Aortic Dissection in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve-Associated Aneurysms

Don't skip a beat! Critical findings in imaging studies performed in adults with congenital heart disease

With ongoing advances in both medical and surgical management, the population of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) continues to grow each year and has surpassed the number of pediatric cases. These adult patients will present to adult emergency departments with increasing frequency. Adults with CHD are at increased risk of developing not only cardiovascular complications, such as aortic dissection and thromboemboli, but also abdominopelvic and neurologic processes at younger ages. These individuals are also more likely to develop less urgent but clinically significant complications including end-organ dysfunction, baffle leaks, or bleeding collateral vessels. Ultimately, imaging can play a critical role in determining the triage, diagnosis, and management of adult CHD patients. To accomplish this goal, radiologists must be able to distinguish acute and chronic complications of treated CHD from benign processes, including expected post-surgical changes or imaging artifacts. Radiologists also need to be familiar with the various long-term risks and complications associated with both treated and untreated forms of CHD, particularly those in adults with complex lesions.

Well-functioning bicuspid aortic valves should be preserved during aortic replacement for the ascending aortopathy phenotype

OBJECTIVES

Consensus has not been reached on whether or not to replace or preserve a well-functioning bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in patients undergoing aortic replacement for the ascending phenotype of BAV aortopathy. We characterize morphology, evaluate progression of aortic regurgitation or aortic stenosis, and investigate the need for aortic valve replacement in patients whose well-functioning BAV was preserved during ascending aortic replacement ≥10 years prior.

METHODS

From January 1991 to August 2011, 191 patients with a well-functioning BAV underwent supracoronary aortic replacement (113 valves were minimally repaired). Aortic morphology was evaluated, aortic regurgitation grade and transvalvular aortic gradient modeled parametrically, and survival assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 10 years.

RESULTS

Mean aortic diameter was 2.9 ± 0.53 cm at the annulus and 4.2 ± 0.55 cm at the sinuses. Mean maximum ascending diameter was 5.1 ± 0.49 cm. All patients exhibited a cusp-fusion BAV phenotype. Fifteen-year progression to severe aortic regurgitation was 3.2%. Mean aortic valve gradient began to rise 5 years postoperatively to 27 mm Hg by 14 years. Freedom from aortic valve replacement at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 95%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. Minimal valve repair was not associated with late aortic valve replacement. Fifteen-year survival was 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preserving a well-functioning BAV should be considered in carefully selected patients undergoing aortic replacement for the ascending phenotype of BAV aortopathy. The valves remain durable in the long term, with slow progression of regurgitation or stenosis, and low probability of aortic valve replacement through 10 years.

Morphological risk of acute type A aortic dissection in the mildly to moderately dilated aorta

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse and determine the role of aortic length and curvature in the pathogenesis of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with ascending aortic diameters (AADs) <5 cm.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical and imaging data of patients with ATAAD (n = 201) and ascending aortic dilation (n = 83). Thoracic aortic bending index (TABI) was used to quantify aortic curvature and analyse its role in ATAAD below the diameter risk threshold.

RESULTS

The AAD was <5.0 and <4.0 cm in 78% and 37% of patients with ATAAD, respectively. The median ascending aortic length (AAL) was 104.6 mm (Q1-Q3, 96.5-113.6 mm), and in 62.7% of patients, it was <11 cm. The median TABI was 14.99 mm/cm (Q1-Q3, 14.18-15.86 mm/cm). Patients with ATAAD and those with aortic dilation were matched for AAD, age, sex, height and other clinical factors. After matched, the dissection group had higher AALs (median, 102.9 mm; Q1-Q3, 96.0-112.5 mm vs median, 88.2 mm; Q1-Q3, 83.7-95.9 mm; P < 0.001) and TABI (median, 14.84 mm/cm; Q1-Q3, 14.06-15.83 mm/cm vs median, 13.55 mm/cm; Q1-Q3, 13.03-14.28 mm/cm; P < 0.001). According to the regression analysis, the area under the curve required to distinguish patients with ATAAD from those with aortic dilation was 0.831 in AAL, 0.837 in TABI and 0.907 when AAL was combined with TABI.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with ATAAD had higher AAL and TABI than those with aortic dilation. The combination of TABI and AAL might be a potential morphological marker for determining ATAAD risk below the current aortic diameter risk threshold.

Age is superior to aortopathy phenotype as a predictor of aortic mechanics in patients with bicuspid valve

OBJECTIVES

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy is defined by 3 phenotypes-root, ascending, and diffuse-based on region of maximal aortic dilation. We sought to determine the association between aortic mechanical behavior and aortopathy phenotype versus other clinical variables.

METHODS

From August 1, 2016, to March 1, 2023, 375 aortic specimens were collected from 105 patients undergoing elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair for BAV aortopathy. Planar biaxial data (191 specimens) informed constitutive descriptors of the arterial wall that were combined with in vivo geometry and hemodynamics to predict stiffness, stress, and energy density under physiologic loads. Uniaxial testing (184 specimens) evaluated failure stretch and failure Cauchy stress. Boosting regression was implemented to model the association between clinical variables and mechanical metrics.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mechanical metrics between the root phenotype (N = 33, 31%) and ascending/diffuse phenotypes (N = 72, 69%). Biaxial testing demonstrated older age was associated with increased circumferential stiffness, decreased stress, and decreased energy density. On uniaxial testing, longitudinally versus circumferentially oriented specimens failed at significantly lower Cauchy stress (50th [15th, 85th percentiles]: 1.0 [0.7, 1.6] MPa vs 1.9 [1.3, 3.1] MPa; P < .001). Age was associated with decreased failure stretch and stress. Elongated ascending aortas were also associated with decreased failure stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic mechanical function under physiologic and failure conditions in BAV aortopathy is robustly associated with age and poorly associated with aortopathy phenotype. Data suggesting that the root phenotype of BAV aortopathy portends worse outcomes are unlikely to be related to aberrant, phenotype-specific tissue mechanics.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves and Ascending Aorta ≥50 mm Under Surveillance

Background

Clinical outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients with ascending aortic diameters ≥50 mm who are under surveillance are poorly defined.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in BAV patients with ascending aorta ≥50 mm.

Methods

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAV adults with ascending aorta diameters ≥50 mm by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Patients were categorized into 50 to 54 mm and ≥55 mm groups. Clinical outcomes were aortic dissection (AoD), aorta surgery, surgical mortality, and all-cause death.

Results

Of 875 consecutive BAV patients (age 60 ± 13 years, 86% men, aortic diameter 51 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 50-53 mm]), 328 (37%) underwent early surgery ≤3 months from index TTE. Of the remaining 547 patients under surveillance, 496 had diameters 50 to 54 mm and 51 had diameters ≥55 mm and were collectively followed for 7.51 (IQR: 3.98-12.20) years. Of 496 patients with diameters 50 to 54 mm under surveillance, 266 (54%) underwent surgery 2.0 (IQR: 0.77-4.16) years from index TTE. AoD occurred in 9/496 (1.8%) patients for an incidence of 0.4 cases per 100 person-years, surgical mortality was 5/266 (1.9%); and ≥moderate aortic stenosis (but not aorta size) was associated with all-cause death, hazard ratio: 2.05 (95% CI: 1.32-3.20), P = 0.001. Conversely, in 547 total patients under surveillance (including 50-54 mm and ≥55 mm), both aorta size and ≥moderate aortic stenosis were associated with all-cause death (both P ≤ 0.027). AoD rate in patients ≥55 mm under surveillance was 5.9%.

Conclusions

In BAV patients with ascending aorta 50 to 54 mm under surveillance, AoD incidence is low and the overall rates of AoD and surgical mortality are similar, suggesting clinical equivalence between surgical and surveillance strategies. Conversely, patients with aortas ≥55 mm should undergo surgery. Aortic stenosis is associated with all-cause death in these patients.

A Comprehensive Review of Management Strategies for Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV): Exploring Epidemiology, Aetiology, Aortopathy, and Interventions in Light of Recent Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stands as the most prevalent congenital heart condition intricately linked to aortic pathologies encompassing aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic stenosis, aortic root dilation, and aortic dissection. The aetiology of BAV is notably intricate, involving a spectrum of genes and polymorphisms. Moreover, BAV lays the groundwork for an array of structural heart and aortic disorders, presenting varying degrees of severity. Establishing a tailored clinical approach amid this diverse range of BAV-related conditions is of utmost significance. In this comprehensive review, we delve into the epidemiology, aetiology, associated ailments, and clinical management of BAV, encompassing imaging to aortic surgery. Our exploration is guided by the perspectives of the aortic team, spanning six distinct guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted an exhaustive search across databases like PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Embase to extract relevant studies. Our review incorporates 84 references and integrates insights from six different guidelines to create a comprehensive clinical management section.

RESULTS

BAV presents complexities in its aetiology, with specific polymorphisms and gene disorders observed in groups with elevated BAV prevalence, contributing to increased susceptibility to other cardiovascular conditions. The altered hemodynamics inherent to BAV instigate adverse remodelling of the aorta and heart, thus fostering the development of epigenetically linked aortic and heart diseases. Employing TTE screening for first-degree relatives of BAV patients might be beneficial for disease tracking and enhancing clinical outcomes. While SAVR is the primary recommendation for indicated AVR in BAV, TAVR might be an option for certain patients endorsed by adept aortic teams. In addition, proficient teams can perform aortic valve repair for AR cases. Aortic surgery necessitates personalized evaluation, accounting for genetic makeup and risk factors. While the standard aortic replacement threshold stands at 55 mm, it may be tailored to 50 mm or even 45 mm based on patient-specific considerations.

CONCLUSION

This review reiterates the significance of considering the multifactorial nature of BAV as well as the need for further research to be carried out in the field.

Histopathological findings of diseased ascending aortae with clinicopathological correlation - A single-centre study of 160 cases

The most common reason for ascending aorta resection is an aneurysm or dissection. Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition in which an aneurysm is a crucial risk factor. The essential criteria for aneurysm resection include the diameter, genetic predisposition, and aortic valve disease. This study aimed to compare the histological findings in aneurysms and dissections and correlate them with clinical parameters to determine whether histopathological findings correspond with the current clinical approach. A total of 160 ascending aorta surgical specimens, separate or with an aortic valve, were collected and divided into four groups: aneurysm-tricuspid (n = 40; median 67 y), aneurysm-malformed (n = 68; median 50 y), dissection-tricuspid (n = 48; median 65.5 y), and dissection-malformed (n = 4; median 52.5 y). Male preponderance was observed in all groups; the youngest patients were in the aneurysm-malformed group. None of the specimens showed normal aortic histology. The most common finding in the aortic samples was medial degeneration, which was the most severe and most common in dissection. The mildest findings were found in the aneurysm-malformed group. Atherosclerosis was predominant and most severe in the aneurysm-tricuspid group, while only mild in both dissection groups, suggesting its protective effect against this complication. Chronic aortitis was the least common pathology, found only in the aneurysm-tricuspid group. The aortic valve was resected and examined simultaneously with the ascending aorta in 76 cases, most commonly in the aneurysm-malformed group (n = 53). Myxoid degeneration was the major finding in the tricuspid aortic valves, with calcifications in the malformed. Comparing the histopathological results with the clinical aspects, aneurysms with a malformed aortic valve seem to be managed appropriately, with the findings not reaching the severity as in patients with a tricuspid valve. In contrast, in patients with a tricuspid valve, there were more dissections than aneurysms, with a significant subset of aneurysms showing histological findings almost identical to those of dissections. Supported by histological findings, patients with a diseased ascending aorta and tricuspid aortic valve represent an underdiagnosed risk group that would benefit from earlier diagnosis and intervention to prevent dissection. There is a need to find a marker for dissection risk other than the aortic diameter.

Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is observed in 1-2% of the general population. In addition to valve-related complications (such as aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation), individuals with BAV often develop dilatation of the proximal aorta (aortic root and ascending aorta), a condition termed BAV aortopathy. The development of BAV aortopathy can occur independent of valvular alterations and can lead to aneurysm formation, aortic dissection or aortic rupture. This review aims to update the clinician with an approach to BAV aortopathy decision making in keeping with the 2022 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guideline recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ACC/AHA 2022 guidelines provide a contemporary and comprehensive approach to the diagnosis and treatment of aortic pathologies. We review the thresholds for replacement of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta along with the strength and level of evidence recommendations. We also review the various Class 2A and 2B recommendations for earlier intervention, which emphasize the importance of experienced surgeons, and multidisciplinary aortic teams (MATs).

SUMMARY

BAV aortopathy is a common and heterogenous clinical problem. The decision making around timing of intervention requires a personalized approach that is based on the aortic dimensions, valve function, rate of growth, family history, patient factors, and surgical experience within MATs.

Regional and directional delamination properties of healthy human ascending aorta and sinotubular junction

PURPOSE

Acute type A aortic dissection (AD) is a catastrophic event associated with high mortality. Biomechanics can provide an understanding of the forces that lead the initial intimal tear to propagate, resulting in aortic dissection. We previously studied the material properties of normal human aortic roots. In this study, our objective was to determine the regional and directional delamination properties of healthy human ascending aorta (AscAo) and sinotubular junction (STJ).

RESULTS

From 19 healthy donor hearts, total 107 samples from the AscAo and STJ were collected and tested along the circumferential and longitudinal directions. Specimens were subjected to uniaxial peeling testing with a manually created tear in the medial layer. The lateral AscAo subregion (greater curvature) had significantly lower delamination strength and dissection energy than anterior, medial, and posterior subregions in the longitudinal direction. Regionally, the delamination strength at AscAo was significantly lower than at STJ overall (p = 0.02) and in circumferential direction (p = 0.02) only. Directionally, the delamination strength at AscAo overall and in the anterior AscAo was significant lower in circumferential direction than longitudinal direction. Dissection energy demonstrated similar regional and directional trend as delamination strength. In addition, both dissection energy and delamination strength were correlated positively with thickness and negatively with age in the AscAo. In addition, the dissection energy was negatively related to stiffness at physiologic mean blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater curvature of the AscAo had the lowest delamination strength and dissection energy suggesting that region was most vulnerable to dissection propagation distally. Increased thickness of AscAo would be protective of dissection propagation while propagation would be more likely with increased AscAo stiffness.

Ex Vivo Analysis of an Association of Mechanical Strength of Dilated Ascending Aorta with Tissue Matrix Metalloproteinases and Cytokines

We analyzed the associations of the mechanical strength of dilated ascending aorta wall (intraoperative samples from 30 patients with non-syndromic aneurysms) with tissue MMPs and the cytokine system. Some samples were stretched to break on an Instron 3343 testing machine and the tensile strength was calculated; others were homogenized and the concentrations of MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, their inhibitors (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2), and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were determined by ELISA. Direct correlations between aortic tensile strength and concentrations of IL-10 (r=0.46), TNFα (r=0.60), and vessel diameter (r=0.67) and an inverse correlation with patient's age (r=-0.59) were revealed. Compensatory mechanisms supporting the strength of the ascending aortic aneurysm are possible. No associations of MMP-1, MMP-7, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 with tensile strength and aortic diameter were found.

Systolic reverse flow derived from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in bicuspid aortic valve is associated with aortic dilation and aortic valve stenosis: a cross sectional study in 655 subjects

BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is associated with increased risk of aortopathy. In addition to current intervention guidelines, BAV mediated changes in aortic 3D hemodynamics have been considered as risk stratification measures. We aimed to evaluate the association of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived voxel-wise aortic reverse flow with aortic dilation and to investigate the role of aortic valve regurgitation (AR) and stenosis (AS) on reverse flow in systole and diastole.

METHODS

510 patients with BAV (52 ± 14 years) and 120 patients with trileaflet aortic valve (TAV) (61 ± 11 years) and mid-ascending aorta diameter (MAAD) > 35 mm who underwent CMR including 4D flow CMR were retrospectively included. An age and sex-matched healthy control cohort (n = 25, 49 ± 12 years) was selected. Voxel-wise reverse flow was calculated in the aorta and quantified by the mean reverse flow in the ascending aorta (AAo) during systole and diastole.

RESULTS

BAV patients without AS and AR demonstrated significantly increased systolic and diastolic reverse flow (222% and 13% increases respectively, p < 0.01) compared to healthy controls and also had significantly increased systolic reverse flow compared to TAV patients with aortic dilation (79% increase, p < 0.01). In patients with isolated AR, systolic and diastolic AAo reverse flow increased significantly with AR severity (c = - 83.2 and c = - 205.6, p < 0.001). In patients with isolated AS, AS severity was associated with an increase in both systolic (c = - 253.1, p < 0.001) and diastolic (c = - 87.0, p = 0.02) AAo reverse flow. Right and left/right and non-coronary fusion phenotype showed elevated systolic reverse flow (> 17% increase, p < 0.01). Right and non-coronary fusion phenotype showed decreased diastolic reverse flow (> 27% decrease, p < 0.01). MAAD was an independent predictor of systolic (p < 0.001), but not diastolic, reverse flow (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

4D flow CMR derived reverse flow associated with BAV was successfully captured even in the absence of AR or AS and in comparison to TAV patients with aortic dilation. Diastolic AAo reverse flow increased with AR severity while AS severity strongly correlated with increased systolic reverse flow in the AAo. Additionally, increasing MAAD was independently associated with increasing systolic AAo reverse flow. Thus, systolic AAo reverse flow may be a valuable metric for evaluating disease severity in future longitudinal outcome studies.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Clinical implications of the biomechanics of bicuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which affects up to 2% of the general population, results from the abnormal fusion of the cusps of the aortic valve. Patients with BAV are at a higher risk for developing aortic dilatation, a condition known as bicuspid aortopathy, which is associated with potentially life-threatening sequelae such as aortic dissection and aortic rupture. Although BAV biomechanics have been shown to contribute to aortopathy, their precise impact is yet to be delineated. Herein, we present the latest literature related to BAV biomechanics. We present the most recent definitions and classifications for BAV. We also summarize the current evidence pertaining to the mechanisms that drive bicuspid aortopathy. We highlight how aberrant flow patterns can contribute to the development of aortic dilatation. Finally, we discuss the role cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can have in assessing and managing patient with BAV and bicuspid aortopathy.

The association between cardiac magnetic resonance-derived aortic stiffness parameters and aortic dilation in young adults with bicuspid aortic valve: With and without coarctation of aorta

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with progressive aortic dilation. Studies in aortopathies have shown a correlation between increased aortic stiffness and aortic dilation. We aimed to evaluate aortic stiffness measures as predictors of progressive aortic dilation by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in BAV patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 49 patients with BAV (median age 21.1 years at first CMR visit) with ≥2 CMR at the Wisconsin Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program (WAtCH). Circumferential aortic strain, distensibility, and β-stiffness index were obtained from CMR-derived aortic root cine imaging, and aortic dimensions were measured at aortic root and ascending aorta. A linear mixed-model and logistic regression were used to identify important predictors of progressive aortic dilation.

Results

Over a median of 3.8 years follow-up, the annual growth rates of aortic root and ascending aorta dimensions were 0.25 and 0.16 mm/year, respectively. Aortic strain and distensibility decreased while β-stiffness index increased with age. Aortic root strain and distensibility were associated with progressive dilation of the ascending aorta. Baseline aortic root diameter was an independent predictor of >1 mm/year growth rate of the aortic root (adjusted OR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.03-1.74, p = 0.028). Most patients (61 %) had coexisting coarctation of aorta. Despite the higher prevalence of hypertension in patients with aortic coarctation, hypertension or coarctation had no effect on baseline aorta dimensions, stiffness, or progressive aortic dilation.

Conclusion

Some CMR-derived aortic stiffness parameters correlated with progressive aortic dilation in BAV and should be further investigated in larger and older BAV cohorts.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Interventions in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

Interventions in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) focus on surgical and percutaneous interventions in light of rapidly evolving ACHD clinical practice. To bring rigour to our process and amplify the cumulative nature of evidence ACHD care we used the ADAPTE process; we systematically adjudicated, updated, and adapted existing guidelines by Canadian, American, and European cardiac societies from 2010 to 2020. We applied this to interventions related to right and left ventricular outflow obstruction, tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation, aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve, atrioventricular canal defects, Ebstein anomaly, complete and congenitally corrected transposition, and patients with the Fontan operation. In addition to tables indexed to evidence, clinical flow diagrams are included for each lesion to facilitate a practical approach to clinical decision-making. Excluded are recommendations for pacemakers, defibrillators, and arrhythmia-directed interventions covered in separate designated documents. Similarly, where overlap occurs with other guidelines for valvular interventions, reference is made to parallel publications. There is a paucity of high-level quality of evidence in the form of randomized clinical trials to support guidelines in ACHD. We accounted for this in the wording of the strength of recommendations put forth by our national and international experts. As data grow on long-term follow-up, we expect that the evidence driving clinical practice will become increasingly granular. These recommendations are meant to be used to guide dialogue between clinicians, interventional cardiologists, surgeons, and patients making complex decisions relative to ACHD interventions.

Location of Aortic Enlargement and Risk of Type A Dissection at Smaller Diameters

BACKGROUND

Previous work has demonstrated that more than one-half of acute type A aortic dissections (ATADs) occur at a maximal aortic diameter (MAD) of <5.5 cm. However, no analysis has investigated whether ATAD risk at smaller MADs is more common with modest dilation of the aortic root (AR) or supracoronary ascending aorta (AA) in patients without genetically triggered aortopathy.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine if the segment of modest aortic dilation affects risk of ATAD.

METHODS

Using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) database from May 1996 to October 2016, we identified 667 ATAD patients with MAD <5.5 cm. Patients were stratified by location of the largest proximal aortic segment (AR or AA). Patients with known genetically triggered aortopathy were excluded. MADs at time of dissection were compared between AR and AA groups. Secondary outcomes included operation, postoperative outcomes, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Of patients with ATAD at an MAD <5.5 cm, 79.5% (n = 530) were in the AA group and 20.5% (n = 137) in the AR group. Modestly dilated ARs (median MAD 4.6 cm [IQR: 4.1-5.0 cm]) dissected at a significantly smaller diameter than modestly dilated AAs (median MAD 4.8 cm [IQR: 4.4-5.1 cm]) (P < 0.01). AR patients were significantly younger than AA patients (58.5 ± 13.0 years vs 63.2 ± 13.3 years; P < 0.01) and more commonly male (78% vs 65%; P < 0.01). Postoperative and long-term outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ATAD appears to occur at smaller diameters in patients with modest dilation in the AR vs the AA (4.6 vs 4.8 cm). These findings may have implications for future consensus guidelines regarding the management of patients with aortic disease.

Natural history of bicuspid aortic valves and ascending aortic aneurysms: Aortic center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The American Association of Thoracic Surgery published guidelines in 2018 encouraging regular surveillance rather than surgical intervention for ascending aortic aneurysms under 5.5 cm in both bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. Since then, there have been limited studies reporting outcomes, especially by valve type. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes including survival and aortic events in a cohort of BAV and TAV patients with ascending aortic aneurisms followed conservatively with routine computerized tomography  (CT) surveillance per current guidelines.

METHODS

We followed 188 patients in our clinic between 2016 and 2019; 147 had two or more CT scans which allowed measurement of aortic growth. Echocardiogram data was evaluated for each patient. We identified similar cohorts of BAV (n = 32) and TAV (n = 64) patients matched by age, sex, hypertension, smoking history, family history of aortic disease, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the unmatched cohorts were performed.

RESULTS

The mean aneurysm size was 4.3 ± 0.58 cm with 95% confidence interval (3.14, 5.46). This did not differ between BAV and TAV patients, nor did aneurysm growth rates. Overall adverse event rate (dissection, rupture, and death) was low for the entire cohort (BAV group, 3% and TAV group, 3.5%). Survival at 10 years for the entire cohort was 90 ± 32%.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of aortic valve type, there was a similar natural history and low adverse event rate. In the absence of risk factors, conservative management can be accomplished with minimal risk to the patient.

Ascending aorta mechanics and dimensions in aortopathy – from science to application

The ascending aorta has a unique microstructure and biomechanical properties that allow it to absorb energy during systole and return energy during diastole (Windkessel effect). Derangements in aortic architecture can result in changes to biomechanics and inefficiencies in function. Ultimately biomechanical failure may occur resulting in aortic dissection or rupture. By measuring aortic biomechanics with either in vivo or ex vivo methods, one may be able to predict tissue failure in patients with aortic disease such as aneurysms. An understanding of the biomechanical changes that lead to these tissue-level failures may help guide therapy, disease surveillance, surgical intervention, and aid in the development of new treatments for this deadly condition.

Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure

Background  A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis–containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes.

Methods  From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation ( n  = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure ( n  = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs.

Results  Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all p  < 0.02) versus receiving a Bentall procedure. Operative mortality was 0.16% (reimplantation, 1/448, 0.22%; Bentall 0/195, 0%). After reimplantation, 8-year freedom from severe AR was 95% and 10-year freedom from reintervention was 98%. Ten-year survival was 95%. Higher preoperative AR grade ( p  < 0.0001) but not larger root diameter ( p  = 0.3) was associated with higher grade of late regurgitation after a reimplantation procedure. Among propensity-matched patients, reimplantation compared with a Bentall was associated with similar 10-year survival (89% vs. 94%), but more late AR (8-year freedom from severe AR: 93% vs. 99.9%) and greater early reduction in, but similar late, left ventricular mass (104 vs. 105 g•m ^–2 at 8 years).

Conclusion  Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

Demographic and Regional Trends of Mortality in Patients With Aortic Dissection in the United States, 1999 to 2019

Background

Aortic dissection (AoD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, the burden of AoD mortality is not well characterized, and contemporary data and mortality trends in different demographic and geographic subgroups have not been described.

Methods and Results

Trends in AoD mortality were assessed using a cross‐sectional analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide‐Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Crude and age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 1 million people with associated annual percent changes were determined. Joinpoint regression was used to assess trends in the overall sample and different demographic (sex, race and ethnicity, age) and geographic subgroups. Between 1999 and 2019, a total of 86 855 AoD deaths occurred within the United States. In the overall population, AAMR was 21.1 per 1 million in 1999 and 21.3 in 2019. After an initial decline in mortality, AAMR increased from 2012 to 2019, with an associated annual change of 2.5% (95% CI, 1.8–3.3). Men, older adults (aged ≥85 years), and non‐Hispanic Black or African American individuals had higher mortality rates than women, younger individuals, and other racial and ethnic individuals, respectively. Despite lower AAMRs throughout the study period, women experienced greater increases in AAMR from 2012 to 2019 compared with men. Similarly, non‐Hispanic Black or African American individuals had a pronounced increase in AAMR from 2012 to 2019.

Conclusions

Despite an initial decline in AoD mortality, the mortality rate has been increasing from 2012 to 2019, with pronounced increases among women and non‐Hispanic Black or African American individuals.

Imaging and Surveillance of Chronic Aortic Dissection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

All patients surviving an acute aortic dissection require continued lifelong surveillance of their diseased aorta. Late complications, driven predominantly by chronic false lumen degeneration and aneurysm formation, often require surgical, endovascular, or hybrid interventions to treat or prevent aortic rupture. Imaging plays a central role in the medical decision-making of patients with chronic aortic dissection. Accurate aortic diameter measurements and rigorous, systematic documentation of diameter changes over time with different imaging equipment and modalities pose a range of practical challenges in these complex patients. Currently, no guidelines or recommendations for imaging surveillance in patients with chronic aortic dissection exist. In this document, we present state-of-the-art imaging and measurement techniques for patients with chronic aortic dissection and clarify the need for standardized measurements and reporting for lifelong surveillance. We also examine the emerging role of imaging and computer simulations to predict aortic false lumen degeneration, remodeling, and biomechanical failure from morphological and hemodynamic features. These insights may improve risk stratification, individualize contemporary treatment options, and potentially aid in the conception of novel treatment strategies in the future.

Heart Failure Associated With Ventricular Septal Defect, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Non-stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve, and Patent Foramen Ovale

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) and bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are the two most common congenital heart defects. BAV may occur sporadically or in association with other cardiac malformations. VSDs have decreased incidence in the adult population due to spontaneous closure. Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) can be associated with these conditions but the simultaneous association of these defects has never been reported in the literature. We report the case of a 35-year-old male patient with persistent VSD, BAV, and PFO associated with new-onset heart failure and MVP. We aim to study the association between the coexistence of structural heart malformations and the increased risk of heart failure.

International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes. ©  2021 Jointly between the RSNA, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. All rights reserved. Keywords: Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Aortopathy, Nomenclature, Classification.

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

Relationship between indexed aortic area and aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm²/m. We sought to assess the utility of the IAA in identifying at-risk BAV-associated TAAs with abnormal IAA, albeit with sub-threshold aortic diameter.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm²/m, median IAAs corresponding to aortic diameters <4.0 cm, 4.0-4.5 cm, 4.5-5.0 cm, 5.0-5.5 cm and >5.5 cm, and median aortic diameters corresponding to an abnormal IAA.

Results

50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm²/m had diameters smaller than the 5.5 cm guideline cut-off for surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Significant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm²/m, whilst not fulfilling the size criteria indicating aortic surgery in contemporary guidelines. Further analysis of IAA in larger BAV cohorts is necessary to clarify its role in patient selection and optimal timing for prophylactic aortic replacement.

Rapid ascending aorta stiffening in bicuspid aortic valve on serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation: comparison with connective tissue disorders

BACKGROUND

Aortic stiffness has been shown to be abnormal in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and is considered a component of the aortopathy associated with this condition. Progressive aortic stiffening associated with aging has been previously described in normal adults. However, it is not known if aging related aortic stiffening occurs at the same rate in BAV patients. We determined the longitudinal rate of decline in segmental distensibility in BAV patients using serial cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies, and compared to previously published results from a group of patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD).

METHODS

A retrospective review of CMR and clinical data on children and adults with BAV (n = 49, 73% male; 23 ± 11 years) with at least two CMRs (total 98 examinations) over a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range 1-9 years) was performed to measure aortic distensibility at the ascending (AAo) and descending aorta (DAo). Longitudinal changes in aortic stiffness were assessed using linear mixed-effects modeling. The comparison group of CTD patients had a similar age and gender profile (n = 50, 64% male; 20.6 ± 12 years).

RESULTS

Compared to CTD patients, BAV patients had a more distensible AAo early in life but showed a steeper decline in distensibility on serial examinations [mean 10-year decline in AAo distensibility (× 10-3 mmHg-1) 2.4 in BAV vs 1.3 in CTD, p = 0.005]. In contrast, the DAo was more distensible in BAV patients throughout the age spectrum, and DAo distensibility declined with aging at a rate similar to CTD patients [mean 10 year decline in DAo distensibility (× 10-3 mmHg-1) 0.3 in BAV vs 0.4 in CTD, p = 0.58].

CONCLUSIONS

On serial CMR measurements, AAo distensibility declined at significantly steeper rate in BAV patients compared to a comparison group with CTDs, while DAo distensibility declined at similar rates in both groups. These findings offer new mechanistic insights into the differing pathogenesis of the aortopathy seen in BAV and CTD patients.

New indicators for systematic assessment of aortic morphology: a narrative review

In order to prevent the occurrence of aortic adverse events in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, preventive surgery is the sole option in case of large aneurysm. Identifying high-risk patients timely and accurately requires effective predictive indicators of aortic adverse events and accurate risk stratification thresholds. Absolute diameter measured after a single imaging examination, which has been used as the predictive indicator for decades, has been proved to be ineffective for risk stratification in moderately dilated aorta. Previously, new indicators combining absolute diameters with personalized parameters have been reported to show better predictive power of aortic adverse events than absolute diameters by correcting the effect of these parameters on the diameters. Meanwhile, combining three-dimensional parameters to formulate risk stratification thresholds not only may characterize the aortic risk morphology more precisely, but also predict aortic adverse events more accurately. These new indicators may provide more systematic assessment methods of patients’ risk, formulate more personalized intervention strategies for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, and also provide a basis for researchers to develop more accurate and effective risk thresholds. We also highlight that the algorithm obtained by combining multiple indicators may be a better choice compared with single indicator, but this still requires the support of more evidence. Due to the particularity of syndromic aortic disease, whether these new indicators can be used for its risk stratification is still uncertain. Therefore, the scope of this manuscript does not include this kind of disease.

Thoracic Aortic Dissection in Tetralogy of Fallot: A Review of the National Inpatient Sample Database

Background

Thoracic aortic aneurysm is common in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF); the incidence of thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) is unknown, but generally considered to be uncommon. The purpose of this study was to determine incidence and risk factors for TAD in TOF patients.

Methods and Results

This work is a retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for cases of ascending TAD among all hospital admissions in adults with TOF, 2000–2014. Of 18 353 admissions in TOF patients, 11 (0.06%; 6 per 10 000 admissions) of these were TAD‐related admissions. For the TAD‐related admissions, mean age was 49.8±7.2 years; aortic surgical interventions were performed during 8 of the admissions, and overall in‐hospital mortality was 45% (5 of 11). Risk factors associated with TAD‐related admission were age >60 years (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.23–3.25; P=0.013), male sex (odds ratio, 6.91; 95% CI, 4.85–8.54; P<0.001), and hypertension (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.06–3.19; P=0.037).

Conclusions

This is the first population‐based study of TAD outcomes in patients with TOF, and it showed a low risk of TAD in this population. This has important clinical implication with regard to surveillance and surgical intervention. Given that prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysm is higher in TOF patients compared with the general population; therefore, making clinical decisions based on outcomes data and practice guidelines derived from patients with degenerative and bicuspid aortic valve–related aortopathies may lead to overtreatment. Further studies are required to better understand the pathobiology of this disease in order to make evidence‐based recommendations for surveillance and treatment.

The science of BAV aortopathy

The aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is an epidemiologically relevant source of chronic and acute aortic disease (aneurysm and dissection). However, its pathogenesis is still the object of scientific uncertainties and debates. Indeed, the mechanisms determining the diseases of the ascending aorta in BAV patients are most likely complex and multifactorial, i.e. resulting from variable modes of interplay between genetic and hemodynamic factors. Although few scientific studies have so far taken into adequate account this complexity, leaving the precise sequence of pathogenetic events still undiscovered, the accumulated evidence from previous research approaches have at least brought about important insights. While genetic studies have so far identified variants relevant to either valve malformation or aortic complications (including those in the genes NOTCH1, TGFBR2, ACTA2, GATA5, NKX2.5, SMAD6, ROBO4), however each explaining not more than 5% of the study population, other investigations have thoroughly described both the flow features, with consequent forces acting on the arterial wall (including skewed flow jet direction, rotational flow, wall shear stress), and the main changes in the molecular and cellular wall structure (including extracellular matrix degradation, smooth muscle cell changes, oxidative stress, unbalance of TGF-β signaling, aberrant endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition). All of this evidence, together with the recognition of the diverse phenotypes that the aortopathy can assume in BAV patients, holding possible prognostic significance, is reviewed in this chapter. The complex and multifaceted body of knowledge resulting from clinical and basic science studies on BAV aortopathy has the potential to importantly influence modes of clinical management of this disease in the near future.

Surgical repair of bicuspid aortopathy at small diameters: Clinical and institutional factors

OBJECTIVE

Bicuspid aortic valve is a common risk factor for thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. Guidelines for elective ascending aortic intervention (AAI) in bicuspid aortic valve are derived from limited evidence, and the extent of practice variation due to patient and provider characteristics is unknown. Using data from 2 large cardiovascular registries, we investigated factors that influence decisions for AAI.

METHODS

All bicuspid aortic valve cases with known aortic diameters and surgical status were included. We used multivariable logistic regression to profile predictors of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) or AVR+AAI, stratified by patient characteristics, surgical indications, and institution.

RESULTS

We studied 2861 subjects at 18 institutions from 1996 to 2015. The median aortic diameter of patients who underwent AVR+AAI varied widely across institutions (39-52 mm). Aortic diameters were <45 mm in 38% of patients undergoing AVR+AAI. Patients who underwent AAI at <45 mm, compared with those managed nonoperatively, were younger (54 ± 13 vs 61 ± 15 years; P < .001) with more frequent aortic stenosis (53% vs 28%; P < .001) and regurgitation (52% vs 18%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and institutional factors influence the timing of AAI and are associated with significant variability in ascending aortic diameter at AAI across institutions. More than one third of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve undergo AAI at aortic diameters <45 mm. Long-term outcomes of this subgroup of patients, who may manifest earlier and more severe disease, are needed to determine the risk-benefit ratio of routine aortic interventions at smaller diameters.

Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in <50 Years Old Patients - Where is the Evidence?

Aortic valve disease is one of the most common valvular heart diseases in the cardiovascular category. Surgical replacement of the diseased aortic valve remains the definitive intervention for most diseases.

There is a clear consensus that in young patients who require aortic valve replacement, a mechanical prosthesis is the preferred choice due to its durable prosthesis without fear of wear and tear over time. However, this comes at the expense of increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events; in addition, there is a lack of strict evidence in using bioprosthesis in patients younger than 50 years. The objective of this review article is to assess the current evidence behind using bioprosthetic aortic valve in this young cohort.