In vivo inhibition of neuropeptide FF agonism by BIBP3226, an NPY Y1 receptor antagonist

Brain RFamide Neuropeptides in Stress-Related Psychopathologies

The RFamide peptide family is a group of proteins that share a common C-terminal arginine-phenylalanine-amide motif. To date, the family comprises five groups in mammals: neuropeptide FF, LPXRFamides/RFamide-related peptides, prolactin releasing peptide, QRFP, and kisspeptins. Different RFamide peptides have their own cognate receptors and are produced by different cell populations, although they all can also bind to neuropeptide FF receptors with different affinities. RFamide peptides function in the brain as neuropeptides regulating key aspects of homeostasis such as energy balance, reproduction, and cardiovascular function. Furthermore, they are involved in the organization of the stress response including modulation of pain. Considering the interaction between stress and various parameters of homeostasis, the role of RFamide peptides may be critical in the development of stress-related neuropathologies. This review will therefore focus on the role of RFamide peptides as possible key hubs in stress and stress-related psychopathologies. The neurotransmitter coexpression profile of RFamide-producing cells is also discussed, highlighting its potential functional significance. The development of novel pharmaceutical agents for the treatment of stress-related disorders is an ongoing need. Thus, the importance of RFamide research is underlined by the emergence of peptidergic and G-protein coupled receptor-based therapeutic targets in the pharmaceutical industry.

Modulatory role of neuropeptide FF system in macrophages

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is an octapeptide that regulates various cellular processes, especially pain perception. Recently, there has been a growing interest in understanding the modulation of NPFF in neuroendocrine inflammation. This review aims to provide a thorough overview of the regulation of NPFF in macrophage-mediated biological processes. We delve into the impact of NPFF on macrophage polarization, self-renewal modulation, and the promotion of mitophagy, facilitating the transition from thermogenic fat to fat-storing adipose tissue. Additionally, we explore the NPFF-dependent regulation of the inflammatory response mediated by macrophages, its impact on the differentiation of macrophages, and its capacity to induce alterations in the transcriptome of macrophages. We also address the potential of NPFF as a therapeutic molecule in the field of neuroendocrine inflammation. Overall, our work offers an understanding of the influence of NPFF on macrophage, facilitating the exploration of its pharmacological significance in future studies.

NPFF signalling is critical for thermosensory and dietary regulation of thermogenesis

Thermogenesis is a centrally regulated physiological process integral for thermoregulation and energy homeostasis. However, the mechanisms and pathways involved remain poorly understood. Importantly, in this study we uncovered that in an environment of 28 °C that is within the mouse thermoneutral zone, lack of NPFF signalling leads to significant increases in energy expenditure, resting metabolic rate and brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis, which is associated with decreased body weight gain and lean tissue mass. Interestingly, when exposed to a high-fat diet (HFD) at 28 °C, Npff^-/- mice lost the high energy expenditure phenotype observed under chow condition and exhibited an impaired diet-induced thermogenesis. On the other hand, under conditions of increasing levels of thermal demands, Npff^-/- mice exhibited an elevated BAT thermogenesis at mild cold condition (22 °C), but initiated comparable BAT thermogenic responses as WT mice when thermal demand increased, such as an exposure to 4 °C. Together, these results reveal NPFF signalling as a novel and critical player in the control of thermogenesis, where it regulates thermosensory thermogenesis at warm condition and adjusts thermoregulation under positive energy balance to regulate diet-induced thermogenesis.

The distribution of Neuropeptide FF and Neuropeptide VF in central and peripheral tissues and their role in energy homeostasis control

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and Neuropeptide VF (NPVF) are part of the extended RFamide peptide family characterized by their common arginine (R) and amidated phenylalanine (F)-motif at the carboxyl terminus. Both peptides signal through their respective high affinity G-protein coupled receptors, NPFFR2 and NPFFR1, but also show binding affinity for the other receptor due to their sequence similarity. NPFF and NPVF are highly conserved throughout evolution and can be found across the whole animal kingdom. Both have been implicated in a variety of biological mechanisms, including nociception, locomotion, reproduction, and response to pain and stress. However, more recently a new major functional role in the control of energy homeostasis has been discovered. In this article we will summarise the current knowledge on the distribution of NPFF, NPVF, and their receptors in central and peripheral tissues, as well as how this relates to the regulation of food intake and energy balance, which will help to better understand their role in these processes and thus might help finding treatments for impaired energy homeostasis disorders, such as obesity or anorexia.

Lack of neuropeptide FF signalling in mice leads to reduced repetitive behavior, altered drinking behavior, and fuel type selection

Although best known for their involvement in modulating nociception, Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) group peptides have been suggested to fulfil a variety of biological functions such as feeding, anxiety behaviors and thermogenesis. However, evidence supporting these functions of NPFF is mostly pharmacological, leaving the physiological relevance unaddressed. Here we examined the physiological impact of lack of NPFF signalling in both genders using a Npff^-/- mouse model. NPFF expression in the mouse is restricted to the spinal cord and brainstem while its cognate receptor NPFFR2 has wider distribution throughout the brain. Both male and female Npff^-/- mice showed reduced repetitive behaviors evidenced in the marble burying test and self-grooming test. A decrease in anxiety-related behaviors in the Npff^-/- mice was also observe in the open field test and to a lesser degree in an elevated plus maze test. Moreover, both male and female Npff^-/- mice exhibited increased water intake resulting from increases in drinking size, rather than number of drinking events. During a fasting-refeeding challenge, Npff^-/- mice of both genders displayed alterations in reparatory exchange ratio that reflect a greater fuel type flexibility. Npff^-/- mice were otherwise wild-type-like regarding body weight, body composition, feeding behaviors, locomotion or energy expenditure. Together, these findings reveal the important physiological roles of NPFF signalling in the regulation of anxiety-related and repetitive behaviors, fluid homeostasis and oxidative fuel selection, highlighting the therapeutical potential of the NPFF system in a number of behavioral and metabolic disorders.

[The role of neuropeptide Y for the development of allergic airway responses]

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter that is widely expressed in the brain and peripheral nervous system. Various immune cells express the receptor for NPY, Y1 receptor. NPY modulates these cells via its Y1 receptor, and involvement of NPY in the pathophysiology of bronchial asthma, has been reported. Increased plasma levels of NPY in asthmatic patients have been reported. NPY polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk for asthma in overweight subjects and young adults. We and other researchers have reported that using murine models of allergic airway responses, NPY and Y1 receptor play critical roles for the development of allergic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, manipulating NPY-Y1 pathway represents a novel therapeutic target to control allergic airway responses, and might be beneficial for treatment of bronchial asthma.

Microinjection of 26RFa, an endogenous ligand for the glutamine RF-amide peptide receptor (QRFP receptor), into the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), locus coelureus (LC), and periaqueductal grey (PAG) produces an analgesic effect in rats

26RFa is an endogenous ligand for the QRFP receptor. We previously found that intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa produces an analgesic effect in a rat formalin test. In the present study, we directly tested the hypothesis that the analgesic effects of 26RFa in the formalin test are mediated in well-recognized regions of the descending inhibitory pain pathways, such as the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), locus coeruleus (LC), and periaqueductal grey (PAG) in rats. Injection cannulae were stereotaxically placed in the RVM, LC, or PAG through a burr hole. 26RFa (15 μg) or saline was delivered in a total volume of 0.5 μL. In a formalin test, 50 μL of 5% formalin was injected subcutaneously into the hind paw. In an antagonist study, idazoxan, an α-2 antagonist, or naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, was administered. Microinjection of 26RFa into the RVM had no effect compared with that in saline-injected rats. Microinjection of 26RFa into the LC contralateral, but not ipsilateral, to the formalin injection site significantly decreased the number of flinching behaviors compared with that of saline-injected rats. This effect was antagonized by intrathecal injection of idazoxan. Microinjection of 26RFa into the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, PAG produced an analgesic effect, and this effect was partly antagonized by intraperitoneal naloxone. These data suggest that 26RFa microinjected into the contralateral LC induced noradrenaline release in the spinal cord and produced an analgesic effect. In the contralateral PAG, 26RFa activated the opioid system, and some analgesic effects were mediated by opioid system activation.

In vitro and in vivo characterization of the bifunctional μ- and δ- opioid receptors ligand MCRT on mouse gastrointestinal motility

BACKGROUND

Chimeric opioid MCRT was a novel multi-target ligand based on morphiceptin and PFRTic-NH₂, and produced potent analgesia (ED₅₀ = 0.03 nmol/mouse) with less upper gastrointestinal dysmotility. In this study, we sought to perform the tests to evaluate the pharmacological effects of MCRT on distal colon motility and defecation function. Moreover, opioid receptor antagonists and neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptor antagonists were utilized to explore the mechanisms.

METHODS

Isolated mouse colon bioassay and colonic bead expulsion were to characterize MCRT-induced inhibition of colonic motility in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Fecal pellet output was to evaluate the defecation function.

RESULTS

(1) In vitro, MCRT increased colonic contraction via μ- and δ- opioid receptors (MOR and DOR). (2) In vivo, MCRT delayed colonic bead expulsion (ED₅₀ = 1.1 nmol/mouse) independent of opioid and NPFF receptors. (3) In vivo, MCRT inhibited fecal number (ED₅₀ = 1.43 nmol/mouse) and dry weight (ED₅₀ = 1.63 nmol/mouse), which was mediated by DOR partially but not MOR.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Data indicated that MCRT was less prone to induce gastrointestinal dysmotility at analgesic doses, and provided a possibility for safer opioid analgesic. (2) Based on the mechanism explorations, we speculated on the existence of such an opioid receptor subtype or MOR/DOR heterodimer, which was involved in the central analgesia and the in vitro colonic contractions but not the central colonic dysmotility.

What's in a Name? Roles of RFamide-Related Peptides Beyond Gonadotrophin Inhibition

RFamide-related peptides (RFRPs) have been heavily implicated in the control of reproductive function subsequent to their discovery more than 16 years ago. However, recent studies using genetic and pharmacological tools have challenged their importance in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. It is generally accepted that RFRPs act as part of a wider RFamide system, which involves two receptors, called the neuropeptide FF receptors (NPFFR1 and R2), and includes the closely-related neuropeptide NPFF. NPFF has been studied ever since the 1980s and many of the functions of NPFF are also shared by RFRPs. The current review questions whether these functions of NPFF are indeed specific to just NPFF alone and presents evidence from both neuroendocrine and pharmacological perspectives. Furthermore, recently emerging new functions of RFRPs are discussed with the overall goal of clarifying the functions of RFRPs beyond the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.

Effects of direct QRFP-26 administration into the medial hypothalamic area on food intake in rats

The RFamide peptide family comprises a number of biologically active peptides sharing RF motif at their C-terminal end. These peptides are involved in the control of multiple physiological functions including regulation of metabolism and feeding behavior. QRFP-43 as well as its 26-aminoacid residue QRFP-26 are able to cause orexigenic effect when administered to the rodents' cerebral ventricles. QRFPs have been suggested as the endogenous ligands of the previously orphan GPR103 receptors. GPR103 receptors share amino acid identity with other receptors of neuropeptides involved in feeding (NPY, NPFF, galanin). QRFP-26 expressing neurons and binding sites are densely present in the rat medial hypothalamus (MHA), an area directly responsible for the regulation of feeding. QRFP-26 was delivered to the target area by direct intrahypothalamic microinjection, and the consumption of liquid food was measured over a 60 min period. Both doses (100 and 200 ng) significantly increased food intake. Non-specific receptor antagonist BIBP3226 eliminated the orexigenic effect caused by QRFP-26 administration. Effective doses of QRFP-26 did not modify general locomotor activity and behavioral patterns examined in the open-field test. This study is the first reporting feeding modulating effects following direct intrahypothalamic QRFP-26 administration.

Role of neuropeptide FF in central cardiovascular and neuroendocrine regulation

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) is an octapeptide belonging to the RFamide family of peptides that have been implicated in a wide variety of physiological functions in the brain including central cardiovascular and neuroendocrine regulation. The effects of these peptides are mediated via NPFF1 and NPFF2 receptors that are abundantly expressed in the rat and human brain. Herein, we review evidence for the role of NPFF in central regulation of blood pressure particularly within the brainstem and the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). At a cellular level, NPFF demonstrates distinct responses in magnocellular and parvocellular neurons of the PVN, which regulate the secretion of neurohypophyseal hormones and sympathetic outflow, respectively. Finally, the presence of NPFF system in the human brain and its alterations within the hypertensive brain are discussed.

Selective mode of action of guanidine-containing non-peptides at human NPFF receptors

The binding pocket of both NPFF receptors was investigated, focusing on subtype-selective behavior. By use of four nonpeptidic compounds and the peptide mimetics RF9 and BIBP3226, agonistic and antagonistic properties were characterized. A set of Ala receptor mutants was generated. The binding pocket was narrowed down to the upper part of transmembrane helices V, VI, VII and the extracellular loop 2. Positions 5.27 and 6.59 have been shown to have a strong impact on receptor activation and were suggested to form an acidic, negatively charged binding pocket in both NPFF receptor subtypes. Additionally, position 7.35 was identified to play an important role in functional selectivity. According to docking experiments, the aryl group of AC-216 interacts with position 7.35 in the NPFF(1) but not in the NPFF(2) receptor. These results provide distinct insights into the receptor specific binding pockets, which is necessary for the development of drugs to address the NPFF system.

Nonpeptide ligands of neuropeptide FF: current status and structural insights

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) was first isolated from the bovine brain in 1985 and is linked with a variety of biological activities. NPFF, which belongs to the RF-amide family of peptides, interacts with two distinct G-protein-coupled receptors, NPFF(1) and NPFF(2). These receptors are distributed throughout the body. The NPFF system was initially described as an anti-opioid system and, while the NPFF system does affect the opioid system, it also has been implicated in pain modulation, changes in arterial blood pressure, feeding behavior and regulation of core body temperature and of monoamine systems. Most of this pharmacology has been realized from the peptide NPFF itself or through peptide analogs. The quest for nonpeptide tools for this receptor system has been limited by low selectivity and poor pharmacokinetic properties. Herein, we summarize the current knowledge from the scientific and patent literature that demonstrates a clear need for future medicinal chemistry efforts.

RFamide Peptides: Structure, Function, Mechanisms and Pharmaceutical Potential

Different neuropeptides, all containing a common carboxy-terminal RFamide sequence, have been characterized as ligands of the RFamide peptide receptor family. Currently, five subgroups have been characterized with respect to their N-terminal sequence and hence cover a wide pattern of biological functions, like important neuroendocrine, behavioral, sensory and automatic functions. The RFamide peptide receptor family represents a multiligand/multireceptor system, as many ligands are recognized by several GPCR subtypes within one family. Multireceptor systems are often susceptible to cross-reactions, as their numerous ligands are frequently closely related. In this review we focus on recent results in the field of structure-activity studies as well as mutational exploration of crucial positions within this GPCR system. The review summarizes the reported peptide analogs and recently developed small molecule ligands (agonists and antagonists) to highlight the current understanding of the pharmacophoric elements, required for affinity and activity at the receptor family. Furthermore, we address the biological functions of the ligands and give an overview on their involvement in physiological processes. We provide insights in the knowledge for the design of highly selective ligands for single receptor subtypes to minimize cross-talk and to eliminate effects from interactions within the GPCR system. This will support the drug development of members of the RFamide family.

Effects of neuropeptide FF system on CB₁ and CB₂ receptors mediated antinociception in mice

It has been demonstrated that opioid and cannabinoid receptor systems can produce similar signal transduction and behavioural effects. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) belongs to an opioid-modulating peptide family. NPFF has been reported to play important roles in control of pain and analgesia through interactions with the opioid system. We were interested in whether the central and peripheral antinociception of cannabinoids could be influenced by supraspinal NPFF system. The present study examined the effects of NPFF and related peptides on the antinociceptive activities induced by the non-selective cannabinoid receptors agonist WIN55,212-2, given by supraspinal and intraplantar routes. In mice, the central and peripheral antinociception of WIN55,212-2 are mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, respectively. Interestingly, central administration of NPFF significantly reduced central and peripheral analgesia of cannabinoids in dose-dependent manners. In contrast, dNPA and NPVF (i.c.v.), two highly selective agonists for NPFF(2) and NPFF(1) receptors, dose-dependently augmented the antinociception caused by intracerebroventricular and intraplantar injection of WIN55,212-2. Additionally, pretreatment with the NPFF receptors selective antagonist RF9 (i.c.v.) markedly reduced the cannabinoid-modulating activities of NPFF and related peptides in nociceptive assays. These data provide the first evidence for a functional interaction between NPFF and cannabinoid systems, indicating that activation of central NPFF receptors interferes with cannabinoid-mediated central and peripheral antinociception. Intriguingly, the present work may pave the way for a new strategy of using combination treatment of cannabinoid and NPFF agonists for pain management. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder'.

Anti-allodynic effects of intrathecally and intracerebroventricularly administered 26RFa, an intrinsic agonist for GRP103, in the rat partial sciatic nerve ligation model

26RFa and QRFP are endogenous ligands of GPR103. 26RFa binding sites are widely distributed in the brain and the spinal cord where they are involved in processing pain. In the present study, the effects of intrathecal and intracerebroventricular applications of 26RFa on the level of mechanical allodynia induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation were examined in rats. The level of mechanical allodynia was measured using von Frey filaments. Intrathecal and intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa attenuated the level of mechanical allodynia. 26RFa has been reported to activate not only GPR103 but also neuropeptide FF2 receptor and the effect of intrathecally and intracerebroventricularly administered 26RFa was not antagonized by BIBP3226, an antagonist of neuropeptide FF receptor. Immunohistochemical examination revealed that QRFP-like immunoreactivity (QRFP-LI) was expressed mainly in the small to medium sized neurons in the L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and that partial sciatic nerve injury increased the percentage of QRFP-LI positive neurons. 7 days after the nerve injury, QRFP-LI positive neurons in the L5 DRG ipsilateral to the partial sciatic nerve injury were larger than those in the L5 DRG ipsilateral to the sham operation. These data suggest that (1) exogenously applied 26RFa modulates nociceptive transmission at the spinal and the supraspinal brain in the neuropathic pain model, (2) the mechanism 26RFa uses to produce an anti-allodynic effect may be mediated by the activation of GPR103, and (3) partial sciatic nerve ligation affects the expression of QRFP-LI in the dorsal root ganglion.

Structure-activity studies of RFamide peptides reveal subtype-selective activation of neuropeptide FF1 and FF2 receptors

Selectivity is a major issue in closely related multiligand/multireceptor systems. In this study we investigated the RFamide systems of hNPFF₁R and hNPFF₂R that bind the endogenous peptide hormones NPFF, NPAF, NPVF, and NPSF. By use of a systematic approach, we characterized the role of the C-terminal dipeptide with respect to agonistic properties using synthesized [Xaa 7]NPFF and [Xaa 8]NPFF analogues. We were able to identify only slight differences in potency upon changing the position of Arg 7, as all modifications resulted in identical behavior at the NPFF₁R and NPFF₂R. However, the C-terminal Phe 8 was able to be replaced by Trp or His with only a minor loss in potency at the NPFF₂R relative to the NPFF₁R. Analogues with shorter side chains, such as α-amino-4-guanidino butyric acid ([Agb 7]NPFF) or phenylglycine ([Phg 8]NPFF), decreased efficacy for the NPFF₁ R to 25-31 % of the maximal response, suggesting that these agonist-receptor complexes are more susceptible to structural modifications. In contrast, mutations to the conserved Asp 6.59 residue in the third extracellular loop of both receptors revealed a higher sensitivity toward the hNPFF₂R receptor than toward hNPFF₁R. These data provide new insight into the subtype-specific agonistic activation of the NPFF₁ and NPFF(2) receptors that are necessary for the development of selective agonists.

Opioid-modulating properties of the neuropeptide FF system

Opioid receptors are involved in the control of pain perception in the central nervous system together with endogenous neuropeptides, termed opioid-modulating peptides, participating in a homeostatic system. Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and related peptides possess anti-opioid properties, the cellular mechanisms of which are still unclear. The purpose of this review is to detail the phenomenon of cross-talk taking place between opioid and NPFF systems at the in vivo pharmacological level and to propose cellular and molecular models of functioning. A better knowledge of the mechanisms underlying opioid-modulating properties of NPFF has potential therapeutic interest for the control of opioid functions, notably for alleviating pain and/or for the treatment of opioid abuse.

Pressor and tachycardic responses to intrathecal administration of neuropeptide FF in anesthetized rats

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) belongs to a neuropeptide family including two precursors (pro-NPFF(A) and pro-NPFF(B)) and two receptors (NPFF(1) and NPFF(2)). NPFF and NPFF receptor mRNAs have been reported to be highly expressed and localized in the rat and human spinal cord. In the present study, the i.t. action of NPFF system on blood pressure and heart rate were examined using NPFF and two related agonists, NPVF and dNPA, which exhibit highest selectivities for NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptors, respectively. In urethane-anesthetized rats, NPFF and related peptides (5-40 nmol, i.t.) produced significant pressor and tachycardic responses at the spinal cord level. These effects were dose-dependent and similar with respect to time-course for the three peptides. Furthermore, i.t. injection of RF9 (20 nmol), a selective NPFF antagonist, significantly antagonized the cardiovascular responses to 20 nmol NPFF and related peptides (i.t.). Moreover, pretreatment of the rats with alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine (1mg/kg, i.v.) significantly reduced the pressor effects of NPFF. Nevertheless, pretreatment with muscarinic receptor and adrenoceptor antagonists (i.v.) could block the tachycardic effects induced by NPFF. Collectively, our results suggested that i.t. administration of NPFF and related peptides increased MAP and HR which were possibly mediated by the activation of both NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptors in the rat spinal cord. In addition, our results showed that the muscarinic receptor and adrenoceptor participated in the tachycardic response to i.t. NPFF, while alpha-adrenoceptor played an important role in the regulation of pressor effect of NPFF.

Neuropeptide FF receptors have opposing modulatory effects on nociception

The role of neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and its analogs in pain modulation is ambiguous. Although NPFF was first characterized as an antiopioid peptide, both antinociceptive and pronociceptive effects have been reported, depending on the route of administration. Currently, two NPFF receptors, termed FF1 and FF2, have been identified and cloned, but their roles in pain modulation remain elusive because of the lack of availability of selective compounds suitable for systemic administration in in vivo models. Ligand-binding studies confirm ubiquitous expression of both subtypes in brain, whereas only FF2 receptors are expressed spinally. This disparity in localization has served as the foundation of the hypothesis that FF1 receptors mediate the pronociceptive actions of NPFF. We have identified novel small molecule NPFF receptor agonists and antagonists with varying degrees of FF2/FF1 functional selectivity. Using these pharmacological tools in vivo has allowed us to define the roles of NPFF receptor subtypes as pertains to the modulation of nociception. We demonstrate that selective FF2 agonism does not modulate acute pain but instead ameliorates inflammatory and neuropathic pains. Treatment with a nonselective FF1/FF2 agonist potentiates allodynia in neuropathic rats and increases sensitivity to noxious thermal and to non-noxious mechanical stimuli in normal rats in an FF1 antagonist-reversible manner. Treatment with FF1 antagonists reversed established mechanical allodynia, indicating the possibility of increased NPFF tone through FF1 receptors. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the opposing roles of NPFF receptors and highlight selective FF2 agonism and/or selective FF1 antagonism as potential targets warranting further investigation.

Pharmacological characterization of the mouse NPFF2 receptor

This study presents the binding and functional properties of the mouse NPFF(2) (mNPFF(2)) receptor, in comparison with its human counterpart (hNPFF(2)). Binding experiments were performed by using the NPFF(2) selective radioligand [(3)H]-EYF in membranes from CHO cells transfected with mouse and human NPFF(2) receptors and compared to membranes from mouse olfactory bulb, the brain region expressing the highest density of NPFF(2) receptors in mouse. mNPFF(2) receptors exhibited a high affinity (Kd=0.2-0.4 nM) for [(3)H]-EYF, comparable to that of hNPFF(2) receptors. Also, the binding selectivity profile of mNPFF(2) receptors was comparable to that of hNPFF(2) receptors, except for three ligands (NPSF, NPVF, RF9) that were about tenfold more potent and active on mouse receptors than on human receptors. In particular, compared to hNPFF(2) receptors, mNPFF(2) receptors were less discriminative towards the proNPFF(B)-derived peptide. This suggests some species-related differences in the binding properties of NPFF(2) receptors that could have repercussion when evaluating the pharmacological properties of drugs in vivo.

Intracerebroventricular administration of 26RFa produces an analgesic effect in the rat formalin test

GPR103 is one of the orphan G protein-coupled receptors. Recently, an endogenous ligand for GPR103, 26RFa, was identified. Many 26RFa binding sites have been observed in various nuclei of the brain involved in the processing of pain such as the parafascicular thalamic nucleus, the locus coeruleus, the dorsal raphe nucleus, and the parabrachial nucleus. In the present study, the effects of intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa were tested in the rat. Intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa significantly decreased the number of both phase 1 and phase 2 agitation behaviors induced by paw formalin injection. This analgesic effect of 26RFa on the phase 1 response, but not phase 2 response, was antagonized by BIBP3226, a mixed antagonist of neuropeptide Y Y1 and neuropeptide FF receptors. Intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa has no effect in the 52.5 degrees C hot plate test. Intracerebroventricular injection of 26RFa had no effect on the expression of Fos-like immunoreactivity induced by paw formalin injection in the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn. These data suggest that (1) 26RFa modulates nociceptive transmission at the supraspinal site during a formalin test, (2) the mechanism 26RFa uses to produce an analgesic effect on the phase 1 response is different from that on the phase 2 response, and (3) intracerebroventricularly injected 26RFa dose not directly inhibit the nociceptive input to the spinal cord.

Neuropeptide Y and gamma-melanocyte stimulating hormone (gamma-MSH) share a common pressor mechanism of action

Central circuits known to regulate food intake and energy expenditure also affect central cardiovascular regulation. For example, both the melanocortin and neuropeptide Y (NPY) peptide families, known to regulate food intake, also produce central hypertensive effects. Members of both families share a similar C-terminal amino acid residue sequence, RF(Y) amide, a sequence distinct from that required for melanocortin receptor binding. A recently delineated family of RFamide receptors recognizes both of these C-terminal motifs. We now present evidence that an antagonist with Y1 and RFamide receptor activity, BIBO3304, will attenuate the central cardiovascular effects of both gamma-melanocyte stimulating hormone (gamma-MSH) and NPY. The use of synthetic melanocortin and NPY peptide analogs excluded an interaction with melanocortin or Y family receptors. We suggest that the anatomical convergence of NPY and melanocortin neurons on cardiovascular control centers may have pathophysiological implications through a common or similar RFamide receptor(s), much as they converge on other nuclei to coordinately control energy homeostasis.

Neuropeptide FF receptors antagonist, RF9, attenuates opioid-evoked hypothermia in mice

The present study used the endpoint of hypothermia to investigate opioid and neuropeptide FF (NPFF) interactions in conscious animals. Both opioid and NPFF systems played important roles in thermoregulation, which suggested a link between opioid receptors and NPFF receptors in the production of hypothermia. Therefore, we designed a study to investigate the relationship between opioid and NPFF in control of thermoregulation in mice. The selective NPFF receptors antagonist RF9 (30nmol) injected into the third ventricle failed to induce significant effect, but it completely antagonized the hypothermia of NPFF (45 nmol) after cerebral administration in mice. In addition, RF9 (30 nmol) co-injected i.c.v. in the third ventricle reduced the hypothermia induced by morphine (5nmol,) or nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) (2 nmol). Neither the classical opioid receptors antagonist naloxone (10 nmol) nor NOP receptor antagonist [Nphe(1)]NC(1-13)NH(2) (7.5 nmol) reduced the hypothermia induced by the central injection of NPFF at dose of 45 nmol. Co-injected with a low dose of NPFF (5 nmol), the hypothermia of morphine (5 nmol) or N/OFQ (2 nmol) was not modified. These results suggest that NPFF receptors activation is required for opioid to produce hypothermia. In contrast, NPFF-induced hypothermia is mainly mediated by its own receptors, independent of opioid receptors in the mouse brain. This interaction, quantitated in the present study, is the first evidence that NPFF receptors mediate opioid-induced hypothermia in conscious animals.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006

This paper is the 29th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2006 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurological disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Pharmacological effects of the dansylated neuropeptide FF analogues on body temperature and morphine analgesia

In our previous work, the two putative agonists (dansyl-GSRFamide and dansyl-PQRFamide) and the two putative antagonists (dansyl-GSRamide and dansyl-PQRamide) on neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptors were synthesized to evaluate the importance of Phe(8) of NPFF. In the present study, these putative NPFF agonists/antagonists containing different N-terminal sequences were further examined for their pharmacological profiles in thermoregulatory and nociceptive tests. The results indicated that the two dansylated agonists potently possessed similar thermoregulation (rank order of potencies: dansyl-GSRFamide>>NPFF>dansyl-PQRFamide) and different modulation of opioid-induced analgesia; in contrast, both of the two putative antagonists exhibited marked hypothermia (rank order of potencies: dansyl-PQRamide>dansyl-GSRamide) and facilitation of morphine analgesia (rank order of potencies: dansyl-PQRamide > dansyl-GSRamide). These data reveal that the difference of the N-terminal residues of the two putative agonists causes their dissociation of pharmacological pro- and anti-opioid effects. In addition, their N-terminal part is important to determine the potency of the dansylated agonists/antagonists. Our work might be helpful to develop a highly potent and fluorescent NPFF ligand.