1
|
Green CD, Kang S, Harvey EA, Jones HA. ADHD in Black Youth: A Content Analysis of Empirical Research from 1972 to 2023. J Atten Disord 2024; 28:1699-1715. [PMID: 39318151 DOI: 10.1177/10870547241285244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this content analysis study was to characterize patterns of research on Black youth with ADHD. METHOD Relevant articles were identified through searching psychology and medical databases and cross-referencing citations in previously published review articles. The 204 empirical articles included in this study (1) were conducted in the United States, (2) had a predominantly child or adolescent sample, (3) had more than 80% Black youth/families in the study sample and/or conducted separate analyses for Black youth/families, and (4) examined ADHD symptoms or diagnoses. Articles were categorized into five primary content areas: Assessment, Treatment, Perceptions, Prevalence, and Associated Correlates. Journal characteristics, sample characteristics, and methodological characteristics are presented across these content areas. RESULTS Findings show a relatively low representation of Black youth with ADHD in the literature, with most studies using race comparative approaches and secondary data analyses, and many being published in medical journals. CONCLUSION Based on these results, changes are recommended both at the individual study and broader systems levels (e.g., funding agencies). More research, funding, and publications centering Black youth with ADHD are vital to understanding and correcting long-standing health disparities for this community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrin D Green
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sungha Kang
- University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
- Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian J, Gamaldo AA, Madduri K, Tavares C, Maseru N, Saunders D, King G. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Staffing Levels in Philadelphia Nursing Homes: Disparities Based on the Racial Composition of Geographical Areas. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2024; 25:152-161. [PMID: 39150355 PMCID: PMC11366174 DOI: 10.1177/15271544241270061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Research to assess and inform health policy is an essential component of the policymaking process to advance equity in public health practice. This study investigated health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022) in older adult institutional settings in Philadelphia, PA, to inform policy initiatives, interventions, and infrastructure development. We first explored the changing patterns of nursing staffing levels (total direct care staff and registered nurses [RNs]) measured by hours per resident per day (HPRD) before and after COVID-19. Our findings revealed that HPRD levels consistently fell below the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommended standards from 2018 to 2022, with notable declines observed starting from 2021. Results from multilevel modeling showed significant declines in HPRD for total direct care nursing staff in nursing homes located in zip codes with a high proportion of Black residents (≥40%). In contrast, HPRD for RNs significantly declined in nursing homes located in zip codes with a lower proportion of Black residents (<40%). Moreover, higher reported direct care HPRD and RN HPRD were associated with any reported COVID-19 cases only within zip codes with a low proportion of Black residents. These findings indicate the need for additional policies to address these observed patterns in staffing levels. Our study provides a foundation for future policy reviews utilizing a conceptual framework that is health equity-centric for local and state health departments program and units intended for institutional care settings for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyan Tian
- Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | | | - Kamesh Madduri
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Carlos Tavares
- Anthropology and Sociology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA, USA
| | - Noble Maseru
- Schools of Health Sciences Office of Diversity Equity and Inclusion, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Saunders
- Office of Health Equity, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Gary King
- Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bentley-Edwards KL, Adisa O, Ruff KE, McClure ES, Robinson WR. Race, racism, and covid-19 in the US: lessons not learnt. BMJ 2024; 384:e076106. [PMID: 38408791 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Keisha L Bentley-Edwards
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Olanrewaju Adisa
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Kennedy E Ruff
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McClure
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Whitney R Robinson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
- Division of Women's Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pham KCT, Chiew KS. The impact of air pollution on neurocognitive development: Adverse effects and health disparities. Dev Psychobiol 2023; 65:e22440. [PMID: 38010305 PMCID: PMC10683861 DOI: 10.1002/dev.22440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Air pollution is recognized as a major public health concern. The number of deaths related to ambient air pollution has increased in recent years and is projected to continue rising. Additionally, both short- and long-term air pollution exposure has been linked with deleterious effects on neurocognitive function and development. While air pollution poses as a threat to everyone, people of color and individuals of lower socioeconomic status are often exposed to elevated levels of air pollution as a function of systemic racism and classism. Further, given additional disparities in access to healthcare and other compounding stressors, adverse effects of air pollution on neurocognitive health are exacerbated among individuals who hold marginalized identities-making effects both less likely to be detected and treated. This review examines evidence of the effects of air pollution on neurocognitive development across the lifespan and incorporates an environmental justice perspective to highlight disparities in air pollution exposure across race and socioeconomic status. Last, upon the reviewed evidence, limitations of past research and recommendations for policy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim-Chi T Pham
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Kimberly S Chiew
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gruber J, Hinshaw SP, Clark LA, Rottenberg J, Prinstein MJ. Young Adult Mental Health Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Can Enlightened Policy Promote Long-Term Change? POLICY INSIGHTS FROM THE BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 2023; 10:75-82. [PMID: 36942264 PMCID: PMC10018249 DOI: 10.1177/23727322221150199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
The status of mental health for adolescents and young adults has aptly been termed a "crisis" across research, clinical, and policy quarters. Arguably, the status quo provision of mental health services for adolescents and young adults is neither acceptable nor salvageable in its current form. Instead, only a wholesale policy transformation of mental health sciences can address crises of this scope. Pandemic-related impacts on mental health, particularly among young adults, have clearly exposed the need for the mental healthcare field to develop a set of transformative priorities to achieve long overdue, systemic changes: (1) frequent mental health tracking, (2) increased access to mental health care, (3) working with and within communities, (4) collaboration across disciplines and stakeholders, (5) prevention-focused emphasis, (6) use of dimensional descriptions over categorical pronouncements, and (7) addressing systemic inequities. The pandemic required changes in mental healthcare that can and should be the beginning of long-needed reform, calling upon all mental health care disciplines to embrace innovation and relinquish outdated traditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Gruber
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Stephen P. Hinshaw
- University of California, Berkeley, California, CA, USA
- University of California, San Francisco, California, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dorvil S, Nieves C, Pierre J, Valdez J, Dannefer R, Shiman LJ, Diallo F. Disruption of Healthcare in New York City During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From Residents Living in North and Central Brooklyn, the South Bronx, and East and Central Harlem. J Prim Care Community Health 2023; 14:21501319231205992. [PMID: 37905997 PMCID: PMC10619193 DOI: 10.1177/21501319231205992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected some New York City (NYC) neighborhoods that primarily consist of Black, Indigenous, and Latinx residents. In comparison to the rest of NYC, these neighborhoods experienced high hospitalization and COVID-related death rates, which has been attributed to a longstanding history of structural racism and disinvestment. While stay-at-home orders were implemented to reduce the spread of COVID-19, this may have also affected access and utilization of non-COVID related healthcare services. This study aims to assess the prevalence of and reasons for the disruption of non-COVID related healthcare services during the first 18 months of the pandemic. METHODS From September 30, 2021 to November 4, 2021, the NYC Health Department administered the COVID-19 Community Recovery Survey to a subset of residents who were part of the NYC Health Panel a probability-based survey panel. This cross-sectional survey, which included closed and open-ended questions, was either self-administered online or completed via CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) in English, Spanish, and Simplified Chinese. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses and unweighted, weighted, age-adjusted percentages, and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS With a response rate of 30.3% (N = 1358), more than half of participants (54%) reported disruption to either routine physical healthcare or mental health services. Concern about getting COVID-19 (61%), stay-at-home policies (40%), belief that care could safely be postponed (35%), and appointment challenges (34%) were among reasons for delaying routine healthcare. Concern about getting COVID-19 (38%) and reduced hours of service (36%) were primary reasons for delaying mental healthcare. Reported reasons for the sustained delay of care past 18 months involved COVID concerns, appointment, and insurance challenges. CONCLUSIONS Due to the pandemic, some disruption to healthcare was expected. However, most study participants either avoided or experienced a delay in healthcare. The delay of non-COVID related healthcare throughout the pandemic may result in the further widening of the health inequity gap among NYC residents dealing with a higher chronic disease burden before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. Findings from this study can support equitable COVID-19 recovery, and guide efforts with health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheena Dorvil
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christina Nieves
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Pierre
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jocelyn Valdez
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Dannefer
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren J. Shiman
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fatoumata Diallo
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carter-Edwards L, Hightower M, Schick V, Nguyen T, Hidalgo B, Cacari Stone L, Laird R, Ossip D, Rubio M, ElShourbagy Ferreira S, Carrasquillo O. The CTSA Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) Task Force's recommendations for the CTSA program consortium. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 7:e41. [PMID: 36845311 PMCID: PMC9947599 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program recognizes that advancing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) requires moving beyond statements of commitment to transformative actions. In 2021, the CTSA Program created a Task Force (TF) to initiate work in support of structural and transformational initiatives that advance DEIA for the consortium and its individual hubs. We describe the process of forming the expertise-driven (DEIA) TF and our activities to date. We 1) developed and adopted the DEIA Learning Systems Framework to guide our approach; 2) defined a set of recommendations across four focus areas (Institutional; Programmatic; Community-Centered; and Social, Cultural, Environmental); and 3) designed and disseminated a survey to capture the CTSA Program's baseline demographic, community, infrastructural, and leadership diversity. The CTSA Consortium also elevated the TF to a standing Committee to extend our understanding, development, and implementation of DEIA approaches to translational and clinical science. These initial steps provide a foundation for collectively fostering environment that support DEIA across the research continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Carter-Edwards
- The North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Maia Hightower
- Utah Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vanessa Schick
- Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tung Nguyen
- University of California San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bertha Hidalgo
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lisa Cacari Stone
- University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Rebecca Laird
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), University of Rochester Clinical Translational Science Institute, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Ossip
- Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC), University of Rochester Clinical Translational Science Institute, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mercedes Rubio
- Division of Training, Workforce Development, and Diversity, National Institute of General Medicical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sanae ElShourbagy Ferreira
- Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program Branch, National Center for Advancing Translational Science, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Olveen Carrasquillo
- University of Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moss E, Patterson NA, Seals BF. An Examination of US COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15629. [PMID: 36497703 PMCID: PMC9738558 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 quickly spread across the United States (US) while communications and policies at all government levels suffered from inconsistency, misinformation, and lack of coordination. In order to explain the discrepancy between availability and population uptake, a case study was conducted analyzing vaccine rollout plans, social media, and Health Officer/Other Key Informant interviews in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. Key research questions included, "What were the barriers and facilitators of early COVID vaccine distribution?" and "What mechanisms in the community emerged to alleviate strains in early vaccination?" Findings from this study revealed that pre-existing emergency preparedness infrastructures and plans developed since the 9/11 tragedy were seemingly abandoned. This caused health departments at all levels of government to make impromptu, non-uniform decisions leading to confusion, vaccine hesitancy, and ultimately low uptake. The results indicate that future vaccine rollout best practices must include evidence-based decision-making, coordinated communications, and outreach to high-priority and vulnerable communities.
Collapse
|