1
|
Beaudin J, Chouinard MC, Hudon É, Hudon C. Integrated self-management support provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:212. [PMID: 38867162 PMCID: PMC11167744 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02464-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More and more people suffer from concomitant chronic physical diseases and common mental disorders, calling for integrated self-management support in primary care. However, self-management support of chronic physical diseases and common mental disorders is not clearly operationalized by guidelines and is still conducted in silos by primary care nurses, especially in favour of chronic diseases. This study aims to better understand primary care nurses' experience of integrated self-management support for people with physical chronic diseases and common mental disorders. METHODS An interpretive descriptive qualitative approach was conducted with 23 primary care nurses from family medicine groups in Quebec (Canada). They were selected through purposive and snowball sampling methods to participate in an individual interview. Data were analysed using an iterative inductive and deductive analysis (Rainbow Model of Integrated Care and the Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) taxonomy). RESULTS Nurses' experience of integrated self-management support for people with CD and CMD was structured around: (1) elements of the approach; (2) clinical integration through prevention and health promotion; and (3) operationalization of integrated self-management support. Several elements deemed essential to integrated self-management support were identified. Nurses offered integrated self-management support through prevention of risk factors and promotion of a healthy lifestyle for physical chronic diseases and common mental disorders. Nurses' self-management support activities included education, action plans, monitoring, and many practical, psychological, and social support strategies. A model of integrated self-management support for primary care nursing is proposed to better understand its clinical integration. CONCLUSION This study presents clinical integration of self-management support and activities for people with physical chronic diseases and common mental disorders in primary care settings. Understanding integrated self-management support will help implement future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Beaudin
- Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada.
- Module des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Bd de l'Université, Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 2B1, Canada.
| | - Maud-Christine Chouinard
- Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7
| | - Émilie Hudon
- Module des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Bd de l'Université, Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 2B1, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raya-Tena A, Fernández-San-Martín MI, Martín-Royo J, Casajuana-Closas M, Jiménez-Herrera MF. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study of a psychoeducational group intervention for people with depression and physical comorbidity in primary care. ENFERMERIA CLINICA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2024; 34:108-119. [PMID: 38508236 DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a psychoeducational group intervention led by primary care (PC) nurses in relation to customary care to prevent the depression and improve quality of life in patients with physical comorbidity. DESIGN Economic evaluation based on data from randomized, multicenter clinical trial with blind response variables and a one-year follow-up, carried in the context of the PSICODEP study. LOCATION 7 PC teams from Catalonia. PARTICIPANTS >50 year-old patients with depression and some physical comorbidity: diabetes mellitus type 2, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or asthma. INTERVENTION 12 psychoeducational group sessions, 1 per week, led by 2 PC nurses with prior training. MEASUREMENTS Effectiveness: depression-free days (DFD) calculated from the BDI-II and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the Euroqol-5D. Direct costs: PC visits, mental health, emergencies and hospitalizations, drugs. Indirect costs: days of temporary disability (TD). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), cost-effectiveness (ΔCost/ΔDLD) and cost-utility (ΔCost/ΔQALY) were estimated. RESULTS The study includes 380 patients (intervention group [IG] = 204; control group [CG] = 176). 81.6% women; mean age 68.4 (SD = 8.8). The IG had a higher mean cost of visits, less of hospitalizations and less TD than the CG. The difference in costs between the IG and the CG was -357.95€ (95% CI: -2026.96 to 1311.06) at one year of follow-up. There was a mean of 11.95 (95% CI: -15.98 to 39.88) more DFD in the IG than in the CG. QALYs were similar (difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05). The ICERs were 29.95€/DLD and 35,795€/QALY. CONCLUSIONS Psychoeducational intervention is associated with an improvement in DFD, as well as a reduction in costs at 12 months, although not significantly. QALYs were very similar between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Raya-Tena
- Centre d'Atenció Primària Dr. Lluís Sayé, ABS Raval Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain; Línea d'Investigació en Biomedicina, Epidemiologia i Pràctica Clínica Avançada, Facultat de Infermeria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
| | - María Isabel Fernández-San-Martín
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain; Unitat Docent Multiprofesional, Gerència Territorial Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Martín-Royo
- Unitat Bàsica de Prevenció, Gerència Territorial Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Casajuana-Closas
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - María Francisca Jiménez-Herrera
- Línea d'Investigació en Biomedicina, Epidemiologia i Pràctica Clínica Avançada, Facultat de Infermeria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Felez-Nobrega M, Koyanagi A. Health status and quality of life in comorbid physical multimorbidity and depression among adults aged ⩾50 years from low- and middle-income countries. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2023; 69:1250-1259. [PMID: 36825661 DOI: 10.1177/00207640231157253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the clinical and functional significance of comorbid depression in physical multimorbidity in middle-aged and older adults and from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are lacking. AIMS This study aims to determine the association of comorbid depression in physical multimorbidity with health outcomes and quality of life among adults aged ⩾50 years from six LMICs. METHODS Cross-sectional, nationally representative data from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health were analyzed. DSM-IV Depression was based on past 12-month symptoms. Eleven chronic physical conditions were assessed. Health status was based on scales ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worse). The quality of life (8-item WHO Quality of Life) scale ranged from 0 (worse) to 100 (best). Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Data on 34,129 individuals aged ⩾50 years [mean (SD) age 62.4 (16.0) years; 52.1% females] were analyzed. Among people with physical multimorbidity, having comorbid depression was associated with significantly worse health status in terms of sleep/energy (β = 14.71: 95% CI [12.23, 17.20]), self-care (13.23: [8.66, 17.82]), pain/discomfort (13.03: [9.59, 16.47]), mobility (11.06: [6.91, 15.21]), cognition (10.41: [7.31, 13.50]), perceived stress (8.35: [4.71, 11.99]), interpersonal activities (7.81: [3.71, 11.91]), and lower quality of life (-8.81: [-10.74, -6.88]). CONCLUSIONS Comorbid depression in physical multimorbidity was associated with lower quality of life and poorer scores in multiple domains of health status. Treatment of depression in people with physical multimorbidity may potentially lead to better clinical outcomes, but future studies are needed to determine the most effective intervention to address this comorbidity in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireia Felez-Nobrega
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), ISCIII, Spain
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), ISCIII, Spain
- ICREA, Pg. Lluis Companys 23, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hynes DM, Thomas KC. Realigning theory with evidence to understand the role of care coordination in mental health services research. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2023; 26:55-61. [PMID: 37333504 PMCID: PMC10273861 DOI: 10.1177/20534345231153801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Current theoretical models intended to guide health services research and evaluation lack care coordination-its features and impacts. These aspects are critical for understanding the role of care coordination in healthcare use, quality, and outcomes. In this Focus article, we briefly review the well-known Andersen individual behavioral model (IBM) of healthcare use and the Donabedian health system and quality model (HSQM) together with recent practice-based evidence. We propose a new integrated theoretical model of healthcare and care coordination. The model can serve as a guide for future research to better understand the variation in care coordination services and delivery and its added value to improving mental health in different real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M Hynes
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
- Health Management and Policy Program, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, and Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Kathleen C Thomas
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Irwin KE, Callaway CA, Corveleyn AE, Pappano CR, Barry MJ, Tiersma KM, Nelson ZE, Fields LE, Pirl WF, Greer JA, Temel JS, Ryan DP, Nierenberg AA, Park ER. Study protocol for a randomized trial of bridge: Person-centered collaborative care for serious mental illness and cancer. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 123:106975. [PMID: 36307008 PMCID: PMC11033617 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience inequities in cancer care that contribute to increased cancer mortality. Involving mental health at the time of cancer diagnosis may improve cancer care delivery for patients with SMI yet access to care remains challenging. Collaborative care is a promising approach to integrate mental health and cancer care that has not yet been studied in this marginalized population. METHODS/DESIGN We describe a 24-week, two-arm, single-site randomized trial of person-centered collaborative care (Bridge) for patients with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression with psychiatric hospitalization) and their caregivers. 120 patients are randomized 1:1 to Bridge or Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) along with their caregivers. Researchers proactively identify individuals with SMI and a new breast, lung, gastrointestinal, or head and neck cancer that can be treated with curative intent. EUC includes informing oncologists about the patient's psychiatric diagnosis, notifying patients about available psychosocial services, and tracking patient and caregiver outcomes. Bridge includes a proactive assessment by psychiatry and social work, a person-centered, team approach including collaboration between mental health and oncology, and increased access to evidence-based psycho-oncology care. The primary outcome is cancer care disruptions evaluated by a blinded panel of oncologists. Secondary outcomes include patient and caregiver-reported outcomes and healthcare utilization. Barriers to Bridge implementation and dissemination are assessed using mixed methods. DISCUSSION This trial will inform efforts to systematically identify individuals with SMI and cancer and generate the first experimental evidence for the impact of person-centered collaborative care on cancer care for this underserved population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Irwin
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute of Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Catherine A Callaway
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Amy E Corveleyn
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Catherine R Pappano
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States of America
| | - Maura J Barry
- University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, ME, United States of America
| | - Keenae M Tiersma
- University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Zoe E Nelson
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States of America
| | - Lauren E Fields
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - William F Pirl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute of Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute of Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - David P Ryan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Andrew A Nierenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elyse R Park
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Cancer Outcomes Research and Education Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America; Mongan Institute of Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leung LB, Rubenstein LV, Jaske E, Taylor L, Post EP, Nelson KM, Rosland AM. Association of Integrated Mental Health Services with Physical Health Quality Among VA Primary Care Patients. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:3331-3337. [PMID: 35141854 PMCID: PMC9550947 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07287-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated care for comorbid depression and chronic medical disease improved physical and mental health outcomes in randomized controlled trials. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) across all primary care clinics nationally to increase access to mental/behavioral health treatment, alongside physical health management. OBJECTIVE To examine whether widespread, pragmatic PC-MHI implementation was associated with improved care quality for chronic medical diseases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study included 828,050 primary care patients with at least one quality metric among 396 VA clinics providing PC-MHI services between October 2013 and September 2016. MAIN MEASURE(S) For outcome measures, chart abstractors rated whether diabetes and cardiovascular quality metrics were met for patients at each clinic as part of VA's established quality reporting program. The explanatory variable was the proportion of primary care patients seen by integrated mental health specialists in each clinic annually. Multilevel logistic regression models examined associations between clinic PC-MHI proportion and patient-level quality metrics, adjusting for regional, patient, and time-level effects and clinic and patient characteristics. KEY RESULTS Median proportion of patients seen in PC-MHI per clinic was 6.4% (IQR=4.7-8.7%). Nineteen percent of patients with diabetes had poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c >9%). Five percent had severely elevated blood pressure (>160/100 mmHg). Each two-fold increase in clinic PC-MHI proportion was associated with 2% lower adjusted odds of poor glycemic control (95% CI=0.96-0.99; p=0.046) in diabetes. While there was no association with quality for patients diagnosed with hypertension, patients without diagnosed hypertension had 5% (CI=0.92-0.99; p=0.046) lower adjusted odds of having elevated blood pressures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Primary care clinics where integrated mental health care reached a greater proportion of patients achieved modest albeit statistically significant gains in key chronic care quality metrics, providing optimism about the expected effects of large-scale PC-MHI implementation on physical health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda B Leung
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd (111G), Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA. .,Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Lisa V Rubenstein
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Erin Jaske
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Edward P Post
- VA Ann Arbor, Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Karin M Nelson
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ann-Marie Rosland
- VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beaudin J, Chouinard MC, Girard A, Houle J, Ellefsen É, Hudon C. Integrated self-management support provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders: a scoping review. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:212. [PMID: 35918723 PMCID: PMC9344621 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01000-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To map integrated and non-integrated self-management support interventions provided by primary care nurses to persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders and describe their characteristics. DESIGN A scoping review. DATA SOURCES In April 2020, we conducted searches in several databases (Academic Research Complete, AMED, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Emcare, HealthSTAR, Proquest Central) using self-management support, nurse, primary care and their related terms. Of the resulting 4241 articles, 30 were included into the analysis. REVIEW METHODS We used the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care to identify integrated self-management interventions and to analyze the data and the PRISMS taxonomy for the description of interventions. Study selection and data synthesis were performed by the team. Self-management support interventions were considered integrated if they were consistent with the Rainbow model's definition of clinical integration and person-focused care. RESULTS The 30 selected articles related to 10 self-management support interventions. Among these, five interventions were considered integrated. The delivery of the interventions showed variability. Strategies used were education, problem-solving therapies, action planning, and goal setting. Integrated self-management support intervention characteristics were nurse-person relationship, engagement, and biopsychosocial approach. A framework for integrated self-management was proposed. The main characteristics of the non-integrated self-management support were disease-specific approach, protocol-driven, and lack of adaptability. CONCLUSION Our review synthesizes integrated and non-integrated self-management support interventions and their characteristics. We propose recommendations to improve its clinical integration. However, further theoretical clarification and qualitative research are needed. IMPLICATION FOR NURSING Self-management support is an important activity for primary care nurses and persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders, who are increasingly present in primary care, and require an integrated approach. IMPACT This review addresses the paucity of details surrounding integrated self-management support for persons with chronic diseases and common mental disorders and provides a framework to better describe its characteristics. The findings could be used to design future research and improve the clinical integration of this activity by nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Beaudin
- Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada.
| | - Maud-Christine Chouinard
- Faculté Des Sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite-d'Youville, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Ariane Girard
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, VITAM Research Center On Sustainable Health, 2601, Chemin de La Canardière (G-2300), Québec, Québec, G1J 2G3, Canada
| | - Janie Houle
- Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec À Montréal, case postale 8888, succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada
| | - Édith Ellefsen
- École des sciences infirmières, Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Québec, 3001J1H 5N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blackmore MA, Patel UB, Stein D, Carleton KE, Ricketts SM, Ansari AM, Chung H. Collaborative Care for Low-Income Patients From Racial-Ethnic Minority Groups in Primary Care: Engagement and Clinical Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:842-848. [PMID: 35139653 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess model impact and opportunities for improvement, this study examined collaborative care model (CoCM) engagement and clinical outcomes among low-income patients from racial-ethnic minority groups with depression and anxiety. METHODS Starting in 2015, the CoCM was implemented in seven primary care practices of an urban academic medical center serving patients from racial-ethnic minority backgrounds, predominantly Medicaid beneficiaries. Eligible individuals scored positive for depressive or anxiety symptoms (or both) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and PHQ-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-2 (GAD-2) and GAD-7 during systematic screening in primary care settings. Screening rates and yield, patient characteristics, and CoCM engagement and outcomes were examined. Clinical improvement was measured by the difference in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores at baseline and at 10-to-14-week follow-up. RESULTS High rates of screening (87%, N=88,236 of 101,091) and identification of individuals with depression or anxiety (13%, N=11,886) were observed, and 58% of 3,957 patients who engaged in minimally adequate CoCM treatment had significant clinical improvement. Nevertheless, only 56% of eligible patients engaged in the model, and 25% of those individuals did not return for at least one follow-up appointment. Being female with clinically significant comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms and having Medicaid or commercial insurance increased the likelihood of CoCM engagement. CONCLUSIONS CoCM can help engage vulnerable patients in behavioral health care and improve clinical symptoms. However, significant opportunity exists to advance the model's impact in treating depressive and anxiety disorders and decreasing health disparities by addressing engagement barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle A Blackmore
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Urvashi B Patel
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Dana Stein
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Kelly E Carleton
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Sarah M Ricketts
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Asif M Ansari
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| | - Henry Chung
- Montefiore Care Management Organization (Blackmore, Ricketts), Einstein College of Medicine (Patel, Chung), and Montefiore Medical Group (Ansari), Montefiore Health System, Yonkers, New York; CareMount Medical, Population Health (Stein), and Mantra Health (Carleton), New York City
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rosenfeld LC, Wang P, Holland J, Ruble M, Parsons T, Huang H. Care Management of Comorbid Medical and Psychiatric Illness: A Conceptual Framework for Improving Equity of Care. Popul Health Manag 2022; 25:148-156. [PMID: 35442788 PMCID: PMC9058884 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2021.0366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychiatric and medical comorbidities are common among adults in the United States. Due to the complex interplay between medical and psychiatric illness, comorbidities result in substantial disparities in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. There is, thus, both an ethical and fiscal imperative to develop care management programs to address the needs of individuals with comorbid conditions. Although there is substantial evidence supporting the use of care management for improving health outcomes for patients with chronic diseases, the majority of interventions described in the literature are condition-specific. Given the prevalence of comorbidities, the authors of this article reviewed the literature and drew on their clinical expertise to guide the development of future multimorbidity care management programs. Their review yielded one study of multimorbidity care management and two studies of multimorbidity collaborative care. The authors supplemented their findings by describing three key pillars of effective care management, as well as specific interventions to offer patients based on their psychiatric diagnoses and illness severity. The authors proposed short-, medium-, and long-term indicators to measure and track the impact of care management programs on disparities in care. Future studies are needed to identify which elements of existing multimorbidity collaborative care models are active ingredients, as well as which of the suggested supplemental interventions offer the greatest value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa C Rosenfeld
- Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Philip Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Hsiang Huang
- Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wulsin LR, Sagui-Henson SJ, Roos LG, Wang D, Jenkins B, Cohen BE, Shah AJ, Slavich GM. Stress Measurement in Primary Care: Conceptual Issues, Barriers, Resources, and Recommendations for Study. Psychosom Med 2022; 84:267-275. [PMID: 35067657 PMCID: PMC8976751 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Exposure to stressors in daily life and dysregulated stress responses are associated with increased risk for a variety of chronic mental and physical health problems, including anxiety disorders, depression, asthma, heart disease, certain cancers, and autoimmune and neurodegenerative disorders. Despite this fact, stress exposure and responses are rarely assessed in the primary care setting and infrequently targeted for disease prevention or treatment. METHOD In this narrative review, we describe the primary reasons for this striking disjoint between the centrality of stress for promoting disease and how rarely it is assessed by summarizing the main conceptual, measurement, practical, and reimbursement issues that have made stress difficult to routinely measure in primary care. The following issues will be reviewed: a) assessment of stress in primary care, b) biobehavioral pathways linking stress and illness, c) the value of stress measurements for improving outcomes in primary care, d) barriers to measuring and managing stress, and e) key research questions relevant to stress assessment and intervention in primary care. RESULTS On the basis of our synthesis, we suggest several approaches that can be pursued to advance this work, including feasibility and acceptability studies, cost-benefit studies, and clinical improvement studies. CONCLUSIONS Although stress is recognized as a key contributor to chronic disease risk and mortality, additional research is needed to determine how and when instruments for assessing life stress might be useful in the primary care setting, and how stress-related data could be integrated into disease prevention and treatment strategies to reduce chronic disease burden and improve human health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawson R Wulsin
- From the Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, and Cincinnati Veterans Administration Medical Center (Wulsin), Cincinnati, Ohio; Osher Center for Integrative Medicine (Sagui-Henson), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Health Psychology PhD Program (Roos), University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina; Center for Economic and Social Research (Wang), University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Department of Psychology, Chapman University, Center on Stress & Health, and Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care (Jenkins), University of California, Irvine; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (Cohen), San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology (Shah), Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (Shah), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta; and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (Shah), Decatur, Georgia; and Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Slavich), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Technology-Assisted Collaborative Care Program for People with Diabetes and/or High Blood Pressure Attending Primary Health Care: A Feasibility Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182212000. [PMID: 34831756 PMCID: PMC8618659 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The comorbidity of depression with physical chronic diseases is usually not considered in clinical guidelines. This study evaluated the feasibility of a technology-assisted collaborative care (TCC) program for depression in people with diabetes and/or high blood pressure (DM/HBP) attending a primary health care (PHC) facility in Santiago, Chile. Twenty people diagnosed with DM/HBP having a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥ 15 points were recruited. The TCC program consisted of a face-to-face, computer-assisted psychosocial intervention (CPI, five biweekly sessions), telephone monitoring (TM), and a mobile phone application for behavioral activation (CONEMO). Assessments of depressive symptoms and other health-related outcomes were made. Thirteen patients completed the CAPI, 12 received TM, and none tried CONEMO. The TCC program was potentially efficacious in treating depression, with two-thirds of participants achieving response to depression treatment 12 weeks after baseline. Decreases were observed in depressive symptoms and healthcare visits and increases in mental health-related quality of life and adherence to treatment. Patients perceived the CPI as acceptable. The TCC program was partially feasible and potentially efficacious for managing depression in people with DM/HBP. These data are valuable inputs for a future randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
|
12
|
Renwick S, Hookes S, Draycott T, Dey M, Hodge F, Storey J, Winter C, Sengupta N, Benjamin F. PROMPT Wales project: national scaling of an evidence-based intervention to improve safety and training in maternity. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:e001280. [PMID: 34675036 PMCID: PMC8532559 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In healthcare, there is increasing recognition of the importance of developing and testing strategies to scale effective interventions. The NHS long-term plan (2019) acknowledges that often a gold standard approach to a problem already exists somewhere within the NHS, however, it has not been replicated widely across the system. METHODS We describe the approach and process measures for national scaling of PROMPT (Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training) across 12 obstetric-led maternity units in Wales. PROMPT is an evidence-based training package for local maternity staff, previously associated with improvements in maternal and neonatal outcomes, reduction in litigation related to preventable harm and improved safety culture. PROMPT has previously been disseminated internationally using a train-the-trainer model. However, this has been associated with variations in uptake, fidelity and impact. In Wales, the project was supported by Welsh Government, and a structured scaling plan was developed, encompassing ongoing implementation support from a multi-professional team. RESULTS PROMPT was successfully implemented in all obstetric led units in Wales, with 326 local PROMPT facilitators trained, and 82.5%-100% of maternity staff attended a local PROMPT course in the first 15 months of the project (January 2019-March 2020). All training courses included evidence-based authentic elements, and 93% of courses in the first year (100/107) were supported by a national implementation team, providing coaching, implementation support and quality assurance. CONCLUSIONS Authentically scaling up complex interventions is a significant challenge. To replicate the improved outcomes demonstrated by PROMPT, intervention reach and fidelity must first be demonstrated.In this national scaling project, our scaling methodology led to the successful implementation of PROMPT across all health boards in Wales. Additionally, we demonstrated reduced variation in adoption, reach, timescale and intervention fidelity between maternity units with varying readiness for change, which had been difficult in two previous large-scale PROMPT implementation projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Renwick
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- PROMPT Maternity Foundation, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Hookes
- NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership Legal and Risk Services, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Madhuchanda Dey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - Frances Hodge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | | | | | - Niladri Sengupta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bodelwyddan, UK
| | - Fiona Benjamin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Renn BN, Johnson M, Powers DM, Vredevoogd M, Unützer J. Collaborative care for depression yields similar improvement among older and younger rural adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 70:110-118. [PMID: 34536286 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depressive disorders are among the most prevalent mental health conditions; however, significant barriers to treatment access persist. This study examined differences in depression outcomes between younger and older adults in a large-scale implementation demonstration of the collaborative care model (CoCM). METHODS Secondary data analysis of a longitudinal, observational implementation demonstration at eight primary care clinics across low-resourced rural or frontier areas of the Western United States. Seven of these clinics were federally qualified health centers. The sample consisted of 3722 younger (18-64 years) and older (65+ years) adult primary care patients diagnosed with unipolar depression. All participants received depression treatment via CoCM, which enhances usual primary care and makes efficient use of specialists by using a behavioral healthcare manager and a psychiatric consultant to support primary care providers. Clinics were followed for up to 27 months. Patients were followed until they completed treatment or dropped out. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) assessed depressive symptoms at baseline (enrollment) and at most follow-up contacts. The primary treatment outcome was a change between a patient's first and last recorded PHQ-9 scores. RESULTS Across both age groups, there was an average overall reduction of 6.9 points on the PHQ-9. Older adults demonstrated a greater decrease in depression scores of 2.06 points (95% CI -2.98 to -1.14, p < 0.001) on the PHQ-9 compared with younger adults. Estimates were robust when adjusting for gender, race, and clinic. CONCLUSIONS CoCM resulted in meaningful improvement in depressive symptoms across age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna N Renn
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Diane M Powers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mindy Vredevoogd
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jürgen Unützer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Practice Facilitation in Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care Settings: a Scoping Review. J Behav Health Serv Res 2021; 48:133-155. [PMID: 32458281 DOI: 10.1007/s11414-020-09709-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the contributions of practice facilitators in settings aiming to deliver integrated behavioral health and primary care. This scoping review identifies peer-reviewed articles that describe efforts to deliver integrated behavioral health care with the support of practice facilitators. Five databases were systematically searched to identify empirical and conceptual papers. Fourteen articles met the following inclusion criteria: (1) empirical studies evaluating the effectiveness of practice facilitation (n = 4), (2) study protocols that will test the effectiveness of practice facilitation (n = 2), (3) studies that included practice facilitators as part of a larger intervention without evaluating their effectiveness (n = 5), and (4) conceptual manuscripts endorsing practice facilitation for integrated care (n = 3). Practice facilitators can potentially support health systems in delivering integrated behavioral health care, but future research is needed to understand their necessary qualifications, the effectiveness of practice facilitation these efforts, and what study outcomes are appropriate for evaluating whether practice facilitation has been effective.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rojas G, Martínez P, Guajardo V, Campos S, Herrera P, Vöhringer PA, Gómez V, Szabo W, Araya R. A collaborative, computer-assisted, psycho-educational intervention for depressed patients with chronic disease at primary care: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:418. [PMID: 34419010 PMCID: PMC8380397 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03380-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression and chronic diseases are frequently comorbid public health problems. However, clinical guidelines often fail to consider comorbidities. This study protocol describes a cluster randomized trial (CRT) aimed to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative, computer-assisted, psycho-educational intervention versus enhanced usual care (EUC) in the treatment of depressed patients with hypertension and/or diabetes in primary care clinics (PCC) in Santiago, Chile. METHODS Two-arm, single-blind, CRT carried out at two municipalities in Santiago, Chile. Eight PCC will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio within each municipality, 4 PCC in each municipality) to the INTERVENTION or EUC. A total of 360 depressed patients, aged at least 18 years, with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Item [PHQ-9] scores ≥15, and enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Program at the participating PCC. Patients with alcohol/substance abuse; current treatment for depression, bipolar disorder, or psychosis; illiteracy; severe impairment; and resident in long-term care facilities, will be excluded. Patients in both arms will be invited to use the Web page of the project, which includes basic health education information. Patients in the INTERVENTION will receive eight sessions of a computer-assisted, psycho-educational intervention delivered by trained therapists, a structured telephone calls to monitor progress, and usual medical care for chronic diseases. Therapists will receive biweekly and monthly supervision by psychologist and psychiatrist, respectively. A monthly meeting will be held between the PCC team and a member of the research team to ensure continuity of care. Patients in EUC will receive depression treatment according to clinical guidelines and usual medical care for chronic diseases. Outcome assessments will be conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. The primary outcome will be depression improvement at 6 months, defined as ≥50% reduction in baseline PHQ-9 scores. Intention-to-treat analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION This study will be one of the first to provide evidence for the effectiveness of a collaborative, computer-assisted, psycho-educational intervention for depressed patients with chronic disease at primary care in a Latin American country. TRIAL REGISTRATION retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov , first posted: November 3, 2020, under identifier: NCT04613076 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graciela Rojas
- Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Avenida La Paz, 1003, Santiago, Chile. .,ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile. .,ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Imhay, Santiago, Chile. .,ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Nucleus in Social Development (DESOC), Santiago, Chile.
| | - Pablo Martínez
- grid.412248.9Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Avenida La Paz, 1003 Santiago, Chile ,grid.488997.3ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile ,grid.424112.00000 0001 0943 9683ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Nucleus to Improve the Mental Health of Adolescents and Youths, Imhay, Santiago, Chile ,grid.412179.80000 0001 2191 5013Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile ,Psicomedica, Clinical & Research Group, Santiago, Chile
| | - Viviana Guajardo
- grid.412248.9Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Avenida La Paz, 1003 Santiago, Chile ,grid.488997.3ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile ,Servicio de Psiquiatría, Hospital El Pino, Santiago, Chile
| | - Solange Campos
- grid.7870.80000 0001 2157 0406Escuela de Enfermería, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pablo Herrera
- grid.443909.30000 0004 0385 4466Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paul A. Vöhringer
- grid.412248.9Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Avenida La Paz, 1003 Santiago, Chile ,grid.488997.3ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile ,grid.412179.80000 0001 2191 5013Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile ,grid.67033.310000 0000 8934 4045Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA ,grid.67033.310000 0000 8934 4045Department of Psychiatry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Víctor Gómez
- grid.488997.3ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile ,grid.443909.30000 0004 0385 4466Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile ,grid.7870.80000 0001 2157 0406Programa de Doctorado en Psicoterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile y Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Wilsa Szabo
- grid.488997.3ANID, Millennium Science Initiative Program, Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile ,grid.412179.80000 0001 2191 5013Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile ,grid.443909.30000 0004 0385 4466Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile ,grid.7870.80000 0001 2157 0406Programa de Doctorado en Psicoterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile y Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ricardo Araya
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Health Services and Population Research, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jung A, Du Y, Nübel J, Busch MA, Heidemann C, Scheidt-Nave C, Baumert J. Are depressive symptoms associated with quality of care in diabetes? Findings from a nationwide population-based study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2021; 9:e001804. [PMID: 33753346 PMCID: PMC7986897 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated whether the presence of depressive symptoms among adults with diagnosed diabetes is associated with adverse quality of diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study population was drawn from the German national health survey 'German Health Update' 2014/2015-European Health Interview Survey and included 1712 participants aged ≥18 years with self-reported diabetes during the past 12 months. Depressive symptoms in the past 2 weeks were assessed by the eight-item depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), with PHQ-8 sum score values ≥10 indicating current depressive symptoms. We selected 12 care indicators in diabetes based on self-reported information on care processes and outcomes. Associations of depressive symptoms with those indicators were examined in multivariable logistic regression models with stepwise adjustments. RESULTS Overall, 15.6% of adults with diagnosed diabetes reported depressive symptoms, which were higher in women than in men (18.7% vs 12.9%). Adjusted for age, sex, education, social support, health-related behaviors, and diabetes duration, adults with depressive symptoms were more likely to report acute hypoglycemia (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.88) or hyperglycemia (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.37) in the past 12 months, long-term diabetes complications (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.55 to 3.39) as well as currently having a diet plan (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.29) than adults without depressive symptoms. Significant associations between depressive symptoms and other care indicators were not observed. CONCLUSIONS The present population-based study of adults with diagnosed diabetes indicates an association between depressive symptoms and adverse diabetes-specific care with respect to outcome but largely not to process indicators. Our findings underline the need for intensified care for persons with diabetes and depressive symptoms. Future research needs to identify underlying mechanisms with a focus on the inter-relationship between diabetes, depression and diabetes-related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Jung
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Public Health, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yong Du
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Nübel
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus A Busch
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christin Heidemann
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christa Scheidt-Nave
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Baumert
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee JK, McCutcheon LRM, Fazel MT, Cooley JH, Slack MK. Assessment of Interprofessional Collaborative Practices and Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes and Hypertension in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2036725. [PMID: 33576817 PMCID: PMC7881360 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Interprofessional collaborative practice (ICP), the collaboration of health workers from different professional backgrounds with patients, families, caregivers, and communities, is central to optimal primary care. However, limited evidence exists regarding its association with patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of ICP with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels among adults receiving primary care. DATA SOURCES A literature search of English language journals (January 2013-2018; updated through March 2020) was conducted using MEDLINE; Embase; Ovid IPA; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials: Issue 2 of 12, February 2018; NHS Economic Evaluation Database: Issue 2 of 4, April 2015; Clarivate Analytics WOS Science Citation Index Expanded (1990-2018); EBSCOhost CINAHL Plus With Full Text (1937-2018); Elsevier Scopus; FirstSearch OAIster; AHRQ PCMH Citations Collection; ClinicalTrials.gov; and HSRProj. STUDY SELECTION Studies needed to evaluate the association of ICP (≥3 professions) with HbA1c, SBP, or DBP levels in adults with diabetes and/or hypertension receiving primary care. A dual review was performed for screening and selection. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guideline for data abstractions and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations for bias assessment. Two dual review teams conducted independent data extraction with consensus. Data were pooled using a random-effects model for meta-analyses and forest plots constructed to report standardized mean differences (SMDs). For high heterogeneity (I2), data were stratified by baseline level and by study design. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes included HbA1c, SBP, and DBP levels as determined before data collection. RESULTS A total of 3543 titles or abstracts were screened; 170 abstracts or full texts were reviewed. Of 50 articles in the systematic review, 39 (15 randomized clinical trials [RCTs], 24 non-RCTs) were included in the meta-analyses of HbA1c (n = 34), SBP (n = 25), and DBP (n = 24). The sample size ranged from 40 to 20 524, and mean age ranged from 51 to 70 years, with 0% to 100% participants being male. Varied ICP features were reported. The SMD varied by baseline HbA1c, although all SMDs significantly favored ICP (HbA1c <8, SMD = -0.13; P < .001; HbA1c ≥8 to < 9, SMD = -0.24; P = .007; and HbA1c ≥9, SMD = -0.60; P < .001). The SMD for SBP and DBP were -0.31 (95% CI, -0.46 to -0.17); P < .001 and -0.28 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.14); P < .001, respectively, with effect sizes not associated with baseline levels. Overall I2 was greater than 80% for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICP was associated with reductions in HbA1c regardless of baseline levels as well as with reduced SBP and DBP. However, the greatest reductions were found with HbA1c levels of 9 or higher. The implementation of ICP in primary care may be associated with improvements in patient outcomes in diabetes and hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Livia R. M. McCutcheon
- Star Wellness Family Practice, St Luke’s Family Medicine Residency, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
- Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown M, Moore CA, MacGregor J, Lucey JR. Primary Care and Mental Health: Overview of Integrated Care Models. J Nurse Pract 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
A Roadmap for Institutionalizing Collaborative Care for Depression in a Large Integrated Healthcare System. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:839-848. [PMID: 33107004 PMCID: PMC7652957 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06102-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaborative models for depression have not been widely adopted throughout the USA, possibly because there are no successful roadmaps for implementing these types of models. OBJECTIVE To provide such a roadmap through a case study of the institutionalization of a depression care management (DCM) initiative for adult depression in a large healthcare system serving over 300,000 adults with depression. DESIGN A retrospective observational program evaluation. Program evaluation results are presented for those patients enrolled in the initiative from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. PARTICIPANTS Over a 4-year period, 17,052 patients were treated in the DCM program. In general, participants were women (76%), were Hispanic (47%), spoke English (84%), and were 51.1 ± 18.3 years old, the majority of whom were 30-64 years old (57%). INTERVENTION The collaborative care portion of the DCM initiative (DCM program) was implemented by a collaborative care team containing a treatment specialist, an assessment specialist, administrative staff, a primary care physician, and a psychiatry physician. MAIN MEASURES The main outcome measures were total score on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Outcomes were improvement (defined as at least 50% reduction in symptoms) and remission (defined as a PHQ-9 less than 5) of depression symptoms. Follow-up of depression symptoms was also collected at 6 months following discharge. KEY RESULTS The average course of treatment in 2018, after full implementation, was 4.6 ± 3.0 months; 62% of patients experienced improvement in symptoms, and 45% experienced remission of their depression at the time of discharge. These rates were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative care for depression can be institutionalized in large healthcare systems and be sustained with a specific, detailed roadmap that includes workflows, training, treatment guidelines, and clear documentation standards that are linked to performance metrics. Extensive stakeholder engagement at every level is also critical for success.
Collapse
|
20
|
Unützer J, Carlo AC, Arao R, Vredevoogd M, Fortney J, Powers D, Russo J. Variation In The Effectiveness Of Collaborative Care For Depression: Does It Matter Where You Get Your Care? Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:1943-1950. [PMID: 33136506 PMCID: PMC10846930 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that the collaborative care model for depression in primary care is more effective than usual care, but little is known about the effectiveness of this approach in real-world settings. We used patient-reported outcome data from 11,303 patients receiving collaborative care for depression in 135 primary care clinics to examine variations in depression outcomes. The average treatment response across this large sample of clinics was substantially lower than response rates reported in randomized controlled trials, and substantial outcome variation was observed. Patient factors such as initial depression severity, clinic factors such as the number of years of collaborative care practice, and the degree of implementation support received were associated with depression outcomes at follow-up. Our findings suggest that the level of implementation support could be an important influence on the effectiveness of collaborative care model programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Unützer
- Jürgen Unützer is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, in Seattle, Washington
| | - Andrew C Carlo
- Andrew C. Carlo is a senior fellow in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - Robert Arao
- Robert Arao is a research scientist in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - Melinda Vredevoogd
- Melinda Vredevoogd is a research program manager in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - John Fortney
- John Fortney is a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - Diane Powers
- Diane Powers is a research scientist in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| | - Joan Russo
- Joan Russo is an associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Miller CJ, Griffith KN, Stolzmann K, Kim B, Connolly SL, Bauer MS. An Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Team-based Collaborative Care in Outpatient General Mental Health Clinics. Med Care 2020; 58:874-880. [PMID: 32732780 PMCID: PMC8177737 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaborative Chronic Care Models represent an evidence-based way to structure care for chronic conditions, including mental health conditions. Few studies, however, have examined the cost implications of collaborative care for mental health. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct an economic analysis of implementing collaborative care in 9 outpatient general mental health clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN Analyses were derived from a stepped wedge hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. We conducted cost-minimization analyses from the health system perspective, incorporating implementation costs, outpatient costs, and inpatient costs for the year before collaborative care implementation and the implementation year. We used a difference-in-differences approach and conducted 1-way sensitivity analyses to determine the robustness of results to variations ±15% in model parameters, along with probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. SUBJECTS Our treatment group included 5507 patients who were initially engaged in care within 9 outpatient general mental health teams that underwent collaborative care implementation. We compared costs for this group to 45,981 control patients who received mental health treatment as usual at the same medical centers. RESULTS Collaborative care implementation cost about $40 per patient and was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient costs and a nonsignificant increase in outpatient mental health costs. This implementation was associated with $78 in cost savings per patient. Monte Carlo simulation suggested that implementation was cost saving in 78% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative care implementation for mental health teams was associated with significant reductions in mental health hospitalizations, leading to substantial cost savings of about $1.70 for every dollar spent for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. Miller
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| | - Kevin N. Griffith
- Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC), VA Boston Healthcare System
- Department of Health Law, Policy, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly Stolzmann
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
| | - Bo Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| | - Samantha L. Connolly
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| | - Mark S. Bauer
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hynes M. Beyond Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: 10 Steps to Better Control. Am J Lifestyle Med 2020; 15:434-440. [PMID: 34366742 DOI: 10.1177/1559827620943326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation includes risk factor modification beyond ablation, with lifestyle modifications including treatment of obesity through diet and moderate exercise being at the top of the list. Losing 10% of body weight if obese, a plant-based diet, exercise, maintaining systolic blood pressure below 130 mm Hg, treatment of sleep disorders and obstructive sleep apnea, stress management, and treatment of depression and anxiety should all be included in treatment. Maximizing evidence-based treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes is also paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijane Hynes
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Saldana L, Bennett I, Powers D, Vredevoogd M, Grover T, Schaper H, Campbell M. Scaling Implementation of Collaborative Care for Depression: Adaptation of the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC). ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2020; 47:188-196. [PMID: 31197625 PMCID: PMC6908762 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00944-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Tools to monitor implementation progress could facilitate scale-up of effective treatments. Most treatment for depression, a common and disabling condition, is provided in primary care settings. Collaborative Care Management (CoCM) is an evidence-based model for treating common mental health conditions, including depression, in this setting; yet, it is not widely implemented. The Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) was adapted for CoCM and piloted in eight rural primary care clinics serving adults challenged by low-income status. The CoCM-SIC accurately assessed implementation effectiveness and detected site variations in performance, suggesting key implementation activities to aid future scale-ups of CoCM for diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Saldana
- Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Holle Schaper
- Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA
| | - Mark Campbell
- Oregon Social Learning Center, 10 Shelton McMurphey Blvd, Eugene, OR, 97401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bowen DJ, Powers DM, Russo J, Arao R, LePoire E, Sutherland E, Ratzliff ADH. Implementing collaborative care to reduce depression for rural native American/Alaska native people. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:34. [PMID: 31931791 PMCID: PMC6958691 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4875-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of Collaborative Care on rural Native American and Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients. METHODS Collaborative Care was implemented in three AI/AN serving clinics. Clinic staff participated in training and coaching designed to facilitate practice change. We followed clinics for 2 years to observe improvements in depression treatment and to examine treatment outcomes for enrolled patients. Collaborative Care elements included universal screening for depression, evidence-based treatment to target, use of behavioral health care managers to deliver the intervention, use of psychiatric consultants to provide caseload consultation, and quality improvement tracking to improve and maintain outcomes. We used t-tests to evaluate the main effects of Collaborative Care and used multiple linear regression to better understand the predictors of success. We also collected qualitative data from members of the Collaborative Care clinical team about their experience. RESULTS The clinics participated in training and practice coaching to implement Collaborative Care for depressed patients. Depression response (50% or greater reduction in depression symptoms as measured by the PHQ-9) and remission (PHQ-9 score less than 5) rates were equivalent in AI/AN patients as compared with White patients in the same clinics. Significant predictors of positive treatment outcome include only one depression treatment episodes during the study and more follow-up visits per patient. Clinicians were overall positive about their experience and the effect on patient care in their clinic. CONCLUSIONS This project showed that it is possible to deliver Collaborative Care to AI/AN patients via primary care settings in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J. Bowen
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Diane M. Powers
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Joan Russo
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Robert Arao
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Erin LePoire
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Earl Sutherland
- Bighorn Valley Health Center, 10 4th Street W, Hardin, MT USA
| | - Anna D. H. Ratzliff
- University of Washington, A204, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Michal M, Eggebrecht L, Göbel S, Panova-Noeva M, Nagler M, Arnold N, Lauterbach M, Bickel C, Wiltink J, Beutel ME, Münzel T, Wild PS, Prochaska JH. The relevance of depressive symptoms for the outcome of patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: results from the thrombEVAL cohort study. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY 2020; 7:271-279. [PMID: 31922545 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Although depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC), the relevance of depression for the outcome of anticoagulated individuals is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We analysed data from the multicentre cohort study thrombEVAL (NCT01809015) investigating the efficacy of OAC with vitamin K antagonists. There was an independent study monitoring, and an independent review panel assessed the endpoints. Out of n = 1558 participants, information about depressive symptoms, as measured by the two-item screener of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2), was available in n = 1405 individuals. The mean follow-up period was 28.04 months, with a standard deviation of 11.52 months. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, baseline PHQ-2 sum score was a strong and robust predictor of clinically relevant bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.24; P = 0.011] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.18, 1.08-1.28; P = 0.001) independent of age, sex, high school graduation, partnership, clinical profile, intake of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and quality of OAC therapy. Individuals with clinically significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-2 ≥ 3) had a 57% increased risk for clinically relevant bleeding (fully adjusted HR 1.57, 1.08-2.28) and 54% greater risk for death (fully adjusted HR 1.54, 1.09-2.17). There was no association of depressive symptoms with thromboembolic events. For hospitalization, individuals with depressive symptoms (PHQ-2 ≥ 3) did not experience an elevated risk in the fully adjusted model (HR 1.08, 0.86-1.35; P = 0.52). CONCLUSION Assessment of depression by the PHQ-2 provided independent long-term prognostic information beyond common biomedical risk factors. These findings highlight the need for targeting depressive symptoms in the management of patients receiving OAC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Michal
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Lisa Eggebrecht
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Göbel
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Cardiology - Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Marina Panova-Noeva
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Nagler
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Natalie Arnold
- Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Lauterbach
- Department of Medicine 3, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Trier, Nordallee 1, 54292 Trier, Germany
| | - Christoph Bickel
- Department of Medicine I, Federal Armed Forces Central Hospital, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany
| | - Jörg Wiltink
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Manfred E Beutel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Münzel
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Cardiology - Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Philipp S Wild
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jürgen H Prochaska
- DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.,Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the role of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) in treating depression, focusing on findings from primary care-based studies and their implications for the PCMH. RECENT FINDINGS Pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and collaborative care are evidence-based treatments for depression that can be delivered in primary care and extended to diverse populations. Recent research aligns with the core components of the PCMH model. The core components of the PCMH are critical elements of depression treatment. Comprehensive care within the PCMH addresses medical and behavioral health concerns, including depression. Psychiatric and psychological care must be flexibly delivered so services remain accessible yet patient-centered. To ensure the quality and safety of treatment, depression symptoms must be consistently monitored. Coordination within and occasionally outside of the PCMH is needed to ensure patients receive the appropriate level of care. More research is needed to empirically evaluate depression treatment within the PCMH.
Collapse
|
27
|
Mongelli F, Georgakopoulos P, Pato MT. Challenges and Opportunities to Meet the Mental Health Needs of Underserved and Disenfranchised Populations in the United States. FOCUS (AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING) 2020; 18:16-24. [PMID: 32047393 PMCID: PMC7011222 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This article investigates the gap in access to and quality of mental health care in the United States. This work first discusses how minority populations are most affected by the treatment gap. It summarizes recent literature on the topic for better understanding the needs of psychiatrically underserved and disenfranchised populations and the causes of mental health disparities. It reviews some of the barriers to behavioral health care, including lack of insurance coverage, lack of community-based interventions, unequal access to evidence-based practices, stigma, mental health workforce shortages, and geographical maldistribution of providers. Second, it reviews opportunities to address these disparities. The article provides examples of effective interventions that researchers worldwide have already implemented to address the gap of mental health services within the collaborative care model and global mental health initiatives. Telepsychiatry and improvements in training of the mental health workforce are also listed as useful implementations to overcome the treatment gap for patients seeking mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Mongelli
- Institute for Genomic Health, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine (Pato), and Institute for Genomic Health (Georgakopoulos), SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Mongelli)
| | - Penelope Georgakopoulos
- Institute for Genomic Health, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine (Pato), and Institute for Genomic Health (Georgakopoulos), SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Mongelli)
| | - Michele T Pato
- Institute for Genomic Health, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine (Pato), and Institute for Genomic Health (Georgakopoulos), SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy (Mongelli)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bauer AM, Williams MD, Ratzliff A, Unützer J. Best Practices for Systematic Case Review in Collaborative Care. Psychiatr Serv 2019; 70:1064-1067. [PMID: 31451067 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Conducting systematic case reviews (SCRs) is a critical skill for psychiatrists leveraging their expertise to provide collaborative care in a primary care setting; however, there is little literature to guide best practices for executing an SCR. This column offers guidance to psychiatrists on best practices for conducting SCRs by drawing on experience from psychiatrists who teach collaborative care and who directly observe SCRs in established programs. Furthermore, it describes several common threats to successful SCR and presents potential solutions to assist programs in implementing indirect psychiatric care, an essential component of collaborative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Bauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Bauer, Ratzliff, Unützer); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Williams). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Mark D Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Bauer, Ratzliff, Unützer); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Williams). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Anna Ratzliff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Bauer, Ratzliff, Unützer); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Williams). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Jürgen Unützer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle (Bauer, Ratzliff, Unützer); Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Williams). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bosselmann L, Fangauf SV, Herbeck Belnap B, Chavanon ML, Nagel J, Neitzel C, Schertz A, Hummers E, Wachter R, Herrmann-Lingen C. Blended collaborative care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease improves risk factor control: Results of a randomised feasibility study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2019; 19:134-141. [PMID: 31564125 DOI: 10.1177/1474515119880062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk factor control is essential in limiting the progression of coronary heart disease, but the necessary active patient involvement is often difficult to realise, especially in patients suffering psychosocial risk factors (e.g. distress). Blended collaborative care has been shown as an effective treatment addition, in which a (non-physician) care manager supports patients in implementing and sustaining lifestyle changes, follows-up on patients, and integrates care across providers, targeting both, somatic and psychosocial risk factors. AIMS The aim of this study was to test the feasibility, acceptance and effect of a six-month blended collaborative care intervention in Germany. METHODS For our randomised controlled pilot study with a crossover design we recruited coronary heart disease patients with ⩾1 insufficiently controlled cardiac risk factors and randomised them to either immediate blended collaborative care intervention (immediate intervention group, n=20) or waiting control (waiting control group, n=20). RESULTS Participation rate in the intervention phase was 67% (n=40), and participants reported high satisfaction (M=1.63, standard deviation=0.69; scale 1 (very high) to 5 (very low)). The number of risk factors decreased significantly from baseline to six months in the immediate intervention group (t(60)=3.07, p=0.003), but not in the waiting control group t(60)=-0.29, p=0.77). Similarly, at the end of their intervention following the six-month waiting period, the waiting control group also showed a significant reduction of risk factors (t(60)=3.88, p<0.001). CONCLUSION This study shows that blended collaborative care can be a feasible, accepted and effective addition to standard medical care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the German healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Bosselmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany
| | - Stella V Fangauf
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany
| | - Birgit Herbeck Belnap
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany.,Center for Behavioral Health and Smart Technology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Jonas Nagel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany
| | - Claudia Neitzel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany
| | - Anna Schertz
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany
| | - Eva Hummers
- Department of General Practice, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany
| | - Rolf Wachter
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany.,Clinic and Policlinic for Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen Medical Center, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Smith SN, Almirall D, Prenovost K, Liebrecht C, Kyle J, Eisenberg D, Bauer MS, Kilbourne AM. Change in Patient Outcomes After Augmenting a Low-level Implementation Strategy in Community Practices That Are Slow to Adopt a Collaborative Chronic Care Model: A Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial. Med Care 2019; 57:503-511. [PMID: 31135692 PMCID: PMC6684247 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation strategies are essential for promoting the uptake of evidence-based practices and for patients to receive optimal care. Yet strategies differ substantially in their intensity and feasibility. Lower-intensity strategies (eg, training and technical support) are commonly used but may be insufficient for all clinics. Limited research has examined the comparative effectiveness of augmentations to low-level implementation strategies for nonresponding clinics. OBJECTIVES To compare 2 augmentation strategies for improving uptake of an evidence-based collaborative chronic care model (CCM) on 18-month outcomes for patients with depression at community-based clinics nonresponsive to lower-level implementation support. RESEARCH DESIGN Providers initially received support using a low-level implementation strategy, Replicating Effective Programs (REP). After 6 months, nonresponsive clinics were randomized to add either external facilitation (REP+EF) or external and internal facilitation (REP+EF/IF). MEASURES The primary outcome was patient 12-item short form survey (SF-12) mental health score at month 18. Secondary outcomes were patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression score at month 18 and receipt of the CCM during months 6 through 18. RESULTS Twenty-seven clinics were nonresponsive after 6 months of REP. Thirteen clinics (N=77 patients) were randomized to REP+EF and 14 (N=92) to REP+EF/IF. At 18 months, patients in the REP+EF/IF arm had worse SF-12 [diff, 8.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.59-13.18] and PHQ-9 scores (diff, 1.82; 95% CI, -0.14 to 3.79), and lower odds of CCM receipt (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.30-1.49) than REP+EF patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients at sites receiving the more intensive REP+EF/IF saw less improvement in mood symptoms at 18 months than those receiving REP+EF and were no more likely to receive the CCM. For community-based clinics, EF augmentation may be more feasible than EF/IF for implementing CCMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawna N Smith
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School
- Institute for Social Research
| | - Daniel Almirall
- Institute for Social Research
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan
| | | | - Celeste Liebrecht
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), US Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Julia Kyle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Daniel Eisenberg
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mark S Bauer
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Amy M Kilbourne
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School
- Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI), US Department of Veterans Affairs
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hoeft TJ, Wilcox H, Hinton L, Unützer J. Costs of implementing and sustaining enhanced collaborative care programs involving community partners. Implement Sci 2019; 14:37. [PMID: 30999936 PMCID: PMC6471861 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0882-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collaborative care is an evidence-based program for treating depression in primary care. We sought to expand this model by recruiting clinics interested in incorporating community partners (i.e., community-based organizations (CBO) and/or family members) in the care team. Seven sites implemented evidence-based collaborative care programs with community partners while collecting information on costs of implementing and sustaining programs. METHODS Sites retrospectively collected data on planning and implementation costs with technical assistance from study researchers. Sites also prospectively collected cost of care activities over a 1-month period once the program was implemented to determine resources needed to sustain programs. Personnel salary costs were adjusted, adding 30% for benefits and 30% for administrative overhead. RESULTS The programs implemented varied considerably in staffing, involvement of care partners, and allocation of costs. Total planning and implementation costs varied from $39,280 to $60,575. The largest implementation cost category involved workflow development and ranged from $16,325 to $31,375 with the highest costs in this category attributed to the most successful implementation among clinic-CBO programs. Following implementation, cost per patient over the 1-month period ranged from $154 to $544. Ongoing strategic decision-making and administrative costs, which were included in cost of care, ranged from $284 to $2328 for the month. CONCLUSIONS Sites implemented collaborative care through differing partnerships, staffing, and related costs. Costs to implement and sustain programs developed in partnership are often not collected but are crucial to understanding financial aspects of developing sustainable partnerships. Assessing such costs is feasible and can inform future partnership efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa J Hoeft
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA.
| | - Heather Wilcox
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA
| | - Ladson Hinton
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Jürgen Unützer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356560, Seattle, WA, 98195-6560, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sunderji N, Ion A, Zhu A, Perivolaris A, Rodie D, Mulsant BH. Challenges in conducting research on collaborative mental health care: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open 2019; 7:E405-E414. [PMID: 31201177 PMCID: PMC6579651 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to understand poor uptake of the Primary Care Assessment and Research of a Telephone Intervention for Neuropsychiatric Conditions with Education and Resources study (PARTNERs), a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a collaborative care intervention for people experiencing depression, anxiety or at-risk drinking. We explored primary care providers' experience with PARTNERs, and preferences regarding collaborative care models and trials. METHODS In this qualitative study, we interviewed primary care providers across Ontario who had participated in PARTNERs, using stratified sampling to reach high-, low- and nonreferring providers in urban and rural settings. We audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed the interviews between May and December 2017, collecting and analyzing data concurrently until achieving saturation. RESULTS We interviewed 23 primary care providers. They valued the unique availability of telephone-based coaching for patients but desired greater integration of the coach into their practice. They appreciated expert psychiatric recommendations but rarely changed their practices. Sites varied in organizational adoption and implementation of the study, including whether they designated a local champion, proactively identified eligible patients, integrated the study into existing workflows and reflected on (and revised) practices. These behaviours affected continuing awareness of the study and referral rates. INTERPRETATION Study uptake was influenced by the limited relationship between PARTNERs coaches and primary care providers, and variable attention to leadership, training and quality improvement as vital elements of collaborative care. Study designs focusing on implementation could promote reach and penetration of novel interventions in the practice setting and more successfully advance collaborative care implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadiya Sunderji
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Allyson Ion
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont
| | - Annie Zhu
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont
| | - Athina Perivolaris
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont
| | - David Rodie
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont
| | - Benoit H Mulsant
- Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Sunderji), St. Michael's Hospital; Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Rodie, Mulsant), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Waypoint Research Institute (Sunderji), Penetanguishene, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; School of Social Work (Ion), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Zhu), University of Toronto; Medical Psychiatry Alliance & Collaborative Care (Perivolaris), Telepsychiatry (Rodie) and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute (Mulsant), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Girard A, Ellefsen É, Roberge P, Carrier JD, Hudon C. Challenges of adopting the role of care manager when implementing the collaborative care model for people with common mental illnesses: A scoping review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:369-389. [PMID: 30815993 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
This review aimed to identify the main factors influencing the adoption of the role of care manager (CM) by nurses when implementing the collaborative care model (CCM) for common mental illnesses in primary care settings. A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 14 distinct interventions implemented between 2000 and 2017 in five countries. Two categories of factors were identified and described as follows: (i) strategies for the CCM implementation (e.g. initial care management training and supervision by a mental health specialist) and (ii) context-specific factors (e.g. organizational factors, collaboration with team members, nurses' care management competency). Identified implementation strategies were mainly aimed towards improving the nurse's care management competency, but their efficacy in developing the set of competencies needed to fulfil a CM role was not well demonstrated. There is a need to better understand the relationship between the nurses' competencies, the care management activities, the strategies used to implement the CCM and the context-specific factors. Strategies to optimize the adoption of the CM role should not be solely oriented towards the individual's competency in care management, but also consider other context-specific factors. The CM also needs a favourable context in order to perform his or her activities with competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Girard
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Édith Ellefsen
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pasquale Roberge
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,CHUS Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean-Daniel Carrier
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,CHUS Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bauer MS, Miller CJ, Kim B, Lew R, Stolzmann K, Sullivan J, Riendeau R, Pitcock J, Williamson A, Connolly S, Elwy AR, Weaver K. Effectiveness of Implementing a Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Clinician Teams on Patient Outcomes and Health Status in Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e190230. [PMID: 30821830 PMCID: PMC6484628 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) have extensive randomized clinical trial evidence for effectiveness in serious mental illnesses, but little evidence exists regarding their feasibility or effect in typical practice conditions. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of implementation facilitation in establishing the CCM in mental health teams and the impact on health outcomes of team-treated individuals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This quasi-experimental, randomized stepped-wedge implementation trial was conducted from February 2016 through February 2018, in partnership with the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Nine facilities were enrolled from all VA facilities in the United States to receive CCM implementation support. All veterans (n = 5596) treated by designated outpatient general mental health teams were included for hospitalization analyses, and a randomly selected sample (n = 1050) was identified for health status interviews. Individuals with dementia were excluded. Clinicians (n = 62) at the facilities were surveyed, and site process summaries were rated for concordance with the CCM process. The CCM implementation start time was randomly assigned across 3 waves. Data analysis of this evaluable population was performed from June to September 2018. INTERVENTIONS Internal-external facilitation, combining a study-funded external facilitator and a facility-funded internal facilitator working with a designated team for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Facilitation was hypothesized to be associated with improvements in both implementation and intervention outcomes (hybrid type II trial). Implementation outcomes included the clinician Team Development Measure (TDM) and proportion of CCM-concordant team care processes. The study was powered for the primary health outcome, mental component score (MCS). Hospitalization rate was derived from administrative data. RESULTS The veteran population (n = 5596) included 881 women (15.7%), and the mean (SD) age was 52.2 (14.5) years. The interviewed sample (n = 1050) was similar but was oversampled for women (n = 210 [20.0%]). Facilitation was associated with improvements in TDM subscales for role clarity (53.4%-68.6%; δ = 15.3; 95% CI, 4.4-26.2; P = .01) and team primacy (50.0%-68.6%; δ = 18.6; 95% CI, 8.3-28.9; P = .001). The percentage of CCM-concordant processes achieved varied, ranging from 44% to 89%. No improvement was seen in veteran self-ratings, including the primary outcome. In post hoc analyses, MCS improved in veterans with 3 or more treated mental health diagnoses compared with others (β = 5.03; 95% CI, 2.24-7.82; P < .001). Mental health hospitalizations demonstrated a robust decrease during facilitation (β = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.07; P < .001); this finding withstood 4 internal validity tests. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Implementation facilitation that engages clinicians under typical practice conditions can enhance evidence-based team processes; its effect on self-reported overall population health status was negligible, although health status improved for individuals with complex conditions and hospitalization rate declined. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Bauer
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher J. Miller
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bo Kim
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert Lew
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kelly Stolzmann
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Sullivan
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Health Policy, Law, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Riendeau
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Anthropology, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Jeffery Pitcock
- Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative Program, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock
| | | | - Samantha Connolly
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A. Rani Elwy
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kendra Weaver
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Williams MD, Asiedu GB, Finnie D, Neely C, Egginton J, Finney Rutten LJ, Jacobson RM. Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:92. [PMID: 30709349 PMCID: PMC6359857 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3916-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care coordination has been a common tool for practices seeking to manage complex patients, yet there remains confusion about the most effective and sustainable model. Research exists on opinions of providers of care coordination but there is limited information on perspectives of those in the insurance industry about key elements. We sought to gather opinions from primary care providers and administrators in Minnesota who were involved in a CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) transformational grant implementing COMPASS (Care Of Mental, Physical And Substance-use Syndromes), an evidence-based model of care coordination for depressed patients comorbid with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. We then sought to compare these views with those of private insurance representatives in Minnesota. METHODS We used qualitative methods to conducted forty-two key informant interviews with primary care providers (n = 15); administrators (n = 15); and insurers (n = 12). We analyzed the recorded and transcribed data, once de-identified, using a frameworks analysis approach. RESULTS We identified six primary themes: 1) a defined scope, rationale, and key partnerships for building comprehensive care coordination programs, 2) effective information exchange, 3) a trained and available workforce, 4) the need for a business model and a financially justifiable program, 5) a need for evaluation and ongoing improvement of care coordination, and 6) the importance of patient and family engagement. Overall consensus across stakeholder groups was high including a call for payment reform to support a valued service. Despite their role in paying for care, insurance representatives did not stress reduced utilization as more important than other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Primary care providers and administrators from different organizations and backgrounds, all with experience in COMPASS, in large part agreed with insurance representatives on the main elements of a sustainable model and the need for health reform to sustain this service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dawn Finnie
- Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Claire Neely
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Minneapolis, MN USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Linman S, Benjenk I, Chen J. The medical home functions of primary care practices that care for adults with psychological distress: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:21. [PMID: 30626378 PMCID: PMC6327378 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3845-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care practices are changing the way that they provide care by increasing their medical home functionality. Medical home functionality can improve access to care and increase patient-centeredness, which is essential for persons with mental health issues. This study aims to explore the degree to which medical home functions have been implemented by primary care practices that care for adults with psychological distress. METHODS Analysis of the 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component and Medical Organizations Survey. This unique data set links data from a nationally representative sample of US households to the practices in which they receive primary care. This study focused on adults aged 18 and above. RESULTS As compared to adults without psychological distress, adults with psychological distress had significantly higher rates of chronic illness and poverty. Adults with psychological distress were more likely to receive care from practices that include advanced practitioners and are non-profit or hospital-based. Multivariate models that were adjusted for patient-level and practice-level characteristics indicated that adults with psychological distress are as likely to receive primary care from practices with medical home functionality, including case management, electronic health records, flexible scheduling, and PCMH certification, as adults without psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS Practices that care for adults with mental health issues have not been left behind in the transition towards medical home models of primary care. Policy makers should continue to prioritize adults with mental health issues to receive primary care through this model of delivery due to this population's great potential to benefit from improved access and care coordination. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study does not report the results of a health care intervention on human subject's participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Linman
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Dr #2242, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| | - Ivy Benjenk
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Dr #2242, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| | - Jie Chen
- School of Public Health, University of Maryland, 4200 Valley Dr #2242, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grisham-Takac C, Lai P, Srinivasa M, Vasquez L, Rascati KL. Correlation of antidepressant target dose optimization and achievement of glycemic control. Ment Health Clin 2019; 9:12-17. [PMID: 30627498 PMCID: PMC6322821 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Depression is a recognized cause of disability globally with a propensity to be comorbid in patients with diabetes, leading to poorer health-related outcomes. Although a number of studies have investigated the correlation between improvement in depression and chronic disease, none have reported on achievement of target doses of antidepressant therapies and diabetes control. The objective of this study is to determine the influence of antidepressant dosing optimization on reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients seen at CommUnityCare Health Centers who were initiated on an antidepressant and had uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%). Eligible patients were followed for 12 months after initiation and separated into those who achieved target dose and those who did not. Patient health questionnaire scores were collected when available in an attempt to quantify change in depressive symptoms. Results A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria with 76 achieving an optimal dose (target group) and 102 patients below optimal dose (control group) at the end of the study period. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline with an HbA1c of 9.29% compared to 9.24% in the target and control groups, respectively. At the end of the study period, more patients in the target group achieved an HbA1c < 7% (22.9%, n = 48 vs 4.3%, n = 23, respectively; P < .05). Discussion These results suggest that optimization of antidepressant dosing in patients with diabetes may lead to an increased likelihood of reaching goal HbA1c < 7% although correlation to improvement of depression remains unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catlin Grisham-Takac
- PGY2 Ambulatory Care Resident (at time of study), CommUnityCare Health Centers/University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas,
| | - Phillip Lai
- Medical Science Liason, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Development and Commercialization, Austin, Texas
| | - Maaya Srinivasa
- Clinical Pharmacist, CommUnityCare Health Centers/University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
| | - Lindsay Vasquez
- Clinical Pharmacist and Associate Residency Program Director, CommUnityCare Health Centers/University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
| | - Karen L Rascati
- Professor, University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Warren MB, Hutchison EP, DeHaan J, Krause AJ, Murphy MP, Velez ML. Residents Teaching Residents: Results of an Interdisciplinary Educational Endeavor. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY : THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF DIRECTORS OF PSYCHIATRIC RESIDENCY TRAINING AND THE ASSOCIATION FOR ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY 2018; 42:473-476. [PMID: 29256031 DOI: 10.1007/s40596-017-0864-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Resident physicians across disciplines are engaged in teaching at multiple levels. Available literature focuses on medical student education and intra-disciplinary teaching. The national shortage of psychiatrists coupled with an increasing mental illness burden necessitates development of creative interdisciplinary collaboration. The authors report on an interdisciplinary, resident-to-resident didactic series assessing whether such a model could improve internal medicine resident comfort with managing psychiatric illness on inpatient medical wards. METHODS Internal medicine residents were assessed regarding their comfort level with managing certain common inpatient psychiatric presentations before and after the delivery of a teaching curriculum designed and delivered by psychiatry residents. RESULTS Internal medicine residents' overall confidence with identifying and managing common psychiatric problems on inpatient medical wards improved. Comfort level with managing depression and demoralization and determining decisional capacity both improved to a statistically significant degree. CONCLUSIONS Collaborative, interdisciplinary care is complex and its benefits can be difficult to assess. Data from this study showed that interdisciplinary teaching at the resident level has the potential to be an effective means for building collaboration and can lead to a subjective improvement in comfort managing common inpatient psychiatric presentations on medical wards. Additionally, qualitative observations suggest that such an intervention can improve interdisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
|
39
|
Tabarsy B, Ghiyasvandian S, Moslemi Meheni S, Mohammadzadeh Zarankesh S. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Model on the Quality of Life and Metabolic Indexes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY HEALTH 2018. [DOI: 10.21859/jech.5.1.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
40
|
van Eck van der Sluijs JF, Castelijns H, Eijsbroek V, Rijnders CAT, van Marwijk HWJ, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Illness burden and physical outcomes associated with collaborative care in patients with comorbid depressive disorder in chronic medical conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018; 50:1-14. [PMID: 28957682 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Collaborative care (CC) improves depressive symptoms in people with comorbid depressive disorder in chronic medical conditions, but its effect on physical symptoms has not yet systematically been reviewed. This study aims to do so. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the European and US Clinical Trial Registers. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CC compared to care as usual (CAU), in primary care and general hospital setting, reporting on physical and depressive symptoms as outcomes. Overall treatment effects were estimated for illness burden, physical outcomes and depression, respectively. RESULTS Twenty RCTs were included, with N=4774 patients. The overall effect size of CC versus CAU for illness burden was OR 1.64 (95%CI 1.47;1.83), d=0.27 (95%CI 0.21;0.33). Best physical outcomes in CC were found for hypertension with comorbiddepression. Overall, depression outcomes were better for CC than for CAU. Moderator analyses did not yield statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS CC is more effective than CAU in terms of illness burden, physical outcomes and depression, in patients with comorbid depression in chronic medical conditions. More research covering multiple medical conditions is needed. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on February 19th 2016: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/DisplayPDF.php?ID=CRD42016035553.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonna F van Eck van der Sluijs
- Clinical Centre of Excellence for Body, Mind and Health, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Tranzo Department, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Department of Residency Training, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Castelijns
- Centre for Mental Health Care, PsyQ Tilburg-Parnassia Groep, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Eijsbroek
- Department of Residency Training, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harm W J van Marwijk
- Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine and the EMGO+, Institute for Health and Care Research of VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis
- Clinical Centre of Excellence for Body, Mind and Health, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Tranzo Department, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Youssef AT, Constantino R, Chaudhary ZK, Lee A, Wiljer D, Mylopoulos M, Sockalingam S. Mapping Evidence of Patients' Experiences in Integrated Care Settings: A Protocol for a Scoping Review. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018311. [PMID: 29247100 PMCID: PMC5736037 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Integrated care (IC) models have emerged to address gaps in care for individuals with complex healthcare needs. Although the clinical and cost-effectiveness of IC models are well-established, our understanding of whether IC models facilitate a patient-centred care experience from the patients' perspective is not well understood. This scoping review aims to comprehensively map the literature to provide a broad overview of patients' experiences in IC settings with a focus on the experiences of complex patients with comorbid mental and physical illnesses. It also aims to describe current gaps identified in the literature in our understanding of aspects of care that are often unrecognised. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using established scoping review frameworks and guidelines, we will perform a comprehensive search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies on patients' experiences in IC models. Grey literature sources and studies bibliographies will also be searched to identify relevant studies and documents. Data will be extracted and summarised using descriptive statistical and qualitative analyses. We will also consult with stakeholders from various backgrounds to enhance the comprehensiveness of this review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This review requires no ethical approval. Findings from this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, clinical conferences and in knowledge translation settings, aiming to improve clinical practice and care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa T Youssef
- Institute for Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosa Constantino
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zarah K Chaudhary
- The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Wiljer
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- UHN Digital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Mylopoulos
- The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanjeev Sockalingam
- Institute for Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Huffman JC, Adams CN, Celano CM. Collaborative Care and Related Interventions in Patients With Heart Disease: An Update and New Directions. PSYCHOSOMATICS 2017; 59:1-18. [PMID: 29078987 DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatric disorders, such as depression, are very common in cardiac patients and are independently linked to adverse cardiac outcomes, including mortality. Collaborative care and other integrated care models have been used successfully to manage psychiatric conditions in patients with heart disease, with beneficial effects on function and other outcomes. Novel programs using remote delivery of mental health interventions and promotion of psychological well-being may play an increasingly large role in supporting cardiovascular health. METHODS We review prior studies of standard and expanded integrated care programs among patients with cardiac disease, examine contemporary intervention delivery methods (e.g., Internet or mobile phone) that could be adapted for these programs, and outline mental health-related interventions to promote healthy behaviors and overall recovery across all cardiac patients. RESULTS Standard integrated care models for mental health disorders are effective at improving mood, anxiety, and function in patients with heart disease. Novel, "blended" collaborative care models may have even greater promise in improving cardiac outcomes, and interfacing with cardiac patients via mobile applications, text messages, and video visits may provide additional benefit. A variety of newer interventions using stress management, mindfulness, or positive psychology have shown promising effects on mental health, health behaviors, and overall cardiac outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Further study of novel applications of collaborative care and related interventions is warranted given the potential of these programs to increase the reach and effect of mental health interventions in patients with heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff C Huffman
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Caitlin N Adams
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chauhan M, Niazi SK. Caring for Patients With Chronic Physical and Mental Health Conditions: Lessons From TEAMcare and COMPASS. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2017; 15:279-283. [PMID: 31975858 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20170008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. It often coexists with other chronic conditions, contributing to poor self-management and subsequent poor health outcomes, increased service utilization and cost of care, and poor quality of life. Most patients with depression seek care in primary care settings. Patients given collaborative care for depression alone or for depression with commonly co-occurring general medical conditions have demonstrated improved outcomes. This article reviews findings from the TEAMcare (an integrated multicondition collaborative care program for chronic illnesses) and COMPASS (Care of Mental, Physical and Substance-Use Syndromes) programs to highlight the evidence supporting the effectiveness of the collaborative care model and its implementation in diverse settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Chauhan
- Dr. Chauhan and Dr. Niazi are with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shehzad K Niazi
- Dr. Chauhan and Dr. Niazi are with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tatem KS, Newton-Dame R, Black J, Singer J. Response to "Impact of a national collaborative care initiative for patients with depression and diabetes or cardiovascular disease". Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2017; 47:116-117. [PMID: 28292520 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen S Tatem
- Office of Population Health, OneCity Health, NYC Health+Hospitals, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038, United States.
| | - Remle Newton-Dame
- Office of Population Health, OneCity Health, NYC Health+Hospitals, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038, United States
| | - Jessica Black
- Office of Population Health, OneCity Health, NYC Health+Hospitals, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038, United States
| | - Jesse Singer
- Office of Population Health, OneCity Health, NYC Health+Hospitals, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Katzelnick DJ. Systematic Case Review in Integrated Care. FOCUS: JOURNAL OF LIFE LONG LEARNING IN PSYCHIATRY 2017; 15:292-293. [PMID: 31975860 DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.20170019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David J Katzelnick
- Dr. Katzelnick is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kaar JL, Luberto CM, Campbell KA, Huffman JC. Sleep, health behaviors, and behavioral interventions: Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in adults. World J Cardiol 2017; 9:396-406. [PMID: 28603586 PMCID: PMC5442407 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2017] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous health behaviors, including physical activity, diet, smoking, and sleep, play a major role in preventing the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Among these behaviors, sleep may play a pivotal role, yet it has been studied somewhat less than other behaviors and there have been few well-designed sleep intervention studies targeting CVD. Furthermore, despite the fact that these behaviors are often interrelated, interventions tend to focus on changing one health behavior rather than concurrently intervening on multiple behaviors. Psychological constructs from depression to positive affect may also have a major effect on these health behaviors and ultimately on CVD. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of sleep and other cardiac health behaviors on CVD onset and prognosis. We also describe interventions that may promote these behaviors, from established interventions such as motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy, to more novel approaches focused on mindfulness and other positive psychological constructs. Finally, we outline population-health-level care management approaches for patients with psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression) that may impact cardiac health, and discuss their potential utility in improving mental health, promoting health behaviors, and reducing CVD-related risk. Much work is still needed to better understand how sleep and other health behaviors may uniquely contribute to CVD risk, and additional high-quality studies of interventions designed to modify cardiac health behaviors are required to improve cardiovascular health in individuals and the population at large.
Collapse
|
47
|
Closing the False Divide: Sustainable Approaches to Integrating Mental Health Services into Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med 2017; 32:404-410. [PMID: 28243873 PMCID: PMC5377893 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Mental disorders account for 25% of all health-related disability worldwide. More patients receive treatment for mental disorders in the primary care sector than in the mental health specialty setting. However, brief visits, inadequate reimbursement, deficits in primary care provider (PCP) training, and competing demands often limit the capacity of the PCP to produce optimal outcomes in patients with common mental disorders. More than 80 randomized trials have shown the benefits of collaborative care (CC) models for improving outcomes of patients with depression and anxiety. Six key components of CC include a population-based approach, measurement-based care, treatment to target strategy, care management, supervision by a mental health professional (MHP), and brief psychological therapies. Multiple trials have also shown that CC for depression is equally or more cost-effective than many of the current treatments for medical disorders. Factors that may facilitate the implementation of CC include a more favorable alignment of medical and mental health services in accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes; greater use of telecare as well as automated outcome monitoring; identification of patients who might benefit most from CC; and systematic training of both PCPs and MHPs in integrated team-based care.
Collapse
|
48
|
Warren M. Defining Health in the Era of Value-Based Care: The Six Cs of Health and Healthcare. Cureus 2017; 9:e1046. [PMID: 28367385 PMCID: PMC5362276 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While healthcare expenditure continues to increase overall health outcomes in the United States continue to be submarginal. The changes we make in our healthcare system need to be informed by a comprehensive and actionable definition of health that can unite patients, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. METHODS A literature review across multiple disciplines was conducted to assess a broad range of factors associated with health and well-being and based on this literature review a novel definition of health was developed. RESULTS Development of a definition of health as the ability to dynamically recognize and resolve dissonance in one's physical, mental, social and spiritual worlds via cooperation with social and spiritual connections, the medical community and with the natural world in a way that fosters and promotes harmony, resilience, and relief from suffering. This definition is then expanded into six domains (connection, communication, creativity, cooperation, cost-consciousness, and computerization) which are applicable to individuals, society and the healthcare system and which form the basis for actionable guidelines to promote measurable and sustained change on a public health scale. CONCLUSION Healthcare in the United States is changing and in order to move forward in an evidence-based and compassionate way, we need to understand what we mean by 'health' and how that definition can be operational at individual, societal, and public policy levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Warren
- Boise Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kreider KE. Diabetes Distress or Major Depressive Disorder? A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Psychological Comorbidities of Diabetes. Diabetes Ther 2017; 8:1-7. [PMID: 28160185 PMCID: PMC5306125 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-017-0231-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The presence of major depressive disorder (MDD) in people with diabetes may be up to three times more common than in the general population. People with diabetes and major depressive disorder have worse health outcomes and higher mortality rates. Diabetes distress refers to an emotional state where people experience feelings such as stress, guilt, or denial that arise from living with diabetes and the burden of self-management. Diabetes distress has also been linked to worse health outcomes. There are multiple treatment options for MDD including pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral approaches. Providers treating patients with diabetes must be aware of the frequent comorbidity of diabetes, diabetes distress, and depression and manage patients using a multidisciplinary team approach. This article discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and bi-directional relationship of diabetes and depression and provides a practical, patient-centered approach to diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Evans Kreider
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Coleman KJ, Magnan S, Neely C, Solberg L, Beck A, Trevis J, Heim C, Williams M, Katzelnick D, Unützer J, Pollock B, Hafer E, Ferguson R, Williams S. The COMPASS initiative: description of a nationwide collaborative approach to the care of patients with depression and diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2017; 44:69-76. [PMID: 27558107 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe a national effort to disseminate and implement an evidence-based collaborative care management model for patients with both depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease across multiple, real-world diverse clinical practice sites. METHODS Goals for the initiative were as follows: (1) to improve depression symptoms in 40% of patients, (2) to improve diabetes and hypertension control rates by 20%, (3) to increase provider satisfaction by 20%, (4) to improve patient satisfaction with their care by 20% and (5) to demonstrate cost savings. A Care Management Tracking System was used for collecting clinical care information to create performance measures for quality improvement while also assessing the overall accomplishment of these goals. RESULTS The Care of Mental, Physical and Substance-use Syndromes (COMPASS) initiative spread an evidence-based collaborative care model among 18 medical groups and 172 clinics in eight states. We describe the initiative's evidence-base and methods for others to replicate our work. CONCLUSIONS The COMPASS initiative demonstrated that a diverse set of health care systems and other organizations can work together to rapidly implement an evidence-based care model for complex, hard-to-reach patients. We present this model as an example of how the time gap between research and practice can be reduced on a large scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Coleman
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), 100 S. Los Robles Ave., 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101-2453, USA.
| | - Sanne Magnan
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 8009 34th Ave. S., Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425-1624, USA
| | - Claire Neely
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 8009 34th Ave. S., Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425-1624, USA
| | - Leif Solberg
- HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research (HPIER), 8170 33rd Ave. S., MS23301A, P.O. Box 1524, Bloomington, MN 55440-1524, USA
| | - Arne Beck
- Institute for Health Research (KPCO), Kaiser Permanente Colorado, P.O. Box 378066, Denver, CO 80237-8066, USA
| | - Jim Trevis
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 8009 34th Ave. S., Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425-1624, USA
| | - Carla Heim
- Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), 8009 34th Ave. S., Suite 1200, Bloomington, MN 55425-1624, USA
| | - Mark Williams
- Mayo Clinic Health System, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - David Katzelnick
- Mayo Clinic Health System, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jürgen Unützer
- AIMS Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356650, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA
| | - Betsy Pollock
- AIMS Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 356650, Seattle, WA 98195-6560, USA; Mount Auburn Cambridge IPA (MACIPA), 1380 Soldiers Field Rd., Floor 2, Brighton, MA 02135-1023, USA
| | - Erin Hafer
- Community Health Plan of Washington (CHPW), 720 Olive Way, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98101-1830, USA
| | - Robert Ferguson
- Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative (PRHI), 650 Smithfield St., Centre City Tower, Suite 2400, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3900, USA
| | - Steve Williams
- Michigan Center for Clinical Systems Improvement (Mi-CCSI), 233 E. Fulton St., Suite 20, Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3261, USA
| |
Collapse
|