Valproate for agitation in critically ill patients: A retrospective study

Psychiatric Etiologies and Approaches in Altered Mental Status Presentations: Insights from Consultation Liaison Psychiatry

Consultation liaison psychiatrists are frequently asked to evaluate patients with altered mental status (AMS). Psychiatrists have unique perspectives and approaches to care for confused patients, particularly optimizing facilitation of care and maintaining vigilance for diagnostic overshadowing. Psychiatrists also offer expertise in primary psychiatric illnesses that can overlap with AMS, and the most common etiology of AMS is delirium. In this article, we provide a consultation liaison psychiatrist perspective on AMS and related psychiatric conditions in addition to delirium. Manic and psychotic episodes have primary and secondary etiologies, with some symptoms that can overlap with delirium. Catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and serotonin syndrome are potentially fatal emergencies, and require prompt index of suspicion to optimize clinical outcomes. Trauma sequelae, functional neurologic disorders, and dissociative disorders can present as puzzling cases that require psychiatric facilitation of care. Additionally, AMS is sometimes due to substance intoxication and withdrawal in the hospital. A nonstigmatizing approach to evaluation and management of delirium and AMS can ensure optimal patient care experiences and outcomes.

Pharmacologic Treatment Strategies for Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: Past, Present, and Future

Despite the use of multidomain prevention strategies, delirium still frequently occurs in hospitalized adults. With delirium often associated with undesirable symptoms and deleterious outcomes, including cognitive decline, treatment is important. Risk-factor reduction and the protocolized use of multidomain, nonpharmacologic bundles remain the mainstay of delirium treatment. There is a current lack of strong evidence to suggest any pharmacologic intervention to treat delirium will help resolve it faster, reduce its symptoms (other than agitation), facilitate hospital throughput, or improve post-hospital outcomes including long-term cognitive function. With the exception of dexmedetomidine as a treatment of severe delirium-associated agitation in the ICU, current practice guidelines do not recommend the routine use of any pharmacologic intervention to treat delirium in any hospital population. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating new pharmacologic delirium treatment interventions and addressing key challenges and gaps surrounding delirium treatment research.

A Combination of Low Doses of Lithium and Valproate Improves Cognitive Outcomes after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

The prevalence of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is high compared with moderate and severe TBI, comprising almost 80% of all brain injuries. mTBI activates a complex cascade of biochemical, molecular, structural, and pathological changes that can result in neurological and cognitive impairments. These impairments can manifest even in the absence of overt brain damage. Given the complexity of changes triggered by mTBI, a combination of drugs that target multiple TBI-activated cascades may be required to improve mTBI outcomes. It has been previously demonstrated that cotreatment with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs lithium plus valproate (Li + VPA) for 3 weeks after a moderate-to-severe controlled cortical impact injury reduced cortical tissue loss and improved motor function. Since both lithium and valproate can exhibit toxicity at high doses, it would be beneficial to determine if this combination treatment is effective when administered at low doses and for a shorter duration, and if it can improve cognitive function, after a mild diffuse TBI. In the present study, we tested if the combination of low doses of lithium (1 mEq/kg or 0.5 mEq/kg) plus valproate (20 mg/kg) administered for 3 days after a mild fluid percussion injury can improve hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. Our data show that the combination of low-dose Li + VPA improved spatial learning and memory, effects not seen when either drug was administered alone. In addition, postinjury Li + VPA treatment improved recognition memory and sociability and reduced fear generalization. Postinjury Li + VPA also reduced the number of anti-ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1)-positive microglia counted using a convolutional neural network, indicating a reduction in neuroinflammation. These findings indicate that low-dose Li + VPA administered acutely after mTBI may have translational utility to reduce pathology and improve cognitive function.

Anxiolytic and sedative effects of sodium valproate with different experimental paradigms in male and female rats

Valproic acid or sodium valproate is a widely used drug in the treatment of epilepsy, although it also appears to have anxiolytic and sedative properties derived from its agonistic action on the GABAergic system. To analyze these potential effects of the drug, we conducted three experiments with rats using procedures designed to assess anxiety in rodents. In the first experiment, with a fear conditioning procedure, three groups of male rats were included that received either 100 mg/kg or 300 mg/kg of valproate or an equivalent volume of saline solution. In Experiment 2, recording spontaneous activity in an open field, we compared the effects of valproic acid (300 mg/kg) on male and female rats. In the third experiment, we analyzed the effect of valproic acid using a novelty-induced hypophagia test and tested again for potential differences as a function of the sex of the animals. The results showed an anxiolytic effect restricted to the 300 mg/kg dose of the drug in Experiment 1. Such an effect was restricted to the female sample in Experiment 2, but in the third experiment affected both sexes. As for the sedative effect, it was observed in all experiments irrespective of the sex of the rats. These findings hold significant implications for the treatment of anxiety disorders since valproate may offer a novel therapeutic approach for anxiety-related conditions with distinct benefits and fewer side effects. However, clinical studies are needed to validate the translation of these findings from animal models to human patients.

Treatment of Aggressive Behavior and Agitation in an 11-Year-Old Boy with Co-Occurring Autism and ADHD: A Case Report and Literature Review on the Use of Intravenous Valproate in Emergency Psychiatry

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a persistent neurodevelopmental disorder frequently co-occurring with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and behavior-related disorders. While behavioral therapy is the first-line option to manage the core symptoms of ASD, pharmacological therapy is sometimes needed to treat acute problems, such as agitation and aggressive behaviors. Recent guidelines recommend the use of neuroleptics to reduce psychomotor agitation in patients with ASD. However, as children with ASD are often drug-resistant, alternative treatments are often justified. Reports from the literature have indicated that intravenous valproate (IV-VPA) can be effective in reducing agitation in psychiatric patients, with a lower frequency of adverse events compared to conventional treatments. However, as the related findings are occasionally inconsistent, IV-VPA is not yet an approved option in the context of clinical psychiatry. We aim to improve knowledge of the IV-VPA treatment option for emergency psychiatric treatment in pediatric patients. Methods: We report the case of an 11-year-old boy suffering from a complex neurodevelopmental condition who experienced a psychotic episode with severe aggressive and disruptive behaviors and was successfully treated with IV-VPA. Furthermore, we provide an updated literature review on this topic. Conclusion: In our case, first-line therapies proved to be ineffective. To the contrary, IV-VPA led to safe and prompt clinical success, which is in line with other reports. Based on our literature review, IV-VPA can be highly effective and reduces the risk of adverse events that frequently occur with the use of high-dose standard medications in emergency psychiatry.

Use of Valproic Acid for the Management of Delirium and Agitation in the Intensive Care Unit

Purpose: Assess the efficacy and safety of valproic acid (VPA) for delirium and agitation in the intensive care unit (ICU) as compared to the use of other antipsychotics. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for delirium and agitation in the ICU. Patients were included if they had a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ≥2 and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU positive. Patients were split into two groups based on their VPA exposure. The primary outcome was delirium free days. Secondary outcomes included agitation free days, ICU length of stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation duration, and mortality. Results: One hundred eight patients were included, 49 patients in the VPA group and 59 patients in the control group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome (difference -.15, 95% CI: 0.63-.93, P = .70). There were no significant differences in agitation-free days, mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, or ICU LOS. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that VPA is associated with similar delirium and agitation-free days compared to other non-VPA medications, with some adverse effects. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate the routine use of VPA in this setting.

Valproic acid for agitation in the intensive care unit: an observational study of psychiatric consults

BACKGROUND

Agitation is a common clinical problem encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). Treatment options are based on clinical experience and sparse quality literature.

AIM

The aim of this study was to describe the effect of valproic acid (VPA) as adjuvant treatment for agitation in the ICU, identify predictors of response to VPA and evaluate the independent effect of VPA on agitation compared to standard of care (SOC).

METHOD

This retrospective single center observational study evaluated adult patients admitted to the ICU for whom a psychiatric consultation was requested for agitation management, with agitation defined as a Richmond Agitation Sedation Score of 2 or greater. A descriptive analysis of the proportion of agitation-free patients per day of follow-up, the incidence of agitation-related-events, as well as the evolution of co-medications use over time are presented. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of VPA response, defined as being agitation-free on Day 7 and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the independent effect of VPA as adjuvant therapy for agitation in the critically ill.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients were included in the study with 78 receiving VPA. The percentage of agitation-free patients on VPA was 6.5% (5/77) on Day 1, 14.1% (11/78) on Day 3 and 39.5% (30/76) on Day 7. Multivariate regression model for clinical and demographic variables identified female gender as predictor of response on Day 7 (OR 6.10 [1.18-31.64], p = 0.03). The independent effect of VPA was non-significant when compared to SOC.

CONCLUSION

Although VPA used as adjuvant treatment was associated with a decrease in agitation, its effect when compared to SOC did not yield significant results.

Risk factors, preventive interventions, overlapping symptoms, and clinical measures of delirium in elderly patients

Delirium is an acute reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome caused by multiple factors. It is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes including cognitive impairment, functional decline, prolonged hospitalization, and increased nursing service. The prevalence of delirium was high in department of cardiology, geriatric, and intensive care unit of hospital. With the increase in the aged population, further increases in delirium seem likely. However, it remains poorly recognized in the clinical practice. This article comprehensively discusses the latest research perspectives on the epidemiological data, risk factors, preventive interventions, overlapping symptoms, and clinical measures of delirium, including specific measures to manage delirium in clinical real-world situations. This article helps readers improve their knowledge and understanding of delirium and helps clinicians quickly identify and implement timely therapeutic measures to address various delirium subtypes that occur in the clinical settings to ensure patients are treated as aggressively as possible.

A Retrospective Case Series on Valproic Acid for Early Post-Traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis After Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Concomitant Agitation

Purpose: Early post-traumatic seizures occur within 7 days following a traumatic brain injury and may lead to additional brain damage and poor outcomes. Levetiracetam or phenytoin is often used for seizure prophylaxis in this patient population, but valproic acid may be an appropriate therapeutic alternative in patients with concomitant agitation. Evidence for the use of valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation is limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation. Methods: This single-center, retrospective case series includes 18 patients who received valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation. Efficacy for early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis is assessed by the incidence of seizures within 7 days of injury. Efficacy for agitation is assessed by changes in Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale scores during valproic acid therapy. The safety of valproic acid is defined by the incidence of selected adverse events. Results: Among 18 patients with traumatic brain injuries receiving valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizures and agitation, one patient experienced a seizure during the period of prophylaxis and thrombocytopenia was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: In this small cohort of patients, valproic acid appears be a potential option to prevent early post-traumatic seizures in patients with traumatic brain injuries and concomitant agitation with minimal adverse effects. Randomized, controlled studies are needed to further investigate the role of valproic acid for this indication, including standards for dosing regimens, serum drug monitoring, and the relationship between valproic acid treatment and mortality.

Derivation and Validation of a New Equation for Estimating Free Valproate Concentration in Critically Ill Adult Patients

IMPORTANCE

Protein binding of valproate varies among ICU patients, altering the biologically active free valproate concentration (VPAC). Free VPAC is measured at few laboratories and is often discordant with total VPAC. Existing equations to predict free VPAC are either not validated or are inaccurate in ICU patients.

OBJECTIVES

We designed this study to derive and validate a novel equation to predict free VPAC using data from ICU patients and to compare its performance to published equations.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two academic medical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients older than 18 years old with concomitant free and total VPACs measured in the ICU were included in the derivation cohort if admitted from 2014 to 2018, and the validation cohort if admitted from 2019 to 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Multivariable linear regression was used to derive an equation to predict free VPAC. Modified Bland-Altman plots and the rate of therapeutic concordance between the measured and predicted free VPAC were compared.

RESULTS

Demographics, median free and total VPACs, and valproate free fractions were similar among 115 patients in the derivation cohort and 147 patients in the validation cohort. The Bland-Altman plots showed the new equation performed better (bias, 0.3 [95% limits of agreement, -13.6 to 14.2]) than the Nasreddine (-9.2 [-26.5 to 8.2]), Kodama (-9.7 [-30.0 to 10.7]), Conde Giner (-7.9 [-24.9 to 9.1]), and Parent (-9.9 [-30.7 to 11.0]) equations, and similar to Doré (-2.0 [-16.0 to 11.9]). The Doré and new equations had the highest therapeutic concordance rate (73%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For patients at risk of altered protein binding such as ICU patients, existing equations to predict free VPAC are discordant with measured free VPAC. A new equation had low bias but was imprecise. External validation should be performed to improve its precision and generalizability. Until then, monitoring free valproate is recommended during critical illness.

Risk of delirium with antiepileptic drug use: a study based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs may cause delirium, and the risk may vary with each drug. However, related studies have provided inconsistent results.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of antiepileptic drugs is a risk factor for delirium development.

METHOD

Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database, we analysed 573,316 reports pertaining to the period from 2004 to 2020. Reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of delirium associated with use of antiepileptic drugs were calculated after adjusting for potential confounders. Furthermore, for each antiepileptic drug, we performed an analysis stratified based on older age and benzodiazepine receptor agonist usage.

RESULTS

There were 27,439 reports of antiepileptic drug-related adverse events. Of these, 191 reports were associated with antiepileptic drugs and delirium (crude reporting odds ratio [cROR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.93). The use of lacosamide (adjusted reporting odds ratio [aROR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.24-4.80), lamotrigine (aROR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.26), levetiracetam (aROR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.35-2.71), and valproic acid (aROR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16-1.91) was related to a significantly higher reporting odds ratio for delirium, even after adjustment for possible confounding factors. However, when used in combination with benzodiazepine receptor agonists, none of the antiepileptic drugs were found to be associated with delirium.

CONCLUSION

Our study's findings suggest that antiepileptic drug usage may be associated with delirium development.

Preventing and treating delirium in clinical settings for older adults

Delirium is a serious consequence of many acute or worsening chronic medical conditions, a side effect of medications, and a precipitant of worsening functional and cognitive status in older adults. It is a syndrome characterized by fluctuations in cognition and impaired attention that develops over a short period of time in response to an underlying medical condition, a substance (prescribed, over the counter, or recreational), or substance withdrawal and can be multi-factorial. We present a narrative review of the literature on nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic approaches to prevention and treatment of delirium with a focus on older adults as a vulnerable population. Older adult patients are most at risk due to decreasing physiologic reserves, with delirium rates of up to 80% in critical care settings. Presentation of delirium can be hyperactive, hypoactive, or mixed, making identification and study challenging as patients with hypoactive delirium are less likely to come to attention in an inpatient or long-term care setting. Studies of delirium focus on prevention and treatment with nonpharmacological or medication interventions, with the preponderance of evidence favoring multi-component nonpharmacological approaches to prevention as the most effective. Though use of antipsychotic medication in delirium is common, existing evidence does not support routine use, showing no clear benefit in clinically significant outcome measures and with evidence of harm in some studies. We therefore suggest that antipsychotics be used to treat agitation, psychosis, and distress associated with delirium at the lowest effective doses and shortest possible duration and not be considered a treatment of delirium itself. Future studies may clarify the use of other agents, such as melatonin and melatonin receptor agonists, alpha-2 receptor agonists, and anti-epileptics.

Buprenorphine Continuation During Critical Illness Associated With Decreased Inpatient Opioid Use in Individuals Maintained on Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder in a Retrospective Study

The number of patients maintained on buprenorphine is steadily increasing. To date, no study has reported buprenorphine management practices for these patients during critical illness, nor its relationship with supplemental full-agonist opioid administration during their hospital stay. In this single-center retrospective study, we have explored the incidence of buprenorphine continuation during critical illness among patients receiving buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between nonbuprenorphine opioid exposure and buprenorphine administration during the intensive care unit (ICU) and post-ICU phases of care. Our study included adults maintained on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder admitted to the ICU between December 1, 2014, and May 31, 2019. Nonbuprenorphine, full agonist opioid doses were converted to fentanyl equivalents (FEs). Fifty-one (44%) patients received buprenorphine during the ICU phase of care, with an average dose of 8 (8-12) mg/day. During the post-ICU phase of care, 68 (62%) received buprenorphine, with an average dose of 10 (7-14) mg/day. Lack of mechanical ventilation and acetaminophen use were also associated with buprenorphine use. Full agonist opioid use was more frequent on days when buprenorphine was not given (odds ratio [OR], 6.2 [95% CI, 2.3-16.4]; P < .001). Additionally, the average cumulative dose of opioids given on nonbuprenorphine administration days was significantly higher both in the ICU (OR, 1803 [95% CI, 1271-2553] vs OR, 327 [95% CI, 152-708] FEs/day; P < 0.001) and after ICU discharge (OR, 1476 [95% CI, 962-2265] vs OR, 238 [95% CI, 150-377] FEs/day; P < .001). Given these findings, buprenorphine continuation during critical illness should be considered, as it is associated with significantly decreased full agonist opioid use.

Pharmacologic Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Burn Patients

The majority of hospitalized burn patients experience pain, agitation, and delirium. The development of each one of these conditions can also lead to, or worsen, the others. Providers, therefore, need to thoroughly assess the underlying issue to determine the most effective treatment. Multimodal pharmacologic regimens are often used in conjunction with non-pharmacologic strategies to manage pain, agitation, and delirium. This review focuses on the pharmacologic management of these complicated patients in a critical-care setting.

Valproic Acid-Associated Hyperammonemia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Hyperammonemia is an adverse effect that poses clinical uncertainty around valproic acid (VPA) use. The prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperammonemia and its relationship to VPA concentration is not well established. There is also no clear guidance regarding its management. This results in variability in the monitoring and treatment of VPA-induced hyperammonemia. To inform clinical practice, this systematic review aims to summarize evidence available around VPA-associated hyperammonemia and its prevalence, clinical outcomes, and management.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed through Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO using search terms that identified hyperammonemia in patients receiving VPA. Two reviewers independently performed primary title and abstract screening with a third reviewer resolving conflicting screening results. This process was repeated during the full-text review process.

RESULTS

A total of 240 articles were included. Prevalence of asymptomatic hyperammonemia (5%-73%) was higher than symptomatic hyperammonemia (0.7%-22.2%) and occurred within the therapeutic range of VPA serum concentration. Various risk factors were identified, including concomitant medications, liver injury, and defects in carnitine metabolism. With VPA discontinued, most symptomatic patients returned to baseline mental status with normalized ammonia level. There was insufficient data to support routine monitoring of ammonia level for VPA-associated hyperammonemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Valproic acid-associated hyperammonemia is a common adverse effect that may occur within therapeutic range of VPA. Further studies are required to determine the benefit of routine ammonia level monitoring and to guide the management of VPA-associated hyperammonemia.

Is there evidence for using anticonvulsants in the prevention and/or treatment of delirium among older adults?

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the use of anticonvulsants for the prevention and/or treatment of delirium among older adults.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of databases: MEDLINE ALL (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled was conducted.

RESULTS

The search identified four RCTs that evaluated the use of anticonvulsants among older adults with delirium. One RCT evaluated the perioperative use of gabapentin among individuals undergoing spinal surgery and the development of postoperative delirium. One RCT evaluated the relationship between the use of perioperative gabapentin and the development of postoperative delirium among individuals undergoing spinal surgery and hip and knee arthroplasty. Two post-hoc analyses of RCTs evaluated the use of gabapentin and pregabalin among individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). The perioperative use of gabapentin reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium among older adults undergoing spinal surgery. The perioperative use of gabapentin did not reduce the rates, severity or duration of postoperative delirium among older adults who were undergoing spine and hip and knee arthroplasty. The perioperative use of gabapentin did not reduce the incidence or duration of postoperative delirium among older adults undergoing elective TKA. The perioperative use of pregabalin did not reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium among older adults undergoing elective THA. Gabapentin and pregabalin were well tolerated among the individuals enrolled in these trials. There were no RCTs identified that evaluated the use of other anticonvulsants for the prevention and/or treatment of delirium among older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, the routine use of anticonvulsants for the prevention and/or treatment of delirium among older adults cannot be recommended.

Evaluation of Free Valproate Concentration in Critically Ill Patients

Protein binding of valproate is variable in ICU patients, and the total valproate concentration does not predict the free valproate concentration, even when correcting for albumin. We sought to quantify valproate free concentration among ICU patients, identify risk factors associated with an increasing free valproate concentration, and evaluate the association between free valproate concentration with potential adverse drug effect.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

SETTING

Two academic medical centers.

PATIENTS

Patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age with concomitant free and total valproate concentrations collected in the ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two-hundred fifty-six patients were included in the study, with a median age of 56 years (42-70) and 65% of patients were male. The median total valproate concentration was 53 µg/mL (38-70 µg/mL), the free valproate concentration was 12 µg/mL (7-20 µg/mL), and the free fraction was 23.6% (17.0-33.9%). Therapeutic discordance between the free and total valproate concentration occurred in 70% of patients. On multivariable analysis, increased free valproate concentration was associated with higher total valproate concentration (per 5 µg/mL increase, increase 1.72 µg/mL, 95% CI, 1.48-1.96) and lower serum albumin (per 1 g/dL decrease, increase 4.60 µg/mL, 95% CI, 2.71-6.49). There was no association between free valproate concentration and adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The valproate total and free concentration was discordant in the majority of patients (70%). Increased valproate free concentration was associated with hypoalbuminemia and total valproate concentration. Clinical decisions based on total valproate concentration may be incorrect for many ICU patients. Prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings and their clinical relevance.

Retrospective evaluation of a delirium order set utilizing nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of delirium in medical intensive care unit patients

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To describe the use of a medical intensive care unit (MICU) delirium order set pilot and its associated impact on utilization of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions, pharmacologic continuation at transitions of care, and resolution of ICU delirium.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of MICU patients who received delirium management using an order set pilot compared to standard care. Patients 18 years of age or older admitted to the MICU between May 2019 and January 2020 who received an antipsychotic or valproic acid for the treatment of delirium were included.

RESULTS

Pharmacologic treatment continuation past ICU discharge occurred in 30% of patients in the pilot cohort (n = 50) compared to 54% of patients receiving standard care (n = 50; P = 0.027). On treatment days 1 through 7, utilization of deliriogenic medications was significantly lower in the pilot cohort (78% vs 96%, P = 0.007). No differences were observed between the groups in delirium resolution, delirium recurrence, hospital and ICU length of stay, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

A MICU order set prioritizing nonpharmacologic management and limiting the duration of pharmacologic agents for delirium may aid providers in the management of ICU delirium and reduce exposure to pharmacologic interventions.

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous valproate in agitation: a systematic review

RATIONALE

The use of intravenous valproate is not approved for clinical practice in psychiatry. Literature data pointed out for a potential usefulness of this route of administration for valproate, but there is no actual consensus.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of intravenous valproate in agitation as well as general safety.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies evaluating the use of intravenous valproate in agitation was conducted. Additionally, safety was evaluated in all randomized trials involving the use of intravenous valproate in all medical conditions (epilepsy, migraine and psychiatric conditions).

RESULTS

For the systematic review on effectiveness in agitation, the search yielded 965 articles overall. After removing duplicates, 9411 articles were screened by title and abstract, and 39 of these were evaluated at a full-text level. Six studies were considered eligible for qualitative synthesis: one RCT and case report (n = 3), followed by cohort studies (n = 2). For the systematic review on safety, twenty-two RCTs were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous valproate seems efficacious in reducing agitation in psychiatric patients; it generally appears safe compared to other neuroleptics or antiepileptics. However, the evidence is still not strong as it  relies mainly on open-label studies or case series.

A Retrospective Case Series of Concomitant Carbapenem and Valproic Acid Use: Are Best Practice Advisories Working?

Background: A Best Practice Advisory (BPA) warns clinicians of an interaction between carbapenems and valproic acid (VPA) that can cause significant declines in VPA levels leading to serious consequences for patients treated for seizure disorder and unknown implications for alternative indications. Objective: The goal of this study was to assess BPA efficacy in avoiding concomitant VPA/carbapenems, and to characterize use of these agents, clinical implications, and potential alternative therapeutic options. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients over the course of 1 year who were concomitantly prescribed a carbapenem and VPA at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Data collected included: level of care, duration of concomitant therapy, indications, VPA levels during or surrounding overlap, documentation of the interaction, and therapeutic implications. Results: Carbapenems and VPA were administered to 591 and 625 patients, respectively; the BPA fired 126 times in 24 patients, and 15 patients were initiated on these agents concomitantly. Eight (53%) patients received VPA for seizures. The remaining seven (47%) received VPA for alternative indications. Eight of nine VPA levels were sub-therapeutic during carbapenem therapy and polypharmacy was administered in all patients receiving VPA for non-convulsive indications. Conclusion: Co-prescribing of these drugs was rare; however, the BPA was ineffective in 63% of instances. Reductions in VPA efficacy for any indication should be expected with concomitant carbapenem administration. Antibiotics other than carbapenems should be considered when coverage of multidrug resistant Gram-negative pathogens is required in patients whose VPA treatment cannot be interrupted or switched to a therapeutic alternative.

Valproic Acid in the Management of Delirium

CONTEXT

Antipsychotics and benzodiazepines do not improve delirium. Valproic acid (VPA) has been used recently to treat agitation in delirium.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for VPA in the management of Delirium.

METHODS

Systematic review. English language, age 19 and above, from 1946 to January 12, 2021.

MESH TERMS

"Valproic acid", "valproate", "sodium valproate", "delirium", "acute mania with delirium" in PubMed and Ovid.

EXCLUSION

Studies of VPA used for diagnoses other than delirium.

RESULTS

21 abstracts were identified and 10 studies were included in the review (252 patients): One prospective open label study (n: 7), 2 case series (n: 22), 4 retrospective studies (n: 219) and 3 case reports (n: 4). No randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the effect of VPA in delirium. 237/250 (94.8%) patients were in the ICU. Mean age was 59.7 (27-87). 153/204 (74%) were male. The mean starting dose was 733 mg/day in 148 patients and the mean dose at follow up was 1061 mg/day in 205 patients. CAM ICU was used to diagnose delirium in 6 reviews. Delirium improved in case series in 19/22 patients. Delirium improved in retrospective studies at day 3 compared to day 1. VPA levels were not consistently reported. Hyperammonemia (12-19%) and thrombocytopenia (9-13%) were the most common side effects. No deaths were attributed to VPA.

CONCLUSION

VPA is being used more frequently for delirium. The evidence is limited to retrospective studies and case series. There is a need for RCT to evaluate the effect of VPA in delirium compared to other alternatives and placebo.

Delirium and long term cognition in critically ill patients

Delirium, a form of acute brain dysfunction, is very common in the critically ill adult patient population. Although its pathophysiology is poorly understood, multiple factors associated with delirium have been identified, many of which are coincident with critical illness. To date, no drug or non-drug treatments have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with delirium. Clinical trials have provided a limited understanding of the contributions of multiple triggers and processes of intensive care unit (ICU) acquired delirium, making identification of therapies difficult. Delirium is independently associated with poor long term outcomes, including persistent cognitive impairment. A longer duration of delirium is associated with worse long term cognition after adjustment for age, education, pre-existing cognitive function, severity of illness, and exposure to sedatives. Interestingly, differences in prevalence are seen between ICU survivor populations, with survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome experiencing higher rates of cognitive impairment at early follow-up compared with mixed ICU survivor populations. Although cognitive performance improves over time for some ICU survivors, impairment is persistent in others. Studies have so far been unable to identify patients at higher risk of long term cognitive impairment; this is an active area of scientific investigation.

Safety of dexmedetomidine for the control of agitation in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Behavioural disturbances such as agitation are common following traumatic brain injury and can interfere with treatments, cause self-harm and delay rehabilitation. As there is a lack of evidence on the optimal approach to manage agitation in recovering TBI patients, various pharmacological agents are used including antipsychotics, anticonvulsants and sedative agents. Among sedatives, the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine to control agitation in traumatic brain injury patients is not well documented.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the safety, use and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for the management of agitation following traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal for a traumatic brain injury who received dexmedetomidine for agitation between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017 were reviewed. Patients who received dexmedetomidine for indications other than agitation were excluded. Data on dexmedetomidine prescription practices and safety were extracted. Frequency of agitation and concomitant psychoactive medication use was explored over a period starting two days prior to the initiation of dexmedetomidine to six days after or discontinuation, whichever came first.

RESULTS

We identified 41 patients in whom dexmedetomidine was initiated. Dexmedetomidine was started on median ICU day 3 (25^th -75^th percentiles: 2-7) and had a median treatment duration of 3 days (25^th -75^th percentiles: 3-6) and a mean average rate of 0.62 mcg/kg/h (SD 0.25). Although hypotension (76%) and bradycardia (54%) were common, only one patient required intervention. The proportion of patients with at least one episode of agitation decreased from 100% on day 0, to 88%, 69% and 63% on days 1, 2 and 3 of dexmedetomidine, respectively. The decrease was statistically significant difference between days 0 and 2 as well as between days 0 and 3. Concomitant use of propofol and benzodiazepines also decreased over the course of dexmedetomidine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine use was safe and associated with a reduction in agitation in traumatic brain injury patients in the 96 hours following its initiation.

A rapid review of the pathoetiology, presentation, and management of delirium in adults with COVID-19

Background COVID-19 causes significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the high prevalence of delirium and delirium-related symptoms in COVID-19 patients, data and evidence-based recommendations on the pathophysiology and management of delirium are limited. Objective We conducted a rapid review of COVID-19-related delirium literature to provide a synthesis of literature on the prevalence, pathoetiology, and management of delirium in these patients. Methods Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, LitCovid, WHO-COVID-19, and Web of Science electronic databases were conducted. Grey literature was also reviewed, including preprint servers, archives, and websites of relevant organizations. Search results were limited to the English language. We included literature focused on adults with COVID-19 and delirium. Papers were excluded if they did not mention signs or symptoms of delirium. Results 229 studies described prevalence, pathoetiology, and/or management of delirium in adults with COVID-19. Delirium was rarely assessed with validated tools. Delirium affected >50% of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. The etiology of COVID-19 delirium is likely multifactorial, with some evidence of direct brain effect. Prevention remains the cornerstone of management in these patients. To date, there is no evidence to suggest specific pharmacological strategies. Discussion Delirium is common in COVID-19 and may manifest from both indirect and direct effects on the central nervous system. Further research is required to investigate contributing mechanisms. As there is limited empirical literature on delirium management in COVID-19, management with non-pharmacological measures and judicious use of pharmacotherapy is suggested.

Neurocovid: Pharmacological Recommendations for Delirium Associated With COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as one of the biggest health threats of our generation. A significant portion of patients are presenting with delirium and neuropsychiatric sequelae of the disease. Unique examination findings and responses to treatment have been identified.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we seek to provide pharmacologic and treatment recommendations specific to delirium in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a literature search reviewing the neuropsychiatric complications and treatments in prior coronavirus epidemics including Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses, as well as the emerging literature regarding COVID-19. We also convened a work group of consultation-liaison psychiatrists actively managing patients with COVID-19 in our hospital. Finally, we synthesized these findings to provide preliminary pharmacologic recommendations for treating delirium in these patients.

RESULTS

Delirium is frequently found in patients who test positive for COVID-19, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. There appears to be a higher rate of agitation, myoclonus, abulia, and alogia. No data are currently available on the treatment of delirium in patients with COVID-19. Extrapolating from general delirium treatment, Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome/severe acute respiratory syndrome case reports, and our experience, preliminary recommendations for pharmacologic management have been assembled.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Low-potency neuroleptics and alpha-2 adrenergic agents may be especially useful in this setting. Further research into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 will be key in developing more targeted treatment guidelines.

Delirio en niños críticamente enfermos

El delirio en pacientes críticos es una condición médica que afecta tanto a adultos como a niños; en ambas poblaciones implica graves complicaciones como estancia hospitalaria prolongada, alto riesgo de muerte y deterioro cognitivo a largo plazo, así como mayores costos económicos en cuanto a la prestación de servicios de salud. La principal dificultad de esta condición en la población pediátrica es su adecuado reconocimiento, ya que puede presentarse en edades muy tempranas, incluso en niños lactantes, cuando sus signos y síntomas pueden confundirse o superponerse con otras patologías, tales como el síndrome de abstinencia. En consecuencia, en estos casos el uso de herramientas diagnósticas puede ser una labor compleja que implica múltiples dificultades.Antes de 2011 no había muchos estudios que abordaran la evaluación del delirio en niños. Sin embargo, ese mismo año se estableció la primera escala desarrollada específicamente para el monitoreo de pacientes en unidades de cuidado intensivo pediátrico, lo que llevó a un aumento significativos del número de casos de delirio en niños menores de 5 años críticamente enfermos; esta situación hizo que los pediatras se interesaran más en estudiar esta importante patología.La presente reflexión, basada en una revisión de la literatura, busca actualizar el amplio espectro fisiopatológico del delirio en niños críticamente enfermos y, de esta forma, mejorar su tamizaje, diagnóstico e intervenciones terapéuticas tempranas en todas las edades pediátricas, incluso en menores de 5 años.

Prolonged Refractory ICU Delirium Successfully Treated With Valproic Acid: Case Report and Literature Review

Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is characterized by acute onset of cerebral dysfunction with a change or fluctuation in baseline mental status. Delirium management includes non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment. However at times, alternative pharmacologic treatment is warranted. Valproic acid (VPA) is a potential pharmacologic agent that can be utilized to treat ICU delirium, though there is a paucity of evidence for its use, especially in patients with a history of substance abuse. We review the literature on VPA use in ICU delirium, and describe a challenging case of a 27-year-old female with a history of substance abuse experiencing hyperactive ICU delirium for greater than a month, refractory to multiple treatment modalities, and successfully treated with VPA therapy.

Supportive Management and Interventions for Respiratory Failure Due to SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can vary from asymptomatic to severe symptoms. It can lead to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. Triaging patients is key to prevent spread, conserving medical resources, and providing appropriate care. The treatment of these patients remains supportive. Respiratory failure due to the virus should be managed by providing supplemental oxygen and early intubation. Some patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and refractory hypoxemia. In this article, we review the 2 phenotypes of respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation and the management of refractory hypoxemia.

Prescribing Practices of Valproic Acid for Agitation and Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Analgesics, sedatives, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for agitation and delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU), but their use is limited by adverse effects and lack of efficacy. Valproic acid is an alternative treatment option.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to describe valproic acid prescribing in our institution's ICUs when used for agitation or delirium. Measures of effectiveness and safety were also assessed.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, institutional review board-approved cohort study of adult inpatients admitted to the ICU between January 2018 and August 2018. Patients who received valproic acid for the treatment of agitation or delirium for ≥24 hours were included. Prescribing practices were evaluated for dose, frequency, and route of administration. Effectiveness was assessed via agitation and delirium assessment tools and quantity of adjunctive agents used.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included, with 35 receiving valproic acid alone and 45 in conjunction with antipsychotics. The most common valproic acid regimen was 250 mg orally 3 times daily. Delirium resolution occurred in 55% of patients: 24 in the valproic acid monotherapy group and 20 in the valproic acid plus antipsychotic group (69% vs 44%; P = 0.03). The incidence of delirium decreased from valproic acid day 0 to day 3 (93% vs 68%; P < 0.01), with no change in agitation (64% vs 63%; P = 0.28).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Valproic acid is frequently prescribed in agitated, delirious patients at our institution and may have a role in the management of ICU delirium.

Amantadine and Modafinil as Neurostimulants Following Acute Stroke: A Retrospective Study of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Background/Objective

Neurostimulants may improve or accelerate cognitive and functional recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but few studies have described their safety and effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to describe amantadine and modafinil administration practices during acute stroke care starting in the ICU and to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

Methods

Consecutive adult ICU patients treated with amantadine and/or modafinil following acute non-traumatic IS, ICH, or SAH were evaluated. Neurostimulant administration data were extracted from the electronic medication administration record, including medication (amantadine, modafinil, or both), starting dose, time from stroke to initiation, and whether the neurostimulant was continued at hospital discharge. Patients were considered responders if they met two of three criteria within 9 days of neurostimulant initiation: increase in Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score ≥ 3 points from pre-treatment baseline, improved wakefulness or participation documented in caregiver notes, or clinical improvement documented in physical or occupational therapy notes. Potential confounders of the effectiveness assessment and adverse drug effects were also recorded.

Results

A total of 87 patients were evaluable during the 3.7-year study period, including 41 (47%) with ICH, 29 (33%) with IS, and 17 (20%) with SAH. The initial neurostimulant administered was amantadine in 71 (82%) patients, modafinil in 13 (15%), or both in 3 (3%) patients. Neurostimulants were initiated a median of 7 (4.25, 12.75) days post-stroke (range 1–27 days) for somnolence (77%), not following commands (32%), lack of eye opening (28%), or low GCS (17%). The most common starting dose was 100 mg twice daily for both amantadine (86%) and modafinil (54%). Of the 79 patients included in the effectiveness evaluation, 42 (53%) were considered responders, including 34/62 (55%) receiving amantadine monotherapy and 8/24 (33%) receiving both amantadine and modafinil at the time they met the definition of a responder. No patient receiving modafinil monotherapy was considered a responder. The median time from initiation to response was 3 (2, 5) days. Responders were more frequently discharged home or to acute rehabilitation compared to non-responders (90% vs 62%, p = 0.006). Among survivors, 63/72 (88%) were prescribed a neurostimulant at hospital discharge. The most common potential adverse drug effect was sleep disruption (16%).

Conclusions

Neurostimulant administration during acute stroke care may improve wakefulness. Future controlled studies with a neurostimulant administration protocol, prospective evaluation, and discretely defined response and safety criteria are needed to confirm these encouraging findings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-00986-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Valproic Acid for the Management of Agitation and Delirium in the Intensive Care Setting: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

Valproic acid has been proposed as an alternative agent for treatment of agitation and delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU). Clinical data to support the use of valproic acid for this indication are limited. The objective of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety associated with the use of valproic acid for the management of agitation and delirium in the ICU.

METHODS

This retrospective descriptive analysis included patients who were prescribed valproic acid for a minimum of 3 days for the treatment of agitation and/or delirium in the cardiac, surgical, or medical ICU from May 31, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The prevalence of agitation and delirium was assessed during valproic acid therapy for up to 7 days. Additional data analyzed included opioid, sedative, and antipsychotic requirements and safety outcomes.

FINDINGS

A total of 47 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was an observed downward trend in the prevalence of agitation (47.8% vs 16.7%) and delirium (84.8% vs. 63.3%) throughout valproic acid therapy. In addition, the proportion of patients who required dexmedetomidine, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and opioids decreased while patients were taking valproic acid. No adverse effects attributed to valproic acid occurred in this patient population.

IMPLICATIONS

Valproic acid may be an alternative option to assist in the management of agitation and delirium in the ICU. Additional prospective data are needed to validate the use of this agent for the treatment of agitation and delirium in critically ill patients.

Thrombocytopenia during intravenous valproic acid therapy in the neurological intensive care unit

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory abnormality among critically ill patients under neurological intensive care unit (NCU) care. Valproic acid (VPA), a widely used antiepileptic drug, is one of the common causes of drug-induced thrombocytopenia. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence and risk factors of thrombocytopenia after intravenous VPA therapy among the patients admitted to NCU.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were treated with intravenous VPA during their NCU stay between January 2014 and December 2018. We studied the frequency of thrombocytopenia and further evaluated the risk of thrombocytopenia in these patients.

RESULTS

Among the 283 patients (181 male [64.0%], mean age: [61.0 ± 14.9] years) who were treated with intravenous VPA, thrombocytopenia was observed in 104 patients (36.7%). Thrombocytopenia was associated with several risk factors, including lower baseline platelet counts (<200 × 10⁹ /L); aetiologies other than intracranial or subarachnoid haemorrhage; longer use of VPA (more than 3 days); higher daily dose of VPA (more than 1000 mg/d); concurrent use of VPA with other antiepileptic drugs; infection; and the use of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate analysis found several independent risk factors of thrombocytopenia with intravenous VPA therapy, including lower baseline platelet counts, aetiologies other than intracranial or subarachnoid haemorrhage, use of VPA for more than 3 days and infection.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia is common in NCU patients. Because several clinical and laboratory factors are associated with thrombocytopenia, careful use of VPA should be considered in patients with these risk factors.

Pharmacological Management of Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a complex disease that involves a variety of cognitive, behavioral and neurological symptoms, including progressive memory loss, visual hallucinations, parkinsonism, cognitive fluctuations and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD). These symptoms may appear in varying combinations and levels of severity in each patient who is seen in the clinic, making diagnosis and treatment a challenge. DLB is the third most common of all the neurodegenerative diseases behind both Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The median age of onset for DLB (76.3 years) is younger than that seen in PD dementia (81.4 years). New pathological studies have shown that most DLB patients have variable amounts of Alzheimer’s changes in their brains, explaining the wide variability in this disease’s clinical presentation and clinical course. This review discusses the three cholinesterase inhibitors that have been shown to be effective in managing the cognitive and behavioral symptoms of DLB: rivastigmine, galantamine and donepezil. Memantine is able to improve clinical global impression of change in those with mild to moderate DLB. Levodopa can treat the parkinsonism of some DLB patients, but the dose is often limited due to the fact that it can cause agitation or worsening of visual hallucinations. A recent phase 2 clinical trial showed the benefit of zonisamide when it is added as an adjunct to levodopa for treating DLB parkinsonism. While atypical antipsychotic drugs may not always be helpful as monotherapy in managing the agitation associated with DLB, low doses of valproic acid can be effective when added as an adjunct to drugs like quetiapine. Pimavanserin may prove to be a useful treatment for psychosis in DLB patients, but like other antipsychotic drugs that are used in dementia patients, there is a small increased risk of mortality. RBD, which is a common core clinical feature of DLB, can be managed with either melatonin or clonazepam. Two agents targeting alpha-synuclein (NPT200-11 and ambroxol) currently hold promise as disease-modifying therapies for DLB, but they are yet to be tested in clinical trials. An agent (E2027) that offers hope of neuroprotection by increasing central cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels is currently being examined in clinical trials in DLB patients.

An Analysis of Psychoactive Medications Initiated in the ICU but Continued Beyond Discharge: A Pilot Study of Stewardship

BACKGROUND

Psychoactive medications (PM) are frequently administered in the intensive care unit (ICU) to provide comfort. Interventions focused on preventing their continuation after the acute phase of illness are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency that patients with ICU-initiated PM are continued upon ICU and hospital discharge.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, observational study assessed consecutive adult ICU patients who received scheduled PM. Frequency of PM continued at ICU and hospital discharge was recorded. The patient's primary treatment team was contacted by the pharmacist within 72 hours of ICU discharge to establish rationale for continued use or to suggest discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients included, 72% were continued on PM at ICU discharge and 30% at hospital discharge. The pharmacist contacted 40% of treatment teams after ICU discharge and intervention resulted in PM discontinued in 50% of patients. Post ICU discharge, the indication of 41% of patients' PM was unknown by the non-ICU care team or incorrect. Medical ICU patients or those transferred to an outside facility were more likely remain on PM at hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

PM are frequently continued during transitions of care and often without knowledge of the initial indication. Future studies should establish effective PM stewardship methods.

A systematic review of interventions to facilitate extubation in patients difficult-to-wean due to delirium, agitation, or anxiety and a meta-analysis of the effect of dexmedetomidine

BACKGROUND

Delirium, agitation, and anxiety may hinder weaning from mechanical ventilation and lead to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. The most appropriate clinical approach to weaning in these contexts remains unclear and challenging to clinicians. The objective of this systematic review was to identify effective and safe interventions to wean patients that are difficult-to-wean from mechanical ventilation due to delirium, agitation, or anxiety.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. Studies evaluating mechanically ventilated patients deemed difficult-to-wean due to delirium, agitation, or anxiety, and comparing the effects of an intervention with a comparator arm were sought. Time-to-extubation was the primary outcome while the secondary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay.

RESULTS

From 10,860 studies identified, eight met the inclusion criteria: six studies assessed dexmedetomidine while the remaining two assessed loxapine and biofeedback. Pooled analysis of studies assessing dexmedetomidine showed reduced time-to-extubation (six studies, n = 303) by 10.9 hr compared with controls (95% confidence interval [CI], -15.7 to -6.1; I² = 68%) and ICU length of stay (four studies, n = 191) by 2.6 days (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.3; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, the evidence was deemed to be of low quality given the small sample sizes and high heterogeneity. Studies assessing other interventions did not identify improvements compared with controls. Safety assessment was globally poorly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides low quality evidence to suggest the use of dexmedetomidine in patients deemed difficult-to-wean due to agitation, delirium, or anxiety. Insufficient evidence was found regarding other interventions to provide any recommendation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42016042528); registered 15 July, 2016.

Repurposing Valproate, Enteral Clonidine, and Phenobarbital for Comfort in Adult ICU Patients: A Literature Review with Practical Considerations

Provision of adequate sedation is a fundamental part of caring for critically ill patients. Propofol, dexmedetomidine, and benzodiazepines are the most commonly administered sedative medications for adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). These agents are limited by adverse effects, need for a monitored environment for safe administration, and lack of universal effectiveness. Increased interest has recently been expressed about repurposing older pharmacologic agents for patient comfort in the ICU. Valproate, enteral clonidine, and phenobarbital are three agents with increasing evidence supporting their use. Potential benefits associated with their utilization are cost minimization and safe administration after transition out of the ICU. This literature review describes the historical context, pharmacologic characteristics, supportive data, and practical considerations associated with the administration of these agents for comfort in critically ill adult patients.

Oral Agents for the Management of Agitation and Agitated Delirium in Critically Ill Patients

Agitation is one of the most common issues that critically ill patients experience. Medications used to manage agitation are often administered intravenously or intramuscularly in the acutely agitated, critically ill patient. However, a multimodal approach that utilizes multiple routes of administration may be appropriate. This review summarizes the available literature on oral antipsychotics, clonidine, and valproic acid to manage agitation in critically ill patients while also focusing on their pharmacology and appropriate monitoring. Despite inconclusive findings from different studies, antipsychotics, clonidine, and valproic acid may provide benefit for specific patient populations. As more evidence emerges, these agents may start playing a greater role in the management of agitation, which is not amenable to first-line agents. As health care professionals, it is prudent to be familiar with their dosing regimens, common adverse effects, and the monitoring required to maximize patient benefits and minimize harms.

Valproate Protein Binding Is Highly Variable in ICU Patients and Not Predicted by Total Serum Concentrations: A Case Series and Literature Review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The free fraction of valproate (the pharmacologically active moiety, normally 5-10%) may vary significantly in critically ill patients, but this topic is understudied, with only four prior intensive care unit (ICU) case reports. The objective of this study was to evaluate the range of valproate plasma protein binding in ICU patients.

DESIGN

Observational study of consecutive ICU patients.

SETTING

Neurocritical and medical critical care services in a nonuniversity academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive ICU patients treated with valproate with serum albumin less than 4 g/dl.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Simultaneous total and free trough serum valproate concentrations were measured as were serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, platelets, and transaminase values. The reference concentration range was 50-125 mg/L (total) and 5-17 mg/L (free). Valproate concentrations were categorized as within reference range, low, or high, and as concordant if both concentrations were in the same category. Data are reported as median (interquartile range). Fifteen patients (nine men) were evaluated. The median age was 63 (34-70) years. The valproate dose was 3 g/day (35 mg/kg/day). No patient had a valproate free fraction of 5-10%; the median was 48%, and the range was 15-89%. Total and free concentrations showed poor correlation (0.43) and were concordant in only two patients (both in the reference range). Free valproate concentration was poorly predicted by an equation correcting for albumin (r = 0.45). Suspected adverse drug events occurred in 10 patients: hyperammonemia in 7 of 12 tested (58%), elevated transaminases in 2 of 15 (13%), and thrombocytopenia in 5 of 15 (33%).

CONCLUSIONS

Protein binding of valproate was highly inconsistent in this cohort of ICU patients, and total valproate concentrations did not predict free concentrations, even when correcting for albumin. Additional research to define best practice for dosing and monitoring valproate and the relationship between free valproate concentrations and clinical or adverse effects in ICU patients is needed.