Trends in oral anti-osteoporosis drug prescription in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2012: Variation by age, sex, geographic location and ethnicity

Causal relationship between circulating levels of cytokines and bone mineral density: A mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have shown that various cytokines are important factors affecting bone mineral density (BMD), but the causality between the two remains uncertain.

METHODS

Genetic variants associated with 41 circulating cytokines from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 8,293 Finns were used as instrumental variables (IVs) for a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was employed as the primary method to investigate whether the 41 cytokines were causally associated with BMD at five different sites [total body bone mineral density (TB-BMD), heel bone mineral density (HE-BMD), forearm bone mineral density (FA-BMD), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN-BMD), and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD)]. Weighted median and MR-Egger were chosen to further confirm the robustness of the results. We performed MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test (MR-PRESSO), MR-Egger regression, and Cochran's Q test to detect pleiotropy and sensitivity testing.

RESULTS

After Bonferroni correction, two circulating cytokines had a strong causality with BMD at corresponding sites. Genetically predicted circulating hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) levels and HE-BMD were negatively correlated [β (95 % CI) -0.035(-0.055, -0.016), P=0.00038]. Circulating macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) levels and TB-BMD were negatively correlated [β(95 %CI): -0.058(-0.092, -0.024), P=0.00074]. Weighted median and MR-Egger results were in line with the IVW results. We also found suggestive causal relationship (IVW P<0.05) between seven circulating cytokines and BMD at corresponding sites. No significant pleiotropy or heterogeneity was observed in our study.

CONCLUSION

Our MR analyses indicated a causal effect between two circulating cytokines and BMD at corresponding sites (HGF and HE-BMD, MIP-1α and TB-BMD), along with suggestive evidence of a potential causality between seven cytokines and BMD at the corresponding sites. These findings would provide insights into the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, especially immunoporosis.

Global, regional, and national burden of incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for facial fractures from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2019

BACKGROUND

Facial fractures are common injuries causing cosmetic, functional, and psychological damage. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) of facial fractures from 1990 to 2019 using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD).

METHODS

Detailed data for the disease burden of facial fractures were obtained from online available public data (Global Health Data Exchange) derived from the GBD study. The incidence, prevalence, and YLDs of facial fractures from 1990 to 2019 were analyzed by country, region, age, gender, sociodemographic index (SDI), and cause. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), age-standardized YLDs rate (ASYR), and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) were calculated to evaluate the disease burden and quantify the trends over time. The main causes of facial fractures in different years and ages were assessed.

RESULTS

Globally, there were 8.9 million incident cases, 1.5 million cases prevalent cases, and 98.1 thousand years YLDs in 2019. Compared with 1990, the number of incident cases, prevalent cases, and YLDs increased, while ASIR (EAPC, - 0.47; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], - 0.57 to - 0.37), ASPR (EAPC, - 0.39; 95% UI, - 0.46 to - 0.31), ASYR (EAPC, - 0.39; 95% UI, - 0.47 to - 0.32) showed a downward trend. The high SDI region held the highest ASIR, ASPR, and ASYR both in 1990 and 2019, such as New Zealand, Slovenia, and Australia. The burden was higher in men than in women from 1990 to 2019, while the ASRs in women exceeded that of men in the elderly. The ASIR peaked in the young adult group, however, the ASPR and ASYR increased with age. Falls and road injuries were the leading causes of facial fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial fractures continue to cause a heavy burden on public health worldwide. More targeted strategies need to be established to control the burden of facial fractures.

Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, has led to a high risk of fatal osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that sexual dimorphism is a notable feature of osteoporosis, with sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Specifically, females are more susceptible than males to osteoporosis, while males are more prone to disability or death from the disease. To date, sex chromosome abnormalities and steroid hormones have been proven to contribute greatly to sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis by regulating the functions of bone cells. Understanding the sex-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications is essential for improving treatment strategies tailored to women and men. This literature review focuses on the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, mainly in a population of aging patients, chronic glucocorticoid administration, and diabetes. Moreover, we highlight the implications of sexual dimorphism for developing therapeutics and preventive strategies and screening approaches tailored to women and men. Additionally, the challenges in translating bench research to bedside treatments and future directions to overcome these obstacles will be discussed.

Understanding patient views and acceptability of predictive software in osteoporosis identification

INTRODUCTION

Research into patient and public views on predictive software and its use in healthcare is relatively new. This study aimed to understand older adults' acceptability of an opportunistic bone density assessment for osteoporosis diagnosis (IBEX BH), views on its integration into healthcare, and views on predictive software and AI in healthcare.

METHODS

Focus groups were conducted with participants aged over 50 years, based in South West England. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Analysis was informed by the theoretical framework of acceptability.

RESULTS

Two focus groups were undertaken with a total of 14 participants. Overall, the participants were generally positive about the IBEX BH software, and predictive software's in general stating 'it sounds like a brilliant idea'. Although participants did not understand the intricacies of the software, they did not feel they needed to. Concerns about IBEX BH focussed more on the clinical indications of the software (e.g. more scans or medications), with participants expressing less trust in results if they indicated medication. Questions were also raised about how and who would receive the results of this software. Individual choice was evident in these discussions, however most indicated the preferences for spoken communication 'But I would expect that these results would be given by a human to another human.'

CONCLUSIONS

Focus group participants were generally accepting of the use of predictive software in healthcare.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Thought and care needs to be taken when integrating predictive software into practice. Focusses on empowering patients, providing information on processes and results are key.

Global Epidemiology of Hip Fractures: Secular Trends in Incidence Rate, Post-Fracture Treatment, and All-Cause Mortality

In this international study, we examined the incidence of hip fractures, postfracture treatment, and all-cause mortality following hip fractures, based on demographics, geography, and calendar year. We used patient-level healthcare data from 19 countries and regions to identify patients aged 50 years and older hospitalized with a hip fracture from 2005 to 2018. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of hip fractures, post-hip fracture treatment (defined as the proportion of patients receiving anti-osteoporosis medication with various mechanisms of action [bisphosphonates, denosumab, raloxifene, strontium ranelate, or teriparatide] following a hip fracture), and the all-cause mortality rates after hip fractures were estimated using a standardized protocol and common data model. The number of hip fractures in 2050 was projected based on trends in the incidence and estimated future population demographics. In total, 4,115,046 hip fractures were identified from 20 databases. The reported age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of hip fractures ranged from 95.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 94.8-95.4) in Brazil to 315.9 (95% CI 314.0-317.7) in Denmark per 100,000 population. Incidence rates decreased over the study period in most countries; however, the estimated total annual number of hip fractures nearly doubled from 2018 to 2050. Within 1 year following a hip fracture, post-hip fracture treatment ranged from 11.5% (95% CI 11.1% to 11.9%) in Germany to 50.3% (95% CI 50.0% to 50.7%) in the United Kingdom, and all-cause mortality rates ranged from 14.4% (95% CI 14.0% to 14.8%) in Singapore to 28.3% (95% CI 28.0% to 28.6%) in the United Kingdom. Males had lower use of anti-osteoporosis medication than females, higher rates of all-cause mortality, and a larger increase in the projected number of hip fractures by 2050. Substantial variations exist in the global epidemiology of hip fractures and postfracture outcomes. Our findings inform possible actions to reduce the projected public health burden of osteoporotic fractures among the aging population. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Constraining in reimbursement criteria and the adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) in Taiwan: Urbanization makes the difference

BACKGROUND

The Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan implemented a new reimbursement scheme incorporating bone mineral density (BMD) criteria on Jan. 1, 2011. This study aimed to investigate a real-life 11-year secular trend of adherence in new AOMs users and evaluated the change of adherence to AOMs therapy in different urbanization areas after reimbursement criteria were restrained.

METHODS

We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to identify new AOMs users as our study population. The AOMs in this study included denosumab, zoledronate, ibandronate, alendronate, raloxifene, and risedronate. The first prescription date of AOMs was defined as the cohort entry date. The adherence rates within one year after initiation were assessed.

RESULTS

High adherence (≥75%) in the first year increased markedly after the new reimbursement scheme in 2011, changing from 31.8% in 2008, and 41.7% in 2011 to 54.2% in 2018. On the other hand, low adherence (<25%) decreased from 38.8% in 2008 to 14.6% in 2018. In addition, the switchers increased from 5.9% in 2008 to 9.3% in 2018, indicating a more flexible choice of AOMs. The proportion of high adherence to AOMs was highest in high-urbanization areas, and the proportion increased about two times from 30% in 2008 to 60% in 2018.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of new reimbursement criteria in 2011 was associated with increased adherence to AOMs and the increase was most apparent in high-urbanization areas.

What was the Epidemiology and Global Burden of Disease of Hip Fractures From 1990 to 2019? Results From and Additional Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are associated with a high risk of death; among those who survive a hip fracture, many experience substantial decreases in quality of life. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology and burden of hip fractures by country, age, gender, and sociodemographic factors would provide valuable information for healthcare policymaking and clinical practice. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019 was a global-level study estimating the burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories. An exploration and additional analysis of the GBD 2019 would provide a clearer picture of the incidence and burden of hip fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using data from the GBD 2019, we asked, (1) What are the global, regional, and national incidences of hip fractures, and how did they change over a recent 30-year span? (2) What is the global, regional, and national burden of hip fractures in terms of years lived with disability, and how did it change over that same period? (3) What is the leading cause of hip fractures? (4) How did the incidence and years lived with disability of patients with hip fractures change with age, gender, and sociodemographic factors?

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Participant data were obtained from the GBD 2019 ( http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool ). The GBD study is managed by the WHO, coordinated by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It estimates the burden of disease and injury for 204 countries by age, gender, and sociodemographic factors, and can serve as a valuable reference for health policymaking. All estimates and their 95% uncertainty interval (UI) were produced using DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool in the GBD 2019. In this study, we directly pulled the age-standardized incidence rate and years lived with disability rate of hip fractures by location, age, gender, and cause from the GBD 2019. Based on these data, we analyzed the association between the incidence rate and latitude of each country. Then, we calculated the estimated annual percentage change to represent trends from 1990 to 2019. We also used the Spearman rank-order correlation analysis to determine the correlation between the incidence or burden of hip fractures and the sociodemographic index, a composite index of the income per capita, average years of educational attainment, and fertility rates in a country.

RESULTS

Globally, hip fracture incidences were estimated to be 14.2 million (95% UI 11.1 to 18.1), and the associated years lived with disability were 2.9 million (95% UI 2.0 to 4.0) in 2019, with an incidence of 182 (95% UI 142 to 231) and 37 (95% UI 25 to 50) per 100,000, respectively. A strong, positive correlation was observed between the incidence rate and the latitude of each country (rho = 0.65; p < 0.001). From 1990 to 2019, the global incidence rate for both genders remained unchanged (estimated annual percentage change 0.01 [95% confidence interval -0.08 to 0.11]), but was slightly increased in men (estimated annual percentage change 0.11 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.2]). The years lived with disability rate decreased slightly (estimated annual percentage change 0.66 [95% CI -0.73 to -0.6]). These rates were standardized by age. Falls were the leading cause of hip fractures, accounting for 66% of all patients and 55% of the total years lived with disability. The incidence of hip fractures was tightly and positively correlated with the sociodemographic index (rho 0.624; p < 0.001), while the years lived with disability rate was slightly negatively correlated (rho -0.247; p < 0.001). Most hip fractures occurred in people older than 70 years, and women had higher incidence rate (189.7 [95% UI 144.2 to 247.2] versus 166.2 [95% UI 133.2 to 205.8] per 100,000) and years lived with disability (38.4 [95% UI 26.9 to 51.6] versus 33.7 [95% UI 23.1 to 45.5] per 100,000) than men.

CONCLUSION

Hip fractures are common, devastating to patients, and economically burdensome to healthcare systems globally, with falls being the leading cause. The age-standardized incidence rate has slightly increased in men. Many low-latitude countries have lower incidences, possibly because of prolonged sunlight exposure. Policies should be directed to promoting public health education about maintaining bone-protective lifestyles, enhancing the knowledge of osteoporosis management in young resident physicians and those in practice, increasing the awareness of osteoporosis screening and treatment in men, and developing more effective antiosteoporosis drugs for clinical use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Characterising complex health needs and the use of preventive therapies in the older population: a population-based cohort analysis of UK primary care and hospital linked data

BACKGROUND

While several definitions exist for multimorbidity, frailty or polypharmacy, it is yet unclear to what extent single healthcare markers capture the complexity of health-related needs in older people in the community. We aimed to identify and characterise older people with complex health needs based on healthcare resource use (unplanned hospitalisations or polypharmacy) or frailty using large population-based linked records.

METHODS

In this cohort study, data was extracted from UK primary care records (CPRD GOLD), with linked Hospital Episode Statistics inpatient data. People aged > 65 on 1st January 2010, registered in CPRD for ≥ 1 year were included. We identified complex health needs as the top quintile of unplanned hospitalisations, number of prescribed medicines, and electronic frailty index. We characterised all three cohorts, and quantified point-prevalence and incidence rates of preventive medicines use.

RESULTS

Overall, 90,597, 110,225 and 116,076 individuals were included in the hospitalisation, frailty, and polypharmacy cohorts respectively; 28,259 (5.9%) were in all three cohorts, while 277,332 (58.3%) were not in any (background population). Frailty and polypharmacy cohorts had the highest bi-directional overlap. Most comorbidities such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease were more common in the frailty and polypharmacy cohorts compared to the hospitalisation cohort. Generally, prevalence of preventive medicines use was highest in the polypharmacy cohort compared to the other two cohorts: For instance, one-year point-prevalence of statins was 64.2% in the polypharmacy cohort vs. 60.5% in the frailty cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Three distinct groups of older people with complex health needs were identified. Compared to the hospitalisation cohort, frailty and polypharmacy cohorts had more comorbidities and higher preventive therapies use. Research is needed into the benefit-risk of different definitions of complex health needs and use of preventive therapies in the older population.

Trends in osteoporosis medication use in US postmenopausal women: analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000 through 2017-2018

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine trends in the use of osteoporosis medications in postmenopausal women between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018.

METHODS

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were analyzed to describe trends in the use of osteoporosis medications in US women 50 years and older. Joinpoint regression software was used to detect points at which significant changes in the direction and magnitude of the trends occurred over time. Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were assembled to determine the independent association between time period (2007-2008 vs 2017-2018) and osteoporosis medication use.

RESULTS

Of 13,826 postmenopausal women, about 7% reported taking osteoporosis medications. Joinpoint regression demonstrated that the prevalence of women taking osteoporosis medications significantly decreased by -23.3% on average (95% confidence interval [CI], -23.3% to -37.7%) per survey cycle between 2007-2008 and 2017-2018. Similarly, bisphosphonate use decreased by -22.6% on average (95% CI, -38.8% to -2.1%) from 2007 to 2008 onward. Logistic regression demonstrated that, after adjustment for potential confounders including bone mineral density and self-reported hip or spine fractures, postmenopausal women were 61% and 56% less likely to use any osteoporosis medications and bisphosphonates in 2017 to 2018 compared with their counterparts in 2007 to 2008, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of osteoporosis medications in postmenopausal US women has significantly decreased since 2007 to 2008 onward. This finding was mostly attributed to a low prescription rate of bisphosphonate drugs. Moreover, the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women was suboptimal and decreased over time.

Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine

Osteoporosis care has evolved markedly over the last 50 years, such that there are now an established clinical definition, validated methods of fracture risk assessment, and a range of effective pharmacological agents. However, it is apparent that both in the context of primary and secondary fracture prevention, there is a considerable gap between the population at high fracture risk and those actually receiving appropriate antiosteoporosis treatment. In this narrative review article, we document recent work describing the burden of disease, approaches to management, and service provision across Europe, emerging data on gaps in care, and existing/new ways in which these gaps may be addressed at the level of healthcare systems and policy. We conclude that although the field has come a long way in recent decades, there is still a long way to go, and a concerted, integrated effort is now required from all of us involved in this field to address these urgent issues to ensure the best possible outcomes for our patients.

Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was originally published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk for fractures, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

With broader and updated strategies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. A grey literature search, including the online databases ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and drug approval agencies, as well as bibliography checks of relevant systematic reviews was also performed. Eligible trials published between 1966 to 24 March 2021 were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Participants must have received at least one year of risedronate, placebo or other anti-osteoporotic drugs, with or without concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. In the interest of clinical relevance and applicability, we classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled more than one of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD)T score ≤ -2.5, and age ≥ 75 years old. If none of these criteria was met, the study was considered to be primary prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We pooled the relative risk (RR) of fractures using a fixed-effect model based on the expectation that the clinical and methodological characteristics of the respective primary and secondary prevention studies would be homogeneous, and the experience from the previous review suggesting that there would be a small number of studies. The base case included the data available for the longest treatment period in each placebo-controlled trial and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important. The main findings of the review were presented in summary of findings tables, using the GRADE approach. In addition, we looked at benefit and harm comparisons between different dosage regimens for risedronate and between risedronate and other anti-osteoporotic drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria, among which 33 studies (27,348 participants) reported data that could be extracted and quantitatively synthesized. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial. Selection bias was the most frequent concern, with only 24% of the studies describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Fifty per cent and 39% of the studies reporting benefit and harm outcomes, respectively, were subject to high risk. None of the studies included in the quantitative syntheses were judged to be at low risk of bias in all seven domains. The results described below pertain to the comparisons for daily risedronate 5 mg versus placebo which reported major outcomes. Other comparisons are described in the full text. For primary prevention, low- to very low-certainty evidence was collected from four studies (one to two years in length) including 989 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Risedronate 5 mg/day may make little or no difference to wrist fractures [RR 0.48 ( 95% CI 0.03 to 7.50; two studies, 243 participants); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 7% more)] and withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.18; three studies, 748 participants); ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 5% fewer to 1% more)], based on low-certainty evidence. However, its preventive effects on non-vertebral fractures and serious adverse events are not known due to the very low-certainty evidence. There were zero clinical vertebral and hip fractures reported therefore the effects of risedronate for these outcomes are not estimable.  For secondary prevention, nine studies (one to three years in length) including 14,354 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided evidence. Risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fractures [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90; six studies, 12,173 participants); RRR 20% (95% CI 10% to 28%) and ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 3% fewer), moderate certainty], and may reduce hip fractures [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); RRR 27% (95% CI 6% to 44%) and ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 0.2% fewer to 1% fewer), low certainty]. Both of these effects are probably clinically important. However, risedronate's effects are not known for wrist fractures [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.24); three studies,1746 participants); ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more), very-low certainty] and not estimable for clinical vertebral fractures due to zero events reported (low certainty). Risedronate results in little to no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; eight studies, 9529 participants); ARR 0.3% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more); 16.9% in risedronate versus 17.2% in control, high certainty] and probably results in little to no difference in serious adverse events [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.07; six studies, 9435 participants); ARR 0% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 2% more; 29.2% in both groups, moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update recaps the key findings from our previous review that, for secondary prevention, risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fracture, and may reduce the risk of hip fractures. We are uncertain on whether risedronate 5mg/day reduces clinical vertebral and wrist fractures.  Compared to placebo, risedronate probably does not increase the risk of serious adverse events.  For primary prevention, the benefit and harms of risedronate were supported by limited evidence with high uncertainty.

Global incidence, prevalence, and disability of vertebral fractures: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In the context of the population growing and aging worldwide, the epidemiology, and burden of vertebral fracture have not been comprehensively analyzed.

PURPOSE

To delineate the global number and rate of incidence, prevalence and burden of vertebral fracture in 2019, and the temporal trends from 1990 to 2019 by location, age, sex, and the socio-demographic index (SDI).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A cross-sectional study using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD study 2019).

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with vertebral fracture documented in medical records or registrations and included in the GBD study 2019 from different countries worldwide.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Age standardized incidence rate (ASIR), age standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), and age standardized years lived with disability (YLDs).

METHODS

The GBD study 2019 was used to obtain data for this analysis. The incidence, prevalence and disability were analyzed by location, year, sex, age, and SDI. DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, was used to produce the estimates for each value after adjustment for age, sex, and other variables. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated to represent the temporal trends from 1990 to 2019. Spearman's rank order correlation was used to determine the correlation between SDI and the incidence and burden of vertebral fracture. This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province of China (No. 2020BCB049), and no conflicts of interest-associated biases existed in this study.

RESULTS

Globally, there were 8.6 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 6,6-11,3 million) incident cases, 5.3 million (95% UI, 4.6-6.2 million) prevalent cases, and 0.55 million (95% UI, 0.37-0.77 million) YLDs of vertebral fracture. Compared with 1990, the number of incident cases and YLDs in 2019 increased by 38% (95% UI, 23%-48%) and 75% (95% UI, 65%-85%), respectively, while the ASIR (EAPC, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.14), ASPR (EAPC, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.22 to -0.02) and age standardized YLD rate (ASYR) (EAPC, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.04) decreased during this period. High ASIR, ASPR and ASYR were commonly seen in high-SDI countries, such as high-income North America, Australia, Central and Eastern Europe. In the country level, positive correlations were observed between SDI and ASIR (rho, 0.596; p<.001) and ASYR (rho, 0.413; p<.001). Males had higher ASIR and ASYR worldwide in each year from 1990 to 2019. However, the incidence, and YLD rates in females surpassed that in males after 65 years of age. Increasing trends were observed for both incidence and YLD rates with age. Falls were the leading cause for vertebral fracture across all ages.

CONCLUSIONS

The past thirty years have seen increasing numbers but decreasing rates of global incidence, prevalence, and disability of vertebral fractures, resulting from the growing population worldwide. With population aging, efforts are still in urgent need to address vertebral fracture related health outcomes.

Bisphosphonates and the risk of atypical femur fractures

Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing hip and other fractures. However, concerns about atypical femur fractures (AFFs) have contributed to substantially decreased bisphosphonate use, and hip fracture rates may be increasing. Despite this impact, important uncertainties remain regarding AFF risks including the association between bisphosphonate use and other risk factors such as BMD, age, weight, and race. To address this evidence gap, a cohort study of 196,129 women ≥50 years of age in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente HMO women (with ≥1 bisphosphonate prescription) were studied; the primary outcome was radiographically-adjudicated AFF between 2007 and 2017. Risk factors including bisphosphonate use and race were obtained from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox models were used for analysis. Benefit-risk was modeled for 1-10 years of bisphosphonates to compare fractures prevented vs. AFFs associated. Among 196,129 women, 277 (0.1%) sustained AFFs. After multivariable adjustment, AFF risk increased with longer bisphosphonate duration: hazard ratio (HR) increased from HR = 8.9 (95%CI: 2.8,28) for 3-5 years to HR = 43.5 (13.7138.1) for >8 years. Hip BMD, surprisingly, was not associated with AFF risk. Other risk factors included Asian ancestry (HR = 4.8 (3.6, 6.6)), short stature, overweight, and glucocorticoid use. Bisphosphonate discontinuation was associated with rapid decrease in AFF risk. Decreases in osteoporotic and hip fractures risk during 1-10 years of bisphosphonates far outweighed the increase AFF risk in Caucasians, but less so in Asians. In Caucasians, after 3 years 149 hip fractures were prevented with 2 AFFs associated compared to 91 and 8 in Asians. The evidence for several potential mechanisms is summarized with femoral geometry being the most likely to explain AFF risk differences between Asians and Caucasians. The results from this new study add to the evidence base for AFF risk factors and will help inform clinical decision-making for individual patients about initiation and duration of bisphosphonate therapy and drug holidays.

Relationship Between Muscle Strength, Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density in Adolescents

Adolescence is an important period for the acquisition of bone mass, which can be enhanced by several factors. This study aimed examine the relationships of handgrip strength, free-fat mass, and fat mass with bone mineral density in adolescents. 118 adolescents (60 girls), aged 10 to 14 years, participated in the study. Information on sex, age, handgrip strength, free-fat mass, fat mass and bone mineral density were collected. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine possible relationships between bone mineral density and handgrip strength, free-fat mass and fat mass. There was a relation between handgrip strength and free-fat mass with bone mineral density in both sexes. Fat mass was correlated with bone mineral density only in girls (r= 0.314, p< 0.014). The final models, adjusted for sexual maturation, included free-fat mass (girls - β= 0.419, p< 0.001; boys - β= 0.455; p< 0.001) and handgrip strength (girls - β= 0.358, p< 0.05; boys - β= 0.325; p< 0.05) and these variables together explained 51.8% and 62.9% of the variation of bone mineral density, in girls and boys, respectively. Handgrip strength and free-fat mass were positively associated with bone mineral density. A sex-specific difference indicated that higher levels of free-fat mass are of paramount importance for both sexes.

Trends in postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment in France during the period 2007-2016: A nationwide claims database analysis

PURPOSE

To describe the trends in the pharmacological management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in France during the period 2007-2016.

METHOD

This cross-sectional, yearly repeated study of patients in France used the nationwide claims database 'Échantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires' (EGB), covering a 1 in 97 representative sample of approximately 600,000 individuals insured by the main French public insurance scheme. For women aged 50-89 years, prescriptions for all anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) marketed in France during the study period (bisphosphonates alone or used in combination with calcium, selective estrogen receptor modulators, strontium ranelate, teriparatide or denosumab) were identified in each calendar year. Initiation of any AOM in a calendar year was defined by the absence of a prescription for any AOM within the 2 previous calendar years. Incidence was calculated for all AOM prescriptions and initial prescriptions for AOM.

RESULTS

Marked changes were observed in the rates of women receiving any AOM, with a slight increase from 2007 to 2009 (from 10.22 to 10.42 per 100 patient-years [PY]), then a plateau in 2009-2010, followed by a rapid and more than twofold decrease until 2016 (from 10.39 to 5.02 per 100 PY). The decrease in the overall rate of women initiating an AOM showed a rapid halving from 2007 to 2012 (from 2.56 to 1.15 per 100 PY), followed by a plateau in the range of 0.90-1.0 per 100 PY during the period 2013-2016. In contrast, the use of calcium/vitamin D has been rapidly increasing as the only prevention and exclusive intervention for postmenopausal osteoporosis, from 10.6% of women in 2007 to 47.7% in 2016. The profile of patients initiating AOM changed substantially over the 10-year period. Despite a stable mean age of approximately 69 years, an increasing proportion of women with severe chronic comorbidities (from 34.9% to 43.3%), history of fractures (from 7.8% to 13.3%) or high-dose steroid use (from 2.9% to 8.4%) was observed. The decline of AOM initiation was associated with a marked reduction of prescriptions during the study period: by 64.2% for primary care physicians; by 36.7% for specialty doctors; and by 18.4% for rheumatologists.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a general trend toward an AOM uptake that is increasingly limited to a fraction of patients who are at high risk of fractures. In the context of an aging population and declining prescription rates for AOM, these data highlight an increasing treatment gap among women in France with osteoporosis, which is similar to that seen in other European countries and in the USA.

Global, Regional, and National Burden of Low Bone Mineral Density From 1990 to 2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

OBJECTIVE

We aim to explore the global spatial prevalence and temporal trends of the burden of low bone mineral density (LBMD) worldwide, due to a lack of related studies.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

We used data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 to conduct this study. LBMD in the GBD study includes both osteopenia and osteoporosis. The estimation for the prevalence, measured by the summary exposure value (SEV), and burden of LBMD was made in DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool. Correlation analysis was performed using the Spearman rank order correlation methods. The temporal trends were represented by the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC).

RESULTS

In 2019, there were 438 thousand deaths and 16.6 million DALYs attributable to LBMD, increasing by 111.1% and 93.8% respectively, compared to that in 1990. From 1990 to 2019, the prevalence of LBMD has decreased worldwide, but has increased in high-income North America. Some countries, such as the United States, Australia, Canada, and China had increased disability and mortality rates of LBMD with time. Countries with low socio-demographic index (SDI) had higher incidence and mortality rate than those with high SDI. The prevalence of LBMD was lower in males, but the attributable disability and mortality were higher in males in all years from 1990 to 2019.

CONCLUSION

With population aging, countries worldwide, especially those with low-SDI, will face increasing challenges in reducing the burden attributable to LBMD and osteoporosis. The treatment of osteoporosis has been overlooked in men for a long time. Effective measures are warranted to control the prevalence and burden of LBMD.

Sex differences in recovery of quality of life 12 months post-fracture in community-dwelling older adults: analyses of the Australian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS)

In this study of 695 Australian older adults (aged ≥50 years), we found that men and women had a similar trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) recovery following fragility fracture at any skeletal site. These results provide us with critical knowledge that improves our understanding of health outcomes post-fracture.

INTRODUCTION

Mortality is higher in men than that in women following a fragility fracture, but it is unclear whether recovery of patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) differs between sexes. This study aimed to identify sex differences in HRQoL recovery 12 months post-fracture.

METHODS

Data were from the Australian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS). Participants recruited to AusICUROS were adults aged ≥50 years who sustained a fragility fracture. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L at three time-points post-fracture: within 2 weeks (including pre-fracture recall) and at 4 and 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken, adjusting for confounders including age, education, income, and healthcare utilization post-fracture.

RESULTS

Overall, 695 AusICUROS participants (536 women, 77.1%) were eligible for analysis with fractures at the hip (n = 150), distal forearm (n = 261), vertebrae (n = 61), humerus (n = 52), and other skeletal sites (n = 171). At the time of fracture, men were younger, reported a higher income, and were more likely to be employed, compared with women. For all fracture sites combined, there were no differences between men and women in recovery to pre-fracture HRQoL at 12-month follow-up (adjusted OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.75-1.61). When stratified by fracture site, no significant sex differences were seen for hip (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.42-2.52), distal forearm (OR = 1.60; 95% CI: 0.68-3.78), vertebral (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 0.61-8.48), humeral (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 0.16-9.99), and other fractures (OR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.44-2.26).

CONCLUSION

Community-dwelling men and women who survived the 12 months following fragility fracture had a similar trajectory of HRQoL recovery at any skeletal site.

Prevalence of osteoporosis in elderly women in Hong Kong

Objectives

To determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and the proportion who needed treatment after screening women aged 65 years or older; their treatment acceptance and continuation.

Methods

This is an observational study conducted between May 2017 and April 2020.

Participants underwent clinical assessment and bone mineral density measurement of lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Those with osteoporosis at any site or osteopenia with 10-year major fracture risk ≥ 20% or hip fracture risk ≥ 3% by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool® were offered drug treatment.

Results

Among 1800 participants, 15.9% were normal, 33.2% were low-risk osteopenic, 27.2% were high-risk osteopenic, and 23.7% were osteoporotic. Their mean age was 69.4 years and 6.3% had low-energy fractures after menopause. After stepwise logistic regression analysis, only prior low-energy fractures after menopause and low body mass index (BMI) remained significantly correlated with osteoporosis. Those who needed treatment were significantly older, menopaused at age 45 years or earlier, had a parent with hip fracture, had low-energy fractures after menopause, and low BMI. Drug was offered to 916 women but 67.6% refused because they worried about side effects, interaction with existing drugs, and were reluctant to take more drugs. Treatment acceptance was significantly higher among osteoporotic patients. Treatment continuation at 6th and 12th months was also significantly higher in osteoporotic patients.

Conclusions

Osteoporosis screening in elderly women identified a significant proportion who needed treatment. Encouraging them to initiate drug, especially high-risk osteopenic patients, remained a challenge.

Assessment of previous fracture and anti-osteoporotic medication prescription in hip fracture patients

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture prevention is an essential component in elderly patient care. History of prior fracture is a significant risk factor for subsequent hip fracture. There are variable rates of treatment for these groups of patients. The aims of this study were to make an assessment of how many hip fracture patients over a 1 year period had a previous fracture and to assess whether or not these patients were on anti-osteoporotic medication.

METHODS

Assessment on whether or not patients had a prior fracture using the national radiology imaging system checking radiology reports for all previous imaging performed. Checking patients bone health status using the hip fracture database for our hospital.

RESULTS

There were 225 hip fractures in 221 patients over a 1-year period. About 42.6% of females and 35.9% of males had a history of previous fracture. Vertebral fractures were the most common type of fracture. We found 7% of patients had a contralateral hip fracture. There were 81% of patients with prior fracture, and 71% of those without prior fracture were on anti-osteoporotic medication.

DISCUSSION

Vertebral fractures were the most common preceding fracture in hip fracture patients. There were many patients with a history of fragility fractures that were not on preventative medication. Overall there were good prescription rates of anti-osteoporotic medication. There were significantly higher rates of prescription amongst females compared with males.

Opportunities and Challenges in Functional Genomics Research in Osteoporosis: Report From a Workshop Held by the Causes Working Group of the Osteoporosis and Bone Research Academy of the Royal Osteoporosis Society on October 5th 2020

The discovery that sclerostin is the defective protein underlying the rare heritable bone mass disorder, sclerosteosis, ultimately led to development of anti-sclerostin antibodies as a new treatment for osteoporosis. In the era of large scale GWAS, many additional genetic signals associated with bone mass and related traits have since been reported. However, how best to interrogate these signals in order to identify the underlying gene responsible for these genetic associations, a prerequisite for identifying drug targets for further treatments, remains a challenge. The resources available for supporting functional genomics research continues to expand, exemplified by "multi-omics" database resources, with improved availability of datasets derived from bone tissues. These databases provide information about potential molecular mediators such as mRNA expression, protein expression, and DNA methylation levels, which can be interrogated to map genetic signals to specific genes based on identification of causal pathways between the genetic signal and the phenotype being studied. Functional evaluation of potential causative genes has been facilitated by characterization of the "osteocyte signature", by broad phenotyping of knockout mice with deletions of over 7,000 genes, in which more detailed skeletal phenotyping is currently being undertaken, and by development of zebrafish as a highly efficient additional in vivo model for functional studies of the skeleton. Looking to the future, this expanding repertoire of tools offers the hope of accurately defining the major genetic signals which contribute to osteoporosis. This may in turn lead to the identification of additional therapeutic targets, and ultimately new treatments for osteoporosis.

The secular trends in the use of medications for osteoporosis in South Korea using Intercontinental Medical Statistics Health Sales Audit 2006-2018

Objectives

Osteoporosis medications are widely available in South Korea, and well reimbursed by the Government Health Insurance; however, some expensive drugs are not reimbursed. The prescription of anti-osteoporosis drugs (AODs) are increasing for the elderly and for postmenopausal women. We investigate the secular trends of AODs in South Korea.

Methods

We used the Intercontinental Medical Statistics Health Sales Audit between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2018. We analyzed the total sales costs and market share of AODs including bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitonins, and denosumab using the number of days of therapy (DOT). Changes of prescription patterns including original versus generic drugs, vitamin D combination, and types of medical institutions were also analyzed.

Results

Bisphosphonates were the most frequently used drug during the study period although its DOT declined from 92.5% in 2008 to 80.0% in 2018. SERMs were the second-most used medication, and has maintained around 13% since 2015. The proportion of calcitonins has decreased since 2011, mainly due to malignancy risk. In contrast, the DOT of PTH and denosumab increased to 0.8% and 4.7% in 2018, respectively. The use of generics, vitamin D combination, and intravenous bisphosphonates has been increasing throughout the study period.

Conclusions

Prescription patterns using DOT are changing probably due to the increase in older adult patients and severely osteoporotic patients. There are other issues including safety and the launching of new drugs.

Trends in hip and distal femoral fracture rates in Italy from 2007 to 2017

Osteoporosis-related fractures are a growing public health concern worldwide due to high societal and economic burden. The study aims to assess trends in incidence rates of hip and distal femoral fractures and in the use of anti-osteoporosis drugs in Italy between 2007 and 2017. Patients with hip and distal femoral fractures (ICD-9-CM codes 820.x and 821.x) were identified in the Italian National Hospital Discharge Database while anti-osteoporosis medication data were retrieved from the National Observatory on the Use of Medicines Database. A joinpoint regression analysis was performed to identify the years where the trends in incidence rates of hip and distal femoral fractures changed significantly; the average annual percentage change for the period of observation was estimated. Hospitalizations for femoral fractures were 991,059, of which 91.4% were hip fractures and 76.5% occurred in women. Age-standardized hip fractures rate per 100,000 person-years decreased both in women (-8.7%; from 789.9 in 2007 to 721.5 in 2017) and in men (-4.3%; from 423.9 to 405.6), while the rate of distal femoral fractures increased by 23.9% in women (from 67.78 to 83.95) and 22.7% in men (from 27.76 to 34.06). These changes were associated with an increment in the use of anti-osteoporosis drugs from 2007 to 2011 (from 9.1 to 12.4 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day), followed by a plateau in the period 2012-2017. The use of bisphosphonates increased progressively from 2007 to 2010 (from 8.2 to 10.5 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day), followed by a plateau and then decreased from 2015 onwards. The decreasing trend of hip fractures could be related to a major intake of anti-osteoporosis medications while the increment of distal femoral fractures might be due to population aging and to the use of bisphosphonates and denosumab. Further research is needed to identify and implement interventions to prevent hip and distal femoral fractures.

Quality and effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment decision aids: a systematic review and environmental scan

Decision aids (DAs) are evidence-based tools that support shared decision-making (SDM) implementation in practice; this study aimed to identify existing osteoporosis DAs and assess their quality and efficacy; and to gain feedback from a patient advisory group on findings and implications for further research. We searched multiple bibliographic databases to identify research studies from 2000 to 2019 and undertook an environmental scan (search conducted February 2019, repeated in March 2020). A pair of reviewers, working independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, evaluated each trial's risk of bias, and conducted DA quality assessment using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). Public contributors (patients and caregivers with experience of osteoporosis and fragility fractures) participated in discussion groups to review a sample of DAs, express preferences for a new DA, and discuss plans for development of a new DA. We identified 6 studies, with high or unclear risk of bias. Across included studies, use of an osteoporosis DA was reported to result in reduced decisional conflict compared with baseline, increased SDM, and increased accuracy of patients' perceived fracture risk compared with controls. Eleven DAs were identified, of which none met the full set of IPDAS criteria for certification for minimization of bias. Public contributors expressed preferences for encounter DAs that are individualized to patients' own needs and risk. Using a systematic review and environmental scan, we identified 11 decision aids to inform patient decisions about osteoporosis treatment and 6 studies evaluating their effectiveness. Use of decision aids increased accuracy of risk perception and shared decision-making but the decision aids themselves fail to comprehensively meet international quality standards and patient needs, underpinning the need for new DA development.

Gender Differences in Inhaled Pharmacotherapy Utilization in Patients with Obstructive Airway Diseases (OADs): A Population-Based Study

Purpose

Gender differences in the incidence, susceptibility and severity of many obstructive airway diseases (OADs) have been well recognized. However, gender differences in the inhaled pharmacotherapy profile are not well characterized.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate gender differences in new-users of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), short-or long-acting beta₂-agonist (SABA or LABA), ICS/LABA, short-or long-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA or LAMA) among patients with asthma, COPD or asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). We used Clinical Practice Research Datalink to identify OAD patients, 18 years and older, who were new-users (1-year washout period) from 01-January-1998 to 31-July-2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine gender differences in each of the inhaled pharmacotherapies after controlling for potential confounders.

Results

A total of 242,079 new-users (asthma: 84.93%; COPD: 10.19%; ACO: 4.88%) of inhaled pharmacotherapies were identified. The multivariable analyses showed that males with COPD were more likely to be a new user of a LABA (odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.49), LAMA (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10–1.33), SAMA (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.01–1.21) and less likely to be a new user of a SABA (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80–0.89) compared to females. Similar patterns were also observed for patients with ACO; males were more likely to be prescribed with LABA (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03–1.55), LAMA (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.48), SAMA (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.48), and less likely to be a new user of a SABA (OR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.96). Also, males with asthma were more likely to be a new-user of ICS/LABA (OR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08–1.23) and less likely to start an ICS (OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95–0.99) in comparison with females.

Conclusion

Our study showed significant gender differences in new-users of inhaled pharmacotherapies among OAD patients. Adjusting for proxies of disease severity, calendar year, smoking and socioeconomic status did not change the association by gender.

Trends and Geographical Variability in Osteoporosis Treatment After Hip Fracture: A Multilevel Analysis of 30,965 Patients in the Region of Valencia, Spain

Despite improvements in the therapeutic arsenal and the recommendations of guidelines, low rates of prescribing osteoporosis medications are being reported worldwide for patients surviving a hip fracture, and important geographical variation remain. We aimed to describe trends in the proportion of patients that receive osteoporosis medication after hip fracture and to analyze the geographical variation in the prescription of drug therapy and its associated factors in the region of Valencia, Spain. We studied a population-based retrospective cohort of 30,965 patients aged 65 years and older, discharged from hospital after a hip fracture from January 2008 to December 2015, who were followed up for 3 months after discharge to identify the presence of any prescription of osteoporosis medication. We conducted a multilevel multiple logistic regression analysis with two levels (individuals and health departments [HD]) to determine which individual covariates were associated with receiving a prescription of osteoporosis medication in the 3 months after discharge, as well as the importance of the HD of hospitalization. The percentage of patients treated in the region decreased from a maximum of 28.9% in 2009 to 16.4% in 2015. By sex, the proportion of women treated reached a maximum of 33.4% in 2009 and declined to 19% in 2015, while the proportion of men reached a maximum of 14% in 2011 and reduced to 8.1% in 2015. By health department, there was a noticeable variability in the rate of patients treated, ranging from 40.9% to 11.1% in the whole period (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 7.54%; median odds ratio [MOR] = 1.64). Proportion of treated patients decreased in 20 of the 24 HDs. Variability could be also observed with regard to choice of medication by HD. This situation pressingly demands action (both at the organizational and professional levels) focused on populations at a higher risk (such as hip fracture patients) that particularly address underutilization and unwarranted variation.

Anti-osteoporosis medication treatment pattern after osteoporotic fracture during 2010-2016 in Fujian, China

This study demonstrates a low anti-osteoporosis drug treatment rate (22.1% in women, 9.5% in men) after osteoporotic fracture in the real-world setting of Fujian, China. The primary medication was calcitonin. The suboptimal treatment was particularly critical among men, low-level hospitals, wrist/vertebral fracture, and the younger elderly patients.

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to investigate the prescription patterns and related influencing factors of anti-osteoporosis drug prescribing after osteoporotic fracture in Fujian, China, between 2010 and 2016.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study based on an existing electronic health record database (National Healthcare Big Data in Fuzhou, China, 37 hospitals included). Patients over 50 years old with newly diagnosed osteoporotic fractures between 2010 and 2016 were included. Postfracture osteoporosis therapies were summarized by overall and fracture site. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify influencing factors of anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) prescription.

RESULTS

Overall, 22.1% of women and 9.5% of men over 50 years old received AOM treatment after osteoporotic fracture within 1 year during 2010-2016, with particular low use of bisphosphonates, 5.3% in women and 1.5% in men. The highest rate of AOM treatment was found in patients with hip fracture (24.5%), followed by vertebral fracture (14.2%) and wrist fracture (2.3%). Of the AOM-treated patients, 90.5% received calcitonin therapy. The treatment rate of AOM showed a slight decline during 2010-2016, but steady rise trends were observed in Ca/vitamin D (VD) prescription. Hospital level, age, sex, previous osteoporosis, previous AOM prescription, and previous oral glucocorticoid prescription were strong predicting factors of AOM prescription.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, AOM treatment was suboptimal and the treatment rate even decreased over time among osteoporosis fracture patients in Fujian, China. The suboptimal treatment was particularly critical among men, low-level hospitals, wrist/vertebral fracture, and the younger elderly patients.

The epidemiology of osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

With a worldwide ageing population, the importance of the prevention and management of osteoporotic fragility fractures is increasing over time. In this review, we discuss in detail the epidemiology of fragility fractures, how this is shaped by pharmacological interventions and how novel screening programmes can reduce the clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures.

SOURCES OF DATA

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using various combinations of the keywords 'osteoporosis', 'epidemiology', 'fracture', 'screening', `FRAX' and 'SCOOP'.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

The economic burden of osteoporosis-related fracture is significant, costing approximately $17.9 and £4 billion per annum in the USA and UK.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Risk calculators such as the web-based FRAX® algorithm have enabled assessment of an individual's fracture risk using clinical risk factors, with only partial consideration of bone mineral density (BMD).

GROWING POINTS

As with all new interventions, we await the results of long-term use of osteoporosis screening algorithms and how these can be refined and incorporated into clinical practice.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Despite advances in osteoporosis screening, a minority of men and women at high fracture risk worldwide receive treatment. The economic and societal burden caused by osteoporosis is a clear motivation for improving the screening and management of osteoporosis worldwide.

Osteoporosis medication use among Australian women over two decades

Despite the burden of osteoporosis and treatment availability, a treatment gap remains. Women in a population-based study were followed with respect to use of anti-fracture medication over two decades. Use increased over time but remained suboptimal, with less than 20% of those at high risk of fracture receiving treatment.

PURPOSE

We examined trends in osteoporosis-related medication use over time using data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study, an ongoing, population-based study.

METHODS

Self-reported medication use data were available for 822 women (50-90 years) at time-1 (1993-1997), 575 women at time-2 (2004-2008), and 527 women at time-3 (2011-2014) participating in a longitudinal study. Prevalence of any osteoporosis-related medication use (pooled anti-fracture (bisphosphonates, raloxifene, denosumab, or strontium); hormone therapy; and supplements (calcium and/or vitamin D)) was calculated using bootstrapping methods for the whole group and those at risk of fracture, identified using FRAX Aus® (probability of major osteoporotic fracture ≥ 20% and/or ≥ 3% hip fracture) and BMD (osteoporosis indicated by a T-score of less than - 2.5 at either the femoral neck or spine). Time trend (age groups 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80+ years) and time-point effects were evaluated using mixed effects logistic models.

RESULTS

The use of any osteoporosis-related medication increased over three time points (time-1, 25.9% (95% CI 23.1, 28.8); time-2, 32.5% (28.7, 36.3); time-3, 35.9% (31.9, 39.8)), driven by the use of supplements (time-1, 12.9% (95% CI 10.6, 15.1); time-2, 22.1% (18.8, 25.4); time-3, 30.9% (26.9, 35.5)) and anti-fracture medication (time-1, 0.9% (0.4, 1.6); time-2, 5.0% (3.3, 6.8); time-3, 4.4% (2.7, 6.3)). Women at high risk of fracture were identified by BMD (time-1, n = 231 (28.1%); time-2, n = 92 (16.0%); time-3, n = 51 (9.7%)) and FRAX criteria (time-1, n = 272 (33.1%); time-2, n = 105 (18.3%); time-3, n = 100 (19.0%)). The use of anti-fracture medication was low among these groups (BMD criteria: time-1, 1.7% (0.4, 3.7); time-2, 16.3% (8.7, 24.3); time-3, 15.7% (7.1, 26.1); FRAX criteria: time-1, 1.1% (0.0, 2.3); time-2, 18.1% (11.5, 25.5); time-3, 13.0% (6.5, 19.8)).

CONCLUSION

Use of anti-fracture medication among women at risk of fracture remained low over time. Investment into systems approaches to correct the treatment gap is warranted.

A retrospective database study of oral corticosteroid and bisphosphonate prescribing patterns in England

Exposure to oral corticosteroids (OCS) is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Guidelines suggest bisphosphonate (BP) therapy as the first-line treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). This population study used publicly available data, including prescription annual cost analysis and monthly practice-level data. Our aim was to examine the prescribing of OCS and BP at practice level and investigate reasons for variation using a mixed-effect negative binomial regression analysis. There was a rise in OCS and BP prescriptions of 55% and 1200% from 1998 to 2018, respectively. Of the 6586 included practices, the median (IQR) of OCS and BP prescriptions were 120.8 (84.8-160.4) and 107.7 (73.8-147.4) per 1000 patients, respectively. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were significantly associated with OCS use (p < 0.0001), but only COPD was associated with BP use (p < 0.0001). Higher OCS prescribing rates were associated with higher BP prescribing rates (5th to 1st quintile-IRR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.88-2.10). Practice list size, deprivation and advanced age were all associated with both drugs (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, although OCS use is positively associated with BP prescription, variation among practices and CCGs exists. The variation in prescribing suggests there is still a need to improve GIOP prevention.

General and Specific Considerations as to why Osteoporosis-Related Care Is Often Suboptimal

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The assessment of fracture risk and use of antiosteoporosis medications have increased greatly over the last 20-30 years. However, despite this, osteoporosis care remains suboptimal worldwide. Even in patients who have sustained a fragility fracture, fewer than 20% actually receive appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy in the year following the fracture. There is also evidence that treatment rates have declined substantially in the last 5-10 years, in many countries. The goal of this article is to consider the causes for this decline and consider how this situation could be remedied.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of possible reasons, including the lack of prioritisation of osteoporosis therapy in ageing populations with multimorbidity, disproportionate concerns regarding the rare side effects of anti-resorptives and adverse changes in reimbursement in the USA, have been identified as contributing factors in poor osteoporosis care. Improved secondary prevention strategies; screening measures (primary prevention) and appropriate, cost-effective guideline and treatment threshold development could support the optimisation of osteoporosis care and prevention of future fractures.

Inequalities in prescription rates of anti-osteoporosis drugs in primary care in England: A practice-level prescribing data analysis in 2013-2018

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential variations in prescription rates of anti-osteoporosis drugs at the general practitioner (GP) practice level in England, analysing associations of prescription rates with key demographic and socio-economic variables, and its evolution over time.

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis was conducted using prescription data from all GP practices in England between April 2013 and September 2018. Potential associations between prescription rates and other variables (sex, age, ethnicity, rural-urban classification and income deprivation) were analysed using mixed-effects Poisson regressions and concentration indices.

RESULTS

Alendronic acid was the most frequently prescribed anti-osteoporosis drug. Exploratory and regression analyses showed the association between GP prescriptions and the characteristics of the population they serve. Income deprivation had a statistically significant and negative effect on prescription levels of alendronic acid, denosumab, ibandronic acid and risedronate sodium. Since 2013, denosumab prescriptions exhibited a steep surge in the least income-deprived areas, compared with a modest rise in the most income-deprived areas. Concentration indices indicated a disproportionate concentration of denosumab and, to a lesser extent, ibandronic acid prescriptions among the least income-deprived. The analyses demonstrated that different prescribing behaviours may exist across GPs according to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to which they belong.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in the prescription of anti-osteoporosis drugs exists across GPs and CCGs in England, this being more prominent for certain drugs (e.g. denosumab) compared with others (e.g. alendronic acid). Inequalities exist in English primary healthcare and we advocate our findings could support the efforts of decision-makers towards a more equitable system.

Repurposing amino-bisphosphonates by liposome formulation for a new role in cancer treatment

Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have been commercially available for over four decades and are used for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and bone metastases derived from various cancer types. Zoledronate and alendronate, two of the most potent N-BPs, have demonstrated direct tumoricidal activity on tumor cells and immune modulatory effects on myeloid cells and T cells in vitro and in animal models of cancer. However, the rapid renal clearance and sequestration in mineral bone of these drugs in free form severely limit their systemic exposure and applications in cancer patients. Reformulation of N-BPs by encapsulation in liposomal nanoparticles addresses these pharmacokinetic barriers, and liposomal zoledronate and alendronate formulations have been found to increase the anticancer efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapies and adoptive T cell immunotherapies in murine cancer models. Herein, we review the differences in pharmacology between N-BPs versus non-N-BPs (e.g., clodronate), free versus liposomal N-BP formulations, and targeted versus non-targeted liposomal N-BPs, and the clinical and preclinical evidence supporting a role for liposomal N-BPs in the treatment of cancer. We propose that pegylated liposomal alendronate (PLA) has the most potential for clinical translation based on favorable therapeutic index, ability to passively target and accumulate in tumors, proven biocompatibility of the liposome carrier, and preclinical anticancer efficacy.

Time trends in oral bisphosphonate initiation in Ontario, Canada over 20 years reflect drug policy and healthcare delivery changes

Characteristics of patients starting oral bisphosphonate therapy changed over time, reflecting trends in osteoporosis management (e.g., new drugs to market), and general healthcare delivery (e.g., benzodiazepine use declined, statin use increased). When designing studies that examine osteoporosis drug effects, potential time-related biases must be considered.

INTRODUCTION

To describe the type of oral bisphosphonate initiated and characteristics of patients starting oral bisphosphonate therapy over time.

METHODS

We identified community-dwelling older adults (ages ≥ 66 years) initiating oral bisphosphonate therapy from April 1996 to March 2016 (1996 to 2015 fiscal years) using healthcare administrative data in Ontario. Patients with conditions other than osteoporosis that may impact bisphosphonate prescribing were excluded. The bisphosphonate initiated and patient characteristics were summarized by fiscal year and stratified by sex.

RESULTS

We identified 560,817 eligible patients (81% women). Most patients initiated cyclical etidronate from 1996 until 2005, and then weekly regimens became dominant. In 2008, risedronate became the main oral bisphosphonate (46% risedronate, 43% alendronate, 11% etidronate); with its use increasing after availability of monthly and delayed-release risedronate formulations. In 2015, 71% of patients started risedronate, 28% started alendronate, and less than 2% started etidronate. Characteristics of patients changed over time, reflecting changes in osteoporosis management and general healthcare delivery. Over time, a larger proportion of men (9% to 28%) and patients with diabetes (women 10% to 17%, men 14% to 22%) initiated therapy; benzodiazepine (women 22% to 13%, men 20% to 10%) and estrogen-based hormone replacement therapy (12% to 15% of women 1996-2002 to 3% since 2008) decreased, while statin use increased (women 15% to 39%, men 14% to 52%).

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of patients starting oral bisphosphonate therapy have changed over time. Consideration must be given to these time trends when designing studies that examine osteoporosis drug effects.

State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm, and humerus. Over recent decades, it has evolved from being viewed as an inevitable consequence of ageing, to being recognised as a serious and eminently treatable disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this article, we review the literature pertaining to the epidemiology of osteoporosis, associated health burden, approaches to risk assessment and treatment.

RESULTS

Although there is some evidence that fracture incidence has reached a plateau, or even started to decline, in the developed world, an ageing population and adoption of westernised lifestyles in transitioning populations is leading to an increasing burden of osteoporosis across the world. Whilst the clinical definition of osteoporosis has been based solely on bone mineral density, the prediction of fracture at the individual level has been improved by consideration of clinical risk factors in tools such as FRAX®, derived from a greater understanding of the epidemiology of osteoporosis. Such advances in approaches to primary and secondary prevention of fractures, coupled with elucidation of the underlying biology, and the development of a range of highly effective antiosteoporosis medications, have enabled a step change in our ability to prevent osteoporosis-related fractures. However, there remains a substantial disparity between the number of individuals at high fracture risk and number treated globally.

CONCLUSION

Urgent work is needed at the level of health care systems, national and international policy, and in communication with patients and public, to ensure that all patients who should receive treatment for osteoporosis actually do so.

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention for osteoporosis as prescribed in clinical practice in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in the five largest European countries (EU5) using the IOF reference cost-effectiveness model. Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice was cost-saving (provided more QALYs at lower costs) compared to no treatment in each of the EU5.

PURPOSE

To estimate the real-world cost-effectiveness of pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in the five largest European countries by population size: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK) (collectively EU5).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed sales data on osteoporosis drugs in each of the EU5 to derive a hypothetical intervention that corresponds to the mix of osteoporosis medication prescribed in clinical practice. The costs for this treatment mix were obtained directly from the sales data, and the efficacy of the treatment mix was estimated by weighing the treatment-specific fracture risk reductions from a published meta-analysis. Subsequently, we estimated the cost-effectiveness using costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) of the intervention compared to no treatment in each of the EU5 using the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) reference cost-effectiveness model. The model population comprised postmenopausal women, mean age 72 years with established osteoporosis (T-score ≤ - 2.5) among whom 23.6% had a prevalent vertebral fracture. The model was populated with country-specific data from the literature.

RESULTS

Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice was cost-saving (provided more QALYs at lower costs) compared to no treatment in each country. The findings were robust in scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological fracture prevention as prescribed in clinical practice is cost-saving in each of the EU5. Because of the under-diagnosis and under-treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis, from a health economic perspective, further cost-savings may be reached by expanding treatment to those at increased risk of fracture currently not receiving any treatment.

Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is associated with increased fragility of bone and a subsequent increased risk of fracture. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is intimately linked with the imaging and quantification of bone and BMD. Scanning modalities, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or quantitative CT, have been developed and honed over the past half century to provide measures of BMD and bone microarchitecture for the purposes of clinical practice and research. Combined with fracture prediction tools such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) (which use a combination of clinical risk factors for fracture to provide a measure of risk), these elements have led to a paradigm shift in the ability to diagnose osteoporosis and predict individuals who are at risk of fragility fracture. Despite these developments, a treatment gap exists between individuals who are at risk of osteoporotic fracture and those who are receiving therapy. In this Review, we summarize the epidemiology of osteoporosis, the history of scanning modalities, fracture prediction tools and future directions, including the most recent developments in prediction of fractures.

Antibiotic exposure and 'response failure' for subsequent respiratory tract infections: an observational cohort study of UK preschool children in primary care

Background

Childhood antibiotic exposure has important clinically relevant implications. These include disruption to the microbiome, antibiotic resistance, and clinical workload manifesting as treatment ‘failure’.

Aim

To examine the relationship between the number of antibiotic courses prescribed to preschool children for acute respiratory tract infections (RTI), in the preceding year, and subsequent RTIs that failed to respond to antibiotic treatment (‘response failures’).

Design and setting

A cohort study using UK primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 2009 to 2016.

Method

Children aged 12 to 60 months (1 to 5 years) who were prescribed an antibiotic for an acute RTI (upper and lower RTI or otitis media) were included. One random index antibiotic course for RTI per child was selected. Exposure was the number of antibiotic prescriptions for acute RTI up to 12 months before the index antibiotic prescription. The outcome was ‘response failure’ up to 14 days after index antibiotic prescription, defined as: subsequent antibiotic prescription; referral; hospital admission; death; or emergency department attendance within 3 days. The authors used logistic regression models to estimate the odds between antibiotic exposure and response failure.

Results

Out of 114 329 children who were prescribed an antibiotic course for acute RTI, children who received ≥2 antibiotic courses for acute RTIs in the preceding year had greater odds of response failure; one antibiotic course: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.88 to 1.21), P = 0.67, n = 230 children; ≥2 antibiotic courses: adjusted OR 1.32 (CI = 1.04 to 1.66), P = 0.02, n = 97.

Conclusion

Childhood antibiotic exposure for acute RTI may be a good predictor for subsequent response failure (but not necessarily because of antibiotic treatment failure). Further research is needed to improve understanding of the mechanisms underlying response failure.

Impact of Drug Safety Warnings and Cost-Sharing Policies on Osteoporosis Drug Utilization in Spain: A Major Reduction But With the Persistence of Over and Underuse. Data From the ESOSVAL Cohort From 2009 to 2015

Background: Recent studies in several countries show a significant decrease in the consumption of osteoporosis drugs from a peak around 2009, mainly attributed to bisphosphonate safety warnings issued by regulatory agencies on jaw osteonecrosis, atypical fractures, and esophageal cancer, but no studies have assessed the impact of these warnings by risk of fracture strata. Aim: The aim of this work is to assess changes in the utilization of osteoporosis drugs in the region of Valencia (Spain) after safety warnings from regulatory agencies and cost-sharing changes, according to patient socio-demographic and risk of fracture characteristics. Patients and Methods: We constructed a monthly series of osteoporosis drug consumption for 2009-2015 from the ESOSVAL cohort (n = 11,035; women: 48%; mean age: 65 years old) and used interrupted time series and segmented linear regression models to assess changes in osteoporosis drug utilization while controlling for previous levels and trends after three natural intervention dates: the issue of the Spanish Agency for Drugs and Medical Products (AEMPS) Osteonecrosis Jaw Warning (Sept 2009), the AEMPS Atypical femur Fracture Warning (Apr 2011), and the modification of the cost-sharing scheme (Jul 2012). Results: The AEMPS Osteonecrosis Jaw Warning was not associated with a decline in the consumption of osteoporosis drugs, while the warning on atypical fracture (a downward trend of 0.11% fewer people treated each month) and the increase in the cost-sharing scheme (immediate change level of -1.07% in the proportion of people treated) were associated with a strong decline in the proportion of patients treated, so that by the end of 2015 osteoporosis drug consumption was around half that of 2009. The relative decline was similar in people with both a high and low risk of fracture. Conclusion: The AEMPS Atypical femur Fracture Warning of Apr 2010 was associated with a significant decrease in the number of people treated, reinforced by the increase in the pharmaceutical cost-sharing in 2012. Decreases in treatment affected patients both at a low and higher risk of fracture.

Use of oral bisphosphonates and risk of hospital admission with osteonecrosis of the jaw: Large prospective cohort study in UK women

About 1 in 10 postmenopausal UK women are currently prescribed oral bisphosphonates, but there are concerns about their adverse effects. Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a recognised uncommon but important side effect of intravenous bisphosphonates, but epidemiological evidence on risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with oral bisphosphonate use is less conclusive. The incidence of hospital admission with osteonecrosis of the jaw was examined among 521,695 Million Women Study participants, aged 64.7 years at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with use of oral bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women followed-up by record-linkage to National Health Service hospital admission databases. During mean follow-up of 8.2 years per woman, 100 women were admitted to hospital with first recorded osteonecrosis of the jaw, at mean age 72.4 years. Almost a third (29/100) of the cases had ever-used oral bisphosphonates. Ever-users had a six-fold increased risk of hospital admission for osteonecrosis of the jaw, when compared with never-users (adjusted RR = 6.09, 95% CI 3.83-9.66; p < 0.0001). The relative risk for osteonecrosis of the jaw in never-users of oral bisphosphonates was increased in women with prior cancer (RR = 3.40, 2.22-5.22, p < 0.0001). The estimated absolute risk of hospital admission for osteonecrosis of the jaw over a 5-year period from age 70 to 74 in women without prior cancer was 0.09 per 1000 in never-users and 0.69 per 1000 in ever-users of oral bisphosphonates. In this UK population of postmenopausal women, use of oral bisphosphonates was associated with a 6-fold increased risk of hospital admission with osteonecrosis of the jaw, accounting for around one-third of cases, with an excess risk of about 0.6/1000 users over 5 years.

Trends in the incidence of testing for vitamin D deficiency in primary care in the UK: a retrospective analysis of The Health Improvement Network (THIN), 2005-2015

OBJECTIVE

To investigate trends in the incidence of testing for vitamin D deficiency and the prevalence of patients with circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) indicative of deficiency (<30 nmol/L) between 2005 and 2015.

DESIGN

Longitudinal analysis of electronic health records in The Health Improvement Network primary care database.

SETTING

UK primary care.

INTERVENTION

None.

PARTICIPANTS

The analysis included 6 416 709 participants aged 18 years and older.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Incidence of having a blood test for vitamin D deficiency between 2005 and 2015, the prevalence with blood 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L and the effects of age, ethnicity and socioeconomic status on these measures were assessed.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up time of 5.4 (SD 3.7) years, there were 210 502 patients tested for vitamin D deficiency. The incidence of vitamin D testing rose from 0.29 per 1000 person-years at risk (PYAR) (95% CI 0.27 to 0.31) in 2005 to 16.1 per 1000 PYAR (95% CI 15.9 to 16.2) in 2015. Being female, older, non-white ethnicity and more economically deprived were all strongly associated with being tested. One-third (n=69 515) had 25(OH)D <30 nmol/L, but the per cent deficient among ethnic minority groups ranged from 43% among mixed ethnicity to 66% in Asians. Being male, younger and more economically deprived were also all associated with vitamin D deficiency (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for vitamin D deficiency increased over the past decade among adults in the UK. One-third of UK adults who had a vitamin D test performed in primary care were vitamin D deficient, and deficiency was much higher among ethnic minority patients. Future research should focus on strategies to ensure population intake of vitamin D, particularly in at-risk groups, meets recommendations to reduce the risk of deficiency and need for testing.

Changing rates in fracture trends are temporally associated with declining testing and treatment: reality or ecologic fallacy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The changing patterns of osteoporosis treatment and fragility fractures have led to what leaders are calling a 'crisis in the osteoporosis.' We address data on changing patterns in fractures, and highlight strengths and limitations of recently published data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Declines in hip fracture rates have been shown in studies from around the world. However, recently, using national Medicare data, Michael Lewiecki and colleagues show a plateau in the decline of hip fracture incidence in the United States from 2012 to 2015. Population-based data is integral for evaluating temporal trends; however, researchers must consider the biases associated with them including: age effects, period effects, and cohort effects. Rosengren and colleagues conducted the most comprehensive evaluation of age, period, and birth cohort effects in their study of hip fracture trends from 1987 to 2010 in Denmark and Sweden, in which they identified changes in hip fracture rates based on age, period, and cohort effects.

SUMMARY

Recent findings show clear temporal trends in changing fracture rates. Studies, which evaluated these biases largely attribute increased hip fracture rates to various age, period, and cohort effects, highlighting the importance of appropriate screening and treatment.

Hip fracture rates and time trends in use of anti-osteoporosis medications in Denmark for the period 2005 to 2015: Missed opportunities in fracture prevention

BACKGROUND

Declining use of bisphosphonates (BP) in the United States and Europe may lead to a widening of the treatment gap for osteoporosis and an increase in fracture rates. However, a shift to non-bisphosphonates and to hospital administered i.v. BPs could lead to overestimation of the treatment gap if analyses are based exclusively on BP prescriptions. When a healthcare system successfully narrows the treatment gap by making appropriate use of anti-osteoporosis drugs, we would expect to see declining rates of osteoporotic fractures with much of the decrease being statistically attributable to medication uptake. We analysed a best-case scenario where all use of BPs, denosumab, raloxifene and PTH analogues - including the oncology area - was contrasted with the trend in hip fracture rates. This scenario also considered users of raloxifene and teriparatide as covered by osteoporosis drugs though the primary RCT for raloxifene showed no risk reduction in nonvertebral fractures and the RCT for teriparatide risk reductions for non-vertebral fractures but not hip fracture specifically. Sensitivity analyses were also done.

METHODS

We used aggregate statistics on hip fracture events and total use of the above medications estimating the number of persons potentially covered. The reduction in hip fracture rates attributable to treatment was estimated using the absolute risk reduction (ARR) found in real-world users of oral alendronate in Denmark with the ARR in the FIT primary prevention arm as an alternative scenario.

RESULTS

A plateau in use of osteoporosis medications occurred in 2014. Between 2005 and 2015, hip fracture rates declined by 30%. However, only up to 20% of the observed reduction in hip fracture rates was statistically attributable to treatment even in a best-case scenario. Sensitivity analyses where raloxifene and teriparatide were excluded did not impact on this finding.

DISCUSSION

Anti-osteoporosis treatment in Denmark reached a plateau in 2014 even in a best-case scenario where all dispensations were assumed to be for osteoporosis. Future studies may be able to distinguish between the oncology area and the osteoporosis indication as well as provide a delineation of age and gender demographics among users of hospital administered osteoporosis medications. About 80% of the decline in hip fracture rates appears to be due to factors other than osteoporosis medication. The plateau in use of osteoporosis treatment at a level that is too low to make a meaningful impact on societal fracture burden is problematic given the predicted increased age-specific hip fracture rates.

Osteoporosis

Fractures resulting from osteoporosis become increasingly common in women after age 55 years and men after age 65 years, resulting in substantial bone-associated morbidities, and increased mortality and health-care costs. Research advances have led to a more accurate assessment of fracture risk and have increased the range of therapeutic options available to prevent fractures. Fracture risk algorithms that combine clinical risk factors and bone mineral density are now widely used in clinical practice to target high-risk individuals for treatment. The discovery of key pathways regulating bone resorption and formation has identified new approaches to treatment with distinctive mechanisms of action. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition and long-term, sometimes lifelong, management is required. In individuals at high risk of fracture, the benefit versus risk profile is likely to be favourable for up to 10 years of treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab. In people at a very high or imminent risk of fracture, therapy with teriparatide or abaloparatide should be considered; however, since treatment duration with these drugs is restricted to 18-24 months, treatment should be continued with an antiresorptive drug. Individuals at high risk of fractures do not receive adequate treatment and strategies to address this treatment gap-eg, widespread implementation of Fracture Liaison Services and improvement of adherence to therapy-are important challenges for the future.

Inequalities in hip fracture incidence are greatest in the North of England: regional analysis of the effects of social deprivation on hip fracture incidence across England

OBJECTIVES

Hip fracture risk varies by geography and by levels of deprivation. We examined the effect of local area-level deprivation on hip fracture incidence across nine regions in England, using 14 years of hospital data, to determine whether inequalities in hip fracture incidence rates vary across geographic regions in England.

STUDY DESIGN

Sequential annual cross-sectional studies over 14 years.

METHODS

We used English Hospital Episodes Statistics (2001/02-2014/15) to identify hip fractures in adults aged 50+ years and mid-year population estimates (2001-2014) from the Office for National Statistics. The Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to measure local area deprivation. We calculated age-standardised hip fracture incidence rates per 100,000 population, stratified by gender, geographic region, deprivation quintiles and time-period, using the 2001 English population as the reference population. Using Poisson regression, we calculated age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for hip fracture, stratified as above.

RESULTS

Over 14 years, we identified 747,369 hospital admissions with an index hip fracture. Age-standardised hip fracture incidence was highest in the North East for both men and women. In North England (North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber), hip fracture incidence was relatively higher in more deprived areas, particularly among men: IRR most vs least deprived quintile 2.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.00-2.12) in men, 1.62 (95% CI 1.60-1.65) in women. A relationship, albeit less marked, between deprivation and hip fracture incidence was observed among men in the Midlands and South, but with no clear pattern among women.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional variation in hip fracture incidence exists across England, with the greatest absolute burden of incident hip fractures observed in the North East for both men and women. Across local areas in North England, absolute and relative inequalities in hip fracture incidence were greater than in other regions. Our findings highlight the need for improved fracture prevention programmes that aim to reduce regional and social inequalities in hip fracture incidence.

Progress and Problems in Bone and Mineral Disorders

A number of new drugs are moving through the osteoporosis therapy pipeline. Some show great promise for patients while one has fallen by the wayside at the last hurdle. New, effective therapies are warmly welcomed but there are still uncertainties around management of osteoporosis with currently available drugs that are contributing to what is commonly being referred to as the ‘treatment gap’; a differential between those patients who would benefit from treatment versus those who actually are receiving it. Furthermore, in parallel to the common public health disease of osteoporosis, there have been tangible developments in therapies available for some rare bone and calcium diseases.

Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs

Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.

Secular trends of use of anti-osteoporotic treatments in Spain: A population-based cohort study including over 1.5million people and more than 12years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Different regulatory actions for anti-osteoporotic medication (AOM) were taken during the last years, including marketing of new drugs, safety warnings, or restrictions on the indications. We aimed to characterise the secular trends of AOM use in Spain from 2001 to 2013.

METHODS

A cohort study using the Spanish Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research in Primary Care (BIFAP), was performed. BIFAP includes anonym records for 4million patients. Participants entered the study when aged ≥50years in 2001-2013 and after 1year of data available, and were followed to an AOM prescription (including alendronate, other bisphosphonates, SERM (selective estrogen receptor modulators), strontium ranelate, teriparatide or denosumab), death, lost or the end of December 2013. Prevalence (%) and incidence rate (IR/1000person-years (py)) of AOM users were computed by years and sex.

RESULTS

Out of 1.5million participants, 135,410 received AOM treatment during 2001-2013. Prevalence was 6.1% (women) and 1.1% (men), that increased from 2001 (2.0%) to 2009 (7.6%) to decrease thereafter. Out of them, 95,057 were incident. The IR was 24.90 (women) and 2.77 (men), that increased from 2001 (21.25 and 1.96) to 2007 (35.84 and 3.64), and decreased to 12.48 and 1.81 (2013). IRs were highest for bisphosphonates along the years (ranging 3.70-14.73 and 0.57-1.75 in women and men respectively), followed by SERM up to 2005 (6.51-9.02 and 0.06-0.07), and strontium ranelate from 2006 (4.66 and 0.45) to 2012 (2.05 and 0.26). IR for teriparatide increased from marketing in 2004 (0.10-1.01 and 0.02-0.29), as was denosumab from marketing in 2011 (0.03-2.64 and 0.09-0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Population-based estimates of AOM use in Spain peaked in 2007-2009 and decreased thereafter, irrespective of age and sex. New treatments were ten times higher in women than men. Bisphosphonates were the most frequently prescribed class, followed by SERM in women before 2006, strontium otherwise till 2012, and denosumab in women or teriparatide in men in 2013. Changes in the osteoporosis criteria, fracture risk assessment strategies, and regulatory actions for AOM around the time, may explain that trend.

The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide

Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm and humerus. Substantial geographic variation has been noted in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide, with Western populations (North America, Europe and Oceania), reporting increases in hip fracture throughout the second half of the 20th century, with a stabilisation or decline in the last two decades. In developing populations however, particularly in Asia, the rates of osteoporotic fracture appears to be increasing. The massive global burden consequent to osteoporosis means that fracture risk assessment should be a high priority among health measures considered by policy makers. The WHO operational definition of osteoporosis, based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been used globally since the mid-1990s. However, although this definition identifies those at greatest individual risk of fracture, in the population overall a greater total number of fractures occur in individuals with BMD values above the threshold for osteoporosis diagnosis. A number of web-based tools to enable the inclusion of clinical risk factors, with or without BMD, in fracture prediction algorithms have been developed to improve the identification of individuals at high fracture risk, the most commonly used globally being FRAX®. Access to DXA, osteoporosis risk assessment, case finding and treatment varies worldwide, but despite such advances studies indicate that a minority of men and women at high fracture risk receive treatment. Importantly, research is ongoing to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis case finding and risk assessment strategies worldwide. The huge burden caused by osteoporosis related fractures to individuals, healthcare systems and societies should provide a clear impetus for the progression of such approaches.

Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs

Osteoporosis is a silent disease with increasing prevalence due to the global ageing population. Decreased bone strength and bone quality is the hallmark of osteoporosis which leads to an increased risk of fragility fractures in elderly. It has been estimated that approximately ~50% of women will suffer during their lifetime from an osteoporotic fracture. This must be considered as a major health concern, as it has previously been established that fragility fracture has been associated with decreased quality of life due to increased disability, more frequent hospital admission and most importantly, osteoporotic fractures have been related to an augmented mortality risk. Anti-osteoporotic drugs are available for improving bone quality. Although there is access to these therapeutic options, there remain multiple unmet needs in the field of osteoporosis and fracture care, for example, the primary prevention of osteoporosis in young individuals (to reach a high peak bone mass), the optimization of the use of imaging techniques [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) and new techniques measuring bone quality], the use of nonmedical treatment options and surgical techniques of fracture healing. In this review, we will discuss topics that play a role in the occurrence and prevention of fractures, and we give an overview of and insight into the critical issues and challenges around osteoporosis and fracture prevention.

Reprint of: The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide

Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm and humerus. Substantial geographic variation has been noted in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide, with Western populations (North America, Europe and Oceania), reporting increases in hip fracture throughout the second half of the 20th century, with a stabilisation or decline in the last two decades. In developing populations however, particularly in Asia, the rates of osteoporotic fracture appears to be increasing. The massive global burden consequent to osteoporosis means that fracture risk assessment should be a high priority amongst health measures considered by policy makers. The WHO operational definition of osteoporosis, based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been used globally since the mid-1990s. However, although this definition identifies those at greatest individual risk of fracture, in the population overall a greater total number of fractures occur in individuals with BMD values above threshold for osteoporosis diagnosis. A number of web-based tools to enable the inclusion of clinical risk factors, with or without BMD, in fracture prediction algorithms have been developed to improve the identification of individuals at high fracture risk, the most commonly used globally being FRAX®. Access to DXA, osteoporosis risk assessment, case finding and treatment varies worldwide, but despite such advances studies indicate that a minority of men and women at high fracture risk receive treatment. Importantly, research is ongoing to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis case finding and risk assessment strategies worldwide. The huge burden caused by osteoporosis related fractures to individuals, healthcare systems and societies should provide a clear impetus for the progression of such approaches.