A Polypill Strategy to Improve Adherence

Statin initiation after myocardial infarction in patients with alcohol-related liver disease: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Secondary prevention with statins improves clinical outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to compare odds of statin initiation after MI in patients with co-existing alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) to the general population, and the association between statin initiation and mortality in the patients with ALD.

METHODS

All statin-naïve patients with ALD and a first-time MI between 2006 and 2020 were identified from Swedish healthcare registers and matched for age, sex, and year of MI with up to ten ALD-free general population controls with a first-time MI. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) for statin initiation within 30 days after MI for ALD patients versus controls. Cox regression was used in patients with ALD to compare mortality between statin initiators and non-initiators.

RESULTS

Of the 276 patients with a first-time MI and ALD, 206 (74.6%) were male, the median age was 67 (interquartile range 62-72), 151 (54.7%) had cirrhosis, and 62 (22.5%) had decompensated cirrhosis. 1769 matched controls were included. Initiation of statins was less common in ALD patients (50.0%) than controls (89.2%, adjusted OR = .15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .10-.20). Among patients with ALD, statin initiators and non-initiators were followed for a median of 3.9 (interquartile range = 1.8-7.7) and 1.9 years (interquartile range = .5-4.4), respectively. Statin initiators had lower mortality than non-initiators (adjusted hazard ratio = .41, 95%CI = .28-.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ALD less often initiated statins after MI than the general population. Statin initiation was associated with improved survival, suggesting that patients with ALD might be undertreated following MI.

Association of intensive blood pressure management with cardiovascular outcomes in patients using multiple classes of antihypertensive medications: a post-hoc analysis of the STEP Trial

High medication burden is associated with poor treatment effect and high risk of cardiovascular outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between the antihypertensive medication burden and cardiovascular outcomes in the STEP trial. This post-hoc analysis of the STEP trial enrolled 8511 participants, including 8041 with low burden and 470 with high burden. High antihypertensive medication burden was defined as being treated with ≥3 different classes of prescribed antihypertensive medications. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular outcomes. Fine-Gray model was used in this study. Among all participants, high antihypertensive medication burden was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome compared with low medication burden (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.24), which was consistent in the standard group (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.20-3.18) and the intensive group (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.57-2.13; Pinteraction = 0.18). The beneficial effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control on the primary outcome remained significant in the high burden group (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.95) and the low burden group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98; Pinteraction = 0.18). At 24 months, the percentage of participants achieving the target SBP was lower in the high medication burden group (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98). In both standard and intensive treatment groups, participants with a high medication burden were harder to achieve the target SBP (Pinteraction = 0.65). High antihypertensive medication burden was associated with worse SBP control and a greater risk of cardiovascular events. Intensive SBP control showed cardiovascular benefits in both medication burden groups. Trial registration: STEP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03015311. Registered 2 January 2017.

Impact of Guideline-Directed Drug Therapy after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Outcome in Young Patients-Age and Sex-Specific Factors

Background: Specifically young women are at risk for a poor outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate sex- and age-specific differences in outcome and associate these results with adherence to a guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (OMT). Methods: Administrative insurance data (≈26 million insured) were screened for patients aged 18-60 years with STEMI. Patient demographics, details on in-hospital treatment, adherence to OMT and its effect on mortality were assessed. Adherence to OMT was analyzed using multistate models and an association of those with death was fitted using multivariable Cox regression models with time-dependent co-variables. Results: Overall, 59,401 patients (19.3% women), median age 52 (interquartile range 48, 56) presented with STEMI. Female sex was associated with a poor outcome early after STEMI (90-day mortality: odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.32, p < 0.001). Overall survival was reduced in women compared to same-aged men. The ten-year survival rate was 19.7% (18.1-21.2%) versus 19.6% (18.9-20.4%) in men (p < 0.001). Although long-term drug adherence was low, its intake was associated with a better outcome. Specifically younger women showed a markedly lower mortality when on OMT (hazard ratio (HR) 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.26) versus HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.28-0.33) in men, pint < 0.001). Conclusions: Specifically young women were at risk for a poor outcome in the early phase after STEMI. Although long-term adherence to OMT was low, it was generally associated with a lower mortality, specifically in women. Our findings emphasize on early and long-term preventive measures in all patients after STEMI.

Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease

Non-adherence to medication is a global health problem with far-reaching individual-level and population-level consequences but remains unappreciated and under-addressed in the clinical setting. With increasing comorbidity and polypharmacy as well as an ageing population, cardiovascular disease and medication non-adherence are likely to become increasingly prevalent. Multiple methods for detecting non-adherence exist but are imperfect, and, despite emerging technology, a gold standard remains elusive. Non-adherence to medication is dynamic and often has multiple causes, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease, which tends to require lifelong medication to control symptoms and risk factors in order to prevent disease progression. In this Review, we identify the causes of medication non-adherence and summarize interventions that have been proven in randomized clinical trials to be effective in improving adherence. Practical solutions and areas for future research are also proposed.

The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death and disability worldwide. Although age-standardized CVD mortality rates decreased globally by 14.5% between 2006 and 2016, the burden of CVD remains disproportionately higher in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries. Even though proven, effective approaches based on multiple-drug intake aimed at the prevention and treatment of CVD are currently available, poor adherence, early discontinuation of treatment, and suboptimal daily execution of the prescribed therapeutic regimes give rise to shortfalls in drug exposure, leading to high variability in the responses to the prescribed medications. Wald and Law, in their landmark paper published in BMJ 2003, hypothesized that the use of a fixed-dose combination of statins, β-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and aspirin (classic Polypill composition) may increase adherence and decrease CVD by up to 80% when prescribed as primary prevention or in substitution of traditional protocols. Since then, many clinical trials have tested this hypothesis, with comparable results. This review aims to describe the available clinical trials performed to assess the impact of fixed-dose combinations on adherence, cost-effectiveness, and the risk factors critical to the onset of CVD.

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The polypill strategy, originally developed to improve medication adherence, has demonstrated efficacy in improving baseline systolic blood pressures and cholesterol levels in multiple clinical trials. However, the long-term clinical impact of improved major cardiovascular events (MACE) outcomes by the polypill remains uncertain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent trials with long-term follow-up, which included minority groups and people with low socioeconomic status, have shown non-inferiority with no difference in adverse effects rates for the secondary prevention of MACE. Although the polypill strategy was initially introduced to improve adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for cardiovascular complications, the strategy has surpassed standard medical treatment for secondary prevention of MACE outcomes. Studies also showed improved medication compliance in underserved populations.

Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO) scientific statement on the simplification of the drug regimen for secondary cardiovascular prevention

The issue of suboptimal drug regimen adherence in secondary cardiovascular prevention presents a significant barrier to improving patient outcomes. To address this, the utilization of drug combinations, specifically single pill combinations (SPCs) and polypills, was proposed as a strategy to simplify treatment regimens. This approach aims to enhance treatment accessibility, affordability, and adherence, thereby reducing healthcare costs and improving patient health. The document is an Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO) scientific statement on simplifying drug regimens for secondary cardiovascular prevention. It discusses the underuse of treatments despite available, effective, and accessible options, highlighting a significant gap in secondary prevention across different socio-economic statuses and countries. The statement explores barriers to implementing evidence-based treatments, including patient, healthcare provider, and system-related challenges. The paper also reviews international guidelines, the role of SPCs and polypills in clinical practice, and their economic impact, advocating for their use in secondary prevention to improve patient outcomes and adherence.

Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy, also known as polypill therapy, targets risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and has been proposed as a strategy to reduce global ASCVD burden. Here we conducted a systematic search for relevant studies from 2016-2022 to assess the effects of FDC therapy for prevention of ASCVD. The studies selected include randomized trials evaluating FDC therapy with at least one blood pressure-lowering drug and one lipid-lowering drug. The study data were independently extracted, the quality of evidence was appraised by multiple reviewers and effect estimates were pooled using a fixed-effect meta-analysis when statistical heterogeneity was low to moderate. The main outcomes of the analysis were all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal ASCVD events, adverse events, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adherence. Among 26 trials (n = 27,317 participants, 43.2% female and mean age range 52.9-76.0), FDC therapy was associated with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, with higher rates of adherence and adverse events in both primary and mixed secondary prevention populations. For studies with a mostly primary prevention population, FDC therapy was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality by 11% (5.6% versus 6.3%; relative risk (risk ratio) of 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.00; I2 = 0%; four trials and 16,278 participants) and risk of fatal and nonfatal ASCVD events by 29% (6.1% versus 8.4%; relative risk (risk ratio) of 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.79; I2 = 0%; five trials and 15,503 participants). One adequately powered trial in an exclusively secondary prevention population showed that FDC therapy reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 24%. These findings support adoption and implementation of polypills to lower risk for all-cause mortality and ASCVD.

Is there a role for earlier use of combination therapy?

As the global population ages and cardiovascular risk factors rise, we can expect a continued increase in atherosclerotic disease. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is a cornerstone of cardiovascular risk reduction with strong, causal evidence indicating that the greatest benefit is derived from early and large decreases in LDL-C. Despite the adoption of statins as the backbone of lipid-therapy regimens, numerous studies and registry analyses reveal our collective inability to achieve LDL-C goals in high-risk patients. Combination therapy with ezetimibe has been shown to result in statistically significant decreases in LDL-C level, atheroma volume, and cardiovascular adverse event rates. A major barrier to implementing an upfront combination therapy approach is the perceived side effects from therapeutic agents although multiple studies show that a therapeutic patient-physician relationship could overcome this issue. Novel agents such as PCSK-9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid, and inclisiran have the potential to achieve similar outcomes although additional research is needed regarding the cost effectiveness of these approaches. Despite these hurdles, there is a role for the newer agents early in the disease course of high-risk patients such as those with markedly elevated LDL-C >190 mg/dL and FH. The implementation of upfront combination therapy, especially in high-risk patients, will decrease clinical inertia while allowing for earlier consideration of newer, effective agents to decrease cardiovascular burden.

Fixed-Dose Combination Formulations in Solid Oral Drug Therapy: Advantages, Limitations, and Design Features

Whilst monotherapy is traditionally the preferred treatment starting point for chronic conditions such as hypertension and diabetes, other diseases require the use of multiple drugs (polytherapy) from the onset of treatment (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, tuberculosis, and malaria). Successful treatment of these chronic conditions is sometimes hampered by patient non-adherence to polytherapy. The options available for polytherapy are either the sequential addition of individual drug products to deliver an effective multi-drug regimen or the use of a single fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy product. This article intends to critically review the use of FDC drug therapy and provide an insight into FDC products which are already commercially available. Shortcomings of FDC formulations are discussed from multiple perspectives and research gaps are identified. Moreover, an overview of fundamental formulation considerations is provided to aid formulation scientists in the design and development of new FDC products.

Effectiveness of Single-Tablet Combination Therapy in Improving Adherence and Persistence and the Relation to Clinical and Economic Outcomes

Background: Single-tablet combination therapies (STCTs) combine multiple drugs into one formulation, making drug administration more convenient for patients. STCTs were developed to address concerns with treatment adherence and persistence, but the impact of STCT use is not fully understood across indications. Objectives: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to examine STCT-associated outcomes across 4 evidence domains: clinical trials, real-world evidence (RWE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) studies, and economic evaluations. Methods: Four SLRs were conducted across the aforementioned domains. Included studies compared STCTs as well as fixed-dose combinations ([FDCs] of non-tablet formulations) with the equivalent active compounds and doses in loose-dose combinations (LDCs). Original research articles were included; case reports, case series, and non-English-language sources were excluded. Databases searched included EconLit, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE® ALL. Two independent reviewers assessed relevant studies and extracted data. Conflicts were resolved with a third reviewer or consensus-based discussion. Results: In all, 109 studies were identified; 27 studies were identified in more than one SLR. Treatment adherence was significantly higher in patients receiving FDCs vs LDCs in 12 of 13 RWE studies and 3 of 13 clinical trials. All 18 RWE studies reported higher persistence with FDCs. In RWE studies examining clinical outcomes (n = 17), 14 reported positive findings with FDCs, including a reduced need for add-on medication, blood pressure control, and improved hemoglobin A1C. HRQoL studies generally reported numerical improvements with STCTs or similarities between STCTs and LDCs. Economic outcomes favored STCT use. All 6 cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analyses found FDCs were less expensive and more efficacious than LDCs. Four budget impact models found that STCTs were associated with cost savings. Medical costs and healthcare resource use were generally lower with FDCs than with LDCs. Discussion: Evidence from RWE and economic studies strongly favored STCT use, while clinical trials and HRQoL studies primarily reported similarity between STCTs and LDCs. This may be due to clinical trial procedures aimed at maximizing adherence and HRQoL measures that are not designed to evaluate drug administration. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the value of STCTs for improving patient adherence, persistence, and clinical outcomes while also offering economic advantages.

World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: 2023 Update

Background

Secondary prevention lifestyle and pharmacological treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) reduce a high proportion of recurrent events and mortality. However, significant gaps exist between guideline recommendations and usual clinical practice.

Objectives

Describe the state of the art, the roadblocks, and successful strategies to overcome them in ASCVD secondary prevention management.

Methods

A writing group reviewed guidelines and research papers and received inputs from an international committee composed of cardiovascular prevention and health systems experts about the article's structure, content, and draft. Finally, an external expert group reviewed the paper.

Results

Smoking cessation, physical activity, diet and weight management, antiplatelets, statins, beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and cardiac rehabilitation reduce events and mortality. Potential roadblocks may occur at the individual, healthcare provider, and health system levels and include lack of access to healthcare and medicines, clinical inertia, lack of primary care infrastructure or built environments that support preventive cardiovascular health behaviours. Possible solutions include improving health literacy, self-management strategies, national policies to improve lifestyle and access to secondary prevention medication (including fix-dose combination therapy), implementing rehabilitation programs, and incorporating digital health interventions. Digital tools are being examined in a range of settings from enhancing self-management, risk factor control, and cardiac rehab.

Conclusions

Effective strategies for secondary prevention management exist, but there are barriers to their implementation. WHF roadmaps can facilitate the development of a strategic plan to identify and implement local and national level approaches for improving secondary prevention.

Efficacy and Safety of a Polypill to Reduce Cardiovascular Events: A Review of Clinical Trials

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of mortality globally. Modifiable risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, can be managed through lifestyle and pharmacotherapy treatments to reduce the risk of primary and secondary major cardiovascular events in patients with elevated risk. Despite effective and available medications to manage and mitigate cardiovascular risk factors, control rates of hypertension and dyslipidemia are suboptimal, and greater efforts are needed to reduce cardiovascular event rates worldwide. A polypill containing several classes of medications proven to lower cardiovascular risk in a single-dose form has been associated with improved medication adherence over multiple single-ingredient medications and may lead to reduced cardiovascular events. The goal of this article is to review available data from clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of polypills compared with placebo or usual care for cardiovascular risk reduction. Three databases were searched (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect) for randomized trials that compared a single polypill with usual care or placebo and reported major adverse cardiovascular events for each study group. A total of 6 trials were selected for inclusion. Several polypill formulations were compared with placebo or usual care with multiple single-ingredient medications in study populations consisting of both primary and secondary prevention patients. Overall, the polypill seems to be associated with reduced major adverse cardiovascular event and comparable safety with usual care treatment with an added benefit of improved adherence over multiple single-ingredient medications. The polypill has potential to be a cost-effective intervention to reduce the global burden of cardiovascular disease.

The Impact of Polypill on Adherence and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Polypills, containing various combinations of medications for primary and secondary CVD prevention, have been developed to enhance medication adherence and reduce the healthcare burden of CVD. However, their effectiveness compared to usual care remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of polypills on cardiovascular risk factors, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and medication adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search for large-scale randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of polypills versus usual care on CVD risk factors and events. Outcomes included changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), lipid profiles, occurrence of MACE, and medication adherence.

RESULTS

The use of polypills led to a statistically significant yet clinically modest reduction in SBP (mean difference -1.47 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.50 to -0.44, p<0.01) and DBP (mean difference- 1.10 mmHg, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.51, p< 0.01) compared to usual care. Polypills also showed a significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 -0.95, p<0.01). There was a non-significant reduction in LDL and HDL levels. Adherence to medication improved by up to 17% in polypill users compared to those on usual care (p < 0.01). A multivariable metaregression analysis suggested that adherence may be the underlying factor responsible for the observed effect of the polypills on blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Polypills were found to significantly reduce SBP, DBP and MACE. An improvement in medication adherence was also observed among polypill users, which might be responsible for the significant reduction in SBP observed users. Future research might benefit from exploring a more personalized approach to the composition of polypills, which could reveal a more clinically significant impact of increased adherence on CVD outcomes.

A review of polypills for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a prevalent chronic condition managed through pharmacotherapy targeting modifiable risk factors. However, ASCVD patients often face poor medication adherence due to a high pill burden from multiple oral drugs, contributing to cardiovascular events. Recent evidence indicates that polypills combining antihypertensive and statin medications effectively control risk factors and improve adherence in various ASCVD risk patients. Randomized clinical trials demonstrate polypill efficacy in reducing major cardiovascular events, making them a convenient strategy for both established ASCVD patients and those without ASCVD. These positive results encourage the incorporation of polypills into comprehensive cardiovascular prevention programs, particularly for socio-economically vulnerable populations. Nevertheless, barriers remain, such as unclear regulatory approval pathways and physician hesitancy. Despite challenges, the benefits of fixed-dose combinations are evident and should be encouraged for secondary and primary prevention, especially in high-risk categories. Technological advancements could further support the successful integration of polypills in clinical practice. This review discusses the evidence, challenges, and perspectives of polypills, emphasizing their potential impact on cardiovascular disease management.

Polypill-based strategy vs. usual care for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the impact of a polypill-based strategy (PBS) on therapeutic adherence and cardiovascular outcomes compared with usual care for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases from inception to January 2023, including RCTs comparing PBS with usual care in patients with prior CVD. We assessed efficacy outcomes of therapeutic adherence, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and safety outcomes of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4.1 and R Version 4.2.1. A total of 8 RCTs with a population of 6541 individuals were included, of whom 3318 (50.7%) were treated with the PBS. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months. The polypill-based strategy was associated with a significantly increased therapeutic adherence [risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.34; P < 0.001]. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.85; P = 0.004), SBP [mean difference (MD) -1.47 mmHg; 95% CI -2.86 to -0.09; P = 0.04], and LDL-C (MD -3.83 mg/dL; 95% CI -6.99 to -0.67; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in the PBS group. The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar between groups (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.54-1.29; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

In patients with pre-existing CVD, a PBS is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and improved therapeutic adherence, along with a modest decrease in SBP and LDL-C compared with usual care. Thus, a PBS may be considered a preferred option for this patient population.

Contemporary secondary prevention in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction with and without chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis

Background

Survivors of myocardial infarction have an elevated risk of long-term mortality. We sought to evaluate guideline-directed medical treatment and its impact on long-term mortality in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) according to their chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage.

Methods

Using German health insurance claims data, 157 663 hospitalized survivors of STEMI were identified. Regarding different CKD stages, we retrospectively analysed the filled prescriptions of platelet inhibitors (PAI)/oral anticoagulation, statins, beta-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ACE-I/AT1-A) and their association with long-term mortality.

Results

Prescription rates for all four guideline-directed drugs were highest in patients without or with mild CKD and lowest in patients on dialysis. They dropped from 73.4% to 39.2% in patients without CKD and from 47.1% to 29% in patients on dialysis within the 5-year follow-up period. Mortality rates were dramatically increased in patients with CKD compared with patients without CKD (5-year mortality: no CKD, 16.7%; CKD stage 3, 47.1%; CKD stage 5d, 69.7%). Filled prescriptions of at least one drug class [one drug: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.66-0.74; four drugs: HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.27-0.30; P < .001 for both] as well as the distinct drug classes (statins: HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.54-0.56; ACE-I/AT1-A: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.67-0.70; beta-blocker: HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90; PAI/oral anticoagulation: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00; all P < .05) improved long-term mortality.

Conclusions

An improved long-term guideline-recommended drug therapy after STEMI regardless of renal impairment might lead to beneficial effects on long-term mortality.

A cardiovascular polypill for secondary stroke prevention in a tertiary centre in Ghana (SMAART): a phase 2 randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

A cardiovascular polypill containing generic drugs might facilitate sustained implementation of and adherence to evidence-based treatments, especially in resource-limited settings. However, the impact of a cardiovascular polypill in mitigating atherosclerotic risk among stroke survivors has not been assessed. We aimed to compare a polypill regimen with usual care on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) regression after ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

In SMAART, a phase 2 parallel, open-label, assessor-masked, randomised clinical trial, we randomly allocated individuals (aged ≥18 years) who had an ischaemic stroke within the previous 2 months, using a computer-generated randomisation sequence (1:1), to either a polypill or usual care group at a tertiary centre in Ghana. The polypill regimen was a fixed-dose pill containing 5 mg ramipril, 50 mg atenolol, 12·5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, 20 mg simvastatin, and 100 mg aspirin administered as two capsules once per day for 12 months. Usual care was tailored guideline-recommended secondary prevention medications. The primary outcome was the change in CIMT over 12 months with adjustment for baseline values, compared using ANCOVA in all participants with complete data at month 12. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03329599, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 12, 2019, and Dec 4, 2020, we randomly assigned 148 participants (74 to the usual care group and 74 to the polypill group), 74 (50%) of whom were male and 74 (50%) female. CIMT was assessed in 62 (84%) of 74 participants in the usual care group and 59 (80%) of 74 participants in the polypill group; the main reason for loss to follow-up was participants not completing the study. The mean CIMT change at month 12 was -0·092 mm (95% CI -0·130 to -0·051) in the usual care group versus -0·017 mm (-0·067 to 0·034) in the polypill group, with an adjusted mean difference of 0·049 (-0·008 to 0·109; p=0·11). Serious adverse events occurred among two (3%) participants in the usual care group, and eight (11%) participants in the polypill group (p=0·049).

INTERPRETATION

The polypill regimen resulted in similar regression in subclinical atherosclerosis and many secondary and tertiary outcome measures as the tailored drug regimen, but with more serious adverse events. Larger, longer-term, event-based studies, including patients with stroke in primary care settings, are warranted.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health.

TRANSLATION

For the Akan (Twi) translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Polypill use for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A position paper

Cardiovascular (CV) guidelines stress the need for global intervention to manage risk factors and reduce the risk of major vascular events. Growing evidence supports the use of polypill as a strategy to prevent cerebral and cardiovascular disease, however it is still underused in clinical practice. This paper presents an expert consensus aimed to summarize the data regarding polypill use. The authors consider the benefits of polypill and the significant claims for clinical applicability. Potential advantages and disadvantages, data regarding several populations in primary and secondary prevention, and pharmacoeconomic data are also addressed.

Redefining the polypill: pros and cons in cardiovascular precision medicine

Polypill is a multi-drug formulation in a single pill intended to simplify the drug regimen and reduce medication-induced adverse effects. The most common multidrug combinations in a polypill are used to treat cardiovascular diseases and are targeted against key modifiable risk factors such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia. These contain blood-pressure lowering agents, statins, and anti-platelet agents usually in a fixed dose. Polypills can be an affordable therapeutic intervention for treating high-risk patients, as these are proven to increase patients' adherence to medication and improve clinical outcomes. Over the previous years, randomized clinical trials of several polypills have yielded contradictory findings, raising skepticism regarding their widespread use in primary disease prevention. Here, we have reviewed the concept of polypills, the evidence-based strengths, the limitations of this polypharmacy intervention strategy, and discussed future directions for their use in the primary and secondary preventive management of cardiovascular diseases and associated risk factors.

Benefits of the Polypill on Medication Adherence in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review

Background

Higher medication adherence reduces the risk of new cardiovascular events. However, there are individual and health system barriers that lead to lower adherence. The polypill has demonstrated benefits in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mainly driven by an increase in adherence. We aim to evaluate the impact of the polypill on adherence to cardiovascular medication, its efficacy and safety in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Methods

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases were searched from January 2003 to December 2022. We included randomized, pragmatic, or real-world clinical trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was medication adherence, secondary outcomes were efficacy in cardiovascular disease in primary and secondary prevention and safety.

Results

From the 490 publications screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into a comparative table Of those included, 70% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 53.8% focused on secondary prevention. Most of the studies received a high and moderate quality rating. Self-report, pill counting and, the Morisky scale were the most frequent methods to evaluate adherence (84.6%). Compared with standard medication, the polypill improved overall medication adherence by 13%, with percentages ranging from 7.6% to 34.9%. Moreover, a potential benefit was also observed in reducing Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), particularly in secondary prevention studies, with hazard ratios ranged between 0.43 to 0.76. Compared to standard care, the profile of side effects was similar.

Conclusion

The polypill is an effective, safe, and practical strategy to improve adherence in people at risk of CVD. Although there is a demonstrated benefit in reducing MACE, predominantly in secondary prevention, there are still gaps in its efficacy in primary prevention and reducing total mortality. Therefore, the importance of obtaining long-term results of the polypill effect and how this strategy can be implemented in real practice.

[Therapeutic adherence of patients with cardiovascular risk in primary care. REAAP project]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perceptions and daily experiences of primary care (PC) physicians in dealing with the lack of therapeutic adherence in patients with cardiovascular risk, as well as their expectations and possible areas for improvement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A qualitative study (within the framework of the REAAP project: Network of Experts in Adherence in Primary Care) carried out in several autonomous communities in Spain using an open-ended questionnaire completed by PC physicians and analyzed using the framework analysis method to guide the coding of the topics.

RESULTS

Eighteen physicians participated, and three main themes were identified from their responses: an approach to adherence during clinical practice, barriers that hinder the appropriate adherence, and interventions to improve it. The strategies most frequently mentioned to facilitate patients' therapeutic adherence were improving physician-patient communication and continuity of care, involving community pharmacies, and simplifying treatment by prescribing drugs in fixed combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no single ideal strategy to facilitate therapeutic adherence, and it is necessary to combine several interventions to optimize it. The first step is to understand the problems and the tools available. Initiatives such as the REAAP project are an important means to improve patient adherence, and for healthcare personnel to recognize the importance that this issue deserves.

The cardiovascular polypill as baseline treatment improves lipid profile and blood pressure regardless of body mass index in patients with cardiovascular disease. The Bacus study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatment with lipid-lowering and antihypertensive drugs has been proposed as a strategy to improve excess cardiovascular (CV) risk among obese individuals. The present study aimed to assess whether the CV polypill (Sincronium®) could be an effective strategy to help improve CV risk factor control in obese/overweight individuals requiring secondary prevention.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective study reviewing the hospital medical records of 479 patients with established CV disease who initiated treatment with the CV polypill between 2013 and 2019 at a general hospital in Mexico. Patients were grouped as normal weight, overweight or obese according to their initial body mass index (BMI). We collected blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, and vascular age at the last visit recorded during the period following treatment.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, all assessed lipid parameters improved compared to baseline regardless of the initial BMI category (all p<0.001). There was an increase from baseline regarding the proportion of patients with at target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after treatment (2.3% vs. 30.1%; p<0.001), more than 80% of patients achieved triglyceride levels <200 mg/dL (p<0.001), and more than 80% achieved target BP levels in all BMI subgroups (p<0.001). The subanalyses in the elderly population yielded similar results, with a significant overall improvement in lipid and BP control after initiating the CV polypill strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the CV polypill as baseline therapy for secondary prevention seems to be a reasonable strategy that enhances CV risk factor control regardless of the patient's BMI.

The use of the CNIC-Polypill in real-life clinical practice: opportunities and challenges in patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease - expert panel meeting report

Although the cardiovascular (CV) polypill concept is not new and several guidelines state that a CV polypill should be considered an integral part of a comprehensive CV disease (CVD) prevention strategy, there are still some barriers to its implementation in the real-world setting, mainly in secondary CV prevention. As the CNIC-polypill is the only one approved for secondary CV prevention in patients with atherosclerotic CVD in 27 countries worldwide, a panel of four discussants and 30 participants from 18 countries conveyed in a virtual meeting on April 21, 2022, to discuss key clinical questions regarding the practical use of the CNIC-Polypill and barriers to its implementation.Data presented showed that, although the use of the CV polypill is not explicitly mentioned in the current 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on CVD prevention, it may be used in any patient for secondary CVD prevention tolerating all their components to improve outcomes through different aspects. The favourable results of the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly (SECURE) trial now reinforce this recommendation. The panellists presented algorithms on how to switch from any baseline regimen when starting treatment with the CNIC-polypill in different situations, including patients with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and a previous CV event; at discharge after a cardiovascular event; in chronic ischemic conditions; and in cases of polypharmacy. The panellists and expert discussants did agree that available studies conducted so far with the CNIC-polypill demonstrate that it is as efficacious as the monocomponents, equipotent drugs, or other therapies; reduces the risk of experiencing recurrent major CV events; improves medication adherence; reduces health care costs and resources compared to patients treated with loose drugs; and the patients prefer it over the multipill strategy.In conclusion, the data presented by the participants provided the evidence behind the use of the CNIC-polypill to help fulfil the goal of encouraging its adoption by physicians.

Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Outcomes With Polypills for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the outcomes of "polypill" therapy in cardiovascular disease prevention have yielded mixed results. We performed an electronic search through January 2023 for RCTs that examined the use of polypills for cardiovascular disease primary or secondary prevention. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). The final analysis included 11 RCTs with 25,389 patients; 12,791 patients were in the polypill arm, and 12,598 patients were in the control arm. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 5.6 years. Polypill therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACCE (5.8% vs 7.7%; risk ratio [RR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.91). The reduction of MACCE risk was consistent in both primary and secondary prevention. Polypill therapy was associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular mortality (2.1% vs 3%; RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.87), myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 3.2%; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.84) and stroke (0.9% vs 1.6%; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.90). Polypill therapy was associated with a higher degree of adherence. There was no difference between both groups in the incidence of serious adverse events (16.1% vs 15.9%; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.36). In conclusion, we found that a polypill strategy was associated with a lower incidence of cardiac events and higher adherence, without an increased incidence of adverse events. This benefit was consistent for both primary and secondary prevention.

Economic Burden Associated with the Treatment with a Cardiovascular Polypill in Secondary Prevention in Spain: Cost-Effectiveness Results of the NEPTUNO Study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to estimate health-care resources utilization, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with the treatment with CNIC-Polypill as secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to other treatments, in clinical practice in Spain.

Patients and Methods

An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records (economic results [healthcare perspective], NEPTUNO-study; BIG-PAC-database) of patients who initiated secondary prevention between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed up to 2 years (maximum). Four cohorts were balanced with a propensity-score-matching (PSM): 1) CNIC-Polypill (aspirin+atorvastatin+ramipril), 2) Monocomponents (same separate drugs), 3) Equipotent (equipotent drugs) and 4) Other therapies ([OT], other cardiovascular drugs). Incidence of cardiovascular events, health-care resources utilization and healthcare and non-healthcare costs (2020 Euros) were compared. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per cardiovascular event avoided were estimated.

Results

After PSM, 1614 patients were recruited in each study cohort. The accumulated incidence of cardiovascular events during the 24-month follow-up was lower in the CNIC-Polypill cohort vs the other cohorts (19.8% vs Monocomponents: 23.3%, Equipotent: 25.5% and OT: 26.8%; p<0.01). During the follow-up period, the CNIC-Polypill cohort also reduced the health-care resources utilization per patient compared to the other cohorts, particularly primary care visits (16.6 vs Monocomponents: 18.7, Equipotent: 18.9 and OT: 21.0; p<0.001) and hospitalization days (2.3 vs Monocomponents: 3.4, Equipotent: 3.7 and OT: 4.0; p<0.001). The treatment cost in the CNIC-Polypill cohort was lower than that in the other cohorts (€4668 vs Monocomponents: €5587; Equipotent: €5682 and OT: €6016; p<0.001) (Difference: -€919, -€1014 and -€1348, respectively). Due to the reduction of cardiovascular events and costs, the CNIC-Polypill is a dominant alternative compared to the other treatments.

Conclusion

CNIC-Polypill reduces recurrent major cardiovascular events and costs, being a cost-saving strategy as secondary prevention of ASCVD.

The polypill strategy in cardiovascular disease prevention: It's time for its implementation

A polypill strategy has been demonstrated to improve treatment adherence in several cardiovascular disease (CVD) settings. However, data on the prognostic impact in the secondary prevention setting have been scarce. The Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly trial, the results of which have been recently published, has demonstrated a benefit in terms of major adverse CVD event reduction. This finding, in addition to previous evidence, should lead to a broader polypill implementation in CVD prevention.

Cost-effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill versus separate monocomponents in cardiovascular secondary prevention in Spain

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Despite advances in treatment, cardiovascular disease is the second leading cause of death in Spain. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill strategy (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg, atorvastatin 20/40 mg, ramipril 2.5/5/10 mg) compared with the same separate monocomponents for the secondary prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events in adults in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Markov cost-utility model was adapted considering 4 health states (stable, subsequent major adverse cardiovascular event, subsequent ischemic stroke and death) and the SMART risk equation over a lifetime horizon from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System. The CNIC-Polypill strategy was compared with monocomponents in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 secondary prevention patients. The NEPTUNO study, official databases, and the literature were reviewed to identify effectiveness, epidemiological, costs and utility data. Outcomes were costs (in 2021 euros) per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted LY (QALY) gained. A 3% discount rate was applied. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The CNIC-Polypill strategy in secondary prevention results in more LY (13.22) and QALY (11.64) gains at a lower cost than monocomponents. The CNIC-Polypill is dominant and saves є280.68 per patient compared with monocomponents. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis shows that 82.4% of the simulations are below the threshold of є25,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNIC-Polypill strategy in secondary cardiovascular prevention is cost-effective compared with the same separate monocomponents, resulting in a cost-saving strategy to the Spanish National Healthcare System.

[The polypill in cardiovascular prevention: successful through simplification? : New study results on the benefit of the polypill strategy in primary and secondary prevention]

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is still the major cause of death worldwide. Beside the elevated blood pressure, a major modifiable risk factor is the elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Although both risk factors are well manageable, therapeutic control remains poor with low adherence to medication being a major cause of insufficient treatment success. One solution to overcome this issue is the polypill concept, i.e. a combination of different drugs in one tablet. This not only increases adherence but also significantly improves patients' prognosis by reducing cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on current evidence published in randomized control trials in primary and secondary prevention. A major focus is on the recently published SECURE trial dealing with the polypill in secondary prevention.

CURRENT DATA

Most trials dealing with the polypill concept focus on the control of risk factors such as blood pressure and LDL cholesterol while lacking a prognostic benefit in the form of a reduction in cardiovascular events. Recent trials such as the HOPE‑3, PolyIran and TIPS‑3 trials have shown a prognostic improvement for the polypill in primary prevention. In secondary prevention there has been a lack of prognostic benefit for the polypill to date. The recently published SECURE trial closed this gap by showing a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in post-infarct patients and also showing a reduction in cardiovascular death by 33%.

CONCLUSION

The concept of the polypill has evolved from a comfort method for patients aimed at facilitating adherence to an innovative therapeutic concept with a proven prognostic advantage compared to current treatment practice by reducing cardiovascular events and mortality. Therefore, it is time to implement the concept of the polypill in primary and secondary prevention to improve patients' prognosis and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease worldwide.

Access to cardiovascular medicines in low- and middle-income countries: a mini review

BACKGROUND

Many cardiovascular (CV) medicines are required for long term. However, with their limited resources, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may have challenges with access to cardiovascular medicines. The aim of this review was to provide a summary of available evidence on access to cardiovascular medicines in LMICs.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Google scholar for English language articles on access to cardiovascular medicines for the period 2010-2022. We also searched for articles reporting measures for challenges in access to CV medicines from 2007 to 2022. Studies conducted in LMICs, and reporting availability and affordability were included for review. We also reviewed studies reporting affordability or availability using the World Health Organisation/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) method. Levels of affordability and availability were compared.

RESULTS

Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria for review on availability and affordability. Although availability appears to have improved, many countries did not meet the availability target of 80%. Between economies and within countries, there are equity gaps in access to CV medicines. Availability is lower in public health facilities than private facilities. Seven out of 11 studies reported availability less than 80%. Eight studies which investigated availability in the public sector reported less than 80% availability. Overall, CV medicines, especially combined treatments are not affordable in the majority of countries. Simultaneous achievement of availability and affordability target is low. In the studies reviewed, less than 1-53.5 days wages were required to purchase one month supply of CV medicines. Failure to meet affordability was 9-75%. Five studies showed that, on average 1.6 days' wages of the Lowest-Paid Government Worker (LPGW) was required to purchase generic CV medicines in the public sector. Efficient forecasting and procurement, increased public financing and policies to improve generic use, among others are measures for improving availability and affordability.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gaps exist in access to cardiovascular medicines in LMICs, and in many low-and lower middle-income countries access to cardiovascular medicines is low. To improve access and achieve the Global Action Plan on non-communicable diseases in these countries, policy interventions must be urgently instituted.

The changing landscape of drug clinical trials on cardiometabolic diseases in China, 2009-2021

BACKGROUND

Cardiometabolic disease is a clinical syndrome characterized by multiple metabolic disorders, with atherosclerosis as the core and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events as the outcome. Drug research and development (R&D) in cardiometabolic diseases has grown rapidly worldwide. However, the development of cardiometabolic drug clinical trials in China remains unclear. This study aims to depict the changing landscape of drug clinical trials for cardiometabolic diseases in China during 2009-2021.

METHODS

The detailed information of drug trials on cardiometabolic diseases registered in the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) Registration and Information Disclosure Platform was collected between January 1, 2009, and July 1, 2021. The landscape of cardiometabolic drug clinical trials was analyzed by the characteristics, time trends, indications, pharmacological mechanisms, and geographical distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 2466 drug clinical trials on cardiometabolic diseases were extracted and analyzed. The annual number of drug trials increased rapidly in the past twelve years. Among all the trials, the bioequivalence trials (1428; 58.3%) accounted for the largest proportion, followed by phase I (555; 22.5%), phase III (278; 11.3%), phase II (169; 6.9%), and phase IV (26; 1.1%). Of 2466 trials, 2133 (86.5%) trials were monomer drugs, only 236 (9.6%) trials were polypills and 97 (3.9%) were traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compounds. In terms of pharmacological mechanisms, the number of trials in dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium antagonists 321 (11.9%) ranked first, while trials in angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) 289 (10.7%) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor 205 (7.6%) ranked second and third place respectively. Of 236 chemical polypills trials, 23 (9.7%) polypills were the combination of DHP calcium antagonists and statins, while others were the combination of two same pharmacological effect agents. As for the geographical distribution of leading units, 36 trials were led by principal investigators (PI) units from Beijing, followed by Jiangsu (n = 29), Shanghai (n = 19), Guangdong (n = 19), and Hunan (n = 19), showing an uneven regional distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Great progress has been made in drug clinical trials on cardiometabolic diseases, especially in antihypertensive agents, hypoglycemic agents, and hypolipidemic agents. However, the insufficient innovation of first-in-class drugs and polypills should be carefully considered by all stakeholders in drug trials.

Association between hospital-physician vertical integration and medication adherence rates

OBJECTIVE

To test the association between vertical integration of primary care providers (PCPs) and adherence rates for anti-diabetics, renin angiotensin system antagonists (RASA), and statins.

DATA SOURCES

Medicare Part B outpatient fee-for-service claims and Medicare Part D event data from 2014 to 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

We estimated difference-in-differences regressions, comparing changes in adherence among patients with PCPs who converted from independent to integrated to changes among patients whose PCPs remained independent or integrated during the study period. To test for heterogenous impacts by patient demographics, we estimated triple difference regressions that included additional interaction terms by comorbidity rates, age group, and race/ethnicity.

EXTRACTION METHODS

We extracted Medicare claims for adults with continuous enrollment in Parts B and D during the study period.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The proportion of patients who had a vertically integrated PCP increased by approximately 23% over the study period. Changes in adherence did not differ significantly between patients based on whether their PCP became integrated (Statins: 0.18, 95% CI -0.13, 0.49; RASA: -0.13, 95% CI -0.46, 0.19; Anti-Diabetics: -0.20, 95% CI -0.78, 0.38). Among patients with PCPs who became integrated, there were significant decreases in adherence for patients who were Black, Asian, Hispanic, or Native American, above 80 years old, and had greater comorbidities for all three classes.

CONCLUSIONS

While there were no average changes in adherence following vertical integration of PCPs, health equity worsened, with significant declines in adherence for Black, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American patients, patients over 80 years old, and patients with greater comorbidities. These findings suggest that integration may reduce clinicians' incentives to compete based on the quality of care delivered. Given the price increases associated with integration, integration may be a net welfare loss.

An Expert Opinion on the Role of the Rosuvastatin/Amlodipine Single Pill Fixed Dose Combination in Cardiovascular Prevention

Current cardiovascular disease prevention strategies are based on the management of cardiovascular risk as a continuum, redefining the therapeutic goals for each individual based on the estimated global risk profile. Given the frequent clustering of the principal cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, in the same individual, patients are required to take multiple drugs to achieve therapeutic targets. The adoption of single pill fixed dose combinations may contribute to achieve better control of blood pressure and cholesterol compared to the separate administration of the individual drugs, mostly due to better adherence related to therapeutic simplicities. This paper reports the outcomes of an Expert multidisciplinary Roundtable. In particular, the rational and potential clinical use of the single pill fixed dose combination "Rosuvastatin-Amlodipine" for the management of concomitant hypertension/hypercholesterolemia in different clinical fields are discussed. This Expert Opinion also illustrates the importance of an early and effective management of total cardiovascular risk, highlights the substantial benefits of combining blood pressure and lipid-lowering treatments in a single-pill fixed dose combination and attempts to identify and overcome the barriers to the implementation in clinical practice of the fixed dose combinations with dual targets. This Expert Panel identifies and proposes the categories of patients who may benefit the most from this fixed dose combination.

Effect of Yearly Exercise on Medication Expense and Benefit-Cost Ratio in Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Lifestyle modification through incorporation of exercise training could improve metabolic syndrome (MetS) clinical components (hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and visceral abdominal obesity). We aimed to assess if long-term exercise training could restrain the increased pharmacological cost of the clinical management of the MetS.

METHODS

Medicine cost during a 5-yr-long randomized controlled exercise intervention trial was analyzed. After a per-protocol analysis, a group of 64 individuals 53 ± 2 yr old, with overweight (body mass index, 33.4 ± 0.9 kg·m -2 ) and MetS (3.6 ± 0.2 factors) were randomized to a training (4 months·yr -1 for 5 yr; EXERCISE, n = 25) or to a control group (CONTROL, n = 26). Subjects were studied on three occasions during the 5-yr follow-up. Participants continued their routine medication managed by their general practitioner. The main outcome is the 5-yr evolution of medication cost to treat MetS (hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia). A secondary outcome is the benefit-cost ratio of the exercise intervention.

RESULTS

In CONTROL, medicine cost increased 160% from baseline ( P < 0.001), whereas in EXERCISE, it remained unchanged (33%; P = 0.25). After the 5-yr follow-up, medicine use was 60% and medicine cost 74% higher in CONTROL than EXERCISE ( P < 0.05 in both cases). However, MetS z score was similarly reduced over time in both groups ( P = 0.244 for group-time interaction). The number of prescribed medications increased after 5 yr in CONTROL (89%; P < 0.001), whereas it remained stable with yearly training (17%; P = 0.72 in EXERCISE). Ten-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimation increased only in CONTROL (15%; P = 0.05 for group-time interaction). The benefit in medicine savings (€153 per year and patient) triplicated the estimated cost (€50.8 per year and patient) of the exercise intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-yr-long supervised exercise training program in middle-age individuals with MetS prevents the need for increasing medicine use. The savings in pharmacological therapy outweighs the estimated costs of implementing the exercise program.

Polypill Programs to Prevent Stroke and Cut Costs in Low Income Countries: Moving From Clinical Efficacy to Pragmatic Implementation

Current projections are that the already overwhelming burden of strokes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will continue to rise over the coming decades as the prevalence of traditional vascular risk factors burgeon in these countries. Cardiovascular polypills containing combinations of antihypertensive(s), a statin, with or without aspirin or folic acid in the form of a single pill, represent a viable strategy for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in LMICs. Large multicenter trials in LMIC and high-income country (HIC) settings have now clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of the cardiovascular polypill versus placebo (or usual care) in reducing primary stroke risk by 50%. For survivors of a recent myocardial infarction residing in HICs, the polypill reduced risk of major cardiovascular events by 25% due to improved treatment adherence. Data on the clinical efficacy of the polypill for secondary stroke prevention are scanty both in HICs and LMICs. Cost-effectiveness analyses data from LMICs suggest cost savings with the polypill for primary and secondary prevention of stroke and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. However, major contextual barriers in LMICs need to be surmounted through mixed methods research and hybrid clinical trials to assess its real-world effectiveness, before the adoption of the polypill for primary and secondary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention in routine clinical practice.

GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is a critical therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The GLP-1R cellular signaling mechanism relevant to insulin secretion and blood glucose regulation has been extensively studied. Numerous drugs targeting GLP-1R have entered clinical treatment. However, novel functional molecules with reduced side effects and enhanced therapeutic efficacy are still in high demand. In this review, we summarize the basis of GLP-1R cellular signaling, and how it is involved in the treatment of T2DM. We review the functional molecules of incretin therapy in various stages of clinical trials. We also outline the current strategies and emerging techniques that are furthering the development of novel therapeutic drugs for T2DM and other metabolic diseases.

Effect of the Polypill on Adherence and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

It is important to understand the role of polypills on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) to help decision-makers make robust guidelines on using polypills in these people. Therefore, the current meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of polypills on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with or at high risk of CVD. The present meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized control trials (RCTs) from inception to January 1, 2023. The outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis were adherence to prescribed drugs at the study end, the incidence of cardiovascular events, and change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline to the study end in mmol/l. A total of six studies were included in the present meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 13139 (6577 in the polypill group and 6562 in the control group). Meta-analysis showed that medication adherence was significantly higher in patients receiving polypills compared to the control group (relative risk (RR): 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-1.56, p-value: 0.001). The risk of a cardiovascular event was significantly lower in the polypill group (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82, p-value: 0.001). No significant differences were found in the changes in LDL-C and total cholesterol between the two groups. This meta-analysis shows a significant impact of polypills on medication adherence. We also found that polypills can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with or at high risk of CVD. Our study has also shown that regardless of the history of CVD, polypills play an important role in promoting medication adherence in patients with and without a history of CVD.

Safety and efficacy of a cardiovascular polypill in people at high and very high risk without a previous cardiovascular event: the international VULCANO randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular (CV) polypills are a useful baseline treatment to prevent CV diseases by combining different drug classes in a single pill to simultaneously target more than one risk factor. The aim of the present trial was to determine whether the treatment with the CNIC-polypill was at least non-inferior to usual care in terms of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and systolic BP (SBP) values in subjects at high or very high risk without a previous CV event.

METHODS

The VULCANO was an international, multicentre open-label trial involving 492 participants recruited from hospital clinics or primary care centres. Patients were randomised to the CNIC-polypill -containing aspirin, atorvastatin, and ramipril- or usual care. The primary outcome was the comparison of the mean change in LDL-c and SBP values after 16 weeks of treatment between treatment groups.

RESULTS

The upper confidence limit of the mean change in LDL-c between treatments was below the prespecified margin (10 mg/dL) and above zero, and non-inferiority and superiority of the CNIC-polypill (p = 0.0001) was reached. There were no significant differences in SBP between groups. However, the upper confidence limit crossed the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 3 mm Hg. Significant differences favoured the CNIC-polypill in reducing total cholesterol (p = 0.0004) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (p = 0.0017). There were no reports of major bleeding episodes. The frequency of non-serious gastrointestinal disorders was more frequent in the CNIC-polypill arm.

CONCLUSION

The switch from conventional treatment to the CNIC-polypill approach was safe and appears a reasonable strategy to control risk factors and prevent CVD. Trial registration This trial was registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) the 20th February 2017 (register number 2016-004015-13; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2016-004015-13 ).

Polypill Strategy in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

BACKGROUND

A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on pharmacological interventions for long-term secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack

Recurrent stroke affects 9% to 15% of people within 1 year. This European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on pharmacological management of blood pressure (BP), diabetes mellitus, lipid levels and antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of recurrent stroke and other important outcomes in people with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). It does not cover interventions for specific causes of stroke, including anticoagulation for cardioembolic stroke, which are addressed in other guidelines. This guideline was developed through ESO standard operating procedures and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified clinical questions, selected outcomes, performed systematic reviews, with meta-analyses where appropriate, and made evidence-based recommendations, with expert consensus statements where evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation. To reduce the long-term risk of recurrent stroke or other important outcomes after ischaemic stroke or TIA, we recommend: BP lowering treatment to a target of <130/80 mmHg, except in subgroups at increased risk of harm; HMGCoA-reductase inhibitors (statins) and targeting a low density lipoprotein level of <1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl); avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel after the first 90 days; to not give direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) for embolic stroke of undetermined source and to consider pioglitazone in people with diabetes or insulin resistance, after careful consideration of potential risks. In addition to the evidence-based recommendations, all or the majority of working group members supported: out-of-office BP monitoring; use of combination treatment for BP control; consideration of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors when lipid targets are not achieved; consideration of use of low-dose DOACs in addition to an antiplatelet in selected groups of people with coronary or peripheral artery disease and aiming for an HbA1c level of <53 mmol/mol (7%) in people with diabetes mellitus. These guidelines aim to standardise long-term pharmacological treatment to reduce the burden of recurrent stroke in Europe.

Personalised Paediatric Chewable Ibuprofen Tablets Fabricated Using 3D Micro-extrusion Printing Technology

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming an attractive technology for the design and development of personalized paediatric dosage forms with improved palatability. In this work micro-extrusion based printing was implemented for the fabrication of chewable paediatric ibuprofen (IBU) tablets by assessing a range of front runner polymers in taste masking. Due to the drug-polymer miscibility and the IBU plasticization effect, micro-extrusion was proved to be an ideal technology for processing the drug/polymer powder blends for the printing of paediatric dosage forms. The printed tablets presented high printing quality with reproducible layer thickness and a smooth surface. Due to the drug-polymer interactions induced during printing processing, IBU was found to form a glass solution confirmed by differential calorimetry (DSC) while H-bonding interactions were identified by confocal Raman mapping. IBU was also found to be uniformly distributed within the polymer matrices at molecular level. The tablet palatability was assessed by panellists and revealed excellent taste masking of the IBU's bitter taste. Overall micro-extrusion demonstrated promising processing capabilities of powder blends for rapid printing and development of personalised dosage forms.

Association of polypill therapy with cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and adherence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Prior studies have reported improvements in population-level risk factor burden and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes using polypills for CVD risk reduction. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of polypills on CVD outcomes, mortality, adherence, and side effects across different settings has not previously been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the association between polypill therapy and CVD outcomes published before February 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of major adverse CVD events (MACE). Risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes were converted to log RR and pooled using a generic inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Data for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects modeling and presented as mean differences with 95% CIs. Eight studies representing 25,584 patients were included for analysis. In the overall pooled analysis, the use of polypills was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.02) and significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-1.00). The reductions in the risk of MACE with polypill use varied by baseline risk and nature of the study population (primary prevention vs. secondary prevention), with the most significant risk reduction among lower-risk cohorts, including within primary prevention populations [RR 0.70 (0.62, 0.79)]. Among measures of CVD risk factors, modest but significant reductions were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure [systolic: mean difference 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: -3.07 to -0.91); diastolic: mean difference 1.30 mmHg (95% CI: -2.42 to -0.19), but not for levels of total or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Use of the polypill strategy significantly improved drug adherence (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11-1.55) with no association between polypill use and rates of adverse events or drug discontinuation. The use of polypill formulations is associated with significant reductions in CVD risk factors and the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, particularly in the low-risk and primary prevention population.

Single-pill fixed-dose drug combinations to reduce blood pressure: the right pill for the right patient

Arterial hypertension is one of the major causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Effective and sustained reduction in blood pressure is essential to reduce individual cardiovascular risk. In daily clinical practice, single-pill fixed-dose combinations of different drug classes are important therapeutic resources that could improve both treatment adherence and cardiovascular risk management by targeting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. The aim of this practical narrative review is to help physicians choosing the right single-pill fixed-dose combination for the right patient in the daily clinical practice, based on the individual clinical phenotype and cardiovascular risk profile.