Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy-based regimens in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Real‑world evidence of advanced non‑small cell lung carcinoma treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although clinical trials on immunotherapy have provided promising results, real-world research in clinical practice is needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy. The present study aimed to characterize real-world outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens. The medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC, who were treated with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, were reviewed for data collection. The primary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Therefore, multiple Cox regression models were used to investigate the predictive factors for survival outcomes. Furthermore, survival curves for PFS and OS were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. The present study included a total of 133 patients with advanced NSCLC who received therapy with ICIs between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022. The final follow-up date was August 24, 2023. The median PFS and OS times were 9.8 and 27.2 months, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex, clinical stage, PD-L1 status, previous systemic therapy, and brain and liver metastases were associated with PFS, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, clinical stage, PD-L1 status and brain metastasis were associated with OS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% was an indicator of favorable PFS and OS. An ECOG performance status score of ≥1 was also associated with poor OS but not with PFS. Furthermore, brain metastasis was an indicator for poor PFS and OS, while liver metastasis was only associated with a poor PFS. Finally, the results of the present study demonstrated that PD-L1 status was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC, especially adenocarcinoma, who were treated with ICIs plus chemotherapy. The results also suggested that patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% could benefit when the aforementioned regimens were administrated as a first-line or later-line therapy.

Impact of PROphet Test in Changing Physicians' Therapeutic Decision-Making for Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) regimens are approved for first-line treatment of metastatic nononcogene-driven NSCLC. Guidelines do not differentiate which patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% should receive ICI monotherapy. The clinically validated PROphet NSCLC plasma proteomic-based test is designed to inform this therapeutic decision.

METHODS

One hundred oncologists were presented with 3 "virtual" metastatic NSCLC cases with PD-L1 scores and asked to recommend an approved first-line regimen. They then watched an online educational webinar on the PROphetNSCLC test. Postwebinar, the same cases were represented with the addition of a PROphet result, and oncologists again recommended a first-line regimen. Responses were compared to assess the impact on first-line treatment selection.

RESULTS

Treatment recommendation changed in 39.6% of PROphet-tested cases, with 93% of physicians changing at least 1 case. In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, 89% of physicians changed their recommendation, followed by 77%, in PD-L1 < 1%, and 36% in PD-L1 1% to 49%. ​In the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet POSITIVE group, the recommendation for ICI monotherapy increased from 60% to 89%. ​For the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, the recommendation for monotherapy dropped from 60% to 9%. In the PD-L1 < 1%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, 35% of patients were spared toxicity from ICI compared to 11% in PROphet untested cases.

CONCLUSION

Adding PROphet to PD-L1 expression impacted therapeutic decision making in first-line NSCLC. PROphet identifies those predicted to have an overall survival benefit from ICI monotherapy versus combination versus chemotherapy, improving the probability of efficacy and reducing toxicity for some patients.

Initial clinical experience with durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real‑world practice

Although durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) has been approved as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC), its outcomes in real-world clinical practice are unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dur/Tre treatment. This multicenter study was conducted between March 2023 and January 2024, and included 120 patients with u-HCC treated with Dur/Tre. Among the patients, 44 had no history of systemic treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), therapeutic response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 15.8 and 53.3%, respectively. The median PFS was 3.9 months. The incidence rates of AEs of any grade and those grade 3 or higher were 83.3 and 36.7%, respectively. Liver injury was the most frequent AE of any grade and grade 3 or higher. Although there was no significant difference in ORR and PFS between the first and later line groups (ORR 15.8 vs. 15.7%, P=0.986; PFS 4.5 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.213), there was a significant difference in DCR between the two groups (65.8 vs. 45.9%, P=0.034). No significant differences were noted between the first- and later-line treatment groups regarding the incidence rate of AEs. Decision tree analysis revealed that poor liver function and advanced age were significant variables for discontinuation owing to AEs. In conclusion, Dur/Tre as first-line therapy had better disease control responses compared with later-line therapy; however, this regimen should be carefully administered to patients with deteriorating hepatic function or advanced age.

Erlotinib or Gefitinib for Treating Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Lung Cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protocol for a National Whole-of-Patient-Population Retrospective Cohort Study and Results of a Validation Substudy

BACKGROUND

Starting in 2010, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib were introduced into routine use in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) for treating advanced lung cancer, but their impact in this setting is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The study described in this protocol aims to understand the effectiveness and safety of these new personalized lung cancer treatments and the contributions made by concomitant medicines and other factors to adverse outcomes in the general NZ patient population. A substudy aimed to validate national electronic health databases as the data source and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying outcomes and variables.

METHODS

This study will include all NZ patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were first dispensed erlotinib or gefitinib before October 1, 2020, and followed until death or for at least 1 year. Routinely collected health administrative and clinical data will be collated from national electronic cancer registration, hospital discharge, mortality registration, and pharmaceutical dispensing databases by deterministic data linkage using National Health Index numbers. The primary effectiveness and safety outcomes will be time to treatment discontinuation and serious adverse events, respectively. The primary variable will be high-risk concomitant medicines use with erlotinib or gefitinib. For the validation substudy (n=100), data from clinical records were compared to those from national electronic health databases and analyzed by agreement analysis for categorical data and by paired 2-tailed t tests for numerical data.

RESULTS

In the validation substudy, national electronic health databases and clinical records agreed in determining patient eligibility and for identifying serious adverse events, high-risk concomitant medicines use, and other categorical data with overall agreement and κ statistic of >90% and >0.8000, respectively; for example, for the determination of patient eligibility, the comparison of proxy and standard eligibility criteria applied to national electronic health databases and clinical records, respectively, showed overall agreement and κ statistic of 96% and 0.8936, respectively. Dates for estimating time to treatment discontinuation and other numerical variables and outcomes showed small differences, mostly with nonsignificant P values and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference; for example, for the dates of the first dispensing of erlotinib or gefitinib, national electronic health databases and clinical records differed on average by approximately 4 days with a nonsignificant P value of .33 and 95% CIs overlapping with zero difference. As of May 2024, the main study is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol is presented for a national whole-of-patient-population retrospective cohort study designed to describe the safety and effectiveness of erlotinib and gefitinib during their first decade of routine use in NZ for treating EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer. The validation substudy demonstrated the feasibility and validity of using national electronic health databases and the methods for determining patient eligibility and identifying the study outcomes and variables proposed in the study protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000998549; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368928.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/51381.

Comparison of treatment outcome between first-line combination immunotherapy (anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD1) with or without chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Despite promising outcomes of first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), limited accessibility due to reimbursement was remain the problem in low to middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate real-world effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC in Northern Thailand.

METHOD

A retrospective, single-centered cohort, was conducted. Patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent PD-L1 testing (excluding EGFR and ALK mutations) and were treated with immunotherapy or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone were included. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients, of which 21 patients received immunotherapy-based regimen and 102 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 11.9 months in immunotherapy-based group compared to 5.93 months in the chemotherapy group, with a. hazard ratio (HR) of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.68; p = 0.001). Similarly, the median OS was 26.68 months in the immunotherapy-based group and 11.21 months in the chemotherapy group, with HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.8; p = 0.009). ORRs were significantly higher in the immunotherapy-based group, with 65% of patients showing a response compared to 32% in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The result of this real-world study in patients with advanced stage NSCLC indicate that first-line immunotherapy-based regimen was associated with significantly greater PFS, OS, and ORR with a safety profile consistent with pivotal studies.

Pan-cancer prognosis, immune infiltration, and drug resistance characterization of lung squamous cell carcinoma tumor microenvironment-related genes

Background

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in cancer development; however, its implications in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and pan-cancer have been poorly understood.

Methods

In this study, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumor tissue using Expression Data (ESTIMATE) datasets were applied to identify differentially expressed genes. Additionally, online public databases were utilized for in-depth bioinformatics analysis of pan-cancer datasets to investigate the prognostic implications of TME-related genes further.

Results

Our study demonstrated a significant association between stromal scores, immune scores, and specific clinical characteristics in LUSC patients. C3AR1, CSF1R, CCL2, CCR1, and CD14 were identified as prognostic genes related to the TME. All TME-related prognostic genes demonstrated varying degrees of correlation with immune infiltration subtypes and tumor cell stemness. Moreover, our study revealed that TME-related prognostic genes, particularly C3AR1 and CCR1, might contribute to drug resistance in cancer cells.

Conclusions

The identified TME-related prognostic genes, particularly C3AR1 and CCR1, have potential implications for understanding and targeting drug resistance mechanisms in cancer cells.

The real-world treatment characteristic and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: Data from a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unresolved issues. Here, we assessed the treatment characteristics and efficacy of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using real-world data and evaluated the predictive value of factors, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, for the clinical outcome of ICIs in NSCLC.

METHODS

Analyzed data was collected from hospitalized patients in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2017 and March 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for analyzing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), while Cox regression models was employed to access the correlation between the efficacy of immunotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics, disease information, and characteristics of ICI treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were included in the retrospective study and characteristics of immunotherapy varied significantly among PD-L1 expression groups. The median rwPFS for the entire population was 9.76 months. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with high PD-L1 expression, early TNM stage, first-line immunotherapy, EGFR wild-type and those who have not received radiotherapy and targeted therapy previously were more likely to have better rwPFS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses identified PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation status and previous radiotherapy as the most influential predictors of the response to ICI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the real-world experience of Chinese NSCLC patients undergoing ICI treatment, offering guidance for clinical decision-making based on various patient conditions, preferences, and indications for ICIs, through the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy and predictors in NSCLC patients.

Prognostic impact of age in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment

BACKGROUND

Research on the association between age and clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as first-line setting is limited. The aim of study is to determine the influence of age on the progress-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in those patients after adjusting for potential confounders.

METHODS

A total of 207 advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment in Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from March 10, 2019, to December 31, 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. χ2 (categorical variables) was used to analyze the differences among the different age groups. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the association between age and clinical outcomes. P values < 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 58.8 ± 10.3 years. The percentages of patients < 65, 65-69, 70-74, and ≥ 75 years were 66.7 %, 19.3 %, 9.2 % and 4.8 %, respectively. Compared to the aged < 65 years group, the HR for the risk of disease progression for each group are 0.67 (95 %CI = 0.40-1.12, P = 0.125), 0.66 (95 %CI = 0.31, 1.43, P = 0.298), and 2.27 (95 %CI = 0.80, 6.45, P = 0.124), respectively, with no significant differences in the results. And the HR for risk of death for the 65-69 years and 70-74 years groups was 1.16 (95 %CI = 0.64-2.08, P = 0.628) and 0.93 (95 %CI = 0.39-2.23, P = 0.879), respectively. The difference has no statistical significance. Whereas in patients aged ≥ 75, there is an increased risk of death after adjusted confounders with HR = 4.83 (95 %CI = 2.06-11.35). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Trend test indicates that with advancing age, the patient's risk of death increases (HR = 1.33, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.75, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Age may not be the primary factor influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, but particular attention should be given to the elderly population.

Prognostic Impact of TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of TP53 mutations in advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) patients treated with chemotherapy and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients with nsNSCLC treated in the first line from January 2018 to May 2021. The patient was separated into 2 groups according to their TP53 mutation status (wt vs. mut). Survival was estimated through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 220 patients included, 126 were in the mutTP53 group, and 94 were in the wtTP53wt group. Median OS (mOS) was not significantly different between the mutTP53 and wtTP53 groups [17.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.3-21.5) vs. 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.2), (P = .051)]. In subgroup analyses, the mutTP53 group treated with ICI had a significantly improved mOS compared to the wtTP53 group [(24.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-not reach) vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 4.7-not reach), (P = .017)] and mPFS [(9.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-not reach) vs. 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.3-13.8) (P = .048)]. There was no difference in terms of mOS and mPFS between the mutTP53 and the wtTP53 group treated by chemotherapy alone or combined with ICI.

CONCLUSION

TP53 mutation had no survival impact in the overall population, but is associated with better outcomes with ICI alone. These results suggest that patients with TP53 mutations could be treated with ICI alone, and wild-type patients could benefit from the addition of chemotherapy.

Real-world outcomes of Italian patients with advanced non-squamous lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-pemetrexed

PURPOSE

The aim of this multi-center, retrospective/prospective cohort observational study was to evaluate outcomes in routine clinical practice of first-line chemo-immunotherapy with cis/carboplatin, pemetrexed and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 33 Italian centers.

METHODS

The outcome measure was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in a real-world patient population. Secondary endpoints were: progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

1068 patients were enrolled at the time of data cut-off (January 31st, 2023), and 812 (76.0%) belonged to the retrospective cohort. Median age was 66 years (27-85), ECOG PS was ≥ 2 in 91 (8.6%) patients; 254 (23.8%) patients had brain metastases at baseline; 38 (3.6%) patients had tumor with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. After a median follow-up of 17.0 months (95% CI, 16.1-17.9), median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.4-18.8) and PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 8.8-11.2). Median DoR (n = 493) was 14.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-17.1). ORR was 43.4% (95% CI, 40.4-46.4). Any-grade AEs occurred in 636 (59.6%) patients and grade ≥ 3 in 253 (23.7%) patients. Most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (6.3%) and anemia (6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line chemo-immunotherapy was effective and tolerable in this large, real-world Italian study of patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Our results were in line with the KEYNOTE-189 registration study, also considering the low number of PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients included in our study.

First-line Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Sweden: A Population-based Real-world Study with Focus on Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved significantly since the introduction of immunotherapies. We here describe PD-L1 testing rates, treatment patterns, and real-world outcomes for PD-(L)1 inhibitors in Sweden.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were obtained from the Swedish National Lung Cancer Registry for patients with advanced NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0-2 who initiated first-line -systemic treatment from 01 April 2017 to 30 June 2020. PD-L1 testing was available in the registry from 01 January 2018. Kaplan-Meier was used for overall survival (OS) by type treatment and histology.

RESULTS

A total of 2,204 patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable stage IIIB/C or IV NSCLC initiated first-line treatment, 1,807 (82%) with nonsquamous (NSQ) and 397 (18%) with SQ. Eighty-six per cent (NSQ) or 85% (SQ) had been tested for PD-L1 expression, a proportion that increased over time. The use of platinum-based therapy as first-line treatment decreased substantially over time while there was an upward trend for PD-(L)1-based therapy. Among patients with PS 0-1 initiating a first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor monotherapy, the median OS was 18.6 and 13.3 months for NSQ and SQ NSCLC patients, respectively, while for the PD-(L)1 inhibitor and chemotherapy combination regimen, the median OS was 24.0 months for NSQ and not evaluable for SQ patients.

INTERPRETATION

The majority of advanced NSCLCs in Sweden were tested for PD-L1 expression. Real-world OS in patients with PS 0-1 receiving first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitor-based regimens was similar to what has been reported in pivotal clinical trials on PD-(L)1 inhibitors.

Real-world safety of first-line immuno-oncology combination therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: Real-world adverse event (AE) data are limited for first-line (1L) treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Using Flatiron Health Spotlight data, information for a pre-specified list of AEs was abstracted and described among patients with advanced NSCLC receiving 1L nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI), NIVO + IPI + chemotherapy and other approved immuno-oncology (IO) therapy + chemotherapy combination therapies. Results: Fatigue, pain, dyspnea, weight loss, decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, cough, constipation and rash were the most common AEs. Rates of AEs were generally numerically similar across the three cohorts. The majority of patients received treatment for AEs and approximately one fourth of the patients had hospitalization due to their AEs. Conclusion: The real-world safety experiences of patients treated with 1L NIVO + IPI-based regimens were in general similar to those treated with other approved IO + chemotherapy combination therapies.

Real-World Data Quality Framework for Oncology Time to Treatment Discontinuation Use Case: Implementation and Evaluation Study

BACKGROUND

The importance of real-world evidence is widely recognized in observational oncology studies. However, the lack of interoperable data quality standards in the fragmented health information technology landscape represents an important challenge. Therefore, adopting validated systematic methods for evaluating data quality is important for oncology outcomes research leveraging real-world data (RWD).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to implement real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) for a systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) as a new use case for the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment, a framework linking data quality and relevance in fit-for-purpose RWD assessment.

METHODS

To define the rwTTD use case, we mapped the operational definition of rwTTD to RWD elements commonly available from oncology electronic health record-derived data sets. We identified 20 tasks to check the completeness and plausibility of data elements concerning SACT use, line of therapy (LOT), death date, and length of follow-up. Using descriptive statistics, we illustrated how to implement the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment on 2 oncology databases (Data sets A and B) to estimate the rwTTD of an SACT drug (target SACT) for patients with advanced head and neck cancer diagnosed on or after January 1, 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 1200 (24.96%) of 4808 patients in Data set A and 237 (5.92%) of 4003 patients in Data set B received the target SACT, suggesting better relevance of the former in estimating the rwTTD of the target SACT. The 2 data sets differed with regard to the terminology used for SACT drugs, LOT format, and target SACT LOT distribution over time. Data set B appeared to have less complete SACT records, longer lags in incorporating the latest data, and incomplete mortality data, suggesting a lack of fitness for estimating rwTTD.

CONCLUSIONS

The fit-for-purpose data quality assessment demonstrated substantial variability in the quality of the 2 real-world data sets. The data quality specifications applied for rwTTD estimation can be expanded to support a broad spectrum of oncology use cases.

Plasma Proteome-Based Test for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Current guidelines for the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations recommend checkpoint immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. This approach fails to account for individual patient variability and host immune factors and often results in less-than-ideal outcomes. To address the limitations of the current guidelines, we developed and subsequently blindly validated a machine learning algorithm using pretreatment plasma proteomic profiles for personalized treatment decisions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter observational trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04056247) of patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapy (n = 540) and an additional patient cohort receiving chemotherapy (n = 85) who consented to pretreatment plasma and clinical data collection. Plasma proteome profiling was performed using SomaScan Assay v4.1.

RESULTS

Our test demonstrates a strong association between model output and clinical benefit (CB) from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based treatments, evidenced by high concordance between predicted and observed CB (R2 = 0.98, P < .001). The test categorizes patients as either PROphet-positive or PROphet-negative and further stratifies patient outcomes beyond PD-L1 expression levels. The test successfully differentiates between PROphet-negative patients exhibiting high tumor PD-L1 levels (≥50%) who have enhanced overall survival when treated with a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy compared with immunotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.51], P = .0003). By contrast, PROphet-positive patients show comparable outcomes when treated with immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.42 to 1.44], P = .424).

CONCLUSION

Plasma proteome-based testing of individual patients, in combination with standard PD-L1 testing, distinguishes patient subsets with distinct differences in outcomes from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data suggest that this approach can improve the precision of first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC.

Association between treatment and improvements in overall survival of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer since 2011: A study in the United States, Canada, and Germany using retrospective real-world databases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in three countries between 2011 and 2020.

METHODS

Three databases (US, Canada, Germany) were used to identify incident aNSCLC patients. OS was assessed from the date of incident aNSCLC diagnosis and, for patients who received at least a first line of therapy (1LOT), from the date of 1LOT initiation. In multivariable analyses, we analyzed the influence of index year and type of prescribed treatment on OS.

FINDINGS

We included 51,318 patients with an incident aNSCLC diagnosis. The percentage of patients treated with a 1LOT differed substantially between countries, whereas the number of patients receiving immunotherapies/targeted treatments increased over time in all three countries. Median OS from the date of incident diagnosis was 9.9 months in the United States vs. 4.1 months in Canada. When measured from the start of 1LOT, patients had a median OS of 10.7 months in the United States, 10.9 months in Canada, and 10.9 months in Germany. OS from the start of 1LOT improved in all three countries from 2011 to 2020 by approximately 3 to 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed continuous improvement in OS among patients receiving at least a 1LOT from 2011 to 2020 was likely driven by improved care and changes in the treatment landscape. The difference in the proportion of patients receiving a 1LOT in the observed countries requires further investigation.

Pembrolizumab-combination therapy for NSCLC- effectiveness and predictive factors in real-world practice

Introduction

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in <50% of tumour cells (TC).

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy of the treatment in real-world practice, paying attention to the predictive factors, with a special focus on low level of PD-L1 expression. This study is a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with stage IV NSCLC.

Results

A group of 339 consecutive patients was analysed, among them 51% patients with low PD-L1 expression. In the overall population, the ORR was 40.6%, median PFS and OS were 13 months (95% CI 11.4-15) and 16.8 months (95% CI 13.3-20.3), respectively. In multivariate analysis for the entire study population, performance status - ECOG 1 vs. 0 (HR 2.2, 95%CI 1.1-4.6; p=0.02), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)>3 (HR 2.3, 95%CI 1.3-4.2; p=0.04), presence of liver (HR 2.0, 95%CI 1-3.7; p=0. 03) and bone metastases (HR 1.3, 95%CI 1-3; p=0.04), weight loss (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-2.8; p=0.01) and sum of measurable lesions diameters >110 mm (HR 1.7, 95%CI 1-2.9, p=0.049) had a negative impact on OS.

Conclusions

In the real world, patients can clinically benefit from immunochemotherapy, regardless of the expression of PD-L1 and the histological type. Other clinicopathological factors such as performance status, extent, and location of secondary lesions have prognostic significance.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and association with PD-L1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The use of thromboprophylactic therapy is subject to an accurate assessment of the VTE risk depending on patients, tumor characteristics and type of systemic antineoplastic treatments. However, little is known concerning the risk of VTE in patients suffering from an advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy and the impact of tumor biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, observational, single-centre study in a cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence of VTE, the impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence, overall survival, the rate of VTE recurrence under anticoagulant treatment and the rate of bleeding complications.

Results

109 patients were included, of whom 21 (19.3%) presented a VTE event during a median follow-up of 13 months. VTE incidence at 3, 6 and 12 months was 12.1%, 15.1% and 17.5% respectively. 61% were pulmonary embolisms, 9.5% were isolated deep vein thrombosis and 14.3% were central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Our study did not show a significant impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence. Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 81.9%, 74.4% and 70.3% respectively. Four patients developed a recurrent VTE under anticoagulation therapy 3 to 5 months after the first VTE event. One patient suffered from a major bleeding complication while under anticoagulation therapy, leading to death.

Conclusion

VTE is a common complication in advanced NSCLC patients treated with concomitant chemo-immunotherapy. In our study, 19.3% of patients developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 13 months. PD-L1 did not appear to be associated with VTE occurrence. We recorded high VTE recurrence rates despite anticoagulant treatment. Further investigations are needed to determine if high PD-L1 expression is associated with VTE.

Face to face among different chemo-immunotherapy combinations in the first line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of an international expert panel meeting by the italian association of thoracic oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard of care option in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Positive efficacy and safety results have been demonstrated with different chemo-ICI combinations in the corresponding clinical trials, however no randomized prospective comparison is available and there is no evidence on how to choose among the available regimens.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2023 to review data on chemo-ICI regimens available in the first-line setting in patients with NSCLC, and reach common considerations both in clinical practice and in research setting.

RESULTS

Overall, all panelists agreed that safety of the chemo-immunotherapy combination regimens is supported by reviewed data, showing no additional toxicity concerns over those of the individual components of each regimen and highlighting differences in toxicity profile based on ICI component (single anti-PD-1 versus double anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4). Among disease characteristics, PD-L1 value (<1%) but not histology was considered a potential selection factor in favor of the combination with dual ICI. With regards to clinical features, the panelists agreed that chemotherapy, whichever the ICI combination regimen, remains the backbone to counteract disease-related symptoms included those conditioning worse performance status. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to prospectively evaluating the impact of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 on brain metastasis, biomarker subgroups, and the optimal duration and schedule of combination regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, the panelists reached common considerations on strengths and differences between chemotherapy plus single agent ICI and chemotherapy plus double agent ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. In the absence of direct comparison, different toxicity profile and subgroup analysis by PD-L1 are considered as the main potential features to select among the two regimens, however to be confirmed by recommended prospective randomized clinical research.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a nationwide precision medicine program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Germany: a historical cohort analysis

Background

The national Network Genomic Medicine (nNGM) Lung Cancer provides comprehensive and high-quality multiplex molecular diagnostics and standardized personalized treatment recommendation for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in Germany. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the nNGM precision medicine program in terms of overall survival (OS) using real-world data (RWD).

Methods

A historical nationwide cohort analysis of patients with aNSCLC and initial diagnosis between 04/2019 and 06/2020 was conducted to compare treatment and OS of patients with and without nNGM-participation. Patients participating within the nNGM (nNGM group) were selected based on a prospective nNGM database. The electronic health records (EHR) of the prospective nNGM database were case-specifically linked to claims data (AOK, German health insurance). The control group was selected from claims data of patients receiving usual care without nNGM-participation (non-nNGM group). The minimum follow-up period was six months.

Findings

Overall, n = 509 patients in the nNGM group and n = 7213 patients in the non-nNGM group met the inclusion criteria. Patients participating in the nNGM had a significantly improved OS compared to the non-nNGM group (median OS: 10.5 months vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.008, HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.95). The 1-year survival rates were 46.8% (nNGM) and 41.3% (non-nNGM). The use of approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the first-line setting was significantly higher in the nNGM group than in the non-nNGM group (nNGM: 8.4% (43/509) vs. non-nNGM: 5.1% (366/7213), p = 0.001). Overall, patients receiving first-line TKI treatment had significantly higher 1-year OS rates than patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and/or chemotherapy (67.2% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001).

Interpretation

This is the first study to demonstrate a significant survival benefit and higher utilization of targeted therapies for aNSCLC patients participating within nNGM. Our data indicate that precision medicine programs can enhance collaborative personalized lung cancer care and promote the implementation of treatment innovations and the latest scientific knowledge into clinical routine care.

Funding

The study was funded by the AOK Federal Association Germany.

State of cancer care in India and opportunities for innovation

Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in India. Despite recent medical and technological advances, the cancer burden in India remains high and continues to rise. Moreover, substantial regional disparities in cancer incidence and access to essential medical resources exist throughout the country. While innovative and effective cancer therapies hold promise for improving patient outcomes, several barriers hinder their development and utilization in India. Here we provide an overview of these barriers, including challenges related to patient awareness, inadequate infrastructure, scarcity of trained oncology professionals, and the high cost of cancer care. Furthermore, we discuss the limited availability of cancer clinical trials in the country, along with an examination of potential avenues to enhance cancer care in India. By confronting these hurdles head-on and implementing innovative, pragmatic solutions, we take an indispensable step toward a future where every cancer patient in the country can access quality care.

The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs.

METHODS

Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.

Overview of approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials of novel treatments for solid tumors normally measure disease progression using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. However, novel, scalable approaches to estimate disease progression using real-world data are needed to advance cancer outcomes research. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize examples from the existing literature on approaches to estimate real-world disease progression and their relative strengths and limitations, using lung cancer as a case study.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was conducted in PubMed to identify articles that used approaches to estimate real-world disease progression in lung cancer patients. Data abstracted included data source, approach used to estimate real-world progression, and comparison to a selected gold standard (if applicable).

RESULTS

A total of 40 articles were identified from 2008 to 2022. Five approaches to estimate real-world disease progression were identified including manual abstraction of medical records, natural language processing of clinical notes and/or radiology reports, treatment-based algorithms, changes in tumor volume, and delta radiomics-based approaches. The accuracy of these progression approaches were assessed using different methods, including correlations between real-world endpoints and overall survival for manual abstraction (Spearman rank ρ = 0.61-0.84) and area under the curve for natural language processing approaches (area under the curve = 0.86-0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world disease progression has been measured in several observational studies of lung cancer. However, comparing the accuracy of methods across studies is challenging, in part, because of the lack of a gold standard and the different methods used to evaluate accuracy. Concerted efforts are needed to define a gold standard and quality metrics for real-world data.

Significant changes in advanced lung cancer survival during the past decade in Hungary: impact of modern immunotherapy and the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

The approval of immunotherapy (I-O) for the treatment of late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) opened new perspectives in improving survival outcomes. However, survival data have not yet been provided from the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. The aims of our study were to assess and compare survival outcomes of patients with advanced LC receiving systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) before and after the approval of immunotherapy in Hungary, and to examine the impact of pandemic on survival outcomes using data from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database.

Methods

This retrospective, longitudinal study included patients aged ≥20 years who were diagnosed with advanced stage lung cancer (LC) (ICD-10 C34) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2021 and received SACT treatment without LC-related surgery. Survival rates were evaluated by year of diagnosis, sex, age, and LC histology.

Results

In total, 35,416 patients were newly diagnosed with advanced LC and received SACT during the study period (mean age at diagnosis: 62.1-66.3 years). In patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma, 3-year survival was significantly higher among those diagnosed in 2019 vs. 2011-2012 (28.7% [95% CI: 26.4%-30.9%] vs. 14.45% [95% CI: 13.21%-15.69%], respectively). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 3-year survival rates were 22.3% (95% CI: 19.4%-25.2%) and 13.37% (95% CI: 11.8%-15.0%) in 2019 and 2011-2012, respectively, the change was statistically significant. Compared to 2011-2012, the hazard ratio of survival change for non-squamous cell carcinoma patients was 0.91, 0.82, and 0.62 in 2015-2016, 2017-2018, and 2019, respectively (p<0.001 for all cases). In the squamous cell carcinoma group, corresponding hazard ratios were 0.93, 0.87, and 0.78, respectively (p<0.001 for all cases). Survival improvements remained significant in both patient populations during the Covid-19 pandemic (2020-2021). No significant improvements were found in the survival of patients with small cell carcinoma. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line treatment in all diagnostic periods, however, the proportion of patients receiving first- or second-line immunotherapy significantly increased during the study period.

Conclusion

3-year survival rates of NSCLC almost doubled among patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma and significantly improved at squamous cell carcinoma over the past decade in Hungary. Improvements could potentially be attributable by the introduction of immunotherapy and were not offset by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of First-Line Immunotherapy Among Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring BRAF, MET, or HER2 Alterations

Introduction

Data on utilization and clinical outcomes of programmed cell death protein or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors in NSCLC with uncommon oncogenic alterations is limited.

Methods

This retrospective study used a deidentified U.S. nationwide clinicogenomic database to select patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations, diagnosed from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2020, who initiated first-line therapy. Our objectives were to summarize characteristics and treatment patterns for patients with four little-studied genomic alterations or driver-negative NSCLC. We estimated Kaplan-Meier real-world time on treatment (rwTOT) and time to next treatment for patients receiving PD-(L)1 inhibitors. The data cutoff was September 30, 2021.

Results

Of the 3971 eligible patients, 84 (2%) had NSCLC with BRAF V600E mutation, 117 (3%) had MET exon 14 skipping mutation, 130 (3%) had MET amplification, 91 (2%) had ERBB2 activation mutation, and 691 patients (17%) had driver-negative NSCLC. Patient characteristics differed among cohorts as expected. The most common first-line regimen in each cohort was a PD-(L)1 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. The median rwTOT with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy was 4.6 months in the driver-negative cohort and ranged from 2.9 months (ERBB2 mutation) to 7.6 months (BRAF V600E mutation). The median rwTOT with anti-PD-(L)1-chemotherapy combination was 5.2 months in the driver-negative cohort and 6 months in all but the BRAF V600E cohort (17.5 mo). The patterns of real-world time to next treatment results were similar.

Conclusions

Substantial use of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and associated clinical outcomes are consistent with previous real-world findings and suggest no detriment from PD-(L)1 inhibitors for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring one of these four genomic alterations relative to driver-negative NSCLC.

Impact of first-line immunotherapy on survival and intracranial outcomes in a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases at diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Although brain metastases (BM) at diagnosis are common in non-squamous NSCLC patients (ns-NSCLC), they have been mostly excluded from randomized trials. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate real-word outcomes of frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in these patients.

METHODS

Our study assess the intracranial and overall efficacy of first-line ICI-based therapy compared to chemotherapy (CT) in ns-NSCLC patients diagnosed with BM, showing no targetable alterations. Patients were divided according to systemic therapy: CT, ICI, or CT-ICI. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. Secondary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (icPFS).

RESULTS

Between 01 and 2018 and 05-2021, 118 patients were included (52 CT, 38 ICI and 28 CT-ICI). Median follow-up was 30.0 months. Intracranial radiotherapy was delivered for 75.0%, 68.4% and 67.9% of patients for CT, ICI and CT-ICI groups (p = 0.805). After adjustment, ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a better OS compared to CT (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.89, and HR = 0.52, 95 %CI: 0.27-1.01, respectively). ICI and CT-ICI were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intracranial progression by 54% (HR = 0.46, 95 %CI: 0.25-0.84) and 59% (HR = 0.41, 95 %CI: 0.23-0.77) compared to CT. Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with an increased icPFS compared to systemic therapy alone (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.92), whereas whole-brain was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life ns-NSCLC patients with BM at diagnosis treated frontline with ICI presented OS and icPFS benefit compared to CT alone. A prospective assessment of the ideal type and sequence of systemic and local therapy should be conducted.

Expanding the applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced lung cancer beyond disease progression

Background

Immunotherapy, particularly the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), assumes a pivotal role in the comprehensive management of advanced lung cancer. There has been substantial deliberation regarding the appropriateness of extending ICIs treatment beyond the point of disease progression. This study delves into the potential benefits of sustained utilization of ICIs subsequent to disease progression in patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 248 patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer who received treatment with ICIs. The study population comprised 99 patients in the treatment beyond progression (TBP) group and 42 patients in the non-treatment beyond progression (NTBP) group. Parameters including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was employed to analyze prognostic factors related to immunotherapy.

Results

Patients undergoing primary treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibited a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.3 months. In the context of disease progression, a comparison between the TBP and NTBP groups was performed with respect to mPFS. The results demonstrated that the TBP group manifested an mPFS of 8.6 months, contrasting with the NTBP group's mPFS of 4.0 months (p=0.028). The mean overall survival (mOS) in the TBP group exhibited a statistically significant increase in comparison to the NTBP group (14.1 months vs. 6.0 months, p=0.028). Evaluation of the objective response rate (ORR) between the TBP and NTBP groups revealed a substantial distinction. The TBP group displayed an ORR of 12.1%, while the NTBP group exhibited a lower ORR of 2.4%. The statistical analysis yielded a p-value of 0.068, signifying a notable trend towards significance. The disease control rate (DCR) was also assessed and exhibited a noteworthy variance between the two groups, with a higher DCR of 92.9% in contrast to 71.4% in the control group (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Subsequent to ICIs treatment, a subset of patients may derive continued benefits from anticancer therapy, notwithstanding the progression of their advanced lung cancer.

Effects of Acetaminophen Exposure on Outcomes of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

(1) Background: Several studies have investigated potential interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and commonly prescribed medications. Although acetaminophen (APAP) has not been considered susceptible to interaction with ICIs, recent research has shown that detectable plasma levels of this drug can hinder the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies. A reliable assessment of the potential interaction between APAP and ICIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients would be worthwhile since it is often prescribed in this condition. We sought to evaluate the impact of the concomitant use of APAP in patients with advanced NSCLC on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade using real-world evidence. (2) Methods: This study included consecutive patients with histologically proven stage IV NSCLC who underwent first-line therapy with pembrolizumab as a single agent or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, or second-line therapy with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab. The intensity of APAP exposure was classified as low (therapeutic intake lasting less than 24 h or a cumulative intake lower than 60 doses of 1000 mg) or high (therapeutic intake lasting more than 24 h or a total intake exceeding 60 doses of 1000 mg). The favorable outcome of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies was defined by durable clinical benefit (DCB). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were relevant to our efficacy analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) methods were applied to adjust for differences between the APAP exposure subgroups. (3) Results: Over the course of April 2018 to October 2022, 80 patients were treated with first-line pembrolizumab either as single-agent therapy or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. During the period from June 2015 to November 2022, 145 patients were given anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy as second-line treatment. Subsequent efficacy analyses relied on adjusted PSM populations in both treatment settings. Multivariate testing revealed that only the level of APAP and corticosteroid intake had an independent effect on DCB in both treatment lines. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed high exposure to APAP and immunosuppressive corticosteroid therapy as independent predictors of shorter PFS and OS in both treatment settings. (4) Conclusions: Our findings would strengthen the available evidence that concomitant intake of APAP blunts the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. The detrimental effects appear to depend on the cumulative dose and duration of exposure to APAP. The inherent shortcomings of the current research warrant confirmation in larger independent series.

Evaluating the potential of immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has become the standard therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, no robust evidence on the efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients has been established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients. NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) between 2016 and 2022 were divided into two cohorts according to the age: the Elderly cohort (patients aged ≥ 75 years) and the Nonelderly cohort (patients aged < 75 years). The progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 111 NSCLC patients were included in this study (41 patients in the Elderly cohort and 70 patients in the Nonelderly cohort). The PFS (5.6 months vs. 6.3 months, P = 0.98), response rate (36.6% vs. 44.9%, P = 0.51), and disease control rate (80.5% vs. 76.8%, P = 0.83) were not significantly different between the two cohorts. In a subgroup analysis, stratified according to PD-L1 expression (low vs. high) and ICI treatment mode (ICI monotherapy vs. CIT), the PFSs of both cohorts were also not significantly different, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Moreover, the frequency of irAEs did not significantly differ between elderly and nonelderly NSCLC patients (21/41 [51.2%] vs. 38/70 [54.3%], P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients were not inferior to those in younger patients.

Real-World Outcomes of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and Atezolizumab Treatment Efficacy in Korean Veterans with Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive analysis of ICI usage and treatment outcomes in elderly Korean veterans with stage IV NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included, and three cohorts were derived according to the type of ICI received. Thereafter, the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 180 patients with NSCLC (median age, 76 years) included in this study, 49 (27.7%), 61 (33.9%), and 70 (38.9%) received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab, respectively, and 19.4%, 36.1%, and 34.4% had PD-L1 expressions < 1%, 1-49%, and ≥50%, respectively. The pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab groups, the objective response rates (ORR), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 22.4%, 8.2%, and 4.3% (p = 0.004), and 59.2, 55.7%, and 30.0% (p = 0.001), respectively. However, no difference in the overall survival (OS) rate was noted among the groups (12.6 months vs. 8.4 months vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.334). Similarly, there was no treatment specific OS benefit with respect to the tumor PD-L1 expression status. Interestingly, multivariate analysis identified bone metastasis as a significant poor prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.75 [95% CI, 1.31-5.76], p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab and nivolumab showed stronger associations with increases in ORR and DCR than atezolizumab, but no statistically significant differences were observed with respect to OS.

Transformation of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Small Cell Lung Cancer After Immunotherapy Resistance: A Case Report

The transformation of lung adenocarcinoma to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a relatively common phenomenon. However, transformation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to SCLC following treatment with immunotherapy is very rare. Here, we report a case of a 56-year-old patient diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). He received four cycles of immunotherapy with sugemalimab and chemotherapy with albumin paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin, and a partial response was achieved. Subsequently, the patient received 5 cycles of immunotherapy with sugemalimab. However, he developed rapid progression of mediastinal lymph nodes, and biopsy results showed transformation to SCLC. His tumor did not respond to the next line of carboplatin combined with etoposide, and he died six months after the discovery of SCLC transformation. In conclusion, SCLC transformation is also an important resistance mechanism for lung SCC patients treated with immunotherapy and predicts a very poor outcome. Repeat biopsy is needed for advanced lung SCC that has progressed with immunotherapy.

What to do after immune-checkpoint inhibitors failure in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an expert opinion and review

INTRODUCTION

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (IO) have significantly improved outcomes of patients with non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), becoming the first-line agents for advanced disease. However, resistance remains a significant clinical challenge, limiting their effectiveness.

AREAS COVERED

Hereby, we addressed standard and innovative therapeutic approaches for NSCLC patients experiencing progression after IO treatment, discussing the emerging resistance mechanisms and the ongoing efforts to overcome them. In order to provide a complete overview of the matter, we performed a comprehensive literature search across prominent databases, including PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), and the Cochrane Library, and a research of the main ongoing studies on clinicaltrials.gov.

EXPERT OPINION

The dynamics of progression to IO, especially in terms of time to treatment failure and burden of progressive disease, should guide the best subsequent management, together with patient clinical conditions. Long-responders to IO might benefit from continuation of IO beyond-progression, in combination with other treatments. Patients who experience early progression should be treated with salvage CT in case of preserved clinical conditions. Finally, patients who respond to IO for a considerable timeframe and who later present oligo-progression could be treated with a multimodal approach in order to maximize the benefit of immunotherapy.

Outcomes and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent curable surgery: a protocol for a real-world, retrospective, population-based and nationwide Chinese National Lung Cancer Cohort (CNLCC) study

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is one of the main approaches for the comprehensive treatment of early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study conducts a nationwide multicentre study to explore factors that could influence the outcomes of patients with I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent curable surgery in real-world scenarios.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2013 and December 2020 will be identified from 30 large public medical services centres in mainland China. The algorithm of natural language processing and artificial intelligence techniques were used to extract data from electronic health records of enrolled patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria. Six categories of parameters are collected and stored from the electronic records, then the parameters will be structured as a high-quality structured case report form. The code book will be compiled and each parameter will be classified and designated a code. In addition, the study retrieves the survival status and causes of death of patients from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary endpoints are overall survival and the secondary endpoint is disease-free survival. Finally, an online platform is formed for data queries and the original records will be stored as secure electronic documents.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at conferences and publications in open-access journals. This study has been registered in the Chinese Trial Register (ChiCTR2100052773) on 11 May 2021, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=136659.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100052773.

Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Immunotherapy alone (mono-IT) or combined with chemotherapy (chemo-IT) has recently become the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Here, real-world outcomes of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT of advanced NSCLC treated within routine clinical practice at a single academic center in the Central Eastern European (CEE) region are presented.

Materials and methods

A total of 176 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with mono-IT (118 patients) or chemo-IT (58 patients) were included. At the participating institution, all medical data relevant for providing oncology care are collected prospectively and in a standardized manner using purposely created pro-forms. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (mOS) and median duration of treatment (mDOT).

Results

The 118 patients in the mono-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (59%), 20% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 14% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a median follow-up time (mFU) of 24.1 months, the mOS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 11.1-27.6), and the mDOT was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5). The 1-year OS was 62%. The 58 patients in the chemo-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (64%), 9% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 7% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a mFU of 15.5 months, the mOS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 15.9-26.7), and the mDOT was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.6). The 1-year OS was 75%. Adverse events of severe grade were recorded in 18% and 26% of patients, and immunotherapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 19% and 9% in the mono-IT and chemo-IT groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusion

The results from the present real-world observational study from a CEE country suggest similar effectiveness and safety of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT in patients with advanced NSCLC to those observed in randomized clinical trials. However, continuous follow-up will offer better insight into the magnitude of long-term benefits in routine clinical practice.

Checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized lung cancer management improving overall survival and providing durable responses with a favorable toxicity profile. New questions have emerged regarding the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy among older adults, typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Several factors have to be taken into account in order to reduce the realistic risk of over or under-treatment of this growing subgroup of patients. In this perspective, geriatric assessment and screening tools should be implemented in clinical practice; moreover older patients' inclusion into adapted-designed clinical trials should be promoted. In this review, we discuss immunotherapy activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) older patients, the role of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, treatment toxicity and its management with a focus on future perspectives in this rapidly evolving scenario.

Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of checkpoint blockade response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To expand our understanding of the molecular features underlying response to checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC, we describe here the first joint analysis of the Stand Up To Cancer-Mark Foundation cohort, a resource of whole exome and/or RNA sequencing from 393 patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, along with matched clinical response annotation. We identify a number of associations between molecular features and outcome, including (1) favorable (for example, ATM altered) and unfavorable (for example, TERT amplified) genomic subgroups, (2) a prominent association between expression of inducible components of the immunoproteasome and response and (3) a dedifferentiated tumor-intrinsic subtype with enhanced response to checkpoint blockade. Taken together, results from this cohort demonstrate the complexity of biological determinants underlying immunotherapy outcomes and reinforce the discovery potential of integrative analysis within large, well-curated, cancer-specific cohorts.

Predictive Capability of PD-L1 Protein Expression for Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Any Differences Based on Histology?

Lung cancer is responsible for 1.8 million annual deaths. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) represent 85% of lung cancer tumors. While surgery is an effective early-stage treatment, the majority of newly identified US lung cancer cases are stage III/IV. Immunotherapy, using programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor antibody therapeutics, has increased survival for patients with NSCLC. PD-L1 protein expression is widely used as a predictive biomarker informing treatment decisions. However, only a minority of patients (27%-39%) respond to PD-L1/PD-1 treatment. PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry assay has deficiencies in identifying responding and refractory patients. Given the different characteristics of squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, the predictability of PD-L1 levels in determining which patients would benefit from immunotherapy could vary between the 2 histologies. We analyzed 17 phase-III clinical studies and a retrospective study to determine if the predictive capability of PD-L1 expression varies between squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. For patients with NSCLC treated with mono or dual-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), PD-L1 expression was more predictive of benefit for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC than squamous NSCLC. Patients with nonsquamous histology and PD-L1 high tumor proportion scores (TPS) survived 2.0x longer compared to those with low TPS, when treated with monotherapy ICI. Among patients with squamous NSCLC, that difference was 1.2 to 1.3x. For patients treated with ICIs and chemotherapy, there was no clear difference in the predictive value of PD-L1 levels between histologies. We encourage future researchers to analyze the predictability of PD-L1 biomarker expression separately for squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC.

The Role of Immunotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Elderly Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the history of NSCLC treatment by becoming, alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, a mainstay of first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC. This increasingly dictates the identification of predictive biomarkers of response that can guide patient selection, in order to rationalize and personalize therapies, particularly in elderly patients. Immunotherapy in these patients raises questions of efficacy and tolerability related to aging, which is accompanied by a progressive decline in various body functions. Physical, biological and psychological changes contribute to individual validity status and, preferably, 'fit' patients are generally enrolled in clinical trials. In elderly patients, especially frail and complex patients with more than one chronic disease, data are poor and specific prospective studies are needed. This review reports the main available results on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older patients with advanced NSCLC, in terms of efficacy and toxicity, and aims to highlight the need to better predict which patients might benefit from immunotherapy agents by probing knowledge and integrating information on immune system changes and age-related physiopathological modifications.

Advances in the treatment of postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer and their impact on survival in Asian patients

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy on survival after postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or more with complete pathological resection between 2008 and 2018 (N = 2254). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Survival trends and the effect of TKIs/immunotherapy were analyzed using Joinpoint (National Cancer Institute) and Cox regression.

RESULTS

In 443 (19.7%) postoperative recurrences, median time to recurrence was 1.1 years; epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFR+), 191 (43.1%); anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement (ALK+), 13 (2.9%); not detected or unknown (ND), 239 (54.0%). In multivariable analysis, age, time to recurrence, adenocarcinoma, symptomatic recurrence, any treatment for recurrence, use of the epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, use of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase TKI, and use of immunotherapy were significant prognostic factors. Survival was significantly better in the EGFR+/ALK+ group than in the ND group (median, 4.7 vs 2.1 years; P < .01). Between 2010 and 2018, 2-year postrecurrence survival improved significantly (annual percentage change [APC], 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0). In subset analyses, neither change in 2-year survival nor TKI use was significant over time in the EGFR+/ALK+ group, but the ND group experienced significant improvement in 2-year survival (APC, 13.5; 95% CI, 5.4-22.2) and increasing trend in immunotherapy use (APC, 23.0; 95% CI, -5.9 to 60) after 2013.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after postoperative recurrence of NSCLC has improved significantly since 2010. Use of immunotherapy in patients without driver mutations may have contributed to that improvement. Prognosis in patients with driver mutations remains favorable with the TKIs introduced before the study period.

Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study

PURPOSE

The open-label, phase III POSEIDON study evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) and durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D + CT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT) in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

METHODS

Patients (n = 1,013) with EGFR/ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg and platinum-based chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression and one additional tremelimumab dose; durvalumab plus chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression; or chemotherapy for up to six 21-day cycles (with or without maintenance pemetrexed; all arms). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for D + CT versus CT. Key alpha-controlled secondary end points were PFS and OS for T + D + CT versus CT.

RESULTS

PFS was significantly improved with D + CT versus CT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P = .0009; median, 5.5 v 4.8 months); a trend for improved OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .0758; median, 13.3 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 29.6% v 22.1%). PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.86; P = .0003; median, 6.2 v 4.8 months) and OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; P = .0030; median, 14.0 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 32.9% v 22.1%) were significantly improved with T + D + CT versus CT. Treatment-related adverse events were maximum grade 3/4 in 51.8%, 44.6%, and 44.4% of patients receiving T + D + CT, D + CT, and CT, respectively; 15.5%, 14.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

D + CT significantly improved PFS versus CT. A limited course of tremelimumab added to durvalumab and chemotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS versus CT, without meaningful additional tolerability burden, representing a potential new option in first-line mNSCLC.

Development and validation of a decision model for the evaluation of novel lung cancer treatments in the Netherlands

Recent discoveries in molecular diagnostics and drug treatments have improved the treatment of patients with advanced (inoperable) non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from solely platinum-based chemotherapy to more personalized treatment, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, these improvements come at considerable costs, highlighting the need to assess their cost-effectiveness in order to optimize lung cancer care. Traditionally, cost-effectiveness models for the evaluation of new lung cancer treatments were based on the findings of the randomized control trials (RCTs). However, the strict RCT inclusion criteria make RCT patients not representative of patients in the real-world. Patients in RCTs have a better prognosis than patients in a real-world setting. Therefore, in this study, we developed and validated a diagnosis-treatment decision model for patients with advanced (inoperable) non-squamous NSCLC based on real-world data in the Netherlands. The model is a patient-level microsimulation model implemented as discrete event simulation with five health events. Patients are simulated from diagnosis to death, including at most three treatment lines. The base-model (non-personalized strategy) was populated using real-world data of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy between 2008 and 2014 in one of six Dutch teaching hospitals. To simulate personalized care, molecular tumor characteristics were incorporated in the model based on the literature. The impact of novel targeted treatments and immunotherapies was included based on published RCTs. To validate the model, we compared survival under a personalized treatment strategy with observed real-world survival. This model can be used for health-care evaluation of personalized treatment for patients with advanced (inoperable) NSCLC in the Netherlands.

Twelve ESMO Congress 2022 breakthroughs: practicing oncologists' perceptions and potential application on presented data

BACKGROUND

During the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2022, outcome data of a great number of clinical trials were presented. For the attending medical oncologist, it is important to structure these data in a way that facilitates a trade-off between treatment burden and benefit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To illustrate this, we carried out a narrative non-systematic review of 12 selected oral presentations with potential impact on future daily practice, focusing on trial methodology, possible study flaws, reported clinical benefit and implementability.

RESULTS

The selected presentations encompassed 10 phase III trials, 1 randomized phase II trial and 1 phase II trial. In 7 out of 12 trials, quality of life and/or patient-reported outcomes had been evaluated. None of the trials, which reported progression-free survival (PFS) data, provided information, which could exclude informative censoring bias. In none of the trials reporting overall survival (OS) data, potential flaws due to undesirable crossover and imbalance between study groups regarding post-progression treatments were addressed. For the 11 reviewed randomized trials, the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) grade achieved with the new intervention was calculated based on the presented data. The MCBS grade varied from 1 to 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review confirms the high-quality standard of current cancer research and the clinical relevance of the research questions answered. However, during presentation of PFS and/or OS data, factors known to affect PFS and OS analysis should be structurally addressed. In order to keep cancer care affordable and sustainable, it could be considered to include an ESMO-MCBS threshold in the drug appraisal process of regulatory authorities.

Real-world multicentre cohort of first-line pembrolizumab alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1 ≥ 50

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab alone (IO-mono) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT-IO) is first-line standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. This retrospective multicentre study assessed real-world use and efficacy of both strategies.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% from eight hospitals who had received at least one cycle of IO-mono or CT-IO were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-word progression-free-survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and a Cox model with inverse propensity treatment weighting was carried out.

RESULTS

Among the 243 patients included, 141 (58%) received IO-mono and 102 (42%) CT-IO. Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (95% CI 10.4-13.3), median OS was not reached, but no difference was observed between groups (p = 0.51). Early deaths at 12 weeks were 11% (95% CI 4.6-16.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.0-20.9) in CT-IO and IO groups (p = 0.32). After adjustment for age, gender, performance status, histology, brain metastases, liver metastases and tobacco status, no statistically significant difference was found for OS between groups, neither in the multivariate adjusted model [HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.61-1.86), p = 0.8] nor in propensity adjusted analysis [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.65), p = 0.99]. Male gender (HR 2.01, p = 0.01) and PS ≥ 2 (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) were found to be negative independent predictive factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. However, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line does not appear to impact survival outcomes, even regarding early deaths.

Case report: Pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab in a patient with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer after a single 200 mg administration

Background

Pembrolizumab is a well-tolerated biologic agent with a potentially stable and durable anti-tumor response. Unfortunately, discontinuation of therapy can occur as a consequence of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). These irAEs appear independent of dose and exposure. However, such irAEs might also result from pembrolizumab's highly specific mechanism of action and current dosing regimens. However, the currently available pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data to reassess dosing strategies are insufficient.To highlight the importance of additional PK/PD studies, we present a case describing the complexity of pembrolizumab's PK/PD after a single 200 mg pembrolizumab dose in a treatment-naive patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Case description

A 72-year-old man with stage IV NSCLC presented hepatotoxic symptoms 19 days after receiving the first 200 mg pembrolizumab dose. Hence, pembrolizumab therapy was paused, and prednisolone therapy was initiated, which successfully inhibited the toxic effect of pembrolizumab. However, repeated flare-ups due to prednisolone tapering suggest that the toxic effect of pembrolizumab outlasts the presence of pembrolizumab in the bloodstream. This further suggests that the T-cell-mediated immune response outlasts the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor occupancy by pembrolizumab, which challenges the need for the current fixed-interval strategies and their stop criteria.Furthermore, a validated ELISA quantified pembrolizumab levels in 15 samples within 123 days after administration. A shift in the pembrolizumab clearance rate was evident ensuing day 77 (0.6 µg/mL) after administration. Pembrolizumab levels up to day 77 (9.1-0.6 µg/mL) strongly exhibited a linear, first-order clearance (R² = 0.991), whereas after day 77, an accelerated non-linear clearance was observed. This transition from a linear to non-linear clearance was most likely a result of full target receptor saturation to non-full target receptor saturation, in which the added effect of target-mediated drug disposition occurs. This suggests that pembrolizumab's targets were fully saturated at levels above 0.6 µg/mL, which is 43 to 61 times lower than the steady-state trough levels (C_trough,ss) of the currently registered fixed-dosing regimens (3-5).

Survival Outcomes of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Limited Access to Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy in a Cancer Center of a Low- and Middle-Income Country

OBJECTIVE

To describe the survival outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with limited access to immunotherapy and targeted therapy in a cancer reference center in Colombia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated between 2013 and 2018 was performed, majority diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. It was carried out in a public cancer reference center that provides care to patients of low and middle socioeconomic status. Overall survival and progression-free survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. A Cox regression model was performed for univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

209 patients were included with majority of adenocarcinoma (79.5%). First-line treatment was cytotoxic chemotherapy (50.2%), EGFR-targeted therapy (14.8%), chemoimmunotherapy (1.9%), and ALK-targeted therapy (1.4%). 31.6% received best supportive care. Median time of follow-up was 13 months, median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI, 7.9-14.4), 13 months for adenocarcinoma (95% CI, 8.1-17.9), and 2.5 months for squamous cell carcinoma (95% CI, 0.6-4.4) (P < .001). Median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.7) without differences according to the type of first-line therapy. Median time-to-treatment was 55 days and only 54% of patients with a tested actionable mutation in EGFR received an EGFR-targeted therapy as the first-line treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that squamous cell carcinoma histology and receiving best supportive care were independent factors for worse overall survival ((HR:1.8, 95% CI, 1.076-3.082, P=.026) and (HR:14.6, 95% CI, 8.921-24.049, P < .001), respectively). Meanwhile, squamous cell carcinoma histology was an independent factor for worse progression-free survival (HR:3.4, 95% CI, 1.540-7.464, P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in precision medicine, during the study period, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the most used treatment in our patients. Furthermore, about a third of them received best supportive care. The use of targeted therapies has been restricted by access to molecular diagnosis and remained low until 2018. Access to immunotherapy should be prioritized.

First-Line Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous NSCLC: Real-World Outcomes at U.S. Oncology Practices

Introduction

Pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and (nab-)paclitaxel (pembrolizumab-chemotherapy) is currently an approved and recommended systemic therapy for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. This retrospective study evaluated real-world time on treatment (rwToT) and overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced squamous NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy at oncology practices in the United States.

Methods

Using a real-world database, we selected adult patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent advanced squamous NSCLC (unresectable stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV) and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1) who initiated first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy from November 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine rwToT and OS overall and by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Data cutoff was October 31, 2021.

Results

Of 364 eligible patients, 243 (67%) were men; median age was 70 (range: 43-84) years; and PD-L1 expression was greater than or equal to 1%, less than 1%, and unknown for 172 (47%), 94 (26%), and 98 patients (27%), respectively. Median follow-up from pembrolizumab-chemotherapy initiation to data cutoff was 26.2 months. Overall, median pembrolizumab rwToT was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-7.6), with on-treatment rates of 29.3% and 15.9% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median OS was 15.3 months (95% CI: 11.7-18.6), with 12- and 24-month OS rates of 54.9% and 37.3%, respectively. Median OS did not differ with PD-L1 expression: 16.2 months (95% CI: 10.3-20.6) for PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% and 17.2 months (95% CI: 10.8-20.6) for PD-L1 less than 1%.

Conclusions

For patients with advanced squamous NSCLC and good performance status treated with first-line pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, rwToT and OS are similar to clinical trial findings for treatment duration and OS.

Clinical Potential of Circulating Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) for Longitudinally Monitoring Clinical Outcomes in the First-Line Setting of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Real-World Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing implementation of targeted and immunotherapy-based treatments, the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC remains dismal. We prospectively evaluated longitudinal plasma cfDNA kinetics as an early marker of therapeutic efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing standard first-line treatments.

METHODS

From February 2020 to May 2022, treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were consecutively enrolled at the Medical Oncology Unit of the Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo (Italy). We quantified cfDNA in terms of ng/μL using a Qubit^TM dsDNA HS Assay Kit. The agreement between the cfDNA and radiologic response was evaluated from baseline (T0) to the radiologic evaluation (T1).

RESULTS

A total of 315 liquid biopsy samples were collected from 63 patients at baseline, with a total of 235 paired plasma samples from 47 patients at disease re-evaluation. A fair concordance was observed between early and durable radiographic and cfDNA response (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.001); 11 and 18 patients receiving TKI (Pearson's chi-squared test = 4.278; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.039) and IO treatments (Pearson's chi-squared test = 7.481; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.006) showed a significant and durable association between cfDNA dynamics and the first radiologic evaluation, whereas among the 18 patients undergoing CT, no significant correlation was observed (Pearson's chi-squared test = 0.720; Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.396). The ECOG-PS 2 patients presented with the mean baseline cfDNA levels 2.6-fold higher than those with ECOG-PS 0-1 (1.71 vs. 0.65 ng/µL; p = 0.105).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world study demonstrates that quantitative changes in cfDNA values correlated with responses to therapy and relapse of disease in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing TKI- and IO-based treatments.

Real-World Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Among Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and High PD-L1 Expression Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as First-Line Therapy

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard-of-care for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the US de-identified electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health aNSCLC database (January 1, 2018, to July 31, 2021) among patients with PD-L1 ≥50% initiating first-line ICIs with or without chemotherapy. A clinical trial-like sub-cohort was also identified with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, adequate organ function, and no brain metastases or other primary cancers. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) by ICI regimen (ICI+chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy) and PD-L1 expression (50-69%, 70-89%, 90-100%). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between ICI regimen, PD-L1 level, and OS, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables.

Results

A total of 2631 patients with aNSCLC initiating ICI+chemotherapy (n = 992) or ICI monotherapy (n = 1639) were included; median (Q1, Q3) age was 71 (63-78) years and 51.6% were male. The trial-like sub-cohort (n = 1029) generally had better outcomes vs. the overall cohort. Patients receiving ICI+chemotherapy generally had longer median OS vs. ICI monotherapy. Multivariable analyses showed no association between ICI regimen and OS among patients with PD-L1 70-89% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.09) or 90-100% (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.08), but patients with PD-L1 50-69% receiving ICI+chemotherapy had longer OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99).

Conclusion

Outcomes in real-world clinical trial-like patients with aNSCLC approached those reported in pivotal ICI trials in high PD-L1 expressers. ICI monotherapy offers a potential alternative in patients with PD-L1 ≥70% while avoiding potential chemotherapy toxicity exposure; the benefits are less clear in patients with PD-L1 50-69%. Future studies should confirm these findings.