The role of DNA methylation in the mechanisms of memory reconsolidation and development of amnesia

DNA Methylation Machinery in Gastropod Mollusks

The role of DNA methylation in mollusks is just beginning to be understood. This review synthesizes current knowledge on this potent molecular hallmark of epigenetic control in gastropods-the largest class of mollusks and ubiquitous inhabitants of diverse habitats. Their DNA methylation machinery shows a high degree of conservation in CG maintenance methylation mechanisms, driven mainly by DNMT1 homologues, and the presence of MBD2 and MBD2/3 proteins as DNA methylation readers. The mosaic-like DNA methylation landscape occurs mainly in a CG context and is primarily confined to gene bodies and housekeeping genes. DNA methylation emerges as a critical regulator of reproduction, development, and adaptation, with tissue-specific patterns being observed in gonadal structures. Its dynamics also serve as an important regulatory mechanism underlying learning and memory processes. DNA methylation can be affected by various environmental stimuli, including as pathogens and abiotic stresses, potentially impacting phenotypic variation and population diversity. Overall, the features of DNA methylation in gastropods are complex, being an essential part of their epigenome. However, comprehensive studies integrating developmental stages, tissues, and environmental conditions, functional annotation of methylated regions, and integrated genomic-epigenomic analyses are lacking. Addressing these knowledge gaps will advance our understanding of gastropod biology, ecology, and evolution.

Epigenetic Processes of DNA Methylation Are Selectively Involved in the Mechanisms of Retrograde and Anteograde Amnesia

The participation of DNA methylation processes in the mechanisms of anterograde and retrograde amnesia caused by impaired reconsolidation of conditioned food aversion memory by NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists or serotonin receptor antagonists, respectively, were studied on grape snails. Anterograde amnesia was characterized by impaired formation of long-term memory during repeated learning. Administration of a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor to amnestic animals resulted in accelerated formation of long-term memory during 1 day of repetitive training vs 3 days during initial training. In serotonin-dependent retrograde amnesia, repeated learning without DNMT inhibitor administration or after inhibitor injections led to the formation of long-term memory. The dynamics of memory formation was similar in both cases and did not differ from that during the initial training: the memory was formed within 3 days of training. Thus, epigenetic processes of DNA methylation are selectively involved in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia, but do not participate in the mechanisms of retrograde amnesia.

DNA methylation inhibition participates in the anterograde amnesia key mechanism through the suppression of the transcription of genes involved in memory formation in grape snails

The study of the amnesia mechanisms is of both theoretical and practical importance. The mechanisms of anterograde amnesia are the least studied, due to the lack of an experimental model that allows studying this amnesia type molecular and cellular mechanisms. Previously, we found that conditional food aversion memory reconsolidation impairment in snails by NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists led to the amnesia induction, in the late stages of which (>10 days) repeated training did not cause long-term memory formation. In the same animals, long-term memory aversion to a new food type was formed. We characterized this amnesia as specific anterograde amnesia. In the present work we studied the role of epigenetic DNA methylation processes as well as protein and mRNA synthesis in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery. DNMT methyltransferase inhibitors (iDNMT: zebularine, RG108 (N-Phthalyl-1-tryptophan), and 5-AZA (5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine)) were used to alter DNA methylation. It was found that in amnesic animals the iDNMT administration before or after shortened repeated training led to the rapid long-term conditional food aversion formation (Ebbinghaus saving effect). This result suggests that amnestic animals retain a latent memory, which is the basis for accelerated memory formation during repeated training. Protein synthesis inhibitors administration (cycloheximide) before or immediately after repeated training or administration of RNA synthesis inhibitor (actinomycin D) after repeated training prevented memory formation under iDNMT action. The earlier protein synthesis inhibitor effect suggests that the proteins required for memory formation are translated from the pre-existing, translationally repressed mRNAs. Thus, we have shown for the first time that the anterograde amnesia key mechanism is DNMT-dependent suppression of the transcription of genes involved in memory mechanisms. Inhibition of DNMT during repeated training reversed these genes expression blockade, opening access to them by transcription factors synthesized during training from the pre-existing mRNAs.

Comparative Study of the Effect of a DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor and a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor on Memory Formation Processes in Anterograde Amnesia

The participation of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery was studied on grape snails trained in conditioned food aversion. Anterograde amnesia developed 10 days after memory reconsolidation impairment with an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist and was characterized by long-term memory formation impairment upon repeated training. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor injections to snails 1 h before repeated training, as well as 15 min or 4 h after repeated training, caused rapid formation of memory that persisted for at least 10 days. Injections of histone deacetylase inhibitor before repeated training also induced the formation of a stable long-term memory. However, administration of histone deacetylase inhibitor 15 min after repeated training initiated a temporary memory recovery. Injections of the inhibitor 4 h after repeated training were ineffective. These results indicate that histone-dependent chromatin remodeling and DNA methylation are selectively involved in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery.

Protein synthesis inhibitor administration before a reminder caused recovery from amnesia induced by memory reconsolidation impairment with NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist

Memory recovery in amnestic animals is one of the most poorly studied processes. In this paper, we examine the role of protein synthesis and a reminder in the mechanisms of amnesia and memory recovery in grape snails trained to conditioned food aversion. Amnesia was induced by the impairment of memory reconsolidation using NMDA (N-methyl d-aspartate) glutamate receptor antagonists. In an early stage of amnesia (day 3), injections of protein synthesis inhibitors into animals combined with a reminder by a conditioned stimulus (CS) led to the recovery of aversive reactions to its presentation. Two types of changes in reactions to CS were revealed. In most animals, a persistent recovery of memory retrieval was found that lasted for at least 10 days. In other snails, aversive responses to CS persisted for 24 h. Isolated injections of inhibitors, injections of inhibitors and a reminder by the learning environment (without presenting a CS), usage of a differentiating stimulus instead of a CS, or inhibitor injections after the reminder did not affect the development of amnesia. The administration of protein synthesis inhibitors and a reminder in the late period after amnesia induction (10 days) did not affect its development or caused a short-term memory recovery. We suggest that amnesia is an active process that develops over time. The reminder induces the reactivation of the amnesia process dependent on protein synthesis, while the administration of protein synthesis inhibitors leads to the impairment of amnesia reactivation and recovery of the state formed before amnesia induction (i.e., recovery of conditioned food aversion memory).

Learning against the Background of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibition Leads to the Formation of Memory That Is Resistant to Reactivation and Impairment

The involvement of DNA methylation in the mechanisms of formation of conditioned food aversion memory was studied on Helix lucorum snails. The dynamics of aversion formation in snails injected with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor RG108 did not differ from that in control snails. The memory was retained for more than one month after training following RG108 injection and the duration of memory persistence did not differ from that in control animals. However, the characteristics of memory in control and experimental snails differed significantly. In control snails, injections of glutamate NMDA-receptor antagonist or protein synthesis inhibitor before memory retrieval caused disorders in the memory reconsolidation and development of amnesia 2 days after training. By contrast, injections of these substances before retrieval to snails trained against the background of RG108 treatment caused no memory disorders. We hypothesized that inhibition of DNA methylation processes led to the formation of strong memory, not reactivated after retrieval and not transformed into a labile state sensitive to amnesic agents.

Administration of Protein Synthesis Inhibitor before Reminder Reverses Amnesia Induced by Memory Reconsolidation Impairment with 5-HT Receptors Antagonist

Administration of 5-HT receptor antagonist to snails trained in conditioned food aversion prior to reminding of the conditioning stimulus caused amnesia. At the early period of amnesia (day 3), injections of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide without reminder or reminder alone were ineffective. At the same time, injections of the inhibitor combined with reminder led to memory recovery; this effect in most animals persisted for at least 10 days. In the rest snails, aversive responses to presentations of the conditioning stimulus persisted for 2 days. Cycloheximide injection and reminder in 10 days after induction of amnesia did not affect its development or caused a transient memory recovery (2 days). We hypothesized that amnesia is an active process unfolding in time. One of mechanism of this process is reminder-induced and protein synthesis-depended reactivation of amnesia. Inhibitor of protein synthesis disturbed this reactivation and led to recovery of the initial memory of conditioned food aversion.

Protein synthesis inhibitors induce both memory impairment and its recovery

The involvement of protein synthesis in the mechanisms of conditioned food aversion memory impairment and recovery in grape snails was studied. It was found that protein synthesis inhibitor (cycloheximide) injections before a reminder by the conditioned stimulus (CS) caused amnesia development. Three days after amnesia induction, injections of cycloheximide or another protein synthesis inhibitor, anisomycin, combined with a reminder by four CSs resulted in memory retrieval, which was saved for 24 h. Cycloheximide injections and the administration of one CS as a reminder to an amnestic animals caused the memory expression only in response to this CS, while it was absent the next day. The isolated administration of a reminder or inhibitor injections without a reminder was not effective. It is suggested that amnesia is an active process and that one of its mechanisms may be a protein-dependent amnesia reactivation caused by a reminder. The administration of protein synthesis inhibitors led to impairment of amnesia reactivation and to recovery of the state formed before amnesia induction and thus to the recovery of conditioned food aversion memory.

Peculiarities of Participation of DNA Methyltransferases in the Mechanisms of Storage, Impairment, and Recovery of Conditioned Food Aversion Memory

We studied the participation of DNA-methylation processes in the mechanisms of memory storage and reconsolidation, amnesia induction, and in recovery of the conditioned food aversion memory in edible snails. It was found that daily injections of DNA methyltransferases inhibitor over 3 days combined with a reminder of a conditioned food stimulus did not affect memory storage. The administration of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors did not suppress induction of amnesia caused the NMDA receptor antagonist/reminder. Injections of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors combined with the reminder led to memory recovery in 3 days after amnesia induction. Thus, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in the same doses did not affect storage and reconsolidation of memory, as well as the mechanisms of amnesia induction. At the same time, injections of inhibitors led to memory recovery, apparently, due to disruption of reactivation and amnesia development.

NMDA or 5-HT receptor antagonists impair memory reconsolidation and induce various types of amnesia

Elucidation of amnesia mechanisms is one of the central problems in neuroscience with immense practical application. Previously, we found that conditioned food presentation combined with injection of a neurotransmitter receptor antagonist or protein synthesis inhibitor led to amnesia induction. In the present study, we investigated the time course and features of two amnesias: induced by impairment of memory reconsolidation using an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist (MK-801) and a serotonin receptor antagonist (methiothepin, MET) on snails trained with food aversion conditioning. During the early period of amnesia (<10th day), the unpaired presentation of conditioned stimuli (CS) or unconditioned stimuli (US) in the same training context did not have an effect on both types of amnesia. Retraining an on 1st or 3rd day of amnesia induction facilitated memory formation, i.e. the number of CS + US pairings was lower than at initial training. On the 10th or 30th day after the MET/reminder, the number of CS + US pairings did not change between initial training and retraining. Retraining on the 10th or 30th day following the MK-801/reminder in the same or a new context of learning resulted in short, but not long-term, memory, and the number of CS + US pairings was higher than at the initial training. This type of amnesia was specific to the CS we used at initial training, since long-term memory for another kind of CS could be formed in the same snails. The attained results suggest that disruption of memory reconsolidation using antagonists of serotonin or NMDA glutamate receptors induced amnesias with different abilities to form long-term memory during the late period of development.

Involvement of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 in the Mechanisms of Conditioned Food Aversion Memory Reconsolidation

Experiments were performed on the snails trained in conditioned food aversion for 3 days. Injection of TDZD-8 (glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor, 2 mg/kg) in combination with reminder (presentation of a conditioned food stimulus) led to memory impairment developing 3 days after inhibitor/reminder exposure and followed by spontaneous recovery in 10 days. Injections of TDZD-8 in a dose of 4 or 20 mg/kg before reminder were shown to cause amnesia that persisted for more than 10 days. Memory recovery during repeated training was observed at the earlier period than after initial training. The impairment of memory reconsolidation by TDZD-8 after training of snails for 1 day was less pronounced than under standard training conditions (3 days). The effect of a glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor during memory reconsolidation is probably followed by impairment of memory retrieval and/or partial loss, which can be compensated spontaneously or after repeated training.

DNA methylation is necessary for erythropoietin to improve spatial learning and memory in SAMP8 mice

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the role of Dnmts in the improvement of spatial learning and memory induced by erythropoietin (EPO) in SAMP8 mice.

METHODS

The Morris water maze (MWM) was used to assess spatial learning and memory. Mice were administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of recombinant human EPO and hippocamppi infusion (IH) of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-AZA). The expression of genes Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in the hippocampus was detected by real-time qPCR. The level of proteins DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B was measured by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Spatial learning and memory in SAMP8 were promoted after i.p. injection of EPO (5000IU/kg/day) and expression of Dnmt3b mRNA and DNMT3B proteins in the hippocampus increased. The improved memory by EPO was blocked after IH 5-AZA.

CONCLUSION

DNA methylation is necessary for EPO to enhance spatial learning and memory in SAMP8 mice.