1
|
Qiao K, Wei Y, Tao C, Zhu J, Yuan S. Proton therapy for breast cancer: Reducing toxicity. Thorac Cancer 2024. [PMID: 39275876 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a crucial component in the holistic management of breast cancer, with approximately 60% of individuals diagnosed with breast cancer requiring this treatment. As the survival rate of individuals with breast cancer has significantly increased, there is a growing focus on the long-term well-being of patients. Proton therapy (PT) is a new and rapidly developing radiotherapy method. In comparison with conventional photon therapy, PT offers the benefits of decreased radiation toxicity and increased dosage in the designated region. This can extend patients' lifespan and enhance their overall well-being. The present analysis examines the function of PT in diminishing the harmful effects of radiation in cases of breast cancer, while also providing a brief overview of the future potential and obstacles associated with PT for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailin Qiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yuchun Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Cheng Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics & Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics & Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Shuanghu Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Decker SM, Bruza P, Zhang R, Pogue BW, Gladstone DJ, Jarvis LA. Visual Dose Monitoring for Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Treatments via Combined Cherenkov Imaging and Scintillation Dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)03291-7. [PMID: 39182736 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 07/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigates scintillation dosimetry coupled with Cherenkov imaging for in vivo dose monitoring during whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT). Given recent observations of excess dose to the contralateral breast (CB), in vivo dosimetry (IVD) could help ensure accurate dose delivery and decrease risks of secondary cancer. This work presents a rapid, streamlined alternative to traditional IVD, providing direct visualization of measurement location relative to the treatment field on the patient. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten WBRT patients consented under an institutional review board-approved protocol were monitored with scintillation dosimetry and always-on Cherenkov imaging, on both their treated and CB for 1 to 3 fractions. Scintillator dosimeters, small plastic discs 1 mm thick and 15 mm in diameter, were calibrated against optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) to generate an integral output-to-dose conversion, where integral output is measured in postprocessing through a custom fitting algorithm. The discs have been extensively characterized in a previous study for various treatment conditions including beam energy and treatment geometry. RESULTS A total of 44 dosimetry measurements were evaluated, including 22 treated breast and 22 CB measurements. After integral output-to-dose calibration, in vivo scintillator dosimeters exhibited high linearity (R2 = 0.99) with paired OSLD readings across all patients. The difference between scintillation and OSLD dose measurements averaged 2.8% of the prescribed dose, or an absolute dose difference of approximately 7 cGy. CONCLUSIONS Integration of scintillation dosimetry with Cherenkov imaging offers an accurate, rapid alternative for in vivo dose verification in WBRT, circumventing the limitations of conventional point dosimeters. The additional benefit of visualizing measurement locations relative to the treatment field provides users an enhanced understanding of results and allows for detection of high dose gradients. Future work will explore the applicability of this technique across a broader range of radiation therapy treatments, aiming to streamline IVD practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah M Decker
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
| | - Petr Bruza
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Brian W Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - David J Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; The Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Lesley A Jarvis
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; The Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuru O, Ozan Goksel E, Volkan Demircan N, Sengoz M. Evaluation of helical tomotherapy as an alternative for left-sided breast cancer patients not compliant with deep inspiration breath hold. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100268. [PMID: 39247163 PMCID: PMC11380380 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate, from a dosimetric perspective, whether helical Tomotherapy (HT) during free breathing (FB) can serve as an alternative technique for treating left-sided breast cancer patients who are unable to comply with the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. Material and Methods For this purpose, the CT images of 20 left breast-only cancer patients acquired in both FB and DIBH phases were utilized. The left breast was contoured as the target volume, while the heart, LAD, ipsilateral and contralateral lungs, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk on the CT images obtained in both DIBH and FB. Planning with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was performed on the CT scans obtained in the DIBH (VMAT-DIBH), while planning with the HT technique was carried out on the CT scans obtained in the FB (HT-FB). Subsequently, dosimetric comparison of the plans were done in terms of target coverage and preservation of normal tissues. Results Both techniques achieved the desired target coverage; however, in terms of D2, Vpres values, Conformity Number (CN), and Homogeneity Index (HI), the HT-FB technique was found to be superior. While the mean doses to the heart were similar for both techniques, doses to the LAD and left lung were found to be superior in plans generated with the HT-FB technique. When compared in terms of contralateral breast and right lung protection, VMAT-DIBH technique was found to be significantly superior. Conclusion The treatment of left breast-only patients with the HT-FB technique has been observed to provide similar heart protection and better LAD and ipsilateral lung protection compared to the VMAT-DIBH technique without compromising target coverage. However, when the HT-FB technique is used, doses to the contralateral lung and contralateral breast should be carefully evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okan Kuru
- Eastern Mediterranean University, School of Health Services, Radiotherapy Program, Famagusta, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey
| | - Evren Ozan Goksel
- Acibadem MAA University, Vocational School of Health Services, Radiotherapy Program, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Niyazi Volkan Demircan
- Bahcesehir University Hospital, Medical Park Goztepe, Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meric Sengoz
- Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wahabi JM, Wong JHD, Mahdiraji GA, Ung NM. Feasibility of determining external beam radiotherapy dose using LuSy dosimeter. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14387. [PMID: 38778567 PMCID: PMC11163501 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose measurement is an essential part of radiotherapy to verify the correct delivery of doses to patients and ensure patient safety. Recent advancements in radiotherapy technology have highlighted the need for fast and precise dosimeters. Technologies like FLASH radiotherapy and magnetic-resonance linear accelerators (MR-LINAC) demand dosimeters that can meet their unique requirements. One promising solution is the plastic scintillator-based dosimeter with high spatial resolution and real-time dose output. This study explores the feasibility of using the LuSy dosimeter, an in-house developed plastic scintillator dosimeter for dose verification across various radiotherapy techniques, including conformal radiotherapy (CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A new dosimetry system, comprising a new plastic scintillator as the sensing material, was developed and characterized for radiotherapy beams. Treatment plans were created for conformal radiotherapy, IMRT, VMAT, and SRS and delivered to a phantom. LuSy dosimeter was used to measure the delivered dose for each plan on the surface of the phantom and inside the target volumes. Then, LuSy measurements were compared against an ionization chamber, MOSFET dosimeter, radiochromic films, and dose calculated using the treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS For CRT, surface dose measurement by LuSy dosimeter showed a deviation of -5.5% and -5.4% for breast and abdomen treatment from the TPS, respectively. When measuring inside the target volume for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS, the LuSy dosimeter produced a mean deviation of -3.0% from the TPS. Surface dose measurement resulted in higher TPS discrepancies where the deviations for IMRT, VMAT, and SRS were -2.0%, -19.5%, and 16.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION The LuSy dosimeter was feasible for measuring radiotherapy doses for various treatment techniques. Treatment delivery verification enables early error detection, allowing for safe treatment delivery for radiotherapy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janatul Madinah Wahabi
- Department of Biomedical ImagingFaculty of MedicineUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
- Radiotherapy and Oncology DepartmentNational Cancer InstitutePutrajayaMalaysia
| | - Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
- Department of Biomedical ImagingFaculty of MedicineUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
- Universiti Malaya Research Imaging Centre (UMRIC), Faculty of MedicineUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | | | - Ngie Min Ung
- Clinical Oncology UnitFaculty of MedicineUniversiti MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paschal HM(P, Kabat CN, Martin T, Saenz D, Myers P, Rasmussen K, Stathakis S, Bonnen M, Papanikolaou N, Kirby N. Dosimetric characterization of a new surface-conforming electron MLC prototype. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14173. [PMID: 37858985 PMCID: PMC10860448 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose is to reduce normal tissue radiation toxicity for electron therapy through the creation of a surface-conforming electron multileaf collimator (SCEM). The SCEM combines the benefits of skin collimation, electron conformal radiotherapy, and modulated electron radiotherapy. An early concept for the SCEM was constructed. It consists of leaves that protrude towards the patient, allowing the leaves to conform closely to irregular patient surfaces. The leaves are made of acrylic to decrease bremsstrahlung, thereby decreasing the out-of-field dose. Water tank scans were performed with the SCEM in place for various field sizes for all available electron energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) with a 0.5 cm air gap to the water surface at 100 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). These measurements were compared with Cerrobend cutouts with the field size-matched at 100 and 110 cm SSD. Output factor measurements were taken in solid water for each energy at dmax for both the cerrobend cutouts and SCEM at 100 cm SSD. Percent depth dose (PDD) curves for the SCEM shifted shallower for all energies and field sizes. The SCEM also produced a higher surface dose relative to Cerrobend cutouts, with the maximum being a 9.8% increase for the 3 cm × 9 cm field at 9 MeV. When compared to the Cerrobend cutouts at 110 cm SSD, the SCEM showed a significant decrease in the penumbra, particularly for lower energies (i.e., 6 and 9 MeV). The SCEM also showed reduced out-of-field dose and lower bremsstrahlung production than the Cerrobend cutouts. The SCEM provides significant improvement in the penumbra and out-of-field dose by allowing collimation close to the skin surface compared to Cerrobend cutouts. However, the added scatter from the SCEM increases shallow PDD values. Future work will focus on reducing this scatter while maintaining the penumbra and out-of-field benefits the SCEM has over conventional collimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly M. (Parenica) Paschal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Christopher N. Kabat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Thomas Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Daniel Saenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Pamela Myers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Karl Rasmussen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Sotirios Stathakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Mark Bonnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Nikos Papanikolaou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Neil Kirby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bonaccorsi SG, Tessonnier T, Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Harrabi S, Hörner-Rieber J, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Mairani A. Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:410. [PMID: 38254899 PMCID: PMC10814201 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi S, Dreyfuss I, Taswell CS, Cyriac J, Butkus M, Takita C. Proton Beam Therapy for Breast Cancer. Crit Rev Oncog 2024; 29:67-82. [PMID: 38683154 DOI: 10.1615/critrevoncog.2023050319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Given the radiobiological and physical properties of the proton, proton beam therapy has the potential to be advantageous for many patients compared with conventional radiotherapy by limiting toxicity and improving patient outcomes in specific breast cancer scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraphina Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Isabella Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Cyriac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Butkus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avatefi M, HadavandSiri F, Nazari SSH, Akbari ME. Risk factors of developing contralateral breast cancer after first primary breast cancer treatment. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2024; 7:e1927. [PMID: 37919558 PMCID: PMC10809186 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Increased survival of primary BC (PBC) has increased contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and become a health problem. AIMS This study aimed to determine the effect of disease-free interval (DFI), risk factors and PBC characteristics on the progression of CBC within primary BC survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS This retrospective study identified 5003 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2020 in the cancer research center. The study included 145 CBC and 4858 PBC survivors, with CBC diagnosed at least 6 months after the detection of primary BC. ER+, PR+, and HER2+ were reported in 72.13%, 66.67%, and 30% of CBC patients. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) BC was reported in 69.57% of patients, and 81.90% and 83.64% of the patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and external radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method indicated that the median time interval between PBC and CBC was 3.92 years, and the 5-year DFI was 97%. The Cox proportional hazard regression model indicated that although more than half of the participants had no family history of BC (69.57%), women 60 years and older were negatively associated with CBC. CONCLUSION This study provides the first investigation of CBC and DFI risk factors among PBC survivors in Iran. Age was found to be negatively associated with CBC development particularly after the age of 60, indicating the necessity of tracking CBC survivors carefully in this age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Avatefi
- Cancer Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yuan K, Yao X, Liao X, Diao P, Xin X, Ma J, Li J, Orlandini LC. Comparing breath hold versus free breathing irradiation for left-sided breast radiotherapy by PlanIQ™. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:200. [PMID: 38098106 PMCID: PMC10722777 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02386-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most widespread cancer in women and young women worldwide. Moving towards customised radiotherapy, balancing the use of the available technology with the best treatment modality may not be an easy task in the daily routine. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing IQ-feasibility into clinical practice to support the decision of free-breathing (FB) versus breath-hold (BH) left-sided breast irradiations, in order to optimise the technology available and the effectiveness of the treatment. METHODS Thirty-five patients who received 3D radiotherapy treatment of the left breast in deep-inspiration BH were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography scans in FB and BH were acquired for each patient; targets contoured in both imaging datasets by an experienced radiation oncologist, and organs at risk delineated using automatic segmentation software were exported to PlanIQ™ (Sun Nuclear Corp.) to generate feasibility dose volume histogram (FDVHs). The dosimetric parameter of BH versus FB FDVH, and BH clinical dataset versus BH FDVH were compared. RESULTS A total of 30 patients out of 35 patients analysed, presented for the BH treatments a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the heart mean dose ([Formula: see text]), volume receiving 5 Gy ([Formula: see text]) and 20 Gy ([Formula: see text]), of 35.7%, 54.5%, and 2.1%, respectively; for the left lung, a lower reduction was registered and significant only for [Formula: see text] (21.4%, p = 0.046). For the remaining five patients, the FDVH cut-off points of heart and lung were superimposable with differences of less than 1%. Heart and left lung dosimetric parameters of the BH clinical plans are located in the difficult zone of the FDVH and differ significantly (p < 0.05) from the corresponding parameters of the FDVH curves delimiting this buffer area between the impossible and feasible zones, respectively. CONCLUSION The use of PlanIQTM as a decision-support tool for the FB versus BH treatment delivery modality allows customisation of the treatment technique using the most appropriate technology for each patient enabling accurate management of available technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Xinghong Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiongfei Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China.
| | - Pen Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Xin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiabao Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| | - Lucia Clara Orlandini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University and Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Barele M, Akdeniz D, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Andrieu N, Noguès C, van Asperen CJ, Wevers M, Ausems MGEM, de Bock GH, Dommering CJ, Gómez-García EB, van Leeuwen FE, Mooij TM, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Evans DG, Izatt L, Tischkowitz M, Frost D, Brewer C, Olah E, Simard J, Singer CF, Thomassen M, Kast K, Rhiem K, Engel C, de la Hoya M, Foretová L, Jakubowska A, Jager A, Sattler MGA, Schmidt MK, Hooning MJ. Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with breast cancer and a germline-BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergoing radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1318-1328. [PMID: 37369040 PMCID: PMC10637040 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced secondary breast cancer (BC) may be a concern after radiation therapy (RT) for primary breast cancer (PBC), especially in young patients with germline (g)BRCA-associated BC who already have high contralateral BC (CBC) risk and potentially increased genetic susceptibility to radiation. We sought to investigate whether adjuvant RT for PBC increases the risk of CBC in patients with gBRCA1/2-associated BC. METHODS The gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers diagnosed with PBC were selected from the prospective International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between RT (yes vs no) and CBC risk. We further stratified for BRCA status and age at PBC diagnosis (<40 and >40 years). Statistical significance tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 3602 eligible patients, 2297 (64%) received adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. The RT group had more patients with stage III PBC than the non-RT group (15% vs 3%, P < .001), received chemotherapy more often (81% vs 70%, P < .001), and received endocrine therapy more often (50% vs 35%, P < .001). The RT group had an increased CBC risk compared with the non-RT group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.86). Statistical significance was observed in gBRCA2 (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.77) but not in gBRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.77; P = .39 for interaction). In the combined gBRCA1/2 group, patients irradiated when they were younger than or older than 40 years of age at PBC diagnosis showed similar risks (HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.04 and HR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RT regimens minimizing contralateral breast dose should be considered in gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark van Barele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Delal Akdeniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Genepso
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d’Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes & Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - HEBON
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marijke Wevers
- Department for Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Edit Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology (PREMIO), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Kast
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center of Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lenka Foretová
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet G A Sattler
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee MK, Robson ME. Contralateral breast cancer risk with radiation therapy in BRCA mutation carriers: what do we tell patients? J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1243-1245. [PMID: 37603726 PMCID: PMC10637031 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minna K Lee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Breast Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Frengen J, Vikström J, Mjaaland I, Funderud M, Almberg SS, Dybvik KI, Hjelstuen MHB. Locoregional breast radiotherapy including IMN: optimizing the dose distribution using an automated non-coplanar VMAT-technique. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1169-1177. [PMID: 37812070 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2264488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) offers better conformity, homogeneity and sparing of the heart and ipsilateral lung for locoregional radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). However, conventional coplanar VMAT (cVMAT) can result in higher doses to the normal tissue on the contralateral side. This study investigates a non-coplanar VMAT-technique (ncVMAT) to mitigate this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS CT series of 20 left sided breast cancer patients were included for planning of locoregional breast radiotherapy including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Three treatment plans; 3D-CRT, cVMAT and ncVMAT, were generated for each patient with a prescription dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. Both VMAT-techniques consisted of a single arc in the axial plane, while ncVMAT included an additional arc in the sagittal plane. All plans were optimized to cover the clinical target volume (CTV) by 38.05 Gy for the breast and 36.05 Gy for lymph nodes, with as low as possible dose to organs at risk. RESULTS Full CTV coverage was achieved for all plans. Both cVMAT and ncVMAT delivered more conformal and homogeneous target doses than 3D-CRT. Doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung were significantly lower with ncVMAT compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. ncVMAT reduced doses to both the contralateral breast and lung compared to cVMAT and achieved levels similar to 3D-CRT for the contralateral breast and moderately higher doses for the contralateral lung. Delivery of high doses (>30 Gy) to the contralateral side was completely avoided with ncVMAT, contrary to the results for cVMAT and 3D-CRT. CONCLUSION ncVMAT reduced doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung as compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. All contralateral dose metrics were reduced with the novel ncVMAT technique compared to cVMAT, and the mean contralateral breast doses were similar to 3D-CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jomar Frengen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Johan Vikström
- Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Ingvil Mjaaland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marit Funderud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sigrun Saur Almberg
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kjell Ivar Dybvik
- Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Watt GP, Smith SA, Howell RM, Pérez-Andújar A, Reiner AS, Cerviño L, McCormick B, Hess D, Knight JA, Malone KE, John EM, Bernstein L, Lynch CF, Mellemkjær L, Shore RE, Liang X, Woods M, Boice JD, Dauer LT, Bernstein JL. Trends in Radiation Dose to the Contralateral Breast During Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy. Radiat Res 2023; 200:331-339. [PMID: 37590492 PMCID: PMC10684055 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00014.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Over 4 million survivors of breast cancer live in the United States, 35% of whom were treated before 2009. Approximately half of patients with breast cancer receive radiation therapy, which exposes the untreated contralateral breast to radiation and increases the risk of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Radiation oncology has strived to reduce unwanted radiation dose, but it is unknown whether a corresponding decline in actual dose received to the untreated contralateral breast has occurred. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in unwanted contralateral breast radiation dose to inform risk assessment of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Individually estimated radiation absorbed doses to the four quadrants and areola central area of the contralateral breast were estimated for 2,132 women treated with radiation therapy for local/regional breast cancers at age <55 years diagnosed between 1985 and 2008. The two inner quadrant doses and two outer quadrant doses were averaged. Trends in dose to each of the three areas of the contralateral breast were evaluated in multivariable models. The population impact of reducing contralateral breast dose on the incidence of radiation-associated CBC was assessed by estimating population attributable risk fraction (PAR) in a multivariable model. The median dose to the inner quadrants of the contralateral breast was 1.70 Gy; to the areola, 1.20 Gy; and to the outer quadrants, 0.72 Gy. Ninety-two percent of patients received ≥1 Gy to the inner quadrants. For each calendar year of diagnosis, dose declined significantly for each location, most rapidly for the inner quadrants (0.04 Gy/year). Declines in dose were similar across subgroups defined by age at diagnosis and body mass index. The PAR for CBC due to radiation exposure >1 Gy for women <40 years of age was 17%. Radiation dose-reduction measures have reduced dose to the contralateral breast during breast radiation therapy. Reducing the dose to the contralateral breast to <1 Gy could prevent an estimated 17% of subsequent radiation-associated CBCs for women treated under 40 years of age. These dose estimates inform CBC surveillance for the growing number of breast cancer survivors who received radiation therapy as young women in recent decades. Continued reductions in dose to the contralateral breast could further reduce the incidence of radiation-associated CBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P. Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan A. Smith
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca M. Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Anne S. Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Beryl McCormick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Julia A. Knight
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen E. Malone
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Esther M. John
- Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | | | | | - Roy E. Shore
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meghan Woods
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John D. Boice
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Jonine L. Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Onal C, Bozca R, Oymak E, Guler OC. Comparison of helical and TomoDirect techniques with simultaneous integrated boost in early breast cancer patients. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:541-550. [PMID: 37795226 PMCID: PMC10547420 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to perform dosimetric comparisons of helical (H) and TomoDirect (TD) plans for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Materials and methods Fifty patients, 25 with left-side and 25 with right-side tumors, were determined for a treatment planning system for a total dose of 50.4Gy in 1.8Gy per fraction to WBI, with a SIB of 2.3Gy per fraction delivered to the tumor bed. The planning target volume (PTV) doses and the conformity (CI) and homogeneity indices (HI) for PTVbreast and PTVboost, as well as organ-at-risk (OAR) doses and treatment times, were compared between the H and TD plans. Results All plans met the PTV coverage criteria for the H plan, except for mean V107 of PTVbreast for TD plan. The H plan yielded better homogeneity and conformity of dose distribution compared to the TD plan. The ipsilateral mean lung doses were not significantly different between the two plans. The TD plans is advantageous for mean doses to the heart, contralateral breast and lung, spinal cord, and esophagus than the H plans. In both the H and TD plans, the right-sided breast patients had lower heart dose parameters than the left-sided breast patients. The TD plan is superior to the H plan in sparing the contralateral breast and lung by decreasing low-dose volumes. Conclusions While the OAR dose advantages of TD are appealing, shorter treatment times or improved dose homogeneity and conformity for target volume may be advantageous for H plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Onal
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Türkiye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Türkiye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Recep Bozca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Türkiye
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Türkiye
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ahmed SK, Keole SR. Proton Therapy in the Adolescent and Young Adult Population. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4269. [PMID: 37686545 PMCID: PMC10487250 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent and young adult cancer patients are at high risk of developing radiation-associated side effects after treatment. Proton beam radiation therapy might reduce the risk of these side effects for this population without compromising treatment efficacy. METHODS We review the current literature describing the utility of proton beam radiation therapy in the treatment of central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, breast cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma for the adolescent and young adult cancer population. RESULTS Proton beam radiation therapy has utility for the treatment of certain cancers in the young adult population. Preliminary data suggest reduced radiation dose to normal tissues, which might reduce radiation-associated toxicities. Research is ongoing to further establish the role of proton therapy in this population. CONCLUSION This report highlights the potential utility of proton beam radiation for certain adolescent young adult cancers, especially with reducing radiation doses to organs at risk and thereby potentially lowering risks of certain treatment-associated toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Morra A, Schreurs MAC, Andrulis IL, Anton‐Culver H, Augustinsson A, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brauch H, Broeks A, Buys SS, Camp NJ, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang‐Claude J, Chung WK, Colonna SV, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Dennis J, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Easton DF, Eccles DM, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, Gago‐Dominguez M, García‐Closas M, García‐Sáenz JA, Genkinger J, Grassmann F, Gündert M, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Hamann U, Harrington PA, Hartikainen JM, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Houlston RS, Howell A, Jakubowska A, Janni W, Jernström H, John EM, Johnson N, Jones ME, Kristensen VN, Kurian AW, Lambrechts D, Le Marchand L, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Lux MP, Mannermaa A, Mavroudis D, Mulligan AM, Muranen TA, Nevanlinna H, Nevelsteen I, Neven P, Newman WG, Obi N, Offit K, Olshan AF, Park‐Simon T, Patel AV, Peterlongo P, Phillips K, Plaseska‐Karanfilska D, Polley EC, Presneau N, Pylkäs K, Rack B, Radice P, Rashid MU, Rhenius V, Robson M, Romero A, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Schuetze S, Scott C, Shah M, Smichkoska S, Southey MC, Tapper WJ, Teras LR, Tollenaar RAEM, Tomczyk K, Tomlinson I, Troester MA, Vachon CM, van Veen EM, Wang Q, Wendt C, Wildiers H, Winqvist R, Ziogas A, Hall P, Pharoah PDP, Adank MA, Hollestelle A, Schmidt MK, Hooning MJ. Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival. Cancer Med 2023; 12:16142-16162. [PMID: 37401034 PMCID: PMC10469654 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers. AIM To assessed the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS. METHODS Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with a first primary invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations with treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death. RESULTS There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status. The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.55-0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR (95% CI): 1.30 (1.09-1.56)]. CONCLUSION Systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Morra
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer GeneticsLunenfeld‐Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Molecular GeneticsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Hoda Anton‐Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research InstituteUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer‐Bosch‐Institute of Clinical PharmacologyStuttgartGermany
- iFIT‐Cluster of ExcellenceUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site TübingenGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)TübingenGermany
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Nicola J. Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Jose E. Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS)Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo‐SERGASVigoSpain
| | | | - Jenny Chang‐Claude
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH)University Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Wendy K. Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and MedicineColumbia UniversityNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Sarah V. Colonna
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Angela Cox
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield Institute for Nucleic Acids (SInFoNiA)University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Simon S. Cross
- Department of Neuroscience, Academic Unit of PathologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical GeneticsFox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of PathologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research UnitHannover Medical SchoolHannoverGermany
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Miriam Dwek
- School of Life SciencesUniversity of WestminsterLondonUK
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | | | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital DüsseldorfHeinrich‐Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jonine D. Figueroa
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and InformaticsThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh CentreThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Manuela Gago‐Dominguez
- Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, SERGAS, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS) FoundationComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de SantiagoSantiago de CompostelaSpain
| | - Montserrat García‐Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - José A. García‐Sáenz
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC)Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC)MadridSpain
| | - Jeanine Genkinger
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Health and Medical UniversityPotsdamGermany
| | - Melanie Gündert
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, C080German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic HeidelbergUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Institute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Zentrum MünchenGerman Research Center for Environmental HealthNeuherbergGermany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast CancerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Patricia A. Harrington
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Jaana M. Hartikainen
- Translational Cancer Research AreaUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer‐Bosch‐Institute of Clinical PharmacologyStuttgartGermany
- University of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Richard S. Houlston
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | | | - Esther M. John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Nichola Johnson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Michael E. Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of Medical GeneticsOslo University Hospital and University of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Allison W. Kurian
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human GeneticsKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- VIB Center for Cancer BiologyVIBLeuvenBelgium
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHawaiiUSA
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical GeneticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐NurembergUniversity Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research AreaUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic MedicineUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
- Biobank of Eastern FinlandKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Hospital of HeraklionHeraklionGreece
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathobiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Laboratory Medicine ProgramUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Taru A. Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University HospitalUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Ines Nevelsteen
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - William G. Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Nadia Obi
- Institute for Medical Biometry and EpidemiologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and GeneticsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Andrew F. Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Alpa V. Patel
- Department of Population ScienceAmerican Cancer SocietyAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM ETS ‐ The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Genome Diagnostics ProgramMilanItaly
| | - Kelly‐Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global HealthThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Medical OncologyPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Dijana Plaseska‐Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 'Georgi D. Efremov'MASASkopjeRepublic of North Macedonia
| | - Eric C. Polley
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health SciencesMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyNorthern Finland Laboratory Centre OuluOuluFinland
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Paolo Radice
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori“Predictive Medicine: Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk”MilanItaly
| | - Muhammad U. Rashid
- Molecular Genetics of Breast CancerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Basic SciencesShaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC)LahorePakistan
| | - Valerie Rhenius
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Mark Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario Puerta de HierroMadridSpain
| | | | - Elinor J. Sawyer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy's CampusKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Sabine Schuetze
- Department of Gynaecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
| | - Christopher Scott
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health SciencesMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Mitul Shah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Snezhana Smichkoska
- Medical Faculty, University Clinic of Radiotherapy and OncologySs. Cyril and Methodius University in SkopjeSkopjeRepublic of North Macedonia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash HealthMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Clinical PathologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Cancer Epidemiology DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Lauren R. Teras
- Department of Population ScienceAmerican Cancer SocietyAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | - Katarzyna Tomczyk
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research CentreThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Cancer Research CentreThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Melissa A. Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Celine M. Vachon
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health SciencesMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Elke M. van Veen
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Camilla Wendt
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, SödersjukhusetKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of OncologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals LeuvenLeuven Cancer InstituteLeuvenBelgium
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter OuluUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor BiologyNorthern Finland Laboratory Centre OuluOuluFinland
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research InstituteUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCaliforniaUSA
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of OncologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - Paul D. P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Muriel A. Adank
- Family Cancer ClinicThe Netherlands Cancer Institute ‐ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | | | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer Institute ‐ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huang Y, Gong C, Luo M, Yuan X, Ding S, Wang X, Zhang Y. Comparative dosimetric and radiobiological assessment of left-sided whole breast and regional nodes with advanced radiotherapy techniques. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023:rrad045. [PMID: 37315943 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the dosimetric and radiobiologic differences of the left-sided whole breast and regional nodes in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT). The IMRT, VMAT, and HT plans in this study were generated for thirty-five left-sided breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The planning target volume (PTV) included the whole breast and supraclavicular nodes. PTV coverage, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), dose to organs at risk (OARs), secondary cancer complication probability (SCCP), and excess absolute risk (EAR) were used to evaluate the plans. Compared to IMRT, the VMAT and HT plans resulted in higher PTV coverage and homogeneity. The VMAT and HT plans also delivered a lower mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (9.19 ± 1.36 Gy, 9.48 ± 1.17 Gy vs. 11.31 ± 1.42 Gy) and heart (3.99 ± 0.86 Gy, 4.48 ± 0.62 Gy vs. 5.53 ± 1.02 Gy) and reduced the V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, and V40Gy of the ipsilateral lung and heart. The SCCP and EAR for the ipsilateral lung were reduced by 3.67%, 3.09% in VMAT, and 22.18%, 19.21% in HT, respectively. While were increased for the contralateral lung and breast. This study showed that VMAT plans provide a more homogeneous dose distribution to the PTV, minimizing exposure to ipsilateral structures and significantly reducing SCCP and EAR, and slightly increasing dose to contralateral structures. Overall, the VMAT plan can be considered a beneficial technique for BCS patients whose PTV includes the whole breast and regional nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuling Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Changfei Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Mingming Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Xingxing Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Shenggou Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, 519 East Beijing Road, Qingshanhu District, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330029, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ott OJ, Stillkrieg W, Lambrecht U, Schweizer C, Lamrani A, Sauer TO, Strnad V, Bert C, Hack CC, Beckmann MW, Fietkau R. External-Beam-Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Reduces Organ-at-Risk Doses Compared to Whole-Breast Irradiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3128. [PMID: 37370738 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In order to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in external-beam-accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) compared to standard whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early breast cancer received APBI within a prospective institutional single-arm trial. The prescribed dose to the planning treatment volume was 38 Gy in 10 fractions on 10 consecutive working days. OAR doses for the contralateral breast, the ipsilateral, contralateral, and whole lung, the whole heart, left ventricle (LV), and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and for the spinal cord and the skin were assessed and compared to a control group with real-world data from 116 patients who underwent WBI. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00004417. Compared to WBI, APBI led to reduced OAR doses for the contralateral breast (0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9 Gy, p = 0.000), the ipsilateral (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 Gy, p = 0.000) and whole mean lung dose (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.000), the mean heart dose (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4 Gy, p = 0.007), the LV V23 (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001), the mean LAD dose (2.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.8 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001), the maximum spinal cord dose (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 5.7 Gy, p = 0.016), and the maximum skin dose (39.6 ± 1.8 vs. 49.1 ± 5.8 Gy, p = 0.000). APBI should be recommended to suitable patients to minimize the risk of secondary tumor induction and the incidence of consecutive major cardiac events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Stillkrieg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Lambrecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia Schweizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Allison Lamrani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tim-Oliver Sauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carolin C Hack
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grzywacz VP, Arden JD, Mankuzhy NP, Gustafson GS, Sebastian EA, Abbott VL, Walters KJ, Puzzonia JA, Limbacher AS, Hafron JM, Krauss DJ. Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101160. [PMID: 36896212 PMCID: PMC9991537 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A "normal tissue" structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. Results Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. Conclusions High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jessica D Arden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Nikhil P Mankuzhy
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph's Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gary S Gustafson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | - Veronica L Abbott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Kailee J Walters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Julie A Puzzonia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Amy S Limbacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Jason M Hafron
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Daniel J Krauss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bufacchi A, Arcangeli G, Pasciuti K. Performance of auto-planning for VMAT hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost. Med Dosim 2023:S0958-3947(23)00025-0. [PMID: 37087355 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
Retrospective analysis of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for hypofractionated left whole-breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost to assess the performance of the auto-planning (AP) engine. Fifteen treatment plans, produced using manual optimization planning approach (MP) were replanned using (AP) approach. Dose-volume parameters were defined to quantify the quality of concurrent treatment plans assessing target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for statistical comparison of all results obtained from the use of the 2 approaches. Dose coverage for both PTVs, PTVbreast, and PTVboost, were similar with AP showing slightly significantly better results for the homogeneity index for both PTVs, for D98% of PTVbreast and D2% of PTVboost. AP plans provided a significant reduction of dose for ipsilateral lung and contralateral lung. No significant differences were observed for heart and contralateral breast. A percentage difference of -14.0% was found for the mean dose of left coronary artery between AP plans and MP plans. Despite increase of total MU by 4.3% for AP plans, planning time resulted about half of that of the MP approach. Although PTVs doses were similar between MP and AP plans, AP plans generally spared OARs significantly better than MP plans. Furthermore, the shortest AP treatment plan time approach was attractive with respect to the workload.
Collapse
|
21
|
Morra A, Schreurs MAC, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Augustinsson A, Beckmann MW, Behrens S, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Brauch H, Broeks A, Buys SS, Camp NJ, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang-Claude J, Chung WK, Collaborators NBCS, Colonna SV, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Dennis J, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Dwek M, Easton DF, Eccles DM, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, Gabrielson M, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, García-Sáenz JA, Genkinger J, Grassmann F, Gündert M, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Hamann U, Harrington PA, Hartikainen JM, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Houlston RS, Howell A, Investigators ABCTB, Investigators KC, Jakubowska A, Janni W, Jernström H, John EM, Johnson N, Jones ME, Kristensen VN, Kurian AW, Lambrechts D, Marchand LL, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Lux MP, Mannermaa A, Mavroudis D, Mulligan AM, Muranen TA, Nevanlinna H, Nevelsteen I, Neven P, Newman WG, Obi N, Offit K, Olshan AF, Park-Simon TW, Patel AV, Peterlongo P, Phillips KA, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Polley EC, Presneau N, Pylkäs K, Rack B, Radice P, Rashid MU, Rhenius V, Robson M, Romero A, Saloustros E, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Schuetze S, Scott C, Shah M, Smichkoska S, Southey MC, Tapper WJ, Teras LR, Tollenaar RA, Tomczyk K, Tomlinson I, Troester MA, Vachon CM, Veen EMV, Wang Q, Wendt C, Wildiers H, Winqvist R, Ziogas A, Hall P, Pharoah PD, Adank MA, Hollestelle A, Schmidt MK, Hooning MJ. Association of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with contralateral breast cancer risk and breast cancer-specific survival. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2569372. [PMID: 36824750 PMCID: PMC9949248 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2569372/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) patients with a germline CHEK2 c.1100delC variant have an increased risk of contralateral BC (CBC) and worse BC-specific survival (BCSS) compared to non-carriers. We aimed to assess the associations of CHEK2 c.1100delC, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment with CBC risk and BCSS. Analyses were based on 82,701 women diagnosed with invasive BC including 963 CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers; median follow-up was 9.1 years. Differential associations of treatment by CHEK2 c.1100delC status were tested by including interaction terms in a multivariable Cox regression model. A multi-state model was used for further insight into the relation between CHEK2 c.1100delC status, treatment, CBC risk and death. There was no evidence for differential associations of therapy with CBC risk by CHEK2 c.1100delC status The strongest association with reduced CBC risk was observed for the combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy [HR(95%CI): 0.66 (0.55-0.78)]. No association was observed with radiotherapy. Results from the multi-state model showed shorter BCSS for CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers versus non-carriers also after accounting for CBC occurrence [HR(95%CI) :1.30 (1.09-1.56)]. In conclusion, systemic therapy was associated with reduced CBC risk irrespective of CHEK2 c.1100delC status. Moreover, CHEK2 c.1100delC carriers had shorter BCSS, which appears not to be fully explained by their CBC risk. (Main MS: 3201 words).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology
| | | | | | | | - Jose E. Castelao
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - D. Gareth Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
| | | | - Tanja N. Fehm
- University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf
| | | | | | | | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
| | - José A. García-Sáenz
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC)
| | | | | | | | - Eric Hahnen
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne
| | | | | | | | | | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Neven
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven
| | | | - Nadia Obi
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Paolo Radice
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne
| | | | | | | | - Snezhana Smichkoska
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Medical Faculty, University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elke M. van Veen
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
| | | | | | - Hans Wildiers
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven
| | | | | | | | | | - Muriel A. Adank
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Evron E, Ben-David MA, Kaidar-Person O, Corn BW. Nonsurgical Options for Risk Reduction of Contralateral Breast Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:964-969. [PMID: 36306484 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ella Evron
- Kaplan Hospital, Hadassah Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Merav A Ben-David
- Assuta Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Faculty of Health Science, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Racka I, Majewska K, Winiecki J. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer patients-comparative analysis of dose distribution and estimation of projected secondary cancer risk. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:90-101. [PMID: 35943553 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01979-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare two techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique (3D-CRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim of the study was estimation of the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary cancer for both radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 25 patients who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), three treatment plans were generated: one using a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and two using volumetric modulated arc therapy. First VMAT-DIBH geometry consisted of three partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 3A) and second consisted of four partial arcs (ARC-DIBH 4A). Cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], ipsilateral and contralateral lung [IL, CL], and contralateral breast [CB]). Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) and organ equivalent doses (OEDs) were calculated using the differential DVHs. Excess absolute risks (EARs) for second cancers were estimated using Schneider's full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS All plans fulfilled the criterium for PTV V95% ≥ 95%. The PTV coverage, homogeneity, and conformity indices were significantly better for VMAT-DIBH. VMAT showed a significantly increased mean dose and V5Gy for all OARs, but reduced LAD Dmax by 15 Gy. For IL, CL, and CB, the 3D-CRT DIBH method achieved the lowest values of EAR: 28.38 per 10,000 PYs, 2.55 per 10,000 PYs, and 4.48 per 10,000 PYs (p < 0.001), compared to 40.29 per 10,000 PYs, 15.62 per 10,000 PYs, and 23.44 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 3A plans and 41.12 per 10,000 PYs, 15.59 per 10,000 PYs, and 22.73 per 10,000 PYs for ARC-DIBH 4A plans. Both techniques provided negligibly low NTCPs for all OARs. CONCLUSION The study shows that VMAT-DIBH provides better OAR sparing against high doses. However, the large low-dose-bath (≤ 5 Gy) is still a concern due to the fact that a larger volume of normal tissues exposed to lower doses may increase a radiation-induced risk of secondary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iga Racka
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Karolina Majewska
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Janusz Winiecki
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Clinic of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicholas Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schoepen M, Speleers B, De Neve W, Vakaet V, Deseyne P, Paelinck L, Van Greveling A, Veldeman L, Detand J, De Gersem W. Four irradiation and three positioning techniques for whole-breast radiotherapy: Is sophisticated always better? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13720. [PMID: 36106550 PMCID: PMC9680580 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report on a dosimetrical study of three patient positions (supine, prone dive, and prone crawl) and four irradiation techniques for whole-breast irradiation (WBI): wedged-tangential fields (W-TF), tangential-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (TF-IMRT), multi-beam IMRT (MB-IMRT), and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT). This is the first study to evaluate prone crawl positioning in WBI and the first study to quantify dosimetrical and anatomical differences with prone dive positioning. METHODS We analyzed five datasets with left- and right-sided patients (n = 51). One dataset also included deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) data. A total of 252 new treatment plans were composed. Dose-volume parameters and indices of conformity were calculated for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs). Furthermore, anatomical differences among patient positions were quantified to explain dosimetrical differences. RESULTS Target coverage was inferior for W-TF and supine position. W-TF proved overall inferior, and IMAT proved foremost effective in supine position. TF-IMRT proved competitive to the more demanding MB-IMRT and IMAT in prone dive, but not in prone crawl position. The lung-sparing effect was overall confirmed for both prone dive and prone crawl positioning and was largest for prone crawl. For the heart, no differences were found between prone dive and supine positioning, whereas prone crawl showed cardiac advantages, although minor compared to the established heart-sparing effect of DIBH. Dose differences for contralateral breast were minor among the patient positions. In prone crawl position, the ipsilateral breast sags deeper and the PTV is further away from the OARs than in prone dive position. CONCLUSIONS The prone dive and prone crawl position are valid alternatives to the supine position in WBI, with largest advantages for lung structures. For the heart, differences are small, which establishes the role of DIBH in different patient positions. These results may be of particular interest to radiotherapy centers with limited technical resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Schoepen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
- Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureGhent UniversityKortrijkBelgium
| | - Bruno Speleers
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
| | - Vincent Vakaet
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium
| | | | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium
| | - Jan Detand
- Department of Industrial Systems Engineering and Product Design, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureGhent UniversityKortrijkBelgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital GhentGhentBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Canet M, Harbron R, Thierry-Chef I, Cardis E. Cancer Effects of Low to Moderate Doses of Ionizing Radiation in Young People with Cancer-Predisposing Conditions: A Systematic Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:1871-1889. [PMID: 35861626 PMCID: PMC9530642 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Moderate to high doses of ionizing radiation (IR) are known to increase the risk of cancer, particularly following childhood exposure. Concerns remain regarding risks from lower doses and the role of cancer-predisposing factors (CPF; genetic disorders, immunodeficiency, mutations/variants in DNA damage detection or repair genes) on radiation-induced cancer (RIC) risk. We conducted a systematic review of evidence that CPFs modify RIC risk in young people. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE for epidemiologic studies of cancer risk in humans (<25 years) with a CPF, exposed to low-moderate IR. Risk of bias was considered. Fifteen articles focusing on leukemia, lymphoma, breast, brain, and thyroid cancers were included. We found inadequate evidence that CPFs modify the risk of radiation-induced leukemia, lymphoma, brain/central nervous system, and thyroid cancers and limited evidence that BRCA mutations modify radiation-induced breast cancer risk. Heterogeneity was observed across studies regarding exposure measures, and the numbers of subjects with CPFs other than BRCA mutations were very small. Further studies with more appropriate study designs are needed to elucidate the impact of CPFs on RIC. They should focus either on populations of carriers of specific gene mutations or on common susceptible variants using polygenic risk scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maelle Canet
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard Harbron
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Balaji K, Ramasubramanian V. Integrated scoring approach to assess radiotherapy plan quality for breast cancer treatment. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:707-716. [PMID: 36196407 PMCID: PMC9521686 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Proposal of an integrated scoring approach assessing the quality of different treatment techniques in a radiotherapy planning comparison. This scoring method incorporates all dosimetric indices of planning target volumes (PTVs) as well as organs at risk (OARs) and provides a single quantitative measure to select an ideal plan. Materials and methods The radiotherapy planning techniques compared were field-in-field (FinF), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), hybrid IMRT (H-IMRT), and hybrid VMAT (H-VMAT). These plans were generated for twenty-five locally advanced left-sided breast cancer patients. The PTVs were prescribed a hypofractionation dose of 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions. The integrated score for each planning technique was calculated using the proposed formula. Results An integrated score value that is close to zero indicates a superior plan. The integrated score that incorporates all dosimetric indices (PTVs and OARs) were 1.37, 1.64, 1.72, 1.18, and 1.24 for FinF, IMRT, VMAT, H-IMRT, and H-VMAT plans, respectively. Conclusion The proposed integrated scoring approach is scientific to select a better plan and flexible to incorporate the patient-specific clinical demands. This simple tool is useful to quantify the treatment techniques and able to differentiate the acceptable and unacceptable plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karunakaran Balaji
- School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Retrospective Analysis for Dose Reduction to Organs at Risk with New Personalized Breast Holder (PERSBRA) in Left Breast IMRT. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091368. [PMID: 36143153 PMCID: PMC9505458 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluated dose differences in normal organs at risk, such as the lungs, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), right coronary artery, left ventricle, and right breast under personalized breast holder (PERSBRA), when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This study evaluated the radiation protection offered by PERSBRA in left breast cancer radiation therapy. Here, we retrospectively collected data from 24 patients with left breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery as well as IMRT radiotherapy. We compared the dose differences in target coverage and organs at risk with and without PERSBRA. For target coverage, tumor prescribed dose 95% coverage, conformity index, and homogeneity index were evaluated. For organs at risk, we compared the mean heart dose, mean left ventricle dose, LAD maximum and mean dose, mean left lung receiving 20 Gy, 10 Gy, and 5 Gy of left lung volume, maximum and mean coronary artery of the right, maximum of right breast, and mean dose. Good target coverage was achieved with and without PERSBRA. When PERSBRA was used with IMRT, the mean dose of the heart decreased by 42%, the maximum dose of LAD decreased by 26.4%, and the mean dose of LAD decreased by 47.0%. The mean dose of the left ventricle decreased by 54.1%, the volume (V20) of the left lung that received 20 Gy decreased by 22.8%, the volume (V10) of the left lung that received 10 Gy decreased by 19.8%, the volume (V5) of the left lung that received 5 Gy decreased by 15.7%, and the mean dose of the left lung decreased by 23.3%. Using PERSBRA with IMRT greatly decreases the dose to organs at risk (left lung, heart, left ventricle, and LAD). This study found that PERSBRA with IMRT can achieve results similar to deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy (DIBH) in terms of reducing the heart radiation dose and the risk of developing heart disease in patients with left breast cancer who cannot undergo DIBH.
Collapse
|
28
|
Leon SM, Paucar O, Correa N, Glassell M, Gonzales Ccoscco AEE, Olguin EA, Shankar A, Moskvin V, Schwarz BC, Alva-Sanchez MS, Moyses H, Hamrick B, Sarria G, Li B, Tajima T, Necas A, Guzman C, Challco R, Montoya Zavaleta ME, Meza Z, Zapata Requena MR, Gonzales Gálvez A, Marquina J, Quispe K, Chavez T, Castilla L, Moscoso Carrasco JM, Ramirez J, Marquez Pachas JF, Neira E, Vilca W, Mendez J, Hernandez J, Roa D. Low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs using an interventional radiology C-arm fluoroscope: Monte Carlo treatment planning and dose measurements in a postmortem subject. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 35961284 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac8939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to use Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements to investigate the dosimetric suitability of an interventional radiology (IR) c-arm fluoroscope to deliver low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs. APPROACH A previously-validated MC model of an IR fluoroscope was used to calculate the dose distributions in a COVID-19-infected patient, 20 non-infected patients of varying sizes, and a postmortem subject. Dose distributions for PA, AP/PA, 3-field and 4-field treatments irradiating 95% of the lungs to a 0.5 Gy dose were calculated. An algorithm was created to calculate skin entrance dose as a function of patient thickness for treatment planning purposes. Treatments were experimentally validated in a postmortem subject by using implanted dosimeters to capture organ doses. MAIN RESULTS Mean doses to the left/right lungs for the COVID-19 CT data were 1.2/1.3 Gy, 0.8/0.9 Gy, 0.8/0.8 Gy and 0.6/0.6 Gy for the PA, AP/PA, 3-field, and 4-field configurations, respectively. Skin dose toxicity was the highest probability for the PA and lowest for the 4-field configuration. Dose to the heart slightly exceeded the ICRP tolerance; all other organ doses were below published tolerances. The AP/PA configuration provided the best fit for entrance skin dose as a function of patient thickness (R2 = 0.8). The average dose difference between simulation and measurement in the postmortem subject was 0.7%. SIGNIFICANCE An IR fluoroscope should be capable of delivering low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs with tolerable collateral dose to nearby organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Leon
- Radiology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100374, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, UNITED STATES
| | - Oliver Paucar
- Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Av. Túpac Amaru 210, Rimac, 15333, PERU
| | - Nathalie Correa
- Radiology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100374, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, UNITED STATES
| | - Megan Glassell
- Radiology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100374, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, UNITED STATES
| | | | - Edmond Alonso Olguin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, UNITED STATES
| | - Alok Shankar
- Radiology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100374, Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, UNITED STATES
| | - Vadim Moskvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 210, Memphis, Tennessee, 38105, UNITED STATES
| | - Bryan C Schwarz
- Radiology, University of Florida, PO Box 100374, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0374, UNITED STATES
| | - Mirko Salomon Alva-Sanchez
- Ciências Exatas e Sócias aplicadas, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Rua Sarmento Leite, 245, Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, 90050-170, BRAZIL
| | - Harry Moyses
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, California, 92868, UNITED STATES
| | - Barbara Hamrick
- Environmental Health and Safety, University of California Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, California, 92868, UNITED STATES
| | - Gustavo Sarria
- University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 53127, GERMANY
| | - Benjamin Li
- University of California San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California, 94115, UNITED STATES
| | - Toshiki Tajima
- University of California, 4129 Frederick Reines Hall, Irvine, California, 92697, UNITED STATES
| | - Ales Necas
- TAE Technologies, 1961 Pauling, Foothill Ranch, California, 92610, UNITED STATES
| | - Carmen Guzman
- Universidad Ricardo Palma Facultad de Medicina Humana, Av. Benavides 5440, Santiago de Surco, Lima, 33, PERU
| | - Roger Challco
- Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Av. Túpac Amaru 210, Rimac, 15333, PERU
| | | | - Zintia Meza
- Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería, Av. Túpac Amaru 210, Rimac, 15333, PERU
| | | | | | - Juan Marquina
- Aliada Centro Oncologico, Av. José Gálvez Barrenechea N° 1044, San Isidro, Lima, 27, PERU
| | - Karina Quispe
- Aliada Centro Oncologico, Av. José Gálvez Barrenechea N° 1044, San Isidro, Lima, 27, PERU
| | - Toribia Chavez
- Aliada Centro Oncologico, Av. José Gálvez Barrenechea N° 1044, San Isidro, Lima, 27, PERU
| | - Luisa Castilla
- Aliada Centro Oncologico, Av. José Gálvez Barrenechea N° 1044, San Isidro, Lima, 27, PERU
| | | | - Jose Ramirez
- Aliada Centro Oncologico, Av. José Gálvez Barrenechea N° 1044, San Isidro, Lima, Callao, 27, PERU
| | - Jose Fernando Marquez Pachas
- FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS FÍSICAS, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, AV. CARLOS AMEZAGA 375, LIMA 1, Lima, LIMA, 506, PERU
| | - Edith Neira
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Av. Angamos 2520, Surquillo, Lima, 15038, PERU
| | - Walter Vilca
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Av. Angamos 2520, Surquillo, Lima, 15038, PERU
| | - Juan Mendez
- Universidad Nacional del Callao, Av. Juan Pablo Ⅱ 306, Bellavista, Callao, 07011, PERU
| | - Jimmy Hernandez
- HRS Oncology International, 2657 Windmill Parkway, PO Box 375, Henderson, Nevada, 89074, UNITED STATES
| | - Dante Roa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, California, 92868, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aristei C, Bölükbaşı Y, Kaidar-Person O, Pfeffer R, Arenas M, Boersma LJ, Ciabattoni A, Coles CE, Franco P, Krengli M, Leonardi MC, Marazzi F, Masiello V, Meattini I, Montero A, Offersen B, Trigo ML, Bourgier C, Genovesi D, Kouloulias V, Morganti AG, Meduri B, Pasinetti N, Pedretti S, Perrucci E, Rivera S, Tombolini V, Vidali C, Valentini V, Poortmans P. Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 177:103774. [PMID: 35917884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Oncology Institute, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion University Medical School, Israel
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Hoan de Reus, IISPV, Spain
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Antonella Ciabattoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Marazzi
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence & Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Lurdes Trigo
- Service of Brachytherapy, Department of Image and Radioncology, Instituto Português Oncologia Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Clinicizzato Chieti and University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2(nd) Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna; DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University; Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Istituto del Radio "O.Alberti" - Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia
| | | | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, University "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- former Senior Assistant Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang Z, Li D, Peng F, Tan Z, Yang P, Peng Z, Li X, Qi X, Sun W, Liu Y, Wang Y. Evaluation of Hybrid VMAT Advantages and Robustness Considering Setup Errors Using Surface Guided Dose Accumulation for Internal Lymph Mammary Nodes Irradiation of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:907181. [PMID: 35936730 PMCID: PMC9354548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.907181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Setup error is a key factor affecting postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes is the most investigated aspect for PMRT patients. In this study, we evaluated the robustness, radiobiological, and dosimetric benefits of the hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) planning technique based on the setup error in dose accumulation using a surface-guided system for radiation therapy. Methods We retrospectively selected 32 patients treated by a radiation oncologist and evaluated the clinical target volume (CTV), including internal lymph node irradiation (IMNIs), and considered the planning target volume (PTV) margin to be 5 mm. Three different planning techniques were evaluated: tangential-VMAT (T-VMAT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and H-VMAT. The interfraction and intrafraction setup errors were analyzed in each field and the accumulated dose was evaluated as the patients underwent daily surface-guided monitoring. These parameters were included while evaluating CTV coverage, the dose required for the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and the left ventricle (LV), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the heart and lungs, and the second cancer complication probability (SCCP) for contralateral breast (CB). Results When the setup error was accounted for dose accumulation, T-VMAT (95.51%) and H-VMAT (95.48%) had a higher CTV coverage than IMRT (91.25%). In the NTCP for the heart, H-VMAT (0.04%) was higher than T-VMAT (0.01%) and lower than IMRT (0.2%). However, the SCCP (1.05%) of CB using H-VMAT was lower than that using T-VMAT (2%) as well as delivery efficiency. And T-VMAT (3.72) and IMRT (10.5).had higher plan complexity than H-VMAT (3.71). Conclusions In this study, based on the dose accumulation of setup error for patients with left-sided PMRT with IMNI, we found that the H-VMAT technique was superior for achieving an optimum balance between target coverage, OAR dose, complication probability, plan robustness, and complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Daming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Feng Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhibo Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Pengfei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhaoming Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen-Peking University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xinyue Qi
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Weixiao Sun
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yajie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center, Shenzhen-Peking University, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yajie Liu, ; Yuenan Wang,
| | - Yuenan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Yajie Liu, ; Yuenan Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lai L, Yen T, Liu Y. A comprehensive dosimetric comparison in adjuvant radiotherapy for various regional lymph node irradiations of left-side breast cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
32
|
Chen CP, Lin CY, Kuo CC, Chen TH, Lin SC, Tseng KH, Cheng HW, Chao HL, Yen SH, Lin RY, Feng CJ, Lu LS, Chiou JF, Hsu SM. Skin Surface Dose for Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Personalized Breast Holder: Comparison with Various Radiotherapy Techniques and Clinical Experiences. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133205. [PMID: 35804977 PMCID: PMC9264904 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Breast immobilization with personalized breast holder (PERSBRA) is a promising approach for normal organ protection during whole breast radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the skin surface dose for breast radiotherapy with PERSBRA using different radiotherapy techniques. Materials and methods: We designed PERSBRA with three different mesh sizes (large, fine and solid) and applied them on an anthropomorphic(Rando) phantom. Treatment planning was generated using hybrid, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques to deliver a prescribed dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions accordingly. Dose measurement with EBT3 film and TLD were taken on Rando phantom without PERSBRA, large mesh, fine mesh and solid PERSBRA for (a) tumor doses, (b) surface doses for medial field and lateral field irradiation undergoing hybrid, IMRT, VMAT techniques. Results: The tumor dose deviation was less than five percent between the measured doses of the EBT3 film and the TLD among the different techniques. The application of a PERSBRA was associated with a higher dose of the skin surface. A large mesh size of PERSBRA was associated with a lower surface dose. The findings were consistent among hybrid, IMRT, or VMAT techniques. Conclusions: Breast immobilization with PERSBRA can reduce heart toxicity but leads to a build-up of skin surface doses, which can be improved with a larger mesh design for common radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiu-Ping Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Chi-Yeh Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
| | - Chia-Chun Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program for Cancer Molecular Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University and Academia Sinica, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Tung-Ho Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
| | - Shao-Chen Lin
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
| | - Kuo-Hsiung Tseng
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan;
| | - Hao-Wen Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan;
- School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Lung Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan
| | - Sang-Hue Yen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (C.-P.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (C.-C.K.); (H.-L.C.); (S.-H.Y.)
| | - Ruo-Yu Lin
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Chen-Ju Feng
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
| | - Long-Sheng Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- TMU Research Center of Cancer Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Ph.D. Program for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fong Chiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan; (T.-H.C.); (L.-S.L.)
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (J.-F.C.); (S.-M.H.)
| | - Shih-Ming Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; (R.-Y.L.); (C.-J.F.)
- Correspondence: (J.-F.C.); (S.-M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wakeford R, Hauptmann M. The risk of cancer following high, and very high, doses of ionising radiation. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:020518. [PMID: 35671754 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac767b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
It is established that moderate-to-high doses of ionising radiation increase the risk of subsequent cancer in the exposed individual, but the question arises as to the risk of cancer from higher doses, such as those delivered during radiotherapy, accidents, or deliberate acts of malice. In general, the cumulative dose received during a course of radiation treatment is sufficiently high that it would kill a person if delivered as a single dose to the whole body, but therapeutic doses are carefully fractionated and high/very high doses are generally limited to a small tissue volume under controlled conditions. The very high cumulative doses delivered as fractions during radiation treatment are designed to inactivate diseased cells, but inevitably some healthy cells will also receive high/very high doses. How the doses (ranging from <1 Gy to tens of Gy) received by healthy tissues during radiotherapy affect the risk of second primary cancer is an increasingly important issue to address as more cancer patients survive the disease. Studies show that, except for a turndown for thyroid cancer, a linear dose-response for second primary solid cancers seems to exist over a cumulative gamma radiation dose range of tens of gray, but with a gradient of excess relative risk per Gy that varies with the type of second cancer, and which is notably shallower than that found in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors receiving a single moderate-to-high acute dose. The risk of second primary cancer consequent to high/very high doses of radiation is likely to be due to repopulation of heavily irradiated tissues by surviving stem cells, some of which will have been malignantly transformed by radiation exposure, although the exact mechanism is not known, and various models have been proposed. It is important to understand the mechanisms that lead to the raised risk of second primary cancers consequent to the receipt of high/very high doses, in particular so that the risks associated with novel radiation treatment regimens-for example, intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy that deliver high doses to the target volume while exposing relatively large volumes of healthy tissue to low/moderate doses, and treatments using protons or heavy ions rather than photons-may be properly assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wakeford
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Fehrbelliner Strasse 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Xia C, Qin L, Wang Y, Yao L, Shia B, Wu SY. Risk factors and specific cancer types of second primary malignancies in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy: a case-control cohort study based on the SEER database. Am J Cancer Res 2022; 12:2744-2756. [PMID: 35812050 PMCID: PMC9251704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with breast cancer can survive and live a long, cancer-free life; however, late complications of treatment, such as second primary malignancies (SPMs), have emerged as a competing cause of death and morbidity. We conducted a long-term population-based cohort study to identify the risk factors for SPMs and specific secondary cancer types after various latency periods of irradiated breast cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for independent risk factors for SPM. We also calculated the HR of each specific cancer type and the latency time to specific SPMs. The risk of SPM was statistically significantly higher in patients with adjuvant RT than in patients without adjuvant RT (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.105, 95% CI: 1.013-1.206). Compared with the control group, the case group had significantly increased risks of contralateral breast cancer (aHR: 1.268, 95% CI: 1.112-1.445), lung cancer (aHR: 1.218, 95% CI: 1.049-1.565), and urinary system cancer (aHR: 1.702, 95% CI: 1.140-2.543). Adjuvant RT for breast cancer increases the risk of SPM. Contralateral breast cancer, lung cancer, and bladder cancer were significant SPMs after breast RT, although the cumulative risk of SPM was low, at approximately 6, 10, and 13 cancers per 1000 women with irradiated breasts at latency periods of 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, after breast RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanxin Xia
- Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic CooperationDongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Qin
- School of Statistics, University of International Business and EconomicsBeijing, China
| | - Yinzhi Wang
- School of Statistics, University of International Business and EconomicsBeijing, China
| | - Ling Yao
- Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic CooperationDongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Benchang Shia
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei City, Taiwan
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Yuan Wu
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei City, Taiwan
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia UniversityTaichung, Taiwan
- Big Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai HospitalYilan, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai HospitalYilan, Taiwan
- Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia UniversityTaichung, Taiwan
- Centers for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical UniversityTaipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Haimour A, Alkhaibary A, Alabssi H, Tous M, Alqarni A, Saleh M, Alshehri S. Аssessment of E-learning readiness among different levels of Nursing Learners in KING SAUD MEDICAL CITY. CARDIOMETRY 2022. [DOI: 10.18137/cardiometry.2022.22.160167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Nurses’ and students’ willingness to increase information and practical skills through electronic platforms may help in setting up hundreds of timesaving and economical e-learning programs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the readiness of e-learning among different levels of nurses and nursing students. Methods: In this quantitative research, 425 participants from King Saud Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were included. The study population included nurses and nursing students. Results: With p < 0.042 the research indicated that there are statistically significant differences between nursing groups with respect to e-Learning readiness. Conclusions: The nursing staff and students in King Saud Medical City demonstrated significant readiness levels towards e-learning, while the level of readiness and experience towards e-learning vary for different nursing groups
Collapse
|
36
|
Modulation of Secondary Cancer Risks from Radiation Exposure by Sex, Age and Gonadal Hormone Status: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12050725. [PMID: 35629147 PMCID: PMC9146871 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Available data on cancer secondary to ionizing radiation consistently show an excess (2-fold amount) of radiation-attributable solid tumors in women relative to men. This excess risk varies by organ and age, with the largest sex differences (6- to more than 10-fold) found in female thyroid and breasts exposed between birth until menopause (~50 years old) relative to age-matched males. Studies in humans and animals also show large changes in cell proliferation rates, radiotracer accumulation and target density in female reproductive organs, breast, thyroid and brain in conjunction with physiological changes in gonadal hormones during the menstrual cycle, puberty, lactation and menopause. These sex differences and hormonal effects present challenges as well as opportunities to personalize radiation-based treatment and diagnostic paradigms so as to optimize the risk/benefit ratios in radiation-based cancer therapy and diagnosis. Specifically, Targeted Radionuclide Therapy (TRT) is a fast-expanding cancer treatment modality utilizing radiopharmaceuticals with high avidity to specific molecular tumor markers, many of which are influenced by sex and gonadal hormone status. However, past and present dosimetry studies of TRT agents do not stratify results by sex and hormonal environment. We conclude that cancer management using ionizing radiation should be personalized and informed by the patient sex, age and hormonal status.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ogino I, Seto H, Shigenaga D, Hata M. Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:113-120. [PMID: 35402036 PMCID: PMC8989456 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The most common secondary cancer is contralateral breast (CLB) cancer after whole breast irradiation (WBI). The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction of CLB dose in tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) for WBI using flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. Materials and methods We generated automated planning of 20 young breast cancer patients with limited user interaction. Dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung, heart, and CLB were calculated. The dose of PTV, the most medial CLB point, and the CLB point below the nipple was measured using an ionization chamber inserted in a slab phantom. We compared the two t-IMRT plans generated by FFF beams and flattening-filter (FF) beams. Results All plans were clinically acceptable. There was no difference in the conformal index, the homogeneity for FFF was significantly worse. For the ipsilateral lung, the maximum dose (Dmax) was significantly higher; however, V20 showed a tendency to be lower in the FFF plan. No differences were found in the Dmax and V30 to the heart of the left breast cancer. FF planning showed significantly lower Dmax and mean dose to the CLB. In contrast to the calculation results, the measured dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple were significantly lower in FFF mode than in FF mode, with mean reductions of 21.1% and 20%, respectively. Conclusions T-IMRT planning using FFF reduced the measured out-of-field dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Ogino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Seto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Daisuke Shigenaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Iezzi M, Cusumano D, Piccari D, Menna S, Catucci F, D’Aviero A, Re A, Di Dio C, Quaranta F, Boschetti A, Marras M, Piro D, Tomei F, Votta C, Valentini V, Mattiucci GC. Dosimetric Impact of Inter-Fraction Variability in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Towards New Criteria to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:838039. [PMID: 35480103 PMCID: PMC9035849 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.838039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose As a discipline in its infancy, online adaptive RT (ART) needs new ontologies and ad hoc criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of its use in clinical practice. In this experience, we propose a predictive model able to quantify the dosimetric impact due to daily inter-fraction variability in a standard RT breast treatment, to identify in advance the treatment fractions where patients might benefit from an online ART approach. Methods The study was focused on right breast cancer patients treated using standard adjuvant RT on an artificial intelligence (AI)-based linear accelerator. Patients were treated with daily CBCT images and without online adaptation, prescribing 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, with four IMRT tangential beams. ESTRO guidelines were followed for the delineation on planning CT (pCT) of organs at risk and targets. For each patient, all the CBCT images were rigidly aligned to pCT: CTV and PTV were manually re-contoured and the original treatment plan was recalculated. Various radiological parameters were measured on CBCT images, to quantify inter-fraction variability present in each RT fraction after the couch shifts compensation. The variation of these parameters was correlated with the variation of V95% of PTV (ΔV95%) using the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test. Fractions where ΔV95% > 2% were considered as adverse events. A logistic regression model was calculated considering the most significant parameter, and its performance was quantified with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results A total of 75 fractions on 5 patients were analyzed. The body variation between daily CBCT and pCT along the beam axis with the highest MU was identified as the best predictor (p = 0.002). The predictive model showed an area under ROC curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82–0.99) with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 83.8% at the best threshold, which was equal to 3 mm. Conclusion A novel strategy to identify treatment fractions that may benefit online ART was proposed. After image alignment, the measure of body difference between daily CBCT and pCT can be considered as an indirect estimator of V95% PTV variation: a difference larger than 3 mm will result in a V95% decrease larger than 2%. A larger number of observations is needed to confirm the results of this hypothesis-generating study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Davide Cusumano,
| | - Danila Piccari
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Menna
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | - Andrea D’Aviero
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Alessia Re
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Carmela Di Dio
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Marras
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Domenico Piro
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Flavia Tomei
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Claudio Votta
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yoon J, Davis D, Li D, Lian C, Mostaghimi A. Atypical post-radiation vascular proliferation outside field of prior radiation exposure. JAAD Case Rep 2022; 24:1-3. [PMID: 35518275 PMCID: PMC9062730 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jaewon Yoon
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dale Davis
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Li
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christine Lian
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arash Mostaghimi
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Correspondence to: Arash Mostaghimi, MD, MPA, MPH, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Uğurlu BT, Türk A, Celasun MG, Hekimoglu A. Fluence map analyzer reduces low dose volume in locally advanced post mastectomy breast cancer patients. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8:035003. [PMID: 35203070 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac584e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Multi-leaf collimator dose leakage in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans causes higher low dose volume which increases the long-term risks of radiotherapy. We have developed Fluence Map Analyzer (FMA) program that suggests the ideal field geometry to reduce low dose volume in locally advanced breast cancer IMRT plans. In this comparative experimental study, FMA has been applied to standard IMRT plans (STD-IMRT) of randomly selected 15 left and 15 right-sided locally advanced breast cancer patients. All patients underwent a modified radical mastectomy. The chest wall, IMN, axillary, and supraclavicular lymph nodes are included in planning target volume (PTV). The heart, lungs, contralateral breast, and medulla spinalis were delineated as organs at risk (OARs). Two sets of plans, namely STD-IMRT and FMA-IMRT, were generated for each patient. The dosimetric analysis was performed using dose-volume histogram (DVH) and standard evaluation parameters of PTV and OARs. No differences could be observed among the two techniques for PTV coverage. However, FMA-IMRT plans achieved significantly lower V5volumes and mean doses of the heart, lungs, contralateral breast, and body contours. FMA-IMRT used a smaller number of sub-fields and fewer monitor units (MU). FMA automizes the field geometry determination process for locally advanced breast cancer IMRT planning while reducing low dose volume significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berat Tuğrul Uğurlu
- Kutahya Health Science University Medicine Faculty Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, 43040, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Ali Türk
- Kutahya Health Science University Medicine Faculty Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, 43040, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Gürol Celasun
- Kutahya Health Science University Medicine Faculty Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, 43040, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Azamat Hekimoglu
- Afyonkarahisar Health Science University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stanton C, Bell LJ, Le A, Griffiths B, Wu K, Adams J, Ambrose L, Andree‐Evarts D, Porter B, Bromley R, van Gysen K, Morgia M, Lamoury G, Eade T, Booth JT, Carroll S. Comprehensive nodal breast VMAT: solving the low-dose wash dilemma using an iterative knowledge-based radiotherapy planning solution. J Med Radiat Sci 2022; 69:85-97. [PMID: 34387031 PMCID: PMC8892431 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aimed to develop a simple and robust volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) solution for comprehensive lymph node (CLN) breast cancer without increase in low-dose wash. METHODS Forty CLN-breast patient data sets were utilised to develop a knowledge-based planning (KBP) VMAT model, which limits low-dose wash using iterative learning and base-tangential methods as benchmark. Another twenty data sets were employed to validate the model comparing KBP-generated ipsilateral VMAT (ipsi-VMAT) plans against the benchmarked hybrid (h)-VMAT (departmental standard) and bowtie-VMAT (published best practice) methods. Planning target volume (PTV), conformity/homogeneity index (CI/HI), organ-at-risk (OAR), remaining-volume-at-risk (RVR) and blinded radiation oncologist (RO) plan preference were evaluated. RESULTS Ipsi- and bowtie-VMAT plans were dosimetrically equivalent, achieving greater nodal target coverage (P < 0.05) compared to h-VMAT with minor reduction in breast coverage. CI was enhanced for a small reduction in breast HI with improved dose sparing to ipsilateral-lung and humeral head (P < 0.05) at immaterial expense to spinal cord. Significantly, low-dose wash to OARs and RVR were comparable between all plan types demonstrating a simple VMAT class solution robust to patient-specific anatomic variation can be applied to CLN breast without need for complex beam modification (hybrid plans, avoidance sectors or other). This result was supported by blinded RO review. CONCLUSIONS A simple and robust ipsilateral VMAT class solution for CLN breast generated using iterative KBP modelling can achieve clinically acceptable target coverage and OAR sparing without unwanted increase in low-dose wash associated with increased second malignancy risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Stanton
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Linda J. Bell
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Andrew Le
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Brooke Griffiths
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kenny Wu
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jessica Adams
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Leigh Ambrose
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Denise Andree‐Evarts
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Brian Porter
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Regina Bromley
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kirsten van Gysen
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marita Morgia
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Gillian Lamoury
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jeremy T. Booth
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Institute of Medical PhysicsSchool of PhysicsUniversity of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Susan Carroll
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentNorthern Sydney Cancer CentreRoyal North Shore HospitalSt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySt LeonardsNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Anand S, Pandey P, Begum MY, Chidambaram K, Arya DK, Gupta RK, Sankhwar R, Jaiswal S, Thakur S, Rajinikanth PS. Electrospun Biomimetic Multifunctional Nanofibers Loaded with Ferulic Acid for Enhanced Antimicrobial and Wound-Healing Activities in STZ-Induced Diabetic Rats. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:302. [PMID: 35337100 PMCID: PMC8954421 DOI: 10.3390/ph15030302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulceration is the most distressing complication of diabetes having no standard therapy. Nanofibers are an emerging and versatile nanotechnology-based drug-delivery system with unique wound-healing properties. This study aimed to prepare and evaluate silk-sericin based hybrid nanofibrous mats for diabetic foot ulcer. The nanofibrous mats were prepared by electrospinning using silk sericin mixed with different proportions of polycaprolactone (PCL) and cellulose acetate (CA) loaded with ferulic acid (FA). The in vitro characterizations, such as surface morphology, mechanical properties, swelling behavior, biodegradability, scanning electron microscopy, and drug release were carried out. The SEM images indicated that nanofibers formed with varied diameters, ranging from 100 to 250 nm, and their tensile strength was found to range from 7 to 15 MPa. In vitro release demonstrated that the nanofibers sustained FA release over an extended time of period. In vitro cytotoxicity showed that the nanofibers possessed a lower cytotoxicity in HaCaT cells. The in vivo wound-healing studies demonstrated an excellent wound-healing efficiency of the nanofibers in diabetic rats. Furthermore, the histopathological studies showed the nanofibers' ability to restore the skin's normal structure. Therefore, it was concluded that the prepared silk-sericin-based hybrid nanofibers loaded with FA could be a promising drug-delivery platform for the effective treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Anand
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (S.A.); (P.P.); (D.K.A.); (S.J.); (S.T.)
| | - Prashant Pandey
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (S.A.); (P.P.); (D.K.A.); (S.J.); (S.T.)
| | | | - Kumarappan Chidambaram
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Dilip Kumar Arya
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (S.A.); (P.P.); (D.K.A.); (S.J.); (S.T.)
| | - Ravi Kr. Gupta
- Department of Environmental Microbiology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (R.K.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Ruchi Sankhwar
- Department of Environmental Microbiology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (R.K.G.); (R.S.)
| | - Shweta Jaiswal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (S.A.); (P.P.); (D.K.A.); (S.J.); (S.T.)
| | - Sunita Thakur
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow 226025, India; (S.A.); (P.P.); (D.K.A.); (S.J.); (S.T.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kowalchuk RO, Corbin KS, Jimenez RB. Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041066. [PMID: 35205814 PMCID: PMC8870138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Kimberly S. Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jayaram CS, Chauhan N, Dolma SK, Reddy SGE. Chemical Composition and Insecticidal Activities of Essential Oils against the Pulse Beetle. Molecules 2022; 27:568. [PMID: 35056883 PMCID: PMC8777654 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pulse beetles, Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus, are essential pests of cowpea, gram, soybean and pulses. Application of synthetic insecticides against the pulse beetle has led to insect resistance; insecticide residues on grains affect human health and the environment. Essential oils (EOs) are the best alternatives to synthetics due to their safety to the environment and health. The main objective of the investigation was to study the chemical composition and insecticidal activities of EOs, their combinations and compounds against the pulse beetle under laboratory. Neo-isomenthol, carvone and β-ocimene are the significant components of tested oils using GC-MS. Mentha spicata showed promising fumigant toxicity against C. chinensis (LC50 = 0.94 µL/mL) and was followed by M. piperita (LC50 = 0.98 µL/mL), whereas M. piperita (LC50 = 0.92 µL/mL) against C. maculatus. A combination of Tagetes minuta + M. piperita showed more toxicity against C. chinensis after 48 h (LC50 = 0.87 µL/mL) than T. minuta + M. spicata (LC50 = 1.07 µL/mL). L-Carvone showed fumigant toxicity against C. chinensis after 48 h (LC50 = 1.19 µL/mL). Binary mixtures of T. minuta +M. piperita and M. spicata showed promising toxicity and synergistic activity. EOs also exhibited repellence and ovipositional inhibition. The application of M. piperita can be recommended for the control of the pulse beetle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. S. Jayaram
- Entomology Laboratory, Agrotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur 176061, India; (C.S.J.); (N.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Nandita Chauhan
- Entomology Laboratory, Agrotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur 176061, India; (C.S.J.); (N.C.); (S.K.D.)
| | - Shudh Kirti Dolma
- Entomology Laboratory, Agrotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur 176061, India; (C.S.J.); (N.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
| | - S. G. Eswara Reddy
- Entomology Laboratory, Agrotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur 176061, India; (C.S.J.); (N.C.); (S.K.D.)
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang R, Shen J, Yan H, Gao X, Dong T, Li S, Wang P, Zhou J. Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in patients of left-sided breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy: CONSORT. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e28427. [PMID: 35029181 PMCID: PMC8757972 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel treatment strategy that protects normal tissues and enhances target volume coverage during radiotherapy.This study aimed to clarify whether VMAT is superior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer patients after modified radical mastectomy.Left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modified radical mastectomy were eligible for analysis. The dose distribution of both planning target volume and organs at risk were analyzed by using dose volume histograms.Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis. Both VMAT and IMRT plans were sufficient in planning target volume coverage. In terms of conformity, VMAT was superior to IMRT (P = .034). Dmean, V5, and V10 of the heart were significantly decreased in VMAT plans when compared with IMRT plans. VMAT was as effective as IMRT plans in sparing of other normal tissues. In addition, both the mean number of monitor units and treatment time were significantly reduced when VMAT was compared with IMRT.VMAT plans was equivalent or superior to IMRT plans in dose distribution, and was associated with slightly advantage in sparing of the heart and coronary arteries. Our analyses suggested VMAT as a preferred option in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modified radical mastectomy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Olacak N, Hazeral Y, Hazeral B, Duran O, Güray G, Alanyali S, Haydaroğlu A. Dosimetric evaluation of different radiotherapy techniques in mastectomized left-sided breast cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1018_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
47
|
Settatree S, Dunlop A, Mohajer J, Brand D, Mooney L, Ross G, Gulliford S, Harris E, Kirby A. What Can Proton Beam Therapy Achieve for Patients with Pectus Excavatum Requiring Left Breast, Axilla and Internal Mammary Nodal Radiotherapy? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e570-e577. [PMID: 34226114 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Exposure of the heart to radiation increases the risk of ischaemic heart disease, proportionate to the mean heart dose (MHD). Radiotherapy techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce MHD. The aims of this study were to quantify the MHD reduction achievable by PBT compared with volumetric modulated arc therapy in breath hold (VMAT-BH) in patients with pectus excavatum (PEx), to identify an anatomical metric from a computed tomography scan that might indicate which patients will achieve the greatest MHD reductions from PBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen patients with PEx (Haller Index ≥2.7) were identified from radiotherapy planning computed tomography images. Left breast/chest wall, axilla (I-IV) and internal mammary node (IMN) volumes were delineated. VMAT and PBT plans were prepared, all satisfying target coverage constraints. Signed-rank comparisons of techniques were undertaken for the mean dose to the heart, ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast. Spearman's rho correlations were calculated for anatomical metrics against MHD reduction achieved by PBT. RESULTS The mean MHD for VMAT-BH plans was 4.1 Gy compared with 0.7 Gy for PBT plans. PBT reduced MHD by an average of 3.4 Gy (range 2.8-4.4 Gy) compared with VMAT-BH (P < 0.001). PBT significantly reduced the mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (4.7 Gy, P < 0.001) and contralateral breast (2.7 Gy, P < 0.001). The distance (mm) at the most inferomedial extent of IMN volume (IMN to heart distance) negatively correlated with MHD reduction achieved by PBT (Spearman's rho -0.88 (95% confidence interval -0.96 to -0.67, P < 0.001)). CONCLUSION For patients with PEx requiring left-sided breast and IMN radiotherapy, a clinically significant MHD reduction is achievable using PBT, compared with the optimal photon technique (VMAT-BH). This is a patient group in whom PBT could have the greatest benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Settatree
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A Dunlop
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Mohajer
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Brand
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - L Mooney
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Ross
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Gulliford
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospital, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, UK
| | - E Harris
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Kirby
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Watt GP, Knight JA, Lin C, Lynch CF, Malone KE, John EM, Bernstein L, Brooks JD, Reiner AS, Liang X, Woods M, Nguyen TL, Hopper JL, Pike MC, Bernstein JL. Mammographic texture features associated with contralateral breast cancer in the WECARE Study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:146. [PMID: 34845211 PMCID: PMC8630158 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00354-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate whether mammographic texture features were associated with second primary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk, we created a "texture risk score" using pre-treatment mammograms in a case-control study of 212 women with CBC and 223 controls with unilateral breast cancer. The texture risk score was associated with CBC (odds per adjusted standard deviation = 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.56) after adjustment for mammographic percent density and confounders. These results support the potential of texture features for CBC risk assessment of breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P. Watt
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Julia A. Knight
- grid.250674.20000 0004 0626 6184Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Christine Lin
- grid.240473.60000 0004 0543 9901Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA
| | - Charles F. Lynch
- grid.214572.70000 0004 1936 8294 Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
| | - Kathleen E. Malone
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Esther M. John
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA ,grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- grid.410425.60000 0004 0421 8357Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA USA
| | - Jennifer D. Brooks
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Anne S. Reiner
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Meghan Woods
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Tuong L. Nguyen
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Jonine L. Bernstein
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chun S, Gopal J, Muthu M. Antioxidant Activity of Mushroom Extracts/Polysaccharides-Their Antiviral Properties and Plausible AntiCOVID-19 Properties. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:1899. [PMID: 34943001 PMCID: PMC8750169 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10121899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Mushrooms have been long accomplished for their medicinal properties and bioactivity. The ancients benefitted from it, even before they knew that there was more to mushrooms than just the culinary aspect. This review addresses the benefits of mushrooms and specifically dwells on the positive attributes of mushroom polysaccharides. Compared to mushroom research, mushroom polysaccharide-based reports were observed to be significantly less frequent. This review highlights the antioxidant properties and mechanisms as well as consolidates the various antioxidant applications of mushroom polysaccharides. The biological activities of mushroom polysaccharides are also briefly discussed. The antiviral properties of mushrooms and their polysaccharides have been reviewed and presented. The lacunae in implementation of the antiviral benefits into antiCOVID-19 pursuits has been highlighted. The need for expansion and extrapolation of the knowns of mushrooms to extend into the unknown is emphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manikandan Muthu
- Department of Environmental Health Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea; (S.C.); (J.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer including internal mammary nodes. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:499-507. [PMID: 34821135 PMCID: PMC8647793 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT) is proposed to reduce toxicity in heart and lungs for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Patients and methods This retrospective study included 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent locoregional radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. For each patient, the ncVMAT plan was designed with four partial arcs comprising two coplanar arcs and two non-coplanar arcs, with a couch rotating to 90°. The prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of planning target volume (PTV), with 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions. For each ncVMAT plan, dosimetric parameters were compared with the coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (coV-MAT) plan. Results T here were improvements in conformity index, homogeneity index and V55 of total target volume (PTVall) comparing ncVMAT to coVMAT (p < 0.001). Among the organs at risk, the average V30, V20, V10, V5, and mean dose (Dmean) of the heart decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ncVMAT significantly reduced the mean V20, V10, V5, and Dmean of left lung and the mean V10 and V5 and Dmean of contralateral lung (p < 0.001). An improved sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery and right breast were also observed with ncVMAT (p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared to coVMAT, ncVMAT provides improved conformity and homogeneity of whole P TV, better dose sparing of the heart, bilateral lungs, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and right breast for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with IMN, potentially reducing the risk of normal tissue damage.
Collapse
|