The benefits of an unsupervised exercise program in persons with well-healed burn injuries within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)

Recovery of functional independence following major burn: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Major burn injury, despite advancements in care and prevention, can have a profound impact on long-term morbidity, affecting quality of life and socioeconomic standing. We aim to explore factors predicting recovery of independence, the expected rate and time in majorly burned patients, and the measures of progress used.

METHOD

A systematic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, CINAHL) was conducted for studies reporting outcomes pertaining to physical ability indicative of independent function in adult (>15 y) cohorts who had suffered a major burn (>20% TBSA) up to 30 years after treatment in a developed specialised burn service. Data extracted included factors affecting rate of and time to achievement of function in five independence domains, as well as the outcome measures used.

RESULTS

21 eligible studies were included comprising 1298 major burns survivors with a combined mean age of 39.6 y and a mean TBSA of 25.8%. The most significant recurring factors impacting recovery of independent function were older age, female gender, burn severity, prolonged ICU and hospital admission, preceding mental health conditions, and post-acute psychological issues. Exercise-based rehabilitation conferred benefits on major burn patients even over 2 years following injury. Discharge to independent living from hospital occurred in 27% to 97% of patients, while reported return to work rates varied from 52% to 80%. Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief, Functional Independence Measure, and Physical Composite Score (SF-36) were the most widely used outcome scoring systems.

CONCLUSION

Major burn survivors have protracted recovery with potential for persistent chronic impairments, remaining consistently below baseline levels of function. Non-modifiable factors such as age and gender, and disease characteristics such as burn size with associated physical, physiological and psychosocial sequelae are contributory. Further research is required to explore achievement of specific milestones of major burn and polytrauma critical care patients, while early targeted rehabilitation addressing physical, psychological, and vocational needs has promising potential benefit.

Six Months of Exercise Training Improves Ventilatory Responses during Exercise in Adults with Well-Healed Burn Injuries

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary function is lower after a severe burn injury, which could influence ventilatory responses during exercise. It is unclear whether exercise training improves pulmonary function or ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that exercise training improves pulmonary function and ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries.

METHODS

Thirty-nine adults (28 with well-healed burn injuries and 11 non-burn-injured controls) completed 6 months of unsupervised, progressive exercise training including endurance, resistance, and high-intensity interval components. Before and after exercise training, we performed comprehensive pulmonary function testing and measured ventilatory responses during cycling exercise. We compared variables using two-way ANOVA (group-time; i.e., preexercise/postexercise training (repeated factor)).

RESULTS

Exercise training did not increase percent predicted spirometry, lung diffusing capacity, or airway resistance measures (time: P ≥ 0.14 for all variables). However, exercise training reduced minute ventilation ( V̇E ; time: P ≤ 0.05 for 50 and 75 W) and the ventilatory equivalent for oxygen ( V̇E /V̇O 2 ; time: P < 0.001 for 75 W) during fixed-load exercise for both groups. The ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide ( V̇E /V̇CO 2 ) during exercise at 75 W was reduced after exercise training (time: P = 0.04). The percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate at the ventilatory threshold was lower in adults with well-healed burn injuries before ( P = 0.002), but not after ( P = 0.22), exercise training. Lastly, exercise training increased V̇E and reduced V̇E /V̇O 2 during maximal exercise (time: P = 0.005 for both variables).

CONCLUSIONS

These novel findings demonstrate that exercise training can improve ventilatory responses during exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries.

Cardiac remodeling in well-healed burn survivors after 6 months of unsupervised progressive exercise training

Aerobic exercise is important in the rehabilitation of individuals with prior burn injuries, but no studies have examined whether adult burn survivors demonstrate cardiac remodeling to long-term aerobic exercise training. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that 6 months of progressive exercise training improves cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of cardiac structure and function in well-healed burn survivors. Secondary analyses explored relations between burn surface area and changes in cardiac structure in the cohort of burn survivors. V̇o2peak assessments and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline and following 6 months of progressive exercise training from 19 well-healed burn survivors and 10 nonburned control participants. V̇o2peak increased following 6 months of training in both groups (Control: Δ5.5 ± 5.8 mL/kg/min; Burn Survivors: Δ3.2 ± 3.6 mL/kg/min, main effect of training, P < 0.001). Left ventricle (LV) mass (Control: Δ1.7 ± 3.1 g/m2; Burn survivors: Δ1.8 ± 2.7 g/m2), stroke volume (Control: Δ5.8 ± 5.2 mL/m2; Burn Survivors: Δ2.8 ± 4.2 mL/m2), and ejection fraction (Control: Δ2.4 ± 4.0%; Burn Survivors: Δ2.2 ± 4.3%) similarly increased following 6 months of exercise training in both cohorts (main effect of training P < 0.05 for all indexes). LV end-diastolic volume increased in the control group (Δ6.5 ± 4.5 mL/m2) but not in the cohort of burn survivors (Δ1.9 ± 2.7 mL/m2, interaction, P = 0.040). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that burn surface area had little to no effect on changes in ventricular mass or end-diastolic volumes in response to exercise training. Our findings provide initial evidence of physiological cardiac remodeling, which is not impacted by burn size, in response to exercise training in individuals with well-healed burn injuries.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Aerobic exercise is important in the rehabilitation of individuals with prior burn injuries, but no studies have examined whether adult burn survivors demonstrate cardiac remodeling to long-term aerobic exercise training. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that 6 months of progressive exercise training would improve cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-based measures of cardiac structure and function in well-healed burn survivors. Our findings highlight the ability of exercise training to modify cardiac structure and function in well-healed burn survivors and nonburned sedentary controls alike.

Six months of unsupervised exercise training lowers blood pressure during moderate, but not vigorous, aerobic exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries

Exercise training reduces cardiovascular disease risk, partly due to arterial blood pressure (BP) lowering at rest and during fixed-load exercise. However, it is unclear whether exercise training can reduce BP at rest and during exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that 6 mo of unsupervised exercise training reduces BP at rest and during lower-body cycle ergometry in adults with well-healed burn injuries. Thirty-nine adults (28 with well-healed burn injuries and 11 controls) completed 6 mo of unsupervised, progressive exercise training including endurance, resistance, and high-intensity interval components. Before and after exercise training, we measured BP at rest, during fixed-load submaximal exercise (50 and 75 W), during fixed-intensity submaximal exercise (40% and 70% of V̇o2peak), and during maximal exercise on a lower-body cycle ergometer. We compared cardiovascular variables using two-way ANOVA (group × pre/postexercise training [repeated factor]). Adults with well-healed burn injuries had higher diastolic BP at rest (P = 0.04), which was unchanged by exercise training (P = 0.26). Exercise training reduced systolic, mean, and diastolic BP during fixed-load cycling exercise at 75 W in adults with well-healed burn injuries (P ≤ 0.03 for all), but not controls (P ≥ 0.67 for all). Exercise training also reduced mean and diastolic BP during exercise at 40% (P ≤ 0.02 for both), but not at 70% (P ≥ 0.18 for both), of V̇o2peak. These data suggest that a 6-mo unsupervised exercise training program lowers BP during moderate, but not vigorous, aerobic exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Adults with well-healed burn injuries have greater cardiovascular disease morbidity and all-cause mortality compared with nonburn-injured adults. We found that exercise training reduced blood pressure (BP) during fixed-load cycling at 75 W and during moderate, but not vigorous, intensity cycling exercise in adults with well-healed burn injuries. These data suggest that 6 mo of unsupervised exercise training provides some degree of cardioprotection by reducing BP responses during submaximal exercise in well-healed burn-injured adults.

Adults with well-healed burn injuries have lower pulmonary function values decades after injury

Sub-acute (e.g., inhalation injury) and/or acute insults sustained during a severe burn injury impairs pulmonary function. However, previous work has not fully characterized pulmonary function in adults with well-healed burn injuries decades after an injury. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that adults with well-healed burn injuries have lower pulmonary function years after recovery. Our cohort of adults with well-healed burn-injuries (n = 41) had a lower forced expiratory volume in one second (Burn: 93 ± 16 vs. Control: 103 ± 10%predicted, mean ± SD; d = 0.60, p = 0.04), lower maximal voluntary ventilation (Burn: 84 [71-97] vs. Control: 105 [94-122] %predicted, median [IQR]; d = 0.84, p < 0.01), and a higher specific airway resistance (Burn: 235 ± 80 vs. Control: 179 ± 40%predicted, mean ± SD; d = 0.66, p = 0.02) than non-burned control participants (n = 12). No variables were meaningfully influenced by having a previous inhalation injury (d ≤ 0.44, p ≥ 0.19; 13 of 41 had an inhalation injury), the size of the body surface area burned (R2  ≤ 0.06, p ≥ 0.15; range of 15%-88% body surface area burned), or the time since the burn injury (R2  ≤ 0.04, p ≥ 0.22; range of 2-50 years post-injury). These data suggest that adults with well-healed burn injuries have lower pulmonary function decades after injury. Therefore, future research should examine rehabilitation strategies that could improve pulmonary function among adults with well-healed burn injuries.