1
|
Jacquemont J, Loiseau C, Tornabene L, Claudet J. 3D ocean assessments reveal that fisheries reach deep but marine protection remains shallow. Nat Commun 2024; 15:4027. [PMID: 38773096 PMCID: PMC11109251 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47975-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The wave of new global conservation targets, the conclusion of the High Seas Treaty negotiations, and the expansion of extractive use into the deep sea call for a paradigm shift in ocean conservation. The current reductionist 2D representation of the ocean to set targets and measure impacts will fail at achieving effective biodiversity conservation. Here, we develop a framework that overlays depth realms onto marine ecoregions to conduct the first three-dimensional spatial analysis of global marine conservation achievements and fisheries footprint. Our novel approach reveals conservation gaps of mesophotic, rariphotic, and abyssal depths and an underrepresentation of high protection levels across all depths. In contrast, the 3D footprint of fisheries covers all depths, with benthic fishing occurring down to the lower bathyal and mesopelagic fishing peaking in areas overlying abyssal depths. Additionally, conservation efforts are biased towards areas where the lowest fishing pressures occur, compromising the effectiveness of the marine conservation network. These spatial mismatches emphasize the need to shift towards 3D thinking to achieve ocean sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Jacquemont
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat St, Seattle, WA, USA.
- National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Maison de l'Océan, 195 rue Saint-Jacques, Paris, France.
| | - Charles Loiseau
- National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Maison de l'Océan, 195 rue Saint-Jacques, Paris, France
| | - Luke Tornabene
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat St, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joachim Claudet
- National Center for Scientific Research, PSL Université Paris, CRIOBE, CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Maison de l'Océan, 195 rue Saint-Jacques, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blanluet A, Game ET, Dunn DC, Everett JD, Lombard AT, Richardson AJ. Evaluating ecological benefits of oceanic protected areas. Trends Ecol Evol 2024; 39:175-187. [PMID: 37778906 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Oceans beyond the continental shelf represent the largest yet least protected environments. The new agreement to increase protection targets to 30% by 2030 and the recent United Nations (UN) High Seas Treaty try to address this gap, and an increase in the declaration of oceanic Marine Protected Areas (oMPAs) in waters beyond 200 m in depth is likely. Here we find that there is contradictory evidence concerning the benefits of oMPAs in terms of protecting pelagic habitats, providing refuge for highly mobile species, and potential fisheries benefits. We discover a mismatch between oMPA management objectives focusing on protection of pelagic habitats and biodiversity, and scientific research focusing on fisheries benefits. We suggest that the solution is to harness emerging technologies to monitor inside and outside oMPAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Blanluet
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia; The Nature Conservancy, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.
| | - Edward T Game
- The Nature Conservancy, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
| | - Daniel C Dunn
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science (CBCS), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia
| | - Jason D Everett
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment, Queensland Biosciences Precinct (QBP), St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia; Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda T Lombard
- Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, South Africa
| | - Anthony J Richardson
- School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science (CBCS), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment, Queensland Biosciences Precinct (QBP), St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trevail AM, Nicoll MAC, Freeman R, Le Corre M, Schwarz J, Jaeger A, Bretagnolle V, Calabrese L, Feare C, Lebarbenchon C, Norris K, Orlowski S, Pinet P, Plot V, Rocamora G, Shah N, Votier SC. Tracking seabird migration in the tropical Indian Ocean reveals basin-scale conservation need. Curr Biol 2023; 33:5247-5256.e4. [PMID: 37972589 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Understanding marine predator distributions is an essential component of arresting their catastrophic declines.1,2,3,4 In temperate, polar, and upwelling seas, predictable oceanographic features can aggregate migratory predators, which benefit from site-based protection.5,6,7,8 In more oligotrophic tropical waters, however, it is unclear whether environmental conditions create similar multi-species hotspots. We track the non-breeding movements and habitat preferences of a tropical seabird assemblage (n = 348 individuals, 9 species, and 10 colonies in the western Indian Ocean), which supports globally important biodiversity.9,10,11,12 We mapped species richness from tracked populations and then predicted the same diversity measure for all known Indian Ocean colonies. Most species had large non-breeding ranges, low or variable residency patterns, and specific habitat preferences. This in turn revealed that maximum species richness covered >3.9 million km2, with no focused aggregations, in stark contrast to large-scale tracking studies in all other ocean basins.5,6,7,13,14 High species richness was captured by existing marine protected areas (MPAs) in the region; however, most occurred in the unprotected high seas beyond national jurisdictions. Seabirds experience cumulative anthropogenic impacts13 and high mortality15,16 during non-breeding. Therefore, our results suggest that seabird conservation in the tropical Indian Ocean requires an ocean-wide perspective, including high seas legislation.17 As restoration actions improve the outlook for tropical seabirds on land18,19,20,21,22 and environmental change reshapes the habitats that support them at sea,15,16 appropriate marine conservation will be crucial for their long-term recovery and whole ecosystem restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice M Trevail
- Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
| | - Malcolm A C Nicoll
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW14RY, UK
| | - Robin Freeman
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW14RY, UK
| | - Matthieu Le Corre
- Écologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien, UMR ENTROPIE, Université de la Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Jill Schwarz
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Audrey Jaeger
- Écologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien, UMR ENTROPIE, Université de la Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Vincent Bretagnolle
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC-CNRS), 79360 Beauvoir sur Niort, France
| | - Licia Calabrese
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC-CNRS), 79360 Beauvoir sur Niort, France; Island Conservation Society, Pointe Larue, Mahé P.O Box 775, Seychelles; Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre of the University of Seychelles, Anse Royale, Mahé, Seychelles
| | - Chris Feare
- WildWings Bird Management, 2 North View Cottages, Grayswood Common, Haslemere, Surrey GU27 2DN, UK; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of New South Wales (UNSW), NSW, Sydney 2052, Australia
| | - Camille Lebarbenchon
- Université de la Réunion, UMR Processus Infectieux en Milieu Insulaire Tropical (PIMIT), INSERM 1187, CNRS 9192, IRD 249, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Ken Norris
- Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
| | - Sabine Orlowski
- Écologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien, UMR ENTROPIE, Université de la Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Patrick Pinet
- Parc national de La Réunion, Life+ Pétrels. 258 Rue de la République, 97431 Plaine des Palmistes, La Réunion, France
| | - Virginie Plot
- Écologie marine tropicale des océans Pacifique et Indien, UMR ENTROPIE, Université de la Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151, 97715 Saint Denis, La Réunion, France
| | - Gerard Rocamora
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC-CNRS), 79360 Beauvoir sur Niort, France; Island Biodiversity and Conservation Centre of the University of Seychelles, Anse Royale, Mahé, Seychelles
| | - Nirmal Shah
- Nature Seychelles, P.O. Box 1310, The Centre for Environment and Education, Roche Caiman, Mahé, Seychelles; The Centre for Environment and Education, Roche Caiman, Mahé, Seychelles
| | - Stephen C Votier
- The Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Figgener C, Bernardo J, Plotkin PT. Delineating and characterizing critical habitat for the Eastern Pacific olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea): Individual differences in migratory routes present challenges for conservation measures. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.933424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The effective conservation of highly migratory marine species is only possible if core areas of activity and critical habitat can be identified within the vast and dynamic oceanic environment and later on used to delineate marine protected areas (MPAs). However, gathering population-level data and identifying universal patterns within a species or population can be difficult when only a small sample size exists and individuals are not ecologically interchangeable. In addition, the open ocean beyond the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of a country is considered the high-seas and is not part of any jurisdiction and therefore challenging to govern by laws. Granting protection to species using these waters is sometimes virtually impossible. Another challenge is the dynamic nature of the oceanic environment. MPAs are usually based on spatially explicit and static areas, but migratory routes can shift following available food, currents, and temperatures or else, potentially rendering designated areas useless. The red-listed olive ridley turtle is known for its nomadic migratory and feeding behavior and a divergent nesting strategy among females. Our study used two approaches to identify critical habitats for the population nesting in Costa Rica and feeding in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. One was based on a static Kernel Density Approach to identify core areas. The other was a habitat preference model that took into account changing environmental variables such as sea surface temperature and chlorophyll-a concentrations. We were able to identify core areas at the population level by pooling two datasets and increasing our sample size. Our habitat preference model showed a high correlation of olive ridley presence with all tested environmental variables, except chlorophyll-a concentration. Our results reveal that olive ridleys use mainly regions that fall within EEZs and, therefore, the jurisdiction of six countries in Central America and provide an essential conservation tool.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoening T, Durden JM, Faber C, Felden J, Heger K, Hoving HJT, Kiko R, Köser K, Krämmer C, Kwasnitschka T, Möller KO, Nakath D, Naß A, Nattkemper TW, Purser A, Zurowietz M. Making marine image data FAIR. Sci Data 2022; 9:414. [PMID: 35840583 PMCID: PMC9287444 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01491-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Underwater images are used to explore and monitor ocean habitats, generating huge datasets with unusual data characteristics that preclude traditional data management strategies. Due to the lack of universally adopted data standards, image data collected from the marine environment are increasing in heterogeneity, preventing objective comparison. The extraction of actionable information thus remains challenging, particularly for researchers not directly involved with the image data collection. Standardized formats and procedures are needed to enable sustainable image analysis and processing tools, as are solutions for image publication in long-term repositories to ascertain reuse of data. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) provide a framework for such data management goals. We propose the use of image FAIR Digital Objects (iFDOs) and present an infrastructure environment to create and exploit such FAIR digital objects. We show how these iFDOs can be created, validated, managed and stored, and which data associated with imagery should be curated. The goal is to reduce image management overheads while simultaneously creating visibility for image acquisition and publication efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timm Schoening
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Jennifer M Durden
- National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
| | - Claas Faber
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Janine Felden
- MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. 8, D-28359, Bremen, Germany
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Karl Heger
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Rainer Kiko
- Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, Sorbonne Université, 06230, Villefranche-sur-Mer, France
| | - Kevin Köser
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christopher Krämmer
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | | | - Klas Ove Möller
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Institute of Carbon Cycles, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - David Nakath
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea Naß
- DLR/Institute of Planetary Research, Planetary Geology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tim W Nattkemper
- Biodata Mining Group, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Autun Purser
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Martin Zurowietz
- Biodata Mining Group, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Important marine areas for endangered African penguins before and after the crucial stage of moulting. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9489. [PMID: 35676286 PMCID: PMC9177839 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12969-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The population of the Endangered African penguin Spheniscus demersus has decreased by > 65% in the last 20 years. A major driver of this decrease has been the reduced availability of their principal prey, sardine Sardinops sagax and anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus. To date, conservation efforts to improve prey availability have focused on spatial management strategies to reduce resource competition with purse-seine fisheries during the breeding season. However, penguins also undergo an annual catastrophic moult when they are unable to feed for several weeks. Before moulting they must accumulate sufficient energy stores to survive this critical life-history stage. Using GPS tracking data collected between 2012 and 2019, we identify important foraging areas for pre- and post-moult African penguins at three of their major colonies in South Africa: Dassen Island and Stony Point (Western Cape) and Bird Island (Eastern Cape). The foraging ranges of pre- and post-moult adult African penguins (c. 600 km from colony) was far greater than that previously observed for breeding penguins (c. 50 km from colony) and varied considerably between sites, years and pre- and post-moult stages. Despite their more extensive range during the non-breeding season, waters within 20 and 50 km of their breeding colonies were used intensively and represent important foraging areas to pre- and post-moult penguins. Furthermore, penguins in the Western Cape travelled significantly further than those in the Eastern Cape which is likely a reflection of the poor prey availability along the west coast of South Africa. Our findings identify important marine areas for pre- and post-moult African penguins and support for the expansion of fisheries-related spatio-temporal management strategies to help conserve African penguins outside the breeding season.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilmour M, Adams J, Block B, Caselle J, Friedlander A, Game E, Hazen E, Holmes N, Lafferty K, Maxwell S, McCauley D, Oleson E, Pollock K, Shaffer S, Wolff N, Wegmann A. Evaluation of MPA designs that protect highly mobile megafauna now and under climate change scenarios. Glob Ecol Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
8
|
Philopatry as a Tool to Define Tentative Closed Migration Cycles and Conservation Areas for Large Pelagic Fishes in the Pacific. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14095577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Migrations of large pelagic fishes across the Pacific are usually inferred from tagging or genetic studies. Even though these techniques have improved over time, they still fail to demonstrate large transoceanic migrations, usually proposing ‘routes’ that do not cycle seasonally. The current study uses the concept of ‘philopatry’ in 11 large pelagic fish species, i.e., the tendency for animals to return to their natal site to reproduce. Tentative migration routes and maps emerge by applying this concept to the movements extracted through a comprehensive review of the literature on satellite and conventional tagging, and population and subpopulation linkages inferred from genetic and/or genomic studies. Moreover, when comparing these proposed migration routes and the mapped reconstructed catch (1950–2016, Sea Around Us) of each species in the Pacific, similarities emerge, reinforcing the accuracy of these migration cycles informed by philopatry. Finally, by superposing the migration routes of our 11 species, we identified areas of the Pacific that are part of the inferred migration routes of multiple species, leading to a discussion of possible ‘blue corridors’ that would protect the studied species’ key migration routes and stocks, which are important for the fisheries, culture and nutrition of Pacific islanders.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nash KL, Alexander K, Melbourne-Thomas J, Novaglio C, Sbrocchi C, Villanueva C, Pecl GT. Developing achievable alternate futures for key challenges during the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES 2022; 32:19-36. [PMID: 33424142 DOI: 10.22541/au.160166561.14686672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The oceans face a range of complex challenges for which the impacts on society are highly uncertain but mostly negative. Tackling these challenges is testing society's capacity to mobilise transformative action, engendering a sense of powerlessness. Envisaging positive but realistic visions of the future, and considering how current knowledge, resources, and technology could be used to achieve these futures, may lead to greater action to achieve sustainable transformations. Future Seas (www.FutureSeas2030.org) brought together researchers across career stages, Indigenous Peoples and environmental managers to develop scenarios for 12 challenges facing the oceans, leveraging interdisciplinary knowledge to improve society's capacity to purposefully shape the direction of marine social-ecological systems over the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030). We describe and reflect on Future Seas, providing guidance for co-developing scenarios in interdisciplinary teams tasked with exploring ocean futures. We detail the narrative development for two futures: our current trajectory based on published evidence, and a more sustainable future, consistent with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, which is technically achievable using existing and emerging knowledge. Presentation of Business-as-usual and More Sustainable futures-together-allows communication of both trajectories, whilst also highlighting achievable, sustainable versions of the future. The advantages of the interdisciplinary approach taken include: (1) integrating different perspectives on solutions, (2) capacity to explore interactions between Life Under Water (Goal 14) and other SDGs, and (3) cross-disciplinary learning. This approach allowed participants to conceptualise shared visions of the future and co-design transformative pathways to achieving those futures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SI The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1007/s11160-020-09629-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty L Nash
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Karen Alexander
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Jess Melbourne-Thomas
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - Camilla Novaglio
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - Carla Sbrocchi
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, 2007 Australia
| | - Cecilia Villanueva
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Gretta T Pecl
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jones DC, Ceia FR, Murphy E, Delord K, Furness RW, Verdy A, Mazloff M, Phillips RA, Sagar PM, Sallée JB, Schreiber B, Thompson DR, Torres LG, Underwood PJ, Weimerskirch H, Xavier JC. Untangling local and remote influences in two major petrel habitats in the oligotrophic Southern Ocean. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:5773-5785. [PMID: 34386992 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Ocean circulation connects geographically distinct ecosystems across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales via exchanges of physical and biogeochemical properties. Remote oceanographic processes can be especially important for ecosystems in the Southern Ocean, where the Antarctic Circumpolar Current transports properties across ocean basins through both advection and mixing. Recent tracking studies have indicated the existence of two large-scale, open ocean habitats in the Southern Ocean used by grey petrels (Procellaria cinerea) from two populations (i.e., Kerguelen and Antipodes islands) during their nonbreeding season for extended periods during austral summer (i.e., October to February). In this work, we use a novel combination of large-scale oceanographic observations, surface drifter data, satellite-derived primary productivity, numerical adjoint sensitivity experiments, and output from a biogeochemical state estimate to examine local and remote influences on these grey petrel habitats. Our aim is to understand the oceanographic features that control these isolated foraging areas and to evaluate their ecological value as oligotrophic open ocean habitats. We estimate the minimum local primary productivity required to support these populations to be much <1% of the estimated local primary productivity. The region in the southeast Indian Ocean used by the birds from Kerguelen is connected by circulation to the productive Kerguelen shelf. In contrast, the region in the south-central Pacific Ocean used by seabirds from the Antipodes is relatively isolated suggesting it is more influenced by local factors or the cumulative effects of many seasonal cycles. This work exemplifies the potential use of predator distributions and oceanographic data to highlight areas of the open ocean that may be more dynamic and productive than previously thought. Our results highlight the need to consider advective connections between ecosystems in the Southern Ocean and to re-evaluate the ecological relevance of oligotrophic Southern Ocean regions from a conservation perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Jones
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Filipe R Ceia
- Department of Life Sciences, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Eugene Murphy
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Karine Delord
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 du CNRS-La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Robert W Furness
- Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ariane Verdy
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Matthew Mazloff
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Richard A Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul M Sagar
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Ben Schreiber
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David R Thompson
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Leigh G Torres
- Geospatial Ecology of Marine Megafauna Lab, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Marine Mammal Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Philip J Underwood
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Henri Weimerskirch
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372 du CNRS-La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - José C Xavier
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blythe J, Baird J, Bennett N, Dale G, Nash KL, Pickering G, Wabnitz CCC. Fostering ocean empathy through future scenarios. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Blythe
- Environmental Sustainability Research Centre Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
| | - Julia Baird
- Environmental Sustainability Research Centre Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
- Department of Geography and Tourism Studies Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
- Sustainability Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Maroochydore DC QLD Australia
| | | | - Gillian Dale
- Environmental Sustainability Research Centre Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
| | - Kirsty L. Nash
- Centre for Marine Socioecology University of Tasmania Hobart TAS Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Gary Pickering
- Environmental Sustainability Research Centre Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
- Sustainability Research Centre University of the Sunshine Coast Maroochydore DC QLD Australia
- Department of Biological Sciences Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
- Department of Psychology Brock University Saint Catharines ON Canada
| | - Colette C. C. Wabnitz
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davies TE, Carneiro AP, Tarzia M, Wakefield E, Hennicke JC, Frederiksen M, Hansen ES, Campos B, Hazin C, Lascelles B, Anker‐Nilssen T, Arnardóttir H, Barrett RT, Biscoito M, Bollache L, Boulinier T, Catry P, Ceia FR, Chastel O, Christensen‐Dalsgaard S, Cruz‐Flores M, Danielsen J, Daunt F, Dunn E, Egevang C, Fagundes AI, Fayet AL, Fort J, Furness RW, Gilg O, González‐Solís J, Granadeiro JP, Grémillet D, Guilford T, Hanssen SA, Harris MP, Hedd A, Huffeldt NP, Jessopp M, Kolbeinsson Y, Krietsch J, Lang J, Linnebjerg JF, Lorentsen S, Madeiros J, Magnusdottir E, Mallory ML, McFarlane Tranquilla L, Merkel FR, Militão T, Moe B, Montevecchi WA, Morera‐Pujol V, Mosbech A, Neves V, Newell MA, Olsen B, Paiva VH, Peter H, Petersen A, Phillips RA, Ramírez I, Ramos JA, Ramos R, Ronconi RA, Ryan PG, Schmidt NM, Sigurðsson IA, Sittler B, Steen H, Stenhouse IJ, Strøm H, Systad GHR, Thompson P, Thórarinsson TL, Bemmelen RS, Wanless S, Zino F, Dias MP. Multispecies tracking reveals a major seabird hotspot in the North Atlantic. Conserv Lett 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ewan Wakefield
- Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow U.K
| | | | | | | | - Bruna Campos
- EuroNatur Foundation Radolfzell Germany
- Stichting BirdLife Europe Brussels Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Loïc Bollache
- UMR 6249 Chrono‐environnement Université de Bourgogne Franche‐Comté Besançon France
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
| | - Thierry Boulinier
- Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive CNRS ‐ Université de Montpellier ‐ Université Paul‐Valéry Montpellier – EPHE Montpellier France
| | - Paulo Catry
- MARE ‐ Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA ‐ Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
| | - Filipe R. Ceia
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Olivier Chastel
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC) UMR 7372 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université Villiers‐en‐bois France
| | | | - Marta Cruz‐Flores
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jérôme Fort
- Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs) UMR 7266 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université La Rochelle France
| | - Robert W. Furness
- Institute of Biodiversity Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow U.K
| | - Olivier Gilg
- UMR 6249 Chrono‐environnement Université de Bourgogne Franche‐Comté Besançon France
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
| | - Jacob González‐Solís
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | | | - David Grémillet
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (CEBC) UMR 7372 CNRS‐La Rochelle Université Villiers‐en‐bois France
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology Rondebosch South Africa
| | | | | | | | - April Hedd
- Wildlife Research Division Environment and Climate Change Mount Pearl NL Canada
| | - Nicholas Per Huffeldt
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Nuuk Greenland
| | - Mark Jessopp
- School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, Environmental Research Institute University College Cork Ireland
| | | | - Johannes Krietsch
- Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Ecology and Evolution Jena Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Ornithology Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics Seewiesen Germany
| | - Johannes Lang
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
- Justus‐Liebig‐University Giessen, Clinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish Working Group for Wildlife Research Giessen Germany
| | | | | | - Jeremy Madeiros
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of Bermuda Paget Bermuda
| | | | | | | | - Flemming R. Merkel
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources Nuuk Greenland
| | - Teresa Militão
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Børge Moe
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Trondheim Norway
| | | | - Virginia Morera‐Pujol
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Anders Mosbech
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde Denmark
| | - Verónica Neves
- MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, IMAR & Okeanos Horta Portugal
| | | | - Bergur Olsen
- Faroe Marine Research Institute Tórshavn Faroe Islands
| | - Vitor H. Paiva
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Hans‐Ulrich Peter
- Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Ecology and Evolution Jena Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jaime A. Ramos
- University of Coimbra, MARE‐Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Dep. Life Sciences Coimbra Portugal
| | - Raül Ramos
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Dept. de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - Robert A. Ronconi
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada Dartmouth NS Canada
| | - Peter G. Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology Rondebosch South Africa
| | | | | | - Benoît Sittler
- Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique Francheville France
- University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Thompson
- Lighthouse Field Station, School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Cromarty U.K
| | - Thorkell L. Thórarinsson
- Northeast Iceland Nature Research Centre Húsavík Iceland
- Icelandic Institute of Natural History Garðabær Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Maria P. Dias
- BirdLife International Cambridge U.K
- MARE ‐ Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre ISPA ‐ Instituto Universitário Lisbon Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forrest JAH, Bouchet PJ, Barley SC, McLennan AG, Meeuwig JJ. True blue: Temporal and spatial stability of pelagic wildlife at a submarine canyon. Ecosphere 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J. A. H. Forrest
- School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley Perth6009Australia
| | - P. J. Bouchet
- School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley Perth6009Australia
- School of Ocean Sciences Bangor University LL59 5AB Menai Bridge BangorUK
| | - S. C. Barley
- School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley Perth6009Australia
| | - A. G. McLennan
- School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley Perth6009Australia
| | - J. J. Meeuwig
- School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Hwy Crawley Perth6009Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nash KL, Alexander K, Melbourne-Thomas J, Novaglio C, Sbrocchi C, Villanueva C, Pecl GT. Developing achievable alternate futures for key challenges during the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES 2021; 32:19-36. [PMID: 33424142 PMCID: PMC7778847 DOI: 10.1007/s11160-020-09629-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The oceans face a range of complex challenges for which the impacts on society are highly uncertain but mostly negative. Tackling these challenges is testing society's capacity to mobilise transformative action, engendering a sense of powerlessness. Envisaging positive but realistic visions of the future, and considering how current knowledge, resources, and technology could be used to achieve these futures, may lead to greater action to achieve sustainable transformations. Future Seas (www.FutureSeas2030.org) brought together researchers across career stages, Indigenous Peoples and environmental managers to develop scenarios for 12 challenges facing the oceans, leveraging interdisciplinary knowledge to improve society's capacity to purposefully shape the direction of marine social-ecological systems over the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021-2030). We describe and reflect on Future Seas, providing guidance for co-developing scenarios in interdisciplinary teams tasked with exploring ocean futures. We detail the narrative development for two futures: our current trajectory based on published evidence, and a more sustainable future, consistent with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, which is technically achievable using existing and emerging knowledge. Presentation of Business-as-usual and More Sustainable futures-together-allows communication of both trajectories, whilst also highlighting achievable, sustainable versions of the future. The advantages of the interdisciplinary approach taken include: (1) integrating different perspectives on solutions, (2) capacity to explore interactions between Life Under Water (Goal 14) and other SDGs, and (3) cross-disciplinary learning. This approach allowed participants to conceptualise shared visions of the future and co-design transformative pathways to achieving those futures. Supplementary Information SI The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1007/s11160-020-09629-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty L. Nash
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Karen Alexander
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Jess Melbourne-Thomas
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - Camilla Novaglio
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia
| | - Carla Sbrocchi
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, 2007 Australia
| | - Cecilia Villanueva
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| | - Gretta T. Pecl
- Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
García‐Barón I, Giakoumi S, Santos MB, Granado I, Louzao M. The value of time‐series data for conservation planning. J Appl Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel García‐Barón
- AZTIMarine ResearchBasque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Pasaia Spain
| | - Sylvaine Giakoumi
- Université Côte d'AzurCNRSUMR 7035 ECOSEAS Nice France
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions School of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - María Begoña Santos
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO)Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo Vigo Spain
| | - Igor Granado
- AZTIMarine ResearchBasque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Pasaia Spain
| | - Maite Louzao
- AZTIMarine ResearchBasque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Pasaia Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Steinfurth A, Oppel S, Dias MP, Starnes T, Pearmain EJ, Dilley BJ, Davies D, Nydegger M, Bell C, Le Bouard F, Bond AL, Cuthbert RJ, Glass T, Makhado AB, Crawford RJM, Ryan PG, Wanless RM, Ratcliffe N. Important marine areas for the conservation of northern rockhopper penguins within the Tristan da Cunha Exclusive Economic Zone. ENDANGER SPECIES RES 2020. [DOI: 10.3354/esr01076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The designation of Marine Protected Areas has become an important approach to conserving marine ecosystems that relies on robust information on the spatial distribution of biodiversity. We used GPS tracking data to identify marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) for the Endangered northern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes moseleyi within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Tristan da Cunha in the South Atlantic. Penguins were tracked throughout their breeding season from 3 of the 4 main islands in the Tristan da Cunha group. Foraging trips remained largely within the EEZ, with the exception of those from Gough Island during the incubation stage. We found substantial variability in trip duration and foraging range among breeding stages and islands, consistent use of areas among years and spatial segregation of the areas used by neighbouring islands. For colonies with no or insufficient tracking data, we defined marine IBAs based on the mean maximum foraging range and merged the areas identified to propose IBAs around the Tristan da Cunha archipelago and Gough Island. The 2 proposed marine IBAs encompass 2% of Tristan da Cunha’s EEZ, and are used by all northern rockhopper penguins breeding in the Tristan da Cunha group, representing ~90% of the global population. Currently, one of the main threats to northern rockhopper penguins within the Tristan da Cunha EEZ is marine pollution from shipping, and the risk of this would be reduced by declaring waters within 50 nautical miles of the coast as ‘areas to be avoided’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Steinfurth
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
| | - S Oppel
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - MP Dias
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Center, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, 1100-304 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - T Starnes
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - EJ Pearmain
- BirdLife International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - BJ Dilley
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
| | - D Davies
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
| | - M Nydegger
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - C Bell
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - F Le Bouard
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - AL Bond
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
- Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Tring, HP23 6AP, UK
| | - RJ Cuthbert
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
- World Land Trust, Blyth House, Bridge Street, Halesworth, IP19 8AB, UK
| | - T Glass
- Tristan Conservation Department, Edinburgh of the Seven Seas, Tristan da Cunha, TDCU 1ZZ, South Atlantic
| | - AB Makhado
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
- Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, PO Box 52126, Cape Town 8000, South Africa
| | - RJM Crawford
- Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, PO Box 52126, Cape Town 8000, South Africa
| | - PG Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
| | - RM Wanless
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
- Institute of Marine Affairs and Resource Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, 20224, Taiwan
| | - N Ratcliffe
- British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang J, Gao X, Xu L, Dai L, Chen J, Tian S, Chen Y. Biodiversity in the bycatch community of Chinese tuna longline fisheries in the Pacific Ocean. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
18
|
Falcini F, Corrado R, Torri M, Mangano MC, Zarrad R, Di Cintio A, Palatella L, Jarboui O, Missaoui H, Cuttitta A, Patti B, Santoleri R, Sarà G, Lacorata G. Seascape connectivity of European anchovy in the Central Mediterranean Sea revealed by weighted Lagrangian backtracking and bio-energetic modelling. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18630. [PMID: 33122692 PMCID: PMC7596485 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ecological connectivity is one of the most important processes that shape marine populations and ecosystems, determining their distribution, persistence, and productivity. Here we use the synergy of Lagrangian back-trajectories, otolith-derived ages of larvae, and satellite-based chlorophyll-a to identify spawning areas of European anchovy from ichthyoplanktonic data, collected in the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea), i.e., the crucial channel in between the European and African continents. We obtain new evidence of ecosystem connectivity between North Africa and recruitment regions off the southern European coasts. We assess this result by using bio-energetic modeling, which predicts species-specific responses to environmental changes by producing quantitative information on functional traits. Our work gives support to a collaborative and harmonized use of Geographical Sub-Areas, currently identified by the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean. It also confirms the need to incorporate climate and environmental variability effects into future marine resources management plans, strategies, and directives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Falcini
- Istituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy.
| | - Raffaele Corrado
- Istituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Torri
- Istituto per lo studio degli impatti Antropici e Sostenibilità in ambiente marino, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via del mare 3, 91021, Torretta-Granitola, Campobello di Mazara (TP), Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mangano
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DiSTeM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy.,Dipartimento Ecologia Marina Integrata, Stazione zoologica Anton Dohrn, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo (complesso Roosevelt), 90142, Palermo, Italy
| | - Rafik Zarrad
- Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, BP 138, 5199, Mahdia, Tunisia
| | - Antonio Di Cintio
- Istituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Palatella
- Liceo Scientifico Statale "C. De Giorgi", viale De Pietro 14, 73100, Lecce, Italy
| | - Othman Jarboui
- Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, BP 1035, 3018, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Hechmi Missaoui
- Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, 2025, Salambô, Tunisia
| | - Angela Cuttitta
- Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Filippo Parlatore 65, 90145, Palermo, Italy
| | - Bernardo Patti
- Istituto per lo studio degli impatti Antropici e Sostenibilità in ambiente marino, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo 4521, 90149, Palermo, PA, Italy
| | - Rosalia Santoleri
- Istituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Sarà
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare (DiSTeM), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 16, 90128, Palermo, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Lacorata
- Istituto di Scienze Marine, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy.,Center of Excellence for Telesensing of Environment and Model Prediction of Severe events (CETEMPS), Università dell'Aquila, via Vetoio snc (Fraz. Coppito), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Requena S, Oppel S, Bond AL, Hall J, Cleeland J, Crawford RJM, Davies D, Dilley BJ, Glass T, Makhado A, Ratcliffe N, Reid TA, Ronconi RA, Schofield A, Steinfurth A, Wege M, Bester M, Ryan PG. Marine hotspots of activity inform protection of a threatened community of pelagic species in a large oceanic jurisdiction. Anim Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Requena
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - S. Oppel
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - A. L. Bond
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
- Bird Group Department of Life Sciences The National History Museum Tring UK
| | - J. Hall
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - J. Cleeland
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - R. J. M. Crawford
- Department of Environmental Affairs Branch Oceans and Coasts Cape Town South Africa
| | - D. Davies
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST‐NRF Centre of Excellence University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa
| | - B. J. Dilley
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST‐NRF Centre of Excellence University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa
| | - T. Glass
- Tristan da Cunha Conservation Department Edinburgh of the Seven Seas Tristan da Cunha
| | - A. Makhado
- Department of Environmental Affairs Branch Oceans and Coasts Cape Town South Africa
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST‐NRF Centre of Excellence University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa
| | | | - T. A. Reid
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST‐NRF Centre of Excellence University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa
| | - R. A. Ronconi
- Department of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
- Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Dartmouth Nova Scotia Canada
| | - A. Schofield
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - A. Steinfurth
- RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Sandy UK
| | - M. Wege
- Department of Zoology and Entomology Mammal Research Institute University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
| | - M. Bester
- Department of Zoology and Entomology Mammal Research Institute University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
| | - P. G. Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology DST‐NRF Centre of Excellence University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) can contribute to protecting biodiversity and managing ocean activities, including fishing. There is, however, limited evidence of ecological responses to blue water MPAs. We conducted the first comprehensive evaluation of impacts on fisheries production and ecological responses to pelagic MPAs of the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument. A Bayesian time series-based counterfactual modelling approach using fishery-dependent data was used to compare the temporal response in the MPAs to three reference regions for standardized catch rates, lengths, trophic level of the catch and species diversity. Catch rates of bigeye tuna, the main target species (Kingman/Palmyra MPA, causal effect probability >99% of an 84% reduction; 95% credible interval: -143%, -25%), and blue shark (Johnston MPAs, causal effect probability >95%) were significantly lower and longnose lancetfish significantly higher (Johnston MPAs, causal effect probability >95%) than predicted had the MPAs not been established, possibly from closing areas near shallow features, which aggregate pelagic predators, and from ‘fishing-the-line’. There were no apparent causal impacts of the MPAs on species diversity, lengths and trophic level of the catch, perhaps because the MPAs were young, were too small, did not contain critical habitat for specific life-history stages, had been lightly exploited or experienced fishing-the-line. We also assessed model-standardized catch rates for species of conservation concern and mean trophic level of the catch within and outside of MPAs. Displaced effort produced multi-species conflicts: MPAs protect bycatch hotspots and hotspots of bycatch-to-target catch ratios for some at-risk species, but coldspots for others. Mean trophic level of the catch was significantly higher around MPAs, likely due to the aggregating effect of the shallow features and there having been light fishing pressure within MPAs. These findings demonstrate how exploring a wide range of ecological responses supports evidence-based evaluations of blue water MPAs.
Collapse
|
21
|
Welch H, Brodie S, Jacox MG, Bograd SJ, Hazen EL. Decision-support tools for dynamic management. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:589-599. [PMID: 31486126 PMCID: PMC7317865 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Spatial management is a valuable strategy to advance regional goals for nature conservation, economic development, and human health. One challenge of spatial management is navigating the prioritization of multiple features. This challenge becomes more pronounced in dynamic management scenarios, in which boundaries are flexible in space and time in response to changing biological, environmental, or socioeconomic conditions. To implement dynamic management, decision-support tools are needed to guide spatial prioritization as feature distributions shift under changing conditions. Marxan is a widely applied decision-support tool designed for static management scenarios, but its utility in dynamic management has not been evaluated. EcoCast is a new decision-support tool developed explicitly for the dynamic management of multiple features, but it lacks some of Marxan's functionality. We used a hindcast analysis to compare the capacity of these 2 tools to prioritize 4 marine species in a dynamic management scenario for fisheries sustainability. We successfully configured Marxan to operate dynamically on a daily time scale to resemble EcoCast. The relationship between EcoCast solutions and the underlying species distributions was more linear and less noisy, whereas Marxan solutions had more contrast between waters that were good and poor to fish. Neither decision-support tool clearly outperformed the other; the appropriateness of each depends on management purpose, resource-manager preference, and technological capacity of tool developers. Article impact statement: Marxan can function as a decision-support tool for dynamic management scenarios in which boundaries are flexible in space and time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Welch
- Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California Santa Cruz1156 High StreetSanta CruzCA95064U.S.A.
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSuite 255A, 99 Pacific Street, Heritage HarborMontereyCA93940U.S.A.
| | - Stephanie Brodie
- Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California Santa Cruz1156 High StreetSanta CruzCA95064U.S.A.
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSuite 255A, 99 Pacific Street, Heritage HarborMontereyCA93940U.S.A.
| | - Michael G. Jacox
- Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California Santa Cruz1156 High StreetSanta CruzCA95064U.S.A.
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSuite 255A, 99 Pacific Street, Heritage HarborMontereyCA93940U.S.A.
- Earth System Research LaboratoryNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration325 Broadway StreetBoulderCO80305U.S.A.
| | - Steven J. Bograd
- Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California Santa Cruz1156 High StreetSanta CruzCA95064U.S.A.
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSuite 255A, 99 Pacific Street, Heritage HarborMontereyCA93940U.S.A.
| | - Elliott L. Hazen
- Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California Santa Cruz1156 High StreetSanta CruzCA95064U.S.A.
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSuite 255A, 99 Pacific Street, Heritage HarborMontereyCA93940U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stevenson SL, Woolley SNC, Barnett J, Dunstan P. Testing the presence of marine protected areas against their ability to reduce pressures on biodiversity. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:622-631. [PMID: 31667866 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are the preferred tool for preventing marine biodiversity loss, as reflected in international protected area targets. Although the area covered by MPAs is expanding, there is a concern that opposition from resource users is driving them into already low-use locations, whereas high-pressure areas remain unprotected, which has serious implications for biodiversity conservation. We tested the spatial relationships between different human-induced pressures on marine biodiversity and global MPAs. We used global, modeled pressure data and the World Database on Protected Areas to calculate the levels of 15 different human-induced pressures inside and outside the world's MPAs. We fitted binomial generalized linear models to the data to determine whether each pressure had a positive or negative effect on the likelihood of an area being protected and whether this effect changed with different categories of protection. Pelagic and artisanal fishing, shipping, and introductions of invasive species by ships had a negative relationship with protection, and this relationship persisted under even the least restrictive categories of protection (e.g., protected areas classified as category VI under the International Union for Conservation of Nature, a category that permits sustainable use). In contrast, pressures from dispersed, diffusive sources (e.g., pollution and ocean acidification) had positive relationships with protection. Our results showed that MPAs are systematically established in areas where there is low political opposition, limiting the capacity of existing MPAs to manage key drivers of biodiversity loss. We suggest that conservation efforts focus on biodiversity outcomes and effective reduction of pressures rather than prescribing area-based targets, and that alternative approaches to conservation are needed in areas where protection is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone L Stevenson
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
- School of Geography, University of Melbourne, 221 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Skipton N C Woolley
- CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, 3-4 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Hobart, TAS, 7004, Australia
| | - Jon Barnett
- School of Geography, University of Melbourne, 221 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Piers Dunstan
- CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, 3-4 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Hobart, TAS, 7004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cunha M, Génio L, Pradillon F, Clavel Henry M, Beaulieu S, Birch J, Campuzano F, Carretón M, De Leo F, Gula J, Laming S, Lindsay D, Matos F, Metaxas A, Meyer-Kaiser K, Mills S, Queiroga H, Rodrigues C, Sarrazin J, Watanabe H, Young R, Young C. Foresight Workshop on Advances in Ocean Biological Observations: a sustained system for deep-ocean meroplankton. RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2020. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.6.e54284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in technology have enabled an unprecedented development of underwater research, extending from near shore to the deepest regions of the globe. However, monitoring of biodiversity is not fully implemented in political agendas and biological observations in the deep ocean have been even more limited in space and time.
The Foresight Workshop on Advances in Ocean Biological Observations: a sustained system for deep-ocean meroplankton was convened to to foster advances in the knowledge on deep-ocean invertebrate larval distributions and improve our understanding of fundamental deep-ocean ecological processes such as connectivity and resilience of benthic communities to natural and human-induced disturbance. This Meroplankton Observations Workshop had two specific goals: 1) review the state-of-the-art instrumentation available for meroplankton observations; 2) develop a strategy to implement technological innovations for in-situ meroplankton observation. Presentations and discussions are summarised in this report covering: i) key challenges and priorities for advancing the knowledge of deep-sea larval diversity and distribution: ii) recent developments in technology and future needs for plankton observation, iii) data integration and oceanographic modelling; iv) synergies and added value of a sustained observation system for meroplankton; v) steps for developing a sustained observation system for deep-ocean meroplankton and plans to maximise collaborative opportunities.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hindell MA, Reisinger RR, Ropert-Coudert Y, Hückstädt LA, Trathan PN, Bornemann H, Charrassin JB, Chown SL, Costa DP, Danis B, Lea MA, Thompson D, Torres LG, Van de Putte AP, Alderman R, Andrews-Goff V, Arthur B, Ballard G, Bengtson J, Bester MN, Blix AS, Boehme L, Bost CA, Boveng P, Cleeland J, Constantine R, Corney S, Crawford RJM, Dalla Rosa L, de Bruyn PJN, Delord K, Descamps S, Double M, Emmerson L, Fedak M, Friedlaender A, Gales N, Goebel ME, Goetz KT, Guinet C, Goldsworthy SD, Harcourt R, Hinke JT, Jerosch K, Kato A, Kerry KR, Kirkwood R, Kooyman GL, Kovacs KM, Lawton K, Lowther AD, Lydersen C, Lyver PO, Makhado AB, Márquez MEI, McDonald BI, McMahon CR, Muelbert M, Nachtsheim D, Nicholls KW, Nordøy ES, Olmastroni S, Phillips RA, Pistorius P, Plötz J, Pütz K, Ratcliffe N, Ryan PG, Santos M, Southwell C, Staniland I, Takahashi A, Tarroux A, Trivelpiece W, Wakefield E, Weimerskirch H, Wienecke B, Xavier JC, Wotherspoon S, Jonsen ID, Raymond B. Tracking of marine predators to protect Southern Ocean ecosystems. Nature 2020; 580:87-92. [PMID: 32238927 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2126-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Southern Ocean ecosystems are under pressure from resource exploitation and climate change1,2. Mitigation requires the identification and protection of Areas of Ecological Significance (AESs), which have so far not been determined at the ocean-basin scale. Here, using assemblage-level tracking of marine predators, we identify AESs for this globally important region and assess current threats and protection levels. Integration of more than 4,000 tracks from 17 bird and mammal species reveals AESs around sub-Antarctic islands in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans and over the Antarctic continental shelf. Fishing pressure is disproportionately concentrated inside AESs, and climate change over the next century is predicted to impose pressure on these areas, particularly around the Antarctic continent. At present, 7.1% of the ocean south of 40°S is under formal protection, including 29% of the total AESs. The establishment and regular revision of networks of protection that encompass AESs are needed to provide long-term mitigation of growing pressures on Southern Ocean ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hindell
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. .,Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
| | - Ryan R Reisinger
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France.,CESAB-FRB, Institut Bouisson Bertrand, Montpellier, France.,LOCEAN/IPSL, Sorbonne Université-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, UMR7159, Paris, France
| | - Yan Ropert-Coudert
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Luis A Hückstädt
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Philip N Trathan
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Horst Bornemann
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | | | - Steven L Chown
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Danis
- Marine Biology Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mary-Anne Lea
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - David Thompson
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Leigh G Torres
- Marine Mammal Institute, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, USA
| | - Anton P Van de Putte
- BEDIC, OD Nature, Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rachael Alderman
- Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Virginia Andrews-Goff
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ben Arthur
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - John Bengtson
- Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marthán N Bester
- Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | | | | | - Charles-André Bost
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Peter Boveng
- Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jaimie Cleeland
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Stuart Corney
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Robert J M Crawford
- Oceans and Coasts, Department of Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Luciano Dalla Rosa
- Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
| | - P J Nico de Bruyn
- Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa
| | - Karine Delord
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | | | - Mike Double
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Louise Emmerson
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Mike Fedak
- Scottish Oceans Institute, St Andrews, UK
| | - Ari Friedlaender
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.,Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Nick Gales
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Michael E Goebel
- Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly T Goetz
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Christophe Guinet
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Simon D Goldsworthy
- South Australian Research and Development Institute, West Beach, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rob Harcourt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jefferson T Hinke
- Antarctic Ecosystems Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kerstin Jerosch
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Akiko Kato
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Knowles R Kerry
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Roger Kirkwood
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Gerald L Kooyman
- Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kit M Kovacs
- Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kieran Lawton
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Azwianewi B Makhado
- Oceans and Coasts, Department of Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Birgitte I McDonald
- Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, San José State University, Moss Landing, CA, USA
| | - Clive R McMahon
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Monica Muelbert
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
| | - Dominik Nachtsheim
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany.,Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Büsum, Germany
| | - Keith W Nicholls
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Silvia Olmastroni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell'Ambiente, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy.,Museo Nazionale dell'Antartide, Siena, Italy
| | - Richard A Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pierre Pistorius
- DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
| | - Joachim Plötz
- Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | | | - Norman Ratcliffe
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter G Ryan
- DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | | | - Colin Southwell
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Iain Staniland
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Arnaud Tarroux
- Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.,Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Wayne Trivelpiece
- Antarctic Ecosystems Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ewan Wakefield
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Henri Weimerskirch
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Station d'Écologie de Chizé-La Rochelle Université, CNRS UMR7372, Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Barbara Wienecke
- Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - José C Xavier
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK.,Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Simon Wotherspoon
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Ian D Jonsen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben Raymond
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Arroyo GM, Cruz ADL, Delgado D. How adequately are the critically endangered Balearic Shearwaters protected by the Special Protection Areas (SPAs) for seabirds? A case study in the Gulf of Cadiz. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
26
|
Lander ME, Fadely BS, Gelatt TS, Sterling JT, Johnson DS, Pelland NA. Mixing it up in Alaska: Habitat use of adult female Steller sea lions reveals a variety of foraging strategies. Ecosphere 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E. Lander
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| | - Brian S. Fadely
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| | - Thomas S. Gelatt
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| | - Jeremy T. Sterling
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| | - Devin S. Johnson
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| | - Noel A. Pelland
- Marine Mammal Laboratory Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington 98115 USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Beger M, Wendt H, Sullivan J, Mason C, LeGrand J, Davey K, Jupiter S, Ceccarelli DM, Dempsey A, Edgar G, Feary DA, Fenner D, Gauna M, Grice H, Kirmani SN, Mangubhai S, Purkis S, Richards ZT, Rotjan R, Stuart-Smith R, Sykes H, Yakub N, Bauman AG, Hughes A, Raubani J, Lewis A, Fernandes L. National-scale marine bioregions for the Southwest Pacific. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2020; 150:110710. [PMID: 31753567 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Existing marine bioregions covering the Pacific Ocean are conceptualised at spatial scales that are too broad for national marine spatial planning. Here, we developed the first combined oceanic and coastal marine bioregionalisation at national scales, delineating 262 deep-water and 103 reef-associated bioregions across the southwest Pacific. The deep-water bioregions were informed by thirty biophysical environmental variables. For reef-associated environments, records for 806 taxa at 7369 sites were used to predict the probability of observing taxa based on environmental variables. Both deep-water and reef-associated bioregions were defined with cluster analysis applied to the environmental variables and predicted species observation probabilities, respectively to classify areas with high taxonomic similarity. Local experts further refined the delineation of the bioregions at national scales for four countries. This work provides marine bioregions that enable the design of ecologically representative national systems of marine protected areas within offshore and inshore environments in the Pacific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Beger
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Hans Wendt
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji
| | - Jonah Sullivan
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji; Geoscience Australia, Environmental Geoscience Division, 101 Jerrabomberra Ave, Symonston, ACT, 2609, Australia
| | - Claire Mason
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia
| | - Jimaima LeGrand
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji; Department of Transport and Main Roads, 131 Sugar Rd, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kate Davey
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji
| | - Stacy Jupiter
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, 11 Ma'afu Street, Suva, Fiji
| | - Daniela M Ceccarelli
- Marine Ecology Consultant, 36 Barton Street, Magnetic Island QLD, 4819, Australia
| | - Alex Dempsey
- Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA
| | - Graham Edgar
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, 7053, Australia
| | | | | | - Marian Gauna
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji
| | - Hannah Grice
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Sahar Noor Kirmani
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji
| | - Sangeeta Mangubhai
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, 11 Ma'afu Street, Suva, Fiji
| | - Sam Purkis
- Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA; Department of Marine Geosciences, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, USA
| | - Zoe T Richards
- Coral Conservation and Research Group, School of Molecular and Life Science, Curtin University, Bentley WA, 6102, Australia; Aquatic Zoology Department, Western Australian Museum, Welshpool, WA, Australia
| | - Randi Rotjan
- Department of Biology, Boston University. 5 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Rick Stuart-Smith
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, 7053, Australia
| | - Helen Sykes
- Marine Ecology Consulting, PO Box 2558, Government Buildings, Suva, Fiji Islands
| | - Naushad Yakub
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji
| | - Andrew G Bauman
- Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Singapore
| | - Alec Hughes
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Solomon Islands, P.O. Box 98, Munda, Western Province, Solomon Islands
| | - Jason Raubani
- The Pacific Community, 95 Promenade Roger Laroque, BP D5, 98848, Noumea, New Caledonia
| | - Adam Lewis
- Geoscience Australia, Environmental Geoscience Division, 101 Jerrabomberra Ave, Symonston, ACT, 2609, Australia
| | - Leanne Fernandes
- Oceania Regional Office, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature), 5 Ma'afu Street, Private Mail Bag, Suva, Fiji.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gilman E, Kaiser MJ, Chaloupka M. Do static and dynamic marine protected areas that restrict pelagic fishing achieve ecological objectives? Ecosphere 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Gilman
- Pelagic Ecosystems Research Group & Tuna Program The Nature Conservancy 3661 Loulu Street Honolulu Hawaii 96822 USA
| | | | - Milani Chaloupka
- Ecological Modelling Services Pty Ltd & Marine Spatial Ecology Lab University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mesoscale eddies release pelagic sharks from thermal constraints to foraging in the ocean twilight zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:17187-17192. [PMID: 31387979 PMCID: PMC6717292 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903067116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
New dynamic approaches to managing marine fisheries promise more effective management in a changing climate. However, they require detailed knowledge of the links between oceanographic features and marine megafauna. Here, we demonstrate that satellite tracking of animal movements, combined with ocean remote sensing and numerical models, can provide this critical information for the most exploited pelagic shark in the Atlantic Ocean. We find that this predator dives deep in warm, swirling water masses called eddies that have traditionally been considered ocean “deserts.” Sharks use these warm features as a conduit to forage in the ocean twilight zone, a region of the deep ocean that contains the largest fish biomass on Earth, highlighting the importance of these deep ocean prey resources. Mesoscale eddies are critical components of the ocean’s “internal weather” system. Mixing and stirring by eddies exerts significant control on biogeochemical fluxes in the open ocean, and eddies may trap distinctive plankton communities that remain coherent for months and can be transported hundreds to thousands of kilometers. Debate regarding how and why predators use fronts and eddies, for example as a migratory cue, enhanced forage opportunities, or preferred thermal habitat, has been ongoing since the 1950s. The influence of eddies on the behavior of large pelagic fishes, however, remains largely unexplored. Here, we reconstruct movements of a pelagic predator, the blue shark (Prionace glauca), in the Gulf Stream region using electronic tags, earth-observing satellites, and data-assimilating ocean forecasting models. Based on >2,000 tracking days and nearly 500,000 high-resolution time series measurements collected by 15 instrumented individuals, we show that blue sharks seek out the interiors of anticyclonic eddies where they dive deep while foraging. Our observations counter the existing paradigm that anticyclonic eddies are unproductive ocean “deserts” and suggest anomalously warm temperatures in these features connect surface-oriented predators to the most abundant fish community on the planet in the mesopelagic. These results also shed light on the ecosystem services provided by mesopelagic prey. Careful consideration will be needed before biomass extraction from the ocean twilight zone to avoid interrupting a key link between planktonic production and top predators. Moreover, robust associations between targeted fish species and oceanographic features increase the prospects for effective dynamic ocean management.
Collapse
|
30
|
McInturf AG, Pollack L, Yang LH, Spiegel O. Vectors with autonomy: what distinguishes animal‐mediated nutrient transport from abiotic vectors? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2019; 94:1761-1773. [DOI: 10.1111/brv.12525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra G. McInturf
- Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology University of California One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 U.S.A
| | - Lea Pollack
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 U.S.A
| | - Louie H. Yang
- Department of Entomology and Nematology University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616 U.S.A
| | - Orr Spiegel
- School of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences Sherman Building, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, 69978 Israel
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Valente R, Correia AM, Gil Á, González García L, Sousa‐Pinto I. Baleen whales in Macaronesia: occurrence patterns revealed through a bibliographic review. Mamm Rev 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/mam.12148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Raul Valente
- Department of BiologyFaculty of SciencesUniversity of Porto 4169‐007 Porto Portugal
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR) Av. General Norton de Matos s/n 4450‐208 Matosinhos Portugal
| | - Ana M. Correia
- Department of BiologyFaculty of SciencesUniversity of Porto 4169‐007 Porto Portugal
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR) Av. General Norton de Matos s/n 4450‐208 Matosinhos Portugal
| | - Ágatha Gil
- Department of BiologyFaculty of SciencesUniversity of Porto 4169‐007 Porto Portugal
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR) Av. General Norton de Matos s/n 4450‐208 Matosinhos Portugal
| | - Laura González García
- Remote Sensing and GIS LaboratoryDepartment of Applied PhysicsUniversity of Vigo Campus Lagoas de Marcosende 36310 Vigo Spain
| | - Isabel Sousa‐Pinto
- Department of BiologyFaculty of SciencesUniversity of Porto 4169‐007 Porto Portugal
- Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR) Av. General Norton de Matos s/n 4450‐208 Matosinhos Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rooker JR, Dance MA, Wells RJD, Ajemian MJ, Block BA, Castleton MR, Drymon JM, Falterman BJ, Franks JS, Hammerschlag N, Hendon JM, Hoffmayer ER, Kraus RT, McKinney JA, Secor DH, Stunz GW, Walter JF. Population connectivity of pelagic megafauna in the Cuba-Mexico-United States triangle. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1663. [PMID: 30733508 PMCID: PMC6367330 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The timing and extent of international crossings by billfishes, tunas, and sharks in the Cuba-Mexico-United States (U.S.) triangle was investigated using electronic tagging data from eight species that resulted in >22,000 tracking days. Transnational movements of these highly mobile marine predators were pronounced with varying levels of bi- or tri-national population connectivity displayed by each species. Billfishes and tunas moved throughout the Gulf of Mexico and all species investigated (blue marlin, white marlin, Atlantic bluefin tuna, yellowfin tuna) frequently crossed international boundaries and entered the territorial waters of Cuba and/or Mexico. Certain sharks (tiger shark, scalloped hammerhead) displayed prolonged periods of residency in U.S. waters with more limited displacements, while whale sharks and to a lesser degree shortfin mako moved through multiple jurisdictions. The spatial extent of associated movements was generally associated with their differential use of coastal and open ocean pelagic ecosystems. Species with the majority of daily positions in oceanic waters off the continental shelf showed the greatest tendency for transnational movements and typically traveled farther from initial tagging locations. Several species converged on a common seasonal movement pattern between territorial waters of the U.S. (summer) and Mexico (winter).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay R Rooker
- Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University, 1001 Texas Clipper Road, Galveston, Texas, 77554, USA.
- Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
| | - Michael A Dance
- Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State University, 2255 Energy, Coast and Environment Building, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803, USA
| | - R J David Wells
- Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University, 1001 Texas Clipper Road, Galveston, Texas, 77554, USA
- Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA
| | - Matthew J Ajemian
- Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 US 1 North, Fort. Pierce, Florida, 34946, USA
| | - Barbara A Block
- Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd., Pacific Grove, California, 93950, USA
| | - Michael R Castleton
- Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd., Pacific Grove, California, 93950, USA
| | - J Marcus Drymon
- Mississippi State University, Coastal Research and Extension Center, 1815 Popps Ferry Road, Biloxi, Mississippi, 39532, USA
| | - Brett J Falterman
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 2021 Lakeshore Dr., Suite 220, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70122, USA
| | - James S Franks
- Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East Beach Drive Ocean Springs, Mississippi, 39564, USA
| | - Neil Hammerschlag
- Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, 33149, USA
| | - Jill M Hendon
- Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East Beach Drive Ocean Springs, Mississippi, 39564, USA
| | - Eric R Hoffmayer
- NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, P.O. Drawer 1207, Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39568, USA
| | - Richard T Kraus
- Lake Erie Biological Station, USGS, 6100 Columbus Avenue, Sandusky, Ohio, 44870, USA
| | - Jennifer A McKinney
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 2021 Lakeshore Dr., Suite 220, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70122, USA
| | - David H Secor
- Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P.O. Box 38, Solomons, Maryland, 20688, USA
| | - Gregory W Stunz
- Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5869, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78412, USA
| | - John F Walter
- NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, Florida, 33149, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
García-Barón I, Authier M, Caballero A, Vázquez JA, Santos MB, Murcia JL, Louzao M. Modelling the spatial abundance of a migratory predator: A call for transboundary marine protected areas. DIVERS DISTRIB 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthieu Authier
- Observatoire PELAGIS (CRMM), UMS 3462; CNRS-Université de La Rochelle; La Rochelle France
- ADERA; Pessac Cedex France
| | | | | | - M. Begoña Santos
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo; Vigo Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Afán I, Giménez J, Forero MG, Ramírez F. An adaptive method for identifying marine areas of high conservation priority. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2018; 32:1436-1447. [PMID: 29968335 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation is particularly challenging in the marine environment due to the open and dynamic nature of the ocean, the paucity of information on species distribution, and the necessary balance between marine biodiversity conservation and essential supporting services such as seafood provision. We used the Patagonian seabird breeding community as a case study to propose an integrated and adaptive method for delimiting key marine areas for conservation. Priority areas were defined through a free decision-support tool (Marxan) that included projected at-sea distributions of seabirds (approximately 2,225,000 individuals of 14 species); BirdLife Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) for pelagic bird species; and the economic costs of potential regulations in fishing practices. The proposed reserve network encompassed approximately 300,000 km2 that was largely concentrated in northern and southern inshore and northern and central offshore regions. This reserve network exceeded the minimum threshold of 20% conservation of the abundance of each species proposed by the World Parks Congress. Based on marine currents in the study area, we further identified the 3 primary water masses that may influence areas of conservation priority through water inflow. Our reserve network may benefit from enhanced marine productivity in these highly connected areas, but they may be threatened by human impacts such as marine pollution. Our method of reserve network design is an important advance with respect to the more classical approaches based on criteria defined for one or a few species and may be particularly useful when information on spatial patterns is data deficient. Our approach also accommodates addition of new information on seabird distribution and population dynamics, human activities, and alterations in the marine environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Afán
- Remote Sensing and GIS Laboratory (LAST-EBD), Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), C/AméricoVespucio, 26, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Joan Giménez
- Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Manuela G Forero
- Department of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Francisco Ramírez
- Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 643, 08028, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Corrigan S, Lowther AD, Beheregaray LB, Bruce BD, Cliff G, Duffy CA, Foulis A, Francis MP, Goldsworthy SD, Hyde JR, Jabado RW, Kacev D, Marshall L, Mucientes GR, Naylor GJP, Pepperell JG, Queiroz N, White WT, Wintner SP, Rogers PJ. Population Connectivity of the Highly Migratory Shortfin Mako (Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque 1810) and Implications for Management in the Southern Hemisphere. Front Ecol Evol 2018. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
36
|
Duarte de Paula Costa M, Mills M, Richardson AJ, Fuller RA, Muelbert JH, Possingham HP. Efficiently enforcing artisanal fisheries to protect estuarine biodiversity. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018; 28:1450-1458. [PMID: 29944185 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Artisanal fisheries support millions of livelihoods worldwide, yet ineffective enforcement can allow for continued environmental degradation due to overexploitation. Here, we use spatial planning to design an enforcement strategy for a pre-existing spatial closure for artisanal fisheries considering climate variability, existing seasonal fishing closures, representative conservation targets and enforcement costs. We calculated enforcement cost in three ways, based on different assumptions about who could be responsible for monitoring the fishery. We applied this approach in the Patos Lagoon estuary (Brazil), where we found three important results. First, spatial priorities for enforcement were similar under different climate scenarios. Second, we found that the cost and percentage of area enforced varied among scenarios tested by the conservation planning analysis, with only a modest increase in budget needed to incorporate climate variability. Third, we found that spatial priorities for enforcement depend on whether enforcement is carried out by a central authority or by the community itself. Here, we demonstrated a method that can be used to efficiently design enforcement plans, resulting in the conservation of biodiversity and estuarine resources. Also, cost of enforcement can be potentially reduced when fishers are empowered to enforce management within their fishing grounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micheli Duarte de Paula Costa
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
- Laboratório de Ecologia do Ictioplâncton, Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Campus Carreiros, Avenida Itália Km 8, CP 474, Rio Grande, RS, 96203900, Brazil
| | - Morena Mills
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Richardson
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, Queensland BioSciences Precinct (QBP), St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia
- School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Richard A Fuller
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - José H Muelbert
- Laboratório de Ecologia do Ictioplâncton, Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Campus Carreiros, Avenida Itália Km 8, CP 474, Rio Grande, RS, 96203900, Brazil
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Hugh P Possingham
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
- The Nature Conservancy, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mason C, Alderman R, McGowan J, Possingham HP, Hobday AJ, Sumner M, Shaw J. Telemetry reveals existing marine protected areas are worse than random for protecting the foraging habitat of threatened shy albatross (Thalassarche cauta
). DIVERS DISTRIB 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Mason
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Queensland; St Lucia Queensland Australia
| | - Rachael Alderman
- Marine Conservation Program; Department of Primary Industries; Parks, Water and Environment; Hobart Tasmania Australia
| | - Jennifer McGowan
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Queensland; St Lucia Queensland Australia
- Department of Biological Sciences; Macquarie University; North Ryde New South Wales Australia
| | - Hugh P. Possingham
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Queensland; St Lucia Queensland Australia
- The Nature Conservancy; Arlington Virginia USA
| | | | - Michael Sumner
- Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston Tasmania Australia
| | - Justine Shaw
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions; School of Biological Sciences; The University of Queensland; St Lucia Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jones KR, Klein CJ, Halpern BS, Venter O, Grantham H, Kuempel CD, Shumway N, Friedlander AM, Possingham HP, Watson JEM. The Location and Protection Status of Earth's Diminishing Marine Wilderness. Curr Biol 2018; 28:2506-2512.e3. [PMID: 30057308 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
As human activities increasingly threaten biodiversity [1, 2], areas devoid of intense human impacts are vital refugia [3]. These wilderness areas contain high genetic diversity, unique functional traits, and endemic species [4-7]; maintain high levels of ecological and evolutionary connectivity [8-10]; and may be well placed to resist and recover from the impacts of climate change [11-13]. On land, rapid declines in wilderness [3] have led to urgent calls for its protection [3, 14]. In contrast, little is known about the extent and protection of marine wilderness [4, 5]. Here we systematically map marine wilderness globally by identifying areas that have both very little impact (lowest 10%) from 15 anthropogenic stressors and also a very low combined cumulative impact from these stressors. We discover that ∼13% of the ocean meets this definition of global wilderness, with most being located in the high seas. Recognizing that human influence differs across ocean regions, we repeat the analysis within each of the 16 ocean realms [15]. Realm-specific wilderness extent varies considerably, with >16 million km2 (8.6%) in the Warm Indo-Pacific, down to <2,000 km2 (0.5%) in Temperate Southern Africa. We also show that the marine protected area estate holds only 4.9% of global wilderness and 4.1% of realm-specific wilderness, very little of which is in biodiverse ecosystems such as coral reefs. Proactive retention of marine wilderness should now be incorporated into global strategies aimed at conserving biodiversity and ensuring that large-scale ecological and evolutionary processes continue. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall R Jones
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA; School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| | - Carissa J Klein
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Benjamin S Halpern
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101-5504, USA; Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA; Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Burkhurst Road, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Oscar Venter
- Natural Resource and Environmental Studies Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
| | - Hedley Grantham
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA
| | - Caitlin D Kuempel
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Nicole Shumway
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Alan M Friedlander
- Pristine Seas, National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, USA; Fisheries Ecology Research Lab, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA
| | - Hugh P Possingham
- Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; The Nature Conservancy, 4245 Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, USA
| | - James E M Watson
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, NY 10460, USA; School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Conservation and Biodiversity Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
O'Leary BC, Roberts CM. Ecological connectivity across ocean depths: Implications for protected area design. Glob Ecol Conserv 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael A. Magris
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Robert L. Pressey
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Using temporally explicit habitat suitability models to assess threats to mobile species and evaluate the effectiveness of marine protected areas. J Nat Conserv 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
42
|
Egerton JP, Johnson AF, Turner J, LeVay L, Mascareñas-Osorio I, Aburto-Oropeza O. Hydroacoustics as a tool to examine the effects of Marine Protected Areas and habitat type on marine fish communities. Sci Rep 2018; 8:47. [PMID: 29335421 PMCID: PMC5768732 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18353-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Hydroacoustic technologies are widely used in fisheries research but few studies have used them to examine the effects of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). We evaluate the efficacy of hydroacoustics to examine the effects of closure to fishing and habitat type on fish populations in the Cabo Pulmo National Park (CPNP), Mexico, and compare these methods to Underwater Visual Censuses (UVC). Fish density, biomass and size were all significantly higher inside the CPNP (299%, 144% and 52% respectively) than outside in non-MPA control areas. These values were much higher when only accounting for the reefs within the CPNP (4715%, 6970% and 97% respectively) highlighting the importance of both habitat complexity and protection from fishing for fish populations. Acoustic estimates of fish biomass over reef-specific sites did not differ significantly from those estimated using UVC data, although acoustic densities were less due to higher numbers of small fish recorded by UVC. There is thus considerable merit in nesting UVC surveys, also providing species information, within hydroacoustic surveys. This study is a valuable starting point in demonstrating the utility of hydroacoustics to assess the effects of coastal MPAs on fish populations, something that has been underutilised in MPA design, formation and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Egerton
- School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Wales, UK.
| | - A F Johnson
- Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - J Turner
- School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Wales, UK
| | - L LeVay
- School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Wales, UK
| | | | - O Aburto-Oropeza
- Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Reisinger RR, Raymond B, Hindell MA, Bester MN, Crawford RJM, Davies D, de Bruyn PJN, Dilley BJ, Kirkman SP, Makhado AB, Ryan PG, Schoombie S, Stevens K, Sumner MD, Tosh CA, Wege M, Whitehead TO, Wotherspoon S, Pistorius PA. Habitat modelling of tracking data from multiple marine predators identifies important areas in the Southern Indian Ocean. DIVERS DISTRIB 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan R. Reisinger
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; Department of Zoology and Coastal and Marine Research Institute; Nelson Mandela University; Port Elizabeth South Africa
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé; UMR 7372 du CNRS-Université de La Rochelle; Villiers-en-Bois France
- CESAB-FRB; Aix-en-Provence France
| | - Ben Raymond
- Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston TAS Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
- Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Mark A. Hindell
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
- Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Marthán N. Bester
- Mammal Research Institute; Department of Zoology and Entomology; University of Pretoria; Hatfield South Africa
| | - Robert J. M. Crawford
- Department of Environmental Affairs, Branch Oceans and Coasts; Cape Town South Africa
- Animal Demography Unit; Department of Biological Sciences; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Delia Davies
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - P. J. Nico de Bruyn
- Mammal Research Institute; Department of Zoology and Entomology; University of Pretoria; Hatfield South Africa
| | - Ben J. Dilley
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Stephen P. Kirkman
- Department of Environmental Affairs, Branch Oceans and Coasts; Cape Town South Africa
- Animal Demography Unit; Department of Biological Sciences; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Azwianewi B. Makhado
- Department of Environmental Affairs, Branch Oceans and Coasts; Cape Town South Africa
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Peter G. Ryan
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Stefan Schoombie
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Kim Stevens
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Michael D. Sumner
- Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston TAS Australia
- Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Cheryl A. Tosh
- Mammal Research Institute; Department of Zoology and Entomology; University of Pretoria; Hatfield South Africa
| | - Mia Wege
- Mammal Research Institute; Department of Zoology and Entomology; University of Pretoria; Hatfield South Africa
| | - Thomas Otto Whitehead
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence; FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Simon Wotherspoon
- Australian Antarctic Division; Kingston TAS Australia
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies; University of Tasmania; Hobart TAS Australia
| | - Pierre A. Pistorius
- DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology; Department of Zoology and Coastal and Marine Research Institute; Nelson Mandela University; Port Elizabeth South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Christensen-Dalsgaard S, May R, Lorentsen SH. Taking a trip to the shelf: Behavioral decisions are mediated by the proximity to foraging habitats in the black-legged kittiwake. Ecol Evol 2017; 8:866-878. [PMID: 29375761 PMCID: PMC5773323 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
For marine top predators like seabirds, the oceans represent a multitude of habitats regarding oceanographic conditions and food availability. Worldwide, these marine habitats are being altered by changes in climate and increased anthropogenic impact. This is causing a growing concern on how seabird populations might adapt to these changes. Understanding how seabird populations respond to fluctuating environmental conditions and to what extent behavioral flexibility can buffer variations in food availability can help predict how seabirds may cope with changes in the marine environment. Such knowledge is important to implement proper long‐term conservation measures intended to protect marine predators. We explored behavioral flexibility in choice of foraging habitat of chick‐rearing black‐legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla during multiple years. By comparing foraging behavior of individuals from two colonies with large differences in oceanographic conditions and distances to predictable feeding areas at the Norwegian shelf break, we investigated how foraging decisions are related to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. We found that proximity to the shelf break determined which factors drove the decision to forage there. At the colony near the shelf break, time of departure from the colony and wind speed were most important in driving the choice of habitat. At the colony farther from the shelf break, the decision to forage there was driven by adult body condition. Birds furthermore adjusted foraging behavior metrics according to time of the day, weather conditions, body condition, and the age of the chicks. The study shows that kittiwakes have high degree of flexibility in their behavioral response to a variable marine environment, which might help them buffer changes in prey distribution around the colonies. The flexibility is, however, dependent on the availability of foraging habitats near the colony.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard
- Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.,Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway
| | - Roel May
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Planetary boundaries for a blue planet. Nat Ecol Evol 2017; 1:1625-1634. [DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0319-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
46
|
Cornejo-Donoso J, Einarsson B, Birnir B, Gaines SD. Effects of fish movement assumptions on the design of a marine protected area to protect an overfished stock. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0186309. [PMID: 29023580 PMCID: PMC5638509 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Marine Protected Areas (MPA) are important management tools shown to protect marine organisms, restore biomass, and increase fisheries yields. While MPAs have been successful in meeting these goals for many relatively sedentary species, highly mobile organisms may get few benefits from this type of spatial protection due to their frequent movement outside the protected area. The use of a large MPA can compensate for extensive movement, but testing this empirically is challenging, as it requires both large areas and sufficient time series to draw conclusions. To overcome this limitation, MPA models have been used to identify designs and predict potential outcomes, but these simulations are highly sensitive to the assumptions describing the organism’s movements. Due to recent improvements in computational simulations, it is now possible to include very complex movement assumptions in MPA models (e.g. Individual Based Model). These have renewed interest in MPA simulations, which implicitly assume that increasing the detail in fish movement overcomes the sensitivity to the movement assumptions. Nevertheless, a systematic comparison of the designs and outcomes obtained under different movement assumptions has not been done. In this paper, we use an individual based model, interconnected to population and fishing fleet models, to explore the value of increasing the detail of the movement assumptions using four scenarios of increasing behavioral complexity: a) random, diffusive movement, b) aggregations, c) aggregations that respond to environmental forcing (e.g. sea surface temperature), and d) aggregations that respond to environmental forcing and are transported by currents. We then compare these models to determine how the assumptions affect MPA design, and therefore the effective protection of the stocks. Our results show that the optimal MPA size to maximize fisheries benefits increases as movement complexity increases from ~10% for the diffusive assumption to ~30% when full environment forcing was used. We also found that in cases of limited understanding of the movement dynamics of a species, simplified assumptions can be used to provide a guide for the minimum MPA size needed to effectively protect the stock. However, using oversimplified assumptions can produce suboptimal designs and lead to a density underestimation of ca. 30%; therefore, the main value of detailed movement dynamics is to provide more reliable MPA design and predicted outcomes. Large MPAs can be effective in recovering overfished stocks, protect pelagic fish and provide significant increases in fisheries yields. Our models provide a means to empirically test this spatial management tool, which theoretical evidence consistently suggests as an effective alternative to managing highly mobile pelagic stocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Cornejo-Donoso
- Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Marine Science, Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Baldvin Einarsson
- Department of Mathematics, South Hall, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
| | - Bjorn Birnir
- Department of Mathematics, South Hall, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
- School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Steven D. Gaines
- Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, Bren Hall, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Venegas‐Li R, Levin N, Possingham H, Kark S. 3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments. Methods Ecol Evol 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rubén Venegas‐Li
- The Biodiversity Research Group School of Biological Sciences Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
| | - Noam Levin
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
- Department of Geography The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
| | - Hugh Possingham
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
- Conservation Science The Nature Conservancy South Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Salit Kark
- The Biodiversity Research Group School of Biological Sciences Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) The University of Queensland St Lucia Qld Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Noam Levin
- Department of Geography The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mount Scopus Jerusalem 91905 Israel
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Salit Kark
- The Biodiversity Research Group, The School of Biological Sciences, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions and NESP Threatened Species hub, Centre for Biodiversity & Conservation Science The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Roberto Danovaro
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences Polytechnic University of Marche 60131 Ancona Italy
- Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn Naples Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ramos R, Carlile N, Madeiros J, Ramírez I, Paiva VH, Dinis HA, Zino F, Biscoito M, Leal GR, Bugoni L, Jodice PGR, Ryan PG, González-Solís J. It is the time for oceanic seabirds: Tracking year-round distribution of gadfly petrels across the Atlantic Ocean. DIVERS DISTRIB 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raül Ramos
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Departament de Biologia Evolutiva; Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals; Universitat de Barcelona; Barcelona Spain
| | | | - Jeremy Madeiros
- Department of Conservation Sciences; Ministry of Health and Environment; Government of Bermuda; Flatts Bermuda
| | - Iván Ramírez
- BirdLife International-The David Attenborough Building; Cambridge United Kingdom
| | - Vitor H. Paiva
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE); Department of Life Sciences; University of Coimbra; Coimbra Portugal
| | | | - Francis Zino
- Freira Conservation Project (FCP); Funchal Madeira Portugal
| | - Manuel Biscoito
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE); Estação de Biologia Marinha do Funchal and OOM-Museu de História Natural do Funchal; Funchal Madeira Portugal
| | - Gustavo R. Leal
- Laboratório de Aves Aquáticas e Tartarugas Marinhas; Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG); Rio Grande RS Brazil
| | - Leandro Bugoni
- Laboratório de Aves Aquáticas e Tartarugas Marinhas; Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG); Rio Grande RS Brazil
| | - Patrick G. R. Jodice
- U.S. Geological Survey; South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; Clemson University; Clemson SC USA
| | - Peter G. Ryan
- FitzPatrick Institute; DST-NRF Centre of Excellence; University of Cape Town; Rondebosch South Africa
| | - Jacob González-Solís
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio) and Departament de Biologia Evolutiva; Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals; Universitat de Barcelona; Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Albouy C, Delattre VL, Mérigot B, Meynard CN, Leprieur F. Multifaceted biodiversity hotspots of marine mammals for conservation priorities. DIVERS DISTRIB 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Albouy
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL; Birmensdorf Switzerland
- Landscape Ecology; Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems; ETH Zürich; Zürich Switzerland
- IFREMER; Unité Ecologie et Modèles pour l'Halieutique; Nantes Cedex 3 France
| | - Valentine L. Delattre
- Université de Montpellier; UMR 9190 MARBEC (CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, UM); Montpellier Cedex 5 France
| | - Bastien Mérigot
- Université de Montpellier; UMR 9190 MARBEC (CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, UM); Montpellier Cedex 5 France
| | - Christine N. Meynard
- INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA/IRD/Cirad/Montpellier SupAgro); Campus International de Baillarguet; Montferrier-sur-Lez Cedex France
- Virginia Institute of Marine Science; College of William & Mary; Gloucester Point VA USA
| | - Fabien Leprieur
- Université de Montpellier; UMR 9190 MARBEC (CNRS, IFREMER, IRD, UM); Montpellier Cedex 5 France
| |
Collapse
|