1
|
Zhou Y, Berridge C, Hooyman N, Mroz TM, Sadak T, Choi SW, Phelan EA. Care Partners' Engagement in Preventing Falls for Community-Dwelling Older People With Dementia. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnae064. [PMID: 38832587 PMCID: PMC11247405 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Little is known about how to prevent falls in community-dwelling older people with dementia. Although their care partners adopt various behaviors to prevent their falls, it is unclear if these behaviors reduce falls for those with different levels of fall risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Linking the 2015 and 2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study and the 2015 National Study of Caregiving (NSOC), we identified 390 community-dwelling older people with dementia with 607 care partners. We selected 26 NSOC items representing fall risk management (FRM) behaviors. We examined the prevalence and dimensionality of these behaviors and investigated associations between care partners' behaviors in 2015 (T1) and older people's falls in 2016 (T2) stratified by their fall incidence at T1, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS Five domains of FRM were identified: mobility and safety assistance, medical service coordination, health management, social service coordination, and accommodation. For those who did not fall at T1, mobility and safety assistance and social service coordination were each associated with an increased risk of falling at T2 (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.83, p = .019, aIRR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.01-1.55, p = .043). For those who had fallen at T1, social service coordination was associated with a decreased risk of falling at T2 (aIRR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73-0.94, p = .004). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS The different impacts of dementia care partners' FRM behaviors emphasize the need to address specific behaviors when involving care partners in preventing falls for older people with dementia at varying levels of fall risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanjin Zhou
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Clara Berridge
- School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nancy Hooyman
- School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tracy M Mroz
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Tatiana Sadak
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Seung W Choi
- College of Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou Y, Thakkar N, Phelan EA, Ishado E, Li CY, Borson S, Sadak T. How do care partners overcome the challenges associated with falls of community-dwelling older people with dementia? A qualitative study. DEMENTIA 2024:14713012241267137. [PMID: 39033360 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241267137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Previous studies have found that falls among community-dwelling older people with dementia negatively impact the health and well-being of their relative/friend care partners. Limited studies have explored the challenges care partners experience because of older people's falls (including fall incidents and fall risks). We sought to investigate care partners' experiences of these challenges and how care partners responded. METHODS We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of 48 dementia care partner interviews (age range: 33-86, mean: 61, 70.8% women; 58.3% adult children; 29.2% spouse; 62.5% completed college; 25% people of color), conducted after a health crisis of older people with dementia from three local university-affiliated hospitals in the United States. FINDINGS Care partners reported that falls in older people with dementia can intensify overall care demands and lead to self-sacrificing behaviors, dissatisfaction with healthcare providers, conflicts with care recipients, and intense emotions. Care partners described several adaptations to mitigate these impacts, including practicing acceptance, approaching falls as an opportunity for learning, facilitating collaborations within formal/informal care networks, collaborating with older people with dementia to balance autonomy and safety, and modifying the physical environment. DISCUSSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Falls among older people with dementia are a significant stressor and an important activation stimulus for their care partners. Our findings suggest that care partners are "second clients" and "competent collaborators." As they provide important insights about fall prevention, care partners should be engaged to co-design new multi-level interventions to facilitate collaborations among care networks, older people with dementia, and service providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanjin Zhou
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - Nirali Thakkar
- Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, USA
| | - Emily Ishado
- School of Nursing, University of Washington, USA
| | - Chih-Ying Li
- Department of Occupational Therapy, and School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
- Department of Population Health and Health Disparities, University of Texas Medical Branch, USA
| | - Soo Borson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qin Q, Temkin-Greener H, Veazie P, Makineni R, Cai S. Disparities in COVID-19-Related Mortality Among Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Variations Over Time. J Appl Gerontol 2024:7334648241264908. [PMID: 39030708 DOI: 10.1177/07334648241264908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) had a high risk of COVID-19-related mortality. Racial and ethnic minorities were disproportionally impacted by the pandemic. The variations in disparities, including racial and ethnic disparities and disparities across communities, in COVID-19-related mortality across the different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic among the ADRD population are unknown. This observational study estimated linear probability models for community-dwelling older adults with ADRD who were diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021 using multiple national data (e.g., Medicare data), accounting for individual and community characteristics. Disparities in 30-day mortality were compared between 2020 and 2021. The socioeconomic disparity in COVID-19-related mortality across communities became insignificant during the later stage of the pandemic, ethnic differences in COVID-19-related mortality decreased but persisted, and racial disparity remained largely unchanged. The study provides insights into interventions to mitigate lingering disparities in health outcomes among the vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuyuan Qin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Helena Temkin-Greener
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Peter Veazie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Rajesh Makineni
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Shubing Cai
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Conor R, Russell AM, Pack A, Oladejo D, Filec S, Rogalski E, Morhardt D, Lindquist LA, Wolf MS. Managing medications among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Patient-caregiver perspectives. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024. [PMID: 39007450 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With changing cognitive abilities, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia face challenges in successfully managing multidrug regimens. We sought to understand how individuals with MCI or dementia and their family caregivers manage multidrug regimens and better understand patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication management responsibilities. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews among patient-caregiver dyads. Eligibility included: patients with a diagnosis of MCI, mild or moderate dementia, managing ≥3 chronic conditions, ≥5 prescription medications, who also had a family caregiver ≥18 years old. Semi-structured interview guides, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, ascertained roles and responsibilities for medication management and patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities. RESULTS We interviewed 32 patient-caregiver dyads. Older adults and caregivers favored older adult autonomy in medication management, and individuals with MCI and mild dementia largely managed their medications independently using multiple strategies (e.g., establishing daily routines, using pillboxes). Among individuals with moderate dementia, caregivers assumed all medication-related responsibilities except when living separately. In those scenarios, caregivers set up organizers and made reminder calls, but did not observe family members taking medications. Patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities frequently occurred after caregivers observed older adults making errors with medications. As caregivers sought to assume greater responsibilities with family members' medicines, they faced multiple barriers. Most barriers were dyadic; they affected both the older adult and the caregiver and/or the relationship. Some barriers were specific to caregivers; these included caregivers' competing responsibilities or inaccurate perceptions of dementia, while other barriers were related to the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS To ease medication management transitions, balance must be sought between preservation of older adult autonomy and early family caregiver involvement. Clinicians should work to initiate conversations with family caregivers and individuals living with MCI or dementia about transitioning medication responsibilities as memory loss progresses, simplify regimens, and deprescribe, as appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel O'Conor
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrea M Russell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Allison Pack
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dianne Oladejo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah Filec
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emily Rogalski
- Healthy Aging & Alzheimer's Research Care (HAARC) Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Darby Morhardt
- Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Lee A Lindquist
- Division of Geriatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael S Wolf
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Center for Applied Health Research on Aging, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Green AR, Quiles R, Daddato AE, Merrey J, Weffald L, Gleason K, Xue QL, Swarthout M, Feeser S, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Blinka MD, Libby AM, Boxer RS. Pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing for people living with dementia and polypharmacy in primary care: A pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1973-1984. [PMID: 38488757 PMCID: PMC11226386 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with dementia (PLWD) have complex medication regimens, exposing them to increased risk of harm. Pragmatic deprescribing strategies that align with patient-care partner goals are needed. METHODS A pilot study of a pharmacist-led intervention to optimize medications with patient-care partner priorities, ran May 2021-2022 at two health systems. PLWD with ≥7 medications in primary care and a care partner were enrolled. After an introductory mailing, dyads were randomized to a pharmacist telehealth intervention immediately (intervention) or delayed by 3 months (control). Feasibility outcomes were enrollment, intervention completion, pharmacist time, and primary care provider (PCP) acceptance of recommendations. To refine pragmatic data collection protocols, we assessed the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI; primary efficacy outcome) and the Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassles Scale (FCMAHS). RESULTS 69 dyads enrolled; 27 of 34 (79%) randomized to intervention and 28 of 35 (80%) randomized to control completed the intervention. Most visits (93%) took more than 20 min and required multiple follow-up interactions (62%). PCPs responded to 82% of the pharmacists' first messages and agreed with 98% of recommendations. At 3 months, 22 (81%) patients in the intervention and 14 (50%) in the control had ≥1 medication discontinued; 21 (78%) and 12 (43%), respectively, had ≥1 new medication added. The mean number of medications decreased by 0.6 (3.4) in the intervention and 0.2 (1.7) in the control, reflecting a non-clinically meaningful 1.0 (±12.4) point reduction in the MRCI among intervention patients and a 1.2 (±12.9) point increase among control. FCMAHS scores decreased by 3.3 (±18.8) points in the intervention and 2.5 (±14.4) points in the control. CONCLUSION Though complex, pharmacist-led telehealth deprescribing is feasible and may reduce medication burden in PLWD. To align with patient-care partner goals, pharmacists recommended deprescribing and prescribing. If scalable, such interventions may optimize goal-concordant care for PLWD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rosalphie Quiles
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrea E Daddato
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Linda Weffald
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Kathy Gleason
- Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Qian-Li Xue
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Scott Feeser
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marcela D Blinka
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anne M Libby
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rebecca S Boxer
- Davis Department of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jacobson M, Ferido P, Zissimopoulos J. Health care utilization before and after a dementia diagnosis in Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:1856-1866. [PMID: 37668467 PMCID: PMC10912367 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Half of all Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA). Many studies document lower care utilization and mortality in MA than traditional Medicare (TM), but evidence for persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) is limited. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2015-2018 Medicare claims and encounter data for community-dwelling beneficiaries aged 65 and over in TM and MA with an incident ADRD diagnosis in 2017. We compared monthly hospitalization rates and outpatient visits 12 months before and after diagnosis and mortality 1 year from diagnosis. Models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities. Sensitivity analyses addressed residual confounding using a control group with incident arthritis/glaucoma or excluding MA Special Needs Plans, and potential underreporting by restricting to MA plans with high data completeness. RESULTS Among 454,508 beneficiaries diagnosed with ADRD in 2017, 250,837 (55%) were in TM and 203,671 (45%) in MA. Four to 12 months before diagnosis, monthly hospitalizations and outpatient visits were similar in TM and MA. In the diagnosis month, 36.5% of beneficiaries in TM had a hospitalization compared with 25.4% in MA, an adjusted difference of 10.7 percentage points [95% CI: 10.3, 11.1]. Beneficiaries in TM averaged 10.5 outpatient visits in the diagnosis month compared with 8.4 in MA, an adjusted difference of 1.59 visits [95% CI: 1.47-1.70]. Utilization differences narrowed but remained higher in TM for many months. One-year mortality was 27.9% in TM and 22.2% in MA; an adjusted odds ratio of 1.152 [95% CI: 1.135-1.169] for those in TM compared with MA. Controlling for hospitalization in the diagnosis month substantially reduced the mortality difference. CONCLUSION Hospitalization rates and outpatient visits increased more after an ADRD diagnosis in TM than MA. One-year post-diagnosis, mortality was not higher in MA than TM but comparisons of quality of life and caregiver burden are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireille Jacobson
- Andrus School of Gerontology & Schaeffer Center, University of Southern California
| | - Patricia Ferido
- Price School of Public Policy & Schaeffer Center, University of Southern California
| | - Julie Zissimopoulos
- Price School of Public Policy & Schaeffer Center, University of Southern California
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:3708-3821. [PMID: 38689398 PMCID: PMC11095490 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care and the ramifications of AD for family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses the larger health care system for older adults with cognitive issues, focusing on the role of caregivers and non-physician health care professionals. An estimated 6.9 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060, barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent or cure AD. Official AD death certificates recorded 119,399 deaths from AD in 2021. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States. Official counts for more recent years are still being compiled. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2021, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 140%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18.4 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2023. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $346.6 billion in 2023. Its costs, however, extend to unpaid caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes. Members of the paid health care and broader community-based workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. However, the United States faces growing shortages across different segments of the dementia care workforce due to a combination of factors, including the absolute increase in the number of people living with dementia. Therefore, targeted programs and care delivery models will be needed to attract, better train and effectively deploy health care and community-based workers to provide dementia care. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2024 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $360 billion. The Special Report investigates how caregivers of older adults with cognitive issues interact with the health care system and examines the role non-physician health care professionals play in facilitating clinical care and access to community-based services and supports. It includes surveys of caregivers and health care workers, focusing on their experiences, challenges, awareness and perceptions of dementia care navigation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Selkoe DJ. The advent of Alzheimer treatments will change the trajectory of human aging. NATURE AGING 2024; 4:453-463. [PMID: 38641654 DOI: 10.1038/s43587-024-00611-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Slowing neurodegenerative disorders of late life has lagged behind progress on other chronic diseases. But advances in two areas, biochemical pathology and human genetics, have now identified early pathogenic events, enabling molecular hypotheses and disease-modifying treatments. A salient example is the discovery that antibodies to amyloid ß-protein, long debated as a causative factor in Alzheimer's disease (AD), clear amyloid plaques, decrease levels of abnormal tau proteins and slow cognitive decline. Approval of amyloid antibodies as the first disease-modifying treatments means a gradually rising fraction of the world's estimated 60 million people with symptomatic disease may decline less or even stabilize. Society is entering an era in which the unchecked devastation of AD is no longer inevitable. This Perspective considers the impact of slowing AD and other neurodegenerative disorders on the trajectory of aging, allowing people to survive into late life with less functional decline. The implications of this moment for medicine and society are profound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis J Selkoe
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ryvicker M, Barrón Y, Song J, Zolnoori M, Shah S, Burgdorf JG, Noble JM, Topaz M. Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Home Health Care Patients at Risk for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. J Appl Gerontol 2024:7334648241242321. [PMID: 38556756 DOI: 10.1177/07334648241242321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to: (1) validate a natural language processing (NLP) system developed for the home health care setting to identify signs and symptoms of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) documented in clinicians' free-text notes; (2) determine whether signs and symptoms detected via NLP help to identify patients at risk of a new ADRD diagnosis within four years after admission. This study applied NLP to a longitudinal dataset including medical record and Medicare claims data for 56,652 home health care patients and Cox proportional hazard models to the subset of 24,874 patients admitted without an ADRD diagnosis. Selected ADRD signs and symptoms were associated with increased risk of a new ADRD diagnosis during follow-up, including: motor issues; hoarding/cluttering; uncooperative behavior; delusions or hallucinations; mention of ADRD disease names; and caregiver stress. NLP can help to identify patients in need of ADRD-related evaluation and support services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Ryvicker
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yolanda Barrón
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jiyoun Song
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Shivani Shah
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia G Burgdorf
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M Noble
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maxim Topaz
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, USA
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bozzay ML, Joyce HE, Jiang L, De Vito AN, Emrani S, Browne J, Bayer TA, Quinn MJ, Primack JM, Kelso CM, Wu WC, Rudolph JL, McGeary JE, Kunicki ZJ. Time to Dementia Diagnosis Among Veterans with Comorbid Insomnia and Depressive Episodes. J Alzheimers Dis 2024; 100:899-909. [PMID: 38995783 DOI: 10.3233/jad-240080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Older adults with heart failure are at elevated risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). Research suggests that insomnia and depressive episodes contribute somewhat dissociable impacts on risk for AD/ADRD in this patient population, although the temporal ordering of effects is unknown. Objective This study examined time to dementia diagnosis among patients with comorbid insomnia and/or depressive episodes in an epidemiological sample. Methods Secondary data analyses were conducted using a cohort study of 203,819 Veterans with a primary admission diagnosis of heart failure in 129 VA Medical Centers. Results Patients with diagnoses of both insomnia and depressive episodes had the shortest time to a dementia diagnosis at both 1-year (Hazard ratio = 1.43, 95% CI [1.36, 1.51]) and 3-year follow-up time points (Hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% CI [1.34, 1.47]) versus patients with one or neither comorbidity. Conclusions Individuals with both comorbidities had the shortest time to dementia onset. Screening for these comorbidities may help to identify patients at elevated risk of dementia who could benefit from enhanced monitoring or early intervention strategies for more rapid detection and management of dementia symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie L Bozzay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Lan Jiang
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alyssa N De Vito
- Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sheina Emrani
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Julia Browne
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas A Bayer
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - McKenzie J Quinn
- VA RR& D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer M Primack
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Catherine M Kelso
- VA RR& D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Veterans Health Administration, Office of Patient Care Services, Geriatrics and Extended Care, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Wen-Chih Wu
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - James L Rudolph
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John E McGeary
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Zachary J Kunicki
- VA Center of Innovation in Long Term Services, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu W, Holkeboer KJ, Kolawole TO, Carbone L, Mahmoudi E. Natural language processing to identify social determinants of health in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia from electronic health records. Health Serv Res 2023; 58:1292-1302. [PMID: 37534741 PMCID: PMC10622277 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm that identifies social determinants of health (SDoH), including housing, transportation, food, and medication insecurities, social isolation, abuse, neglect, or exploitation, and financial difficulties for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) from unstructured electronic health records (EHRs). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING We leveraged 1000 medical notes randomly selected from 7401 emergency department and inpatient social worker notes generated between 2015 and 2019 for 231 unique patients diagnosed with ADRD at Michigan Medicine. STUDY DESIGN We developed a rule-based NLP algorithm for the identification of seven domains of SDoH noted above. We also compared the rule-based algorithm with deep learning and regularized logistic regression approaches. These models were compared using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All notes were split into 700 notes for training NLP algorithms, and 300 notes for validation. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Social worker notes used in this study were extracted from the Michigan Medicine EHR database. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Of the 700 notes for training, F1 and AUC for the rule-based algorithm were at least 0.94 and 0.95, respectively, for all SDoH categories. Of the 300 notes for validation, F1 and AUC were at least 0.80 and 0.97, respectively, for all SDoH except housing and medication insecurities. The deep learning and regularized logistic regression algorithms had unsatisfactory performance. CONCLUSIONS The rule-based algorithm can accurately extract SDoH information in all seven domains of SDoH except housing and medication insecurities. Findings from the algorithm can be used by clinicians and social workers to proactively address social needs of patients with ADRD and other vulnerable patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Wu
- Departments of Population Health and Medicine, Grossman School of MedicineNew York UniversityNew York CityNew YorkUSA
- Center for Data ScienceNew York UniversityNew York CityNew YorkUSA
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Kaes J. Holkeboer
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- College of Literature, Science, and the ArtsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Temidun O. Kolawole
- Krieger School of Arts and SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Lorrie Carbone
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Elham Mahmoudi
- Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and InnovationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Karmarkar AM, Roy I, Lane T, Shaibi S, Baldwin JA, Kumar A. Home health services for minorities in urban and rural areas with Alzheimer's and related dementia. Home Health Care Serv Q 2023; 42:265-281. [PMID: 37128943 DOI: 10.1080/01621424.2023.2206368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Timely access and continuum of care in older adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia (ADRD) is critical. This is a retrospective study on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with ADRD diagnosis discharged to home with home health care following an episode of acute hospitalization. Our sample included 262,525 patients. White patients in rural areas have significantly higher odds of delay (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). Black patients in urban areas (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.12-1.19) and Hispanic patients in urban areas also were more likely to have a delay (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11). Black and Hispanic patients residing in urban areas had a higher likelihood of delay in home healthcare initiation following hospitalization compared to Whites residing in urban areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol M Karmarkar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Research Department, Sheltering Arms Institute, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Indrakshi Roy
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Taylor Lane
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Stefany Shaibi
- Physical Therapy Department, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Julie A Baldwin
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Amit Kumar
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
James HO, Trivedi AN, Meyers DJ. Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Disenrollment Among Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2023; 4:e233080. [PMID: 37713210 PMCID: PMC10504614 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Large enrollment growth has been observed in the Medicare Advantage program, but less is known about enrollment patterns among persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Objective To evaluate patterns in Medicare Advantage enrollment and disenrollment among beneficiaries with or without ADRD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used 6 national data sources between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018. Analyses were performed between June 2021 and August 2022. The cohort comprised US Medicare beneficiaries with acute or postacute care utilization between 2013 and 2018. Exposure ADRD diagnosis from an acute or postacute care encounter Medicare data source. Main Outcomes and Measures Enrollment in Medicare Advantage, disenrollment from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare, and contract exit (leaving a Medicare Advantage contract for traditional Medicare or a different Medicare Advantage contract). Results The 32 796 872 Medicare beneficiaries in the cohort had a mean (SD) age of 74.0 (12.5) years and included 18 228 513 females (55.6%). Enrollment in Medicare Advantage among beneficiaries with ADRD increased from 24.7% (95% CI, 24.7%-24.8%) in 2013 to 33.0% (95% CI, 32.9%-33.1%) in 2018, an absolute increase of 8.3 percentage points and a 33.4% relative increase after adjusting for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and utilization and including county fixed effects. Among beneficiaries without ADRD, enrollment in Medicare Advantage increased by 8.2 percentage points from 27.6% (95% CI, 27.6%-27.6%) in 2013 to 35.8% (95% CI, 35.8%-35.8%) in 2018, a 29.7% relative increase over the study period. Beneficiaries with ADRD were 1.4 times as likely to disenroll from their Medicare Advantage contract to traditional Medicare (4.4% vs 3.2% in 2017-2018; P < .001) in adjusted analyses. Regardless of ADRD status, beneficiaries had similar rates of switching to a new Medicare Advantage contract. Differences in contract exit rates were associated with higher rates of disenrollment from Medicare Advantage to traditional Medicare among beneficiaries with ADRD vs those without ADRD (16.3% [95% CI, 16.2%-16.3%] vs 15.1% [95% CI, 15.1%-15.1%]). Beneficiaries with ADRD and dual eligibility for Medicaid enrollment had higher rates of contract exit than those without dual eligibility (19.7% [95% CI, 19.6%-19.7%] vs 14.9% [95% CI, 14.8%-14.9%]), and these differences were even greater than those among beneficiaries without ADRD and with and without dual-eligibility status, respectively (18.3% [95% CI, 18.2%-18.3%] vs 13.8% [95% CI, 13.7%-13.8%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of the Medicare population with acute and postacute care use, beneficiaries with ADRD had increasing enrollment in the Medicare Advantage program, proportional to the growth in overall enrollment, but their disenrollment from Medicare Advantage in the following year remained higher compared with beneficiaries without ADRD. The findings highlight the need to understand the factors associated with higher disenrollment rates and determine whether such rates reflect access or quality challenges for beneficiaries with ADRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah O. James
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Amal N. Trivedi
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David J. Meyers
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Karmarkar AM, Roy I, Rivera-Hernandez M, Shaibi S, Baldwin JA, Lane T, Kean J, Kumar A. Examining the role of race and quality of home health agencies in delayed initiation of home health services for individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:4037-4045. [PMID: 37204409 PMCID: PMC10730234 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We examined differences in the timeliness of the initiation of home health care by race and the quality of home health agencies (HHA) among patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS Medicare claims and home health assessment data were used for the study cohort: individuals aged ≥65 years with ADRD, and discharged from the hospital. Home health latency was defined as patients receiving home health care after 2 days following hospital discharge. RESULTS Of 251,887 patients with ADRD, 57% received home health within 2 days following hospital discharge. Black patients were significantly more likely to experience home health latency (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-1.19) compared to White patients. Home health latency was significantly higher for Black patients in low-rating HHA (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22-1.37) compared to White patients in high-rating HHA. DISCUSSION Black patients are more likely to experience a delay in home health care initiation than White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol M Karmarkar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- Research Department, Sheltering Arms Institute, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Indrakshi Roy
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Maricruz Rivera-Hernandez
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Stefany Shaibi
- Physical Therapy Department, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Julie A Baldwin
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Taylor Lane
- Center for Health Equity Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
| | - Jacob Kean
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Amit Kumar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Okoye SM, Fabius CD, Reider L, Wolff JL. Predictors of falls in older adults with and without dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:2888-2897. [PMID: 36633222 PMCID: PMC10336176 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persons living with, versus without, dementia (PLWD) have heightened fall-risk. Little is known about whether fall-risk factors differ by dementia status. METHODS Using the 2015 and 2016 National Health and Aging Trends Study, we prospectively identified fall-risk factors over a 12-month period among community-living older adults ≥65 years with and without dementia (n = 5581). RESULTS Fall rates were higher among PLWD compared to persons without dementia (45.5% vs. 30.9%). In a multivariable model including sociodemographic, health, function, and environmental characteristics as predictors, vision impairment (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.12-4.40), and living with a spouse versus alone (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.09-5.43) predicted falls among PLWD, but not among persons without dementia. History of previous falls predicted subsequent falls regardless of dementia status (OR: 6.20, 95% CI: 3.81-10.09, and OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.50-3.40, respectively). DISCUSSION Incorporating appropriate fall-risk factors could inform effective falls screening and prevention strategies for PLWD. HIGHLIGHTS 46% of persons with dementia had ≥1 falls versus 31% of those without dementia in 2016. Vision impairment and living with a spouse predicted falls in persons with dementia. Study results support tailored fall prevention strategies for persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chanee D. Fabius
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa Reider
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer L. Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Piovesan EC, Freitas BZD, Lemanski FCB, Carazzo CA. Alzheimer's disease: an epidemiological analysis over the number of hospitalizations and deaths in Brazil. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2023; 81:577-584. [PMID: 37379869 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by impaired cognitive function. It results in high morbidity, including a large number of hospitalizations, and mortality, generating high costs to health systems. OBJECTIVE The present epidemiological analysis evaluated the number of hospitalizations and deaths by AD as the main diagnosis in Brazil between 2010 and 2020. This endeavor should contribute to a better understanding of the disease and its implications. METHODS The present analytical, observational, longitudinal, and retrospective study used data extracted from the Department of Informatics of the Brazilian Unified Health System (DATASUS, in the Portuguese acronym). The variables include the number of hospitalizations, the total cost spent, the average cost per hospitalization, the average length of hospital stay, the number of deaths during hospitalization, the mortality rate per hospitalization, sex, age group, region, and race. RESULTS From 2010 to 2020, there were 188,811 deaths and 13,882 hospitalizations for AD, with a total expenditure of BRL 25,953,019.40 in hospitalizations. The average length of hospital stay was 25 days. Over the considered period, mortality, the number of hospitalizations, and the total cost increased while the average length of stay decreased. CONCLUSION From 2010 to 2020, AD represented a large portion of hospital admissions, generating a significant cost to the health system and a large number of deaths. These data are important to undertake joint efforts to prevent hospitalizations of these patients in order to minimize impacts on the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Charles André Carazzo
- Universidade de Passo Fundo, Faculdade de Medicina, Passo Fundo RS, Brazil
- Instituto de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wurm R, Parvizi T, Goeschl S, Untersteiner H, Silvaieh S, Stamm T, Cetin H, Reichardt B, Stögmann E. Analysis of co-medication in people with dementia. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:823-830. [PMID: 36632031 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Dementia prevalence is increasing, with numbers projected to double by 2050. Risk factors for its development include age and cardiovascular comorbidities, which are found more often in patients with dementia and should be treated properly to improve outcomes. In this case-control study, we analysed a large population-based prescription database to explore the patterns of co-medication in patients with dementia. METHODS Prescription claims covering >99% of the Austrian population from 2005 to 2016 were obtained. Patients who were treated with an approved antidementia drug (ADD) were included and co-medication exposure was recorded. A group of people not taking ADDs was matched for age, sex and follow-up duration as a control. RESULTS We included 70,799 patients on ADDs who were exposed to a mean of 5.3 co-medications while control patients were treated with a total of 5.2 co-medications (p < 0.001). We found that patients on ADDs received less somatic (4.1 vs. 4.5) but more psychiatric medication (1.1 vs. 0.6; p < 0.001 for both). Patients on ADDs were less likely to be treated for pain, cardiovascular conditions or hyperlipidemia. More than 50% of patients on ADDs were treated with antidepressants or antipsychotics. Greater number of co-medications was associated with markers of more intensive antidementia treatment. CONCLUSION Patients on ADDs received more medications overall but were less frequently treated for somatic conditions known to be more prevalent in this group. Together, our data suggest that management of comorbidities in dementia could be improved to optimize outcome and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Wurm
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Tandis Parvizi
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Stella Goeschl
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Sara Silvaieh
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Hakan Cetin
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease, including prevalence and incidence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report examines the patient journey from awareness of cognitive changes to potential treatment with drugs that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's. An estimated 6.7 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, and Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States. In 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death, Alzheimer's was the seventh-leading cause of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 18 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2022. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $339.5 billion in 2022. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the paid health care workforce are involved in diagnosing, treating and caring for people with dementia. In recent years, however, a shortage of such workers has developed in the United States. This shortage - brought about, in part, by COVID-19 - has occurred at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Therefore, programs will be needed to attract workers and better train health care teams. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2023 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $345 billion. The Special Report examines whether there will be sufficient numbers of physician specialists to provide Alzheimer's care and treatment now that two drugs are available that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sheehan OC, Gleason KS, Bayliss EA, Green AR, Drace ML, Norton J, Reeve E, Shetterly SM, Weffald LA, Sawyer JK, Maciejewski ML, Kraus C, Maiyani M, Wolff J, Boyd CM. Intervention design in cognitively impaired populations-Lessons learned from the OPTIMIZE deprescribing pragmatic trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:774-784. [PMID: 36508725 PMCID: PMC11163949 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cognitive impairment and multiple chronic conditions, increasing risks of adverse drug events, hospitalization, and death. Deprescribing, the process of reducing or stopping potentially inappropriate medications, may improve outcomes. The OPTIMIZE pragmatic trial examined whether educating and activating patients, family members and clinicians about deprescribing reduces number of chronic medications and potentially inappropriate medications. Acceptability and challenges of intervention delivery in cognitively impaired older adults are not well understood. METHODS We explored mechanisms of intervention implementation through post hoc qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholder groups of 15 patients, 7 caregivers, and 28 clinicians. We assessed the context in which the intervention was delivered, its implementation, and mechanisms of impact. RESULTS Acceptance of the intervention was affected by contextual factors including cognition, prior knowledge of deprescribing, communication, and time constraints. All stakeholder groups endorsed the acceptability, importance, and delivery of the intervention. Positive mechanisms of impact included patients scheduling specific appointments to discuss deprescribing and providers being prompted to consider deprescribing. Recollection of intervention materials was inconsistent but most likely shortly after intervention delivery. Short visit times remained the largest provider barrier to deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Our work identifies key learnings in intervention delivery that can guide future scaling of deprescribing interventions in this population. We highlight the critical roles of timing and repetition in intervention delivery to cognitively impaired populations and the barrier posed by short consultation times. The acceptability of the intervention to patients and family members highlights the potential to incorporate deprescribing education into routine clinical practice and expand proven interventions to other vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla C Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathy S Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melanie L Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jonathan Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Australia
| | - Susan M Shetterly
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Linda A Weffald
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer K Sawyer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Courtney Kraus
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer Wolff
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Prevalence of Comorbid Depression and Insomnia Among Veterans Hospitalized for Heart Failure with Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2023; 31:428-437. [PMID: 36863973 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine prevalence of Alzheimer Disease and related dementias (ADRD) and patient characteristics as a function of comorbid insomnia and/or depression among heart failure (HF) patients discharged from hospitals. DESIGN Retrospective cohort descriptive epidemiology study. SETTING VA Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS N = 373,897 Veterans hospitalized with heart failure from October 1, 2011 until September 30, 2020. MEASUREMENTS We examined VA and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) coding in the year prior to admission using published ICD-9/10 codes for dementia, insomnia, and depression. The primary outcome was the prevalence of ADRD and the secondary outcomes were 30-day and 365-day mortality. RESULTS The cohort were predominantly older adults (mean age = 72 years, SD = 11), male (97%), and White (73%). Dementia prevalence in participants without insomnia or depression was 12%. In those with both insomnia and depression, dementia prevalence was 34%. For insomnia alone and depression alone, dementia prevalence was 21% and 24%, respectively. Mortality followed a similar pattern with highest 30-day and 365-day mortality higher in those with both insomnia and depression. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that persons with both insomnia and depression are at an increased risk of ADRD and mortality compared to persons with one or neither condition. Screening for both insomnia and depression, especially in patients with other ADRD risk factors, could lead to earlier identification of ADRD. Understanding comorbid conditions which may represent earlier signs of ADRD may be critical in the identification of ADRD risk.
Collapse
|
21
|
Hovsepian VE, Sadak T, Schlak AE, Liu J, Poghosyan L. The Association between Primary Care Practices' Structural Capabilities and Hospitalizations among Persons Living with Dementia. J Appl Gerontol 2023:7334648231155444. [PMID: 36738162 DOI: 10.1177/07334648231155444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Persons living with dementia (PLWD) are more likely to be hospitalized than individuals without dementia. Little is known about key features (i.e., structural capabilities) in primary care practices where PLWD receive care. This study assessed the relationship between structural capabilities (i.e., care coordination, community integration, and reminder systems) and hospitalizations among PLWD. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 5001 PLWD in 192 practices and used three datasets: nurse practitioner surveys, Medicare claims, and Minimum Data Set. Using generalized estimating equations, we evaluated the association between structural capabilities and hospitalizations. Results: PLWD who received care from practices with care coordination were less likely to have hospitalizations (OR = 0.62, p < .05). No statistically significant associations were observed between community integration and reminder systems and hospitalizations. Conclusion: Primary care practices need to tailor structural capabilities to address the needs of PLWD to reduce hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaneh E Hovsepian
- School of Nursing, 16142University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tatiana Sadak
- 7284University of Washington, WA School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jianfang Liu
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coley RY, Smith JJ, Karliner L, Idu AE, Lee SJ, Fuller S, Lam R, Barnes DE, Dublin S. External Validation of the eRADAR Risk Score for Detecting Undiagnosed Dementia in Two Real-World Healthcare Systems. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:351-360. [PMID: 35906516 PMCID: PMC9904522 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07736-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fifty percent of people living with dementia are undiagnosed. The electronic health record (EHR) Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) was developed to identify older adults at risk of having undiagnosed dementia using routinely collected clinical data. OBJECTIVE To externally validate eRADAR in two real-world healthcare systems, including examining performance over time and by race/ethnicity. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: 129,315 members of Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), an integrated health system providing insurance coverage and medical care, and 13,444 primary care patients at University of California San Francisco Health (UCSF), an academic medical system, aged 65 years or older without prior EHR documentation of dementia diagnosis or medication. MAIN MEASURES Performance of eRADAR scores, calculated annually from EHR data (including vital signs, diagnoses, medications, and utilization in the prior 2 years), for predicting EHR documentation of incident dementia diagnosis within 12 months. KEY RESULTS A total of 7631 dementia diagnoses were observed at KPWA (11.1 per 1000 person-years) and 216 at UCSF (4.6 per 1000 person-years). The area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.85) at KPWA and 0.79 (0.76-0.82) at UCSF. Using the 90th percentile as the cut point for identifying high-risk patients, sensitivity was 54% (53-56%) at KPWA and 44% (38-51%) at UCSF. Performance was similar over time, including across the transition from International Classification of Diseases, version 9 (ICD-9) to ICD-10 codes, and across racial/ethnic groups (though small samples limited precision in some groups). CONCLUSIONS eRADAR showed strong external validity for detecting undiagnosed dementia in two health systems with different patient populations and differential availability of external healthcare data for risk calculations. In this study, eRADAR demonstrated generalizability from a research sample to real-world clinical populations, transportability across health systems, robustness to temporal changes in healthcare, and similar performance across larger racial/ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Yates Coley
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Julia J Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Leah Karliner
- Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Abisola E Idu
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sei J Lee
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sharon Fuller
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rosemary Lam
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Deborah E Barnes
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sascha Dublin
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kiadaliri A, Lohmander LS, Dahlberg LE, Englund M. Incipient dementia and avoidable hospital admission in persons with osteoarthritis. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2023; 5:100341. [PMID: 36798737 PMCID: PMC9926213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the associations between incipient dementia (ID) and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) among people with osteoarthritis (OA) of the peripheral joints. Methods Among individuals aged 51-99 years residing in Skåne, Sweden, in 2009, we identified those with a doctor-diagnosed OA and no dementia during 1998-2009 (n = 57,733). Treating ID as a time-varying exposure, we followed people from January 1, 2010 or their 60th birthday (whichever occurred last) until hospitalization for ACSCs, death, 100th birthday, relocation outside Skåne, or December 31, 2019 (whichever occurred first). Using age as time scale, we applied flexible parametric survival models, adjusted for confounders, to assess the associations between ID and hospitalization for ACSCs. Results There were 58 and 33 hospitalizations for ACSCs per 1000 person-years among OA people with and without ID, respectively. The association between ID and hospitalization for any ACSCs was age-dependent with higher risk in ages<86 years and lower risks in older ages. Between ages 60 and 100 years, persons with ID had, on average, 5.8 (95% CI 0.9, 10.7), 1.6 (-2.6, 5.9) and 3.1 (2.3, 4.0) fewer hospital-free years for any, chronic and acute ACSCs, respectively, compared with persons without ID. Conclusions Among persons with OA, while ID was associated with increased risks of hospitalization for ACSCs in younger ages, it was associated with decreased risk in oldest ages. These results suggest the need for improvement in quality of ambulatory care including the continuity of care for people with OA having dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Kiadaliri
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,Centre for Economic Demography, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,Corresponding author. Skåne University Hospital, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Remissgatan 4, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
| | - L Stefan Lohmander
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Leif E. Dahlberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin Englund
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ruiz-Adame M, Ibañez A, Mollayeva T, Trépel D. Association Between Neuroticism and Dementia on Healthcare Use: A Multi-Level Analysis Across 27 Countries from The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 95:181-193. [PMID: 37482998 PMCID: PMC11194739 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with high levels of neuroticism are greater users of health services. Similarly, people with dementia have a higher risk of hospitalization and medical visits. As a result, dementia and a high level of neuroticism increase healthcare use (HCU). However, how these joint factors impact the HCU at the population level is unknown. Similarly, no previous study has assessed the degree of generalization of such impacts, considering relevant variables including age, gender, socioeconomic, and country-level variability. OBJECTIVE To examine how neuroticism and dementia interact in the HCU. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed on a sample of 76,561 people (2.4% with dementia) from 27 European countries and Israel. Data were analyzed with six steps multilevel non-binomial regression modeling, a statistical method that accounts for correlation in the data taken within the same participant. RESULTS Both dementia (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR): 1.537; α= 0.000) and neuroticism (IRR: 1.122; α= 0.000) increased the HCU. The effect of having dementia and the level of neuroticism increased the HCU: around 53.67% for the case of having dementia, and 12.05% for each increment in the level of neuroticism. Conversely, high levels of neuroticism in dementia decreased HCU (IRR: 0.962; α= 0.073). These results remained robust when controlling for age, gender, socioeconomic, and country-levels effects. CONCLUSION Contrary to previous findings, neuroticism trait in people with dementia decreases the HCU across sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and country heterogeneity. These results, which take into account this personality trait among people with dementia, are relevant for the planning of health and social services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Ruiz-Adame
- Applied Economic Department, University of Granada, Campus of Melilla, Melilla, Spain
- Trépel Laboratory, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Agustín Ibañez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute, Universidad Adolfo Ibanez, Santiago, Chile
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center & CONICET, Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Predictive Brain Health Modelling, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tatyana Mollayeva
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dominic Trépel
- Trépel Laboratory, Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhu Y, Olchanski N, Cohen JT, Freund KM, Faul JD, Fillit HM, Neumann PJ, Lin PJ. Life-Sustaining Treatments Among Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Dementia at the End of Life. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 96:1183-1193. [PMID: 37955089 PMCID: PMC10777481 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults with dementia including Alzheimer's disease may have difficulty communicating their treatment preferences and thus may receive intensive end-of-life (EOL) care that confers limited benefits. OBJECTIVE This study compared the use of life-sustaining interventions during the last 90 days of life among Medicare beneficiaries with and without dementia. METHODS This cohort study utilized population-based national survey data from the 2000-2016 Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims. Our sample included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older deceased between 2000 and 2016. The main outcome was receipt of any life-sustaining interventions during the last 90 days of life, including mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, tube feeding, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We used logistic regression, stratified by nursing home use, to examine dementia status (no dementia, non-advanced dementia, advanced dementia) and patient characteristics associated with receiving those interventions. RESULTS Community dwellers with dementia were more likely than those without dementia to receive life-sustaining treatments in their last 90 days of life (advanced dementia: OR = 1.83 [1.42-2.35]; non-advanced dementia: OR = 1.16 [1.01-1.32]). Advance care planning was associated with lower odds of receiving life-sustaining treatments in the community (OR = 0.84 [0.74-0.96]) and in nursing homes (OR = 0.68 [0.53-0.86]). More beneficiaries with advanced dementia received interventions discordant with their EOL treatment preferences. CONCLUSIONS Community dwellers with advanced dementia were more likely to receive life-sustaining treatments at the end of life and such treatments may be discordant with their EOL wishes. Enhancing advance care planning and patient-physician communication may improve EOL care quality for persons with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Zhu
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalia Olchanski
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joshua T. Cohen
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M. Freund
- Center for Health Equity Research, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica D. Faul
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Peter J. Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Short-term associations between ambient air pollution and emergency department visits for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2022; 7:e237. [PMID: 36777523 PMCID: PMC9915954 DOI: 10.1097/ee9.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Dementia is a seriously disabling illness with substantial economic and social burdens. Alzheimer's disease and its related dementias (AD/ADRD) constitute about two-thirds of dementias. AD/ADRD patients have a high prevalence of comorbid conditions that are known to be exacerbated by exposure to ambient air pollution. Existing studies mostly focused on the long-term association between air pollution and AD/ADRD morbidity, while very few have investigated short-term associations. This study aims to estimate short-term associations between AD/ADRD emergency department (ED) visits and three common air pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and warm-season ozone. Methods For the period 2005 to 2015, we analyzed over 7.5 million AD/ADRD ED visits in five US states (California, Missouri, North Carolina, New Jersey, and New York) using a time-stratified case-crossover design with conditional logistic regression. Daily estimated PM2.5, NO2, and warm-season ozone concentrations at 1 km spatial resolution were aggregated to the ZIP code level as exposure. Results The most consistent positive association was found for NO2. Across five states, a 17.1 ppb increase in NO2 concentration over a 4-day period was associated with a 0.61% (95% confidence interval = 0.27%, 0.95%) increase in AD/ADRD ED visits. For PM2.5, a positive association with AD/ADRD ED visits was found only in New York (0.64%, 95% confidence interval = 0.26%, 1.01% per 6.3 µg/m3). Associations with warm-season ozone levels were null. Conclusions Our results suggest AD/ADRD patients are vulnerable to short-term health effects of ambient air pollution and strategies to lower exposure may reduce morbidity.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jutkowitz E, Halladay C, Tsai J, Hooshyar D, Quach L, O’Toole T, Rudolph JL. Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias among veterans experiencing housing insecurity. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:1306-1313. [PMID: 34757668 PMCID: PMC10257219 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Housing insecure veterans are aging, but the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) in the population is unknown. METHODS We calculated the prevalence of AD/ADRD diagnoses in 2018 among veterans that experienced homelessness, were at-risk for homelessness, or were stably housed. We determined acute care (emergency department, hospitalizations, psychiatric hospitalizations), and any long-term care (nursing home, and community-based) use by housing status among veterans with an AD/ADRD diagnosis. RESULTS The overall prevalence of AD/ADRD diagnoses for homeless, at-risk, and stably housed veterans was 3.66%, 13.48%, and 3.04%, respectively. Housing insecure veterans with AD/ADRD used more acute care, and were more likely to have a nursing home admission compared to stably housed veterans. At risk, but not homeless veterans, were more likely to use US Department of Veterans Affairs-paid home and community-based care than stably housed veterans. DISCUSSION The prevalence of AD/ADRD diagnoses is greater among housing insecure veterans than stably housed veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Jutkowitz
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher Halladay
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jack Tsai
- VA National Center on Homelessness among Veterans, Tampa, Florida, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dina Hooshyar
- VA National Center on Homelessness among Veterans, Tampa, Florida, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lien Quach
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Department of Gerontology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas O’Toole
- Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - James L. Rudolph
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bayliss EA, Shetterly SM, Drace ML, Norton JD, Maiyani M, Gleason KS, Sawyer JK, Weffald LA, Green AR, Reeve E, Maciejewski ML, Sheehan OC, Wolff JL, Kraus C, Boyd CM. Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians: The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:534-542. [PMID: 35343999 PMCID: PMC8961395 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Individuals with dementia or mild cognitive impairment frequently have multiple chronic conditions (defined as ≥2 chronic medical conditions) and take multiple medications, increasing their risk for adverse outcomes. Deprescribing (reducing or stopping medications for which potential harms outweigh potential benefits) may decrease their risk of adverse outcomes. Objective To examine the effectiveness of increasing patient and clinician awareness about the potential to deprescribe unnecessary or risky medications among patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic, patient-centered, 12-month cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020, at 18 primary care clinics in a not-for-profit integrated health care delivery system. The study included 3012 adults aged 65 years or older with dementia or mild cognitive impairment who had 1 or more additional chronic medical conditions and were taking 5 or more long-term medications. Interventions An educational brochure and a questionnaire on attitudes toward deprescribing were mailed to patients prior to a primary care visit, clinicians were notified about the mailing, and deprescribing tip sheets were distributed to clinicians at monthly clinic meetings. Main Outcomes and Measures The number of prescribed long-term medications and the percentage of individuals prescribed 1 or more potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results This study comprised 1433 individuals (806 women [56.2%]; mean [SD] age, 80.1 [7.2] years) in 9 intervention clinics and 1579 individuals (874 women [55.4%]; mean [SD] age, 79.9 [7.5] years) in 9 control clinics who met the eligibility criteria. At baseline, both groups were prescribed a similar mean (SD) number of long-term medications (7.0 [2.1] in the intervention group and 7.0 [2.2] in the control group), and a similar proportion of individuals in both groups were taking 1 or more PIMs (437 of 1433 individuals [30.5%] in the intervention group and 467 of 1579 individuals [29.6%] in the control group). At 6 months, the adjusted mean number of long-term medications was similar in the intervention and control groups (6.4 [95% CI, 6.3-6.5] vs 6.5 [95% CI, 6.4-6.6]; P = .14). The estimated percentages of patients in the intervention and control groups taking 1 or more PIMs were similar (17.8% [95% CI, 15.4%-20.5%] vs 20.9% [95% CI, 18.4%-23.6%]; P = .08). In preplanned subgroup analyses, adjusted differences between the intervention and control groups were -0.16 (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.01) for individuals prescribed 7 or more long-term medications at baseline (n = 1434) and -0.03 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.13) for those prescribed 5 to 6 medications (n = 1578) (P = .28 for interaction; P = .19 for subgroup interaction for PIMs). Conclusions and Relevance This large-scale educational deprescribing intervention for older adults with cognitive impairment taking 5 or more long-term medications and their primary care clinicians demonstrated small effect sizes and did not significantly reduce the number of long-term medications and PIMs. Such interventions should target older adults taking relatively more medications. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03984396.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | | | - Melanie L. Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Jonathan D. Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Kathy S. Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | - Linda A. Weffald
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Ariel R. Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew L. Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Orla C. Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Courtney Kraus
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gungabissoon U, Perera G, Galwey NW, Stewart R. Potentially avoidable causes of hospitalisation in people with dementia: contemporaneous associations by stage of dementia in a South London clinical cohort. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055447. [PMID: 35383067 PMCID: PMC8984034 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the frequency of all-cause and ambulatory care sensitive condition (ACSCs)-related hospitalisations among individuals with dementia. In addition, to investigate differences by stage of dementia based on recorded cognitive function. SETTING Data from a large London dementia care clinical case register, linked to a national hospitalisation database. PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged ≥65 years with a confirmed dementia diagnosis with recorded cognitive function. OUTCOME MEASURES Acute general hospital admissions were evaluated within 6 months of a randomly selected cognitive function score in patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia. To evaluate associations between ACSC-related hospital admissions (overall and individual ACSCs) and stage of dementia, an ordinal regression was performed, modelling stage of dementia as the dependant variable (to facilitate efficient model selection, with no implication concerning the direction of causality). RESULTS Of the 5294 people with dementia, 2993 (56.5%) had at least one hospitalisation during a 12-month period of evaluation, and 1192 (22.5%) had an ACSC-related admission. Proportions with an all-cause or ACSC-related hospitalisation were greater in the groups with more advanced dementia (all-cause 53.9%, 57.1% and 60.9%, p 0.002; ACSC-related 19.5%, 24.0% and 25.3%, p<0.0001 in the mild, moderate and severe groups, respectively). An ACSC-related admission was associated with 1.3-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5) increased odds of more severe dementia after adjusting for demographic factors. Concerning admissions for individual ACSCs, the most common ACSC was urinary tract infection /pyelonephritis (9.8% of hospitalised patients) followed by pneumonia (7.1%); in an adjusted model, these were each associated with 1.4-fold increased odds of more severe dementia (95% CI 1.2 to 1.7 and 1.1 to 1.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Potentially avoidable hospitalisations were common in people with dementia, particularly in those with greater cognitive impairment. Our results call for greater attention to the extent of cognitive status impairment, and not just dementia diagnosis, when evaluating measures to reduce the risk of potentially avoidable hospitalisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usha Gungabissoon
- Epidemiology (Value Evidence and Outcomes), GSK, Brentford, London, UK
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Gayan Perera
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | | | - Robert Stewart
- Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
- Mental Health of Older Adults, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on family caregivers, the dementia workforce and society. The Special Report discusses consumers' and primary care physicians' perspectives on awareness, diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), including MCI due to Alzheimer's disease. An estimated 6.5 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available. Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 and the seventh-leading cause of death in 2020 and 2021, when COVID-19 entered the ranks of the top ten causes of death. Alzheimer's remains the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 16 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2021. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $271.6 billion in 2021. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Members of the dementia care workforce have also been affected by COVID-19. As essential care workers, some have opted to change jobs to protect their own health and the health of their families. However, this occurs at a time when more members of the dementia care workforce are needed. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are almost three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 22 times as great. Total payments in 2022 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $321 billion. A recent survey commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association revealed several barriers to consumers' understanding of MCI. The survey showed low awareness of MCI among Americans, a reluctance among Americans to see their doctor after noticing MCI symptoms, and persistent challenges for primary care physicians in diagnosing MCI. Survey results indicate the need to improve MCI awareness and diagnosis, especially in underserved communities, and to encourage greater participation in MCI-related clinical trials.
Collapse
|
31
|
Disparities in diabetes-related avoidable hospitalization among diabetes patients with disability using a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1794. [PMID: 35110602 PMCID: PMC8810810 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05557-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes is an ambulatory care sensitive condition that quality of care can prevent complications development and hospitalization needs. However, diabetes patients with disability face greater challenges with receiving quality diabetes care than those without disabilities. This study examined diabetes-related avoidable hospitalizations (DRAH) focusing on the association with disability. We used nationally representative health insurance cohort data from 2002 to 2013. The study population is people who were newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. We measured the cumulated number of DRAH using the Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs). The variables of interest were disability severity and type. We performed a recurrent events analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression model. Among 49,410 type 2 diabetes patients, 12,231 (24.8%) experienced DRAHs at least once during the follow-up period. Among the total population, 5924 (12.0%) diabetes patients were registered as disabled. The findings report that disability severity was significantly associated with higher risks for DRAH, where severely disabled diabetes patients showed the highest hazard ratio of 2.24 (95% CI 1.80-2.79). Among three DRAH indicators, severely disabled diabetes patients showed increased risks for long-term (AHR 2.21, 95% CI 1.89-2.60) and uncontrolled (AHR 2.28, 95% CI 1.80-2.88) DRAH. In addition, intellectual (AHR 5.52, 95% CI 3.78-8.05) and mental (AHR 3.97, 95% CI 2.29-6.89) disability showed higher risks than other types of disability. In conclusion, diabetes patients with disability are at higher risk for DRAH compared to those without disabilities, and those with intellectual and mental disabilities were more likely to experience DRAH compared to those with physical or other types of disability. These findings call for action to find the more appropriate interventions to improve targeted diabetes primary care for patients with disability. Further research is needed to better understand determinants of increasing risks of DRAH.
Collapse
|
32
|
Amjad H, Samus QM, Huang J, Gundavarpu S, Bynum JPW, Wolff J, Roth DL. Acute care utilization risk among older adults living undiagnosed or unaware of dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:470-480. [PMID: 34773706 PMCID: PMC8821204 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits. Many persons with dementia are undiagnosed or unaware of their diagnosis, however. Our objective was to determine whether undiagnosed dementia or unawareness affects risk of hospitalization or ED visits. METHODS Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 3537 community-living adults age ≥65 enrolled in the 2011-2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study with linked fee-for-service Medicare claims. Using self or proxy reported diagnosis, proxy dementia screening questionnaire, cognitive testing, and Medicare claims diagnosis, participants were classified as having (1) no dementia or dementia, for which they were classified as (2) undiagnosed, (3) diagnosed but unaware, or (4) diagnosed and aware. Proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause and potentially preventable hospitalization and ED visit risk by time-varying dementia status, adjusting for older adult characteristics. RESULTS Most participants (n = 2879) had no dementia at baseline. Among participants with dementia at baseline (n = 658), 187 were undiagnosed, 300 diagnosed but unaware, and 171 diagnosed and aware. In multivariable adjusted proportional hazards models, persons with undiagnosed dementia had lower risk of hospitalization and ED visits compared to persons diagnosed and aware (all-cause hospitalization aHR 0.59 [0.44, 0.79] and ED visit aHR 0.63 [0.47, 0.85]) and similar risks of these outcomes compared to persons without dementia. Individuals diagnosed but unaware had greater risk compared to those without dementia: aHR 1.37 (1.18, 1.59) for all-cause hospitalization and 1.48 (1.28, 1.71) for ED visits; they experienced risk comparable to individuals diagnosed and aware. CONCLUSION Older adults with undiagnosed dementia are not at increased risk of acute care utilization after accounting for differences in other characteristics. Individuals unaware of diagnosed dementia demonstrate risk similar to individuals aware of the diagnosis. Increasing diagnosis alone may not affect acute care utilization. The role of awareness warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halima Amjad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Baltimore, MD,Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Quincy M. Samus
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jin Huang
- Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Julie PW Bynum
- University of Michigan Medical School, Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jennifer Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD
| | - David L. Roth
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Baltimore, MD,Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ryvicker M, Barrón Y, Shah S, Moore SM, Noble JM, Bowles KH, Merrill J. Clinical and Demographic Profiles of Home Care Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Implications for Information Transfer Across Care Settings. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:534-544. [PMID: 33749369 PMCID: PMC8450301 DOI: 10.1177/0733464821999225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Home health care (HHC) clinicians serving individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) do not always have information about the person's ADRD diagnosis, which may be used to improve the HHC plan of care. This retrospective cohort study examined characteristics of 56,652 HHC patients with varied documentation of ADRD diagnoses. Data included clinical assessments and Medicare claims for a 6-month look-back period and 4-year follow-up. Nearly half the sample had an ADRD diagnosis observed in the claims either prior to or following the HHC admission. Among those with a prior diagnosis, 63% did not have it documented on the HHC assessment; the diagnosis may not have been known to the HHC team or incorporated into the care plan. Patients with ADRD had heightened risk for adverse outcomes (e.g., urinary tract infection and aspiration pneumonia). Interoperable data across health care settings should include ADRD-specific elements about diagnoses, symptoms, and risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Ryvicker
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York
- Vital Statistics Consulting
| | - Yolanda Barrón
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York
| | - Shivani Shah
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York
| | - Stanley M. Moore
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York
| | | | - Kathryn H. Bowles
- Center for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bandini JI, Schulson LB, Ahluwalia SC, Harrison J, Chen EK, Lai JS, Edelen M. Patient, Family Caregiver, and Provider Perceptions on Self-Assessment Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: Findings From a Qualitative Study. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2022; 8:23337214221131403. [PMID: 36275410 PMCID: PMC9583195 DOI: 10.1177/23337214221131403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient, family, and provider perspectives on routine cognitive screening of older adults in primary care using a novel self-assessment tool for detection of early cognitive impairment (CI). We conducted four virtual focus groups with patients aged 65 and older with no CI (n = 18) and family caregivers of patients with CI (n = 5) and interviews with primary care providers (n = 11). Patient and family caregiver participants felt that early detection of CI was important in primary care and may facilitate planning for the future including finances, living arrangements, and advance care planning. Providers reported that they do not use a standardized tool to routinely screen patients for CI yet endorsed the use of a self-assessment CI screening tool. These results suggest that routine screening of older adults using a brief, self-assessment screening tool for CI in primary care may be acceptable to patients, family caregivers, and providers. The findings from this study will inform the development of a brief self-assessment CI screening tool for use in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucy B. Schulson
- RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine,
MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jin-Shei Lai
- Northwestern University Feinberg School
of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maria Edelen
- RAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston,
MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hovsepian V, Bilazarian A, Schlak AE, Sadak T, Poghosyan L. The Impact of Ambulatory Dementia Care Models on Hospitalization of Persons Living With Dementia: A Systematic Review. Res Aging 2021; 44:560-572. [PMID: 34957873 PMCID: PMC9429825 DOI: 10.1177/01640275211053239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review presents an overview of the existing dementia care models in various ambulatory care settings under three categories (i.e., home- and community-based care models, partnership between health systems and community-based resources, and consultation models) and their impact on hospitalization among Persons Living with Dementia (PLWD). PRISMA guidelines were applied, and our search resulted in a total of 13 studies focusing on 11 care models. Seven studies reported that utilization of dementia care models was associated with a modest reduction in hospitalization among community-residing PLWD. Only two studies reported statistically significant results. Dementia care models that were utilized in specialty ambulatory care settings such as memory care showed more promising results than traditional primary care. To develop a better understanding of how dementia care models can be improved, future studies should explore how confounders (e.g., stage of dementia) influence hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaneh Hovsepian
- School of Nursing, 15760Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ani Bilazarian
- School of Nursing, 15760Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amelia E Schlak
- School of Nursing, 15760Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tatiana Sadak
- School of Nursing, 16181University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Godard-Sebillotte C, Strumpf E, Sourial N, Rochette L, Pelletier E, Vedel I. Avoidable Hospitalizations in Persons with Dementia: a Population-Wide Descriptive Study (2000-2015). Can Geriatr J 2021; 24:209-221. [PMID: 34484504 PMCID: PMC8390329 DOI: 10.5770/cgj.24.486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether avoidable hospitalizations in community-dwelling persons with dementia have decreased during primary care reforms is unknown. Methods We described the prevalence and trends in avoidable hospitalizations in population-based repeated yearly cohorts of 192,144 community-dwelling persons with incident dementia (Quebec, 2000-2015) in the context of a province-wide primary care reform, using the provincial health administrative database. Results Trends in both types of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Condition (ACSC) hospitalization (general and older population) and 30-day readmission rates remained constant with average rates per 100 person-years: 20.5 (19.9-21.1), 31.7 (31.0-32.4), 20.6 (20.1-21.2), respectively. Rates of delayed hospital discharge (i.e., alternate level of care (ALC) hospitalizations) decreased from 23.8 (21.1-26.9) to 17.9 (16.1-20.1) (relative change -24.6%). Conclusions These figures shed light on the importance of the phenomenon, its lack of improvement for most outcomes over the years, and the need to develop evidence-based policies to prevent avoidable hospitalizations in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin Strumpf
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC.,Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - Nadia Sourial
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - Louis Rochette
- Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, QC.,Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Quebec City, QC
| | - Eric Pelletier
- Department of Economics, McGill University, Montreal, QC.,Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Quebec City, QC
| | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gilmore-Bykovskyi AL, Hovanes M, Mirr J, Block L. Discharge Communication of Dementia-Related Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Care Management Strategies During Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility Transitions. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2021; 34:378-388. [PMID: 32812457 PMCID: PMC7892639 DOI: 10.1177/0891988720944245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Provided the complexity of managing dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), accurate communication about these symptoms at hospital discharge is critical to facilitating safe and effective transitions, particularly transitions from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities (SNF), which are often poorly managed. Skilled nursing facilities providers have cited undercommunication regarding NPS as a major challenge that contributes to poor outcomes including rehospitalization. This multisite retrospective cohort study identified omission rates for NPS and associated management strategies in discharge communication as compared to medical record documentation in the 72 hours preceding discharge among hospitalized patients with dementia. High rates of omission were found across NPS and management strategies: anxiety (94%), agitation/aggression (77%), hallucinations (85%), 1:1 supervision (90%), high fall risk (89%), use of restraints (91%). Omission rate for new or modified antipsychotic medication was 12.9%. Findings underscore the need for additional research on cross-setting communication regarding care needs of patients with dementia-who often cannot communicate these needs on their own-in facilitating high-quality transitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Gilmore-Bykovskyi
- 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Melissa Hovanes
- 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jacquelyn Mirr
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
- Mercy Hospital St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Laura Block
- 5228University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Morita K, Fukahori H, Ogawara H, Iwagami M, Matsui H, Okura T, Itoh S, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Outcomes of a financial incentive scheme for dementia care by dementia specialist teams in acute-care hospitals: A difference-in-differences analysis of a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:1386-1397. [PMID: 33733528 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The quality of care for dementia in acute-care settings has been criticised. In 2016, the Japanese universal health insurance system introduced a financial incentive scheme for dementia care by dementia specialist teams in acute-care hospitals. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this financial incentive scheme on short-term outcomes (in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission). DESIGN AND METHODS Using a Japanese nationwide inpatient database, we identified older adult patients with moderate-to-severe dementia admitted for pneumonia, heart failure, cerebral infarction, urinary tract infection, intracranial injury or hip fracture from April 2014 to March 2018. We selected 180 propensity score-matched pairs of hospitals that adopted (n = 180 of 185) and that did not adopt (n = 180 of 744) the financial incentive scheme. We then conducted a patient-level difference-in-differences analysis. In a sensitivity analysis, we restricted the postintervention group to patients who actually received dementia care. RESULTS There was no association between a hospital's adoption of the incentive scheme and in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.06; p = 0.48) or 30-day readmission (aOR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95-1.14; p = 0.37). Only 29% of patients in hospitals adopting the scheme actually received dementia care. The sensitivity analysis showed that receiving dementia care was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS The financial incentive scheme to enhance dementia care by dementia specialist teams in Japan may not be working effectively, but the results do suggest that individual dementia care was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kojiro Morita
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Fukahori
- Division of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ogawara
- Major in Nursing, Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masao Iwagami
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Okura
- Yamato Homecare Clinic Osaki, Osaki-shi, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Sakiko Itoh
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Care System Development, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Global mortality from dementia: Application of a new method and results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2021; 7:e12200. [PMID: 34337138 PMCID: PMC8315276 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dementia is currently one of the leading causes of mortality globally, and mortality due to dementia will likely increase in the future along with corresponding increases in population growth and population aging. However, large inconsistencies in coding practices in vital registration systems over time and between countries complicate the estimation of global dementia mortality. METHODS We meta-analyzed the excess risk of death in those with dementia and multiplied these estimates by the proportion of dementia deaths occurring in those with severe, end-stage disease to calculate the total number of deaths that could be attributed to dementia. RESULTS We estimated that there were 1.62 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 0.41-4.21) deaths globally due to dementia in 2019. More dementia deaths occurred in women (1.06 million [0.27-2.71]) than men (0.56 million [0.14-1.51]), largely but not entirely due to the higher life expectancy in women (age-standardized female-to-male ratio 1.19 [1.10-1.26]). Due to population aging, there was a large increase in all-age mortality rates from dementia between 1990 and 2019 (100.1% [89.1-117.5]). In 2019, deaths due to dementia ranked seventh globally in all ages and fourth among individuals 70 and older compared to deaths from other diseases estimated in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. DISCUSSION Mortality due to dementia represents a substantial global burden, and is expected to continue to grow into the future as an older, aging population expands globally.
Collapse
|
40
|
Aranda MP, Kremer IN, Hinton L, Zissimopoulos J, Whitmer RA, Hummel CH, Trejo L, Fabius C. Impact of dementia: Health disparities, population trends, care interventions, and economic costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:1774-1783. [PMID: 34245588 PMCID: PMC8608182 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The dementia experience is not a monolithic phenomenon-and while core elements of dementia are considered universal-people living with dementia experience the disorder differently. Understanding the patterning of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in the population with regards to incidence, risk factors, impacts on dementia care, and economic costs associated with ADRD can provide clues to target risk and protective factors for all populations as well as addressing health disparities. METHODS We discuss information presented at the 2020 National Research Summit on Care, Services, and Supports for Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers, Theme 1: Impact of Dementia. In this article, we describe select population trends, care interventions, and economic impacts, health disparities and implications for future research from the perspective of our diverse panel comprised of academic stakeholders, and persons living with dementia, and care partners. RESULTS Dementia incidence is decreasing yet the advances in population health are uneven. Studies examining the educational, geographic and race/ethnic distribution of ADRD have identified clear disparities. Disparities in health and healthcare may be amplified by significant gaps in the evidence base for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. The economic costs for persons living with dementia and the value of family care partners' time are high, and may persist into future generations. CONCLUSIONS Significant research gaps remain. Ensuring that ADRD healthcare services and long-term care services and supports are accessible, affordable, and effective for all segments of our population is essential for health equity. Policy-level interventions are in short supply to redress broad unmet needs and systemic sources of disparities. Whole of society challenges demand research producing whole of society solutions. The urgency, complexity, and scale merit a "whole of government" approach involving collaboration across numerous federal agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian N. Kremer
- LEAD Coalition (Leaders Engaged on Alzheimer’s Disease)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wu X, Fan L, Ke S, He Y, Zhang K, Yang S. Longitudinal Associations of Stroke With Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults in the United States: A Population-Based Study. Front Public Health 2021; 9:637042. [PMID: 34095050 PMCID: PMC8170040 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.637042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal associations of stroke with cognitive impairment in older US adults. Method: The data used in this longitudinal analysis were extracted from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) from 2011 to 2019. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the longitudinal association of stroke with cognitive impairment. The multivariable model was adjusted by demographic, physical, and mental characteristics, and the complex survey design of NHATS was taken into consideration. Results: A total of 7,052 participants with complete data were included. At the baseline, the weighted proportion of cognitive impairment was 19.37% (95% CI, 17.92–20.81%), and the weighted proportion of the history of stroke was 9.81% (95% CI, 8.90–10.72%). In univariate analysis, baseline stroke history was significantly associated with cognitive impairment in the future (hazard ratio, 1.746; 95% CI, 1.461–2.088), and the baseline cognitive impairment was significantly associated with future report of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.436; 95% CI, 1.088–1.896). In multivariable model, stroke was also significantly associated with cognitive impairment (hazard ratio, 1.241; 95% CI, 1.011–1.522); however, the reverse association was not significant (hazard ratio, 1.068; 95% CI, 0.788–1.447). After the data from proxy respondents were excluded, in the sensitive analyses, the results remained unchanged. Conclusion: Older adults in the United States who suffered strokes are more likely to develop cognitive impairment as a result in the future than those who have not had strokes. However, the reverse association did not hold. Furthermore, the study suggests that it is necessary to screen and take early intervention for cognitive impairment in stroke survivors and prevent the incidence of stroke by modifying risk factors in the general population with rapidly growing older US adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tongji Medical College, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Fan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Medical College, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Songqing Ke
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yangting He
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Biostatistician at Causality Clinical Data Technology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China
| | - Shijun Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Tongji Medical College, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Robinson RL, Rentz DM, Andrews JS, Zagar A, Kim Y, Bruemmer V, Schwartz RL, Ye W, Fillit HM. Costs of Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease in the United States: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study (GERAS-US)1. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 75:437-450. [PMID: 32250304 PMCID: PMC7306889 DOI: 10.3233/jad-191212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Costs associated with early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD; mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and mild dementia [MILD]) are understudied. OBJECTIVE To compare costs associated with MCI and MILD due to AD in the United States. METHODS Data included baseline patient/study partner medical history, healthcare resource utilization, and outcome assessments as part of a prospective cohort study. Direct, indirect, and total societal costs were derived by applying standardized unit costs to resources for the 1-month pre-baseline period (USD2017). Costs/month for MCI and MILD cohorts were compared using analysis of variance models. To strengthen the confidence of diagnosis, amyloid-β (Aβ) tests were included and analyses were replicated stratifying within each cohort by amyloid status [+ /-]. RESULTS Patients (N = 1327) with MILD versus MCI had higher total societal costs/month ($4243 versus $2816; p < 0.001). These costs were not significantly different within each severity cohort by amyloid status. The largest fraction of overall costs were informal caregiver costs (45.1%) for the MILD cohort, whereas direct medical patient costs were the largest for the MCI cohort (39.0%). Correspondingly, caregiver time spent on basic activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs, and supervision time was twice as high for MILD versus MCI (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early AD poses a financial burden, and despite higher functioning among those with MCI, caregivers were significantly impacted. The major cost driver was the patient's clinical cognitive-functional status and not amyloid status. Differences were primarily due to rising need for caregiver support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dorene M Rentz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Yongin Kim
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Wenyu Ye
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Howard M Fillit
- Geriatric Medicine, Palliative Care and Neuroscience, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chen J, Benjenk I, Barath D, Anderson AC, Reynolds CF. Disparities in Preventable Hospitalization Among Patients With Alzheimer Diseases. Am J Prev Med 2021; 60:595-604. [PMID: 33832801 PMCID: PMC8068589 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION System-level care coordination strategies can be the most effective to promote continuity of care among people with Alzheimer's disease; however, the evidence is lacking. The objective of this study is to determine whether accountable care organizations are associated with lower rates of potentially preventable hospitalizations for people with Alzheimer's disease and whether hospital accountable care organization affiliation is associated with reduced racial and ethnic disparities in preventable hospitalizations among patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS This study employed a cross-sectional study design and used 2015 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project inpatient claims data from 11 states and the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. Logistic regression and the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method were used. RESULTS African American patients with Alzheimer's disease were less likely to be hospitalized at accountable care organization‒affiliated hospitals than White patients. Among patients with Alzheimer's disease who were hospitalized, hospital accountable care organization affiliation was associated with lower odds of potentially preventable hospitalizations (OR=0.86, p=0.02; OR=0.66, p<0.001 with propensity score matching) after controlling for patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and state indicators. Hospital accountable care organization affiliation explained 3.01% (p<0.01) of the disparity in potentially preventable hospitalizations between White and African American patients but could not explain disparities between White and Latinx patients. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that accountable care organizations may be able to improve care coordination for people with Alzheimer's disease and to reduce disparities between Whites and African Americans. Further research is needed to determine whether this benefit can be attributed to accountable care organization formation or whether providers that participate in accountable care organizations tend to provide higher-quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; Hospital And Public health interdisciPlinarY research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
| | - Ivy Benjenk
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; Hospital And Public health interdisciPlinarY research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Deanna Barath
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; Hospital And Public health interdisciPlinarY research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Andrew C Anderson
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Charles F Reynolds
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zaslavsky O, Yu O, Walker RL, Crane PK, Gray SL, Sadak T, Borson S, Larson EB. Incident Dementia, Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels and Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations in People Age 65 and Older with Diabetes. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 76:2054-2061. [PMID: 33914085 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine whether incident dementia and HbA1c levels are associated with increased rates of potentially preventable hospitalizations (PPH) in persons with diabetes. METHODS 565 adults age 65+ ever treated for diabetes were from ACT study. PPH were from principal discharge diagnoses and included diabetes PPH (dPPH), respiratory PPH (rPPH), urinovolemic PPH (uPPH), cardiovascular, and other PPH. Poisson generalized estimating equations estimated rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between dementia or HbA1c measures and rate of PPH. RESULTS 562 individuals contributed 3602 dementia-free years, and 132 individuals contributed 511 dementia follow-up years. 128 (23%) dementia-free individuals had 210 PPH admissions and a crude rate of 58 per 1000 person-years while 55 (42%) individuals with dementia had 93 PPH admissions, a rate of 182 per 1000 person-years. The adjusted RR (95% CI) comparing rates between dementia and dementia-free groups were 2.27 (1.60, 3.21) for overall PPH; 5.90 (2.70, 12.88) for dPPH; 5.17 (2.49, 10.73) for uPPH, and 2.01 (1.06, 3.83) for rPPH. Compared with HbA1c of 7-8% and adjusted for dementia, the RR (95% CI) for overall PPH was 1.43 (1.00, 2.06) for >8% and 1.18 (0.85, 1.65) for <7% HbA1c. The uPPH RR was also increased, comparing >8% and <7% HbA1c levels. CONCLUSION Incident dementia is associated with higher rates of PPH among people with diabetes, especially PPHs due to diabetes, UTI, and dehydration. Potential evidence suggested that HbA1c levels of >8% vs. lower levels are associated with higher rates of overall, UTI and dehydration-related PPHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Zaslavsky
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Onchee Yu
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Rod L Walker
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA
| | - Paul K Crane
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Shelly L Gray
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Tatiana Sadak
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Soo Borson
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Department, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA.,School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bablok I, Binder H, Stelzer D, Kaier K, Graf E, Wangler J, Jansky M, Löhr M, Schulz M, Kockläuner M, Geschke K, Wuttke-Linnemann A, Fellgiebel A, Farin E. Primary dementia care based on the individual needs of the patient: study protocol of the cluster randomized controlled trial, DemStepCare. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:222. [PMID: 33794789 PMCID: PMC8012747 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02114-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most people with dementia (PwD) are cared for at home, with general practitioners (GPs) playing a key part in the treatment. However, primary dementia care suffers from a number of shortcomings: Often, diagnoses are made too late and therapies by GPs do not follow the guidelines. In cases of acute crises, PwD are too often admitted to hospital with adverse effects on the further course of the disease. The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate a new GP-based, complex dementia care model, DemStepCare. DemStepCare aims to ensure demand-oriented, stepped care for PwD and their caregivers. Methods/design In a cluster randomized controlled trial, the care of PwD receiving a complex intervention, where the GP is supported by a multi-professional team, is compared to (slightly expanded) usual care. GPs are clustered by GP practice, with 120 GP practices participating in total. GP practices are randomized to an intervention or a control group. 800 PwD are to be included per group. Recruitment takes place in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. In addition, a second control group with at least 800 PwD will be formed using aggregated routine data from German health insurance companies. The intervention comprises the training of GPs, case management including repeated risk assessment of the patients’ care situation, the demand-oriented service of an outpatient clinic, an electronic case record, external medication analyses and a link to regional support services. The primary aims of the intervention are to positively influence the quality of life for PwD, to reduce the caregivers’ burden, and to reduce the days spent in hospital. Secondary endpoints address medication adequacy and GPs’ attitudes and sensitivity towards dementia, among others. Discussion The GP-based dementia care model DemStepCare is intended to combine a number of promising interventions to provide a complex, stepped intervention that follows the individual needs of PwD and their caregivers. Its effectiveness and feasibility will be assessed in a formative and a summative evaluation. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, DRKS), DRKS00023560. Registered 13 November 2020 - Retrospectively registered. HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00023560.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Bablok
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominikus Stelzer
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Erika Graf
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julian Wangler
- Center for General and Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Jansky
- Center for General and Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Löhr
- Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe, Hospital Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.,Diakonie University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Michael Schulz
- Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe, Hospital Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.,Diakonie University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Marie Kockläuner
- Department of Pharmacy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Katharina Geschke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Alexandra Wuttke-Linnemann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Fellgiebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Erik Farin
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
This article describes the public health impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including incidence and prevalence, mortality and morbidity, use and costs of care, and the overall impact on caregivers and society. The Special Report discusses the challenges of providing equitable health care for people with dementia in the United States. An estimated 6.2 million Americans age 65 and older are living with Alzheimer's dementia today. This number could grow to 13.8 million by 2060 barring the development of medical breakthroughs to prevent, slow or cure AD. Official death certificates recorded 121,499 deaths from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available, making Alzheimer's the sixth-leading cause of death in the United States and the fifth-leading cause of death among Americans age 65 and older. Between 2000 and 2019, deaths from stroke, heart disease and HIV decreased, whereas reported deaths from AD increased more than 145%. This trajectory of deaths from AD was likely exacerbated in 2020 by the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 11 million family members and other unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 15.3 billion hours of care to people with Alzheimer's or other dementias in 2020. These figures reflect a decline in the number of caregivers compared with a decade earlier, as well as an increase in the amount of care provided by each remaining caregiver. Unpaid dementia caregiving was valued at $256.7 billion in 2020. Its costs, however, extend to family caregivers' increased risk for emotional distress and negative mental and physical health outcomes - costs that have been aggravated by COVID-19. Average per-person Medicare payments for services to beneficiaries age 65 and older with AD or other dementias are more than three times as great as payments for beneficiaries without these conditions, and Medicaid payments are more than 23 times as great. Total payments in 2021 for health care, long-term care and hospice services for people age 65 and older with dementia are estimated to be $355 billion. Despite years of efforts to make health care more equitable in the United States, racial and ethnic disparities remain - both in terms of health disparities, which involve differences in the burden of illness, and health care disparities, which involve differences in the ability to use health care services. Blacks, Hispanics, Asian Americans and Native Americans continue to have a higher burden of illness and lower access to health care compared with Whites. Such disparities, which have become more apparent during COVID-19, extend to dementia care. Surveys commissioned by the Alzheimer's Association recently shed new light on the role of discrimination in dementia care, the varying levels of trust between racial and ethnic groups in medical research, and the differences between groups in their levels of concern about and awareness of Alzheimer's disease. These findings emphasize the need to increase racial and ethnic diversity in both the dementia care workforce and in Alzheimer's clinical trials.
Collapse
|
47
|
Can Continuity of Care Reduce Hospitalization Among Community-dwelling Older Adult Veterans Living With Dementia? Med Care 2020; 58:988-995. [PMID: 32925470 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalization is a difficult experience, especially for patients with dementia. Understanding whether better continuity of care (COC) reduces hospitalizations can indicate interventions that might help curb hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE To estimate the causal impact of COC on hospitalizations and different reasons for hospitalization among community-dwelling older veterans with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN Population-based observational study using nationwide Veterans Health Administration data linked to Medicare claims in Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014-2015. To account for unobserved confounders we used an instrumental variable for COC-whether veteran changed residence by more than 10 miles. SUBJECTS Community-dwelling veterans with dementia aged 66 and older, enrolled in Traditional Medicare (n=105,528). MEASURES Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care (BBC) index (0-worst to 1-best COC); binary indicators of any hospitalization for all causes, for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) and for reasons grouped by major diagnostic category. RESULTS The mean BBC in FY 2014 was 0.32 (SD, 0.23). In FY 2015 43.3% of the cohort veterans were hospitalized. A 0.1 higher BBC resulted in 2.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.5%-4.4%) lower probability of hospitalization for all causes. BBC was not associated with hospitalization for ACSCs. Grouped by major diagnostic category, a 0.1 higher BBC resulted in 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.4%) lower probability of hospitalization for neuropsychiatric diseases/disorders, with no impact on hospitalizations for circulatory, respiratory, infectious, kidney and urinary, digestive, musculoskeletal, and endocrine-metabolic diseases/disorders. CONCLUSIONS Among community-dwelling older veterans with dementia, better COC resulted in less hospitalizations, and this effect was primarily due to less hospitalization for neuropsychiatric diseases/disorders but not hospitalization for ACSCs, or other hospitalization reasons.
Collapse
|
48
|
Topaz M, Adams V, Wilson P, Woo K, Ryvicker M. Free-Text Documentation of Dementia Symptoms in Home Healthcare: A Natural Language Processing Study. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2020; 6:2333721420959861. [PMID: 33029550 PMCID: PMC7520927 DOI: 10.1177/2333721420959861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about symptom documentation related to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) by home healthcare (HHC) clinicians. Objective This study: (1) developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm that identifies common neuropsychiatric symptoms of ADRD in HHC free-text clinical notes; (2) described symptom clusters and hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit rates for patients with and without these symptoms. Method We examined a corpus of -2.6 million free-text notes for 112,237 HHC episodes among 89,459 patients admitted to a non-profit HHC agency for post-acute care with any diagnosis. We used NLP software (NimbleMiner) to construct indicators of six neuropsychiatric symptoms. Structured HHC assessment data were used to identify known ADRD diagnoses and construct measures of hospitalization/ED use during HHC. Results Neuropsychiatric symptoms were documented for 40% of episodes. Common clusters included impaired memory, anxiety and/or depressed mood. One in three episodes without an ADRD diagnosis had documented symptoms. Hospitalization/ED rates increased with one or more symptoms present. Conclusion HHC providers should examine episodes with neuropsychiatric symptoms but no ADRD diagnoses to determine whether ADRD diagnosis was missed or to recommend ADRD evaluation. NLP-generated symptom indicators can help to identify high-risk patients for targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim Topaz
- Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paula Wilson
- Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Miriam Ryvicker
- Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, NY, USA.,Vital Statistics Consulting, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Toubøl A, Moestrup L, Ryg J, Thomsen K, Nielsen DS. Stakeholder perspectives of the dementia-friendly hospital: A qualitative descriptive focus group study. DEMENTIA 2020; 20:1501-1517. [PMID: 32930603 DOI: 10.1177/1471301220947848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The term dementia-friendly hospital is increasingly used to describe a variety of initiatives and strategies that are implemented to meet the challenges faced by patients with dementia during hospitalization. However, no definition of the dementia-friendly hospital currently exists. This qualitative focus group study aimed to describe stakeholders' perspectives of the dementia-friendly hospital. Four stakeholder groups were included: people with dementia, relatives, hospital staff, and representatives from the Danish Alzheimer Association. The thematic analysis suggests that a person-centered approach is a key feature. This approach is described as a continuously reflexive awareness of how to see the person behind the dementia diagnosis. We discuss possible revision of the current dementia discourse and the implications of the findings for future practice and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie Toubøl
- 138728Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Denmark
| | - Lene Moestrup
- Health Sciences Research Center, 138728UCL University College, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Katja Thomsen
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Dorthe S Nielsen
- Centre for Global Health, 6174University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lee DCA, Tirlea L, Haines TP. Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent hospital or nursing home admissions among community-dwelling older people with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2020; 28:1408-1429. [PMID: 32223022 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Older people with dementia more frequently experience episodes of hospital care, transferal to nursing home and adverse events when they are in these environments. This study synthesised the available evidence examining non-pharmacological interventions to prevent hospital or nursing home admissions for community-dwelling older people with dementia. Seven health science databases of all dates were searched up to 2 December 2019. Randomised controlled trials and comparative studies investigating non-pharmacological interventions for older people with dementia who lived in the community were included. Meta-analyses using a random-effect model of randomised controlled trials were used to assess the effectiveness of interventions using measures taken as close to 12 months into follow-up as reported. Outcomes were risk and rate of hospital and nursing home admissions. Risk ratio (RR) or rate ratios (RaR) with 95% confidence interval were used to pool results for hospital and nursing home admission outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to include pooling of results from non-randomised trails. Twenty studies were included in the review. Community care coordination reduced rate of nursing home admissions [(2 studies, n = 303 people with dementia and 86 patient-caregiver dyads), pooled RaR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.97), I2 = 0%, p = .45]. Single interventions of psychoeducation and multifactorial interventions comprising of treatment and assessment clinics indicated no effect on hospital or nursing home admissions. The preliminary evidence of community care coordination on reducing the rate of nursing home admissions may be considered with caution when planning for community services or care for older people living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Den-Ching A Lee
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Vic., Australia
| | - Loredana Tirlea
- Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic., Australia
| | - Terry P Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|