1
|
Alonso-Perez E, Heisig JP, Kreyenfeld M, Gellert P, O'Sullivan JL. Intersectional Inequalities in the Transition to Grandparenthood and Cognitive Functioning: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2024; 79:gbae088. [PMID: 38761039 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbae088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In aging societies, more people become vulnerable to experiencing cognitive decline. Simultaneously, the role of grandparenthood is central for older adults and their families. Our study investigates inequalities in the level and trajectories of cognitive functioning among older adults, focusing on possible intersectional effects of social determinants and grandparenthood as a life course transition that may contribute to delaying cognitive decline. METHODS Using longitudinal data from the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe, we analyzed a sample of 19,953 individuals aged 50-85 without grandchildren at baseline. We applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy to investigate variation in cognitive functioning across 48 intersectional strata, defined by sex/gender, migration, education, and occupation. We allowed the impact of becoming a grandparent on cognitive functioning trajectories to vary across strata by including random slopes. RESULTS Intersectional strata accounted for 17.43% of the overall variance in cognitive functioning, with most of the stratum-level variation explained by additive effects of the stratum-defining characteristics. Transition to grandparenthood was associated with higher cognitive functioning, showing a stronger effect for women. Stratum-level variation in the grandparenthood effect was modest, especially after accounting for interactions between grandparenthood and the stratum-defining variables. DISCUSSION This study highlights the importance of social determinants for understanding heterogeneities in older adults' level of cognitive functioning and its association with the transition to grandparenthood. Cumulative disadvantages negatively affect cognitive functioning, hence adopting an intersectional lens is useful to decompose inequalities and derive tailored interventions to promote equal healthy aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Alonso-Perez
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Paul Heisig
- Research Group "Health and Social Inequality," WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Sociology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michaela Kreyenfeld
- Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD), Berlin, Germany
- Social Policy Groups, Hertie School, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD), Berlin, Germany
| | - Julie Lorraine O'Sullivan
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conde M, Tudor K, Begh R, Nolan R, Zhu S, Kale D, Jackson S, Livingstone-Banks J, Lindson N, Notley C, Hastings J, Cox S, Pesko MF, Thomas J, Hartmann-Boyce J. Electronic cigarettes and subsequent use of cigarettes in young people: An evidence and gap map. Addiction 2024. [PMID: 38937796 DOI: 10.1111/add.16583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The use of e-cigarettes may influence later smoking uptake in young people. Evidence and gap maps (EGMs) are interactive on-line tools that display the evidence and gaps in a specific area of policy or research. The aim of this study was to map clusters and gaps in evidence exploring the relationship between e-cigarette use or availability and subsequent combustible tobacco use in people aged < 30 years. METHODS We conducted an EGM of primary studies and systematic reviews. A framework and an interactive EGM was developed in consultation with an expert advisory group. A systematic search of five databases retrieved 9057 records, from which 134 studies were included. Systematic reviews were appraised using AMSTAR-2, and all included studies were coded into the EGM framework resulting in the interactive web-based EGM. A descriptive analysis of key characteristics of the identified evidence clusters and gaps resulted in this report. RESULTS Studies were completed between 2015 and 2023, with the first systematic reviews being published in 2017. Most studies were conducted in western high-income countries, predominantly the United States. Cohort studies were the most frequently used study design. The evidence is clustered on e-cigarette use as an exposure, with an absolute gap identified for evidence looking into the availability of e-cigarettes and subsequent cessation of cigarette smoking. We also found little evidence analysing equity factors, and little exploring characteristics of e-cigarette devices. CONCLUSIONS This evidence and gap map (EGM) offers a tool to explore the available evidence regarding the e-cigarette use/availability and later cigarette smoking in people under the age of 30 years at the time of the search. The majority of the 134 reports is from high-income countries, with an uneven geographic distribution. Most of the systematic reviews are of lower quality, suggesting the need for higher-quality reviews. The evidence is clustered around e-cigarette use as an exposure and subsequent frequency/intensity of current combustible tobacco use. Gaps in evidence focusing on e-cigarette availability, as well as on the influence of equity factors may warrant further research. This EGM can support funders and researchers in identifying future research priorities, while guiding practitioners and policymakers to the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monserrat Conde
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kate Tudor
- National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), UK
| | - Rachna Begh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Nolan
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sufen Zhu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitra Kale
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Jackson
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Nicola Lindson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Caitlin Notley
- Addiction Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Janna Hastings
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Medicine, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Sharon Cox
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael F Pesko
- Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - James Thomas
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson MV, Braithwaite FA, Arnold JB, Crouch SM, Moore E, Heil A, Cooper K, Stanton TR. The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00636. [PMID: 38916521 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique V Wilson
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Felicity A Braithwaite
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - John B Arnold
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sophie M Crouch
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emily Moore
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alrun Heil
- Department of Health Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences (BFH), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan K, Tierney S, Owen G. Applying an equity lens to social prescribing. J Public Health (Oxf) 2024:fdae105. [PMID: 38918883 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social prescribing is often described as an intervention that can help reduce health inequalities yet there is little evidence exploring this. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of accessing and analysing social prescribing (SP) service user data to demonstrate the impact of SP on health inequalities. METHODS The sample size consisted of records for 276 individuals in Site 1 and 1644 in Site 2. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess the characteristics of people accessing SP, the consistency of data collected and the missingness across both sites. RESULTS Both sites collected basic demographic data (age gender, ethnicity and deprivation). However, data collection was inconsistent; issues included poor recording of ethnicity in Site 2, and for both sites, referral source data and health and well-being outcome measures were missing. There was limited data on the wider determinants of health. These data gaps mean that impacts on health inequalities could not be fully explored. CONCLUSIONS It is essential that SP data collection includes information on user demographics and the wider determinants of health in line with PROGRESS Plus factors. Considering equity around who is accessing SP, how they access it and the outcomes is essential to evidencing how SP affects health inequalities and ensuring equitable service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koser Khan
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration (NIHR ARC-NWC), Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AT, UK
| | - Stephanie Tierney
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6HT, UK
| | - Gwilym Owen
- Department of Public Health Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li T, Mayo-Wilson E, Shaughnessy D, Qureshi R. Studying harms of interventions with an equity lens in randomized trials. Trials 2024; 25:403. [PMID: 38902776 PMCID: PMC11191320 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08239-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Equity and health equity are fundamental pillars in fostering a just and inclusive society. While equity underscores fairness in resource allocation and opportunity, health equity aims to eradicate avoidable health disparities among social groups. The concept of harms in interventions-undesirable consequences associated with the use of interventions-often varies across populations due to biological and social factors, necessitating a nuanced understanding. An equity lens reveals disparities in harm distribution, urging researchers and policymakers to address these differences in their decision-making processes. Furthermore, interventions, even well-intentioned ones, can inadvertently exacerbate disparities, emphasizing the need for comprehensive harm assessment. Integrating equity considerations in research practices and trial methodologies, through study design or through practices such as inclusive participant recruitment, is pivotal in advancing health equity. By prioritizing interventions that address disparities and ensuring inclusivity in research, we can foster a more equitable healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianjing Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Evan Mayo-Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Shaughnessy
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Riaz Qureshi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Bekerom L, van Gestel LC, Schoones JW, Bussemaker J, Adriaanse MA. Health behavior interventions among people with lower socio-economic position: a scoping review of behavior change techniques and effectiveness. Health Psychol Behav Med 2024; 12:2365931. [PMID: 38903803 PMCID: PMC11188964 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2365931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Behavior change interventions can unintendedly widen existing socio-economic health inequalities. Understanding why interventions are (in)effective among people with lower socio-economic position (SEP) is essential. Therefore, this scoping review aims to describe what is reported about the behavior change techniques (BCTs) applied within interventions and their effectiveness in encouraging physical activity and healthy eating, and reducing smoking and alcohol consumption according to SEP. Methods A systematic search was conducted in 12 electronic databases, and 151 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included and coded for health behavioral outcomes, SEP-operationalization, BCTs (type and number) and effectiveness. Results Findings suggest that approaches for measuring, defining and substantiating lower SEP vary. Current studies of behavior change interventions for people of different SEP do not systematically identify BCTs, making systematic evaluation of BCT effectiveness impossible. The effectiveness of interventions is mainly evaluated by overall intervention outcomes and SEP-moderation effects are mostly not assessed. Conclusion Using different SEP-operationalizations and not specifying BCTs hampers systematic evidence accumulation regarding effective (combinations of) BCTs for the low SEP population. To learn which BCTs effectively improve health behaviors among people with lower SEP, future intervention developers should justify how SEP is operationalized and must systematically describe and examine BCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes van den Bekerom
- Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Laurens C. van Gestel
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan W. Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jet Bussemaker
- Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands
- The Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A. Adriaanse
- Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodrigues IB, Ching P, Kalra M, Zheng R, Rabinovich A, Papaioannou A, Leckie C, Kobsar D, Fang Q, Bray S, Adachi JD. Exploring the perspectives of older adults who are pre-frail and frail to identify interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and improve mobility: a thematic content analysis. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1582. [PMID: 38872140 PMCID: PMC11170854 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19051-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Older adults who are frail are one of the most sedentary and the least physically active age groups. Prolonged sedentary time is associated with increased risk of negative health outcomes. To help design effective and sustainable content and optimize the uptake of sedentary behaviour interventions, an in-depth understanding of older adults' perceptions of sedentary behaviour is needed; however, most qualitative studies have been conducted in healthy older adults. The aim of this study was to explore perspectives of sedentary behaviour within the context of older adults who are pre-frail and frail after the winter and spring. We included participants if they: (1) spoke English or attended with a translator or caregiver, (2) were ≥ 60 years, and (3) were frail on the Morley Frail Scale. We utilized a qualitative description methodology including a semi-structured in-depth interview and thematic content analysis. Concepts from the COM-B (Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour) model were used to guide the semi-structured interviews and analysis. To ensure credibility of the data, we used an audit trail and analyst triangulation. We recruited 21 older adults (72 ± 7.3 years, 13 females, 13 frail) from southwestern Ontario, Canada. Two individuals were lost to follow-up due to medical mistrust and worse health. We transcribed 39 audio recordings. We identified three salient themes: (1) older adults rationalize their sedentary behaviours through cognitive dissonance (reflective motivation), (2) urban cities in southwestern Ontario may not be "age-friendly" (physical opportunity), and (3) exercise is something people "have to do", but hobbies are for enjoyment despite medical conditions (psychological capability). Perspectives of sedentary behaviour were different in the winter versus spring, with participants perceiving themselves to be less active in winter. Incorporating dissonance-based interventions as part of an educational program could be used to target the reflective motivation and psychological capability components. Future research should consider interdisciplinary collaborations with environmental gerontology to develop age-friendly communities that promote meaningful mobility to target physical opportunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel B Rodrigues
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Priscilla Ching
- Osteoporosis Canada, Patient-Oriented Research (POR), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mayank Kalra
- Faculty of Health, Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Rong Zheng
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Rabinovich
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Leckie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dylan Kobsar
- Faculty of Science, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Qiyin Fang
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Bray
- Faculty of Science, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stockdill ML, King A, Johnson M, Karim Z, Cooper D, Armstrong TS. The relationship between social determinants of health and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms in the primary brain tumor population: A systematic review. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:226-239. [PMID: 38737608 PMCID: PMC11085846 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact cancer-related health outcomes, including survival, but their impact on symptoms is less understood among the primary brain tumor (PBT) population. We conducted a systematic review to examine the relationships between SDOH and neurocognitive and mood-related symptoms among the PBT population. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched using PROGRESS criteria (place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital) on March 8th, 2022. Two individuals screened and assessed study quality using the NHLBI Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies. Of 3006 abstracts identified, 150 full-text articles were assessed, and 48 were included for a total sample of 28 454 study participants. Twenty-two studies examined 1 SDOH; none examined all 8. Four studies measured place of residence, 2 race/ethnicity, 13 occupation, 42 gender, 1 religion, 18 education, 4 socioeconomic status, and 15 social capital. Fifteen studies assessed neurocognitive and 37 mood-related symptoms. While higher education was associated with less neurocognitive symptoms, and among individuals with meningioma sustained unemployment after surgery was associated with depressive symptoms, results were otherwise disparate among SDOH and symptoms. Most studies were descriptive or exploratory, lacking comprehensive inclusion of SDOH. Standardizing SDOH collection, reducing bias, and recruiting diverse samples are recommended in future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macy L Stockdill
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Amanda King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Morgan Johnson
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Zuena Karim
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Diane Cooper
- National Institutes of Health Library, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Carvalho Corôa R, Ben Charif A, Robitaille V, G. V. Mochcovitch D, Abdoulaye Samri M, Akpo TG, Gogovor A, Blanchette V, Gomes Souza L, Kastner K, M. Achim A, McLean RKD, Milat A, Légaré F. Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling initiatives in health and social services: A scoping review. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14086. [PMID: 38837509 PMCID: PMC11150745 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scaling in health and social services (HSS) aims to increase the intended impact of proven effective interventions. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is critical for ensuring that scaling beneficiaries' interests are served. We aimed to identify PPI strategies and their characteristics in the science and practice of scaling in HSS. METHODS In this scoping review, we included any scaling initiative in HSS that used PPI strategies and reported PPI methods and outcomes. We searched electronic databases (e.g., Medline) from inception to 5 February 2024, and grey literature (e.g., Google). Paired reviewers independently selected and extracted eligible reports. A narrative synthesis was performed and we used the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews and the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2). FINDINGS We included 110 unique reports out of 24,579 records. In the past 5 years, the evidence on PPI in scaling has increased faster than in any previous period. We found 236 mutually nonexclusive PPI strategies among 120 scaling initiatives. Twenty-four initiatives did not target a specific country; but most of those that did so (n = 96) occurred in higher-income countries (n = 51). Community-based primary health care was the most frequent level of care (n = 103). Mostly, patients and the public were involved throughout all scaling phases (n = 46) and throughout the continuum of collaboration (n = 45); the most frequently reported ethical lens regarding the rationale for PPI was consequentialist-utilitarian (n = 96). Few papers reported PPI recruitment processes (n = 31) or incentives used (n = 18). PPI strategies occurred mostly in direct care (n = 88). Patient and public education was the PPI strategy most reported (n = 31), followed by population consultations (n = 30). CONCLUSIONS PPI in scaling is increasing in HSS. Further investigation is needed to better document the PPI experience in scaling and ensure that it occurs in a meaningful and equitable way. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Two patients were involved in this review. They shared decisions on review questions, data collection instruments, protocol design, and findings dissemination. REVIEW REGISTRATION Open Science Framework on 19 August 2020 (https://osf.io/zqpx7/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta de Carvalho Corôa
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Unité de soutien au système de santé apprenant QuébecQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | | | | | - Diogo G. V. Mochcovitch
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | | | - Talagbe Gabin Akpo
- Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Institut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Unité de soutien au système de santé apprenant QuébecQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | - Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Department of Human Kinetics and Podiatric MedicineUniversité du Québec à Trois‐RivièresTrois‐RivièresQuebecCanada
| | - Lucas Gomes Souza
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | | | - Amélie M. Achim
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- CERVO Brain Research CentreQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | - Robert K. D. McLean
- International Development Research CentreOttawaOntarioCanada
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschWestern CapeSouth Africa
| | - Andrew Milat
- School of Public HealthUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Sydney Health PartnersSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM—Centre de recherche en santé durableCentre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale‐NationaleQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Unité de soutien au système de santé apprenant QuébecQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Faculty of MedicineUniversité LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec ‐ Université LavalQuebec CityQuebecCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ghogomu ET, Welch V, Yaqubi M, Dewidar O, Barbeau VI, Biswas S, Card K, Hsiung S, Muhl C, Nelson M, Salzwedel DM, Saragosa M, Yu C, Mulligan K, Hébert P. PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2024; 20:e1382. [PMID: 38434537 PMCID: PMC10903187 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Objectives This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: The aim of this evidence and gap map is to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing interventions addressing a non-medical, health-related social need for older adults in any setting. Specific objectives are as follows: 1.To identify existing evidence from primary studies and systematic reviews on the effects of community-based interventions that address non-medical, health-related social needs of older adults to improve their health and wellbeing.2.To identify research evidence gaps for new high-quality primary studies and systematic reviews.3.To highlight evidence of health equity considerations from included primary studies and systematic reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Srija Biswas
- Canadian Institute of Social PrescribingCanadian Red CrossTorontoCanada
| | - Kiffer Card
- Faculty of Health SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
| | - Sonia Hsiung
- Canadian Institute of Social PrescribingCanadian Red CrossTorontoCanada
| | - Caitlin Muhl
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health SciencesQueens UniversityKingstonCanada
| | - Michelle Nelson
- Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Douglas M. Salzwedel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
| | | | | | - Kate Mulligan
- Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Paul Hébert
- Bruyère Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalMontrealCanada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strohacker K, Sudeck G, Keegan R, Ibrahim AH, Beaumont CT. Contextualising flexible nonlinear periodization as a person-adaptive behavioral model for exercise maintenance. Health Psychol Rev 2024; 18:285-298. [PMID: 37401403 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2233592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing focus on developing person-adaptive strategies to support sustained exercise behaviour, necessitating conceptual models to guide future research and applications. This paper introduces Flexible nonlinear periodisation (FNLP) - a proposed, but underdeveloped person-adaptive model originating in sport-specific conditioning - that, pending empirical refinement and evaluation, may be applied in health promotion and disease prevention settings. To initiate such efforts, the procedures of FNLP (i.e., acutely and dynamically matching exercise demand to individual assessments of mental and physical readiness) are integrated with contemporary health behaviour evidence and theory to propose a modified FNLP model and to show hypothesised pathways by which FNLP may support exercise adherence (e.g., flexible goal setting, management of affective responses, and provision of autonomy/variety-support). Considerations for future research are also provided to guide iterative, evidence-based efforts for further development, acceptability, implementation, and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelley Strohacker
- Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Gorden Sudeck
- Institute of Sport Science, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Interfacultary Research Institute for Sports and Physical Activity, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Richard Keegan
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Adam H Ibrahim
- Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Cory T Beaumont
- Department of Allied Health, Sport, and Wellness, Baldwin Wallace University, Berea, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelly SE, Wang X, Hsieh SC, Abdul-Wahid A, Derry M, Skidmore B, Wells GA. Additive toxicity arising from combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with renal or endometrial carcinoma: Protocol for a rapid systematic review. MethodsX 2024; 12:102730. [PMID: 38779442 PMCID: PMC11109459 DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ICI/TKI) is an effective treatment strategy for some cancers. A better understanding of the potential additive toxicity for ICI/TKI combinations is needed to inform patient and provider treatment decisions. We aim to evaluate the safety of ICI/TKI combinations for individuals with renal cell or endometrial carcinoma. This rapid systematic review (SR) protocol follows PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search will be designed, peer reviewed and executed by experienced information specialists (Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, Embase) to identify published SRs and primary studies published since the most recent SR search. Randomized, quasi- or non-randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies are eligible if they compare ICI/TKI combinations to monotherapy or standard of care in participants with renal cell or endometrial carcinoma. The primary outcome is grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse-effects. Studies will be screened, selected, extracted and assessed for risk of bias by a single reviewer and checked completely by a second. Where feasible and appropriate, we will pool studies separately by design and indication using meta-analysis and test robustness of effects using prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Results will be summarized descriptively and presented in tables and figures. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023416388).•This will be a comprehensive systematic review of the additive toxicity arising from the combined use of ICI/TKIs in patients with renal-cell or endometrial carcinoma.•We will consider treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (Grade 3 or higher).•Identified safety profile may be used to inform patient or provider treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon E. Kelly
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xiaoqin Wang
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shu-Ching Hsieh
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aws Abdul-Wahid
- Bureau of Biologics, Radiopharmaceuticals and Self-Care Products, Marketed Health Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Derry
- Bureau of Biologics, Radiopharmaceuticals and Self-Care Products, Marketed Health Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Independent Information Scientist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - George A. Wells
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anyiwe K, Erman A, Hassan M, Feld JJ, Pullenayegum E, Wong WWL, Sander B. Characterising the effectiveness of social determinants of health-focused hepatitis B interventions: a systematic review. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2024; 24:e366-e385. [PMID: 38184004 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00590-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Social determinants of health are important in designing effective interventions for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This systematic review characterises equity-oriented, social determinants of health-focused HBV interventions, and describes their effectiveness in terms of the prevention, care, or treatment of HBV in high-income countries. We searched electronic databases for central concepts of 'HBV', 'equity', 'social determinants of health', 'intervention', and 'Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries'. Screening and data abstraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were abstracted from 66 studies; articles with a comparative study design (n=36) were included in the narrative synthesis, highlighting social determinants of health domains of interventions, HBV-relevant health outcomes, and extra-health social determinants of health effects (ie, those effects that extend beyond health outcomes). Synthesis aligned with six emergent themes corresponding to HBV prevention and care: knowledge and education, diagnosis and screening, immunisation, care initiation, engagement with clinical care and treatment, and upstream prevention. Studies presented a heterogeneous array of HBV-relevant health outcomes. Most interventions were tailored for social determinants of health domains of race, ethnicity, culture, and language; drug use; and socioeconomic status. Across the themes, at least two-thirds of interventions showed comparative effectiveness for addressing HBV. Extra-health social determinants of health outcomes were observed for two studies. Considerable diversity in population-level approaches was observed regarding intervention goals and effectiveness; most interventions were effective at enhancing the prevention, care, or treatment of HBV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kikanwa Anyiwe
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Aysegul Erman
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marian Hassan
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jordan J Feld
- Sandra Rotman Centre for Global Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William W L Wong
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beate Sander
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hewitt J, Hamad N, Beecher C, Turner T, Chakraborty S. Poor reporting limited consideration of EDI in the Australian guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 170:111361. [PMID: 38631531 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Actively addressing issues of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in healthcare guidelines provides an important avenue ensure that individuals and communities receive high-quality healthcare that meets their needs. In 2020, the National Clinical Evidence Taskforce was charged with developing Australian living guidelines for COVID-19 (the Guidelines). It was intended that the Guidelines would consider the biological and social determinants of health (BSDH) underpinning evidence-based recommendations for of the treatment of COVID-19. The objective of this paper is to describe the evidence available on BSDH that is reported in published trials of disease-modifying therapies for COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Published papers of randomized controlled trials that informed clinical recommendations (for and against drug therapies for COVID-19) in the Guidelines were reviewed retrospectively using a case series design. We extracted reported characteristics relating to BSDH. These included age, sex, gender, geographical location, ethnicity (including indigenous), disability, migrant status, income, education, employment, and social support. A descriptive analysis was conducted to illustrate the characteristics available for use in guideline development. RESULTS A total of 115 peer-reviewed papers describing randomized control trials of drug interventions for the treatment of COVID-19 were included. BSDH characteristics were poorly reported. Geographical location of the study was the only category reported in all papers. While age and sex were reported in most papers (n = 109 and 108, respectively), ethnicity was reported in only one-third of papers (n = 40), social support was reported in only three papers, and employment in one paper. No paper reported on gender, disability, migrant status, income, or education. CONCLUSION Consideration of EDI issues is a crucial component of guideline development. Although these issues were widely recognized to impact on health outcomes from COVID-19, reporting of these characteristics was poor in COVID trials. Urgent action is needed to improve reporting of EDI characteristics if they are to be meaningfully considered in guideline processes, and health inequity is overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Hewitt
- National Clinical Evidence Taskforce, Australian Living Evidence Collaboration, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nada Hamad
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire Beecher
- National Clinical Evidence Taskforce, Australian Living Evidence Collaboration, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tari Turner
- National Clinical Evidence Taskforce, Australian Living Evidence Collaboration, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Samantha Chakraborty
- National Clinical Evidence Taskforce, Australian Living Evidence Collaboration, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Azañedo D, Visconti-Lopez FJ, Hernández-Vásquez A. Oral Health Service Use in Older Peruvians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int Dent J 2024; 74:473-481. [PMID: 38225185 PMCID: PMC11123544 DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this work was to analyse inequalities in oral health services utilisation (OHSU) in older Peruvian adults through comparative analysis of the years 2019 and 2021. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the 2019 and 2021 Demographic and Health Survey (ENDES). The outcome variable was OHSU by older Peruvian adults in the past year. We used Poisson generalised linear models adjusted for age and sex to assess changes in OHSU by sociodemographic characteristics. The Erreygers concentration index was used to describe the socioeconomic inequalities in OHSU. The contribution of each variable to inequalities was estimated by a decomposition analysis. RESULTS In 2021, OHSU probability amongst older Peruvian adults decreased by 37% compared to 2019. The decline was greatest in those aged 80 or older (51%), the lowest wealth quintile (47%), those with functional limitations (53%), and those whose native language is Quechua or other indigenous languages (47%). Surprisingly, we observed a reduction in OHSU inequalities (difference: -0.1074; P = .003) during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly amongst rural residents (difference: -0.0771; P = .030), the lowest wealth quintile (difference: -0.0764; P = .020), and those with functional limitations (difference: -0.3665; P < .001). Poverty accounted for 73% of the inequality in 2021. CONCLUSIONS The probability of OHSU has significantly decreased likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Paradoxically, we observed a reduction in OHSU inequalities during the pandemic, despite the known socioeconomic impact. However, further research is required to gain deeper understanding of this phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Akram Hernández-Vásquez
- Centro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pottkotter K, Hazlett M, Mansfield CJ, Rethman K, Fritz JM, Quatman-Yates CC, Briggs MS. Understanding social determinants of health and physical therapy outcomes in patients with low back pain: A scoping review. Musculoskeletal Care 2024; 22:e1888. [PMID: 38747557 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is the number one cause of disability worldwide; however, it is not clear how social determinants of health (SDOH) impact care management and outcomes related to physical therapy (PT) services for patients with LBP. OBJECTIVE The purposes of this scoping review are to examine and assimilate the literature on how SDOH and PT care relate to non-specific LBP outcomes and identify gaps in the literature to target for future research. METHODS Data were extracted from eight electronic databases from January 2011 to February 2022. Reviewers independently screened all studies using the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines. Data related to study design, type of PT, type of non-specific LBP, patient demographics, PT intervention, SDOH, and PT outcomes were extracted from the articles. RESULTS A total of 30,523 studies were screened, with 1961 articles undergoing full text review. Ultimately, 76 articles were identified for inclusion. Sex and age were the most frequent SDOH examined (88% and 78% respectively) followed by education level (18%). Approximately half of the studies that examined age, sex, and education level identified no effect on outcomes. The number of studies examining other factors was small and the types of outcomes evaluated were variable, which limited the ability to pool results. CONCLUSIONS Sex and age were the most frequent SDOH examined followed by education level. Other factors were evaluated less frequently, making it difficult to draw conclusions. Study design and heterogeneity of determinants and outcomes were barriers to examining the potential impact on patients with LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Pottkotter
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ambulatory Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Miriam Hazlett
- The Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Cody J Mansfield
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ambulatory Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Katherine Rethman
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ambulatory Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Julie M Fritz
- College of Health, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Catherine C Quatman-Yates
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthew S Briggs
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ambulatory Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Sports Medicine Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- The Ohio State University School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rizvi A, Kearns M, Dignam M, Coates A, Sharp MK, Magwood O, Labelle PR, Elmestekawy N, Rossiter S, Al‐Zubaidi AAA, Dewidar O, Idzerda L, Aguilera JMP, Seal H, Little J, Martín AMA, Petkovic J, Jull J, Gergyek L, Ghogomu ET, Shea B, Atance C, Ellingwood H, Pollard C, Mbuagbaw L, Wells GA, Welch V, Kristjansson E. Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty-related outcomes in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2024; 20:e1414. [PMID: 38887375 PMCID: PMC11180702 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
Background High-income countries offer social assistance (welfare) programs to help alleviate poverty for people with little or no income. These programs have become increasingly conditional and stringent in recent decades based on the premise that transitioning people from government support to paid work will improve their circumstances. However, many people end up with low-paying and precarious jobs that may cause more poverty because they lose benefits such as housing subsidies and health and dental insurance, while incurring job-related expenses. Conditional assistance programs are also expensive to administer and cause stigma. A guaranteed basic income (GBI) has been proposed as a more effective approach for alleviating poverty, and several experiments have been conducted in high-income countries to investigate whether GBI leads to improved outcomes compared to existing social programs. Objectives The aim of this review was to conduct a synthesis of quantitative evidence on GBI interventions in high-income countries, to compare the effectiveness of various types of GBI versus "usual care" (including existing social assistance programs) in improving poverty-related outcomes. Search Methods Searches of 16 academic databases were conducted in May 2022, using both keywords and database-specific controlled vocabulary, without limits or restrictions on language or date. Sources of gray literature (conference, governmental, and institutional websites) were searched in September 2022. We also searched reference lists of review articles, citations of included articles, and tables of contents of relevant journals in September 2022. Hand searching for recent publications was conducted until December 2022. Selection Criteria We included all quantitative study designs except cross-sectional (at one timepoint), with or without control groups. We included studies in high income countries with any population and with interventions meeting our criteria for GBI: unconditional, with regular payments in cash (not in-kind) that were fixed or predictable in amount. Although two primary outcomes of interest were selected a priori (food insecurity, and poverty level assessed using official, national, or international measures), we did not screen studies on the basis of reported outcomes because it was not possible to define all potentially relevant poverty-related outcomes in advance. Data Collection and Analysis We followed the Campbell Collaboration conduct and reporting guidelines to ensure a rigorous methodology. The risk of bias was assessed across seven domains: confounding, selection, attrition, motivation, implementation, measurement, and analysis/reporting. We conducted meta-analyses where results could be combined; otherwise, we presented the results in tables. We reported effect estimates as standard mean differences (SMDs) if the included studies reported them or provided sufficient data for us to calculate them. To compare the effects of different types of interventions, we developed a GBI typology based on the characteristics of experimental interventions as well as theoretical conceptualizations of GBI. Eligible poverty-related outcomes were classified into categories and sub-categories, to facilitate the synthesis of the individual findings. Because most of the included studies analyzed experiments conducted by other researchers, it was necessary to divide our analysis according to the "experiment" stage (i.e., design, recruitment, intervention, data collection) and the "study" stage (data analysis and reporting of results). Main Results Our searches yielded 24,476 records from databases and 80 from other sources. After screening by title and abstract, the full texts of 294 potentially eligible articles were retrieved and screened, resulting in 27 included studies on 10 experiments. Eight of the experiments were RCTs, one included both an RCT site and a "saturation" site, and one used a repeated cross-sectional design. The duration ranged from one to 5 years. The control groups in all 10 experiments received "usual care" (i.e., no GBI intervention). The total number of participants was unknown because some of the studies did not report exact sample sizes. Of the studies that did, the smallest had 138 participants and the largest had 8019. The risk of bias assessments found "some concerns" for at least one domain in all 27 studies and "high risk" for at least one domain in 25 studies. The risk of bias was assessed as high in 21 studies due to attrition and in 22 studies due to analysis and reporting bias. To compare the interventions, we developed a classification framework of five GBI types, four of which were implemented in the experiments, and one that is used in new experiments now underway. The included studies reported 176 poverty-related outcomes, including one pre-defined primary outcome: food insecurity. The second primary outcome (poverty level assessed using official, national, or international measures) was not reported in any of the included studies. We classified the reported outcomes into seven categories: food insecurity (as a category), economic/material, physical health, psychological/mental health, social, educational, and individual choice/agency. Food insecurity was reported in two studies, both showing improvements (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.49, and SMD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.26) which were not pooled because of different study designs. We conducted meta-analyses on four secondary outcomes that were reported in more than one study: subjective financial well-being, self-rated overall physical health, self-rated life satisfaction, and self-rated mental distress. Improvements were reported, except for overall physical health or if the intervention was similar to existing social assistance. The results for the remaining 170 outcomes, each reported in only one study, were summarized in tables by category and subcategory. Adverse effects were reported in some studies, but only for specific subgroups of participants, and not consistently, so these results may have been due to chance. Authors' Conclusions The results of the included studies were difficult to synthesize because of the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. This was due in part to poverty being multidimensional, so outcomes covered various aspects of life (economic, social, psychological, educational, agency, mental and physical health). Evidence from future studies would be easier to assess if outcomes were measured using more common, validated instruments. Based on our analysis of the included studies, a supplemental type of GBI (provided along with existing programs) may be effective in alleviating poverty-related outcomes. This approach may also be safer than a wholesale reform of existing social assistance approaches, which could have unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Rizvi
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Michael Dignam
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Alison Coates
- Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Melissa K. Sharp
- Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, School of Population HealthRCSI University of Medicine and Health SciencesDublinIreland
| | - Olivia Magwood
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
- Interdisciplinary School of Health SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Nour Elmestekawy
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
- Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Sydney Rossiter
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Omar Dewidar
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
- Temerty School of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Leanne Idzerda
- Centre for Global Health ResearchUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Harshita Seal
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Julian Little
- Department of Epidemiology & Community MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | | | - Janet Jull
- School of Rehabilitation TherapyQueen's UniversityKingstonOntarioCanada
| | - Lucas Gergyek
- Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooOntarioCanada
| | | | - Beverley Shea
- Department of Epidemiology and Community MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Cristina Atance
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Christina Pollard
- School of Population HealthCurtin UniversityBentleyWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - George A. Wells
- School of Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Vivian Welch
- Methods Centre, Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown P, Singh H, Su E, Sirisegaram L, Munce SEP, Eaton AD, Zhabokritsky A, McKinlay S, Kokorelias KM. Understanding the use of co-design methods for research involving older adults living with HIV: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303580. [PMID: 38814951 PMCID: PMC11139262 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
There is a growing population of adults aged 50 years or older living with HIV, facing unique challenges in care due to age, minority status, and stigma. Co-design methodologies, aligning with patient-centered care, have potential for informing interventions addressing the complex needs of older adults with HIV. Despite challenges, co-design has shown promise in empowering older individuals to actively participate in shaping their care experiences. The scoping review outlined here aims to identify gaps in existing co-design work with this population, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity based on PROGRESS-Plus characteristics for future patient-oriented research. This scoping review protocol is informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual to explore co-design methods in geriatric HIV care literature. The methodology encompasses six stages: 1) developing research questions, 2) creating a search strategy, 3) screening and selecting evidence, 4) data extraction, 5) data analysis using content analysis, and 6) consultation with key stakeholders, including community partners and individuals with lived experience. The review will involve a comprehensive literature search, including peer-reviewed databases and gray literature, to identify relevant studies conducted in the past 20 years. The inclusive criteria focus on empirical data related to co-design methods in HIV care for individuals aged 50 or older, aiming to inform future research and co-design studies in geriatric HIV care. The study will be limited by the exclusion of papers not published or translated to English. Additionally, the varied terminology used to describe co-design across different research may result in the exclusion of articles using alternative terms. The consultation with key stakeholders will be crucial for translating insights into meaningful co-design solutions for virtual HIV care, aiming to provide a comprehensive synthesis that informs evidence-based strategies and addresses disparities in geriatric HIV care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige Brown
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Undergraduate Medical Education, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esther Su
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luxey Sirisegaram
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah E. P. Munce
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew D. Eaton
- Faculty of Social Work–Saskatoon Campus, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alice Zhabokritsky
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stuart McKinlay
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Undergraduate Medical Education, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristina M. Kokorelias
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barr J, Mackie A, Gorelik D, Buckingham H, Clark D, Brissett AE. Health Disparities Research in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Scoping Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024. [PMID: 38796736 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health disparities contribute significantly to disease, health outcomes, and access to care. Little is known about the state of health disparities in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS). This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing disparities research in FPRS and guide future disparities-related efforts. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS We conducted a scoping review in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search included all years through March 03, 2023. All peer-reviewed primary literature of any design related to disparities in FPRS was eligible for inclusion. RESULTS Of the 12283 unique abstracts identified, 215 studies underwent full-text review, and 108 remained for final review. The most frequently examined topics were cleft lip and palate (40.7%), facial trauma (29.6%), and gender affirmation (9.3%). There was limited coverage of other areas. Consideration of race/ethnicity (68.5%), socioeconomic status (65.7%), and gender/sex (40.7%) were most common. Social capital (0%), religion, occupation, and features of relationships were least discussed (0.01% each). The majority of studies were published after 2018 (59.2%) and were of nonprospective designs (95.4%). Most studies focused on disparity detection (80.6%) and few focused on understanding (13.9%) or reducing disparities (0.06%). CONCLUSION This study captures the existing literature on health disparities in FPRS. Studies are concentrated in a few areas of FPRS and are primarily in the detecting phase of public health research. Our review highlights several gaps and opportunities for future disparities-related focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Barr
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Aaron Mackie
- School of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Gorelik
- Department of Otolaryngology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hannah Buckingham
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Delaney Clark
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony E Brissett
- Department of Otolaryngology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen CX, Rogers SK, Li R, Hinrichs RJ, Fortenberry JD, Carpenter JS. Social Determinants of Health and Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024:104574. [PMID: 38788887 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Social determinants of health play a key role in health disparities. Dysmenorrhea is a highly prevalent and impactful public health problem affecting reproductive-age females. Systematically examining social determinants of health in dysmenorrhea is important for identifying gaps in the literature and informing research, policy, and clinical practice to reduce the public health burden associated with dysmenorrhea. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the literature on social determinants of health and dysmenorrhea. The review protocol was prospectively registered. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar through February 2024 using search strategies informed by the literature. Screening of the articles, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by at least two reviewers on the Covidence platform. Among 2594 unique records screened, 166 met eligibility criteria and were included for data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Evidence suggests traumatic experiences, toxic environmental exposures, female genital mutilation, job-related stress, lack of menstrual education, and low social support were associated with worse dysmenorrhea outcomes. However, evidence was equivocal regarding relationships between dysmenorrhea outcomes and social determinants of health factors, including socioeconomic status, geographical location, race/ethnicity, employment, and religion. Nearly all articles (99.4%) had a high or very high overall risk of bias. Relationships between social determinants of health and dysmenorrhea outcomes were often inconsistent and complicated by heterogeneous study populations and methodologies. More rigorous research examining social determinants of health in dysmenorrhea is needed to inform policy and clinical practice. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review synthesizes evidence linking social determinants of health and dysmenorrhea. Relationships between SDoH and dysmenorrhea were often equivocal and complicated by heterogeneous study populations and methodologies. We identify directions for future research and SDoH factors that could be addressed clinically (e.g., trauma, menstrual education, occupational stress).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah K Rogers
- Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis School of Science Department of Psychology
| | - Rui Li
- Seattle Children's Research Institute; University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spiga F, Davies AL, Tomlinson E, Moore TH, Dawson S, Breheny K, Savović J, Gao Y, Phillips SM, Hillier-Brown F, Hodder RK, Wolfenden L, Higgins JP, Summerbell CD. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 5:CD015328. [PMID: 38763517 PMCID: PMC11102828 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015328.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of obesity in children is an international public health priority given the prevalence of the condition (and its significant impact on health, development and well-being). Interventions that aim to prevent obesity involve behavioural change strategies that promote healthy eating or 'activity' levels (physical activity, sedentary behaviour and/or sleep) or both, and work by reducing energy intake and/or increasing energy expenditure, respectively. There is uncertainty over which approaches are more effective and numerous new studies have been published over the last five years, since the previous version of this Cochrane review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions that aim to prevent obesity in children by modifying dietary intake or 'activity' levels, or a combination of both, on changes in BMI, zBMI score and serious adverse events. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials in children (mean age 5 years and above but less than 12 years), comparing diet or 'activity' interventions (or both) to prevent obesity with no intervention, usual care, or with another eligible intervention, in any setting. Studies had to measure outcomes at a minimum of 12 weeks post baseline. We excluded interventions designed primarily to improve sporting performance. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our outcomes were body mass index (BMI), zBMI score and serious adverse events, assessed at short- (12 weeks to < 9 months from baseline), medium- (9 months to < 15 months) and long-term (≥ 15 months) follow-up. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS This review includes 172 studies (189,707 participants); 149 studies (160,267 participants) were included in meta-analyses. One hundred forty-six studies were based in high-income countries. The main setting for intervention delivery was schools (111 studies), followed by the community (15 studies), the home (eight studies) and a clinical setting (seven studies); one intervention was conducted by telehealth and 31 studies were conducted in more than one setting. Eighty-six interventions were implemented for less than nine months; the shortest was conducted over one visit and the longest over four years. Non-industry funding was declared by 132 studies; 24 studies were funded in part or wholly by industry. Dietary interventions versus control Dietary interventions, compared with control, may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 0, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 to 0.10; 5 studies, 2107 participants; low-certainty evidence) and at medium-term follow-up (MD -0.01, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.12; 9 studies, 6815 participants; low-certainty evidence) or zBMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.01; 7 studies, 5285 participants; low-certainty evidence). Dietary interventions, compared with control, probably have little to no effect on BMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.17, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.13; 2 studies, 945 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and zBMI at short- or medium-term follow-up (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.01; 8 studies, 3695 participants; MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.02; 9 studies, 7048 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Five studies (1913 participants; very low-certainty evidence) reported data on serious adverse events: one reported serious adverse events (e.g. allergy, behavioural problems and abdominal discomfort) that may have occurred as a result of the intervention; four reported no effect. Activity interventions versus control Activity interventions, compared with control, may have little to no effect on BMI and zBMI at short-term or long-term follow-up (BMI short-term: MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.13; 14 studies, 4069 participants; zBMI short-term: MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.02; 6 studies, 3580 participants; low-certainty evidence; BMI long-term: MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.10; 8 studies, 8302 participants; zBMI long-term: MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.04; 6 studies, 6940 participants; low-certainty evidence). Activity interventions likely result in a slight reduction of BMI and zBMI at medium-term follow-up (BMI: MD -0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.05; 16 studies, 21,286 participants; zBMI: MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.02; 13 studies, 20,600 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Eleven studies (21,278 participants; low-certainty evidence) reported data on serious adverse events; one study reported two minor ankle sprains and one study reported the incident rate of adverse events (e.g. musculoskeletal injuries) that may have occurred as a result of the intervention; nine studies reported no effect. Dietary and activity interventions versus control Dietary and activity interventions, compared with control, may result in a slight reduction in BMI and zBMI at short-term follow-up (BMI: MD -0.11, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.01; 27 studies, 16,066 participants; zBMI: MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.00; 26 studies, 12,784 participants; low-certainty evidence) and likely result in a reduction of BMI and zBMI at medium-term follow-up (BMI: MD -0.11, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.00; 21 studies, 17,547 participants; zBMI: MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.02; 24 studies, 20,998 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Dietary and activity interventions compared with control may result in little to no difference in BMI and zBMI at long-term follow-up (BMI: MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.16; 16 studies, 22,098 participants; zBMI: MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.01; 22 studies, 23,594 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nineteen studies (27,882 participants; low-certainty evidence) reported data on serious adverse events: four studies reported occurrence of serious adverse events (e.g. injuries, low levels of extreme dieting behaviour); 15 studies reported no effect. Heterogeneity was apparent in the results for all outcomes at the three follow-up times, which could not be explained by the main setting of the interventions (school, home, school and home, other), country income status (high-income versus non-high-income), participants' socioeconomic status (low versus mixed) and duration of the intervention. Most studies excluded children with a mental or physical disability. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The body of evidence in this review demonstrates that a range of school-based 'activity' interventions, alone or in combination with dietary interventions, may have a modest beneficial effect on obesity in childhood at short- and medium-term, but not at long-term follow-up. Dietary interventions alone may result in little to no difference. Limited evidence of low quality was identified on the effect of dietary and/or activity interventions on severe adverse events and health inequalities; exploratory analyses of these data suggest no meaningful impact. We identified a dearth of evidence for home and community-based settings (e.g. delivered through local youth groups), for children living with disabilities and indicators of health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Spiga
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Annabel L Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eve Tomlinson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Theresa Hm Moore
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Katie Breheny
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jelena Savović
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Yang Gao
- Department of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Sophie M Phillips
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Durham University, Durham, UK
- Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Child Health and Physical Activity Laboratory, School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frances Hillier-Brown
- Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Human Nutrition Research Centre and Population Health Sciences Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Rebecca K Hodder
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Population Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia
- National Centre of Implementation Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Julian Pt Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Carolyn D Summerbell
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Durham University, Durham, UK
- Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spiga F, Tomlinson E, Davies AL, Moore TH, Dawson S, Breheny K, Savović J, Hodder RK, Wolfenden L, Higgins JP, Summerbell CD. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 5:CD015330. [PMID: 38763518 PMCID: PMC11102824 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015330.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of obesity in adolescents is an international public health priority. The prevalence of overweight and obesity is over 25% in North and South America, Australia, most of Europe, and the Gulf region. Interventions that aim to prevent obesity involve strategies that promote healthy diets or 'activity' levels (physical activity, sedentary behaviour and/or sleep) or both, and work by reducing energy intake and/or increasing energy expenditure, respectively. There is uncertainty over which approaches are more effective, and numerous new studies have been published over the last five years since the previous version of this Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions that aim to prevent obesity in adolescents by modifying dietary intake or 'activity' levels, or a combination of both, on changes in BMI, zBMI score and serious adverse events. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials in adolescents (mean age 12 years and above but less than 19 years), comparing diet or 'activity' interventions (or both) to prevent obesity with no intervention, usual care, or with another eligible intervention, in any setting. Studies had to measure outcomes at a minimum of 12 weeks post baseline. We excluded interventions designed primarily to improve sporting performance. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our outcomes were BMI, zBMI score and serious adverse events, assessed at short- (12 weeks to < 9 months from baseline), medium- (9 months to < 15 months) and long-term (≥ 15 months) follow-up. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS This review includes 74 studies (83,407 participants); 54 studies (46,358 participants) were included in meta-analyses. Sixty studies were based in high-income countries. The main setting for intervention delivery was schools (57 studies), followed by home (nine studies), the community (five studies) and a primary care setting (three studies). Fifty-one interventions were implemented for less than nine months; the shortest was conducted over one visit and the longest over 28 months. Sixty-two studies declared non-industry funding; five were funded in part by industry. Dietary interventions versus control The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of dietary interventions on body mass index (BMI) at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) -0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.41 to 0.06; 3 studies, 605 participants), medium-term follow-up (MD -0.65, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.11; 3 studies, 900 participants), and standardised BMI (zBMI) at long-term follow-up (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.10; 2 studies, 1089 participants); all very low-certainty evidence. Compared with control, dietary interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.30, 95% CI -1.67 to 1.07; 1 study, 44 participants); zBMI at short-term (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01; 5 studies, 3154 participants); and zBMI at medium-term (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.21; 1 study, 112 participants) follow-up; all low-certainty evidence. Dietary interventions may have little to no effect on serious adverse events (two studies, 377 participants; low-certainty evidence). Activity interventions versus control Compared with control, activity interventions do not reduce BMI at short-term follow-up (MD -0.64, 95% CI -1.86 to 0.58; 6 studies, 1780 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably do not reduce zBMI at medium- (MD 0, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05; 6 studies, 5335 participants) or long-term (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.02; 1 study, 985 participants) follow-up; both moderate-certainty evidence. Activity interventions do not reduce zBMI at short-term follow-up (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05; 7 studies, 4718 participants; high-certainty evidence), but may reduce BMI slightly at medium-term (MD -0.32, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.11; 3 studies, 2143 participants) and long-term (MD -0.28, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.05; 1 study, 985 participants) follow-up; both low-certainty evidence. Seven studies (5428 participants; low-certainty evidence) reported data on serious adverse events: two reported injuries relating to the exercise component of the intervention and five reported no effect of intervention on reported serious adverse events. Dietary and activity interventions versus control Dietary and activity interventions, compared with control, do not reduce BMI at short-term follow-up (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.13; 11 studies, 3429 participants; high-certainty evidence), and probably do not reduce BMI at medium-term (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.11; 8 studies, 5612 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or long-term (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.16; 6 studies, 8736 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) follow-up. They may have little to no effect on zBMI in the short term, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.09, 95% CI -0.2 to 0.02; 3 studies, 515 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and they may not reduce zBMI at medium-term (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.01; 6 studies, 3511 participants; low-certainty evidence) or long-term (MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.01; 7 studies, 8430 participants; low-certainty evidence) follow-up. Four studies (2394 participants) reported data on serious adverse events (very low-certainty evidence): one reported an increase in weight concern in a few adolescents and three reported no effect. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence demonstrates that dietary interventions may have little to no effect on obesity in adolescents. There is low-certainty evidence that activity interventions may have a small beneficial effect on BMI at medium- and long-term follow-up. Diet plus activity interventions may result in little to no difference. Importantly, this updated review also suggests that interventions to prevent obesity in this age group may result in little to no difference in serious adverse effects. Limitations of the evidence include inconsistent results across studies, lack of methodological rigour in some studies and small sample sizes. Further research is justified to investigate the effects of diet and activity interventions to prevent childhood obesity in community settings, and in young people with disabilities, since very few ongoing studies are likely to address these. Further randomised trials to address the remaining uncertainty about the effects of diet, activity interventions, or both, to prevent childhood obesity in schools (ideally with zBMI as the measured outcome) would need to have larger samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Spiga
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eve Tomlinson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Annabel L Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Theresa Hm Moore
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Katie Breheny
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jelena Savović
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca K Hodder
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Julian Pt Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Carolyn D Summerbell
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Durham University, Durham, UK
- Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanneke R, Brunskill A. Searching for the social determinants of health: observations from evidence synthesis publications. Syst Rev 2024; 13:134. [PMID: 38755700 PMCID: PMC11097542 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02551-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The social determinants of health (SDOH) are the focus of an exponentially increasing number of publications, including evidence syntheses. However, there is not an established standard for searching for SDOH literature. This study seeks to identify published evidence syntheses pertaining to the SDOH, analyzing the search strategies used and the studies included within these reviews. The primary objectives are to compare search strategies and create a test set of SDOH publications. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for evidence syntheses that mentioned the SDOH in their research questions and included an SDOH search strategy. Relevant data extracted from each review included databases searched; search terms used for the SDOH; conceptual frameworks referenced; and the citations of primary studies included in the reviews, which were compiled to form a test set of cited papers. The relative recall of the respective search strategies was tested by documenting the total number of MEDLINE results each retrieved and the number of test set papers retrieved. RESULTS Sixty-four evidence syntheses were identified and included in the analysis, and 2750 cited papers were extracted. Findings indicate few commonalities across search strategies in search terms used, the total number of results retrieved, and the number of test set cited papers retrieved. One hundred and ninety-three unique MeSH terms and 1385 unique keywords and phrases were noted among the various search strategies. The number of total results retrieved by the SDOH search strategies ranged from 21,793 to over 16 million. The percentage of cited papers retrieved by the search strategies ranged from 2.46 to 97.9%. Less than 3% of the cited papers were indexed with the Social Determinants of Health MeSH. CONCLUSIONS There has been little consistency across evidence syntheses in approaches to searching for SDOH literature. Differences in these strategies could have a significant impact on what literature is retrieved, included in reviews, and, consequently, incorporated into evidence-based practice. By documenting these differences and creating a set of papers relevant to SDOH, this research provides a snapshot of the current challenges in searching for SDOH content and lays the groundwork for the creation of a standardized search approach for SDOH literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Hanneke
- Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, 1750 W Polk St. MC 763, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Amelia Brunskill
- Library of the Health Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, 1750 W Polk St. MC 763, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rodrigues IB, Tariq S, Kouroukis A, Swance R, Adachi J, Bray S, Fang Q, Ioannidis G, Kobsar D, Rabinovich A, Papaioannou A, Zheng R. Mapping sedentary behaviour (MAPS-B) in winter and spring using wearable sensors, indoor positioning systems, and diaries in older adults who are pre-frail and frail: A feasibility longitudinal study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0290197. [PMID: 38753692 PMCID: PMC11098368 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Older adults who are frail are likely to be sedentary. Prior interventions to reduce sedentary time in older adults have not been effective as there is little research about the context of sedentary behaviour (posture, location, purpose, social environment). Moreover, there is limited evidence on feasible measures to assess context of sedentary behaviour in older adults. The aim of our study was to determine the feasibility of measuring context of sedentary behaviour in older adults with pre-frailty or frailty using a combination of objective and self-report measures. We defined "feasibility process" using recruitment (20 participants within two-months), retention (85%), and refusal (20%) rates and "feasibility resource" if the measures capture context and can be linked (e.g., sitting-kitchen-eating-alone) and are all participants willing to use the measures. Context was assessed using a wearable sensor to assess posture, a smart home monitoring system for location, and an electronic or hard-copy diary for purpose and social context over three days in winter and spring. We approached 80 potential individuals, and 58 expressed interest; of the 58 individuals, 37 did not enroll due to lack of interest or medical mistrust (64% refusal). We recruited 21 older adults (72±7.3 years, 13 females, 13 frail) within two months and experienced two dropouts due to medical mistrust or worsening health (90% retention). The wearable sensor, indoor positioning system, and electronic diary accurately captured one domain of context, but the hard copy was often not completed with enough detail, so it was challenging to link it to the other devices. Although not all participants were willing to use the wearable sensor, indoor positioning system, or electronic diary, we were able to triage the measures of those who did. The use of wearable sensors and electronic diaries may be a feasible method to assess context of sedentary behaviour, but more research is needed with device-based measures in diverse groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel B. Rodrigues
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Suleman Tariq
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexa Kouroukis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Swance
- Faculty of Science, Department of Life Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Adachi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Bray
- Faculty of Science, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Qiyin Fang
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Engineering Physics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - George Ioannidis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dylan Kobsar
- Faculty of Science, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Rabinovich
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Evidence and Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rong Zheng
- Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computing and Software, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ocaña-Ortiz A, Gea-Caballero V, Juárez-Vela R, Peiró R, Pérez-Sanz E, Santolalla-Arnedo I, Sufrate-Sorzano T, Garrote-Cámara ME, Paredes-Carbonell JJ. Health equity in urban and rural settings: implementation of the place standard tool in Spain. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1292032. [PMID: 38803816 PMCID: PMC11129683 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The physical, social, and economic characteristics of neighborhoods and municipalities determine the health of their residents, shaping their behaviors and choices regarding health and well-being. Addressing local environmental inequalities requires an intersectoral, participatory, and equity-focused approach. Community participation plays a vital role by providing deeper insights into local contexts, integrating community knowledge and values into processes, and promoting healthier, fairer, and more equitable actions. In recent years, various tools have been developed to assess places and transform them into health-promoting settings. One such tool, the Place Standard Tool (PST), facilitates discussions on Social Determinants of Health grouped into 14 themes, serving as a starting point for local health interventions. In this study, that took place between August 2019 and February 2020, we described the resident's perceptions of two municipalities in the Valencian Community, Spain, using the validated Spanish version of the PST. A mixed-method convergent-parallel design was used to gain a holistic insight into residents' experiences concerning their physical, economic, and social environment. A total of 356 individuals from both municipalities participated in the study through discussion groups, structured interviews, and online survey. Descriptive analysis of the individual questionnaire answers was conducted, and differences between municipalities were explored. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on structured interviews and discussion groups. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to facilitate their comparison and identify areas of convergence or divergence in the findings. Overall, rural areas received more favorable evaluations compared to urban ones. Public Transport as well as Work and Local Economy were consistently rated the lowest across all groups and contexts, while Identity and Belonging received the highest ratings. In the urban area, additional negative ratings were observed for Traffic and Parking, Housing and Community, and Care and Maintenance. Conversely, Identity and Belonging, Natural Spaces, Streets and Spaces, Social Interaction, and Services emerged as the highest-rated themes overall. In the rural context, positive evaluations were given to Walking or Cycling, Traffic and Parking, Housing and Community, and Influence and Sense of Control. Significant differences (p < 0.01) between urban and rural settings were observed in dimensions related to mobility, spaces, housing, social interaction, and identity and belonging. Our study illustrated the capacity of the PST to identifying aspects within local settings that influence health, revealing both positive and challenging factors. Successful implementation requires appropriate territorial delineation, support from local authorities, and effective management of expectations. Furthermore, the tool facilitated community participation in decision-making about local environments, promoting equity by connecting institutional processes with citizen needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Ocaña-Ortiz
- Local Action and Health Equity Group (ALES Group), Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Gandia Health Department, Gandia, Spain
| | - Vicente Gea-Caballero
- Faculty of Health Sciences, VIU Valencia International University, Valencia, Spain
- Research Group SALCOM Community Health and Care, Valencia International University, Valencia, Spain
| | - Raúl Juárez-Vela
- Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- GRUPAC, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Rosana Peiró
- Local Action and Health Equity Group (ALES Group), Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Publica Health General Directorate, Health Department, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERESP ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Pérez-Sanz
- Local Action and Health Equity Group (ALES Group), Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Publica Health General Directorate, Health Department, Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain
| | - Iván Santolalla-Arnedo
- Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- GRUPAC, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Teresa Sufrate-Sorzano
- Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- GRUPAC, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - María Elena Garrote-Cámara
- Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
- GRUPAC, University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Joan Josep Paredes-Carbonell
- Local Action and Health Equity Group (ALES Group), Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research in the Valencian Region (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- Public Health Center of Alzira, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Munce SEP, Wong E, Luong D, Rao J, Cunningham J, Bailey K, John T, Barber C, Batthish M, Chambers K, Cleverley K, Crabtree M, Diaz S, Dimitropoulos G, Gorter JW, Grahovac D, Grimes R, Guttman B, Hébert ML, Henze M, Higgins A, Khodyakov D, Li E, Lo L, Macgregor L, Mooney S, Severino SM, Mukerji G, Penner M, Pidduck J, Shulman R, Stromquist L, Trbovich P, Wan M, Williams L, Yates D, Toulany A. Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080822. [PMID: 38719333 PMCID: PMC11086512 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION https://osf.io/beqjr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E P Munce
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elliott Wong
- University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorothy Luong
- KITE Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justin Rao
- University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessie Cunningham
- Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Bailey
- University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tomisin John
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Barber
- Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Kyle Chambers
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin Cleverley
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Queen Street Site, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marilyn Crabtree
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanober Diaz
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gina Dimitropoulos
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jan Willem Gorter
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Southern Ontario, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Danijela Grahovac
- National Health Hub in Transition, Children's Healthcare Canada, Hamilton, Southern Ontario, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Southern Ontario, Canada
| | - Ruth Grimes
- Canadian Pediatric Society, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Beverly Guttman
- Provincial Council for Maternal and Child Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michèle L Hébert
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Megan Henze
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Surrey Place Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Higgins
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Elaine Li
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisha Lo
- University of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Macgregor
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Martin Luther University College, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Mooney
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Samadhi Mora Severino
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geetha Mukerji
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melanie Penner
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacklynn Pidduck
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rayzel Shulman
- University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Endocrinology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Stromquist
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- National Health Hub in Transition, Children's Healthcare Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia Trbovich
- University of Toronto Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Wan
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Williams
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darryl Yates
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Integrated Knowledge Translation Panel Member, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alene Toulany
- University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Granton D, Rodrigues M, Raparelli V, Honarmand K, Agarwal A, Friedrich JO, Perna B, Spaggiari R, Fortunato V, Risdonne G, Kho M, VanderKaay S, Chaudhuri D, Gomez-Builes C, D'Aragon F, Wiseman D, Lau VI, Lin C, Reid J, Trivedi V, Prakash V, Belley-Cote E, Al Mandhari M, Thabane L, Pilote L, Burns KEA. Sex and gender-based analysis and diversity metric reporting in acute care trials published in high-impact journals: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081118. [PMID: 38719297 PMCID: PMC11103199 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterise sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and diversity metric reporting, representation of female/women participants in acute care trials and temporal changes in reporting before and after publication of the 2016 Sex and Gender Equity in Research guideline. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE for trials published in five leading medical journals in 2014, 2018 and 2020. STUDY SELECTION Trials that enrolled acutely ill adults, compared two or more interventions and reported at least one clinical outcome. DATA ABSTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS 4 reviewers screened citations and 22 reviewers abstracted data, in duplicate. We compared reporting differences between intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiology trials. RESULTS We included 88 trials (75 (85.2%) ICU and 13 (14.8%) cardiology) (n=111 428; 38 140 (34.2%) females/women). Of 23 (26.1%) trials that reported an SGBA, most used a forest plot (22 (95.7%)), were prespecified (21 (91.3%)) and reported a sex-by-intervention interaction with a significance test (19 (82.6%)). Discordant sex and gender terminology were found between headings and subheadings within baseline characteristics tables (17/32 (53.1%)) and between baseline characteristics tables and SGBA (4/23 (17.4%)). Only 25 acute care trials (28.4%) reported race or ethnicity. Participants were predominantly white (78.8%) and male/men (65.8%). No trial reported gendered-social factors. SGBA reporting and female/women representation did not improve temporally. Compared with ICU trials, cardiology trials reported significantly more SGBA (15/75 (20%) vs 8/13 (61.5%) p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Acute care trials in leading medical journals infrequently included SGBA, female/women and non-white trial participants, reported race or ethnicity and never reported gender-related factors. Substantial opportunity exists to improve SGBA and diversity metric reporting and recruitment of female/women participants in acute care trials. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022282565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Granton
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Myanca Rodrigues
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valeria Raparelli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- University Center for Studies on Gender Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Kimia Honarmand
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Mackenzie Health, Vaughan, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan O Friedrich
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Critical Care and Medicine Departments, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benedetta Perna
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Spaggiari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Valeria Fortunato
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gianluca Risdonne
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Michelle Kho
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Physiotherapy Department, Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra VanderKaay
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dipayan Chaudhuri
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolina Gomez-Builes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frédérick D'Aragon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel Wiseman
- Departments of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vincent Issac Lau
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Celina Lin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Reid
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vatsal Trivedi
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Varuna Prakash
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Belley-Cote
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Divisions of Cardiology and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maha Al Mandhari
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louise Pilote
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen E A Burns
- Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Critical Care and Medicine Departments, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tarride JE, Okoh A, Aryal K, Prada C, Milinkovic D, Keepanasseril A, Iorio A. Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registries. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:187. [PMID: 38711103 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03193-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare disease registries (RDRs) are valuable tools for improving clinical care and advancing research. However, they often vary qualitatively, structurally, and operationally in ways that can determine their potential utility as a source of evidence to support decision-making regarding the approval and funding of new treatments for rare diseases. OBJECTIVES The goal of this research project was to review the literature on rare disease registries and identify best practices to improve the quality of RDRs. METHODS In this scoping review, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE as well as the websites of regulatory bodies and health technology assessment agencies from 2010 to April 2023 for literature offering guidance or recommendations to ensure, improve, or maintain quality RDRs. RESULTS The search yielded 1,175 unique references, of which 64 met the inclusion criteria. The characteristics of RDRs deemed to be relevant to their quality align with three main domains and several sub-domains considered to be best practices for quality RDRs: (1) governance (registry purpose and description; governance structure; stakeholder engagement; sustainability; ethics/legal/privacy; data governance; documentation; and training and support); (2) data (standardized disease classification; common data elements; data dictionary; data collection; data quality and assurance; and data analysis and reporting); and (3) information technology (IT) infrastructure (physical and virtual infrastructure; and software infrastructure guided by FAIR principles (Findability; Accessibility; Interoperability; and Reusability). CONCLUSIONS Although RDRs face numerous challenges due to their small and dispersed populations, RDRs can generate quality data to support healthcare decision-making through the use of standards and principles on strong governance, quality data practices, and IT infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Tarride
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Programs for the Assessment of Technologies in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - A Okoh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - K Aryal
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - C Prada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Deborah Milinkovic
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - A Keepanasseril
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - A Iorio
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hollands GJ, South E, Shemilt I, Oliver S, Thomas J, Sowden AJ. Methods used to conceptualize dimensions of health equity impacts of public health interventions in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111312. [PMID: 38432524 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our aims were to, first, identify and summarize the use of methods, frameworks, and tools as a conceptual basis for investigating dimensions of equity impacts of public health interventions in systematic reviews including an equity focus. These include PROGRESS-Plus, which identifies key sociodemographic characteristics that determine health outcomes. Second, we aimed to document challenges and opportunities encountered in the application of such methods, as reported in systematic reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a methodological study, comprising an overview of systematic reviews with a focus on, or that aimed to assess, the equity impacts of public health interventions. We used electronic searches of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Promoting Health Effectiveness Reviews (DoPHER), and the Finding Accessible Inequalities Research in Public Health Database, supplemented with automated searches of the OpenAlex dataset. An active learning algorithm was used to prioritize title-abstract records for manual screening against eligibility criteria. We extracted and analyzed a core dataset from a purposively selected sample of reviews, to summarize key characteristics and approaches to conceptualizing investigations of equity. RESULTS We assessed 322 full-text reports for eligibility, from which we included 120 reports of systematic reviews. PROGRESS-Plus was the only formalized framework used to conceptualize dimensions of equity impacts. Most reviews were able to apply their intended methods to at least some degree. Where intended methods were unable to be applied fully, this was usually because primary research studies did not report the necessary information. A general rationale for focusing on equity impacts was often included, but few reviews explicitly justified their focus on (or exclusion of) specific dimensions. In addition to practical challenges such as data not being available, authors highlighted significant measurement and conceptual issues with applying these methods which may impair the ability to investigate and interpret differential impacts within and between studies. These issues included investigating constructs that lack standardized operationalization and measurement, and the complex nature of differential impacts, with dimensions that may interact with one another, as well as with particular temporal, personal, social or geographic contexts. CONCLUSION PROGRESS-Plus is the predominant framework used in systematic reviews to conceptualize differential impacts of public health interventions by dimensions of equity. It appears sufficiently broad to encompass dimensions of equity examined in most investigations of this kind. However, PROGRESS-Plus does not necessarily ensure or guide critical thinking about more complex pathways, including interactions between dimensions of equity, and with wider contextual factors, and important practical, measurement and conceptual challenges remain. The findings from investigations of equity impacts in systematic reviews could be made more useful through more explicitly rationalized and considered approaches to the design, conduct and reporting of both primary research and the reviews themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J Hollands
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Emily South
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ian Shemilt
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sandy Oliver
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - James Thomas
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amanda J Sowden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Groom LL, Schoenthaler AM, Mann DM, Brody AA. Construction of the Digital Health Equity-Focused Implementation Research Conceptual Model - Bridging the Divide Between Equity-focused Digital Health and Implementation Research. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 3:e0000509. [PMID: 38776354 PMCID: PMC11111026 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Digital health implementations and investments continue to expand. As the reliance on digital health increases, it is imperative to implement technologies with inclusive and accessible approaches. A conceptual model can be used to guide equity-focused digital health implementations to improve suitability and uptake in diverse populations. The objective of this study is expand an implementation model with recommendations on the equitable implementation of new digital health technologies. The Digital Health Equity-Focused Implementation Research (DH-EquIR) conceptual model was developed based on a rigorous review of digital health implementation and health equity literature. The Equity-Focused Implementation Research for Health Programs (EquIR) model was used as a starting point and merged with digital equity and digital health implementation models. Existing theoretical frameworks and models were appraised as well as individual equity-sensitive implementation studies. Patient and program-related concepts related to digital equity, digital health implementation, and assessment of social/digital determinants of health were included. Sixty-two articles were analyzed to inform the adaption of the EquIR model for digital health. These articles included digital health equity models and frameworks, digital health implementation models and frameworks, research articles, guidelines, and concept analyses. Concepts were organized into EquIR conceptual groupings, including population health status, planning the program, designing the program, implementing the program, and equity-focused implementation outcomes. The adapted DH-EquIR conceptual model diagram was created as well as detailed tables displaying related equity concepts, evidence gaps in source articles, and analysis of existing equity-related models and tools. The DH-EquIR model serves to guide digital health developers and implementation specialists to promote the inclusion of health-equity planning in every phase of implementation. In addition, it can assist researchers and product developers to avoid repeating the mistakes that have led to inequities in the implementation of digital health across populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa L. Groom
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Medical Center Information Technology Department of Health Informatics, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Antoinette M. Schoenthaler
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Devin M. Mann
- Medical Center Information Technology Department of Health Informatics, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Abraham A. Brody
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Agboola F, Wright AC. A framework for evaluating the diversity of clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111299. [PMID: 38395092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The topic of diversity in clinical trials is rising to the forefront of many conversations in evidence-based medicine, and efforts are being made to improve the diversity of clinical trials. However, there is little uniformity in the methods used to evaluate these efforts. In this article, we describe our Clinical trial Diversity Rating (CDR) framework and the development process, including the broader considerations for evaluating the demographic diversity of clinical trials and their implications, and demonstrate its use through an illustrative example. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING The development of the framework was a four-step process, including a scoping review, a cross-sectional study, creation of the tool, and integration of feedback from an advisory group. RESULTS Our scoping review identified 110 publications that examined clinical trial diversity. Race/ethnicity, sex, and age were the most common characteristics evaluated. About 85% clearly defined the benchmark used for evaluation, but less than half (48%) used disease prevalence as the benchmark. Only 64% of studies defined what would be considered adequate representation. The cross-sectional study, which applied some of the approaches identified in the literature, helped to identify the complexities of evaluating multinational trials and certain demographic characteristics. Key decisions for the CDR framework, such as the demographic characteristics to be evaluated, the benchmark and thresholds for evaluation, and how these factors contribute to the overall rating of clinical trial diversity, were informed by the two earlier phases and feedback from an advisory group. CONCLUSION The CDR framework provides an objective and transparent approach to evaluating clinical trial diversity. Groups such as Health Technology Assessment bodies, clinical trial regulators, policymakers, journal editors, and individual researchers can use this tool to examine, monitor, and improve diversity in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Foluso Agboola
- Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
| | - Abigail C Wright
- Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schober T, Wong K, DeLisle G, Caya C, Brendish NJ, Clark TW, Dendukuri N, Doan Q, Fontela PS, Gore GC, Li P, McGeer AJ, Noël KC, Robinson JL, Suarthana E, Papenburg J. Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:528-536. [PMID: 38436951 PMCID: PMC10913011 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Importance Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. Objective To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing. Data Extraction and Synthesis Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Main Outcomes and Measures Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs. Results Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further studies in adults, especially those with high-risk conditions, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilmann Schober
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kimberly Wong
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gaëlle DeLisle
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chelsea Caya
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathan J Brendish
- School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
- Department of Infection, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Tristan W Clark
- School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
- Department of Infection, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England
| | - Nandini Dendukuri
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Quynh Doan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patricia S Fontela
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Genevieve C Gore
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Patricia Li
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Allison J McGeer
- Department of Microbiology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim Chloe Noël
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Joan L Robinson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eva Suarthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jesse Papenburg
- Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kou R, Sadafi SL, Principato R, Anderson LN, Brignardello-Petersen R, Mbuagbaw L. Reporting of health equity considerations in vaccine trials for COVID-19: a methodological review. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 169:111315. [PMID: 38447854 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES An emerging body of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on COVID-19 vaccines has served as the evidence base for public health decision-making. While it is recommended that RCTs report results by health equity stratifiers to reduce bias in health care and gaps in research, it is unknown whether this was done in COVID-19 vaccine trials. To critically examine the use of health equity stratifiers in COVID-19 vaccine trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a methodological review of published COVID-19 vaccine trials available in the COVID-19 living Network Meta-Analysis systematic review database through February 8, 2023. Based on the PROGRESS-Plus framework, we examined the following health equity stratifiers: place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic status, social capital, age, disability, features of relationships, and temporary situations. We assessed each study in duplicate according to three criteria for comprehensive health-equity reporting: 1) describing participants, 2) reporting equity-relevant results, and 3) discussing equity-relevant implications of trial findings. RESULTS We reviewed 144 trial manuscripts. The most frequently used PROGRESS-Plus stratifiers to describe participants were age (100%), place of residence (100%), gender/sex (99%), and race/ethnicity (64%). Age was most often used to disaggregate or adjust results (67%), followed by gender or sex (35%). Discussions of equity-relevant implications often indicated limited generalizability of results concerning age (40% of studies). Half (47%) of the studies considered at least one health equity stratifier for all three criteria. No trials included stratifiers related to religion, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, or features of relationships. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccine trials provided a limited description of health equity stratifiers as defined by PROGRESS-Plus and infrequently disaggregated results or discussed the study implications as they related to health equity. Considering the health disparities exacerbated during the pandemic, increased uptake of PROGRESS-Plus in RCTs would support a more nuanced understanding of health disparities and better inform actions to improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Kou
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Sarah Lopes Sadafi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachael Principato
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura N Anderson
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Watt JA, Porter J, Tavilsup P, Chowdhury M, Hatch S, Ismail Z, Kumar S, Kirkham J, Goodarzi Z, Seitz D. Guideline Recommendations on Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:837-846.e21. [PMID: 38640961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize recommendations on assessing and managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) in existing clinical practice guidelines on dementia care to learn from and adapt recommendations to a Canadian context and language for describing BPSDs. DESIGN Systematic review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines on dementia care that made 1 or more recommendations on BPSD assessment or management. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, JBI EBM, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and gray literature for clinical practice guidelines on dementia care making recommendations on BPSD, published between January 1, 2011, and October 13, 2022. Two independent reviewers conducted study screening and data abstraction. Four independent reviewers completed quality appraisal using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool; included guidelines had a mean overall AGREE II score ≥4. RESULTS Our systematic review identified 23 moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines (264 recommendations). The mean overall quality score on the AGREE II tool ranged from 4 to 6.5. Recommendations were clearly presented (mean clarity of presentation score 73.5%), but guideline applicability was not consistently addressed (mean applicability score 39.3%). BPSD was the most prevalent term describing neuropsychiatric symptoms (number of guidelines [n] = 14). People with lived experience contributed to 6 guidelines (26.1%). Ten guidelines (43.5%) described 1 or more health equity considerations. Guidelines made recommendations for assessing and managing agitation (n = 12), aggression (n = 10), psychosis (n = 11), depression (n = 9), anxiety (n = 5), apathy (n = 6), inappropriate sexual behavior (n = 3), nighttime behavior (n = 5), and eating disturbances (n = 3). There was substantial variability in recommendation statements, evidence quality assigned to each statement, and strength of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS There are several moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines making recommendations on BPSD assessment and management, but variability in recommendation statements across guidelines and insufficient consideration of guideline applicability may hamper guideline dissemination and implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Watt
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Porter
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pattara Tavilsup
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mohammad Chowdhury
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stacey Hatch
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zahinoor Ismail
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Kirkham
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zahra Goodarzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dallas Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Bell S, Zhelev Z, Bethel A, Coon JT, Anderson R. Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-87. [PMID: 38778710 DOI: 10.3310/ttwg4738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing. Objectives To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people. Methods MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project. Results Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within Goals, we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In Relationships, building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational Processes and procedures, such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within Technology and infrastructure, the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care. Limitations Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic. Conclusions Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways. Future work Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals. Study registration The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân de Bell
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Zhivko Zhelev
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Alison Bethel
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chipako I, Singhal S, Hollingsworth B. Impact of sexual and reproductive health interventions among young people in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Front Glob Womens Health 2024; 5:1344135. [PMID: 38699461 PMCID: PMC11063325 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1344135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this scoping review was to identify and provide an overview of the impact of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) interventions on reproductive health outcomes among young people in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods Searches were carried out in five data bases. The databases were searched using variations and combinations of the following keywords: contraception, family planning, birth control, young people and adolescents. The Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of-Interventions tools were used to assess risk of bias for articles included. Results Community-based programs, mHealth, SRH education, counselling, community health workers, youth friendly health services, economic support and mass media interventions generally had a positive effect on childbirth spacing, modern contraceptive knowledge, modern contraceptive use/uptake, adolescent sexual abstinence, pregnancy and myths and misperceptions about modern contraception. Conclusion Sexual and reproductive health interventions have a positive impact on sexual and reproductive health outcomes. With the increasing popularity of mHealth coupled with the effectiveness of youth friendly health services, future youth SRH interventions could integrate both strategies to improve SRH services access and utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Chipako
- Health Economics and Policy Department, Division of Health Research Graduate College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Saurabh Singhal
- Economics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce Hollingsworth
- Health Economics and Policy Department, Division of Health Research Graduate College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wagnild JM, Akhter N, Lee D, Jayeola B, Darko DM, Adeyeye MC, Komeh JP, Nahamya D, Kasim A, Hampshire K. The role of constraints and information gaps in driving risky medicine purchasing practices in four African countries. Health Policy Plan 2024; 39:372-386. [PMID: 38300508 PMCID: PMC11005838 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Substandard and falsified (SF) medical products pose a major threat to public health and socioeconomic development, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In response, public education campaigns have been developed to alert consumers about the risks of SF medicines and provide guidance on 'safer' practices, along with other demand- and supply-side measures. However, little is currently known about the potential effectiveness of such campaigns while structural constraints to accessing quality-assured medicines persist. This paper analyses survey data on medicine purchasing practices, information and constraints from four African countries (Ghana, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Uganda; n > 1000 per country). Using multivariate regression and structural equation modelling, we present what we believe to be the first attempt to tease apart, statistically, the effects of an information gap vs structural constraints in driving potential public exposure to SF medicines. The analysis confirms that less privileged groups (including, variously, those in rural settlements, with low levels of formal education, not in paid employment, often women and households with a disability or long-term sickness) are disproportionately potentially exposed to SF medicines; these same demographic groups also tend to have lower levels of awareness and experience greater levels of constraint. Despite the constraints, our models suggest that public health education may have an important role to play in modifying some (but not all) risky practices. Appropriately targeted public messaging can thus be a useful part of the toolbox in the fight against SF medicines, but it can only work effectively in combination with wider-reaching reforms to address higher-level vulnerabilities in pharmaceutical supply chains in Africa and expand access to quality-assured public-sector health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle M Wagnild
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Nasima Akhter
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Diana Lee
- Incidents and Substandard/Falsified Medical Products Team, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | - Babatunde Jayeola
- Incidents and Substandard/Falsified Medical Products Team, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland
| | | | - Moji Christianah Adeyeye
- National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control, Plot 2032, Olusegun, Obasanjo Way, Zone 7, Wuse, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - James P Komeh
- Pharmacy Board of Sierra Leone, New England Ville, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - David Nahamya
- Secretary to the Authority, National Drug Authority, PO Box 23096, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Adetayo Kasim
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Kate Hampshire
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Oostlander SA, Sauvé-Schenk K, Bissett D. Practicing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experiences of Canadian Hospital-Based Occupational Therapists. Can J Occup Ther 2024:84174241245622. [PMID: 38592284 DOI: 10.1177/00084174241245622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Background. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted hospital operations worldwide, including services delivered by occupational therapists (OTs). Purpose. This study aimed to understand the experiences of OTs at one Canadian, tertiary care hospital during the 2021-2022 period of the pandemic. Method. We used a qualitative descriptive approach to describe the experiences of OTs during the pandemic. Findings. While there were similarities in the 10 participating OTs' experiences, salient differences were largely linked to the method of service delivery. Inpatient OTs benefitted from the support of colleagues and developed coping strategies in response to high levels of workplace stress and anxiety and a perceived lack of support from many levels of society. Clinically, they spent more time on discharge planning with fewer resources. OTs providing virtual/hybrid services experienced unique challenges related to adapting their practice to a virtual platform, including challenges assessing patients. They described benefits associated with virtual/hybrid service delivery and brought up concerns around equity of service provision. Conclusion. OTs in this hospital setting faced challenges in providing patient care and supporting their own wellness during the pandemic. Future research could explore the role of leadership in supporting occupational therapy practice during public health emergencies.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kumar SS, Collings AT, Collins C, Colvin J, Sylla P, Slater BJ. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10809-8. [PMID: 38575829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10809-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The SAGES Guidelines Committee creates evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Due to existing health disparities, recommendations made in these guidelines may have different impacts on different populations. The updates to our standard operating procedure described herein will allow us to produce well-designed guidelines that take these disparities into account and potentially reduce health inequities. METHODS This paper outlines updates to the SAGES Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure in order to incorporate issues of heath equity into our guideline development process with the goal of minimizing downstream health disparities. RESULTS SAGES has developed an evidence-based, standardized approach to consider issues of health equity throughout the guideline development process to allow physicians to better counsel patients and make research recommendations to better address disparities. CONCLUSION Societies that promote guidelines within their organization must make an intentional effort to prevent the widening of health disparities as a result of their recommendations. The updates to the Guidelines Committee Standard Operating Procedure will hopefully lead to increased attention to these disparities and provide specific recommendations to reduce them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunjay S Kumar
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amelia T Collings
- Hiram C. Polk, Jr. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Courtney Collins
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Colvin
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Patricia Sylla
- System Chief, Division of Colon and Rectal Division, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bethany J Slater
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vanden Bossche D, Van Poel E, Vanden Bussche P, Petré B, Ponsar C, Decat P, Willems S. Outreach work in Belgian primary care practices during COVID-19: results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 24:283. [PMID: 38570775 PMCID: PMC10988793 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02323-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) have a vital role in reaching out to vulnerable populations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, they experience many challenges to fulfill this role. This study aimed to examine associations between practice characteristics, patient population characteristics and the extent of deprivation of practice area on the one hand, and the level of outreach work performed by primary care practices (PCPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic on the other hand. METHODS Belgian data from the international PRICOV-19 study were analyzed. Data were collected between December 2020 and August 2021 using an online survey in PCPs. Practices were recruited through randomized and convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed. Four survey questions related to outreach work constitute the outcome variable. The adjusted models included four practice characteristics (practice type, being a teaching practice for GP trainees; the presence of a nurse or a nurse assistant and the presence of a social worker or health promotor), two patient population characteristics (social vulnerability and medical complexity) and an area deprivation index. RESULTS Data from 462 respondents were included. First, the factors significantly associated with outreach work in PCPs are the type of PCP (with GPs working in a group performing more outreach work), and the presence of a nurse (assistant), social worker or health promotor. Second, the extent of outreach work done by a PCP is significantly associated with the social vulnerability of the practice's patient population. This social vulnerability factor, affecting outreach work, differed with the level of medical complexity of the practice's patient population and with the level of deprivation of the municipality where the practice is situated. CONCLUSIONS In this study, outreach work in PCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic is facilitated by the group-type cooperation of GPs and by the support of at least one staff member of the disciplines of nursing, social work, or health promotion. These findings suggest that improving the effectiveness of outreach efforts in PCPs requires addressing organizational factors at the practice level. This applies in particular to PCPs having a more socially vulnerable patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorien Vanden Bossche
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Esther Van Poel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pierre Vanden Bussche
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benoit Petré
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Cécile Ponsar
- Academic Center of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Peter Decat
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sara Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wagle NS, Park S, Washburn D, Ohsfeldt R, Kum HC, Singal AG. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment Receipt in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:463-470. [PMID: 38252039 PMCID: PMC10990826 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Racial and ethnic disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis exist, partly related to differential failures along the cancer care continuum. We characterized racial and ethnic disparities in treatment receipt among patients with HCC in the United States. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases to identify studies published between January 2012 and March 2022 reporting HCC treatment receipt among adult patients with HCC, stratified by race or ethnicity. We calculated pooled odds ratios for HCC treatment using random effects models. RESULTS We identified 15 studies with 320,686 patients (65.8% White, 13.9% Black, 10.4% Asian, and 8.5% Hispanic). Overall, 33.2% of HCC patients underwent any treatment, and 22.7% underwent curative treatment. Compared with White patients, Black patients had lower odds of any treatment (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81) and curative treatment (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.78). Similarly, Hispanic patients had lower pooled odds of curative treatment (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.84). CONCLUSIONS There were significant racial and ethnic disparities in HCC treatment receipt, with Black patients having lower odds of receiving any and curative treatment while Hispanic patients having lower odds of curative treatment. IMPACT Racial and ethnic differences in treatment receipt serve as an intervention target to reduce disparities in HCC prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Sandeep Wagle
- Population Informatics Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M, Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
| | - Sulki Park
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M, Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College, Station, Texas
| | - David Washburn
- Population Informatics Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M, Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
| | - Robert Ohsfeldt
- Population Informatics Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M, Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
| | - Hye-Chung Kum
- Population Informatics Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Texas A&M, Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College, Station, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
McGarrigle L, Norman G, Hurst H, Todd C. Rehabilitation interventions to modify physical frailty in adults before lung transplantation: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078561. [PMID: 38569690 PMCID: PMC11146394 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage lung disease for a small group of patients meeting strict acceptance criteria after optimal medical management has failed. Physical frailty is prevalent in lung transplant candidates and has been linked to worse outcomes both on the waiting list and postoperatively. Exercise has been proven to be beneficial in optimising exercise capacity and quality of life in lung transplant candidates, but its impact on physical frailty is unknown. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of exercise interventions in modifying physical frailty for adults awaiting lung transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database. We will search four databases plus trial registries to identify primary studies of adult candidates for lung transplantation undertaking exercise interventions and assessing outcomes pertaining to physical frailty. Studies must include at least 10 participants. Article screening will be performed by two researchers independently at each stage. Extraction will be performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. The risk of bias in studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using tools appropriate for the research design of each study; where appropriate, we will use Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 or ROBINS-I. At each stage of the review process, discrepancies will be resolved through a consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Meta-analyses of frailty outcomes will be performed if possible and appropriate as will prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Where we are unable to perform meta-analysis, we will conduct narrative synthesis following Synthesis without Meta-analysis guidance. The review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethical issues are predicted due to the nature of this study. Dissemination will occur via conference abstracts, professional networks, peer-reviewed journals and patient support groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022363730.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura McGarrigle
- Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Gill Norman
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Hurst
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK
- Renal, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shi C, Dumville J, Rubinstein F, Norman G, Ullah A, Bashir S, Bower P, Vardy ERLC. Inpatient-level care at home delivered by virtual wards and hospital at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions and their components. BMC Med 2024; 22:145. [PMID: 38561754 PMCID: PMC10986022 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03312-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology-enabled inpatient-level care at home services, such as virtual wards and hospital at home, are being rapidly implemented. This is the first systematic review to link the components of these service delivery innovations to evidence of effectiveness to explore implications for practice and research. METHODS For this review (registered here https://osf.io/je39y ), we searched Cochrane-recommended multiple databases up to 30 November 2022 and additional resources for randomised and non-randomised studies that compared technology-enabled inpatient-level care at home with hospital-based inpatient care. We classified interventions into care model groups using three key components: clinical activities, workforce, and technology. We synthesised evidence by these groups quantitatively or narratively for mortality, hospital readmissions, cost-effectiveness and length of stay. RESULTS We include 69 studies: 38 randomised studies (6413 participants; largely judged as low or unclear risk of bias) and 31 non-randomised studies (31,950 participants; largely judged at serious or critical risk of bias). The 69 studies described 63 interventions which formed eight model groups. Most models, regardless of using low- or high-intensity technology, may have similar or reduced hospital readmission risk compared with hospital-based inpatient care (low-certainty evidence from randomised trials). For mortality, most models had uncertain or unavailable evidence. Two exceptions were low technology-enabled models that involve hospital- and community-based professionals, they may have similar mortality risk compared with hospital-based inpatient care (low- or moderate-certainty evidence from randomised trials). Cost-effectiveness evidence is unavailable for high technology-enabled models, but sparse evidence suggests the low technology-enabled multidisciplinary care delivered by hospital-based teams appears more cost-effective than hospital-based care for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS Low-certainty evidence suggests that none of technology-enabled care at home models we explored put people at higher risk of readmission compared with hospital-based care. Where limited evidence on mortality is available, there appears to be no additional risk of mortality due to use of technology-enabled at home models. It is unclear whether inpatient-level care at home using higher levels of technology confers additional benefits. Further research should focus on clearly defined interventions in high-priority populations and include comparative cost-effectiveness evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://osf.io/je39y .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhu Shi
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK.
| | - Jo Dumville
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
| | - Fernando Rubinstein
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gill Norman
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Akbar Ullah
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Saima Bashir
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma R L C Vardy
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
- Oldham Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Oldham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thomas M, Verma V, Gheshlaghi N, Esdaile J, Avina-Zubieta A, Barnabe C, Harrison M, De Vera MA. Reporting of determinants of health inequities and participant characteristics in randomized controlled trials of systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada: A scoping review. Lupus 2024; 33:462-469. [PMID: 38339797 PMCID: PMC10955787 DOI: 10.1177/09612033241233032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report participant characteristics relevant to identifying health inequities in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) randomized controlled trials conducted in Canada. METHODS We conducted a scoping review by searching MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (1990 to June 2023), and CENTRAL (inception to June 2023). Eligible studies: used an RCT design; evaluated interventions (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic) among SLE patients aged ≥18 years; and were conducted in Canada. Data extraction was guided by the Campbell and Cochrane Equity Methods Group's PROGRESS-Plus framework on 11 factors leading to health inequities (Place of residence; Race, culture, ethnicity, and language; Occupation; Gender and sex; Religion; Education; Socioeconomic status; Social capital; Plus: Personal characteristics associated with discrimination; Features of relationships; and Time-dependent relationships). RESULTS Of 1901 unique records, 6 met the inclusion criteria. Sex and age were the only PROGRESS factors that were reported in all studies. The majority of participants were female (84.4% to 100%), and mean ages of participants ranged from 42 to 52.3 years. Place of residence, race, education, and social capital were reported in three studies. Socioeconomic status was reported in two studies, and occupation was reported in one study. Religion, features of relationships, and time-dependent relationships were not reported in any included studies. CONCLUSION Limited reporting of determinants of health inequities in RCTs for SLE in Canada suggests the need for reporting standards to support equity, diversity, and inclusion practices in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Thomas
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Vanay Verma
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Niloofar Gheshlaghi
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John Esdaile
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mark Harrison
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary A De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Amjad S, Tromburg C, Adesunkanmi M, Mawa J, Mahbub N, Campbell S, Chari R, Rowe BH, Ospina MB. Social Determinants of Health and Pediatric Emergency Department Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med 2024; 83:291-313. [PMID: 38069966 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Social determinants of health contribute to disparities in pediatric health and health care. Our objective was to synthesize and evaluate the evidence on the association between social determinants of health and emergency department (ED) outcomes in pediatric populations. METHODS This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity Extension guidelines. Observational epidemiological studies were included if they examined at least 1 social determinant of health from the PROGRESS-Plus framework in relation to ED outcomes among children <18 years old. Effect direction plots were used for narrative results and pooled odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for meta-analyses. RESULTS Fifty-eight studies were included, involving 17,275,090 children and 103,296,839 ED visits. Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status were the most reported social determinants of health (71% each). Black children had 3 times the odds of utilizing the ED (pOR 3.16, 95% CI 2.46 to 4.08), whereas visits by Indigenous children increased the odds of departure prior to completion of care (pOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.80) compared to White children. Public insurance, low income, neighborhood deprivation, and proximity to an ED were also predictors of ED utilization. Children whose caregivers had a preferred language other than English had longer length of stay and increased hospital admission. CONCLUSION Social determinants of health, particularly race, socioeconomic deprivation, proximity to an ED, and language, play important roles in ED care-seeking patterns of children and families. Increased utilization of ED services by children from racial minority and lower socioeconomic status groups may reflect barriers to health insurance and access to health care, including primary and subspecialty care, and/or poorer overall health, necessitating ED care. An intersectional approach is needed to better understand the trajectories of disparities in pediatric ED outcomes and to develop, implement, and evaluate future policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana Amjad
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Courtney Tromburg
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maryam Adesunkanmi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jannatul Mawa
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nazif Mahbub
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sandra Campbell
- John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Radha Chari
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brian H Rowe
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maria B Ospina
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University; Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Loughran KJ, Emerson J, Avery L, Suri S, Flynn D, Kaner E, Rapley T, Martin D, McPhee J, Fernandes-James C, Harrison SL. Exercise-based interventions targeting balance and falls in people with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2024; 33:240003. [PMID: 38925795 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0003-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review quantifies the mean treatment effect of exercise-based interventions on balance and falls risk in people with COPD. METHODS A structured search strategy (2000-2023) was applied to eight databases to identify studies evaluating the impact of exercise-based interventions (≥14 days in duration) on balance or falls in people with COPD. Pooled mean treatment effects (95% confidence intervals (CIs), 95% prediction intervals (PIs)) were calculated for outcomes reported in five or more studies. Inter-individual response variance and the promise of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were explored. RESULTS 34 studies (n=1712) were included. There were greater improvements in balance post intervention compared to controls for the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (mean 2.51, 95% CI 0.22-4.80, 95% PI -4.60-9.63), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (mean -1.12 s, 95% CI -1.69- -0.55 s, 95% PI -2.78-0.54 s), Single-Leg Stance (SLS) test (mean 3.25 s, 95% CI 2.72-3.77 s, 95% PI 2.64-3.86 s) and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale (mean 8.50%, 95% CI 2.41-14.58%, 95% PI -8.92-25.92%). Effect on falls remains unknown. Treatment effects were larger in male versus mixed-sex groups for the ABC scale and SLS test, and in balance training versus other exercise-based interventions for the BBS and TUG test. Falls history was not associated with changes in balance. Meta-analysis of individual response variance was not possible and study-level results were inconclusive. Eleven promising BCTs were identified (promise ratio ≥2). CONCLUSION Evidence for the effect of exercise-based interventions eliciting clinically important improvements in balance for people with COPD is weak, but targeted balance training produces the greatest benefits. Future exercise interventions may benefit from inclusion of the identified promising BCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsti J Loughran
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jonathan Emerson
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Leah Avery
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Sophie Suri
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Darren Flynn
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tim Rapley
- Department of Social Work, Community Wellbeing and Education, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jamie McPhee
- Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Fernandes-James
- Respiratory Department, University Hospital of North Tees, North Tees & Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hardwick, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dewidar O, McHale G, Al Zubaidi A, Bondok M, Abdelrazeq L, Huang J, Jearvis A, Aliyeva K, Alghamyan A, Jahel F, Greer-Smith R, Tufte J, Barker LC, Elmestekawy N, Sharp MK, Horsley T, Prats CJ, Jull J, Wolfenden L, Cuervo LG, Hardy BJ, Roberts JH, Ghogomu E, Obuku E, Owusu-Addo E, Nicholls SG, Mbuagbaw L, Funnell S, Shea B, Rizvi A, Tugwell P, Bhutta Z, Welch V, Melendez-Torres GJ. Motivations for investigating health inequities in observational epidemiology: a content analysis of 320 studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 168:111283. [PMID: 38369078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To enhance equity in clinical and epidemiological research, it is crucial to understand researcher motivations for conducting equity-relevant studies. Therefore, we evaluated author motivations in a randomly selected sample of equity-relevant observational studies published during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We searched MEDLINE for studies from 2020 to 2022, resulting in 16,828 references. We randomly selected 320 studies purposefully sampled across income setting (high vs low-middle-income), COVID-19 topic (vs non-COVID-19), and focus on populations experiencing inequities. Of those, 206 explicitly mentioned motivations which we analyzed thematically. We used discourse analysis to investigate the reasons behind emerging motivations. RESULTS We identified the following motivations: (1) examining health disparities, (2) tackling social determinants to improve access, and (3) addressing knowledge gaps in health equity. Discourse analysis showed motivations stem from commitments to social justice and recognizing the importance of highlighting it in research. Other discourses included aspiring to improve health-care efficiency, wanting to understand cause-effect relationships, and seeking to contribute to an equitable evidence base. CONCLUSION Understanding researchers' motivations for assessing health equity can aid in developing guidance that tailors to their needs. We will consider these motivations in developing and sharing equity guidance to better meet researchers' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Dewidar
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Georgia McHale
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ali Al Zubaidi
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Mostafa Bondok
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Leenah Abdelrazeq
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Carelton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jimmy Huang
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Alyssa Jearvis
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Khadija Aliyeva
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Amjad Alghamyan
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Fatima Jahel
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | - Lucy C Barker
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nour Elmestekawy
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Melissa K Sharp
- Department of General Practice, Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tanya Horsley
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Clara Juandro Prats
- Applied Health Research Center, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janet Jull
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Cochrane Public Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luis Gabriel Cuervo
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Washington, DC, USA; Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Preventive Medicine, Doctoral School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Billie-Jo Hardy
- Social and Behavioural Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janet Hatchet Roberts
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Ekwaro Obuku
- Africa Centre for Systematic Reviews & Knowledge Translation, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ebenezer Owusu-Addo
- Bureau of Integrated Rural Development, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Stuart G Nicholls
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sarah Funnell
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Bev Shea
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Anita Rizvi
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zulfiqar Bhutta
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Excellence in Women and Child Health and Institute of Global Health and Development, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Vivian Welch
- Bruyère Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mahant S, Borkhoff CM, Parkin PC, Imsirovic H, Tuna M, Macarthur C, To T, Gill PJ. Sociodemographic Factors and Trends in Bronchiolitis-Related Emergency Department Visit and Hospitalization Rates. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e248976. [PMID: 38683605 PMCID: PMC11059049 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Bronchiolitis is the most common and most cumulatively expensive condition in pediatric hospital care. Few population-based studies have examined health inequalities in bronchiolitis outcomes over time. Objective To examine trends in bronchiolitis-related emergency department (ED) visit and hospitalization rates by sociodemographic factors in a universally funded health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants This repeated cross-sectional cohort study was performed from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2022, using population-based health administrative data from children younger than 2 years in Ontario, Canada. Main Outcome and Measures Bronchiolitis ED visit and hospitalization rates per 1000 person-years reported for the equity stratifiers of sex, residence location (rural vs urban), and material resources quintile. Trends in annual rates by equity stratifiers were analyzed using joinpoint regression and estimating the average annual percentage change (AAPC) with 95% CI and the absolute difference in AAPC with 95% CI from April 1, 2004, to March 31, 2020. Results Of 2 921 573 children included in the study, 1 422 088 (48.7%) were female and 2 619 139 (89.6%) lived in an urban location. Emergency department visit and hospitalization rates were highest for boys, those with rural residence, and those with least material resources. There were no significant between-group absolute differences in the AAPC in ED visits per 1000 person-years by sex (female vs male; 0.22; 95% CI, -0.92 to 1.35; P = .71), residence (rural vs urban; -0.31; 95% CI -1.70 to 1.09; P = .67), or material resources (quintile 5 vs 1; -1.17; 95% CI, -2.57 to 0.22; P = .10). Similarly, there were no significant between-group absolute differences in the AAPC in hospitalizations per 1000 person-years by sex (female vs male; 0.53; 95% CI, -1.11 to 2.17; P = .53), residence (rural vs urban; -0.62; 95% CI, -2.63 to 1.40; P = .55), or material resources (quintile 5 vs 1; -0.93; 95% CI -3.80 to 1.93; P = .52). Conclusions and Relevance In this population-based cohort study of children in a universally funded health care system, inequalities in bronchiolitis ED visit and hospitalization rates did not improve over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Mahant
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cornelia M. Borkhoff
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine and the Pediatric Outcomes Research Team, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia C. Parkin
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine and the Pediatric Outcomes Research Team, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Meltem Tuna
- ICES, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colin Macarthur
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teresa To
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter J. Gill
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Long HA, Hindmarch S, Martindale JP, Brooks JM, Harvie M, French DP. Emotion constructs and outcome measures following false positive breast screening test results: A systematic review of reporting clarity and selection rationale. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6334. [PMID: 38549216 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE (i) To systematically identify constructs and outcome measures used to assess the emotional and mood impact of false positive breast screening test results; (ii) to appraise the reporting clarity and rationale for selecting constructs and outcome measures. METHODS Databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were systematically searched from 1970. Studies using standardised and non-standardised outcome measures to evaluate the emotion or mood impact of false positive breast screening test results were eligible. A 15-item coding scheme was devised to appraise articles on clarity and rationale for selected constructs and measures. RESULTS Forty-seven articles were identified. The most investigated constructs were general anxiety and depression and disease-specific anxiety and worry. Twenty-two standardised general outcome questionnaire measures and three standardised disease-specific outcome questionnaire measures were identified. Twenty articles used non-standardised scales/items. Reporting of constructs and outcome measures was generally clear, but rationales for their selection were lacking. Anxiety was typically justified, but justification for depression was almost always absent. Practical and psychometric justification for selecting outcome measures was lacking, and theoretical rationale was absent. CONCLUSIONS Heterogeneity in constructs and measures, coupled with unclear rationale for these, impedes a thorough understanding of why there are emotional effects of false positive screening test results. This may explain the repeated practice of investigating less relevant outcomes such as depression. There is need to develop a consensual conceptual model of and standardised approach to measuring emotional impact from cancer screening test results, to address heterogeneity and other known issues of interpreting an inconsistent evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah A Long
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Hindmarch
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John-Paul Martindale
- School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna M Brooks
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ponzano M, Buren R, Adams NT, Jun J, Jetha A, Mack DE, Ginis KAM. Effect of Exercise on Mental Health and Health-related Quality of Life in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024:S0003-9993(24)00900-6. [PMID: 38556188 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.02.737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of exercise interventions on mental health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with SCI. DATA SOURCES We searched Embase, CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, and SPORTDiscus from inception to September 2023. STUDY SELECTION We included randomized controlled trials that (1) involved participants ≥18 years old with a SCI; (2) administered an exercise intervention; and (3) measured subjective well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, and/or HRQoL as outcomes. We reported standardized means differences (d) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), assessed the risk of bias by using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2), and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. DATA SYNTHESIS Nineteen studies (797 participants, mean age <65 years in every study) were included. Exercise improved overall well-being (d=0.494; 95% CI 0.268, 0.720; low certainty evidence), subjective well-being (d=0.543; 95% CI 0.270, 0.816; low certainty evidence), psychological well-being (d=0.499; 95% CI 0.193, 0.805; low certainty evidence), social well-being (d=0.452; 95% CI 0.151, 0.752; low certainty evidence), and HRQoL (d=0.323; 95% CI 0.072, 0.574; low certainty evidence). Four serious adverse events probably attributable to the interventions were reported in 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS Exercise interventions can improve well-being and HRQoL in adults with SCI <65 years of age. Additional research is needed to determine effectiveness in adults ≥65 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ponzano
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre (BSCC), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Robert Buren
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre (BSCC), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nathan T Adams
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre (BSCC), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jane Jun
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Arif Jetha
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Diane E Mack
- Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St Catharines, Canada
| | - Kathleen A Martin Ginis
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Blusson Spinal Cord Centre (BSCC), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| |
Collapse
|