1
|
Havelka EM, Sanfilippo JE, Juneau PL, Sherman G, Cooper D, Leggio L. The effect of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use on vaccine acceptance, uptake, and adherence: a systematic review. Alcohol Alcohol 2024; 59:agae057. [PMID: 39371015 PMCID: PMC11456869 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agae057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy is increasingly recognized as a health challenge affecting populations worldwide. Given the biological vulnerabilities and structural barriers people who use substances and/or have behavioral addictions face, this systematic review aims to evaluate whether this subpopulation is less prone to adhere to vaccination recommendations. METHODS Electronic searches of published original research were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and PsycINFO from database inception to December 2022. Our strategy encompassed retrievals regardless of languages and date of publication. Animal studies, abstracts without a full manuscript, and studies which were considered to have lower robustness of scientific evidence were excluded. Outcomes measured were vaccine acceptance, uptake, and adherence. Results were interpreted through a narrative synthesis. RESULTS The search yielded 103 retrievals encompassing data collected on 5 576 374 persons who were predominantly residents of Europe (n = 39) and North America (n = 27). Tobacco use, the substance for which many studies were found (n = 91), was significantly associated with poorer vaccine acceptance, uptake and adherence for influenza, COVID-19, human papillomavirus (HPV), and maternal and childhood vaccines. Peri-natal and parental substance use was identified as a risk factor for suboptimal vaccine-related outcomes concerning maternal COVID-19 and childhood vaccines. Finally, people identified as 'using', 'abusing', or 'misusing' drugs or substances may be at decreased odds of all outcomes in various vaccines. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, the studies identified several groups with statistically significant greater vaccine hesitancy and decreased engagement among whom targeted measures could be beneficial. Timely evidence, especially on behavioral addictions and substances besides tobacco, is lacking, and warrants urgent attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M Havelka
- Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology Section, Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
- Centre for Addictive Disorders, Department of Adult Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8001, Switzerland
| | - Jenna E Sanfilippo
- Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology Section, Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Paul L Juneau
- National Institutes of Health Library, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, United States
| | - Garrick Sherman
- Office of the Clinical Director, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
| | - Diane Cooper
- Office of Research Services, Division of Library Services, National Institutes of Health; Building 10 Bethesda, MD 20892, United States
| | - Lorenzo Leggio
- Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology Section, Translational Addiction Medicine Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institutes of Health, 251 Bayview Blvd, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
George G, Strauss M, Lansdell E, Nota P, Peters RPH, Brysiewicz P, Nadesan-Reddy N, Wassenaar D. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake among South African health care workers. Vaccine 2024; 42:126181. [PMID: 39111155 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying factors associated with vaccine uptake among health care workers (HCWs) remains crucial to generating evidence aimed at guiding national COVID-19 vaccination and future infectious disease outbreak strategies. This study aimed to elucidate these factors, focusing on the interplay between socio-demographic, health, knowledge, beliefs and attitudinal indicators. METHODS This was a cross-sectional online survey administered to HCWs across South Africa between August and October 2022. Bivariate and Multivariate logistic regressions identified associations between COVID-19 vaccine uptake and demographics, occupational characteristics, general knowledge of and attitudes towards vaccination, perceived COVID-19 risk and perceived importance of COVID-19 vaccine attributes. RESULTS Analysis revealed high vaccine uptake rates among the sample of 5564 HCWs, with 87.6% of the sample vaccinated at the time of the study. Demographic measures significantly associated with vaccine uptake were age (P-value = 0.001), race (P-value = 0.021), religion (P-value = 0.004), and having a chronic illness (P-value <0.001). Belief and attitude measures significantly associated with vaccine uptake included: need for vaccines (P-value <0.001), perceived risk of infection (P-value = 0.001), perceived patient risk (P-value <0.001), and perceived vaccine knowledge (P-value <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that HCWs who listed their religion as African Spirituality (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2-0.7; P-value = 0.002) and had any occupation other than nurse or doctor (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.4-0.8; P-value <0.001), were less likely to vaccinate, while HCWs who had a chronic condition (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0; P-value <0.001) were more likely to have been vaccinated. CONCLUSION This study provides useful insights into the factors associated with and possibly driving COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs in South Africa. These results add to a limited body of knowledge on contextual dynamics associated with vaccination programmes in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin George
- Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa; Division of Social Medicine and Global Health, Lund University, 22363 Lund, Sweden.
| | - Michael Strauss
- Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
| | - Emma Lansdell
- Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
| | - Phiwe Nota
- Health Economics and HIV and AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
| | - Remco P H Peters
- Research Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London 5241, South Africa
| | - Petra Brysiewicz
- School of Nursing & Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
| | - Nisha Nadesan-Reddy
- School of Nursing & Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
| | - Douglas Wassenaar
- South African Research Ethics Training Initiative, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maraqa B, Nazzal Z, Baroud H, Douden M, El Hamshary Y, Jalamneh T. Healthcare workers' attitudes toward and factors influencing their acceptance of an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine: a cross-sectional study in Palestine. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:624. [PMID: 38745215 PMCID: PMC11092075 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11016-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants may necessitate an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare workers' (HCWs) acceptance of a COVID-19 yearly booster vaccine if recommended and its association with their attitudes and burnout levels. METHODS We used an online self-administered questionnaire to conduct a cross-sectional study of all HCWs in the West Bank and Gaza Strip of Palestine between August and September 2022. We used the Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale to assess HCWs' vaccination attitudes and the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess work-related Burnout. In addition, we conducted logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with the acceptance of the booster vaccine. RESULTS The study included 919 HCWs; 52.4% were male, 46.5% were physicians, 30.0% were nurses, and 63.1% worked in hospitals. One-third of HCWs (95% CI: 30.5%-36.7%) said they would accept an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. HCWs who are suspicious of vaccine benefits [aOR = .70; 95%CI: .65-.75] and those concerned about unforeseeable future effects [aOR = .90; 95%CI: .84-.95] are less likely to accept the booster vaccine if recommended, whereas those who receive annual influenza vaccine are more likely to get it [aOR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.7-5.0]. CONCLUSION Only about a third of HCWs would agree to receive an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. Mistrust of the vaccine's efficacy and concerns about side effects continue to drive COVID-19 vaccine reluctance. Health officials need to address HCWs' concerns to increase their acceptance of the annual vaccine if it is to be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beesan Maraqa
- Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine
- Community and Family medicine department, College of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine
| | - Zaher Nazzal
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Hassan Baroud
- Department of Family Medicine, Palestinian Medical Council, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Mahmoud Douden
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Yousef El Hamshary
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
- Department of Internal Medicine, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Tala Jalamneh
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roederer T, Mollo B, Vincent C, Leduc G, Sayyad-Hilario J, Mosnier M, Vandentorren S. Estimating COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its drivers among migrants, homeless and precariously housed people in France. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:30. [PMID: 36801917 PMCID: PMC9939372 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00257-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migrants, people experiencing homelessness (PEH), or precariously housed (PH) are at high risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19. However, while data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in these populations are available in the USA, Canada, and Denmark, we are lacking, to the best of our knowledge, data from France. METHODS In late 2021, we carried out a cross-sectional survey to determine COVID-19 vaccine coverage in PEH/PH residing in Ile-de-France and Marseille, France, and to explore its drivers. Participants aged over 18 years were interviewed face-to-face where they slept the previous night, in their preferred language, and then stratified for analysis into three housing groups (Streets, Accommodated, and Precariously Housed). Standardized vaccination rates were computed and compared to the French population. Multilevel univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were built. RESULTS We find that 76.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.3-78.1) of the 3690 participants received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose while 91.1% of the French population did so. Vaccine uptake varies by stratum, with the highest uptake (85.6%; reference) in PH, followed by Accommodated (75.4%; adjusted odds-ratio = 0.79; 95% CI 0.51-1.09 vs. PH) and lowest in Streets (42.0%; AOR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.25-0.57 vs. PH). Use for vaccine certificate, age, socioeconomic factors, and vaccine hesitancy is associated with vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS In France, PEH/PH, and especially the most excluded, are less likely than the general population to receive COVID-19 vaccines. While vaccine mandate has proved an effective strategy, targeted outreach, on-site vaccinations, and sensitization activities are strategies enhancing vaccine uptake that can easily be replicated in future campaigns and other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bastien Mollo
- grid.452373.40000 0004 0643 8660Epicentre, Paris, France ,grid.452373.40000 0004 0643 8660Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France ,grid.411119.d0000 0000 8588 831XInfectious and Tropical Diseases Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Ghislain Leduc
- grid.452373.40000 0004 0643 8660Epicentre, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Stéphanie Vandentorren
- grid.493975.50000 0004 5948 8741Santé Publique France, Saint Maurice, France ,grid.508062.90000 0004 8511 8605University of Bordeaux, INSERM UMR 1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Joe-Ikechebelu NN, Umeh UM, Eleje GU, Igbodike EP, Ogbuefi EO, Akanwa AO, Echendu ST, Ngene WO, Okpala AN, Okolo OC, Okechukwu CE, Akabuike JC, Agu HO, Okpala VO, Nwazor OC, Nnedum AOU, Esimone CC, Agwaniru HN, Ezeabasili EI, Joe-Ikechebelu BB. Acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers in Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital, Amaku-Awka, Nigeria. Ther Adv Infect Dis 2023; 10:20499361231174776. [PMID: 37954403 PMCID: PMC10637133 DOI: 10.1177/20499361231174776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare workers were at the forefront of the COVID-19 pandemic. The acceptability and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare workers was an important strategy in halting the spread of the virus as well as the antecedent implications on global health and the world economy. Objectives This study aims to determine the acceptability rate and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination of frontline healthcare workers in Awka, Nigeria. Design This is an analytical cross-sectional study. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2022 to April 2022 to obtain the data for this study. One hundred healthcare workers were studied. Acceptability rate and barriers to uptake of COVID-19 vaccination were outcome measures. Results The COVID-19 vaccination rate was 45.0% among healthcare workers in study area of Awka metropolis. Ages 30-39 years had the highest acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination, 19 (47.5%; p = 0.262) with a more female preponderance of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance compared to males [26 (41.3%) vs 16 (42.2%), p = 0.721]. The place of residence of respondents (urban vs rural) and their marital status (married vs single) appeared not to influence the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination [(38 (42.2%) vs 3 (33.3%); p = 0.667; 25 (36.8% vs 17 (54.8%); p = 0.433)]. Years of work experience (<10 years vs >10 years) significantly affected COVID-19 vaccine acceptance [27 (45.8%) vs 12 (52.2%); p = 0.029]. Educational status and monthly income appeared not to influence vaccine uptake (p > 0.05, for both). A significant number of respondents were not sure why they should or should not take the COVID-19 vaccine [49 (92.5%) vs 35 (83.3%); p = 0.001]. Conclusion The COVID-19 vaccination rate is still poor among healthcare workers in Awka metropolis. The majority of respondents do not know why they should or should not take COVID-19 vaccine. We therefore recommend robust awareness campaigns that will explain in clear terms the essence and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in order to improve vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngozi Nneka Joe-Ikechebelu
- Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Amaku-Awka, Anambra State 420110, Nigeria
| | - Uche Marian Umeh
- Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Awka, Nigeria
| | - George Uchenna Eleje
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
| | - Emeka Philip Igbodike
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
- Evercare Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Emmanuel Okwudili Ogbuefi
- Department of Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Biosciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
| | - Angela Oyilieze Akanwa
- Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Uli, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Augusta Nkiruka Okpala
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | - Helen Obioma Agu
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
| | | | - Onyinye Chinenye Nwazor
- Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University Teaching Hospital, Awka, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ruf AK, Völkl-Kernstock S, Eitenberger M, Gabriel M, Klager E, Kletecka-Pulker M, Klomfar S, Teufel A, Wochele-Thoma T. Employer impact on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among nursing and social care employees in Austria. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1023914. [PMID: 36438259 PMCID: PMC9686277 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1023914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Since becoming available, vaccines against COVID-19 have been a focus of public debate. This is particularly relevant among healthcare and social workers, who interact with vulnerable patients and clients on a daily basis. With employers implementing educational programs and offering incentives to raise vaccine willingness among their staff, it is crucial to understand drivers of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy as well as the impact employers can play on vaccine decision-making. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study via computer-assisted telephone and web interviews. We recruited from a pool of employees from nursing and social care institutions in Vienna and Lower Austria operated by one healthcare NGO. Variables included in the analysis were socio-demographic attributes, reasons for or against the vaccine, sources of information, opinions of mandatory vaccination, and whether respondents had previously been infected with COVID-19 or knew someone who had. Results 86.2% of respondents had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. 13.8% were unvaccinated. Vaccinated respondents' main reason for getting the vaccine was to protect themselves (79.6%) as well as others (74.1%), while non-vaccinated respondents cited a fear of short or long-term side effects (58.8 and 42.4%, respectively) as their primary reason for not getting vaccinated. 72.8% of the unvaccinated said no incentive would make them change their mind, while 17.4% specified abstract concepts or systemic change as effective incentives. Monetary incentives were not seen as a motivator. Unvaccinated respondents were significantly more worried about the future than vaccinated respondents (78.8 vs. 26.3%, p < 0.001). They were also significantly more likely to view their employers' vaccine recommendations as "manipulative" (50.6 vs. 12.4%, p < 0.001), while vaccinated respondents were significantly more likely to view them as "supportive" (68.0 vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusion While employers have the means to mediate public health decision-making by providing information, deciding to become vaccinated is a more complex process including public debate, world views, political influences, and the uptake of information. Employers can act as mediators for public health decision-making, moving policy measures beyond an individualized view of health choices and health literacy toward more structural, systemic, and community-based efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kathrin Ruf
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Völkl-Kernstock
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Marcus Gabriel
- Institute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Klager
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Kletecka-Pulker
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sophie Klomfar
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Teufel
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Galanis P, Vraka I, Katsiroumpa A, Siskou O, Konstantakopoulou O, Katsoulas T, Mariolis-Sapsakos T, Kaitelidou D. COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1637. [PMID: 36298502 PMCID: PMC9610263 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The vaccine-induced immunity of healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCWs worldwide and to identify predictors of vaccination. We searched Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, PubMed, ProQuest, CINAHL, and medRxiv up to 25 August 2022. We applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We found 25 studies including 491,624 vaccinated HCWs, while the full sample included 555,561 HCWs. The overall proportion of vaccinated HCWs was 77.3%. Vaccine uptake for studies that were conducted in North America (85.6%) was higher than the proportion for studies that were conducted in Asia (79.5%), Europe (72.8%), and Africa (65.6%). The overall prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 83.6% and 77.4% for physicians and nurses, respectively. Older age, white race, physicians' profession, seasonal influenza vaccine, direct COVID-19 patient care, and confidence in COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness were positive predictors of vaccine uptake, while history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was a negative predictor. Deep understanding of the factors that influence HCWs' decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine is critical to implementing tailored communication strategies for HCWs who are at risk for not getting vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Galanis
- Clinical Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Vraka
- Department of Radiology, P. & A. Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Aglaia Katsiroumpa
- Clinical Epidemiology Laboratory, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Olga Siskou
- Department of Tourism Studies, University of Piraeus, 18534 Piraeus, Greece
| | - Olympia Konstantakopoulou
- Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Katsoulas
- Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Daphne Kaitelidou
- Center for Health Services Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qasrawi H, Abdullah I, Masri H, Maraqa B, Mohammad A, Qub L, Alkarajeh M, Dweik M, Atabeh S, Jalamneh T, Alajrami Y, Nazzal Z. Perceived barriers to Palestinian pregnant women’s acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination using the Health Believe Model: a cross-sectional study. Women Health 2022; 62:678-687. [DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2108194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Qasrawi
- Radiology department, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Ibtesam Abdullah
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Hadeel Masri
- Women’s Health & Development Unit, Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine
| | - Beesan Maraqa
- Family Medicine department,Family & Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebron University, Hebron, Palestine
| | - Ahmad Mohammad
- Thabet Thabet governmental hospital, Ministry of Health, Tulkarem, Palestine
| | - Lama Qub
- Thabet Thabet governmental hospital, Ministry of Health, Tulkarem, Palestine
| | | | - Mohammad Dweik
- Hebron governmental hospital, Ministry of Health, Hebron, Palestine
| | - Salam Atabeh
- Rafedia Surgical hospital, Ministry of Health, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Tala Jalamneh
- Jenin governmental hospital, Ministry of Health, Jenin, Palestine
| | - Yara Alajrami
- Palestine Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Ramallah, Palestine
| | - Zaher Nazzal
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|