Application effects of coated urea and urease and nitrification inhibitors on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical cotton field of the Mississippi delta region

Potential of enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizers in reducing nitrogen and carbon losses in a sandy soil integrated crop-livestock system

The demand for food is increasing, which poses significant challenges to humanity's sustainable and sufficient food production. Using fertilizers with new technologies with a low environmental impact is becoming increasingly necessary. In this context, the industry has been creating alternatives to optimize the use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, with the improvement of urea being crucial for sustainable agricultural production. The objective of this study was to assess the use of fertilizers with integrated technology, specifically urea NBPT + Duromide and formaldehyde urea, aiming to reduce N losses through ammonia (NH3-N) volatilization and, consequently, mitigate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS), thereby addressing the impacts of global warming. Evaluations were conducted over three agricultural years (2020/2021, 2021/2022, and 2022/2023). The pasture used was Urochloa Brizhanta cv. marandu, and soybeans (Glycine max L) were cultivated. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications in a 3 × 4 factorial arrangement. The treatments consisted of three N sources: conventional urea (UrConv) for immediate release, formaldehyde urea (UrFormaldehyde) for slow release, and urea with urease inhibitor and Duromide technology (UrDuromide), combined with four rates (0, 100, 200, and 400 kg ha-1 of N). NH3-N volatilization data were subjected to nonlinear regression using a logistic model. NH3-N volatilization losses varied according to the rate and fertilizer, reaching up to 33% in UrConv. UrDuromide exhibited reduced efficiency over the evaluated years compared to UrConv, reducing losses by 52% in the first year, 46% in the second, and only 5% in the third. UrFormaldehyde showed less variability, ranging between 57% and 45% reduction in NH3-N losses. The effects on TOC and CO2 emissions followed similar trends, with UrConv causing the highest CO2 emissions and more significant TOC accumulation. UrFormaldehyde reduced CO2 by up to 8% compared to UrConv, while UrDuromide reduced it by 6% compared to UrConv in greenhouse gas emissions and consequently lower soil organic carbon accumulation. In conclusion, using technology to enhance efficiency in nitrogen fertilizers showed promising results in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, offering hope for a sustainable future and making it a viable alternative to conventional urea sources.

Can urea-coated fertilizers be an effective means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving crop productivity?

Given the significance of nitrogen (N) as the most constraining nutrient in agro-ecosystems, it is crucial to develop an updated model for N fertilizers management to achieve higher crop yields while minimizing the negative impacts on the environment. Coated urea is touted as one of the most important controlled-release N fertilizers used in agriculture to reduce cropland emissions and improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for optimal crop yields. The sustainability of coated urea depends on the trade-offs between crop productivity, NUE and greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4 and N2O); however, role of various agro-edaphic factors in influencing these trade-offs remains unclear. To determine the effects of soil properties, climatic conditions, experimental conditions, and type of coated urea on greenhouse gas emissions, NH3 losses, crop productivity, and NUE, we conducted a meta-analysis using data from 76 peer-reviewed studies. Our results showed that the application of coated urea under field conditions contributed to a greater reduction in N2O emissions (-48.67%) and higher NUE (58.72%), but crop yields were not significant. Across different climate regions, subtropical monsoon climate showed a perceptible mitigation for CO2, CH4 and NH3 (-78.38%; -83.33%; -27.46%), while temperate climate reduced N2O emissions by -70.36%. For different crops, only rice demonstrated reduction in CO2, CH4, N2O and NH3 losses. On the other hand, our findings revealed a mitigating trade-off between CO2 and CH4 emissions on medium-textured soils and N2O emissions on fine-textured soils. A significant reduction in N2O and NH3 losses was evident when coated urea was applied to soils with a pH > 5.5. Interestingly, application of coated urea to soils with higher C/N ratios increased NH3 losses but showed a noticeable N2O reduction. We found that polymer-coated urea reduced CH4 and N2O emissions and NH3 losses at the expense of higher CO2 emissions. Moreover, application of a lower dose of coated urea (0-100 kg N ha-1) enhanced CO2 and CH4 mitigation, while N2O mitigation increased linearly with increasing dose of coated urea. Most importantly, our results showed that the application of coated urea leads to a large mismatch between NUE, crop yields and greenhouse gas mitigation. By and large, the application of coated urea did not correspond with higher crop yields despite significant reduction in the emissions and improved NUE. Overall, these results suggest that site-specific agro-edaphic conditions should be considered when applying coated urea to reduce these emissions and N volatilization losses for increasing NUE and crop yields.

Mitigation of ammonia volatilization from organic and inorganic nitrogen sources applied to soil using water hyacinth biochars

The recent global population explosion has increased people's food demand. To meet this demand, huge amounts of nitrogen (N) fertilizer have been applied in the worldwide. However, ammonia (NH3) volatilization is one of the primary factors of N loss from soil after N application causing decrease crop N utilization efficiency and productivity. Incubation experiments were conducted on an acidic clayey soil with two different N sources (urea and anaerobic digestion effluent; ADE), two differently-produced biochars, and three biochar application rates (0%, 0.25%, and 1.0% w/w). Ammonia volatilization was lower from urea (14.0-23.5 mg N kg-1) and ADE (11.3-21.0 mg N kg-1) with biochar application than those without biochar (40.1 and 26.2 mg N kg-1 from urea and ADE alone, respectively). Biochar application significantly mitigated volatilization and reduction percentages for urea and ADE were 40%-64% and 18%-55%, respectively. 1.0% biochar application mitigated volatilization significantly compared to 0.25% application regardless of N source and biochar types. Possible mechanism for volatilization mitigation for urea and ADE were increased N immobilization by soil microorganisms and accelerated net nitrification rate due to increased soil nitrifying bacteria, respectively. Overall, our results clarified different mechanisms for N volatilization mitigation from different (inorganic vs. organic) N sources with biochar application.

Global warming potential assessment under reclaimed water and livestock wastewater irrigation coupled with co-application of inhibitors and biochar

The application of nitrification inhibitors (nitrapyrin) and urease inhibitors (N-(N-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) under conventional water resources has been considered as an effective means to improve nitrogen utilization efficiency and mitigate soil greenhouse gas emissions. However, it is not known whether the inhibitors still have an inhibitory effect under unconventional water resources (reclaimed water and livestock wastewater) irrigation and whether their use in combination with biochar improves the mitigation effect. Therefore, unconventional water resources were used for irrigation, with groundwater (GW) control. Nitrapyrin and N-(N-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide were used alone or in combination with biochar in a pot experiment, and CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions were measured. The results showed that irrigation of unconventional water resources exacerbated global warming potential (GWP). All exogenous substance treatments increased CO2 and CH4 emissions and suppressed N2O emissions, independent of the type of water, compared to no substances (NS). The inhibitors were ineffective in reducing the GWP whether or not in combination with biochar, and the combined application of inhibitors with biochar further increased the GWP. This study suggests that using inhibitors and biochar in combination to regulate the greenhouse effect under unconventional water resources irrigation should be done with caution.

Nitrification and urease inhibitors mitigate global warming potential and ammonia volatilization from urea in rice-wheat system in India: A field to lab experiment

The efficacy of alternative nitrogenous fertilizers for mitigating greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from a rice-wheat cropping system in northern India was addressed in a laboratory incubation experiment using soil from a 10-year residue management field experiment (crop residue removal, CRR, vs. incorporation, CRI). Neem coated urea (NCU), standard urea (U), urea ammonium sulfate (UAS), and two alternative fertilizers, urea + urease inhibitor NBPT (UUI) and urea + urease inhibitor NBPT + nitrification inhibitor DMPSA (UUINI) were compared to non-fertilized controls for four weeks in incubation under anaerobic condition. Effects of fertilizers on global warming potential (GWP) and ammonia volatilization were dependent on residue treatment. Relative to standard urea, NCU reduced GWP by 11 % in CRI but not significantly in CRR; conversely, UAS reduced GWP by 12 % in CRR but not significantly in CRI. UUI and UUINI reduced GWP in both residue treatments and were more effective in CRI (21 % and 26 %) than CRR (15 % and 14 %). Relative to standard urea, NCU increased ammonia volatilization by 8 % in CRI but not significantly in CRR. Ammonia volatilization was reduced most strongly by UUI (40 % in CRI and 37 % in CRR); it was reduced 28-29 % by UUINI and 12-15 % by UAS. Overall, the urease inhibitor, alone and in combination with the nitrification inhibitor, was more effective in mitigating greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions than NCU. However, these products need to be tested in field settings to validate findings from the controlled laboratory experiment.

Effects of hotter, drier conditions on gaseous losses from nitrogen fertilisers

Global warming is expected to cause hotter, drier summers and more extreme weather events including heat waves and droughts. A little understood aspect of this is its effects on the efficacy of fertilisers and related nutrient losses into the environment. We explored the effects of high soil temperature (>25 °C) and low soil moisture (<40% water filled pore space; WFPS) on emissions of ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) following application of urea to soil and the efficacy of urease inhibitors (UI) in slowing N losses. We incubated soil columns at three temperatures (15, 25, 35 °C) and three soil moisture contents (20, 40, 60% WFPS) with urea applied on the soil surface with and without UIs, and measured NH3 and N2O emissions using chambers placed over the columns. Four fertiliser treatments were applied in triplicate in a randomised complete block design: (1) urea; (2) urea with a single UI (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT); (3) urea with two UI (NBPT and N-(n-propyl) thiophosphoric triamide; NPPT); and (4) a zero N control. Inclusion of UI with urea, relative to urea alone, delayed and reduced peak NH3 emissions. However, the efficacy of UI was reduced with increasing temperature and decreasing soil moisture. Cumulative NH3 emission did not differ between the two UI treatments for a given set of conditions and was reduced by 22-87% compared with urea alone. Maximum cumulative NH3 emission occurred at 35 °C and 20% WFPS, accounting for 31% of the applied N for the urea treatment and 25%, on average for the UI treatments. Urease inhibitors did not influence N2O emissions; however, there were interactive impacts of temperature and moisture, with higher cumulative emissions at 40% WFPS and 15 and 25 °C accounting for 1.85-2.62% of the applied N, whereas at 35 °C there was greater N2O emission at 60% WFPS. Our results suggest that inclusion of UI with urea effectively reduces NH3 losses at temperatures reaching 35 °C, although overall effectiveness decreases with increasing temperature, particularly under low soil moisture conditions.

Modelling potential human exposure to the urease inhibitor NBPT through the environment-food pathway

The urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) has recently attracted a lot of attention attributing to its efficiency in reducing ammonia loss from urea fertiliser applied to temperate grassland soils. Ammonia gas lost to the environment causes soil acidification, eutrophication and contributes to global warming through increased greenhouse gas emissions and ozone layer depletion. The active chemical NBPT blocks the soil microbial enzyme (urease) and reduces ammonia emission. Furthermore, NBPT's use in agriculture might benefit farmers by reducing reliance on expensive nitrate fertiliser and aiding in a shift to more urea-based fertiliser (using NBPT co-applied with urea is more cost-effective). The present study was carried out to characterise the potential transfer of NBPT from grass to liquid milk and compute the associated human health risks. Using probabilistic risk assessment techniques, an exposure assessment model was developed to calculate the Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) of NBPT from milk, following co-application of NBPT with a urea N-fertiliser. Results show that the predicted mean concentration of NBPT in milk is 2.5 × 10-8 mg NBPT/kg milk, while the mean daily intake (EDI) of NBPT is 5 × 10-11 mg NBPT /kg BW/day). Back-calculations revealed that, under the studied conditions, for the EDI to exceed ADI of 3 × 10-2 mg NBPT/kg BW/ day, the NBPT application rate would need to exceed the NBPT fertiliser limit (0.09-0.2% by mass of urea nitrogen) set in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/2008, and the bio-transfer factor would need to be over 100% (implausible). Sensitivity analysis revealed soil pH (SPH), phytoaccumulation factor (PF), NBPT permissible levels in fertiliser (NBPT%), pasture cover (P), and grazing rotation length (t) as critical factors influencing the EDI of NBPT. The present study concludes that NBPT presents negligible risk to human health under the conditions and assumptions studied.

Organic fertilizer substitutions maintain maize yield and mitigate ammonia emissions but increase nitrous oxide emissions

Organic fertilizer can improve soil structure and enhance the nutrient content in soil and is beneficial to sustainable agricultural development. However, the influence of organic fertilizer substitutions on NH₃ and N₂O emissions from farmland is unclear. Thus, we set up an organic substitution field experiment in Northeast China. The experiment included six treatments: single application of chemical fertilizers (NPK: 250 kg N ha^-1); NO₁₀, 10% reduction in chemical nitrogen fertilizers (225 kg N ha^-1) + chicken manure (25 kg N ha^-1); NO₂₀, 20% reduction in chemical nitrogen fertilizers (200 kg N ha^-1) + chicken manure (50 kg N ha^-1); NO₃₀, 30% reduction in chemical nitrogen fertilizers (175 kg N ha^-1) + chicken manure (75 kg N ha^-1); NO₄₀, 40% reduction in chemical nitrogen fertilizers (150 kg N ha^-1) + chicken manure (100 kg N ha^-1); and no-nitrogen fertilizer (CK). This experiment investigated the effects of partial substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizer with organic fertilizer on NH₃ and N₂O emissions and nitrogen use efficiency in a maize field. The results showed that, compared with chemical N, organic fertilizer mitigated NH₃ volatilization but promoted the soil N₂O total emissions during the whole growth stage. NH₃ cumulative volatilization decreased with the increase in the substitution rate of organic fertilizer. Compared with the NPK treatment, the cumulative volatilization of NH₃ in the NO₃₀ and NO₄₀ treatments decreased by 15.24 and 17.92%, respectively. The NO₄₀ treatment had the highest N₂O emission in the whole growth stage, and the N₂O emission of the NO₄₀ treatment increased by 10.72% compared to the NPK treatment. Moreover, the yield, partial factor productivity (PFP), nitrogen harvest index (NHI), and apparent nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE) of NO₃₀ treatment were the highest of all treatments, and the yields, PFP, plant N accumulation, grain N accumulation, and the cumulative emissions of NH₃ and N₂O were similar to N₂₀ treatment. In conclusion, nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency was enhanced, decreasing environmental pollution from livestock under organic fertilizer substitution conditions. We suggested 20% or 30% substitution rates of organic fertilizer were proper.

Ammonia volatilization mitigation in crop farming: A review of fertilizer amendment technologies and mechanisms

Good practices in controlling ammonia produced from the predominant agricultural contributor, crop farming, are the most direct yet effective approaches for mitigating ammonia emissions and further relieving air pollution. Of all the practices that have been investigated in recent decades, fertilizer amendment technologies are garnering increased attention as the low nitrogen use efficiency in most applied quick-acting fertilizers is the main cause of high ammonia emissions. This paper systematically reviews the fertilizer amendment technologies and associated mechanisms that have been developed for ammonia control, especially the technology development of inorganic additives-based complex fertilizers, coating-based enhanced efficiency fertilizers, organic waste-based resource fertilizers and microbial agent and algae-based biofertilizers, and their corresponding mechanisms in farmland properties shifting towards inhibiting ammonia volatilization and enhancing nitrogen use efficiency. The systematic analysis of the literature shows that both enhanced efficiency fertilizers technique and biofertilizers technique present outstanding ammonia inhibition performance with an average mitigation efficiency of 54% and 50.1%, respectively, which is mainly attributed to the slowing down in release and hydrolysis of nitrogen fertilizer, the enhancement in the adsorption and retention of NH₄⁺/NH₃ in soil, and the promotion in the microbial consumption of NH₄⁺ in soil. Furthermore, a combined physical and chemical means, namely membrane/film-based mulching technology, for ammonia volatilization inhibition is also evaluated, which is capable of increasing the resistance of ammonia volatilization. Finally, the review addresses the challenges of mitigating agricultural ammonia emissions with the aim of providing an outlook for future research.

Rational Development of Bacterial Ureases Inhibitors

Urease, an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea, is a virulence factor of various pathogenic bacteria. In particular, Helicobacter pylori, that colonizes the digestive tract and Proteus spp., that can infect the urinary tract, are related to urease activity. Therefore, urease inhibitors are considered as potential therapeutics against these infections. This review describes current knowledge of the structures, activity, and biological importance of bacterial ureases. Moreover, the structure-based design of several classes of bacterial urease inhibitors is presented and discussed. Phosphinic and phosphonic acids were applied as transition-state analogues, while Michael acceptors and ebselen derivatives were applied as covalent binders of cysteine residue. This review incorporates bacterial urease inhibitors from literature published between 2008 and 2021.

Effects of biochar and N-stabilizers on greenhouse gas emissions from a subtropical pasture field applied with organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizers

Pasturelands contribute significantly to the global CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O emissions. These gas emissions are influenced by the amount and type of N-fertilizers applied and local climate. Recent studies showed potential of biochar and N-stabilizer compounds in minimizing CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O emissions by regulating N-release from N-fertilizers. The present study was aimed at determining and comparing the effects of biochar and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide + dicyandiamide (N-stabilizer) on CO₂, N₂O and CH₄ emissions from a pasture fertilized with cattle manure or urea. The study was conducted during 2015 and 2016 in an established bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L. Pers.). Treatments consisted of combination of N-sources (manure, and urea) and two mitigation technologies [pine hardwood biochar (BC) and N-stabilizer] along with control. Emissions of GHGs were measured from each plot using static chamber systems. Both BC and N-stabilizer applications with manure applied to the hay field significantly decreased N₂O emissions by 42% and 45%, respectively, in the year-2, and emission factors compared to manure only treatment. Addition of N-stabilizer to urea had significantly decreased N₂O emissions compared to urea alone, while BC had statistically insignificant effect although numerically lowered N₂O emissions in both the years. Application of manure to the soil resulted in significantly higher CO₂ emissions in both years and CH₄ emissions in 2016 compared to unfertilized soil. Urea application had significant effect on CO₂ emissions in 2016, while no effect on CH₄ emissions compared to control. Application of either biochar or N-stabilizer did not significantly affect CO₂ and CH₄ emissions.

Current knowledge on urease and nitrification inhibitors technology and their safety

OBJECTIVE

Urea is one of the most widely used commercial fertilisers worldwide due to its high N density and cost effectiveness. However, it can be lost in the form of gaseous ammonia and other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions which can potentially lead to environmental pollution. Farmers are compelled to apply more urea to account for those losses, thereby increasing their expenditure on fertilization. The objective of this paper is to present a literature review on current knowledge regarding inhibitor technologies such as urease inhibitor; n-(N-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), and nitrification inhibitor; dicyandiamide (DCD).

METHODS

A thorough review of all the scientific literature was carried out and a proposed risk assessment framework developed.

RESULTS

The study showed that the urease inhibitor NBPT significantly reduced NH3 loss from urea. However, concerns about NBPT safety to human health had been raised when the nitrification inhibitor DCD appeared as a residue in milk. This article presents a risk assessment framework for evaluating human exposure to chemicals like NBPT or DCD, following the consumption of foods of animal origin (e.g. milk) from cows grazing on inhibitor-treated pasture.

CONCLUSION

The EU's target of a 40% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 can be aided by using NBPT as part of an overall suite of solutions. A comprehensive risk assessment is advised for effective evaluation of potential risks from exposure to these inhibitors.

Co-application of DMPSA and NBPT with urea mitigates both nitrous oxide emissions and nitrate leaching during irrigated potato production

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production in irrigated coarse-textured soils requires intensive nitrogen (N) fertilization which may increase reactive N losses. Biological soil additives including N-fixing microbes (NFM) have been promoted as a means to increase crop N use efficiency, though few field studies have evaluated their effects, and none have examined the combined use of NFM with microbial inhibitors. A 2-year study (2018-19) in an irrigated loamy sand quantified the effects of the urease inhibitor NBPT, the nitrification inhibitor DMPSA, NFM, and the additive combinations DMPSA + NBPT and DMPSA + NFM on potato performance and growing season nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and nitrate (NO₃^-) leaching. All treatments, except a zero-N control, received diammonium phosphate at 45 kg N ha^-1 and split applied urea at 280 kg N ha^-1. Compared with urea alone, DMPSA + NBPT reduced NO₃^- leaching and N₂O emissions by 25% and 62%, respectively, and increased crop N uptake by 19% in one year, although none of the additive treatments increased tuber yields. The DMPSA and DMPSA + NBPT treatments had greater soil ammonium concentration, and all DMPSA-containing treatments consistently reduced N₂O emissions, compared to urea-only. Use of NBPT by itself reduced NO₃^- leaching by 21% across growing seasons and N₂O emissions by 37% in 2018 relative to urea-only. In contrast to the inhibitors, NFM by itself increased N₂O by 23% in 2019; however, co-applying DMPSA with NFM reduced N₂O emissions by ≥ 50% compared to urea alone. These results demonstrate that DMPSA can mitigate N₂O emissions in potato production systems and that DMPSA + NBPT can reduce both N₂O and NO₃^- losses and increase the N supply for crop uptake. This is the first study to show that combining a nitrification inhibitor with NFM can result in decreased N₂O emissions in contrast to unintended increases in N₂O emissions that can occur when NFM is applied by itself.

Are CH4, CO2, and N2O Emissions from Soil Affected by the Sources and Doses of N in Warm-Season Pasture?

The intensification of pasture production has increased the use of N fertilizers—a practice that can alter soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the fluxes of CH4, CO2, and N2O in the soil of Urochloa brizantha ‘Marandu’ pastures fertilized with different sources and doses of N. Two field experiments were conducted to evaluate GHG fluxes following N fertilization with urea, ammonium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate at doses of 0, 90, 180, and 270 kg N ha−1. GHG fluxes were quantified using the static chamber technique and gas chromatography. In both experiments, the sources and doses of N did not significantly affect cumulative GHG emissions, while N fertilization significantly affected cumulative N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control treatment. The N2O emission factor following fertilization with urea, ammonium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate was lower than the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change standard (0.35%, 0.24%, and 0.21%, respectively, with fractionation fertilization and 1.00%, 0.83%, and 1.03%, respectively, with single fertilization). These findings are important for integrating national inventories and improving GHG estimation in tropical regions.

A 2-year study of the impact of reduced nitrogen application combined with double inhibitors on soil nitrogen transformation and wheat productivity under drip irrigation

BACKGROUND

Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) and urease inhibitors (UIs) can decrease the risk of nitrogen (N) loss and extend N uptake by plants. However, there are few case studies about reduced N application combined with double inhibitors (DIs, NI plus UI), especially under drip irrigation systems. A 2-year field experiment was therefore conducted to explore the effect of 80% N application rate combined with NI or DIs on soil N transformation, wheat productivity and N use efficiency (NUE) in a drip-irrigated field. The four treatments included a no-fertilizer control, 100% urea, 80% urea + NI (nitrapyrin) and 80% urea + DIs (nitrapyrin and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT)).

RESULTS

Our results showed that the 80% urea + DIs treatment significantly increased the ratio of NH₄ ⁺ to NO₃ ^- and N content (urea-N, NH₄ ⁺ -N and NO₃ ^- -N) in soil at 0-20 cm depth (P < 0.05) at the heading stage and the filling stage of wheat in both 2013 and 2014, relative to the 100% urea treatment. A total of 80% urea + NI treatment decreased wheat N uptake and wheat productivity (plant biomass and yield) compared to 100% urea treatments (P < 0.05). However, application of 80% urea combined with DIs achieved equivalent wheat productivity with 100% urea treatment. Moreover, the greatest NUE (43.6%) was recorded with the application of DIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutting the N application rate by 20% combined with NBPT and nitrapyrin could provide a sustainable fertilization strategy for wheat production under drip irrigation. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.

Using the Nitrification Inhibitor Nitrapyrin in Dairy Farm Effluents Does Not Improve Yield-Scaled Nitrous Oxide and Ammonia Emissions but Reduces Methane Flux

The application of dairy farm effluents (DFE) without previous treatment in paddocks was intensified due to the approval of this practice in Costa Rican legislation since 2012. Applying DFE instead of synthetic N fertilizer in grasslands is an opportunity to reach a circular economy; however, this practice increases the risk of emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and ammonia (NH3), which contribute to global warming. A field experiment was carried out using a permanent grassland (90% Star grass and 10% Kikuyo grass) to simultaneously assess the effect of nitrapyrin on yield-scaled emissions of NH3, CH4, and N2O. The experiment lasted for 5 months in 2017, based on a randomized complete block design, including three treatments of control (CK) without N application, surface application of DFE with nitrapyrin (SNI), and without nitrapyrin (S). Total N applied was 149 ± 12 kg N ha−1 for both S and SNI treatments split into five applications. CH4 emissions from S, SNI, and CK showed a high temporal variation. Daily fluxes of CH4 from SNI were significantly lower than those of S in August (P &lt; 0.05). Cumulative emissions of CH4, the majority produced in the soil, ranged from 4 to 168 g ha−1 for S, and from −13 to 88 g ha−1 for SNI. The ratio between the N2O cumulative emissions and the N applied as DFE were 1.6 ± 0.5 and 1.7 ± 0.2% for S and SNI, respectively. NH3 volatilization potential was very low (i.e., 0.6 ± 0.2% of the N applied). Under the prevailing experimental conditions, no significant difference between yield-scaled NH3 and N2O emissions were found between S and SNI, suggesting that nitrapyrin may not be a viable mitigation option for gaseous N losses from DFE application in Costa Rican grasslands in rainy season.

Enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizers were not effective in reducing N2O emissions from a drip-irrigated cotton field in arid region of Northwestern China

Drip irrigation is an effective water-saving strategy for crop production in arid regions. However, limited information is available on how fertilizer nitrogen (N) management affects soil nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission under drip irrigation. A two-year (2017-2018) field experiment was conducted in arid northwestern China to test management options of fertilizer N to reduce N₂O emission and improve NUE of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drip irrigation. Treatment included a factorial design of rate (120, 240 kg N ha^-1) and source of N fertilizer (Urea, polymer-coated urea-ESN, stabilized urea with nitrification and urease inhibitors-SuperU), and an unfertilized Control. Urea was split-applied with irrigation water (fertigation) whereas ESN and SuperU were all side-banded at pre-plant. Crop yield and N uptake, soil mineral N concentrations, soil temperature and moisture, and N₂O fluxes were determined. Across the two growing seasons, a single pre-plant application with ESN or SuperU significantly increased growing season cumulative N₂O emissions (ƩN₂O) by 29-47% and applied N-scaled emission factor (EF) by 57-83% compared to urea fertigation, irrespectively of application rate. In contrast, cotton yield, agronomic NUE, apparent N recovery (ANR), and yield-based N₂O emission intensity (EI) were not affected by N source. Reducing N rate from 240 to 120 kg N ha^-1 significantly decreased ƩN₂O by 35% in 2017 and 36% in 2018 while simultaneously reduced cotton yield in both years. The increased N₂O emissions with ESN and SuperU were attributed to greater availability of inorganic N resulted from one-time application at pre-plant and higher soil temperature. We concluded that fertigation with urea at the recommended rate is the best option to ensure agronomic productively and agronomic NUE with minimal risk of N₂O emissions. In contrast, the benefit of enhanced efficiency N fertilizer is limited and recommendation on using of these products is challenging for arid croplands under drip irrigation.

Nitrogen fertilisers with urease inhibitors reduce nitrous oxide and ammonia losses, while retaining yield in temperate grassland

Nitrogen fertilisation, although a cornerstone of modern agricultural production, negatively impacts the environment through gaseous losses of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), and ammonia (NH₃), a known air pollutant. The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility of urea treated with urease inhibitors to reduce gaseous N losses in temperate grassland, while maintaining or improving productivity compared to conventional fertiliser formulations. Urease inhibitors were N-(n-butyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (urea + NBPT) and N-(n-propyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NPPT) (urea+ NBPT + NPPT), while conventional fertilisers were urea and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). N₂O emission factors were 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.09% and 0.58% from urea + NBPT, urea, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively, with CAN significantly higher than all the urea formulations, which were not significantly different from each other. Ammonia loss measured over one fertiliser application was significantly larger from urea, at 43%, compared with other formulations at 13.9%, 13.8% and 5.2% from urea + NBPT, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively. Changing fertiliser formulation had no significant impact on grass yield or N uptake in four out of five harvests. In the last harvest urea + NBPT significantly out-yielded urea, but not CAN or urea + NBPT + NPPT. Overall, urea treated with either one or both urease inhibitors significantly reduced emissions of N₂O and NH₃, while preserving yield quantity and quality. Therefore, changing fertiliser formulation to these products should be encouraged as a strategy to reduce GHG and air pollution from agricultural practices in temperate climate.

Ammonia volatilisation from pig slurry and ANS with DMPP applied to Westerwold ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam., cv. Trinova) under Mediterranean conditions

Ammonia volatilisation from agriculture represents an important nitrogen (N) loss which has both environmental and economic impacts. In regions where large amounts of manures are available, there is a need to find appropriate management strategies that help to reuse them without increasing ammonia volatilisation. A study was made of the effect on ammonia volatilisation and yield of fertilising ryegrass with pig slurry (PS) and ammonium nitrosulphate (ANS-26) alone and with the 3,4-dimethylpyrazol phosphate (DMPP) nitrification inhibitor added to them. The study was conducted under Mediterranean conditions at two different sites. The treatments (control, PS, PS + DMPP, ANS-26 and ENTEC®) were established in a randomised block design with three replicates. Ammonia was sampled daily after each fertilisation using semi-static volatilisation chambers. We hypothesised that PS could replace mineral fertiliser without substantially increasing ammonia volatilisation in the studied systems. Temperature positively correlated with ammonia emissions. On the whole, during the two years of the study, the PS treatments presented higher average cumulative ammonia volatilisation (25% of total ammonium nitrogen (TAN) applied at Site 1; 21% of TAN applied at Site 2) than the mineral ones (11% of TAN applied at Site 1; 10% of TAN applied at Site 2). At pre-sowing, ammonia volatilisation was significantly (p < .05) lower (51% at Site 1; 55% at Site 2) than after ryegrass cuts due to burying PS immediately after application. Overall, applying DMPP had no effect on ammonia volatilisation. There were no significant differences in average yield (from 13.7 to 15.8 kg ha^-1 at Site 1; from 11.6 to 13.5 kg ha^-1 at Site 2) between the fertilised treatments, though ENTEC® tended to increase it. Applying PS (pre-sowing fertilisation) in combination with mineral N or processed PS fractions after ryegrass cuts could be an interesting option for the recycling of this livestock by-product without increasing ammonia volatilisation while maintaining yields.

Ammonia Volatilization Loss and Corn Nitrogen Nutrition and Productivity with Efficiency Enhanced UAN and Urea under No-tillage

New urease and nitrification inhibitors and polymer coatings were introduced in recent years, but their effects on N loss and plant N nutrition were scarcely examined in agronomic no-tillage production systems. A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015. A field experiment on urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN) treated with efficiency enhancers was carried out on no-tillage corn in Tennessee in 2014 and 2015. Urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) at concentrations of 20% (NBPT₁), 26.7% (NBPT₂), or 30% (NBPT₃) and polymer coated urea (PCU) were effective but maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea was ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss and improving N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiency of corn compared with untreated urea. Specifically, NBPT₁, NBPT₂, or NBPT₃ treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively. The inhibitory effect of NBPT on ammonia volatilization did not improve with NBPT concentration increased from 20% to 30%. UAN treated with NBPT₃ or a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors resulted in 16.5–16.6% higher corn yield than untreated UAN only when they were surface applied. In conclusion, when urea-containing fertilizers are surface applied without any incorporation into the soil under no-tillage, their use efficiencies and performances on corn can be enhanced with an effective urease inhibitor in areas and years with noticeable urea N losses.

Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer applications by the use of polymer-coated urea: effect on maize yields and environmental impacts of nitrogen losses

BACKGROUND

Urea is commonly over-applied as a nitrogen (N) fertilizer to crops in southern China and has a low utilization efficiency as a result of the high precipitation and high temperatures in this region. This has led to a need to optimize the management of N fertilizer use in maize crops on the subtropical hilly uplands of southern China.

RESULTS

We investigated the effects of applying different amounts of N in the form of polymer-coated urea (PCU) on the yield of maize and gaseous losses of N from soils in the form of NH₃ and N₂ O. The field plots used in this trial had zero-added N (0 kg N ha^-1 ), the addition of urea (240 kg N ha^-1 ) and four levels of fertilization with PCU (1 PCU, 0.9 PCU, 0.8 PCU and 0.7 PCU), which represented a 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% reduction, respectively, in the application of PCU-N relative to the urea plot. Compared to the urea plot, there was little variation in the yield of maize for all the PCU-N treatments, with a significant improvement in the utilization efficiency of N (up to 46.0-51.2%) with a 0-30% reduction in the application of PCU-N. Significant effects in the mitigation of the N₂ O emission flux and the accumulation of N₂ O-N were observed in the 0.8 PCU and 0.7 PCU plots. The application of PCU-N significantly reduced the flux and total amount of NH₃ -N lost to the environment: as the application rate for N decreased by 0-30%, the NH₃ loss was significantly reduced by 12.7-36.1%.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study suggest that the use of PCU could allow a reduction in the application of N of 20-30% compared to traditional agricultural practices in this area with the same yield of maize, although with significantly decreased NH₃ and N₂ O losses and the increased utilization of N. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Producing more grain yield of rice with less ammonia volatilization and greenhouse gases emission using slow/controlled-release urea

Ammonia (NH₃) volatilization and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields contaminate the atmospheric environment and lead to global warming. Field trials (2013-2015) were conducted to estimate the influences of different types of fertilization practices on grain yield, NH₃ volatilization, and methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions in a double rice cropping system in Central China. Results showed that grain yields of rice were improved significantly by using slow/controlled-release urea (S/C-RU). Compared with farmers' fertilizer practice (FFP) treatment, average annual grain yield with application of polymer-coated urea (CRU), nitrapyrin-treated urea (CP), and urea with effective microorganism (EM) treatments was increased by 18.0%, 16.2%, and 15.4%, respectively. However, the effects on NH₃ volatilization and CH₄ and N₂O emissions differed in diverse S/C-RU. Compared with that of the FFP treatment, the annual NH₃ volatilization, CH₄ emission, and N₂O emissions of the CRU treatment were decreased by 64.8%, 19.7%, and 35.2%, respectively; the annual CH₄ and N₂O emissions of the CP treatment were reduced by 33.7% and 40.3%, respectively, while the NH₃ volatilization was increased by 18.5%; the annual NH₃ and N₂O emissions of the EM treatment were reduced by 6.3% and 28.7%, while the CH₄ emission was improved by 4.3%. Overall, CP showed the best emission reduction with a decrement of 34.3% in global warming potential (GWP) and 44.4% in the greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI), followed by CRU treatment with a decrement of 21.1% in GWP and 31.7% in GHGI, compared with that of the FFP treatment. Hence, it is suggested that polymer-coated urea can be a feasible way of mitigating NH₃ volatilization and CH₄ and N₂O emission from rice fields while maintaining or increasing the grain yield in Chinese, the double rice cropping system.

Effects of phosphogypsum, superphosphate, and dicyandiamide on gaseous emission and compost quality during sewage sludge composting

This study investigated the effects of phosphogypsum, superphosphate, and dicyandiamide on gaseous emission and compost quality during sewage sludge composting. Results showed that phosphogypsum reduced ammonia (NH₃) and methane (CH₄) emissions but increased nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission. Superphosphate simultaneously reduced NH₃, N₂O and CH₄ emissions. Dicyandiamide markedly reduced N₂O emission during composting. Combination of phosphogypsum and dicyandiamide reduced CH₄ and N₂O emissions by 75.6% and 86.4%, while NH₃ emission was increased by 22.0%. Combination of superphosphate and dicyandiamide reduced NH₃, CH₄ and N₂O emissions by 12.3%, 81.0% and 88.2%, respectively. More importantly, with the addition of 10% initial raw materials, phosphogypsum and superphosphate conserved nitrogen and improved compost quality by introducing additional nutrients.

The contrasting effects of N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) on N2O emissions in arable soils differing in pH are underlain by complex microbial mechanisms

The urease inhibitor, N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT), has been proposed to reduce synthetic fertilizer-N losses, including nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from agricultural soils. However, the response of N₂O emission to NBPT amendment is inconsistent across soils and associated microbial mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here we performed a meta-analysis of the effects of NBPT on N₂O emissions and found NBPT significantly reduced N₂O emissions in alkaline soils whereas no obvious effects exhibited in acid soils. Based on the finding of meta-analysis that pH was a key modifier in regulating the effect of NBPT on N₂O emissions, we selected two arable soils differing in pH and conducted a microcosm study. In conjunction with measurement of N₂O emission, community structure and abundance of functional guilds were assessed using T-RFLP and qPCR. Our results showed NBPT retarded urea hydrolysis and inhibited nitrification, but stimulated N₂O emission in alkaline soil, whereas it exhibited no remarkable effects in acid soil, thereby only partly confirming the results of meta-analysis. Abundances of AOB and ureC-containing bacteria decreased, while abundance of AOA increased in both soils with NBPT addition. For acid soil, N₂O emissions were significantly correlated with both abundances and community structures of AOA and ureC-containing bacteria, as well as abundance of AOB; for alkaline soil, abundances and community structures of AOB were correlated with N₂O emission, as well as community structures of ureC-containing bacteria and archaea, indicating an inconsistent response pattern of community traits of N₂O emissions-related functional guilds to NBPT between alkaline soil and acid soil. Our findings suggest that (i) efficacy of NBPT in N₂O emission was mainly influenced by soil pH and (ii) variable effects of NBPT on N₂O emission might originate not only from the direct effect of NBPT on community traits of urease-positive microbes, but from the indirect effect on ammonia oxidizers.

Long-term manure application increased greenhouse gas emissions but had no effect on ammonia volatilization in a Northern China upland field

The impacts of manure application on soil ammonia (NH₃) volatilization and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are of interest for both agronomic and environmental reasons. However, how the swine manure addition affects greenhouse gas and N emissions in North China Plain wheat fields is still unknown. A long-term fertilization experiment was carried out on a maize-wheat rotation system in Northern China (Zea mays L-Triticum aestivum L.) from 1990 to 2017. The experiment included four treatments: (1) No fertilizer (CK), (2) single application of chemical fertilizers (NPK), (3) NPK plus 22.5t/ha swine manure (NPKM), (4) NPK plus 33.7t/ha swine manure (NPKM+). A short-term fertilization experiment was conducted from 2016 to 2017 using the same treatments in a field that had been abandoned for decades. The emissions of NH₃ and GHGs were measured during the wheat season from 2016 to 2017. Results showed that after long-term fertilization the wheat yields for NPKM treatment were 7105kg/ha, which were higher than NPK (3880kg/ha) and NPKM+ treatments (5518kg/ha). The wheat yields were similar after short-term fertilization (6098-6887kg/ha). The NH₃-N emission factors (EF_amm) for NPKM and NPKM+ treatments (1.1 and 1.1-1.4%, respectively) were lower than NPK treatment (2.2%) in both the long and short-term fertilization treatments. In the long- and short-term experiments the nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission factors (EF_nit) for NPKM+ treatment were 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively, which were higher than for the NPK treatment (3.5% and 2.5%, respectively) and the NPKM treatment (3.6% and 2.2%, respectively). In addition, under long and short-term fertilization, the greenhouse gas intensities for the NPKM+ treatment were 33.7 and 27.0kg CO₂-eq/kg yield, respectively, which were higher than for the NPKM treatment (22.8 and 21.1kg CO₂-eq/kg yield, respectively). These results imply that excessive swine manure application does not increase yield but increases GHG emissions.

Assessment of reactive nitrogen mitigation potential of different nitrogen treatments under direct-seeded rice and wheat cropping system

The reactive nitrogen (Nr) pollution is a serious environmental problem. A wise application of nitrogen fertilizer is important for mitigating Nr loss. Field experiments were undertaken during the direct-seeded rice and winter-wheat growing seasons from 2014 to 2015 in Nanjing, one of the typical rice-wheat rotation regions in China, to evaluate the potential of different nitrogen fertilizers for mitigating Nr (N₂O, NH₃ emissions, and NO₃^- leaching) losses. Seven different fertilizer treatments were included in this study: a no fertilizer treatment (NF), conventional fertilizer (CF), urea-ammonium mixed nitrogen fertilizer (UA), stabilized urea (UHD; urea + hydroquinone + dicyandiamide), sulfur-coated urea (SCU), urea formaldehyde (UF) and organic fertilizer (OF). In comparison with the CF, all the fertilizer treatments except for UA decreased NH₃ volatilization by 14.5-36.0% (p < 0.05), while none of the N fertilizers had an obvious mitigation effect on N₂O emissions and NO₃^- leaching during the rice and wheat seasons. Further analyses showed that the UHD, UF and OF treatments reduced the yield-scaled Nr loss (NLI) by 32.6-42.5% for the rice season and by 15.5-34.5% for the wheat season as compared to the CF; other treatments relative to CF had no obvious effect with regard to lowering the NLI. UHD, UF and OF could be adopted as an effective mitigation alternative to reduce Nr loss and maintain crop yield in future rice/wheat production. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Trade-off between soil organic carbon sequestration and nitrous oxide emissions from winter wheat-summer maize rotations: Implications of a 25-year fertilization experiment in Northwestern China

The primary aims of this study were to (i) quantify the variations in nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions and soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates under winter wheat-summer maize cropping systems in Guanzhong Plain and (ii) evaluate the impact of organic amendments on greenhouse gas mitigation over a long-term period. We measured N₂O fluxes during the maize season in 2015 under four fertilizer regimes in a long-term fertilization experiment. Soil was treated with only synthetic fertilizers in the maize season and with synthetic fertilizers, synthetic fertilizers plus crop residues and synthetic fertilizers plus low and high levels of dairy manure in the winter wheat season from 1990. The SOC content (0-20cm) was collected annually at the same site between 1990 and 2015. Synthesis of our measurements and previous observations (between 2000 and 2009) within the investigated agricultural landscape revealed that cumulative N₂O emissions increased with the SOC content following natural logarithm models during both the maize and winter wheat seasons (r²>0.77, p<0.001), implying a trade-off between N₂O emissions and SOC sequestration. The SOC content increased under all fertilizer regimes, and the dynamics were well fitted by the linear and logistic regression models (r²>0.74, p<0.001), indicating that all the fertilizer treatments in this study sequestered SOC. By applying these regression models, we estimated that the two manure-amended treatments accumulated a negative global warming potential (ranging from -1.9 to -12.9tCO₂-equivalentha^-1) over the past 25years. However, this benefit would most likely be offset by high N₂O emissions at saturated SOC levels before 2020. Our estimates suggest that organic amendments may not be efficient for greenhouse gas mitigation in Guanzhong Plain over a long-term period. We recommend efforts to inhibit N₂O production via denitrification as being critical to resolving the conflict between SOC sequestration and N₂O emissions.

Combined use of nitrification inhibitor and struvite crystallization to reduce the NH3 and N2O emissions during composting

Struvite crystallization (SCP) is combined with a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD) to mitigate the NH3 and N2O emission during composting. The MgO and H3PO4 were added at a rate of 15% (mole/mole) of initial nitrogen, and the DCD was added at rates of 0%, 2.5%, 5.0%, 7.5% and 10% (w/w) of initial nitrogen respectively. Results showed that the combination use of SCP and DCD was phytotoxin free. The SCP could significantly reduce NH3 losses by 45-53%, but not the DCD. The DCD significantly inhibits nitrification when the content was higher than 50mgkg(-1), and that could reduce the N2O emission by 76.1-77.6%. The DCD degraded fast during the thermophilic phase, as the nitrification will be inhibited by the high temperature and high free ammonia content in this stage, the DCD was suggested to be applied in the maturing periods by 2.5% of initial nitrogen.

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions by changing N fertiliser use from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea based formulations

The accelerating use of synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilisers, to meet the world's growing food demand, is the primary driver for increased atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O). The IPCC default emission factor (EF) for N2O from soils is 1% of the N applied, irrespective of its form. However, N2O emissions tend to be higher from nitrate-containing fertilisers e.g. calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) compared to urea, particularly in regions, which have mild, wet climates and high organic matter soils. Urea can be an inefficient N source due to NH3 volatilisation, but nitrogen stabilisers (urease and nitrification inhibitors) can improve its efficacy. This study evaluated the impact of switching fertiliser formulation from calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) to urea-based products, as a potential mitigation strategy to reduce N2O emissions at six temperate grassland sites on the island of Ireland. The surface applied formulations included CAN, urea and urea with the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and/or the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD). Results showed that N2O emissions were significantly affected by fertiliser formulation, soil type and climatic conditions. The direct N2O emission factor (EF) from CAN averaged 1.49% overall sites, but was highly variable, ranging from 0.58% to 3.81. Amending urea with NBPT, to reduce ammonia volatilisation, resulted in an average EF of 0.40% (ranging from 0.21 to 0.69%)-compared to an average EF of 0.25% for urea (ranging from 0.1 to 0.49%), with both fertilisers significantly lower and less variable than CAN. Cumulative N2O emissions from urea amended with both NBPT and DCD were not significantly different from background levels. Switching from CAN to stabilised urea formulations was found to be an effective strategy to reduce N2O emissions, particularly in wet, temperate grassland.