Comparison of selective ETAand ETBreceptor antagonists in patients with chronic heart failure

Long-Term Effect of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism With Bosentan on the Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure: Primary Results of the ENABLE Trials

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the long-term effect of endothelin receptor antagonism with bosentan on the morbidity and mortality of patients with severe chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Endothelin may play a role in heart failure, but short-term clinical trials with endothelin receptor antagonists have reported disappointing results. Long-term trials are lacking.

METHODS

In 2 identical double-blind trials, we randomly assigned 1,613 patients with New York Heart Association functional class IIIb to IV heart failure and an ejection fraction <35% to receive placebo or bosentan (target dose 125 mg twice daily) for a median of 1.5 years. The primary outcome for each trial was clinical status at 9 months (assessed by the hierarchical clinical composite); the primary outcome across the 2 trials was death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Bosentan did not influence clinical status at 9 months in either trial (p = 0.928 and p = 0.263). In addition, 321 patients in the placebo group and 312 patients in the bosentan group died or were hospitalized for heart failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86 to 1.18; p = 0.90). The bosentan group experienced fluid retention within the first 2 to 4 weeks, as evidenced by increased peripheral edema, weight gain, decreases in hemoglobin, and an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, despite intensification of background diuretics. During follow-up, 173 patients died in the placebo group and 160 patients died in the bosentan group (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.16). About 10% of the bosentan group showed meaningful increases in hepatic transaminases, but none had acute or chronic liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Bosentan did not improve the clinical course or natural history of patients with severe chronic heart failure and but caused early and important fluid retention.

Fine-Tuning Tumor Endothelial Cells to Selectively Kill Cancer

Tumor endothelial cells regulate several aspects of tumor biology, from delivering oxygen and nutrients to shaping the immune response against a tumor and providing a barrier against tumor cell dissemination. Accordingly, targeting tumor endothelial cells represents an important modality in cancer therapy. Whereas initial anti-angiogenic treatments focused mainly on blocking the formation of new blood vessels in cancer, emerging strategies are specifically influencing certain aspects of tumor endothelial cells. For instance, efforts are generated to normalize tumor blood vessels in order to improve tumor perfusion and ameliorate the outcome of chemo-, radio-, and immunotherapy. In addition, treatment options that enhance the properties of tumor blood vessels that support a host’s anti-tumor immune response are being explored. Hence, upcoming anti-angiogenic strategies will shape some specific aspects of the tumor blood vessels that are no longer limited to abrogating angiogenesis. In this review, we enumerate approaches that target tumor endothelial cells to provide anti-cancer benefits and discuss their therapeutic potential.

Endothelin

The endothelins comprise three structurally similar 21-amino acid peptides. Endothelin-1 and -2 activate two G-protein coupled receptors, ETA and ETB, with equal affinity, whereas endothelin-3 has a lower affinity for the ETA subtype. Genes encoding the peptides are present only among vertebrates. The ligand-receptor signaling pathway is a vertebrate innovation and may reflect the evolution of endothelin-1 as the most potent vasoconstrictor in the human cardiovascular system with remarkably long lasting action. Highly selective peptide ETA and ETB antagonists and ETB agonists together with radiolabeled analogs have accurately delineated endothelin pharmacology in humans and animal models, although surprisingly no ETA agonist has been discovered. ET antagonists (bosentan, ambrisentan) have revolutionized the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, with the next generation of antagonists exhibiting improved efficacy (macitentan). Clinical trials continue to explore new applications, particularly in renal failure and for reducing proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. Translational studies suggest a potential benefit of ETB agonists in chemotherapy and neuroprotection. However, demonstrating clinical efficacy of combined inhibitors of the endothelin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase has proved elusive. Over 28 genetic modifications have been made to the ET system in mice through global or cell-specific knockouts, knock ins, or alterations in gene expression of endothelin ligands or their target receptors. These studies have identified key roles for the endothelin isoforms and new therapeutic targets in development, fluid-electrolyte homeostasis, and cardiovascular and neuronal function. For the future, novel pharmacological strategies are emerging via small molecule epigenetic modulators, biologicals such as ETB monoclonal antibodies and the potential of signaling pathway biased agonists and antagonists.

Role of the endothelin system in sexual dimorphism in cardiovascular and renal diseases

Epidemiological studies of blood pressure in men and women and in experimental animal models point to substantial sex differences in the occurrence of arterial hypertension as well as in the various manifestations of arterial hypertension, including myocardial infarction, stroke, retinopathy, chronic kidney failure, as well as hypertension-associated diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus). Increasing evidence demonstrates that the endothelin (ET) system is a major player in the genesis of sex differences in cardiovascular and renal physiology and diseases. Sex differences in the ET system have been described in the vasculature, heart and kidney of humans and experimental animals. In the current review, we briefly describe the role of the ET system in the cardiovascular and renal systems. We also update information on sex differences at different levels of the ET system including synthesis, circulating and tissue levels, receptors, signaling pathways, ET actions, and responses to antagonists in different organs that contribute to blood pressure regulation. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying sex differences in arterial hypertension can impact therapeutic strategies. Sex-targeted and/or sex-tailored approaches may improve treatment of cardiovascular and renal diseases.

Smooth muscle specific disruption of the endothelin-A receptor in mice reduces arterial pressure, and vascular reactivity and affects vascular development

AIMS

The role of vascular smooth muscle endothelin A receptors (ETA) in development and normal physiology remains incompletely understood. To address this, mice were generated with smooth muscle-specific knockout (KO) of ETA.

MAIN METHODS

Mice were homozygous for loxP-flanked exons 6-8 of the EDNRA gene (floxed) or were also hemizygous for a transgene expressing Cre recombinase under control of the smooth muscle-specific SM22 promoter (KO mice).

KEY FINDINGS

Genotyping at 17 days postnatal yielded a 10:1 ratio of floxed:KO mice. Smooth muscle actin staining of embryos at day E10.5 revealed increased tortuosity in dorsal aortae while E12.5 embryos had mandibular, vascular and thymic abnormalities. Mice surviving to weaning developed and bred normally. ETA KO mice aged 2-3 months manifested EDNRA gene recombination in all organs tested. Aortas from KO mice had a >90% reduction in ETA mRNA content, but no differences in ET-1 or ETB mRNA levels. Addition of 0.01-100 nM ET-1 to isolated femoral arteries from floxed, but not KO, mice dose-dependently decreased vessel diameter (up to 80% reduction in the presence of ETB blockade). Intravenous infusion of ET-1 into floxed, but not KO, mice increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) (by ~10 mm Hg). Telemetric analysis revealed decreased MAP in KO mice (reduced by ~7-10 mm Hg) when fed a high salt diet.

SIGNIFICANCE

Smooth muscle ETA is important for normal vascular, mandibular and thymic development and is involved in the maintenance of arterial pressure under physiological conditions.

The role of the paracrine/autocrine mediator endothelin-1 in regulation of cardiac contractility and growth

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a critical autocrine and paracrine regulator of cardiac physiology and pathology. Produced locally within the myocardium in response to diverse mechanical and neurohormonal stimuli, ET-1 acutely modulates cardiac contractility. During pathological cardiovascular conditions such as ischaemia, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure, myocyte expression and activity of the entire ET-1 system is enhanced, allowing the peptide to both initiate and maintain maladaptive cellular responses. Both the acute and chronic effects of ET-1 are dependent on the activation of intracellular signalling pathways, regulated by the inositol-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol produced upon activation of the ET(A) receptor. Subsequent stimulation of protein kinases C and D, calmodulin-dependent kinase II, calcineurin and MAPKs modifies the systolic calcium transient, myofibril function and the activity of transcription factors that coordinate cellular remodelling. The precise nature of the cellular response to ET-1 is governed by the timing, localization and context of such signals, allowing the peptide to regulate both cardiomyocyte physiology and instigate disease.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Endothelin. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.168.issue-1.

Clinical trials with endothelin receptor antagonists: what went wrong and where can we improve?

In the early 1990s, within three years of cloning of endothelin receptors, orally active endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) were tested in humans and the first clinical trial of ERA therapy in humans was published in 1995. ERAs were subsequently tested in clinical trials involving heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension, resistant arterial hypertension, stroke/subarachnoid hemorrhage and various forms of cancer. The results of most of these trials - except those for pulmonary arterial hypertension and scleroderma-related digital ulcers - were either negative or neutral. Problems with study design, patient selection, drug toxicity, and drug dosing have been used to explain or excuse failures. Currently, a number of pharmaceutical companies who had developed ERAs as drug candidates have discontinued clinical trials or further drug development. Given the problems with using ERAs in clinical medicine, at the Twelfth International Conference on Endothelin in Cambridge, UK, a panel discussion was held by clinicians actively involved in clinical development of ERA therapy in renal disease, systemic and pulmonary arterial hypertension, heart failure, and cancer. This article provides summaries from the panel discussion as well as personal perspectives of the panelists on how to proceed with further clinical testing of ERAs and guidance for researchers and decision makers in clinical drug development on where future research efforts might best be focused.

Avaliação da capilaroscopia usando Endotelina-1 como um marcador de ativação endotelial na lesão microvascular e úlceras cutâneas

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a presença da ET-1 em pacientes portadores de esclerodermia e a sua correlação com o nível de atividade da doença; verificar se os níveis de endotelina estão associados com o perfil clínico e de autoanticorpos da esclerodermia e, ainda, se há associação com lesão microvascular detectada pela capilaroscopia periungueal. MÉTODOS: Um total de 74 pacientes, sendo 37 portadores de esclerodermia e o restante controle, foram submetidos à dosagem de ET-1 por meio de teste de ELISA. Pacientes com esclerodermia foram analisados através de um questionário sobre características da doença e pesquisa de autoanticorpos. A gravidade da doença foi definida pelos critérios de Medsger e a doença microvascular foi acessada através de capilaroscopia periungueal. RESULTADOS: Dos 37 pacientes com esclerodermia três (8,1%) eram homens e 34 (91,89%) mulheres, com idade média de 48,97 ? 13,36 anos e tempo médio de doença de 42,54 ? 13,35 anos. Os valores da ET-1 nos controles foram de 0,41 a 5,65 pg/ml (mediana de 2,26 pg/ml) e nos com esclerodermia de 0,41 a 8.82 pg/ml (mediana de 0,41 pg/ml) com p de 0,0007. Não houve correlação com o tempo de doença, idade do paciente e com o nível de acometimento cutâneo. Não encontrou-se correlação entre nível de ET-1 sérica e gravidade da doença (p=0,13). Níveis maiores de ET-1 foram observados na forma de superposição (1,49 a 6,82 pg/ml). CONCLUSÃO: Os níveis de ET-1 em esclerodérmicos mostraram-se inferiores aos controles. Não houve associação dos níveis de ET-1 com as variáveis estudadas.

Tumor immune surveillance and ovarian cancer: lessons on immune mediated tumor rejection or tolerance

In the past few years, cancer immunotherapies have produced promising results. Although traditionally considered unresponsive to immune therapy, increasing evidence indicates that ovarian cancers are, in fact, immunogenic tumors. This evidence comes from diverse epidemiologic and clinical data comprising evidence of spontaneous antitumor immune response and its association with longer survival in a proportion of ovarian cancer patients; evidence of tumor immune evasion mechanisms and their association with short survival in some ovarian cancer patients; and finally pilot data supporting the efficacy of immune therapy. Below we will discuss lessons learned on the biology underlying ovarian cancer immune rejection or tolerance and we will discuss its association with clinical outcome. We will discuss the role of angiogenesis and the tumor endothelium on regulation of the antitumor immune response with a special emphasis on the role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the suppression of immunological processes, which control tumor progression and its unique crosstalk with endothelin systems, and how their interactions may shape the antitumor immune response. In addition, we will discuss mechanisms of tumor tolerance through the suppression or exhaustion of effector cells and how these could be countered in the clinic. We believe that understanding these pathways in the tumor microenvironment will lead to novel strategies for enhancing ovarian cancer immunotherapy.

Therapeutic potential of endothelin receptor modulators: lessons from human clinical trials

The endothelin system, and in particular endothelin receptors, are targets for therapeutic intervention in human diseases. Endothelin receptor antagonists have reached clinical use for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension, and are under clinical investigation for several other diseases, such as cancer, vasospasm or fibrogenic diseases. We review the molecules that have been evaluated in the main clinical trials, from the point of view of receptor selectivity and of their chemical characteristics which were important for efficacy in pulmonary hypertension. We will also discuss future use of antagonists to endothelin receptor(s) in several human diseases and what should be the necessary properties of the future molecules for efficacy in diseases where the presently tested molecules displayed suboptimal efficacy.

Endothelin B receptor, a new target in cancer immune therapy

The endothelins and their G protein-coupled receptors A and B have been implicated in numerous diseases and have recently emerged as pivotal players in a variety of malignancies. Tumors overexpress the endothelin 1 (ET-1) ligand and the endothelin-A-receptor (ET(A)R). Their interaction induces tumor growth and metastasis by promoting tumor cell survival and proliferation, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling. On the basis of results from xenograft models, drug development efforts have focused on antagonizing the autocrine-paracrine effects mediated by ET-1/ET(A)R. In this review, we discuss a novel role of the endothelin-B-receptor (ET(B)R) in tumorigenesis and the effect of its blockade during cancer immune therapy. We highlight key characteristics of the B receptor such as its specific overexpression in the tumor compartment; and specifically, in the tumor endothelium, where its activation by ET-1 suppresses T-cell adhesion and homing to tumors. We also review our recent findings on the effects of ET(B)R-specific blockade in increasing T-cell homing to tumors and enhancing the efficacy of otherwise ineffective immunotherapy.

Endothelin B receptor mediates the endothelial barrier to T cell homing to tumors and disables immune therapy

In spite of their having sufficient immunogenicity, tumor vaccines remain largely ineffective. The mechanisms underlying this lack of efficacy are still unclear. Here we report a previously undescribed mechanism by which the tumor endothelium prevents T cell homing and hinders tumor immunotherapy. Transcriptional profiling of microdissected tumor endothelial cells from human ovarian cancers revealed genes associated with the absence or presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Overexpression of the endothelin B receptor (ET(B)R) was associated with the absence of TILs and short patient survival time. The ET(B)R inhibitor BQ-788 increased T cell adhesion to human endothelium in vitro, an effect countered by intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) blockade or treatment with NO donors. In mice, ET(B)R neutralization by BQ-788 increased T cell homing to tumors; this homing required ICAM-1 and enabled tumor response to otherwise ineffective immunotherapy in vivo without changes in systemic antitumor immune response. These findings highlight a molecular mechanism with the potential to be pharmacologically manipulated to enhance the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy in humans.

Approach to patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 25 mm Hg, is not a diagnosis, but rather the physiologic consequence of the interaction between pulmonary blood flow, pulmonary vascular impedance, and downstream pulmonary venous pressure. The diagnosis and appropriate treatment of PH in patients with or without heart failure (HF) requires an understanding of the underlying pathogenesis, whether it be due to increased pulmonary venous pressure, increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), increased pulmonary blood flow, or a combination thereof. Furthermore, an explanation for the underlying cause must also be sought. For example, a rise in pulmonary venous pressure may relate primarily to an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in a patient with a known cardiomyopathy; however, it may be complicated by severe mitral regurgitation. Similarly, an increased PVR may reflect reactive changes in the pulmonary vasculature due to long-standing pulmonary venous hypertension, concomitant hypoxemia/hypercapnia, or it may be the harbinger of chronic thromboembolic disease. It is imperative that reversible causes of PH be considered. Although most often diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography, full hemodynamic characterization of PH requires right heart catheterization to measure biventricular filling pressures and PVR. Integration of invasive pulmonary hemodynamics with an assessment of right ventricular function is essential to appreciate the clinical and prognostic significance of PH of an individual patient. Right heart catheterization is not practically feasible in all patients with HF and PH; however, at a minimum it should be performed in patients with a Doppler-estimated pulmonary artery pressure greater than 60 mm Hg, those who present clinically with predominant right HF, significant mitral valve disease, and in particular, patients with impaired right ventricular function.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Dual endothelin receptor blockade acutely improves insulin sensitivity in obese patients with insulin resistance and coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Endothelin (ET)-1 is a vasoconstrictor and proinflammatory peptide that may inhibit glucose uptake. The objective of the study was to investigate if ET (selective ET(A) and dual ET(A)+ET(B)) receptor blockade improves insulin sensitivity in patients with insulin resistance and coronary artery disease.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Seven patients (aged 58 +/- 2 years) with insulin resistance and coronary artery disease completed three hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp protocols: a control clamp (saline infusion), during ET(A) receptor blockade (BQ123), and during combined ET(A) (BQ123) and ET(B) receptor blockade (BQ788). Splanchnic blood flow (SBF) and renal blood flow (RBF) were determined by infusions of cardiogreen and p-aminohippurate.

RESULTS

Total-body glucose uptake (M) differed between the clamp protocols with the highest value in the BQ123+BQ788 clamp (P < 0.05). The M value corrected by insulin was higher in the BQ123+BQ788 than in the control clamp (P < 0.01) or the BQ123 clamp (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the control clamp and the BQ123 clamp. Mean arterial pressure did not change during the control clamp, whereas it decreased during both the BQ123 (P < 0.01) and BQ123+BQ788 (P < 0.05) clamps. RBF increased and renal vascular resistance decreased in the BQ123+BQ788 clamp (P < 0.05) but not in the BQ123 clamp. There was no change in SBF in either clamp.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual ET(A)+ET(B) receptor blockade acutely enhances insulin sensitivity in patients with insulin resistance and coronary artery disease, indicating an important role for endogenous ET-1.

Clinical trials of endothelin antagonists in heart failure: publication is good for the public health

The failure of endothelin antagonists to show benefit in heart failure cannot be understood until all the clinical trials are fully published.

Acutely decompensated congestive heart failure: new therapies for an old problem

Acutely decompensated heart failure is a common presentation to US emergency departments, and represents a major and increasing proportion of health burden. In contrast to chronic heart failure, where there have been numerous advances in care and corresponding decreases in morbidity and mortality, outcomes of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure have remained relatively unchanged with an approximate 10% 30-day mortality and almost 40% 1-year rehospitalization rate. This is reflected in the relative paucity of guidelines for this condition.

Vasodilator Effect of Endothelin in Cutaneous Microcirculation of Heart Failure Patients

The heart failure syndrome is associated with a reduced vasodilatory capacity in cutaneous microvessels. The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that an altered activity of the endothelin system contributes to this reduction. The skin blood flow was recorded by laser Doppler flowmetry in patients with congestive heart failure and in age- and gender-matched controls without clinical signs of heart failure. The vessels were stimulated by iontophoretic administration of endothelin-1. The involvement of the endothelin(A) receptor was studied by co-administration of a specific antagonist; the role of the endothelin(B) receptor was studied by the administration of the selective agonist sarafotoxin 6c. The plasma levels of endothelin-1, C-reactive peptide and N-terminal-pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide were elevated in heart failure patients. Unexpected, endothelin-1 induced an endothelin(A) mediated vasodilation. In the heart failure group the dilation was reduced to less than half as compared to control. The response to local warming was reduced in parallel indicating that the attenuation of the response in the heart failure group can be explained by the general decline in vascular reactivity. The response to endothelin(B) receptor stimulation did not differ between the groups. The reduction in endothelin-1 responsiveness is paralleled by a general reduction in microvascular vasodilatory capacity, a phenomenon of increased vascular stiffness in the of heart failure subjects.