Time to surgery and its impact on survival in patients with endometrial cancer: A National cancer database study

Multi-Institutional Study of Referral Patterns for Gynecologic Oncology Consultation

PURPOSE

Evaluation by a gynecologic oncologist (GO) is associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancers, yet little is known about health care factors that influence patients' referrals to GO.

METHODS

Medical records of 50 consecutive new patients seen in GO clinics at each of six referral centers across the United States were reviewed. Patient and disease characteristics were collected along with referral indication, evaluation and referral dates, diagnostic procedures, provider specialties, and zone improvement plan (ZIP) code of up to three referring providers per patient. The primary outcome was interval between first evaluation and referral. Univariate associations were evaluated with Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariable associations with negative binomial regression models. Secondary outcome was prolonged time to GO referral, defined as greater than the 75th percentile. Logistic regression was used for multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

Three hundred patient records were analyzed. The median time from first health care encounter to referral was 15 days (IQR, 5-43). The mean distance from residence to GO was 39.8 miles (standard deviation, 53.8). Seventy-one percent of GO referrals were initiated by obstetrician-gynecologists, 9% by family physicians, and 6% internists. Presentation-to-referral interval was 76% shorter for patients evaluated by an emergency medicine clinician (exp(Beta), 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.53; P < .001). Public insurance was associated with 1.47 times longer time to referral compared with private insurance (exp(Beta), 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.04; P = .001). Residents of nonmetropolitan ZIP codes were less likely to have prolonged time to referral (odds ratio [OR], 0.288; P = .017). Distance from residence to GO (per 10 miles) increased the likelihood of prolonged time to referral (OR, 1.10; P = .010).

CONCLUSION

Interventions are needed to improve recognition and referral of patients for gynecologic oncology evaluation. Community outreach and engagement with obstetrician-gynecologists should be prioritized to improve times to referral.

Endometrial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Parameters, Treatment Modalities, and Prognostic Outcomes at a Tertiary Oncology Center in the UAE

Background Endometrial carcinoma (EC) remains a pressing global health issue, with a discernible upsurge in incidence, especially in developed countries. Notably, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has witnessed a surge in EC cases, demanding an in-depth, region-specific exploration into the disease's clinical, treatment, and prognostic facets against the backdrop of its unique socio-genetic and environmental contours. Aim This study aimed to profess a comprehensive understanding of EC by examining clinical parameters, treatment modalities, and prognostic outcomes in the UAE context, thereby seeking to delineate potential correlations between varied therapeutic combinations, patient demographics, and tumor characteristics in affecting prognostic outcomes. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study involving 93 patients diagnosed with EC from January 2011 to March 2023 at a leading oncology center in the UAE was conducted. Data, including demographic information, clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and prognostic outcomes, were meticulously extracted and analyzed. The R software (version 4.2.2) facilitated exhaustive statistical analyses, involving descriptive statistics, correlation analyses with the polycor package, and survival analyses utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis via the survival and survminer packages, respectively. Results Although the correlation matrix revealed a noticeable relationship between "Family history" and "Age," most parameters displayed independence, offering a robust platform for ensuing multivariate analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, stratified by therapeutic modalities, exhibited no statistically significant survival differences across therapeutic cohorts (p-values: 0.44, 0.86, and 0.83). Conversely, the composite Cox regression model underscored "non-national" demographic, Diabetes Mellitus II, and stromal invasion as pivotal prognostic factors, indicating the multifactorial nature of survival in EC patients and emphasizing demographic and tumor characteristics over therapeutic modalities as influential prognostic determinants. Conclusion In conclusion, while therapy types were not directly correlated with survival, demographic and tumor traits prominently impacted prognostic outcomes, advocating for an intricate, multidimensional approach to managing EC in the UAE. This study hopes to sow seeds for subsequent research, shaping clinically and culturally apt practices and policies in the region's healthcare landscape.

Disparities in Timeliness of Endometrial Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

We use the person-centered Pathway to Treatment framework to assess the scope of evidence on disparities in endometrial cancer stage at diagnosis. This report is intended to facilitate interventions, research, and advocacy that reduce disparities.

DATA SOURCES

We completed a structured search of electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Included studies were published between January 2000 and 2023 and addressed marginalized population(s) in the United States with the ability to develop endometrial cancer and addressed variable(s) outlined in the Pathway to Treatment.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Our database search strategy was designed for sensitivity to identify studies on disparate prolongation of the Pathway to Treatment for endometrial cancer, tallying 2,171. Inclusion criteria were broad, yet only 24 studies addressed this issue. All articles were independently screened by two reviewers.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included: 10 on symptom appraisal, five on help seeking, five on diagnosis, and 10 on pretreatment intervals. Quality rankings were heterogeneous, between 3 and 9 (median 7.2) per the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We identified three qualitative, two participatory, and two intervention studies. Studies on help seeking predominantly investigate patient-driven delays. When disease factors were controlled for, delays of the pretreatment interval were independently associated with racism toward Black and Hispanic people, less education, lower socioeconomic status, and nonprivate insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence gaps on disparities in timeliness of endometrial cancer care reveal emphasis of patient-driven help-seeking delays, reliance on health care-derived databases, underutilization of participatory methods, and a paucity of intervention studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Given that PROSPERO was not accepting systematic scoping review protocols at the time this study began, this study protocol was shared a priori through Open Science Framework on January 13, 2021 (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/V2ZXY), and through peer review publication on April 13, 2021 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01649-x).

Endometrial Cancer Surgery With or Without Concomitant Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To compare quality of life (QOL) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or early-stage endometrial cancer and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who chose to have concomitant surgery with cancer surgery alone.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted across eight U.S. sites. Potentially eligible patients were screened for SUI symptoms. Those who screened positive were offered referral to urogynecology and incontinence treatment, including concomitant surgery. Participants were categorized into two groups: 1) concomitant cancer and SUI surgery or 2) cancer surgery alone. The primary outcome was cancer-related QOL as measured by the FACT-En (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial) (range 0-100; higher score indicates better QOL). The FACT-En and questionnaires assessing urinary symptom-specific severity and effects were assessed before surgery and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Adjusted median regression accounting for clustering was used to examine the relationship between SUI treatment group and FACT-En scores.

RESULTS

Of 1,322 (53.1%) patients, 702 screened positive for SUI with 532 analyzed; 110 (21%) chose concomitant cancer and SUI surgery, and 422 (79%) chose cancer surgery alone. FACT-En scores increased for both the concomitant SUI surgery and cancer surgery-only groups from the preoperative to the postoperative period. After adjustment for timepoint and preoperative covariates, the median change in FACT-En score (postoperative-preoperative) was 1.2 points higher (95% CI -1.3 to 3.6) for the concomitant SUI surgery group compared with the cancer surgery-only group across the postoperative period. Median time until surgery (22 days vs 16 days; P <.001), estimated blood loss (150 mL vs 72.5 mL; P <.001), and operative time (185.5 minutes vs 152 minutes; P <.001) were all greater for the concomitant cancer and SUI surgery group compared with the cancer-only group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant surgery did not result in improved QOL compared with cancer surgery alone for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and patients with early-stage endometrial cancer with SUI. However, FACT-En scores were improved in both groups.

Survival outcomes following treatment delays among patients with early-stage female cancers: a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severely hindered the timely receipt of health care for patients with cancer, especially female patients. Depression and anxiety were more pronounced in female patients than their male counterparts with cancer during treatment wait-time intervals. Herein, investigating the impact of treatment delays on the survival outcomes of female patients with early-stage cancers can enhance the rational and precise clinical decisions of physicians.

METHODS

We analyzed five types of cancers in women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program between Jan 2010 and Dec 2015. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine the impacts of treatment delays on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the patients.

RESULTS

A total of 241,661 females with early-stage cancer were analyzed (12,617 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 166,051 cases of infiltrating breast cancer, 31,096 cases of differentiated thyroid cancer, 23,550 cases of colorectal cancer, and 8347 cases of cervical cancer). Worse OS rates were observed in patients with treatment delays ≥ 3 months in stage I NSCLC (_adjustedHazard ratio (HR) = 1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.01-1.23, p = 0.044) and stage I infiltrating breast cancer (_adjustedHR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.37, p < 0.001). When the treatment delay intervals were analyzed as continuous variables, similar results were observed in patients with stage I NSCLC (_adjustedHR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.010) and in those with stage I breast cancer (_adjustedHR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.029). However, treatment delays did not reduce the OS of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer, cervical cancer, or colorectal cancer in the early-stage. Only intermediate treatment delays impaired the CSS of patients with cervical cancer in stage I (_adjustedHR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.68, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for confounders, the prolonged time from diagnosis to the initiation of treatment (< 6 months) showed limited negative effects on the survival of most of the patients with early-stage female cancers. Whether our findings serve as evidence supporting the treatment deferral decisions of clinicians for patients with different cancers in resource-limited situations needs further validation.

Perioperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Gynecological Surgery in a Super Morbidly Obese Patient

We report the perioperative management of a 32-year-old woman with super-morbid obesity (body mass index (BMI) of 60.9 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m²)) who underwent a robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in a hospital that was not specialized for obese patients. She successfully reduced her BMI by 10% using dietary restrictions in five weeks, and her surgery was performed two weeks later by consultation between gynecologists and anesthesiologists. This case demonstrates that the determination of the optimal time for surgery by consultation between physicians is crucial in the care of such a complex patient in hospitals that are not specialized for morbidly obese patients. Weight reduction in the preoperative period should be considered for super-morbid obesity patients with malignant diseases, even if the duration of preoperative optimization is shorter than four to eight weeks.

Oncologic outcomes in older women with endometrial carcinoma (≥70 years)

Data are limited in the management of elderly women with endometrial cancer as they are under-represented in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of women ≥70 years who underwent hysterectomy. One hundred and twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age among the cohort was 75 years (range: 70-91), and 52% underwent robotic surgery. The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 67%. The five-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 19%. Based on univariate analysis, white race, lower ASA score, higher pre-operative and post-operative haematocrit, lower estimated blood loss, stage I and robotic surgery were associated with improved OS. On multivariable analysis, ASA score, preoperative haematocrit, estimated blood loss and stage were associated with survival.Survival rates among older women were low and disease recurrence was high. Robotic surgery was safe and appeared to improve perioperative outcomes in older women with endometrial cancer.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecologic cancer with an overall survival above 90%. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. With an ageing population, an increased incidence of endometrial cancer is also expected. Increased frailty and comorbid conditions may prevent this population from undergoing surgery; consequently, these patients are often undertreated for a potentially curable disease.What do the results of this study add? Older women with endometrial cancer have low survival rates and high disease recurrence rates. Elderly women can tolerate robotic surgery to reduce the risk of adverse events.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is important to develop best practices to optimise patients for minimally invasive surgery. The benefits of robotic surgery may encourage patients and surgeons to partake in this approach. A multidisciplinary approach with geriatric evaluation may improve post-operative care and survival. Future clinical trials should include elderly women.

The wait time to primary surgery in endometrial cancer - impact on survival and predictive factors: a population-based SweGCG study

BACKGROUND

Poor survival rates in different cancer types are sometimes blamed on diagnostic and treatment delays, and it has been suggested that such delays might be related to sociodemographic factors such as education and ethnicity. We examined associations of the wait time from diagnosis to surgery and survival in endometrial cancer (EC) and explored patient and tumour factors influencing the wait time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this historical population-based cohort study, The Swedish Quality Registry for Gynaecologic Cancer (SQRGC) was used to identify EC patients who underwent primary surgery between 2010 and 2018. Factors associated with a wait time > 32 d were analysed with logistic regression. The 32-d time point was defined in accordance with the Swedish Standardisation Cancer Care programme. Adjusted Poisson regression analyses were used to analyse excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR).

RESULTS

Out of 7366 women, 5535 waited > 32 d for surgery and 1098 > 70 d. The overall median wait time was 44 d. The factors most strongly associated with a wait time > 32 d were surgery at a university hospital (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.66) followed by country of birth (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.55) and year of diagnosis. There were no associations between wait time and histology or age. A wait time < 15 d was associated with higher mortality (adjusted EMRR 2.29,95% CI 1.36-3.84) whereas no negative survival impact was seen with a wait time of 70 d. Age, tumour stage, histology and risk group were highly associated with survival, whereas education, country of origin and hospital level did not have any impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery within the first two weeks after EC diagnosis was associated with worsened survival. A prolonged wait time did not seem to have any significant adverse effect on prognosis.HighlightsSurgery within the first two weeks after diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) was associated with poorer survival.A prolonged wait time to surgery did not worsen prognosis.Delay in time to surgery was associated with sociodemographic factors.

Pre-operative wait times in high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: Do surgical delays impact patient survival?

OBJECTIVE

Practice guidelines advocating for regionalization of endometrial cancer surgery to gynecologic oncologists practicing in designated gynecologic oncology centres were published in Ontario in June 2013. Our objectives were to determine whether this policy affected surgical wait times, and whether longer wait time to surgery is a predictor of survival in high grade endometrial cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study, which included patients diagnosed with high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who had a hysterectomy between 2003 and 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with a spline function was used to model the relationship between surgical wait time and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We identified 3518 patients who underwent hysterectomy for high-grade non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Patients who had surgery with a gynecologic oncologist had a median surgical wait time from diagnosis to hysterectomy of 53 days compared to 57 days pre-regionalization (p = 0.0007), and from first gynecologic oncology consultation to hysterectomy of 29 days compared to 32 days pre-regionalization (p = 0.0006). Survival was inferior for patients who had surgery within 14 days of diagnosis (HR death 2.7 for 1-7 days, 95% CI 1.61-4.51, and HR death 1.96 for 8-14 days, 95% CI 1.50-2.57), reflective of disease severity. Decreased survival occurred with surgical wait times of more than 45 days from the patient's first gynecologic oncology appointment (HR death 1.19 for 46-60 days, 95% CI 1.04-1.36, and HR death 1.42 for 61-75 days, 95% CI 1.11-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalization of surgery for high-grade endometrial cancer has not had an impact on surgical wait times. Patients who have surgery more than 45 days after surgical consultation have reduced survival.

PREsurgery thoughts - thoughts on prehabilitation in oncologic gynecologic surgery, a qualitative template analysis in older adults and their healthcare professionals

PURPOSE

This study aimed to reveal information that can be used for composing a prehabilitation program tailored to elderly gynecological oncological patients and is applicable to healthcare professionals. We investigated possible content and indications for prehabilitation, and what potential barriers might exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Because of the primary exploratory study aim, inductive thematic template analysis on semi-structured interviews with gynecologic oncological patients aged ≥60 years and healthcare professionals were used.

RESULTS

16 patients and 20 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes important for prehabilitation were found: (1) "Motivation," (2) "Practical issues and facilitators," and (3) "Patient-related factors." A short time interval between diagnosis and surgery was reported as a potential barrier for prehabilitation. Given components for a tailor-made prehabilitation program are: (1) The first contact with a nurse who screens the patients, gives tailor-made advice on prehabilitation and keeps patients motivated and supports them mentally; (2) If patients are referred to a more extensive/supervised program, this should preferably be arranged close to a patients' home.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, an outline of a patient-tailored prehabilitation program was developed. The main important themes for prehabilitation were "Motivation," "Practical issues and facilitators," and "Patient-related factors."IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients and healthcare professionals are positive about prehabilitation.Main themes for designing a prehabilitation program are "Motivation," "Practical issues and facilitators," and "Patient-related factors."Nursing staff can play a key role in prehabilitation.It is important to screen patients for specific impairments to obtain a tailor-made prehabilitation program.For some patients, general advice on prehabilitation might be sufficient, while others may need more supervision.The time interval between diagnosis and surgery is often short and is perceived as a potentially significant barrier for an effective prehabilitation program.

Delayed care for patients with newly diagnosed cancer due to COVID-19 and estimated impact on cancer mortality in France

BACKGROUND

The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses.

RESULTS

A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.

Impact of Medicaid expansion on women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with gynecologic cancer face socioeconomic disparities in care that affect survival outcomes. The Affordable Care Act offered states the option to expand Medicaid enrollment eligibility criteria as a means of improving timely and affordable access to care for the most vulnerable. The variable uptake of expansion by states created a natural experiment, allowing for quasi-experimental methods that offer more unbiased estimates of treatment effects from retrospective data than the traditional regression adjustment.

OBJECTIVE

To use a quasi-experimental, difference-in-difference framework to create unbiased estimates of impact of Medicaid expansion on women with gynecologic cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study from the National Cancer Database files for women with invasive cancers of the uterus, ovary and fallopian tube, cervix, vagina, and vulva diagnosed from 2008 to 2016. Using a marker for state Medicaid expansion status, we created difference-in-difference models to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on the outcomes of access to and timeliness of care. We excluded women aged <40 years owing to the suppression of the state Medicaid expansions status in the data and women aged ≥65 years owing to the universal Medicare coverage availability. Our primary outcome was the rate of uninsurance at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included Medicaid coverage, early-stage diagnosis, treatment at an academic facility, and any treatment or surgery within 30 days of diagnosis. Models were run within multiple subgroups and on a propensity-matched cohort to assess the robustness of the treatment estimates. The assumption of parallel trends was assessed with event study time plots.

RESULTS

Our sample included 335,063 women. Among this cohort, 121,449 were from nonexpansion states and 213,614 were from expansion states, with 79,886 posttreatment cases diagnosed after the expansion took full effect in expansion states. The groups had minor differences in demographics, and we found occasional preperiod event study coefficients diverging from the mean, but the outcome trends were generally similar between the expansion and nonexpansion states in the preperiod, satisfying the necessary assumption for the difference-in-difference analysis. In a basic difference-in-difference model, the Medicaid expansion in January 2014 was associated with significant increases in insurance at diagnosis, treatment at an academic facility, and treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (P<.001 for all). In an adjusted model including all states and accounting for variable expansion implementation time, there was a significant treatment effect of Medicaid expansion on the reduction in uninsurance at diagnosis (-2.00%; 95% confidence interval, -2.3 to -1.7; P<.001), increases in early-stage diagnosis (0.80%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-1.4; P=.02), treatment at an academic facility (0.83%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.5; P=.02), treatment within 30 days (1.62%; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.3; P<.001), and surgery within 30 days (1.54%; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.3; P<.001). In particular, large gains were estimated for women living in low-income zip codes, Hispanic women, and women with cervical cancer. Estimates from the subgroup and propensity-matched cohorts were generally consistent for all outcomes besides early-stage diagnosis and treatment within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Medicaid expansion was significantly associated with gains in the access and timeliness of treatment for nonelderly women with gynecologic cancer. The implementation of Medicaid expansion could greatly benefit women in nonexpansion states. Gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists should advocate for Medicaid expansion as a means of improving outcomes and reducing socioeconomic and racial disparities.

Effect of Radiotherapy in Addition to Surgery in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The role of radiotherapy in the management of early (FIGO I) endometrial cancer is controversial with limited availability of prospective data from randomized trials.

METHODS

German Epidemiologic Cancer Registries provided by the Robert Koch Institute. We considered FIGO I cases with recorded operative treatment (n = 12,718, 2000-2017). We computed hazard ratios (HR) from relative survival models in relation to the mortality of the general population with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariate models were adjusted for age, stage (IA vs. IB), grading, and chemotherapy. Radiotherapy included external radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Cases with a favorable risk profile (FIGO IA, G1/G2) had a slightly lower survival rate, relative to the general population (FIGO IA: 0.9, G1: 0.91). The proportion of FIGO IA cases was lower in the radiotherapy group (52.6%) vs. cases without radiotherapy (78.6%). Additional treatment with radiotherapy was beneficial in FIGO IB (HR = 0.74) and all histopathological grades, but not FIGO IA cases (HR = 0.93) cases. Compared to IA tumors, IB cases had a HR of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.34-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy in addition to surgery is beneficial for patients in a FIGO IB stage. Further studies need to address the impact of new techniques and risk assessment.

Identification of biomarkers correlated with diagnosis and prognosis of endometrial cancer using bioinformatics analysis

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignancies in the female genital system, characterized by high mortality and recurrence rates. This study attempted to screen key genes and potential prognostic biomarkers for EC using bioinformatics analysis. Twenty-seven normal endometrial tissues and 135 EC samples were collected from four Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, then we identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and conducted downstream analyses. Moreover, we screened hub genes by constructing a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Finally, we assessed the prognostic values and molecular mechanism of the potential prognostic genes using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). As a result, 28 upregulated and 94 downregulated genes were determined after gene integration of these four GEO data sets. Gene Ontology analysis indicated that DEGs were mainly involved in transcriptional regulation and cell proliferation. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genome pathway analysis primarily related to transcriptional misregulation and apoptosis. Moreover, the PPI analysis revealed 10 hub genes (JUN, UBE2I, GATA2, WT1, PIAS1, FOXL2, RUNXI, EZR, TCF4, and NR2F2) with a high degree of connectivity, among them, the expression tendency of nine genes except UBE2I were consistent with messenger RNA level from The Cancer Genome Atlas data. Furthermore, only FOXL2, TCF4, and NR2F2 were significantly correlated with prognosis of EC patients, and their low expression associated biological pathways were enriched in the cell cycle and fatty acid metabolism. In conclusion, this study identified three key genes as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets of EC on the basis of integrated bioinformatics analysis. The findings will improve our comprehension of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis and prognosis of EC.

A cohort study of 30 day mortality after NON-EMERGENCY surgery in a COVID-19 cold site

Background

Two million non-emergency surgeries are being cancelled globally every week due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which will have a major impact on patients and healthcare systems.

Methods

During the peak of the pandemic in the United Kingdom, we set up a multicentre cancer network amongst 14 National Health Service institutions, performing urological, thoracic, gynaecological and general surgical urgent and cancer operations at a central COVID-19 cold site. This is a cohort study of 500 consecutive patients undergoing surgery in this network.

The primary outcome was 30-day mortality from COVID-19. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and post-operative complications at 30-days.

Results

500 patients underwent surgery with median age 62.5 (IQR 51–71). 65% were male, 60% had a known diagnosis of cancer and 61% of surgeries were considered complex or major. No patient died from COVID-19 at 30-days. 30-day all-cause mortality was 3/500 (1%). 10 (2%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 4 (1%) with confirmed laboratory diagnosis and 6 (1%) with probable COVID-19. 33/500 (7%) of patients developed Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher complications, with 1/33 (3%) occurring in a patient with COVID-19.

Conclusion

It is safe to continue cancer and urgent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate service reconfiguration.

•

Priority surgeries are being cancelled every week due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

•

A multicentre surgical referral network was set up as part of an NHS England approach to continuing safe surgery

•

The referral network consisted of 14 NHS trusts and surgery was performed at a single COVID-19 ‘cold site’.

•

After 500 surgeries performed, there was a 0% 30-day mortality from COVID-19.

•

It is safe to continue cancer and priority surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate service reconfiguration.

Disparities in surgical management of endometrial cancers in a public healthcare system: A question of equity

OBJECTIVE

Timely surgery has been shown to impact outcome in endometrial cancer patients. Social determinants of health (SDH) are associated with adverse cancer outcomes. We sought to evaluate the association of SDH with surgical treatment indicators in endometrial cancer patients in a public healthcare system.

METHODS

Endometrial cancer patients in Ontario, Canada, diagnosed between 2009 and 2017 were identified, and clinical, social and demographic variables were extracted from administrative databases. Validated community marginalization scores that include material deprivation, residential instability and ethnic concentration were used for stratification. Surgical treatment features were compared across marginalization quintiles using chi-square, Fischer exact or Wilcoxon rank sum tests as appropriate. Predictors of timely surgical treatment were evaluated with logistic regression.

RESULTS

20228 patients were identified of whom 14,423 had primary hysterectomy for a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Fewer patients in marginalized communities received surgery (89% vs. 93%, p < 0.001). Surgical delay was longer among marginalized patients and 78% had surgery within 12 weeks compared to 84% of those least marginalized (p < 0.0001). Other quality indicators of surgical treatment were not negatively associated with marginalization. On multivariable analysis adjusted for patient and disease factors, marginalization was independently associated with increased odds of delayed surgery (OR = 0.94/quintile, CI 0.91-0.97, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Social marginalization is associated with decreased likelihood of having surgery and with delayed surgery among endometrial cancer patients in Ontario. This may be mediated by delayed presentation and real or perceived barriers to access. Reducing surgical wait times among marginalized cancer patients is an important deliverable in public healthcare.

Impact of quality of care on racial disparities in survival for endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Black women experience poorer survival compared with white women across all endometrial cancer stages and histologies. The incidence of endometrial cancer is 30% lower in black women compared with white women, yet mortality is 80% higher in black women. Differences in adherence to evidence-based guidelines have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity.

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether adherence to evidence-based treatment recommendations for endometrial cancer could mitigate survival disparities between black and white women.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with endometrial cancer treated from 2004 through 2016. We established 5 evidence-based quality metrics based on review of primary literature and accepted guidelines: surgical treatment within 6 weeks of diagnosis (Q1), use of minimally invasive surgery (stage I-IIIC; Q2), pelvic nodal assessment (high-risk tumors; Q3), adjuvant radiation (high intermediate risk; Q4), and systemic chemotherapy (stage III-IV; Q5). The rates of 30 and 90 day mortality and 5 year survival were compared between black and white women. To determine the influence of quality on outcomes, we compared outcomes among perfectly adherent black and white women with stage I and III endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

We identified 310,208 women including 35,035 (11.3%) black women and 275,173 (88.3%) white women. Black women were less likely than white women to receive Q1 (65.8 vs 75.6%), Q2 (58.5 vs 72.9%), Q3 (71.3 vs 74.2%), and Q5 (72.7 vs 73.2%) (P < .05 for all). Adherence to each quality metrics was associated with improved survival. Among women with stage I disease, perfect adherence to the relative quality metrics was seen in 53.1% of white and 41.5% of black women. Among perfectly adherent stage I patients, outcomes in black women improved relative to unselected black women; however, they still experienced higher risk of 30 day (adjusted relative risk, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.90), 90 day (adjusted relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.76), and 5 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.59) compared with similar white women. Among women with stage III tumors, perfect adherence to the relative quality metrics was seen in 56.6% of white and 44.1% of black women. Perfectly adherent black women with stage III disease had improved outcomes but remained at increased risk of 30 day (adjusted relative risk, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.44) and 5 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.50) compared with white women.

CONCLUSION

Black women are less likely than white women with endometrial cancer to receive evidence-based care. However, receipt of evidence-based care mitigates but does not eliminate racial disparities in outcomes and black women remain at greater risk of death from endometrial cancer.

Impact of active tuberculosis on treatment decisions in cancer

Background Tuberculosis (TB) and cancer can coexist in some patients especially from low- and middle-income countries. Impact of active TB on treatment decisions in cancer is less well studied. Methods A retrospective case record review of all cases of cancer diagnosed and or treated between January 2012 and December 2019 who were also diagnosed to have active TB (pulmonary or extrapulmonary) was done. Results Any delay or change in standard treatment of cancer because of active TB or its treatment was noted. Among a total of 32,509 cancer cases, 56 (0.17%) patients were diagnosed to have active TB. Twenty six patients (46%) had delay in starting treatment or delay during cancer treatment. Six (11%) patients were changed from curative treatment option to palliative intent (either best supportive care or palliative Radiation) or no further treatment. Three (5%) patients required change from one type of curative treatment modality to another curative option. Conclusion Eleven percent of patients had to be changed from curative intent to palliative treatment or no further treatment, TB being either the direct or indirect cause in all of them. A nationwide data registry of cancer patients with TB, involving multiple centers, should be considered so that specific problems in this context can be identified and addressed in larger details.

The impact of wait times on oncological outcome in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of surgical wait times on outcome of patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer.

METHODS

All consecutive patients surgically treated for grade 3 endometrial cancer between 2007 and 2015 were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the time interval between endometrial biopsy and surgery: wait time from biopsy to surgery ≤12 weeks (84 days) vs more than 12 weeks. Survival analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer were followed for a median of 5.6 years. Fifty-one women (37.5%) waited more than 12 weeks for surgery. Prolonged surgical wait times were not associated with advanced stage at surgery, positive lymph nodes, increased lymphovascular space invasion, and tumor size (P = .8, P = 1.0, P = .2, P = .9, respectively). In multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical and pathological factors, wait times did not significantly affect disease-specific survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.5, P = .6), overall survival (HR: 1.1, 95% CI, 0.6-2.1, P = .7), or progression-free survival (HR: 0.9, 95% CI, 0.5-1.7, P = .8).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged surgical wait time for poorly differentiated endometrial cancer seemed to have a limited impact on clinical outcomes compared to biological factors.

The impact of waiting intervals on survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review of the literature

The purpose of the present systematic review is to summarize the available evidence concerning the impact of investigated intervals of treatment (diagnosis to surgery and surgical treatment to adjuvant therapy) on survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients. We searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases from inception until July 31st 2019. All observational studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Investigated outcomes were retrieved and analyzed as well as factors that influenced the extent of wait intervals. Overall, 12 articles were included that investigated the influence of wait intervals on survival outcomes of 773,185 patients. We observed that the proposed cut-off values for interval periods, the reported survival outcomes as well as the tumor characteristics of included patients varied significantly among the studies that were included. Given these differences, meta-analysis of survival outcomes was not possible. The most common cut-off for the time to surgery interval was 6 weeks and for the time to adjuvant treatment 9 weeks. The percentage of patients that was treated within this limit ranged between 24 and 74 %. Given this information we believe that the optimal interval between diagnosis and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer patients should not exceed eight weeks (keeping in mind that surgery within the first two weeks may be a negative prognostic factor), whereas between surgery and adjuvant therapy should be limited to a maximum of nine weeks. Future studies should evaluate factors that seem to influence the extent of waiting intervals to help determine the limitations of healthcare systems.

Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology guidelines for surgical treatment of endometrial cancer in regions with limited resources

BACKGROUND

Approximately 70% of cancer-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. In addition to social and racial inequalities, treatment options in these countries are usually limited because of the lack of trained staff and equipment, limited patient access to health services, and a small number of clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology developed this guideline to address these barriers and guide physicians treating patients with endometrial cancer (EC) in regions with limited resources and few specialized centers.

METHODS

The guideline was prepared from 10 January to 25 October 20192019 by a multidisciplinary team of 56 experts to discuss the main obstacles faced by EC patients in Brazil. Thirteen questions considered critical to the surgical treatment of these patients were defined. The questions were assigned to groups that reviewed the literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Following a review by the coordinators and a second review by all participants, the groups made final adjustments for presentations in meetings, classified the level of evidence, and voted on the recommendations.

RESULTS

For all questions including staging, fertility spearing treatment, genetic testing, sentinel lymph node use, surgical treatment, and other clinical relevant questions, major agreement was achieved by the participants, always using accessible alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to provide adequate treatment for most EC patients in resource-limited areas, but the first option should be referral to specialized centers with more resources.