Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 14, 2022, to November 22, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 23, 2023, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains a common genetic heart disease reported in populations globally. Recommendations from the "2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians.

Management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an important cause of heart failure and arrhythmias, including sudden death, with a major impact on the healthcare system. Genetic causes and different phenotypes are now increasingly being identified for this condition. In addition, specific medications, such as myosin inhibitors, have been recently shown as potentially able to modify its symptoms, hemodynamic abnormalities and clinical course. Our article aims to provide a comprehensive outline of the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the current era.

Persistence of left atrial thrombus in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have an increased risk of left atrial (LA) thrombus. In this study, we aimed to evaluate thrombus management, thrombus persistence, and thromboembolic events for HCM and non-HCM patients with AF and LA thrombus.

METHODS

From a cohort of 2,155 AF patients undergoing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for any indication, this study included 122 patients with LA thrombus (64 HCM patients and 58 non-HCM controls).

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores between HCM and control patients (3.9 ± 2.2 vs 3.8 ± 2.0, p = 0.88). Ten (16%) and 4 (7%) patients in the HCM and control groups, respectively, were in sinus rhythm at the time of TEE identifying the LA thrombus (p = 0.13). In all patients, the anticoagulation strategy was modified after the LA thrombus diagnosis. A total of 36 (56%) HCM patients and 34 (59%) control patients had follow-up TEE at median 90 and 62 days, respectively, after index TEE. The HCM group had significantly higher 90-day rates of persistent LA thrombus compared to the control group (88% vs 29%; p < 0.001). In adjusted models, HCM was independently associated with LA thrombus persistence. Among patients with LA thrombus, the 5-year cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 11% and 2% in HCM and control groups, respectively (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with AF with LA thrombus identified by TEE, those with HCM appear to have a higher risk of LA thrombus persistence than non-HCM patients despite anticoagulation.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Amyloidosis: From Clinical Management to Catheter Ablation Indication

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients affected by cardiomyopathies. Reports estimate a prevalence of 27% in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and 40% in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The presence of AF typically results in progressive functional decline, an increased frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure, and a higher thromboembolic risk. Medical management using mainly beta-blockers or amiodarone has produced variable outcomes and a high rate of recurrence. Catheter ablation reduces symptom burden and complications despite a moderate rate of recurrence. Recent evidence suggests that an early rhythm control strategy may lead to more favorable short- and long-term outcomes. In this review, we summarize contemporary data on the management of AF in patients with cardiomyopathy (HCM and CA) with particular reference to the timing and outcomes of ablation procedures.

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonist in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well established yet. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with HCM and AF.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify studies comparing DOAC with VKA in patients with HCM and AF. The primary endpoint was thromboembolic events. The relative risks and standard errors were pooled by random-effect models using the generic inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies involving 9395 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to the VKA group, the DOAC group displayed a similar risk of thromboembolic events [RR (95%CI): 0.93 (0.73-1.20), p = 0.59] and ischemic stroke [RR (95%CI): 0.65 (0.33-1.28), p = 0.22]. The incidence of major bleeding was comparable between the two groups [RR (95%CI): 0.75 (0.49-1.15), p = 0.19]. Meanwhile, DOAC therapy was superior to VKA therapy in reducing the incidences of all-cause death [RR (95%CI): 0.44 (0.35-0.55), p < 0.001], cardiovascular death [RR (95%CI): 0.41 (0.22-0.75), p = 0.004], and intracranial hemorrhage [RR (95%CI): 0.42 (0.24-0.74), p = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCM and AF, DOAC therapy was similar to VKA therapy in reducing the risk of thromboembolic events, without increasing bleeding risk. In addition, the DOAC group displayed significant advantages in reducing mortality and intracranial hemorrhage compared with the VKA group. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to provide more evidence for DOAC therapy in this population.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Prior Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin for secondary stroke prevention among adult patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke.

METHODS

Major repositories were screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT subgroups, and observational studies (OBSs, divided in claims and non-claims). Occurrences of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and major bleeding were outcomes of interest. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their confidence intervals (95%CIs) were pooled using random-effects models for each study design. Claims studies were analyzed separately from non-claims, while RCT subgroups were grouped with OBSs (non-claims) as the randomization was broken.

RESULTS

Of 8647 articles, 20 were included (one RCT, six RCT subgroups, nine claims, and four non-claims). Comparing DOACs to warfarin, pooled HRs (95%CI) were consistently in favor of DOACs although some did not reach statistical significance: for ischemic stroke, 0.84 (0.66-1.07) in claims; 0.90 (0.77-1.06) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for systemic embolism, 0.77 (0.62-0.96) in claims; 0.86 (0.77-0.96) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for all-cause mortality, 0.57 (0.33-0.99) in claims; 0.87 (0.79-0.96) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; for ICH, 0.72 (0.39-1.33) in claims; 0.51 (0.38-0.67) in non-claims and RCT subgroups; and for major bleeding, 0.86 (0.71-1.03) in claims; 0.90 (0.76-1.08) for non-claims and RCT subgroups.

CONCLUSION

DOACs were associated with better efficacy and safety profiles than warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with prior stroke, more specifically a lower risk of systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and ICH.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Anticoagulation Strategy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently complicates hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and anticoagulation significantly decreases the risk of stroke in this population. To date, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The present study aimed to systematically compare the two anticoagulation strategies in terms of effectiveness and safety.

METHOD

We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for studies reporting all-cause mortality, major bleeding, or thromboembolic events (TEs). Since no RCTs were available, we included observational studies only. The overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each analyzed parameter were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five observational studies including 6919 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with statistically significant lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35-0.54; p < 0.00001), comparable major bleeding events (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40-1.03; p = 0.07), and TEs (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73-1.22; p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VKAs, a DOAC-based strategy might represent an effective and safe strategy regarding all-cause mortality, major/life-threatening bleeding complications, and TEs in HCM patients with concomitant AF. However, further prospective studies are necessary to reinforce a DOAC-based anticoagulation strategy in this population.

Estimating the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in Japan: A nationwide medical claims database study

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This study assessed the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of HCM in Japan.

METHODS

This retrospective database study analyzed data from 438 hospitals in the Japan Medical Data Vision database from 2016 to 2020. We identified 3913 patients (15 %) with obstructive HCM (oHCM) and 21,714 patients (85 %) with nonobstructive HCM (nHCM).

RESULTS

The estimated total number of patients with oHCM and nHCM in 2020 among Japanese hospitals was 8500 and 43,500, respectively. The prevalence of oHCM and nHCM steadily increased by 27 % and 12 %, respectively, from 2016 to 2020, with a 1:5.2 ratio of oHCM to nHCM in 2020. The mean age of the oHCM and nHCM populations was 72 and 70 years, respectively, and comorbidities included atrial fibrillation (AF) (oHCM, 33.8 %; nHCM, 32.2 %), other arrythmia (30.1 %; 27.6 %), and stroke (16.6 %; 16.4 %). Furthermore, 45.0 % of oHCM and 37.7 % of nHCM patients had undergone at least one hospitalization. A substantial number of HCM patients aged between 20 and 59 years reported AF (oHCM, 17-37 %; nHCM, 4-24 %) and stroke (oHCM, 0-12 %; nHCM, 3-10 %). β-blockers (oHCM, 64.0 %; nHCM, 42.1 %) were the most frequently prescribed treatment, followed by Na channel blockers (29.5 %; 5.7 %), calcium channel blockers (18.1 %; 8.8 %), direct oral anticoagulants (14.5 %; 15.2 %), and warfarin (11.0 %; 11.4 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides important information on the current epidemiological and clinical characteristics of HCM in Japan.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus

In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have accumulated evidence of efficacy and safety in various clinical scenarios and are approved for a wide spectrum of indications. Still, they are currently used off-label for left ventricular thrombus owing to a paucity of evidence. For the same reason, there is a lack of guideline indication as well. Our work is based on an exhaustive analysis of the available literature and provides a structured and detailed update on the use of DOACs in patients with left ventricle thrombus. The safety and efficacy of DOACs were analyzed in particular clinical scenarios. As far as we know, this is the first paper that analyzes DOACs in this approach.

Ischaemic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy predisposes to acute cerebrovascular events including ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack and systemic thromboembolism. Atrial fibrillation confers even higher risk. We aim to report the incidence of these complications and to investigate the impact of atrial fibrillation on the ischaemic risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid and Cochrane library from inception to 20th March 2021. We compared the incidence of ischaemic strokes, transient ischaemic attack, non-specified thromboembolism events and systemic thromboembolism in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with or without atrial fibrillation. Non-specified thromboembolism events in our paper referred to thromboembolic events whereby types were not specified in the studies. Meta-analysis was performed using StataSE 16 software, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² test. A total of 713 studies were identified. Thirty-five articles with 42,570 patients were included. The pooled incidence of stroke/ transient ischaemic attack was 7.45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.80-9.52, p < 0.001) across 24 studies with a total of 37,643 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Atrial fibrillation significantly increased the risk of total stroke/ transient ischaemic attack (Risk Ratio 3.26, 95% CI 1.75-6.08, p < 0.001, I² = 76.0). The incidence of stroke/ transient ischaemic attack was 9.30% (95% CI 6.64-12.87, p = 0.316) in the apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subgroup. Concomitant atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increases the risk of thromboembolic events including ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack. The apical subgroup shows a similar risk of acute cerebrovascular events as the overall hypertrophic cardiomyopathy population.

Genetic variants, pathophysiological pathways, and oral anticoagulation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly prevalent in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, whether the prevalence and incidence of AF are different between genotype-positive vs. genotype-negative patients with HCM remains controversial. Recent evidence has indicated that AF is often the first presentation of genetic HCM patients in the absence of a cardiomyopathy phenotype, implying the importance of genetic testing in this population with early-onset AF. However, the association of the identified sarcomere gene variants with HCM occurrence in the future remains unclear. How the identification of these cardiomyopathy gene variants should influence the use of anticoagulation therapy for a patient with early-onset AF is still undefined. In this review, we sought to assess the genetic variants, pathophysiological pathways, and oral anticoagulation in patients with HCM and AF.

Augmented risk of ischemic stroke in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients without documented atrial fibrillation

Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the risk of IS in HCM patients without documented AF is less recognized. This nationwide population-based cohort study using Korean National Health Insurance database included 8,328 HCM patients without documented AF and 1:2 propensity score-matched 16,656 non-HCM controls between 2010 and 2016. The primary outcome was an incident IS. During a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, IS occurred in 328/8,328 (3.9%) patients with HCM and 443/16,656 (2.7%) controls. The overall incidence of IS was 0.72/100 person-years in the HCM group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (0.44/100 person-years) (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.424–1.895; P < 0.001). The overall incidence of IS was 1.36/100 person-years in HCM patients aged ≥ 65 and 2.32/100 person-years years in those with heart failure, respectively. In the HCM group, age ≥ 65 years (adjusted HR 2.74; 95% CI 2.156–3.486; P < 0.001) and chronic heart failure (adjusted HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.101–2.745; P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for IS. HCM patients without documented AF are at a greater risk of IS, especially in those 65 years of age or older or those with chronic heart failure.

Safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared with well-controlled warfarin in Thai patients with atrial fibrillation

Background

In trials of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were not inferior to warfarin for thromboembolic and bleeding events. However, there are scant data comparing the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF with that of well-controlled warfarin treatment in such patients.

Objectives

To compare total bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with AF who received NOACs, with the same events in those who received well-controlled warfarin treatment.

Methods

We used retrospective data from patients with AF who received NOACs or well-controlled warfarin at the Central Chest Institute of Thailand from January 2017 to December 2019. The primary outcome was total bleeding or thromboembolic events or both. The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality, total bleeding events including major or minor bleeding, and thromboembolic events including ischemic stroke or systemic embolization.

Results

We included data from 180 patients with AF, 90 who received NOACs and 90 who received well-controlled warfarin. The average time in the therapeutic range for those who received warfarin was 84.9% ± 9.8%. The patients who received well-controlled warfarin had more frequent thromboembolic or total bleeding events or both than those who received NOACs (odds ratio [OR] 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-4.07; P = 0.01). There were more minor bleeding events in those who received well-controlled warfarin (OR 3.75; 95% CI 2.79-4.71; P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in thromboembolic events, major bleeding, or all-cause mortality between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Thai patients with AF who received NOACs had less thromboembolic or total bleeding events than those who received well-controlled warfarin treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased risk of suffering thromboembolic events. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are recommended as therapy but there is still limited data regarding the efficacy of prescribing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This retrospective study investigates the effectiveness and safety of NOAC administration in patients with HCM and AF. A total of 124 patients with HCM and AF on an oral anticoagulant therapy were recruited between January 2015 and December 2019; these patients were followed up until March 31, 2020. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the clinical outcomes in patients treated with NOACs versus warfarin. The Cox model was used to estimate the risk of clinically relevant bleeding. Our study included 124 patients, of which 48 (38.7%) received warfarin and 76 (61.3%) received NOACs. Survival analysis showed the patients undergoing NOACs had a lower risk of clinically relevant bleeding (log-rank P = 0.039) over a period of 53.6 months. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) score was 50% (interquartile range: 40.43 to 57.08%). A total of nine patients (18.75%) had a good TTR with a median score of 66.35% (interquartile range: 64.58 to 77.75%). The incidence of death by all causes, cardiovascular death and thromboembolism were similar between NOAC and warfarin-treated patients (log-rank P = 0.239, log-rank P = 0.386, and log-rank P = 0.257, respectively). Patients treated with NOACs showed a significant reduction in the risk of clinical (P = 0.011) and gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.032). Cox multiple regression analysis showed age (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24; P = 0.013) and warfarin therapy (HR 7.37, 95% CI 1.63-33.36; P = 0.010) were independent predictors of clinically relevant bleeding. Compared to warfarin, NOACs were associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding in HCM patients with AF, as demonstrated by the similar incidence of death by all causes, cardiovascular death and thromboembolic events.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiological condition that exhibits various clinical symptoms. The leading cause of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with HCM is advanced diastolic dysfunction and left atrial dilatation and remodeling. In addition to the gradual symptomatic and functional decline caused by AF, there is an increased risk of thromboembolic disease and mortality, especially if there is a rapid ventricular rate or obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. The mainstay of management of AF in HCM is a combination of non-pharmacological lifestyle and risk factor modification, long-term anticoagulation, and rhythm control with anti-arrhythmic medications, septal ablation, and radiofrequency catheter ablation. This article has examined the development of AF in HCM, its clinical symptomatology, and its impact, highlighting its management and the mortality associated with AF in HCM.

Major Clinical Issues in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

By actively implementing contemporary management strategies in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, morbidity and mortality can be substantially reduced. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology and management of the major clinical issues in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, including sudden cardiac death, atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism, dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and heart failure progression. Although echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging currently play an essential and complementary role in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, further studies are needed to establish how developing techniques such as myocardial deformation and late gadolinium enhancement can provide better risk stratification and guide treatment.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is one of the most common inheritable cardiomyopathies. Contemporary management strategies, including the advent of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and effective anticoagulation, have substantially improved the clinical course of HCM patients; however, the disease burden of HCM is still high in Korea. Sudden cardiac death (SCD), atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk, dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, and heart failure (HF) progression remain important issues in HCM. SCD in HCM can be effectively prevented with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. However, appropriate patient selection is important for primary prevention, and the 5-year SCD risk score and the presence of major SCD risk factors should be considered. Anticoagulation should be initiated in all HCM patients with atrial fibrillation regardless of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the first option. Symptomatic dynamic LVOT obstruction is first treated medically with negative inotropes, and if symptoms persist, septal reduction therapy is considered. The recently approved myosin inhibitor mavacamten is promising. HF in HCM is usually related to diastolic dysfunction, while about 5% of HCM patients show reduced left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, also referred to as “end-stage” HCM. Myocardial fibrosis plays an important role in the progression to advanced HF in patients with HCM. Patients who do not respond to guideline-directed medical therapy can be considered for heart transplantation. The development of imaging techniques, such as myocardial deformation on echocardiography and late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance, can provide better risk evaluation and decision-making for management strategies in HCM.

Anticoagulation in cardiomyopathy: unravelling the hidden threat and challenging the threat individually

Cardiomyopathy comprises a heterogeneous group of myocardial abnormalities, structural or functional in nature, in the absence of coronary artery disease and other abnormal loading conditions. These myocardial pathologies can result in premature death or disability from progressive heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, or other embolic events. The European Cardiomyopathy Registry reports a high stroke risk in cardiomyopathy patients ranging from 2.1% to 4.5%, as well as high prevalence of atrial fibrillation ranging from 14.0% to 48.5%. There is a growing interest in evaluating the risk of thromboembolism depending on the type of cardiomyopathy, as well as if anticoagulation is indicated in patients with cardiomyopathy without atrial fibrillation. Data available do not unequivocally support anticoagulation therapy in all of these patients; the management of these patients remains challenging. Many published reports pertaining to the risk of thromboembolism and consecutive treatment strategies mainly focus on single cardiomyopathy subtype. We summarize essential pathophysiological knowledge and review current literature associated with thromboembolism in various cardiomyopathy subtypes, providing recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation as well as clinical management strategies in this field. Certain cardiomyopathy subtypes require anticoagulation independent of atrial fibrillation or CHA2 DS2 -VASc score. Despite the scarcity of evidence regarding the choice of anticoagulation regimen (vitamin K antagonist vs. non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants) in cardiomyopathy, it is discussed and reviewed in this article. Each patient should receive a tailored strategy based on thorough clinical evaluation, published evidence, and clinical experience, due to the current recommendations mostly developed on small-sample studies or empirical evidence. The future research priorities in this area are also addressed in this article.

2021 Focused update of the 2017 consensus guidelines of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

The consensus of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been published in 2017 which provided useful clinical guidance for cardiologists, neurologists, geriatricians, and general practitioners in Asia-Pacific region. In these years, many important new data regarding stroke prevention in AF were reported. The Practice Guidelines subcommittee members comprehensively reviewed updated information on stroke prevention in AF, and summarized them in this 2021 focused update of the 2017 consensus guidelines of the APHRS on stroke prevention in AF. We highlighted and focused on several issues, including the importance of AF Better Care (ABC) pathway, the advantages of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for Asians, the considerations of use of NOACs for Asian patients with AF with single 1 stroke risk factor beyond gender, the role of lifestyle factors on stroke risk, the use of oral anticoagulants during the "coronavirus disease 2019" (COVID-19) pandemic, etc. We fully realize that there are gaps, unaddressed questions, and many areas of uncertainty and debate in the current knowledge of AF, and the physician's decision remains the most important factor in the management of AF.

Perceptions and knowledge gaps on CHA2DS2-VASc score components: a joint survey of Chinese clinicians and clinical pharmacists

BACKGROUND

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is a guideline-recommended stroke risk stratification scheme for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Accurately calculating the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and recognizing the stroke risk in AF patients is the foundation of optimal anticoagulation therapy. This survey aims to obtain a comprehensive understanding of perceptions and knowledge gaps on CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores among Chinese medical professionals for future education programs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among clinicians, including cardiologists, neurologists, emergency physicians (EPs), general practitioners (GPs) and clinical pharmacists (CPs) using a self-administered questionnaire on the Chinese mainland. The survey contained 21 questions in combination with single-choice questions, multiple-choice questions, and an open-ended question, which was distributed online via e-mail or social media.

RESULTS

A total of 562 participants (40.9% cardiologists, 19.2% neurologists, 8.5% EPs, 10.3% GPs, and 21.0% CPs) completed the survey. Most respondents across all specialties reported skills requiring improvements in the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. In general, cardiologists, neurologists, and CPs had a relatively better understanding than GPs and EPs about the application of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Considering 'H' and 'D' components, more than 90% of respondents chose the correct answer in single-choice questions, whereas the correctness rate declined concerning detailed scoring criteria. Regarding 'C,' 'A₂,' 'S₂,' and 'V' components, partly correct answers were commonly observed in most multiple-choice questions. The majority of cardiologists believed themselves to be very familiar or at least familiar with the score and its components, while around 70% of EPs and GPs felt relatively unfamiliar with the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. Mobile apps, AF guidelines and notebooks/handbooks were popular referencing scoring tools for respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Chinese medical professionals, especially EPs and GPs, revealed a lack of knowledge and insufficient skills for CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores and their components. Improvements in the awareness of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and its detailed scoring criteria are urgently needed for Chinese medical professionals. Therefore, education programs concerning the introduction of stroke risk evaluation for AF patients and the development of referencing scoring tools are necessary.

Perioperative Implications of the 2020 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Focused Review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a complex disease with significant implications for patients and the physicians called upon to care for them during the perioperative period. In this article, the 2020 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of pediatric and adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are reviewed, with a particular focus on perioperative considerations for the anesthesiologist.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Consensus Recommendations by the Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology on Strategies for Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk Management

The disease burden of AF is greater in Asia-Pacific than other areas of the world. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as effective alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with AF. The Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology developed this consensus statement to guide physicians in the management of AF in Asian populations. Statements were developed by an expert consensus panel who reviewed the available data from patients in Asia-Pacific. Consensus statements were developed then put to an online vote. The resulting 17 statements provide guidance on the assessment of stroke risk of AF patients in the region, the appropriate use of DOACs in these patients, as well as the concomitant use of DOACs and antiplatelets, and the transition to DOACs from VKAs and vice versa. The periprocedural management of patients on DOAC therapy and the management of patients with bleeding while on DOACs are also discussed.

Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?

Stroke prevention with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is the cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is crucial to assess the stroke and bleeding risks of individual AF patients to make appropriate decisions for OAC use and achieve optimal patient care. In this review, we provided an overview on the correct use of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and update important revisions about the definitions of some of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc components. Also, data about the biomarkers and potential roles of AF duration and left atrial functions in the prediction of stroke in AF were also discussed.

Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary.

Smoking Cessation after Diagnosis of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Stroke and Death

Limited data are available regarding the impact of smoking cessation after atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis on clinical outcomes. Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we included patients newly diagnosed with AF and categorized them into four groups as follows: (i) never smokers, (ii) ex-smokers, (iii) smoking cessation after AF diagnosis ("quitters"), and (iv) current smokers. The primary outcomes were incident ischemic stroke and all-cause death during follow-up. Fatal ischemic stroke and death from cerebrovascular events were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Among 97,637 patients (mean age, 61 years; mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, 2.3), 6.9% stopped smoking after AF diagnosis. The mean follow-up duration was 3.2 ± 2.0 years. After multivariable adjustment, quitters had lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR), 0.702; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.595-0.827) and all-cause death (HR, 0.842; 95% CI, 0.748-0.948) than current smokers. Quitters after AF diagnosis were associated with lower risks of fatal ischemic stroke (HR, 0.454; 95% CI, 0.287-0.718) and death from cerebrovascular events (HR, 0.664; 95% CI, 0.465-0.949) compared with current smokers. Quitting smoking may reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, the severity of ischemic stroke, and the incidence of cerebrovascular events in patients with new-onset AF.

Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly Population

Background

This study examines changes in the ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) status and whether these changes are associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in the elderly Asian population.

Methods and Results

In the Korea National Health Insurance Service–Senior cohort aged ≥60 years, 208 673 participants without prior CVD, including 109 431 who showed changes in CVH status, were assessed. The association of the changes in cardiovascular risk factors with incident CVD was assessed from 2004 to 2014 in the elderly (aged 60–74 years) and very elderly (≥75 years) groups. During the follow‐up period (7.1 years for CVD and 7.2 years for mortality), 19 429 incident CVD events and 24 225 deaths occurred. In both the elderly and very elderly participants, higher CVH status resulted in a lower risk of CVD and mortality. In the very elderly participants, compared with consistently low CVH, consistently high CVH (subhazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23–0.73) was associated with a lower risk of CVD. This trend was consistently observed in the elderly population. In the very elderly participants, total cholesterol level was not informative enough for the prediction of CVD events. In both the elderly and very elderly groups, body mass index and total cholesterol were not informative enough for the prediction of all‐cause mortality.

Conclusions

In both the elderly and very elderly Asian populations without CVD, a consistent relationship was observed between the improvement of a composite metric of CVH and the reduced risk of CVD. Body mass index and total cholesterol were not informative enough for the prediction of all‐cause mortality in both the elderly and very elderly groups.

Importance of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Sex Differences in the Prevention of Embolic Stroke in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Although atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-known risk factor for embolic stroke in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), there is a paucity of information derived from HCM patients who have experienced embolic stroke.

Methods and Results: From 141 consecutive HCM patients who had been hospitalized between 2000 and 2018, the clinical characteristics and management of 86 patients with AF were analyzed retrospectively. The incidence of embolic stroke was 36% (n=31 patients). The median (interquartile range) age of embolic stroke was younger in male than female HCM patients (71 [64–80] vs. 83 [77–87] years, respectively; P=0.009). The prevalence of paroxysmal AF (74%) was significantly higher than that of chronic AF (26%) in 31 patients with embolic stroke (P=0.007). The CHADS₂ score in patients with embolic stroke was not particularly useful in predicting the occurrence of embolic stroke.

Conclusions: One-third of HCM patients with AF developed embolic stroke, and male HCM patients were younger at the time of the embolic stroke than female HCM patients. The prevalence of paroxysmal AF was significantly higher than that of chronic AF in patients with AF and embolic stroke. Early introduction of anticoagulation therapy is recommended at the first documentation of paroxysmal AF.

Thromboembolism in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an inherited cardiac disease, which has a marked heterogeneity in clinical expression, natural history, and prognosis. HCM is associated with a high prevalence of thromboembolic events (stroke and systemic embolic events), even if taking no account of atrial fibrillation (AF), leading to unexpected disability and death in patients of all ages. Several risk factors of thromboembolism such as AF, greater age, left atrial diameter, heart failure and others have been confirmed in patients with HCM. Conventional thromboembolic predictive models were estimated by several trials in HCM population but it turned out to be unsatisfactory. Based on those previous explorations, researchers tried to modify or develop novel models suitable for HCM population in thromboembolism prediction. In consideration of catastrophic advent events of thromboembolism, current guidelines have recommended life-long anticoagulant therapy after a single short AF. Therefore, early identification of risk factors for thromboembolism, accurate risk stratification, timely preventive measures and aggressive management may help to avoid serious adverse thromboembolic events in HCM population.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases.

STRUCTURE

Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

Aim This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Structure Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: comparison of recent international guidelines

Stroke prevention is one of the cornerstones of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As part of the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway (A: Avoid stroke/Anticoagulation; B: Better symptom control; C: Cardiovascular risk and comorbidity optimisation), stroke risk assessment and appropriate thromboprophylaxis is emphasised. Various guidelines have addressed stroke prevention. In this review, we compared the 2017 APHRS, 2018 ACCP, 2019 ACC/AHA/HRS, and 2020 ESC AF guidelines regarding the stroke/bleeding risk assessment and recommendations about the use of OAC. We also aimed to highlight some unique points for each of those guidelines. All four guidelines recommend the use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk assessment, and OAC (preferably NOACs in all NOAC-eligible patients) is recommended for AF patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (males) or ≥3 (females). Guidelines also emphasize the importance of stroke risk reassessments at periodic intervals (e.g. 4-6 months) to inform treatment decisions (e.g. initiation of OAC in patients no longer at low risk of stroke) and address potentially modifiable bleeding risk factors.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonist (VKA) among patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/objectives: Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy is recommended for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) to prevent cardioembolic complications. In patients with non-valvular AF, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been proved to be non-inferior to adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (VKA). However, the role of DOACs in patients with AF in the setting of HCM has not been fully established.Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted by searching for published articles indexed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through 1 May 2019. Eligible studies must start with recruitment of patients with AF in the setting of HCM who received either DOACs or VKA. The studies must follow them for the occurrence of ischaemic stroke. Hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) of developing ischaemic stroke between the two groups must be reported. Pooled HR was calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.Results: A total of three retrospective cohort studies with 4,418 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included into the meta-analysis. A significantly lower risk of all-cause death was observed in the DOACs group than in the VKA group with the pooled HR of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.58, I² = 0%). However, the risk of ischaemic stroke among patients with AF and HCM who received DOACs was not significantly different from those who received VKA with the pooled HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.73-1.22, I² = 0%). Both major bleeding and intracranial bleeding were also not significantly different between those who received DOACs versus those who received VKA with the pooled HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.26, I² = 0%) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.27-1.37, I² = 0%), respectively.Conclusions: The current study found that the risk of all-cause death was significantly reduced but the risk of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding were not significantly different between patients with AF and HCM who had received DOACs and those who received VKA.

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation: A review

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with a prevalence of 23% and incidence of 3.1%. The risk of thromboembolism is high in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy regardless of CHADS₂-VASc score. This review includes 5 observational studies that focused on prevention of thromboembolism in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. The studies evaluated and compared outcomes between patients receiving either warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants. Data showed that direct oral anticoagulants are effective and safe in this patient population and may have a benefit over warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. Because of the high risk of thromboembolism, lifelong anticoagulation with warfarin is recommended to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The available observational data reviewed suggest that direct oral anticoagulants may be safe and effective in this patient population. However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Several studies have explored the use of NOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF); and therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs with VKAs in this population. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases until August 5, 2019 for studies that compared the effect of NOACs with VKAs in patients with HCM and AF. The risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. A total of four observational studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, compared with VKAs use, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of ischemic stroke (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.69), all-cause death (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77). There were no differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism, major or clinically relevant bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with NOACs versus VKAs. Re-analyses with a fixed-effects model produced the similar results as the main analyses. For the efficacy and safety outcomes, comparisons of NOACs versus warfarin produced the similar results as those of NOACs versus VKAs. Based on current data from observational studies, compared with VKAs, NOACs had similar or lower risks of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with HCM and AF.

Current Anticoagulant Usage Patterns and Determinants in Korean Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is influenced by many factors. Using a contemporary registry, we evaluated variables associated with the use of warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (OACs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the prospective multicenter CODE-AF registry, 10529 patients with AF were evaluated. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with the use of anticoagulants.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 66.9±14.4 years, and 64.9% were men. The mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2.6±1.7 and 1.8±1.1, respectively. In patients with high stroke risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥2), OACs were used in 83.2%, including direct OAC in 68.8%. The most important factors for non-OAC treatment were end-stage renal disease [odds ratio (OR) 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.40], myocardial infarct (OR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.40-0.72), and major bleeding (OR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.39-0.84). Female sex (OR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.21-1.61), cancer (OR 1.78; 95% CI: 1.38-2.29), and smoking (OR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.15-2.24) were factors favoring direct OAC use over warfarin. Among patients receiving OACs, the rate of combined antiplatelet agents was 7.8%. However, 73.6% of patients did not have any indication for a combination of antiplatelet agents.

CONCLUSION

Renal disease and history of valvular heart disease were associated with warfarin use, while cancer and smoking status were associated with direct OAC use in high stroke risk patients. The combination of antiplatelet agents with OAC was prescribed in 73.6% of patients without definite indications recommended by guidelines.

Targeted Medical Therapies for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has changed considerably over the years, although molecular therapies targeting core mechanisms of the disease are still lacking. This review provides an overview of the contemporary medical approach to patients with HCM, and of promising novel developments hopefully soon to enter the clinical arena.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our perception of therapeutic targets for medical therapy in HCM is rapidly evolving. Novel approaches include myocardial metabolic modulation, late sodium current inhibition, and allosteric myosin inhibition, actively pursued to reduce and hopefully prevent the development of severe HCM phenotypes, improve symptom control, and preserve patients from disease-related complications. Clinical management of patients with HCM should be guided by in-depth knowledge of the complex mechanisms at the energetic, metabolic, and electrophysiologic level. Until new experimental therapies become available, tailored management of modifiable disease manifestations should be pursued, including lifestyle counseling and prevention of comorbidities.

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Focus on Antithrombotic Management

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), increasingly common in the aging population, are closely related and commonly found together. This article explores the relationship between AF and HF and the thromboembolic effect of these diseases. Morbidity and mortality are increased when the 2 conditions are seen together. Stroke risks are significant with AF and all subtypes of HF. This article suggests that all patients with AF and HF should be considered for anticoagulation. Current evidence suggests that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are effective and safe in AF and HF in comparison with warfarin.

Thromboembolic Outcomes of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review

Objective

Limited data is available assessing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulation (AC) strategies for prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In this systematic review, we conducted a literature search to examine the possible association between different AC strategies and prevention of these adverse outcomes.

Methods

Scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched using relevant medical subject headings and keywords to retrieve studies published through September of 2019. Studies assessing the outcomes of interest in patients with HCM and AF receiving AC, no AC as well as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were selected.

Results

This review identified 14 observational studies evaluating thromboembolic events by AC strategies in 8,479 participants with concomitant HCM and AF. The use of AC was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of total thromboembolic events at 9.5% (112 events in 1,175 patients) compared to 22.1% with no AC (108 events in 489 patients). In addition, the use of DOACs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of thromboembolic events at 4.7% (169 events in 3,576 patients) compared to 8.7% with VKAs (281 events in 3,239 patients). Furthermore, the use of DOACs compared to VKAs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of major bleeding and all-cause mortality at 3.8% (136 events in 3,576 patients) versus 6.8% (220 events in 3,239 patients) and 4.1% (124 events in 3,008 patients) versus 16.1% (384 events in 2,380 patients), respectively.

Conclusions

AC of patients with concomitant HCM and AF was associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events when compared to antiplatelet therapy or no treatment. Treatment with DOACs was also associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality when compared to VKAs.