Safety and Feasibility of Lung Resection After Immunotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Tumors

Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery

PURPOSE

Advances in primary lung cancer drug therapy have extended patients' survival, including patients with stage IV disease. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of salvage surgery following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in primary lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 2050 primary lung cancer surgeries performed at our institution between 2012 and 2022. The study included patients who underwent salvage surgery for unresectable lesions that became resectable or localized residual lesions after treatment. We investigated patients' clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic responses, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified eight cases of salvage surgery after TKI treatment and eight cases after ICI treatment. Five patients experienced early recurrence after surgery; however, the long-term outcome in the post-TKI group was favorable, with a median overall survival (OS) of 66 (range: 28-80) months. Postoperative recurrence was confined to local lymph node recurrence in one patient in the post-ICI group. Despite the relatively short observation period, the long-term prognosis remained promising, with a median OS of 18.7 (range: 9.7-55.8) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery after TKI or ICI treatment can be safely performed, and the OS may be favorable.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sleeve Resection

The prognosis of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor despite the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as it has been shown to improve 5-year absolute benefit survival by only 5%. Recently, neoadjuvant immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), combined with chemotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. For NSCLC invading the main bronchus, sleeve resection has become the preferred modality to avoid pneumonectomy and reserve more cardiac or pulmonary function and to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, there has been a paucity of evidence to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy on bronchial-vascular reconstruction owing to the limited number of patients treated by sleeve lobectomy. Despite promising initial results, key knowledge gaps remain, including the impact on bronchial-vascular reconstruction, biomarkers predictive of ICI response, and the potential for specific perioperative complications associated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in the context of sleeve resection. This review summarizes the latest literature evidence on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy approaches to address the unmet needs of sleeve resection of NSCLC treatment, describes the biomarkers predictive of ICI responses, and perioperative outcomes of sleeve resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

[Surgical and pathological consequences of preoperative immunotherapy in onco-urology]

INTRODUCTION

Patients treated with immunotherapy might need surgical procedures in addition to the medical treatment. The main indications are cytoreductive nephrectomy, cystectomy (as part of clinical trials) and metastasis removal in some oligometastatic patients. This study aims to assess the feasibility of surgery for patients treated by immunotherapy and describes the histological modifications found in the pathological analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, monocentric study. We included all patients operated for a urologic cancer and previously treated with systemic immunotherapy between February 2018 and June 2022. We compared this population with a control group of patients treated with surgery without having previous immunotherapy. Patients were compared according to the cancer type, age and sex. We compared perioperative complications. We performed an analysis for evaluation of the peri-tumoral inflammatory infiltration.

RESULTS

We included 50 patients in this study. The two groups were comparable in age (63.7 vs. 63.3years old, P=0.95) and sex (4 and 6 women in the first and second group). The peroperatory complication rate was comparable (20% vs. 16%, P=1). The mean bleeding volume was comparable (664 vs. 629mL; P=0.89). The postoperative complication rate (48% vs. 56%; P=0.78) and their grade (Clavien III-IV 8% vs. 24%; P=0.24) were comparable. The anatomopathological analysis described the same rate and intensity of peri-tumoral inflammatory infiltrate (96% vs. 96%; P=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative immunotherapy does not appear to be associated with increased surgical difficulty and perioperative complications. Blind histological analysis of the surgical specimens did not reveal any specific features related to pre operative immunotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Grade 3 HAS.

Influence of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy-Chemotherapy on Perioperative Outcomes in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the perioperative outcomes for patients who had locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) and chemotherapy versus a matched cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone.

METHODS

A single-center non-randomized phase 2 trial was undertaken with locally advanced (cT3-4 and/or N+) EAC, and 49 patients completed neoadjuvant avelumab + docetaxel, cisplatin, 5FU (DCF) and esophagectomy between February 2018 and February 2020. These patients were matched with contemporary patients (January 2018 to June 2020) who met the inclusion criteria but received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (NAC) with a comparable docetaxel-based therapy. The postoperative outcomes then were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

For this study, 99 patients with locally advanced EAC underwent esophagectomy and met the enrolment criteria. Of these patients, 50 received NAC alone and 49 received IO + NAC. Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and clinical stage were comparable between the two groups. Operative approach and rate of minimally invasive esophagectomy (~ 60%) were similar in the two groups. For the NAC-alone and IO + NAC groups, the respective overall and major complication rates were similar between the two groups (50% vs. 51% [p = 0.91] and 20% vs. 26% [p = 0.44], respectively), with concordant rates for anastomotic leak (6 [12%] vs. 6 [12%]; p = 0.86) and respiratory complications (13 [26%] vs. 11 [22%]; p = 0.68). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of hospital length of stay or 30- and 90-day mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

The addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma does not appear to alter perioperative short-term outcomes significantly after esophagectomy.

Updated review of perioperative treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer in the new era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: past, present, and future

The perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should control both local and microscopic systemic disease, because the survival of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection alone has been dismal except in stage IA patients. One way to improve surgical outcome is the administration of chemotherapy before or after the surgical procedure. During the last two decades, many clinical studies have focused on developing optimal adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens that can be combined with surgical treatment and/or radiotherapy. Based on the results of those clinical studies, multimodality therapy has been considered to be an appropriate treatment approach for locally advanced NSCLC patients. When nodal involvement is discovered postoperatively, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has conferred an overall survival benefit. More recently, neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant use of immunotherapy adding to the cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been revealed to improve survival of the patients with locally advanced NSCLC in many large-scale clinical trials; although, optimal treatment strategies are still evolving.

Salvage extended surgery after immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the surgical outcomes of salvage extended surgery after definitive medical treatment with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for locally advanced or unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The subjects of this single-center retrospective analysis were 14 patients who underwent salvage surgery after ICI treatment between May, 2017 and April, 2023 at our institute. We reviewed the comprehensive surgical outcomes, including operative procedures, intraoperative findings, and postoperative morbidities. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier estimation.

RESULTS

The initial clinical stage before medical treatment (c-stage) was stage III in eight patients, stage IV in five patients, and one patient had postoperative lung cancer recurrence. The indications for surgery were as follows: local control for relapse or residual tumor in ten patients and discontinuation of systemic therapy because of treatment-related complications in four patients. The surgical modes were segmentectomy (n = 1), lobectomy (n = 4), bilobectomy (n = 3), pneumonectomy (n = 6), and bronchoplasty (n = 7). Grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidities were observed in six patients, including only one case of 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series demonstrated that the surgical outcome of salvage extended surgery after ICI therapy may be positive with careful selection of the procedure and indication.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy on Surgical Outcomes and Time to Radiation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between immunotherapy-containing and standard chemotherapy regimens with treatment delays and postoperative complications in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. The effect of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was compared.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared 139 women treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) from August 2021 to September 2022 with 287 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone prior to July 2021 and underwent surgery. Baseline characteristics, time to treatments, and surgical complications were compared using two-sample non-parametric tests. Linear regression evaluated association of irAEs with time to surgery and radiation. Logistic regression identified factors associated with surgical complications.

RESULTS

Age, body mass index, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and mastectomy rates were similar among cohorts. No clinically relevant difference in time from end of neoadjuvant treatment to surgery was observed [KEYNOTE-522: median 32 (IQR 27, 43) days; non-KEYNOTE-522: median 31 (IQR 26, 37) days; P = 0.048]. Time to radiation did not differ (P = 0.7). A total of 26 patients (9%; non-KEYNOTE-522) versus 11 (8%; KEYNOTE-522) experienced postoperative complications (P = 0.6). In the KEYNOTE-522 cohort, 59 (43%) of 137 patients experienced 82 irAEs; 40 (68%) required treatment. Older age (P = 0.018) and ASA class 4 (P = 0.007) were associated with delays to surgery after adjusting for clinical factors. Experiencing ≥ 1 irAE was associated with delay to radiation (P = 0.029). IrAEs were not associated with surgical complications (P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no clinically meaningful difference between times to surgery/adjuvant radiation or postoperative complications and type of preoperative chemotherapy. IrAEs were associated with delay to adjuvant radiation but not with postoperative complications or delay to surgery.

Lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were to assess the outcomes of lung resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with nonoperative treatment and to identify prognostic factors associated with survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery (2010-2022) after initial nonoperative treatment at a single institution were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Exclusion criteria included metachronous cancer, planned neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery for diagnostic or palliative indications. Cox models were constructed for overall survival and event-free survival. Survival of patients with stage IV disease was compared with survival of a nonstudy cohort who did not undergo surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. Initial clinical stage was early stage in 16%, locoregionally advanced in 25%, and metastatic in 59% of patients. The indication for surgery was recurrence in 18%, local persistent disease in 23%, oligoprogression in 22%, and local control of oligometastatic disease in 38% of patients. Grade 3 or greater complications occurred in 5% of patients; 90-day mortality was 3%. Three-year event-free survival and overall survival were 39% and 73%, respectively. Male sex and lymphovascular invasion were associated with shorter event-free survival and overall survival; younger age and prior radiation therapy were associated with shorter overall survival. Patients with stage IV disease who received salvage lung resection had better overall survival than similar patients who received subsequent systemic therapy and no surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected, heterogeneous population, lung resection after initial nonoperative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer was safe. Surgery as local consolidative therapy was associated with encouraging outcomes and should be considered for these patients.

Analysis of surgical complexity and short-term prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients: neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy improves survival benefits in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but increases tissue density, presenting challenges for surgeons.

Objectives

To compare the differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI).

Design/methods

This study enrolled 106 patients underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2020 and December 2023 at the National Cancer Center of China. Differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between the two neoadjuvant therapy cohorts were evaluated. The pathological indicators such as pathological response rate and lymph node upstaging/downstaging were then analyzed.

Results

In total, 33 patients underwent NTT and 73 underwent NCI preoperatively. Patients who received NTT showed a higher minimally invasive surgery rate (84.8% versus 53.4%, p < 0.01), shorter operative time (144 versus 184 min, p < 0.01), lower conversion rate (3.3% versus 17.8%, p = 0.03), less postoperative drainage (day 3: 140 versus 200 mL, p = 0.03), and lower incidence of postoperative complications including arrhythmias (6.1% versus 26%, p = 0.02). The pathological response rate in the NTT and NCI groups was 70% and 75%, respectively, with the latter group showing a higher complete pathological response rate. The two groups had no significant differences in major pathological response and lymph node pathological response rate.

Conclusion

Patients who received NTT presented fewer surgical challenges for surgeons and had better surgical outcomes than those who received NCI therapy, with comparable pathological response rates between the two cohorts. Accordingly, NTT is the preferred induction regimen for patients harboring mutation status.

Preliminary experience of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Previously, stage-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered inoperable. In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown encouraging efficacy in the treatment of advanced stage NSCLC in several trials. However, the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in treating stage-IIIB NSCLC are still unknown. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the outcomes of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for stage-IIIB NSCLC.

Methods

Thirty patients with stage-IIIB NSCLC who were treated at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Renji Hospital from January 2019 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was administered prior to surgery. The curative effect was evaluated by imaging and pathological examinations.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the patients after neoadjuvant therapy evaluated by imaging studies were 70% and 86.7%, respectively. Of the 30 patients, 19 (63%) underwent surgical resection, in which all achieved a complete R0 resection. The median operative time was 168 minutes (range, 75-295 minutes), and the average intraoperative blood loss was 215.3±258.4 mL. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range, 4-59 days). The major pathological response (MPR) rate was 73.7% (14/19), and the pathological complete response rate was 47.4% (9/19); 2/30 patients (6.7%) had postoperative complications, including two who developed bronchopleural fistulas and one mortality, from a postoperative pulmonary infection. The treatment-related adverse reactions were mainly grades 1-2. Only two patients had grade 3 anemia, and no grade 4 adverse reactions were observed.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy combined with surgery in patients with stage-IIIB NSCLC is safe and feasible. The patient outcomes and optimal number of neoadjuvant treatment cycles need to be explored and studied further.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Following Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Resectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Among Chinese Populations: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but may pose greater technical challenges for surgery. This study aims to assess the feasibility and oncological effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for resectable stage III NSCLC after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

Initial stage IIIA-IIIB NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy undergoing either VATS or open lobectomy at 6 medical centers during 2019-2023 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes and 2-year survival was analyzed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to balance patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the total 143 patients, PSM yielded 62 cases each for VATS and OPEN groups. Induction-related adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. VATS showed a 14.5% conversion rate. Notably, VATS decreased numeric rating scales for postoperative pain, shortened chest tube duration (5[4-7] vs. 6[5-8] days, P = .021), reduced postoperative comorbidities (21.0% vs. 37.1%, P = .048), and dissected less N1 lymph nodes (5[4-6] vs. 7[5-9], P = .005) compared with thoracotomy. Even when converted, VATS achieves perioperative outcomes equivalent to thoracotomy. Additionally, over a median follow-up of 29.5 months, VATS and thoracotomy demonstrated comparable 2-year recurrence-free survival (77.20% vs. 73.73%, P = .640), overall survival (87.22% vs. 88.00%, P = .738), cumulative incidences of cancer-related death, and recurrence patterns. Subsequent subgroup comparisons and multivariate Cox analysis likewise revealed no statistical difference between VATS and thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

VATS is a viable and effective option for resectable stage III NSCLC patients following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, leading to decreased surgical-related pain, earlier chest tube removal, reduced postoperative complications, and similar survival outcomes compared to thoracotomy.

The efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy followed by McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

In immunotherapy, antibodies are activated to block immune checkpoints, resist tumour immunosuppression, shrink tumours and prevent a recurrence. As the science behind tumour immunotherapy continuously develops and improves, neoadjuvant immunotherapy bears more prominent advantages: antigen exposure not only enhances the degree of tumour-specific T-cell response but also prolongs the duration of actions. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of McKeown minimally invasive oesophagectomy (McKeown MIO) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (OC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 94 patients underwent either NICT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by MIO at our institution from January 2020 to October 2022. We assessed the therapy-related adverse events and perioperative outcomes and compared them between the two groups.

RESULTS

After completing at least two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, all patients underwent McKeown MIO with negative margins within 4-7 weeks. Demographic data of the two cohorts were similar. Regarding perioperative characteristics, the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 ml in the NICT group, lower than that of the NCT group (100 ml, P < 0.05). In addition, the NICT group had significantly more harvested lymph nodes than the NCT group ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in post-operative complications. The rate of objective response rate in the NICT group was higher than that in the NCT group (88.3% vs. 58.8%). Regarding tumour regression, the number of patients with TRG Grades 1-3 in the NICT group was more than that in the NCT. Adverse events experienced by the two groups included anaemia and elevated transaminase. We found no difference in the adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the efficacy and feasibility of NICT followed by McKeown MIO in treating locally advanced OC.

Subsequent surgical treatment or maintenance immunotherapy in stage III lung cancer patients achieving a favorable response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: A matched retrospective cohort study from the surgical perspective

BACKGROUND

Current treatment strategies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are highly individualized and subject to ongoing debates. In the era of immunotherapy, surgery assumes a critical role. The aim of this study was to investigate if subsequent surgical intervention, following a favorable response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy, could yield a more favorable prognosis for patients with advanced stage III NSCLC compared to the continuation of immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

We included patients whose tumors exhibited a favorable response (including partial response [PR] and complete response [CR]) to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These patients were categorized into two groups based on their subsequent treatment plans: surgical and nonsurgical (continuation of maintenance immunotherapy and chemotherapy). The efficacy and long-term prognosis of these groups were compared after matching them in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores.

RESULTS

In total, 186 patients (93 in each group) were included in this study after matching via propensity scores. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 96.0%, 88.5%, and 93.1%, 80.7% in the surgical group, and 93.2%, 83.1%, and 57.7%, 50.4% in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Patients in the surgical group exhibited significantly superior PFS and OS compared to those in the nonsurgical group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.00086). Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed ΔBMI, Δtumor size reduction, tumor response, earlier clinical stage (IIIb vs. IIIa), and surgery as independent protective factor for patient prognosis. We further selected 101 patients with CR (39 in the surgical group and 62 in the nonsurgical group) and found that patients in the surgical group were significantly better in both PFS and OS. Our subgroup analysis in postoperative patients demonstrated that different surgical strategies did not significantly affect the long-term prognosis of patients (PFS and OS) but could impact their perioperative experience.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced stage III NSCLC, whose tumors achieved PR and CR after 2-4 cycles of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, experience a more promising prognosis with subsequent surgical intervention compared with the continued immunotherapy. Despite encountering formidable obstacles, such as protracted surgical procedures and associated trauma, we must rise to the challenge and unleash the power of surgery after immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Association of Preoperative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy With Cardiopulmonary Instability and Organ Injury After High-Risk Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the risk of postoperative complications in cancer patients.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

INTERVENTIONS

The main exposure was treatment with an FDA-approved ICI within 6 months before surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Exposure to ICIs and covariates was determined from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative complications, including prolonged pressor or oxygen dependence, kidney injury, or myocardial injury. Secondary outcomes included each subcomponent of the primary outcome. Of 7674 subjects with cancer admitted to the ICU after surgery, 247 were exposed to one or more ICIs in the 6 months before surgery. After propensity score matching, 197 ICI-exposed subjects were matched to 777 nonexposed. The composite outcome occurred in 70 of 197 (35.5%) ICI-exposed subjects and 251 of 777 (32.3%) nonexposed. There was no difference between exposed and nonexposed groups in the primary composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.80-1.58) by conditional logistic regression. Risk of the secondary outcome of prolonged pressor dependence was significantly higher in ICI-exposed subjects (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67). Risks of oxygen dependence (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.75-1.73), kidney injury (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.77-1.71), and myocardial injury (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.00-3.10) were not significantly different. There was no difference between groups in the time to hospital discharge alive (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to ICIs within 6 months before high-risk surgery was not associated with the composite outcome of cardiopulmonary instability or organ injury in patients with cancer. The potential for an association with the secondary outcomes of cardiac instability and injury is worthy of future study.

Surgical and survival outcomes with perioperative or neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint inhibitors combined with platinum-based chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

The use of neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-PD(L)1 was recently tested in multiple clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC. Nine reports from 6 studies were included. Receipt of surgery was more frequent in the experimental arm (odds ratio, OR 1.39) as was pCR (OR 7.60). EFS was improved in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, HR 0.55) regardless of stage, histology, PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 negative, HR 0.74) and smoking exposure (never smokers, HR 0.67), as was OS (HR 0.67). Grade > = 3 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the experimental arm (OR 1.22). The experimental treatment improved surgical outcomes, pCR rates, EFS and OS in stage II-IIIB, EGFR/ALK negative resectable NSCLC; confirmatory evidence is warranted for stage IIIB tumours and with higher maturity of the OS endpoint.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Surgery and Perioperative Complications in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Several clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and their use in clinical practice is expected to increase in the future. Therefore, a proper assessment of surgical outcomes and perioperative complications after neoadjuvant ICIs is essential to establish recommendations and guidelines. We performed a systematic literature review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA), searching the PubMed and Scopus databases from the January 1, 2017, to the July 27, 2023, to identify potentially relevant published trials of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with reseactable NSCLC with available information on surgical outcomes and perioperative complications. A total of 18 studies were included in the review. The rates of surgery cancellation ranged from 0% to 45.8%. Importantly, adverse events (AEs) were the least reported underlying cause, while disease progression caused from 0% to 75% of cancellations. Surgery delays ranged from 0% to 31.3% with AEs as the most frequently reported underlying cause. However, 6 out of 13 trials (46.2%) reported no surgery delays. Conversion rates from minimally invasive to open chest surgery were available for 7 trials and ranged from 0% to 53.8%. Thirty-day mortality rates ranged from 0% to 5.4%, with 11 out of 16 trials reporting 0%. A few reports described perioperative complications in detail. Considering the limited evidence available, we can preliminarily confirm that preoperative ICIs are safe and well tolerated even from the surgical perspective. Additional details on intraoperative findings from prospective controlled trials are needed to establish and disseminate guidelines and recommendations for thoracic surgeons.

Selecting Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients for Immunotherapy

The approval of preoperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is a practice-changing advance for patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. The optimal patient selection requires careful attention to staging and balancing potential risks with expected benefits, particularly as it relates to immune-related adverse events.

Antiplatelet and Wound Healing Implications of Immunotherapy and Targeted Cancer Therapies in the Perioperative Period

The traditional paradigm of oncologic treatment centered on cytotoxic chemotherapy has undergone tremendous advancement during the last 15 yr with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted cancer therapies. These agents, including small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, are highly specific to individual tumor characteristics and can prevent cell growth and tumorigenesis by inhibiting specific molecular targets or single oncogenes. While generally better tolerated than traditional chemotherapy, these therapies are associated with unique constellations of adverse effects. Of particular importance in the perioperative and periprocedural settings are hematologic abnormalities, particularly antiplatelet effects with increased risk of bleeding, and implications for wound healing. This narrative review discusses targeted cancer therapies and provides recommendations for physicians managing these patients' care as it relates to procedural or surgical interventions.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy before resection to avoid delay for early-stage lung cancer or oligometastases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pathologic outcomes from the SABR-BRIDGE protocol

BACKGROUND

During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related operating room closures, some multidisciplinary thoracic oncology teams adopted a paradigm of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a bridge to surgery, an approach called SABR-BRIDGE. This study presents the preliminary surgical and pathological results.

METHODS

Eligible participants from four institutions (three in Canada and one in the United States) had early-stage presumed or biopsy-proven lung malignancy that would normally be surgically resected. SABR was delivered using standard institutional guidelines, with surgery >3 months following SABR with standardized pathologic assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of viable cancer. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% viable tissue.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent SABR. Most common SABR regimens were 34 Gy/1 (29%, n = 21), 48 Gy/3-4 (26%, n = 19), and 50/55 Gy/5 (22%, n = 16). SABR was well-tolerated, with one grade 5 toxicity (death 10 days after SABR with COVID-19) and five grade 2-3 toxicities. Following SABR, 26 patients underwent resection thus far (13 pending surgery). Median time-to-surgery was 4.5 months post-SABR (range, 2-17.5 months). Surgery was reported as being more difficult because of SABR in 38% (n = 10) of cases. Thirteen patients (50%) had pCR and 19 (73%) had MPR. Rates of pCR trended higher in patients operated on at earlier time points (75% if within 3 months, 50% if 3-6 months, and 33% if ≥6 months; p = .069). In the exploratory best-case scenario analysis, pCR rate does not exceed 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SABR-BRIDGE approach allowed for delivery of treatment during a period of operating room closure and was well-tolerated. Even in the best-case scenario, pCR rate does not exceed 82%.

Prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with salvage surgery after drug therapy: a multi-institutional retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of salvage surgeries after drug therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has risen, mainly due to recent progress in molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC. While the safety and effectiveness of salvage surgery after drug therapy for NSCLC have been studied, its indications remain unclear. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with advanced-stage (stages III-IV) NSCLC treated with salvage surgery after drug therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective investigation was conducted on patients who received salvage surgery after drug therapy at four hospitals between 2007 and 2020. Salvage surgery was defined as surgery after drug therapy for local progression, tumor conversion to resectable status, and discontinuation of prior drug therapy owing to serious complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients received cytotoxic agents alone (n = 12 [38%]), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; n = 16 [50%]), or immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 4 [13%]) as prior drug therapy. In 11 (34%) and 21 (66%) patients, the clinical stage before treatment was III or IV, respectively. The median initial and preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were 10.2 (range, 0.5-1024) ng/mL and 4.2 (range, 0.6-92.5) ng/mL, respectively. Among the patients, 28 (88%) underwent lobectomy, 2 (6%) underwent segmentectomy, and 2 (6%) underwent wedge resection. Complete resection of the primary lesion was accomplished in 28 (88%) patients. Postoperative complications were documented in six (19%) patients. Mortality rates were 0% at 30 days and 3% at 90 days post-operation. The 5-year overall survival rate stood at 66%, while the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 21%. Multivariate analyses showed that prior TKI therapy and preoperative serum CEA level < 5 ng/mL were prognostic factors influencing overall survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.06 [0.006-0.68] and 0.03 [0.002-0.41], respectively). The 5-year overall survival in the 11 patients with both favorable prognosticators was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, prior TKI therapy and preoperative serum CEA level < 5 ng/mL were favorable prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with NSCLC treated with salvage surgery. Patients with these prognostic factors are considered good candidates for salvage surgery after drug therapy.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Only a minority of lung cancers are resectable at diagnosis, and many of these will eventually relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting has a modest survival advantage, and there is significant need for new approaches to improve cure rates. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has transformed the prognosis for advanced lung cancer, and is increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting alone, or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. While this has demonstrated convincing improvements in event-free survival and pathologic response, questions remain over optimal duration of therapy, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, response assessment and combination with other modalities. In addition, these results must be considered in the context of recent positive studies of adjuvant immunotherapy. Here, we summarise preclinical context and clinical trials in this space, discuss areas of controversy and pitfalls, and consider future challenges.

Beyond the Frontline: A Triple-Line Approach of Thoracic Surgeons in Lung Cancer Management-State of the Art

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is now described as an extremely heterogeneous disease in its clinical presentation, histology, molecular characteristics, and patient conditions. Over the past 20 years, the management of lung cancer has evolved with positive results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for NSCLC in both metastatic and locally advanced stages. The identification of molecular alterations in NSCLC has also allowed the development of targeted therapies, which provide better outcomes than chemotherapy in selected patients. However, patients usually develop acquired resistance to these treatments. On the other hand, thoracic surgery has progressed thanks to minimally invasive procedures, pre-habilitation and enhanced recovery after surgery. Moreover, within thoracic surgery, precision surgery considers the patient and his/her disease in their entirety to offer the best oncologic strategy. Surgeons support patients from pre-operative rehabilitation to surgery and beyond. They are involved in post-treatment follow-up and lung cancer recurrence. When conventional therapies are no longer effective, salvage surgery can be performed on selected patients.

Underutilization of Systemic Therapy in Patients With NSCLC Undergoing Pneumonectomy: A Missed Opportunity for Survival

Introduction

Recent trials have reported promising results with the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC, but in practice, the proportion of patients who receive systemic therapy (ST) has historically been low. Underutilization of ST may be particularly apparent in patients undergoing pneumonectomy, in whom the physiologic insult and surgical complications may preclude adjuvant therapy (ADJ). We, therefore, evaluated the use of ST for patients with NSCLC undergoing pneumonectomy.

Methods

We queried the National Cancer Database, including all patients with NSCLC who underwent pneumonectomy between 2006 and 2018. Logistic regression was used to identify associations with ST and neo-ADJ (NEO). Overall survival was compared after propensity score matching (1:1) patients undergoing ST to those undergoing surgery alone using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results

A total of 2619 patients were identified. Among these, 12% received NEO, 43% received ADJ, and 45% surgery alone. Age younger than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.53, 95% confidence interval; [CI]: 1.10-2.11), Asian ethnicity (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.37-5.23), treatment at a high-volume center (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06-1.81), and private insurance (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.05-1.94) were associated with NEO, whereas age younger than 65 years (aOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.61-2.38), comorbidity index less than or equal to 1 (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.29-2.16), and private insurance (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80) were associated with any ST. In the matched cohort, ST was associated with better survival than surgery (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.58-0.78).

Conclusions

A high proportion of patients who undergo pneumonectomy do not receive ST. Patient and socioeconomic factors are associated with the receipt of ST. Given its survival benefit, emphasis should be placed on multimodal treatment strategies, perhaps with greater consideration given to neoadjuvant approaches.

Additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not increase the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) is a novel and promising therapy model for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.The objective of this study aimed to assessed the impact of additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy on patients' short-term outcomes, particularly the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) and pathological response.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT)/ nICT combination with radical esophagectomy were enrolled from three medical centers in China. The authors used propensity score matching (PSM, ration:1:1, caliper=0.01) and inverse probability processing weighting (IPTW) to balance the baseline characteristics and compare the outcomes. Conditional logistic regression and weighted logistic regression analysis were used to further evaluate whether additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy would increase the risk of postoperative AL.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients getting partially advanced ESCC receiving nCT or nICT were enrolled from three medical centers in China. After PSM/IPTW, the baseline characteristics reached an equilibrium between the two groups. After matching, there were no significant difference in the AL incidence between the two groups ( P =0.68, after PSM; P =0.97 after IPTW), and the incidence of AL in the two groups was 15.85 versus 18.29%, and 14.79 versus 15.01%, respectively. After PSM/IPTW, both groups were similar in pleural effusion and pneumonia. After IPTW, the nICT group had a higher incidence of bleeding (3.36 vs. 0.30%, P =0.01), chylothorax (5.79 0.30%, P =0.001), and cardiac events (19.53 vs. 9.20%, P =0.04). recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (7.85 vs. 0.54%, P =0.003). After PSM, both groups were similar in palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (1.22 vs. 3.66%, P =0.31) and cardiac events (19.51 vs. 14.63%, P =0.41). Weighted logistic regression analysis showed that additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy was not responsible for AL (OR=0.56, 95% CI: [0.17, 1.71], after PSM; 0.74, 95% CI: [0.34,1.56], after IPTW). The nICT group had dramatically higher pCR in primary tumor than the nCT group ( P =0.003, PSM; P =0.005, IPTW), 9.76 versus 28.05% and 7.72 versus 21.17%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy could benefit pathological reactions without increasing the risk of AL and pulmonary complications. The authors require further randomized controlled research to validate whether additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy would make a difference in other complications, and determine whether pathologic benefits could translate into prognostic benefits, which would require longer follow-up.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and perioperative outcomes following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with stage I to III NSCLC treated with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone prior to lobectomy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2018). The percentage of operations performed minimally invasively, conversion rates, and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using propensity-score matching. Propensity-score matching was also used to compare perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent an open lobectomy and those who underwent an MIS lobectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the 4229 patients identified, 218 (5%) received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 4011 (95%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. There was no difference in the rate of MIS lobectomy among patients who received immunotherapy compared with those who received chemotherapy alone in propensity score-matched analysis (60.8% vs 51.6%; P = .11). There also were no significant differences in the rate of conversion from MIS to open lobectomy (14% vs 15%, P = .83; odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-2.24) or in nodal downstaging, margin positivity, 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality between the 2 groups. In a subgroup analysis of only patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, there were no differences in pathologic or perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent open lobectomy and those who underwent MIS lobectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national analysis, neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC was not associated with an increased likelihood of the need for thoracotomy, conversion from MIS to open lobectomy, or inferior perioperative outcomes.

Salvage surgery for advanced non-small cell lung cancer following previous immunotherapy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The development of systemic chemotherapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided patients with unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) an opportunity to undergo surgical intervention after initial treatment. However, no consensus regarding the indication for salvage surgery in these patients has been reached.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent salvage surgery for advanced NSCLC (cStage IIIA-IVB) after treatment with ICIs from January 2018 to December 2022 at Aizu Medical Center and Fukushima Medical University Hospital. We evaluated the patients' clinical data, calculated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), and assessed the survival benefit using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients underwent salvage surgery after immunotherapy. All patients achieved downstaging after initial chemotherapy. Eleven patients underwent lobectomy, and one patient underwent extirpation of intra-abdominal lymph nodes. The mean surgery time and intraoperative blood loss were 242.2 min and 415.1 g, respectively. The mean drainage period was 4.2 days (range, 2-9 days). Grade ≥ 3 postoperative complications were confirmed in three patients. The 2-year DFS rate was 71.2%, and the 2-year OS rate was 76.2%. A pathological complete response compatible with ypStage 0 was achieved in four (30.8%) patients. Patients with ypStage 0 and I achieved significantly better OS than those with ypStage ≥ II (p = 0.044), and patients without severe complications achieved significantly better DFS and OS than those with severe complications (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage surgery after chemotherapy including ICIs is a feasible and effective treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who acquire downstaging to pathological stage 0 or I. However, severe perioperative complications might affect patient survival. A prospective study is urgently needed to evaluate the efficacy of salvage surgery.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.

Feasibility of salvage resection following locoregional failure after chemoradiotherapy and consolidation durvalumab for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer, high-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab improves the 5-year overall survival compared to CRT alone. The feasibility and safety of salvage surgery for such patients who subsequently develop locoregional failure (LRF) is unclear. We evaluated our institutional experience with radical-intent salvage surgery in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Details of patients undergoing salvage surgery for locoregional failure after CRT and durvalumab were identified from an institutional surgical database. Each patient's case underwent multidisciplinary discussion at initial disease presentation, and again at time of progression.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent salvage surgery for LRF after prior concurrent (n = 9) or sequential (n = 1) platinum-based high-dose chemo-radiotherapy followed by durvalumab. Consolidation durvalumab was completed in 4 patients, and discontinued in 6, due to either toxicity or disease progression. Median time between end of radiotherapy to detection of LRF was 19 months (range 6-75). Seven patients underwent a lobectomy, 1 a bilobectomy and 2 patients a pneumonectomy. Postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) and 90-day mortality were 10% and 0%, respectively. Median follow-up after surgery was 7 months (range 1-25) during which 2 patients died (both 9 months post-operatively), one due to distant progression, and one of sepsis/bleeding. Eight patients are alive at 1-23 months post-surgery, with 6 showing no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that salvage pulmonary resection can be performed safely in selected patients with LRF following chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab. This radical-intent treatment option merits consideration by multidisciplinary lung tumor boards.

Safety and efficacy of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: real-world experience with a consecutive patient cohort

Objectives

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has recently been applied in the neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), while its superiority over neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) alone remains to be explored. This study explored the safety and efficacy of NACT plus tislelizumab in patients with LAGC.

Methods

The data on patients with LAGC who received NACT combined with radical gastrectomy and NACT plus tislelizumab followed by radical gastrectomy was retrospectively collected. Clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups were compared.

Results

A total of 119 and 50 patients with gastric cancer treated with NACT and NACT plus tislelizumab, respectively, were enrolled. No significant difference was found between the baseline data of the two groups. The operative time (210.5 ± 70.4 min vs. 237.6 ± 68.4 min, P=0.732), intraoperative blood loss (157.8 ± 75.9 ml vs. 149.1 ± 92.5 ml, P=0.609), and number of dissected lymph nodes (24.7 ± 9.3 vs. 28.1 ± 10.3, P=0.195) was not statistically different between the two groups. In comparison to the NACT plus tislelizumab group, the R0 resection rate (100% vs. 89.9%, P=0.019) and pathologic complete response rate (26.0% vs. 3.4%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the NACT group. The postoperative complication rates were 24.4% and 26.0% in the NACT and NACT plus tislelizumab groups with no significant difference (P=0.823). In subgroup analysis, tumor regression grade (TRG) (TRG 3: 72.3% vs. 23.5%, P<0.001) and ypN stage (stages 2-3: 46.8% vs. 5.9%, P=0.003) in the NACT group were significantly higher compared with the NACT plus tislelizumab group in esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

Conclusion

Compared with the S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) NACT regimen, NACT plus tislelizumab significantly improved the efficacy and R0 resection rate of LAGC without increasing the incidence of perioperative complications, particularly in esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

PD‑1/PD‑L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors (Review)

A comprehensive search regarding programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‑1)/programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy in neoadjuvant settings of 11 types of solid cancer was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases, and the abstracts of various conferences were screened. Data presented in 99 clinical trials indicated that preoperative treatment with PD‑1/PD‑L1 combined therapy, particularly immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, could achieve a higher objective response rate, a higher major pathologic response rate and a higher pathologic complete response rate, as well as a lower number of immune‑related adverse events compared with PD‑1/PD‑L1 monotherapy or dual immunotherapy. Although PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor combination caused more treatment‑related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients, most of the TRAEs were acceptable and did not cause marked delays in operation. The data suggest that patients with pathological remission after neoadjuvant immunotherapy exhibit improved postoperative disease‑free survival compared with those without pathological remission. Further studies are still required to evaluate the long‑term survival benefit of neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Precision Surgery in NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. This is mostly because the majority of lung cancers are discovered in advanced stages. In the era of conventional chemotherapy, the prognosis of advanced NSCLC was grim. Important results have been reported in thoracic oncology since the discovery of new molecular alterations and of the role of the immune system. The advent of new therapies has radically changed the approach to lung cancer for a subset of patients with advanced NSCLC, and the concept of incurable disease is still changing. In this setting, surgery seems to have developed a role of rescue therapy for some patients. In precision surgery, the decision to perform surgical procedures is tailored to the individual patient; taking into consideration not only clinical stage, but also clinical and molecular features. Multimodality treatments incorporating surgery, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or targeted agents are feasible in high volume centers with good results in terms of pathologic response and patient morbidity. Thanks to a better understanding of tumor biology, precision thoracic surgery will facilitate optimal and individualized patient selection and treatment, with the goal of improving the outcomes of patients affected by NSCLC.

Perioperative systemic therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: Recent advances and future perspectives

The mainstay of treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. Traditionally, chemotherapy has been used perioperatively in locally extensive disease to improve the oncologic outcomes of surgery, with a 5-year absolute survival benefit of approximately 5%. In recent years, immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have shown excellent results in the treatment of locoregionally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, replacing chemotherapy as first-line treatment in certain cases. Consequently, researchers have been increasingly investigating the use of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with surgery for the treatment of early-stage disease. This growing research interest has resulted in several published and ongoing studies of various size and design. In this mini review, we provide a succinct and up-to-date overview of recently published, phase 3 randomized clinical trials on adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy or targeted therapy for NSCLC. We subsequently discuss some important unresolved clinical issues, including the optimal duration of treatment, scheduling with respect to surgery, and potential combinations of different systemic therapies. Finally, we reference large, randomized, phase 3 studies that are currently in progress and may give answers to those and other clinical questions.

A Review of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the General Surgeon

The immune system is a complex and interconnected system that has evolved to protect its host from foreign pathogens. CD8+ T cells are a type of immune cell that can be directly lethal to tumor cells. However, their tumor killing capabilities can be inhibited by checkpoint molecules. During the last decade, the development of medications that block these checkpoint molecules has revolutionized treatment for some cancer types and indications for use continue to grow. As usage of immunotherapy increases, toxicities and adverse events unique to immunotherapy are becoming more prevalent. Here, we review the commonly targeted inhibitory molecules along with their food and drug administration-approved indications in various cancer therapeutic regimens, immunotherapy-related toxicities, and how this may impact surgical planning.

Treatment of induced oligometastatic disease after partial response to immunochemotherapy in patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and severe toxicity

Treatment of induced oligometastatic disease after partial response to systemic antineoplastic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionised the treatment of stage IV NSCLC. While ICI combined with chemotherapy (ChT) leads to longer duration of response and higher response rates compared with ChT alone, it can also cause serious adverse events (AEs) resulting in treatment discontinuation. In case of treatment discontinuation due to AEs after partial response to systemic treatment, surgical treatment of residual disease can be considered as it could lead to complete response. We present a case of a patient with stage IV NSCLC who is currently alive without any signs of cancer after partial response to ICI/ChT followed by surgical removal of residual disease.

Airway disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Two case reports and a systematic review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used for the treatment of various malignant neoplasms. Interstitial lung disease is a well-known immune-related adverse event, however, ICI-induced airway disease remains under-recognized. Herein, we report two similar cases of pembrolizumab-induced tracheobronchitis presenting as persistent chronic cough and dyspnea. Blood tests revealed elevated C-reactive protein levels without eosinophilia. Spirometry demonstrated mild airflow obstruction. Computed tomography revealed diffuse thickening of the tracheobronchial walls and bronchiectasis predominantly in the lower lobes. Bronchoscopy revealed edematous and erythematous tracheobronchial mucosa, and bronchial biopsy tissue exhibited marked inflammation with predominant infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes. Subsequently, pembrolizumab-induced tracheobronchitis was diagnosed in both cases. Cessation of pembrolizumab and initiation of erythromycin, inhaled corticosteroids, and long-acting beta-agonists gradually improved the symptoms, airflow obstruction, and radiographic findings. These were completely resolved in one case. The other case initially showed a poor response to systemic corticosteroids combined with the aforementioned drugs, but improved gradually and almost completely. These cases exemplify ICI-induced airway disease that is, an under-recognized manifestation of immune-related adverse events. In addition, we have systematically searched the PubMed database for articles on ICI-induced airway disease, categorized the retrieved articles as eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic airway diseases, and reviewed the differences in treatment and prognoses between these two categories.

[Progress of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including neoadjuvant single- or dual-drug immunotherapy or combined immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, has witnessed a rapid development in non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trials exhibited the encouraging pathological responses and certain clinical benefits in selected patients, with tolerable toxicity. Nivolumab with chemotherapy has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the first immunotherapy-based treatment for non-small cell lung cancer in the neoadjuvant treatment setting. There is the need for further evaluation of long-term efficacy, side effects or surgical issues for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
.

Rescue Surgery after Immunotherapy/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Initially Unresectable Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered for a long time as an unresectable disease. Chemotherapy was considered the only therapeutic option for these conditions and the results were unsatisfactory. Recent advances in biology and immunology have led to the use of personalized treatments by using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which produce significant and durable treatment responses. Large trials explored the utility of TKIs and ICIs in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings, showing good results in terms of radiological response and long-term outcomes. Retrospective case series in patients with the previously unresectable disease who received treatment with TKIs, or ICIs showed important clinical changes that consider the possibility of pulmonary resection of the residual disease. They showed an overall feasibility for pulmonary resection but also raised concerns about the technical challenges. In the present study, we analyzed and reported the surgical and long-term outcomes of patients with initial unresectable, locally advanced, or oligometastatic NSCLC who were treated with TKIs or ICIs achieving a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability.

Abstract

Background: We report the outcomes for unresectable patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or immunotherapy who achieved a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and pathological data of 42 patients with histologically proven, inoperable NSCLC who received rescue surgery after a good response to TKI or immunotherapy between March 2014 and December 2021. Results: Of 42 patients, 39 underwent pulmonary resection with therapeutic intent (three explorative thoracotomies). There were 26 males, with a median age of 64 years (range, 41–78 years). Twenty-three patients received TKIs and 19 immunotherapies. Anatomic resection was performed in 97.4% of resected patients (38/39) including 30 lobectomies, one right upper sleeve lobectomy, five pneumonectomies, one tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy, and one bilobectomy; a patient underwent wedge resection. Of 10 procedures attempted via a robotic approach, two required conversion to thoracotomy. No intraoperative morbidity/mortality occurred. The median operative time was 190 (range, 80–426) minutes; estimated blood loss was 200 mL (range, 35–780 mL). Morbidity occurred in 13/39 (33.3%). The median length of hospital stay was 6.5 days (range, 4–23 days). Pathologic downstaging was 74.4% (29/39). With a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the 5-year disease-free interval was 46.5%, and the 5-year overall survival was 66.0%; 32/39 patients (82.1%) are alive, 10 with the disease. Conclusions: Lung resection for suspected residual disease after immunotherapy or TKIs is feasible, with encouraging pathological downstaging. Surgical operation may be technically challenging due to the presence of fibrosis, but significant morbidity appears to be rare. Outcomes are encouraging, with reasonable survival during the short-interval follow-up.

Safety and Feasibility of Esophagectomy Following Combined Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objectives

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (nICT) is a novel treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. There is concern that nICT may increase operation difficulty, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes among esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and nICT and for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2017 through July 2021) who underwent surgery for ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.05 was conducted to balance potential bias.

Results

A 1:1 PSM was conducted based on clinical stage, age, body mass index (BMI), and tumor location, and then 32 comparable pairs were matched. After PSM, age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, smoking history, clinical stage, tumor location, lymphadenectomy field, pathological stage, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups. Compared with the nICT group (median, 300 min), the operation time was significantly longer in the nCRT group (median, 376 min). However, both groups were comparable in intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage volume, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital cost. Further, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission, and major complications were similar in both groups. The nCRT group had an advantage in pathological response. The pathological complete response (pCR) was 18.8% (6/32) in the nICT group and 43.8% (14/32) in the nCRT group (p = 0.03). The major pathological response (MPR) was 71.9% (23/32) in the nCRT group and 34.4% (11/32) in the nICT group (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Based on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy appears to be safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Toripalimab combined with docetaxel and cisplatin neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center, single-arm clinical trial (ESONICT-2)

BACKGROUND

More and more evidence has confirmed the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy drugs, such as camrelizumab and pembrolizumab. There are several phase-I/II studies showing that toripalimab has an acceptable safety profile and promising clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. To further confirm its efficacy and safety, the aim of the study was to evaluate toripalimab combined with docetaxel and cisplatin neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

This study was an investigator-initiated, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, single-center phase II trial (registration number: ChiCTR2100052784). The patients eligible for inclusion criteria at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from October 2019 to October 2020 were included in this study. Patients who were suitable for surgery underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) within 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Pathological complete response (pCR) and adverse events (AEs) were the primary end points. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, major pathological response (MPR), interval to surgery, and 30-day complications.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were enrolled from October 2019 to October 2020. All patients successfully completed 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Treatment-related AEs were common during neoadjuvant therapy, with leucopenia the most frequently occurring AE (4/20, 25%). With respect to immune-related AEs, immune dermatitis occurred in 2 patients, including 1 patient with grade I and 1 patient with grade III. Based on radiologic evaluation, the objective response rate (ORR) was 70% (14/20). Twelve patients underwent McKeown MIE. The pCR rate of the primary tumor was 16.7% (2/12), and the MPR rate of the primary tumor was 5/12 (41.7%). The mean interval to surgery was 33.2 days, and no patients experienced delayed surgery due to treatment-related AEs. Pneumonia was the most common 30-day postoperative complication (3/12, 25%). Anastomotic leakage (AL) only occurred in 1 patient during the hospital stay. There were no treatment- or surgery-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, toripalimab combined with docetaxel and cisplatin as a novel neoadjuvant therapy was safe and effective in locally advanced ESCC.

Safety and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score matching

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of esophagectomy following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who were treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NICT, n = 27) or chemotherapy alone (NCT, n = 95) at our institution between January, 2017 and April, 2021. The primary end point was 30-day complications. Major complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 3. Secondary end points were interval to surgery, operation time, postoperative thoracic drainage, thoracic drainage tube stay, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias caused by potential confounding.

RESULTS

All patients included successfully completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy negative margins. Out of 122 eligible patients, 26 patients in NICT group and 52 patients in NCT group were identified by 1:2 PSM. After PSM, the clinical stage was matched and demographic characteristics of the two groups were well balanced, including age, gender, BMI, ASA status, age-adjusted Charlson index, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy regimens, neoadjuvant cycle, tumor location, lymphadenectomy, pathological stage, histologic sub-type, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups after PSM. Although NICT group had a higher incidence of pneumonia and pleural effusion, however, the CCI index, other complication and major complications were comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage tube stays, thoracic drainage volume, ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay and hospital cost. Furthermore, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy is safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Safety of salvage lung resection after immunotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The safety of salvage lung resection after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not well understood.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we reviewed perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in 11 patients (8 men, 3 women; median age 70 years) who underwent salvage lung resection for unresectable NSCLC after ICI therapy in the 4 years since 2017. Operative factors were also compared according to operating time (> 6 h, n = 7; < 6 h, n = 4).

RESULTS

The clinical stage at the time of diagnosis was IIIA in 2 patients, IIIB in 4, IVA in 2, and IVB in 3. Eight patients received pembrolizumab and 3 received durvalumab. Two patients received an ICI agent alone, 3 underwent chemoradiotherapy, and 6 received chemotherapy. Lobectomy was performed in 10 cases and bilobectomy in 1 case. All patients underwent complete resection. Median operating time was 429 (range 169-570) min with a median blood loss of 199 (range 10-5, 140) mL. The only intraoperative complication was damage to the pulmonary artery. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 27% and 0%, respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 9% (1 patient died of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia). Patients in whom the operating time was > 6 h more frequently had lymph node metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis (100% vs 25%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage lung resection was tolerated after ICI therapy in these patients. Lymph node metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis might make salvage surgery difficult.

Surgical Complexity of Pulmonary Resections Performed for Oligometastatic NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary resection has been established as an important component of local consolidative therapy (LCT) for oligometastatic NSCLC. However, technical aspects of such surgical procedures have not been well characterized. We sought to review the complexity of operations performed within a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.

METHODS

We identified patients treated at a single institution between 2000 and 2017 with stage IV NSCLC, with three or fewer synchronous metastases, and who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor. Medical records were reviewed, and aspects of surgical complexity were recorded. Descriptive analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among 194 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC, 173 (89%) received LCT and 30 (15%) underwent resection of the primary tumor. Thoracotomy was performed in 25 patients (83%), and procedures included 25 (83%) lobectomies, three (10%) pneumonectomies, and two (7%) sublobar resections. Mean blood loss was 200 (50-600) mL, and operative time was 200 (72-492) minutes. Proximal pulmonary artery control was needed in four (15%). Sleeve resection was needed in four (15%). Unplanned procedural change was required in two patients (7%). Chest wall resection occurred in three patients (11%). Lymph nodes were characterized as hard or densely adherent in nine (33%), and operations were described as more difficult than usual in 16 cases (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery has emerged as a key strategy for LCT among patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. These operations can be performed safely, yet frequently require advanced techniques and complex resection strategies. As such, health care teams must be prepared for the technical challenges of these cases.

Current Surgical Indications for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

With recent strides made within the field of thoracic oncology, the management of NSCLC is evolving rapidly. Careful patient selection and timing of multi-modality therapy to permit the optimization of therapeutic benefit must be pursued. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy continue to have a role in the management of lung cancer, surgical therapy remains an essential component of lung cancer treatment in early, locally and regionally advanced, as well as in selected, cases of metastatic disease. Recent and most impactful advances in the treatment of lung cancer relate to the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, molecular profiling, and predictive biomarker discovery. Many of these systemic therapies are a part of the standard of care in metastatic NSCLC, and their indications are expanding towards surgically operable lung cancer to improve survival outcomes. Numerous completed and ongoing clinical trials in the surgically operable NSCLC speak to the interest and importance of the multi-modality therapy even in earlier stages of NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the current standard of care indications for surgical therapy in stage I-IV NSCLC as well as on the anticipated future direction of multi-disciplinary lung cancer therapy.

Radical Resection for Second EGFR-mutated Primary Lung Cancer Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Monotherapy for Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma

A 78-year-old woman with multiple lung nodules, epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations, and diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (cT4N3M1a, stage IVA), was referred to our hospital. She received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The therapy showed remarkable antitumor effects; only a single nodule remained in the right upper lobe. The nodule was diagnosed as adenocarcinoma through a biopsy. We subsequently performed right upper lobectomy for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC). The surgical specimen contained EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations and not exon 20 insertion mutations.

Initial experience of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab in a patient with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) more and more frequently and the effects were thrilling. Toripalimab as a new immune checkpoint inhibitor has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, data regarding the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after treatment with toripalimab for NSCLC remain scarce. Here, we present a case with locally advanced NSCLC that received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy after treatment with toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old male patient with a history of coronary artery stenting operation for two times was found a 3.4 × 3.2 cm cavity mass in the upper lobe of the left lung and enlarged left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Pathological results identified squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with a locally advanced NSCLC and received VATS left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab for 3 cycles. The postoperative pathological results showed complete tumor remission. Short-term follow-up results were excellent, and long-term results remain to be revealed.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results showed that the use of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy for the locally advanced NSCLC before surgical resection is safe and feasible.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 trial (ESONICT-1)

Background

To investigate the safety and feasibility of combining neoadjuvant sintilimab (Innovent Biologics, Suzhou, China) and chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

The study was an investigator-initiated, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm, single-center phase 2 trial. Patients aged between 18 to 75 years with locally advanced ESCC were eligible for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT). The nICT included cisplatin (60 mg/m²) on day 1, albumin-bound paclitaxel (125 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8, and sintilimab (200 mg) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Clinical evaluation was conducted after 2 cycles of nICT. Within 4–6 weeks after nICT, patients underwent esophagectomy. The primary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), R0 resection rate, interval to surgery, and 30-day complications. This trial was registered at chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100045659.

Results

From July 2020 to June 2021, 30 patients were enrolled. All patients successfully completed 2 cycles of nICT. AEs were common during nICT, and the most common AE was anorexia (20/30, 67%). However, only one patient with grade 3 ESCC had increased transaminase. According to radiologic evaluations, the objective response rate (ORR) was 67% (20/30) and the disease control rate 97% (29/30). Twenty-three patients underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The pCR rate of the primary tumor was 21.7%, and the MPR rate of the primary tumor was 52.2%. The median interval to surgery was 40 days, and no patients delayed surgery due to AEs. Pneumonia was the most common major 30-day postoperative complication (9/23, 39%). Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in two patients during the hospital stay, and one patient was readmitted due to AL. There was no treatment- or surgery-related deaths.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy for locally advanced ESCC appears to be safe and feasible with limited AEs, high R0 resection rate, promising pCR rate, and manageable postoperative complications. Long-term follow-up is required. A multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy in locally advanced ESCC is warranted to confirm these results.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (nICT) is a novel treatment for locally esophageal cancer squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of nICT on surgery safety by comparing short-term outcomes between the surgery alone group and the nICT followed by surgery group.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to identify patients (from January 2017 to July 2021) who underwent surgery for ESCC with or without nICT. A propensity score matching (PSM) comparison (1:1) was conducted to reduce selection biases and balance the demographic and oncologic characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, the nICT group (n = 38) was comparable to the surgery alone group (n = 38) in the following characteristics: age, sex, BMI, ASA status, smoking, tumor location, lymph node resection, clinical stage, anastomotic location, surgical approach, and surgical approach. The operation time and incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the nICT group were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). However, other complications and major complications were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss, ICU stay time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization cost. The 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and ICU readmission rates were also similar in the nICT and control groups. In the nICT group, the pathological complete response rate in primary tumor was 18.4%, and the major pathological response rate in tumor was 42.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our preliminary experience, nICT followed by surgery is safe and effective with acceptable increased operation risk, manageable postoperative complications, and promising pathological response. Further multicenter prospective trials are needed to validate our results.