1
|
Shui L, Shibata D, Chan KCG, Zhang W, Sung J, Haynor DR. Longitudinal Relationship Between Brain Atrophy Patterns, Cognitive Decline, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease Explored by Orthonormal Projective Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 98:969-986. [PMID: 38517788 DOI: 10.3233/jad-231149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Background Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed for tracking the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) through the assessment of brain atrophy. Objective Detection of brain atrophy patterns in patients with AD as the longitudinal disease tracker. Methods We used a refined version of orthonormal projective non-negative matrix factorization (OPNMF) to identify six distinct spatial components of voxel-wise volume loss in the brains of 83 subjects with AD from the ADNI3 cohort relative to healthy young controls from the ABIDE study. We extracted non-negative coefficients representing subject-specific quantitative measures of regional atrophy. Coefficients of brain atrophy were compared to subjects with mild cognitive impairment and controls, to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between AD biomarkers and regional atrophy severity in different groups. We further validated our results in an independent dataset from ADNI2. Results The six non-overlapping atrophy components represent symmetric gray matter volume loss primarily in frontal, temporal, parietal and cerebellar regions. Atrophy in these regions was highly correlated with cognition both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, with medial temporal atrophy showing the strongest correlations. Subjects with elevated CSF levels of TAU and PTAU and lower baseline CSF Aβ42 values, demonstrated a tendency toward a more rapid increase of atrophy. Conclusions The present study has applied a transferable method to characterize the imaging changes associated with AD through six spatially distinct atrophy components and correlated these atrophy patterns with cognitive changes and CSF biomarkers cross-sectionally and longitudinally, which may help us better understand the underlying pathology of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Shui
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dean Shibata
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kwun Chuen Gary Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Wenbo Zhang
- Department of Statistics, University of California Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Junhyoun Sung
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David R Haynor
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park HY, Suh CH, Heo H, Shim WH, Kim SJ. Diagnostic performance of hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6979-6991. [PMID: 35507052 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08838-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of hippocampal volumetry for Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles that evaluated the diagnostic performance of hippocampal volumetry in differentiating AD or MCI from normal controls, published up to March 6, 2022. The quality of the articles was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were conducted to explain study heterogeneity. The diagnostic performance of entorhinal cortex volumetry was also pooled. RESULTS Thirty-three articles (5157 patients) were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AD were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77-86%) and 87% (95% CI, 82-91%), whereas those for MCI were 60% (95% CI, 51-69%) and 75% (95% CI, 67-81%), respectively. No difference in the diagnostic performance was observed between automatic and manual segmentation (p = 0.11). MMSE scores, study design, and the reference standard being used were associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher diagnostic performance of entorhinal cortex volumetry for both AD (pooled sensitivity: 88% vs. 79%, specificity: 92% vs. 89%, p = 0.07) and MCI (pooled sensitivity: 71% vs. 55%, specificity: 83% vs. 68%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis demonstrated good diagnostic performance of hippocampal volumetry for AD or MCI. Entorhinal cortex volumetry might have superior diagnostic performance to hippocampal volumetry. However, due to a small number of studies, the diagnostic performance of entorhinal cortex volumetry is yet to be determined. KEY POINTS • The pooled sensitivity and specificity of hippocampal volumetry for Alzheimer's disease were 82% and 87%, whereas those for mild cognitive impairment were 60% and 75%, respectively. • No significant difference in the diagnostic performance was observed between automatic and manual segmentation. • Subgroup analysis demonstrated superior diagnostic performance of entorhinal cortex volumetry for AD (pooled sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 92%) and MCI (pooled sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 83%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Young Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hwon Heo
- Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Shim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Joon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park HY, Park CR, Suh CH, Shim WH, Kim SJ. Diagnostic performance of the medial temporal lobe atrophy scale in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:9060-9072. [PMID: 34510246 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08227-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance and reliability of the medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) scale in patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to select studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance or reliability of MTA scale, published up to January 21, 2021. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Pooled correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated using the random-effects model based on Fisher's Z transformation of correlations. Meta-regression was performed to explain the study heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of the MTA scale and hippocampal volumetry. RESULTS Twenty-one original articles were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the MTA scale in differentiating Alzheimer's disease from healthy control were 74% (95% CI, 68-79%) and 88% (95% CI, 83-91%), respectively. The area under the curve of the MTA scale was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). Meta-regression demonstrated that the difference in the method of rating the MTA scale was significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in five studies regarding the diagnostic performance between MTA scale and hippocampal volumetry (p = 0.40). The pooled correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreements were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.66-0.92), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis demonstrated a good diagnostic performance and reliability of the MTA scale in Alzheimer's disease. KEY POINTS • The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the MTA scale in differentiating Alzheimer's disease from healthy control were 74% and 88%, respectively. • There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between MTA scale and hippocampal volumetry. • The reliability of MTA scale was excellent based on the pooled correlation coefficient for intra- and interobserver agreements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Young Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chae Ri Park
- Department of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Woo Hyun Shim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Joon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramirez J, Holmes MF, Scott CJM, Ozzoude M, Adamo S, Szilagyi GM, Goubran M, Gao F, Arnott SR, Lawrence-Dewar JM, Beaton D, Strother SC, Munoz DP, Masellis M, Swartz RH, Bartha R, Symons S, Black SE. Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI): Structural MRI Methods and Outcome Measures. Front Neurol 2020; 11:847. [PMID: 32849254 PMCID: PMC7431907 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The Ontario Neurodegenerative Research Initiative (ONDRI) is a 3 years multi-site prospective cohort study that has acquired comprehensive multiple assessment platform data, including 3T structural MRI, from neurodegenerative patients with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, and cerebrovascular disease. This heterogeneous cross-section of patients with complex neurodegenerative and neurovascular pathologies pose significant challenges for standard neuroimaging tools. To effectively quantify regional measures of normal and pathological brain tissue volumes, the ONDRI neuroimaging platform implemented a semi-automated MRI processing pipeline that was able to address many of the challenges resulting from this heterogeneity. The purpose of this paper is to serve as a reference and conceptual overview of the comprehensive neuroimaging pipeline used to generate regional brain tissue volumes and neurovascular marker data that will be made publicly available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Ramirez
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa F Holmes
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher J M Scott
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Miracle Ozzoude
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sabrina Adamo
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gregory M Szilagyi
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maged Goubran
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fuqiang Gao
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Derek Beaton
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen C Strother
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas P Munoz
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mario Masellis
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard H Swartz
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Bartha
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Centre for Functional and Metabolic Mapping, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Sean Symons
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra E Black
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olsen RK, Carr VA, Daugherty AM, La Joie R, Amaral RS, Amunts K, Augustinack JC, Bakker A, Bender AR, Berron D, Boccardi M, Bocchetta M, Burggren AC, Chakravarty MM, Chételat G, de Flores R, DeKraker J, Ding SL, Geerlings MI, Huang Y, Insausti R, Johnson EG, Kanel P, Kedo O, Kennedy KM, Keresztes A, Lee JK, Lindenberger U, Mueller SG, Mulligan EM, Ofen N, Palombo DJ, Pasquini L, Pluta J, Raz N, Rodrigue KM, Schlichting ML, Lee Shing Y, Stark CE, Steve TA, Suthana NA, Wang L, Werkle-Bergner M, Yushkevich PA, Yu Q, Wisse LE. Progress update from the hippocampal subfields group. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2019; 11:439-449. [PMID: 31245529 PMCID: PMC6581847 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heterogeneity of segmentation protocols for medial temporal lobe regions and hippocampal subfields on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging hinders the ability to integrate findings across studies. We aim to develop a harmonized protocol based on expert consensus and histological evidence. METHODS Our international working group, funded by the EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND), is working toward the production of a reliable, validated, harmonized protocol for segmentation of medial temporal lobe regions. The working group uses a novel postmortem data set and online consensus procedures to ensure validity and facilitate adoption. RESULTS This progress report describes the initial results and milestones that we have achieved to date, including the development of a draft protocol and results from the initial reliability tests and consensus procedures. DISCUSSION A harmonized protocol will enable the standardization of segmentation methods across laboratories interested in medial temporal lobe research worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna K. Olsen
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie A. Carr
- Department of Psychology, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Ana M. Daugherty
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert S.C. Amaral
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Hospital Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Quebec, Canada
| | - Katrin Amunts
- C. and O. Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Jean C. Augustinack
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Arnold Bakker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew R. Bender
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - David Berron
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marina Boccardi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison C. Burggren
- Robert and Beverly Lewis Center for Neuroimaging, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - M. Mallar Chakravarty
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Hospital Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Université Normandie, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherché Médicale (INSERM), UMR-S U1237, Caen, France
- GIP Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Robin de Flores
- Université Normandie, Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherché Médicale (INSERM), UMR-S U1237, Caen, France
| | - Jordan DeKraker
- Robarts Research Institute, Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mirjam I. Geerlings
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yushan Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ricardo Insausti
- Human Neuroanatomy Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain
| | | | - Prabesh Kanel
- Department of Radiology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Olga Kedo
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kristen M. Kennedy
- Center for Vital Longevity, Behavioral and Brain Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Attila Keresztes
- Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
- Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Joshua K. Lee
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Ulman Lindenberger
- Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
- Max Planck – University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Berlin, Germany and London, United Kingdom
| | - Susanne G. Mueller
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Noa Ofen
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Neurobiology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Daniela J. Palombo
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Pasquini
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John Pluta
- Division of Translational Medicine and Genomics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Naftali Raz
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karen M. Rodrigue
- Center for Vital Longevity, Behavioral and Brain Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Yee Lee Shing
- Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Craig E.L. Stark
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Trevor A. Steve
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nanthia A. Suthana
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Markus Werkle-Bergner
- Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul A. Yushkevich
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Qijing Yu
- Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Laura E.M. Wisse
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bettcher BM, Gross AL, Gavett BE, Widaman KF, Fletcher E, Dowling NM, Buckley RF, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Zahodne LB, Hohman TJ, Vonk JMJ, Rentz DM, Mungas D. Dynamic change of cognitive reserve: associations with changes in brain, cognition, and diagnosis. Neurobiol Aging 2019; 83:95-104. [PMID: 31585371 PMCID: PMC6977973 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive reserve is inherently a dynamic construct; however, traditional methods of estimating reserve have focused on static proxy variables. A recently proposed psychometric approach entails modeling reserve as residual cognition not explained by demographic and brain variables. In this study, we extended this approach to longitudinal measurement and examined how change in reserve relates to clinical outcomes in late life and influences the effect of brain atrophy on cognitive decline. Results indicated that cognitive reserve changes were associated with progression of clinical diagnosis. More rapid depletion of cognitive reserve was associated with faster decline in nonmemory cognitive functions, even after accounting for longitudinal brain atrophy. The effect of longitudinal brain atrophy on cognitive decline differed based on the extent to which an individual's reserve changed. Whereas depletion of reserve appeared to unmask the effects of brain atrophy on cognitive decline, maintenance of reserve buffered against the negative effects of brain atrophy. Study results highlight that changes in reserve may have important implications for individual differences in cognitive aging trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianne M Bettcher
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Behavioral Neurology Section, Rocky Mountain Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Alden L Gross
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brandon E Gavett
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Keith F Widaman
- Graduate School of Education, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Evan Fletcher
- Department of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - N Maritza Dowling
- Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, George Washington School of Nursing and Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rachel F Buckley
- Departments of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Laura B Zahodne
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Timothy J Hohman
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jet M J Vonk
- Department of Neurology, Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dorene M Rentz
- Departments of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dan Mungas
- Department of Neurology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abrigo J, Shi L, Luo Y, Chen Q, Chu WCW, Mok VCT. Standardization of hippocampus volumetry using automated brain structure volumetry tool for an initial Alzheimer's disease imaging biomarker. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:769-776. [PMID: 30185071 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118795327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One significant barrier to incorporate Alzheimer's disease (AD) imaging biomarkers into diagnostic criteria is the lack of standardized methods for biomarker quantification. The European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium-Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (EADC-ADNI) Harmonization Protocol project provides the most authoritative guideline for hippocampal definition and has produced a manually segmented reference dataset for validation of automated methods. PURPOSE To validate automated hippocampal volumetry using AccuBrain™, against the EADC-ADNI dataset, and assess its diagnostic performance for differentiating AD and normal aging in an independent cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS The EADC-ADNI reference dataset comprise of manually segmented hippocampal labels from 135 volumetric T1-weighted scans from various scanners. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Pearson's r were obtained for AccuBrain™ and FreeSurfer. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a separate cohort of 299 individuals (150 normal controls, 149 with AD) were obtained from the ADNI database and processed with AccuBrain™ to assess its diagnostic accuracy. Area under the curve (AUC) for total hippocampal volumes (HV) and hippocampal fraction (HF) were determined. RESULTS Compared with EADC-ADNI dataset ground truths, AccuBrain™ had a mean DSC of 0.89/0.89/0.89, ICC of 0.94/0.96/0.95, and r of 0.95/0.96/0.95 for right/left/total HV. AccuBrain™ HV and HF had AUC of 0.76 and 0.80, respectively. Thresholds of ≤ 5.71 mL and ≤ 0.38% afforded 80% sensitivity for AD detection. CONCLUSION AccuBrain™ provides accurate automated hippocampus segmentation in accordance with the EADC-ADNI standard, with great potential value in assisting clinical diagnosis of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Abrigo
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Chow Yuk Ho Technology Centre for Innovative Medicine, Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Center for Prevention of Dementia, Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- BrainNow Medical Technology Limited, Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yishan Luo
- BrainNow Medical Technology Limited, Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Qianyun Chen
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Winnie Chiu Wing Chu
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Vincent Chung Tong Mok
- Chow Yuk Ho Technology Centre for Innovative Medicine, Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Center for Prevention of Dementia, Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Femminella GD, Thayanandan T, Calsolaro V, Komici K, Rengo G, Corbi G, Ferrara N. Imaging and Molecular Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E3702. [PMID: 30469491 PMCID: PMC6321449 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19123702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia and is a significant burden for affected patients, carers, and health systems. Great advances have been made in understanding its pathophysiology, to a point that we are moving from a purely clinical diagnosis to a biological one based on the use of biomarkers. Among those, imaging biomarkers are invaluable in Alzheimer's, as they provide an in vivo window to the pathological processes occurring in Alzheimer's brain. While some imaging techniques are still under evaluation in the research setting, some have reached widespread clinical use. In this review, we provide an overview of the most commonly used imaging biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease, from molecular PET imaging to structural MRI, emphasising the concept that multimodal imaging would likely prove to be the optimal tool in the future of Alzheimer's research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tony Thayanandan
- Imperial Memory Unit, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK.
| | - Valeria Calsolaro
- Neurology Imaging Unit, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Klara Komici
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Rengo
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SPA-Società Benefit, IRCCS, 82037 Telese Terme, Italy.
| | - Graziamaria Corbi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Nicola Ferrara
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SPA-Società Benefit, IRCCS, 82037 Telese Terme, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The EADC-ADNI harmonized protocol for hippocampal segmentation: A validation study. Neuroimage 2018; 181:142-148. [PMID: 29966720 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, a group of major international experts have completed a comprehensive effort to efficiently define a harmonized protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation that is optimized for Alzheimer's research (known as the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol (the HarP)). This study compares the HarP with one of the widely used hippocampal segmentation protocols (Pruessner, 2000), based on a single automatic segmentation method trained separately with libraries made from each manual segmentation protocol. The automatic segmentation conformity with the corresponding manual segmentation and the ability to capture Alzheimer's disease related hippocampal atrophy on large datasets are measured to compare the manual protocols. In addition to the possibility of harmonizing different procedures of hippocampal segmentation, our results show that using the HarP, the automatic segmentation conformity with manual segmentation is also preserved (Dice's κ=0.88,κ=0.87 for Pruessner and HarP respectively (p = 0.726 for common training library)). Furthermore, the results show that the HarP can capture the Alzheimer's disease related hippocampal volume differences in large datasets. The HarP-derived segmentation shows large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.5883) in separating Alzheimer's Disease patients versus normal controls (AD:NC) and medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.5747) in separating stable versus progressive Mild Cognitively Impaired patients (sMCI:pMCI). Furthermore, the area under the ROC curve for a LDA classifier trained based on age, sex and HarP-derived hippocampal volume is 0.8858 for AD:NC, and for 0.6677 sMCI:pMCI. These results show that the harmonized protocol-derived labels can be widely used in clinic and research, as a sensitive and accurate way of delineating the hippocampus.
Collapse
|
10
|
Schmidt MF, Storrs JM, Freeman KB, Jack CR, Turner ST, Griswold ME, Mosley TH. A comparison of manual tracing and FreeSurfer for estimating hippocampal volume over the adult lifespan. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39:2500-2513. [PMID: 29468773 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI has become an indispensable tool for brain volumetric studies, with the hippocampus an important region of interest. Automation of the MRI segmentation process has helped advance the field by facilitating the volumetric analysis of larger cohorts and more studies. FreeSurfer has emerged as the de facto standard tool for these analyses, but studies validating its output are all based on older versions. To characterize FreeSurfer's validity, we compare several versions of FreeSurfer software with traditional hand-tracing. Using MRI images of 262 males and 402 females aged 38 to 84, we directly compare estimates of hippocampal volume from multiple versions of FreeSurfer, its hippocampal subfield routines, and our manual tracing protocol. We then use those estimates to assess asymmetry and atrophy, comparing performance of different estimators with each other and with brain atrophy measures. FreeSurfer consistently reports larger volumes than manual tracing. This difference is smaller in larger hippocampi or older people, with these biases weaker in version 6.0.0 than prior versions. All methods tested agree qualitatively on rightward asymmetry and increasing atrophy in older people. FreeSurfer saves time and money, and approximates the same atrophy measures as manual tracing, but it introduces biases that could require statistical adjustments in some studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike F Schmidt
- Program in Neuroscience, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.,Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Judd M Storrs
- Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Kevin B Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | | | - Stephen T Turner
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael E Griswold
- Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| | - Thomas H Mosley
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Imaging. NEURODEGENER DIS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72938-1_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
12
|
Sheikh-Bahaei N, Sajjadi SA, Manavaki R, Gillard JH. Imaging Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2017; 1:71-88. [PMID: 30480230 PMCID: PMC6159632 DOI: 10.3233/adr-170013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Although recent developments in imaging biomarkers have revolutionized the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease at early stages, the utility of most of these techniques in clinical setting remains unclear. The aim of this review is to provide a clear stepwise algorithm on using multitier imaging biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to be used by clinicians and radiologists for day-to-day practice. We summarized the role of most common imaging techniques and their appropriate clinical use based on current consensus guidelines and recommendations with brief sections on acquisition and analysis techniques for each imaging modality. Structural imaging, preferably MRI or alternatively high resolution CT, is the essential first tier of imaging. It improves the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and excludes other potential pathologies. When the results of clinical examination and structural imaging, assessed by dementia expert, are still inconclusive, functional imaging can be used as a more advanced option. PET with ligands such as amyloid tracers and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose can improve the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis particularly at the early stages of the disease. There are, however, limitations in using these techniques in wider community due to a combination of lack of facilities and expertise to interpret the findings. The role of some of the more recent imaging techniques including tau imaging, functional MRI, or diffusion tensor imaging in clinical practice, remains to be established in the ongoing and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Roido Manavaki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Blanken AE, Hurtz S, Zarow C, Biado K, Honarpisheh H, Somme J, Brook J, Tung S, Kraft E, Lo D, Ng DW, Vinters HV, Apostolova LG. Associations between hippocampal morphometry and neuropathologic markers of Alzheimer's disease using 7 T MRI. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2017; 15:56-61. [PMID: 28491492 PMCID: PMC5412112 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Revised: 04/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Hippocampal atrophy, amyloid plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles are established pathologic markers of Alzheimer's disease. We analyzed the temporal lobes of 9 Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and 7 cognitively normal (NC) subjects. Brains were scanned post-mortem at 7 Tesla. We extracted hippocampal volumes and radial distances using automated segmentation techniques. Hippocampal slices were stained for amyloid beta (Aβ), tau, and cresyl violet to evaluate neuronal counts. The hippocampal subfields, CA1, CA2, CA3, CA4, and subiculum were manually traced so that the neuronal counts, Aβ, and tau burden could be obtained for each region. We used linear regression to detect associations between hippocampal atrophy in 3D, clinical diagnosis and total as well as subfield pathology burden measures. As expected, we found significant correlations between hippocampal radial distance and mean neuronal count, as well as diagnosis. There were subfield specific associations between hippocampal radial distance and tau in CA2, and cresyl violet neuronal counts in CA1 and subiculum. These results provide further validation for the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Center Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol (HarP). We researched the correlations of hippocampal radial distance with Alzheimer's pathology. Hippocampal radial distance was associated with mean neuronal count and diagnosis. Our findings support for the use of hippocampal surface mapping in AD research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna E Blanken
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sona Hurtz
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chris Zarow
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristina Biado
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hedieh Honarpisheh
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Johanne Somme
- Department of Neurology, Barakaldo, Basque Country, Spain
| | - Jenny Brook
- Department of Medicine - Statistics Core, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Spencer Tung
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Emily Kraft
- University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y, USA
| | - Darrick Lo
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Denise W Ng
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harry V Vinters
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liana G Apostolova
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pini L, Pievani M, Bocchetta M, Altomare D, Bosco P, Cavedo E, Galluzzi S, Marizzoni M, Frisoni GB. Brain atrophy in Alzheimer's Disease and aging. Ageing Res Rev 2016; 30:25-48. [PMID: 26827786 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 443] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Thanks to its safety and accessibility, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is extensively used in clinical routine and research field, largely contributing to our understanding of the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the main findings in AD and normal aging over the past twenty years, focusing on the patterns of gray and white matter changes assessed in vivo using MRI. Major progresses in the field concern the segmentation of the hippocampus with novel manual and automatic segmentation approaches, which might soon enable to assess also hippocampal subfields. Advancements in quantification of hippocampal volumetry might pave the way to its broader use as outcome marker in AD clinical trials. Patterns of cortical atrophy have been shown to accurately track disease progression and seem promising in distinguishing among AD subtypes. Disease progression has also been associated with changes in white matter tracts. Recent studies have investigated two areas often overlooked in AD, such as the striatum and basal forebrain, reporting significant atrophy, although the impact of these changes on cognition is still unclear. Future integration of different MRI modalities may further advance the field by providing more powerful biomarkers of disease onset and progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Pini
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michela Pievani
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele Altomare
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Bosco
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière & Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), UMR S 1127, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière Paris & CATI Multicenter Neuroimaging Platform, France
| | - Samantha Galluzzi
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Moira Marizzoni
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory Alzheimer's Neuroimaging & Epidemiology, IRCCS Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Memory Clinic and LANVIE-Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manjón JV, Coupé P. volBrain: An Online MRI Brain Volumetry System. Front Neuroinform 2016; 10:30. [PMID: 27512372 PMCID: PMC4961698 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 310] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The amount of medical image data produced in clinical and research settings is rapidly growing resulting in vast amount of data to analyze. Automatic and reliable quantitative analysis tools, including segmentation, allow to analyze brain development and to understand specific patterns of many neurological diseases. This field has recently experienced many advances with successful techniques based on non-linear warping and label fusion. In this work we present a novel and fully automatic pipeline for volumetric brain analysis based on multi-atlas label fusion technology that is able to provide accurate volumetric information at different levels of detail in a short time. This method is available through the volBrain online web interface (http://volbrain.upv.es), which is publically and freely accessible to the scientific community. Our new framework has been compared with current state-of-the-art methods showing very competitive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José V Manjón
- Instituto de Aplicaciones de las Tecnologías de la Información y de las Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ITACA), Universitat Politècnica de València Valencia, Spain
| | - Pierrick Coupé
- Pictura Research Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 5800), Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueTalence, France; Pictura Research Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 5800), Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique, University BordeauxTalence, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Menéndez-González M, de Celis Alonso B, Salas-Pacheco J, Arias-Carrión O. Structural Neuroimaging of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. J Alzheimers Dis 2016; 48:581-9. [PMID: 26402089 DOI: 10.3233/jad-150226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Atrophy in the medial temporal lobe (MTA) is being used as a criterion to support a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). There are several structural neuroimaging approaches for quantifying MTA, including semiquantitative visual rating scales, volumetry (3D), planimetry (2D), and linear measures (1D). Current applications of structural neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials (ADCTs) incorporate it as a tool for improving the selection of subjects for enrollment or for stratification, for tracking disease progression, or providing evidence of target engagement for new therapeutic agents. It may also be used as a surrogate marker, providing evidence of disease-modifying effects. However, despite the widespread use of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in ADCTs, there are some important challenges and limitations, such as difficulties in the interpretation of results, limitations in translating results into clinical practice, and reproducibility issues, among others. Solutions to these issues may arise from other methodologies that are able to link the results of volumetric MRI from trials with conventional MRIs performed in routine clinical practice (linear or planimetric methods). Also of potential benefit are automated volumetry, using indices for comparing the relative rate of atrophy of different regions instead of absolute rates of atrophy, and combining structural neuroimaging with other biomarkers. In this review, authors present the existing structural neuroimaging approaches for MTA quantification. They then discuss solutions to the limitations of the different techniques as well as the current challenges of the field. Finally, they discuss how the current advances in AD neuroimaging can help AD diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Menéndez-González
- Unidad de Neurología, Hospital Álvarez-Buylla, Mieres, Asturias, España.,Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Asturias, España.,Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Asturias, España
| | - Benito de Celis Alonso
- Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México.,Facultad para el Desarrollo, Carlos Sigüenza, Puebla, México
| | - José Salas-Pacheco
- Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, México
| | - Oscar Arias-Carrión
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González/IFC-UNAM, México DF, México
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Cedarbaum J, Donohue MC, Green RC, Harvey D, Jack CR, Jagust W, Morris JC, Petersen RC, Saykin AJ, Shaw L, Thompson PM, Toga AW, Trojanowski JQ. Impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2004 to 2014. Alzheimers Dement 2016; 11:865-84. [PMID: 26194320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) was established in 2004 to facilitate the development of effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) by validating biomarkers for AD clinical trials. METHODS We searched for ADNI publications using established methods. RESULTS ADNI has (1) developed standardized biomarkers for use in clinical trial subject selection and as surrogate outcome measures; (2) standardized protocols for use across multiple centers; (3) initiated worldwide ADNI; (4) inspired initiatives investigating traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder in military populations, and depression, respectively, as an AD risk factor; (5) acted as a data-sharing model; (6) generated data used in over 600 publications, leading to the identification of novel AD risk alleles, and an understanding of the relationship between biomarkers and AD progression; and (7) inspired other public-private partnerships developing biomarkers for Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. DISCUSSION ADNI has made myriad impacts in its first decade. A competitive renewal of the project in 2015 would see the use of newly developed tau imaging ligands, and the continued development of recruitment strategies and outcome measures for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Weiner
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Dallas P Veitch
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California- San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Laurel A Beckett
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Nigel J Cairns
- Department of Neurology, Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesse Cedarbaum
- Neurology Early Clinical Development, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michael C Donohue
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danielle Harvey
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - William Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and the School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leslie Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, University of Southern California, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Arthur W Toga
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Institute on Aging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Udall Parkinson's Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S, Ballard C, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Cedazo-Minguez A, Dubois B, Edvardsson D, Feldman H, Fratiglioni L, Frisoni GB, Gauthier S, Georges J, Graff C, Iqbal K, Jessen F, Johansson G, Jönsson L, Kivipelto M, Knapp M, Mangialasche F, Melis R, Nordberg A, Rikkert MO, Qiu C, Sakmar TP, Scheltens P, Schneider LS, Sperling R, Tjernberg LO, Waldemar G, Wimo A, Zetterberg H. Defeating Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:455-532. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00062-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1001] [Impact Index Per Article: 125.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
19
|
Scott G, Ramlackhansingh AF, Edison P, Hellyer P, Cole J, Veronese M, Leech R, Greenwood RJ, Turkheimer FE, Gentleman SM, Heckemann RA, Matthews PM, Brooks DJ, Sharp DJ. Amyloid pathology and axonal injury after brain trauma. Neurology 2016; 86:821-8. [PMID: 26843562 PMCID: PMC4793784 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To image β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque burden in long-term survivors of traumatic brain injury (TBI), test whether traumatic axonal injury and Aβ are correlated, and compare the spatial distribution of Aβ to Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS Patients 11 months to 17 years after moderate-severe TBI underwent (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B ((11)C-PiB)-PET, structural and diffusion MRI, and neuropsychological examination. Healthy aged controls and patients with AD underwent PET and structural MRI. Binding potential (BPND) images of (11)C-PiB, which index Aβ plaque density, were computed using an automatic reference region extraction procedure. Voxelwise and regional differences in BPND were assessed. In TBI, a measure of white matter integrity, fractional anisotropy, was estimated and correlated with (11)C-PiB BPND. RESULTS Twenty-eight participants (9 with TBI, 9 controls, 10 with AD) were assessed. Increased (11)C-PiB BPND was found in TBI vs controls in the posterior cingulate cortex and cerebellum. Binding in the posterior cingulate cortex increased with decreasing fractional anisotropy of associated white matter tracts and increased with time since injury. Compared to AD, binding after TBI was lower in neocortical regions but increased in the cerebellum. CONCLUSIONS Increased Aβ burden was observed in TBI. The distribution overlaps with, but is distinct from, that of AD. This suggests a mechanistic link between TBI and the development of neuropathologic features of dementia, which may relate to axonal damage produced by the injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Scott
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Anil F Ramlackhansingh
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Paul Edison
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Peter Hellyer
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - James Cole
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Mattia Veronese
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Rob Leech
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Richard J Greenwood
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Federico E Turkheimer
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Steve M Gentleman
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Rolf A Heckemann
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Paul M Matthews
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - David J Brooks
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - David J Sharp
- From the Division of Brain Sciences (G.S., A.F.R., P.E., P.H., J.C., R.L., S.M.G., R.A.H., P.M.M., D.J.B., D.J.S.), Department of Medicine, Imperial College London; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (P.H., M.V., F.E.T.), King's College London; Institute of Neurology (R.J.G.), University College London, UK; MedTech West at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (R.A.H.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden; and Institute of Clinical Medicine (D.J.B.), Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Atri A. Imaging of neurodegenerative cognitive and behavioral disorders: practical considerations for dementia clinical practice. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2016; 136:971-984. [PMID: 27430453 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53486-6.00050-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This chapter reviews clinical applications and imaging findings useful in medical practice relating to neurodegenerative cognitive/dementing disorders. The preponderance of evidence and consensus guidelines support an essential role of multitiered neuroimaging in the evaluation and management of neurodegenerative cognitive/dementia syndrome that range in severity from mild impairments to frank dementia. Additionally, imaging features are incorporated in updated clinical and research diagnostic criteria for most dementias, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Frontotemporal Lobar Degenerations/Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), and Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI). Best clinical practices dictate that structural imaging, preferably with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when possible and computed tomography when not, be obtained as a first-tier approach during the course of a thorough clinical evaluation to improve diagnostic confidence and assess for nonneurodegenerative treatable conditions that may cause or substantially contribute to cognitive/behavioral symptoms or which may dictate a substantial change in management. These conditions include less common structural (e.g., mass lesions such as tumors and hematomas; normal-pressure hydrocephalus), inflammatory, autoimmune and infectious conditions, and more common comorbid contributing conditions (e.g., vascular cerebral injury causing leukoaraiosis, infarcts, or microhemorrhages) that can produce a mixed dementia syndrome. When, after appropriate clinical, cognitive/neuropsychologic, and structural neuroimaging assessment, a dementia specialist remains in doubt regarding etiology and appropriate management, second-tier imaging with molecular methods, preferably with fluorodexoyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) (or single-photon emission computed tomography if PET is unavailable) can provide more diagnostic specificity (e.g., help differentiate between atypical AD and FTD as the etiology for a frontal/dysexecutive syndrome). The potential clinical utility of other promising methods, whether already approved for use (e.g., amyloid PET) or as yet only used in research (e.g., tau PET, functional MRI, diffusor tensor imaging), remains to be proven for widespread use in community practice. However, these constitute unreimbursed third-tier options that merit further study for clinical and cost-effective utility. In the future, combination use of imaging methods will likely improve diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Atri
- Ray Dolby Brain Health Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sørensen L, Igel C, Liv Hansen N, Osler M, Lauritzen M, Rostrup E, Nielsen M. Early detection of Alzheimer's disease using MRI hippocampal texture. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 37:1148-61. [PMID: 26686837 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Revised: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with reduction in hippocampal volume in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, it is unknown whether hippocampal texture changes in persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) that does not have a change in hippocampal volume. We tested the hypothesis that hippocampal texture has association to early cognitive loss beyond that of volumetric changes. The texture marker was trained and evaluated using T1-weighted MRI scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, and subsequently applied to score independent data sets from the Australian Imaging, Biomarker & Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL) and the Metropolit 1953 Danish Male Birth Cohort (Metropolit). Hippocampal texture was superior to volume reduction as predictor of MCI-to-AD conversion in ADNI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.74 vs. 0.67; DeLong test, p = 0.005), and provided even better prognostic results in AIBL (AUC 0.83). Hippocampal texture, but not volume, correlated with Addenbrooke's cognitive examination score (Pearson correlation, r = -0.25, p < 0.001) in the Metropolit cohort. The hippocampal texture marker correlated with hippocampal glucose metabolism as indicated by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (Pearson correlation, r = -0.57, p < 0.001). Texture statistics remained significant after adjustment for volume in all cases, and the combination of texture and volume did not improve diagnostic or prognostic AUCs significantly. Our study highlights the presence of hippocampal texture abnormalities in MCI, and the possibility that texture may serve as a prognostic neuroimaging biomarker of early cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauge Sørensen
- The Image Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biomediq A/S, Denmark
| | - Christian Igel
- The Image Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Naja Liv Hansen
- Functional Imaging Unit, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Osler
- Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Martin Lauritzen
- Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Egill Rostrup
- Functional Imaging Unit, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Nielsen
- The Image Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biomediq A/S, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Promteangtrong C, Kolber M, Ramchandra P, Moghbel M, Houshmand S, Schöll M, Bai H, Werner TJ, Alavi A, Buchpiguel C. Multimodality Imaging Approach in Alzheimer disease. Part I: Structural MRI, Functional MRI, Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Magnetization Transfer Imaging. Dement Neuropsychol 2015; 9:318-329. [PMID: 29213981 PMCID: PMC5619314 DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642015dn94000318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The authors make a complete review of the potential clinical applications of
traditional and novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in the
evaluation of patients with Alzheimer's disease, including structural MRI,
functional MRI, diffusion tension imaging and magnetization transfer
imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcus Kolber
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Priya Ramchandra
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mateen Moghbel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sina Houshmand
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Schöll
- Karolinska Institutet, Alzheimer Neurobiology Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Halbert Bai
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas J Werner
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carlos Buchpiguel
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Nuclear Medicine Center, Radiology Institute, University of São Paulo General Hospital , São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Amoroso N, Errico R, Bruno S, Chincarini A, Garuccio E, Sensi F, Tangaro S, Tateo A, Bellotti R. Hippocampal unified multi-atlas network (HUMAN): protocol and scale validation of a novel segmentation tool. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:8851-67. [PMID: 26531765 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/22/8851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
24
|
Mattsson N, Carrillo MC, Dean RA, Devous MD, Nikolcheva T, Pesini P, Salter H, Potter WZ, Sperling RS, Bateman RJ, Bain LJ, Liu E. Revolutionizing Alzheimer's disease and clinical trials through biomarkers. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA: DIAGNOSIS, ASSESSMENT & DISEASE MONITORING 2015; 1:412-9. [PMID: 27239522 PMCID: PMC4879481 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable met in May 2014 to explore recent progress in developing biomarkers to improve understanding of disease pathogenesis and expedite drug development. Although existing biomarkers have proved extremely useful for enrichment of subjects in clinical trials, there is a clear need to develop novel biomarkers that are minimally invasive and that more broadly characterize underlying pathogenic mechanisms, including neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. These may include blood-based assays and new neuropsychological testing protocols, as well as novel ligands for positron emission tomography imaging, and advanced magnetic resonance imaging methodologies. In addition, there is a need for biomarkers that can serve as theragnostic markers of response to treatment. Standardization remains a challenge, although international consortia have made substantial progress in this area and provide lessons for future standardization efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Sweden
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-(0)-40-33-50-36; Fax: +46-(0)-40-33-56-57.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hugh Salter
- AztraZeneca, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Enchi Liu
- Janssen Research and Development, LLC., San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luo Y, Cao Z, Liu Y, Wu L, Shan H, Liu Y, Ma T, Zhu X, Zhou D, Jiang B, Wang J. T2 signal intensity and volume abnormalities of hippocampal subregions in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Neurosci 2015; 126:904-11. [PMID: 26376712 DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2015.1083018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The volumetry of the hippocampal subregion may provide additional information in the early investigation of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and the T2 signal intensity (T2-SI) of the hippocampal subregion has not been well studied quantitatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in aMCI. METHODS Using combined MRI-based hippocampal volumetry and T2-SI at the levels of the whole hippocampus and hippocampal subregion, 18 patients with aMCI and 18 age-matched controls were investigated. RESULTS Significantly lower left whole hippocampal and hippocampal head volumes and higher T2-SI in the bilateral whole hippocampus and hippocampal head were shown, whereas atrophy of the right whole hippocampus and hippocampal subregion was not significant in aMCI. Additionally, correlations were found among the hippocampal volume, T2-SI and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores for aMCI in the whole hippocampus and some hippocampal subregions and an almost perfect correlation was found between T2-SI of the left hippocampal head and MMSE scores regarding aMCI (r = -0.831, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION Abnormalities of the hippocampal volume and T2-SI were documented in aMCI, whereas T2-SI was implied to be more susceptible than the volume in the pathohistological progression in aMCI. Additionally, T2-SI in the left hippocampal head may be a potential biomarker to facilitate the early diagnosis of aMCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Luo
- a Department of Radiology , The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , China.,b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Zhihong Cao
- b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Yu Liu
- c Department of Radiology , Yixing Second People's Hospital , Wuxi , China
| | - Liwei Wu
- b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Hairong Shan
- b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Yiwen Liu
- b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Tieliang Ma
- b Department of Radiology , The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University , Wuxi , China
| | - Xuee Zhu
- a Department of Radiology , The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , China
| | - Dan Zhou
- a Department of Radiology , The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , China
| | - Binghu Jiang
- a Department of Radiology , The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , China
| | - Jichen Wang
- a Department of Radiology , The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing , China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Maglietta R, Amoroso N, Boccardi M, Bruno S, Chincarini A, Frisoni GB, Inglese P, Redolfi A, Tangaro S, Tateo A, Bellotti R. Automated hippocampal segmentation in 3D MRI using random undersampling with boosting algorithm. Pattern Anal Appl 2015; 19:579-591. [PMID: 27110218 PMCID: PMC4828512 DOI: 10.1007/s10044-015-0492-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The automated identification of brain structure in Magnetic Resonance Imaging is very important both in neuroscience research and as a possible clinical diagnostic tool. In this study, a novel strategy for fully automated hippocampal segmentation in MRI is presented. It is based on a supervised algorithm, called RUSBoost, which combines data random undersampling with a boosting algorithm. RUSBoost is an algorithm specifically designed for imbalanced classification, suitable for large data sets because it uses random undersampling of the majority class. The RUSBoost performances were compared with those of ADABoost, Random Forest and the publicly available brain segmentation package, FreeSurfer. This study was conducted on a data set of 50 T1-weighted structural brain images. The RUSBoost-based segmentation tool achieved the best results with a Dice's index of [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) for the left (right) brain hemisphere. An independent data set of 50 T1-weighted structural brain scans was used for an independent validation of the fully trained strategies. Again the RUSBoost segmentations compared favorably with manual segmentations with the highest performances among the four tools. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient between hippocampal volumes computed by manual and RUSBoost segmentations was 0.83 (0.82) for left (right) side, statistically significant, and higher than those computed by Adaboost, Random Forest and FreeSurfer. The proposed method may be suitable for accurate, robust and statistically significant segmentations of hippocampi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalia Maglietta
- />Istituto di Studi sui Sistemi Intelligenti per l’Automazione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via G. Amendola 122, 70126 Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Amoroso
- />Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica M.Merlin, Universita’ degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Marina Boccardi
- />LENITEM Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Chincarini
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- />LENITEM Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
- />AFaR Associazione FateBeneFratelli per la Ricerca, Roma, Italy
- />Psychogeriatric Ward, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Inglese
- />Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica M.Merlin, Universita’ degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- />LENITEM Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sabina Tangaro
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Tateo
- />Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica M.Merlin, Universita’ degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Bellotti
- />Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica M.Merlin, Universita’ degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - The Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
- />Istituto di Studi sui Sistemi Intelligenti per l’Automazione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via G. Amendola 122, 70126 Bari, Italy
- />Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica M.Merlin, Universita’ degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy
- />LENITEM Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
- />Overdale Hospital, Saint Helier, Jersey
- />Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy
- />AFaR Associazione FateBeneFratelli per la Ricerca, Roma, Italy
- />Psychogeriatric Ward, IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio, FBF, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Cedarbaum J, Green RC, Harvey D, Jack CR, Jagust W, Luthman J, Morris JC, Petersen RC, Saykin AJ, Shaw L, Shen L, Schwarz A, Toga AW, Trojanowski JQ. 2014 Update of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:e1-120. [PMID: 26073027 PMCID: PMC5469297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/18/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is an ongoing, longitudinal, multicenter study designed to develop clinical, imaging, genetic, and biochemical biomarkers for the early detection and tracking of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The initial study, ADNI-1, enrolled 400 subjects with early mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 200 with early AD, and 200 cognitively normal elderly controls. ADNI-1 was extended by a 2-year Grand Opportunities grant in 2009 and by a competitive renewal, ADNI-2, which enrolled an additional 550 participants and will run until 2015. This article reviews all papers published since the inception of the initiative and summarizes the results to the end of 2013. The major accomplishments of ADNI have been as follows: (1) the development of standardized methods for clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in a multicenter setting; (2) elucidation of the patterns and rates of change of imaging and CSF biomarker measurements in control subjects, MCI patients, and AD patients. CSF biomarkers are largely consistent with disease trajectories predicted by β-amyloid cascade (Hardy, J Alzheimer's Dis 2006;9(Suppl 3):151-3) and tau-mediated neurodegeneration hypotheses for AD, whereas brain atrophy and hypometabolism levels show predicted patterns but exhibit differing rates of change depending on region and disease severity; (3) the assessment of alternative methods of diagnostic categorization. Currently, the best classifiers select and combine optimum features from multiple modalities, including MRI, [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, amyloid PET, CSF biomarkers, and clinical tests; (4) the development of blood biomarkers for AD as potentially noninvasive and low-cost alternatives to CSF biomarkers for AD diagnosis and the assessment of α-syn as an additional biomarker; (5) the development of methods for the early detection of AD. CSF biomarkers, β-amyloid 42 and tau, as well as amyloid PET may reflect the earliest steps in AD pathology in mildly symptomatic or even nonsymptomatic subjects and are leading candidates for the detection of AD in its preclinical stages; (6) the improvement of clinical trial efficiency through the identification of subjects most likely to undergo imminent future clinical decline and the use of more sensitive outcome measures to reduce sample sizes. Multimodal methods incorporating APOE status and longitudinal MRI proved most highly predictive of future decline. Refinements of clinical tests used as outcome measures such as clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes further reduced sample sizes; (7) the pioneering of genome-wide association studies that leverage quantitative imaging and biomarker phenotypes, including longitudinal data, to confirm recently identified loci, CR1, CLU, and PICALM and to identify novel AD risk loci; (8) worldwide impact through the establishment of ADNI-like programs in Japan, Australia, Argentina, Taiwan, China, Korea, Europe, and Italy; (9) understanding the biology and pathobiology of normal aging, MCI, and AD through integration of ADNI biomarker and clinical data to stimulate research that will resolve controversies about competing hypotheses on the etiopathogenesis of AD, thereby advancing efforts to find disease-modifying drugs for AD; and (10) the establishment of infrastructure to allow sharing of all raw and processed data without embargo to interested scientific investigators throughout the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Weiner
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Dallas P Veitch
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Laurel A Beckett
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Nigel J Cairns
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesse Cedarbaum
- Neurology Early Clinical Development, Biogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danielle Harvey
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - William Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Johan Luthman
- Neuroscience Clinical Development, Neuroscience & General Medicine Product Creation Unit, Eisai Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Leslie Shaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Li Shen
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Adam Schwarz
- Tailored Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Arthur W Toga
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Q Trojanowski
- Institute on Aging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Alzheimer's Disease Core Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Udall Parkinson's Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Neurodegenerative Research, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yushkevich PA, Amaral RSC, Augustinack JC, Bender AR, Bernstein JD, Boccardi M, Bocchetta M, Burggren AC, Carr VA, Chakravarty MM, Chételat G, Daugherty AM, Davachi L, Ding SL, Ekstrom A, Geerlings MI, Hassan A, Huang Y, Iglesias JE, La Joie R, Kerchner GA, LaRocque KF, Libby LA, Malykhin N, Mueller SG, Olsen RK, Palombo DJ, Parekh MB, Pluta JB, Preston AR, Pruessner JC, Ranganath C, Raz N, Schlichting ML, Schoemaker D, Singh S, Stark CEL, Suthana N, Tompary A, Turowski MM, Van Leemput K, Wagner AD, Wang L, Winterburn JL, Wisse LEM, Yassa MA, Zeineh MM. Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: towards a harmonized segmentation protocol. Neuroimage 2015; 111:526-41. [PMID: 25596463 PMCID: PMC4387011 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 234] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Revised: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 01/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An increasing number of human in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have focused on examining the structure and function of the subfields of the hippocampal formation (the dentate gyrus, CA fields 1-3, and the subiculum) and subregions of the parahippocampal gyrus (entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices). The ability to interpret the results of such studies and to relate them to each other would be improved if a common standard existed for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions. Currently, research groups label different subsets of structures and use different rules, landmarks, and cues to define their anatomical extents. This paper characterizes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the variability in the existing manual segmentation protocols for labeling hippocampal and parahippocampal substructures in MRI, with the goal of guiding subsequent work on developing a harmonized substructure segmentation protocol. METHOD MRI scans of a single healthy adult human subject were acquired both at 3 T and 7 T. Representatives from 21 research groups applied their respective manual segmentation protocols to the MRI modalities of their choice. The resulting set of 21 segmentations was analyzed in a common anatomical space to quantify similarity and identify areas of agreement. RESULTS The differences between the 21 protocols include the region within which segmentation is performed, the set of anatomical labels used, and the extents of specific anatomical labels. The greatest overall disagreement among the protocols is at the CA1/subiculum boundary, and disagreement across all structures is greatest in the anterior portion of the hippocampal formation relative to the body and tail. CONCLUSIONS The combined examination of the 21 protocols in the same dataset suggests possible strategies towards developing a harmonized subfield segmentation protocol and facilitates comparison between published studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Yushkevich
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Robert S C Amaral
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Canada
| | - Jean C Augustinack
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey D Bernstein
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA; Stanford Center for Memory Disorders, USA
| | - Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine), IRCCS Centro S. Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Italy
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine), IRCCS Centro S. Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alison C Burggren
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - M Mallar Chakravarty
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Canada
| | - Gaël Chételat
- INSERM U1077, Universitè de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR-S1077, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, CHU de Caen, U1077, Caen, France
| | - Ana M Daugherty
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, USA; Psychology Department, Wayne State University, USA
| | - Lila Davachi
- Department of Psychology, New York University, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, USA
| | | | - Arne Ekstrom
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Abdul Hassan
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Yushan Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Eugenio Iglesias
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Renaud La Joie
- INSERM U1077, Universitè de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR-S1077, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, CHU de Caen, U1077, Caen, France
| | - Geoffrey A Kerchner
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, USA; Stanford Center for Memory Disorders, USA
| | | | - Laura A Libby
- Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Nikolai Malykhin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susanne G Mueller
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA; Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Francisco VA Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | | | - John B Pluta
- Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alison R Preston
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - Jens C Pruessner
- McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Canada
| | - Charan Ranganath
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, USA
| | - Naftali Raz
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, USA; Psychology Department, Wayne State University, USA
| | - Margaret L Schlichting
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - Dorothee Schoemaker
- McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Canada
| | - Sachi Singh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
| | - Craig E L Stark
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, USA
| | - Nanthia Suthana
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Marta M Turowski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
| | - Koen Van Leemput
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Anthony D Wagner
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA; Neurosciences Program, Stanford University, USA
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA; Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
| | - Julie L Winterburn
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Canada
| | - Laura E M Wisse
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michael A Yassa
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wolz R, Schwarz AJ, Yu P, Cole PE, Rueckert D, Jack CR, Raunig D, Hill D. Robustness of automated hippocampal volumetry across magnetic resonance field strengths and repeat images. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 10:430-438.e2. [PMID: 24985688 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Revised: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low HCV has recently been qualified by the European Medicines Agency as a biomarker for enrichment of clinical trials in predementia stages of Alzheimer's disease. For automated methods to meet the necessary regulatory requirements, it is essential they be standardized and their performance be well characterized. METHODS The within-image and between-field strength reproducibility of automated hippocampal volumetry using the Learning Embeddings for Atlas Propagation (or LEAP) algorithm was assessed on 153 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative subjects. RESULTS Tests/retests at 1.5 T and 3 T, and a comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T, yielded average unsigned variabilities in HCVs of 1.51%, 1.52%, and 2.68%. A small bias between field strengths (mean signed difference, 1.17%; standard deviation, 3.07%) was observed. CONCLUSIONS The measured reproducibility characteristics confirm the suitability of using automated magnetic resonance imaging analyses to assess HCVs quantitatively and to represent a fundamental characterization that is critical to meet the regulatory requirements for using hippocampal volumetry in clinical trials and health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Wolz
- IXICO Plc, London, UK; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Peng Yu
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Frisoni GB, Jack CR, Bocchetta M, Bauer C, Frederiksen KS, Liu Y, Preboske G, Swihart T, Blair M, Cavedo E, Grothe MJ, Lanfredi M, Martinez O, Nishikawa M, Portegies M, Stoub T, Ward C, Apostolova LG, Ganzola R, Wolf D, Barkhof F, Bartzokis G, DeCarli C, Csernansky JG, deToledo-Morrell L, Geerlings MI, Kaye J, Killiany RJ, Lehéricy S, Matsuda H, O'Brien J, Silbert LC, Scheltens P, Soininen H, Teipel S, Waldemar G, Fellgiebel A, Barnes J, Firbank M, Gerritsen L, Henneman W, Malykhin N, Pruessner JC, Wang L, Watson C, Wolf H, deLeon M, Pantel J, Ferrari C, Bosco P, Pasqualetti P, Duchesne S, Duvernoy H, Boccardi M. The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: evidence of validity. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:111-25. [PMID: 25267715 PMCID: PMC4422168 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Revised: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An international Delphi panel has defined a harmonized protocol (HarP) for the manual segmentation of the hippocampus on MR. The aim of this study is to study the concurrent validity of the HarP toward local protocols, and its major sources of variance. METHODS Fourteen tracers segmented 10 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases scanned at 1.5 T and 3T following local protocols, qualified for segmentation based on the HarP through a standard web-platform and resegmented following the HarP. The five most accurate tracers followed the HarP to segment 15 ADNI cases acquired at three time points on both 1.5 T and 3T. RESULTS The agreement among tracers was relatively low with the local protocols (absolute left/right ICC 0.44/0.43) and much higher with the HarP (absolute left/right ICC 0.88/0.89). On the larger set of 15 cases, the HarP agreement within (left/right ICC range: 0.94/0.95 to 0.99/0.99) and among tracers (left/right ICC range: 0.89/0.90) was very high. The volume variance due to different tracers was 0.9% of the total, comparing favorably to variance due to scanner manufacturer (1.2), atrophy rates (3.5), hemispheric asymmetry (3.7), field strength (4.4), and significantly smaller than the variance due to atrophy (33.5%, P < .001), and physiological variability (49.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The HarP has high measurement stability compared with local segmentation protocols, and good reproducibility within and among human tracers. Hippocampi segmented with the HarP can be used as a reference for the qualification of human tracers and automated segmentation algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Frisoni
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Memory Clinic and LANVIE - Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Corinna Bauer
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yawu Liu
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Gregory Preboske
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tim Swihart
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Melanie Blair
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel J Grothe
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany
| | - Mariangela Lanfredi
- Unit of Psychiatry, IRCCS - Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Oliver Martinez
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Marileen Portegies
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Travis Stoub
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chadwich Ward
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Liana G Apostolova
- Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Laboratory of NeuroImaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rossana Ganzola
- Department of Radiology, Université Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Dominik Wolf
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Image Analysis Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George Bartzokis
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles DeCarli
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Kaye
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ronald J Killiany
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephane Lehéricy
- Service de Neuroradiologie, Hopital de la Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | | | - John O'Brien
- Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lisa C Silbert
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Cente and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Fellgiebel
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Josephine Barnes
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Michael Firbank
- Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lotte Gerritsen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wouter Henneman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Image Analysis Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolai Malykhin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jens C Pruessner
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Craig Watson
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Henrike Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry Research and Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospitals, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Mony deLeon
- New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Johannes Pantel
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- Unit of Psychiatry, IRCCS - Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Bosco
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Patrizio Pasqualetti
- SeSMIT (Service for Medical Statistics and Information Technology), AFaR (Fatebenefratelli Association for Research), Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy; Unit of Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS "San Raffaele Pisana", Rome, Italy
| | - Simon Duchesne
- Department of Radiology, Université Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Apostolova LG, Zarow C, Biado K, Hurtz S, Boccardi M, Somme J, Honarpisheh H, Blanken AE, Brook J, Tung S, Lo D, Ng D, Alger JR, Vinters HV, Bocchetta M, Duvernoy H, Jack CR, Frisoni GB. Relationship between hippocampal atrophy and neuropathology markers: a 7T MRI validation study of the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:139-50. [PMID: 25620800 PMCID: PMC4348340 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2013] [Revised: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The pathologic validation of European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Center Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol (HarP). METHODS Temporal lobes of nine Alzheimer's disease (AD) and seven cognitively normal subjects were scanned post-mortem at 7 Tesla. Hippocampal volumes were obtained with HarP. Six-micrometer-thick hippocampal slices were stained for amyloid beta (Aβ), tau, and cresyl violet. Hippocampal subfields were manually traced. Neuronal counts, Aβ, and tau burden for each hippocampal subfield were obtained. RESULTS We found significant correlations between hippocampal volume and Braak and Braak staging (ρ = -0.75, P = .001), tau (ρ = -0.53, P = .034), Aβ burden (ρ = -0.61, P = .012), and neuronal count (ρ = 0.77, P < .001). Exploratory subfield-wise significant associations were found for Aβ in Cornu Ammonis (CA)1 (ρ = -0.58, P = .019) and subiculum (ρ = -0.75, P = .001), tau in CA2 (ρ = -0.59, P = .016), and CA3 (ρ = -0.5, P = .047), and neuronal count in CA1 (ρ = 0.55, P = .028), CA3 (ρ = 0.65, P = .006), and CA4 (ρ = 0.76, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS The observed associations provide pathological confirmation of hippocampal morphometry as a valid biomarker for AD and pathologic validation of HarP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Zarow
- Department of Neurology, USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristina Biado
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sona Hurtz
- San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine), IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio- Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Johanne Somme
- Department of Neurology, Alava University Hospital, Victoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Hedieh Honarpisheh
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Jenny Brook
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Spencer Tung
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Darrick Lo
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Denise Ng
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Harry V Vinters
- Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine), IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio- Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine), IRCCS S.Giovanni di Dio- Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
HarP: The EADC‐ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation. A standard of reference from a global working group. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:107-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
33
|
Bron EE, Smits M, van der Flier WM, Vrenken H, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Papma JM, Steketee RME, Méndez Orellana C, Meijboom R, Pinto M, Meireles JR, Garrett C, Bastos-Leite AJ, Abdulkadir A, Ronneberger O, Amoroso N, Bellotti R, Cárdenas-Peña D, Álvarez-Meza AM, Dolph CV, Iftekharuddin KM, Eskildsen SF, Coupé P, Fonov VS, Franke K, Gaser C, Ledig C, Guerrero R, Tong T, Gray KR, Moradi E, Tohka J, Routier A, Durrleman S, Sarica A, Di Fatta G, Sensi F, Chincarini A, Smith GM, Stoyanov ZV, Sørensen L, Nielsen M, Tangaro S, Inglese P, Wachinger C, Reuter M, van Swieten JC, Niessen WJ, Klein S. Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: the CADDementia challenge. Neuroimage 2015; 111:562-79. [PMID: 25652394 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI have demonstrated high performance in the literature, but are difficult to compare as different data sets and methodology were used for evaluation. In addition, it is unclear how the algorithms would perform on previously unseen data, and thus, how they would perform in clinical practice when there is no real opportunity to adapt the algorithm to the data at hand. To address these comparability, generalizability and clinical applicability issues, we organized a grand challenge that aimed to objectively compare algorithms based on a clinically representative multi-center data set. Using clinical practice as the starting point, the goal was to reproduce the clinical diagnosis. Therefore, we evaluated algorithms for multi-class classification of three diagnostic groups: patients with probable Alzheimer's disease, patients with mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. The diagnosis based on clinical criteria was used as reference standard, as it was the best available reference despite its known limitations. For evaluation, a previously unseen test set was used consisting of 354 T1-weighted MRI scans with the diagnoses blinded. Fifteen research teams participated with a total of 29 algorithms. The algorithms were trained on a small training set (n=30) and optionally on data from other sources (e.g., the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle flagship study of aging). The best performing algorithm yielded an accuracy of 63.0% and an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of 78.8%. In general, the best performances were achieved using feature extraction based on voxel-based morphometry or a combination of features that included volume, cortical thickness, shape and intensity. The challenge is open for new submissions via the web-based framework: http://caddementia.grand-challenge.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther E Bron
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Vrenken
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janne M Papma
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carolina Méndez Orellana
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Madalena Pinto
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Carolina Garrett
- Department of Neurology, Hospital de São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - António J Bastos-Leite
- Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ahmed Abdulkadir
- Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Germany; Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Ronneberger
- BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies, University of Freiburg, Germany; Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nicola Amoroso
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Branch of Bari, Italy; Department of Physics, University of Bari, Italy
| | - Roberto Bellotti
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Branch of Bari, Italy; Department of Physics, University of Bari, Italy
| | - David Cárdenas-Peña
- Signal Processing and Recognition Group, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Simon F Eskildsen
- Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pierrick Coupé
- Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique, Unit Mixte de Recherche CNRS (UMR 5800), PICTURA Research Group, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vladimir S Fonov
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Katja Franke
- Structural Brain Mapping Group, Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Germany; Structural Brain Mapping Group, Department of Psychiatry, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian Gaser
- Structural Brain Mapping Group, Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Germany; Structural Brain Mapping Group, Department of Psychiatry, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - Christian Ledig
- Biomedical Image Analysis (BioMedIA) Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Ricardo Guerrero
- Biomedical Image Analysis (BioMedIA) Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Tong Tong
- Biomedical Image Analysis (BioMedIA) Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Katherine R Gray
- Biomedical Image Analysis (BioMedIA) Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Elaheh Moradi
- Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Finland
| | - Jussi Tohka
- Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Finland
| | - Alexandre Routier
- Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, F-75013 Paris, France; Centre d'Acquisition et de Traitement des Images (CATI), Paris, France
| | - Stanley Durrleman
- Inserm U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, F-75013 Paris, France; Centre d'Acquisition et de Traitement des Images (CATI), Paris, France
| | - Alessia Sarica
- Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Fatta
- School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AY, UK
| | - Francesco Sensi
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Branch of Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Garry M Smith
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, University of Reading, RG6 6AH, UK; School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AY, UK
| | - Zhivko V Stoyanov
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, University of Reading, RG6 6AH, UK; School of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AY, UK
| | - Lauge Sørensen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sabina Tangaro
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Branch of Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Inglese
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Branch of Bari, Italy
| | - Christian Wachinger
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MA Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, USA
| | - Martin Reuter
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, MA Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, USA
| | | | - Wiro J Niessen
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Imaging Physics, Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Klein
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Duchesne S, Valdivia F, Robitaille N, Mouiha A, Valdivia FA, Bocchetta M, Apostolova LG, Ganzola R, Preboske G, Wolf D, Boccardi M, Jack CR, Frisoni GB. Manual segmentation qualification platform for the EADC‐ADNI harmonized protocol for hippocampal segmentation project. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:161-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Revised: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Duchesne
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - Fernando Valdivia
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - Nicolas Robitaille
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - Abderazzak Mouiha
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - F. Abiel Valdivia
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- LENITEM (Laboratory of EpidemiologyNeuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS – S. Giovanni di Dio – FatebenefratelliBresciaItaly
- Department of Molecular and Translational MedicineUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
| | - Liana G. Apostolova
- Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Laboratory of NeuroImaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
| | - Rossana Ganzola
- Department of RadiologyUniversité Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de QuébecQuebec CityCanada
| | - Greg Preboske
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyMayo Clinic and FoundationRochesterMNUSA
| | - Dominik Wolf
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und PsychotherapieJohannes Gutenberg‐UniversitätMainzGermany
| | - Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of EpidemiologyNeuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS – S. Giovanni di Dio – FatebenefratelliBresciaItaly
| | - Clifford R. Jack
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyMayo Clinic and FoundationRochesterMNUSA
| | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- LENITEM (Laboratory of EpidemiologyNeuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS – S. Giovanni di Dio – FatebenefratelliBresciaItaly
- University Hospitals and University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD, Jagust WJ, Johnson KA, Mathis CA, Minhas D, Pontecorvo MJ, Rowe CC, Skovronsky DM, Mintun MA. The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11:1-15.e1-4. [PMID: 25443857 PMCID: PMC4300247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 581] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2013] [Revised: 06/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Although amyloid imaging with PiB-PET ([C-11]Pittsburgh Compound-B positron emission tomography), and now with F-18-labeled tracers, has produced remarkably consistent qualitative findings across a large number of centers, there has been considerable variability in the exact numbers reported as quantitative outcome measures of tracer retention. In some cases this is as trivial as the choice of units, in some cases it is scanner dependent, and of course, different tracers yield different numbers. Our working group was formed to standardize quantitative amyloid imaging measures by scaling the outcome of each particular analysis method or tracer to a 0 to 100 scale, anchored by young controls (≤ 45 years) and typical Alzheimer's disease patients. The units of this scale have been named "Centiloids." Basically, we describe a "standard" method of analyzing PiB PET data and then a method for scaling any "nonstandard" method of PiB PET analysis (or any other tracer) to the Centiloid scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Klunk
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. PA, USA.
| | - Robert A Koeppe
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Julie C Price
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Tammie L Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael D Devous
- Department of Neurology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Keith A Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chester A Mathis
- Departments of Radiology, Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Davneet Minhas
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cavedo E, Lista S, Khachaturian Z, Aisen P, Amouyel P, Herholz K, Jack CR, Sperling R, Cummings J, Blennow K, O'Bryant S, Frisoni GB, Khachaturian A, Kivipelto M, Klunk W, Broich K, Andrieu S, de Schotten MT, Mangin JF, Lammertsma AA, Johnson K, Teipel S, Drzezga A, Bokde A, Colliot O, Bakardjian H, Zetterberg H, Dubois B, Vellas B, Schneider LS, Hampel H. The Road Ahead to Cure Alzheimer's Disease: Development of Biological Markers and Neuroimaging Methods for Prevention Trials Across all Stages and Target Populations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2014; 1:181-202. [PMID: 26478889 PMCID: PMC4606938 DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2014.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a slowly progressing non-linear dynamic brain disease in which pathophysiological abnormalities, detectable in vivo by biological markers, precede overt clinical symptoms by many years to decades. Use of these biomarkers for the detection of early and preclinical AD has become of central importance following publication of two international expert working group's revised criteria for the diagnosis of AD dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, prodromal AD and preclinical AD. As a consequence of matured research evidence six AD biomarkers are sufficiently validated and partly qualified to be incorporated into operationalized clinical diagnostic criteria and use in primary and secondary prevention trials. These biomarkers fall into two molecular categories: biomarkers of amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition and plaque formation as well as of tau-protein related hyperphosphorylation and neurodegeneration. Three of the six gold-standard ("core feasible) biomarkers are neuroimaging measures and three are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analytes. CSF Aβ1-42 (Aβ1-42), also expressed as Aβ1-42 : Aβ1-40 ratio, T-tau, and P-tau Thr181 & Thr231 proteins have proven diagnostic accuracy and risk enhancement in prodromal MCI and AD dementia. Conversely, having all three biomarkers in the normal range rules out AD. Intermediate conditions require further patient follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at increasing field strength and resolution allows detecting the evolution of distinct types of structural and functional abnormality pattern throughout early to late AD stages. Anatomical or volumetric MRI is the most widely used technique and provides local and global measures of atrophy. The revised diagnostic criteria for "prodromal AD" and "mild cognitive impairment due to AD" include hippocampal atrophy (as the fourth validated biomarker), which is considered an indicator of regional neuronal injury. Advanced image analysis techniques generate automatic and reproducible measures both in regions of interest, such as the hippocampus and in an exploratory fashion, observer and hypothesis-indedendent, throughout the entire brain. Evolving modalities such as diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) and advanced tractography as well as resting-state functional MRI provide useful additionally useful measures indicating the degree of fiber tract and neural network disintegration (structural, effective and functional connectivity) that may substantially contribute to early detection and the mapping of progression. These modalities require further standardization and validation. The use of molecular in vivo amyloid imaging agents (the fifth validated biomarker), such as the Pittsburgh Compound-B and markers of neurodegeneration, such as fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) (as the sixth validated biomarker) support the detection of early AD pathological processes and associated neurodegeneration. How to use, interpret, and disclose biomarker results drives the need for optimized standardization. Multimodal AD biomarkers do not evolve in an identical manner but rather in a sequential but temporally overlapping fashion. Models of the temporal evolution of AD biomarkers can take the form of plots of biomarker severity (degree of abnormality) versus time. AD biomarkers can be combined to increase accuracy or risk. A list of genetic risk factors is increasingly included in secondary prevention trials to stratify and select individuals at genetic risk of AD. Although most of these biomarker candidates are not yet qualified and approved by regulatory authorities for their intended use in drug trials, they are nonetheless applied in ongoing clinical studies for the following functions: (i) inclusion/exclusion criteria, (ii) patient stratification, (iii) evaluation of treatment effect, (iv) drug target engagement, and (v) safety. Moreover, novel promising hypothesis-driven, as well as exploratory biochemical, genetic, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging markers for use in clinical trials are being developed. The current state-of-the-art and future perspectives on both biological and neuroimaging derived biomarker discovery and development as well as the intended application in prevention trials is outlined in the present publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cavedo
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière & Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), UMR S 1127, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière Paris & CATI multicenter neuroimaging platform, France; Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli Brescia, Italy
| | - S Lista
- AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair; Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière & Inserm U1127 Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, France
| | - Z Khachaturian
- The Campaign to Prevent Alzheimer's Disease by 2020 (PAD2020), Potomac, MD, USA
| | - P Aisen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - P Amouyel
- Inserm, U744, Lille, 59000, France; Université Lille 2, Lille, 59000, France; Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, 59000, France; Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, 59000, France
| | - K Herholz
- Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - C R Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - R Sperling
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Cummings
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, 888 West Bonneville Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, USA
| | - K Blennow
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - S O'Bryant
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Aging & Alzheimer's Disease Research, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - G B Frisoni
- IRCCS Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - M Kivipelto
- Karolinska Institutet Alzheimer Research Center, NVS, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - W Klunk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA
| | - K Broich
- Federal Institute of Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany
| | - S Andrieu
- Inserm UMR1027, Université de Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France; Public health department, CHU de Toulouse
| | - M Thiebaut de Schotten
- Natbrainlab, Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), UMRS 1127 Paris, France; Inserm, U 1127, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France
| | - J-F Mangin
- CEA UNATI, Neurospin, CEA Gif-sur-Yvette, France & CATI multicenter neuroimaging platform
| | - A A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Johnson
- Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Teipel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, and DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Rostock, Germany
| | - A Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne Germany
| | - A Bokde
- Cognitive Systems Group, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - O Colliot
- Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR S 1127, F-75013, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, Inserm, U1127, F-75013, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225 ICM, 75013, Paris, France; Inria, Aramis project-team, Centre de Recherche Paris-Rocquencourt, France
| | - H Bakardjian
- Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease (IM2A), Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France; IHU-A-ICM - Paris Institute of Translational Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - H Zetterberg
- Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - B Dubois
- Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière & Inserm U1127 Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, France
| | - B Vellas
- Inserm UMR1027, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - L S Schneider
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - H Hampel
- AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair; Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière & Inserm U1127 Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Conejo Bayón F, Maese J, Fernandez Oliveira A, Mesas T, Herrera de la Llave E, Alvarez Avellón T, Menéndez-González M. Feasibility of the Medial Temporal lobe Atrophy index (MTAi) and derived methods for measuring atrophy of the medial temporal lobe. Front Aging Neurosci 2014; 6:305. [PMID: 25414666 PMCID: PMC4220710 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The Medial Temporal-lobe Atrophy index (MTAi), 2D-Medial Temporal Atrophy (2D-MTA), yearly rate of MTA (yrRMTA) and yearly rate of relative MTA (yrRMTA) are simple protocols for measuring the relative extent of atrophy in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) in relation to the global brain atrophy. Albeit preliminary studies showed interest of these methods in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), frontotemporal lobe degeneration (FTLD) and correlation with cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD), formal feasibility and validity studies remained pending. As a first step, we aimed to assess the feasibility. Mainly, we aimed to assess the reproducibility of measuring the areas needed to compute these indices. We also aimed to assess the efforts needed to start using these methods correctly. Methods: A series of 290 1.5T-MRI studies from 230 subjects ranging 65–85 years old who had been studied for cognitive impairment were used in this study. Six inexperienced tracers (IT) plus one experienced tracer (ET) traced the three areas needed to compute the indices. Finally, tracers underwent a short survey on their experience learning to compute the MTAi and experience of usage, including items relative to training time needed to understand and apply the MTAi, time to perform a study after training and overall satisfaction. Results: Learning to trace the areas needed to compute the MTAi and derived methods is quick and easy. Results indicate very good intrarater Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the MTAi, good intrarater ICC for the 2D-MTA, yrMTA and yrRMTA and also good interrater ICC for the MTAi, 2D-MTA, yrMTA and yrRMTA. Conclusion: Our data support that MTAi and derived methods (2D-MTA, yrMTA and yrRTMA) have good to very good intrarater and interrater reproducibility and may be easily implemented in clinical practice even if new users have no experience tracing the area of regions of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jesús Maese
- Grupo de Trabajo Reumatología Basada en la Evidencia, Sociedad Española de Reumatología Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Manuel Menéndez-González
- Hospital Álvarez-Buylla Mieres, Spain ; Morphology and Cellular Biology, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain ; Instituto de Neurociencias Oviedo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kehoe EG, McNulty JP, Mullins PG, Bokde ALW. Advances in MRI biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Biomark Med 2014; 8:1151-69. [DOI: 10.2217/bmm.14.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
With the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) predicted to increase substantially over the coming decades, the development of effective biomarkers for the early detection of the disease is paramount. In this short review, the main neuroimaging techniques which have shown potential as biomarkers for AD are introduced, with a focus on MRI. Structural MRI measures of the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe are still the most clinically validated biomarkers for AD, but newer techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging offer great scope in tracking changes in the brain, particularly in functional and structural connectivity, which may precede gray matter atrophy. These new advances in neuroimaging methods require further development and crucially, standardization; however, before they are used as biomarkers to aid in the diagnosis of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth G Kehoe
- The Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Cognitive Systems Group, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jonathan P McNulty
- School of Medicine & Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Arun L W Bokde
- The Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Cognitive Systems Group, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Harmonized benchmark labels of the hippocampus on magnetic resonance: The EADC‐ADNI project. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 11:151-60.e5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2013] [Revised: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
High-Dimensional Medial Lobe Morphometry: An Automated MRI Biomarker for the New AD Diagnostic Criteria. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2014; 2014:278096. [PMID: 25254139 PMCID: PMC4164123 DOI: 10.1155/2014/278096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Medial temporal lobe atrophy assessment via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed in recent criteria as an in vivo diagnostic biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, practical application of these criteria in a clinical setting will require automated MRI analysis techniques. To this end, we wished to validate our automated, high-dimensional morphometry technique to the hypothetical prediction of future clinical status from baseline data in a cohort of subjects in a large, multicentric setting, compared to currently known clinical status for these subjects. Materials and Methods. The study group consisted of 214 controls, 371 mild cognitive impairment (147 having progressed to probable AD and 224 stable), and 181 probable AD from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, with data acquired on 58 different 1.5 T scanners. We measured the sensitivity and specificity of our technique in a hierarchical fashion, first testing the effect of intensity standardization, then between different volumes of interest, and finally its generalizability for a large, multicentric cohort. Results. We obtained 73.2% prediction accuracy with 79.5% sensitivity for the prediction of MCI progression to clinically probable AD. The positive predictive value was 81.6% for MCI progressing on average within 1.5 (0.3 s.d.) year. Conclusion. With high accuracy, the technique's ability to identify discriminant medial temporal lobe atrophy has been demonstrated in a large, multicentric environment. It is suitable as an aid for clinical diagnostic of AD.
Collapse
|
41
|
Delphi definition of the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 11:126-38. [PMID: 25130658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2013] [Revised: 12/12/2013] [Accepted: 02/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to have international experts converge on a harmonized definition of whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures, to define standard operating procedures for magnetic resonance (MR)-based manual hippocampal segmentation. METHODS The panel received a questionnaire regarding whole hippocampus boundaries and segmentation procedures. Quantitative information was supplied to allow evidence-based answers. A recursive and anonymous Delphi procedure was used to achieve convergence. Significance of agreement among panelists was assessed by exact probability on Fisher's and binomial tests. RESULTS Agreement was significant on the inclusion of alveus/fimbria (P = .021), whole hippocampal tail (P = .013), medial border of the body according to visible morphology (P = .0006), and on this combined set of features (P = .001). This definition captures 100% of hippocampal tissue, 100% of Alzheimer's disease-related atrophy, and demonstrated good reliability on preliminary intrarater (0.98) and inter-rater (0.94) estimates. DISCUSSION Consensus was achieved among international experts with respect to hippocampal segmentation using MR resulting in a harmonized segmentation protocol.
Collapse
|
42
|
Merlo Pich E, Jeromin A, Frisoni GB, Hill D, Lockhart A, Schmidt ME, Turner MR, Mondello S, Potter WZ. Imaging as a biomarker in drug discovery for Alzheimer's disease: is MRI a suitable technology? Alzheimers Res Ther 2014; 6:51. [PMID: 25484927 PMCID: PMC4255417 DOI: 10.1186/alzrt276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
This review provides perspectives on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a neuroimaging approach in the development of novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease. These considerations were generated in a roundtable at a recent Wellcome Trust meeting that included experts from academia and industry. It was agreed that MRI, either structural or functional, could be used as a diagnostic, for assessing worsening of disease status, for monitoring vascular pathology, and for stratifying clinical trial populations. It was agreed also that MRI implementation is in its infancy, requiring more evidence of association with the disease states, test-retest data, better standardization across multiple clinical sites, and application in multimodal approaches which include other imaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography, electroencephalography, and magnetoencephalography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Merlo Pich
- Clinical Imaging, Neuroscience DTA pRED, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Grenzacherstrasse 124 CH-4070, Basel, CH, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Jeromin
- Atlantic Biomarkers, LLC, 316 NW 28th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging, and Telemedicine, via Pilastroni 4, Brescia 25125, Italy
| | - Derek Hill
- Medical Imaging Science, UCL, London, UK
- IXICO Ltd, Floor 4, Griffin Court, 15 Long Lane, London EC1A 9PN, UK
| | - Andrew Lockhart
- GlaxoSmithKline, Neurodegeneration DPU R&D China, Neurosciences TA Unit, Clinical Unit Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2GG, UK
| | - Mark E Schmidt
- Experimental Medicine, Neuroscience Therapeutic Area, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, B-2340, Beerse 2340, Belgium
| | - Martin R Turner
- Oxford University Nuffield, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Stefania Mondello
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - William Z Potter
- National Institute of Mental Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, BG NSC RM 7209, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Automated voxel-by-voxel tissue classification for hippocampal segmentation: methods and validation. Phys Med 2014; 30:878-87. [PMID: 25018049 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2014] [Revised: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 06/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The hippocampus is an important structural biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has a primary role in the pathogenesis of other neurological and psychiatric diseases. This study presents a fully automated pattern recognition system for an accurate and reproducible segmentation of the hippocampus in structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The method was validated on a mixed cohort of 56 T1-weighted structural brain images, and consists of three processing levels: (a) Linear registration: all brain images were registered to a standard template and an automated method was applied to capture the global shape of the hippocampus. (b) Feature extraction: all voxels included in the previously selected volume were characterized by 315 features computed from local information. (c) Voxel classification: a Random Forest algorithm was used to classify voxels as belonging or not belonging to the hippocampus. In order to improve the classification performance, an adaptive learning method based on the use of the Pearson's correlation coefficient was developed. The segmentation results (Dice similarity index = 0.81 ± 0.03) compare well with other state-of-the art approaches. A validation study was conducted on an independent dataset of 100 T1-weighted brain images, achieving significantly better results than those obtained with FreeSurfer.
Collapse
|
44
|
Menéndez-González M, López-Muñiz A, Vega JA, Salas-Pacheco JM, Arias-Carrión O. MTA index: a simple 2D-method for assessing atrophy of the medial temporal lobe using clinically available neuroimaging. Front Aging Neurosci 2014; 6:23. [PMID: 24715861 PMCID: PMC3970022 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 02/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Despite a strong correlation to severity of AD pathology, the measurement of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is not being widely used in daily clinical practice as a criterion in the diagnosis of prodromal and probable AD. This is mainly because the methods available to date are sophisticated and difficult to implement for routine use in most hospitals—volumetric methods—or lack objectivity—visual rating scales. In this pilot study we aim to describe a new, simple and objective method for measuring the rate of MTA in relation to the global atrophy using clinically available neuroimaging and describe the rationale behind this method. Description: This method consists of calculating a ratio with the area of 3 regions traced manually on one single coronal MRI slide at the level of the interpeduncular fossa: (1) the medial temporal lobe (MTL) region (A); (2) the parenchima within the medial temporal region, that includes the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus—the fimbria taenia and plexus choroideus are excluded—(B); and (3) the body of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle (C). Therefrom we can compute the ratio “Medial Temporal Atrophy index” at both sides as follows: MTAi = (A − B)× 10/C. Conclusions: The MTAi is a simple 2D-method for measuring the relative extent of atrophy in the MTL in relation to the global brain atrophy. This method can be useful for a more accurate diagnosis of AD in routine clinical practice. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of MTAi in the diagnosis of early AD, in tracking the progression of AD and in the differential diagnosis of AD with other dementias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Menéndez-González
- Unidad de Neurología, Hospital Álvarez-Buylla Mieres, Spain ; Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain ; Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - Alfonso López-Muñiz
- Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain ; Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - José A Vega
- Departamento de Morfología y Biología Celular, Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo, Spain
| | - José M Salas-Pacheco
- Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango Durango, México
| | - Oscar Arias-Carrión
- Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González/UNAM México DF, Mexico ; Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento y Sueño (TMS), Hospital General Ajusco Medio México DF, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zarpalas D, Gkontra P, Daras P, Maglaveras N. Accurate and Fully Automatic Hippocampus Segmentation Using Subject-Specific 3D Optimal Local Maps Into a Hybrid Active Contour Model. IEEE JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL ENGINEERING IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE-JTEHM 2014; 2:1800116. [PMID: 27170866 PMCID: PMC4852536 DOI: 10.1109/jtehm.2014.2297953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Revised: 11/04/2013] [Accepted: 12/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Assessing the structural integrity of the hippocampus (HC) is an essential step toward prevention, diagnosis, and follow-up of various brain disorders due to the implication of the structural changes of the HC in those disorders. In this respect, the development of automatic segmentation methods that can accurately, reliably, and reproducibly segment the HC has attracted considerable attention over the past decades. This paper presents an innovative 3-D fully automatic method to be used on top of the multiatlas concept for the HC segmentation. The method is based on a subject-specific set of 3-D optimal local maps (OLMs) that locally control the influence of each energy term of a hybrid active contour model (ACM). The complete set of the OLMs for a set of training images is defined simultaneously via an optimization scheme. At the same time, the optimal ACM parameters are also calculated. Therefore, heuristic parameter fine-tuning is not required. Training OLMs are subsequently combined, by applying an extended multiatlas concept, to produce the OLMs that are anatomically more suitable to the test image. The proposed algorithm was tested on three different and publicly available data sets. Its accuracy was compared with that of state-of-the-art methods demonstrating the efficacy and robustness of the proposed method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Zarpalas
- Information Technologies InstituteCentre for Research and Technology HellasThessalonikiGreece57001; Aristotle University of ThessalonikiLaboratory of Medical Informatics, the Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece54124
| | - Polyxeni Gkontra
- Information Technologies Institute Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Thessaloniki Greece 57001
| | - Petros Daras
- Information Technologies Institute Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Thessaloniki Greece 57001
| | - Nicos Maglaveras
- Aristotle University of ThessalonikiLaboratory of Medical Informatics, the Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece54124; Institute of Applied BiosciencesCentre for Research and Technology HellasThessalonikiGreece57001
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bozzali M, Serra L. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Imaging. NEURODEGENER DIS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6380-0_10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
47
|
Boccardi M, Bocchetta M, Apostolova LG, Preboske G, Robitaille N, Pasqualetti P, Collins LD, Duchesne S, Jack CR, Frisoni GB. Establishing magnetic resonance images orientation for the EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation protocol. J Neuroimaging 2013; 24:509-14. [PMID: 24279479 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2013] [Revised: 06/07/2013] [Accepted: 06/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE An effort to define and validate a Harmonized Protocol for standard hippocampal segmentation is being carried out. We wished to estimate the effect of magnetic resonance image (MRI) spatial orientation on manual hippocampal segmentations to define optimal standard orientation of MRIs for hippocampal volumetry. METHODS Three expert tracers segmented twice the hippocampi of 10 ADNI subjects on MRI slices oriented perpendicular to the anterior-posterior commissure (AC-PC) line and the long hippocampal axes plane, following internationally harmonized landmarks. We computed intra and interrater reliability figures for total volumes and similarity coefficients. RESULTS Total volume reliability was similar for both orientations. Similarity coefficients were significantly higher for the AC-PC orientation (exact P = 0.002). DISCUSSION These data show that AC-PC orientation is slightly more reliable for manual segmentations, possibly due to better visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid spaces separating hippocampal head and amygdala. A Delphi panel of experts has used these data to decide on the optimal orientation for a Harmonized Protocol for hippocampal segmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hampel H, Lista S, Teipel SJ, Garaci F, Nisticò R, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Bertram L, Duyckaerts C, Bakardjian H, Drzezga A, Colliot O, Epelbaum S, Broich K, Lehéricy S, Brice A, Khachaturian ZS, Aisen PS, Dubois B. Perspective on future role of biological markers in clinical therapy trials of Alzheimer's disease: a long-range point of view beyond 2020. Biochem Pharmacol 2013; 88:426-49. [PMID: 24275164 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2013] [Revised: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying various paths toward the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has begun to provide new insight for interventions to modify disease progression. The evolving knowledge gained from multidisciplinary basic research has begun to identify new concepts for treatments and distinct classes of therapeutic targets; as well as putative disease-modifying compounds that are now being tested in clinical trials. There is a mounting consensus that such disease modifying compounds and/or interventions are more likely to be effectively administered as early as possible in the cascade of pathogenic processes preceding and underlying the clinical expression of AD. The budding sentiment is that "treatments" need to be applied before various molecular mechanisms converge into an irreversible pathway leading to morphological, metabolic and functional alterations that characterize the pathophysiology of AD. In light of this, biological indicators of pathophysiological mechanisms are desired to chart and detect AD throughout the asymptomatic early molecular stages into the prodromal and early dementia phase. A major conceptual development in the clinical AD research field was the recent proposal of new diagnostic criteria, which specifically incorporate the use of biomarkers as defining criteria for preclinical stages of AD. This paradigm shift in AD definition, conceptualization, operationalization, detection and diagnosis represents novel fundamental opportunities for the modification of interventional trial designs. This perspective summarizes not only present knowledge regarding biological markers but also unresolved questions on the status of surrogate indicators for detection of the disease in asymptomatic people and diagnosis of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Hampel
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Pavillon François Lhermitte, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
| | - Simone Lista
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
| | - Stefan J Teipel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Rostock, Germany
| | - Francesco Garaci
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology, and Radiotherapy, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy; IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome and San Raffaele Cassino, Cassino, Italy
| | - Robert Nisticò
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy; IRCSS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; University College London Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Lars Bertram
- Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charles Duyckaerts
- Laboratoire de Neuropathologie Raymond-Escourolle, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Hovagim Bakardjian
- IM2A - Institute of Memory and Alzheimer's Disease, Paris, France; IHU-A-ICM - Paris Institute of Translational Neurosciences Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Olivier Colliot
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, UMR-S975 Paris, France; Inserm, U975, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France; ICM - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France; INRIA, Aramis Team, Centre de Recherche Paris-Rocquencourt, France
| | - Stéphane Epelbaum
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Département de Neurologie, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - Karl Broich
- Federal Institute of Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany
| | - Stéphane Lehéricy
- IHU-A-ICM - Paris Institute of Translational Neurosciences Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, UMR-S975 Paris, France; Inserm, U975, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France; ICM - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France
| | - Alexis Brice
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, UMR-S975 Paris, France; Inserm, U975, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7225, Paris, France; ICM - Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Département de Génétique et Cytogénétique, Paris, France
| | | | - Paul S Aisen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Département de Neurologie, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Winston GP, Cardoso MJ, Williams EJ, Burdett JL, Bartlett PA, Espak M, Behr C, Duncan JS, Ourselin S. Automated hippocampal segmentation in patients with epilepsy: available free online. Epilepsia 2013; 54:2166-73. [PMID: 24151901 PMCID: PMC3995014 DOI: 10.1111/epi.12408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hippocampal sclerosis, a common cause of refractory focal epilepsy, requires hippocampal volumetry for accurate diagnosis and surgical planning. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and subject to interrater/intrarater variability. Automated algorithms perform poorly in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. We validate and make freely available online a novel automated method. METHODS Manual hippocampal segmentation was performed on 876, 3T MRI scans and 202, 1.5T scans. A template database of 400 high-quality manual segmentations was used to perform automated segmentation of all scans with a multi-atlas-based segmentation propagation method adapted to perform label fusion based on local similarity to ensure accurate segmentation regardless of pathology. Agreement between manual and automated segmentations was assessed by degree of overlap (Dice coefficient) and comparison of hippocampal volumes. KEY FINDINGS The automated segmentation algorithm provided robust delineation of the hippocampi on 3T scans with no more variability than that seen between different human raters (Dice coefficients: interrater 0.832, manual vs. automated 0.847). In addition, the algorithm provided excellent results with the 1.5T scans (Dice coefficient 0.827), and automated segmentation remained accurate even in small sclerotic hippocampi. There was a strong correlation between manual and automated hippocampal volumes (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.929 on the left and 0.941 on the right in 3T scans). SIGNIFICANCE We demonstrate reliable identification of hippocampal atrophy in patients with hippocampal sclerosis, which is crucial for clinical management of epilepsy, particularly if surgical treatment is being contemplated. We provide a free online Web-based service to enable hippocampal volumetry to be available globally, with consequent greatly improved evaluation of those with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin P Winston
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
|