Renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor use at hospital discharge among patients with moderate to severe acute kidney injury and its association with recurrent acute kidney injury and mortality

Estimated Effect of Restarting Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors after Discontinuation on Kidney Outcomes and Mortality

Key Points

Restarting renin-angiotensin system inhibitor after discontinuation was associated with a lower risk of kidney outcomes and mortality but not related to hyperkalemia. Our findings support a proactive approach to restarting renin-angiotensin system inhibitor among patients with CKD.

Background

While renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) have been the mainstream treatment for patients with CKD, they are often discontinued because of adverse effects such as hyperkalemia and AKI. It is unknown whether restarting RASi after discontinuation improves clinical outcomes.

Methods

Using the Osaka Consortium for Kidney disease Research database, we performed a target trial emulation study including 6065 patients with an eGFR of 10–60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 who were followed up by nephrologists and discontinued RASi between 2005 and 2021. With a clone-censor-weight approach, we compared a treatment strategy for restarting RASi within a year after discontinuation with that for not restarting RASi. Patients were followed up for 5 years at maximum after RASi discontinuation. The primary outcome was a composite kidney outcome (initiation of KRT, a ≥50% decline in eGFR, or kidney failure [eGFR <5 ml/min per 1.73 m2]). Secondary outcomes were all-cause death and incidence of hyperkalemia (serum potassium levels ≥5.5 mEq/L).

Results

Among those who discontinued RASi (mean [SD] age 66 [15] years, 62% male, mean [SD] eGFR 40 [26] ml/min per 1.73 m2), 2262 (37%) restarted RASi within a year. Restarting RASi was associated with a lower hazard of the composite kidney outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.78 to 0.93]) and all-cause death (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.80) compared with not restarting RASi. The incidence of hyperkalemia did not differ significantly between the two strategies (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27).

Conclusions

Restarting RASi after discontinuation was associated with a lower risk of kidney outcomes and mortality but not related to the incidence of hyperkalemia.

Treatment of chronic kidney disease in older populations

As the world population ages, an expected increase in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among older individuals will pose a considerable challenge for health care systems in terms of resource allocation for disease management. Treatment strategies for older patients with CKD should ideally align with those applied to the general population, focusing on minimizing cardiovascular events and reducing the risk of progression to kidney failure. Emerging therapies, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, hold promise for the effective management of CKD in older individuals. In addition, non-pharmacological interventions such as nutritional and exercise therapies have a crucial role. These interventions enhance the effects of pharmacotherapy and, importantly, contribute to the maintenance of cognitive function and overall quality of life. Various factors beyond age and cognitive function must be taken into account when considering kidney replacement therapy for patients with kidney failure. Importantly, all treatment options, including dialysis, transplantation and conservative management approaches, should be tailored to the individual through patient-centred decision-making. The dynamic integration of digital technologies into medical practice has the potential to transform the management of CKD in the aging population.

Unveiling the enigma of acute kidney disease: predicting prognosis, exploring interventions, and embracing a multidisciplinary approach

Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a critical transitional period between acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The incidence of AKD following acute kidney injury is approximately 33.6%, and it can occur without identifiable preceding acute kidney injury. The development of AKD is associated with increased risks of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and mortality. Biomarkers and subphenotypes are promising tools to predict prognosis in AKD. The complex clinical situations in patients with AKD necessitate a comprehensive and structured approach, termed "KAMPS" (kidney function check, advocacy, medications, pressure, sick day protocols). We introduce "MAND-MASS," an acronym devised to summarize the reconciliation of medications during episodes of acute illness, as a critical component of the sick day protocols at AKD. A multidisciplinary team care, consisting of nephrologists, pharmacists, dietitians, health educators, and nurses, is an optimal model to achieve the care bundle in KAMPS. Although the evidence for patients with AKD is still lacking, several potential pharmacological agents may improve outcomes, including but not limited to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In conclusion, accurate prognosis prediction and effective treatment for AKD are critical yet unmet clinical needs. Future studies are urgently needed to improve patient care in this complex and rapidly evolving field.

The effect of pharmacist-led medication therapy management in the multidisciplinary care of acute kidney injury survivors

BACKGROUND

The Acute Disease Quality Initiative advocates multidisciplinary care for the survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI). The bundled care strategy recognizes the role of pharmacists. However, their specific contributions in this context remain underexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined the efficacy of pharmacist-led post-AKI pharmaceutical care in outpatient settings at a single center. Adults with recent AKI during hospitalization, maintaining an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 postdischarge, were enrolled in a multidisciplinary team care program from March 2022 to January 2023, with a 6-month follow-up period. Pharmacist-delivered care adhered to international multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. Efficacy was evaluated by analyzing medication-related recommendations, medication adherence, nephrotoxic drug utilization, and renoprotective medication usage before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were referred to the pharmacist-managed clinic. Of these, 33 patients (mean age, 63 ± 15 years; 60.6% male) attended the clinic. Nineteen patients completed follow-up visits. The pharmacist provided 14 medication-related recommendations to relevant physicians, with 10 of these recommendations (71.4%) being accepted. There was a significant decrease in the use of modifiable nephrotoxic drugs (p = 0.03). However, no significant improvements were noted in medication adherence or the utilization of renoprotective medications.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the potential benefits of pharmacist-led post-AKI bundled care strategy in outpatient settings. We observed a significant reduction in the utilization of modifiable nephrotoxic drugs, indicating the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions in optimizing medication regimens to mitigate renal harm.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade after AKI with or without Recovery among US Veterans with Diabetic Kidney Disease

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Among patients with CKD, optimal use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers after AKI is uncertain. Despite these medications' ability to reduce risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes, there is concern that ACEi/ARB use may delay recovery of kidney function or precipitate recurrent AKI. Prior studies have provided conflicting data regarding the optimal timing of these medications after AKI and have not addressed the role of kidney recovery in determining appropriate timing. This study in US Veterans with diabetes mellitus and proteinuria demonstrated an association between ACEi/ARB use and lower mortality. This association was more pronounced with earlier post-AKI ACEi/ARB use and was not meaningfully affected by initiating ACEis/ARBs before versus after recovery from AKI.

BACKGROUND

Optimal use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) after AKI is uncertain.

METHODS

Using data derived from electronic medical records, we sought to estimate the association between ACEi/ARB use after AKI and mortality in US military Veterans with indications for such treatment (diabetes and proteinuria) while accounting for AKI recovery. We used ACEi/ARB treatment after hospitalization with AKI (defined as serum creatinine ≥50% above baseline concentration) as a time-varying exposure in Cox models. The outcome was all-cause mortality. Recovery was defined as return to ≤110% of baseline creatinine. A secondary analysis focused on ACEi/ARB use relative to AKI recovery (before versus after).

RESULTS

Among 54,735 Veterans with AKI, 31,146 deaths occurred over a median follow-up period of 2.3 years. Approximately 57% received an ACEi/ARB <3 months after hospitalization. In multivariate analysis with time-varying recovery, post-AKI ACEi/ARB use was associated with lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.77). The association between ACEi/ARB use and mortality varied over time, with lower mortality risk associated with earlier initiation ( P for interaction with time <0.001). In secondary analysis, compared with those with neither recovery nor ACEi/ARB use, risk of mortality was lower in those with recovery without ACEi/ARB use (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.94), those without recovery with ACEi/ARB use (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.72), and those with ACEi/ARB use after recovery (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated lower mortality associated with ACEi/ARB use in Veterans with diabetes, proteinuria, and AKI, regardless of recovery. Results favored earlier ACEi/ARB initiation.

Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization With Acute Kidney Injury

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) carries high rates of morbidity and mortality. This study quantified various short- and long-term outcomes after hospitalization with AKI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective propensity score (PS)-matched cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Optum Clinformatics, a national claims database, was used to identify patients hospitalized with and without an AKI discharge diagnosis between January 2007 and September 2020.

EXPOSURE

Among patients with prior continuous enrollment for at least 2years without AKI hospitalization, 471,176 patients hospitalized with AKI were identified and PS-matched to 471,176 patients hospitalized without AKI.

OUTCOME(S)

All-cause and selected-cause rehospitalizations and mortality 90 and 365 days after index hospitalization.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

After PS matching, rehospitalization and death incidences were estimated using the cumulative incidence function method and compared using Gray's test. The association of AKI hospitalization with each outcome was tested using Cox models for all-cause mortality and, with mortality as competing risk, cause-specific hazard modeling for all-cause and selected-cause rehospitalization. Overall and stratified analyses were performed to evaluate for interaction between an AKI hospitalization and preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RESULTS

After PS matching, AKI was associated with higher rates of rehospitalization for any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.60-1.65), end-stage renal disease (HR, 6.21; 95% CI, 1.04-36.92), heart failure (HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 2.66, 2.97), sepsis (HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.49-2.75), pneumonia (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.37-1.57), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.33-1.65), and volume depletion (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.37-1.96) at 90 days after discharge compared with the group without AKI, with similar findings at 365 days. Mortality rate was higher in the group with AKI than in the group without AKI at 90 (HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.61-2.72) and 365 days (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 2.08-2.14). The higher risk of outcomes persisted when participants were stratified by CKD status (P<0.01).

LIMITATIONS

Causal associations between AKI and the reported outcomes cannot be inferred.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI during hospitalization in patients with and without CKD is associated with increased risk of 90- and 365-day all-cause/selected-cause rehospitalization and death.

Adverse effects during treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors; should we stay or should we stop?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent evidence on the benefits and harms of stopping therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) after the occurrence of adverse events or in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

RAASi may result hyperkalemia or acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in persons with CKD. Guidelines recommend to temporarily stop RAASi until the problem is resolved. However permanent discontinuation of RAASi is common in clinical practice with the potential to heighten subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A series of studies evaluating the consequences of stopping RAASi (vs. continuing) after an episode of hyperkalemia or AKI consistently report worse clinical outcomes, both higher risk of death and cardiovascular events. The STOP-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) trial and two large observational studies also favor the decision to continue ACEi/ angiotensin receptor blockers in advanced CKD, refuting old observations that use of these medications can accelerate the risk of kidney replacement therapy.

SUMMARY

Available evidence suggests continuing with RAASi after the occurrence of adverse events or in patients with advanced CKD, primarily attributed to sustained cardioprotection. This is in line with current guideline recommendations.

Renal Microcirculation Injury as the Main Cause of Ischemic Acute Kidney Injury Development

Acute kidney injury (AKI) can result from multiple factors. The main cause is reduced renal perfusion. Kidneys are susceptible to ischemia due to the anatomy of microcirculation that wraps around the renal tubules-peritubular capillary (PTC) network. Cortical and medullary superficial tubules have a large share in transport and require the supply of oxygen for ATP production, while it is the cortex that receives almost 100% of the blood flowing through the kidneys and the medulla only accounts for 5-10% of it. This difference makes the tubules present in the superficial layer of the medulla very susceptible to ischemia. Impaired blood flow causes damage to the endothelium, with an increase in its prothrombotic and pro-adhesive properties. This causes congestion in the microcirculation of the renal medulla. The next stage is the migration of pericytes with the disintegration of these vessels. The phenomenon of destruction of small vessels is called peritubular rarefaction, attributed as the main cause of further irreversible changes in the damaged kidney leading to the development of chronic kidney disease. In this article, we will present the characteristic structure of renal microcirculation, its regulation, and the mechanism of damage in acute ischemia, and we will try to find methods of prevention with particular emphasis on the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Acute kidney injury increases risk of kidney stones-a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common. An episode of AKI may modify the risk of developing kidney stones by potential long-term effects on urine composition. We aimed to investigate the association between AKI and the risk of kidney stone presentations.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study used patient data (1 January 2008-31 December 2017), from an Australian Local Health District, which included AKI diagnosis, demographics, comorbidities and kidney stone admissions. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards and propensity-matched analysis were used to determine the impact of AKI on the risk of kidney stones. To address possible population inhomogeneity in comparisons between no AKI and hospitalized AKI, sub-group analysis was done comparing inpatient and outpatient AKI versus no AKI, to assess consistency of association with future stones. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to capture the impact of a known AKI status and AKI severity.

RESULTS

Out of 137 635 patients, 23 001 (17%) had an AKI diagnosis and 2295 (2%) had kidney stone presentations. In the unadjusted analysis, AKI was associated with kidney stones, with AKI used as a time-varying exposure, [hazard ratio (HR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.50)]. Both inpatient-AKI (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.39) and outpatient-AKI (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.30-1.94) were significantly associated with future stones compared to no AKI subjects. This association persisted in the adjusted analysis (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.66), propensity-matched dataset (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.99) and sensitivity analysis. There was a dose-response relationship with higher stages of AKI being associated with a greater risk of kidney stones.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients, AKI is associated with a greater risk of kidney stones, which increases with higher stages of AKI. This association should be examined in other cohorts and populations for verification.

Renoprotective Effects of Luteolin: Therapeutic Potential for COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injuries

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has been increasingly reported in critically-ill COVID-19 patients. Moreover, there was significant positive correlation between COVID-19 deaths and renal disorders in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with underlying comorbidities who required renal replacement therapy. It has suggested that death in COVID-19 patients with AKI is 3-fold higher than in COVID-19 patients without AKI. The pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated AKI could be attributed to unspecific mechanisms, as well as COVID-19-specific mechanisms such as direct cellular injury, an imbalanced renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, pro-inflammatory cytokines elicited by the viral infection and thrombotic events. To date, there is no specific treatment for COVID-19 and its associated AKI. Luteolin is a natural compound with multiple pharmacological activities, including anticoronavirus, as well as renoprotective activities against kidney injury induced by sepsis, renal ischemia and diverse nephrotoxic agents. Therefore, in this review, we mechanistically discuss the anti-SARS-CoV-2 and renoprotective activities of luteolin, which highlight its therapeutic potential in COVID-19-AKI patients.

Folic acid-targeted pluronic F127 micelles improve oxidative stress and inhibit fibrosis for increasing AKI efficacy

The oxidative stress and activation of the fibrosis pathway are essential pathological mechanisms of acute kidney injury (AKI). In this article, we designed a drug delivery system that could effectively improve oxidative stress and relieve fibrosis by the combination of precise targeting, solubilization, and reducing the toxicity of nano-transport system to strengthen the efficacy of AKI. Folic acid (FA) was used as the targeting molecule, and curcumin (Cur) and resveratrol (Res), which are Chinese medicine monomers with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, were used as model drugs. Here, the targeting nanosystem (Cur/Res@FA-F127/TPGS) co-loaded with Cur and Res was successfully synthesized. Finally, the comprehensive therapeutic effect of the nanosystem was evaluated through the targeted and pharmacodynamic researches on the AKI models induced by cisplatin (CDDP) in vitro and in vivo. The studies in vitro proved that the nanosystem could not only specifically target HK-2 cells and promote the effective accumulation of Cur and Res in the kidney, but also effectively improve oxidative stress by eliminating reactive oxygen species (ROS), stabilizing mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and reducing the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. The studies in vivo showed that the nanosystem could effectively play the role of anti-oxidation, anti-inflammatory and alleviate fibrosis to reduce the apoptosis and necrosis of renal tubular cells. The nanosystem could coordinately repair damaged HK-2 cells by improving oxidative stress, inhibiting inflammation and tissue fibrosis, which provided a new idea for the treatment of AKI.

Stopping kidney protection in the elderly following acute kidney injury: think mortality

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is projected to become the fifth most common global cause of death by 2040. This illustrates a key consequence of CKD, i.e. premature mortality. Since nephroprotective drugs such as renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and sodium–glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors decrease glomerular hyperfiltration, they may be stopped following an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI). This may theoretically modify the risks of subsequent events, ranging from hyperkalaemia to CKD progression to cardiovascular events, but the evidence so far has been inconsistent. Roemer et al. have now addressed the shortcomings of prior studies. In a population of mostly elderly (median age 78 years) prevalent users of RAS blockers with an indication for this therapy and who survived for at least 3 months after discharge following a hospitalization characterized by moderate to severe AKI, roughly 50% had stopped RAS blockade at 3 months. Stopping RAS blockade was associated with an increased risk of a primary composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction and stroke, of which a large majority (80%) of events were deaths. In contrast, the risk of hyperkalaemia was reduced and the risk of repeated AKI, CKD progression or heart failure hospitalization was unchanged in patients who stopped RAS blockers. These findings call for a re-evaluation of the practice of stopping RAS blockers in the long-term following AKI and suggest that studies are needed regarding similar practices for SGLT2 inhibitors.

Stopping Versus Continuing Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors After Acute Kidney Injury and Adverse Clinical Outcomes; An Observational Study From Routine Care Data

Background

The risk–benefit ratio of continuing with renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) after an episode of acute kidney injury (AKI) is unclear. While stopping RASi may prevent recurrent AKI or hyperkalaemia, it may deprive patients of the cardiovascular benefits of using RASi.

Methods

We analysed outcomes of long-term RASi users experiencing AKI (stage 2 or 3, or clinically coded) during hospitalization in Stockholm and Sweden during 2007–18. We compared stopping RASi within 3 months after discharge with continuing RASi. The primary study outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Recurrent AKI was our secondary outcome and we considered hyperkalaemia as a positive control outcome. Propensity score overlap weighted Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), balancing 75 confounders. Weighted absolute risk differences (ARDs) were also determined.

Results

We included 10 165 individuals, of whom 4429 stopped and 5736 continued RASi, with a median follow-up of 2.3 years. The median age was 78 years; 45% were women and median kidney function before the index episode of AKI was 55 mL/min/1.73 m². After weighting, those who stopped had an increased risk [HR, 95% confidence interval (CI)] of the composite of death, MI and stroke [1.13, 1.07–1.19; ARD 3.7, 95% CI 2.6–4.8] compared with those who continued, a similar risk of recurrent AKI (0.94, 0.84–1.05) and a decreased risk of hyperkalaemia (0.79, 0.71–0.88).

Discussion

Stopping RASi use among survivors of moderate-to-severe AKI was associated with a similar risk of recurrent AKI, but higher risk of the composite of death, MI and stroke.

Acute renal injury events in diabetic patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors: A comprehensive review with a special reference to RAAS blockers

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are two pharmacological classes that proved a remarkable nephroprotective effect, yet a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) was also pointed out. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended caution with the concomitant use of these medications. While the literature devoted to RAAS blockers remained surprisingly limited, numerous articles were published in recent years with SGLT2is. Safety analyses of large prospective cardiorenal trials showed a reduced rather than an increased number of AKI events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with SGLT2is compared with those treated with placebo, despite the fact that a majority of patients received RAAS blockers at baseline. Interestingly, retrospective observational studies confirmed these reassuring findings in real-life conditions in more heterogeneous and possibly more frailty populations also commonly treated with RAAS blockers by showing a reduced risk of AKI with SGLT2is compared with other glucose-lowering drugs. Currently, there are no evidence of an increased risk of AKI with RAAS blocker-SGLT2i combinations in absence of haemodynamic instability. Several underlying mechanisms could explain a decreased rather than an increased risk of AKI with SGLT2is, including in patients treated with RAAS blockers.

Klotho in kidney diseases: A crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin system and endoplasmic reticulum stress

Klotho is a transmembrane anti-ageing protein that exists in three forms, i.e., α-Klotho, β-Klotho, and γ-Klotho with distinct organ-specific expression and functions in the body. Here we focus on α-Klotho (mentioned as 'Klotho' only), abundantly expressed by the distal and proximal convoluted tubules of the kidney. Significant decline in systemic and renal Klotho level is a new hallmark for kidney disease progression. Emerging research portrays Klotho as a promising diagnostic as well as a therapeutic target for diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease. Even so, the underlying mechanisms of Klotho regulation and the strategies to restore its systemic as well as the renal level are still lacking. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the current standard of care for kidney diseases where the molecular mechanisms for their nephroprotective action are still ambiguous. Moreover, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) also plays a crucial role in kidney disease progression. Few studies have claimed that RAAS has a direct relation with ER stress generation and vice versa in kidney disease. Interestingly, RAAS and ER stress modulation is associated with Klotho regulation in kidney disease. Here we focus on how the RAAS and ER stress connects with Klotho regulation in kidney disease. We also discuss Klotho and ER stress in an alliance with the concept of hemodynamic and metabolic overload in kidney disease. In addition, we highlight novel approaches to implement Klotho as a therapeutic target via RAAS and ER stress modulation for the treatment of diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease.

Catechins: Therapeutic Perspectives in COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Data obtained from several intensive care units around the world have provided substantial evidence of the strong association between impairment of the renal function and in-hospital deaths of critically ill COVID-19 patients, especially those with comorbidities and requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common renal disorder of various etiologies characterized by a sudden and sustained decrease of renal function. Studies have shown that 5-46% of COVID-19 patients develop AKI during hospital stay, and the mortality of those patients may reach up to 100% depending on various factors, such as organ failures and RRT requirement. Catechins are natural products that have multiple pharmacological activities, including anti-coronavirus and reno-protective activities against kidney injury induced by nephrotoxic agents, obstructive nephropathies and AKI accompanying metabolic and cardiovascular disorders. Therefore, in this review, we discuss the anti-SARS-CoV-2 and reno-protective effects of catechins from a mechanistic perspective. We believe that catechins may serve as promising therapeutics in COVID-19-associated AKI due to their well-recognized anti-SARS-CoV-2, and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that mediate their reno-protective activities.

Achieved blood pressure post-acute kidney injury and risk of adverse outcomes after AKI: A prospective parallel cohort study

BACKGROUND

There has recently been considerable interest in better understanding how blood pressure should be managed after an episode of hospitalized AKI, but there are scant data regarding the associations between blood pressure measured after AKI and subsequent adverse outcomes. We hypothesized that among AKI survivors, higher blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge would be associated with worse outcomes. We also hypothesized these associations between blood pressure and outcomes would be similar among those who survived non-AKI hospitalizations.

METHODS

We quantified how systolic blood pressure (SBP) observed three months after hospital discharge was associated with risks of subsequent hospitalized AKI, loss of kidney function, mortality, and heart failure events among 769 patients in the prospective ASSESS-AKI cohort study who had hospitalized AKI. We repeated this analysis among the 769 matched non-AKI ASSESS-AKI enrollees. We then formally tested for AKI interaction in the full cohort of 1538 patients to determine if these associations differed among those who did and did not experience AKI during the index hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among 769 patients with AKI, 42 % had subsequent AKI, 13 % had loss of kidney function, 27 % died, and 18 % had heart failure events. SBP 3 months post-hospitalization did not have a stepwise association with the risk of subsequent AKI, loss of kidney function, mortality, or heart failure events. Among the 769 without AKI, there was also no stepwise association with these risks. In formal interaction testing using the full cohort of 1538 patients, hospitalized AKI did not modify the association between post-discharge SBP and subsequent risks of adverse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our first hypothesis, we did not observe that higher stepwise blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge with AKI was associated with worse outcomes. Our data were consistent with our second hypothesis that the association between blood pressure measured three months after hospital discharge and outcomes among AKI survivors is similar to that observed among those who survived non-AKI hospitalizations.

Pharmacoepidemiology for nephrologists (part 2): potential biases and how to overcome them

Observational pharmacoepidemiological studies using routinely collected healthcare data are increasingly being used in the field of nephrology to answer questions on the effectiveness and safety of medications. This review discusses a number of biases that may arise in such studies and proposes solutions to minimize them during the design or statistical analysis phase. We first describe designs to handle confounding by indication (e.g. active comparator design) and methods to investigate the influence of unmeasured confounding, such as the E-value, the use of negative control outcomes and control cohorts. We next discuss prevalent user and immortal time biases in pharmacoepidemiology research and how these can be prevented by focussing on incident users and applying either landmarking, using a time-varying exposure, or the cloning, censoring and weighting method. Lastly, we briefly discuss the common issues with missing data and misclassification bias. When these biases are properly accounted for, pharmacoepidemiological observational studies can provide valuable information for clinical practice.

Outcome of acute kidney injury: how to make a difference?

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent organ failure encountered among intensive care unit patients. In addition to the well-known immediate complications (hydroelectrolytic disorders, hypervolemia, drug overdose), the occurrence of long-term complications and/or chronic comorbidities related to AKI has long been underestimated. The aim of this manuscript is to briefly review the short- and long-term consequences of AKI and discuss strategies likely to improve outcome of AKI.

MAIN BODY

We reviewed the literature, focusing on the consequences of AKI in all its aspects and the management of AKI. We addressed the importance of clinical management for improving outcomes AKI. Finally, we have also proposed candidate future strategies and management perspectives.

CONCLUSION

AKI must be considered as a systemic disease. Due to its short- and long-term impact, measures to prevent AKI and limit the consequences of AKI are expected to improve global outcomes of patients suffering from critical illnesses.

Determinants of Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury: Clinical Predictors and Beyond

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome characterized by rapid impairment of kidney function. The incidence of AKI and its severe form AKI requiring dialysis (AKI-D) has been increasing over the years. AKI etiology may be multifactorial and is substantially associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome of AKI-D can vary from partial or complete recovery to transitioning to chronic kidney disease, end stage kidney disease, or even death. Predicting outcomes of patients with AKI is crucial as it may allow clinicians to guide policy regarding adequate management of this problem and offer the best long-term options to their patients in advance. In this manuscript, we will review the current evidence regarding the determinants of AKI outcomes, focusing on AKI-D.

Ten things to know about ten cardiovascular disease risk factors

Given rapid advancements in medical science, it is often challenging for the busy clinician to remain up-to-date on the fundamental and multifaceted aspects of preventive cardiology and maintain awareness of the latest guidelines applicable to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. The "American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update" is a summary document (updated yearly) regarding CVD risk factors. This "ASPC Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update" summary document reflects the perspective of the section authors regarding ten things to know about ten sentinel CVD risk factors. It also includes quick access to sentinel references (applicable guidelines and select reviews) for each CVD risk factor section. The ten CVD risk factors include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, high blood pressure, obesity, considerations of select populations (older age, race/ethnicity, and sex differences), thrombosis/smoking, kidney dysfunction and genetics/familial hypercholesterolemia. For the individual patient, other CVD risk factors may be relevant, beyond the CVD risk factors discussed here. However, it is the intent of the "ASPC Top Ten CVD Risk Factors 2021 Update" to provide a succinct overview of things to know about ten common CVD risk factors applicable to preventive cardiology.