Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a "good" measure

The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty on Postoperative Physical Function, Lower Limb Strength and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The trial aimed to examine the effect of eight weeks preoperative low-load blood flow restricted resistance training (BFR-RT) on physical function, lower limb strength, and patient-reported outcomes in knee OA patients 3 and 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compared with preoperative usual care. An assessor blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. Eighty-six patients scheduled for TKA who were allocated to 8 weeks BFR-RT on the affected leg 3x/week or preoperative usual care involving no exercise (CON).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

30-s sit to stand (30STS).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Timed Up&Go, 40-m walk test (40mWT), knee range of motion (ROM) 1-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press and knee extensor strength, maximal isometric contraction (MVIC) for the knee extensors and flexors, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Euroqol 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-L5) questionnaire. Data were collected at baseline (12 weeks pre-surgery), ~3 days pre-surgery, 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant between-group differences in the change from baseline to 3 and 12 months postoperatively on 30STS, TUG, or 40mFWT. Significant between-group differences were observed at 3 but not 12 months postoperatively for the corresponding changes in 1RM leg press strength, 1RM knee extensor strength, and MVIC knee extensor favoring BFR-RT. No between-group differences were observed for the delta changes from baseline in knee ROM, KOOS subscales or EQ-5D-L5 at any postoperative time points. These findings suggest that preoperative BFR-RT offered no superior effects compared with usual preoperative care on postoperative physical function or patient-reported outcomes. Preoperative BFR-RT produced amplified gains in lower limb muscle strength at 3 months postoperatively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04081493.

Introducing a specified on-line multimodal prehabilitation approach for total knee replacement surgery candidates using data from the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory field-based, pre-post, mixed methods implementation pilot study

RATIONALE

Individuals waiting for total-knee-replacement surgery are at risk of developing morbidities and frailty which may affect their postoperative recovery. Multi-modal prehabilitation could mitigate these unintentional effects.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To implement and evaluate a specified online multi-modal prehabilitation intervention in patients waiting for total-knee-replacement surgery in a large urban acute hospital trust.

METHOD

A non-randomised, pre/post analysis implementation pilot with a nested qualitative study was conducted and is reported following the standards for implementation studies (StaRI) guidance. Of 35 listed cases, 12 (34%) were eligible, recruited, and completed an 8-week multi-modal online intervention incorporating 5 modalities (i) cardiovascular exercise, (ii) strength/balance function, (iii) smoking cessation, (iv) opioid use, (v) nutritional intake. Interventions were specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System, where rehabilitation treatment theory accounts for discrete treatment components. Two participated in an online qualitative interview post-intervention. Process evaluation included intervention fidelity, eligibility/recruitment/retention rates, and clinical outcomes included knee function, frailty, gait velocity, anxiety/depression, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Five participants (42%) completed the intervention and were retained at follow-up. The intervention was delivered online at specified doses, frequency/durations indicative of high respective adherence, quantity, and exposure fidelity. There was significant improvement in median oxford knee score (p = 0.015), gait velocity (p = 0.040) and anxiety (p = 0.023). The interview revealed 5 themes; surgery preconceptions, motivation, acceptability, postoperative experiences, and future recommendations confirming acceptance of the intervention by virtue of adhering to the treatment exposure delivered as planned.

CONCLUSION

The specified multi-modal prehabilitation was acceptable, implementable, and demonstrated evidence of preliminary efficacy. Further experimental pilot work that represents the spectrum of frailty, obesity, quality of life, and comorbidities associated with total-knee-replacement surgery is indicated.

Strategies to Manage Poorer Outcomes After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Current Understanding, Unanswered Questions, and Future Directions

PURPOSE

Although hip or knee arthroplasty is generally a successful intervention, it is documented that 15%-30% of patients undergoing arthroplasty report suboptimal outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the key findings concerning the management of poorer outcomes after hip or knee arthroplasty.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of articles was conducted up to November 2023 across three electronic databases. Only studies written in English were included, with no limitations applied regarding study design and time.

RESULT

Efficiently addressing poorer outcomes after arthroplasty necessitates a thorough exploration of appropriate methods for assessing recovery following hip or knee arthroplasty, ensuring accurate identification of patients at risk or experiencing poorer recovery. When selecting appropriate outcome measure tools, various factors should be taken into consideration, including understanding patients' priorities throughout the recovery process, assessing psychometric properties of outcome measure tools at different time points after arthroplasty, understanding how to combine/reconcile provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures, and determining the appropriate methods to interpret outcome measure scores. However, further research in these areas is warranted. In addition, the identification of key modifiable factors affecting outcomes and the development of interventions to manage these factors are needed.

CONCLUSION

There is growing attention paid to delivering interventions for patients at risk or not optimally recovering following hip or knee arthroplasty. To achieve this, it is essential to identify the most appropriate outcome measure tools, factors associated with poorer recovery and management of these factors.

Efficacy of Protein and Essential Amino Acid Supplementation in Lower Limb Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of protein and/or essential amino acid (EAA) supplementation in all lower limb surgeries using systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included RCTs that assessed the efficacy of protein and/or EAA supplementation in lower limb surgeries. On June 2, 2023, we searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcomes were mobility, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and acute kidney injury (AKI). The secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, muscle strength, muscle mass, and all adverse events. We performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We included 12 RCTs (622 patients). These studies included four on hip fracture surgery, three on total hip arthroplasty, and five on total knee arthroplasty. Protein and/or EAA supplementation may slightly improve PRO (standard mean difference 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22 to 0.80, low certainty of evidence). Nevertheless, it may not improve mobility (mean difference 0.07 m/s, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.16, low certainty of evidence). No adverse events including AKI were reported. Muscle strength may have increased (standard mean difference 0.31, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.61, very low certainty of evidence). However, exercise capacity (mean difference 5.43 m, 95% CI: -35.59 to 46.45, very low certainty of evidence) and muscle mass (standard mean difference -0.08, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.33, very low certainty of evidence) were not improved. While protein and/or EAA supplementation in lower limb surgeries may improve PRO, it is unlikely to affect mobility. Despite this, the medical team and patients might still consider protein and/or EAA supplementation a useful option.

Functional Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to identify the existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in hip or knee arthroplasty for adults with osteoarthritis and assess their content validity using the modified International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) core set for osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Four databases were systematically searched to identify disease or joint-specific PROMs evaluating function after hip or knee arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently evaluated the content of PROMs based on established ICF linking rules.

RESULTS

From 449 studies included in this review, 50 PROMs were identified. The mobility chapter of activities and participation was the most common component, followed by the sensory function and pain chapter of body function and structure. The most frequent ICF activity and participation categories were d451 going up and down stairs, d4701 using private motorized transportation, d4104 standing, and d4154 maintaining a standing position. However, 11 ICF categories of the modified OA core set were not captured in any PROMs. This ICF-based content analysis of PROMs revealed that included activity and participation categories vary widely, with little overlap among PROMs. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score had the most coverage for activity and participation (36.7%).

CONCLUSION

Even though our search identified 50 specific PROMs, there remain gaps in content related to activity and participation coverage. By providing a content analysis of the PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty, this study may help clinicians select PROMs based on covered categories and relevant clinical objectives.

High Area Deprivation Index is Associated With Not Achieving the Patient-acceptable Symptom State After TKA

BACKGROUND

The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) approximates a patient's relative socioeconomic deprivation. The ADI has been associated with increased healthcare use after TKA, but it is unknown whether there is an association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Given that a high proportion of patients are dissatisfied with their results after TKA, and the large number of these procedures performed, knowledge of factors associated with PROMs may indicate opportunities to provide support to patients who might benefit from it.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the ADI associated with achieving the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for pain, Joint Replacement (JR), and Physical Function (PS) short forms after TKA? (2) Is the ADI associated with achieving the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for the KOOS pain, JR, and PS short forms?

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of data drawn from a longitudinally maintained database. Between January 2016 and July 2021, a total of 12,239 patients underwent unilateral TKA at a tertiary healthcare center. Of these, 92% (11,213) had available baseline PROM data and were potentially eligible. An additional 21% (2400) of patients were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 1 year or had incomplete data, leaving 79% (8813) for analysis here. The MCID is the smallest change in an outcome score that a patient is likely to perceive as a clinically important improvement, and the PASS refers to the threshold beyond which patients consider their symptoms acceptable and consistent with adequate functioning and well-being. MCIDs were calculated using a distribution-based method. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to investigate the association of ADI with 1-year PROMs while controlling for patient demographic variables. ADI was stratified into quintiles based on their distribution in our sample. Achievement of MCID and PASS thresholds was determined by the improvement between preoperative and 1-year PROMs.

RESULTS

After controlling for patient demographic factors, ADI was not associated with an inability to achieve the MCID for the KOOS pain, KOOS PS, or KOOS JR. A higher ADI was independently associated with an increased risk of inability to achieve the PASS for KOOS pain (for example, the odds ratio of those in the ADI category of 83 to 100 compared with those in the 1 to 32 category was 1.34 [95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.58]) and KOOS JR (for example, the OR of those in the ADI category of 83 to 100 compared with those in the 1 the 32 category was 1.29 [95% CI 1.10 to 1.53]), but not KOOS PS (for example, the OR of those in the ADI category of 83 to 100 compared with those in the 1 the 32 category was 1.09 [95% CI 0.92 to 1.29]).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that social and economic factors are associated with patients' perceptions of their overall pain and function after TKA, but such factors are not associated with patients' perceptions of their improvement in symptoms. Patients from areas with higher deprivation may be an at-risk population and could benefit from targeted interventions to improve their perception of their healthcare experience, such as through referrals to nonemergent medical transportation and supporting applications to local care coordination services before proceeding with TKA. Future research should investigate the mechanisms underlying why socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with inability to achieve the PASS, but not the MCID, after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Establishing minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds following birmingham hip resurfacing

INTRODUCTION

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) has emerged as a compelling and innovative alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially among young, active patients. However, the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds have not yet been determined for patients undergoing BHR. Therefore, the current study aimed to (1) determine the MCID and PASS thresholds for both the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-Pain and HOOS physical function shortform (PS), for patients who underwent BHR; and (2) identify factors influencing the achievement of MCID and PASS for HOOS-Pain and HOOS-PS.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from patients undergoing BHR was analyzed. Patients with osteoarthritis and completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMs were included. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate MCID and PASS, respectively. The optimal cut-off point for PASS thresholds was calculated using the Youden index.

RESULTS

MCID for HOOS-Pain and PS were calculated to be 9.2 and 9.3, respectively. The PASS threshold for HOOS-Pain and PS were ≥ 77.7 and ≥ 87.3, respectively. The current study identified several factors affecting postoperative achievement of thresholds. Baseline Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were a predictor for achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-Pain, achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-PS, achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-Pain, and achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-PS. Furthermore, baseline HOOS-Pain was a significant predictor for achieving MCID for postoperative HOOS-PS, achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-Pain, and achieving PASS for postoperative HOOS-PS.

CONCLUSIONS

MCID and PASS thresholds were established for HOOS-Pain and PS domains following BHR with most patients achieving these clinically meaningful benchmarks. Additionally, several factors affecting achievement of MCID and PASS were identified, including modifiable risk factors that may allow clinicians to implement optimization strategies and further improve outcomes.

Stepping Up Recovery: Integrating Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Wearable Technology for Rehabilitation Following Knee Arthroplasty

Improvement after knee arthroplasty (KA) is often measured using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, PROMs are limited due to their subjectivity. Therefore, wearable technology is becoming commonly utilized to objectively assess physical activity and function. We assessed the correlation between PROMs and step/stair flight counts in total (TKA) and partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) patients.Analysis of a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study investigating the collection of average daily step and stair flight counts, was performed. Subjects (N = 1,844 TKA patients and N = 489 PKA patients) completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and provided numerical rating scale pain scores pre- and postoperatively. Only patients who reported living in a multilevel home environment (N = 896 TKA patients and N = 258 PKA patients) were included in analysis of stair flight counts. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine correlations between variables.Among TKA patients, pain scores demonstrated a negative correlation to mean step counts at preoperative (r = -0.14, p < 0.0001) and 1-month follow-up (r = -0.14, p < 0.0001). Similar negative correlations were true for pain and stair flight counts at preoperative (r = -0.16, p < 0.0001) and 1-month follow-up (r = -0.11, p = 0.006). KOOS JR scores demonstrated weak positive correlations with mean step counts at preoperative (r = 0.19, p < 0.0001) and 1-month postoperative (r = 0.17, p < 0.0001). Similar positive correlations were true for KOOS JR scores and stair flight counts preoperatively (r = 0.13, p = 0.0002) and at 1-month postoperatively (r = 0.10, p = 0.0048). For PKA patients, correlations between pain and KOOS JR with step/stair counts demonstrated similar directionality.Given the correlation between wearable-generated data and PROMs, wearable technology may be beneficial in evaluating patient outcomes following KA. By combining subjective feedback with the objective data, health care providers can gain a holistic view of patients' progress and tailor treatment plans accordingly.

What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical short form (PS), and joint replacement (JR) 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty stratified by preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) versus non-OA.

METHODS

A prospective institutional cohort of 5,887 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (January 2016 to December 2018) was included. There were 4,184 patients (77.0%) who completed a one-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, and baseline and one-year HOOS pain, PS, and JR scores were recorded. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis: OA or non-OA. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and MCIDs were estimated using a distribution-based approach. The PASS values were estimated using an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at one year post surgery.

RESULTS

The MCID thresholds were slightly higher in the non-OA cohort versus OA patients. (HOOS-Pain: OA: 8.35 versus non-OA: 8.85 points; HOOS-PS: OA: 9.47 versus non-OA: 9.90 points; and HOOS-JR: OA: 7.76 versus non-OA: 8.46 points). Similarly, all MDC thresholds were consistently higher in the non-OA cohort compared to OA patients. The OA cohort exhibited similar or higher PASS thresholds compared to the non-OA cohort for HOOS-Pain (OA: ≥80.6 versus non-OA: ≥77.5 points), HOOS-PS (OA: ≥83.6 versus non-OA: ≥83.6 points), and HOOS-JR (OA: ≥76.8 versus non-OA: ≥73.5 points). A similar percentage of patients achieved MCID and PASS thresholds regardless of preoperative diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

While MCID and MDC thresholds for all HOOS subdomains were slightly higher among non-OA than OA patients, PASS thresholds for HOOS pain and JR were slightly higher in the OA group. The absolute magnitude of the difference in these thresholds may not be sufficient to cause major clinical differences. However, these subtle differences may have a significant impact when used as indicators of operative success in a population setting.

Impact of implant design on the Forgotten Joint Score: a retrospective study comparing two contemporary knee designs

This retrospective study was designed to assess two fixed bearing total knee design concepts and their clinical outcomes, particularly in Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Patients were assessed clinically using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Participants completed an FJS-12 and a short form of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-PS). A total of 216 knees -76 with Genesis II and 150 with Vanguard total knee arthroplasties - were included. Patients in the Vanguard group had significantly better postoperative FJS-12 scores (by 10.1 points, p = 0.019). Differences in KSS subscores also reached the level of statistical significance. KOOS-PS did not differ significantly. Statistically significant differences between the two knee designs on FJS-12, KS and FS assessments were revealed, but overall, these differences may not reach the threshold of clinical significance.

Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for KOOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty

UPDATE

This article was updated on May 1, 2024 because of a previous error, which was discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. The byline that had read "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†" now reads "Ahmed K. Emara, MD 1 *, Ignacio Pasqualini, MD 1 *, Yuxuan Jin, MS 1 , Alison K. Klika, MS 1 , Melissa N. Orr, BS 1 , Pedro J. Rullán, MD 1 , Nicolas S. Piuzzi, MD 1 , and the Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group†".

BACKGROUND

Literature-reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate marked variability. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), MCID, and PASS thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subdomain, Physical Function Short Form (PS), and Joint Replacement (JR) among patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 6,778 patients who underwent primary TKA was analyzed. Overall, 1-year follow-up was completed by 5,316 patients for the KOOS Pain, 5,018 patients for the KOOS PS, and 4,033 patients for the KOOS JR. A total of 5,186 patients had an OA diagnosis; this group had an average age of 67.0 years and was 59.9% female and 80.4% White. Diagnosis-specific MDCs and MCIDs were estimated with use of a distribution-based approach. PASS values were estimated with use of an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The MCID thresholds for the OA group were 7.9 for the KOOS Pain, 8.0 for the KOOS PS, and 6.7 for the KOOS JR. A high percentage of patients achieved the MCID threshold for each outcome measure (KOOS Pain, 95%; KOOS PS, 88%; and KOOS JR, 94%). The MDC 80% to 95% confidence intervals ranged from 9.1 to 14.0 for the KOOS Pain, 9.2 to 14.1 for the KOOS PS, and 7.7 to 11.8 for the KOOS JR. The PASS thresholds for the OA group were 77.7 for the KOOS Pain (achieved by 73% of patients), 70.3 for the KOOS PS (achieved by 68% of patients), and 70.7 for the KOOS JR (achieved by 70% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provided useful MCID, MDC, and PASS thresholds for the KOOS Pain, PS, and JR for patients with OA. The diagnosis-specific metrics established herein can serve as benchmarks for clinically meaningful postoperative improvement. Future research and quality assessments should utilize these OA-specific thresholds when evaluating outcomes following TKA. Doing so will enable more accurate determinations of operative success and improvements in patient-centered care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simplified Chinese version of the knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in patients after total knee arthroplasty

Objectives

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) has been utilized to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in individuals following knee injuries, such as those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee osteoarthritis, but has not yet been applied to individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in China. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Simplified Chinese version of the KOOS in Chinese individuals undergoing TKA.

Methods

This study distributed 170 questionnaires, and assessed the KOOS of the participants, along with requiring them to complete the Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey. There were 35 participants completed a test-retest reliability survey with a 24-h interval, 129 participants completed a pre - surgery survey, and 119 individuals completed a post - surgery survey 6 weeks after the surgery. The following tests were conducted: Cronbach's alpha (α) to assess internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate test-retest reliability, Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) to examine construct validity, effect size (ES) to detect measure responsiveness, minimal detectable change (MDC) to assess measurement errors. Floor and ceiling effects (<15%) were also asses evaluated.

Results

The simplified Chinese version of the KOOS showed good test-retest reliability in participants after TKA, with an ICC of 0.82-0.97 (95% CI). The internal consistency of the five subscales of the KOOS was good (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.96). No floor or ceiling effects were found. Regarding construct validity, a strong positive correlation was found between each of the three KOOS subscales (activities of daily living, knee-related Quality of Life, and sport and recreation subscales) and the general health and bodily pain subscales of the SF-36 (0.53 < ρ < 0.61). The subscales of the simplified Chinese version of the KOOS showed responsiveness (ES: 0.68 to 0.86) before and after 6 weeks of physical treatment. The MDC ranged from 10.28 to 23.24.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the KOOS showed good psychometric properties and was found to be valid, reliable, and simple as an assessment tool for symptoms, pain, activity of daily living, sports and recreational activity and quality of life for the Chinese population suffering from TKA.

Sit-to-stand power predicts functional performance and patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Lower limb muscle power is positively associated with functional performance and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and suggested as an important variable to evaluate in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA).

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between muscle power derived from the 30-sec sit-to-stand test (STS power) with functional performance and PROMs compared to maximal isometric knee extensor strength (KE MVC) in male- and female patients with advanced OA.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional design.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients (66.6 [64.9-67.7]years) with advanced knee OA were included. Dependent variables were STS power and KE MVC. Independent variables were Timed Up&Go (TUG), 40-m fast-paced walk test (40mFWT), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales.

COVARIATE

Age.

ANALYSES

Simple linear- and multiple regression analyses with and without adjusting for age. Pitman's test was used to evaluate differences in correlation strength among dependent variables.

RESULTS

STS power demonstrated a statistical relationship with TUG and 40mFWT for both sexes (β coefficients -1.11 to -4.36 (p < 0.05), r2 = 0.47-0.55 (p < 0.05)), and with KOOS Pain, ADL, and Sport for male patients (β coefficients 6.53 to 7.17 (p < 0.05), r2 = 0.29-0.33 (p < 0.05)). Knee extensor MVC demonstrated no relationship with any outcomes for male patients or female patients. STS power displayed statistically stronger correlation to functional performance.

CONCLUSION

STS power was associated with functional performance in both male patients and female patients suffering from advanced knee OA. Moreover, STS power was associated with KOOS Pain, Sport, and ADLin male patients. The assessment of STS power should be considered in the evaluation of patients with advanced knee OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04081493.

Comparison of immediate versus optional delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injury through a parallel, multicentric, pragmatic randomized controlled trial - IODA trial

BACKGROUND

Standard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomized controlled trials [1, 2] (RCT) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared to immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to verify these results and assess whether patient-specific parameters determine if a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, multi-center RCT with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomized to conservative treatment (rehabilitation + optional delayed surgery) or immediate ACL reconstruction (< 12 weeks). The primary outcome is the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 7 months (short term) and 1-year long term) post-injury. These following additional outcomes will be administered at 4 and 7 months (short term) and 1, 2, and 3 years post-injury (long term): patient-reported outcomes concerning knee symptoms, knee function and quality of life, functional knee tests, time to return to pre-injury activity level and return to work, structural knee joint damage and cartilage health (only at 4 months and 3 years post-injury), as well as adverse events such as re-rupture rates. Furthermore, the secondary objective is to identify (through a predictive analysis) individuals who would benefit the most from early reconstruction versus those who should rather be treated conservatively.

DISCUSSION

This large RCT will assess the clinical effectiveness of both surgical and conservative treatment. In addition, it will be the first study that provides insights into which patient-specific factors predict successful outcomes after conservative treatment of ACL injuries. These results will be the first step toward early patient identification regarding treatment decisions. This is urgently needed to avoid (1) delayed surgeries and prolonged rehabilitation and (2) unnecessary surgeries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

this trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05747079) on 10/02/2023.

The Association of Season of Surgery and Patient Reported Outcomes following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Understanding the impact of situational variables on surgical recovery can improve outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Literature examining hospital outcomes by season remains inconclusive, with limited focus on patient experience. The aim of this study is to investigate if there are differences in hospital and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) after THA depending on the season of the index procedure to improve surgeon preoperative counseling.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing primary THA at a single large academic center between January 2013 and August 2020. Demographic, operative, hospital, and PROMs were gathered from the institutional electronic medical record and our institutional joint replacement outcomes database.

Results

6418 patients underwent primary THA and met inclusion criteria. Of this patient population, 1636 underwent surgery in winter, 1543 in spring, 1811 in summer, and 1428 in fall. PROMs were equivalent across seasons at nearly time points. The average age of patients was 65 (+/- 10) years, with an average BMI of 29.3 (+/- 6). Rates of complications including ED visits within 30 days, readmission within 90 days, unplanned readmission, dislocation, fracture, or wound infection were not significantly different by season (P > .05).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate no differences in complications and PROMs at 1 year in patients undergoing THA during 4 distinct seasons. Notably, patients had functional differences at the second follow-up visit, suggesting variation in short-term recovery. Patients could be counseled that they have similar rates of complications and postoperative recovery regardless of season.

Joint awareness among total hip arthroplasty patients operated through anterior approach versus posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare joint awareness in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the anterior approach (AA) versus the posterior approach (PA). The hypothesis was that patients who underwent THA via AA would have better forgetfulness of the artificial joint.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of major literature databases and bibliographic details was conducted to identify studies evaluating the forgotten joint score (FJS-12) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients operated through the anterior approach (AA) and posterior approach (PA). Out of 234 studies identified, seven studies met the inclusion criteria for review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and the risk of bias in the included studies. The FJS-12 was evaluated at three months, one year, and beyond 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean FJS-12 at > 2 years was 82.03 in the AA group and 80.32 in the PA group. The forest plot analysis (n = 819 patients) revealed no significant difference in FJS-12 score between these two approaches (MD 2.13, 95% CI [- 1.17, 5.42], p = 0.21; I2 = 60%). However, the joint awareness was significantly lesser in the AA group at 3 months (MD 12.56, 95% CI [9.58, 15.54], p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and 1 year (MD 9.55, 95% CI [7.85, 11.24], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

After analyzing the available literature, it was found that THA patients operated through the AA approach have significantly lower joint awareness than those operated through the PA approach in the first year of surgery. However, there is no significant difference in joint awareness between these two approaches after 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Establishing patient-centered metrics for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score following medial unicompartmental knee arthropalsty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptoms state (PASS) threshold for the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain subscore, KOOS physical short form (PS), and KOOS joint replacement (JR) following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 743 patients undergoing mUKA from a single academic institution from April 2015 through March 2020 were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected both pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively. Distribution-based and anchored-based approaches were used to estimate MCIDs and PASS, respectively. The optimal cut-off point and the percentage of patients who achieved PASS were also calculated.

RESULTS

MCID for KOOS-pain, KOOS-PS, and KOOS-JR following mUKA were calculated to be 7.6, 7.3, and 6.2, respectively. The PASS threshold for KOOS pain, PS, and JR were 77.8, 70.3, and 70.7, with 68%, 66%, and 64% of patients achieving satisfactory outcomes, respectively. Cut-off values for delta KOOS pain, PS, and JR were found to be 25.7, 14.3, and 20.7 with 73%, 69%, and 68% of patients achieving satisfactory outcomes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current study identified useful values for the MCID and PASS thresholds at 1 year following medial UKA of KOOS pain, KOOS PS, and KOOS JR scores. These values may be used as targets for surgeons when evaluating PROMS using KOOS to determine whether patients have achieved successful outcomes after their surgical intervention. Potential uses include the integration of these values into predictive models to enhance shared decision-making and guide more informed decisions to optimize patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Only Low Patients' Expectations Are Prognostic for Dissatisfaction With Performing Work-Related Knee-Straining Activities After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether preoperative expectations regarding performing work-related knee-straining activities were associated with being dissatisfied 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among working patients, and, to identify prognostic factors for being dissatisfied with performing these work-related knee-straining activities.

DESIGN

Multicenter prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Orthopedic surgery departments of 7 hospitals in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive sample of 175 working patients who were on the waiting list for TKA (median age 59 years, 53% women) and intended to return to work (N=175).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Dissatisfaction with performing work-related knee-straining activities 6 months postoperative was measured using the Work Osteoarthritis or joint-Replacement Questionnaire (score range 0-100). The clinically relevant cut-off points for being satisfied and dissatisfied were ≥71 and ≤50, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (19%) were dissatisfied with performing work-related knee-straining activities 6 months after TKA. Patients who expected to be dissatisfied preoperative had a 5.1 times higher odds (95% CI 1.7-15.5) of being dissatisfied 6 months postoperatively compared with patients who expected to be satisfied preoperative. Regression analyses revealed that only patients' expectations were prognostic for being dissatisfied 6 months postoperatively rather than age, pain level, or having a knee-straining job.

CONCLUSIONS

Two in 10 working patients are dissatisfied with performing work-related knee-straining activities 6 months after TKA. Only preoperative patients' expectations appeared prognostic. Therefore, we should better prepare working patients with low expectations by managing their preoperative expectations and improving their performance of work-related knee-straining activities in rehabilitation.

When Do We Perform Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty? General and Demographic-Specific Trends of Preoperative Pain and Function among 10,327 Patients

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the sole disease-modifying intervention for end-stage osteoarthritis. However, the temporal trends and stratification of age and patient demographics of pain and function levels at which surgeons perform TKA have not been characterized. The present investigation aimed to analyze the temporal trends of preoperative pain and functional patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) over the past 5 years when stratifying patient demographics. A prospective cohort of all patients who underwent primary elective TKA between January 2016 and December 2020 at a North American integrated tertiary health care system was retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was quarterly baseline (preoperative) pain and function PROM values before primary elective TKA. Evaluated PROMs included Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain and KOOS-physical function shortform (PS) for the 5-year study period and were stratified by patient demographics (age, sex, race, and body mass index [BMI]). A total of 10,327 patients were analyzed. Preoperative pain levels remained unchanged over the study period for patients in the 45- to 64-year category (P-trend = 0.922). Conversely, there was a significant improvement in preoperative pain levels in the 65+ years group. Sex-stratified trends between males and females did not demonstrate a significant change in pre-TKA baseline pain over the study period (P-trend = 0.347 and P-trend = 0.0744). Both white and black patients demonstrated consistent KOOS-pain levels throughout the study period (P-trend = 0.0855 and P-trend = 0.626). Only white patients demonstrated improving preoperative KOOS-PS (P-trend = 0.0001), while black and "other" patients demonstrated consistent lower preoperative functional levels throughout the study period (P-trend = 0.456 and P-trend = 0.871). All BMI categories demonstrated relatively consistent preoperative KOOS-pain and KOOS-PS except for overweight and obese patients who demonstrated progressive improvement in preoperative KOOS-PS over the study period. Patients and surgeons are electing to perform primary TKA at higher levels of preoperative function. Stratification by race showed black patients did not experience a similar trend of improving function and exhibited a consistently lower functional level versus white patients. This disparity is likely to be multifactorial but may indicate underlying barriers to TKA access.

Medial Ball-in-Socket Posterior Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical, Functional and Radiographic Evaluation of 100 Consecutive Implants

The number of performed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) operations is constantly growing. This study proposes an evaluation of a series of patients undergoing medial pivot (MP) TKA surgery from a subjective, clinical and biomechanical point of view. A consecutive series of 100 TKAs implanted in a single centre, by the same surgeon, with a medial parapatellar approach with the sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament and cemented components were evaluated. All patients underwent standardized radiographic and functional clinical evaluation, with standing antero-posterior, lateral and patellar axial views; pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months; and then annually. Results were evaluated using three different patient-related outcome measurement scores (PROMs): the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the new Knee Society Score (nKSS) and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Excellent results in all treated knees were documented using the PROMs: the mean nKSS was 199.8, the mean KOOS was good to excellent in every subscale, and the mean was SF-36 82%. There were no cases of septic or aseptic loosening, vascular damage, neurological damage, or revision surgery for any reason. According to the experience gained, MP implants demonstrated excellent results, being clinically functional in both objective and subjective terms as well as radiographic evaluations, thus resulting in a winning strategy for obtaining a TKA that makes the patient satisfied and able to perform their daily life activities.

The simplified Chinese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) in individuals with knee osteoarthritis for mainland China: the study of reliability and validity

BACKGROUND

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) is a free clinical tool commonly used to evaluate the symptoms and functional status of patients with knee injury. For people who speak Chinese, the Hong Kong Chinese and Singapore Chinese versions are preferred. However, variations in the Chinese language and culture are influenced by the country's geography. KOOS for Mainland China has not been reported. Therefore, the current study was to cross-culturally translate the original English version into a simplified Chinese version and to investigate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The simplified Chinese KOOS was obtained through forward-backward translation according to appropriate guidelines. A total of 158 individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) were recruited from 13 hospitals in China to examine the psychometric properties. The test-retest questionnaire was performed at an interval of 5-7 days. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. The data of the first test were used to analyse the construct validity of the simplified Chinese KOOS and Chinese SF-36 through convergent and discriminant validity using Spearman's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Cross-cultural translation exhibited minor cultural differences, and the questionnaire was well understood by the patients. The data from 128 patients, used for the test-retest reliability study, showed good to excellent reliability, with an ICC of 0.808-0.976 for all KOOS subscales. The Cronbach's alpha for all subscales ranged from 0.757 to 0.970, indicating acceptable internal consistency. There was a low-to-high correlation between the five domains of the simplified Chinese version of the KOOS and all domains of the SF-36 in construct validity.

CONCLUSION

The simplified Chinese KOOS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity. In clinical practice and research, this version can help provide valuable information on health-related quality of life for Chinese individuals with KOA in mainland China.

Do Patient Reported Outcomes Reflect Objective Measures of Function? Implications for Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are used in research, clinical practice, and by federal reimbursement models to assess outcomes for patients who have knee osteoarthritis (OA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We examined a large cohort of patients to determine if commonly used PROs reflect observed evaluation as measured by standardized functional tests (SFTs).

METHODS

We used data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a ten-year observational study of knee osteoarthritis patients. Two cohorts were examined: 1) participants who received TKA (n=281) and 2) participants who have native OA (n=4,687). The PROs included Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Intermittent and Constant Pain Score (ICOAP). The SFTs included 20 and 400 meter (M) walks and chair stand pace. Repeated measures correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between PROs and SFTs.

RESULTS

The PROs and SFTs were not strongly correlated in either cohort. The magnitude of the repeated measures correlation (r_rm) between KOOS, WOMAC, SF-12, and ICOAP scores and SFT measurements in native knee OA patients ranged as follows: 400 M walk pace (0.08 to 0.20), chair stand pace (0.05 to 0.12), and 20 M pace (0.02 to 0.21), all with P<0.05. In the TKA cohort, values ranged as follows: 400 M walk pace (0.00 to 0.29), chair stand time (0.02 to 0.23), and 20 M pace (0.03 to 0.30). Due to the smaller cohort size, the majority, but not all had P values <0.05.

CONCLUSION

There is not a strong association between PROs and SFTs among patients who have knee OA or among patients who received a TKA. Therefore, PROs should not be used as a simple proxy for observed evaluation of physical function. Rather, PROs and SFTs are complementary and should be used in combination for a more nuanced and complete characterization of outcome.

KOOS score maps were externally validated to inform knee arthroplasty shared decision making

PURPOSE

The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS) profile of outcome measures are among the most commonly used outcome measures in knee arthroplasty (KA). The purpose was to develop and externally validate "score maps" (one-page figural depictions of most likely scores) for KOOS Pain and Function subscales to facilitate a variety of clinical decisions related to shared decision making prior to KA.

METHODS

Presurgical KA data collected within 1 year of surgery and obtained in two independent studies were used in this cross-sectional study. Score maps were designed to be easily understandable, single-page graphical depictions of predicted KOOS Pain, and KOOS Function, daily activity subscales. To create the score maps, individual item scores from one dataset were used to determine the most probable responses for each item for the entire range of possible scores. Predicted KOOS score maps were derived from Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) data and externally validated using an independent single site KA cohort study. Score map predicted scores from OAI were compared to actual presurgical KOOS subscale scores using Weighted Kappa (Κw) agreement coefficients and actual versus predicted differences in scores.

RESULTS

The score maps derived from OAI and applied to actual scores in the validation sample demonstrated moderate to substantial chance-corrected agreement for both KOOS Pain and KOOS Function, daily activity subscale items. For example, KOOS Pain score map scores applied to the external validation dataset showed chance-corrected agreement with Κw ranging from 0.43 to 0.73. Score maps predicted actual item scores within ± 1 point at least 94% of the time. Findings for the KOOS Function, daily activity subscale items were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Score maps derived from OAI data agreed with actual KOOS scores obtained on an independent dataset at an acceptable degree of precision. Easy-to-use KOOS Pain and Function, daily activity score maps have potential to facilitate a variety of important clinical decisions during discussions between patients and surgeons prior to KA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III prognostic study.

The Role of Wearable Technology in Measuring and Supporting Patient Outcomes Following Total Joint Replacement: Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The incidence rate of total joint replacement (TJR) continues to increase due to the aging population and the surgery that is very successful in providing pain relief to and improving function among patients with advanced knee or hip arthritis. Improving patient outcomes and patient satisfaction after TJR remain important goals. Wearable technologies provide a novel way to capture patient function and activity data and supplement clinical measures and patient-reported outcome measures in order to better understand patient outcomes after TJR.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the current literature to evaluate the potential role of wearable devices and compare them with existing methods for monitoring and improving patient rehabilitation and outcomes following TJR.

METHODS

We performed a literature search by using the research databases supported by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School's Lamar Soutter Library, including PubMed and Scopus, supplemented with the Google Scholar search engine. A specific search strategy was used to identify articles discussing the use of wearable devices in measuring and affecting postoperative outcomes of patients who have undergone TJR. Selected papers were organized into a spreadsheet and categorized for our qualitative literature review to assess how wearable data correlated with clinical measures and patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 9 papers were selected. The literature showed the impact of wearable devices on evaluating and improving postoperative functional outcomes. Wearable-collected data could be used to predict postoperative clinical measures, such as range of motion and Timed Up and Go times. When predicting patient-reported outcomes, specifically Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey scores, strong associations were found between changes in sensor-collected data and changes in patient-reported outcomes over time. Further, the step counts of patients who received feedback from a wearable improved over time when compared to those of patients who did not receive feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that wearable technology has the potential to remotely measure and improve postoperative orthopedic patient outcomes. We anticipate that this review will facilitate further investigation into whether wearable devices are viable tools for guiding the clinical management of TJR rehabilitation.

Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years?

INTRODUCTION

Consensus has not been reached regarding ideal outcome measures for total hip arthroplasty (THA) clinical evaluation and research. The goal of this review was to analyze the trends in outcome metrics within the THA literature and to discuss the potential impact of instrument heterogeneity on clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search of all manuscripts related to THA from January 2005 to December 2019 was performed. Statistical and linear regression analyses were performed for individual outcome metrics as a proportion of total THA publications over time.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in studies utilizing outcomes metrics between 2005 and 2019 (15.1-29.5%; P < 0.001; R² = 98.1%). Within the joint-specific subcategory, use of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) significantly decreased from 2005 to 2019 (82.8-57.3%; P < 0.001), use of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) significantly increased (0-6.7%; P < 0.001), and the modified HHS significantly increased (0-10.5%; P < 0.001). In the quality of life subcategory, EQ-5D demonstrated a significant increase in usage (0-34.8%; P < 0.001), while Short Form-36 significantly decreased (100% vs. 27.3%; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of outcome-reporting metrics in THA has continued to increase, resulting in added complexity within the literature. The utilization rates of individual instruments have shifted over the past 15 years. Additional study is required to determine which specific instruments are recommended.

Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated With Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Phenotypes

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is indicative of the quality of care in the value-driven healthcare model. The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a dichotomous outcome tool measuring the highest level of symptom beyond which a patient considers him/herself well. The purpose of the present study was to identify combined preoperative phenotypes of PROMs associated with not achieving PASS at 1 year following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to associate such phenotypes with hospital utilization parameters.

METHODS

A prospective institutional cohort of 4,034 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis (OA) with 1-year follow-up was included. Preoperative scores on Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-pain, HOOS physical short form-(PS), and Veteran's Rand-12 (VR-12) mental component summary-(MCS) were used to develop phenotypes. Associations between preoperative 'phenotype' and 1-year PASS, discharge disposition, prolonged length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation were evaluated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

10.6% (427/4,043) reported their state as 'not satisfactory' at 1 year. The phenotypes were the only preoperative factors to demonstrate the increased likelihood of 1-year dissatisfaction. Only phenotypes with lower than average preoperative MCS demonstrated this association. Low scores in all presently measured PROMs (Pain-PS-MCS-) was associated with double the odds of 1-year dissatisfaction (P < .001), 2.43 times the odds of nonhome discharge and 2.2 times the odds of prolonged LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower preoperative scores across multiple PROMs have increased odds of dissatisfaction after THA; and assessing pain, function, and MCS concomitantly (as phenotypes) may support identifying patients at risk for not achieving a satisfactory outcome.

Effect of the knee replacement surgery on activity level based on ActivPAL: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

The knee replacement (KR) surgery aims to restore the activity level and reduce the risk of experiencing disabilities. The outcomes of this surgery are evaluated mainly with subjective tools or low validity objective tools. However, the effect of the surgery on activity level using high validity objective accelerometer is still in question.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the benefit of KR surgery alone to enhance physical activity recommendations based on high validity accelerometer. Two independent reviewers evaluated five electronic databases (Cochrane-Central-Register-of-Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) to find relative studies between January 2000 and October 2021. The quality assessments and risk of bias assessments were examined.

RESULTS

Three articles were included with 202 participants (86 males, 116 females), with an average age of 64 years and an average 32 kg/m2 body mass index. The results found that the number of steps was significantly improved up to 36.35 and 45.5% after 6-months and 1-year of the surgery, respectively. However, these changes did not meet the recommended activity level guideline and could be related to the patients' health status and their activity level before the surgery. No significant changes were seen in sedentary time, standing time, and upright time after 6-months and 1-year follow-ups. Heterogeneity among studies was low to moderate (0-63%).

CONCLUSION

Knee replacement surgery is an effective treatment for improving patients' quality of life with severe knee injuries. However, various factors impact the success of surgical and achieving maximum benefit of the surgery. One factor, sedentary time, can be reduced by implementing pre-and post-surgery exercise or physical activity recommendations. Further studies are needed to understand the benefit of surgery with or without rehabilitation assessed using high validity monitors.

When is Surgery Performed? Trends, Demographic Associations, and Phenotypical Characterization of Baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Before Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Evaluating trends and drivers of baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is critical to understanding when patients and providers elect to undergo surgery. We aimed to assess the following: (1) 5-year trends in baseline PROMs pre-THA (total hip arthroplasty) stratified by patient determinants; (2) patient factor associated with poor preoperative hip pain/function; (3) phenotypes of combined pain/function PROMs at baseline; and (4) intersurgeon variability in PROM thresholds at surgery.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 6,902 primary THAs was enrolled (January 2016 to December 2020). Patient/surgeon details and PROMs were collected at point of care preoperatively. Outcomes included trends (5 years; 20 quarters) in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-Pain and HOOS-PS (Physical Function Short-Form), stratified by patient demographics. Patients were further classified into phenotype categories of above or equal to median pain/function (P+PS+); below median pain/function (P-PS-); above or equal to median pain but below median function (P+PS-); and below median pain but above or equal to median function (P-PS+).

RESULTS

Baseline HOOS-Pain was consistent across the study period (P-trend = .166), while HOOS-PS demonstrated increasing function (P-trend = .015). Such trends were appreciable in males, females, and White (P-trend < .001, each) but not Black patients (P-trend = .67). Higher odds ratio (OR) of low baseline HOOS-Pain and HOOS-PS were detected among females (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-1.98, P < .001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.77, P < .001), Black patients (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.35-2.82, P < .001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.34-1.89, P < .001), and smokers (HOOS-Pain: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.29-1.89, P < .001; HOOS-PS: OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.25-1.85, P < .001). The P-PS- cohort (32.4%) had lowest age (65.2 ± 11.1 years), highest body mass index (31.6 ± 6.9 kg/m²), females (64.8%), Black (15.8%), and current smokers (12.2%). There was significant intersurgeon preoperative PROM variation in HOOS-Pain and HOOS-PS (P < .001, each).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the general population, Black patients have consistently received THA at lower functional levels throughout the 5-year period. Females, smokers, and Black patients were more likely to have poorer pain and function at THA. PROMs assessment as combined pain-function phenotypes may provide a more comprehensive interpretation of patient status preoperatively.

Combinations of Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Phenotype (Pain, Function, and Mental Health) Predict Outcome After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Value-driven healthcare models prioritize patient-perceived benefits to quantify the quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is the highest level of symptom beyond which a patient considers his/her condition satisfactory. We identified preoperative phenotypes of PROMs associated with not achieving PASS at 1 year following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and explored the relationships between such phenotypes with hospital utilization parameters.

METHODS

A prospective institutional cohort of 5,274 primary TKAs for osteoarthritis from 2016 to 2019 with 1-year follow-up were included. Preoperative scores on Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain, KOOS-Physical function Short form (PS), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used to develop patient phenotypes. Associations between preoperative "phenotype" and 1-year PASS, discharge disposition, length of stay, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation were evaluated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

In total, 16.3% (n = 862) of patients reported their state as "not acceptable" at 1 year. A combination of low scores in each of the presently examined PROMs was associated with the highest odds of 1-year dissatisfaction (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.74-2.74). The PROM phenotypes were the greatest drivers compared to sociodemographic variables in predicting satisfaction. Combinations of low scores in VR-12 MCS and KOOS-PS were significantly associated with both non-home discharge status and prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Patients with combined lower preoperative scores across multiple PROMs (KOOS-Pain <41.7, KOOS-PS <51.5, and VR-12 MCS <52.8) have increased odds of dissatisfaction after TKA. Measuring pain, function, and mental health concurrently as phenotypes may help identify TKA patients at risk for not achieving a satisfactory outcome at 1 year.

What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly promoted for use in routine orthopaedic care with the expectation that if they are made available during encounters, they will be incorporated into clinical practice. We investigated an initiative in which PROMs were systematically collected and provided via the electronic health record but were infrequently used.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a qualitative study, we asked: (1) Why are PROM results not being used in clinical care when they are available to surgeons? (2) What aspects of PROMs are seen as useful for clinical care? (3) How are PROMs generally perceived by surgeons and orthopaedic leaders?

METHODS

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in a single health system in an urban setting using semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of orthopaedic surgeons and leaders who would have substantial knowledge of and experience with the organization's PROM system, which was embedded in the electronic health record and developed for use in clinical care but was not being used. We included surgeons whose practices consisted of at least 90% patients with osteoarthritis, including surgical and nonsurgical management, and thus their patients would be completing PROMs surveys, or surgeons who were leaders in one of the three orthopaedic divisions in the health plan. The senior research manager for orthopaedics identified 14 potential participants meeting these criteria, 11 of whom agreed to study participation. Participants included nine surgeons and two orthopaedic leaders; the majority were men, with a median of 13 years of clinical practice. Study interviews were conducted by an experienced interviewer not known to participants, in private conference rooms in the healthcare setting, and a median (range) of 27 minutes (16 to 40) in length. A content analysis approach was employed for data analysis, with thematic inductive saturation reached in the analysis and attention to trustworthiness and rigor during the analytic process.

RESULTS

Interviewees reported that PROM scores are not being used in patient clinical care because of logistical barriers, such as access and display issues and the time required, and perceptual barriers, such as concerns about patient understanding and the validity and reliability of measures. Surgeons preferred talking with patients about the personal outcomes patients had identified as important; most patients preferred to assess progress toward their own goals than PROMs scores for other people. Surgeons also identified changes that could facilitate PROM use and reduce barriers in clinical care, including pushing PROM scores to physicians' inboxes, developing inserts for physician notes, using easy-to-understand graphical displays, and engaging patients about PROMs earlier in the care process. Participants all agreed that PROMs in aggregate use are valuable for the organization, department, and individual surgeons, but individual patient scores are not.

CONCLUSION

Despite the availability of PROMs, there are important barriers to incorporating and using PROMs in clinical care. Providing access to PROM scores without clearly understanding how and why surgeons may consider using or incorporating them into their clinical practice can result in expensive and underused systems that add little value for the clinician, patient, or organization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Involving front-line orthopaedic surgeons and leaders in shaping the design and structure of PROM systems is important for use in clinical care, but these interviewees seemed to see aggregate data as more valuable than individual patient scores.

The influence of obesity on achievement of a 'forgotten joint' following total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Obesity has been associated with poorer outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, data remain sparse on its impact on patients' joint awareness following surgery. This study aims to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on improvement in outcomes following TKA as assessed by the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1075 patients who underwent primary TKA from 2017 to 2020 with available postoperative FJS-12 scores. Patients were stratified based on their BMI (kg/m²): < 30, 30.0-34.9 (obese class I), 35.0-39.9 (obese class II), and ≥ 40 (obese class III). FJS-12 and KOOS, JR scores were collected at various time points. Demographic differences were assessed with Chi-square and ANOVA tests. Mean scores between BMI groups were compared using univariate ANCOVA, controlling for observed demographic differences.

RESULTS

Of the 1075 patients included, there were 457 with a BMI < 30, 331 who were obese class I, 162 obese class II, and 125 obese class III. There were no statistical differences in FJS-12 scores between the BMI groups at 3 months (27.24 vs. 25.33 vs. 23.57 vs. 22.48; p = 0.99), 1 year (45.07 vs. 41.86 vs. 40.51 vs. 36.22; p = 0.92) and 2 years (51.31 vs. 52.86 vs. 46.17 vs. 44.97; p = 0.94). Preoperative KOOS, JR scores significantly differed between the various BMI categories (49.33 vs. 46.63 vs. 44.24 vs. 39.33; p < 0.01); however, 3-month (p = 0.20) and 1-year (p = 0.13) scores were not statistically significant. Mean improvement in FJS-12 scores from 3 months to 2 years was statistically greatest for obese class I patients and lowest for obese class III patients (24.07 vs. 27.53 vs. 22.60 vs. 22.49; p = 0.01). KOOS, JR score improvement from baseline to 1 year was statistically greatest for obese class III patients and lowest for non-obese patients (22.34 vs. 25.49 vs. 23.77 vs. 27.58; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

While all groups demonstrated postoperative improvement, those with higher BMI reported lower mean FJS-12 scores but these differences were not found to be significant. Our study showed no significant impact of BMI on postoperative joint awareness, which implies that obese patients, in all obesity classes, experience similar functional improvement following TKA.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Shared Decision-Making Is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Knee But Not Hip Osteoarthritis: The DECIDE-OA Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend shared surgical decision-making, yet it is unclear whether shared decision-making improves health outcomes in patients who are considering knee and hip replacement. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether patients who made high-quality, informed, patient-centered (IPC) decisions had better health outcomes, higher satisfaction, and less decision regret compared with those who made lower-quality decisions.

METHODS

A multisite, randomized study of 2 decision aids for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis was utilized to collect data on decision-making and health outcomes at 2 time points: shortly after the initial surgical evaluation and about 6 months after treatment. We calculated the percentage of patients who made an IPC decision and examined the a priori hypotheses that IPC decisions would be associated with better health outcomes, satisfaction, and less regret at 6 months. Linear and logistic regression models were utilized to examine the relationships.

RESULTS

The analytic sample included 854 patients with a mean age of 65 years (standard deviation, 9 years), of whom 58% were female, 93% were White non-Hispanic, 67% had knee (compared with hip) osteoarthritis, and 62% underwent operative treatment within 6 months of the initial evaluation. The majority of patients (68%) made IPC decisions. The IPC group had significantly larger gains in quality of life (mean difference in EuroQol-5 Dimension, 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.001) compared with the non-IPC group. For knee patients, the IPC group also had significantly better Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (mean difference, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 8.3; p = 0.004), higher satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.3; p = 0.003), much better pain relief (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; p = 0.002), and were more likely to have no decision regret (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.1; p = 0.003). For hip patients, IPC decisions were not associated with better Harris hip scores or satisfaction and were associated with more regret.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher-quality decisions predicted small improvements in health outcomes, as well as greater satisfaction and less regret for patients with knee osteoarthritis, but not for patients with hip osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cross-validation of good versus poor self-reported outcome trajectory types following knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether good versus poor outcome trajectories and predictors of poor outcome obtained in a derivation study could be replicated in an independent sample of persons undergoing knee arthroplasty (KA).

METHODS

We used data from TRIO-POPULAR, a prospective cohort study of 926 participants who underwent KA in the United Kingdom. The participants were assessed preoperatively and 6-weeks, 6- and 12-months postoperatively. The Oxford Knee Score was the primary outcome and a variety of pre-operative predictors of outcome were selected. The outcome measure and the predictors were selected to most closely align with a previously published derivation study of good versus poor outcome. Confirmatory two-piece latent class growth curve analyses were used to model outcome and regression was used to identify predictors of outcome class.

RESULTS

Trajectories for the Oxford Knee Scores from TRIO-POPULAR replicated trajectories for WOMAC Pain and Function scores from the previously published derivation study. Multivariable predictors of poor outcome were pain catastrophizing (odds ratio = 1.125, 95% CI = 1.048, .206, p = 0.001) and comorbidity (odds ratio = 1.134, 95%CI = 1.049, 1.227, p = 0.002. Pain catastrophizing also predicted poor outcome in the derivation study.

CONCLUSIONS

Good and poor outcome trajectories replicated those found in the previously published derivation study. Our model-based method produces stable outcome trajectories despite using data from different countries and participants with substantively different characteristics. Predictors of poor outcome were somewhat inconsistent between the cross-validation and derivation studies. Pain catastrophizing was the only consistent poor outcome predictor.

Physical activity, pain interference and comorbidities relate to PROMIS physical function in younger adults following total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine if preoperative physical and psychological health risk factors are influential on physical function and satisfaction scores in a cohort of relatively younger adults one year post-total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients were recruited pre- and one year post-total knee arthroplasty. Physical (i.e., body mass index, sex, physical activity level, number of comorbidities) and psychological (i.e., depression, expectations, pain inference) health risk factors were obtained pre-total knee arthroplasty and compared to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function computerized adaptive testing and satisfaction scores one year post-total knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Bootstrap inclusion fraction methods were performed to compare the stability of each predictor variable prior to final regression analyzes. Poorer preoperative physical activity level (standardized regression coefficient = 0.37; p < 0.01), pain interference (standardized regression coefficient = -0.24; p = 0.03) and greater comorbidities (standardized regression coefficient = -0.27; p = 0.01) resulted in worse physical function scores one year post-total knee arthroplasty. Greater preoperative comorbidities (odds ratio = 0.63; p < 0.01) resulted in worse satisfaction scores one year post-total knee arthroplasty. No other predictor variable had any relationship on either clinical outcome (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Younger adults with greater comorbidities, lower physical activity level and higher pain interference scores preoperatively reported poorer functional recovery one year post-total knee arthroplasty. Understanding how preoperative status of younger adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty may lead to better improved surgical decision making and health care delivery for this vulnerable and growing patient subgroup.Implications for RehabilitationProjections estimate total knee arthroplasty in relatively younger adults (<65 years) will make up the majority of surgical procedures performed in the United States within the next two decades, however little is known in this patient population.This study provides evidence that relatively younger adults with greater comorbidities, lower physical activity level and higher pain interference scores preoperatively result in poorer functional recovery one year post-total knee arthroplasty.The results also suggest greater comorbidities identified preoperatively have the largest influence on one year satisfaction scores in younger adults post-total knee arthroplasty.Modifiable characteristics such as improving physical activity level, incorporating pain management strategies and reducing comorbidities preoperatively or adopting into postoperative rehabilitative care may influence the postoperative physical function and satisfaction scores in relatively younger adults undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Ultrasound examination of tibiofibular widening of forceful knee flexion is recommended for patients with proximal tibiofibular joint instability

BACKGROUND

Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) instability is uncommon, resulting from violent twisting motions of the flexed knee during sport activities. No known image variables functionally relate the degrees of PTFJ instability.

OBJECTIVE

This study used ultrasound imaging to quantify the discrimination threshold for PTFJ instability and relevant functional significances.

METHODS

Twenty patients (mean age: 42.7 (21-59) years) with chronic PTFJ instability participated in this study. Along with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS),the tibiofibular distances of the affected and unaffected knees were estimated with ultrasonography in the four standardized conditions at 90° of flexion of the hip and knee, including neutrally relaxed position, passive internal rotation, passive external rotation, and forceful flexion of the knee joint.

RESULTS

During forceful knee flexion, the absolute tibiofibular distance in the affected leg (28.1 ± 4.0 mm) was greater than the unaffected leg (25.1 ± 3.7 mm). Relative changes in tibiofibular distance (RTFD) were different for both legs (affected leg:3.9 ± 2.7 mm; unaffected leg:1.0 ± 1.4 mm) (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the RTFD was a potent predictor of PTFJ instability (84.5%) with specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 65%. Patients with RTFD greater than 2.95 mm exhibited higher scores on the KOOS subscales of pain (P = 0.043) and quality of life (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonic measurement of the tibiofibular distance under forceful knee flexion is clinically valuable for diagnosing PTFJ instability with functional significance.

Collection and Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Arthroplasty Registries: Multinational Survey and Recommendations

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated questionnaires that are completed by patients. Arthroplasty registries vary in PROM collection and use. Current information about registry collection and use of PROMs is important to help improve methods of PROM data analysis, reporting, comparison, and use toward improving clinical practice.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To characterize PROM collection and use by registries, we asked: (1) What is the current practice of PROM collection by arthroplasty registries that are current or former members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries, and are there sufficient similarities in PROM collection between registries to enable useful international comparisons that could inform the improvement of arthroplasty care? (2) How do registries differ in PROM administration and demographic, clinical, and comorbidity index variables collected for case-mix adjustment in data analysis and reporting? (3) What quality assurance methods are used for PROMs, and how are PROM results reported and used by registries? (4) What recommendations to arthroplasty registries may improve PROM reporting and facilitate international comparisons?

METHODS

An electronic survey was developed with questions about registry structure and collection, analysis, reporting, and use of PROM data and distributed to directors or senior administrators of 39 arthroplasty registries that were current or former members of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries. In all, 64% (25 of 39) of registries responded and completed the survey. Missing responses from incomplete surveys were captured by contacting the registries, and up to three reminder emails were sent to nonresponding registries. Recommendations about PROM collection were drafted, revised, and approved by the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries PROMs Working Group members.

RESULTS

Of the 25 registries that completed the survey, 15 collected generic PROMs, most frequently the EuroQol-5 Dimension survey; 16 collected joint-specific PROMs, most frequently the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; and 11 registries collected a satisfaction item. Most registries administered PROM questionnaires within 3 months before and 1 year after surgery. All 16 registries that collected PROM data collected patient age, sex or gender, BMI, indication for the primary arthroplasty, reason for revision arthroplasty, and a comorbidity index, most often the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. All 16 registries performed regular auditing and reporting of data quality, and most registries reported PROM results to hospitals and linked PROM data to other data sets such as hospital, medication, billing, and emergency care databases. Recommendations for transparent reporting of PROMs were grouped into four categories: demographic and clinical, survey administration, data analysis, and results.

CONCLUSION

Although registries differed in PROM collection and use, there were sufficient similarities that may enable useful data comparisons. The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries PROMs Working Group recommendations identify issues that may be important to most registries such as the need to make decisions about survey times and collection methods, as well as how to select generic and joint-specific surveys, handle missing data and attrition, report data, and ensure representativeness of the sample.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

By collecting PROMs, registries can provide patient-centered data to surgeons, hospitals, and national entities to improve arthroplasty care.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Goodman score in total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Currently, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the standard instruments used to compare arthroplasty results. Goodman et al. recently published a well-constructed scale with excellent psychometric properties that can be quickly administered. The main objective of our study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate a Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The original Goodman scale was translated into Spanish and cross-culturally adapted. Then, the data from this version were tested for psychometric quality. We designed a cross-sectional study for data collection. This study enrolled 2 institutions. Patients who underwent hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included. A total of 153 patients were contacted twice to record the Goodman and Oxford hip scales (OHS) to assess the validity of the questionnaire. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha, Concordance using 3 test: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and the Bradley-Blackwood F test. The spearman correlation was used to asses correlation between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale.

RESULTS

The overall satisfaction after THA was reported to be "very satisfied" by 137 patients (75%), and only 14 patients reported some degree of dissatisfaction (6%). The improvement in quality of life was reported to be "more than I ever dreamed possible" by 41% patients. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable, reaching a coefficient of 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1). No statistical difference (t test, p = 0.55) was found in the original version, with great internal validity. Test re-test concordance was optimal among the 3 tests used. A moderate correlation was found between the OHS and the Spanish-adapted Goodman scale.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish version of the Goodman questionnaire in THA is a reliable, consistent, and feasible scale to evaluate patient satisfaction and improvement in the quality of life in Spanish speakers.

Impact of Obesity on the Forgotten Joint Score Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a growing public health concern. This study aims to identify the association of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2130 patients at a single urban, academic, tertiary institution who underwent primary THA from 2016-2020 with available postoperative FJS-12 scores. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their BMI (kg/m²):<30 (nonobese) and ≥30 (obese). FJS-12 scores were collected postoperatively at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and independent sample t-tests. Mean scores between the groups were compared using multilinear regression analysis, controlling for demographic differences.

RESULTS

Of the 2130 patients included, 1378 were nonobese, and 752 were obese. Although obese patients reported lower FJS-12 scores all time periods, there were no statistical differences between the two groups at 3 months (53.61 vs 49.62;P = .689), 1 year (68.11 vs 62.45; P = .349), and 2 years (73.60 vs 65.58; P = .102). A subanalysis comparing patients who were of normal BMI (<25), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obese (≥30) followed a similar inverse trend in scores but showed no statistical differences at all postoperative time points (3m:P = .612,1y:P = .607,2y:P = .253). Mean improvement in FJS-12 scores from 3 months to 1 year (14.50 vs 12.83; P = .041), 1 year to 2 years (5.49 vs 3.13; P = .004), and from 3 months to 2 years (20.00 vs15.96; P < .001) were significantly greater for nonobese patients compared to obese patients.

CONCLUSION

While obesity trended toward lower FJS-12 scores, the differences in scores were not statistically significant compared to nonobese patients. BMI did not influence overall FJS-12 scores; however, obese patients achieved a slightly smaller statistical improvement during the first 2 years, though this may not be clinically significant.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Effect of preoperative long-term opioid therapy on patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of multicentre population-based administrative data

Background

Up to 40% of patients are receiving opioids at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the United States despite evidence suggesting opioids are ineffective for pain associated with arthritis and have substantial risks. Our primary objective was to determine whether preoperative opioid users had worse knee pain and physical function outcomes 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively; our secondary objective was to determine the prevalence of opioid use before and after TKA in Alberta, Canada.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of population-based data, we identified adult patients who underwent TKA between 2013 and 2015 in Alberta. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between preoperative opioid use and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function scores 12 months after TKA, adjusting for potentially confounding variables.

Results

Of the 1907 patients, 592 (31.0%) had at least 1 opioid dispensed before TKA, and 124 (6.5%) were classified as long-term opioid users. Long-term opioid users had worse adjusted WOMAC pain and physical function scores 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively (pain score β = 7.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 11.6; physical function score β = 7.8, 95% CI 4.0 to 11.6; p < 0.001 for both). The majority (89 ([71.8%]) of patients who were long-term opioid users preoperatively were dispensed opioids 180–360 days after TKA, compared to 158 (12.0%) patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively.

Conclusion

A substantial number of patients were dispensed opioids before and after TKA, and patients who received opioids preoperatively had worse adjusted pain and functional outcome scores 12 months after TKA than patients who were opioid-naive preoperatively. These results suggest that patients prescribed opioids preoperatively should be counselled judiciously regarding expected outcomes after TKA.

The virtue of optimistic realism - expectation fulfillment predicts patient-rated global effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence highlights the importance of preoperative expectations in predicting patient-reported outcomes of orthopedic surgeries. To date, it is still a matter of controversy whether patient satisfaction can be maximized by promoting either optimistic or realistic outcome expectations before surgery. Adjusting overly optimistic outcome expectancies in favor of a more realistic outlook on the limitations of total hip arthroplasty could reduce the risk of disappointment and lead to greater satisfaction with surgery outcomes. Our prospective cohort study was aimed at comparing the relative predictive influence of baseline expectations, expectation fulfillment and symptomatic improvement on the global effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Ninety patients (49 female, 41 male; mean age: 63 ± 12.87 years) fulfilled inclusion criteria and completed a comprehensive preoperative assessment comprising sociodemographic, clinical, functional and psychological phenotypes. Moreover, the strengths of preoperative expectations for improvements in eight pain-related and functional domains were recorded on a 5-point Likert-scale. At 12 months after surgery, patients were asked to rate perceived improvements in each of these domains as well as the global effectiveness of the total hip replacement on a 5-point Likert-scale. To evaluate the relative impact of preoperative expectations, symptom improvement and the fulfillment of expectations on the global effectiveness of surgery, a sequential multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Compared with the actual improvement at 12-months follow-up, prior expectations had been overly optimistic in about 28% of patients for hip pain, in about 45% for walking ability and around 60% for back pain, independence in everyday life, physical exercise, general function social interactions and mental well-being. An optimistic hip pain expectation, walking ability at baseline and the fulfillment of expectations for walking ability, general function and independence in everyday life were found to independently predict global effectiveness ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive expectation about pain and the fulfillment of expectations concerning functional domains predicted higher global effectiveness ratings. In line with many authors investigating the relationship between the fulfillment of expectations and satisfaction with medical interventions, we suggest that professionals should explicitly address their patients' expectations during the preoperative education and consultation.

Validation of the Impact Index: can we measure disease effects on quality of life in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis?

PURPOSE

To validate the Impact Index, a short, publicly available scale that measures the extent to which a respondent's health problem adversely impacts their quality of life.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis surveyed after visiting a surgeon at baseline (N = 322) and about 6 months after the visit (N = 283). Patients responded to the Impact Index and previously validated questionnaires about overall health, pain, and function. The Impact Index includes four questions that ask how much the respondent is bothered, worried, limited, or in pain due to their health condition over the past 30 days. Total scores range from 0 to 12; higher scores indicate more deleterious impact.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly female (55%), majority white (95%), had an average age of 65 (SD = 9), and most had surgery (64%). The baseline Impact Index score was 9.48 (SD = 2.63); at follow up 4.75 (SD = 3.54). Impact Index was related to overall health at baseline (r =  - 0.49). For knee patients at baseline, Impact Index was negatively related to their knee symptoms (r =  - 0.49) and knee pain (r =  - 0.67). For hip patients at baseline, Impact Index was negatively related to the Harris Hip score (r =  - 0.62). Scale directions varied; however, the signs of all correlations were as hypothesized. The Impact Index was predictive of surgical choice (p < .001, OR = 1.45), however, overall health (p = .88) and comorbidity (p = .24) measures were not. Reliability was acceptable (α = 0.85). Responsiveness statistics suggested overall health, pain, function, and Impact Index measures reflected improvement patients experienced from surgery. The Impact Index had the largest effect sizes (> - 3.4) and Guyatt Responsiveness Statistics (> - 2.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The Impact Index demonstrated strong evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness in hip or knee osteoarthritis patients.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Correlates With Modified Harris Hip Score in Total Hip Arthroplasty

The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a validated and disease-specific instrument commonly used to assess outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a validated, computer adaptive testing (CAT)-based global health assessment tool. The authors' goal was to examine the correlation between PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs and the mHHS in patients undergoing primary THA. All THAs were performed by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained dedicated total joint surgeons at 1 academic institution. Patients completed PROMIS and mHHS assessments preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation values were determined. A total of 48 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. Preoperatively, mean total PROMIS score (Pain Interference and Physical Function) was 74.2 and mHHS was 50.8. Preoperatively, mean total PROMIS score showed a moderate correlation (r=0.56; P<.0001) with total mHHS. Postoperatively, mean total PROMIS score at 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks was 82.4, 93.4, 100, and 100, respectively (all P<.01 vs baseline), and mHHS was 68.2, 81.1, 85.9, and 88.6, respectively (all P<.01). At 3, 6, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively, a strong and consistent correlation was observed between the total PROMIS score and mHHS (r=0.74, 0.74, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively; all P<.0001). The PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs accurately assessed preoperative pain and dysfunction, as well as clinical improvement following THA. Combined PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function is comparable to the mHHS when assessing outcome following THA for osteoarthritis. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e19-e25.].

Third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation is a good treatment option for athletic persons

PURPOSE

Autologous chondrocyte implantation is an established method for the treatment of joint cartilage damage. However, to date it has not been established that autologous chondrocyte implantation is an appropriate procedure for cartilage defects therapy in athletic persons. The aim of this study is to analyze if third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation is an appropriate treatment for athletic persons with full cartilage defect of the knee joints.

METHODS

A total of 84 patients were treated with third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (NOVOCART^® 3D). The mean follow-up time was 8 years (5-14). Sports activity was measured via UCLA Activity Score and Tegner Activity Scale before the onset of knee pain and postoperatively in an annual clinical evaluation. 41 athletic persons and 43 non-athletic persons (UCLA-Cut-off: 7; Tegner Activity Scale-Cut-off: 4) were analyzed. Patient reported outcomes were captured using IKDC subjective, KOOS, Lysholm score and VAS score on movement.

RESULTS

Patient reported outcomes (IKDC, VAS at rest, VAS on movement) showed significant improvement (p < 0.001) postoperatively. Athletic persons demonstrated significantly better results than non-athletic persons in the analyzed outcome scores (IKDC: p < 0.01, KOOS: p < 0.01, Lysholm score: p < 0.01). 96.4% of the patients were able to return to sport and over 50% returned or surpassed their preinjury sports level. The remaining patients were downgraded by a median of two points on the UCLA- and 2.5 on the Tegner Activity Scale. A shift from high-impact sports to active events and moderate or mild activities was found. Furthermore, it was shown that preoperative UCLA score and Tegner Activity Scale correlated significantly with the patient reported outcome postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a suitable treatment option for athletic persons with full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee. The return to sports activity is possible, but includes a shift from high-impact sports to less strenuous activities.

Creating a Value Dashboard for Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUND

Value-based health-care delivery is a framework for restructuring our health-care systems with the goal of providing better outcomes for patients at lower cost. Value is determined by patient health outcomes per dollar spent on health services. We sought to develop a value dashboard that could be used to easily track and improve the value of total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA).

METHODS

We created a value dashboard for TKAs and THAs at our institution. Value was defined as quality of outcomes per dollar spent. The dashboard for each procedure displayed the average value by surgeon, compared with institutional averages for physical function scores and cost. Quality metrics were determined by weighted surgeon ranking using a modified Delphi process and included both clinical and patient-reported outcomes, as measured by the mean change in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS-10) physical function score, mean change in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) or the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), mean change in the modified Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, complication rate, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate, and 30-day readmission rate. Average direct costs per surgeon were used. Data from January 2017 through April 2018 were included to ensure 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Six surgeons were included in the value dashboard for TKA, and 5 were included in the THA dashboard. The value for TKA by surgeon ranged from 7% below to 12% above the institutional benchmark. The value for THA by surgeon ranged from 12% below to 7% above the institutional benchmark.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed dashboard utilizes value in a health-care framework and could be used for comparing and improving value for THA and TKA. This dashboard successfully combined patient outcome metrics and direct costs of surgical procedures. Future studies should focus on involving patients in this process and using national data to create benchmarks, which could provide a more accurate representation of value than using institutional averages.

Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching

BACKGROUND

With the development of 4th generation ceramic bearing, the large ceramic head is available for ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head to those with 3rd generation 28 mm head using propensity score matching.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 4th generation 36 mm ceramic head in 129 patients and 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs identified from 405 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 3rd generation 28 mm head by propensity score matching. There were 83 males and 50 females in both groups with a mean age of 55 years. There was no significant difference in other demographic features except for follow-up period (4.2 years in the 36 mm group and 6.4 years in the 28 mm group, p < 0.001). Clinical and radiological results and occurrence of complication were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Harris Hip Score was increased significantly from 46.4 to 92.1 in the 36 mm group and from 46.7 to 93.6 in the 28 mm group. No loosening or osteolysis was observed in the 36 mm group. However, one hip showed radiologic sign of loosening in the 28 mm group. As for complication, postoperative dislocation was more frequent in the 28 mm group (6 in the 28 mm group vs. 0 in the 36 mm group, p = 0.03). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in other results including inguinal pain, squeaking or ceramic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head significantly reduced postoperative dislocation rate without increasing the rate of inguinal pain, squeaking, or ceramic fracture compared to that with 3rd generation 28 mm head.

Evolving Outcome Measures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Trends and Utilization Rates Over the Past 15 Years

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome metrics and reporting are important for demonstrating value associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This review studied the patient-reported outcome utilization trends as reported within the TKA literature over a 15-year period.

METHODS

A PubMed search of all manuscripts related to TKA from January 2005 to December 2019 was performed. Descriptive statistics were used for individual outcome metrics as proportions of total article publications focusing on TKA outcomes. Linear regressions analysis was performed to demonstrate significant changes in utilization rates over time.

RESULTS

There was a significant overall increase in studies utilizing outcome metrics between 2005 and 2019 (16.1%-45.0%; P < .001; R² = 98.7%). Within joint-specific metrics (2005-2019), use of Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome score increased (0%-14.8%; P < .001); while use of Knee Society Knee Scoring System decreased (55.2%-35.4%; P = .007). Of the studies reporting general health, use of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 decreased (100%-66.7% from 2014 to 2019; P = .006), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global-10 increased (0%-21.4% from 2005 to 2019; P < .001). In the quality of life subcategory (2005-2019), EuroQol 5-Dimension Health Outcome Survey increased in usage (14.3%-28.0%; P < .001), while Short Form-36 use decreased (85.7%-36.6%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although utilization of outcome metrics has significantly increased over the last 15 years in the TKA literature, there still exists considerable heterogeneity of outcome metrics. This lack of consensus may impede comparisons of studies for clinical and research purposes, as well as hinder cross-walk of outcome tools over time. Further study is needed to identify ideal global and joint-specific tools, while balancing issues like ease of use and utility in specific populations such as the young and highly active.

Single postoperative infusion of zoledronic acid to improve patient-reported outcome after hip or knee replacement: study protocol for a randomised, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

In Sweden, roughly 3000 patients are reoperated each year due to pain and loss of function related to a loosened hip or knee prosthesis. These reoperations are strenuous for the patient, technically demanding and costly for the healthcare system. Any such reoperation that can be prevented would be of great benefit. Bisphosphonates are drugs that inhibit osteoclast function. Several clinical trials suggest that bisphosphonates lead to improved implant fixation and one small study even indicates better functional outcome. Furthermore, in epidemiological studies, bisphosphonates have been shown to decrease the rate of revision for aseptic loosening by half. Thus, there are several indirect indications that bisphosphonates could improve patient-reported outcome, but no firm evidence.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a pragmatic randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, academic clinical trial of a single postoperative dose of zoledronic acid, in patients younger than 80 years undergoing primary total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis. Participants will be recruited from two orthopaedic departments. All surgeries will be performed, and study drugs given at Motala Hospital, Sweden. The primary endpoint is to investigate between-group differences in the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at 3-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be investigated at 1 year, 3 years and 6 years, and stratified for hip and knee implants. These secondary endpoints are supportive, exploratory or explanatory. A total of 1000 patients will be included in the study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping (DNR 2015/286-31). The study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for pharmacological trials. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and the media.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT: No 2015-001200-55; Pre-results.

Forgotten Joint Score in THA: Comparing the Direct Anterior Approach to Posterior Approach

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity because of potential decreased postoperative pain and quicker recovery after surgery in comparison to the posterior approach (PA). With a growing focus on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements after surgery, we sought to determine if one approach led to better PRO scores as determined by the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) questionnaire.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of primary THAs between September 2016 and September 2019 at a single academic hospital was conducted. Demographic and clinical data in addition to FJS-12 scores were collected. Two groups were created based on THA approach. Frequency rates, means, and standard deviations were used to describe baseline patient characteristics. Differences in demographic data were accounted for using linear regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 1469 cases were identified, with 830 using the DAA and 639 the PA. Significant demographic differences were observed between the 2 groups. However, when controlling for this, there were no differences in FJS-12 scores between approaches at 1 and 1.75 years (P = .232 and P = .486, respectively). At 12 weeks, DAA patients had higher satisfaction (59.21 vs 46.8; P = .006). When controlling for surgeon case volume, no differences in FJS-12 were observed at any of the time points (P = .536, P = .452, and P = .967, respectively) CONCLUSION: DAA THA patients trended toward better PRO scores than their PA counterparts. However, when controlling for surgeon case volume, no differences were observed, which suggests that surgeon case volume and experience have an important effect on patient satisfaction and FJS-12 scores.

One-year Oxford knee scores should be used in preference to 6-month scores when assessing the outcome of total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to assess whether there was a clinically significant difference in the mean Oxford knee score (OKS) between 6 and 12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to identify variables associated with a clinically significant change in the OKS between 6 and 12 months.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using an established arthroplasty database of 1574 primary TKA procedures. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, OKS and EuroQoL 5-domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. A clinically significant change in the OKS was defined as 5 points or more.

Results

There was a 1.1-point increase in the OKS between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, which was statistically significant (95% confidence (CI) 0.8–1.3, p < 0.0001). There were 381 (24.2%) patients who had a clinically significant improvement in their OKS from 6 to 12 months. After adjusting for confounding, patients with a lower BMI (p = 0.028), without diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), a better preoperative OKS (p < 0.001) or a worse 6-month OKS (p < 0.001) were more likely to have a clinically significant improvement. A 6-month OKS < 36 points was a reliable predictor of a clinically significant improvement in the 6-month to 12-month OKS (area under the curve 0.73, 95% CI 0.70–0.75, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Overall, there was no clinically significant change in the OKS from 6 to 12 months; however, a clinically significant improvement was observed in approximately a quarter of patients and was more likely in those scoring less than 36 points at 6 months. Level of evidence: retrospective diagnostic study, level III.

Associations between comorbidity and quality of life outcomes after total joint replacement

PURPOSE

We examined associations between self-reported and clinician-assessed comorbidity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after hip and knee replacement.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based national survey. Participants aged 45 years or older (n = 409) were recruited from the New Zealand Joint Registry six months after a total hip (THR), total knee (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The main outcome QOL was measured using an 8-item short form of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref) questionnaire six months following joint replacement surgery. The WHOQOL is a generic and non-health condition specific measure of QOL.

RESULTS

Participants were on average 68 years of age, with more men (54%) than women (46%). Number of coexisting conditions and body mass index were correlated with age, pain and function scores, and QOL (p < 0.01), but not with each other. Linear regression analyses showed that comorbidities such as number of comorbid conditions and BMI had moderate associations with QOL outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that general QOL outcomes following hip and knee joint replacement, while generally high, were associated with comorbidity burden and BMI. Future prospective research examining change in QOL before and following surgery would help to advance understandings of the various factors that contribute to patient satisfaction with their joint replacement.