Development of homogeneous assay for simultaneous measurement of apoE-deficient, apoE-containing, and total HDL-cholesterol

Association of oxidized ApoB and oxidized ApoA-I with high-risk coronary plaque features in cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Oxidized apolipoprotein B (oxLDL) and oxidized ApoA-I (oxHDL) are proatherogenic. Their prognostic value for assessing high-risk plaques by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is missing.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational study, 306 participants with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had extensive lipoprotein profiling. Proteomics analysis was performed on isolated oxHDL, and atherosclerotic plaque assessment was accomplished by quantitative CCTA.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly White, overweight men (58.5%) on statin therapy (43.5%). Increase in LDL-C, ApoB, small dense LDL-C (P < 0.001 for all), triglycerides (P = 0.03), and lower HDL function were observed in the high oxLDL group. High oxLDL associated with necrotic burden (NB; β = 0.20; P < 0.0001) and fibrofatty burden (FFB; β = 0.15; P = 0.001) after multivariate adjustment. Low oxHDL had a significant reverse association with these plaque characteristics. Plasma oxHDL levels better predicted NB and FFB after adjustment (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.27-3.88, and OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.71-4.58) compared with oxLDL and HDL-C. Interestingly, oxHDL associated with fibrous burden (FB) change over 3.3 years (β = 0.535; P = 0.033) when compared with oxLDL. Combined Met136 mono-oxidation and Trp132 dioxidation of HDL showed evident association with coronary artery calcium score (r = 0.786; P < 0.001) and FB (r = 0.539; P = 0.012) in high oxHDL, whereas Met136 mono-oxidation significantly associated with vulnerable plaque in low oxHDL.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the investigated oxidized lipids are associated with high-risk coronary plaque features and progression over time in patients with CVD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT01621594.

FUNDING

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the NIH Intramural Research Program.

Circadian Rhythm of Subspecies of Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

AIMS

We established automated assay kits for quantifying small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL)-cholesterol (C), LDL-triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)3-C, and apolipoprotein (apo)E-rich HDL-C, and these have been recognized as sensitive biomarkers for predicting coronary artery disease. We investigated the circadian rhythms of these novel lipids to determine if fasting is required to determine basal levels.

METHODS

Forty-eight inpatients with type 2 diabetes and 19 healthy volunteers were studied. Blood samples were collected at seven time points, which were obtained after an overnight fast, before and 2 h after each meal, and before the next breakfast. sdLDL-C, LDL-TG, remnant-like particle (RLP)-C, TG-rich lipoprotein (TRL-C), HDL3-C, and apoE-rich HDL-C were measured by the homogeneous methods. NonHDL-C, large buoyant (lb)LDL-C and HDL2-C were calculated by subtracting sdLDL-C from LDL-C or HDL3-C from HDL-C, respectively.

RESULTS

Serum TG levels were significantly increased after meals in both healthy participants and patients with diabetes. RLP-C and TRL-C were also increased postprandially. LDL-TG, LDL-C, nonHDL-C, HDL2,3-C, and apoE-rich HDL-C did not exhibit significant fluctuation during the day in healthy participants and patients with diabetes. sdLDL-C was slightly increased postprandially in subjects with diabetes (1-2 mg/dl, 3%-9%), though its increase was not significant compared to the baseline (fasting) level. Significant postprandial reduction was observed with LDL-C and lbLDL-C. There was no influence of statin therapy or oral anti-diabetes drugs on the circadian rhythm of LDL-C subspecies.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtle postprandial increase in sdLDL-C is considered a negligible level in general clinical practice. Fasting is not mandatory to measure basal concentrations of LDL and HDL subspecies.

Complex association of apolipoprotein E-containing HDL with coronary artery disease burden in cardiovascular disease

Background

Although traditional lipid parameters and coronary imaging techniques are valuable for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction, better diagnostic tests are still needed.

Methods

In a prospective, observational study, 795 individuals had extensive cardiometabolic profiling, including emerging biomarkers, such as apolipoprotein E–containing HDL-cholesterol (ApoE-HDL-C). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was assessed in the entire cohort, and quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) characterization of total burden, noncalcified burden (NCB), and fibrous plaque burden (FB) was performed in a subcohort (n = 300) of patients stratified by concentration of ApoE-HDL-C. Total and HDL-containing apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) were also measured.

Results

Most patients had a clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 80.4% of 795), with mean age of 59 years, a majority being male (57%), and about half on statin treatment. The low ApoE-HDL-C group had more severe stenosis (11% vs. 2%, overall P < 0.001), with higher CAC as compared with high ApoE-HDL-C. On quantitative CCTA, the high ApoE-HDL-C group had lower NCB (β = –0.24, P = 0.0001), which tended to be significant in a fully adjusted model (β = –0.32, P = 0.001) and altered by ApoC-III in HDL levels. Low ApoE-HDL-C was significantly associated with LDL particle number (β = 0.31; P = 0.0001). Finally, when stratified by FB, ApoC-III in HDL showed a more robust predictive value of CAD over ApoE-HDL-C (AUC: 0.705, P = 0.0001) in a fully adjusted model.

Conclusion

ApoE-containing HDL-C showed a significant association with early coronary plaque characteristics and is affected by the presence of ApoC-III, indicating that low ApoE-HDL-C and high ApoC-III may be important markers of CVD severity.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01621594.

Funding

This work was supported by the NHLBI at the NIH Intramural Research Program.

Evaluation of the apolipoprotein E (apoE)-HDL-associated risk factors for coronary heart disease using duo-functional electrochemical aptasensor

Apolipoprotein E containing high-density lipoprotein (apoE-HDL) and apoE-HDL cholesterol (apoE-HDL-C) are recently recognized as potential biomarkers for coronary heart disease (CHD). We herein developed a two-stage, enzyme-assisted, dual-signal aptasensor that enables a useful electrochemical sensing platform for simultaneous determination of apoE-HDL, apoE-HDL-C, and total HDL-C presented in the sample. The detection scheme consists of two subsystems. In subsystem (I), the level of apoE-HDL is evaluated upon the binding of apoE-specific aptamer and subsequently methylene blue (MB)-labeled DNA displacement occurs on the electrode surface, resulting in electrochemical reduction of methylene blue. In subsystem (II), two kinds of cholesterol levels (apoE-HDL-C and total HDL-C) can be measured. For apoE-HDL-C, the amount of cholesterol in apoE-HDL captured by the aptamer in the first step can be further determined with the aid of surfactant, cholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidase, and p-aminophenol-mediated electrochemical signal amplification. As for total HDL-C, the amount of cholesterol is determined by the same approach as that used for apoE-HDL-C determination, but without washing (separation). The linear dynamic range for apoE-HDL determination is from 1 to 100 mg/dL (R² = 1.00). For cholesterol standards, the linear dynamic range is determined to be 0-250 mg/dL (R² = 0.98). Finally, serial dilutions of purified human HDL preparations were examined using the newly developed aptasensor; the percentage of apoE-HDL-C to HDL-C was found to be ~10%, which correlated well with previously reported values. In conclusion, we successfully developed an electrochemical aptasensor that allows concurrent quantification of apoE-HDL, apoE-HDL-C, and HDL-C on the same platform, offering an efficient, convenient, and purification-free sensing strategy for predictive CHD biomarkers.

Comparison of a novel cholesterol efflux assay using immobilized liposome-bound gel beads with the conventional method

Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is an atheroprotective function of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). CEC is currently measured using artificially prepared foam cells composed of cultured macrophage and ³H-cholesterol. However, this conventional method is not suitable for clinical laboratory use due to poor repeatability, complexity, and low safety. Recently, we reported a novel CEC assay, called the immobilized liposome-bound gel beads (ILG) method. The ILG method is an alternative to foam cells, comprising gel beads and 4,4-diflioro-4-bora-3a,4a-s-indacene labeled cholesterol (BODIPY-cholesterol) instead of macrophage and ³H-cholesterol, respectively. The ILG method has shown adequate basic properties and strong correlation with the conventional method. Here, we aimed to compare this new ILG method with the conventional method in-depth. When apoB-depleted serum was used as the cholesterol acceptor (CA), the ILG method had far better reproducibility than the conventional method. The CEC of major HDL subclasses HDL₂ and HDL₃ had similar results in both the ILG and conventional method. However, the ILG method did not reflect the CEC of apolipoprotein (apo) A–I and a minor HDL subclass which uses ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 on foam cells. Superior reproducibility of the ILG method, which is a limitation of the conventional method, and similar CEC results for major HDL subclasses in the ILG and conventional methods, provide further evidence that the ILG method is promising for measuring CEC clinically. However, some HDL subclasses or apo might have poor CEC correlation between these methods. Further research is therefore needed to confirm the clinical significance of estimating CEC by the ILG method.

Conventional and Novel Lipid Measures and Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the association of multiple lipid measures with incident peripheral artery disease (PAD). Approach and Results: We used Cox proportional hazards models to characterize the associations of each of the fasting lipid measures (total cholesterol, LDL-C [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol], HDL-C [high-density lipoprotein cholesterol], triglycerides, RLP-C [remnant lipoprotein cholesterol], LDL-TG [LDL-triglycerides], sdLDL-C [small dense LDL-C], and Apo-E-HDL [Apo-E-containing HDL-C]) with incident PAD identified by pertinent International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) hospital discharge codes (eg, 440.2) among 8330 Black and White ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) participants (mean age 62.8 [SD 5.6] years) free of PAD at baseline (1996-1998) through 2015. Since lipid traits are biologically correlated to each other, we also conducted principal component analysis to identify underlying components for PAD risk. There were 246 incident PAD cases with a median follow-up of 17 years. After accounting for potential confounders, the following lipid measures were significantly associated with PAD (hazard ratio per 1-SD increment [decrement for HDL-C and Apo-E-HDL]): triglycerides, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.08-1.36); RLP-C, 1.18 (1.08-1.29); LDL-TG, 1.18 (1.05-1.33); HDL-C, 1.39 (1.16-1.67); and Apo-E-HDL, 1.27 (1.07-1.51). The principal component analysis identified 3 components (1: mainly loaded by triglycerides, RLP-C, LDL-TG, and sdLDL-C; 2: by HDL-C and Apo-E-HDL; and 3: by LDL-C and RLP-C). Components 1 and 2 showed independent associations with incident PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Triglyceride-related and HDL-related lipids were independently associated with incident PAD, which has implications on preventive strategies for PAD. However, none of the novel lipid measures outperformed conventional ones. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Comparison of Omega-3 Eicosapentaenoic Acid Versus Docosahexaenoic Acid-Rich Fish Oil Supplementation on Plasma Lipids and Lipoproteins in Normolipidemic Adults

Background: Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have both shared and different cardiovascular effects, and commonly used fish oil supplements have considerably varied EPA/DHA ratios. Aims: We compared the effects of fish oil supplements with different EPA/DHA ratios on lipoprotein metabolism. Methods: In a double-blind, randomized cross-over study, normolipidemic adults (n = 30) consumed 12 g/day of EPA-rich (EPA/DHA: 2.3) or DHA-rich (EPA/DHA: 0.3) fish oil for 8-weeks, separated by an 8-week washout period. Results: Both fish oil supplements similarly lowered plasma TG levels and TG-related NMR parameters versus baseline (p < 0.05). There were no changes in plasma cholesterol-related parameters due to either fish oil, although on-treatment levels for LDL particle number were slightly higher for DHA-rich oil compared with EPA-rich oil (p < 0.05). Both fish oil supplements similarly altered HDL subclass profile and proteome, and down regulated HDL proteins related to inflammation, with EPA-rich oil to a greater extent. Furthermore, EPA-rich oil increased apoM abundance versus DHA-rich oil (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, fish oil supplements with varied EPA/DHA ratios had similar effects on total lipids/lipoproteins, but differences were observed in lipoprotein subfraction composition and distribution, which could impact on the use of EPA versus DHA for improving cardiovascular health.

Supplementation with saury oil, a fish oil high in omega-11 monounsaturated fatty acids, improves plasma lipids in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Fish oil enriched in omega-11 long-chain monounsaturated fatty acids (LCMUFAs; C20:1 and C22:1 isomers combined) have shown lipid-lowering and atheroprotective effects in animal models.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a first-in-human trial of LCMUFA-rich saury fish oil supplementation to test its safety and possible effect on plasma lipids.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial was carried out in 30 healthy normolipidemic adults (BMI <25 kg/m2; mean TG, 84 mg/dL). Treatment periods of 8 weeks were separated by an 8-week washout period. Subjects were randomized to receive either 12 g of saury oil (3.5 g of LCMUFA and 3.4 g of omega-3 FAs) or identical capsules with control oil (a mixture of sardine and olive oil; 4.9 g of shorter-chain MUFA oleate and 3 g of omega-3 FAs).

RESULTS

Saury oil supplementation was safe and resulted in LDL particle counts 12% lower than control oil (P < .001). Saury oil also had a minor effect on increasing HDL particle size (9.8 nm vs 9.7 nm; P < .05) based on a linear mixed effect model. In contrast, control oil, but not saury oil, increased LDL-C by 7.5% compared with baseline (P < .05). Saury oil had similar effects compared with control oil on lowering plasma TG levels, VLDL, and TG-rich lipoprotein particle counts (by ∼16%, 25%, and 35%, respectively; P < .05), and increasing HDL-C and cholesterol efflux capacity (by ∼6% and 8%, respectively; P < .05) compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

Saury oil supplementation is well tolerated and has beneficial effects on several cardiovascular parameters, such as LDL particle counts, HDL particle size, and plasma TG levels.

Characterization of the cholesterol efflux of apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein in THP-1 cells

High-density lipoprotein (HDL), also known as antiatherogenic lipoprotein, consists of heterogeneous particles in terms of size, density and composition, suggesting differences among HDL subclasses in characteristics and functions. We investigated the role of apolipoprotein E (apoE)-containing HDL, a minor HDL subclass, in the cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) of HDL, which is its predominant atheroprotective function. The CEC of apoE-containing HDL was similar to that of apoE-deficient HDL, but the former exhibited a greater rate increase (1.48-fold) compared to that of the latter (1.10-fold) by the stimulation of THP-1 macrophages with the Liver X Receptor (LXR) agonist. No difference in CEC was observed without the LXR agonist between apoA-I, the main apolipoprotein in HDL, and apoE, whereas the increase in CEC in response to treatment with the LXR agonist was greater for apoA-I (4.25-fold) than for apoE (2.22-fold). Furthermore, the increase in the CEC of apoE-containing HDL induced by the LXR agonist was significantly reduced by treatment with glyburide, an inhibitor of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1). These results suggest that apoE-containing HDL, unlike apoE-deficient HDL, is involved in cholesterol efflux via ABCA1.

Shared genetic architecture between metabolic traits and Alzheimer's disease: a large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis

A growing number of studies clearly demonstrate a substantial link between metabolic dysfunction and the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), especially glucose-related dysfunction; one hypothesis for this comorbidity is the presence of a common genetic etiology. We conducted a large-scale cross-trait GWAS to investigate the genetic overlap between AD and ten metabolic traits. Among all the metabolic traits, fasting glucose, fasting insulin and HDL were found to be genetically associated with AD. Local genetic covariance analysis found that 19q13 region had strong local genetic correlation between AD and T2D (P = 6.78 × 10^- 22), LDL (P = 1.74 × 10^- 253) and HDL (P = 7.94 × 10^- 18). Cross-trait meta-analysis identified 4 loci that were associated with AD and fasting glucose, 3 loci that were associated with AD and fasting insulin, and 20 loci that were associated with AD and HDL (P_meta < 1.6 × 10^- 8, single trait P < 0.05). Functional analysis revealed that the shared genes are enriched in amyloid metabolic process, lipoprotein remodeling and other related biological pathways; also in pancreas, liver, blood and other tissues. Our work identifies common genetic architectures shared between AD and fasting glucose, fasting insulin and HDL, and sheds light on molecular mechanisms underlying the association between metabolic dysregulation and AD.

Serum amyloid A does not affect high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement by a homogeneous assay

BACKGROUND

Serum amyloid A (SAA), which is one of the acute phase proteins, alters the structure of HDL by associating with it during circulation. We focused on whether SAA influences the values of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) measurements when using a homogeneous assay.

METHODS

HDLs were isolated by ultracentrifugation from serum samples of 248 patients that were stratified into three groups based on their serum SAA concentrations (low: SAA ≤ 8 μg/mL; middle: 8 < SAA ≤ 100 μg/mL; and high: SAA > 100 μg/mL). HDL-C concentrations of the serum samples measured by the homogeneous assay were compared with the total cholesterol concentrations of HDL fractions isolated by ultracentrifugation.

RESULTS

HDLs obtained from patients with low SAA concentrations were separated into their general particle sizes and classified as HDL₂ and HDL₃ by native-gel electrophoresis. On the other hand, HDLs obtained from patients with high SAA concentrations occasionally showed distributions different from the typical sizes of HDL₂ and HDL₃, such as extremely small or large particles. Nevertheless, HDL-C concentrations measured using the homogeneous assay were strongly correlated with those measured using the ultracentrifugation method, regardless of the SAA concentrations. However, the ratios of HDL-C concentrations obtained by the homogeneous assay to those obtained by the ultracentrifugation method for patients with high SAA concentrations were significantly lower than those of patients with low SAA concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

A large amount of SAA attached to HDL altered the HDL particle size but did not essentially affect HDL-C measurement by homogeneous assay.

A two-step homogeneous assay for apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein shows antiatherogenic properties in vitro. There is a need for a homogeneous assay to determine the concentration of apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein for in vivo studies.

METHODS

In the proposed homogeneous assay, lipoproteins other than apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein were eliminated in the first step. Apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was measured in the second step. The control study used a 13% polyethylene glycol precipitation assay (control assay).

RESULTS

The homogeneous assay showed good performance in validation studies. In subjects with normal liver function ( n = 78), a significant correlation was found between the control assay and the homogeneous assay ( r = 0.824). Serum apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, determined by the control assay and the homogeneous assay, respectively, were 0.05 (0.04-0.10) (median [25th-75th percentile]) mmol/L and 0.10 (0.06-0.13) mmol/L for healthy individuals ( n = 12), and 0.03 (0.01-0.13) mmol/L and 0.02 (0.01-0.02) mmol/L for patients with cholestasis ( n = 6). The results indicate that the homogeneous assay recovers cholesterol contained in physiological apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein, but not in pathological apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein from cholestatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed two-step homogeneous assay enables selective measurement of physiological apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in common autoanalysers. This assay might uncover a role for apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein in physiological conditions.

Apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) modifies the impact of cholesterol-overloaded HDL on incident coronary heart disease risk: A community-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have shown that cholesterol-overloaded high-density lipoprotein (HDL) can promote the formation of apolipoprotein E (APOE)-containing HDL, a process correcting the atherogenic function of cholesterol-overloaded HDL.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to explore whether APOE-containing HDL can attenuate the defective impact of cholesterol-overloaded HDL on the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in humans.

METHODS

We measured APOE-HDL cholesterol (APOE-HDLC), HDL cholesterol (HDLC), and HDL particle number in 1112 participants aged 45 to 74 years at baseline in a community-based cohort study. Cholesterol molecules per HDL particle (HDL-C/P ratio) were calculated as the ratio of HDLC to HDL particle number. The ratio of APOE-HDLC to total HDLC (APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio) was calculated to assess the relative proportion of APOE-HDLC in total HDLC.

RESULTS

The HDL-C/P ratio was strongly correlated with APOE-HDLC (partial-r: 0.615). Participants with cholesterol-overloaded HDL (indicated by the highest level of the HDL-C/P ratio) had a high APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio. Baseline cholesterol-overloaded HDL significantly increased the 10-year risk of incident CHD (hazard ratio = 2.42; 95% confidence interval = 1.06-8.32), but this was attenuated by an increased APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio. Participants with high HDL-C/P ratio and APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio had a 42% lower risk, whereas those with a high HDL-C/P ratio and low APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio had a 2.54-fold higher risk, than those with low HDL-C/P ratio and APOE-HDLC/HDLC ratio after multiple adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Cholesterol-overloaded HDLs are related with increased APOE-containing HDL species. APOE-containing HDL was found to attenuate the impact of cholesterol-overloaded HDL on increased incident CHD risk, suggesting that APOE-containing HDL may correct the dysfunction of cholesterol-overloaded HDL.

Changes in apolipoprotein E-containing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) have little impact on HDL-cholesterol measurements using homogeneous assays in normolipidemic and dyslipidemic subjects

BACKGROUND

High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) is generally measured using several homogeneous assays. We aimed to clarify whether apolipoprotein E-containing HDL (apoE-HDL) subfractions are altered during storage, and if so, whether such changes affect the HDL-C concentration measured using homogeneous assays.

METHODS

We stored serum from normolipidemic (n=32) and dyslipidemic (n=17) subjects at 4°C for up to 7days. ApoE-HDL subfractions were analyzed using native 2-dimensional gel (native 2D-gel) electrophoresis. HDL-C concentrations were determined using 2 precipitation and 4homogeneous assays.

RESULTS

Native 2D-gel electrophoresis revealed variously sized apoE-HDL subfractions. After 4h incubation at 37°C, subfractions of smaller particles were converted into larger particles by lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity. After 7days storage at 4°C, the smaller subfractions were decreased in the normolipidemic group, accompanying increases in larger subfractions, whereas changes in the respective subfractions varied among individuals in the dyslipidemic group. HDL-C concentrations were significantly lower after storage at 4°C in all assays, except that using Sekisui Medical's reagent. Therefore, changes in HDL-C concentration and apoE-HDL subfractions were independent of each other.

CONCLUSION

ApoE-HDL subfractions change during storage, but these changes are not linked to those in HDL-C concentration measured using homogeneous assays.