Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and cancer outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Revisiting the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes: new insights from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and the risk of neoplasm in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

Literature retrieval was conducted using databases from inception to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT-2i with placebo or other treatments in patients with T2D, and with reports of neoplasm events were included. Results were computed as the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 53 RCTs with 126,232 participants were included. No significant differences were found for the risk of overall neoplasm (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.19, I2 = 23%) in patients with SGLT-2i treatment compared with non-users. However, decreased risk of pulmonary neoplasm (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.99, I2 = 0.0%) was observed in SGLT-2i users compared to non-users, while increased risk of prostate neoplasm in SGLT-2i users was found (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.47, I2 = 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with non-users, the use of SGLT-2i was not associated with the risk of overall neoplasm. However, pulmonary neoplasms were less frequent in SGLT-2i users, while an increased risk of prostate neoplasm was observed in SGLT-2i users compared to non-users.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021273681.

Breast Cancer Risk and Management in the Endocrine Clinic: A Comprehensive Review

OBJECTIVE

This review seeks to provide endocrine clinicians with a comprehensive analysis of breast cancer risk, diagnostic modalities and management strategies in women with endocrine disorders, with particular emphasis on the influence of metabolic factors such as diabetes and obesity, and the role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT).

DESIGN

The review examines a spectrum of endocrine disorders commonly encountered in clinical practice, including Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Types 1 (MEN1), 2 (MEN2) and 4 (MEN4), Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (PPGL), Acromegaly, Hyperprolactinaemia, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH), Turner Syndrome, alongside metabolic conditions such as diabetes and obesity and the effects of MHT. The review critically appraises each disorder's association with breast cancer risk, screening implications and therapeutic management.

PATIENTS

This analysis focuses on women with the aforementioned endocrine and metabolic disorders, assessing their specific breast cancer risk profiles, informed by the latest clinical evidence and molecular insights.

MEASUREMENTS

The review comprehensively evaluates current evidence-based approaches to screening, diagnostic accuracy and treatment in this patient cohort. Emphasis is placed on the metabolic derangements, hormonal influences and genetic predispositions that modulate breast cancer risk, providing disorder-specific recommendations for individualised care.

RESULTS

The findings indicate a significantly elevated breast cancer risk in patients with MEN1, necessitating early initiation of MRI screening by age 40. In MEN2, emerging evidence suggests that combining RET inhibitors with endocrine therapy may yield clinical benefits, although further research is needed to validate this approach. The breast cancer risk associated with MEN4 and VHL syndromes, while documented, remains less well-characterised, requiring further investigation. Diabetes and obesity are confirmed as major modifiable risk factors, particularly in postmenopausal women, where hyperinsulinemia and metabolic dysfunction contribute to increased incidence and poorer outcomes, notably in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The role of MHT, particularly combined oestrogen-progestogen therapy, is strongly associated with increased breast cancer risk, particularly for hormone receptor-positive malignancies, necessitating cautious use and personalised treatment planning. In contrast, oestrogen-only MHT appears to confer a reduced risk in women post-hysterectomy. For patients with PCOS, CAH and Turner Syndrome, while definitive evidence of elevated breast cancer risk is lacking, individualised screening strategies and careful hormone therapy management remain essential due to the complex interplay of hormonal and metabolic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The review highlights the need for personalised breast cancer screening and management protocols in women with endocrine and metabolic disorders. For high-risk groups such as MEN1 patients, early initiation of MRI screening is warranted. In women with diabetes and obesity, targeted interventions addressing hyperinsulinemia and metabolic dysfunction are critical to mitigating their increased cancer risk. The association between MHT and breast cancer underscores the importance of individualised risk stratification in hormone therapy administration, particularly in women with predisposing genetic or endocrine conditions. Enhanced surveillance tailored to the unique risk profiles of endocrine disorder patients will facilitate early detection and improve clinical outcomes. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to refine these associations and develop robust, evidence-based guidelines.

SGLT-2 inhibitors are beneficial in reducing the risk of thyroid cancer: findings from a Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have investigated the association between diabetes medications and thyroid cancer, but the results have not been conclusive. This study used a Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the causal relationship between diabetes medications and thyroid cancer (TC).

METHODS

Exposures were six major diabetes medications target, while outcomes were TC and its differentiated forms, including papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Mendelian randomization was conducted using IVW, MR-Egger, and weighted median methods. Tests for heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out were also performed.

RESULTS

In European populations, SGLT2 inhibitors were significantly negatively associated with TC (OR 0.051, 95% CI 0.006-0.465, P = 0.0082) as well as PTC (OR 0.034, 95% CI 0.003-0.411, P = 0.0079), while no correlation was found with FTC. These findings remained consistent even after applying the Bonferroni correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors could be potential therapeutic targets for TC, especially for PTC, in European populations. However, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to verify their ability to reduce the risk of and treat these types of cancer.

Exploring the Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cancer: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Opportunities

Cancer cells utilize larger amounts of glucose than their normal counterparts, and the expression of GLUT transporters is a known diagnostic target and a prognostic factor for many cancers. Recent evidence has shown that sodium-glucose transporters are also expressed in different types of cancer, and SGLT2 has raised particular interest because of the current availability of anti-diabetic drugs that block SGLT2 in the kidney, which could be readily re-purposed for the treatment of cancer. The aim of this article is to perform a narrative review of the existing literature and a critical appraisal of the evidence for a role of SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment and prevention of cancer. SGLT2 inhibitors block Na-dependent glucose uptake in the proximal kidney tubules, leading to glycosuria and the improvement of blood glucose levels and insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients. They also have a series of systemic effects, including reduced blood pressure, weight loss, and reduced inflammation, which also make them effective for heart failure and kidney disease. Epidemiological evidence in diabetic patients suggests that individuals treated with SGLT2 inhibitors may have a lower incidence and better outcomes of cancer. These studies are confirmed by pre-clinical evidence of an effect of SGLT2 inhibitors against cancer in xenograft and genetically engineered models, as well as by in vitro mechanistic studies. The action of SGLT2 inhibitors in cancer can be mediated by the direct inhibition of glucose uptake in cancer cells, as well as by systemic effects. In conclusion, there is evidence suggesting a potential role of SGLT2 inhibitors against different types of cancer. The most convincing evidence exists for lung and breast adenocarcinomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer. Several ongoing clinical trials will provide more information on the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors against cancer.

A comprehensive review of the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin

INTRODUCTION

Ertugliflozin is the fourth sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor approved by the US FDA in 2017 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AREAS COVERED

The main purpose of this review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. We conducted a search of relevant literature on ertugliflozin in the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to 22 October 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Ertugliflozin reduces the incidence of composite renal endpoints, maintain eGFR, and decreases urine albumin to creatinine ratio. Cardiovascular effects of ertugliflozin are primarily demonstrated in the VERTIS CV trial. However, the cardiovascular benefits of ertugliflozin are inferior to those of empagliflozin or canagliflozin. Ertugliflozin had non-significant impact on major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); ertugliflozin did reduce the risk of HHF, including in elderly population. Notably, ertugliflozin did not significantly reduce NT-proBNP levels in heart failure patients, while it decreased the incidence of persistent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation events. Ertugliflozin may be beneficial for ocular diseases or neurodegenerative diseases. Adverse events associated with ertugliflozin are similar to those of previously approved SGLT2 inhibitors, although it is associated with a higher overall risk of cancer, especially renal cancer.

Relationship between SGLT2 inhibitor use and specific cancer types: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: The study aimed to explore the incidence of cancer as an adverse event to SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) use in Type 2 diabetes.Materials & methods: The study followed PRISMA guidelines to pool RCTs conforming the inclusion criteria. Random effects model was used to pool risk ratios.Results & conclusion: After reviewing 19 studies, the analysis suggested a possible increased risk of reproductive, breast, thyroid, hematologic/lymphatic, urinary, skin and skeletal cancers with SGLT2i use. Conversely, lower incidences of respiratory and cardiovascular cancers were noted. However, these associations lacked statistical significance. Caution is advised in using SGLT2i due to potential cancer risks, especially in diabetic patients prone to cancer. More RCTs are essential due to limited research in this area.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and renal cancer in the US FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests an association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and a higher risk of renal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the disproportionate association between SGLT2 inhibitors and renal cancer.

METHODS

We used AERSMine to mine data from FAERS, covering the period from 2014 Q1 to 2023 Q3. The control group was treated with other glucose-lowering medications (ATC-A10B). Disproportionality analysis results were performed using a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and an information component (IC) with 95% credible interval.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the SGLT2 inhibitor group had a higher disproportionate renal cancer reporting frequency (0.92 vs 0.27/1000 reports; PRR 3.38; 95% CI 2.68-4.25; p < 0.001) with an IC of 1.36 (0.60-2.06), comprising dapagliflozin (PRR 4.14; 2.95-5.80; p < 0.001), empagliflozin (PRR 2.74; 1.94-3.89; p < 0.001), and canagliflozin (PRR 3.56; 2.48-5.12; p < 0.001). Consistent results were obtained in the diabetes indication with the primary outcomes only for the SGLT2 inhibitors group (not individual molecule). The results of the sensitivity analysis (excluding hypertension indication or antihypertensive drugs, obesity, smoking, alpha-1 blockers, or anti-renal cancer drugs) were highly consistent with the main outcomes, indicating good robustness of the results. The results from 2004 Q1 to 2023 Q3 were similar to those from 2014 Q1 to 2023 Q3, with the exception of empagliflozin.

CONCLUSION

There was a disproportionate association between SGLT2 inhibitors and renal cancer, which supports the current meta-analysis results indicating an increased risk of renal cancer associated with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Anti-Diabetic Therapies and Cancer: From Bench to Bedside

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant risk factor for various cancers, with the impact of anti-diabetic therapies on cancer progression differing across malignancies. Among these therapies, metformin has gained attention for its potential anti-cancer effects, primarily through modulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (AMPK/mTOR) pathway and the induction of autophagy. Beyond metformin, other conventional anti-diabetic treatments, such as insulin, sulfonylureas (SUs), pioglitazone, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, have also been examined for their roles in cancer biology, though findings are often inconclusive. More recently, novel medications, like glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, have revolutionized DM management by not only improving glycemic control but also delivering substantial cardiovascular and renal benefits. Given their diverse metabolic effects, including anti-obesogenic properties, these novel agents are now under meticulous investigation for their potential influence on tumorigenesis and cancer advancement. This review aims to offer a comprehensive exploration of the evolving landscape of glucose-lowering treatments and their implications in cancer biology. It critically evaluates experimental evidence surrounding the molecular mechanisms by which these medications may modulate oncogenic signaling pathways and reshape the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, it assesses translational research and clinical trials to gauge the practical relevance of these findings in real-world settings. Finally, it explores the potential of anti-diabetic medications as adjuncts in cancer treatment, particularly in enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy, minimizing toxicity, and addressing resistance within the framework of immunotherapy.

Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with incident cancer

AIM

It remains unknown whether sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) could be associated with incident cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed individuals having diabetes and newly prescribed SGLT2i or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) in a large-scale epidemiological database. The primary outcome was the incidence of cancer. A propensity score matching algorithm was employed to compare the subsequent development of cancer between the SGLT2i and DPP4i groups.

RESULTS

After 1:2 propensity score matching, 26,823 individuals (8,941 SGLT2i, 17,882 DPP4i) were analyzed. During the mean follow-up duration of 2.0 ± 1.6 years, 1,076 individuals developed cancer. SGLT2i administration was associated with a reduced risk of cancer (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.70-0.91). Particularly, SGLT2i administration was related to a lower risk of colorectal cancer (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.50-0.998). Our primary findings remained consistent across various sensitivity analyses, including overlap weighting analysis (HR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.66-0.94), inverse probability of treatment weighting 0.75 (95 % CI 0.65-0.86), and induction period settings 0.78 (95 % CI 0.65-0.93). The risk of developing cancer was comparable among individual SGLT2is (P-value of 0.1738).

CONCLUSION

Our investigation using nationwide real-world data demonstrated the potential advantage of SGLT2i over DPP4i in reducing the development of cancer in individuals with diabetes.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors During Cancer Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Ongoing Clinical Trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this paper is to summarize the data pertaining to the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines for cancer treatment. We discuss the potential efficacy of this class of medications, incorporating insights from existing literature and ongoing studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

SGLT2i are a class of medications which were initially developed for treatment of Type 2 diabetes and later extended to treat heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction regardless of diabetes status. There remains a need for effective and safe treatments to preventing cardiotoxicity in anthracycline-treated patients. It has been proposed that SGLT2i may provide protection against the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines. Some of the proposed mechanisms include beneficial metabolic, neurohormonal, and hemodynamic effects, renal protection, as well as a decrease in inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction and ion homeostasis. There is emerging evidence from basic science and observational studies that SGLT2i may play a role in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine the role of SGLT2 inhibitors as a cardioprotective therapy in patients receiving anthracyclines for the treatment of cancer.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on cancer has yet to be fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cancer.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to July 15, 2023, to identify eligible randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that lasted at least ≥24 weeks. The primary outcome was the overall cancer incidence, and the secondary outcomes were the incidences of various types of cancer. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method, fixed effects model, risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to analyze dichotomous variables. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the SGLT2 inhibitor type, baseline conditions, and follow-up duration. All meta-analyses were performed using RevMan5.4.1 and Stata MP 16.0.

RESULTS

A total of 58 publications (59 trials) were included, comprising 113,909 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or chronic kidney disease and/or high cardiovascular risk and/or heart failure (SGLT2 inhibitor group, 63864; placebo group, 50045). Compared to the placebo SGLT2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the overall incidence of cancer (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.94-1.08; p = 0.82). However, ertugliflozin did significantly increase the overall incidence of cancer (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.64; p = 0.04). SGLT2 inhibitors did not increase the risks of bladder or breast cancer. However, dapagliflozin did significantly reduce the risk of bladder cancer by 47% (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.81; p = 0.003). SGLT2 inhibitors had no significant effect on the risks of gastrointestinal, thyroid, skin, respiratory, prostate, uterine/endometrial, hepatic and pancreatic cancers. Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of respiratory cancer by 26% (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-1.00; p = 0.05). SGLT2 inhibitors (particularly mediated by dapagliflozin and ertugliflozin but not statistically significant) were associated with a greater risk of renal cancer than the placebo (RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

SGLT2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the overall risk of cancer or the risks of bladder and breast cancers. However, the higher risk of renal cancer associated with SGLT2 inhibitors warrants concern.

Applications of SGLT2 inhibitors beyond glycaemic control

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were initially developed for their glucose-lowering effects and have shown a modest glycaemic benefit in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the past decade, a series of large, robust clinical trials of these therapies have demonstrated striking beneficial effects for various care goals, transforming the chronic disease therapeutic landscape. Cardiovascular safety studies in people with T2DM demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. Subsequent trials in participants with heart failure with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects on heart failure outcomes. In dedicated kidney outcome studies, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the incidence of kidney failure among participants with or without diabetes. Post hoc analyses have suggested a range of other benefits of these drugs in conditions as diverse as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, kidney stone prevention and anaemia. SGLT2 inhibitors have a generally favourable adverse effect profile, although patient selection and medication counselling remain important. Concerted efforts are needed to better integrate these agents into routine care and support long-term medication adherence to close the gap between clinical trial outcomes and those achieved in the real world.

Type Disparity in Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Incidences of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Study

(1) Background: Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) have been reported to significantly reduce renal cell carcinoma (RCC) risk. However, the effect between individual SGLT2Is on RCC incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or heart failure is unclear. We conducted an observational analysis to explore type disparity in the prescription of SGLT2Is on RCC risk. (2) Methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study using the Health and Welfare Data Science Center database (2016-2021) was conducted. Patients aged ≥40 years who took SGLT2Is were designated as the SGLT2I group, whereas propensity score 1:1-matched randomly selected patients without SGLT2Is were assigned to the non-SGLT2I group. The primary outcome was the risk of incident RCC between individual SGLT2Is. Multiple Cox regression modeling was conducted to analyze the association between individual SGLT2I use and RCC risk. (3) Results: After a 5.5-year follow-up, SGLT2I use was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident RCC (hazard: 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.89). Compared with non-users and after adjusting for the index year, sex, age, comorbidities, concurrent medication, and the risk of developing RCC, the hazard ratios of dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and empagliflozin were 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.83), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.46-1.30), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56-0.90), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our data show a type-based effect of SGLT2Is on RCC risk. The type-based effect of SGLT2Is should be further studied for better clinical management information and for reducing RCC incidence in patients with T2D.

The Cardioprotective and Anticancer Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally approved for type 2 diabetes mellitus, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure, in patients with and without diabetes. An intriguing research area involves exploring the potential application of SGLT2 inhibitors in cardio-oncology, aiming to mitigate the cardiovascular adverse events associated with anticancer treatments. These inhibitors present a unique dual nature, offering both cardioprotective effects and anticancer properties, conferring a double benefit for cardio-oncology patients. In this review, the authors first examine the established cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure and subsequently explore the existing body of evidence, including both preclinical and clinical studies, that supports the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the context of cardio-oncology. The authors further discuss the mechanisms through which SGLT2 inhibitors protect against cardiovascular toxicity secondary to cancer treatment. Finally, they explore the potential anticancer effects of SGLT2 inhibitors along with their proposed mechanisms.

Antidiabetic Drugs in Breast Cancer Patients

Diabetes is one of the leading chronic conditions worldwide, and breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. The linkage between diabetes and its ability to increase the risk of breast cancer should always be analyzed in patients. This review focuses on the impact of antihyperglycemic therapy in breast cancer patients. Patients with diabetes have a higher risk of developing cancer than the general population. Moreover, diabetes patients have a higher incidence and mortality of breast cancer. In this review, we describe the influence of antidiabetic drugs from insulin and metformin to the current and emerging therapies, incretins and SGLT-2 inhibitors, on breast cancer prognosis. We also emphasize the role of obesity and the metastasis process in breast cancer patients who are treated with antidiabetic drugs.