.

METHODS

A series of questionnaires were completed by key opinion leaders from selected specialist centers in 12 countries concerning aspects of the care of FH, including screening, diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment, teaching/training, and research; the United Kingdom (UK) was used as the international benchmark.

RESULTS

The estimated percentage of patients diagnosed with the condition was low (overall <3%) in all countries, compared with ∼15% in the UK. Underdetection of FH was associated with government expenditure on health care (ϰ = 0.667, P < .05). Opportunistic and systematic screening methods, and the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria were most commonly used to detect FH; genetic testing was infrequently used. Noninvasive imaging of coronary calcium and/or carotid plaques was underutilized in risk assessment. Patients with FH were generally not adequately treated, with <30% of patients achieving guideline recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets on conventional therapies. Treatment gaps included suboptimal availability and use of lipoprotein apheresis and proprotein convertase subtilsin-kexin type 9 inhibitors. A deficit of FH registries, training programs, and publications were identified in less economically developed countries. The demonstration of cost-effectiveness for cascade screening, genetic testing, and specialized treatments were significantly associated with the availability of subsidies from the health care system (ϰ = 0.571-0.800, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

We identified important gaps across the continuum of care for FH, particularly in less economically developed countries. Wider implementation of primary and pediatric care, telehealth services, patient support groups, education/training programs, research activities, and health technology assessments are needed to improve the care of patients with FH in these countries.