1
|
Feng J, Zhang K, Dou L, Shi Z, Chen G, Li S. Health state utility values in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:2321-2334. [PMID: 38824212 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03670-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic condition that requires lifelong treatment and results in a serious disease burden. Health state utility values (HSUVs) are a valuable tool for quantifying this burden and conducting cost-utility analysis. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain estimates of HSUVs in patients with AS, explored potential sources of heterogeneity, and compared pooled patient HSUVs with population norms. METHOD We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane database and Scopus until July, 2023 to obtain eligible studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I checklist. RESULTS Forty-two publications involving 11,354 participants were included in this systematic review. The most commonly used instrument is the EQ-5D (38 studies). The estimated HSUVs for patients with AS from all available studies was pooled as 0.62 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.65). The pooled mean utility estimates from the random effects meta-analysis for SF-6D, EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and HUI3 were 0.65 (95% CI 0.62,0.68), 0.63 (95% CI 0.59,0.66), 0.60 (95% CI 0.42,0.79), and 0.48 (95% CI 0.43,0.53), respectively. For the EQ-5D-3L we conducted stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression based on key subgroups. The pooled estimates of EQ-5D-3L were lower for patients published before 2010, with high disease activity, long duration of disease, and in developed countries. CONCLUSION Pooled estimates of HSUVs for people with AS were substantially lower than population norms. These estimates provide robust evidence that can inform the economic evaluation of new therapies for individuals with AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JunChao Feng
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
| | | | - Lei Dou
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Zhao Shi
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3145, Australia
| | - Shunping Li
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
- NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
- Center for Health Preference Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Button E, Carter H, Gavin NC, LeBlanc TW, McCaffrey N. A systematic review of health state utility values for older people with acute myeloid leukaemia. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03734-9. [PMID: 39172308 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03734-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older people with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have a poor prognosis, reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and require substantial healthcare resources. The objectives of this systematic review were to determine what health state utility values (HSUVs) are reported in the literature that can be used in economic evaluations of interventions for older people with AML, identify research gaps, and discuss directions for future research. METHODS The following databases were searched for studies published from inception until Feb 2023: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EconLit. Studies were included if they reported on HSUVs of people with AML >60 years, or HRQoL data that could be mapped to HSUVs using currently published algorithms. RESULTS Of 532 studies identified, 7 met inclusion (4 full studies and 3 conference abstracts). Twenty-eight potentially eligible studies were excluded as they did not report HRQoL measures in sufficient detail to be mapped to utility values. Included studies reported on health states of newly diagnosed disease (n=4 studies), intensive therapy (n=1 study), controlled remission (n=3 studies), and relapsed or refractory disease (n=2 studies). No studies reported on low intensity therapy or supportive care health states. Utility values were largely reported via the EuroQol and ranged from 0.535 (intensive therapy) to 0.834 (controlled remission). CONCLUSION There are gaps in knowledge on HSUVs for older people with AML, particularly for certain treatment-related health states. Future articles should publish comprehensive HRQoL outcomes to enable use in economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Button
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes, Queensland University of Technology, Level 7, Q Block, 66 Must Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Hannah Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicole C Gavin
- Cancer Care Services, Metro North Hospital and Health Services, Queensland Health Brisbane, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ng CA, De Abreu Lourenco R, Viney R, Norman R, King MT, Kim N, Mulhern B. Valuing quality of life for economic evaluations in cancer: navigating multiple methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024:1-14. [PMID: 39158365 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2393332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Utility values offer a quantitative means to evaluate the impact of novel cancer treatments on patients' quality of life (QoL). However, the multiple methods available for valuing QoL present challenges in selecting the most appropriate method across different contexts. AREAS COVERED This review provides cancer clinicians and researchers with an overview of methods to value QoL for economic evaluations, including standalone and derived preference-based measures (PBMs) and direct preference elicitation methods. Recent developments are described, including the comparative performance of cancer-specific PBMs versus generic PBMs, measurement of outcomes beyond health-related QoL, and increased use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Recommendations and considerations are provided to guide the choice of method for cancer research. EXPERT OPINION We foresee continued adoption of the QLU-C10D and FACT-8D in cancer clinical trials given the extensive use of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G in cancer research. While these cancer-specific PBMs offer the convenience of eliciting utility values without needing a standalone PBM, researchers should consider potential limitations if they intend to substitute them for generic PBMs. As the field advances, there is a greater need for consensus on the approach to selection and integration of various methods in cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie-Anne Ng
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nancy Kim
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pesonen M, Jylhä V, Kankaanpää E. Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2024:02174543-990000000-00336. [PMID: 39054883 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-23-00511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to examine the role of adverse drug events (ADEs) caused by pharmacological interventions in cost-effectiveness models for diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema. INTRODUCTION Guidelines for economic evaluation recognize the importance of including ADEs in the analysis, but in practice, consideration of ADEs in cost-effectiveness models seem to be vague. Inadequate inclusion of these harmful outcomes affects the reliability of the results, and the information provided by economic evaluation could be misleading. Reviewing whether and how ADEs are incorporated in cost-effectiveness models is necessary to understand the current practices of economic evaluation. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies included were published between 2011-2022 in English, representing cost-effectiveness analyses using modeling framework for pharmacological interventions in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, or diabetic macular edema. Other types of analyses and other types of conditions were excluded. METHODS The databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and NHS Economic Evaluation Database. Gray literature was searched via the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Network for Health Technology Assessment, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. The search was conducted on January 1, 2023. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. Full-text review was conducted by 3 independent reviewers. A data extraction form was used to extract and analyze the data. Results were presented in tabular format with a narrative summary, and discussed in the context of existing literature and guidelines. RESULTS A total of 242 reports were extracted and analyzed in this scoping review. For the included analyses, type 2 diabetes was the most common disease (86%) followed by type 1 diabetes (10%), diabetic macular edema (9%), and diabetic retinopathy (0.4%). The majority of the included analyses used a health care payer perspective (88%) and had a time horizon of 30 years or more (75%). The most common model type was a simulation model (57%), followed by a Markov simulation model (18%). Of the included cost-effectiveness analyses, 26% included ADEs in the modeling, and 13% of the analyses excluded them. Most of the analyses (61%) partly considered ADEs; that is, only 1 or 2 ADEs were included. No difference in overall inclusion of ADEs between the different conditions existed, but the models for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema more often omitted the ADE-related impact on quality of life compared with the models for diabetes mellitus. Most analyses included ADEs in the models as probabilities (55%) or as a submodel (40%), and the most common source for ADE incidences were clinical trials (65%). CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of ADEs in cost-effectiveness models is suboptimal. The ADE-related costs were better captured than the ADE-related impact on quality of life, which was most pronounced in the models for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Future research should investigate the potential impact of ADEs on the results, and identify the criteria and policies for practical inclusion of ADEs in economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Pesonen
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Virpi Jylhä
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Centre for Nursing Science and Social and Health Management, Kuopio University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of North Savo, Finland
| | - Eila Kankaanpää
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valentine WJ, Norrbacka K, Boye KS. Utilities for Complications Associated with Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of the Literature. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2655-2681. [PMID: 38771477 PMCID: PMC11213775 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02878-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Utility values are used in health economic modeling analyses of type 2 diabetes (T2D) to quantify the effect of acute and long-term complications on quality of life (QoL). For accurate modeling projections, it is important that the utility values used are up to date, accurate and representative of the simulated model cohort. METHODS A literature review was performed to identify utility values for health states representing acute and chronic T2D-related complications including cardiovascular complications, stroke, renal disease, ophthalmic complications, neuropathy, diabetic foot, amputation and hypoglycemia. Searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases and limited to articles published since 2010. Supplementary searches were performed to identify data published at congresses in 2019-2023. RESULTS A total of 54 articles were identified that reported utility values for T2D-related complications. The most frequently used elicitation method/instrument was the EQ-5D (n = 42 studies) followed by the Short Form-6 dimensions (n = 6), time tradeoff (n = 5), the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 or Mark 3 (n = 2), 15D (n = 1), visual analog scale (n = 1) and standard gamble (n = 1). Stroke and amputation were consistently associated with the largest decrements in QoL. There is a lack of published data that distinguishes between severity of several complications including renal disease, retinopathy and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS Diabetes-related complications can have a profound impact on QoL; therefore, it is important that these are captured accurately and appropriately in health economic models. Recently published utility values for diabetes-related complications that can be used to inform health economic models are summarized here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Valentine
- Ossian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sivaprasad S, Bailey C, Downey L, Gilbert R, Gale R, Kotagiri A, Mahmood S, Morgan-Warren P, Napier J, Narendran N, Pearce I, Rennie C, Talks J, Wojcik R, Jandhyala R. Real-world service costs for neovascular-AMD clinics in the United Kingdom: structured literature review and scenario analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2024; 40:1221-1233. [PMID: 38814914 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2362278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) emphasize drug costs as the differentiator between NICE recommended anti-VEGF treatments but may neglect real-world non-drug costs of running nAMD services in the UK. To address this, this study identified real-world non-drug service cost items relevant to UK NHS nAMD clinics, including costs arising from operational strain (demand exceeding capacity). METHODS Cost items were identified by a structured literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature, and an expert panel of 10 UK-based ophthalmologists with relevance to real-world practice. These items underwent meta-synthesis and were then determined in a consensus exercise. RESULTS Of 237 cost items identified, 217 (91.6%) met the consensus threshold of >0.51 and were included in the nAMD Service Non-Drug Cost Instrument (nAS). Sensitivity of cost items taken from UK Health Technology Assessment (HTA) using the nAS as the reference standard was low (HTAmin: 1.84%, 95% CI 0.50-4.65%; HTAmax: 70.51%, 95% CI 63.96-76.49%). False negative rates showed variable likelihood of misclassifying a service by cost burden depending on prevalence. Scenario analysis using cost magnitudes estimated annual per-patient clinic cost at £845 (within capacity) to £13,960 (under strain) compared to an HTAmin estimate of £210. Accounting for cost of strain under an assumed 50% increase in health resource utilization influenced cost-effectiveness in a hypothetical genericisation scenario. CONCLUSION Findings suggested that HTA underestimates UK NHS nAMD clinic cost burden with cost of strain contributing substantial additional unmeasured expense with impact on CEA. Given potential undertreatment due to strain, durability is suggested as one of the relevant factors in CEA of nAMD anti-VEGF treatments due to robustness under limited capacity conditions affecting UK ophthalmology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sobha Sivaprasad
- NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Bailey
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Louise Downey
- Ophthalmology Research Team, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital, UK
| | - Rose Gilbert
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bayer PLC, Reading, UK
| | - Richard Gale
- Department of Ophthalmology, Bayer PLC, Reading, UK
- Ophthalmology and Clinical Visual Science, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Ajay Kotagiri
- Sunderland Eye Infirmary, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields UK
| | - Sajjad Mahmood
- Manchester Eye Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Nirodhini Narendran
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ian Pearce
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christina Rennie
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - James Talks
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghabri S, Dawoud D, Drummond M. Methods for Including Adverse Events in Economic Evaluations: Suggestions for Improvement. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:936-942. [PMID: 38548180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inclusion of relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes in economic evaluation of health technologies is required to aid efficient healthcare decisions. Our objective was to identify the key issues related to the inclusion of adverse events (AEs) in economic evaluation and explore perspectives for good practice recommendations to handle these issues. METHODS We focused on the frequently encountered methodological issues related to the integration of AEs in economic evaluations of health technologies. We distinguished the following elements: the incorporation of AEs in decision models, the terminology of AEs, the estimation of AEs consequences in terms of quality of life (QoL) and costs, and the exploration of the uncertainty related to the impact of AEs on the economic results. RESULTS We illustrated and discussed each of the identified issues by giving health technology assessment examples. We focused on the extent to which the integration of AEs in decision models can be improved by dealing with the lack of relevant real-world safety data, estimating the consequences of AEs (eg, for costs and QoL loss), exploring the impacts of AEs that are not adequately captured in current measurement of health-related QoL, and identifying the need for development of a good terminology of relevant types of AEs to be incorporated in economic evaluation. CONCLUSION Based on a reflection the key methodological issues related to the incorporation of adverse drug events in economic evaluations, we suggested several recommendations to serve a starting point for health technology assessment agencies and researchers to develop good research practices in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salah Ghabri
- Department of Medical Evaluation, French National Authority for Health (HAS), Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- Science, Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, England, UK
| | - Michael Drummond
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ul Husnain MI, Hajizadeh M, Ahmad H, Khanam R. The Hidden Toll of Psychological Distress in Australian Adults and Its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Health State Utilities. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:583-598. [PMID: 38530626 PMCID: PMC11178635 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00879-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological distress (PD) is a major health problem that affects all aspects of health-related quality of life including physical, mental and social health, leading to a substantial human and economic burden. Studies have revealed a concerning rise in the prevalence of PD and various mental health conditions among Australians, particularly in female individuals. There is a scarcity of studies that estimate health state utilities (HSUs), which reflect the overall health-related quality of life in individuals with PD. No such studies have been conducted in Australia thus far. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the age-specific, sex-specific and PD category-specific HSUs (disutilities) in Australian adults with PD to inform healthcare decision making in the management of PD. METHODS Data on age, sex, SF-36/SF6D responses, Kessler psychological distress (K10) scale scores and other characteristics of N = 15,139 participants (n = 8149 female individuals) aged >15 years were derived from the latest wave (21) of the nationally representative Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia survey. Participants were grouped into the severity categories of no (K10 score: 10-19), mild (K10: 20-24), moderate (K10: 25-29) and severe PD (K10: 30-50). Both crude and adjusted HSUs were calculated from participants' SF-36 profiles, considering potential confounders such as smoking, marital status, remoteness, education and income levels. The calculations were based on the SF-6D algorithm and aligned with Australian population norms. Additionally, the HSUs were stratified by age, sex and PD categories. Disutilities of PD, representing the mean difference between HSUs of people with PD and those without, were also calculated for each group. RESULTS The average age of individuals was 46.130 years (46% male), and 31% experienced PD in the last 4 weeks. Overall, individuals with PD had significantly lower mean HSUs than those likely to be no PD, 0.637 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.636, 0.640) vs 0.776 (95% CI 0.775, 0.777) i.e. disutility: -0.139 [95% CI -0.139, -0.138]). Mean disutilities of -0.108 (95% CI -0.110, -0.104), -0.140 (95% CI -0.142, -0.138), and -0.188 (95% CI -0.190, -0.187) were observed for mild PD, moderate PD and severe PD, respectively. Disutilities of PD also differed by age and sex groups. For instance, female individuals had up to 0.049 points lower mean HSUs than male individuals across the three classifications of PD. There was a clear decline in health-related quality of life with increasing age, demonstrated by lower mean HSUs in older population age groups, that ranged from 0.818 (95% CI 0.817, 0.818) for the 15-24 years age group with no PD to 0.496 (95% CI 0.491, 0.500) for the 65+ years age group with severe PD). Across all ages and genders, respondents were more likely to report issues in certain dimensions, notably vitality, and these responses did not uniformly align with ageing. CONCLUSIONS The burden of PD in Australia is substantial, with a significant impact on female individuals and older individuals. Implementing age-specific and sex-specific healthcare interventions to address PD among Australian adults may greatly alleviate this burden. The PD state-specific HSUs calculated in our study can serve as valuable inputs for future health economic evaluations of PD in Australia and similar populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rasheda Khanam
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowomba, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Darab MG, Engel L, Henzler D, Lauerer M, Nagel E, Brown V, Mihalopoulos C. Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Interventions for Dementia: An Updated Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:503-525. [PMID: 38554246 PMCID: PMC11178626 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00878-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been an increase in model-based economic evaluations of interventions for dementia. The most recent systematic review of economic evaluations for dementia highlighted weaknesses in studies, including lack of justification for model assumptions and data inputs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to update the last published systematic review of model-based economic evaluations of interventions for dementia, including Alzheimer's disease, with a focus on any methodological improvements and quality assessment of the studies. METHODS Systematic searches in eight databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, international HTA database, and the Tufts Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry were undertaken from February 2018 until August 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Philips checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. The findings were summarized through narrative analysis. RESULTS This review included 23 studies, comprising cost-utility analyses (87%), cost-benefit analyses (9%) and cost-effectiveness analyses (4%). The studies covered various interventions, including pharmacological (n = 10, 43%), non-pharmacological (n = 4, 17%), prevention (n = 4, 17%), diagnostic (n = 4, 17%) and integrated (n = 1, 4%) [diagnostics-pharmacologic] strategies. Markov transition models were commonly employed (65%), followed by decision trees (13%) and discrete-event simulation (9%). Several interventions from all categories were reported as being cost effective. The quality of reporting was suboptimal for the Methods and Results sections in almost all studies, although the majority of studies adequately addressed the decision problem, scope, and model-type selection in their economic evaluations. Regarding the quality of methodology, only a minority of studies addressed competing theories or clearly explained the rationale for model structure. Furthermore, few studies systematically identified key parameters or assessed data quality, and uncertainty was mostly addressed partially. CONCLUSIONS This review informs future research and resource allocation by providing insights into model-based economic evaluations for dementia interventions and highlighting areas for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Ghaffari Darab
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- Institute for Management in Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - Lidia Engel
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dennis Henzler
- Institute for Management in Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Michael Lauerer
- Institute for Management in Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Eckhard Nagel
- Institute for Management in Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Vicki Brown
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muchadeyi MT, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Di Tanna GL, Eckford RD, Feng Y, Meregaglia M, Peasgood T, Petrou S, Ubels J, Schlander M. Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:767-782. [PMID: 38551803 PMCID: PMC11180162 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01365-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing number of studies that generate health state utility values (HSUVs) and the impact of HSUVs on cost-utility analyses make a robust tailored quality appraisal (QA) tool for systematic reviews of these studies necessary. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to address conceptual issues regarding QA in systematic reviews of studies eliciting HSUVs by establishing a consensus on the definitions, dimensions and scope of a QA tool specific to this context. METHODS A modified Delphi method was used in this study. An international multidisciplinary panel of seven experts was purposively assembled. The experts engaged in two anonymous online survey rounds. After each round, the experts received structured and controlled feedback on the previous phase. Controlled feedback allowed the experts to re-evaluate and adjust their positions based on collective insights. Following these surveys, a virtual face-to-face meeting was held to resolve outstanding issues. Consensus was defined a priori at all stages of the modified Delphi process. RESULTS The response rates to the first-round and second-round questionnaires and the virtual consensus meeting were 100%, 86% and 71%, respectively. The entire process culminated in a consensus on the definitions of scientific quality, QA, the three QA dimensions-reporting, relevance and methodological quality-and the scope of a QA tool specific to studies that elicit HSUVs. CONCLUSIONS Achieving this consensus marks a pivotal step towards developing a QA tool specific to systematic reviews of studies eliciting HSUVs. Future research will build on this foundation, identify QA items, signalling questions and response options, and develop a QA tool specific to studies eliciting HSUVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muchandifunga Trust Muchadeyi
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (DEASS), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Lugano, Switzerland
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel D Eckford
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yan Feng
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michela Meregaglia
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Schlander
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
- Alfred Weber Institute for Economics (AWI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khoirunnisa SM, Suryanegara FDA, Setiawan D, Postma MJ. Quality-adjusted life years for HER2-positive, early-stage breast cancer using trastuzumab-containing regimens in the context of cost-effectiveness studies: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:613-629. [PMID: 38738869 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2352006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing regimens, by focusing on both Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases without language or publication year restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed methodology and reporting quality using the Drummond checklist and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022), respectively. Costs were converted to US dollars (US$) for 2023 for cross-study comparison. RESULTS Twenty-two articles, primarily from high-income countries (HICs), were included, with ICERs ranging from US$13,176/QALY to US$254,510/QALY, falling within country-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. A notable association was observed between higher QALYs and lower ICERs, indicating a favorable cost-effectiveness and health outcome relationship. EQ-5D was the most utilized instrument for assessing health state utility values, with diverse targeted populations. CONCLUSIONS Studies reporting higher QALYs tend to have lower ICERs, indicating a positive relationship between cost-effectiveness and health outcomes. However, challenges such as methodological heterogeneity and transparency in utility valuation persist, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. REGISTRATION PROSPERO ID: CRD42021259826.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudewi Mukaromah Khoirunnisa
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Research Institute Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung Selatan, Indonesia
| | - Fithria Dyah Ayu Suryanegara
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Research Institute Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Didik Setiawan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Banyumas, Indonesia
- Center for Health Economic Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Banyumas, Indonesia
| | - Maarten Jacobus Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Research Institute Science in Healthy Aging and healthcaRE, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Centre of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barman-Aksözen J, Hentschel N, Pettersson M, Schupp E, Granata F, Dechant C, Aksözen MH, Falchetto R. Fair Funding Decisions: Consistency of the Time Horizons Used in the Calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years for Therapies for Very Rare Diseases by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:616. [PMID: 38791830 PMCID: PMC11121024 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments. A QALY is a measure that combines the size of the clinical benefit of a treatment with the time the patient benefits from it, i.e., the time horizon. We wanted to know how consistently QALY gains are calculated at NICE. Therefore, we have analysed information on the time horizons used for the QALY calculations of the concluded evaluations conducted under the Highly Specialised Technologies programme for treatments of very rare diseases at NICE. For treatments with final guidance published by December 2023 (n = 29), a time horizon of median 97.5 years (range: 35 to 125 years) was used to calculate the QALY gains. For most QALY calculations, the accepted time horizon was longer than either the expected treatment duration or the estimated life expectancy. In contrast, for the only technology with a final negative funding decision, i.e., afamelanotide for treating the lifelong chronic disease erythropoietic protoporphyria, a time horizon that was shorter than the expected treatment duration was used. The fairness and consistency of the evaluation process of treatments for very rare diseases at NICE should be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Barman-Aksözen
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Hentschel
- Independent Researcher, Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mårten Pettersson
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Schupp
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Granata
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, S.C Medicina ad Indirizzo Metabolico, 20122 Milano, Italy
| | - Cornelia Dechant
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mehmet Hakan Aksözen
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rocco Falchetto
- International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pan J, Han Q, Zhou P, Zhou J, Zhang M, Zhu W. Assessing health-related quality of life of Chinese population using CQ-11D. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:34. [PMID: 38637793 PMCID: PMC11027529 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02250-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the Chinese population by using the Chinese medicine quality of life-11 dimensions (CQ-11D) questionnaire and to identify factors associated with HRQoL. METHODS The data was derived from a survey conducted by the Institute of Pharmacoeconomics Evaluation at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine on the quality of life of the Chinese population. The sex and age of respondents were considered through quota sampling. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health indicators were collected using the structured questionnaire. We performed bivariate analyses first to examine the associations between the above factors and the HRQoL of respondents measured by the CQ-11D. Multivariate linear regression and ordinal logistic regression models were established to analyze the factors (demographic, socioeconomic, and health indicators) differences in HRQoL, as well as the risk of each group reporting problems across the 11 dimensions of CQ-11D. RESULTS From February 2021 to November 2022, a total of 7,604 respondents were involved and 7,498 respondents were included. The sample approximated the general adult Chinese population in terms of age, sex, and district of residence, and each geographic distribution ranged from 9.71 to 25.54%. Of the respondents, 45.84% were male, and 89.82% were Han ethnicity. The mean utility score ranged from 0.796 to 0.921 as age increased. According to the respondents, most health problems were identified in the PL (fatigue) (70.16%) and SM (quality of sleep) (63.63%) dimensions. The CQ-11D index scores varied with the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of respondents, except for ethnicity (p > 0.05) and income (p > 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed significant negative associations between health utility scores and various factors. These factors include sex (female), age over 65, belonging to ethnic minorities, rural household registration, being widowed or divorced, having a primary school education or below, being a student or unemployed, having a low income of 0-1,300, engaging in smoking or drinking, limited participation in physical activities, experiencing changes in self-perceived health status compared to the previous year, and having chronic diseases. The odds of respondents reporting problems in 11 dimensions varied among different socio-demographic groups. CONCLUSIONS This study reports the first Chinese population norms for the CQ-11D derived using a representative sample of the Chinese general population. Self-reported health status measured by the CQ-11D varies among different socio-economic groups. In addition to participation a physical activity and the presence of chronic disease, smoking and drinking also significantly influence HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Pan
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Qianxi Han
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Pingda Zhou
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jiameng Zhou
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Mengpei Zhang
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wentao Zhu
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
- University of Chinese Medicine, Higher education zone in LiangXiang Town, FangShan District, Beijing, 102401, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tan MHP, Ong SC, Tahir NAM, Ali AM, Mustafa N. Health state utility values ranges across varying stages and severity of type 2 diabetes-related complications: A systematic review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297589. [PMID: 38574169 PMCID: PMC10994347 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health state utility values (HSUV) for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complications are useful in economic evaluations to determine cost effectiveness of an intervention. However, there is a lack of reference ranges for different severity and stages of individual complications. This study aimed to provide an overview of HSUV decrement ranges for common T2DM complications focusing on different severity and stages of complications. METHOD A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE. (Jan 2000 to April 2022). Included studies for HSUV estimates were from outpatient setting, regardless of treatment types, complication stages, regions and HRQoL instruments. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) outcomes was to be presented as HSUV decrement values, adjusted according to social demographics and comorbidities. Adjusted HSUV decrements were extracted and compiled according to individual complications. After which, subsequently grouped into mild or severe category for comparison. RESULTS Searches identified 35 studies. The size of the study population ranged from 160 to 14,826. The HSUV decrement range was widest for cerebrovascular disease (stroke): -0.0060 to -0.0780 for mild stroke and -0.035 to -0.266 for severe stroke; retinopathy: mild (-0.005 to -0.0862), moderate (-0.0030 to -0.1845) and severe retinopathy (-0.023 to -0.2434); amputation: (-0.1050 to -0.2880). Different nature of complication severity defined in studies could be categorized into: those with acute nature, chronic with lasting effects, those with symptoms at early stage or those with repetitive frequency or episodes. DISCUSSION Overview of HSUV decrement ranges across different stages of each T2DM diabetes-related complications shows that chronic complications with lasting impact such as amputation, severe stroke with sequelae and severe retinopathy with blindness were generally associated with larger HSUV decrement range. Considerable heterogeneities exist across the studies. Promoting standardized complication definitions and identifying the most influential health state stages on HSUV decrements may assist researchers for future cost-effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Hwee Pheng Tan
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Siew Chin Ong
- Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Nurul Ain Mohd Tahir
- Department of Pharmacy, Kampus Kuala Lumpur Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Adliah Mhd Ali
- Department of Pharmacy, Kampus Kuala Lumpur Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Norlaila Mustafa
- Department of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bailey C, Howell M, Raghunandan R, Dalziel K, Howard K, Mulhern B, Petrou S, Rowen D, Salisbury A, Viney R, Lancsar E, Devlin N. The RETRIEVE Checklist for Studies Reporting the Elicitation of Stated Preferences for Child Health-Related Quality of Life. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:435-446. [PMID: 38217776 PMCID: PMC10937763 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01333-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent systematic reviews show varying methods for eliciting, modelling, and reporting preference-based values for child health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes, thus producing value sets with different characteristics. Reporting in many of the reviewed studies was found to be incomplete and inconsistent, making them difficult to assess. Checklists can help to improve standards of reporting; however, existing checklists do not address methodological issues for valuing child HRQoL. Existing checklists also focus on reporting methods and processes used in developing HRQoL values, with less focus on reporting of the values' key characteristics and properties. We aimed to develop a checklist for studies generating values for child HRQoL, including for disease-specific states and value sets for generic child HRQoL instruments. DEVELOPMENT A conceptual model provided a structure for grouping items into five modules. Potential items were sourced from an adult HRQoL checklist review, with additional items specific to children developed using recent reviews. Checklist items were reduced by eliminating duplication and overlap, then refined for relevance and clarity via an iterative process. Long and short checklist versions were produced for different user needs. The resulting long RETRIEVE contains 83 items, with modules for reporting methods (A-D) and characteristics of values (E), for researchers planning and reporting child health valuation studies. The short RETRIEVE contains 14 items for decision makers or researchers choosing value sets. CONCLUSION Applying the RETRIEVE checklists to relevant studies suggests feasibility. RETRIEVE has the potential to improve completeness in the reporting of preference-based values for child HRQOL outcomes and to improve assessment of preference-based value sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cate Bailey
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St., Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rakhee Raghunandan
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St., Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics, Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Amber Salisbury
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics, Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services and Policy Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St., Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kennedy K, Sarohia G, Podbielski D, Pickard S, Tarride JE, Xie F. Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x. [PMID: 38411844 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Describing the characteristics and sources of health state utility values and reporting practice in the literature of cost-utility analyses facilitates an understanding of the level of the transparency, validity, and generalizability of cost-utility analyses. Improving the quality of reporting will support investigators in describing the incremental value of emerging glaucoma interventions. OBJECTIVE To describe the state of practice among published glaucoma cost-utility analysis studies, focusing on valuation of health and the quality of reporting. EVIDENCE REVIEW We searched several databases including Medline, CINHAL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Biosis previews, the Health Economic Evaluations Database, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED). We included full-text, English, published cost-utility analyses of glaucoma interventions with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios. Excluded studies were non-English language, reviews, editorials, protocols, or other types of economic studies (cost-benefit, cost-minimization, cost-effectiveness). Study characteristics, operational definitions of glaucoma health states and health state utilities were extracted. The original source of the health utility was reviewed to determine the scale of measurement and the source of preference weighting. Items from the Systematic Review of Utilities for Cost-Effectiveness (SpRUCE checklist) were used to assess the reporting and quality of health utilities in glaucoma CUA. FINDINGS 43 CUAs were included, with 11 unique sources of health utilities. A wide range of health utilities for the same Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson glaucoma health states were reported; ocular hypertension (0.84-0.95), mild (0.68-0.94), moderate (0.57-0.92), advanced (0.58-0.88), severe/blind (0.46-0.76), and bilateral blindness (0.26-0.5). Most studies reported the basis for using health utilities (34, 79%) and any assumptions or adjustments applied to the health utilities (22, 51%). Few studies reported a framework for assessing the relevance of health utilities to a decision context (8, 19%). Even fewer (3, 7%) applied a systematic search strategy to identify health utilities and used a structured assessment of quality for inclusion. Overall, reporting has not improved over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This review describes that few CUAs describe important rationale for using health state utility values. Including additional details on the search, appraisal, selection, and inclusion process of health utility values improves transparency, generalizability and supports the assessment of the validity of study conclusions. Future investigations should aim to use health utilities on the same scale of measurement across health states and consider the source and relevance to the decision context/purpose of conducting that cost-utility study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Kennedy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z3, Canada.
| | - Gurkaran Sarohia
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924, 107 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T5H 0X5, Canada
| | | | - Simon Pickard
- College of Pharmacy-Pharmacy Systems Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Feng Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mudumba R, Chan HH, Cheng YY, Wang CC, Correia L, Ballreich J, Levy J. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:153-163. [PMID: 38042333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine as second-line therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer from a US healthcare sector perspective. METHODS A 3-state partitioned survival model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with trastuzumab emtansine. For both treatments, modeled patients were administered treatment intravenously every 3 weeks indefinitely or until disease progression. Transition parameters were principally derived from the updated DESTINY-Breast03 phase III randomized clinical trial. Costs include drug costs extracted from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services average sales price and administrative, adverse event, and third-line therapy costs derived from published literature, measured in 2022 US dollars. Health utilities for health states and disutilities for adverse events were sourced from published literature. Effects were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We conducted both probabilistic sensitivity analysis and comprehensive scenario analysis to test model assumptions and robustness, while utilizing a lifetime horizon. RESULTS In our base-case analysis, total costs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were $1 266 945, compared with $820 082 for trastuzumab emtansine. Total QALYs for trastuzumab deruxtecan were 5.09, compared with 3.15 for trastuzumab emtansine. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $230 285/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that trastuzumab deruxtecan had an 11.1% probability of being cost-effective at a $100 000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSIONS Despite the higher efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive metastatic breast cancer, our findings raise concern regarding its value at current prices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mudumba
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Hui-Hsuan Chan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yuan-Yuan Cheng
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chien-Chen Wang
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Luis Correia
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeromie Ballreich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Levy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Alphen AMIA, Krijkamp EM, Gravesteijn BY, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Busschbach JJ. Surgical prioritization based on decision model outcomes is not sensitive to differences between the health-related quality of life values estimates of physicians and citizens. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:529-539. [PMID: 37938403 PMCID: PMC10850033 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03544-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decision models can be used to support allocation of scarce surgical resources. These models incorporate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) values that can be determined using physician panels. The predominant opinion is that one should use values obtained from citizens. We investigated whether physicians give different HRQoL values to citizens and evaluate whether such differences impact decision model outcomes. METHODS A two-round Delphi study was conducted. Citizens estimated HRQoL of pre- and post-operative health states for ten surgeries using a visual analogue scale. These values were compared using Bland-Altman analysis with HRQoL values previously obtained from physicians. Impact on decision model outcomes was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the rankings of surgeries established using the physicians' and the citizens' values. RESULTS A total of 71 citizens estimated HRQoL. Citizens' values on the VAS scale were - 0.07 points (95% CI - 0.12 to - 0.01) lower than the physicians' values. The correlation between the rankings of surgeries based on citizens' and physicians' values was 0.96 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Physicians put higher values on health states than citizens. However, these differences only result in switches between adjacent entries in the ranking. It would seem that HRQoL values obtained from physicians are adequate to inform decision models during crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M I A van Alphen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eline M Krijkamp
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Y Gravesteijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan J Busschbach
- Department of Medical Psychology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hainsworth R, Thompson AJ, Guthrie B, Payne K, Rogers G. International Systematic Review of Utility Values Associated with Cardiovascular Disease and Reflections on Selecting Evidence for a UK Decision-Analytic Model. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:217-234. [PMID: 38174427 PMCID: PMC10865747 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231214782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluating interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires estimates of its effect on utility. We aimed to 1) systematically review utility estimates for CVDs published since 2013 and 2) critically appraise UK-relevant estimates and calculate corresponding baseline utility multipliers. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase (April 22, 2021) using CVD and utility terms. We screened results for primary studies reporting utility distributions for people with experience of heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, stable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or unstable angina. We extracted characteristics from studies included. For UK estimates based on the EuroQoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D) measure, we assessed risk of bias and applicability to a decision-analytic model, pooled arms/time points as appropriate, and estimated baseline utility multipliers using predicted utility for age- and sex- matched populations without CVD. We sought utility sources from directly applicable studies with low risk of bias, prioritizing plausibility of severity ordering in our base-case model and highest population ascertainment in a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Most of the 403 studies identified used EQ-5D (n = 217) and most assessed Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development populations (n = 262), although measures and countries varied widely. UK studies using EQ-5D (n = 29) produced very heterogeneous baseline utility multipliers for each type of CVD, precluding meta-analysis and implying different possible severity orderings. We could find sources that provided a plausible ordering of utilities while adequately representing health states. CONCLUSIONS We cataloged international CVD utility estimates and calculated UK-relevant baseline utility multipliers. Modelers should consider unreported sources of heterogeneity, such as population differences, when selecting utility evidence from reviews. HIGHLIGHTS Published systematic reviews have summarized estimates of utility associated with cardiovascular disease published up to 2013.We 1) reviewed utility estimates for 7 types of cardiovascular disease published since 2013, 2) critically appraised UK-relevant studies, and 3) estimated the effect of each cardiovascular disease on baseline utility.Our review 1) recommends a consistent and reliable set of baseline utility multipliers for 7 types of cardiovascular disease and 2) provides systematically identified reference information for researchers seeking utility evidence for their own context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Hainsworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander J Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gabriel Rogers
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hill-McManus D. The Difference Method Approach for Sampling Order Constrained Parameters: An Improved Implementation and Important Limitations. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:11-18. [PMID: 37603151 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01313-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
A health economic model may include a set of related inputs whose true values are uncertain, but that can be assumed to follow a logical order. Various approaches are available for performing probabilistic sensitivity analysis while preserving the order constraint, one such approach is known as the difference method. The difference method approach appears to have many of the required properties, has been endorsed by good practice guidelines, and is likely to prove a popular approach. However, the proposed implementation of the difference method approach is cumbersome, requiring numerical estimation, which might present a barrier to its adoption. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the method can always be applied to three or more model inputs and whether it is unbiased across all possible input values. This study has investigated these three issues for ordered inputs bounded between 0 and 1. An analytic solution is given that allows for more straightforward and compact implementation. The difference method approach cannot always be applied to a set of three or more model inputs, and this depends on the relative size of the variances of the logit-transformed Beta distributions fitted to each variable. The approach can also produce samples with biased means and variances under certain combinations of input means and variances. It is recommended that the difference method approach be used where appropriate; however, an understanding of its limitations is necessary to identify such cases.
Collapse
|
21
|
Antonazzo IC, Cortesi PA, Zanon E, Pasca S, Morfini M, Santoro C, De Cristofaro R, Di Minno G, Cozzolino P, Mantovani LG. Personalized Prophylaxis with myPKFiT CE: A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Haemophilia A Patients. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:34. [PMID: 38256294 PMCID: PMC10820281 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and costs associated with pharmacokinetics-driven (PK) prophylaxis based on the myPKFiT® device in patients affected by hemophilia A (HA) in Italy. Materials and Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in three Italian hemophilia centers. All patients with moderate or severe HA, aged ≥ 18 years, capable of having PK estimated using the myPKFiT device, and who had had a clinical visit between 1 November 2019 and 31 March 2022 were included. Differences in clinical, treatment, health resources, and cost data were assessed comparing post-PK prophylaxis with pre-PK. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated as cost (EUR) per bleed avoided. Results: The study enrolled 13 patients with HA. The mean annual bleeding rate decreased by -1.45 (-63.80%, p = 0.0055) after the use of myPKFiT®. Overall, the consumption of FVIII IU increased by 1.73% during follow-up compared to the period prior the use of the myPKFiT. Prophylaxis based on the myPKFiT resulted in an ICER of EUR 5099.89 per bleed avoided. Conclusions: The results of our study support the idea that the use of PK data in clinical practice can be associated with an improvement in the management of patients, as well as clinical outcomes, with a reasonable increase in costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (P.A.C.); (L.G.M.)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Angelo Cortesi
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (P.A.C.); (L.G.M.)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milano, Italy
| | - Ezio Zanon
- Hemophilia Center, University Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Samantha Pasca
- Laboratory Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Massimo Morfini
- Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres—AICE, 50100 Firenze, Italy;
| | | | - Raimondo De Cristofaro
- Center for Haemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Catholic University School of Medicine, ‘A. Gemelli’ Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Di Minno
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Service Centre of Coagulation Disorders, ‘Federico II’ University, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Paolo Cozzolino
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (P.A.C.); (L.G.M.)
| | - Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (P.A.C.); (L.G.M.)
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ahmed A, Dujaili JA, Chuah LH, Hashmi FK, Le LKD, Khanal S, Awaisu A, Chaiyakunapruk N. Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-retroviral Adherence Interventions for People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review of Decision Analytical Models. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:731-750. [PMID: 37389788 PMCID: PMC10403422 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00818-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although safe and effective anti-retrovirals (ARVs) are readily available, non-adherence to ARVs is highly prevalent among people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (PLWHA). Different adherence-improving interventions have been developed and examined through decision analytic model-based health technology assessments. This systematic review aimed to review and appraise the decision analytical economic models developed to assess ARV adherence-improvement interventions. METHODS The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022270039), and reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Relevant studies were identified through searches in six generic and specialized bibliographic databases, i.e. PubMed, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, PsycINFO, Health Economic Evaluations Database, tufts CEA registry and EconLit, from their inception to 23 October 2022. The cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions is represented by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The quality of studies was assessed using the quality of the health economics studies (QHES) instrument. Data were narratively synthesized in the form of tables and texts. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, a permutation matrix was used for quantitative data synthesis rather than a meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifteen studies, mostly conducted in North America (8/15 studies), were included in the review. The time horizon ranged from a year to a lifetime. Ten out of 15 studies used a micro-simulation, 4/15 studies employed Markov and 1/15 employed a dynamic model. The most commonly used interventions reported include technology based (5/15), nurse involved (2/15), directly observed therapy (2/15), case manager involved (1/15) and others that involved multi-component interventions (5/15). In 1/15 studies, interventions gained higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with cost savings. The interventions in 14/15 studies were more effective but at a higher cost, and the overall ICER was well below the acceptable threshold mentioned in each study, indicating the interventions could potentially be implemented after careful interpretation. The studies were graded as high quality (13/15) or fair quality (2/15), with some methodological inconsistencies reported. CONCLUSION Counselling and smartphone-based interventions are cost-effective, and they have the potential to reduce the chronic adherence problem significantly. The quality of decision models can be improved by addressing inconsistencies in model selection, data inputs incorporated into models and uncertainty assessment methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ahmed
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Juman Abdulelah Dujaili
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea University, Wales, UK
| | - Lay Hong Chuah
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Furqan Khurshid Hashmi
- University College of Pharmacy, University of Punjab, Allama Iqbal Campus, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan
| | - Long Khanh-Dao Le
- Monash University Health Economics Group (MUHEG), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Saval Khanal
- Health Economics Consulting, University of East Anglia, Coventry, UK
| | - Ahmed Awaisu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- IDEAS Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Santi I, Lloyd AJ, Hastedt CE, Versteegh MM. Societal Utilities for Cognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia: Developing a Preference-Based Scoring Algorithm Based on the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale. Adv Ther 2023; 40:4060-4073. [PMID: 37440123 PMCID: PMC10427516 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02553-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Loss of cognitive function is a common feature in schizophrenia. However, generic measures of health-related quality of life favored by decision-makers, such as the EQ-5D, are not designed to detect changes in cognitive function. We report the valuation of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), a schizophrenia-specific measure of cognitive impairment. METHODS Expert opinion and psychometric analysis of the SCoRS from clinical trial data was undertaken to select 5 key items from the measure. These items were combined orthogonally to develop health-state vignettes. Vignettes were valued using composite time trade-off (cTTO) in one-on-one video calls. Several econometric models were fitted to the data to estimate disutilities. Performance of EQ-5D- and SCoRS-based utilities were compared in the trial data. RESULTS The SCoRS items selected for the valuation study represented attention, learning, processing speed, social cognition and memory. Four hundred respondents participated in the valuation study. The best observed health state was valued at 0.855 [standard deviation (SD) = 0.179] and the worst at 0.152 (SD = 0.575). At the most severe levels, 'social cognition' received the largest disutility followed by 'learning' and 'memory'. The final model to estimate utilities had 15 parameters. SCoRS-based utilities were sensitive to change in cognition, but the EQ-5D was not. CONCLUSION It is feasible to value different dimensions of cognition separately using a validated instrument for proxy assessment. The resulting utilities indicate loss of quality of life due to reduced cognitive functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Santi
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Claudia E Hastedt
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany
| | - Matthijs M Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Neppelenbroek NJM, de Wit GA, Dalziel K, Devlin N, Carvalho NI. Use of Utility and Disability Weights in Economic Evaluation of Pediatric Vaccines. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1098-1106. [PMID: 36967026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe how utility weights and disability weights have been used in the context of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of pediatric vaccines for infectious diseases and assess the comparability between weights. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of CEAs of pediatric vaccines for 16 infectious diseases, published between January 2013 and December 2020 and using QALYs or DALYs as outcome measure. Data on values and sources of weights for the estimation of QALYs and DALYs were extracted from studies and compared across similar health states. Reporting was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS Out of 2154 articles identified, 216 CEAs met our inclusion criteria. Of the included studies, 157 used utility weights and 59 used disability weights in their valuation of health states. In QALY studies, the source, background, who's preferences (adults'/children's) were applied and adjustments made to utility weights were poorly reported. In DALY studies, the Global Burden of Disease study was most often referenced. Valuation weights for similar health states varied within QALY studies and between DALY and QALY studies, but no systematic differences were identified. CONCLUSIONS This review identified considerable gaps in the way valuation weights are used and reported on in CEA. The nonstandardized use of weights may lead to different conclusions about cost-effectiveness of vaccines and policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke J M Neppelenbroek
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; MSc Epidemiology Student, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - G Ardine de Wit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention, and Health services, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie I Carvalho
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yang Z, Zeng X, Huang W, Chai Q, Zhao A, Chuang LH, Wu B, Luo N. Characteristics of health-state utilities used in cost-effectiveness analyses: a systematic review of published studies in Asia. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:59. [PMID: 37340446 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02131-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is the preferred form of economic evaluation in many countries. As one of the key data inputs in cost-utility models, health state utility (HSU) has a crucial impact on CUA results. In the past decades, health technology assessment has been expanding rapidly in Asia, yet research examining the methodology and process used to generate cost-effectiveness evidence is scarce. The aim of this study was to examine the reporting of the characteristics of HSU data used in CUAs in Asia and how the characteristics have changed over time. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify published CUA studies targeting Asian populations. Information was extracted for both the general characteristics of selected studies and the characteristics of reported HSU data. For each HSU value identified, we extracted data for four key characteristics, including 1) estimation method; 2) source of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data; 3) source of preference data; and 4) sample size. The percentage of nonreporting was calculated and compared over two time periods (1990-2010 vs 2011-2020). RESULTS A total of 789 studies were included and 4,052 HSUs were identified. Of these HSUs, 3,351 (82.7%) were from published literature and 656 (16.2%) were from unpublished empirical data. Overall, the characteristics of HSU data were not reported in more than 80% of the studies. Of HSUs whose characteristics were reported, most of them were estimated using the EQ-5D (55.7%), Asian HRQoL data (91.9%), and Asian health preferences (87.7%); 45.7% of the HSUs was estimated with a sample of 100 or more individuals. All four characteristics showed improvements after 2010. CONCLUSION Over the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in CUA studies targeting Asian populations. However, HSU's characteristics were not reported in most of the CUA studies, making it difficult to evaluate the quality and appropriateness of the HSUs used in those cost-effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China
- Center of Medicine Economics and Management Research, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China
| | - Xueyun Zeng
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Weidong Huang
- School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| | - Qingqing Chai
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Ling-Hsiang Chuang
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- GongJing Healthcare (Nanjing) Co. Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Bin Wu
- School of Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cooper OAE, Ghatnekar O, Piglowska N, Smith CA, Swinburn P, Catto JWF, Niegisch G, Jakobsen JS. Elicitation of Health State Utilities Associated with Progression from Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Unresponsive Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC). PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2023; 7:469-477. [PMID: 36737511 PMCID: PMC9897878 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00392-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The treatments for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) vary between bladder preserving intravesical approaches and radical cystectomy. The impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life may vary widely. The purpose of this study was to elicit the general public's perspective on quality of life, measured as utility scores associated with treatment for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive NMIBC and disease progression, for supporting economic evaluation of newly developed treatments for NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Part I involved the development and testing of health states describing NMIBC, which was informed by a rapid review, expert input and a patient advisor. Part II involved elicitation of societal utility values for the different health states. Time trade-off (TTO) interviews were conducted with members of the UK general public. Five health states described different NMIBC scenarios including disease recurrence and progression. Participants ranked each health state, followed by the TTO valuation exercise. Descriptors included NMIBC symptom severity, impact and treatment characteristics. RESULTS In total, 202 members of the general public participated. The mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 14.6) years. Sample mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) and index scores were 83.2 (12.3) and 0.89 (0.18), respectively. Mean utilities were 0.781 for No High-Grade Recurrence, 0.586 for High-Grade Recurrence, 0.572 for > 1-Year Post-cystectomy and 0.283 for metastatic disease. The First Year Post-cystectomy path health state had a mean utility of 0.288. Pairwise comparisons found statistically significant differences between utilities (p < 0.001), except between High-Grade Recurrence and > 1-Year Post-cystectomy (p = 0.524). There were significant differences in utility scores by age and employment status. CONCLUSION This study provides utility scores for health states describing living with NMIBC, which is associated with a significant health-related quality-of-life burden. These values address an existing gap in available data and have the potential to be used in models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of both current and newly developed treatments for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - James W. F. Catto
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bray JW, Thornburg BD, Gebreselassie AW, LaButte CA, Barbosa C, Wittenberg E. Estimating Joint Health State Utility Algorithms Under Partial Information. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:742-749. [PMID: 36307281 PMCID: PMC10126182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We explored the performance of existing joint health state utility estimators when data are not available on utilities that isolate single-condition health states excluding any co-occurring condition. METHODS Using data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, we defined 2 information sets: (1) a full-information set that includes the narrowly defined health state utilities used in most studies that test the performance of joint health state utility estimators, and (2) a limited information set that includes only the more broadly defined health state utilities more commonly available to researchers. We used an example of alcohol use disorder co-occurring with cirrhosis of the liver, depressive disorder, or nicotine use disorder to illustrate our analysis. RESULTS We found that the performance of joint health state utility estimators is appreciably different under limited information than under full information. Full-information estimators typically overestimate the joint state utility, whereas limited-information estimators underestimate the joint state utility, except for the minimum estimator, which is overestimated in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Researchers using joint health state utility estimators should understand the information set available to them and use methodological guidance appropriate for that information set. We recommend the minimum estimator under limited information based on its ease of use, consistency (and therefore a predictable direction of bias), and lower root mean squared error.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy W Bray
- Department of Economics, UNC Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yang Z, Rand K, Luo N. Censoring Time Trade-off Values at 0 Versus at -1: How Does the Assumption for Worse-Than-Dead Time Trade-off Values Affect the Modeling of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Data? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:685-693. [PMID: 36375679 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A recent study found that negative utility values elicited using composite time trade-off (TTO) were barely associated with the severity of EQ-5D-5L health states, suggesting poor discriminative ability. Assuming negative values provide limited information, this study aimed to explore the usefulness of censoring negative TTO values at 0 in modeling EQ-5D-5L valuation data. METHODS We analyzed EQ-5D-5L valuation data from China, The Netherlands, Canada, Singapore, and Thailand. For each data set, we estimated value sets using 2 Tobit models, one left-censored at -1 (current practice) and one left-censored at 0 (our proposed method), and compared the model performances. We hypothesized that censoring at 0 and censoring at -1 would produce similar values, though on slightly different scales. RESULTS When censoring at 0, logical inconsistencies and statistical significance were improved but the value range was compressed. In the cross-attribute level effects model, the 3-level parameters were similar between the models censored at 0 and -1, but the rank order of some dimension parameters was altered. Health state values predicted by the 2 censoring models approximated a perfect agreement after rescaling. CONCLUSIONS Censoring TTO values at 0 improved model estimation and fit but produced higher utility values than models censoring at -1. Investigators of future EQ-5D value set studies using the composite TTO method are advised to examine the validity of negative TTO values before choosing modeling strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Kim Rand
- Health Services Research Center, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Maths in Health B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hughes D, Lenny A, Shah K, Longworth L, Devercelli G, Ayodele O. Estimation of Health State Utility Values in Fabry Disease Using Vignette Development and Valuation. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 10:80-88. [PMID: 37064293 PMCID: PMC10095067 DOI: 10.36469/001c.71344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Background: Health state utilities are measures of health-related quality of life that reflect the value placed on improvements in patients' health status and are necessary for estimation of quality-adjusted life-years. Health state utility data on Fabry disease (FD) are limited. In this study we used vignette (scenario) construction and valuation to develop health state utilities. Objectives: The aim of this study was to use vignette construction and valuation to estimate health state utility values suitable for inclusion in economic models of FD treatments. Methods: Health state vignettes were developed from semistructured qualitative telephone interviews with patients with FD and informed by published literature and input from an expert. Each vignette was valued in an online survey by members of the United Kingdom (UK) general population using the composite time trade-off (TTO) method, which aims to determine the time the respondent would trade to live in full health compared with each impaired health state. Results: Eight adults (50% women) with FD from the UK were interviewed. They were recruited via various approaches, including patient organizations and social media. The interviewees' responses, evidence from published literature, and input from a clinical expert informed the development of 6 health state vignettes (pain, moderate clinically evident FD [CEFD], severe CEFD, end-stage renal disease [ESRD], stroke, and cardiovascular disease [CVD]) and 3 combined health states (severe CEFD + ESRD, severe CEFD + CVD, and severe CEFD + stroke). A vignette valuation survey was administered to 1222 participants from the UK general population who were members of an external surveying organization and agreed to participate in this study; 1175 surveys were successfully completed and included in the analysis. Responses to TTO questions were converted into utility values for each health state. Pain was the highest valued health state (0.465), and severe CEFD + ESRD was the lowest (0.033). Discussion: Overall, mean utility values declined as the severity of the vignettes increased, indicating that respondents were more willing to trade life-years to avoid a severe health state. Conclusions: Health state vignettes reflect the effects of FD on all major health-related quality-of-life domains and may help to support economic modeling for treatment of FD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derralynn Hughes
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Olulade Ayodele
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Acaster S, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Brazier JE, Wainwright CE, Quon BS, Duckers J, Quittner AL, Lou Y, Sosnay PR, McGarry LJ. Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised-8 Dimensions: Estimating Utilities From the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:567-578. [PMID: 36509366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cystic fibrosis (CF) limits survival and negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) may be used to make reimbursement decisions for new CF treatments; nevertheless, generic utility measures used in CEA, such as EQ-5D, are insensitive to meaningful changes in lung function and HRQOL in CF. Here we develop a new, CF disease-specific, preference-based utility measure based on the adolescent/adult version of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), a widely used, CF-specific, patient-reported measure of HRQOL. METHODS Blinded CFQ-R data from 4 clinical trials (NCT02347657, NCT02392234, NCT01807923, and NCT01807949) were used to identify discriminating items for a classification system using psychometric (eg, factor and Rasch) analyses. Thirty-two health states were selected for a time trade-off (TTO) exercise with a representative sample of the UK general population. TTO utilities were used to estimate a preference-based scoring algorithm by regression analysis (tobit models with robust standard errors clustered on participants with censoring at -1). RESULTS A classification system with 8 dimensions (CFQ-R-8 dimensions; physical functioning, vitality, emotion, role functioning, breathing difficulty, cough, abdominal pain, and body image) was generated. TTO was completed by 400 participants (mean age, 47.3 years; 49.8% female). Among the regression models evaluated, the tobit heteroscedastic-ordered model was preferred, with a predicted utility range from 0.236 to 1, no logical inconsistencies, and a mean absolute error of 0.032. CONCLUSION The CFQ-R-8 dimensions is the first disease-specific, preference-based scoring algorithm for CF, enabling estimation of disease-specific utilities for CEA based on the well-validated and widely used CFQ-R.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Claire E Wainwright
- Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Bradley S Quon
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, and Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jamie Duckers
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, NHS Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | | | - Yiyue Lou
- Biostatistics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick R Sosnay
- Clincal Development, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa J McGarry
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lu Y, Dai Z, Chang F, Wang L, He J, Shi P, Zhang H, Lu Y. Whether and How Disutilities of Adverse Events were Used in the Economic Evaluation of Drug Therapy for Cancer Treatment. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:295-306. [PMID: 36658308 PMCID: PMC9928913 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01232-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The disutilities of adverse events (AEs) are important inputs for cost-utility analysis (CUA), reflecting the impacts of AEs on health outcomes. Health technology assessment institutions and scholars have proposed recommendations for applying disutility values in economic evaluations. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the current use of disutilities of AEs as model parameters in the CUA of cancer drug therapy and to compare the discrepancies between the use of disutilities and published recommendations. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the official websites of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) for CUAs of drug therapy for cancer published in English from January 2019 to April 2022. Information about the use of disutilities of AEs (whether and how disutilities were used, or why they were not used) in selected studies was extracted and compared with published recommendations. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize the results. RESULTS A total of 467 CUAs were included, 54% (254/467) of which included disutilities of AEs in their model. The proportion that included these disutilities increased from 2019 to 2021, ranging from 47% (51/107) to 61% (116/190). Only 6% (15/254) of the CUAs using disutilities of AEs considered all five recommendations about the justification for inclusion and exclusion, description of values and sources, grades of AEs, calculation, and uncertainty analyses. Only 15% (72/467) provided a clear justification for inclusion and exclusion of disutilities of AEs, and 7% (17/254) did not provide values or sources. In total, 69% (175/254) of the analyses focused on AEs of grade 3 or greater, and 11% (28/254) applied utility decrements for grades 1 and 2. Disutilities of AEs were generally calculated using the incidence rates, which were clearly stated in 49% (65/132) of the analyses. Uncertainty analyses were conducted in 84% (214/254) of the CUAs. CONCLUSIONS The current use of disutilities of AEs in CUAs shows some discrepancies with recommendations proposed in the literature. One is that detailed information about the use of disutilities of AEs was not reported and the other is that essential methods to analyze the impact of AEs on quality-adjusted life-years were not thoroughly conducted. Therefore, it is suggested that researchers should attach importance to the impact of AEs on health-related quality of life. Furthermore, an application process was developed for the disutilities of AEs to remind and guide researchers to correctly use the disutilities of AEs as parameters in the decision-analytic model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqiong Lu
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhanjing Dai
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Chang
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Li Wang
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiafang He
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Penghua Shi
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Haitao Zhang
- Institute of National Governance and National Audit, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yun Lu
- School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China.
- Center for Health Care Policy Research of China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Salari P, Henrard S, O’Mahony C, Welsing P, Bhadhuri A, Jungo KT, Beck T, O’Mahony D, Byrne S, Spinewine A, Knol W, Rodondi N, Schwenkglenks M. Healthcare Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Multimorbid Patients After Hospitalization. Health Serv Insights 2023; 16:11786329231153278. [PMID: 36760460 PMCID: PMC9903041 DOI: 10.1177/11786329231153278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives We identified factors associated with healthcare costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of multimorbid older adults with polypharmacy. Methods Using data from the OPERAM (OPtimising thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in the Multimorbid older people) trial, we described the magnitude and composition of healthcare costs, and time trends of HRQoL, during 1-year after an acute-care hospitalization. We performed a cluster analysis to identify groups with different cost and HRQoL trends. Using multilevel models, we also identified factors associated with costs and HRQoL. Results Two months after hospitalization monthly mean costs peaked (CHF 7'124) and HRQoL was highest (0.67). They both decreased thereafter. Age, falls, and comorbidities were associated with higher 1-year costs. Being female and housebound were negatively associated with HRQoL, while moderate alcohol consumption had a positive association. Being independent in daily activities was associated with lower costs and higher HRQoL. Conclusion Although only some identified potential influences on costs and HRQoL are modifiable, our observations support the importance of prevention before health deterioration in older people with multimorbid illness and associated polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Salari
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Switzerland,Paola Salari, Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse, 61, Basel 4056, Switzerland.
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Louvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium,Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cian O’Mahony
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
| | - Paco Welsing
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas Beck
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Denis O’Mahony
- Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Stephen Byrne
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Louvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium,CHU UCL Namur, Pharmacy Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Wilma Knol
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
de Freitas HM, Danese D, Hubig L, Lloyd A, Lombardelli S. Estimating health state utilities in primary hyperoxaluria type 1: a valuation study. J Med Econ 2023; 26:386-393. [PMID: 36852648 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2176678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Quantitative data on health state utilities in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) are lacking. This study was conducted to estimate utility values in PH1 using 3 standard valuation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Health state vignettes were developed with input from expert clinicians to describe different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) within the setting of PH1, along with a post-combined liver and kidney transplant (CLKT) health state ≥12 months following transplantation. The utility associated with living in each PH1 health state, as described by the vignettes, was evaluated by members of the UK general public using standard utility assessment techniques, including EQ-5D-5L, Visual Analog Scale, and Time Trade-Off. RESULTS A similar pattern across the three valuation methods was observed. Utility values were roughly constant from CKD stage 1-3b and then dropped sharply from these states to CKD stage 4. Decreases in utility in the later stages of CKD (stages 4-5) were followed by a recovery in quality of life in the post-CLKT health state. LIMITATIONS Vignettes may not fully capture the burden of living with PH1. CONCLUSIONS This study serves as an informative source of data on how the burden of PH1 varies across disease stages of CKD and post-CLKT in patients with PH1. The study findings highlight the unique clinical features of PH1 compared with non-PH1-related CKD, such as the need for earlier and more intensive hemodialysis, the risk of systemic oxalosis, and the potential need for CLKT (as opposed to kidney-only transplant). The impact of PH1 on health-related quality of life, which worsens once hemodialysis is required and systemic disease manifestations occur, is captured in this study using quantitative health state utilities. These data provide an understanding of the impact of PH1 on health-related quality of life and will facilitate health economic evaluation of future treatments.
Collapse
|
34
|
Clarijs ME, Kregting LM, van Ravesteyn NT, Koppert LB, Korfage IJ. Health-related Quality of Life using the EQ-5D-5L: normative utility scores in a Dutch female population. Qual Life Res 2023; 32:373-381. [PMID: 36264532 PMCID: PMC9584237 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03271-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Normative utility scores represent the health related quality of life of the general population, are of utmost importance in cost-effectiveness studies and should reflect relevant sexes and age groups. The aim of this study was to estimate EQ-5D-5L normative utility scores in a population of Dutch females, stratified by age, and to compare these scores to those of female populations of three other countries. METHODS Dutch women completed the EQ-5D-5L online between January and July 2020. Mean normative utilities were computed using the Dutch EQ-5D-5L value set, stratified by age, tested for differences using the Kruskall-Wallis test, and compared to normative utility scores of female populations elsewhere. Additionally, to support the use of the Dutch EQ-5D-5L data in other settings, normative utility scores were also calculated by applying the value sets of Germany, United Kingdom and USA. RESULTS Data of 9037 women were analyzed and the weighted mean utility score was 0.911 (SD 0.155, 95% CI 0.908-0.914). The mean normative utility scores differed between age groups, showing lower scores in older females. Compared to other normative utility scores of female populations, Dutch mean utilities were consistently higher except for age groups 18-24 and 25-34. With the three country-specific value sets, new age-specific mean normative utility scores were provided. CONCLUSION This study provides mean normative utility scores of a large cohort of Dutch females per age group, which were found to be lower in older age groups. Utility scores calculated with three other value sets were made available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes E. Clarijs
- Department of Oncologic and Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Academic Breast Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lindy M. Kregting
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolien T. van Ravesteyn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Oncologic and Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Academic Breast Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ida J. Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wang Y, Gavan SP, Steinke D, Cheung KL, Chen LC. The impact of age on health utility values for older women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-regression. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:169. [PMID: 36564800 PMCID: PMC9789668 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02067-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An increasing number of postmenopausal women are diagnosed with breast cancer at an older age (≥ 70 years). There is a lack of synthesised health utility data to support decision-making for managing breast cancer in this older population. This study aimed to identify the availability of, and the subsequent impact of age on, health state utility values (HSUVs) measured by the EQ-5D for older women with early-stage breast cancer. METHOD This systematic review identified EQ-5D (3L or 5L version) HSUVs for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Studies were identified from a previous systematic review (inception to 2009) and an electronic database search (Medline and Embase; 2009 to September 2021). Mean HSUVs were summarised by health state. Quality appraisal was performed on studies reporting HSUVs for older ages (≥ 70 years). Multivariable meta-regression assessed the association between HSUVs and age, health state, treatments received, and time of measuring the utility values (greater or less than one year post-treatment). RESULTS Fifty EQ-5D HSUVs were identified from 13 studies. Mean HSUVs decreased as health state worsened: from the stable (mean=0.83) to progression (mean=0.79) and advanced (mean=0.68) states. Two studies reported six HSUVs estimated from the sample of women with a mean age ≥ 70. Meta-regression model fit improved by including age as an independent variable and attenuated the estimated utility decrements associated with worse health states. Utility decrements for the progression and advanced states were -0.052 (95%CI: -0.097, -0.007) and -0.143 (95%CI: -0.264, -0.022) respectively. The breast cancer-specific utility decrement associated with a one-year increase in age was -0.001 (95%CI: -0.004, 0.002). CONCLUSION Relevant and accurate HSUVs are essential to help support decision-making about the most effective and cost-effective ways to manage early-stage breast cancer in older women. Age has a vital role in determining health utility values in this population. This study provides analysts and decision-makers with HSUVs and utility decrements that reflect the disease process in this older population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubo Wang
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, 1stFloor Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT UK
| | - Sean P. Gavan
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Douglas Steinke
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, 1stFloor Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT UK
| | - Kwok-Leung Cheung
- grid.4563.40000 0004 1936 8868School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT UK
| | - Li-Chia Chen
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, 1stFloor Stopford Building, Manchester, M13 9PT UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Muchadeyi MT, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Schlander M. Quality appraisal for systematic literature reviews of health state utility values: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:303. [PMID: 36434521 PMCID: PMC9700894 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01784-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health state utility values (HSUVs) are an essential input parameter to cost-utility analysis (CUA). Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) provide summarized information for selecting utility values from an increasing number of primary studies eliciting HSUVs. Quality appraisal (QA) of such SLRs is an important process towards the credibility of HSUVs estimates; yet, authors often overlook this crucial process. A scientifically developed and widely accepted QA tool for this purpose is lacking and warranted. OBJECTIVES To comprehensively describe the nature of QA in published SRLs of studies eliciting HSUVs and generate a list of commonly used items. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase from 01.01.2015 to 15.05.2021. SLRs of empirical studies eliciting HSUVs that were published in English were included. We extracted descriptive data, which included QA tools checklists or good practice recommendations used or cited, items used, and the methods of incorporating QA results into study findings. Descriptive statistics (frequencies of use and occurrences of items, acceptance and counterfactual acceptance rates) were computed and a comprehensive list of QA items was generated. RESULTS A total of 73 SLRs were included, comprising 93 items and 35 QA tools and good recommendation practices. The prevalence of QA was 55% (40/73). Recommendations by NICE and ISPOR guidelines appeared in 42% (16/40) of the SLRs that appraised quality. The most commonly used QA items in SLRs were response rates (27/40), statistical analysis (22/40), sample size (21/40) and loss of follow up (21/40). Yet, the most commonly featured items in QA tools and GPRs were statistical analysis (23/35), confounding or baseline equivalency (20/35), and blinding (14/35). Only 5% of the SLRS used QA to inform the data analysis, with acceptance rates of 100% (in two studies) 67%, 53% and 33%. The mean counterfactual acceptance rate was 55% (median 53% and IQR 56%). CONCLUSIONS There is a considerably low prevalence of QA in the SLRs of HSUVs. Also, there is a wide variation in the QA dimensions and items included in both SLRs and extracted tools. This underscores the need for a scientifically developed QA tool for multi-variable primary studies of HSUVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muchandifunga Trust Muchadeyi
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Foundation Under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Foundation Under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Health Economics, WifOR institute, Rheinstraße 22, Darmstadt, 64283 Germany
| | - Michael Schlander
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Foundation Under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Alfred Weber Institute for Economics (AWI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Oh BC, Lee JE, Nam JH, Hong JY, Kwon SH, Lee EK. Health-related quality of life in adult patients with asthma according to asthma control and severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:908837. [PMID: 36479200 PMCID: PMC9720394 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.908837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The utility values are increasingly being used in economic evaluations and health policy decision making. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the utility values for asthma, particularly with respect to severity and asthma control. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies published until July, 2020, reporting the utilities of adult asthma. We extracted utility values derived by nine indirect and four direct utility instruments. Meta-analyses were performed for each utility instrument according to health states based on the level of asthma control and severity. Results: Fifty-two eligible studies were included in our systematic review, of which forty studies were used in the meta-analyses. Among the 13 utility instruments, the most used was EQ-5D-3L, whereas EQ-5D-5L showed the narrowest 95% confidence interval (95% CI, 0.83-0.86) of pooled utility. The pooled utility of asthma declined with worsening control levels and severity. The pooled utility value of EQ-5D-3L was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80) for uncontrolled, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.88) for partly controlled, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90) for well-controlled asthma. Conclusion: Our study shows that EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L are appropriate for economic evaluations in terms of availability and variability of information, respectively. Asthma patients had poorer utility values with worsened severity and level of asthma control. This study will be useful for health economists conducting economic evaluations of asthma treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byeong-Chan Oh
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Ju-Eun Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jin Hyun Nam
- Divison of Big Data Science, Korea University Sejong Campus, Sejong, South Korea
| | - Ji-Yoon Hong
- Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, South Korea
| | - Sun-Hong Kwon
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Eui-Kyung Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McCreanor V, Lum E, Graves N, Luo N, Parsonage W, Barnett A. Reducing waste in collection of quality-of-life data through better reporting: a case study. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2931-2938. [PMID: 35072906 PMCID: PMC9470638 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03079-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study describes the reporting of the preference-based health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instrument, the EQ-5D, and proposes strategies to improve reporting and reduce research waste. The EQ-5D is a validated instrument widely used for health economic evaluation and is useful for informing health policy. METHODS As part of a systematic review of papers reporting EQ-5D utility weights in patients with coronary artery disease, we noted the reasons data from some papers could not be reused in a meta-analysis, including whether health utility weights and sufficient statistical details were reported. Research waste was quantified using: (1) the percentage of papers and sample size excluded, and (2) researcher time and cost reviewing poorly reported papers. RESULTS Our search strategy found 5942 papers. At title and abstract screening 93% were excluded. Of the 379 full text papers screened, 130 papers reported using EQ-5D. Only 46% (60/130) of those studies reported utility weights and/or statistical properties enabling meta-analysis. Only 67% of included papers had reported EQ-5D in the title or abstract. A total sample size of 133,298 was excluded because of poor reporting. The cost of researcher time wasted estimated to be between $3816 and $13,279 for our review. CONCLUSIONS Poor reporting of EQ-5D data creates research waste where potentially useful data are excluded from meta-analyses and economic evaluations. Poor reporting of HRQOL instruments also creates waste due to additional time spent reviewing papers for systematic reviews that are subsequently excluded. RECOMMENDATIONS Studies using the EQ-5D should report utility weights with appropriate summary statistics to enable reuse in meta-analysis and more robust evidence for health policy. We recommend authors report the HRQOL instrument in the title or abstract in line with current reporting guidelines (CONSORT-PRO and SPIRIT-PRO Extensions) to make it easier for other researchers to find. Validated instruments should also be listed in the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to improve cataloguing and retrieval of previous research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria McCreanor
- AusHSI, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Metro North Health, Herston, Australia.
| | - Elaine Lum
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Graves
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Health Services & Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - William Parsonage
- AusHSI, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Cardiology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Adrian Barnett
- AusHSI, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ngo PJ, Wade S, Banks E, Karikios DJ, Canfell K, Weber MF. Large-Scale Population-Based Surveys Linked to Administrative Health Databases as a Source of Data on Health Utilities in Australia. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1634-1643. [PMID: 35527166 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Large-scale health surveys that contain quality-of-life instruments are a rich source of health utility data for health economic evaluations, especially when linked to routinely collected, administrative health databases. We derived health utility values for a wide range of health conditions using a large Australian cohort study linked to population-wide health databases. METHODS Short-Form 6-Dimension utility values were calculated for 56 094 adults, aged 47+ years, in the New South Wales 45 and Up Study who completed the Social, Economic, and Environmental Factors survey (2010-2011). Mean utilities were summarized for major health conditions identified through self-report, hospital records, primary cancer notifications, and claims for government-subsidized prescription medicines and medical services. To identify unique associations between health conditions and utilities, beta regression was performed. Utility values were analyzed by time to death using linked death records. RESULTS Mean Short-Form 6-Dimension utility was 0.810 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.809-0.811), was age dependent, and was higher in men than women. Utilities for serious health conditions ranged from 0.685 (95% CI 0.652-0.718) for lung cancer to 0.800 (95% CI 0.787-0.812) for melanoma whereas disease-free respondents had a mean of 0.859 (95% CI 0.858-0.861). Most health conditions were independently associated with poorer quality of life. Utility values also declined by proximity to death where participants sampled 6 months before death had a mean score of 0.637 (95% CI 0.613-0.662). CONCLUSIONS Our data offer a snapshot of the health status of an older Australian population and show that record linkage can enable comprehensive ascertainment of utility values for use in health economic modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preston J Ngo
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Stephen Wade
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Deme J Karikios
- Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marianne F Weber
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen MKY, Vissapragada R, Bulamu N, Gupta M, Werth V, Sebaratnam DF. Cost-Utility Analysis of Rituximab vs Mycophenolate Mofetil for the Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:1013-1021. [PMID: 35895045 PMCID: PMC9330276 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance There is an increasing body of literature that supports the use of rituximab as a first-line steroid-sparing agent in pemphigus vulgaris. However, the cost of rituximab is substantial compared with conventional agents, and there are limited health economic data to justify its use. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab biosimilars relative to mycophenolate mofetil as a first-line steroid-sparing agent for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Design, Setting, and Participants A cost-utility analysis over a 24-month time horizon was conducted from the perspective of the Australian health care sector using a modeled cohort of treatment-naive adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate disease progression following first-line treatment with rituximab biosimilars or mycophenolate mofetil. The simulated cohort transitioned between controlled disease, uncontrolled disease, and death. Efficacy and utility data were obtained from available published literature. Cost data were primarily obtained from published government data. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. Primary outcomes were the changes in cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over the 24 months. Interventions Rituximab biosimilars and mycophenolate mofetil. Results The simulated cohort of treatment-naive patients had a mean age of 50.8 years, a female-to-male ratio of 1.24, and moderate to severe disease as classified by the Harman criteria. First-line rituximab biosimilars were associated with a cost reduction of AU$639 and an improvement of 0.07 QALYs compared with mycophenolate mofetil, resulting in an ICER of -AU$8818/QALY. Rituximab biosimilars were therefore more effective and less costly compared with mycophenolate mofetil. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that rituximab biosimilars remained cost-effective across a range of values for cost, utility, and transition probability input parameters and willingness-to-pay thresholds. Conclusions and Relevance In this cost-utility analysis, rituximab biosimilars were cost-effective compared with mycophenolate mofetil for moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris. Further investigation into its cost-effectiveness over a longer time horizon is necessary, but the favorable results of this study suggest that the high acquisition costs of rituximab biosimilars may be offset by its effectiveness and provide economic evidence in support of its listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for pemphigus vulgaris.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle K Y Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ravi Vissapragada
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Norma Bulamu
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monisha Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Victoria Werth
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Deshan Frank Sebaratnam
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lourenção M, Simões Correa Galendi J, Galvão HDCR, Antoniazzi AP, Grasel RS, Carvalho AL, Mauad EC, de Oliveira JHC, Reis RM, Mandrik O, Palmero EI. Cost-Effectiveness of BRCA 1/2 Genetic Test and Preventive Strategies: Using Real-World Data From an Upper-Middle Income Country. Front Oncol 2022; 12:951310. [PMID: 35898894 PMCID: PMC9309566 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although BRCA1/2 genetic testing in developed countries is part of the reality for high-risk patients for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the same is not true for upper-middle-income countries. For that reason, this study aimed to evaluate whether the BRCA1/2 genetic test and preventive strategies for women at high risk for HBOC are cost-effective compared to not performing these strategies in an upper-middle-income country. Adopting a payer perspective, a Markov model with a time horizon of 70 years was built to delineate the health states for a cohort of healthy women aged 30 years that fulfilled the BRCA1/2 testing criteria according to the guidelines. Transition probabilities were calculated based on real-world data of women tested for BRCA1/2 germline mutations in a cancer reference hospital from 2011 to 2020. We analyzed 275 BRCA mutated index cases and 356 BRCA mutation carriers that were first- or second-degree relatives of the patients. Costs were based on the Brazilian public health system reimbursement values. Health state utilities were retrieved from literature. The BRCA1/2 genetic test and preventive strategies result in more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$ 11,900.31 (U$ 5,504.31)/QALY. This result can represent a strong argument in favor of implementing genetic testing strategies for high-risk women even in countries with upper-middle income, considering not only the cancer prevention possibilities associated with the genetic testing but also its cost-effectiveness to the health system. These strategies are cost-effective, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$ 25,000 (U$ 11,563.37)/QALY, indicating that the government should consider offering them for women at high risk for HBOC. The results were robust in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Lourenção
- School of Economics, Business Administration and Accounting at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Julia Simões Correa Galendi
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Rebeca Silveira Grasel
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - André Lopes Carvalho
- Early Detection Prevention and Infections, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Rui Manuel Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
- ICVS/3B’s – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Olena Mandrik
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Edenir Inêz Palmero
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Genetics, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nicod E, Meregaglia M, Whittal A, Upadhyaya S, Facey K, Drummond M. Consideration of quality of life in the health technology assessments of rare disease treatments. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:645-669. [PMID: 34714428 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01387-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Challenges with patient-reported outcome (PRO) evidence and health state utility values (HSUVs) in rare diseases exist due to small, heterogeneous populations, lack of disease knowledge and early onset. To better incorporate quality of life (QoL) into Health Technology Assessment, a clearer understanding of these challenges is needed. METHODS NICE appraisals of non-oncology treatments with an EMA orphan designation (n = 24), and corresponding appraisals in the Netherlands, France, and Germany were included. Document analysis of appraisal reports investigated how PROs/HSUVs influenced decision-making and was representative of QoL impact of condition and treatment. RESULTS PRO evidence was not included in 6/24 NICE appraisals. When included, it either failed to demonstrate change, capture domains important for patients, or was uncertain. In the other countries, little information was reported and evidence largely did not demonstrate change. In NICE appraisals, HSUVs were derived through the collection of EQ-5D data (7/24 cases), mapping (6/24), vignettes (5/24), and published literature or other techniques (6/24). The majority did not use data collected alongside clinical trials. Few measures demonstrated significant change due to lack of sensitivity or face validity, short-term data, or implausible health states. In 8/24 NICE appraisals, patient surveys or input during appraisal committee meetings supported the interpretation of uncertainty or provided evidence about QoL. CONCLUSIONS This study sheds light on the nature of PRO evidence in rare diseases and associated challenges. Results emphasise the need for improved development and use of PRO/HSUVs. Other forms of evidence and expert input are crucial to support better appraisal of uncertain or missing evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Nicod
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michela Meregaglia
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136, Milan, Italy
| | - Amanda Whittal
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Via Sarfatti 10, 20136, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Karen Facey
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Santos M, Monteiro AL, Biz AN, Guerra A, Cramer H, Canuto V, Cruz L, Pinto M, Viegas M, Fernandes R, Zimmermann I. Guidelines for Utility Measurement for Economic Analysis: The Brazilian Policy. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 31:67-73. [PMID: 35533599 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health-related quality of life is expressed in utilities, also referred to as utility estimates or parameters. Considerations about the source and type of utility values are especially important in a modeling context, where the lack of transparency, including the lack of a hierarchy for utility data sources, is a major issue to any estimation and can potentially compromise model reliability. OBJECTIVES This document aims to present the first version of the Brazilian guidelines for utility measurement to support economic analysis. METHODS A virtual workshop and a modified Delphi panel with 10 health technology specialists followed a rapid evaluation of 110 technical documents and indexed publications. The recommendations are based on the proposition that has received the most votes, although contentious issues are addressed in the suggestion or discussion. The rationale for the final decision is included in the text. RESULTS The consensus includes 50 recommendations with the following topics: Transparency and Reliability, Model Design, Conditions Under Which Generic Questionnaires Are Not Sensible or Valid, Utility Evidence Hierarchy, Utility Data Searching, Modeling Utility Values, Extrapolating Quality Adjusted Life-Years for Models With Lifetime Horizons, Caregiver Utility, Utility Data Synthesis, Quality/Certainty of the Evidence, and Utility Estimates in End-of-Life Conditions. CONCLUSIONS The goal of this project is to create unified national standards for using utility metrics in economic analysis in Brazil. This set of recommendations is not obligatory, but it is meant to serve as a guide and lead to the development of better and more transparent economic models in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisa Santos
- National Institute of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Andrea Liborio Monteiro
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aline Navega Biz
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Augusto Guerra
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Helena Cramer
- National Institute of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Vania Canuto
- Department of Management and Incorporation of Health Technologies, Ministry of Health, Brazil
| | - Luciane Cruz
- Research Project Office, Moinhos de Vento Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Marcia Pinto
- National Institute of Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Ivan Zimmermann
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Levrat-Guillen F, Ghazi T. Cost-Effectiveness of Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems in Type 1 Diabetes: Comment on Jendle et al. Diabetes Ther 2022; 13:1121-1123. [PMID: 35403951 PMCID: PMC9076758 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01251-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fleur Levrat-Guillen
- Abbott Laboratories Ltd, Abbott House, Vanwall Business Park, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 4XE UK
| | - Tara Ghazi
- Abbott Laboratories Ltd, Abbott Scandinavia AB, Hemvärnsgatan 9, 171 29 Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Brown GC, Brown MM, Stein JD, Sharma S. Quality of life associated with no light perception vision. Can J Ophthalmol 2022:S0008-4182(22)00091-6. [PMID: 35472297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Time trade-off (TTO) utility analysis quantifies the quality of life associated with best-seeing-eye (BSE) vision. We compared the patient quality of life associated with unilateral and bilateral no light perception (NLP) with that of a control cohort without NLP. DESIGN Cross-sectional interviews using a validated, reliable TTO vision utility analysis instrument. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1598 consecutive ophthalmology patients from the authors' practices. METHODS Patient records were reviewed in a case-control fashion The utilities of participants with unilateral or bilateral NLP vision were compared with those from patients without NLP vision. RESULTS Among 99 NLP patients, 93 (94%) had unilateral NLP and 6 (6%) had bilateral NLP, for a total of 105 NLP eyes. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated the highest correlation between utility and BSE acuity (p = 0.001), with no correlation with age, ophthalmic disease, time of vision loss, race, or education. Mean unilateral NLP utility ranged from 0.55 in the counting fingers to light perception subcohort to 0.80 in the 20/20-20/25 subcohort. The 6-person bilateral NLP subcohort had a 0.54 utility. The 99-patient NLP cohort mean utility was 0.69, a 55% quality-of-life decrease versus a BSE vision-matched 0.80 in 1499 non-NLP patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS TTO utility in unilateral NLP patients correlated with BSE vision at a lower utility than in patients with matched BSE vision without fellow-eye NLP. Decreased unilateral NLP patient quality of life should be considered in cost-utility analysis and clinical management. Bilateral NLP patient utility (0.54) was slightly less than that (0.55) in blind unilateral NLP patients with fellow-eye counting fingers to light perception vision, suggesting that more study is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C Brown
- Center for Value-Based Medicine, Hilton Head, SC; Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical University, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
| | - Melissa M Brown
- Center for Value-Based Medicine, Hilton Head, SC; Wills Eye Hospital, Jefferson Medical University, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | - Joshua D Stein
- Glaucoma Service, University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Sanjay Sharma
- Hotel Dieu Hospital, Queens University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hammeken LH, Baunwall SMD, Dahlerup JF, Hvas CL, Ehlers LH. Health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221078441. [PMID: 35463939 PMCID: PMC9019313 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221078441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health-related quality of life (HrQoL) can be substantially affected in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) but the impact of effective treatment of the infection remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the HrQoL in patients with rCDI and estimate the gain in HrQoL associated with effective treatment of rCDI. METHODS Patients' HrQoL was estimated based on EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires obtained from a Danish randomised controlled trial (RCT). In the RCT, 64 patients with rCDI were randomised to receive either vancomycin (n = 16), fidaxomicin (n = 24) or faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) preceded by vancomycin (n = 24). The primary outcome in the RCT was rCDI resolution. Patients were closely monitored during the RCT, and rescue FMT was offered to those who failed their primary treatment. Patients' HrQoL was measured at baseline and at 8- and 26-weeks follow-up. Linear regression analyses conditional on the differences between baseline and follow-up measurements were used to assess statistical significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS Within 26 weeks of follow-up, 13 (81%) patients treated with vancomycin, 12 (50%) patients treated with fidaxomicin, and 3 (13%) patients treated with FMT had a subsequent recurrence and received a rescue FMT. The average HrQoL for untreated patients with rCDI was 0.675. After receiving effective treatment, this value increased by 0.139 to 0.813 (p < 0.001) at week 8 and by 0.098 to 0.773 (p = 0.003) at week 26 of follow-up compared with baseline. CONCLUSION The HrQoL was adversely affected in patients with an active episode of rCDI but increased substantially after receiving an effective treatment algorithm in which rescue FMT was provided in case of a primary treatment failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION The RCT was preregistered at EudraCT (j.no. 2015-003004-24, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-003004-24/results) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier NCT02743234, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02743234).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simon M. D. Baunwall
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens F. Dahlerup
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christian L. Hvas
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars H. Ehlers
- Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Salari P, O’Mahony C, Henrard S, Welsing P, Bhadhuri A, Schur N, Roumet M, Beglinger S, Beck T, Jungo KT, Byrne S, Hossmann S, Knol W, O’Mahony D, Spinewine A, Rodondi N, Schwenkglenks M. Cost-effectiveness of a structured medication review approach for multimorbid older adults: Within-trial analysis of the OPERAM study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265507. [PMID: 35404990 PMCID: PMC9000111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inappropriate polypharmacy has been linked with adverse outcomes in older, multimorbid adults. OPERAM is a European cluster-randomized trial aimed at testing the effect of a structured pharmacotherapy optimization intervention on preventable drug-related hospital admissions in multimorbid adults with polypharmacy aged 70 years or older. Clinical results of the trial showed a pattern of reduced drug-related hospital admissions, but without statistical significance. In this study we assessed the cost-effectiveness of the pharmacotherapy optimisation intervention. Methods We performed a pre-planned within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the OPERAM intervention, from a healthcare system perspective. All data were collected within the trial apart from unit costs. QALYs were computed by applying the crosswalk German valuation algorithm to EQ-5D-5L-based quality of life data. Considering the clustered structure of the data and between-country heterogeneity, we applied Generalized Structural Equation Models (GSEMs) on a multiple imputed sample to estimate costs and QALYs. We also performed analyses by country and subgroup analyses by patient and morbidity characteristics. Results Trial-wide, the intervention was numerically dominant, with a potential cost-saving of CHF 3’588 (95% confidence interval (CI): -7’716; 540) and gain of 0.025 QALYs (CI: -0.002; 0.052) per patient. Robustness analyses confirmed the validity of the GSEM model. Subgroup analyses suggested stronger effects in people at higher risk. Conclusion We observed a pattern towards dominance, potentially resulting from an accumulation of multiple small positive intervention effects. Our methodological approaches may inform other CEAs of multi-country, cluster-randomized trials facing presence of missing values and heterogeneity between centres/countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Salari
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Cian O’Mahony
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Louvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paco Welsing
- Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nadine Schur
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marie Roumet
- Clinical Trial Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shanthi Beglinger
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Beck
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephen Byrne
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Wilma Knol
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Denis O’Mahony
- Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Pharmacy Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rovers MM, Wijn SRW, Grutters JPC, Metsemakers SJJPM, Vermeulen RJ, van der Pennen R, Berden BJJM, Gooszen HG, Scholte M, Govers TM. Development of a decision analytical framework to prioritise operating room capacity: lessons learnt from an empirical example on delayed elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054110. [PMID: 35396284 PMCID: PMC8995574 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a prioritisation framework to support priority setting for elective surgeries after COVID-19 based on the impact on patient well-being and cost. DESIGN We developed decision analytical models to estimate the consequences of delayed elective surgical procedures (eg, total hip replacement, bariatric surgery or septoplasty). SETTING The framework was applied to a large hospital in the Netherlands. OUTCOME MEASURES Quality measures impacts on quality of life and costs were taken into account and combined to calculate net monetary losses per week delay, which quantifies the total loss for society expressed in monetary terms. Net monetary losses were weighted by operating times. RESULTS We studied 13 common elective procedures from four specialties. Highest loss in quality of life due to delayed surgery was found for total hip replacement (utility loss of 0.27, ie, 99 days lost in perfect health); the lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (utility loss of 0.05, ie, 18 days lost in perfect health). Costs of surgical delay per patient were highest for bariatric surgery (€31/pp per week) and lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (-€2/pp per week). Weighted by operating room (OR) time bariatric surgery provides most value (€1.19/pp per OR minute) and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy provides the least value (€0.34/pp per OR minute). In a large hospital the net monetary loss due to prolonged waiting times was €700 840 after the first COVID-19 wave, an increase of 506% compared with the year before. CONCLUSIONS This surgical prioritisation framework can be tailored to specific centres and countries to support priority setting for delayed elective operations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, both in and between surgical disciplines. In the long-term, the framework can contribute to the efficient distribution of OR time and will therefore add to the discussion on appropriate use of healthcare budgets. The online framework can be accessed via: https://stanwijn.shinyapps.io/priORitize/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroeska M Rovers
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stan RW Wijn
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke PC Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne JJPM Metsemakers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robin J Vermeulen
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ron van der Pennen
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Bart JJM Berden
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Insititute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hein G Gooszen
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mirre Scholte
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim M Govers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Superabsorbent wound dressings versus foams dressings for the management of moderate-to-highly exuding venous leg ulcers in French settings: An early stage model-based economic evaluation. J Tissue Viability 2022; 31:523-530. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
50
|
Dawoud D, Lamb A, Moore A, Bregman C, Rupniewska E, Paling T, Wolfram V, Lovett RES, Dent R. Capturing what matters: updating NICE methods guidance on measuring and valuing health. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2167-2173. [PMID: 35247152 PMCID: PMC9188493 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In July 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) initiated a major review of its health technology evaluation methods to update its methods guide. This update has recently concluded with the publication of its health technology evaluation manual in January 2022. This paper reports the methods and findings of the review in relation to the recommended approach to use for the measurement and valuation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in submissions to NICE. Issues related to (i) the methods to use when NICE’s preferred measure (EQ-5D) is not appropriate or not available; (ii) adjusting health state utility values over time to account for age; (iii) measuring and valuing HRQoL in children and young people; and (iv) including carers’ QoL in economic evaluations were included in this review. This commentary summarises the methods used to undertake the review, its findings, and the changes to NICE methods that were proposed based on these findings. It also outlines topics where further research is needed before definitive methods guidance can be issued. The broad proposals described here were subject to a public consultation in 2020 and a further consultation on the updated methods guidance was completed in October 2021 before the publication of the manual in January 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia Dawoud
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.
| | - Alan Lamb
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Alan Moore
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Bregman
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Ewa Rupniewska
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas Paling
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | - Verena Wolfram
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ross Dent
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|