Comparative Risk of Serious Infections With Biologic Agents and Oral Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sex and gender in inflammatory bowel disease outcomes and research

Extensive patient heterogeneity is a challenge in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Sex and gender, as well as the interaction of sex and gender with other social identities, referred to as intersectionality, contribute to this heterogeneity and might affect IBD outcomes. An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, researchers, patients, and sex and gender experts reviewed current literature on the effect of sex and gender dimensions on IBD outcomes. The team also investigated the role that stakeholders have in advancing sex-based and gender-based IBD knowledge, as comprehensive studies are scarce. Acknowledging and integrating sex and gender into the organisation and content of research (eg, study design, participant recruitment, data analysis, data interpretation, data dissemination, and impact evaluation) could enhance the validity, relevance, and applicability of research. Such gendered innovation has potential for advancing personalised medicine and improving the quality of life for people with IBD.

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: 2024 American Gastroenterological Association Evidence Synthesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Guidelines on the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases through November 21, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe UC, comparing different advanced therapies (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, interleukin 12/23 or selective interleukin 23 antagonists, and Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) against placebo or another active comparator. Our primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of clinical remission, and our secondary outcome was endoscopic improvement. We performed a network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach and applied Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to appraise certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

After excluding JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatment (in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration), low-certainty evidence supports clinically important benefit with infliximab, ozanimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab over adalimumab and mirikizumab for achieving remission with induction therapy in biologically naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC, with risankizumab and ozanimod being ranked the highest for induction of clinical remission. With the inclusion of JAK inhibitors as first-line therapy, upadacitinib was more efficacious compared with all other medications except ozanimod and risankizumab, with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In patients with prior biologic exposure, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and ustekinumab were ranked highest for achieving remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to appraise quality of evidence, this updated network meta-analysis will be used to inform comparative efficacy and positioning of advanced therapies for the treatment of biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Pharmacokinetics of S1P receptor modulators in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, affecting the colorectal mucosae, with a relapsing-remitting course, characterized by the trafficking and gathering of lymphocytes in the inflammatory intestinal mucosa. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators preventing lymphocytes egress from lymphoid tissues to the active inflammation site is an alternative therapeutic option in this condition.

AREA COVERED

We carried out a comprehensive review of the literature available on Medline, Scopus and Embase regarding the pharmacokinetics of S1P receptor modulators. For each compound, we reviewed the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic data and efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies and real-life studies when available.

EXPERT OPINION

S1P receptor modulators, including ozanimod and etrasimod (both currently on the market) as well as VTX002 (under development), are a new class of drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, inducing and maintaining the remission. Due to its pharmacokinetic features, this class of drugs has certain advantages such as an oral administration, a short half-life, a high volume of distribution, and no immunogenicity. On the other hand, there are risks of cardiological and ophthalmological side-effects, as well as drug-drug interactions risk, that require special attention from the healthcare providers.

Modern Advanced Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Practical Considerations and Positioning

The therapeutic armamentarium for management of inflammatory bowel diseases has expanded dramatically in the last 5 years, with the introduction of several medications with different mechanisms of action. These include the oral small molecule drugs Janus kinase inhibitors (including upadacitinib, approved for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [UC], and tofacitinib, approved for UC) and sphingosphine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (ozanimod and etrasimod, both approved for UC), and biologic agents, such as selective interleukin-23 antagonists (risankizumab approved for Crohn's disease, and mirikizumab approved for UC). The efficacy and safety of these therapies vary. In this review, we discuss practical use of these newer advanced therapies focusing on real-world effectiveness and safety data, dosing and monitoring considerations, and special situations for their use, such as pregnancy, comorbid immune-mediated disease, use in hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, and in the perioperative setting. We also propose our approach to positioning these therapies in clinical practice, relying on careful integration of the medication's comparative effectiveness and safety in the context of an individual patient's risk of disease- and treatment-related complications and preferences.

Co-occurrence of oral pemphigus vulgaris and herpes simplex virus infection in a young patient with Crohn's disease: report of a rare case of oral lesions during anti-TFN alpha and immunomodulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune disease that affects desmoglein-1 and desmoglein-3, leading to intraepithelial vesiculobullous lesions. In the oral mucosa, PV lesions can mimic other diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid, other forms of pemphigus, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and virus-induced ulcers like herpes simplex virus (HSV), making diagnosis challenging. The co-occurrence of PV with Crohn's disease is rare and predominantly seen in younger patients. The therapeutic mainstay for both PV and Crohn's disease usually involves systemic corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants and immunobiological drugs. Literature indicates that the use of these drugs, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors, for managing autoimmune diseases like Crohn's can potentially induce other autoimmune diseases known as autoimmune-like syndromes, which include episodes of lupus-like syndrome and inflammatory neuropathies. There are few cases in the literature reporting the development of PV in individuals with CD undergoing infliximab therapy.

CASE REPORT

A young female with severe Crohn's disease, treated with the TNF-alpha inhibitor infliximab, developed friable pseudomembranous oral ulcerations. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses confirmed these as PV. The treatment included clobetasol propionate and low-level photobiomodulation, which resulted in partial improvement. The patient later experienced severe intestinal bleeding, requiring intravenous hydrocortisone therapy, which improved both her systemic condition and oral lesions. Weeks later, new ulcerations caused by herpes virus and candidiasis were identified, leading to treatment with oral acyclovir, a 21-day regimen of oral nystatin rinse, and photodynamic therapy, ultimately healing the oral infections. To manage her condition, the gastroenterologists included methotrexate (25 mg) in her regimen to reduce the immunogenicity of infliximab and minimize corticosteroid use, as the patient was in remission for Crohn's disease, and the oral PV lesions were under control.

CONCLUSION

Young patients with Crohn's disease should be referred to an oral medicine specialist for comorbidity investigation, as oral PV and opportunistic infections can arise during immunosuppressive therapy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's, should be carefully evaluated for potential side effects, including oral PV.

High Rates of Seroprotection to Hepatitis B After a Hepatitis B Challenge Dose in Previously Vaccinated Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Immunosuppressive Therapy

BACKGROUND

Healthy populations have high rates of sustained vaccine-induced seroprotection to hepatitis B virus, but previous studies in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shown suboptimal seroprotection rates. A challenge dose of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) is recommended in previously vaccinated individuals who are seronegative to elicit an anamnestic response and determine if they are seroprotected. The aim of our study was to determine sustained seroprotection rates to hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) in patients with IBD.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study of patients with IBD previously vaccinated with a three dose HepB series. Patients had a hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) drawn; if it was below 10 mIU/mL, they received a challenge dose of the HepB vaccine to assess for anamnestic response and sustained seroprotection. The primary outcome was to determine the rate of sustained seroprotection (anti-HBs ≥ 10).

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients met inclusion criteria, mean age 35.7 years ± 13.6 standard deviation (SD). Initially 120 (71.4%) had anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL, with median anti-HBs of 37 mIU/mL (interquartile range 0-234); 48 (28.6%) needed a challenge dose, of which 34 responded with anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL. In total, 154 (91.7%) demonstrated sustained seroprotection to HepB. Those not seroprotected were more likely to have been vaccinated on immunosuppressive therapy or after their diagnosis of IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Most vaccinated patients with IBD maintain sustained seroprotection to HepB despite prolonged exposure to immunosuppression. This contradicts prior studies and shows that immunosuppression does not lead to loss of seroprotection.

Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are at Increased Risk of Hospitalization Due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus

INTRODUCTION

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing respiratory infections. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus with adverse outcomes in older adults. This study aimed to determine whether patients with IBD are at increased risk of a serious infection due to RSV.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using the multi-institutional research network TriNetX to assess the risk of hospitalization in a cohort of patients with IBD compared with that in a non-IBD control cohort with RSV infection from January 1, 2007, to February 27, 2023. One-to-one (1:1) propensity score matching was performed for demographic variables and RSV risk factors between the 2 cohorts. Risk was expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

There were 794 patients in the IBD-RSV cohort and 93,074 patients in the non-IBD-RSV cohort. The mean age of the IBD-RSV cohort was 55.6 ± 20 years, 59% were female, 80% were White, and 56.9% had Crohn's disease. The IBD-RSV cohort was at an increased risk of hospitalization (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.59). There was no difference in the risk (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.19) of a composite outcome of hospitalization-related complications between the 2 cohorts. Recent systemic corticosteroid use (<3 months) was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.30-2.59) in the IBD-RSV cohort.

DISCUSSION

We found that adult patients with IBD and RSV infection are at an increased risk of hospitalization and may benefit from the new RSV vaccine recommended for adults aged 60 years and older.

Comparative Risk of Serious Infection With Vedolizumab vs Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From Nationwide Swedish Registers

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population.

METHODS

In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission.

RESULTS

During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11).

DISCUSSION

Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies.

Impact of Treatment Response on Risk of Serious Infections in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Secondary Analysis of the PYRAMID Registry

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Traditional risk factors for serious infections with advanced therapies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have been assessed at baseline before starting therapy. We evaluated the impact of treatment response on the risk of serious infections in adalimumab-treated patients with CD through secondary analysis of the PYRAMID registry (NCT00524537).

METHODS

We included patients with CD who initiated adalimumab and classified them as treatment responders (achieved steroid-free clinical remission based on patient-reported outcomes) vs nonresponders (not in steroid-free clinical remission) at 6 months after treatment initiation (landmark). We compared the risk of serious infections between responders vs nonresponders between 6 and 36 months after treatment initiation through stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 1515 adalimumab-treated patients, 763 (50.4%) were classified as responders at 6 months (37 ± 13 y; 56% female; disease duration, 9.5 ± 8.5 y). Compared with nonresponders, responders were less likely to have moderate to severe symptoms (55.6% vs 33%), or require steroids (45.5% vs 17.3%) or opiates (6.6% vs 1.3%) at baseline, without any differences in disease location, perianal disease, and prior CD complications. During follow-up evaluation, using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, responders were 34% less likely to experience serious infections compared with nonresponders (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.96). Risk of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal infections was lower in responders vs nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CD who respond to adalimumab have a lower risk of developing serious infections compared with nonresponders. These findings underscore that initiation of advanced therapy for CD may lower the risk of serious infections through effective disease control and avoidance of corticosteroids.

Effectiveness and safety of a third-line rescue treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to infliximab or ciclosporin (REASUC study)

BACKGROUND

The advent of new therapeutic agents and the improvement of supporting care might change the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and avoid colectomy.

AIMS

To evaluate the colectomy-free survival and safety of a third-line treatment in patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids and who failed either infliximab or ciclosporin.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids who had failed infliximab or ciclosporin and received a third-line treatment during the same hospitalisation. Patients who stopped second-line treatment due to disease activity or adverse events (AEs) were eligible. We assessed short-term colectomy-free survival by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for long-term assessment.

RESULTS

Among 78 patients, 32 received infliximab and 46 ciclosporin as second-line rescue treatment. Third-line treatment was infliximab in 45 (58%), ciclosporin in 17 (22%), tofacitinib in 13 (17%) and ustekinumab in 3 (3.8%). Colectomy was performed in 29 patients (37%) during follow-up (median 21 weeks). Of the 78 patients, 32 and 18 were in clinical remission at, respectively, 12 and 52 weeks. At the last visit, 25 patients were still on third-line rescue treatment, while 12 had stopped it due to clinical remission. AEs were reported in 26 (33%) patients. Two patients died (2.6%), including one following colectomy.

CONCLUSION

Third-line rescue treatment avoided colectomy in over half of the patients with ASUC and may be considered a therapeutic strategy.

Selecting first-line advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis: A clinical application of personalized medicine

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease that affects the colon, leading to symptoms of bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and urgency. The treatment of UC has evolved over the past few decades from locally active anti-inflammatory compounds to more selective therapies that target specific arrays of the immune system. The challenge of selecting the first advanced therapy became apparent in this rapidly expanding landscape of medications. No current investigational tools, such as genetic, immunologic, or biological markers, can guide the identification of the safest and most effective therapeutic option for each patient. Hence, physicians must carefully assess patient/disease characteristics and match them with the most suitable drug through a clinically driven assessment. In this paper, we outline patient and drug characteristics that play a role in selecting first-line advanced therapies for UC and propose an algorithm for selection.

Novel and emerging drugs for the treatment of Crohn's disease: a review of phase II and III trials

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by unpredictable flare-ups and periods of remission. While several therapeutic options, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrin, and interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitors, as well as IL-23 and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have been approved for CD treatment, a substantial number of patients fail to respond adequately or experience a loss of response over time. In recent years, the scientific community has been actively investigating novel agents to address these challenges and improve the management of CD.

AREAS COVERED

This comprehensive narrative review provides an overview of recent developments in CD treatment, summarizing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. We delve into the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of emerging therapies, encompassing JAK inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, S1P1 receptor modulators, and combined targeted treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

The armamentarium of CD therapeutic agents is constantly expanding. We analyze pivotal findings from phase 2 and phase 3 CD treatment trials. We also underscore the existing gaps in therapy and the paramount role of ongoing research and innovation in CD management.

Adverse events of biologic or small molecule therapies in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Biologic or small-molecule therapies are highly effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and approval by the FDA has significantly increased both their clinical use and the development of novel regimens. However, the identification and management of their associated toxicities poses challenges for clinicians and researchers.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1, 2000, to October 15, 2022, and in the databases. A random-effects model with logit transformation was applied to the analysis heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic with incidence and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for any adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs).

Results

In Crohn's disease (CD), the total AE incidence was 67.0 % (95 % CI, 66.2%-67.8 %; I2 = 97.2 %) for any AEs and 7.3 % (6.9-7.7; 97.2) for serious AEs. In ulcerative colitis (UC), the overall incidence of any and serious AEs was 63.6 % (63.0-64.3; 98.1) and 5.7 % (5.4-6.0; 88.9), respectively. The most common AEs were infections (21.5 [20.3-22.8], 32.6 [31.0-34.2], 25.9 [24.5-27.2], and 13.7 [10.7-16.7]) in CD patients that were treated with TNF antagonists, anti-integrins, anti-IL agents, and JAK inhibitors, respectively, and in UC patients also were infections (22.8 [21.7-24.0], 27.4 [25.9-28.9], and 18.4 [16.7-20.2]), respectively, as well as increases in lactic dehydrogenase levels (23.1 [20.8-25.4]) with JAK inhibitors.

Conclusion

This study offers a comprehensive summary of toxic side effects of IBD treatments and a useful reference for both patients and clinicians.

Research progress of Ustekinumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, recurrent gastrointestinal disorder with elusive etiology. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-23 have emerged as key proinflammatory mediators/cytokines in IBD pathogenesis. Ustekinumab (UST), targeting IL-12 and IL-23, has demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of IBD. Recently, UST has become increasingly favored as a potential first-line treatment option. This review delineates UST's mechanism of action, its clinical applications in IBD, including the response rates, strategies for dose optimization for case of partial or lost response, and potential adverse events. This review aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of UST's role as a therapeutic option in IBD management.

Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT and real-world observational studies

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib, a novel and selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1, has demonstrated promising efficacy in managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, our primary aim was to comprehensively assess the therapeutic effectiveness and safety profile of upadacitinib in the treatment of patients with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature search across prominent databases, including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central, to identify pertinent studies providing insights into the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in IBD. The primary endpoint was the achievement of clinical remission, while secondary endpoints encompassed clinical response, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and the evaluation of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis of nine studies, we categorized results by study type. Clinical remission rates were: RCTs 36 % (95 % CI = 30-42 %), real-world studies 25 % (95 % CI = 1-49 %), retrospective studies 40 % (95 % CI = 24-56 %), cohort studies 55 % (95 % CI = 25-85 %). Clinical response rates were: RCTs 61 % (95 % CI = 55-67 %), real-world studies 42 % (95 % CI = 14-70 %), cohort studies 65 % (95 % CI = 57-73 %). Endoscopic remission rates were: RCTs 19 % (95 % CI = 15-24 %), cohort studies 29 % (95 % CI = 5-52 %). Endoscopic response rates were: RCTs 41 % (95 % CI = 36-47 %), cohort studies 57 % (95 % CI = 31-83 %). Incidence rate for any AEs: IBD 69 % (95 % CI = 63-76 %), UC 65 % (95 % CI = 57-74 %), CD 75 % (95 % CI = 67-82 %).

CONCLUSION

Cumulative data from real-world studies and trials confirm the efficacy of upadacitinib in IBD induction and maintenance, with consistent safety. However, further long-term studies are needed to understand its sustained effectiveness and safety.

A Review of Available Medical Therapies to Treat Moderate-to-Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The treatment armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease has expanded rapidly in the past several years with new biologic and small molecule-agents approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This has made treatment selection more challenging with limited but evolving guidance as to where to position each medication. In this review, we discuss the efficacy data for each agent approved in the United States by reviewing their phase 3 trial data and other comparative effectiveness studies. In addition, safety considerations and use in special populations are summarized with proposed algorithms for positioning therapies. The aim is to provide a synopsis of high-impact data and aid in outpatient treatment decision-making for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Ileal inflammation is reduced due to treatment with a metalloprotease from BmooMP-α-I snake venom in an experimental model of Toxoplasma gondii infection

The selection process for advanced therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) must prioritize safety, especially when considering new biologic agents or oral molecule modulators. In C57BL/6 mice, oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii induces intestinal inflammation through excessive tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production, making TNF neutralization a potential therapeutic intervention. Considering this, the present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of BmooMP-α-I, a snake venom metalloprotease isolated from Bothrops moojeni, which could promote TNF hydrolysis, in treating T. gondii-induced ileitis. The results showed that C57BL/6 mice orally infected with 50 cysts of T. gondii from the Me49 strain and treated with BmooMP-α-I exhibited prolonged survival and improved morbidity scores. Additionally, the treatment ameliorated both the macroscopic and microscopic aspects of the intestine, reduced macrophage influx, and decreased the production of inflammatory mediators by mesenteric lymph node cells. These findings provide compelling experimental evidence supporting the ability of BmooMP-α-I to alleviate ileal inflammation. Considering that the currently available therapeutic protocols are not completely effective and often result in side effects, the exploration of alternative strategies involving novel therapeutic agents, as demonstrated in this study, has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases.

An Orally-Administered Nanotherapeutics with Carbon Monoxide Supplying for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy by Scavenging Oxidative Stress and Restoring Gut Immune Homeostasis

Traditional drug-based treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significant limitations due to their potential off-target systemic side-effects. Currently, there is a lack of understanding on how to effectively address excessive oxidative stress, dysregulated immune homeostasis, and microbiota dysbiosis within the IBD microenvironment. Herein, we introduce a nanotherapeutic approach, named LBL-CO@MPDA, for IBD treatment. LBL-CO@MPDA is an orally administered formulation that supplies carbon monoxide (CO) for therapeutic purposes. To create the LBL-CO@MPDA nanocomposite, we developed a layer by layer (LBL) self-assembly strategy where we coated chitosan/alginate polyelectrolytes onto the surface of CO prodrug-loaded mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles (CO@MPDA). Benefiting from the negatively charged surface of the LBL coating, it allows for targeted accumulation of LBL-CO@MPDA specifically onto the positively charged inflamed colon lesions through electrostatic interactions. Furthermore, in the oxidative microenvironment of the inflamed colon, the nanotherapeutic system releases CO in a responsive manner. Interestingly, CO@MPDA ameliorates inflammatory conditions by MPDA-mediated ROS-scavenging and CO-mediated immunomodulation. CO-supplying activates heme oxygenase-1, leading to macrophage M2 polarization via the Notch/Hes1/Stat3 signaling pathway, while suppressing the inflammatory response by down-regulating the p38 MAPK and NF-κB (p50/p65) signaling pathways. In the mice model of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced IBD, LBL-CO@MPDA effectively reverses the pro-inflammatory microenvironment and restores gut barrier functions through multiple mechanisms, including scavenging oxidative stress, restoring immune homeostasis, and modulating the gut microbiota. Collectively, our findings highlight the promising potential of this innovative nanotherapeutic strategy for the targeted treatment of IBD.

Early Ileocecal Resection for Crohn's Disease Is Associated With Improved Long-term Outcomes Compared With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early Crohn's disease (CD) treatment involves anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, whereas ileocecal resection (ICR) is reserved for complicated CD or treatment failure. We compared long-term outcomes of primary ICR and anti-TNF therapy for ileocecal CD.

METHODS

Using cross-linked nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with ileal or ileocecal CD between 2003 and 2018 and treated with ICR or anti-TNF agents within 1 year of diagnosis. The primary outcome was a composite of ≥1 of the following: CD-related hospitalization, systemic corticosteroid exposure, CD-related surgery, and perianal CD. We conducted adjusted Cox's proportional hazards regression analyses and determined the cumulative risk of different treatments after primary ICR or anti-TNF therapy.

RESULTS

Of 16,443 individuals diagnosed with CD, 1279 individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 45.4% underwent ICR and 54.6% received anti-TNF. The composite outcome occurred in 273 individuals (incidence rate, 110/1000 person-years) in the ICR group and in 318 individuals (incidence rate, 202/1000 person-years) in the anti-TNF group. The risk of the composite outcome was 33% lower with ICR compared with anti-TNF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.83). ICR was associated with reduced risk of systemic corticosteroid exposure and CD-related surgery, but not other secondary outcomes. The proportion of individuals on immunomodulator, anti-TNF, who underwent subsequent resection, or were on no therapy 5 years post-ICR was 46.3%, 16.8%, 1.8%, and 49.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that ICR may have a role as first-line therapy in CD management and challenge the current paradigm of reserving surgery for complicated CD refractory or intolerant to medications. Yet, given inherent biases associated with observational data, our findings should be interpreted and applied cautiously in clinical decision making.

Pharmacological Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Narrative Review of the Past 90 Years

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases had their first peak in incidence in countries in North America, Europe, and Oceania and are currently experiencing a new acceleration in incidence, especially in Latin America and Asia. Despite technological advances, 90 years after the development of the first molecule for the treatment of IBD, we still do not have drugs that promote disease remission in a generalized way. We carried out a narrative review on therapeutic advances in the treatment of IBD, the mechanisms of action, and the challenges facing the therapeutic goals in the treatment of IBD. Salicylates are still used in the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Corticosteroids have an indication restricted to the period of therapeutic induction due to frequent adverse events, while technologies with less systemic action have been developed. Most immunomodulators showed a late onset of action, requiring a differentiated initial strategy to control the disease. New therapeutic perspectives emerged with biological therapy, initially with anti-TNF, followed by anti-integrins and anti-interleukins. Despite the different mechanisms of action, there are similarities between the general rates of effectiveness. These similar results were also evidenced in JAK inhibitors and S1p modulators, the last therapeutic classes approved for the treatment of IBD.

Acalypha australis L. Extract Attenuates DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice by Regulating Inflammatory Factor Release and Blocking NF-κB Activation

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic gastroenteric inflammatory disease that may cause life-threatening complications. Currently available therapeutic drugs are not as effective as expected, necessitating the development of new targets and drugs. The etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms of UC are largely unclear; thus, the treatment effects are limited. The aqueous extract of Acalypha australis L. (AAL) has shown good therapeutic efficacy in treating UC. AAL is used in traditional Chinese medicine owing to its hemostasis, detoxification, and heat clearance effects. Although astragalus has such broad-spectrum biological activities closely related to inflammation, its therapeutic efficacy for UC treatment has not been reported, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. We studied the therapeutic effect of AAL on UC in mice and explored its potential mechanism. Mice were treated with AAL aqueous extract for 7 days (20 mg/kg), after which the colon tissue was assessed for damage (colon mucosal damage index [CMDI]), apoptosis (immunohistochemistry), and release of cytokines (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). The concentration of AAL aqueous extract at 20 mg/kg significantly improved the CMDI score and colon injury of UC model. It also reduced the serum levels of IL-2, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-22, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, and decreased apoptosis in the colon. AAL water extract also significantly reduced the expression level of NF-κB pathway-related proteins. In conclusion, AAL can protect against UC mainly by inhibiting the expression level of NF-κB pathway-related proteins and reducing the release of inflammatory factors.

An update on the safety of long-term vedolizumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (Entyvio) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that disrupts the interaction between α4β7 integrin on circulating T-lymphocytes and MAdCAM-1 on the vascular endothelium to prevent their egress to sites of gut inflammation. It has proven therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review assesses the safety profile of vedolizumab from the registration trial programs, open-label extension studies, observational real-world data, and pooled safety analyses. This includes an evaluation of the long-term overall safety in special populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease with a well-established safety profile. No unexpected long-term safety signals have been identified. Safety data in pregnancy, in pediatric and elderly populations, in patients undergoing surgery, and in patients with a prior history of cancer are reassuring. Due to its safety merits, we propose that vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for advanced combination treatment with an anti-cytokine approach using another biologic or novel small molecule inhibitor. This is important in patients with medically refractory IBD, in patients at high risk of developing disease-related complications, or in patients with concomitant uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Risk-Benefit of IBD Drugs: A Physicians and Patients Survey

BACKGROUND

Treatment choices for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are based on the balance between risks and benefits. Our AI was to compare the perspectives of patients and physicians in evaluating the risks and benefits before initiating therapy for IBD.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was conducted between March and August 2022. All patients with confirmed IBD and all physicians who attended an IBDscope webinar were invited to participate.

RESULTS

In total, 367 patients and 146 physicians participated. For most patients (71.4%) and physicians (89.0%), efficacy and safety were equally important. Clinical improvement and clinical remission were the most relevant outcomes for patients (90.9 and 88.4), while clinical remission and endoscopic remission were for physicians (90.0 and 87.6). The main factors in the benefit-risk assessment were quality of life (95.1%), disease activity (87.5%), and presence of comorbidities (84.5%) for patients, and presence of comorbidities (99.3%), disease activity (97.9%), and prior failure to biologics/small molecules (96.6%) for physicians. Based on patients' and physicians' opinions, the risk of serious infections, malignancies, cardiovascular events, death, relapse, all infections, surgery, and hospitalization should be included in the benefit-risk assessment.

CONCLUSION

Physicians and patients have different priorities in evaluating the benefit-risk balance of a new therapy.

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases in older adults

The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in older adults (ie, aged over 60 years old) is increasing due to a combination of an ageing population with compounding prevalence of IBD and increasing incidence of elderly-onset (ie, onset over the age of 60 years) IBD. Despite the increasing prevalence of IBD, there is a paucity of evidence on which to base management of older adults with IBD, leading to substantial variability in care. This population is under-represented in clinical trials and has a high burden of chronic corticosteroid use, low uptake of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and high rates of unplanned health-care use and disability. Management of IBD in older adults requires carefully weighing an individual patient's risk of IBD-related complications, IBD-directed immunosuppressive therapy, and non-IBD comorbidities. A deeper understanding of biological and functional age, dynamic risk stratification strategies (including frailty-based risk assessment tools), comparative effectiveness and safety of current therapies and treatment strategies, and shared decision making to inform treatment goals and targets is needed to improve outcomes in older adults with IBD. In this Review, we discuss the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, and medical and surgical management of older individuals living with IBD and identify key research gaps and approaches to address them.

COVID-19 and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus represents an unprecedented global health crisis. Safe and effective vaccines were rapidly developed and deployed that reduced COVID-19-related severe disease, hospitalization, and death. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are not at increased risk of severe disease or death from COVID-19, and data from large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective. Ongoing research is clarifying the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with inflammatory bowel disease, long-term immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, and optimal timing for repeated COVID-19 vaccination doses.

Use of biologics for the management of Crohn's disease: IG-IBD clinical guidelines based on the GRADE methodology

A cure for Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown etiology, is not available, so patients require lifelong management to keep inflammation under control. The therapeutic armamentarium has expanded with approval of several biological drugs, including infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab - monoclonal antibodies that target different inflammatory pathways - and darvadstrocel, a suspension of expanded human allogeneic, adipose-derived, mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of refractory complex perianal fistula. Notwithstanding existing practice guidelines on medical therapy for CD, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease felt the need to issue new guidelines focused on the use of biologics for managing the intestinal manifestations of CD and based on the GRADE methodology. This document presents recommendations regarding six clinical settings, from the induction to the maintenance of clinical remission, and from optimization and de-escalation of treatments to dealing with perianal CD and post-operative recurrence. The 19 evidence-based statements are supported by information on the quality of the evidence, agreement rate among panel members, and panel comments mainly based on evidence from real world studies.

Clinical Evaluation of Risankizumab in the Treatment of Adults with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes

This article will review risankizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin 23 (IL-23) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. The article will detail the mechanism of action and dosing strategies. Efficacy in induction and maintenances will be reviewed from available clinical trials as well as an evaluation of safety of the medication for use in Crohn's disease and other immune mediated diseases. Finally, a discussion of when to use this medication for treatment in Crohn's disease as well as how to monitor patients after medication initiation will be discussed.

Is there an optimal sequence of biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease?

Over the past two decades, 11 biologic agents have been approved for use in most countries for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Antitumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents are commonly used as the first biologic in clinical practice, and nearly all pivotal studies of induction therapy enrolled patients with and without prior use of anti-TNF therapy. This narrative review presents a reasonable approach to devising treatment sequences, examining the magnitude of benefit for each drug versus placebo or active comparator and then considering how that benefit changes with prior anti-TNF treatment. Data from ULTRA 2, GEMINI 1, VARSITY, and True North in patients with ulcerative colitis indicate that induction adalimumab, vedolizumab, and ozanimod showed lower clinical remission rates after anti-TNF therapy, while UNIFI, OCTAVE 1&2, and U-ACHIEVE/U-ACCOMPLISH show ustekinumab, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib did not. In patients with Crohn's disease, endoscopic remission or mucosal healing after induction therapy rather than clinical remission as well as assessment of persistent endoscopic remission are good measures of long-term disease outcomes. Considering the drugs for which data on endoscopic remission rates are available, EXTEND and GEMINI 2&3 show adalimumab and vedolizumab with persistently lower endoscopic remission rates after prior anti-TNF therapy, while IM-UNIFI, SEAVUE, and FORTIFY show ustekinumab and risankizumab did not. Data from the multicenter retrospective EVOLVE study indicate that the effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy does not seem to be significantly impacted by prior vedolizumab therapy, and may further suggest the benefit of using vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. As adverse event rates remain low across all treatments, the magnitude of harm from untreated or poorly treated disease far outweighs harm from any individual therapy. Regardless of the treatment sequence, careful monitoring for early signs of treatment nonresponse and switching to another potentially highly active therapy are critical to effective management of IBD.