Tofacitinib reduces mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 Tofacitinib in COVID-19

Mucosal implications of oral Jak3-targeted drugs in COVID patients

The JAK family, particularly JAK3, plays a crucial role in immune signaling and inflammatory responses. Dysregulated JAK3 activation in SARS-CoV-2 infections has been associated with severe inflammation and respiratory complications, making JAK inhibitors a viable therapeutic option. However, their use raises concerns regarding immunosuppression, which could increase susceptibility to secondary infections. While long-term adverse effects are less of a concern in acute COVID-19 treatment, patient selection and monitoring remain critical. Furthermore, adverse effects associated with oral JAK3 inhibitors necessitate the exploration of alternative strategies to optimize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing risks. This review highlights the role of JAK3 in immune and epithelial cells, examines the adverse effects of oral JAK3 inhibitors in COVID-19 and other treatments, and discusses alternative therapeutic strategies for improving patient outcomes.

The development of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has caused a great threat to the global economy and public health, initiatives have been launched to control the spread of the virus. To explore the efficacy of drugs, a large number of clinical trials have been carried out, with the purpose of providing guidelines based on high-quality evidence for clinicians. We mainly discuss therapeutic agents for COVID-19 and explain the mechanism, including antiviral agents, tocilizumab, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, neutralizing antibody therapies and corticosteroids. In addition, the COVID-19 vaccine has been proven to be efficacious in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. We systematically analyzed four mainstream vaccine platforms: messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, viral vector vaccines, inactivated vaccines and protein subunit vaccines. We evaluated the therapeutic effects of drugs and vaccines through enumerating the most typical clinical trials. However, the emergence of novel variants has further complicated the interpretation of the available clinical data, especially vaccines and antibody therapies. In the post-epidemic era, therapeutic agents are still the first choice for controlling the progression of disease, whereas the protective effect of vaccines against different strains should be assessed comprehensively.

JAK inhibition with tofacitinib rapidly increases contractile force in human skeletal muscle

Reduction in muscle contractile force associated with many clinical conditions incurs serious morbidity and increased mortality. Here, we report the first evidence that JAK inhibition impacts contractile force in normal human muscle. Muscle biopsies were taken from patients who were randomized to receive tofacitinib (n = 16) or placebo (n = 17) for 48 h. Single-fiber contractile force and molecular studies were carried out. The contractile force of individual diaphragm myofibers pooled from the tofacitinib group (n = 248 fibers) was significantly higher than those from the placebo group (n = 238 fibers), with a 15.7% greater mean maximum specific force (P = 0.0016). Tofacitinib treatment similarly increased fiber force in the serratus anterior muscle. The increased force was associated with reduced muscle protein oxidation and FoxO-ubiquitination-proteasome signaling, and increased levels of smooth muscle MYLK. Inhibition of MYLK attenuated the tofacitinib-dependent increase in fiber force. These data demonstrate that tofacitinib increases the contractile force of skeletal muscle and offers several underlying mechanisms. Inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway is thus a potential new therapy for the muscle dysfunction that occurs in many clinical conditions.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib on COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The use of drugs off-label for managing COVID-19 offers a potential approach. Among these potential drugs, tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, is strongly implicated in its ability to mitigate mortality by attenuating the cytokine storm syndrome. This study systematically reviewed and quantitatively assessed the effectiveness and safety profile of tofacitinib use through meta-analysis. Through searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases up to May 31, 2024, six articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified, encompassing 669 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The review findings indicate that tofacitinib use demonstrates significant clinical efficacy, as evidenced by a reduced risk of mortality (P = 0.003), and a decreased need for invasive mechanical ventilation (P = 0.0002). Furthermore, tofacitinib use is not correlated with an increased risk of adverse drug reactions (P = 0.98), indicating a favorable safety profile. In conclusion, the evidence supports the clinical efficacy of tofacitinib for COVID-19 patients without concomitant risks of adverse effects. Further clinical studies, especially larger-scale randomized controlled trials, are necessary to validate the findings of this study.

Autism spectrum disorder and a possible role of anti-inflammatory treatments: experience in the pediatric allergy/immunology clinic

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD1) is a behaviorally defined syndrome encompassing a markedly heterogeneous patient population. Many ASD subjects fail to respond to the 1st line behavioral and pharmacological interventions, leaving parents to seek out other treatment options. Evidence supports that neuroinflammation plays a role in ASD pathogenesis. However, the underlying mechanisms likely vary for each ASD patient, influenced by genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Although anti-inflammatory treatment measures, mainly based on metabolic changes and oxidative stress, have provided promising results in some ASD subjects, the use of such measures requires the careful selection of ASD subjects based on clinical and laboratory findings. Recent progress in neuroscience and molecular immunology has made it possible to allow re-purposing of currently available anti-inflammatory medications, used for autoimmune and other chronic inflammatory conditions, as treatment options for ASD subjects. On the other hand, emerging anti-inflammatory medications, including biologic and gate-keeper blockers, exert powerful anti-inflammatory effects on specific mediators or signaling pathways. It will require both a keen understanding of the mechanisms of action of such agents and the careful selection of ASD patients suitable for each treatment. This review will attempt to summarize the use of anti-inflammatory agents already used in targeting ASD patients, and then emerging anti-inflammatory measures applicable for ASD subjects based on scientific rationale and clinical trial data, if available. In our experience, some ASD patients were treated under diagnoses of autoimmune/autoinflammatory conditions and/or post-infectious neuroinflammation. However, there are little clinical trial data specifically for ASD subjects. Therefore, these emerging immunomodulating agents for potential use for ASD subjects will be discussed based on preclinical data, case reports, or data generated in patients with other medical conditions. This review will hopefully highlight the expanding scope of immunomodulating agents for treating neuroinflammation in ASD subjects.

A Pilot and Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Add-On Therapy to Remdesivir in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients

AIM

This placebo-controlled and randomized pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of tofacitinib/remdesivir combination therapy compared to remdesivir alone on clinical and laboratory findings of severely ill COVID-19 patients for future large-scale studies.

METHOD

Fifty patients were included in this study. They were randomly allocated into two groups of 25 subjects each. Patients in the treatment group received a five-day course of tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) in addition to a five-day course of remdesivir, whereas the control group received a 10-day course of remdesivir with a placebo.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of need for intubation (oxygen saturation level), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, death and length of hospitalization between the two groups (P>0.05). Nevertheless, the PRIEST severity score was significantly reduced in the treatment group compared to the control group (P=0.03, effect size [95% CI]: -0.616 [0.0233-1.1723]). Moreover, the mean level of C-reactive protein after 10 days was significantly decreased in the treatment group but increased in the control group (P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib adopted in this pilot study modulate the inflammation and reduce the PRIEST score in severe COVID-19 patients. So, it is feasible and could be applied in future larger-scale trials to precisely determine its effects on coronavirus infections.

Tofacitinib in Patients Hospitalized With Moderate and Severe COVID-19: Not Just Another Kinase Inhibitor

Background There has been an intense search for pharmacological agents that can complement corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib has shown promise in this regard. This study aimed to determine the impact of adding tofacitinib to standard care on the mortality and total duration of hospital stay in severe COVID-19. Methodology This retrospective study compared the mortality and total duration of hospital stay among patients admitted with severe COVID-19 to a designated COVID-19 hospital in south India who had received tofacitinib in addition to standard care versus standard care alone. Medical case records of severe COVID-19 patients were retrieved and screened for inclusion. Categorical variables such as mortality were expressed as proportions and compared using the chi-square test, while continuous variables such as total duration of hospital stay were compared via the independent t-test. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated for the mortality difference between the two groups. P-values ≤0.05 were considered significant. Results Following the initial screening of 250 medical records, 186 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 103 had received tofacitinib and 83 had received standard care. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (OR = 1.58 (95% confidence interval = 0.71 to 3.51); p = 0.26). The total duration of hospital stay was significantly longer among those in the tofacitinib group (17.14 ± 8.85 days vs. 14.04 ± 5.48 days; p = 0.01). Conclusions Tofacitinib did not improve the clinical outcomes when used to supplement corticosteroids in the treatment of severe COVID-19.

JAK Inhibitors in Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs) comprise a group of severe and often fatal hyperinflammatory conditions driven by the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by activated cells of the immune system. Many of the CSS-associated cytokines mediate their downstream effects by signaling through the Janus kinases (JAKs) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs). In addition, several of these cytokines are produced downstream of JAK/STAT pathway activation. Therefore, targeting JAK/STAT signaling using small molecule JAK inhibitors has become an increasingly appealing therapeutic option to dampen hyperinflammation in patients with CSSs. Application of JAK inhibitors in preclinical CSS models has shown improvements in multiple sequelae of hyperinflammation, and there is growing clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of JAK inhibition in patients with these conditions. Although generally well tolerated, JAK inhibitor use is not without potential for toxicity, especially in settings like CSSs where end-organ dysfunction is common. More prospective clinical trials incorporating JAK inhibitors, alone or in combination with other immunomodulatory therapies, are necessary to determine the optimal dosing, schedule, efficacy, and tolerability of these agents for patients experiencing CSSs.

Hexahydrocurcumin from Zingiberis rhizoma attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute pneumonia through JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is one of the major causes of death after pathogens infection. Zingiberis rhizoma (GAN JIANG) is a herb that used in combination with other Chinese medicines to treat pathogen such as virus induced pneumonia. However, the affect of hexahydrocurcumin (HHC), a component from Zingiberis rhizoma, on pneumonia remains unknown.

PURPOSE

This study aims to explore the effects of HHC on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute pneumonia, and to clarify the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

The pneumonia model of C57BL/6 mice was established by intratracheal injection of LPS to evaluate the therapeutic effect of HHC on lung injury and inflammation in vivo. RAW264.7 macrophages were utilized to illustrate the cellular mechanism of HHC in vitro.

RESULTS

HHC alleviated lung injury, ROS and inflammatory cytokine IL-6 production in pneumonia mice in vivo. Molecular docking results disclosed the binding of HHC to JAK1 protein. The study further showed that HHC suppressed the inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β gene expression, inhibited the phosphorylation of JAK1 but not JAK3, and the subsequent STAT3 phosphorylation in LPS-activated macrophages. HHC exhibited no effects on the protein levels of JAK1 and STAT3 in vitro. Consistently, HHC also attenuated the JAK1, STAT3 phosphorylation in pneumonia mice in vivo.

CONCLUSION

The results reveal that HHC attenuates pneumonia by targeted inhibition of JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway. It indicates the novel role of HHC to treat pneumonia, and its potential applications for JAK inhibitor-treated diseases.

A narrative review on tofacitinib: The properties, function, and usefulness to treat coronavirus disease 2019

In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the formation of cytokine storm may have a role in worsening of the disease. By attaching the cytokines like interleukin-6 to the cytokine receptors on a cell surface, Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway will be activated in the cytoplasm lead to hyperinflammatory conditions and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Inhibition of JAK/STAT pathway may be useful to prevent the formation of cytokine storm. Tofacitinib is a pan inhibitor of JAKs. In this review, the main characteristics of tofacitinib and its usefulness against COVID-19 pneumonia were reviewed. Tofacitinib may be a hopeful therapeutic candidate against COVID-19 respiratory injury since it inhibits a range of inflammatory pathways. Hence, the agent may be considered a potential therapeutic against the post-COVID-19 respiratory damage. Compared to other JAK inhibitors (JAKi), the administration of tofacitinib in COVID-19 patients may be safer and more effective. Other JAKi such as baricitinib are related to severe adverse events such as thrombotic events compared to more common side effects of tofacitinib.

Effect of tofacitinib on clinical and laboratory findings in severe and resistant patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of a strong Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib, in individuals suffering from severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pneumonia are not definite well.

METHODS

In this non-randomized and non-blinded trial, a total of 52 Iranian patients with severe COVID-19 associated with decreased oxygen saturation, elevated C-reactive protein, and/or persistent fever were included. A total of 52 patients were included in this study. Tofacitinib was administered to 29 patients (55.8%) in addition to the standard care treatments, whereas 23 patients (44.2%) were treated with the standard of care alone (mostly antiviral agents and corticosteroids). Tofacitinib was administered at a dose of 5 mg twice daily for up to 10 days. The primary outcomes were mortality rate, oxygen saturation level, CT findings, rate of breath, heart rate, and level of consciousness. Inflammatory cytokines and blood biomarkers were considered as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Death from any cause through day 14 occurred in 51.7% of the tofacitinib group and 65.2% of the control group. There was no significant difference in lung radiographic findings between the intervention and control groups at the first day of the study and after the study period. However, a significant decrease was observed in the extent of lung tissue involvement in the intervention group after administration of tofacitinib. Regarding cell and blood biomarkers, a significant decrease in the CPK levels in the intervention group and Hct and ACE levels in the control group was observed after fourteen days of the study. Moreover, a significant increase in SGOT and ferritin values was detected in the control group 14 days after the beginning tofacitinib administration. Comparing control and intervention groups, there was a significant difference in hemoglobin, SGOT, LDH, ferritin, and ACE values between groups before the intervention, while after fourteen days of the study, no significant difference was found. In case of DHEAS and TSH levels, a significant decrease was seen in the intervention group compared to the control after the study period. No other significant improvement was detected in other outcomes of the tofacitinib group compared to the control.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of tofacitinib combined with corticosteroids, is not effective enough to treat severe COVID-19 patients and the use of this medication should be considered before the disease deterioration.

Investigating the risk of deep vein thrombosis with JAK inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are immune-modulating medications used to treat conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, COVID-19, ulcerative colitis, atopic dermatitis, myelofibrosis, and polycythemia Vera. However, these medications have been associated with higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis. The objective of this study was to investigate potential safety signals for DVT associated with JAK inhibitors using disproportionality analysis from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively investigated case/non-case analysis using Openvigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 (2004Q1 to 2022Q4). The preferred term used was 'deep vein thrombosis,' and the drugs included were baricitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. Reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and information component were used to detect signals.

RESULTS

Overall 114,005 AE reports related to JAK inhibitors were identified, of which 647 reports (baricitinib - 169, tofacitinib - 425, and upadacitinib - 53) associated with DVT were obtained from FAERS. On analysis, baricitinib and tofacitinib had greater signal strength for age group of 65-100 years and all three had the highest signal strength for male gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified signals for DVT with baricitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. Further research using well-designed epidemiological data is needed to validate these results.

Severe COVID-19: Drugs and Clinical Trials

By January of 2023, the COVID-19 pandemic had led to a reported total of 6,700,883 deaths and 662,631,114 cases worldwide. To date, there have been no effective therapies or standardized treatment schemes for this disease; therefore, the search for effective prophylactic and therapeutic strategies is a primary goal that must be addressed. This review aims to provide an analysis of the most efficient and promising therapies and drugs for the prevention and treatment of severe COVID-19, comparing their degree of success, scope, and limitations, with the aim of providing support to health professionals in choosing the best pharmacological approach. An investigation of the most promising and effective treatments against COVID-19 that are currently available was carried out by employing search terms including "Convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19" or "Viral polymerase inhibitors" and "COVID-19" in the Clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed databases. From the current perspective and with the information available from the various clinical trials assessing the efficacy of different therapeutic options, we conclude that it is necessary to standardize certain variables-such as the viral clearance time, biomarkers associated with severity, hospital stay, requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation, and mortality rate-in order to facilitate verification of the efficacy of such treatments and to better assess the repeatability of the most effective and promising results.

The development of COVID-19 treatment

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a pandemic named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has become the greatest worldwide public health threat of this century. Recent studies have unraveled numerous mysteries of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and thus largely improved the studies of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutic strategies. However, important questions remain regarding its therapy. In this review, the recent research advances on COVID-19 mechanism are quickly summarized. We mainly discuss current therapy strategies for COVID-19, with an emphasis on antiviral agents, neutralizing antibody therapies, Janus kinase inhibitors, and steroids. When necessary, specific mechanisms and the history of therapy are present, and representative strategies are described in detail. Finally, we discuss key outstanding questions regarding future directions of the development of COVID-19 treatment.

Therapeutic implications of current Janus kinase inhibitors as anti-COVID agents: A review

Severe cases of COVID-19 are characterized by hyperinflammation induced by cytokine storm, ARDS leading to multiorgan failure and death. JAK-STAT signaling has been implicated in immunopathogenesis of COVID-19 infection under different stages such as viral entry, escaping innate immunity, replication, and subsequent inflammatory processes. Prompted by this fact and prior utilization as an immunomodulatory agent for several autoimmune, allergic, and inflammatory conditions, Jakinibs have been recognized as validated small molecules targeting the rapid release of proinflammatory cytokines, primarily IL-6, and GM-CSF. Various clinical trials are under investigation to evaluate Jakinibs as potential candidates for treating COVID-19. Till date, there is only one small molecule Jakinib known as baricitinib has received FDA-approval as a standalone immunomodulatory agent in treating critical COVID-19 patients. Though various meta-analyses have confirmed and validated the safety and efficacy of Jakinibs, further studies are required to understand the elaborated pathogenesis of COVID-19, duration of Jakinib treatment, and assess the combination therapeutic strategies. In this review, we highlighted JAK-STAT signalling in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and clinically approved Jakinibs. Moreover, this review described substantially the promising use of Jakinibs and discussed their limitations in the context of COVID-19 therapy. Hence, this review article provides a concise, yet significant insight into the therapeutic implications of Jakinibs as potential anti-COVID agents which opens up a new horizon in the treatment of COVID-19, effectively.

Janus kinases inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019: A pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

JAK (Janus kinases) inhibitors have been proposed as a promising treatment option for the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the benefits of JAK inhibitors and the optimum thereof for COVID-19 have not been adequately defined.

Methods

Databases were searched from their inception dates to 17 June 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Extracted data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the coefficient of mortality.

Results

Twenty-eight studies of 8,206 patients were included and assessed qualitatively (modified Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores). A pairwise meta-analysis revealed that JAK inhibitors effectively reduced the mortality (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46-0.63; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 32%) without increasing the risk of adverse events (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.18; P = 0.79; I 2 = 12%). In a network meta-analysis, clinical efficacy benefits were seen among different types of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib) without the observation of a declined incidence of adverse events. The assessment of rank probabilities indicated that ruxolitinib presented the greatest likelihood of benefits regarding mortality and adverse events.

Conclusion

JAK inhibitors appear to be a promising treatment for COVID-19 concerning reducing mortality, and they do not increase the risk of adverse events vs. standard of care. A network meta-analysis suggests that mortality benefits are associated with specific JAK inhibitors, and among these, ruxolitinib presents the greatest likelihood of having benefits for mortality and adverse events.

Systematic review registration

[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42022343338].

A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy of Several Pharmacologic Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and the cause of the pandemic is extremely contagious among people and has spread around the world. Antivirals, immunomodulators, and other medications, such as antibiotics, stem cells, and plasma therapy, have all been utilized in the treatment of COVID-19. To better understand the clinical efficacy of these agents and to aid in the selection of effective COVID-19 therapies in various countries, this study reviewed the effectiveness of the various pharmacologic agents that have been used for COVID-19 therapy globally by summarizing the clinical outcomes that have been obtained from the clinical trials published on each drug related to COVID-19 infection. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the use of remdesivir, paxlovid, molnupiravir, baricitinib, tixagevimab-cilgavimab, and bebtelovimab for the management of COVID-19. On the other hand, most research advises against using chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients because they are not beneficial. Although the FDA has given emergency use authorization for some monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab, etesevimab, casirivimab, and imdevimab for managing COVID-19, they are not currently approved for use because the Omicron variant has significantly reduced their in vitro susceptibility. In this study, we also included a wide range of alternative therapy strategies that effectively treat COVID-19 patients, although further randomized studies are necessary to support and assess their applicability.

Thrombotic storm in coronavirus disease 2019: from underlying mechanisms to its management

Introduction. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, is associated with high mortality rates worldwide.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Thrombotic problems, such as coagulopathy, are common in COVID-19 patients. Despite anticoagulation, thrombosis is more common in patients in the intensive care unit and patients with more severe disease. Although the exact mechanisms of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients are still unclear, studies showed that overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), cytokine storm, endothelial damage, formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and also extracellular vesicles (EVs) in response to COVID-19 induced inflammation can lead to systemic coagulation and thrombosis.Aim. The management of COVID-19 patients requires the use of basic and readily available laboratory markers, both on admission and during hospitalization. Because it is critical to understand the pathophysiology of COVID-19 induced coagulopathy and treatment strategies, in this review we attempt to explain the underlying mechanism of COVID-19 coagulopathy, its diagnosis, and the associated successful treatment strategies.Conclusion. The exact mechanisms behind COVID-19-related coagulopathy are still unclear, but several studies revealed some mechanisms. More research is needed to determine the best anticoagulant regimen and to study other therapeutic options.

Timing of tofacitinib therapy is critical to improving outcomes in severe-critical COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital

Describe the use of tofacitinib in severe and critical coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and explore the association of drug initiation time with survival. A retrospective study of inpatients with severe or critical COVID-19 at a tertiary care hospital, who were prescribed generic tofacitinib for at least 48 hours, was conducted. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, illness severity, treatment, adverse effects and outcomes were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on median duration of symptomatic illness prior to tofacitinib administration, as early or late initiation groups. Forty-one patients ([85.4% males], mean age 52.9 ± 12.5 years), were studied. 65.9% (n = 27) had severe COVID-19, while 34.1% (n = 14) were critically ill. Death occurred in 36.6% patients (n = 15). The median time to prescription of tofacitinib was 13 (9.50, 16.0) days of symptom onset. Tofacitinib was initiated early (8-13 days) in 56.1% of patients (n = 23), while the remaining received it beyond day 14 of symptom onset (late initiation group). Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, presence of diabetes mellitus and illness duration prior to hospitalization demonstrated higher odds of survival (adjusted odds ratio 19.3, 95% confidence interval 2.57, 145.2) in the early initiation group, compared to the late initiation group. Early initiation of tofacitinib in severe and critical COVID-19 has potential to improve survival odds.

Recent clinical findings on the role of kinase inhibitors in COVID-19 management

The highly pathogenic, novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has emerged as a once-in-a-century pandemic with poor consequences, urgently calling for new therapeutics, cures, and supportive interventions. It has already affected over 250 million people worldwide; thereby, there is a need for novel therapies to alleviate the related complications. There is a paradigm shift in developing drugs and clinical practices to combat COVID-19. Several clinical trials have been performed or are testing diverse pharmacological interventions to alleviate viral load and complications such as cytokine release storm (CRS). Kinase-inhibitors have appeared as potential antiviral agents for COVID-19 patients due to their efficacy against CRS. Combination of kinase inhibitors with other therapies can achieve more efficacy against COVID-19. Based on the pre-clinical trials, kinase inhibitors such as Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) inhibitors, Brutton's tyrosin kinase (BTK) inhibitors, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (p38 MAPK) inhibitors, Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) inhibitors can be a promising strategy against COVID-19. Kinase inhibitors possess crucial pharmacological properties for a successful re-purposing in terms of dual anti-inflammatory and anti-viral effects. This review will address the current clinical evidence and the newest discovery regarding the application of kinase inhibitors in COVID-19. An outlook on ongoing clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) and unpublished data is also presented here. Besides, Kinase inhibitors' function on COVID-19-mediated CRS is discussed.

Vaccination and Mortality of Patients with a Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19): A Global Approach

Aim. The aim is to study the correlation between the vaccination rate (VR) and mortality rate of patients with COVID-19 (MpCOV).

Methods. The countries with gross domestic product per capita corrected for purchasing power parity (GDP PPP) over $-10,000 were selected for an ecologic study. The city-states and countries with a population of 1,000,000 were excluded. The number of patients who died from COVID-19 within a week was divided by the number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 within a week 20 days earlier to calculate MpCOV.

Results. We included 85 countries. VR (r = –0.604; p < 0.001) and GDPpcPPP level (p = 0.202), is an independent determinant of MpCOV. There was no significant difference in MpCOV between groups of countries with VR < 20 % and 20–39 % (1.96 [1.21; 4.67] vs. 1.96 [1.01; 3.36] %; p = 0.464). MpCOV was higher in countries where VR were lower when groups of countries with VR of 20–39 %, 40–59 %, 60–79 %, and ≥80 % were compared (1.96 [1.01; 3.36] vs. 1.11 [0.76; 1.64] vs. 0.50 [0.39; 1.00] vs. 0.16 [0.10; 0.21]; p = 0.003; p = 0.020, and p = 0.008).

Conclusions. An increase in VR correlates with a decrease in MpCOV.

Levilimab and baricitinib prescribing experience in outpatient COVID-19 patients’ treatment

Aim. To study the effect of levilimab or baricitinib in combination with standard therapy (ST) on the incidence of severe viral pneumonia associated with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19. Materials and methods. A multicenter, open-label observational study of the efficacy and safety of levilimab in combination with ST (group 1, n=100), baricitinib in combination with ST (group 2, n=139), or in comparison with ST (group 3, n=200) in outpatients with verified CT-1 pneumonia. Results. According to the results of laboratory tests, patients treated with levilimab in combination with ST had the best dynamics of changes in CRP from reliably the highest level (mg/L) to the lowest in comparison with other groups. In the group of patients with ST, in contrast to the other groups, no dynamics of CRP was observed by day 5 of therapy. In group of hospitalized patients initially receiving levilimab in addition to ST, the rate of transfer to the intensive care unit (2 patients, 9.52%) and length of stay (4 days) was significantly lower compared to the values in patients in both the baricitinib group in combination with ST (7 patients, 15.56%; 5 days [interquartile range 36.5]) and in patients receiving ST alone (7 patients, 15.56%; 5 days [interquartile range 36.5]). Also in hospitalized patients we observed no statistically significant intergroup differences in the incidence of infectious complications and thromboembolic events, which confirms the safety of including levilimab or baricitinib in COVID-19 pathogenetic therapy regimens. Observational results support the hypothesis that the initial inclusion of levilimab or baricitinib in addition to ST is accompanied by a reduced risk of viral pneumonia progression. Conclusion. The addition of levilimab or baricitinib to the therapy regimen for coronavirus infection during the outpatient phase has demonstrated a preemptive anti-inflammatory effect and reduced the probability of lung tissue damage progression.

The AI-Assisted Identification and Clinical Efficacy of Baricitinib in the Treatment of COVID-19

During the current pandemic, the vast majority of COVID-19 patients experienced mild symptoms, but some had a potentially fatal aberrant hyperinflammatory immune reaction characterized by high levels of IL-6 and other cytokines. Modulation of this immune reaction has proven to be the only method of reducing mortality in severe and critical COVID-19. The anti-inflammatory drug baricitinib (Olumiant) has recently been strongly recommended by the WHO for use in COVID-19 patients because it reduces the risk of progressive disease and death. It is a Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor approved for rheumatoid arthritis which was suggested in early 2020 as a treatment for COVID-19. In this review the AI-assisted identification of baricitinib, its antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, and efficacy in clinical trials are discussed and compared with those of other immune modulators including glucocorticoids, IL-6 and IL-1 receptor blockers and other JAK inhibitors. Baricitinib inhibits both virus infection and cytokine signalling and is not only important for COVID-19 management but is “non-immunological”, and so should remain effective if new SARS-CoV-2 variants escape immune control. The repurposing of baricitinib is an example of how advanced artificial intelligence (AI) can quickly identify new drug candidates that have clinical benefit in previously unsuspected therapeutic areas.

Caracterización del uso de tofacitinib como tratamiento para COVID-19

Objetivo

El propósito principal de este estudio es caracterizar y comparar la población que recibió tofacitinib con aquella que no fue tratada con este fármaco para la COVID-19 en la Clínica Unión Médica del Norte, durante el año 2020.

Métodos

Se realizó un estudio de tipo observacional, retrospectivo transversal de tipo exploratorio y de fuente secundaria. Se analizaron las características de los participantes y su tratamiento en relación con los parámetros de laboratorio y las características clínicas.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 507 pacientes ingresados en la unidad de COVID-19 de la Clínica Unión Médica del Norte. Se determinó que las defunciones fueron menores en el grupo que se medicó con tofacitinib (6,45%) en comparación con el grupo que no utilizó dicho fármaco. Asimismo, los medicados con esta terapia ameritaron en menos proporción soporte ventilatorio, sin embargo, hubo más proporción de ingresos a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Además, se identificó una reducción mayor en la glucemia en aquellos pacientes medicados con tofacitinib, aunque mayores niveles de ferritina y dímero D.

Conclusiones

El fármaco tofacitinib puede actuar de manera beneficiosa en relación con la mortalidad y la reducción del uso de ventilación mecánica. En adición, podría colaborar con la evolución de los pacientes. No obstante, nuestra investigación no es concluyente. Es necesario realizar futuras investigaciones confirmatorias de la eficacia de la terapia con tofacitinib para los pacientes con COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: Role of interleukin-6 and the inflammatory cascade

Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus that represents a serious threat to human lives has emerged. There is still no definite treatment for severe cases of the disease caused by this virus, named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). One of the most considered treatment strategies targets the exaggerated immune regulator, and interleukin (IL)-6 is a crucial pro-inflammatory mediator. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases show an elevated level of IL-6 related to disease severity. IL-6 activity can be inhibited by the following: IL-6 itself, IL-6 signaling pathways such as Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT), gp130, IL-6R, and downstream activated ILs, such as IL-17 and IL-6 cytokine. Currently, according to these studies and their results, IL-6 blockade with anti-IL-6 or its receptor antibodies such as tocilizumab in COVID-19 is beneficial in severe cases and may reduce the mortality rate. JAK-STAT inhibitors block the cytokine storm by inhibiting several crucial pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α and IL-6 and have shown various results in clinical trials. IL-6 induces IL-17 secretion, and IL-17 is involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes. Clinical trials of anti-IL-17 drugs are currently recruiting, and anti-gp130 antibody is preclinical. However, this agent has shown positive effects in inflammatory bowel disease clinical trials and could be tested for SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to review the role of IL-6 in the cytokine storm and studies regarding IL-6 and blockade of its inflammatory pathways in COVID-19 to determine if any of these agents are beneficial for COVID-19 patients.

Janus kinase inhibitors in immunoinflammatory diseases: 10 years of clinical practice in rheumatology

Despite great advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), which have led to a significant improvement in the prognosis in many patients, the central medical problems of this pathology – restoring the quality of life and reducing mortality to the population level – are far from being resolved. This served as a powerful stimulus for the study of new approaches to the pharmacotherapy of IMIDs, one of which is associated with the discovery of targets for small-molecule therapeutics that inhibit intracellular “signaling” molecules JAKs (Janus kinases). The current achievements, trends and recommendations regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IMIDs and also in the hyper-response phase of COVID-19 are reviewed.

An updated overview of recent advances, challenges, and clinical considerations of IL-6 signaling blockade in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Since 2019, COVID-19 has become the most important health dilemma around the world. The dysregulated immune response which results in ARDS and cytokine storm has an outstanding role in the progression of pulmonary damage in COVID-19. IL-6, through induction of pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, is the pioneer of the hyperinflammatory condition and cytokine storm in severe COVID-19. Therefore, IL-6 pathway blockade is considered an emerging approach with high efficacy to reduce lung damage in COVID-19. This article aims to review the pleiotropic roles of the IL-6 pathway in lung damage and ARDS in severe COVID-19, and the rationale for IL-6 signaling blockade at different levels, including IL-6 soluble and membrane receptor pathways, IL-6 downstream signaling (such as JAK-STAT) inhibition, and non-specific anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches. Recent clinical data of each method, with specific concentration on tocilizumab, along with other new drugs, such as sarilumab and siltuximab, have been discussed. Challenges of IL-6 signaling inhibition, such as the risk of superinfection and hepatic injury, and possible solutions have also been explained. Moreover, to achieve the highest efficacy, ongoing clinical trials and special clinical considerations of using different IL-6 inhibitors have been discussed in detail. Special considerations, including the appropriate timing and dosage, monotherapy or combination therapy, and proper side effect managment must be noticed regarding the clinical administration of these drugs. Future studies are still necessary to improve the productivity and unknown aspects of IL-6 signaling blockade for personalized treatment of severe COVID-19.

Janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitors and coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, JAK-inhibitors are repurposed for therapy of Covid-19 because of their ability in restraining immune response, yet the corroboration regarding their advantage is still unclear. This study sought to analyze the efficacy of JAK-inhibitors to ameliorate the outcomes of Covid-19 sufferer.Research design and methods: Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on ClinicalTrials.gov, Europe PMC, and PubMed sources until June 2nd, 2021. All published studies on JAK-inhibitors and Covid-19 were collected.

RESULTS

There were 14 studies with 4,363 Covid-19 patients contained in the meta-analysis. Based on our data, we suggested that JAK-inhibitors corresponded with increased recovery rate (RR 1.17; 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, p= 0.040, I2 = 91%, random-effect modeling); shortened time to recovery (mean difference -0.96; 95%CI: -1.15, -0.77, p< 0.00001, I2 = 28%, random-effect modeling); reduction of clinical deterioration risk (RR 0.66; 95%CI: 0.48-0.89, p= 0.008, I2 = 57%, random-effect modeling); and reduction of Covid-19 mortality (RR 0.52; 95%CI: 0.36-0.76, p= 0.0006, I2 = 33%, random-effect modeling).

CONCLUSIONS

This study propose that JAK-inhibitors perhaps provide advantageous effects on Covid-19 outcomes. JAK-inhibitors may be given during 1-2 weeks of disease to optimize its beneficial effects in halting the exaggerated immune response.

The Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Patients With COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cytokine storm observed in patients with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) contributes to poor clinical outcomes and increased mortality. Janus kinases (JAKs) are important mediators in the cytokine storm. Therefore, we conduct a living systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature investigating efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Databases were searched up to December 1, 2021 for interventional and observational studies comparing JAK inhibitor treatment with concurrent control in patients with COVID-19. Efficacy and safety outcomes were evaluated by pooled risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

Of 3,170 records retrieved, 15 studies were eligible and 13 were evaluated in the meta-analysis (n = 3,977). Based on data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), baricitinib treatment significantly decreased mortality by day 28 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80) without increasing the incidence of adverse outcomes. In subgroup analysis, patients who required supplemental oxygen (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95) or high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.85) at baseline benefited most. Pooled analysis of all eligible studies for JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and nezulcitinib) demonstrated a significant decrease in mortality (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.78) with no increase in the risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Baricitinib probably decreases mortality in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19, especially for patients who required supplemental oxygen or high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation at baseline. The efficacy and safety of other JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and nezulcitinib, await more evidence.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021261414, identifier: CRD42021261414.

COVID-19 and Venous Thromboembolism: From Pathological Mechanisms to Clinical Management

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is becoming a global pandemic, is caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. In COVID-19, thrombotic events occur frequently, mainly venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is closely related to disease severity and clinical prognosis. Compared with historical controls, the occurrence of VTE in hospitalized and critical COVID-19 patients is incredibly high. However, the pathophysiology of thrombosis and the best strategies for thrombosis prevention in COVID-19 remain unclear, thus needing further exploration. Virchow’s triad elements have been proposed as important risk factors for thrombotic diseases. Therefore, the three factors outlined by Virchow can also be applied to the formation of venous thrombosis in the COVID-19 setting. A thorough understanding of the complex interactions in these processes is important in the search for effective treatments for COVID-19. In this work, we focus on the pathological mechanisms of VTE in COVID-19 from the aspects of endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability, abnormal blood flow. We also discuss the treatment of VTE as well as the ongoing clinical trials of heparin anticoagulant therapy. In addition, according to the pathophysiological mechanism of COVID-19-associated thrombosis, we extended the range of antithrombotic drugs including antiplatelet drugs, antifibrinolytic drugs, and anti-inflammatory drugs, hoping to find effective drug therapy and improve the prognosis of VTE in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 treatment in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Exact information about the efficacy of various medications proposed by regulatory bodies in children with COVID-19 is limited due to the lack of controlled trials in the existing literature.

Methods

Different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE CENTRAL, LitCovid, medRxiv, and bioRxiv) were searched for articles describing the management of COVID-19 cases in children with 18 shortlisted medications. Prospective/retrospective studies/case series (with at least 20 cases) reporting COVID-19 in patients aged ≤14 years were searched to collect information regarding clinical details and severity of participants, medications used, and outcome. The pooled estimate of these parameters across studies was performed using a random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis depending on the degree of heterogeneity.

Results

From a total of 5794 records, 97 studies/case series (8243 patients) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. A total of 21% children received at least one medication specifically used for COVID-19. While antivirals were used in 15.3% of children, remedesivir was the most commonly used antiviral drug in 6.2% of included children without many reports of serious adverse effects. There was a more prevalent use of anti-inflammatory medications including corticosteroids (27.8%, P = 0.01). Total 91% of severe cases described in literature in children received some anti-inflammatory medications. Among them, corticosteroids (17%) and Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) (17.5%) were the most predominant followed by interferon (4.2%), tocilizumab (1.5%), and anakinra (0.8%). The most predominant therapy among multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) cases were IVIG (81%), followed by aspirin (67%), corticosteroids (64%), inotropes (62%), and anticoagulation (56%, mostly low molecular weight heparin, LMWH). Overall mortality was only 1.3%, but when we analyzed separately including only cases with moderate and severe disease, the mortality rate was 4.6%.

Conclusion

Among pharmacological modalities, anti-inflammatory agents like corticosteroids and antivirals like remdesivir have the most promising evidence for severe cases of pediatric COVID-19. Intravenous immunoglobulin and other anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory agents like anakinra, aspirin, and anticoagulants have important therapeutic role in cases with MIS-C. Most of the mild cases recover with conservative treatment only.

Autoinflammatory Diseases and Cytokine Storms-Imbalances of Innate and Adaptative Immunity

Innate and adaptive immune responses have a well-known link and represent the distinctive origins of several diseases, many of which may be the consequence of the loss of balance between these two responses. Indeed, autoinflammation and autoimmunity represent the two extremes of a continuous spectrum of pathologic conditions with numerous overlaps in different pathologies. A common characteristic of these dysregulations is represented by hyperinflammation, which is an exaggerated response of the immune system, especially involving white blood cells, macrophages, and inflammasome activation with the hyperproduction of cytokines in response to various triggering stimuli. Moreover, hyperinflammation is of great interest, as it is one of the main manifestations of COVID-19 infection, and the cytokine storm and its most important components are the targets of the pharmacological treatments used to combat COVID-19 damage. In this context, the purpose of our review is to provide a focus on the pathogenesis of autoinflammation and, in particular, of hyperinflammation in order to generate insights for the identification of new therapeutic targets and strategies.

Janus Kinase inhibitors for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been successfully utilized in the clinical treatment of several rheumatologic (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) and inflammatory diseases (e.g. hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). Based on the growing evidence that moderate and severe COVID-19 infections are associated with a dysregulated inflammatory state, this class of medications has been repurposed as a potential therapy for COVID-19, an infection caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three JAK inhibitors have been evaluated in human studies of COVID-19: Baricitinib, Tofacitinib, and Ruxolitinib. Most published studies are observational, but three randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trials have been completed: two large trials (N = 2,558 patients) with baricitinb demonstrated significant faster improvement in clinical status and reduction in the recovery time, as well as, significant reduction in the progression to invasive mechanical ventilation and mortality. One smaller randomized trial (N = 289) involving tofacitinib showed significant reduction in the progression to invasive ventilation or death. Notably, these three randomized placebo-controlled trials with close to 3,000 patients did not reveal any safety concerns associated with JAK inhibitors in terms of secondary infections or venous thromboembolism. Based on this high-quality evidence, both the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the National Institutes of Health guidelines recommend using baricitinib as part of the treatment approach for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

SUMMARY

JAK inhibitors are novel treatment agents in the field of infectious diseases. One JAK inhibitor, baricitinib has demonstrated significant clinical and survival benefits in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials. Baricitinib is already recommended for clinical practice by multiple guidelines.

Beyond Vaccines: Clinical Status of Prospective COVID-19 Therapeutics

Since November 2019 the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused nearly 200 million infection and more than 4 million deaths globally (Updated information from the World Health Organization, as on 2nd Aug 2021). Within only one year into the pandemic, several vaccines were designed and reached approval for the immunization of the world population. The remarkable protective effects of the manufactured vaccines are demonstrated in countries with high vaccination rates, such as Israel and UK. However, limited production capacities, poor distribution infrastructures and political hesitations still hamper the availability of vaccines in many countries. In addition, due to the emergency of SARS-CoV-2 variants with immune escape properties towards the vaccines the global numbers of new infections as well as patients developing severe COVID-19, remains high. New studies reported that about 8% of infected individuals develop long term symptoms with strong personal restrictions on private as well as professional level, which contributes to the long socioeconomic problems caused by this pandemic. Until today, emergency use-approved treatment options for COVID-19 are limited to the antiviral Remdesivir, a nucleoside analogue targeting the viral polymerase, the glucocorticosteroide Dexamethasone as well as neutralizing antibodies. The therapeutic benefits of these treatments are under ongoing debate and clinical studies assessing the efficiency of these treatments are still underway. To identify new therapeutic treatments for COVID-19, now and by the post-pandemic era, diverse experimental approaches are under scientific evaluation in companies and scientific research teams all over the world. To accelerate clinical translation of promising candidates, repurposing approaches of known approved drugs are specifically fostered but also novel technologies are being developed and are under investigation. This review summarizes the recent developments from the lab bench as well as the clinical status of emerging therapeutic candidates and discusses possible therapeutic entry points for the treatment strategies with regard to the biology of SARS-CoV-2 and the clinical course of COVID-19.

Clinical efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 12, 2021. RCTs comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors with a placebo or standard care in treating COVID-19 patients were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality rate at day 28.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. The all-cause mortality rate at day 28 was lower among the patients receiving JAK inhibitors than among the controls (4.1% [28/647] versus 7.0% [48/684], OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92, I² = 0). The clinical recovery rate was higher among the patients receiving JAK inhibitors than among the controls (85.1% (579/680) versus 80.0% [547/684], OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.93, I² = 0). Additionally, the use of JAK inhibitors was associated with a shorter time to recovery than among the controls (MD, -2.84; 95% CI, -5.56 to -0.12; I² = 50%). The rate of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) was lower in the patients who used JAK inhibitors than among the controls. Finally, no significant difference was observed between the patients who used JAK inhibitors and the controls in the risk of any adverse events (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.34; I² = 33%) and serious adverse events (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.45-1.44; I² = 46%).

CONCLUSIONS

JAK inhibitors can lead to a better clinical outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and they are a safe agent in the treatment of COVID-19.