Urotensin II, a novel peptide in central and peripheral cardiovascular control

Urotensin 2 and Oxidative Stress Levels in Maternal Serum in Pregnancies Complicated by Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Background and objectives: In this study, the aim was to investigate Urotensin 2 (U-II) levels and oxidant/antioxidant system parameters in pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Materials and Methods: A total of 36 healthy, pregnant women who had not been diagnosed with IUGR and 36 pregnant women who had been diagnosed with IUGR at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinic at Gaziantep University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The serum total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), thiol-disulfide levels, U-II measurements, and oxidative stress index (OSI) calculations were carried out at the biochemistry laboratory at Gaziantep University. Results: According to this study, there was no statistically significant difference between the group with IUGR and the control group of healthy, pregnant women in terms of total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), oxidative stress index (OSI), native thiol, total thiol, disulfide, disulfide/native thiol, disulfide/total thiol, native thiol/total thiol, and U-II values. There was, however, a positive linear correlation between TOS and total thiol levels in the group with IUGR (p = 0.021, r = 0.384), and a positive linear correlation between OSI and total thiol values in the control group (p = 0.049, r = 0.330). In addition, there was a negative correlation between disulfide levels and gestational weeks at birth in the group with IUGR (p = 0.027, r = 0.369). Conclusions: Consequently, there was no significant difference between the control group and the group with pregnancies complicated by idiopathic IUGR in terms of serum oxidant/antioxidant system parameters and U-II levels. It is necessary to conduct more extensive studies evaluating placental, maternal, and fetal oxidative stress in conjunction in order to investigate the role of oxidative stress in IUGR.

Evaluation of Endothelial Dysfunction in Bipolar Affective Disorders: Serum Endocan and Urotensin-II Levels

Objective

This study investigated changes in urotensin-II (U-II) and endocan levels which can be used as an early biological marker of endothelial injury in the episode and remission phases of bipolar affective disorder (BAD).

Methods

We compared endocan and U-II levels, which has been shown to be closely associated with neurotransmitter systems in addition to continuity of endothelial structure and inflammatory response, in patients with BAD in remission for at least one year (n=42) and in patients still in manic or depressive episodes (n=16) with healthy controls (n=30).

Results

Both endocan and U-II levels were significantly higher in the bipolar patients than in the controls. Endocan and U-II levels were also significantly correlated with one another (p=0.000, r=0.833). Both endocan (p=0.000) and U-II levels (p=0.000) were significantly higher in the bipolar attack group compared to the subjects in remission, and in the remission group compared to the controls.

Conclusion

In this study we determined significantly higher endocan and U-II levels in BAD compared to the controls, while serum endocan and U-II levels of patients undergoing attacks were also significantly higher than those of the controls and also those of patients in remission.

Central and Peripheral Effects of Urotensin II and Urotensin II-Related Peptides on Cardiac Baroreflex Sensitivity in Trout

The baroreflex response is an essential component of the cardiovascular regulation that buffers abrupt changes in blood pressure to maintain homeostasis. Urotensin II (UII) and its receptor UT are present in the brain and in peripheral cardiovascular tissues of fish and mammals. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of UII in these vertebrates provokes hypertension and tachycardia, suggesting that the cardio-inhibitory baroreflex response is impaired. Since nothing is known about the effect of UII on the cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), we decided to clarify the changes in spontaneous BRS using a cross spectral analysis technique of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval variabilities after ICV and intra-arterial (IA) injections of trout UII in the unanesthetized trout. We contrasted the effects of UII with those observed for the UII-related peptides (URP), URP1 and URP2. Compared with vehicle-injected trout, ICV injection of UII (5-500 pmol) produced a gradual increase in SBP, a decrease in the R-R interval (reflecting a tachycardia) associated with a dose-dependent reduction of the BRS. The threshold dose for a significant effect on these parameters was 50 pmol (BRS; -55%; 1450 ± 165 ms/kPa vs. 3240 ± 300 ms/kPa; P < 0.05). Only the 500-pmol dose of URP2 caused a significant increase in SBP without changing significantly the R-R interval but reduced the BRS. IA injection of UII (5-500 pmol) caused a dose-dependent elevation of SBP. Contrasting with the ICV effects of UII, the R-R interval increased (reflecting a bradycardia) up to the 50-pmol dose while the BRS remained unchanged (50 pmol; 2530 ± 270 ms/kPa vs. 2600 ± 180 ms/kPa; P < 0.05). Nonetheless, the highest dose of UII reduced the BRS as did the highest dose of URP1. In conclusion, the contrasting effect of low picomolar doses of UII after central and peripheral injection on the BRS suggests that only the central urotensinergic system is involved in the attenuation of the BRS. The limited and quite divergent effects of URP1 and URP2 on the BRS, indicate that the action of UII is specific for this peptide. Further studies are required to elucidate the site(s) and mechanisms of action of UII on the baroreflex pathways. Whether such effects of central UII on the BRS exist in mammals including humans warrants further investigations.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCII. Urotensin II, urotensin II-related peptide, and their receptor: from structure to function

Urotensin II (UII) is a cyclic neuropeptide that was first isolated from the urophysis of teleost fish on the basis of its ability to contract the hindgut. Subsequently, UII was characterized in tetrapods including humans. Phylogenetic studies and synteny analysis indicate that UII and its paralogous peptide urotensin II-related peptide (URP) belong to the somatostatin/cortistatin superfamily. In mammals, the UII and URP genes are primarily expressed in cholinergic neurons of the brainstem and spinal cord. UII and URP mRNAs are also present in various organs notably in the cardiovascular, renal, and endocrine systems. UII and URP activate a common G protein-coupled receptor, called UT, that exhibits relatively high sequence identity with somatostatin, opioid, and galanin receptors. The UT gene is widely expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and in peripheral tissues including the retina, heart, vascular bed, lung, kidney, adrenal medulla, and skeletal muscle. Structure-activity relationship studies and NMR conformational analysis have led to the rational design of a number of peptidic and nonpeptidic UT agonists and antagonists. Consistent with the wide distribution of UT, UII has now been shown to exert a large array of biologic activities, in particular in the CNS, the cardiovascular system, and the kidney. Here, we review the current knowledge concerning the pleiotropic actions of UII and discusses the possible use of antagonists for future therapeutic applications.

Divergent cardio-ventilatory and locomotor effects of centrally and peripherally administered urotensin II and urotensin II-related peptides in trout

The urotensin II (UII) gene family consists of four paralogous genes called UII, UII-related peptide (URP), URP1 and URP2. UII and URP peptides exhibit the same cyclic hexapeptide core sequence (CFWKYC) while the N- and C-terminal regions are variable. UII, URP1, and URP2 mRNAs are differentially expressed within the central nervous system of teleost fishes, suggesting that they may exert distinct functions. Although the cardiovascular, ventilatory and locomotor effects of UII have been described in teleosts, much less is known regarding the physiological actions of URPs. The goal of the present study was to compare the central and peripheral actions of picomolar doses (5-500 pmol) of trout UII, URP1, and URP2 on cardio-ventilatory variables and locomotor activity in the unanesthetized trout. Compared to vehicle, intracerebroventricular injection of UII, URP1 and URP2 evoked a gradual increase in total ventilation (V TOT) reaching statistical significance for doses of 50 and 500 pmol of UII and URP1 but for only 500 pmol of URP2. In addition, UII, URP1 and URP2 provoked an elevation of dorsal aortic blood pressure (P DA) accompanied with tachycardia. All peptides caused an increase in locomotor activity (A CT), at a threshold dose of 5 pmol for UII and URP1, and 50 pmol for URP2. After intra-arterial (IA) injection, and in contrast to their central effects, only the highest dose of UII and URP1 significantly elevated V TOT and A CT. UII produced a dose-dependent hypertensive effect with concomitant bradycardia while URP1 increased P DA and heart rate after injection of only the highest dose of peptide. URP2 did not evoke any cardio-ventilatory or locomotor effect after IA injection. Collectively, these findings support the hypothesis that endogenous UII, URP1 and URP2 in the trout brain may act as neurotransmitters and/or neuromodulators acting synergistically or differentially to control the cardio-respiratory and locomotor systems. In the periphery, the only physiological actions of these peptides might be those related to the well-known cardiovascular regulatory actions of UII. It remains to determine whether the observed divergent physiological effects of UII and URPs are due to differential interaction with the UT receptor or binding to distinct UT subtypes.

Molecular evolution of GPCRs: Somatostatin/urotensin II receptors

Somatostatin (SS) and urotensin II (UII) are members of two families of structurally related neuropeptides present in all vertebrates. They exert a large array of biological activities that are mediated by two families of G-protein-coupled receptors called SSTR and UTS2R respectively. It is proposed that the two families of peptides as well as those of their receptors probably derive from a single ancestral ligand-receptor pair. This pair had already been duplicated before the emergence of vertebrates to generate one SS peptide with two receptors and one UII peptide with one receptor. Thereafter, each family expanded in the three whole-genome duplications (1R, 2R, and 3R) that occurred during the evolution of vertebrates, whereupon some local duplications and gene losses occurred. Following the 2R event, the vertebrate ancestor is deduced to have possessed three SS (SS1, SS2, and SS5) and six SSTR (SSTR1-6) genes, on the one hand, and four UII (UII, URP, URP1, and URP2) and five UTS2R (UTS2R1-5) genes, on the other hand. In the teleost lineage, all these have been preserved with the exception of SSTR4. Moreover, several additional genes have been gained through the 3R event, such as SS4 and a second copy of the UII, SSTR2, SSTR3, and SSTR5 genes, and through local duplications, such as SS3. In mammals, all the genes of the SSTR family have been preserved, with the exception of SSTR6. In contrast, for the other families, extensive gene losses occurred, as only the SS1, SS2, UII, and URP genes and one UTS2R gene are still present.

New molecule in the etiology of schizophrenia: urotensin II

AIMS

Urotensin II (U-II) is a cyclic peptide that was first isolated from the caudal neurosecretory system of goby fish. U-II receptors were detected in the vascular endothelium, brain and kidney cortex. Urotensin is by far the most powerful vasoconstrictor identified. U-II molecules were previously isolated from the brain of rats and were shown to have an impact on rat behavior. The aim of the present study was to measure the level of U-II molecule in schizophrenia patients and to investigate whether the U-II level is associated with the etiology of schizophrenia.

METHODS

Forty schizophrenia patients who were followed at Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine Department of Psychiatry Psychotic Disorders Unit and 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were taken from the antecubital vein after 12-h fasting. U-II level was measured on ELISA.

RESULTS

The U-II level in schizophrenia patients was significantly higher than in the control group. U-II level was not different with regard to gender in either group. U-II level was not different between subgroups of schizophrenia. No significant correlation was found between U-II level, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale scores.

CONCLUSION

U-II level was higher in schizophrenia patients, indicating that U-II level may be related to the etiology of the disease.

UII and UT in grouper: cloning and effects on the transcription of hormones related to growth control

Urotensin II (UII) is a cyclic peptide that was originally extracted from the caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) of fish. UII is well known to exhibit cardiovascular, ventilatory, and motor effects in vertebrates. Studies have reported that UII exerts mitogenic effects and can act as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in mammals. However, similar information in fish is limited. In this study, the full-length cDNAs of UII and its receptor (UT) were cloned and characterized in the orange-spotted grouper. UII and UT were expressed ubiquitously in various tissues in grouper, and particularly high levels were observed in the CNSS, CNS, and ovary. A functional study showed that UT was coupled with intracellular Ca2+ mobilization in HEK293 cells. Studies carried out using i.p. injections of UII in grouper showed the following: i) in the hypothalamus, UII can significantly stimulate the mRNA expression of ghrh and simultaneously inhibit the mRNA expression of somatostatin 1 (ss1) and ss2 3 h after injection; ii) in the pituitary, UII also significantly induced the mRNA expression of gh 6 and 12  h after injection; and iii) in the liver, the mRNA expression levels of ghr1/ghr2 and igf1/igf2 were markedly increased 12 and 3  h after the i.p. injection of UII respectively. These results collectively indicate that the UII/UT system may play a role in the promotion of the growth of the orange-spotted grouper.

In vitro siRNA-mediated knockdown of the UT receptor: implications of density on the efficacy of a range of UT ligands

Urotensin-II (U-II) is the peptide agonist for the U-II receptor (UT). Putative UT antagonists, urantide and UFP-803, have been found to have variable efficacy in a range of assays. We have used siRNA-mediated RNA interference to probe the efficacy of these ligands compared to U-II. Knockdown of human UT occurs in the same cellular background with the same coupling machinery allowing relative efficacy to be probed. CHO cells stably expressing 1,110 fmol/mg protein of human UT (CHOhUT) were transfected with s194454, s194455 (UT-targeting), or a negative control siRNA using siPORT amine transfection reagent. After 48 h,silencing was assessed using quantitative PCR in a duplex assay format. Functional consequences of silencing were assessed by measuring [Ca2+]i in Fura-2 loaded cells using the NOVOstar plate reader. Silencing with s194455 was greater than that with s194454 (93.5±2.8% and 73.0±2.5%knockdown of UT mRNA respectively at 10−7 M, p00.006).Both s194455 and s194454 knocked down UT mRNA expression with equal potency (EC50 1.38 and 0.45 nM). The negative control did not affect UT mRNA expression. U-II(10−6M) increased [Ca2+]i 630±69, 402±49 and 190±14nM,urantide (10−6 M) increased [Ca2+]i 408±55, 191±40, and 131±10 nM and UFP-803 (10−6 M) increased [Ca2+]i 134±23, 83±11 and 53±3nM for negative control siRNA, s194454 and s194455, respectively.We have demonstrated silencing of UT mRNA and a reduction of absolute efficacy of three UT ligands. However, we were unable to resolve any changes in relative efficacy for urantide and UFP-803. This is likely to result from a high starting expression and retention of a receptor/coupling reserve.

Association between urotensin II gene polymorphism and pre-eclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of a specific polymorphism (S89N) in exon 3 of the urotensin II (UTS2) gene in pre-eclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred and forty-two subjects, 85 with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (group I) and 57 healthy pregnant subjects as a control group (group II), who had been admitted between January 2006 and December 2007, were included. All the subjects were tested for G to A transition in codon 266 in the urotensin II gene by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The distributions of genotypes and allele frequencies were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Demographics such as age, gestational age, gravidity, abortion and parity were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups concerning genotype distribution and allele frequency (p = 0.305, p = 0.326, respectively). The observed genotype counts did not deviate significantly from those expected according to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that UTS2 single gene (S89N) polymorphism is not associated with pre-eclampsia. Further studies are needed to investigate the prevalence of other single nucleotide gene polymorphisms in pre-eclampsia.

A rat brain atlas of urotensin-II receptor expression and a review of central urotensin-II effects

Urotensin-II (U-II) is an 11-amino acid cyclic peptide which exerts its actions through a G(q) protein-coupled receptor, UT. Much of the research focus of U-II is as a peptide of the periphery, particularly cardiovascular. Despite this, U-II was originally identified as a neuropeptide, and its expression is broad throughout the central nervous system. This brief review article catalogs the known sites of expression of UT within the CNS in the form of a diagrammatic rat brain atlas. Furthermore, the functional consequences of UT activation within specific brain regions are discussed along with the likely actions of synthetic UT ligands. Areas of high, medium, and low expression include the arcuate, paraventricular, and pedunculopontine tegmental nuclei, respectively. In the arcuate and paraventricular nuclei, where expression is high and moderate, U-II produces a pressor/tachycardic response in the former and a weaker response in the latter. Based on the known pharmacology of UT ligands (and assuming density is the primary determinant of efficacy in this case), we predict a weak response in the arcuate nucleus and possible antagonism of endogenous U-II response in the paraventricular nucleus by a low-efficacy partial agonist. These predicted responses lend themselves to relatively simple experimental verification.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the urotensin-II receptor antagonist palosuran in healthy male subjects

Palosuran is a new potent and specific antagonist of the human urotensin II (U-II) receptor (UT receptor). This entry-into-humans study evaluated the tolerability and safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of palosuran in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending-dose design. Oral doses of 5 to 2000 mg were given to 9 sequential groups of 8 healthy young men (6 on active drug, 2 on placebo) each. At regular intervals, tolerability and safety parameters and plasma levels of palosuran and U-II were determined. Urine was collected to determine excretion of sodium, potassium, creatinine, and palosuran. In this study, palosuran was well tolerated. No serious adverse events or dose-related adverse events were reported. No treatment-related pattern was detected for vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, or electrocardiography parameters. After rapid absorption, palosuran displayed a plasma concentration-time profile characterized by 2 peaks at approximately 1 and 4 hours after drug administration. The apparent terminal elimination half-life was approximately 20 hours. AUC and C(max) values increased proportionally with doses up to 500 mg. Excretion of unchanged palosuran in urine was limited. No consistent effect was found on any of the pharmacodynamic variables measured. The results of this entry-into-humans study warrant further investigation of the therapeutic potential of palosuran.

Expression and functional role of urotensin-II and its receptor in the adrenal cortex and medulla: novel insights for the pathophysiology of primary aldosteronism

CONTEXT

The involvement of urotensin II, a vasoactive peptide acting via the G protein-coupled urotensin II receptor, in arterial hypertension remains contentious.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the expression of urotensin II and urotensin II receptor in adrenocortical and adrenomedullary tumors and the functional effects of urotensin II receptor activation.

DESIGN

The expression of urotensin II and urotensin II receptor was measured by real time RT-PCR in aldosterone-producing adenoma (n = 22) and pheochromocytoma (n = 10), using histologically normal adrenocortical (n = 6) and normal adrenomedullary (n = 5) tissue as control. Urotensin II peptide and urotensin II receptor protein were investigated with immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. To identify urotensin II-related and urotensin II receptor-related pathways, a whole transcriptome analysis was used. The adrenocortical effects of urotensin II receptor activation were also assessed by urotensin II infusion with/without the urotensin II receptor antagonist palosuran in rats.

RESULTS

Urotensin II was more expressed in pheochromocytoma than in aldosterone-producing adenoma tissue; the opposite was seen for the urotensin II receptor expression. Urotensin II receptor activation in vivo in rats enhanced (by 182 +/- 9%; P < 0.007) the adrenocortical expression of immunoreactive aldosterone synthase.

CONCLUSIONS

Urotensin II is a putative mediator of the effects of the adrenal medulla and pheochromocytoma on the adrenocortical zona glomerulosa. This pathophysiological link might account for the reported causal relationship between pheochromocytoma and primary aldosteronism.

Possible pathogenic link between migraine and urotensin-II

Our aim was to determine the levels of human urotensin-II (hU-II) in the plasma of migraine patients and controls, to ascertain if there were a difference in the pathogenesis of migraine. A total of 27 patients who suffer from migraines and 27 controls were included in the study. Venous blood samples were drawn twice both from migraine patients and controls to measure hU-II plasma levels. The average levels of hU-II during migraine episode, between episodes, and controls were found to be 0.483, 0.493, and 0.737 pg/mL, respectively. The levels of hU-II in the controls were higher significantly. When comparisons were made according to sex, age groups, and types and durations of migraine, there was no significant difference in the levels of hU-II in the patients. The low levels of hU-II in the plasma of migraine patients compared with controls may be an indicator of its role in the pathogenesis.

Behavioral actions of urotensin-II

Urotensin-II (U-II) and urotensin-II-related peptide (URP) have been identified as the endogenous ligands of the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR14 now renamed UT. The occurrence of U-II and URP in the central nervous system, and the widespread distribution of UT in the brain suggest that U-II and URP may play various behavioral activities. Studies conducted in rodents have shown that central administration of U-II stimulates locomotion, provokes anxiety- and depressive-like states, enhances feeding activity and increases the duration of paradoxical sleep episodes. These observations indicate that, besides the endocrine/paracrine activities of U-II and URP on cardiovascular and kidney functions, these peptides may act as neurotransmitters and/or neuromodulators to regulate various neurobiological activities.

Central and peripheral cardiovascular, ventilatory, and motor effects of trout urotensin-II in the trout

Urotensin-II (U-II) was originally considered to be exclusively the product of the caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) of teleost fish, but it has now been demonstrated that U-II is widely expressed in peripheral tissues and nervous structures of species from lampreys to mammals. However, very little is known regarding the physiological effects of this peptide in its species of origin. In the present review, we summarize the most significant results relating to the cardiovascular, ventilatory, and motor effects of centrally and peripherally administered synthetic trout U-II in our experimental animal model, the unanesthetized trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. In addition, we compare the actions of U-II with those of other neurohormonal peptides, particularly with the actions of urotensin-I, a 41-amino acid residue peptide paralogous to corticotropin-releasing hormone that is co-localized with U-II within neurons of the CNSS.

Urotensin II in chronic liver disease: in vivo effect on vascular tone

OBJECTIVE

Urotensin II (UII) is now recognized as the most potent human vasoconstrictor. Although its role in human pathophysiology is unknown, vasoactive mediators are known to be important in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension complicating chronic liver disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of UII in liver cirrhosis via examination of the in vivo effect of UII in this patient group.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The vasoactive effects of UII were measured using Laser Doppler velocimetry on cirrhotic patients (n = 14) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 14) after UII administration by iontophoresis to the cutaneous microcirculation of the forearm.

RESULTS

In vivo administration of UII produced vasoconstriction of the cutaneous microcirculation in the cirrhotic group and vasodilatation in the controls, with values differing significantly at the two highest doses of UII: 10(-9) mol (p = 0.01) and 10(-7) mol (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

UII mediates vasoconstriction of the microcirculation of cirrhotics but not of controls. This suggests that UII has pathophysiological relevance in the portal hypertensive population through its vasoactive properties. Further studies of UII and UII-antagonists are warranted in this patient population.

Role of urotensin II and its receptor in health and disease

Urotensin II (U-II) is currently the most potent vasoconstrictor identified. This action is brought about via activation of a G(q/11)-protein coupled receptor (UT receptor). U-II activation of the UT receptor increases inositol phosphate turnover and intracellular Ca(2+). In addition to producing vasoconstriction, dilation and ionotropic effects have also been described. There is considerable variation in the responsiveness of particular vascular beds from the same and different species, including humans. Receptors for U-II are located peripherally on vascular smooth muscle (contractile responses) and endothelial cells (dilatory responses via nitric oxide). In humans, plasma U-II is elevated in heart failure, renal failure, liver disease, and diabetes. Iontophoresis of U-II in healthy volunteers produces vasodilation (of the forearm) while in patients with heart failure or hypertension a constriction is observed. To date there is only one clinical study using a UT receptor antagonist (palosuran) in diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria. This antagonist reduced albumin excretion, probably by increasing renal blood flow. Studies in other disease conditions are eagerly awaited. In summary, the U-II / UT receptor system has clinical potential, and for the anesthesiologist, this novel peptide-receptor system may be of use in the intensive care unit.

Urotensin-II expression in the mouse spinal cord

Urotensin-II (UII), a 12 amino acid peptide, was discovered in the teleost fish neurosecretory cells located in the caudal portion of the spinal cord and which project to a neurohemal gland called the urophysis. The distribution of UII and of its prepro-UII mRNA is not limited to fish and was found for example in the rat spinal cord. In view of the potential interest of obtaining transgenic mice, we have therefore characterized the distribution of mouse pro-UII mRNA and UII immunoreactivity, by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in the mouse spinal cord. A population of UII-like immunoreactive cell bodies was located in the ventral horn of the different segments. These cells displayed all the features of motoneurons, as confirmed by a double immunohistochemical labelling showing the co-occurrence of UII and vesicular acetylcholine transporter, and by electron microscope immunocytochemistry. Retrograde labelling of motoneurons innervating the bulbocavernosus penile muscle showed that some of them contained UII. In situ hybridization histochemistry revealed that pro-UII mRNA was located in some ventral horn neuronal perikarya. The pro-UII mRNA-containing cell bodies possessed the same motoneuron characteristics, confirming the results of the immunohistochemical studies and showing that the gene of mouse UII is expressed in a subpopulation of motoneurons in the spinal cord. Our results support the assumption that UII peptide characterized as endocrine in fish is also expressed within mammalian motoneurons.

A novel hypothalamic neuroendocrine peptide: URP (urotensin-II-related peptide)?

Urotensin-II-related peptide (URP) is an eight-amino-acid peptide recently isolated from rat brain and considered as the endogenous ligand for the urotensin-II receptor. Immunohistochemical treatment of mouse brain sections with anti-URP antibodies revealed numerous immunopositive fibres in the median eminence and vascular organ of the lamina terminalis as well as labelled cell bodies, mainly in the preoptic area. In consecutive serial sections, in situ hybridization demonstrated URP-mRNA in neuronal perikarya. Double-immunofluorescence labelling showed a co-localization of URP and GnRH in fibres and cell bodies. These results suggest the existence of URP as a novel hypothalamic neuroendocrine peptide co-localized and possible co-released with GnRH.

Effects of pre-eclampsia on maternal plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and umbilical cord urotensin II concentrations: a pilot study † †This work was presented at the Liverpool meeting of the Anaesthetic Research Society, July 8–9, 2004 (E. Cowley, J. Waugh, N. Ali, P. Sharpe, J. P. Thompson and D. G. Lambert. Urotensin II concentrations are not elevated in pre-eclampsia. Br J Anaesth 2004; 612P)

BACKGROUND

Urotensin II (UII) is the most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor identified to date. Pre-eclampsia is associated with arteriolar vasospasm but the precise underlying mechanism is uncertain and we hypothesized that UII concentrations might also be elevated. In this study we measured UII concentrations in maternal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and umbilical vein plasma from pre-eclamptic (PET) and normotensive patients undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.

METHODS

With LREC approval and informed consent we recruited two groups of 10 patients; control [mean (range) age, 29 (22-43) yr; BMI, 25 (20-32); gestation, 273 (267-281) days; mean arterial pressure (MAP) on day of delivery, 81 (75-96) mm Hg] and PET [age, 34 (22-40) yr; BMI, 25 (21-46); gestation, 253 (203-289) days; MAP on day of delivery, 106 (88-128) mm Hg]. Maternal blood and CSF samples and umbilical vein blood samples were taken. UII was extracted and concentrations measured using a radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Two plasma and two CSF samples in the control and two CSF samples in the PET group were below the assay detection limits. There were no differences in maternal plasma or CSF or umbilical vein UII concentrations between the groups. However, there was a small ( approximately 40%) but significant increase in cord UII concentrations when compared with paired plasma in the PET group. There was a weak but significant negative correlation (r=-0.4, P=0.049) between cord UII concentrations and gestation in the PET group. In addition, we observed a significant positive correlation between plasma and CSF (r(2)=+0.57, P=0.0009, n=16), plasma and cord (r(2)=+0.43, P=0.0031, n=18) and CSF and cord (r(2)=+0.32, P=0.022, n=16) UII concentrations for the whole data set.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively the data indicate that UII concentrations do not increase in PET compared with controls but, in PET patients, cord UII concentrations are elevated relative to paired plasma samples. Elevated umbilical vein UII concentrations may simply indicate reduced placental viability and possibly UII metabolism as a result of reduced blood flow or possibly that the placenta is producing UII.