1
|
Temes CM, Boccagno C, Gold AK, Kobaissi H, Hsu I, Montinola S, Sylvia LG. Comorbidity of bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder: Phenomenology, course, and treatment considerations. Bipolar Disord 2024. [PMID: 39034111 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM Bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are both serious psychiatric conditions that elevate the risk for harmful outcomes. Although these conditions represent distinct diagnostic entities, existing research suggests that approximately 20% of individuals with BD meet the criteria for comorbid BPD. Individuals with comorbid BD/BPD appear to have a markedly more severe and phenomenologically distinct clinical course when compared with those with BD alone. However, treatments have generally not been tested in this specific population, and currently, no formal treatment guidelines exist for this subgroup of patients. METHOD In the current paper, we review the epidemiological and descriptive research characterizing those with comorbid BD/BPD and discuss the impact of this comorbidity on psychosocial treatment. We also review current findings on evidence-based treatments for BD and BPD that show promise in treating those with comorbid BD/BPD. RESULTS In our review of the literature, we highlight the importance of recognizing this comorbidity and discuss avenues for developing and integrating evidence-based treatment approaches for this understudied clinical population. CONCLUSIONS Although formal trials of interventions targeted to comorbid BD/BPD are limited, there is promising evidence regarding the possibility of using or integrating existing evidence-based approaches for this population. There are also several areas of clinical practice improvement and future research directions that stem from this literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Temes
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Chelsea Boccagno
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard T.H. Chan School for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandra K Gold
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hadi Kobaissi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingrid Hsu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sofia Montinola
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Louisa G Sylvia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dauten Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Azevedo J, Swales M, Carreiras D, Guiomar R, Macedo A, Castilho P. BI-REAL: A 12-session DBT skills group intervention adapted for bipolar disorder - A feasibility randomised pilot trial. J Affect Disord 2024; 356:394-404. [PMID: 38615843 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
International guidelines endorse psychological treatment for Bipolar Disorder (BD); however, the absence of a recognised gold-standard intervention requires further research. A Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) skills group intervention with 12 sessions was developed. This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes variance of Bi-REAL - Respond Effectively, Assertively, and Live mindfully, tailored for individuals with BD, in preparation for a future RCT. METHODS 52 participants (female = 62.7 %; mean age = 43.2 ± 11.1) with BD were randomised by blocks to either the experimental group (EG; n = 26; Bi-REAL + Treatment as Usual, TAU) receiving 12 weekly 90-minutes sessions, or the control group (CG; n = 26, TAU). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed with a multimethod approach (qualitative interviews, semi-structured clinical interviews and a battery of self-report questionnaires - candidate main outcomes Bipolar Recovery Questionnaire (BRQ) and brief Quality of Life for Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)). All participants were evaluated at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and 3-month follow-up (T2). RESULTS Acceptability was supported by participants' positive feedback and ratings of the sessions and programme overall, as well as the treatment attendance (86.25 % of sessions attended). The trial overall retention rate was 74.5 %, with CG having a higher dropout rate across the 3-timepoints (42.31 %). A significant Time × Group interaction effect was found for BRQ and QoL.BD favouring the intervention group (p < .05). LIMITATIONS The assessors were not blind at T1 (only at T2). Recruitment plan was impacted due to COVID-19 restrictions and replication is questionable. High attrition rates in the CG. CONCLUSIONS The acceptability of Bi-REAL was sustained, and subsequent feasibility testing will be necessary to establish whether the retention rates of the overall trial improve and if feasibility is confirmed, before progressing to a definitive trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julieta Azevedo
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Portugal; Bangor University, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
| | - Michaela Swales
- Bangor University, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, United Kingdom
| | - Diogo Carreiras
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Portugal
| | - Raquel Guiomar
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Portugal
| | - António Macedo
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Psychological Medicine (IPM), Portugal; Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Portugal; Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, EPE (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paula Castilho
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brancati GE, De Rosa U, Acierno D, Caruso V, De Dominicis F, Petrucci A, Moriconi M, Elefante C, Gemignani S, Medda P, Schiavi E, Perugi G. Development of a self-report screening instrument for emotional dysregulation: the Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity and Stability questionnaire, screening version (RIPoSt-SV). J Affect Disord 2024; 355:406-414. [PMID: 38570039 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional dysregulation (ED) refers to the inability to manage emotional experiences or expressions hindering goal-oriented behavior. Moderate impairment on at least two domains among temper control, affective lability, and emotional over-reactivity has been proposed to identify ED in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). No screening measure designed for use in diverse psychiatric samples exists. We aimed to develop a self-report screening tool for ED based on the 40-item version of the Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity, and Stability questionnaire (RIPoSt-40). METHODS 150 adult outpatients with non-psychotic conditions were enrolled between February and July 2023 at the Second Psychiatry Unit of Pisa University Hospital. Clinically significant ED (CSED) was defined based on the previously suggested approach for ADHD. Differences between patients with and without CSED were tested. To develop our screening instrument, a decision tree algorithm was trained by hyperparameter tuning through 5-fold cross-validation in 120 subjects and tested on the remaining 30. RESULTS 75 subjects met criteria for CSED (50 %). CSED was associated with lower age and higher prevalence of psychiatric conditions, including minor mood disorders, ADHD, cannabis use disorders, and eating disorders. We identified a decision tree consisting of six items from RIPoSt-40 that effectively detected CSED, with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 80 % or higher in both the training and testing sets. LIMITATIONS Tertiary-level; no consensus on criteria; sample size. CONCLUSION The screening version of the Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity, and Stability questionnaire (RIPoSt-SV) demonstrates promise as a valuable tool for ED screening in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Emilio Brancati
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ugo De Rosa
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Donatella Acierno
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valerio Caruso
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco De Dominicis
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy; Mental Health Centre, Local Health Unit 2, Spoleto, Italy
| | - Alessandra Petrucci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy; Mental Health Centre, Local Health Unit 2, Terni, Italy
| | - Martina Moriconi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Camilla Elefante
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Samuele Gemignani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Medda
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Schiavi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulio Perugi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Psychiatry Unit 2, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mograbi DC, Hall S, Arantes B, Huntley J. The cognitive neuroscience of self-awareness: Current framework, clinical implications, and future research directions. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS. COGNITIVE SCIENCE 2024; 15:e1670. [PMID: 38043919 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Self-awareness, the ability to take oneself as the object of awareness, has been an enigma for our species, with different answers to this question being provided by religion, philosophy, and, more recently, science. The current review aims to discuss the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying self-awareness. The multidimensional nature of self-awareness will be explored, suggesting how it can be thought of as an emergent property observed in different cognitive complexity levels, within a predictive coding approach. A presentation of alterations of self-awareness in neuropsychiatric conditions will ground a discussion on alternative frameworks to understand this phenomenon, in health and psychopathology, with future research directions being indicated to fill current gaps in the literature. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Consciousness Psychology > Brain Function and Dysfunction Neuroscience > Cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Mograbi
- Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Hall
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Beatriz Arantes
- Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jonathan Huntley
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durpoix A, Lachaux E, Weiner L, Weibel S. Transdiagnostic skills training group of dialectical behavior therapy: a long-term naturalistic study. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2023; 10:37. [PMID: 38124187 PMCID: PMC10734074 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-023-00243-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) has assembled a large body of evidence for the treatment of emotional dysregulation in borderline personality disorder (BPD), but also in other disorders characterized by emotional dysregulation (e.g., bipolar disorder (BD) and ADHD). Standalone skills learning groups address the problem of limited resources in several clinical settings. Furthermore, transdiagnostic skills groups facilitate the recruitment and decrease the scattering of resources in psychiatric settings. However, few studies have focused on the pertinence of transdiagnostic standalone skills groups in naturalistic settings as well as their long-term outcomes. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of participation in a transdiagnostic DBT skills group one year after its completion. METHOD Transdiagnostic DBT skills training groups were provided for BPD, BD and ADHD patients in a University Psychiatric Department (Strasbourg, France), between 2019 and 2020. They consisted of 16 group sessions of 2.5 h and 3 individual sessions. At 1-year follow-up, ad-hoc questionnaires were proposed to all participants to assess the perceived impacts, the changes in symptomatology, and the maintenance of skills learned. RESULT 22 of the 31 participants were interviewed at the one-year post-group session (64% BPD, 41% ADHD and 27% BD). 73% participants estimated that group impact was important or very important, 64% stated using the skills learned often or very often, mainly emotion regulation skills. An improvement in emotional instability, substance use, impulsivity and suicidal thoughts was reported by respectively 100%, 91%, 86% and 85% of participants. Quality of life improved according to 90% participants. All patients reported an improvement in suicidality during the post-group year, especially in suicide attempts. Psychotropic medication decreased in 59% of participants. DISCUSSION Our one-year naturalistic study suggests that transdiagnostic DBT skills training groups are promising for the treatment of emotional dysregulation in people with BPD, BD and/or ADHD. The observational design and the lack of control group are the main limitations. Randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the long-term efficacy of transdiagnostic skills learning groups in naturalistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaury Durpoix
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France.
- Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, 67000, France.
| | - Enzo Lachaux
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France
- Faculty of Psychology, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, 67000, France
| | - Luisa Weiner
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France
- Faculty of Psychology, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, 67000, France
- Laboratoire de Psychologie des Cognitions, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, 67000, France
| | - Sébastien Weibel
- Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictology Department, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, 67000, France
- Inserm u1114, Strasbourg, 67000, France
- Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, 67000, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Prisco M, Oliva V, Fico G, Radua J, Grande I, Roberto N, Anmella G, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Fornaro M, de Bartolomeis A, Serretti A, Vieta E, Murru A. Emotion dysregulation in bipolar disorder compared to other mental illnesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7484-7503. [PMID: 37842774 PMCID: PMC10951413 DOI: 10.1017/s003329172300243x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
People with bipolar disorder (BD) often present emotion dysregulation (ED), a pattern of emotional expression interfering with goal-directed behavior. ED is a transdiagnostic construct, and it is unclear whether it manifests itself similarly in other conditions, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) or borderline personality disorder (BPD), or has specific features in BD. The present systematic review and meta-analysis explored ED and adopted emotion regulation (ER) strategies in BD compared with other psychiatric conditions. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched from inception to April 28th, 2022. Studies implementing validated instruments assessing ED or ER strategies in BD and other psychiatric disorders were reviewed, and meta-analyses were conducted. Twenty-nine studies yielding multiple comparisons were included. BD was compared to MDD in 20 studies (n = 2451), to BPD in six studies (n = 1001), to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in three studies (n = 232), to anxiety disorders in two studies (n = 320), to schizophrenia in one study (n = 223), and to post-traumatic stress disorder in one study (n = 31). BD patients did not differ from MDD patients in adopting most adaptive and maladaptive ER strategies. However, small-to-moderate differences in positive rumination and risk-taking behaviors were observed. In contrast, patients with BPD presented an overall higher degree of ED and more maladaptive ER strategies. There were insufficient data for a meta-analytic comparison with other psychiatric disorders. The present report further supports the idea that ED is a transdiagnostic construct spanning a continuum across different psychiatric disorders, outlining specific clinical features that could represent potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele De Prisco
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Oliva
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanna Fico
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Imaging of Mood- and Anxiety-Related Disorders (IMARD) Group, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Psychiatric Research and Education, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Iria Grande
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalia Roberto
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gerard Anmella
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michele Fornaro
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea de Bartolomeis
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Serretti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Murru
- Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Hospìtal Clinic de Barcelona. c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), c. Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Neurosciences (UBNeuro), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Petell JA, Bilsky SA. An Examination of the Association between Emotion Regulation and Emetophobia Symptoms. Psychol Rep 2023:332941231213855. [PMID: 37934134 DOI: 10.1177/00332941231213855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific phobia of vomiting, referred to as emetophobia, is a specific phobia characterized by persistent and severe fear of vomit. Individuals with emetophobia engage in a variety of emotional and behavioral avoidance strategies to distance themselves from perceived vomit-related threat. As such, individuals may struggle to effectively use emotion regulation (ER) skills; however, to date, limited work has examined the association between emotion regulation and emetophobia symptoms. The present study aimed to address this gap in the literature and examine the association between ER and emetophobia symptoms. METHODS Participants (N = 508) were a remote, clinical sample of individuals recruited via social media forums dedicated to the disorder who self-identified as experiencing emetophobia. Hierarchical linear regressions were used to assessed unique contributions of ER to emetophobia symptoms. Age, gender, and depressive symptoms were entered as covariates in the hierarchical regression. RESULTS Results demonstrated ER was significantly related to emetophobia symptoms above and beyond the effects of depressive symptoms, age and gender in the current sample. CONCLUSIONS The findings provide initial support for an association between ER and emetophobia, and suggest future directions for refining the conceptualization of emetophobia. Limitations and considerations include the recruitment strategy via social media websites for individuals with emetophobia, limited diversity of the sample, and cross-sectional nature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Petell
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| | - Sarah A Bilsky
- Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Katar KS, Örsel S, Gündoğmuş AG. Investigation of the role of personality traits and emotion regulation on personality functioning in patients with depression/anxiety disorder. Personal Ment Health 2023; 17:232-245. [PMID: 36693422 DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The relationship between the dimensional assessment of personality and difficulties in emotion regulation has yet to be made clear. The present study aimed to investigate the role of personality traits and emotion regulation on personality functioning. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) were rated for 220 patients with depression and/or anxiety disorder diagnosis and 100 healthy controls. Stepwise regression analyses (SRA) were used to find potential predictors of personality functioning, and generalized linear analyses (GLA) were used to find mediators between the traits and personality functioning. SRA results in the clinical group showed that higher depression, antagonism, difficulties in impulse control and difficulties in awareness predicted higher levels of dysfunction in personality. According to GLA results in the clinical group, the impulse subscale of DERS partially mediated the relationship between antagonism and level of impairment in personality functioning. Our results indicate that certain emotion regulation styles and personality traits play an important role in predicting personality functioning in the clinical sample of depression and anxiety patients. Future studies should focus on specific emotion dysregulation strategies and broaden the dimensional personality literature in different samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kübra Sezer Katar
- University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sibel Örsel
- University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayse Gökçen Gündoğmuş
- University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Castellini G, Merola GP, Baccaredda Boy O, Pecoraro V, Bozza B, Cassioli E, Rossi E, Bessi V, Sorbi S, Nacmias B, Ricca V. Emotional dysregulation, alexithymia and neuroticism: a systematic review on the genetic basis of a subset of psychological traits. Psychiatr Genet 2023; 33:79-101. [PMID: 36729042 PMCID: PMC10158611 DOI: 10.1097/ypg.0000000000000335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Neuroticism, alexithymia and emotion dysregulation are key traits and known risk factors for several psychiatric conditions. In this systematic review, the aim is to evaluate the genetic contribution to these psychological phenotypes. A systematic review of articles found in PubMed was conducted. Search terms included 'genetic', 'GWAS', 'neuroticism', 'alexithymia' and 'emotion dysregulation'. Risk of bias was assessed utilizing the STREGA checklist. Two hundred two papers were selected from existing literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these, 27 were genome-wide studies and 175 were genetic association studies. Single gene association studies focused on selected groups of genes, mostly involved in neurotransmission, with conflicting results. GWAS studies on neuroticism, on the other hand, found several relevant and replicated intergenic and intronic loci affecting the expression and regulation of crucial and well-known genes (such as DRD2 and CRHR1). Mutations in genes coding for trascriptional factors were also found to be associated with neuroticism (DCC, XKR6, TCF4, RBFOX1), as well as a noncoding regulatory RNA (LINC00461). On the other hand, little GWAS data are available on alexythima and emotional dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Valentina Bessi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sandro Sorbi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetta Nacmias
- Neurology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
De Prisco M, Oliva V, Fico G, Fornaro M, de Bartolomeis A, Serretti A, Vieta E, Murru A. Defining clinical characteristics of emotion dysregulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 142:104914. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
11
|
Carmassi C, Conti L, Gravina D, Nardi B, Dell'Osso L. Emotional dysregulation as trans-nosographic psychopathological dimension in adulthood: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:900277. [PMID: 36104987 PMCID: PMC9464828 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Emotional dysregulation (ED) is characterized by inappropriate emotional reactions related to environmental or cognitive stimuli. In most recent years, increasing interest has been devoted to its definition and detection across mental disorders for its detrimental role progressively highlighted in both neurodevelopment and adult mental disorders, with implications on the severity of clinical manifestations. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate and gather the scientific evidence about ED in adult psychiatric population to elucidate the concept of ED as trans-nosographic entity. Methods The electronics databases PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was reviewed to identify studies in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines; at the end of the selection process a total of 29 studies (N = 709; N = 658; N = 1,425) was included. All studies included assessed the presence of ED symptoms, by means of a validate scale in adult (>18 years of age), in clinically diagnosed patients as well as healthy control participants. Results Our results suggest ED as a trans-diagnostic factor across multiple mental disorders, such as bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, personality disorders; a better definition of this concept could be helpful to interpret and clarify many clinical cases and improve their diagnostic and therapeutic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lorenzo Conti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bayes A, Spoelma M, Parker G. Comorbid bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder: Diagnosis using machine learning. J Psychiatr Res 2022; 152:1-6. [PMID: 35696742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Comorbid bipolar disorder (BP) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) presents a diagnostic challenge in its differentiation from each condition individually. We aimed to use a machine learning (ML) approach to differentiate comorbid BP/BPD from both BP and BPD. Participants were assigned DSM diagnoses and compared on self-report measures examining personality, emotion regulation strategies and perceived parental experiences during childhood. 82 participants were assigned as BP, 52 as BPD and 53 as comorbid BP/BPD. ML-derived diagnoses had an accuracy of 79.6% in classifying BP/BPD vs. BP, and 61.7% in classifying BP/BPD vs. BPD. Stress-related paranoid ideation and other core borderline personality items were important in distinguishing BP/BPD vs. BP, whereas deficits in emotion regulation strategies were important in distinguishing BP/BPD vs. BPD. Impulsivity and anger were important across both analyses. We identified clinical variables more distinctive in comorbid BP/BPD, with superior accuracy in distinguishing from BP, and with lower accuracy compared to BPD alone. Such an additive model should assist in sharpening clinical decision making, with future machine learning examination of larger datasets likely to further improve diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bayes
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, 2031, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mansueto G, Marino C, Palmieri S, Offredi A, Sarracino D, Sassaroli S, Ruggiero GM, Spada MM, Caselli G. Difficulties in emotion regulation: The role of repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs. J Affect Disord 2022; 308:473-483. [PMID: 35460736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model as a basis, this study explored whether, in both general population and clinical samples, metacognitive beliefs and repetitive negative thinking (i.e., rumination and worry) are associated with higher levels of emotion dysregulation. METHODS 395 participants from the general population and 388 outpatients seeking psychological treatment were recruited. Emotion dysregulation, metacognitive beliefs, rumination, worry, anxiety, depression, personality disorders were assessed. ANOVA and Welch's tests, correlation and path analyses were run. RESULTS Repetitive negative thinking was found to play a mediating role in the relationship between metacognitive beliefs and emotion dysregulation in both general population and clinical samples. Moreover, metacognitive beliefs were found to be directly associated to emotion dysregulation. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS Emotion dysregulation appears to be associated with the tendency to engage in repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs. Repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs could be a suitable therapeutic target to reduce difficulties in emotion regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mansueto
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy; Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
| | - Claudia Marino
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Rd, SE1 0AA London, UK; Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Palmieri
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy; School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Rd, SE1 0AA London, UK; Studi Cognitivi, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center Milan, Foro Buonaparte 57, 20121 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Offredi
- Studi Cognitivi, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center Milan, Foro Buonaparte 57, 20121 Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Sarracino
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Sandra Sassaroli
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy; Studi Cognitivi, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center Milan, Foro Buonaparte 57, 20121 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maria Ruggiero
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy; Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Ricerca, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center Milan, Foro Buonaparte 57, 20121 Milan, Italy
| | - Marcantonio M Spada
- School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Rd, SE1 0AA London, UK
| | - Gabriele Caselli
- Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Ripa di Porta Ticinese 77, 20143 Milan, Italy; Studi Cognitivi, Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center Milan, Foro Buonaparte 57, 20121 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sorgi-Wilson KM, McCloskey MS. Emotion regulation strategies among individuals with borderline personality disorder relative to other groups: A review. Clin Psychol Psychother 2022; 29:1655-1678. [PMID: 35366040 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with difficulties in emotion regulation (ER) abilities. Investigations of ER strategies in BPD have been less robust. This systematic review identified 55 studies comparing ER strategy use between individuals diagnosed with BPD versus psychiatric and non-psychiatric comparison groups. Individuals with BPD reported more frequent maladaptive and less frequent adaptive ER strategy use than non-psychiatric controls. Results were less consistent relative to psychiatric comparison groups, though individuals with BPD reported greater self-criticism and avoidance. Groups responded comparably to instructed use of adaptive (but not maladaptive) ER strategies. This body of research would benefit from further examination of the roles of psychiatric comorbidity and problematic behaviours in the relationship between BPD and ER strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Sorgi-Wilson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael S McCloskey
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miola A, Cattarinussi G, Antiga G, Caiolo S, Solmi M, Sambataro F. Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2022; 302:352-360. [PMID: 35093412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental disorder characterized by mood swings and functional impairment. Although alterations in emotional regulation (ER) are a key feature, a comprehensive meta-analysis on abnormalities in emotion regulation in BD is still lacking. METHODS We performed a random-effects meta-analysis on studies comparing the ER measured with the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in BD and healthy controls (HC) or borderline personality disorder (BPD) and calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the total DERS score between those with BD and HC (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were the SMD of the DERS subscales between BD and HC, as well as the SMD of the total score of DERS and the subscales between BD and BPD. RESULTS Twelve studies (858 BD, 540 BPD, 285 HC) were included. Compared to HC, BD showed significantly higher total DERS score (k=8, SMD 0.962, p<0.001) and subscale scores, including non-acceptance (k=6, SMD=0.85, p<0.001), goal-directed behavior (k=6, SMD=0.894, p<0.001), impulse control (k=6, SMD=1.08, p<0.001), strategies (k=6, SMD=1.25, p<0.001) and emotional clarity (k=6, SMD=0.694, p=0.001). Relative to BPD, BD presented significantly lower scores in all the DERS subscales. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the main analyses. The age of the participants and sample size moderated the primary outcome. LIMITATIONS The small number of studies and the cross-sectional design limit the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that alterations of specific ER abilities are present in BD and their magnitude is smaller relative to BPD. Future therapeutic interventions should target ER strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Miola
- Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy;; Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Giulia Cattarinussi
- Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy;; Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Gilberto Antiga
- Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Caiolo
- Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Solmi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Mental Health, The Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fabio Sambataro
- Department of Neuroscience (DNS), University of Padova, Padua, Italy;; Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cavicchioli M, Maffei C. Rumination as a widespread emotion-based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta-analytic review. J Clin Psychol 2021; 78:989-1008. [PMID: 34816435 DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current quantitative review aims at comprehensively clarifying the role of rumination in borderline personality disorder (BPD) considering its relevance for several clinical models of the disorder. METHOD This meta-analysis included 29 independent studies assessing different forms of rumination-general tendency to engage in ruminative thinking patterns and four types of emotion-based rumination among both nonclinical subjects reporting BPD features and patients with BPD. Furthermore, the study tested whether rumination could be considered a widespread emotion-based cognitive vulnerability in BPD. RESULTS Meta-analytic procedures were based on 46 r coefficients that showed large pooled effect sizes for all forms of rumination. With the exception of interpersonal rumination, the remaining forms of rumination were equally involved in BPD features. CONCLUSIONS Rumination should be considered a widespread emotion-based cognitive vulnerability in BPD. Future studies should provide longitudinal and contextual-based evaluations of rumination among treatment-seeking individuals with BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cavicchioli
- Department of Psychology, University "Vita-Salute San Raffaele", Milan, Italy.,Unit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, San Raffaele-Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Maffei
- Department of Psychology, University "Vita-Salute San Raffaele", Milan, Italy.,Unit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, San Raffaele-Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zimmerman M, Balling C, Chelminski I, Dalrymple K. Patients with borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder: a descriptive and comparative study. Psychol Med 2021; 51:1479-1490. [PMID: 32178744 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720000215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are each significant public health problems. It has been frequently noted that distinguishing BPD from bipolar disorder is challenging. Consequently, reviews and commentaries have focused on differential diagnosis and identifying clinical features to distinguish the two disorders. While there is a burgeoning literature comparing patients with BPD and bipolar disorder, much less research has characterized patients with both disorders. In the current report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we compare psychiatric outpatients with both BPD and bipolar disorder to patients with BPD without bipolar disorder and patients with bipolar disorder without BPD. METHODS Psychiatric outpatients presenting for treatment were evaluated with semi-structured interviews. The focus of the current study is the 517 patients with both BPD and bipolar disorder (n = 59), BPD without bipolar disorder (n = 330), and bipolar disorder without BPD (n = 128). RESULTS Compared to patients with bipolar disorder, the patients with bipolar disorder and BPD had more comorbid disorders, psychopathology in their first-degree relatives, childhood trauma, suicidality, hospitalizations, time unemployed, and likelihood of receiving disability payments. The added presence of bipolar disorder in patients with BPD was associated with more posttraumatic stress disorder in the patients as well as their family, more bipolar disorder and substance use disorders in their relatives, more childhood trauma, unemployment, disability, suicide attempts, and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS Patients with both bipolar disorder and BPD have more severe psychosocial morbidity than patients with only one of these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Zimmerman
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Caroline Balling
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Iwona Chelminski
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kristy Dalrymple
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bayes A, Spoelma MJ, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Parker G. Differentiation of bipolar disorder versus borderline personality disorder: A machine learning approach. J Affect Disord 2021; 288:68-73. [PMID: 33845326 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differentiation of bipolar disorder (BP) from borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common diagnostic dilemma. We undertook a machine learning (ML) approach to distinguish the conditions. METHODS Participants meeting DSM criteria for BP or BPD were compared on measures examining cognitive and behavioral BPD constructs, emotion regulation strategies, and parental behaviors during childhood. Two analyses used continuous and dichotomised data, with ML-allocated diagnoses compared to DSM. RESULTS 82 participants met DSM criteria for BP and 52 for BPD. Accuracy of ML classification was 84.1% - 87.8% for BP, 50% - 57.7% for BPD, with overall accuracy of 73.1% - 73.9%. Importance of items differed between the analyses with the overall most important items including identity difficulties, relationship problems, female gender, feeling suicidal after a relationship breakdown and age. LIMITATIONS Participants were volunteers, preponderance of bipolar II (BP II) participants, comorbidity of BP and BPD not examined, and small BPD sample contributed to the relatively low classification accuracies for this group CONCLUSIONS: Study findings may assist distinguishing BP and BPD based on differences in cognitive and behavioral domains, emotion regulation strategies and parental behaviors. Future studies using larger datasets could further improve predictive accuracy and assist in differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bayes
- Black Dog Institute, Hospital Rd, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
| | | | | | - Gordon Parker
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khosravani V, Berk M, Sharifi Bastan F, Samimi Ardestani SM, Wrobel A. The effects of childhood emotional maltreatment and alexithymia on depressive and manic symptoms and suicidal ideation in females with bipolar disorder: emotion dysregulation as a mediator. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2021; 25:90-102. [PMID: 33559512 DOI: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1879867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The relations of childhood emotional maltreatment and alexithymia to the clinical course of bipolar disorder (BD) have been widely recognised. Difficulties in regulating emotions may explain these relationships. The current study evaluated the effects of childhood emotional maltreatment and alexithymia on depressive and manic symptoms as well as suicidal ideation in female patients with BD. Emotion dysregulation was evaluated as a mediating factor. METHODS Three hundred hospitalised female patients with a diagnosis of BD provided information regarding their history of childhood emotional maltreatment, alexithymia, difficulties in emotion regulation, depressive and manic symptoms, and suicidal ideation. A series of structural equation models (SEMs) were calculated to assess the associations between these variables. RESULTS Childhood emotional abuse and difficulty in identifying feelings were indirectly associated with depressive and manic symptoms as well as suicidal ideation. This association was mediated by emotion dysregulation. This association remained significant after depressive and manic symptoms were controlled in the model. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that patients with BD who experienced emotional abuse during childhood and have difficulties identifying emotions report greater emotion dysregulation. These individuals, in turn, are more likely to experience more severe depressive and manic symptoms as well as suicidal ideation.Key pointsChildhood emotional maltreatment and emotional and clinical factors in bipolar disorder were assessed.Childhood emotional abuse indirectly affected clinical factors via emotion dysregulation.Difficulty in identifying feelings was linked to clinical factors via emotional dysregulation.Emotional dysregulation affected the links of childhood emotional maltreatment and difficulty in identifying feelings on suicidal ideation after controlling for clinical symptoms.Emotional dysregulation dimensions of impulse, strategies, and goals emerge in relation to suicidal ideation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Khosravani
- Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT - The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Orygen, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Seyed Mehdi Samimi Ardestani
- Departments of Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anna Wrobel
- IMPACT - The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.,Orygen, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Socada JL, Söderholm JJ, Rosenström T, Ekelund J, Isometsä E. Presence and Overlap of Bipolar Symptoms and Borderline Features during Major Depressive Episodes. J Affect Disord 2021; 280:467-477. [PMID: 33246197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bipolar symptoms and borderline personality features occur in both unipolar and bipolar major depressive episodes (MDEs). We investigated their prevalence, severity, co-occurrence and overlap. METHODS We interviewed 124 psychiatric outpatients with MDE using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I and II Disorders, the Borderline Personality Disorder Severity Index (BPDSI-IV), and about past (hypo)manic episodes, and stratified them according to the principal diagnosis into subcohorts of major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 50), bipolar disorder (BD, n = 43), and borderline personality disorder (BPD, n = 31). We quantified (hypo)manic symptoms using a novel semi-structured interview (MIXed symptoms during MDE, MIX-MDE) with good psychometric qualities. RESULTS The subcohorts did not differ in MDE severity. They differed significantly in some (hypo)manic symptoms being present on most days in 24% of MDD, 30% of BD, and 42% of BPD subcohort, but only 5% of the BD subcohort fulfilled the DSM-5 mixed features. The mean MIX-MDE scores were 5.7 (SD 4.0), 12.0 (8.2) and 10.5 (7.5), and BPDSI-IV scores 15.6 (7.0), 17.2 (6.2) and 26.9 (8.7), respectively (both p < 0.001). (Hypo)manic days and unspecific symptoms of distractibility and irritability inflated the correlation of observed (hypo)manic symptoms and borderline features. LIMITATIONS Moderate sample size, limited age variation (18-50 years); no previous validation of MIX-MDE. CONCLUSIONS Presence of some mixed and borderline features is common in MDEs, with overlap and diagnosis-specific differences. Unspecific symptoms of irritability and distractibility and the aggravating impact of hypomania on perceived BPD features blur the differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Lumikukka Socada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
| | - John J Söderholm
- University of Helsinki, Health Services of the City of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tom Rosenström
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
| | - Jesper Ekelund
- University of Turku and Turku University Central Hospital, Finland
| | - Erkki Isometsä
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, Boyce P, Bryant R, Hazell P, Hopwood M, Lyndon B, Mulder R, Porter R, Singh AB, Murray G. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021; 55:7-117. [PMID: 33353391 DOI: 10.1177/0004867420979353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide advice and guidance regarding the management of mood disorders, derived from scientific evidence and supplemented by expert clinical consensus to formulate s that maximise clinical utility. METHODS Articles and information sourced from search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were supplemented by literature known to the mood disorders committee (e.g. books, book chapters and government reports) and from published depression and bipolar disorder guidelines. Relevant information was appraised and discussed in detail by members of the mood disorders committee, with a view to formulating and developing consensus-based recommendations and clinical guidance. The guidelines were subjected to rigorous consultation and external review involving: expert and clinical advisors, key stakeholders, professional bodies and specialist groups with interest in mood disorders. RESULTS The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists mood disorders clinical practice guidelines 2020 (MDcpg2020) provide up-to-date guidance regarding the management of mood disorders that is informed by evidence and clinical experience. The guideline is intended for clinical use by psychiatrists, psychologists, primary care physicians and others with an interest in mental health care. CONCLUSION The MDcpg2020 builds on the previous 2015 guidelines and maintains its joint focus on both depressive and bipolar disorders. It provides up-to-date recommendations and guidance within an evidence-based framework, supplemented by expert clinical consensus. MOOD DISORDERS COMMITTEE Gin S Malhi (Chair), Erica Bell, Darryl Bassett, Philip Boyce, Richard Bryant, Philip Hazell, Malcolm Hopwood, Bill Lyndon, Roger Mulder, Richard Porter, Ajeet B Singh and Greg Murray.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gin S Malhi
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Department of Psychiatry, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Erica Bell
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Department of Psychiatry, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Academic Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Philip Boyce
- Department of Psychiatry, Westmead Hospital and the Westmead Clinical School, Wentworthville, NSW, Australia.,Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Hazell
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Malcolm Hopwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Professorial Psychiatry Unit, Albert Road Clinic, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bill Lyndon
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Department of Psychiatry, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Roger Mulder
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Richard Porter
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Ajeet B Singh
- The Geelong Clinic Healthscope, IMPACT - Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Riemann G, Chrispijn M, Weisscher N, Regeer E, Kupka RW. A Feasibility Study of the Addition of STEPPS in Outpatients With Bipolar Disorder and Comorbid Borderline Personality Features: Promises and Pitfalls. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:725381. [PMID: 34858221 PMCID: PMC8631960 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pharmacotherapy is a cornerstone in bipolar disorder (BD) treatment whereas borderline personality disorder (BPD) is treated primarily with psychotherapy. Given the overlap in symptomatology, patients with BD may benefit from psychotherapy designed for BPD. Aims: This paper reports the findings of a non-controlled open feasibility study of STEPPS training in patients with BD and borderline personality features (BPF). Methods: Outpatients with BD were screened for BPD, and if positive interviewed with SCID-II. Patients with at least three BPF, always including impulsivity and anger burst, were included in the intervention study. Severity of BD and BPD and quality of life were assessed. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Of 111 patients with BD 49.5% also screened positive on BPD according to PDQ-4+, and 52.3% of these had BPD according to SCID-II. Very few participants entered the intervention study, and only nine patients completed STEPPS. Descriptive statistics showed improvement on all outcome variables post treatment, but no longer at 6-month follow up. We reflect on the potential reasons for the failed inclusion. Conclusion: Features of BPD were highly prevalent in patients with BD. Still, recruiting patients for a psychological treatment originally designed for BPD proved to be difficult. Feedback of participants suggests that the association of STEPPS with "borderline" had an aversive effect, which may have caused limited inclusion for screening and subsequent drop-out for the treatment. Therefore, STEPPS should be adapted for BD to be an acceptable treatment option. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov/3856, identifier: NTR4016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Riemann
- Department of Applied Psychology, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Deventer, Netherlands.,Dimence Mental Health, Center for Bipolar Disorders, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Melissa Chrispijn
- Dimence Mental Health, Center for Bipolar Disorders, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Nadine Weisscher
- Geestelijke Gezondheids Zorg (GGZ) Heuvelrug, Center for Mental Health, Driebergen, Netherlands
| | - Eline Regeer
- Center for Bipolar Disorders, Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ralph W Kupka
- Center for Bipolar Disorders, Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Department of Psychiatry, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Geestelijke Gezondheids Zorg (GGZ) InGeest, Center for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Massó Rodriguez A, Hogg B, Gardoki-Souto I, Valiente-Gómez A, Trabsa A, Mosquera D, García-Estela A, Colom F, Pérez V, Padberg F, Moreno-Alcázar A, Amann BL. Clinical Features, Neuropsychology and Neuroimaging in Bipolar and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of Cross-Diagnostic Studies. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:681876. [PMID: 34177664 PMCID: PMC8220090 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) have clinically been evolving as separate disorders, though there is still debate on the nosological valence of both conditions, their interaction in terms of co-morbidity or disorder spectrum and their distinct pathophysiology. Objective: The objective of this review is to summarize evidence regarding clinical features, neuropsychological performance and neuroimaging findings from cross-diagnostic studies comparing BD and BPD, to further caracterize their complex interplay. Methods: Using PubMed, PsycINFO and TripDataBase, we conducted a systematic literature search based on PRISMA guidelines of studies published from January 1980 to September 2019 which directly compared BD and BPD. Results: A total of 28 studies comparing BD and BPD were included: 19 compared clinical features, 6 neuropsychological performance and three neuroimaging abnormalities. Depressive symptoms have an earlier onset in BPD than BD. BD patients present more mixed or manic symptoms, with BD-I differing from BPD in manic phases. BPD patients show more negative attitudes toward others and self, more conflictive interpersonal relationships, and more maladaptive regulation strategies in affective instability with separate pathways. Impulsivity seems more a trait in BPD rather than a state as in BD. Otherwise, BD and BPD overlap in depressive and anxious symptoms, dysphoria, various abnormal temperamental traits, suicidal ideation, and childhood trauma. Both disorders differ and share deficits in neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings. Conclusion: Clinical data provide evidence of overlapping features in both disorders, with most of those shared symptoms being more persistent and intense in BPD. Thus, categorical classifications should be compared to dimensional approaches in transdiagnostic studies investigating BPD features in BD regarding their respective explanatory power for individual trajectories. Systematic Review Registration: The search strategy was pre-registered in PROSPERO: CRD42018100268.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Massó Rodriguez
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro Salud Mental Infanto-Juvenil, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bridget Hogg
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- PhD Progamme, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Itxaso Gardoki-Souto
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- PhD Progamme, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Valiente-Gómez
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amira Trabsa
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- PhD Progamme, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dolores Mosquera
- Instituto de Investigación y Tratamiento del Trauma y los Trastornos de la Personalidad (INTRA-TP) Center, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Aitana García-Estela
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesc Colom
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
- Departament of Basic, Evolutive and Education Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Pérez
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ana Moreno-Alcázar
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benedikt Lorenz Amann
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre Fòrum Research Unit, Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addiction, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Mental Health Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: Benedikt Lorenz Amann
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Emotion-Regulation Strategies in Borderline Personality Disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2020; 27:217-232. [PMID: 31219881 DOI: 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Emotion dysregulation is often considered a core characteristic of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). With the development and strength of a contemporary affective-science model that encompasses both healthy emotion regulation (ER) and emotion dysregulation, this model has increasingly been used to understand the affective experiences of people with BPD. In this meta-analysis and review, we systematically review six of the most commonly studied ER strategies and determine their relative endorsement in individuals with elevated symptoms of BPD compared to individuals with low symptoms of BPD and healthy controls, as well as to individuals with other mental disorders. Results from 93 unique studies and 213 different effect-size estimates indicated that symptoms of BPD were associated with less frequent use of ER strategies that would be considered more effective at reducing negative affect (i.e., cognitive reappraisal, problem solving, and acceptance) and more frequent use of ER strategies considered less effective at reducing negative affect (i.e., suppression, rumination, and avoidance). When compared to individuals with other mental disorders, people with BPD endorsed higher rates of rumination and avoidance, and lower rates of problem solving and acceptance. We also review important contributions from studies of ER in BPD that we were unable to incorporate into our meta-analysis. We conclude by discussing how the pattern of using ER strategies in BPD contributes to emotion dysregulation and also the potential reasons for this pattern, integrating both Gross's extended process model of ER and Linehan's updated theoretical account on the development of emotion dysregulation.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bayes AJ, Parker GB. Differentiating borderline personality disorder (BPD) from bipolar disorder: diagnostic efficiency of DSM BPD criteria. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2020; 141:142-148. [PMID: 31758547 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the differential diagnostic efficiency of all DSM-IV borderline personality disorder (BPD) criteria by studying a sample of those with BPD and a contrast group with a bipolar disorder (BP). METHOD Participants were clinically assessed and assigned diagnoses based on DSM criteria - with prevalence rates and diagnostic efficiency values calculated. RESULTS Fifty-three participants were assigned a BPD diagnosis, 83 a BP diagnosis, with comorbid participants excluded. The mean number of DSM BPD criteria assigned was 6.6 (SD = 1.0) in the BPD group and 1.9 (SD = 1.3) in the BP group. The most prevalent criterion in the BPD group was 'affective instability' (AI) (92.5%), with 'inappropriate anger' least endorsed (49%). The highest specificity criterion was 'abandonment fears', which displayed the greatest positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.9, and with AI offering the lowest specificity. 'Unstable relationships' had the highest overall negative predictive value (NPV) = 0.91. The highest percentage accuracy of classification was provided by 'identity disturbance' and 'abandonment fears' criteria, both 85%. CONCLUSION The transdiagnostic nature of 'affective instability' means it is less useful for diagnostic decisions, whereas 'abandonment fears' and 'identity disturbance' offer superior diagnostic efficiency in distinguishing BPD from BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Bayes
- School of Psychiatry, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G B Parker
- School of Psychiatry, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Villarroel J, Salinas V, Silva H, Herrera L, Montes C, Jerez S, Vöhringer PA, Bustamante ML. Beyond the Categorical Distinction Between Borderline Personality Disorder and Bipolar II Disorder Through the Identification of Personality Traits Profiles. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11:552. [PMID: 32922312 PMCID: PMC7456877 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and type-II bipolar disorder (BDII) is not clearly understood. Nevertheless, in clinical practice and research, most efforts focus on establishing a categorical distinction between the two. We propose using personality traits as a more informative strategy to describe them. METHODS Five-Factor Model personality traits were measured in 73 individuals with either BPD or BDII. Latent class cluster analysis was applied to the sample. RESULTS A three-cluster model resulted the best fit to the data, where all clusters had high neuroticism and low extraversion scores but differed widely on the other traits. The clusters' boundaries did not match the categorical diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Our sample showed significant heterogeneity on personality traits, which can have a relevant effect on the outcome of each disorder and that was not captured by the categorical diagnosis. Thus, we advocate for a multivariate approach as a better way to understand the relationship between BPD and BDII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juana Villarroel
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Valeria Salinas
- Neurogenetics Outpatient Clinic and Laboratory, University Neurology Center and Neurology Section, J.M. Ramos Mejía Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Precision Medicine and Clinical Genomics Program, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Translational Medicine Research Institute, Universidad Austral-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hernán Silva
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Luisa Herrera
- Human Genetics Program, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Cristián Montes
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sonia Jerez
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paul A Vöhringer
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Maria Leonor Bustamante
- University Psychiatric Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Human Genetics Program, Faculty of Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Waltereit R, Giller F, Ehrlich S, Roessner V. Affective dysregulation: a transdiagnostic research concept between ADHD, aggressive behavior conditions and borderline personality traits. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 28:1551-1553. [PMID: 31712988 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-019-01438-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Waltereit
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Franziska Giller
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Ehrlich
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Veit Roessner
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bayes A, Parker G, Paris J. Differential Diagnosis of Bipolar II Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019; 21:125. [PMID: 31749106 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-019-1120-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Differentiating bipolar (BP) disorders (in particular BP II) from borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common diagnostic dilemma. We sought to critically examine recent studies that considered clinical differences between BP II and BPD, which might advance their delineation. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies focused on differentiating biological parameters-genetics, epigenetics, diurnal rhythms, structural and functional neuroimaging-with indicative differences not yet sufficient to guide diagnosis. Key differentiating factors include family history, developmental antecedents, illness course, phenomenological differences in mood states, personality style and relationship factors. Less differentiating factors include impulsivity, neuropsychological profiles, gender distribution, comorbidity and treatment response. This review details parameters offering differentiation of BP II from BPD and should assist in resolving a frequent diagnostic dilemma. Future studies should specifically examine the BP II subtype directly with BPD, which would aid in sharpening the distinction between the disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bayes
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia. .,Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Gordon Parker
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joel Paris
- Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brancati GE, Barbuti M, Pallucchini A, Cotugno B, Schiavi E, Hantouche EG, Perugi G. Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity and Stability questionnaire (RIPoSt-40) assessing emotional dysregulation: Development, reliability and validity. J Affect Disord 2019; 257:187-194. [PMID: 31301622 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional dysregulation (ED) is a heterogenous construct with great relevance in psychiatric research and clinical practice. In the present study, we validated a 40-items version of the Reactivity, Intensity, Polarity and Stability questionnaire (RIPoSt-40), a self-report measure of ED. METHODS A non-clinical sample (N = 396) and two clinical samples of patients with cyclothymia (N = 120) and ADHD (N = 54) were recruited. Items were selected and subscales were derived based on inter-item correlations and PCA with promax rotation in the non-clinical sample. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a subsample (N = 60). Internal consistency and concurrent validity with TEMPS-M factors were evaluated in each sample. The three groups results were compared to ascertain discriminant validity. RESULTS Four subscales were identified as measures of affective instability, emotional impulsivity, negative and positive emotionality. The first three subscales also sum up to a negative ED score comprising thirty items. Measures of reliability (test-retest r = 0.71-0.84) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.72-0.95) were generally high. Concurrent validity was supported by correlations with TEMPS-M factors. Discriminant validity was significant (p < 0.001) with cyclothymic and ADHD patients showing higher scores for each subscale, except for positive emotionality. LIMITATIONS The non-clinical sample was recruited through a web-survey and mainly included young and highly educated subjects. Mood and anxiety comorbidity of the clinical samples were not taken into consideration. CONCLUSION RIPoSt-40 questionnaire has proved to be a valid, reliable and useful tool to assess ED both in clinical and non-clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio E Brancati
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Margherita Barbuti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Biagio Cotugno
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Schiavi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa Italy
| | - Elie G Hantouche
- Centre des Troubles Anxieux et de l'Humeur, Anxiety & Mood Center, 89 Boulevard de Courcelles 75008, Paris, France
| | - Giulio Perugi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reich DB, Belleau EL, Temes CM, Gonenc A, Pizzagalli DA, Gruber SA. Amygdala Resting State Connectivity Differences between Bipolar II and Borderline Personality Disorders. Neuropsychobiology 2019; 78:229-237. [PMID: 31553999 PMCID: PMC7968721 DOI: 10.1159/000502440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar II disorder (BD II) have significant clinical overlap, leaving the potential for diagnostic inaccuracies and inadequate treatment recommendations. However, few studies have probed for clinical and neurobiological differences between the two disorders. Clinically, some prior studies have linked BPD with greater impulsivity and more frequent negative affective shifts than BD II, whereas previous neuroimaging studies have highlighted both similar and distinct neural abnormalities in BPD and BD II. Notably, no prior study has specifically targeted cortico-limbic neural differences, which have been hypothesized to underlie these core clinical differences. METHODS Individuals with BPD (n = 14) and BD II (n = 15) completed various clinical measures and a resting state functional imaging scan at 3T. Whole-brain amygdala resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS Relative to the BD II group, BPD participants reported significantly higher levels of impulsivity, trait anxiety, more frequent negative affective shifts, greater interpersonally reactive affective instability, lower overall functioning, and were characterized by lower amygdala-middle frontal gyrus RSFC. Lower amygdala-middle frontal gyrus RSFC was associated with greater impulsivity, trait anxiety, affective shifts, interpersonal affective reactivity, and functional impairment. LIMITATIONS The current study consisted of small sample sizes and lacked a control group. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary study suggests that amygdala-frontal RSFC may distinguish BPD from BD II. These results may guide future work aimed at identifying neural markers that can help disentangle these two disorders, leading to greater diagnostic accuracy and appropriate treatment implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bradford Reich
- Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA,
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,
| | - Emily L Belleau
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christina M Temes
- Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Atilla Gonenc
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Diego A Pizzagalli
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
- McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Staci A Gruber
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cognitive and Behavioral Differentiation of Those With Borderline Personality Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 2019; 207:620-625. [PMID: 31283725 DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000001024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The current study sought to identify features offering differentiation of borderline personality disorder (BPD) from bipolar disorder (BP). Participants were clinically assessed and assigned diagnoses based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. A 113-item self-report questionnaire was completed, comprising cognitive and behavioral constructs weighted to a borderline personality style. A total of n = 53 participants were assigned to BPD, n = 83 to BP, with comorbid participants excluded. Twenty items were highly endorsed (>95%) by the BPD group, with most of the features capturing emotional dysregulation (ED) and identity disturbance; however, many items were also highly endorsed by the participants with BP. Thirty-eight items offered differentiation of BPD from BP, with identity disturbance overrepresented. The study findings indicate that the transdiagnostic nature of ED (a feature of both conditions) means it is less useful for diagnostic decisions, whereas identity disturbance is both intrinsic to BPD and offers specificity in differentiation from BP.
Collapse
|
32
|
Thiebaut S, Jaussent I, Maimoun L, Beziat S, Seneque M, Hamroun D, Lefebvre P, Godart N, Renard E, Courtet P, Guillaume S. Impact of bipolar disorder on eating disorders severity in real-life settings. J Affect Disord 2019; 246:867-872. [PMID: 30795493 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbidity of bipolar disorder (BD) and eating disorders (ED) is common and increases the course and severity of BD. However, the impact of comorbid BD on the clinical profile of ED patients remains unclear. Most studies have focused on patients primarily assessed for BD and data on patients with a primary diagnosis of ED are sparse. We investigated the association between a dual diagnosis and severity in terms of clinical, neuropsychological dimensions and daily functioning. METHOD Two hundred and sixty-one patients with ED were consecutively recruited. BD was screened with the MINI and further confirmed in the French expert centre network. The severity of ED symptoms was assessed with the EDE-Q and EDI-2, daily functioning with the FAST. The neurocognitive assessment targeted attention, set-shifting and decision-making. RESULTS Forty-nine patients screened positive for BD, but diagnosis was confirmed in only thirty patients (11.5% of the cohort). After multiple adjustments, comorbidity was associated with greater severity on the total score and three subscales of the EDE-Q and on four of the ten dimensions of the EDI-2. Comorbid BD was associated with lower daily functioning but not with lower neuropsychological performance. LIMITATIONS Sample referred to specialist clinics not large enough to authorize an analysis by subtype and cross-sectional evaluation. CONCLUSION The association between ED and BD increases ED severity for most of these core features. It negatively impacts daily functioning. The results also highlight issues about the validity of screening tools to detect BD in patients with ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Thiebaut
- Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - I Jaussent
- Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - L Maimoun
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Physiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles, INSERM U1046, UMR9214 CNRS, Université de Montpellier, France
| | - S Beziat
- Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - M Seneque
- Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - D Hamroun
- Direction de la Recherche et de l'Innovation, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - P Lefebvre
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - N Godart
- Equipe de Recherche, Fondation Santé des Etudiants de France, Paris, France; CESP, INSERM 1178, Université Paris-Descartes, UVSQ, Villejuif, France
| | - E Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France; INSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1411, Montpellier, France; Institute of Functional Genomics, CNRS UMR 5203/INSERM U1191, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Ph Courtet
- Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - S Guillaume
- Department of Psychiatric Emergency and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Inserm U1061, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dodd A, Lockwood E, Mansell W, Palmier-Claus J. Emotion regulation strategies in bipolar disorder: A systematic and critical review. J Affect Disord 2019; 246:262-284. [PMID: 30590289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Theoretical frameworks emphasise associations between interpretations and responses to affect and bipolar disorder (BD). This review (PROSPERO CRD42016043801) investigated which emotion regulation (ER) strategies have been applied to BD, are elevated in BD compared to clinical and non-clinical controls, and are associated with clinical and functional outcomes in BD METHODS: Search terms relating to emotion regulation, coping and bipolar disorder were entered into Embase, MedLine and PsycInfo. Quantitative studies investigating relationships between ER strategies and BD were eligible for this narrative synthesis RESULTS: A large volume of research (n = 47) investigated specific ER strategies in BD. Maladaptive strategies such as rumination and dampening were elevated in BD compared to controls and these particular strategies had a detrimental impact on outcomes such as mood symptoms. BD had a similar profile of ER strategies to unipolar depression, but there was limited comparison to other clinical groups. People with BD did not generally have deficits in using adaptive strategies, as evidenced by comparisons with controls and experimental studies LIMITATIONS: Methodological heterogeneity and a lack of ecologically valid ER assessments CONCLUSIONS: Empirical literature is critiqued in line with contemporary theories of BD and of emotion regulation more generally, in order to inform future research recommendations. This includes investigation of the importance of context in the impact of ER strategies, and discrepancies between trait and state use of ER strategies, particularly through experience sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson Dodd
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Lockwood
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester West NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Warren Mansell
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jasper Palmier-Claus
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester West NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bayes A, Graham RK, Parker GB, McCraw S. Is 'subthreshold' bipolar II disorder more difficult to differentiate from borderline personality disorder than formal bipolar II disorder? Psychiatry Res 2018; 264:416-420. [PMID: 29689499 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Recent research indicates that borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be diagnostically differentiated from the bipolar disorders. However, no studies have attempted to differentiate participants with sub-threshold bipolar disorder or SubT BP (where hypomanic episodes last less than 4 days) from those with a BPD. In this study, participants were assigned a SubT BP, bipolar II disorder (BP II) or BPD diagnosis based on clinical assessment and DSM-IV criteria. Participants completed self-report measures and undertook a clinical interview which collected socio-demographic information, a mood history, family history, developmental history, treatment information, and assessed cognitive, emotional and behavioural functioning. Both bipolar groups, whether SubT BP or BP II, differed to the BPD group on a number of key variables (i.e. developmental trauma, depression correlates, borderline personality scores, self-harm and suicide attempts), and compared to each other, returned similar scores on nearly all key variables. Borderline risk scores resulted in comparable classification rates of 0.74 (for BPD vs BP II) and 0.82 (for BPD vs sub-threshold BP II). Study findings indicate that both SubT BP and BP II disorder can be differentiated from BPD on a set of refined clinical variables with comparable accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bayes
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rebecca K Graham
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gordon B Parker
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stacey McCraw
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bassett D, Parker G. Tinkering at the margins: A response to Chanen. Bipolar Disord 2018; 20:76. [PMID: 29424078 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl Bassett
- Faculty of Health and Medical Science, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Gordon Parker
- School of Psychiatry, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tyrer P. Borderline hits the diagnostic buffers again. Bipolar Disord 2017; 19:599-600. [PMID: 29205720 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tyrer
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bayes AJ, Parker GB. Clinical vs. DSM diagnosis of bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and their co-occurrence. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 135:259-265. [PMID: 27976368 DOI: 10.1111/acps.12678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the extent and reasons contributing to discrepancies between those receiving a DSM as against a clinical diagnosis of a bipolar disorder (BP) and/or a borderline personality disorder (BPD). METHOD We interviewed participants previously receiving a BP or BPD diagnosis, studying those who met DSM or clinical criteria for one or both conditions. We compared the numbers of participants allocated to the three diagnostic categories according to rater strategy to calculate concordance rates and determine reasons for discordance. RESULTS Rates of assignment to BP, BPD and comorbid BP/BPD varied according to the diagnostic strategy. Concordance rates were reduced as BP disorder duration criteria were relaxed, with discordance mainly arising from clinical allocation of a BP disorder for those DSM assigned as unipolar depression. Rates of BPD allocation varied marginally, with discordance mostly arising from so clinically diagnosed receiving a comorbid BP/BPD DSM diagnosis. Finally, DSM overestimated comorbidity compared with clinician diagnoses. Of central importance, not imposing the DSM duration criteria for BP did not increase the prevalence of misdiagnosing BPD, a finding at variance with the literature. CONCLUSION Rates and reasons for discordance between clinical and DSM diagnosis are detailed, which should assist clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Bayes
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G B Parker
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|