Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Begosh-Mayne D, Scarborough MT, Gibbs CP, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM. A Prospective Outcomes Study of Proton Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Spine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016;95:297-303. [PMID: 27084648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 01/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]

For:	Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Begosh-Mayne D, Scarborough MT, Gibbs CP, Morris CG, Mendenhall WM. A Prospective Outcomes Study of Proton Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Spine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016;95:297-303. [PMID: 27084648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 01/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Lam FC, Guru S, AbuReesh D, Hori YS, Chuang C, Liu L, Wang L, Gu X, Szalkowski GA, Wang Z, Wohlers C, Tayag A, Emrich SC, Ustrzynski L, Zygourakis CC, Desai A, Hayden Gephart M, Byun J, Pollom EL, Rahimy E, Soltys S, Park DJ, Chang SD. Use of Carbon Fiber Implants to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumor Patients. Brain Sci 2025;15:199. [PMID: 40002531 PMCID: PMC11852773 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open

Affiliation(s)

Fred C. Lam Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Santosh Guru Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Deyaldeen AbuReesh Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Yusuke S. Hori Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Cynthia Chuang Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Lianli Liu Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Lei Wang Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Xuejun Gu Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Gregory A. Szalkowski Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Ziyi Wang Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Christopher Wohlers Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Armine Tayag Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Sara C. Emrich Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Louisa Ustrzynski Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Corinna C. Zygourakis Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Atman Desai Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Melanie Hayden Gephart Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
John Byun Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Erqi Liu Pollom Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Elham Rahimy Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
Scott Soltys Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (C.C.); (L.L.); (L.W.); (X.G.); (G.A.S.); (Z.W.); (C.W.); (J.B.); (E.L.P.); (E.R.); (S.S.)
David J. Park Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)
Steven D. Chang Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (F.C.L.); (S.G.); (D.A.); (Y.S.H.); (A.T.); (S.C.E.); (L.U.); (A.D.); (M.H.G.); (D.J.P.)

Collapse

Tsuchiya K, Akisue T, Ehara S, Kawai A, Kawano H, Hiraga H, Hosono A, Hutani H, Morii T, Morioka H, Nishida Y, Oda Y, Ogose A, Shimose S, Yamaguchi T, Yamamoto T, Yoshida M. Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) clinical practice guideline on the management of primary malignant bone tumors - Secondary publication. J Orthop Sci 2025;30:1-17. [PMID: 39003183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Japan, there are currently no general guidelines for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors. Therefore, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association established a committee to develop guidelines for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary malignant bone tumors for medical professionals in clinical practice.

METHODS

The guidelines were developed in accordance with "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook 2014″ and "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017". The Japanese Orthopaedic Association's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Committee established guideline development and systematic review committees, drawing members from orthopedic specialists leading the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors. Pediatricians, radiologists, and diagnostic pathologists were added to both committees because of the importance of multidisciplinary treatment. Based on the diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary malignant bone tumors, important decision-making points were selected, and clinical questions (CQ) were determined. The strength of recommendation was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations published were selected based on agreement by 70% or more of the voters.

RESULTS

The guideline development committee examined the important clinical issues in the clinical algorithm and selected 22 CQs. The systematic review committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ and a clinical value judgment was added by experts. Eventually, 25 questions were published and the text of each recommendation was determined.

CONCLUSION

Since primary malignant bone tumors are rare, there is a dearth of strong evidence based on randomized controlled trials, and recommendations cannot be applied to all the patients. In clinical practice, appropriate treatment of patients with primary malignant bone tumors should be based on the histopathological diagnosis and degree of progression of each case, using these guidelines as a reference.

Collapse

Chhabra AM, Snider JW, Kole AJ, Stock M, Holtzman AL, Press R, Wang CJ, Li H, Lin H, Shi C, McDonald M, Soike M, Zhou J, Sabouri P, Mossahebi S, Colaco R, Albertini F, Simone CB. Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024;120:1135-1148. [PMID: 39181272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]

Abstract

PURPOSE

Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors.

RESULTS

Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles.

SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE

If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants.

FIELD ARRANGEMENT

Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used.

TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY

Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.

Collapse

Chilukuri S, Burela N, Sundar S, Kamath R, Nangia S, Arjunan M, Kumar R, Ramanujam V, Chacko A, Sharma DS, Jalali R. Impact of Dosimetric Compromises on Early Outcomes of Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas Treated With Image-guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024;9:101582. [PMID: 39258140 PMCID: PMC11381865 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open

Abstract

Purpose

To critically review the clinical factors, dosimetry, and their correlation with early outcomes in patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton beam therapy (PBT).

Methods and Materials

Consecutive 64 patients diagnosed with chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated at our center were studied. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors including dosimetry were captured. Early and late toxicities and early outcomes were evaluated and correlated with clinical and dosimetric factors using standard statistical tools.

Results

The median age of patients was 39 years (range, 4-74 years), and most common site was skull base (47%), followed by sacrum (31%) and mobile spine (22%). The median prescription dose to the high-risk clinical target volumes for chordoma and chondrosarcoma was 70.4 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) and 66 CGE at 2.2 CGE per fraction, respectively. At presentation, 55% presented after a recurrence/progression of which 17% had received previous radiation and 32% had a significant neural compression. At the time of PBT, 25% of patients had suboptimal neural separation. Three-fourths of patients had at least an acceptable target coverage. Although 11% had a tier 1 compromise (gross tumor volume [GTV] D98 < 90%), 14% had a tier 2 compromise (GTVD98 < 59 CGE). With a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 2-year local control and progression-free survival was 86.7% and 81.8% for chordomas and 87.5% and 77.1% for chondrosarcomas, respectively. Residual GTV of >25 cm3 and a tier 2 compromise were associated with inferior local control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P = .019; HR, 0.061; P = .022, respectively) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.128; P = 0.014; HR, 0.194; P =.025, respectively) on multivariate analysis. Despite multiple surgeries, a majority presented with recurrent disease and previous radiations and grade 3 acute and late toxicities were limited and comparable with others in the literature.

Conclusions

Despite multiple surgeries, adequate neural separation was challenging to achieve. Severe dosimetric compromise (GTV D98 < 59 CGE) led to inferior early outcomes. Adequate neural separation is key to avoiding dosimetric compromise and achieving optimal local control.

Collapse

Shi Q, Guo W, Yu S, Xu J, Ji T, Tang X. Clinical characteristics and predisposing factors of lung metastasis in sacral chordoma: a cross-sectional cohort study of 221 cases. Front Oncol 2024;14:1416331. [PMID: 39188679 PMCID: PMC11345221 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1416331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open

Dastgheyb SS, Dreyfuss AD, LaRiviere MJ, Mohiuddin JJ, Baumann BC, Shabason J, Lustig RA, Dorsey JF, Lin A, Grady SM, O'Malley BW, Lee JY, Newman JG, Schuster JM, Alonso-Basanta M. A Prospective Phase I/II Clinical Trial of High-Dose Proton Therapy for Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024;9:101456. [PMID: 38550376 PMCID: PMC10972808 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Sana S. Dastgheyb Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Alexandra D. Dreyfuss Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Michael J. LaRiviere Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Jahan J. Mohiuddin Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
Brian C. Baumann Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Jacob Shabason Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Robert A. Lustig Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Jay F. Dorsey Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Alexander Lin Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Sean M. Grady Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Bert W. O'Malley University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
John Y.K. Lee Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Jason G. Newman Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina
James M. Schuster Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Michelle Alonso-Basanta Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Collapse

Díaz Silvera CM, Azinovic I, Bolle SLE, Pérez Cobos M, Matute R. Role of radiotherapy in the management of spine metastases. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2023;67:542-551. [PMID: 37245636 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023] Open

Díaz Silvera CM, Azinovic I, Bolle SLE, Pérez Cobos M, Matute R. [Translated article] Role of radiotherapy in the management of spine metastases. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2023;67:S542-S551. [PMID: 37541346 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open

Redmond KJ, Schaub SK, Lo SFL, Khan M, Lubelski D, Bilsky M, Yamada Y, Fehlings M, Gogineni E, Vajkoczy P, Ringel F, Meyer B, Amin AG, Combs SE, Lo SS. Radiotherapy for Mobile Spine and Sacral Chordoma: A Critical Review and Practical Guide from the Spine Tumor Academy. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:cancers15082359. [PMID: 37190287 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open

Gilbert A, Tudor M, Montanari J, Commenchail K, Savu DI, Lesueur P, Chevalier F. Chondrosarcoma Resistance to Radiation Therapy: Origins and Potential Therapeutic Solutions. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:cancers15071962. [PMID: 37046623 PMCID: PMC10093143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open

Patel S, Nunna RS, Nie J, Ansari D, Chaudhry NS, Mehta AI. Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Adult Spinal Chordoma Patients in the United States. Global Spine J 2023;13:334-343. [PMID: 33583227 PMCID: PMC9972264 DOI: 10.1177/2192568221995155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Spinal chordomas are rare primary malignant neoplasms of the primitive notochord. They are slow growing but locally aggressive lesions that have high rates of recurrence and metastasis after treatment. Gold standard treatment remains en-bloc surgical resection with questionable efficacy of adjuvant therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with spinal chordoma.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis codes specific for chordoma of spine, sacrum, and coccyx were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) during the years 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization.

RESULTS

1,548 individuals were identified with a diagnosis of chordoma, 60.9% of which were at the sacrum or coccyx and 39.1% at the spine. The mean overall survival of patients in our cohort was 8.2 years. Increased age, larger tumor size, and presence of metastases were associated with worsened overall survival. 71.2% of patients received surgical intervention and both partial and radical resection were associated with significantly improved overall survival (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy administration improved overall survival; however, amongst patients who received radiation, those who received proton-based radiation had significantly improved overall survival compared to traditional radiation.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection significantly improves overall survival in patients with spinal chordoma. In those patients receiving radiation, those who receive proton-based modalities have improved overall survival. Further studies into proton radiotherapy doses are required.

Collapse

Clinical outcomes and toxicities of 100 patients treated with proton therapy for chordoma on the proton collaborative group prospective registry. Radiother Oncol 2023;183:109551. [PMID: 36813169 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]

Gaito S, Hwang EJ, France A, Aznar MC, Burnet N, Crellin A, Holtzman AL, Indelicato DJ, Timmerman B, Whitfield GA, Smith E. Outcomes of Patients Treated in the UK Proton Overseas Programme: Central Nervous System Group. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023;35:283-291. [PMID: 36804292 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]

Abstract

AIMS

In 2008, the UK National Health Service started the Proton Overseas Programme (POP), to provide access for proton beam therapy (PBT) abroad for selected tumour diagnoses while two national centres were being planned. The clinical outcomes for the patient group treated for central nervous system (CNS), base of skull, spinal and paraspinal malignancies are reported here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since the start of the POP, an agreement between the National Health Service and UK referring centres ensured outcomes data collection, including overall survival, local tumour control and late toxicity data. Clinical and treatment-related data were extracted from this national patient database. Grade ≥3 late toxicities were reported following Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0 definition, occurring later than 90 days since the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and September 2020, 830 patients were treated within the POP for the above listed malignancies. Overall survival data were available for 815 patients and local control data for 726 patients. Toxicity analysis was carried out on 702 patients, with patients excluded due to short follow-up (<90 days) and/or inadequate toxicity data available. After a median follow-up of 3.34 years (0.06-11.58), the overall survival was 91.2%. The local control rate was 85.9% after a median follow-up of 2.81 years (range 0.04-11.58). The overall grade ≥3 late toxicity incidence was 11.97%, after a median follow-up of 1.72 years (0.04-8.45). The median radiotherapy prescription dose was 54 GyRBE (34.8-79.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate the safety of PBT for CNS tumours. Preliminary clinical outcomes following PBT for paediatric/teen and young adult and adult CNS tumours treated within the POP are encouraging, which reflects accurate patient selection and treatment quality. The rate of late effects compares favourably with published cohorts. Clinical outcomes from this patient cohort will be compared with those of UK-treated patients since the start of the national PBT service in 2018.

Collapse

Chang C, Charyyev S, Harms J, Slopsema R, Wolf J, Refai D, Yoon T, McDonald MW, Bradley JD, Leng S, Zhou J, Yang X, Lin L. A component method to delineate surgical spine implants for proton Monte Carlo dose calculation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023;24:e13800. [PMID: 36210177 PMCID: PMC9859997 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open

Abstract

PURPOSE

Metallic implants have been correlated to local control failure for spinal sarcoma and chordoma patients due to the uncertainty of implant delineation from computed tomography (CT). Such uncertainty can compromise the proton Monte Carlo dose calculation (MCDC) accuracy. A component method is proposed to determine the dimension and volume of the implants from CT images.

METHODS

The proposed component method leverages the knowledge of surgical implants from medical supply vendors to predefine accurate contours for each implant component, including tulips, screw bodies, lockers, and rods. A retrospective patient study was conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of the method. The reference implant materials and samples were collected from patient medical records and vendors, Medtronic and NuVasive. Additional CT images with extensive features, such as extended Hounsfield units and various reconstruction diameters, were used to quantify the uncertainty of implant contours.

RESULTS

For in vivo patient implant estimation, the reference and the component method differences were 0.35, 0.17, and 0.04 cm3 for tulips, screw bodies, and rods, respectively. The discrepancies by a conventional threshold method were 5.46, 0.76, and 0.05 cm3 , respectively. The mischaracterization of implant materials and dimensions can underdose the clinical target volume coverage by 20 cm3 for a patient with eight lumbar implants. The tulip dominates the dosimetry uncertainty as it can be made from titanium or cobalt-chromium alloys by different vendors.

CONCLUSIONS

A component method was developed and demonstrated using phantom and patient studies with implants. The proposed method provides more accurate implant characterization for proton MCDC and can potentially enhance the treatment quality for proton therapy. The current proof-of-concept study is limited to the implant characterization for lumbar spine. Future investigations could be extended to cervical spine and dental implants for head-and-neck patients where tight margins are required to spare organs at risk.

Collapse

Amadasu E, Panther E, Lucke-Wold B. Characterization and Treatment of Spinal Tumors. INTENSIVE CARE RESEARCH 2022;2:76-95. [PMID: 36741203 PMCID: PMC9893847 DOI: 10.1007/s44231-022-00014-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]

Huo X, Wang K, Song L, Yang Y, Zhu S, Ma J, Tian K, Fan Y, Wang L, Wu Z. Bibliometric analysis of publication trends in chordoma research (1992−2021). INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open

Jabbar R, Jankowski J, Pawełczyk A, Szmyd B, Solek J, Pierzak O, Wojdyn M, Radek M. Cervical Paraspinal Chordoma: A Literature Review with a Novel Case Report. J Clin Med 2022;11:jcm11144117. [PMID: 35887879 PMCID: PMC9325254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open

Holtzman AL, Bates JE, Morris CG, Rutenberg MS, Indelicato DJ, Tavanaiepour D, Mendenhall WM. Impact of Type of Treatment Center and Access to Care on Mortality and Survival for Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Skull Base Surg 2022;83:328-338. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]

Abstract Abstract Introduction In adults with skull base chordoma or chondrosarcoma, the impact of treatment center and access to care have not been well described in regard to perioperative mortality and survival. Methods A query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and review of 1,102 adults—488 with chordomas and 614 with chondrosarcomas—was performed. The Kaplan–Meier's product limit method and chi-square analysis, respectively, assessed overall survival and 30-day (30D) and 90-day (90D) mortalities. Results For 925 patients who had surgery and available mortality data, the 30D and 90D mortality rates were 0.9 and 1.5%. Lower education level (p = 0.0185) and treatment at a nonacademic facility (p = 0.016) were associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality. Median follow-up was 52 months and analysis was dichotomized by histology. For those with skull base chordoma, patients from a larger metro size (p = 0.002), age below the median 52 years (p ≤ 0.001), and private insurance (<0.001) were associated with prolonged survival, whereas for skull base chondrosarcoma, the factors were treatment at an academic medical center (p = 0.001), high-volume center (p = 0.007), age below the median 52 years (p ≤ 0.001), higher income (p = 0.043), higher education (p = 0.017), and private insurance (p ≤ 0.001). Comparing high-, medium-, and low-volume centers, high-volume centers were most likely to be academic, deliver radiotherapy, escalate doses >70 Gy, and utilize proton radiotherapy consistent across both disease subsets. Conclusion Higher educational attainment and treatment at an academic facility were associated with decreased 90D mortality for patients with skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma. For those with skull base chordoma, larger metro size, younger age, and private insurance were associated with prolonged survival; for those with chondrosarcoma, it was treatment at a high-volume or academic medical center, younger age, higher income or education, and private insurance. Collapse

Chen ATC, Hong CBC, Narazaki DK, Rubin V, Serante AR, Ribeiro Junior U, de Lima LGCA, Coimbra BGMM, Cristante AF, Teixeira WGJ. High dose image-guided, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) for chordomas of the sacrum, mobile spine and skull base: preliminary outcomes. J Neurooncol 2022;158:23-31. [PMID: 35451720 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04003-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]

Affiliation(s)

Andre Tsin Chih Chen Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil.
Carlos Bo Chur Hong Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil
Douglas Kenji Narazaki Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Virginio Rubin Department of Radiology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Alexandre Ruggieri Serante Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, 4SS, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01246-000, Brazil
Ulysses Ribeiro Junior Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Luiz Guilherme Cernaglia Aureliano de Lima Department of Pathology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Brian Guilherme Monteiro Marta Coimbra Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
Alexandre Fogaça Cristante Department of Spine Surgery of Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil
William Gemio Jacobsen Teixeira Department of Spine Surgery, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil

Collapse

Cranmer LD, Chau B, Mantilla JG, Loggers ET, Pollack SM, Kim TS, Kim EY, Kane GM, Thompson MJ, Harwood JL, Wagner MJ. Is Chemotherapy Associated with Improved Overall Survival in Patients with Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma? A SEER Database Analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022;480:748-758. [PMID: 34648466 PMCID: PMC8923599 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is a chondrosarcoma subtype associated with high rates of recurrence and a poor prognosis. Others have proposed treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma using osteosarcoma protocols, including perioperative chemotherapy. However, the rarity of this condition poses difficulties in undertaking single- institution studies of sufficient sample size.

QUESTION/PURPOSE

Is perioperative chemotherapy associated with improved overall survival in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma?

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 1973 to 2016 database for patients with a diagnosis of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (n = 308). As dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was only classified as a distinct entity in SEER starting in 2000, only patients treated in 2000 and later were included. We excluded from our analyses those patients with distant disease at diagnosis, a primary site of disease other than bone or joints, and those who did not receive cancer-directed surgery. These criteria yielded 185 dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma patients for inclusion. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After controlling for confounding variables, including age, sex, tumor size, stage, grade, location, and radiation treatment status, and after adjusting for missing data, no overall survival benefit was associated with receipt of chemotherapy in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.12]; p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was not associated with improved OS. These results must be viewed cautiously, given the limited granularity of information on chemotherapy treatment, the concerns regarding chemotherapy misclassification in SEER data, and the small sample of patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, all of which limit the power to detect a difference. Our findings are nevertheless consistent with those of prior reports in which no benefit of chemotherapy could be detected. Lack of clear benefit from perioperative chemotherapy in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma argues that it should be used only after careful consideration, and ideally in the context of a clinical trial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Collapse

Akinduro OO, De Biase G, Goyal A, Meyer JH, Sandhu SJS, Kowalchuk RO, Trifiletti DM, Sheehan J, Merrell KW, Vora SA, Broderick DF, Clarke MJ, Bydon M, McClendon J, Kalani MA, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Abode-Iyamah K. Focused versus conventional radiotherapy in spinal oncology: is there any difference in fusion rates and pseudoarthrosis? J Neurooncol 2022;156:329-339. [PMID: 34993721 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03915-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is considered standard of care for adjuvant peri-operative treatment of many spinal tumors, including those with instrumented fusion. Unfortunately, radiation treatment has been linked to increased risk of pseudoarthrosis. Newer focused radiotherapy strategies with enhanced conformality could offer improved fusion rates for these patients, but this has not been confirmed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients at three tertiary care academic institutions with primary and secondary spinal malignancies that underwent resection, instrumented fusion, and peri-operative radiotherapy. Two board certified neuro-radiologists used the Lenke fusion score to grade fusion status at 6 and 12-months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included clinical pseudoarthrosis, wound complications, the effect of radiation timing and radiobiological dose delivered, the use of photons versus protons, tumor type, tumor location, and use of autograft on fusion outcomes.

RESULTS

After review of 1252 spinal tumor patients, there were 60 patients with at least 6 months follow-up that were included in our analyses. Twenty-five of these patients received focused radiotherapy, 20 patients received conventional radiotherapy, and 15 patients were treated with protons. There was no significant difference between the groups for covariates such as smoking status, obesity, diabetes, intraoperative use of autograft, and use of peri-operative chemotherapy. There was a significantly higher rate of fusion for patients treated with focused radiotherapy compared to those treated with conventional radiotherapy at 6-months (64.0% versus 30.0%, Odds ratio: 4.15, p = 0.036) and 12-months (80.0% versus 42.1%, OR: 5.50, p = 0.022). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical pseudoarthrosis in the conventional radiotherapy cohort compared to patients in the focused radiotherapy cohort (19.1% versus 0%, p = 0.037). There was no difference in fusion outcomes for any of the secondary outcomes except for use of autograft. The use of intra-operative autograft was associated with an improved fusion at 12-months (66.7% versus 37.5%, OR: 3.33, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Focused radiotherapy may be associated with an improved rate of fusion and clinical pseudoarthrosis when compared to conventional radiation delivery strategies in patients with spinal tumors. Use of autograft at the time of surgery may be associated with improved 12-month fusion rates. Further large-scale prospective and randomized controlled studies are needed to better stratify the effects of radiation delivery modality in these patients.

Collapse

Therapeutic Efficacy of Variable Biological Effectiveness of Proton Therapy in U-CH2 and MUG-Chor1 Human Chordoma Cell Death. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:cancers13236115. [PMID: 34885223 PMCID: PMC8656796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open

Abstract

Simple Summary

Chordoma is a rare, slow-growing cancer of the spinal cord. Photon radiation therapy and surgery are the standard of care for chordoma. Proton radiation therapy has become an increasingly common treatment in comparison to photon radiation therapy due to the ability to reduce off-target radiation dose. However, there is still an increased risk of toxicity to the surrounding critical structures that lead to poor treatment outcomes. Moreover, the biologic effectiveness of protons to sterilize chordoma cells remains uncertain and likely varies according to the proton energy spectrum throughout the proton field. We aim to investigate the tumoricidal properties of proton radiation therapy at the middle and end of the proton radiation field and elucidate variations in the relative biological effectiveness for chordoma cells. Our study helps quantify the therapeutic value of treating chordoma near the end of the proton field, where linear energy transfer is relatively high.

Abstract

Background: Chordoma is a cancer of spinal cord, skull base, and sacral area. Currently, the standard of care to treat chordoma is resection followed by radiation therapy. Since, chordoma is present in the spinal cord and these are very sensitive structures and often complete removal by surgery is not possible. As a result, chordoma has a high chance of recurrence and developing resistance to radiation therapy. In addition, treatment of chordoma by conventional radiation therapy can also damage normal tissues surrounding chordoma. Thus, current therapeutic options to treat chordoma are insufficient and novel therapies are desperately needed to treat locally advanced and metastatic chordoma. (2) Methods: In the present investigation, human chordoma cell lines of sacral origin MUG-Chor1 and U-CH2 were cultured and irradiated with Proton Beam Radiation using the clinical superconducting cyclotron and pencil-beam (active) scanning at Middle and End of the Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP). Proton radiation was given at the following doses: Mug-Chor1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 Gy and U-CH2 at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Gy. These doses were selected based on a pilot study in our lab and attempted to produce approximate survival fractions in the range of 1, 0.9, 0.5, 0.1, and 0.01, respectively, chosen for linear quadratic model fitting of the dose response. (3) Results: In this study, we investigated relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton radiation at the end of Spread Out Bragg Peak assuming that the reference radiation is a proton radiation in the middle of the SOBP. We observed differences in the survival of both Human chordoma cell lines, U-CH2 and MUG-Chor1. The data showed that there was a significantly higher cell death at the end of the Bragg peak as compared to middle of the Bragg peak. Based on the linear quadratic (LQ) fit for cell survival we calculated the RBE between M-SOBP and E-SOBP at 95% CI level and it was observed that RBE was higher than 1 at E-SOBP and caused significantly higher cell killing. Proton field at E-SOBP caused complex DNA damage in comparison to M-EOBP and the genes such as DNA topoisomerase 1, GTSE1, RAD51B were downregulated in E-SOBP treated cells. Thus, we conclude that there seems to be substantial variation in RBE (1.3–1.7) at the E-SOBP compared with the M-SOBP.

Collapse

Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Pittman PD, Ahmed AK, Lubelski D, McCarthy EF, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chondrosarcoma of the spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021;21:2078-2096. [PMID: 33971325 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]

Single-institution clinical experience using robust intensity modulated proton therapy in chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the mobile spine and sacrum: Feasibility and need for plan adaptation. Radiother Oncol 2021;166:58-64. [PMID: 34843840 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]

Lin L, Taylor PA, Shen J, Saini J, Kang M, Simone CB, Bradley JD, Li Z, Xiao Y. NRG Oncology Survey of Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Use in US Proton Therapy Centers. Int J Part Ther 2021;8:73-81. [PMID: 34722813 PMCID: PMC8489489 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-d-21-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open

Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s)

Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation has appeared in primary commercial treatment-planning systems and various in-house platforms. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques complement MC capabilities. However, no publications have yet reported how proton therapy centers implement these new technologies, and a national survey is required to determine the feasibility of including MC and companion techniques in cooperative group clinical trials.

Materials/Methods

A 9-question survey was designed to query key clinical parameters: scope of MC utilization, validation methods for heterogeneities, clinical site-specific imaging guidance, proton range uncertainties, and how implants are handled. A national survey was distributed to all 29 operational US proton therapy centers on 13 May 2019.

Results

We received responses from 25 centers (86% participation). Commercial MC was most commonly used for primary plan optimization (16 centers) or primary dose evaluation (18 centers), while in-house MC was used more frequently for secondary dose evaluation (7 centers). Based on the survey, MC was used infrequently for gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecology and extremity compared with other more heterogeneous disease sites (P < .007). Although many centers had published DECT research, only 3/25 centers had implemented DECT clinically, either in the treatment-planning system or to override implant materials. Most centers (64%) treated patients with metal implants on a case-by-case basis, with a variety of methods reported. Twenty-four centers (96%) used MAR images and overrode the surrounding tissue artifacts; however, there was no consensus on how to determine metal dimension, materials density, or stopping powers.

Conclusion

The use of MC for primary dose calculation and optimization was prevalent and, therefore, likely feasible for clinical trials. There was consensus to use MAR and override tissues surrounding metals but no consensus about how to use DECT and MAR for human tissues and implants. Development and standardization of these advanced technologies are strongly encouraged for vendors and clinical physicists.

Collapse

Singh P, Eley J, Saeed A, Bhandary B, Mahmood N, Chen M, Dukic T, Mossahebi S, Rodrigues DB, Mahmood J, Vujaskovic Z, Shukla HD. Effect of hyperthermia and proton beam radiation as a novel approach in chordoma cells death and its clinical implication to treat chordoma. Int J Radiat Biol 2021;97:1675-1686. [PMID: 34495790 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1976861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]

Abstract

PURPOSE

Chordoma is a locally aggressive tumor that most commonly affects the base of the skull/clivus, cervical, and sacral spine. Conventional radiotherapy (RT), cannot be safely increased further to improve disease control due to the risk of toxicity to the surrounding critical structures. Tumor-targeted hyperthermia (HT) combined with Proton Beam Radiation Therapy (PBRT) is known to act as a potent radiosensitizer in cancer control. In this study, we investigated whether PBRT efficacy for chordoma can be enhanced in combination with HT as a radiosensitizer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Human chordoma cell lines, U-CH2 and Mug-chor1 were treated in vitro with HT followed by PBRT with variable doses. The colony-forming assay was performed, and dose-response was characterized by linear-quadratic model fits. HSP-70 and Brachyury (TBXT) biomarkers for chordoma aggression levels were quantified by western blot analysis. Gene microarray analysis was performed by U133 Arrays. Pathway Analysis was also performed using IPA bioinformatic software.

RESULTS

Our findings in both U-CH₂ and Mug-Chor1 cell lines demonstrate that hyperthermia followed by PBRT has an enhanced cell killing effect when compared with PBRT-alone (p < .01). Western blot analysis showed HT decreased the expression of Brachyury protein (p < .05), which is considered a biomarker for chordoma tumor aggression. HT with PBRT also exhibited an RT-dose-dependent decrease of Brachyury expression (p < .05). We also observed enhanced HSP-70 expression due to HT, RT, and HT + RT combined in both cell lines. Interestingly, genomic data showed 344 genes expressed by the treatment of HT + RT compared to HT (68 genes) or RT (112 genes) as individual treatment. We also identified activation of death receptor and apoptotic pathway in HT + RT treated cells.

CONCLUSION

We found that Hyperthermia (HT) combined with Proton Beam Radiation (PBRT) could significantly increase chordoma cell death by activating the death receptor pathway and apoptosis which has the promise to treat metastatic chordoma.

Collapse

Sallabanda M, Garcia R, Lorenzana L, Santaolalla I, Abarca J, Sallabanda K. Treatment of Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas With CyberKnife Robotic Hypofractionated Radiosurgery: A Single Institution Experience. Cureus 2021;13:e17012. [PMID: 34405079 PMCID: PMC8352833 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open

Kim KS, Wu HG. Who Will Benefit from Charged-Particle Therapy? Cancer Res Treat 2021;53:621-634. [PMID: 34176253 PMCID: PMC8291184 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open

Lohberger B, Glaenzer D, Eck N, Steinecker-Frohnwieser B, Leithner A, Rinner B, Kerschbaum-Gruber S, Georg D. Effects of a combined therapy of bortezomib and ionizing radiation on chondrosarcoma three-dimensional spheroid cultures. Oncol Lett 2021;21:428. [PMID: 33868466 PMCID: PMC8045153 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open

Abstract

Chondrosarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of primary bone cancers that are characterized by hyaline cartilaginous neoplastic tissue and are predominantly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy. However, adjuvant radiotherapy is often recommended in inoperable cases or after incomplete resections. To improve the efficiency of treatment, the present study tested a combination therapy with ionizing radiation (IR) and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Using a three-dimensional (3D) spheroid model, 0-20 Gy of IR was applied to chondrosarcoma cells and healthy human chondrocytes. Following combined treatment with IR and bortezomib, the cell cycle distribution, apoptotic induction, the survivin pathway, autophagy and DNA damage were evaluated. Both cell types exhibited a slight decrease in viability following increasing doses of IR; the chondrosarcoma cells demonstrated a significant dose-dependent increase in the expression levels of the DNA damage marker histone H2AX phosphorylation at serine 139 (γH2AX). The combination treatment with bortezomib significantly decreased the cell viability after 48 h compared with that in irradiated cells. High-dose IR induced a G2/M phase arrest, which was accompanied by a decrease in the number of cells at the G1 and S phase. Co-treatment with bortezomib changed the distribution of the cell cycle phases. The mRNA expression levels of the proapoptotic genes Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) and Bak were significantly increased by bortezomib treatment and combination therapy with IR. In addition, the combination therapy resulted in a synergistic decrease of the expression levels of survivin and its corresponding downstream pathway molecules, including heat shock protein 90, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein, smad 2 and smad 3. Comparative analyses of γH2AX at 1 and 24 h post-IR revealed efficient DNA repair in human chondrosarcoma cells. Therefore, additional bortezomib treatment may only temporarily improve the radiation sensitivity of chondrosarcoma cells. However, the inhibition of the survivin pathway by the combined treatment with IR and bortezomib, observed in the present study, revealed a novel aspect in the tumor biology of chondrosarcoma 3D spheroid cultures and may represent a potential target for therapy.

Collapse

Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Limb Chondrosarcomas: A Population-Based Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021;2021:4510423. [PMID: 34055971 PMCID: PMC8147544 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4510423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]

Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Elsamadicy AA, Shin JH, Goodwin CR, Schwab JH, Sciubba DM. Systematic review of charged-particle therapy for chordomas and sarcomas of the mobile spine and sacrum. Neurosurg Focus 2021;50:E17. [PMID: 33932924 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.focus201059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Long-term local control in patients with primary chordoma and sarcoma of the spine and sacrum is increasingly reliant upon en bloc resection with negative margins. At many institutions, adjuvant radiation is recommended; definitive radiation is also recommended for the treatment of unresectable tumors. Because of the high off-target radiation toxicities associated with conventional radiotherapy, there has been growing interest in the use of proton and heavy-ion therapies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding these therapies.

METHODS

The PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Web of Science databases were queried for articles describing the use of proton, combined proton/photon, or heavy-ion therapies for adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy in patients with primary sarcoma or chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed, focusing on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS); local control; and postradiation toxicities.

RESULTS

Of 595 unique articles, 64 underwent full-text screening and 38 were included in the final synthesis. All studies were level III or IV evidence with a high risk of bias; there was also significant overlap in the reported populations, with six centers accounting for roughly three-fourths of all reports. Five-year therapy outcomes were as follows: proton-only therapies, OS 67%-82%, PFS 31%-57%, and DFS 52%-62%; metastases occurred in 17%-18% and acute toxicities in 3%-100% of cases; combined proton/photon therapy, local control 62%-85%, OS 78%-87%, PFS 90%, and DFS 61%-72%; metastases occurred in 12%-14% and acute toxicities in 84%-100% of cases; and carbon ion therapy, local control 53%-100%, OS 52%-86%, PFS (only reported for 3 years) 48%-76%, and DFS 50%-53%; metastases occurred in 2%-39% and acute toxicities in 26%-48%. There were no studies directly comparing outcomes between photon and charged-particle therapies or comparing outcomes between radiation and surgical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence for charged-particle therapies in the management of sarcomas of the spine and sacrum is limited. Preliminary evidence suggests that with these therapies local control and OS at 5 years are comparable among various charged-particle options and may be similar between those treated with definitive charged-particle therapy and historical surgical cohorts. Further research directly comparing charged-particle and photon-based therapies is necessary.

Collapse

Prognostic Nomograms to Predict Overall Survival and Cancer-specific Survival in Sacrum/Pelvic Chondrosarcoma (SC) Patients: A Population-based Propensity Score-matched Study. Clin Spine Surg 2021;34:E177-E185. [PMID: 33017339 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]

Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Mailhot Vega RB, Holtzman AL, Looi WS, Morris CG, Sandler ES, Aldana PR, Bradley JA. Local Control After Proton Therapy for Pediatric Chordoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021;109:1406-1413. [PMID: 33253819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]

Abstract

PURPOSE

Due to the location and high dose required for disease control, pediatric chordomas are theoretically well-suited for treatment with proton therapy, but their low incidence limits the clinical outcome data available in the literature. We sought to report the efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy among a single-institution cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2008 and 2019, 29 patients with a median age of 14.8 years (range, 3.8-21.8) received passive-scattered proton therapy for nonmetastatic chordoma. No patient received prior irradiation. Twenty-four tumors arose in the clivus/cervical spine region and 5 in the lumbosacral spine. Twenty-six tumors demonstrated classic well-differentiated histology and 3 were dedifferentiated or not otherwise specified. Approximately half of the tumors underwent specialized testing: 14 were brachyury-positive and 10 retained INI-1. Three patients had locally recurrent tumors after surgery alone (n = 2) or surgery + chemotherapy (n = 1), and 17 patients had gross disease at the time of radiation. The median radiation dose was 73.8 Gy relative biological effectivness (range, 69-75.6).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 1.0-10.7), the 5-year estimates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 82%, and 86%, respectively. No disease progression was observed beyond 3 years. Excluding 3 patients with dedifferentiated/not-otherwise-specified chordoma, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 92%, and 91%, respectively. Serious toxicities included 3 patients with hardware failure or related infection requiring revision surgery, 2 patients with hormone deficiency, and 2 patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction causing chronic otitis media. No patient experienced brain stem injury, myelopathy, vision loss, or hearing loss after radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients with chordoma, proton therapy is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and high efficacy, particularly in well-differentiated tumors. Complete resection may be unnecessary for local control, and destabilizing operations requiring instrumentation may result in additional complications after therapy.

Collapse

Pennington Z, Ehresman J, McCarthy EF, Ahmed AK, Pittman PD, Lubelski D, Goodwin CR, Sciubba DM. Chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a narrative review. Spine J 2021;21:500-517. [PMID: 33589095 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]

Nunna RS, Patel S, Patil SN, Ansari D, Burch TG, Mehta AI, Chapman J, Oskouian RJ. Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Adult Patients with Spinal Chondrosarcoma in the United States. World Neurosurg 2021;149:e316-e328. [PMID: 33601078 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Spinal chondrosarcomas are rare primary malignant neoplasms composed of cartilage-producing cells. They are slow-growing but locally aggressive lesions that have high rates of recurrence and progression after treatment. We provide the largest comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with spinal chondrosarcoma using a large, prospectively collected national database.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis codes specific for chondrosarcoma of the spine, sacrum, and coccyx were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) during 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization.

RESULTS

A total of 1843 individuals were identified with a diagnosis of chondrosarcoma, 82.1% of which were at the sacrum or coccyx and 17.9% at the spine. The mean overall survival of patients in our cohort was 7.91 years. Increased age, larger tumor, dedifferentiated histology, and presence of metastases were associated with worsened overall survival. Regarding management, 77.7% of patients received surgical intervention and both partial and radical resection were associated with significantly improved overall survival (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy administration improved overall survival; however, among patients who received radiation, those who received higher-dose radiation had significantly improved overall survival compared with those who received lower-dose radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection significantly improves overall survival in patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. In those patients receiving radiation, those who receive high doses have improved overall survival compared with those who receive lower doses. Further studies into optimal radiation modality and doses are required.

Collapse

Fowler J, Takayanagi A, Fiani B, Cathel A, Sarhadi KJ, Arshad M, Lau S, Siddiqi I, Ghanchi H, Wolberg A, Hariri O. Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Options: A Cervical Spine Osteochondroma Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2021;149:215-225.e6. [PMID: 33561553 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]

Konieczkowski DJ, DeLaney TF, Yamada YJ. Radiation Strategies for Spine Chordoma: Proton Beam, Carbon Ions, and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020;31:263-288. [PMID: 32147017 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]

Poel R, Belosi F, Albertini F, Walser M, Gisep A, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy—a phantom study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020;65:245031. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8ba0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]

Ball S, Dash A, Igid HP, Thein KZ, Sharma U, Tijani L. Primary Extra-axial Chordoma Masquerading as Lung Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21:e560-e563. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]

Management of Incidental High-grade Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma by Triple Vertebrectomy and Anterior Reconstruction Using a Posterior-only Approach. Tech Orthop 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/bto.0000000000000500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]

Benson JC, Vizcaino MA, Kim DK, Carr C, Rose P, Eckel L, Diehn F. Exophytic Lumbar Vertebral Body Mass in an Adult with Back Pain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1786-1790. [PMID: 32819895 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]

Evaluation of a VERT-based module for proton radiotherapy education and training. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]

Abstract AbstractIntroduction:In many countries, there is a skills gap in proton therapy with many staff unprepared to work with the new technology. The new Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) proton module provides learners with a simulated proton machine 3D environment. This project aimed to evaluate the role of VERT in training the radiotherapy workforce for the future use of protons.Methods:A practical teaching session using VERT was deployed after a traditional teaching session had provided basic knowledge. A questionnaire deployed before and after VERT enabled comparison of knowledge while a combination of Likert and open questions gathered participant feedback concerning the initiative.Results:A total of 38 students provided evaluation of the session. Overall, there were high levels of satisfaction and enjoyment with 35 participants reporting enjoyment and 36 indicating that the event be repeated.Discussion:Participants felt that they had learned from the experience, although quantitative data lacked statistical significance to demonstrate this. All participants agreed that VERT had provided improved understanding of proton dose deposition arising from visualisation of beams and dose deposition. Most participants agreed that the simulation was realistic and that it had improved their understanding. Feedback in relation to future sessions concerned smaller group sizes, more patient cases, more time and additional clinical datasets.Conclusion:A proton simulation module has been shown to be an enjoyable teaching tool that improves students’ confidence in their knowledge of the underpinning theory and clinical usage of the modality. Learners felt better prepared to encounter protons in clinical practice. Future work will build on these findings using smaller group work and a more robust assessment tool to identify long-term impact of the training. Collapse

Murray FR, Snider JW, Schneider RA, Walser M, Bolsi A, Pica A, Lomax AJ, Weber DC. Prognostic factors for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with postoperative pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a large, single-institution experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2020;32:921-930. [PMID: 32005008 DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.spine1927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the prognostic factors in surgical and adjuvant care for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas after surgery followed by high-dose pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT).

METHODS

From 1997 to 2016, 155 patients (61 female patients; median age 55 years) with spinal (cervical, n = 61; thoracic, n = 29; lumbar, n = 13; sacral, n = 46; pelvic, n = 6) classic chordomas (n = 116) and chondrosarcomas (n = 39; most were low grade) were treated with maximal safe resection followed by PBS-PT (median dose prescribed: 74 Gy [relative biological effectiveness], range 48.6-77 Gy). The majority of patients (n = 153, 98.7%) had undergone at least 1 resection prior to PBS-PT (median 1, range 0-5; biopsy only, n = 2). Fewer than half (45.1%) of the surgeries were rated as gross-total resections (GTRs) prior to PBS-PT. Surgical stabilization (SS) was present in 39% of all patients (n = 60). Ninety-one patients (59%) presented with macroscopic tumor at the start of PBS-PT. The median follow-up duration was 64.7 months (range 12.2-204.8 months).

RESULTS

The 5-year local tumor control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were 64.9% (95% CI 56.3%-73.5%), 59.4% (95% CI 50.6%-68.2%), and 77.9% (95% CI 70.6%-85.2%), respectively. In total, 63 patients (40.6%) experienced failure during the follow-up period: local only in 32 (20.6%), distal only in 7 (4.5%), local + distal in 19 (12.3%), surgical pathway failure (SPF) only in 2 (1.3%), local + SPF in 2 (1.3%), and distal + SPF in 1 (< 1%). Univariate analysis identified gross residual disease, the presence of SS, and treatment era prior to 2008 as highly significant for worse outcome, with all 3 remaining significant on multivariate analysis. The type of surgery (GTR or subtotal resection/biopsy) and whether GTR was achieved by en bloc or curettage did not show a significant prognostic effect. Surgical complications prior to PBS-PT were present in 42.5% of all surgically treated patients and were seen more commonly in patients with multiple surgical interventions (p = 0.005) and those operated on with the intent of en bloc resection (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of resection and metallic stabilization substantially influenced clinical outcomes for patients with spinal chordoma or chondrosarcoma despite high-dose adjuvant PBS-PT. Optimal upfront surgical management of these tumors continues to include GTR, as possible, with prompt adjuvant proton therapy.

Collapse

Terlizzi M, Le Pechoux C, Salas S, Rapeaud E, Lerouge D, Sunyach MP, Vogin G, Sole CV, Zilli T, Lutsyk M, Mampuya A, Calvo FA, Attal J, Karahissarlian V, De Bari B, Ozsahin M, Baumard F, Krengli M, Gomez-Brouchet A, Sargos P, Rochcongar G, Bazille C, Roth V, Salleron J, Thariat J. Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients with Extracranial Chondrosarcoma: A Joint Study of the French Sarcoma Group and Rare Cancer Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020;107:726-735. [PMID: 32289473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]

Abstract

PURPOSE

Postoperative radiation therapy (poRT) of intracranial/skull base chondrosarcomas (CHSs) is standard treatment. However, consensus is lacking for poRT in extracranial CHS (eCHS) owing to their easier resectability and intrinsic radioresistance. We assessed the practice and efficacy of poRT in eCHS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multicentric retrospective study of the French Sarcoma Group/Rare Cancer Network included patients with eCHS who were operated on between 1985 and 2015. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize poRT allocation biases.

RESULTS

Of 182 patients, 60.4% had bone and 39.6% had soft-tissue eCHS. eCHS were of conventional (31.9%), myxoid (28.6%; 41 extraskeletal, 11 skeletal), mesenchymal (9.9%), or other subtypes. En-bloc surgery with complete resection was performed in 52.6% and poRT in 36.8% of patients (median dose, 54 Gy). Irradiated patients had unfavorable initial characteristics, with higher grade and incomplete resection. Median follow-up time was 61 months. Five-year incidence of local relapse was 10% with poRT versus 21.6% without (P = .050). Using the IPTW method, poRT reduced the local relapse risk (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.52; P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% with poRT and 64.2% without (P = .680). Using the IPTW method, poRT improved DFS (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.85; P = .010). The benefit of poRT on local relapse and DFS was confirmed after exclusion of the extraskeletal subtype. There was no difference in overall survival. Prognostic factors of poorer DFS in multivariate analysis were deeper location, higher grade, incomplete resection, and no poRT.

CONCLUSIONS

poRT should be offered in patients with eCHS and high-grade or incomplete resection, regardless of the histologic subtype.

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Mario Terlizzi Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
Cécile Le Pechoux Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Sébastien Salas Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
Etienne Rapeaud Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France
Delphine Lerouge Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France
Marie P Sunyach Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France
Guillaume Vogin Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
Claudio V Sole Clinica Instituto de Radiomedicina (IRAM) and Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
Thomas Zilli Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
Myroslav Lutsyk Rambam HCC, Haïfa, Israel
Ange Mampuya Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
Felipe A Calvo Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
Justine Attal IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
Vardouhie Karahissarlian Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France
Berardino De Bari Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz," Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Besançon, France
Mahmut Ozsahin Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
Florian Baumard Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Marco Krengli Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Novara, Italy
Anne Gomez-Brouchet Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Paul Sargos Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
Goulven Rochcongar Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
Céline Bazille Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
Vincent Roth Easy-CRF SAS, Mathieu, France
Julia Salleron Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Juliette Thariat Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France; Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Caen, France; Unicaen-Normandie Université, Caen, France.

Collapse

Liu S, Zhou X, Song A, Huo Z, Wang Y, Liu Y. Surgical treatment of metastatic mesenchymal chondrosarcoma to the spine: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e18643. [PMID: 32000368 PMCID: PMC7004649 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the spine is a highly unusual disease without standard curative managements yet. The objective of this case report is to present a very rare case of metastatic chondrosarcoma to the spine successfully operated by surgical treatment. The management of these unique cases has yet to be well-documented.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old woman presented with a 4-month history of continuous and progressive back pain and a 1-month history of radiating pain of bilateral lower extremities. The patient, who had been diagnosed of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of maxillary sinus for 3 years, received surgical treatment of palliative endoscopic-assisted total left maxillary resection via mini Caldwell-Luc approach, and palliative enlarged resection due to the progress of residual lesions, followed by no adjuvant therapy. Multiple lytic, expanding lesions of the spine and paraspinal region with severe epidural spinal cord compression was identified.

DIAGNOSIS

CT, MRI and bone scan of spine showed spinal cord compression secondary to the epidural component of the metastatic lesions. Post-operative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of metastatic spinal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent posterior spinal canal decompression, resection of T12 and L3 lesions, internal fixation of T11-L5 pedicles, and cement augmentation of T12 and L3.

OUTCOMES

The patient's neurological deficits improved significantly after the surgery, and the postoperative period was uneventful at the 1-year follow-up visit. There were no complications associated with the spinal surgery during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Metastatic spinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, although rare, should be part of the differential diagnosis when the patient presents with back pain and radiculopathy. We recommend the posterior approach for spinal decompression and total resection of the metastatic chondrosarcoma when the tumor has caused neurological deficits or other severe symptoms. Osteoplasty by cement augmentation is also a good choice for surgical treatment in some patients.

Collapse

Liu S, Zhou X, Song A, Huo Z, Wang Y, Liu Y. Surgical treatment of chondrosarcoma of the sacrum with cement augmentation: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e18413. [PMID: 31852164 PMCID: PMC6922508 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open

Abstract

RATIONALE

Chondrosarcoma of the sacrum is a highly unusual disease without standard curative managements yet. The objective of this study is to report a very rare case of chondrosarcoma of the sacrum successfully operated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. The management of these unique cases has yet to be well-documented.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 45-year-old woman presented with a five-month history of continuous and progressive pain and numbness of left extremity. A lytic, expanding lesion of the sacrum and paraspinal region with severe epidural spinal cord compression was identified.

DIAGNOSIS

MRI of spine showed spinal cord compression secondary to the epidural componant of the giant mass, with increased marrow infiltration of the left S2 vertebral and paravertebral region, which presented as a solid tumor. Post-operative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of sacral well-differentiated chondrosarcoma (stage I B).

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty and cement augmentation of sacrum via a posterior approach.

OUTCOMES

The patient's neurological deficits improved significantly after the surgery, but the patient died of multiple systemic metastases at the 2-year follow-up visit. There were no complications associated with the operation during the follow-up period.

LESSONS

Taken together, the lesion's clinical features, imaging results, and pathological characteristics are unique. Combined efforts of specialists from orthopedics, radiology, neurosurgery, pathology, and medical oncology led to the successful diagnosis and management of this patient. Giant sacral chondrosarcoma, although rare, should be part of the differential diagnosis when the patient presents with back pain and radiculopathy. We recommend the posterior approach for spinal decompression of the sacral chondrosarcoma when the tumor has caused neurological deficits or other severe symptoms. Osteoplasty by cement augmentation is also a good choice for surgical treatment.

Collapse

Guan X, Gao J, Hu J, Hu W, Yang J, Qiu X, Hu C, Kong L, Lu JJ. The preliminary results of proton and carbon ion therapy for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the skull base and cervical spine. Radiat Oncol 2019;14:206. [PMID: 31752953 PMCID: PMC6869181 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open

Affiliation(s)

Xiyin Guan Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Jing Gao Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Jiyi Hu Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Weixu Hu Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Jing Yang Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Xianxin Qiu Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Chaosu Hu Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Lin Kong Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China
Jiade J Lu Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, 4365 Kangxin Road, Shanghai, 201315, China.

Collapse

Revisiting the Role of Radiation Therapy in Chondrosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Study. Sarcoma 2019;2019:4878512. [PMID: 31736653 PMCID: PMC6815626 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4878512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open

Abstract

Background

Although chondrosarcomas (CS) are mostly considered radioresistant, advancements in radiotherapy have brought attention to its use in these patients. Using the largest registry of primary bone tumors, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to better characterize the current use of radiotherapy in CS patients and identify any potential survival benefit with higher radiation doses and advanced radiation therapies.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed CS patients in the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 who underwent radiotherapy. The Kaplan–Meier method with statistical comparisons was used to identify which individual variables related to dosage and delivery modality were associated with improved 5-year survival rates. Multivariate proportional hazards analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of survival.

Results

Of 5,427 patients with a histologic diagnosis of chondrosarcoma, 680 received a form of radiation therapy (13%). The multivariate proportional hazards analysis controlling for various patient, tumor, and treatment variables, including RT dose and modality, demonstrated that while overall radiation therapy (RT) was not associated with improved survival (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.20), when examining just the patient cohort with positive surgical margins, RT trended towards improved survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58–1.13). When comparing advanced and conventional RT modalities, advanced RT was associated with significantly decreased mortality (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38–0.80). However, advanced modality and high-dose RT both trended only toward improved survival compared to patients who did not receive any RT (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.52–1.06 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71–1.21, respectively).

Conclusions

Despite the suggested radioresistance of CS, modern radiotherapies may present a treatment option for certain patients. Our results support a role for high-dose, advanced radiation therapies in selected high-risk CS patients with tumors in surgically challenging locations or unplanned positive margins. While there is an associated survival rate benefit, further, prospective studies are needed for validation.

Collapse

État des lieux de la protonthérapie en France en 2019. Cancer Radiother 2019;23:617-624. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]

Bettegowda C, Yip S, Jiang B, Wang WL, Clarke MJ, Lazary A, Gambarotti M, Zhang M, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Goodwin CR, McCarthy E, Germscheid NM, Sahgal A, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S, Varga PP, Fisher CG, Rhines LD. Prognostic significance of human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter region mutations C228T and C250T for overall survival in spinal chordomas. Neuro Oncol 2019;21:1005-1015. [PMID: 30976795 PMCID: PMC6682209 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Affiliation(s)

Chetan Bettegowda Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Stephen Yip Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Bowen Jiang Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Wei-Lien Wang Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Michelle J Clarke Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Aron Lazary National Center for Spinal Disorders, Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
Marco Gambarotti Department of Pathology, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
Ming Zhang Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Daniel M Sciubba Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Jean-Paul Wolinsky Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
C Rory Goodwin Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Edward McCarthy Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Niccole M Germscheid Research Department, AOSpine International, Davos, Switzerland
Arjun Sahgal Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ziya L Gokaslan Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Stefano Boriani IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
Peter Pal Varga National Center for Spinal Disorders, Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary
Charles G Fisher Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Laurence D Rhines Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Collapse