1
|
Akyüz K, Goisauf M, Martin GM, Mayrhofer MT, Antoniou S, Charalambidou G, Deltas C, Malatras A, Papagregoriou G, Stefanou C, Voutounou M. Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy. Front Genet 2024; 15:1397156. [PMID: 38948356 PMCID: PMC11211562 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Risk governance is central for the successful and ethical operation of biobanks and the continued social license for being custodians of samples and data. Risks in biobanking are often framed as risks for participants, whereas the biobank's risks are often considered as technical ones. Risk governance relies on identifying, assessing, mitigating and communicating all risks based on technical and standardized procedures. However, within such processes, biobank staff are often involved tangentially. In this study, the aim has been to conduct a risk mapping exercise bringing biobank staff as key actors into the process, making better sense of emerging structure of biobanks. Methods: Based on the qualitative research method of situational analysis as well as the card-based discussion and stakeholder engagement processes, risk mapping was conducted at the biobank setting as an interactive engagement exercise. The analyzed material comprises mainly of moderated group discussions. Results: The findings from the risk mapping activity are framed through an organismic metaphor: the biobank as a growing, living organism in a changing environment, where trust and sustainability are cross-cutting elements in making sense of the risks. Focusing on the situatedness of the dynamics within biobanking activity highlights the importance of prioritizing relations at the core of risk governance and promoting ethicality in the biobanking process by expanding the repertoire of considered risks. Conclusion: With the organismic metaphor, the research brings the diverse group of biobank staff to the central stage for risk governance, highlighting how accounting for such diversity and interdependencies at the biobank setting is a prerequisite for an adaptive risk governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaya Akyüz
- Department of ELSI Services and Research, BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria
| | - Melanie Goisauf
- Department of ELSI Services and Research, BBMRI-ERIC, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Stella Antoniou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Georgia Charalambidou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Deltas
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
- University of Cyprus Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Apostolos Malatras
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Gregory Papagregoriou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Charalambos Stefanou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Mariel Voutounou
- Biobank.cy Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oikawa M, Takimoto Y, Akabayashi A. Attitudes of the Public Toward Consent for Biobank Research in Japan. Biopreserv Biobank 2023; 21:518-526. [PMID: 36576410 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parallel to the rapid advancement of biological and information technologies, the role and forms of biobank research have been constantly changing. The ethical, legal, and social implications of consent in biobank research are in a state of flux. This study aimed to clarify current Japanese public preferences regarding the consent model and explore how public attitudes are determined. Methods: We conducted an online, population-based quantitative survey among Japanese residents aged between 20 and 69 years. Statistical analyses consisted of univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of the 1580 respondents, 60.9% preferred autonomy-based consent (specific or dynamic consent) and 23.9% preferred broad-type consent (opt-out or broad consent). Marital status, gender, and privacy concerns were significantly associated with the preference for a consent model. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the public's current preference for autonomy-based consent, including dynamic consent. However, our findings also revealed that approximately half of the respondents considered broad consent as somewhat preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Oikawa
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Takimoto
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Akabayashi
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Slušná ĽK, Balog M. Review of Indicators in the Context of Biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 2023; 21:318-326. [PMID: 36099204 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biobanks that intend to serve as high-performing and stable elements of an innovative research ecosystem must have an established system for regular measurement and evaluation using appropriately set indicators. The main objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of indicators in the context of biobanking, with new perspectives to highlight the existence of numerous options and introduce indicators that could help overcome problems associated with the difficult assessment of the impact of biobanks. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify publications relevant to the topic of indicators in biobanking. The Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed databases were searched using specific keywords. In addition, three articles that focused on indicators designed for the evaluation of research infrastructures were included in the review. Results: Based on the scientific literature for the biobanking field, many types of quantitative and qualitative indicators exist. They are mainly related to the quantity and quality of data and samples, their distribution, the monitoring of research projects, and subsequent publication outputs. The indicators identified in the biobanking literature primarily focus on the outcome, not the impact. Conclusions: Indicators identified in the biobanking literature may be further expanded with suggestions designed for other types of research infrastructures, while considering the context where biobanks operate and the needs of individual biobanking stakeholders. The establishment of a comprehensive monitoring system that captures all necessary elements is crucial for modern biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miroslav Balog
- Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, SAS, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dahlquist JM, Nelson SC, Fullerton SM. Cloud-based biomedical data storage and analysis for genomic research: Landscape analysis of data governance in emerging NIH-supported platforms. HGG ADVANCES 2023; 4:100196. [PMID: 37181330 PMCID: PMC10173774 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The storage, sharing, and analysis of genomic data poses technical and logistical challenges that have precipitated the development of cloud-based computing platforms designed to facilitate collaboration and maximize the scientific utility of data. To understand cloud platforms' policies and procedures and the implications for different stakeholder groups, in summer 2021, we reviewed publicly available documents (N = 94) sourced from platform websites, scientific literature, and lay media for five NIH-funded cloud platforms (the All of Us Research Hub, NHGRI AnVIL, NHLBI BioData Catalyst, NCI Genomic Data Commons, and the Kids First Data Resource Center) and a pre-existing data sharing mechanism, dbGaP. Platform policies were compared across seven categories of data governance: data submission, data ingestion, user authentication and authorization, data security, data access, auditing, and sanctions. Our analysis finds similarities across the platforms, including reliance on a formal data ingestion process, multiple tiers of data access with varying user authentication and/or authorization requirements, platform and user data security measures, and auditing for inappropriate data use. Platforms differ in how data tiers are organized, as well as the specifics of user authentication and authorization across access tiers. Our analysis maps elements of data governance across emerging NIH-funded cloud platforms and as such provides a key resource for stakeholders seeking to understand and utilize data access and analysis options across platforms and to surface aspects of governance that may require harmonization to achieve the desired interoperability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacklyn M. Dahlquist
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Sarah C. Nelson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Corresponding author
| | - Stephanie M. Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patrinos D, Kleiderman E, Fraser W, Zawati MH. Developing Policy for the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative: Going from National to International. Biopreserv Biobank 2023. [PMID: 37192471 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Scientific research is becoming an increasingly collaborative and global venture. The Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI), for instance, is an international Developmental Origins of Health and Disease research collaboration developed to address the increasing burden of noncommunicable diseases around the world. It comprises four separate but harmonized cohort trials in Canada, China, India, and South Africa. These cohorts will generate rich data and biosample sets that can be shared both within the HeLTI Consortium and with other researchers from around the world. Methods: To ensure the coordination and operation of these types of collaborative research initiatives, a standardized and harmonized governance model is required to regulate the processes and interactions between all involved actors. To develop the governance models, frameworks and related policies from other longitudinal cohort studies and biobanks were used, as were guidance documents on biobank and database governance and relevant literature on data and biobank governance. Results: This article outlines the key components of the governance model for the HeLTI Consortium, including management of the cohorts' respective databases and biobanks, access to data and biosamples, and considerations related to intellectual property and publications. Conclusion: Governance within international collaborative research ventures is critical to ensure the operations and benefits of these types of research apparatuses. Although this article focuses on the HeLTI Consortium as a model, it may nonetheless serve as a model for both current and future collaborative consortium-based research initiatives. Clinical Trial Registration Numbers: Canada, ISRCTN13308752; China, ChiCTR1800017773; India, ISRCTN20161479; South Africa, PACTR201903750173871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Patrinos
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - William Fraser
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ma'n H Zawati
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vaz M, Warrier P, Wai-Loon Ho C, Bull S. Respecting values and perspectives in biobanking and genetic research governance: Outcomes of a qualitative study in Bengaluru, India. Wellcome Open Res 2023; 7:78. [PMID: 37485294 PMCID: PMC10357076 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17628.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The promise of biobanking and genetic research (BGR) in the context of translational research towards improving public health and personalised medicine has been recognised in India. Worldwide experience has shown that incorporating stakeholders' expectations and values into the governance of BGR is essential to address ethical aspects of BGR. This paper draws on engagement with various stakeholders in the South Indian city of Bengaluru to understand how incorporating people's values and beliefs can inform policy making decisions and strengthen BGR governance within India. Methods: We adopted a qualitative research approach and conducted six focus group discussions with civil society members and seven in-depth interviews with key informants in BGR, identified through a targeted web search and snowballing methods, until data saturation was reached. Data were thematically analysed to identify emergent patterns. Results: Specific themes relating to the ethics and governance of BGR emerged. Fears and uncertainty about future sample and data use, possibilities of discrimination and exploitation in the use of findings and the lack of comprehensive data protection policies in India along with expectations of enhanced contributor agency, control in future use of samples and data, benefit sharing, enhanced utility of samples, sustained BGR and public good, reflected tensions between different stakeholders' values and beliefs. Fair governance processes through an independent governance committee for biobanks and a system of ongoing engagement with stakeholders emerged as best practice towards building trust and respecting diversity of views and values. Conclusions: Ensuring public trust in BGR requires listening to stakeholders' voices, being open to counter narratives, and a commitment to long term engagement embedded in principles of participatory democracy. This is central to a 'people-centred governance framework' involving a negotiated middle ground and an equilibrium of governance which promotes social justice by being inclusive, transparent, equitable, and trustworthy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manjulika Vaz
- Health and Humanities, St John's Research Institute, St John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034, India
| | - Prasanna Warrier
- Health and Humanities, St John's Research Institute, St John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 034, India
| | - Calvin Wai-Loon Ho
- Department of Law and Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Susan Bull
- Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guerrini CJ, Majumder MA, Robinson JO, Cook-Deegan R, Blank M, Bollinger J, Geary J, Gutierrez AM, Shrikant M, McGuire AL. Fresh takes on five health data sharing domains: Quality, privacy, equity, incentives, and sustainability. Front Big Data 2023; 6:1095119. [PMID: 36814524 PMCID: PMC9939819 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1095119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As entities around the world invest in repositories and other infrastructure to facilitate health data sharing, scalable solutions to data sharing challenges are needed. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 experts to explore views on potential issues and policy options related to health data sharing. In this Perspective, we describe and contextualize unconventional insights shared by our interviewees relevant to issues in five domains: data quality, privacy, equity, incentives, and sustainability. These insights question a focus on granular quality metrics for gatekeeping; challenge enthusiasm for maximalist risk disclosure practices; call attention to power dynamics that potentially compromise the patient's voice; encourage faith in the sharing proclivities of new generations of scientists; and endorse accounting for personal disposition in the selection of long-term partners. We consider the merits of each insight with the broad goal of encouraging creative thinking to address data sharing challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi J. Guerrini
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mary A. Majumder
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jill O. Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Robert Cook-Deegan
- Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Matthew Blank
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Juli Bollinger
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Janis Geary
- Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Amanda M. Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maya Shrikant
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nielsen MEJ, Kongsholm NCH. Blanket Consent and Trust in the Biobanking Context. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2022; 19:613-623. [PMID: 36068428 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10208-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Obtaining human genetic samples is vital for many biobank research purposes, yet, the ethics of obtainment seems to many fraught with difficulties. One key issue is consent: it is by many considered ethically vital that consent must be fully informed (at least ideally speaking) in order to be legitimate. In this paper, we argue for a more liberal approach to consent: a donor need not know all the specifics of future uses of the sample. We argue that blanket consent is ethically defensible, and that this is buttressed by considerations of (justified) trust-relations. Given robust institutional oversight, blanket consent is a permissible form of consent in the bio-banking context.
Collapse
|
9
|
Guan Y, Pathak S, Ballard D, Veluswamy JK, McCullough LE, McBride CM, Gornick MC. Testing a deliberative democracy method with citizens of African ancestry to weigh pros and cons of targeted screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Front Public Health 2022; 10:984926. [PMID: 36424974 PMCID: PMC9679525 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.984926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Democratic deliberation (DD), a strategy to foster co-learning among researchers and communities, could be applied to gain informed public input on health policies relating to genomic translation. Purpose We evaluated the quality of DD for gaining informed community perspectives regarding targeting communities of African Ancestry (AAn) for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) screening in Georgia. Methods We audiotaped a 2.5 day conference conducted via zoom in March 2021 to examine indicators of deliberation quality based on three principles: (1) inclusivity (diverse viewpoints based on participants' demographics, cancer history, and civic engagement), (2) consideration of factual information (balanced and unbiased expert testimonies, participant perceived helpfulness), and (3) deliberation (speaking opportunities, adoption of a societal perspective on the issue, reasoned justification of ideas, and participant satisfaction). Results We recruited 24 participants who reflected the diversity of views and life experiences of citizens of AAn living in Georgia. The expert testimony development process we undertook for creating balanced factual information was endorsed by experts' feedback. Deliberation process evaluation showed that while participation varied (average number of statements = 24, range: 3-62), all participants contributed. Participants were able to apply expert information and take a societal perspective to deliberate on the pros and cons of targeting individuals of AAn for HBOC screening in Georgia. Conclusions The rigorous process of public engagement using deliberative democracy approach can successfully engage a citizenry with diverse and well-informed views, do so in a relatively short time frame and yield perspectives based on high quality discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Guan
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States,*Correspondence: Yue Guan
| | - Sarita Pathak
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Denise Ballard
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States,Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Lauren E. McCullough
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Colleen M. McBride
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michele C. Gornick
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lensink MA, Jongsma KR, Boers SN, Bredenoord AL. Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:90. [PMID: 36050689 PMCID: PMC9438266 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00823-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The rise of precision medicine has led to an unprecedented focus on human biological material in biomedical research. In addition, rapid advances in stem cell technology, regenerative medicine and synthetic biology are leading to more complex human tissue structures and new applications with tremendous potential for medicine. While promising, these developments also raise several ethical and practical challenges which have been the subject of extensive academic debate. These debates have led to increasing calls for longitudinal governance arrangements between tissue providers and biobanks that go beyond the initial moment of obtaining consent, such as closer involvement of tissue providers in what happens to their tissue, and more active participatory approaches to the governance of biobanks. However, in spite of these calls, such measures are being adopted slowly in practice, and there remains a strong tendency to focus on the consent procedure as the tool for addressing the ethical challenges of contemporary biobanking. In this paper, we argue that one of the barriers to this transition is the dominant language pervading the field of human tissue research, in which the provision of tissue is phrased as a 'donation' or 'gift', and tissue providers are referred to as 'donors'. Because of the performative qualities of language, the effect of using 'donation' and 'donor' shapes a professional culture in which biobank participants are perceived as passive providers of tissue free from further considerations or entitlements. This hampers the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are deemed necessary to adequately address the ethical challenges currently faced in human tissue research. Rather than reinforcing this idea through language, we need to pave the way for the kind of participatory approaches to governance that are being extensively argued for by starting with the appropriate terminology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Lensink
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin R Jongsma
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah N Boers
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tone-Pah-Hote T, Redvers N. The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:978826. [PMID: 35991662 PMCID: PMC9386140 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.978826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is ongoing and increasing interest in the commercialization of biospecimen-derived products from Indigenous Peoples. Discourse on benefit-sharing specifically in the context of the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples biospecimens are currently lacking. A better understanding of the potential ethical imperatives is in need of exploration on this emerging topic. This review sought to elucidate through categorization the current discourse in the peer-reviewed literature on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective. Methods A scoping review methodology was utilized to perform a search of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar. A two-stage screening process was used to assess the relevance of any included articles with subsequent manual open coding of articles. Content analysis was applied to identify the main categories and sub-categories within the article data. Results Thirty-three articles met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Four overarching categories from the included articles were identified regarding the most common discourse on the commercialization of Indigenous Peoples' biospecimens from a benefit-sharing perspective, including: exploitation through biocolonialism, sovereignty and Indigenous rights, ethical considerations for benefit-sharing, and guidelines and standards concerns. Conclusion This scoping review highlighted the crucial need to keep Indigenous communities at the center of research projects, ensuring any benefits, advancement, and potential commercial profits are returned to communities through clear and ethical agreements. We encourage all research institutions and institutional ethical review bodies to better clarify the collective needs and interests of Indigenous communities while centering their sovereignty and rights within the research process as it pertains to potential biospecimen product commercialization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarlynn Tone-Pah-Hote
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, United States
| | - Nicole Redvers
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, United States
- Department of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, United States
- *Correspondence: Nicole Redvers
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Economics of Biobanking: Business or Public Good? Literature Review, Structural and Thematic Analysis. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/socsci11070288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This paper reviewed the relevant scientific literature on the business and economics of biobanking to explore key themes and paradigms. The structural properties of the literature were investigated, such as key authors, journals, studies, as well as co-citation and co-authorship networks; the study revealed that the research on business and economics is a niche area within the vast biobanking literature. The research is concentrated in a relatively small number of journals, institutions, and countries, which is rather surprising given the substantial public investment in and concerns about biobank sustainability. The structural analysis also suggested major themes in research on biobanking business and economics and noted shifts in focus on specific themes. The commercialisation of samples is more acknowledged than before but under the condition of equitable sharing of benefits across various stakeholders. Most biobanks are heavily subsidised by the public sector and are considered public goods rather than business enterprises. This is OK, but underutilisation of specimens and low rates of cost recovery suggest that the current mainstream operating model is hardly sustainable. With many biobanks maturing, long-term sustainability became a key topic of the discussion on biobanking trends.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nwebonyi N, Silva S, de Freitas C. Public Views About Involvement in Decision-Making on Health Data Sharing, Access, Use and Reuse: The Importance of Trust in Science and Other Institutions. Front Public Health 2022; 10:852971. [PMID: 35619806 PMCID: PMC9127133 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.852971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Data-intensive and needs-driven research can deliver substantial health benefits. However, concerns with privacy loss, undisclosed surveillance, and discrimination are on the rise due to mounting data breaches. This can undermine the trustworthiness of data processing institutions and reduce people's willingness to share their data. Involving the public in health data governance can help to address this problem by imbuing data processing frameworks with societal values. This study assesses public views about involvement in individual-level decisions concerned with health data and their association with trust in science and other institutions. Methods Cross-sectional study with 162 patients and 489 informal carers followed at two reference centers for rare diseases in an academic hospital in Portugal (June 2019–March 2020). Participants rated the importance of involvement in decision-making concerning health data sharing, access, use, and reuse from “not important” to “very important”. Its association with sociodemographic characteristics, interpersonal trust, trust in national and international institutions, and the importance of trust in research teams and host institutions was tested. Results Most participants perceived involvement in decision-making about data sharing (85.1%), access (87.1%), use (85%) and reuse (79.9%) to be important or very important. Participants who ascribed a high degree of importance to trust in research host institutions were significantly more likely to value involvement in such decisions. A similar position was expressed by participants who valued trust in research teams for data sharing, access, and use. Participants with low levels of trust in national and international institutions and with lower levels of education attributed less importance to being involved in decisions about data use. Conclusion The high value attributed by participants to involvement in individual-level data governance stresses the need to broaden opportunities for public participation in health data decision-making, namely by introducing a meta consent approach. The important role played by trust in science and in other institutions in shaping participants' views about involvement highlights the relevance of pairing such a meta consent approach with the provision of transparent information about the implications of data sharing, the resources needed to make informed choices and the development of harm mitigation tools and redress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngozi Nwebonyi
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Susana Silva
- Departamento de Sociologia, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.,Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Cláudia de Freitas
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.,EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology, University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Milne R, Sorbie A, Dixon-Woods M. What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks? JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:323-328. [PMID: 33741681 PMCID: PMC9046739 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
New models of data governance for health data are a focus of growing interest in an era of challenge to the social licence. In this article, we reflect on what the data trust model, which is founded on principles of participatory governance, can learn from experiences of involving and engagement of members of the public and participants in the governance of large-scale biobanks. We distinguish between upstream and ongoing governance models, showing how they require careful design and operation if they are to deliver on aspirations for deliberation and participation. Drawing on this learning, we identify a set of considerations important to future design for data trusts as they seek to ensure just, proportionate and fair governance. These considerations relate to the timing of involvement of participants, patterns of inclusion and exclusion, and responsiveness to stakeholder involvement and engagement. We emphasise that the evolution of governance models for data should be matched by a commitment to evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annie Sorbie
- Mason Institute for Medicine, Life Sciences and the Law, Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mary Dixon-Woods
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vaz M, Warrier P, Wai-Loon Ho C, Bull S. Respecting values and perspectives in biobanking and genetic research governance: Outcomes of a qualitative study in Bengaluru, India. Wellcome Open Res 2022. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17628.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The promise of biobanking and genetic research (BGR) in the context of translational research towards improving public health and personalised medicine has been recognised in India. Worldwide experience has shown that incorporating stakeholders’ expectations and values into the governance of BGR is essential to address ethical aspects of BGR. This paper draws on engagement with various stakeholders in the South Indian city of Bengaluru to understand how incorporating people’s values and beliefs can inform policy making decisions and strengthen BGR governance within India. Methods: We adopted a qualitative research approach and conducted six focus group discussions with civil society members and seven in-depth interviews with key informants in BGR, identified through a targeted web search and snowballing methods, until data saturation was reached. Data were thematically analysed to identify emergent patterns. Results: Specific themes relating to the ethics and governance of BGR emerged. Fears and uncertainty about future sample and data use, possibilities of discrimination and exploitation in the use of findings and the lack of comprehensive data protection policies in India along with expectations of enhanced contributor agency, control in future use of samples and data, benefit sharing, enhanced utility of samples, sustained BGR and public good, reflected tensions between different stakeholders’ values and beliefs. Fair governance processes through an independent governance committee for biobanks and a system of ongoing engagement with stakeholders emerged as best practice towards building trust and respecting diversity of views and values. Conclusions: Ensuring public trust in BGR requires listening to stakeholders’ voices, being open to counter narratives, and a commitment to long term engagement embedded in principles of participatory democracy. This is central to a ‘people-centred governance framework’ involving a negotiated middle ground and an equilibrium of governance which promotes social justice by being inclusive, transparent, equitable, and trustworthy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Milne R, Morley KI, Almarri MA, Anwer S, Atutornu J, Baranova EE, Bevan P, Cerezo M, Cong Y, Costa A, Critchley C, Fernow J, Goodhand P, Hasan Q, Hibino A, Houeland G, Howard HC, Hussain SZ, Malmgren CI, Izhevskaya VL, Jędrzejak A, Jinhong C, Kimura M, Kleiderman E, Leach B, Liu K, Mascalzoni D, Mendes Á, Minari J, Nicol D, Niemiec E, Patch C, Pollard J, Prainsack B, Rivière M, Robarts L, Roberts J, Romano V, Sheerah HA, Smith J, Soulier A, Steed C, Stefànsdóttir V, Tandre C, Thorogood A, Voigt TH, Wang N, West AV, Yoshizawa G, Middleton A. Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries. Genome Med 2021; 13:92. [PMID: 34034801 PMCID: PMC8147072 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00903-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this. METHODS We analyse the 'Your DNA, Your Say' online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures. RESULTS Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data-endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
| | - Katherine I Morley
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Global and Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Mohamed A Almarri
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Department of Forensic Science and Criminology, Dubai Police GHQ, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Jerome Atutornu
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Elena E Baranova
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, 119049, Russia
| | - Paul Bevan
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Maria Cerezo
- EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Yali Cong
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Alessia Costa
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Christine Critchley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, 3122, Australia
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Josepine Fernow
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Goodhand
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Qurratulain Hasan
- Department of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Kamineni Hospitals, Hyderabad, 500 068, India
- SAAZ Genetics, Hyderabad, 500033, India
| | - Aiko Hibino
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, 036-8560, Japan
| | - Gry Houeland
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Heidi C Howard
- Medical Ethics, Lund Universitet, Sölvegatan, 19, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren
- Department of Public Health and Caring Scienec, Uppsala University, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Solna, Sweden
| | | | | | - Cao Jinhong
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Megumi Kimura
- Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, 186-8603, Japan
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | | | - Keying Liu
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
- School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Álvaro Mendes
- UnIGENe and CGPP - Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, IBMC - Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia
| | - Emilia Niemiec
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christine Patch
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | | | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK
| | | | - Lauren Robarts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Jonathan Roberts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Virginia Romano
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC, Institute of Biomedicine, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Haytham A Sheerah
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - James Smith
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Alexandra Soulier
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claire Steed
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Vigdis Stefànsdóttir
- Landspitali, the National University Hospital of Iceland, 101, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Cornelia Tandre
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, SE-751 22, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Torsten H Voigt
- Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, 52062, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nan Wang
- Medical Ethics Program, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Anne V West
- Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Bloomington, 47405, USA
| | - Go Yoshizawa
- Work Research Institute (AFI), Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lensink MA, Boers SN, M Gulmans VA, Jongsma KR, Bredenoord AL. Mini-gut feelings: perspectives of people with cystic fibrosis on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. Per Med 2021; 18:241-254. [PMID: 33825546 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Organoid technology has enormous potential for precision medicine, such as has recently been demonstrated in the field of cystic fibrosis. However, storage and use of organoids has been associated with ethical challenges and there is currently a lack of harmony in regulation and guidelines to govern the rapid emergence of 'organoid medicine'. Developing sound governance demands incorporation of the perspectives of patients as key stakeholders. Materials & methods: We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with people with cystic fibrosis to explore their perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. Results: We identified three themes: prioritization of research and trust, ambivalent views on commercial involvement and transparency and control. Conclusion: Our study offers important insights for ethically robust governance of 'organoid medicine'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Lensink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, GA Utrecht 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah N Boers
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, GA Utrecht 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent A M Gulmans
- Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (NCFS), Dr. A. Schweitzerweg 3A, MG Baarn 3744, The Netherlands
| | - Karin R Jongsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, GA Utrecht 3508, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, GA Utrecht 3508, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barazzetti G, Bosisio F. A Value-Oriented Framework for Precision Medicine. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:88-90. [PMID: 33825639 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1891338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
19
|
Evans-Jordan SB, Skolbekken JA. Scientific Citizenship’s Youngest Domain: Function Creep in Norway’s Newborn Screening Programme. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/0971721820964891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for inborn errors of metabolism and other serious conditions with onset during infancy is a widespread public health initiative. Like other screening programmes, it aims to discover and treat a disease before effects manifest themselves. Recently, there have been two prominent changes in NBS: a substantial increase in the number of conditions screened for and growing attention to secondary use of residual newborn blood spots. Here, we analyse how this latter change has transpired in Norway. In 2018, Norway’s parliament sanctioned the secondary use of NBS samples for epidemiological research unrelated to NBS. This broadened the programme’s scope, co-opting it for research purposes, making samples available for inclusion in Norway’s biobanking strategy. We argue that this transformation is a case of function creep, whereby the function of screening samples is expanded to serve purposes other than helping newborns. The process provided only minimal involvement from ordinary citizens, but it transformed screened infants into potential scientific citizens. Henceforth, all future generations of Norwegians must choose to stay in or opt out of biobank research when they turn sixteen. Additionally, consenting to this research may occasion a second form of function creep, as ‘actionable findings’ are fed back to participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B. Evans-Jordan
- Sarah B. Evans-Jordan (corresponding author), Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - John-Arne Skolbekken
- John-Arne Skolbekken, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lensink MA, Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Carter SE, van der Ent CK, Bredenoord AL. Organoids for personalized treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: Professional perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. J Cyst Fibros 2020; 20:443-451. [PMID: 33303364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organoid technology is emerging rapidly as a valuable tool for precision medicine, particularly in the field of Cystic Fibrosis (CF). However, biobank storage and use of patient-derived organoids raises specific ethical and practical challenges that demand sound governance. We examined the perspectives of professionals affiliated with CF or organoids on the ethical aspects of organoid biobanking for CF precision medicine. By conducting this study parallel to the process of innovation and development of organoid biobanking, its findings are valuable for the design of responsible governance frameworks. METHODS To identify relevant themes and attitudes we conducted 21 semi-structured qualitative interviews with professionals in the field of organoid technology, biobanking, or CF research and care. RESULTS We identified three key challenges, as well as the suggestions of professionals on how to address them: (1) The challenges associated with commercial involvement, trust, and ownership, (2) Navigating the blurring boundary between research and clinical care, (3) Appropriate approaches to the informed consent procedure. CONCLUSION Sound governance of organoid biobanks aimed at precision medicine requires coming to terms with the fact that its stakeholders no longer belong to separate domains. Responsible governance should be aimed at finding a sound, context-sensitive balance between integration of ongoing co-operation and mutual consideration of interests, and maintaining a feasible and sustainable research climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Lensink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sarah N Boers
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin R Jongsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sarah E Carter
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis K van der Ent
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post KH.01.419.0, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Future-proofing biobanks' governance. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:989-996. [PMID: 32424324 PMCID: PMC7468350 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0646-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Good biobank governance implies—at a minimum—transparency and accountability and the implementation of oversight mechanisms. While the biobanking community is in general committed to such principles, little is known about precisely which governance strategies biobanks adopt to meet those objectives. We conducted an exploratory analysis of governance mechanisms adopted by research biobanks, including genetic biobanks, located in Europe and Canada. We reviewed information available on the websites of 69 biobanks, and directly contacted them for additional information. Our study identified six types of commonly adopted governance strategies: communication, compliance, expert advice, external review, internal procedures, and partnerships. Each strategy is implemented through different mechanisms including, independent ethics assessment, informed consent processes, quality management, data access control, legal compliance, standard operating procedures and external certification. Such mechanisms rely on a wide range of bodies, committees and actors from both within and outside the biobanks themselves. We found that most biobanks aim to be transparent about their governance mechanisms, but could do more to provide more complete and detailed information about them. In particular, the retrievable information, while showing efforts to ensure biobanks operate in a legitimate way, does not specify in sufficient detail how governance mechanisms support accountability, nor how they ensure oversight of research operations. This state of affairs can potentially undermine biobanks’ trustworthiness to stakeholders and the public in a long-term perspective. Given the ever-increasing reliance of biomedical research on large biological repositories and their associated databases, we recommend that biobanks increase their efforts to future-proof their governance.
Collapse
|
22
|
Meagher KM, Curtis SH, Gamm KO, Sutton EJ, McCormick JB, Sharp RR. At a Moment's Notice: Community Advisory Board Perspectives on Biobank Communication to Supplement Broad Consent. Public Health Genomics 2020; 23:77-89. [PMID: 32396907 DOI: 10.1159/000507057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts. OBJECTIVE We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank. METHODS We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research. CONCLUSION Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Meagher
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan H Curtis
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kylie O Gamm
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erica J Sutton
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Degeling C, Carter SM, van Oijen AM, McAnulty J, Sintchenko V, Braunack-Mayer A, Yarwood T, Johnson J, Gilbert GL. Community perspectives on the benefits and risks of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance systems: a report on four community juries. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:31. [PMID: 32334597 PMCID: PMC7183724 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00474-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Outbreaks of infectious disease cause serious and costly health and social problems. Two new technologies – pathogen whole genome sequencing (WGS) and Big Data analytics – promise to improve our capacity to detect and control outbreaks earlier, saving lives and resources. However, routinely using these technologies to capture more detailed and specific personal information could be perceived as intrusive and a threat to privacy. Method Four community juries were convened in two demographically different Sydney municipalities and two regional cities in New South Wales, Australia (western Sydney, Wollongong, Tamworth, eastern Sydney) to elicit the views of well-informed community members on the acceptability and legitimacy of:
making pathogen WGS and linked administrative data available for public health research using this information in concert with data linkage and machine learning to enhance communicable disease surveillance systems
Fifty participants of diverse backgrounds, mixed genders and ages were recruited by random-digit-dialling and topic-blinded social-media advertising. Each jury was presented with balanced factual evidence supporting different expert perspectives on the potential benefits and costs of technologically enhanced public health research and communicable disease surveillance and given the opportunity to question experts. Results Almost all jurors supported data linkage and WGS on routinely collected patient isolates for the purposes of public health research, provided standard de-identification practices were applied. However, allowing this information to be operationalised as a syndromic surveillance system was highly contentious with three juries voting in favour, and one against by narrow margins. For those in favour, support depended on several conditions related to system oversight and security being met. Those against were concerned about loss of privacy and did not trust Australian governments to run secure and effective systems. Conclusions Participants across all four events strongly supported the introduction of data linkage and pathogenomics to public health research under current research governance structures. Combining pathogen WGS with event-based data surveillance systems, however, is likely to be controversial because of a lack of public trust, even when the potential public health benefits are clear. Any suggestion of private sector involvement or commercialisation of WGS or surveillance data was unanimously rejected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Degeling
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia. .,School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
| | - Stacy M Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Antoine M van Oijen
- Molecular Horizons and the Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | | | - Vitali Sintchenko
- The Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology - Public Health, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Annette Braunack-Mayer
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Trent Yarwood
- Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Australia.,Cairns Clinical School, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.,Rural Clinical School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jane Johnson
- The Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology - Public Health, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gwendolyn L Gilbert
- The Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology - Public Health, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lensink MA, Jongsma KR, Boers SN, Noordhoek JJ, Beekman JM, Bredenoord AL. Responsible use of organoids in precision medicine: the need for active participant involvement. Development 2020; 147:147/7/dev177972. [DOI: 10.1242/dev.177972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Organoids are three-dimensional multicellular structures grown in vitro from stem cells and which recapitulate some organ function. They are derivatives of living tissue that can be stored in biobanks for a multitude of research purposes. Biobank research on organoids derived from patients is highly promising for precision medicine, which aims to target treatment to individual patients. The dominant approach for protecting the interests of biobank participants emphasizes broad consent in combination with privacy protection and ex ante (predictive) ethics review. In this paradigm, participants are positioned as passive donors; however, organoid biobanking for precision medicine purposes raises challenges that we believe cannot be adequately addressed without more ongoing involvement of patient-participants. In this Spotlight, we argue why a shift from passive donation towards more active involvement is particularly crucial for biobank research on organoids aimed at precision medicine, and suggest some approaches appropriate to this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Lensink
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karin R. Jongsma
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah N. Boers
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacquelien J. Noordhoek
- Dutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (NCFS), Dr. A. Schweitzerweg 3A, 3744 MG Baarn, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey M. Beekman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Regenerative Medicine Center, University Medical Center, Internal post KH.01.419.0, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yu JH, Juengst E. Do Groups Have Moral Standing in Unregulated mHealth Research? THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:122-128. [PMID: 32342749 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520917037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Biomedical research using data from participants' mobile devices borrows heavily from the ethos of the "citizen science" movement, by delegating data collection and transmission to its volunteer subjects. This engagement gives volunteers the opportunity to feel like partners in the research and retain a reassuring sense of control over their participation. These virtues, in turn, give both grass-roots citizen science initiatives and institutionally sponsored mHealth studies appealing features to flag in recruiting participants from the public. But while grass-roots citizen science projects are often community-based, mHealth research ultimately depends on the individuals who own and use mobile devices. This inflects the ethos of mHealth research towards a celebration of individual autonomy and empowerment, at the expense of its implications for the communities or groups to which its individual participants belong. But the prospects of group harms - and benefits - from mHealth research are as vivid as they are in other forms of data-intensive "precision health" research, and will be important to consider in the design of any studies using this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon-Ho Yu
- Joon-Ho Yu, M.P.H., Ph.D., is a Research Assistant Professor in the Division of Genetic Medicine, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics; Institute for Public Health Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA; and a member of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics at Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute in Seattle, WA. Eric Juengst, Ph.D., is the Director of the Center for Bioethics and Professor of Social Medicine in the School of Medicine of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eric Juengst
- Joon-Ho Yu, M.P.H., Ph.D., is a Research Assistant Professor in the Division of Genetic Medicine, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics; Institute for Public Health Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA; and a member of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics at Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute in Seattle, WA. Eric Juengst, Ph.D., is the Director of the Center for Bioethics and Professor of Social Medicine in the School of Medicine of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:915-924. [PMID: 32086443 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Broad consent is increasingly recommended as an acceptable consent model for biobanking human samples and health data with a view to their future use in research. Empirical evidence on the practice of broad consent and its implementation in the hospital setting, however, is still very limited. We analyse and discuss results from a qualitative study of perceptions of a sample of patients and biobank recruiters regarding broad consent to participate in a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and health data. Our findings suggest that contextual and relational factors play an important role in the practice of broad consent, and illustrate that broad consent relies as much on intuition as on reasoning. Moreover, we show that seeking broad consent in the hospital affects patient-recruiter interaction and that "conditional" trust plays a significant role in broad-consent decision-making. In conclusion, we provide recommendations to improve patient autonomy in the context of hospital-based broad consent.
Collapse
|
27
|
Peppercorn J, Campbell E, Isakoff S, Horick NK, Rabin J, Quain K, Sequist LV, Bardia A, Collyar D, Hlubocky F, Mathews D. Patient Preferences for Use of Archived Biospecimens from Oncology Trials When Adequacy of Informed Consent Is Unclear. Oncologist 2020; 25:78-86. [PMID: 31492767 PMCID: PMC6964122 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncology research increasingly involves biospecimen collection and data sharing. Ethical challenges emerge when researchers seek to use archived biospecimens for purposes that were not well defined in the original informed consent document (ICD). We sought to inform ongoing policy debates by assessing patient views on these issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS We administered a cross-sectional self-administered survey to patients with cancer at an academic medical center. Survey questions addressed attitudes toward cancer research, willingness to donate biospecimens, expectations regarding use of biospecimens, and preferences regarding specific ethical dilemmas. RESULTS Among 240 participants (response rate 69%), virtually all (94%) indicated willingness to donate tissue for research. Most participants (86%) expected that donated tissue would be used for any research deemed scientifically important, and virtually all (94%) expected that the privacy of their health information would be protected. Broad use of stored biospecimens and data sharing with other researchers increased willingness to donate tissue. For three scenarios in which specific consent for proposed biobank research was unclear within the ICD, a majority of patient's favored allowing the research to proceed: 76% to study a different cancer, 88% to study both inherited (germline) and tumor specific (somatic) mutations, and 70% to permit data sharing. A substantial minority believed that research using stored biospecimens should only proceed with specific consent. CONCLUSION When debates arise over appropriate use of archived biospecimens, the interests of the research participants in seeing productive use of their blood or tissue should be considered, in addition to addressing concerns about potential risks and lack of specific consent. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This survey evaluated views of patients with cancer regarding the permissible use of stored biospecimens from cancer trials when modern scientific methods are not well described in the original informed consent document. The vast majority of patients support translational research and expect that any biospecimens they donate will be used to advance knowledge. When researchers, policy makers, and those charged with research oversight debate use of stored biospecimens, it is important to recognize that research participants have an interest in productive use of their blood, tissue, or data, in addition to considerations of risks and the adequacy of documented consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Eric Campbell
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Steve Isakoff
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Nora K. Horick
- MGH Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Julia Rabin
- Mongan Institute Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Katharine Quain
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Lecia V. Sequist
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | - Fay Hlubocky
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The Cancer Research Center, The University of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Debra Mathews
- Department of Pediatrics, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vezyridis P, Timmons S. Resisting big data exploitations in public healthcare: free riding or distributive justice? SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2019; 41:1585-1599. [PMID: 31423602 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We draw on findings from qualitative interviews with health data researchers, GPs and citizens who opted out from NHS England's care.data programme to explore controversies and negotiations around data sharing in the NHS. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from science and technology studies, we show that the new socio-technical, ethical and economic arrangements were resisted not only on the basis of individual autonomy and protection from exploitation, but also as a collective effort to protect NHS services and patient data. We argue that the resulting opt-outs were a call for more personal control over data use. This was not because these citizens placed their personal interests above those of society. It was because they resisted proposed arrangements by networks of stakeholders, not seen as legitimate, to control flows and benefits of NHS patient data. Approaching informed consent this way helps us to explore resistance as a collective action for influencing the direction of such big data programmes towards the preservation of public access to healthcare as well as the distribution of ethical decision-making between independent, trustworthy institutions and individual citizens.
Collapse
|
29
|
Mathews DJH, Rabin JT, Quain K, Campbell E, Collyar D, Hlubocky FJ, Isakoff S, Peppercorn J. Secondary Use of Patient Tissue in Cancer Biobanks. Oncologist 2019; 24:1577-1583. [PMID: 31182655 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As scientific techniques evolve, historical informed consent forms may inadequately address modern research proposals, leading to ethical questions regarding research with archived biospecimens. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS We conducted focus groups among patients with cancer recruited from Massachusetts General Hospital to explore views on medical research, biobanking, and scenarios based on real biospecimen research dilemmas. Our multidisciplinary team developed a structured focus group guide, and all groups were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were coded for themes by two independent investigators using NVivo software. RESULTS Across five focus groups with 21 participants, we found that most participants were supportive of biobanks and use of their own tissue to advance scientific knowledge. Many favor allowing research beyond the scope of the original consent to proceed if recontact is impossible. However, participants were not comfortable speaking for other patients who may oppose research beyond the original consent. This was viewed as a potential violation of participants' rights or interests. Participants were also concerned with a "slippery slope" and potential scientific abuse if research were permitted without adherence to original consent. There was strong support for recontact and reconsent when possible and for the concept of broad consent at the time of tissue collection. CONCLUSION Our participants support use of their tissue to advance research and generally support any productive scientific approach. However, in the absence of broad initial consent, when recontact is impossible, a case-by-case decision must be made regarding a proposal's potential benefits and harms. Many participants support broad use of their tissue, but a substantial minority object to use beyond the original consent. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE For prospective studies collecting tissue for future research, investigators should consider seeking broad consent, to allow for evolution of research questions and methods. For studies using previously collected tissues, researchers should attempt recontact and reconsent for research aims or methods beyond the scope of the original consent. When reconsent is not possible, a case-by-case decision must be made, weighing the scientific value of the biobank, potential benefits of the proposed research, and the likelihood and nature of risks to participants and their welfare interests. This study's data suggest that many participants support broad use of their tissue and prefer science to move forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia T Rabin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Eric Campbell
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Deborah Collyar
- Patient Advocate in Research (PAIR), Danville, California, USA
| | | | - Steven Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tai CG, Harris-Wai J, Schaefer C, Liljestrand P, Somkin CP. Multiple Stakeholder Views on Data Sharing in a Biobank in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Implications for Biobank Governance. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:207-216. [PMID: 31167204 DOI: 10.1159/000500442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beginning in 2005, researchers at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Division of Research developed the Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health (RPGEH), a research resource of linked biospecimens, health surveys, and electronic health records on more than 200,000 adult KPNC members. This study examined multiple stakeholders' values and preferences regarding protection of participants' privacy and wide sharing of participant data by RPGEH. METHODS We conducted 45 semi-structured interviews in person or via phone and two focus groups with seven stakeholder groups, including RPGEH participants and decliners who are KPNC members, KPNC research scientists, external scientists, leadership, Human Subjects Research Protection Program staff, and RPGEH Community Advisory Panel members. RESULTS Three major themes emerged related to: (1) perceived individual and social harms associated with data sharing; (2) concerns to address when governing access to RPGEH data; and (3) impact of a blurred boundary between research and clinical care in the context of biobanking. CONCLUSIONS The study results were considered in the development of RPGEH data governance and motivated the inclusion of KPNC Community Advisory Panel members and ELSI experts on committees that evaluate data access proposals. Our findings can help inform other biobanks going through similar processes developing data sharing and access policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline G Tai
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julie Harris-Wai
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Catherine Schaefer
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Petra Liljestrand
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Carol P Somkin
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA, .,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Burgess MM, O'Doherty KC. Moving From Understanding of Consent Conditions to Heuristics of Trust. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2019; 19:24-26. [PMID: 31090514 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1587036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
|
32
|
Willison DJ, Trowbridge J, Greiver M, Keshavjee K, Mumford D, Sullivan F. Participatory governance over research in an academic research network: the case of Diabetes Action Canada. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026828. [PMID: 31005936 PMCID: PMC6500288 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital data generated in the course of clinical care are increasingly being leveraged for a wide range of secondary purposes. Researchers need to develop governance policies that can assure the public that their information is being used responsibly. Our aim was to develop a generalisable model for governance of research emanating from health data repositories that will invoke the trust of the patients and the healthcare professionals whose data are being accessed for health research. We developed our governance principles and processes through literature review and iterative consultation with key actors in the research network including: a data governance working group, the lead investigators and patient advisors. We then recruited persons to participate in the governing and advisory bodies. Our governance process is informed by eight principles: (1) transparency; (2) accountability; (3) follow rule of law; (4) integrity; (5) participation and inclusiveness; (6) impartiality and independence; (7) effectiveness, efficiency and responsiveness and (8) reflexivity and continuous quality improvement. We describe the rationale for these principles, as well as their connections to the subsequent policies and procedures we developed. We then describe the function of the Research Governing Committee, the majority of whom are either persons living with diabetes or physicians whose data are being used, and the patient and data provider advisory groups with whom they consult and communicate. In conclusion, we have developed a values-based information governance framework and process for Diabetes Action Canada that adds value over-and-above existing scientific and ethics review processes by adding a strong patient perspective and contextual integrity. This model is adaptable to other secure data repositories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald J Willison
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joslyn Trowbridge
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Greiver
- Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Family and Community Medicine, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Frank Sullivan
- Family and Community Medicine, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Manhas KP, Cui X, Tough SC. The Experience of Establishing Data Sharing & Linkage Platforms for Administrative, Research and Community-Service Data. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019; 4:465. [PMID: 32935021 PMCID: PMC7299464 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Innovative data platforms (e.g. biobanks, repositories) continually emerge to facilitate data sharing. Extant and emerging data platforms must navigate myriad tensions for successful data sharing and re-use. Two Alberta data platforms navigated such processes and factors regarding administrative, research and nonprofit data: the Child & Youth Data Laboratory (CYDL) and Secondary Analysis to Generate Evidence (SAGE). Objectives To clarify the social and policy factors that influenced CYDL and SAGE establishment and implementation, and the relationships, if any, between these factors and data type. Methods This paper involves a qualitative secondary analysis of two developmental evaluations on CYDL and SAGE establishment. Six-years post-implementation, the CYDL evaluation entailed document review; website user analysis; interviews (n=30); online stakeholder survey (n=260); and an environmental scan. One-year post implementation, the SAGE evaluation included 15 interviews and document review. We used thematic analysis and comparisons with the literature to identify key factors. Results Three (not mutually exclusive) categories of social and policy factors influenced the navigation towards CYDL and SAGE realization: trusting relationships; sustainability amidst readiness; and privacy within social context. For these platforms to be able to manage, link or share data, trust had to be fostered and maintained across multiple, dynamic and intersecting relationships between primary data producers, data subjects, secondary users and institutions. Platform sustainability required capacity building and innovation. Privacy and information sharing evolved culturally and correspondingly for these data platforms, which required constant flexibility and awareness. Conclusions This analysis calls for more empirical research on the value of data re-use or the detriment in not re-using data. While the culture of information sharing is progressing towards greater openness and capacity for data sharing and re-use, successful data platforms must advocate, facilitate and mobilize analysis and innovation using data re-use while being cognizant of social and policy influences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Alberta Health Services, Seventh Street Plaza, 14th Floor, North Tower, 10030-107 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3E4, Canada
| | - Xinjie Cui
- PolicyWise with Children & Families, 9925 109 St NW, Edmonton, AB T5K 2J8, Canada https://policywise.com/
| | - Suzanne C Tough
- University of Calgary, Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 1N4 https://www.ucalgary.ca/stough/about
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Blasimme A, Fadda M, Schneider M, Vayena E. Data Sharing For Precision Medicine: Policy Lessons And Future Directions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 37:702-709. [PMID: 29733719 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Data sharing is a precondition of precision medicine. Numerous organizations have produced abundant guidance on data sharing. Despite such efforts, data are not being shared to a degree that can trigger the expected data-driven revolution in precision medicine. We set out to explore why. Here we report the results of a comprehensive analysis of data-sharing guidelines issued over the past two decades by multiple organizations. We found that the guidelines overlap on a restricted set of policy themes. However, we observed substantial fragmentation in the policy landscape across specific organizations and data types. This may have contributed to the current stalemate in data sharing. To move toward a more efficient data-sharing ecosystem for precision medicine, policy makers should explore innovative ways to cope with central policy themes such as privacy, consent, and data quality; focus guidance on interoperability, attribution, and public engagement; and promote data-sharing policies that can be adapted to multiple data types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Blasimme
- Alessandro Blasimme is a senior researcher in the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-ETH Zürich, in Switzerland
| | - Marta Fadda
- Marta Fadda is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich
| | - Manuel Schneider
- Manuel Schneider is a PhD candidate in the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich
| | - Effy Vayena
- Effy Vayena ( ) is professor of bioethics in the Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Beskow LM, Hammack CM, Brelsford KM. Thought leader perspectives on benefits and harms in precision medicine research. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0207842. [PMID: 30475858 PMCID: PMC6258115 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine research is underway to identify targeted approaches to improving health and preventing disease. However, such endeavors raise significant privacy and confidentiality concerns. The objective of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits and harms associated with precision medicine research through in-depth interviews with a diverse group of thought leaders, including primarily U.S.-based experts and scholars in the areas of ethics, genome research, health law, historically-disadvantaged populations, informatics, and participant-centric perspectives, as well as government officials and human subjects protections leaders. The results suggest the prospect of an array of individual and societal benefits, as well as physical, dignitary, group, economic, psychological, and legal harms. Relative to the way risks and harms are commonly described in consent forms for precision medicine research, the thought leaders we interviewed arguably emphasized a somewhat different set of issues. The return of individual research results, harm to socially-identifiable groups, the value-dependent nature of many benefits and harms, and the risks to the research enterprise itself emerged as important cross-cutting themes. Our findings highlight specific challenges that warrant concentrated care during the design, conduct, dissemination, and translation of precision medicine research and in the development of consent materials and processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Beskow
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Catherine M. Hammack
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Kathleen M. Brelsford
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Manhas KP, Dodd SX, Page S, Letourneau N, Adair CE, Cui X, Tough SC. Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:97. [PMID: 30419910 PMCID: PMC6233367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0683-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mandates abound to share publicly-funded research data for reuse, while data platforms continue to emerge to facilitate such reuse. Birth cohorts (BC) involve longitudinal designs, significant sample sizes and rich and deep datasets. Data sharing benefits include more analyses, greater research complexity, increased opportunities for collaboration, amplification of public contributions, and reduced respondent burdens. Sharing BC data involves significant challenges including consent, privacy, access policies, communication, and vulnerability of the child. Research on these issues is available for biological data, but these findings may not extend to BC data. We lack consensus on how best to approach these challenges in consent, privacy, communication and autonomy when sharing BC data. We require more stakeholder engagement to understand perspectives and generate consensus. METHODS Parents participating in longitudinal birth cohorts completed a web-based survey investigating consent preferences for sharing their, and their child's, non-biological research data. Results from a previous qualitative inquiry informed survey development, and cognitive interviewing methods (n = 9) were used to improve the question quality and comprehension. Recruitment was via personalized email, with email and phone reminders during the 14-day window for survey completion. RESULTS Three hundred and forty-six of 569 parents completed the survey in September 2014 (60.8%). Participants preferred consent processes for data sharing in future independent research that were less-active (i.e. no consent or opt-out). Parents' consent preferences are associated with their communication preferences. Twenty percent (20.2%) of parents generally agreed that their child should provide consent to continue participating in research at age 12, while 25.6% felt decision-making on sharing non-biological research data should begin at age 18. CONCLUSIONS These finding reflect the parenting population's preference for less project-specific permission when research data is non-biological and de-identified and when governance practices are highly detailed and rigourous. Parents recognize that children should become involved in consent for secondary data use, but there is variability regarding when and how involvement occurs. These findings emphasize governance processes and participant notification rather than project-specific consent for secondary use of de-identified, non-biological data. Ultimately, parents prefer general consent processes for sharing de-identified, non-biological research data with ultimate involvement of the child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Stacey Page
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Carol E. Adair
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Xinjie Cui
- PolicyWise for Children & Families, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Suzanne C. Tough
- PolicyWise for Children & Families, Calgary, Canada
- Pediatrics & Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van Veen EB. Observational health research in Europe: understanding the General Data Protection Regulation and underlying debate. Eur J Cancer 2018; 104:70-80. [PMID: 30336359 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Insights into the incidence and survival of cancer, the influence of lifestyle and environmental factors and the interaction of treatment regimens with outcomes are hugely dependent on observational research, patient data derived from the healthcare system and from volunteers participating in cohort studies, often non-selective. Since 25th May 2018, the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to such data. The GDPR focusses on more individual control for data subjects of 'their' data. Yet, the GDPR was preceded by a long debate. The research community participated actively in that debate, and as a result, the GDPR has research exemptions as well. Some of those apply directly; other exemptions need to be implemented into national law. Those exemptions will be discussed together with a general outline of the GDPR. I propose a substantive definition of research-absent in the GDPR-which can warrant its special status in the GDPR. The debate is not over yet. Most legal texts exhibit ambiguity and are interpreted against a background of values. In this case, those could be subsumed under informational self-determination versus solidarity and the deeper meaning of autonomy. Values will also guide national implementation and their interpretation. The value of individual control or informational self-determination should be balanced by nuanced visions about our mutual dependency in healthcare, as an ever-learning system, especially in the European solidarity-based healthcare systems. Good research governance might be a way forward to escape the consent or anonymise dichotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evert-Ben van Veen
- MLC Foundation, Dagelijkse Groenmarkt 2, 2513 AL Den Haag, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Policy and management related to the release of organisms generated by emerging biotechnologies for pest management should be informed through public engagement. Regulatory decisions can be conceptually distinguished into the development of frameworks, the assessment of the release of a specific modified organism, and implementation decisions such as location and timing. Although these decisions are often intertwined in practice, the negotiation takes place at different stages of technology development and suggests different roles for public engagement. Some approaches to public engagement are more appropriate for different purposes and situations, and it is not always obvious how to go about matching the approach to the purpose. In addition to the diverse technologies involved in generating modified organisms, there are diverse publics with particular interests and different kinds of knowledge. Institutional interests range from commercial development to public regulation and future uptake. Contextual features, such as agency mandates, may limit or structure the extent and approach to public engagement. Different convening groups (government agencies, public interest groups, academics, businesses) and the kind of decision that is being considered determine what kind of input is needed and how the engaging groups will be constituted. This paper considers how the context of the release of genetically modified insects for pest control requires expanding approaches to the design of the public engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Burgess
- 1W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, 227 - 6356 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 Canada
| | - John D Mumford
- 2Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY UK
| | - James V Lavery
- 3Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, and Center for Ethics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Sheikh Z, Hoeyer K. "That is why I have trust": unpacking what 'trust' means to participants in international genetic research in Pakistan and Denmark. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2018; 21:169-179. [PMID: 28875227 PMCID: PMC5956014 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9795-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Trust features prominently in a number of policy documents that have been issued in recent years to facilitate data sharing and international collaboration in medical research. However, it often remains unclear what is meant by 'trust'. By exploring a concrete international collaboration between Denmark and Pakistan, we develop a way of unpacking trust that shifts focus from what trust 'is' to what people invest in relationships and what references to trust do for them in these relationships. Based on interviews in both Pakistan and Denmark with people who provide blood samples and health data for the same laboratory, we find that when participants discuss trust they are trying to shape their relationship to researchers while simultaneously communicating important hopes, fears and expectations. The types of trust people talk about are never unconditional, but involve awareness of uncertainties and risks. There are different things at stake for people in different contexts, and therefore it is not the same to trust researchers in Pakistan as it is in Denmark, even when participants donate to the same laboratory. We conclude that casual references to 'trust' in policy documents risk glossing over important local differences and contribute to a de-politicization of basic inequalities in access to healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Sheikh
- Department of Public Health, Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Klaus Hoeyer
- Department of Public Health, Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kool EM, Bos AME, van der Graaf R, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2018; 24:615-635. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E M Kool
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B C J M Fauser
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nielsen MEJ, Kongsholm NCH, Schovsbo J. Property and human genetic information. J Community Genet 2018; 10:95-107. [PMID: 29713893 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0366-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Do donors (of samples from which genetic information is derived) have some sort of pre-legal (moral) or legal property right to that information? In this paper, we address this question from both a moral philosophical and a legal point of view. We argue that philosophical theories about property do not seem to support a positive answer: We have not mixed our labour with our genes, and the human genome cannot be said to be a fitting object for private ownership based on some idea of self-ownership. An analysis of the term 'property' as seen from a legal perspective yields the conclusion that property is, at best, a linguistic prop whose real content has to be defined at least partially conventionally. Relevant interests that may be seen to be protected seem to be interests of privacy or interests against exploitation. To the extent that the logic behind the patent system holds true limiting incentives decreases innovation in society. A balancing of interest must take place, and we have to make sure that patent protection serves general societal interests and not just those of special interest groups be that inventors or donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen
- Faculty of Humanities & Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Karen Blixensvej 4, DK-2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
| | | | - Jens Schovsbo
- Centre for Information and Innovation Law (CIIR), Faculty of Law, Copenhagen University, Karen Blixens Plads 16, 6B-3-27, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Feeney O, Borry P, Felzmann H, Galvagni L, Haukkala A, Loi M, Nordal S, Rakic V, Riso B, Sterckx S, Vears D. Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality. J Community Genet 2018; 9:133-142. [PMID: 29064073 PMCID: PMC5849703 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0342-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of Web 2.0 technology, along with a population increasingly proficient in Information and Communications Technology (ICT), coupled with the rapid advancements in genetic testing methods, has seen an increase in the presence of participant-centred research initiatives. Such initiatives, aided by the centrality of ICT interconnections, and the ethos they propound seem to further embody the ideal of increasing the participatory nature of research, beyond what might be possible in non-ICT contexts alone. However, the majority of such research seems to actualise a much narrower definition of 'participation'-where it is merely the case that such research initiatives have increased contact with participants through ICT but are otherwise non-participatory in any important normative sense. Furthermore, the rhetoric of participant-centred initiatives tends to inflate this minimalist form of participation into something that it is not, i.e. something genuinely participatory, with greater connections with both the ICT-facilitated political contexts and the largely non-ICT participatory initiatives that have expanded in contemporary health and research contexts. In this paper, we highlight that genuine (ICT-based) 'participation' should enable a reasonable minimum threshold of participatory engagement through, at least, three central participatory elements: educative, sense of being involved and degree of control. While we agree with criticisms that, at present, genuine participation seems more rhetoric than reality, we believe that there is clear potential for a greater ICT-facilitated participatory engagement on all three participatory elements. We outline some practical steps such initiatives could take to further develop these elements and thereby their level of ICT-facilitated participatory engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Feeney
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis, National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Genomics and Society, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heike Felzmann
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis, National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | | | - Ari Haukkala
- Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Michele Loi
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics and the History of Medicine and Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Salvör Nordal
- Centre for Ethics, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Vojin Rakic
- Center for the Study of Bioethics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Brígida Riso
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIES-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sigrid Sterckx
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy & Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danya Vears
- Leuven Institute for Genomics and Society, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kraft SA, Cho MK, Gillespie K, Halley M, Varsava N, Ormond KE, Luft HS, Wilfond BS, Soo-Jin Lee S. Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2018; 18:3-20. [PMID: 29621457 PMCID: PMC6173191 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
With the growth of precision medicine research on health data and biospecimens, research institutions will need to build and maintain long-term, trusting relationships with patient-participants. While trust is important for all research relationships, the longitudinal nature of precision medicine research raises particular challenges for facilitating trust when the specifics of future studies are unknown. Based on focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse patients, we describe several factors that influence patient trust and potential institutional approaches to building trustworthiness. Drawing on these findings, we suggest several considerations for research institutions seeking to cultivate long-term, trusting relationships with patients: (1) Address the role of history and experience on trust, (2) engage concerns about potential group harm, (3) address cultural values and communication barriers, and (4) integrate patient values and expectations into oversight and governance structures.
Collapse
|
45
|
Vayena E, Blasimme A. Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2018; 46:119-129. [PMID: 30034208 PMCID: PMC6052857 DOI: 10.1177/1073110518766026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
To address the ethical challenges in big data health research we propose the concept of systemic oversight. This approach is based on six defining features (adaptivity, flexibility, monitoring, responsiveness, reflexivity, and inclusiveness) and aims at creating a common ground across the oversight pipeline of biomedical big data research. Current trends towards enhancing granularity of informed consent and specifying legal provisions to address informational privacy and discrimination concerns in data-driven health research are laudable. However, these solutions alone cannot have the desired impact unless oversight activities by different stakeholders acquire a common substantive orientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effy Vayena
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETHZurich in Swit-zerland where she directs the Health Ethics and Policy Lab. She is also a faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School. She holds a Master's in History and Philosophy of Science from Imperial College, London and a Ph.D. in History of Medicine from the University of Minnesota
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (Health Ethics and Policy Lab). His work revolves around ethical and policy issues in biotechnology and biomedicine. He graduated in Philosophy and received a Master's in Bioethics from "La Sapienza" University of Rome (Italy) as well as a Ph.D. in Bioethics from the University of Milan, European School of Molecular Medicine (Italy)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Burke W, Beskow LM, Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Brelsford K. Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2018; 46:79-86. [PMID: 29962827 PMCID: PMC6023399 DOI: 10.1177/1073110518766023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Neither the range of potential results from genomic research that might be returned to participants nor future uses of stored data and biospecimens can be fully predicted at the outset of a study. Informed consent procedures require clear explanations about how and by whom decisions are made and what principles and criteria apply. To ensure trustworthy research governance, there is also a need for empirical studies incorporating public input to evaluate and strengthen these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wylie Burke
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Box 357120, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195; Work phone: 206-221-5482; Home phone 206-232-6760; Cell phone: 206-619-3191
| | - Laura M Beskow
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Aves, Suite 400, Nashville TN 37203; Work phone: 615-936-2686
| | - Susan Brown Trinidad
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Box 357120, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195; Work phone:206-543-2508;Home phone: 206-842-9241;Cell phone: 360-850-3428
| | - Stephanie M Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Box 357120, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195; Work phone: 206-616-1864; Home phone: 206-297-1005; Cell phone: 206-529-7029
| | - Kathleen Brelsford
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Aves, Suite 400, Nashville TN 37203; Work phone: 615-936-2686
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tomlinson T, De Vries RG, Kim HM, Gordon L, Ryan KA, Krenz CD, Jewell S, Kim SYH. Effect of deliberation on the public's attitudes toward consent policies for biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:176-185. [PMID: 29348694 PMCID: PMC5838972 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0063-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate the effect of education and deliberation on the willingness of members of the public to donate tissue to biobank research and on their attitudes regarding various biobank consent policies. Participants were randomly assigned to a democratic deliberation (DD) group, an education group that received only written materials, and a control group. Participants completed a survey before the deliberation and two surveys post-deliberation: one on (or just after) the deliberation day, and one 4 weeks later. Subjects were asked to rate 5 biobank consent policies as acceptable (or not) and to identify the best and worst policies. Analyses compared acceptability of different policy options and changes in attitudes across the three groups. After deliberation, subjects in the DD group were less likely to find broad consent (defined here as consent for the use of donations in an unspecified range of future research studies, subject to content and process restrictions) and study-by-study consent acceptable. The DD group was also significantly less likely to endorse broad consent as the best policy (OR = 0.34), and more likely to prefer alternative consent options. These results raise ethical challenges to the current widespread reliance on broad consent in biobank research, but do not support study-by-study consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Tomlinson
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Raymond G De Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - H Myra Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Linda Gordon
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Kerry A Ryan
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chris D Krenz
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott Jewell
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Vayena E, Blasimme A. Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2017; 14:501-513. [PMID: 28983835 PMCID: PMC5715037 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9809-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Empirical evidence suggests that while people hold the capacity to control their data in high regard, they increasingly experience a loss of control over their data in the online world. The capacity to exert control over the generation and flow of personal information is a fundamental premise to important values such as autonomy, privacy, and trust. In healthcare and clinical research this capacity is generally achieved indirectly, by agreeing to specific conditions of informational exposure. Such conditions can be openly stated in informed consent documents or be implicit in the norms of confidentiality that govern the relationships of patients and healthcare professionals. However, with medicine becoming a data-intense enterprise, informed consent and medical confidentiality, as mechanisms of control, are put under pressure. In this paper we explore emerging models of informational control in data-intense healthcare and clinical research, which can compensate for the limitations of currently available instruments. More specifically, we discuss three approaches that hold promise in increasing individual control: the emergence of data portability rights as means to control data access, new mechanisms of informed consent as tools to control data use, and finally, new participatory governance schemes that allow individuals to control their data through direct involvement in data governance. We conclude by suggesting that, despite the impression that biomedical big data diminish individual control, the synergistic effect of new data management models can in fact improve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab—Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Auf der Mauer, 17, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab—Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Auf der Mauer, 17, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reznik ON, Kuzmin DO, Reznik AO. Biobanks as the basis for developing biomedicine: Problems and prospects. Mol Biol 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026893317050156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
50
|
Gibson SG, Axler RE, Lemmens T. Transparency of Biobank Access in Canada: An Assessment of Industry Access and the Availability of Information on Access Policies and Resulting Research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017; 12:310-325. [PMID: 28818009 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617723137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A key issue impacting public trust in biobanks is how these resources are utilized, including who is given access to biobank data and samples. To assess the conditions under which researchers are given access to Canadian biobanks, we reviewed websites and contacted Canadian biobanks to determine the availability of information on access policies and procedures; research resulting from access biobank data and samples; and conditions on private industry access to biobanks. We also conducted expert interviews with key Canadian stakeholders ( n = 11) to obtain their perspectives on biobank transparency and access policies. Among 21 Canadian biobanks, there was wide variation in the access information made publicly available, and the majority of these allowed access by industry applicants. Biobanks should be governed by the principles of transparency, accountability, and accessibility, and attention must be given to the conditions around the commercialization of biobank-based research.
Collapse
|