1
|
Robles C, Monfil L, Ibáñez R, Roura E, Font R, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Brotons M, Martínez-Bueno C, de Sanjosé S, Espinàs JA, Bruni L. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening participation, abnormal cytology prevalence and screening interval in Catalonia. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338859. [PMID: 38873256 PMCID: PMC11171128 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and the interruption of all cancer preventive services, including cervical cancer screening. We aimed to assess the COVID-19 pandemic impact on opportunistic screening participation, abnormal cytology (ASCUS+) prevalence and screening interval in 2020 and 2021 within the Public Health System of Catalonia, Spain. Methods Individual data on cytology and HPV testing of women aged 25-65 from 2014 to 2021 were retrieved from the Information System for Primary Care Services (SISAP). Time-series regression models were used to estimate expected screening participation and abnormal cytology prevalence in 2020 and 2021. The impact was determined by comparing observed and expected values (ratios). Additionally, changes in screening interval trends between 2014 and 2021 were assessed by fitting a Piecewise linear regression model. Results Cervical cancer screening participation decreased by 38.8% and 2.2% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with the most significant impact on participation (-96.1%) occurring in April 2020. Among older women, participation was lower, and it took longer to recover. Abnormal cytology prevalence was 1.4 times higher than expected in 2020 and 2021, with variations by age (range=1.1-1.5). From June 2020 onwards, the screening interval trend significantly changed from an increase of 0.59 to 3.57 months per year, resulting in a median time of 48 months by December 2021. Conclusions During the pandemic, fewer women have participated in cervical cancer screening, abnormal cytology prevalence has increased, and the screening interval is more prolonged than before. The potential cervical cancer lifetime risk implications highlight the need for organized HPV-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Robles
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Monfil
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Ibáñez
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Roura
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Font
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Paula Peremiquel-Trillas
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Brotons
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martínez-Bueno
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) Catalunya, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
- Institut de Salut Global (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laia Bruni
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berzansky I, Reynolds CA, Charlton BM. Breast and cervical cancer screenings across gender identity: results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:865-872. [PMID: 38280155 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01847-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although national medical organizations often neglect to include trans and gender diverse (TGD) people in their breast and cervical cancer screening recommendations, the World Profession Association of Transgender Health recommends that TGD people who are at risk for these cancers follow existing guidelines for cisgender women. Despite WPATH's recommendations, TGD people are less likely to get screened in large part due to discrimination. The COVID-19 pandemic has limited access to cancer screenings among cisgender people, but it is unknown how this has impacted TGD people. METHODS Using national survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS), we examined differences in cervical and breast cancer screening noncompliance across gender identity at two time points: before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS Screening noncompliance increased during the COVID-19 pandemic among cisgender and TGD people (e.g., transgender men, gender non-conforming people). Compared to cisgender women, transgender men and gender non-conforming respondents had higher odds of breast cancer screening noncompliance before and during COVID-19. Transgender men had lower odds of cervical cancer screening noncompliance than cisgender women before COVID-19, but higher odds during the pandemic. Gender non-conforming respondents also had lower odds of cervical cancer screening noncompliance during COVID-19 compared to cisgender women. CONCLUSIONS Screening noncompliance for breast and cervical cancer was more common among TGD people than cisgender women; while these disparities existed before the COVID-19 pandemic, they were exacerbated during the pandemic. Future work should move beyond descriptive statistics and elucidate underlying causes to inform interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isa Berzansky
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Colleen A Reynolds
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany M Charlton
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roach E, Hutten R, Johnson S, Suneja G, Tward J, Petereit D, Gaffney D. The impact of a positive COVID-19 test on timeliness of radiation in patients receiving brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:360-367. [PMID: 38395662 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delays in initiating and completing brachytherapy may have adverse oncologic outcomes for patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in the United States has not been well-characterized. OBJECTIVES We aim to evaluate how a positive COVID-19 test affected timeliness of treatment for patients undergoing brachytherapy for cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer in 2019 and 2020 who received brachytherapy in their treatment. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between cancer diagnosis and start of radiation were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. Time in days from cancer diagnosis to initiation of radiation was compared using two-sample t-tests with p < 0.05 signifying significant differences. RESULTS We identified 38,341 patients with cervical (n = 6,925), uterine (n = 18,587), and prostate cancer (n = 12,829). Rates of COVID-19 positivity were cervical cancer (n = 135; 2%), uterine cancer (n = 236; 1.3%), and prostate cancer (n = 141; 1%). Of those, 35% of cervical, 49% of uterine, and 43% of prostate cancer patients tested positive between their cancer diagnosis and initiation of radiation. Median days to radiation was significantly longer in these patients: 78 versus 51 for cervical cancer (p < 0.01), 150 versus 104 for uterine cancer (p < 0.01), and 154 versus 124 for prostate cancer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS For patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer diagnosed between 2019-2020, testing positive for COVID-19 after their cancer diagnosis was associated with a delay to initiation of radiation by 4-7 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | - Ryan Hutten
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | - Skyler Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jonathan Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang J, Xu W, Huang Q, Chen E, Chen J. SYT7 (synaptotagmin 7) promotes cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24806. [PMID: 38314285 PMCID: PMC10837561 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) ranks among the primary contributors to global cancer-associated mortality. However, the role mediated by synaptotagmin 7 (SYT7) in CESC remains unclear. Our study employed immunohistochemistry to assess the level of SYT7 expression in the tissue microarray. Furthermore, lentiviral shRNA transduction was utilized to establish SYT7 knockdown cell line models based on HeLa and SiHa cell lines. The functional impacts of silencing SYT7 expression in vitro were evaluated. A subcutaneous xenograft model was employed to examine the tumorigenic potential of cells with or without SYT7. The content of SYT7 in CESC tissues was significantly elevated compared to adjacent normal tissues. Functionally, silencing SYT7 in HeLa and SiHa cells suppressed cell proliferation, colony formation ability, and apoptosis enhancement. Additionally, cells with suppressed SYT7 also exhibited inhibited cell migration and invasion. In vivo experiments demonstrated the loss of tumorigenic ability in SYT7 knockdown cells and suppressed tumor growth. Quantitative PCR PrimeView PathArray and apoptosis antibody array analyses revealed that upon elimination of SYT7, there was a significant upregulation observed in Caspase 8, TNF-R1 (TNF receptor superfamily member 1A), and HSPA5 (heat shock protein family A [Hsp70] member 5), while TGFBI (transforming growth factor beta-induced), RPL31 (ribosomal protein L31), LUM (lumican), HSDL2 (hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-like 2), ITGB5 (integrin subunit beta 5), and Smad2 (SMAD family member2) were downregulated. Overall, we have demonstrated the tumor-promoting functions of SYT7 in CESC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinbing Huang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Wensheng Xu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Qiaoqiao Huang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Erling Chen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Junying Chen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duffy SW, de Jonge L, Duffy TE. Effects on Cancer Prevention from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annu Rev Med 2024; 75:1-11. [PMID: 37625124 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-051022-122257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic led to disruption of health services around the world, including cancer services. We carried out a narrative review of the effect of the pandemic on cancer prevention services, including screening. Services were severely affected in the early months of the pandemic, and in some areas are still recovering. Large numbers of additional cancers or additional late-stage cancers have been predicted to arise over the coming years as a result of this disruption. To minimize the effects on cancer outcomes, it is necessary to return as quickly as possible to prepandemic levels of screening and prevention activity or indeed to exceed these levels. The recovery of services should address health inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom;
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Thomas E Duffy
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mrożek-Gąsiorowska M, Tambor M. How COVID-19 has changed the utilization of different health care services in Poland. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:105. [PMID: 38238694 PMCID: PMC10797947 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10554-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care systems in many ways, including access to and the use of non-COVID services. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on the utilization of different public health care services in Poland. METHODS The aggregated data on health care users and provided services for the years 2015/2016-2021 were used to analyse the changes in health care utilization during the pandemic and deviations from pre-pandemic utilization trends. Quantitative analysis was complemented with qualitative descriptions of the changes in principles of health care provision during the pandemic. RESULTS The results show a considerable drop in the provision of most health care services in 2020 that in some cases disturbed pre-pandemic utilization trends and was not made up for in 2021. The most significant decrease has been observed in the field of preventive and public health services, as well as rehabilitation. The provision of these services was put on hold during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS The accumulated COVID-19-related "health debt" urgently calls for government actions to strengthen disease prevention and health promotion in Poland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Mrożek-Gąsiorowska
- Department of Health Economics and Social Security, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 8 Skawinska Street, 31-066, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Marzena Tambor
- Department of Health Economics and Social Security, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 8 Skawinska Street, 31-066, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O'Leary SC, Frost HM. Does HPV vaccination initiation at age 9, improve HPV initiation and vaccine series completion rates by age 13? Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2180971. [PMID: 36892245 PMCID: PMC10026893 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2180971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is important to reduce rates of cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. We aimed to evaluate if a program to initiate HPV vaccination at 9 years improved initiation and completion rates by 13 years of age. Data on empaneled patients aged 9-13 years from January 1, 2021 to August 30, 2022 were abstracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome measures included HPV vaccination initiation and series completion by 13 years of age. The secondary outcome measure was missed opportunities for HPV vaccination. In total, 25,888 patients were included (12,433 pre-intervention, and 13,455 post-intervention). The percentage of patients aged 9-13 with an in-person visit who received at least 1 dose of HPV vaccine increased from 30% pre-intervention to 43% post-intervention. The percentage of patients who received 2 doses of vaccine increased from 19.3% pre-intervention to 42.7% post-intervention. For the overall population seen in-person, initiation of HPV vaccination by age 13 years increased from 42% to 54%. HPV completion increased as well (13% to 18%). HPV vaccination initiation at 9 years of age may be an acceptable and effective approach to improving vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja C O'Leary
- Department of General Pediatrics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of General Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Holly M Frost
- Department of General Pediatrics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of General Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Center for Health Systems Research, Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wickenheisser NE, Dillon M, Broadwater G, Zacherl K, Bixel K, Levine M, Newton M, Thel H, Tucker K, Gehrig P, Khetan VU, Brunette-Masi LL, Matsuo K, Khouri OR, Duhon A, Gowthaman D, Cowan M, Mojdehbakhsh R, Rose S, Olawaiye A, Davidson BA, Moss HA, Havrilesky LJ. Radical hysterectomy case volume and cervical cancer treatment in the era of COVID-19: A multi-site analysis of National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:70-78. [PMID: 37944328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare radical hysterectomy case volume, cancer stage, and biopsy-to-treatment time of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed before and after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS In a multi-institution retrospective cohort study conducted at 6 large, geographically diverse National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, patients treated for newly diagnosed invasive cervical cancer were classified into 2 temporal cohorts based on date of first gynecologic oncology encounter: (1) Pre-Pandemic: 3/1/2018-2/28/2020; (2) Pandemic & Recovery: 4/1/2020-12/31/2021. The primary outcome was total monthly radical hysterectomy case volume. Secondary outcomes were stage at diagnosis and diagnosis-to-treatment time. Statistical analyses used chi-squared and two sample t-tests. RESULTS Between 3/1/2018-12/31/2021, 561 patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer. The Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic & Recovery cohorts had similar age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and Body Mass Index (BMI). During Pandemic & Recovery, the mean monthly radical hysterectomy case volume decreased from 7[SD 2.8] to 5[SD 2.0] (p = 0.001), the proportion of patients diagnosed with Stage I disease dropped from 278/561 (49.5%) to 155/381 (40.7%), and diagnosis of stage II-IV disease increased from 281/561 (50.1%) to 224/381 (58.8%). Primary surgical management was less frequent (38.3% Pandemic & Recovery versus 46.7% Pre-Pandemic, p = 0.013) and fewer surgically-treated patients received surgery within 6 weeks of diagnosis (27.4% versus 38.9%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Lower radical hysterectomy case volume, a shift to higher cervical cancer stage, and delay in surgical therapy were observed across the United States following the COVID-19 outbreak. Decreased surgical volume may result from lower detection of early-stage disease or other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie E Wickenheisser
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Mairead Dillon
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Zacherl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Monica Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Meredith Newton
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Hannah Thel
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Paola Gehrig
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Laurie L Brunette-Masi
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Olivia R Khouri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Ashley Duhon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Divya Gowthaman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Matthew Cowan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel Mojdehbakhsh
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Stephen Rose
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Brittany A Davidson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plotti F, Silvagni A, Montera R, De Cicco Nardone C, Luvero D, Ficarola F, Cundari GB, Branda F, Angioli R, Terranova C. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7016. [PMID: 38002630 PMCID: PMC10671930 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-medico University Foundation in Rome aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of EC. All women with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid and endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2022 were included. The number of cases was higher in period 2 (95 vs. 64 cases). Time to diagnosis did not show statistically significant differences but in period 2, 92.06% of the diagnoses were made following abnormal uterine bleeding, while in period 1, only 67.02% were. The waiting time for the intervention was significantly shorter in period 2. Definitive histology, FIGO staging, surgical technique and adjuvant therapy did not show significant differences between the two periods. The study demonstrates that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a direct effect on the diagnostic delay, tumor staging and type of therapy but rather on the presentation pattern of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Plotti
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Adele Silvagni
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Montera
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo De Cicco Nardone
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Ficarola
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Barbara Cundari
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Branda
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Terranova
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Voigtländer S, Hakimhashemi A, Grundmann N, Radespiel-Tröger M, Inwald EC, Ortmann O, Gerken M, Klug SJ, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Meyer M, Müller-Nordhorn J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reported cancer diagnoses in Bavaria, Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:7493-7503. [PMID: 36964405 PMCID: PMC10038367 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04707-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our study was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on reported cancer cases in Bavaria, Germany, by comparing pre-pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020) and pandemic period (March 2020 to February 2021). METHODS Data on incident cases were retrieved from the Bavarian Cancer Registry (until 22nd April 2022). We included patients with malignant and in situ neoplasms reported by pathology departments with consistent reporting. We calculated the number of incident cases during the COVID-19 pandemic and the pre-pandemic period with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.0018) based on a Poisson approach. We stratified for malignancy (malignant, in situ), tumor site, and month of year. RESULTS Data was available for 30 out of 58 pathology departments (51.7%) from Bavaria. Incident malignant neoplasms dropped from 42,857 cases in the pre-pandemic period to 39,980 cases in the pandemic period (- 6.7%; 95% CI - 8.7%, - 4.7%). Reductions were higher for colon, rectum, skin/melanoma as well as liver (> 10.0% reduction) and less for breast cancer (4.9% reduction). No case reductions were observed for pancreas, esophagus, ovary, and cervix. Percent changes were largest for April 2020 (- 20.9%; 95% CI - 24.7%, - 16.8%) and January 2021 (- 25.2%; 95% CI - 28.8%, - 21.5%) compared to the previous year. Declines tended to be larger for in situ compared to malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSION Detection and diagnosis of cancer were substantially reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Potential effects, e.g. a stage shift of tumors or an increase of cancer mortality, need to be monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Voigtländer
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Amir Hakimhashemi
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Nina Grundmann
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Martin Radespiel-Tröger
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth C. Inwald
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Gerken
- Institute for Quality Assurance and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefanie J. Klug
- Chair of Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- Institute for Quality Assurance and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Meyer
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Schweinauer Hauptstraße 80, 90441 Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Böing CW, Froböse NJ, Schaumburg F, Kampmeier S. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12040611. [PMID: 37111497 PMCID: PMC10143185 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12040611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with a high mortality rate. The clinical outcome of SAB patients highly depends on early diagnosis, adequate antibiotic therapy and source control. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the health care system faced additional organizational challenges and the question arose whether structured screening and triaging for COVID-19 and shifting resources influence the management of SAB. Patients (n = 115) with SAB were enrolled in a retrospective comparative study with historical controls (March 2019-February 2021). The quality of SAB therapy was assessed with a point score, which included correct choice of antibiotic, adequate dosage of antibiotic, sufficient duration of therapy, early start of therapy after receipt of findings, focus search and taking control blood cultures 3-4 days after starting adequate antibiotic therapy. The quality of treatment before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. No significant differences in the total score points were found between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohort. All quality indicators, except the correct duration of antibiotic therapy, showed no significant differences in both cohorts. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the outcome between both cohorts. The treatment quality of SAB therapy was comparable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian W Böing
- Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 41, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Neele J Froböse
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Domagkstraße 10, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Frieder Schaumburg
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Domagkstraße 10, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Stefanie Kampmeier
- Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 41, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|