Management of patients with chronic stable angina at low risk for serious cardiac events

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging multicenter study to determine the effect of sublingual nitroglycerin spray on exercise capacity in patients with chronic stable angina

BACKGROUND

Sublingual nitroglycerin increases exercise duration in patients with stable angina. Brief results from this study were published previously in German. Here, we more fully describe the study methodology, patient characteristics, and detailed results.

METHODS

This double-blind, crossover study enrolled 51 patients with stable angina. Patients were randomized to 1 of 5 treatment sequences and were administered placebo or nitroglycerin spray (0.2 mg, 0.4 mg, 0.8 mg, or 1.6 mg). Patients carried out 1 control exercise tolerance test (ETT) and 1 investigational ETT at each visit.

RESULTS

Dose-dependent increases in time to onset of angina, time to onset of moderate angina, and the occurrence of a minimum 1.0-mm ST-segment depression were seen following administration of nitroglycerin spray.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the use of sublingual nitroglycerin spray in patients with stable angina who are being managed with medical therapy and in patients who have persistent angina post-revascularization.

Job strain and ischemic heart disease: a prospective study using a new approach for exposure assessment

BACKGROUND

Prolonged psychosocial load at the workplace may increase the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), but the issue is still unsettled. We analyzed the association between psychosocial workload and risk of IHD using a new approach allocating measures of psychosocial load to individuals based on the average exposure level in minor work units.

METHODS

Cohort study of 18,258 Danish public service workers in 1106 work units; 79% were women; 108 subjects with history of cardiovascular disease were excluded from the follow-up. The outcome was hospitalization due to IHD (angina pectoris or myocardial infarction) during the period 2002 to end of 2007.

RESULTS

During 87,428 person-years at risk (mean follow-up = 4.82 years), 101 subjects were admitted to a hospital due to IHD. Neither job strain (synergy of job demands and job control) nor general job dissatisfaction were related to IHD risk. However, compared with others, subjects who were allocated to the low job control category, had an increased risk of IHD, Hazard Ratio (95% CI) = 2.0 (1.1 to 3.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings presented do not lend support to the hypothesis that high job strain and job dissatisfaction are important determinants for IHD among Danish predominantly female public service workers.

Selection of optimal therapy for chronic stable angina

Patients with chronic stable angina (CSA) seek a medical opinion for relief of their symptoms and because of fear of having a heart attack. The underlying lesion responsible for CSA is often a severe narrowing of one or more coronary arteries. In addition, the coronary arteries of patients with CSA contain many more nonobstructive lesions, which progress at variable rates, and are prone to rupture and may manifest as acute coronary syndromes (myocardial infarction , unstable angina , or sudden ischemic death). Most patients with CSA can be managed with medical treatment. For angina relief, optimum doses of one of the antianginal drugs (beta blockers , long-acting organic nitrates, or calcium channel blockers ) should be used. If the patient remains symptomatic, combination treatment of BBs plus nitrates or BBs plus dihydropyridine CCBs, or nondihydropyridine CCBs plus nitrates should be tried. Triple therapy has not been shown to be more effective than treatment with two agents. To reduce the incidence of MI, UA, and sudden ischemic death, treatment strategies should include smoking cessation, daily aspirin, daily exercise, and pharmacologic therapy for dyslipidemias, and for elevated blood pressure. Patients who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy and those not willing to take or unable to tolerate antianginal drugs should be considered for percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization. Patients who do not respond to medical therapy and are not candidates for a revascularization procedure may be considered for additional treatment with trimetazidine or nicorandil (these drugs are not available in the United States or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, but are available in some other countries). Ranolazine also looks promising but is not yet available for clinical use. As a last resort, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, sympathectomy, or direct transmyocardial revascularization should be considered for symptom relief.

Current medical management of chronic stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many more non-obstructive plaques, which are prone to rupture resulting in acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). Therefore, the medical management must use strategies which not only relieve symptoms and prolong angina free walking but also reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes. Whether any of the approved antianginal drugs, nitrates, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers reduce the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with stable angina has not been studied to date. Published data shows that percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures and coronary bypass surgery are effective in relieving angina but these procedures do not reduce mortality or the incidence of myocardial infarction compared to anti-anginal drug therapy. From the available data, an initial trial of medical treatment with anti-anginal drugs and strategies to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (smoking cessation, daily aspirin, treatment of dyslipidemias and hypertension) is indicated in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The initial choice of drug will depend on the presence or absence of comorbid conditions. Patients who do not respond to medical therapy or do not wish to take anti-anginal drugs and whose life style is limited because of anginal symptoms should be offered percutaneous revascularization procedures with or without stent placement or coronary bypass surgery. New drug-coated stents hold promise but long-term data and large-scale trials assessing the continued long-term improvement in symptoms and reduction of adverse outcomes is needed before offering such devices to all patients with stable angina. Newer medical therapies such as metabolic modulators and sinus rate lowering drugs also hold promise but need further evaluation. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for some new techniques of enhanced external Counterpulsation, Spinal Cord Stimulation, sympathectomy or direct transmyocardial revascularization. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized trials.

Trimetazidine improves left ventricular function in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

Background

Patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy have an impaired myocardial glucose handling and distal distribution of coronary atherosclerosis. Trimetazidine, an anti-ischemic metabolic agent, improves myocardial glucose utilization though inhibition of fatty acid oxidation. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the metabolic effect of trimetazidine on left ventricular function in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Methods

32 patients (24 males and 8 females, mean (SE) age = 67 ± 6 years) with type 2 diabetes and ischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to receive either trimetazidine (20 mg, t.d.s.) or placebo (t.d.s.) for six months in a randomized parallel study. Patients performed an echocardiogram at baseline and after 6 months.

Results

Demographic data were comparable between the two groups. After six month baseline left ventricular end-diastolic diameters increased from 62.4 ± 1.7 to 63 ± 2.1 mm in the placebo group, while decreased from 63.2 ± 2.1 to 58 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.01 compared to baseline) in the trimetazidine group. Compared to baseline, left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 5.4 ± 0.5% (p < 0.05) in the trimetazidine group while remained unchanged in the placebo group -2.4 ± 1.1% (NS), p < 0.01 between groups. A significant improvement in wall motion score index and in the E/A wave ratio was detected in patients treated with trimetazidine, but not in those receiving placebo.

Conclusion

in diabetic patients with ischemic heart disease trimetazidine added to standard medical therapy has beneficial effect on left ventricular volumes and on left ventricular ejection fraction compared to placebo. This effect may be related to the effect of trimetazidine upon cardiac glucose utilization.

The effect of vardenafil, a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, on the cardiovascular response to exercise in patients with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The effect of vardenafil, a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor, on symptom-limited exercise time, time to first awareness of angina, and time to ischemic threshold (ST-segment depression > or =1 mm from baseline) during exercise tolerance testing (ETT) was examined in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common among men with CAD. PDE5 inhibition is increasingly the preferred treatment option for ED. However, the effect of PDE5 inhibition on exercise-induced ischemia in CAD patients has received limited prospective evaluation.

METHODS

In this double-blind, crossover, single-dose multicenter study, 41 men with reproducible stable exertional angina due to ischemic CAD received vardenafil 10 mg or placebo, followed by ETT (5 to 10 metabolic equivalents [METS], Bruce protocol) 1 h postdose. Sublingual nitrate use was prohibited for > or =24 h pre- and postexercise study days. End points included symptom-limited treadmill exercise time, time to first awareness of angina, time to ischemic threshold, and safety.

RESULTS

Relative to placebo, vardenafil 10 mg did not alter exercise treadmill time (427 +/- 105 s vs. 433 +/- 109 s, p = 0.39), or time to first awareness of angina (292 +/- 110 s vs. 291 +/- 123 s, p = 0.59), but significantly prolonged time to ischemic threshold (334 +/- 108 s vs. 381 +/- 108, p = 0.0004). At peak exercise, vardenafil 10 mg did not alter blood pressure, heart rate, or rate-pressure product relative to placebo. The most common adverse events (facial flushing and headache) were of mild or moderate intensity, and short-lived.

CONCLUSIONS

Vardenafil 10 mg did not impair the ability of patients with stable CAD to exercise at levels equivalent or greater than that attained during sexual intercourse (average of 2.5 to 3.3 METS).

Optimizing drug therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease: the impact of pharmacist-managed pharmacotherapy clinics in a primary care setting

We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacist-managed pharmacotherapy clinics in implementing and maximizing therapy with agents known to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease. This was a retrospective chart review of 150 patients who were treated for coronary artery disease in primary care clinics. Appropriate treatment of hypercholesterolemia occurred in 96% of patients referred to a clinical pharmacy specialist, compared with 68% of those followed by primary care providers alone (p<0.0001). Eighty-five percent and 50%, respectively, achieved goal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values below 105 mg/dl (p<0.0001). Appropriate therapy with aspirin or other antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs was prescribed in 97% and 92%, respectively (p=0.146). As appropriate therapy with these agents was high in both groups, the ability to detect a difference between groups was limited. Among patients with an ejection fraction below 40%, appropriate therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or acceptable alternative was 89% and 69%, respectively (p<0.05). Twenty-seven cardiac events were documented in the clinical pharmacy group, versus 22 in the primary care group (p=0.475). Despite the relatively high percentage of patients reaching goal LDL in the primary care group, referral to clinical pharmacy specialists resulted in statistically significant increases in the number of patients appropriately treated for hypercholesterolemia and achieving goal LDL.

Treatment of stable angina

Severe atherosclerotic narrowing of one or more coronary arteries is responsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The coronary arteries of patients with stable angina also contain many nonobstructive plaques, which are prone to fissures or rupture resulting in presentation of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, sudden ischemic death). In addition to symptomatic relief of symptoms and an increase in angina-free walking time with antianginal drugs or revascularization procedures, the recent emphasis of treatment has been to reduce adverse clinical outcomes (coronary death and myocardial infarction). The role of smoking cessation, aspirin, treatment of elevated lipids, and treatment of high blood pressure in all patients and of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with diminished systolic left ventricular systolic function in reducing adverse outcomes has been well established. What is unknown, however, is whether any anti-anginal drugs (beta-blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium channel blockers) effect adverse outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris. Recent trials evaluated the usefulness of suppression of ambulatory ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris, but it remains to be established whether suppression of ambulatory myocardial ischemia with antianginal agents or revascularization therapy is superior to pharmacologic therapy targeting symptom relief. Patients who have refractory angina despite optimal medical treatment and are not candidates for revascularization procedures may be candidates for newer techniques of transmyocardial revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, spinal cord stimulation, or sympathectomy. The usefulness of these techniques, however, needs to be confirmed in large randomized clinical trials.