A Gender Hypothesis of sex disparities in adverse drug events

The real-world safety profile of tirzepatide: pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

PURPOSE

Randomized controlled trials with tirzepatide (TZP) displayed unprecedented glucose and body weight lowering efficacy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity and a safety profile similar to that of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), mainly characterized by gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE). Concerns on diabetic retinopathy, pancreato-biliary disorders, and medullary thyroid cancer were also addressed. We aimed to investigate whether the same safety issues emerged from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) post-marketing surveillance database.

METHODS

OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 and AERSMine (data 2004Q1-2023Q3) were used to query the FAERS database. Reports of GI AE, diabetic retinopathy, pancreato-biliary disorders, and medullary thyroid cancer were investigated. The analysis was then filtered for age, gender, and designation as primary suspect. AE occurrence with TZP was compared to insulin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, metformin, and GLP-1RA.

RESULTS

Disproportionate reporting of GI [i.e., nausea (ROR 4.01, 95% CI 3.85-4.19)] and pancreato-biliary disorders [i.e., pancreatitis (ROR 3.63, 95% CI 3.15-4.19)], diabetic retinopathy (ROR 4.14, 95% CI 2.34-7.30), and medullary thyroid cancer (ROR 13.67, 95% CI 4.35-42.96) was detected. TZP exhibited a similar risk of GI AE and medullary thyroid cancer and a lower risk of most pancreato-biliary AE and diabetic retinopathy vs. GLP-1RA.

CONCLUSIONS

TZP was associated with an increased risk of specific AE. However, its safety profile was similar to that of GLP-1RA, without increased risk of pancreato-biliary AE, diabetic retinopathy, and medullary thyroid cancer.

Analysis of eplerenone in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database: a focus on overall patient population and gender-specific subgroups

Introduction: Eplerenone is approved for the treatment of hypertension as well as symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following an acute myocardial infarction. However, the adverse events (AEs) have not been systematically analyzed. The aim of this study was to identify adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to eplerenone using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. By identifying previously unreported AEs, the study could potentially contribute to updating the drug's label. Methods: In order to find significant AEs, four algorithms, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were used to analyze the signal strength of the ADRs connected to eplerenone that were gathered from the FAERS database over the previous 20 years. Results: From 2004Q1 to 2023Q4, a total of 20, 629, 811 reported cases were gathered from the FAERS database for this study. After processing the data and filtering, 1,874 case reports were analyzed. Of these cases, 1,070 AEs were identified, 128 of which were eplerenone-related ADRs. We investigated the occurrence of ADRs induced by eplerenone in 27 organ systems. Our study showed that the AEs listed in the medication's package insert correspond with those listed in the literature, including hyperkalemia and increased creatinine. Additionally, the prescription label for eplerenone does not include all system organ class (SOC) terms, like Vascular disorders, hepatobiliary Disorders, etc. Discussion: The study used multiple algorithms to quantify the signal strength and then identified any previously unrecognized ADRs, further studies are needed to confirm the association of ADRs with eplerenone. The findings of this study may provide important insights into the safety profile of eplerenone, ensure that healthcare providers have up-to-date information about their potential risks and help guide them in the correct use of the drug.

Sex mechanisms as nonbinary influences on cognitive diversity

Essentially all neuropsychiatric diagnoses show some degree of sex and/or gender differences in their etiology, diagnosis, or prognosis. As a result, the roles of sex-related variables in behavior and cognition are of strong interest to many, with several lines of research showing effects on executive functions and value-based decision making in particular. These findings are often framed within a sex binary, with behavior of females described as less optimal than male "defaults"-- a framing that pits males and females against each other and deemphasizes the enormous overlap in fundamental neural mechanisms across sexes. Here, we propose an alternative framework in which sex-related factors encompass just one subset of many sources of valuable diversity in cognition. First, we review literature establishing multidimensional, nonbinary impacts of factors related to sex chromosomes and endocrine mechanisms on cognition, focusing on value- based decision-making tasks. Next, we present two suggestions for nonbinary interpretations and analyses of sex-related data that can be implemented by behavioral neuroscientists without devoting laboratory resources to delving into mechanisms underlying sex differences. We recommend (1) shifting interpretations of behavior away from performance metrics and towards strategy assessments to avoid the fallacy that the performance of one sex is worse than another; and (2) asking how much variance sex explains in measures and whether any differences are mosaic rather than binary, to avoid assuming that sex differences in separate measures are inextricably correlated. Nonbinary frameworks in research on cognition will allow neuroscience to represent the full spectrum of brains and behaviors.

How do men and women differ in their depressive symptomatology? A gendered network analysis of depressive symptoms in a French population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

The experience of depressive manifestations and the presentation of symptoms in clinical settings may differ in men and women. Despite the extensive literature, it remains unclear how depressive manifestations interact at symptom levels in men and women. First, we aimed to describe and compare depressive networks by sex. Second, we examined symptom connections to Clinical depression and Functional Limitations as a proxy of self-recognition of a depressive episode.

METHODS

We estimated networks from the 20 CES-D items in men and women from a large population-based French cohort. We computed centrality measures and ran comparisons. Then, we re-estimated two networks in men and women separately, adding, on the one hand, Clinical Depression and, on the other hand, Limitations due to a depressive episode.

RESULTS

Over 200,000 participants were included in this study. Women were twice as likely to have a previous diagnosis of depression. Sex-ratio was less pronounced (1,7:1) for Limitations due to depression. Centrality measures revealed similar symptom patterns. However, network structures differed between men and women. We found some symptom connections to Clinical depression and Limitations to be non-invariant according to sex.

LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional data does not capture the direction of the connections between symptoms and an eventual diagnosis. We lacked data about the diagnosis's context and could not account for other factors influencing depressive symptomatology.

CONCLUSIONS

Network structures differed, suggesting gender-specific mechanisms in activating symptoms and depressive states. Addressing central symptoms evoking depressed moods with tailored interventions may serve to tackle depressive states in men and women.

Training in the implementation of sex and gender research policies: an evaluation of publicly available online courses

BACKGROUND

Recently implemented research policies requiring the inclusion of females and males have created an urgent need for effective training in how to account for sex, and in some cases gender, in biomedical studies.

METHODS

Here, we evaluated three sets of publicly available online training materials on this topic: (1) Integrating Sex & Gender in Health Research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); (2) Sex as a Biological Variable: A Primer from the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH); and (3) The Sex and Gender Dimension in Biomedical Research, developed as part of "Leading Innovative measures to reach gender Balance in Research Activities" (LIBRA) from the European Commission. We reviewed each course with respect to their coverage of (1) What is required by the policy; (2) Rationale for the policy; (3) Handling of the concepts "sex" and "gender;" (4) Research design and analysis; and (5) Interpreting and reporting data.

RESULTS

All three courses discussed the importance of including males and females to better generalize results, discover potential sex differences, and tailor treatments to men and women. The entangled nature of sex and gender, operationalization of sex, and potential downsides of focusing on sex more than other sources of variation were minimally discussed. Notably, all three courses explicitly endorsed invalid analytical approaches that produce bias toward false positive discoveries of difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests a need for revised or new training materials that incorporate four major topics: precise operationalization of sex, potential risks of over-emphasis on sex as a category, recognition of gender and sex as complex and entangled, and rigorous study design and data analysis.

Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database

Introduction: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Real-world studies on the safety of linezolid in large populations are lacking. This study aimed to determine the adverse events associated with linezolid in real-world settings by analyzing data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We retrospectively extracted reports on adverse drug events (ADEs) from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to that of 2023. By using disproportionality analysis including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), along with the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), we evaluated whether there was a significant association between linezolid and ADE. The time to onset of ADE was further analyzed in the general population and within each age, weight, reporting population, and weight subgroups. Results: A total of 11,176 reports of linezolid as the "primary suspected" drug and 263 significant adverse events of linezolid were identified, including some common adverse events such as thrombocytopenia (n = 1,139, ROR 21.98), anaemia (n = 704, ROR 7.39), and unexpected signals that were not listed on the drug label such as rhabdomyolysis (n = 90, ROR 4.33), and electrocardiogram QT prolonged (n = 73, ROR 4.07). Linezolid-induced adverse reactions involved 27 System Organ Class (SOC). Gender differences existed in ADE signals related to linezolid. The median onset time of all ADEs was 6 days, and most ADEs (n = 3,778) occurred within the first month of linezolid use but some may continue to occur even after a year of treatment (n = 46). Conclusion: This study reports the time to onset of adverse effects in detail at the levels of SOC and specific preferred term (PT). The results of our study provide valuable insights for optimizing the use of linezolid and reducing potential side effects, expected to facilitate the safe use of linezolid in clinical settings.