A Randomized Trial of the Optimum Duration of Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Procedure in Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: The OPTALYSE PE Trial

Multicentre, real-world data of next-generation computer-assisted vacuum aspiration thrombectomy in acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Data on interventional treatment of intermediate-high (and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) are limited. The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (CDMT) in a real-world PE patient population.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective registry enrolled PE patients treated with CDMT using the Lightning 12 System. The primary safety endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, procedure-related major bleeding, clinical deterioration, or bailout to another strategy. The primary efficacy outcomes included the reduction of pulmonary arterial pressures and change in the right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio 48 h after the CDMT. Multivariate regression analyzed characteristics associated with RV/LV improvement.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 150 patients, 72% with intermediate-high PE and 28% with high-risk PE. Systemic thrombolysis was contraindicated in 33.3%, whereas in 4% it failed. There were 2% intraprocedural deaths (1.3% due to RV failure and 0.7% due to massive interstitial bleeding), with no more deaths during follow-up. In 0.7%, CDMT was converted to open surgery, and in 0.7%, bailout systemic thrombolysis and extracorporeal oxygenation support. Major bleedings occurred in 1.3% within 48 h post CDMT. Immediate hemodynamic improvements included a mean 11.3±10 mmHg (22.1%) drop in systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (p < 0.0001) and a median 0.33 (0.25-0.45), (25.2%) drop in RV/LV ratio (p < 0.0001 for paired values), CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration thrombectomy with the Lightning 12 system characterizes an acceptable safety profile, substantial improvements in hemodynamic outcomes, and low mortality for patients with intermediate-high and high-risk PE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04879069 - date of registration 04.05.2021.

Pulmonary Vascular Interventions

Endovascular intervention is a safe, effective treatment modality in the management of diverse pulmonary vascular pathologies, including acute or chronic thromboembolic disease, pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (pAVMs), pulmonary artery or bronchial artery hemorrhage, and foreign body retrieval. This article reviews indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes in endovascular management of common pulmonary vascular pathologies, with the goal of improving operator familiarity and facility with these procedures.

Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update

A 2012 review of therapeutic ultrasound was published to educate researchers and physicians on potential applications and concerns for unintended bioeffects (doi: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.4.623). This review serves as an update to the parent article, highlighting advances in therapeutic ultrasound over the past 12 years. In addition to general mechanisms for bioeffects produced by therapeutic ultrasound, current applications, and the pre-clinical and clinical stages are outlined. An overview is provided for image guidance methods to monitor and assess treatment progress. Finally, other topics relevant for the translation of therapeutic ultrasound are discussed, including computational modeling, tissue-mimicking phantoms, and quality assurance protocols.

Catheter-directed interventions in acute pulmonary embolism. Position statement of SEC-Interventional Cardiology Association/SEC-Ischemic Heart Disease and Acute Cardiovascular Care Association/SEC-Working Group on Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the leading cause of hospital death and the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular mortality. Traditionally, treatment options have included anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery; however, catheter-directed interventions (CDI), including catheter-directed thrombolysis and aspiration thrombectomy, have been developed for patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. These techniques can rapidly improve right ventricular function, hemodynamic status, and mortality in some patients, although there is a lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. This document, prepared by the Interventional Cardiology Association, the Association of Ischemic Heart Disease and Acute Cardiovascular Care, and the Working Group on Pulmonary Hypertension of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), reviews the current recommendations and available evidence on the management of PE. It emphasizes the importance of rapid response teams, risk stratification, and early patient monitoring in identifying candidates for reperfusion. Based on existing clinical evidence on CDI, the document discusses various clinical scenarios and provides guidance on patient selection, particularly in situations of uncertainty due to insufficient evidence. Lastly, it describes periprocedural support, highlighting the necessary multidisciplinary approach to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with PE.

Large-Bore Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Primary Results of the PEERLESS Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

There are a lack of randomized controlled trial data comparing outcomes of different catheter-based interventions for intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.

METHODS

PEERLESS is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 550 patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dilatation and additional clinical risk factors randomized 1:1 to treatment with large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The primary end point was a hierarchal win ratio composite of the following (assessed at the sooner of hospital discharge or 7 days after the procedure): (1) all-cause mortality, (2) intracranial hemorrhage, (3) major bleeding, (4) clinical deterioration and/or escalation to bailout, and (5) postprocedural intensive care unit admission and length of stay. Assessments at the 24-hour visit included respiratory rate, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, New York Heart Association classification, right ventricle/left ventricle ratio reduction, and right ventricular function. End points through 30 days included total hospital stay, all-cause readmission, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The primary end point occurred significantly less frequently with LBMT compared with CDT (win ratio, 5.01 [95% CI, 3.68-6.97]; P<0.001). There were significantly fewer episodes of clinical deterioration and/or bailout (1.8% versus 5.4%; P=0.04) with LBMT compared with CDT and less postprocedural intensive care unit use (P<0.001), including admissions (41.6% versus 98.6%) and stays >24 hours (19.3% versus 64.5%). There were no significant differences in mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, or major bleeding between strategies or in a secondary win ratio end point including the first 4 components (win ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.78-2.35]; P=0.30). At the 24-hour visit, respiratory rate was lower for patients treated with LBMT (18.3±3.3 versus 20.1±5.1; P<0.001), and fewer had moderate to severe modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scores (13.5% versus 26.4%; P<0.001), New York Heart Association classifications (16.3% versus 27.4%; P=0.002), and right ventricular dysfunction (42.1% versus 57.9%; P=0.004). Right ventricle/left ventricle ratio reduction was similar (0.32±0.24 versus 0.30±0.26; P=0.55). Patients treated with LBMT had shorter total hospital stays (4.5±2.8 overnights versus 5.3±3.9 overnights; P=0.002) and fewer all-cause readmissions (3.2% versus 7.9%; P=0.03), whereas 30-day mortality was similar (0.4% versus 0.8%; P=0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

PEERLESS met its primary end point in favor of LBMT compared with CDT in treatment of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. LBMT had lower rates of clinical deterioration and/or bailout and postprocedural intensive care unit use compared with CDT, with no difference in mortality or bleeding.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05111613.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Aspiration Thrombectomy and Ultrasound Accelerated Thrombolysis for Management of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT) in pulmonary embolism (PE) management by performing a systematic review of the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed database was searched to identify articles on Inari's FlowTriever and Penumbra's Indigo mechanical thrombectomy devices (Group A) and the Ekos Endovascular system (Group B). Outcomes variables analyzed include pre- and post-procedure RV/LV ratio, pre- and post-procedure pulmonary artery pressure, hospital length of stay, technical success, specific complications, and mortality rate. Mean values were calculated using the weighted mean approach. RevMan Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the meta-analysis for this study. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) approach was used to perform a quality assessment of the included articles in order to verify the validity and reliability of the research.

RESULTS

27 studies were in Group A and 28 studies pertained to Group B. There were 1662 patients in Group A and 1273 patients in Group B. Both groups had similar technical success (99.6% vs 99.4%). Thrombectomy showed longer mean procedure time (73.03 ± 14.57 min vs 47.35 ± 3.15 min), lower mean blood loss (325.20 ± 69.15 mL vs 423.05 ± 64.95 mL), shorter mean ICU stay (2.35 ± 1.64 days vs 3.22 ± 1.27 days), and shorter mean overall hospital stay (6.94 ± 4.38 days vs 7.23 ± 2.31 days). EKOS showed greater mean change in Miller Index (9.05 ± 3.35 vs 4.91 ± 3.70) and greater mean change in pulmonary artery pressure (14.17 ± 6.35 mmHg vs 8.11 ± 4.39 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy are effective therapies for pulmonary embolism with comparable clinical outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy without thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) without using adjunct thrombolysis as reperfusion therapy to manage intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to January 2024. Eligible studies reported more than 10 patients treated for acute PE with catheter-directed thrombectomy only, who were over 18 years of age. Primary endpoints were major bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and hemodynamic changes.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (n = 803) were included for quantitative analysis. The pooled estimate of incidences of in-hospital mortality and major bleeding was 1.8 % (95 % CI 0.009, 0.027) and 2.1 % (95 % CI 0.011, 0.031) respectively. A pooled estimate reported a post-procedural increase in oxygen saturation and systolic blood pressure by 8.96 % (95 % CI: 3.54, 14.38) and 15.02 mmHg (95 % CI 6.35, 23.69) respectively. Post-procedural mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio, and Miller score were reduced by 10.30 mmHg (95 % CI -14.94, -5.66), 0.29 (95 % CI -0.50, -0.08) and 8.09 (95 % CI -10.70, -5.47) respectively.

CONCLUSION

CDT without adjunctive thrombolysis may lead to improvements in hemodynamic outcomes and exhibits favorable safety profiles. This meta-analysis provides a rationale for lowering the threshold for considering this technique, and ongoing randomized trials will further advance the field to determine optimal managment strategies for intermediate and high-risk acute PE.

Economic Analysis of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism is associated with a significant burden of morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Catheter-directed thrombolysis has emerged as a promising option for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism which aims to improve outcomes over standard anticoagulation.

METHODS

We constructed a decision-analytic model comparing the cost-effectiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis to anticoagulation alone for the management of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating deaths averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Uncertainty was addressed by plotting cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds. The main outcome was ICER (US dollars/deaths averted).

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, derived using systemic lysis data, the cost associated with catheter-directed thrombolysis was estimated at $22,353 with a probability of survival at 1 month of 0.984. For the anticoagulation alone strategy, the cost was $25,060, and the probability of survival at 1 month was 0.958. Overall, catheter-directed thrombolysis resulted in savings of $104,089 per death averted (ICER,-$104,089 per death averted). Sensitivity analysis revealed that catheter-directed thrombolysis would no longer be cost-effective when its associated mortality is greater than 0.042. In the probabilistic analysis, at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000, catheter-directed thrombolysis had a 63% chance of being cost-effective, and in cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, it was cost-effective in 63%-78% of simulations for a willingness to pay ranging from $0 to $100,000.

CONCLUSIONS

If the assumptions made in our model are shown to be accurate then CDT would be cost-effective and may lead to considerable cost savings if used where clinically appropriate.

Comparison of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) can result in high mortality. Early risk stratification and treatment are critical for individualized management. In patients with intermediate-high-risk (IHR) PE, guidelines recommend to consider a percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (CDT). While different techniques are available, comparisons between treatments regarding right ventricular (RV) function and outcome are still scarce. This study aimed to compare changes in RV function as well as outcomes in patients with IHR PE after CDT with ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) as compared to large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Patients and methods: This is a retrospective, single-center study in IHR PE, diagnosed in accordance with the ESC Guidelines. All patients underwent a CDT either with USAT (EKOS, Boston Scientific) or MT (FlowTriever System, Inari). Right heart function (RV/LV ratio, TAPSE) was assessed via transthoracic echocardiography before and after CDT as well as interventional characteristics and postinterventional hospital stay were compared. Results: From June 2022 to April 2024, 26 patients (35% female; aged 61.2±15.2 years) were diagnosed with IHR PE and underwent CDT. 14 patients (53.8%) were treated with USAT and 12 patients (46.2%) with MT. The mean procedural time was 40.4±19.8 minutes for USAT and 104±32.2 minutes for MT. RV/LV ratio was improved in both groups (change from baseline USAT -0.48±0.25; MT -0.36±0.13). TAPSE increased by 6.95±3.7 mm in USAT and by 9.8±4.6 mm in MT. Major bleeding (defined as BARC ≥ 3a) occurred only in three patients of the USAT group. The 90-day mortality rate was 0% in both groups. Conclusions: In patients with IHR PE both USAT and MT lead to an improved RV function without mortality within 90 days. Further randomized data have to discriminate the differential impact of novel tools for the treatment of IHR PE.

The individual fibrinolytic capacity predicts the efficacy of ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) is nowadays available as an alternative reperfusion approach for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The lytic agent recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) activates the effector protease plasmin to induce fibrinolysis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify predictive markers for the efficacy of USAT in patients with acute PE.

METHODS

In a single-center cohort study of USAT for intermediate-high or high-risk PE, pulmonary-arterial hemodynamic measurements were performed, and plasma samples were obtained from 35 patients before treatment start, at 6 hours (during infusion of rt-PA), and at 24 hours after treatment start (postlysis). The hemostatic properties were evaluated with thromboelastometry, and fibrinolytic markers and the ex vivo capacity of rt-PA-spiked plasma to generate the plasmin-antiplasmin complex were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients presented with an elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (32.9 ± 7.6 mm Hg), with an average postlysis reduction of 9.4 ± 8.3 mm Hg, yet the treatment response varied markedly across individuals. The endogenous fibrinolytic capacity, as represented by the plasmin-antiplasmin complex and D-dimer, as well as consumption of the endogenous fibrinolysis inhibitor α2-antiplasmin at 6 hours, predicted the individual treatment efficacy, indicated by the reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (all P < .05). Furthermore, ex vivo assessment of the fibrinolytic potential before the start of USAT also predicted efficacy. Both maximum clot lysis INTEM and the novel parameter fibrin-sensitivity ratio were identified as predictors of USAT responsiveness (both P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Markers of fibrinolysis may be harnessed to predict treatment responsiveness to USAT in patients with acute PE.

Advanced Management of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Treatment for Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence-Based Strategies for Optimized Patient Care

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening medical condition caused by the thrombotic occlusion of one or more branches of the lung vasculature, which represents the third most common cause of cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction and stroke. PE treatment requires a tailored approach based on accurate risk stratification and personalized treatment decision-making. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of PE management, yet patients at higher clinical risk may require more rapid reperfusion therapies. In recent years, transcatheter treatment has emerged as a valuable option for patients with intermediate-high or high-risk PE who have contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. Recent advancements in catheter-directed therapies, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy (CDMT), provide minimally invasive options for swift symptom relief and hemodynamic stabilization. This review aims to provide a practical approach for optimal patient selection and management for PE percutaneous therapies, supported by a thorough evaluation of the current evidence base supporting these procedures. A focus on post-procedural management, the prevention of recurrence, and monitoring for long-term complications such as chronic pulmonary hypertension and post-PE syndrome is also specifically tackled.

New targets for antithrombotic medications: seeking to decouple thrombosis from hemostasis

Arterial and venous thromboses are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Numerous antithrombotic agents are currently available with antiplatelet, thrombolytic/fibrinolytic, and anticoagulant activity. However, all the currently available antithrombotic agents carry a risk of bleeding that often prevents their use. This unfavorable risk-benefit profile is particularly challenging for patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, patients with atrial fibrillation at a high risk of bleeding, and patients with end-stage renal disease. Patients with ischemic stroke and acute coronary syndromes have not yet found a favorable risk-benefit profile with anticoagulant therapy to help reduce the residual thromboembolic risk that remains after antiplatelet and lipid therapy. Two emerging classes of antithrombotic agents, factor (F)XI or activated factor Ⅺ (FⅪa) inhibitors and glycoprotein VI inhibitors, have shown promise in their ability to prevent pathologic thrombosis without increasing the risk of hemostatic-related bleeding in phase 2 studies. Among the FⅪ/FXIa inhibitors of coagulation, a parenterally administered monoclonal antibody (abelacimab) and 2 orally administered small molecule inhibitors (asundexian, milvexian) are collectively being studied in patients with atrial fibrillation, cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, acute coronary syndrome, and ischemic stroke. One parenterally administered glycoprotein VI antiplatelet agent (glenzocimab) is currently being studied in patients with ischemic stroke. If shown to be efficacious and safe in ongoing phase 3 studies, both classes of emerging antithrombotic agents have the potential to greatly improve outcomes for patients with challenging thrombotic conditions.

Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence, Innovation, and Horizons

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The goal of this review is to discuss the most up-to-date literature on epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute PE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite an increase in annual incidence rate of PE in the United States and development of multiple advanced therapies for treatment of acute PE, PE-related mortality is not consistently decreasing across populations. Although multiple risk stratification schemes have been developed, it is still unclear which advanced therapy should be used for the individual patient and optimal timing. Fortunately, multiple randomized clinical trials are underway to answer these questions. Nevertheless, up to 50% of patients have persistent reduced quality of life 6 months after acute PE, termed post-PE syndrome. Despite advances in therapeutic options for management of acute PE, many questions remain unanswered, including optimal risk stratification and management of acute PE.

Mortality Outcomes with Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) leads to many emergency department visits annually. Thrombolytic agents, such as alteplase, are currently recommended for massive PE, but genetically modified tenecteplase (TNK) presents advantages. Limited comparative studies exist between TNK and alteplase in PE treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and mortality of TNK compared with alteplase in patients with PE using real-world evidence obtained from a large multicenter registry. Primary outcomes included mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and blood transfusions.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Health Research Network. Patients aged 18 years or older with a PE diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code I26) were included. The following two cohorts were defined: TNK-treated (29 organizations, 266 cases) and alteplase-treated (22,864 cases). Propensity matching controlled for demographic characteristics, anticoagulant use, pre-existing conditions, and vital sign abnormalities associated with PE severity. Patients received TNK or alteplase within 7 days of diagnosis and outcomes were measured at 30 days post thrombolysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-three patients in each cohort were comparable in demographic characteristics and pre-existing conditions. Mortality rates at 30 days post thrombolysis were similar between TNK and alteplase cohorts (19.4% vs 19.8%; risk ratio 0.982; 95% CI 0.704-1.371). Rates of intracerebral hemorrhages and transfusion were too infrequent to analyze.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found TNK to exhibit a similar mortality rate to alteplase in the treatment of PE with hemodynamic instability. The results necessitate prospective evaluation. Given the cost-effectiveness and ease of administration of TNK, these findings contribute to the ongoing discussion about its adoption as a primary thrombolytic agent for stroke and PE.

Trends in Initial Anticoagulation Among US Patients Hospitalized With Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2011-2020

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rather than unfractionated heparin (UFH) for treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) given their efficacy and reduced risk of bleeding. Using data from a large consortium of US hospitals, we examined trends in initial anticoagulation among hospitalized patients diagnosed with acute PE.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of inpatient and observation cases between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, among individuals aged more than or equal to 18 years treated at acute care hospitals contributing data to the Premier Healthcare Database. Included cases received a diagnosis of acute PE, underwent imaging for PE, and received anticoagulation at the time of admission. The primary outcome was the initial anticoagulant selected for treatment.

RESULTS

Among 299,016 cases at 1,045 hospitals, similar proportions received initial treatment with UFH (47.4%) and LMWH (47.9%). Between 2011 and 2020, the proportion of patients initially treated with UFH increased from 41.9% to 56.3%. Over this period, use of LMWH as the initial anticoagulant was reduced from 58.1% in 2011 to 37.3% in 2020. The proportion of cases admitted to the ICU, treated with mechanical ventilation or vasopressors, and inpatient mortality were stable. Factors most strongly associated with receipt of UFH were admission to the ICU (odds ratio [OR] 6.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.31 to 7.54) or step-down unit (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.16 to 2.45), receipt of thrombolysis (OR 4.25; 95% CI 3.09 to 5.84) or vasopressors (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.54), and chronic renal disease (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.54 to 1.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recommendations that LMWH and DOACs be considered first-line for most patients with acute PE, use of UFH is common and increasing. Further research is needed to elucidate factors associated with persistent use of UFH and opportunities for deimplementation of low-value care.

Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Therapy in Pulmonary Embolism: A Narrative Review

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most frequent cause of acute cardiovascular presentation after myocardial infarction and stroke. The treatment approach for PE consists of hemodynamic and respiratory support, anticoagulation, reperfusion treatment, and vena cava filters. Reperfusion treatment consists of systemic thrombolysis (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, streptokinase, and urokinase); percutaneous catheter-directed therapy (CDT); and surgical embolectomy. CDT is an emerging treatment, with most data derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or case series. Currently, there is a lack of data on clinical efficacy and safety outcomes and a lack of large studies that directly compare CDT with systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy.  This narrative review aims to explore the efficacy and safety of systemic thrombolysis and CDT in pulmonary embolism.  Clinical trials have studied CDT for more than a decade now and have shown that CDT improves the post-procedural right ventricular (RV)/left ventricular (LV) ratio and has a reduced rate of bleeding episodes and all-cause mortality. However, there is a lack of large prospective RCTs studying the effects of CDT in intermediate-high-risk PE patients to determine which patients from this sub-group require CDT both in terms of improving short-term mortality risk and long-term morbidity (such as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and post-PE syndrome). Future clinical trials need to focus on identifying which patient groups will benefit from CDT over anticoagulation and if there are any advantages of using the EkoSonic endovascular system (EKOS) (ultrasound (US)-assisted CDT) over standard CDT. In addition, the scientific community needs to study the healthcare costs of CDT over traditional treatment, which is relevant for public health systems such as the National Health Service (NHS). Lastly, we need standardized guidelines for the use of thrombectomy systems since pulmonary embolism is a complex disease requiring a multifaceted and nuanced treatment approach.

A Review of the Effectiveness and Safety of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Venous Thromboembolism

CLINICAL IMPACT

Catheter-directed thrombolysis reduces the thrombolytic time and dose of thrombolytic drugs without affecting the thrombolytic effect to ensure that bleeding does not occur. This helps clinicians choose safer CDT treatments for their patients. We combine the historical process of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy for VTE and prospect the future development of CDT.

Innovation in Catheter-Directed Therapy for Intermediate-High-Risk and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Although anticoagulation remains the cornerstone treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), catheter-directed therapy (CDT) has generated great interest as an adjunctive option for those presenting with hemodynamic decompensation or high risk for deterioration and in whom systemic thrombolysis has failed or is contraindicated. However, randomized controlled data supporting the efficacy and safety of CDT in addition to antithrombotic therapy in patients with high-risk and intermediate- to high-risk PE compared with anticoagulation and systemic thrombolysis alone are lacking. This paucity of high-quality data hampers guideline recommendations regarding the optimal therapeutic approach in such patients with PE. The aim of the present paper is to critically appraise the current evidence for CDT in patients with high-risk and intermediate- to high-risk PE and to highlight major areas of innovation in the recent literature. In addition, the authors describe unmet clinical and research needs, potential strategies to resolve these knowledge gaps, and pathways for device selection.

Inflammatory and Metabolic Predictors of Mortality in Pulmonary Thromboembolism: A Focus on the Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Pan-Immune Inflammation Value

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the importance of metabolic and inflammatory markers, specifically the Triglyceride-Glucose Index (TGI) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), in predicting mortality among patients diagnosed with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Materials and Methods: A total of 450 patients diagnosed with PTE between December 2018 and December 2023 were included in his study. The diagnosis of PTE was confirmed by clinical presentation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies such as computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Data were obtained from medical records, including demographic information, medical history, laboratory results, and clinical outcomes. Results: In terms of age, non-survivors were older on average (66.1 ± 11.8 years) compared to survivors (58.3 ± 12.4 years) (p = 0.03). In terms of gender, 55% of non-survivors and 45% of survivors were male (p = 0.111). Non-survivors had higher BMIs (28.3 ± 5.1) than survivors (25.7 ± 4.5) (p = 0.04). In terms of hypertension, 40% of non-survivors and 30% of survivors had hypertension (p = 0.041). In terms of diabetes, 35% of those who did not survive and 20% of those who survived had diabetes (p = 0.001). In terms of smoking, 25% of non-survivors and 15% of survivors smoke (p = 0.022). In terms of TGI, non-survivors had higher TGI values (12.1 ± 1.5) than survivors (5.9 ± 1.2) (p < 0.001). In terms of PIV, non-survivors had significantly higher PIV (878.2 ± 85.4) than survivors (254.5 ± 61.1) (p < 0.001). The risk factors found to be significantly associated with differentiation in the multiple logistic regression analysis included age, BMI, TGI, and PIV (p = 0.005, p = 0.002, p = 0.013, and 0.022, respectively). As a result, according to ROC analysis for patients who are non-survivors, age, BMI, TGI, and PIV were significant prognostic factors. The cut-off points for these values were >60, >27, >10, and >500, respectively. Conclusions: the TGI and PIV are strong markers for predicting mortality in PTE patients. The independent predictive value of age and BMI further demonstrates their role in risk stratification. We think that high TGI values and PIVs reflect underlying metabolic and inflammatory disorders that may contribute to worse outcomes in these patients.

Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Undergoing Acute Pulmonary Embolism Interventions

Catheter-based interventions and surgical embolectomy represent alternatives to systemic fibrinolysis for patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) or those with intermediate-high-risk PE who deteriorate hemodynamically. They are indicated when systemic fibrinolysis is contraindicated or ineffective, or if obstructive shock is imminent. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be added to reperfusion therapies or used alone for severe right ventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock. These advanced therapies complement but do not replace anticoagulation, which remains the cornerstone in PE management. This review summarizes the evidence and shares practical recommendations for the use of anticoagulant therapy before, during, and after acute PE interventions.

[Pulmonary embolism: outpatient treatment and follow-up]

Despite declining numbers - older people in particular - often die from pulmonary embolism. A rapid assessment of the risk in the event of a suspected embolism, the exclusion of comorbidities and the appropriate therapy are the focus of the current guidelines. Early and subsequent outpatient treatment of a patient with acute PE generally requires 3 criteria: low risk of early complications, the absence of serious comorbidities and the highest possible safety at home and, in the event of a complication, rapid access to acute care in the hospital. For patients with a high risk of VTE recurrence, the long-term dosage of secondary drug prophylaxis is not yet clear - studies are currently underway. In patients at moderate risk of VTE recurrence, low-dose secondary prophylaxis can be used to reduce the risk of bleeding. Outpatient pulmonary embolism follow-up care is becoming increasingly important, because studies have shown several times that serious long-term consequences can occur. In pulmonary embolism patients with persistent dyspnea, reduced performance or risk of CTEPH, an outpatient evaluation of the right ventricle using echocardiography, if necessary, in combination with the determination of natriuretic peptides or spiroergometry, is recommended.

[Pulmonary Embolism]

Pulmonary embolism (PE), the most severe form of presentation of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), currently represents a foremost healthcare issue due to its high impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, costs, and resource consumption. Early mortality associated with PE is primarily due to hemodynamic instability, exacerbation of pre-existing conditions, or major complications of antithrombotic therapies. Beyond the risk of death, there are relevant complications related to PE, such as bleedings, VTE recurrences, and persistence of residual respiratory symptoms; the latter complication related to PE is mainly characterized by two entities, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic disease. Significant scientific advances made in recent years have allowed for the improvement of both diagnostic and therapeutic management of the disease, as outlined in this document through a series of relevant issues about PE that are answered with the most up-to-date scientific evidence.

Interventional Therapies and Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) represents the third leading cause of cardiovascular mortality, with most PE-related mortality associated with acute right ventricular (RV) failure. Despite an increase in attention to acute PE with new endovascular devices for therapy and the adoption of multidisciplinary clinical treatment teams, mortality rates remain high in patients who present with PE-related hemodynamic compromise. Currently, the advanced treatment modalities for acute high-risk and intermediate high-risk PE are limited to several interventional modalities-open surgical embolectomy and systemic fibrinolytic agents. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to describe modern therapeutic techniques and strategies (both interventional and surgical) and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for hemodynamic compromise in PE.

Risk Stratification and Management of Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of mortality. Not only is PE associated with short-term mortality, but up to ~20% of patients might suffer from long-term consequences such as post-PE syndrome and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Current risk stratification tools poorly predict those who are at risk for short-term deterioration and those who develop long-term consequences. Traditionally, systemic thrombolysis has been considered the first-line therapy for patients with high-risk PE without contraindications; however, it comes with the risk of major bleeding (notably intracranial hemorrhage). The use of catheter-directed interventions (embolectomy or thrombolysis) has been increasing owing to their low bleeding risk; however, randomized trial data supporting their efficacy in improving clinical outcomes are limited. In this review, we highlight the evidence supporting the available advanced therapies for high- and intermediate-risk PE and summarize the ongoing trials which are evaluating these therapies.

Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism

Risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) assists with the selection of appropriate initial therapy and treatment setting. Patients with acute symptomatic PE that present with arterial hypotension or shock have a high risk of death, and treatment guidelines recommend strong consideration of reperfusion in this setting. For haemodynamically stable patients with PE, the combination of a negative clinical prognostic score and the absence of computed tomography-assessed right ventricle enlargement may accurately identify those at low-risk of short-term complications after the diagnosis of PE, and such patients might benefit from an abbreviated hospital stay or outpatient therapy. Some evidence suggests that the accumulation of factors indicating worse outcomes from PE on standard anticoagulation identifies the more severe stable patients with acute PE who might benefit from intensive monitoring and recanalization procedures, particularly if haemodynamic deterioration occurs. Current risk classifications have several shortcomings that might adversely affect clinical and healthcare decisions. Ongoing initiatives aim to address many of those shortcomings, and will hopefully help optimize risk stratification algorithms and treatment strategies.

Novel Challenges and Therapeutic Options for Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE), often resulting from deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular death and is associated with increasing incidence, causing considerable morbidity and mortality. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of treatment options in the management of acute PE and DVT, encompassing both established and emerging technologies, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, aspiration thrombectomy, and other endovascular techniques. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, assessing clinical studies, trials, and case reports that detail the use of percutaneous interventions for PE and DVT and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each percutaneous system. Several percutaneous treatments have shown promising results, especially in cases where rapid thrombus resolution is critical, such as in high- and intermediate-high-risk patients. The incidence of major complications, such as bleeding, remains a consideration, though it is generally manageable with proper patient selection and technique. It is fundamentally important to tailor the specific treatment strategy to the clinical and anatomical characteristics of each patient. Percutaneous treatments for acute PE and DVT represent valuable options in the therapeutic arsenal, offering enhanced outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Ongoing advancements in technology and technique, along with comprehensive clinical trials, are essential to further define the role and optimize the use of these interventions.

Episode Care Costs Following Catheter-Directed Reperfusion Therapies for Pulmonary Embolism: A Literature-Based Comparative Cohort Analysis

This analysis aimed to estimate 30-day episode care costs associated with 3 contemporary endovascular therapies indicated for treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). Systematic literature review was used to identify clinical research reporting costs associated with invasive PE care and outcomes for ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT), continuous-aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (CAMT), and volume-controlled-aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (VAMT). Total episode variable care costs were defined as the sum of device costs, variable acute care costs, and contingent costs. Variable acute care costs were estimated using methodology sensitive to periprocedural and postprocedural resource allocation unique to the 3 therapies. Contingent costs included expenses for thrombolytics, postprocedure bleeding events, and readmissions through 30 days. Through February 28, 2023, 70 sources were identified and used to inform estimates of 30-day total episode variable costs. Device costs for USAT, CAMT, and VAMT were the most expensive single component of total episode variable costs, estimated at $5,965, $10,279, and $11,901, respectively. Costs associated with catheterization suite utilization, intensive care, and hospital length of stay, along with contingent costs, were important drivers of total episode costs. Total episode variable care costs through 30 days were $19,146, $20,938, and $17,290 for USAT, CAMT, and VAMT, respectively. In conclusion, estimated total episode care costs after invasive treatment for PE are heavily influenced by device expense, in-hospital care, and postacute care complications. Regardless of device cost, strategies that avoid thrombolytics, reduce the need for intensive care unit care, shorten length of stay, and reduce postprocedure bleeding and 30-day readmissions contributed to the lowest episode costs.

In-hospital and readmission outcomes of patients with cancer admitted for pulmonary embolism treated with or without catheter-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients are at risk of pulmonary embolism (PE). Catheter-based therapies (CBT) are novel reperfusion options for PE though data in patients with cancer is lacking.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE were identified using the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2017 to 2020. Primary outcome were in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital bleeding, 90-day readmission for venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related or right heart failure-related reasons and bleeding. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression and inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT as well as CBT versus systemic thrombolysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7785 patients were included (2511 with high-risk PE) of whom 1045 (13.4%) were managed with CBT. After IPTW, CBT was associated with lower rates of index hospitalization death (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.96) and 90-day readmission (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.81) but higher rates of in-hospital bleeding (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20) which was predominantly post-procedural bleeding. CBT was associated with lower risk of major bleeding (20.8% vs 24.8%; OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94) compared with systemic thrombolysis.

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with cancer with intermediate or high-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. CBT was also associated with decreased risk of index hospitalization major bleeding compared with systemic thrombolysis. Prospective, randomized trials with inclusion of patients with cancer are needed to confirm these findings.

Cerebrovascular events and thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism-induced cardiac arrest: a case series and key challenges

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebrovascular events during thrombolysis in cardiac arrest (CA) caused by pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition. However, the balance between cerebrovascular events and thrombolytic therapy in PE-induced CA remains a great challenge.

METHODS

In this study, we reported three unique cases regarding main concerns surrounding cerebrovascular events in thrombolytic therapy in PE-induced CA.

RESULTS

The patient in the case 1 treated with thrombolysis during CPR and finally discharged neurologically intact. The patient in the case 2 received delayed thrombolysis and died eventually. The patient in the case 3 was contraindicated to thrombolysis due to the complication of subarachioid hemorrahage and died within days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case series highlights three proposed approaches to consider before administering thrombolysis as a treatment option in PE-induced CA patients: (1) prolonging the resuscitation, (2) administering thrombolysis promptly, and (3) ruling out cerebrovascular events.

Successful pharmaco-invasive approach using a lower alteplase dose and VA-ECMO support in high-risk pulmonary embolism: case report

Despite the elevated mortality rates associated with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), this condition remains understudied. Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of invasive therapies such as venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in this patient population remains controversial. Here, we present the case of a 61-year-old male with high-risk PE associated with refractory cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock who underwent a combination of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with VA-ECMO and pharmaco-invasive therapy (mechanical thrombi fragmentation plus lower alteplase dose), resulting in successful pulmonary reperfusion. After a prolonged in-hospital stay, the patient was discharged in stable condition.

Evolution of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams in the United States: A Review of the Literature

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of cardiovascular mortality, with varying presentations and management challenges. Traditional treatment approaches often differ, particularly for submassive/intermediate-risk PEs, because of the lack of clear guidelines and comparative data on treatment efficacy. The introduction of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) aims to standardize and improve outcomes in acute PE management through multidisciplinary collaboration. This review examines the conception, evolution, and operational mechanisms of PERTs while providing a critical analysis of their implementation and efficacy using retrospective trials and recent randomized trials. The study also explores the integration of advanced therapeutic devices and treatment protocols facilitated by PERTs. PERT programs have significantly influenced the management of both massive and submassive PEs, with notable improvements in clinical outcomes such as decreased mortality and reduced length of hospital stay. The utilization of advanced therapies, including catheter-directed thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, has increased under PERT guidance. Evidence from various studies, including those from the National PERT Consortium, underscores the benefits of these multidisciplinary teams in managing complex PE cases, despite some studies showing no significant difference in mortality. PERT programs have demonstrated potentials to reduce morbidity and mortality, streamlining the use of healthcare resources and fostering a model of sustainable practice across medical centers. PERT program implementation appears to have improved PE treatment protocols and innovated advanced therapy options, which will be further refined as they are employed in clinical practice. The continued expansion of the capabilities of PERTs and the forthcoming results from ongoing randomized trials are expected to further define and optimize management protocols for acute PEs.

Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis versus surgical pulmonary embolectomy for intermediate-high or high-risk pulmonary embolism: a randomized phase II non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) is non-inferior to surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) to improve right ventricular (RV) function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

METHODS

In a single-centre, non-inferiority trial, we randomly assigned 27 patients with intermediate-high or high-risk acute PE to undergo either USAT or SPE stratified by PE risk. Primary and secondary outcomes were the baseline-to-72-h difference in right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio and the Qanadli pulmonary occlusion score, respectively, by contrast-enhanced chest-computed tomography assessed by a blinded CoreLab.

RESULTS

The trial was prematurely terminated due to slow enrolment. Mean age was 62.6 (SD 12.4) years, 26% were women, and 15% had high-risk PE. Mean change in RV/LV ratio was -0.34 (95% CI -0.50 to -0.18) in the USAT and -0.53 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.38) in the SPE group (mean difference: 0.152; 95% CI 0.032-0.271; Pnon-inferiority = 0.80; Psuperiority = 0.013). Mean change in Qanadli pulmonary occlusion score was -7.23 (95% CI -9.58 to -4.88) in the USAT and -11.36 (95% CI -15.27 to -7.44) in the SPE group (mean difference: 5.00; 95% CI 0.44-9.56, P = 0.032). Clinical and functional outcomes were similar between the 2 groups up to 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intermediate-high and high-risk acute PE, USAT was not non-inferior when compared with SPE in reducing RV/LV ratio within the first 72 h. In a post hoc superiority analysis, SPE resulted in greater improvement of RV overload and reduction of thrombus burden.

Association of race, ethnicity and insurance status with outcomes for patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated by PERT: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Management of PE has become streamlined with the implementation of PE Response Teams (PERT). Race, ethnicity and insurance status are known to influence the outcomes of patients with acute PE. However, whether the implementation of PERT-based care mitigates these racial and ethnic disparities remains unknown. Our aim was to assess the association of race, ethnicity and insurance with outcomes for patients with acute PE managed by PERT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 290 patients with acute PE, who were admitted to one of three urban teaching hospitals in the Mount Sinai Health System (New York, NY) from January 2021 to October 2023. A propensity score-weighted analysis was performed to explore the association of race, ethnicity and insurance status with overall outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age of included patients was 65.5 years and 149 (51.4%) were female. White, Black and Asian patients constituted 56.2% (163), 39.6% (115) and 3.5% [10] of the cohort respectively. Patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity accounted for 8.3% [24] of the sample. The 30-day rates of mortality, major bleeding and 30-day re-admission were 10.3%, 2.1% and 12.8% respectively. Black patients had higher odds of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 1.445; p < 0.0001) when compared to White patients. Patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity had lower odds of receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis (OR: 0.966; p = 0.0003) and catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy (OR: 0.906; p < 0.0001) when compared to non-Hispanic/Latino patients. Uninsured patients had higher odds of receiving systemic thrombolysis (OR: 1.034; p = 0.0008) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (OR: 1.059; p < 0.0001), and lower odds of receiving catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy (OR: 0.956; p = 0.015) when compared to insured patients, although the odds of 30-day mortality and 30-day major bleeding were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Within a cohort of PE patients managed by PERT, there were significant associations between race, ethnicity and overall outcomes. Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and uninsured status were associated with lower odds of receiving catheter-directed or surgical embolectomy. These results suggest that disparities related to ethnicity and insurance status persist despite PERT-based care of patients with acute PE.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Pulmonary Embolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cardiovascular disease. For most patients, the standard of treatment has long consisted on low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists, but a number of clinical trials and, subsequently, post-marketing studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with or without lead-in heparin therapy are effective alternatives with fewer adverse effects. This evidence has led to important changes in the guidelines on the treatment of VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE), with the DOACs being now recommended as the first therapeutic choice. Additional research has contributed to identifying low-risk PE patients who can benefit from outpatient management or from early discharge from the emergency department with DOAC treatment. There is evidence to support the use of DOACs in intermediate-risk PE patients as well as in high-risk patients receiving thrombolytic treatment. The use of DOACs has also been proven to be safe and effective in special populations of PE patients, such as patients with renal impairment, liver impairment, and cancer.

A Safety and Feasibility Single-Arm Study of a Novel Catheter Thrombectomy Device for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism (ENGULF)

Background

Despite advances in therapy options, pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to carry a high risk of mortality and morbidity. Currently, therapeutic options are limited with only 2 US Food and Drug Administration-cleared catheter-based embolectomy devices approved for the treatment of intermediate-risk PE. The novel Hēlo PE thrombectomy catheter (Endovascular Engineering, Inc) has a flexible and collapsible funnel with an internal agitator for a dual mechanism of treatment for acute PE. We sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of the novel Hēlo PE thrombectomy catheter in intermediate-risk PE.

Methods

A prospective, single-arm feasibility study evaluating the Hēlo PE catheter was performed in patients presenting with intermediate-risk PE. Patients underwent preprocedural and postprocedural computed tomography angiography. Primary efficacy was the difference in preprocedural to postprocedural right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio. Primary and secondary safety outcomes were all-cause mortality, major life-threatening bleeding, device-related serious adverse events, pulmonary or cardiac injury, and clinical decompensation at 48 hours postprocedure and at 30 days.

Results

A total of 25 patients from 8 centers were consented and included in the analysis. Preprocedural computed tomography angiography revealed an RV/LV ratio of 1.53 ± 0.27. All patients underwent a successful thrombectomy procedure. Postprocedure, the RV/LV ratio was reduced to 1.15 ± 0.18, translating into a 23.2 ± 12.81% decrease from baseline. No patients underwent adjunctive thrombolysis. Two patients had adjunctive catheter-directed embolectomy with an alternative device. Two patients had postprocedural anemia requiring transfusion but did not meet criteria for major life-threatening bleeding by VARC-2 criteria. There were no major adverse events including no deaths, major bleeding, pulmonary injury, or vascular complications at 48 hours or 30 days post procedure.

Conclusions

In this multicenter first-in-human study, use of the Hēlo PE thrombectomy catheter was feasible and safe for the treatment of acute PE.

Evidence-Based Update on Transcatheter Therapies for Pulmonary Embolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Multiple new therapies are in development and under study to improve our contemporary care of patients with PE. We review and compare here these novel therapeutics and technologies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple novel therapeutic devices have been developed and are under active study. This work has advanced the care of patients with intermediate and high-risk PE. Novel therapies are improving care of complex PE patients. These have inspired large multicenter international randomized controlled trials that are actively recruiting patients to advance the care of PE. These studies will work towards advancing guidelines for clinical care of patients with PE.

The Current Evidence of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams and Their Role in Future

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a critical medical condition requiring prompt and accurate management. The introduction and growing significance of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT), also termed EXPERT-PE teams, signify a paradigm shift toward a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach in managing this complex entity. As the understanding of acute PE continues to evolve, PERTs stand as a linkage of optimized care, offering personalized and evidence-based management strategies for patients afflicted by this life-threatening condition. The evolving role of PERTs globally is evident in their increasing integration into the standard care pathways for acute PE. These teams have demonstrated benefits such as reducing time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, optimizing resource utilization, and improving patient outcomes.

Contemporary Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Review of the Inferior Vena Cava filter and Other Endovascular Devices

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and endovascular devices are used to mitigate the risk of pulmonary embolism in patients presenting with lower extremity venous thromboembolism in whom long-term anticoagulation is not a good option. However, the efficacy and benefit of these devices remain uncertain, and controversies exist. This review focuses on the current use of IVC filters and other endovascular therapies in clinical practice. The indications, risks, and benefits are discussed based on current data. Further research and randomized controlled trials are needed to characterize the patient population that would benefit most from these interventional therapies.

Integration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation into the Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Overview of Current Evidence

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) refers to a large embolic burden causing right ventricular failure and hemodynamic instability. It accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of PE but contributes significantly to overall PE mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is the first-line revascularization therapy in high-risk PE. Surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy is recommended in patients with an absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides respiratory and hemodynamic support for the most critically ill PE patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The complex management of these individuals requires urgent yet coordinated multidisciplinary care. In light of existing evidence regarding the utility of ECMO in the management of high-risk PE patients, a number of possible indications for ECMO utilization have been suggested in the literature. Specifically, in patients with refractory cardiac arrest, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or refractory shock, including in cases of failed thrombolysis, venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) should be considered, either as a bridge to percutaneous or surgical embolectomy or as a bridge to recovery after surgical embolectomy. We review here the current evidence on the use of ECMO as part of the management strategy for the highest-risk presentations of PE and summarize the latest data in this indication.

Endovascular treatments of acute pulmonary embolism in the post-fibrinolytic era: an up-to-date review

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant contributor to global cardiovascular-related mortality that mainly depends on the severity of the event. The treatment approach for intermediate and high-risk PE remains a topic of debate due to the fine balance between hemodynamic deterioration and bleeding risk. The initial treatment choice for intermediate-risk PE with hemodynamic deterioration and high-risk PE is historically systemic thrombolysis, but this approach is not always effective and carries a notable risk of severe bleeding. For such patients, various interventional treatments have been introduced to clinical practice, including catheter-directed lysis (CDL), ultrasound-assisted CDL, pharmacomechanical CDL, and aspiration thrombectomy. However, the optimal treatment approach remains uncertain. Encouraging outcomes have been presented assessing the novel endovascular treatments, in terms of reducing right ventricular dysfunction and improving hemodynamic stability, opening the possibility of using these devices to prevent hemodynamic instability in less severe cases. However, ongoing randomized trials that assess the efficacy and the association with mortality, especially for aspiration devices, have not yet published their final results. This article aims to offer a comprehensive update of the available catheter-directed therapies for PE, with a focus on novel mechanical thrombectomy techniques, assessing their safety and efficacy, after comparison to the conventional treatment. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This is a comprehensive review of the indications of use, techniques, and clinical outcomes of the most novel endovascular devices for the treatment of pulmonary embolism. KEY POINTS: Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective tool for patients with PE. Aspiration devices prevent hemodynamic deterioration. Catheter directed therapy reduces bleeding complications.

Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolytics

Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.

Anticoagulation Management Post Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary embolus (PE) carries a significant impending morbidity and mortality, especially in intermediate and high-risk patients, and the choice of initial anticoagulation that allows for therapeutic adjustment or manipulation is important. The preferred choice of anticoagulation management includes direct oral anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparin are preferred in special populations or selected patients such as breastfeeding mothers, those with end-stage renal disease, or obese patients, among others. This article reviews the primary and longer-term considerations for anticoagulation management in patients with PE and highlights special patient populations and risk factor considerations.

Fibrinolysis and clinical outcomes in acute pulmonary embolism. Madras medical college pulmonary embolism (M-PER) registry from India

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is the third most common cause of vascular death. Data on APE from India and other low-and middle-income countries is sparse.

OBJECTIVES

Study the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, in-hospital mortality (IMH) and 12 months mortality of patients with APE in India.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 186 consecutive patients diagnosed with APE between November 2016 and November 2021 in Madras Medical College Pulmonary Embolism Registry (M-PER). All patients had electrocardiography and echocardiography. High risk patients and selected intermediate risk patients underwent fibrinolysis.

RESULTS

75 % of our patients were below 50 years of age. 35 % were women. The mean time to presentation from symptom onset was 6.04 ± 10.01 days. 92 % had CT pulmonary angiography. Intermediate risk category (61.3 %) was the more common presentation followed by high risk (26.9 %). Electrocardiography showed S1Q3T3 pattern in 56 %. 76 % had right ventricular dysfunction and 12.4 % had right heart thrombi(RHT) by echocardiography. 50.5 % received fibrinolysis. Patients with RHT received fibrinolysis more frequently (78.3 % vs 46.6 %; p = 0.007). In-hospital mortality (IHM) was 15.6 %. Systemic arterial desaturation and need for mechanical ventilation independently predicted IHM. Ten patients (5.3 %) were lost to follow up. One year mortality was 26.7 % (47/176). One year mortality of patients discharged alive was similar among high, intermediate and low risk groups(14.8 % vs 1.9 % vs 10.5 %; p = 0.891).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PE are often young and present late in India. The in-hospital and 12 months mortality were high. Low and intermediate risk groups had a high post discharge mortality similar to high risk patients.

Intermediate-Risk and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Recognition and Management: Cardiology Clinics: Cardiac Emergencies

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. Every specialty of medical practitioner will encounter PE in their patients, and should be prepared to employ contemporary strategies for diagnosis and initial risk-stratification. Treatment of PE is based on risk-stratification, with anticoagulation for all patients, and advanced modalities including systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapies, and mechanical circulatory supports utilized in a manner paralleling PE severity and clinical context.

Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism-A Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence of about 1/1000 persons. About every sixth patient dies within the first 30 days after diagnosis. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests performed, and is able to confirm the suspicion of PE with typical electrocardiographic signs. Some ECG signs and their regression are also prognostically relevant. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is one option for PE treatment, and aims to relieve right heart strain immediately. The first studies on endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using a dedicated device (FlowTriever System, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) yielded promising results. Methods: In the following, we report the case of a 66-year-old male patient who presented with New York Heart Association III dyspnea in our emergency department. Among typical clinical and laboratory results, he displayed very impressive electrocardiographic and radiological findings at the time of PE diagnosis. Results: After endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, the patient's complaints and pulmonary hemodynamics improved remarkably. In contrast, the ECG worsened paradoxically 18 h after intervention. Nevertheless, control echocardiography 4 days after the intervention no longer showed any signs of right heart strain, and dyspnea had disappeared completely. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the patient presented as completely symptom-free with a high quality of life. His ECG and echocardiography were normal and excluded recurrent right heart strain. Conclusions: Overall, the patient benefitted remarkably from endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, resulting in an almost complete resolution of electrocardiographic PE signs at the 4-month follow-up after exhibiting multiple typical electrocardiographic PE signs at time of diagnosis and initial electrocardiographic worsening 18 h post successful intervention.

Catheter-based therapy for high-risk or intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: death and re-hospitalization

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Catheter-based therapies (CBTs) have been developed as a treatment option in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). There remains a paucity of data to inform decision-making in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE. The aim of this study was to characterize in-hospital and readmission outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE treated with vs. without CBT in a large retrospective registry.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with intermediate-risk or high-risk PE were identified using the 2017-20 National Readmission Database. In-hospital outcomes included death and bleeding and 30- and 90-day readmission outcomes including all-cause, venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related and bleeding-related readmissions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to compare outcomes between CBT and no CBT.

RESULTS

A total of 14 903 [2076 (13.9%) with CBT] and 42 829 [8824 (20.6%) with CBT] patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk PE were included, respectively. Prior to IPTW, patients with CBT were younger and less likely to have cancer and cardiac arrest, receive systemic thrombolysis, or be on mechanical ventilation. In the IPTW logistic regression model, CBT was associated with lower odds of in-hospital death in high-risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.87] and intermediate-risk PE (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.83). Patients with high-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83] and VTE (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34-0.63) readmission. Patients with intermediate-risk PE treated with CBT were associated with lower risk of 90-day all-cause (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.79) and VTE (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76) readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with high-risk or intermediate-risk PE, CBT was associated with lower in-hospital death and 90-day readmission. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Outcomes With Hybrid Catheter-Directed Therapy Compared With Aspiration Thrombectomy for Patients With Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism

PURPOSE

Intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism (IHR PE) is a challenging form of embolism obstruction that causes right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. The optimal management of IHR PE has not been established. This single-center prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complex catheter-directed therapy (CDT) - catheter-directed mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (CDMT) supplemented with catheter-directed thrombolysis (hybrid CDT) in comparison to CDMT alone for IHR PE.

METHODS

A propensity score based on the pulmonary embolism severity index class and Miller obstruction index (MOI) was calculated, and 21 hybrid CDT cases (mean age 54.8 (14.7) years, 9/21 women) were matched with 21 CDMT cases (mean age 58.8 (14.9) years, 13/21 women). The baseline demographics, clinical, and treatment characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected regarding baseline demographics and PE severity parameters. Hybrid CDT demonstrated a higher reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (hybrid CDT: median mPAP reduction 8 mmHg (IQR: 6-10 mmHg) vs CDMT: median mPAP reduction 6 mmHg (IQR: 4-7 mmHg); P = 0.019), MOI score (hybrid CDT: median change - 5 points (IQR: 5-6 points) vs CDMT median change - 3 points (IQR: 3-5 points); P = 0.019), and median RV: left ventricular ratio (hybrid CDT: median change 0.4 (IQR: 0.3-0.45) vs CDMT median change 0.26 (IQR: 0.2-0.4); P = 0.007). No major bleeding was observed. Both the hybrid CDT and CDMT alone treatments are safe and effective in managing IHR PE.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid CDT is a promising technique for the management of IHR PE with insufficient thrombus load reduction by CDMT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT0447356-registration date 16 July 2020.

Ultrasound-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus large-bore thrombectomy in acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: The propensity-matched EKNARI cohort study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) and large-bore-thrombectomy (LBT) are under investigation for the treatment of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolisms (PE). Comparative studies investigating both devices are scarce.

AIMS

This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the two most frequently used devices for treatment of acute PE.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 125 patients undergoing LBT or USAT for intermediate- or high-risk PE between 2019 and 2023. Nearest neighbor propensity matching with logistic regression was used to achieve balance on potential confounders. The primary outcome was the change in the right to left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio between baseline and 24 h.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included. After propensity score matching, 95 patients remained in the sample, of which 69 (73%) underwent USAT and 26 (27%) LBT. The RV/LV ratio decrease between baseline and 24 h was greater in the LBT than in the USAT group (adjusted between-group difference: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04; p = 0.001). Both procedures were safe and adverse events occurred rarely (10% following USAT vs. 4% following LBT; p = 0.439).

CONCLUSION

In acute intermediate-high and high-risk PE, both LBT and USAT were feasible and safe. The reduction in RV/LV ratio was greater following LBT than USAT. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Percutaneous interventions for pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) ranks as a leading cause of in-hospital mortality and the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. The spectrum of PE manifestations varies widely, making it difficult to determine the best treatment approach for specific patients. Conventional treatment options include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery, but emerging percutaneous interventional procedures are being investigated for their potential benefits in heterogeneous PE populations. These novel interventional techniques encompass catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and hybrid approaches combining different mechanisms. Furthermore, inferior vena cava filters are also available as an option for PE prevention. Such interventions may offer faster improvements in right ventricular function, as well as in pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics, in individual patients. Moreover, percutaneous treatment may be a valid alternative to traditional therapies in high bleeding risk patients and could potentially reduce the burden of mortality related to major bleeds, such as that of haemorrhagic strokes. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of these techniques compared to conservative therapies have not been conclusively established. This review offers a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence for percutaneous interventions in PE and provides guidance for selecting appropriate patients and treatments. It serves as a valuable resource for future researchers and clinicians seeking to advance this field. Additionally, we explore future perspectives, proposing "percutaneous primary pulmonary intervention" as a potential paradigm shift in the field.

Cutting-Edge Techniques and Drugs for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Recent advances have led to the development of newer techniques and drugs aimed at improving PE management, reducing its associated morbidity and mortality and the complications related to anticoagulation. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge and future perspectives on PE treatment. Anticoagulation represents the first-line treatment of hemodynamically stable PE, direct oral anticoagulants being a safe and effective alternative to traditional anticoagulation: these drugs have a rapid onset of action, predictable pharmacokinetics, and low bleeding risk. Systemic fibrinolysis is suggested in patients with cardiac arrest, refractory hypotension, or shock due to PE. With this narrative review, we aim to assess the state of the art of newer techniques and drugs that could radically improve PE management in the near future: (i) mechanical thrombectomy and pulmonary embolectomy are promising techniques reserved to patients with massive PE and contraindications or failure to systemic thrombolysis; (ii) catheter-directed thrombolysis is a minimally invasive approach that can be suggested for the treatment of massive or submassive PE, but the lack of large, randomized controlled trials represents a limitation to widespread use; (iii) novel pharmacological approaches, by agents inhibiting thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, factor Xia, and the complement cascade, are currently under investigation to improve PE-related outcomes in specific settings.