Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide stimulates the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells

Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Receptor (GIPR) Overexpression Reduces the Tumorigenic Potential of Retinoblastoma Cells

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common malignant intraocular tumor in early childhood. Gene expression profiling revealed that the gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is upregulated following trefoil factor family peptide 1 (TFF1) overexpression in RB cells. In the study presented, we found this G protein-coupled transmembrane receptor to be co-expressed with TFF1, a new diagnostic and prognostic RB biomarker for advanced subtype 2 RBs. Functional analyses in two RB cell lines revealed a significant reduction in cell viability and growth and a concomitant increase in apoptosis following stable, lentiviral GIPR overexpression, matching the effects seen after TFF1 overexpression. In chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays, GIPR-overexpressing RB cells developed significantly smaller CAM tumors. The effect of GIPR overexpression in RB cells was reversed by the GIPR inhibitor MK0893. The administration of recombinant TFF1 did not augment GIPR overexpression effects, suggesting that GIPR does not serve as a TFF1 receptor. Investigations of potential GIPR up- and downstream mediators suggest the involvement of miR-542-5p and p53 in GIPR signaling. Our results indicate a tumor suppressor role of GIPR in RB, suggesting its pathway as a new potential target for future retinoblastoma therapy.

Genetically proxied impaired GIPR signaling and risk of 6 cancers

Preclinical and genetic studies suggest that impaired glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) signaling worsens glycemic control. The relationship between GIPR signaling and the risk of cancers influenced by impaired glucose homeostasis is unclear. We examined the association of a variant in GIPR, rs1800437 (E354Q), shown to impair long-term GIPR signaling and lower circulating glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide concentrations, with risk of 6 cancers influenced by impaired glucose homeostasis (breast, colorectal, endometrial, lung, pancreatic, and renal) in up to 235,698 cases and 333,932 controls. Each copy of E354Q was associated with a higher risk of overall and luminal A-like breast cancer and this association was consistent in replication and colocalization analyses. E354Q was also associated with higher postprandial glucose concentrations but diminished insulin secretion and lower testosterone concentrations. Our human genetics analysis suggests an adverse effect of the GIPR E354Q variant on breast cancer risk, supporting further evaluation of GIPR signaling in breast cancer prevention.

Tirzepatide-Friend or Foe in Diabetic Cancer Patients?

It is a well-accepted fact that obesity and diabetes increase the risk of incidence of different cancers and their progression, leading to a decrease in the quality of life among affected cancer patients. In addition to decreasing the risk of cancers, maintaining a healthy body mass index (BMI)/body weight and/or blood glucose levels within the normal range critically impacts the response to anti-cancer therapy among affected individuals. A cancer patient managing their body weight and maintaining blood glucose control responds better to anti-cancer therapy than obese individuals and those whose blood glucose levels remain higher than normal during therapeutic intervention. In some cases, anti-diabetic/glucose-lowering drugs, some of which are also used to promote weight loss, were found to possess anti-cancer potential themselves and/or support anti-cancer therapy when used to treat such patients. On the other hand, certain glucose-lowering drugs promoted the cancer phenotype and risked cancer progression when used for treatment. Tirzepatide (TRZD), the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) agonist, has recently gained interest as a promising injectable drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and was approved by the FDA after successful clinical trials (SURPASS 1/2/3/4 and 5, NCT03954834, NCT03987919, NCT03882970, NCT03730662, and NCT04039503). In addition, the reports from the SURMOUNT-1 clinical trial (NCT04184622) support the use of TRZD as an anti-obesity drug. In the current review article, we examine the possibility and molecular mechanisms of how TRZD intervention could benefit cancer therapeutics or increase the risk of cancer progression when used as an anti-diabetic drug in diabetic patients.

Crosstalk between incretin hormones, Th17 and Treg cells in inflammatory diseases

Intestinal epithelial cells constantly crosstalk with the gut microbiota and immune cells of the gut lamina propria. Enteroendocrine cells, secrete hormones, such as incretin hormones, which participate in host physiological events, such as stimulating insulin secretion, satiety, and glucose homeostasis. Interestingly, evidence suggests that the incretin pathway may influence immune cell activation. Consequently, drugs targeting the incretin hormone signaling pathway may ameliorate inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases, cancer, and autoimmune diseases. In this review, we discuss how these hormones may modulate two subsets of CD4 + T cells, the regulatory T cells (Treg)/Th17 axis important for gut homeostasis: thus, preventing the development and progression of inflammatory diseases. We also summarize the main experimental and clinical findings using drugs targeting the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) signaling pathways and their great impact on conditions in which the Treg/Th17 axis is disturbed such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. Understanding the role of incretin stimulation in immune cell activation and function, might contribute to new therapeutic designs for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, autoimmunity, and tumors.

Obesity-related gut hormones and cancer: novel insight into the pathophysiology

The number of cancers attributed to obesity is increasing over time. The mechanisms classically implicated in cancer pathogenesis and progression in patients with obesity involve adiposity-related alteration of insulin, sex hormones, and adipokine pathways. However, they do not fully capture the complexity of the association between obesity-related nutritional imbalance and cancer. Gut hormones are secreted by enteroendocrine cells along the gastrointestinal tract in response to nutritional cues, and act as nutrient sensors, regulating eating behavior and energy homeostasis and playing a role in immune-modulation. The dysregulation of gastrointestinal hormone physiology has been implicated in obesity pathogenesis. For their peculiar function, at the cross-road between nutrients intake, energy homeostasis and inflammation, gut hormones might represent an important but still underestimated mechanism underling the obesity-related high incidence of cancer. In addition, cancer research has revealed the widespread expression of gut hormone receptors in neoplastic tissues, underscoring their implication in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion processes that characterize tumor growth and aggressiveness. In this review, we hypothesize that obesity-related alterations in gut hormones might be implicated in cancer pathogenesis, and provide evidence of the pathways potentially involved.

The pathogenic role of the GIP/GIPR axis in human endocrine tumors: emerging clinical mechanisms beyond diabetes

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone produced in the gastrointestinal tract in response to nutrients. GIP has a variety of effects on different systems, including the potentiation of insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells after food intake (i.e. incretin effect), which is probably the most important. GIP effects are mediated by the GIP receptor (GIPR), a G protein-coupled receptor expressed in several tissues, including islet β-cells, adipocytes, bone cells, and brain. As well as its involvement in metabolic disorders (e.g. it contributes to the impaired postprandial insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and to the pathogenesis of obesity and associated insulin resistance), an inappropriate GIP/GIPR axis activation of potential diagnostic and prognostic value has been reported in several endocrine tumors in recent years. The ectopic GIPR expression seen in patients with overt Cushing syndrome and primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia or unilateral cortisol-producing adenoma has been associated with an inverse rhythm of cortisol secretion, with low fasting morning plasma levels that increase after eating. On the other hand, most acromegalic patients with an unusual GH response to oral glucose suppression have GIPR-positive somatotropinomas, and a milder phenotype, and are more responsive to medical treatment. Neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by a strong GIPR expression that may correlate positively or inversely with the proliferative index MIB-1, and that seems an attractive target for developing novel radioligands. The main purpose of this review is to summarize the role of the GIP/GIPR axis in endocrine neoplasia, in the experimental and the clinical settings.

Comprehensive characterization of cancer-testis genes in testicular germ cell tumor

Cancer‐testis (CT) genes are a group of genes restrictedly expressed in testis and multiple cancers and can serve as candidate driver genes participating in the development of cancers. Our previous study identified a number of CT genes in nongerm cell tumors, but their expression pattern in testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT), a cancer type characterized by less genomic alterations, remained largely unknown. In this study, we systematically investigated the expression pattern of CT genes in TGCT samples and evaluated the transcriptome difference between TGCT and normal testis tissues, using datasets from the UCSC Xena platform, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype‐Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Pathway enrichment analysis and survival analysis were conducted to evaluate the biological function and prognostic effect of expressed CT genes. We identified that 1036 testis‐specific expressed protein‐coding genes and 863 testis‐specific expressed long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were expressed in TGCT samples, including 883 CT protein‐coding genes and 710 CT lncRNAs defined previously. The number of expressed CT genes was significantly higher in seminomas (P = 3.48 × 10⁻¹³) which were characterized by frequent mutations in driver genes (KIT, KRAS and NRAS). In contrast, the number of expressed CT genes showed a moderate negative correlation with the fraction of copy number altered genomes (cor = −0.28, P = 1.20 × 10⁻³). Unlike other cancers, our analysis revealed that 96.16% of the CT genes were down‐regulated in TGCT samples, while CT genes in stem cell maintenance related pathways were up‐regulated. Further survival analysis provided evidence that CT genes could also predict the prognosis of TGCT patients with both disease‐free interval and progression‐free interval as clinical endpoints. Taken together, our study provided a global view of CT genes in TGCT and provided evidence that CT genes played important roles in the progression and maintenance of TGCT.

Small molecule glycoconjugates with anticancer activity

Glycoconjugates are combinations of sugar moieties with organic compounds. Due to their biological resemblance, such structures often have properties that are desirable for drugs. In this study we designed and synthesised several glycoconjugates from small molecular quinolines and substituted gluco- and galactopyranosyl amines. Although the parent quinoline compounds were inactive in affordable concentrations, the glycoconjugates that were obtained appeared to be cytotoxic against cancer cells at the micromolar level. When combined with copper ions, their activity increased even further. Their mechanism of action is connected to the formation of reactive oxygen species and the intercalation of DNA.

Specific biology of neuroendocrine tumors: Peptide receptors as molecular targets

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are characterized by a high over-expression of many different peptide hormone receptors. These receptors represent important molecular targets for imaging and therapy, using either radiolabeled or cold peptide analogs. The clinically best established example is somatostatin receptor targeting. A relatively new application is glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor-targeted imaging of insulinomas, which is highly sensitive. A potential future candidate for peptide receptor targeting is the gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) receptor. It was recently found to exhibit a very wide expression in NET and may be a particularly suitable target in somatostatin and GLP-1 receptor negative tumors. With increasing use of peptide receptor targeting, reliable morphologic in vitro tools to assess peptide receptors in tissues are mandatory, such as in vitro receptor autoradiography or thoroughly established immunohistochemical procedures.

An updated review on cancer risk associated with incretin mimetics and enhancers

Incretin-based therapies, including the use of incretin mimetics of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists and incretin enhancers of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are widely used by clinicians for glucose lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents have benefits of a lower risk of hypoglycemia, being neutral for body weight for DPP-4 inhibitors and having a potential for weight reduction with GLP-1R agonists. They may also have a neutral or beneficial cardiovascular effect. Despite these benefits, an increased risk of cancer (especially pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer) associated with incretin-based therapies has been reported. In this article, we reviewed related literature of experimental animal and observational human studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses published until December 15, 2014. Current studies suggested a probable role of GLP-1R activation on the development of pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer in rodents, but such an effect in humans is not remarkable due to the lower or lack of expression of GLP-1R on human pancreatic ductal cells and thyroid tissues. Findings in human studies are controversial and inconclusive. In the analyses of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system, a significantly higher risk of pancreatic cancer was observed for GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, but a significantly higher risk of thyroid cancer was only observed for GLP-1R agonists. Such a higher risk of pancreatic cancer or thyroid cancer could not be similarly demonstrated in other human observational studies or analyses of data from clinical trials. With regards to cancers other than pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer, available studies supported a neutral association in humans. Some preliminary studies even suggested a potentially beneficial effect on the development of other cancers with the use of incretins. Based on current evidence, continuous monitoring of the cancer issues related to incretin-based therapies is required, even though the benefits may outweigh the potential cancer risk in the general patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Does somatostatin or gastric inhibitory peptide receptor expression correlate with tumor grade and stage in gut neuroendocrine tumors?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Important characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) for prognosis and therapeutic decisions are the MIB-1 proliferative index (tumor grade) and tumor stage. Moreover, these tumors express peptide hormone receptors like somatostatin and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) receptors which represent important established and potential future targets, respectively, for molecular imaging and radiotherapy. However, the interrelation between tumor proliferation, stage, and peptide receptor amounts has never been assessed.

METHODS

In 114 gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary NEN, the proliferative rate assessed with MIB-1 immunohistochemistry and tumor stage were compared with the somatostatin type 2 receptor (sst2) and GIP receptor expression measured quantitatively with in vitro receptor autoradiography.

RESULTS

NEN generally showed high sst2 and GIP receptor expression. GIP receptor but not sst2 expression correlated with the MIB-1 index. GIP receptor levels gradually increased in a subset of insulinomas and nonfunctioning pancreatic NEN, and decreased in ileal and bronchopulmonary NEN with increasing MIB-1 rate. MIB-1 levels were identified, above which GIP receptor levels were consistently high or low. These MIB-1 levels were clearly different from those defining tumor grade. In grade 3 NEN, GIP receptor levels were always low, while sst2 levels were variable and sometimes extremely high. Conversely, sst2 expression correlated more frequently with tumor stage than GIP receptor expression, with metastasized NEN showing higher sst2 levels than localized tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

sst2, a clinically crucial molecular target, shows variable and unpredictable expression in NEN irrespective of tumor grade. Therefore, each NEN should be tested for sst2 if clinical applications with somatostatin analogs are considered. Conversely, the potential future role of GIP receptors as molecular targets in NEN may be dependent on the MIB-1 level.

Cancer biology in diabetes

Diabetes is a serious metabolic disease that causes multiple organ dysfunctions. Recent evidence suggests that diabetes could contribute to the initiation and progression of certain cancers in addition to the classic diabetic complications. Furthermore, some of the drugs used clinically to treat patients with diabetes might affect cancer initiation, progression and mortality. The recent discovery of the possible anticancer effects of metformin, a classic antidiabetic drug, has led physicians and scientists to reconsider the interaction between diabetes and cancer. In the present review, we analyze recent reports in this field, and explore possible mechanistic links between diabetes and cancer biology.

Expression of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and its receptor in the rat major salivary glands

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors (GIPR) are expressed throughout the body. The expression of its ligand, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) however, has only been reported in a limited numbers of organs. Although the rat submandibular salivary gland (SMG) has been found to express GIP, its biological role is still not understood. Moreover, nothing is known about the expression of GIP in other types of salivary glands, i.e. the parotid (PG) and sublingual (SLG) glands. We detected the expression of GIP mRNA in the rat PG, SMG and SLG. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that GIP and GIPR were expressed only in the ductal area of all types of major salivary glands, and no immunostaining was found in the acini area. We also found GIP expression in the rat SMG to be age dependent, with 8-week-old rats showing 2-3-fold higher than those of 9- and 11-week-old rats, respectively. This is the first study to indicate both GIP and GIPR expression in the rat major salivary glands, as well as its variation in the rat SMG during the growth period. These findings are crucial for a better understanding of the physiological function of GIP in rat major salivary gland.

GIPR expression in gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Compounds targeting somatostatin-receptor-type-2 (SSTR2) are useful for small bowel neuroendocrine tumor (SBNET) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) imaging and treatment. We recently characterized expression of 13 cell surface receptor genes in SBNETs and PNETs, identifying three drug targets (GIPR, OXTR, and OPRK1). This study set out to characterize expression of this gene panel in the less common neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and duodenum (gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors [GDNETs]).

METHODS

Primary tumors and adjacent normal tissue were collected at surgery, RNA was extracted, and expression of 13 target genes was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Expression was normalized to GAPDH and POLR2A internal control genes. Expression relative to normal tissue (ddCT) and absolute expression (dCT) were calculated. Wilcoxon tests compared median expression with false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Gene expression was similar in two gastric and seven duodenal tumors, and these were analyzed together. Like SBNETs (n = 63) and PNETs (n = 51), GDNETs showed significant overexpression compared with normal tissue of BRS3, GIPR, GRM1, GPR113, OPRK1, and SSTR2 (P < 0.05 for all). Of these, SSTR2 had the highest absolute expression in GDNETs (median dCT 4.0). Absolute expression of BRS3, GRM1, GPR113, and OPRK1 was significantly lower than SSTR2 in GDNETs (P < 0.05 for all), whereas expression of GIPR was similar to SSTR2 (median 4.3, P = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

As in SBNETs and PNETs, GIPR shows absolute expression close to SSTR2 but has greater overexpression relative to normal tissue (21.1 versus 3.5-fold overexpression). We conclude that GIPR could provide an improved signal-to-noise ratio for imaging versus SSTR2 and represents a promising novel therapeutic target in GDNETs.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor (GIPR) is a promising target for imaging and therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Ligands binding the somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) are useful for imaging and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but not all tumors express high levels of these receptors. The aim of this study was to evaluate gene expression of new therapeutic targets in NETs relative to SSTR2.

METHODS

RNA was extracted from 103 primary small bowel and pancreatic NETs, matched normal tissue, and 123 metastases. Expression of 12 candidate genes was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction normalized to internal controls; candidate gene expression was compared with SSTR2.

RESULTS

Relative to normal tissue, primary NET expression of SSTR2, GPR98, BRS3, GIPR, GRM1, and OPRK1 were increased by 3, 8, 13, 13, 17, and 20-fold, respectively. Similar changes were found in metastases. Although most candidate genes showed lesser absolute expressions than SSTR2, absolute GIPR expression was closest to SSTR2 (mean dCT 3.6 vs. 2.7, P = .01). Absolute OPRK1 and OXTR expression varied greatly by primary tumor type and was close to SSTR2 in small bowel NETs but not pancreatic NETs.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the current treatment standard SSTR2, GIPR has only somewhat lesser absolute gene expression in tumor tissue but much lesser expression in normal tissue, making it a promising new target for NET imaging and therapy.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide: from pathophysiology to therapeutic opportunities in obesity-associated disorders

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a hormone secreted from the intestinal K-cells with established insulin-releasing actions. However, the GIP receptor is widely distributed in peripheral organs, including the adipose tissue, gut, bone and brain, where GIP modulates energy intake, cell metabolism and proliferation, and lipid and glucose metabolism, eventually promoting lipid and glucose storage. In diabetes and obesity, the incretin effect of GIP is blunted, while the extrapancreatic tissues keep a normal sensitivity to this hormone. As GIP levels are normal or elevated in obesity and diabetes, mounting evidence from chemical or genetic GIP deletion in animal models of obesity-related diabetes suggests that GIP may have a pro-obesogenic action and that a strategy antagonizing GIP action may be beneficial in these conditions, clearing triglyceride deposits from adipose tissue, liver and muscle, and restoring normal insulin sensitivity. Emerging evidence also suggests that the metabolic benefits of bypass surgery are mediated, at least in part, by surgical removal of GIP-secreting K-cells in the upper small intestine.

Increased levels of serum glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide as a novel risk factor for human colorectal adenoma

Obesity and insulin resistance are thought to be risk factors for colorectal adenoma. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) stimulates insulin secretion from the pancreas and promotes fat accumulation in adipocytes. The association between serum GIP and the risk of colorectal adenoma has not been examined previously. We investigated this association in 370 subjects who underwent total colonoscopy during thorough physical checkups between January and December 2008. We used a cross-sectional design and classified the subjects into a colorectal adenoma group and a control group without adenoma according to their endoscopic findings. Serum GIP concentrations in samples of venous blood obtained after an overnight fast were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The mean levels of fasting GIP (34.9 ± 49.5 vs 25.0 ± 20.1 pg/mL, P = .04), triglyceride, glucose, and insulin and the values of the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in the colorectal adenoma group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the highest quartile of fasting GIP levels was associated with a significantly high risk of colorectal adenoma (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.96; P = .01) in comparison with the lowest quartile. Quartile analysis demonstrated that increased levels of GIP were related to increased levels of fasting insulin and values of homeostasis model assessment β-cell. These results suggest that an increased level of fasting GIP is associated with an increased risk of colorectal adenoma.